HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/04/2010, C5 - BROAD STREET UNDERGROUND DISTRICT - APPROVAL OF CITY/COUNTY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT council
May 4,2010
j acEnOA Report W.,N.,,A� cs�
CITY O F SAN LU IS 0 B I S P 0
FROM: Jay D. Walter, Director of Public Works -70W
Prepared By: Dan Van Beveren, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: BROAD STREET UNDERGROUND DISTRICT — APPROVAL OF
CITY/COUNTY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and the
County of San Luis Obispo for the continued funding of the Broad Street Utilities
Undergrounding project through the use of County funding allocations.
2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
DISCUSSION
The Broad Street Underground District was adopted by the City Council on November 4, 2003 as
a Rule 20A project which requires utility companies to transfer overhead wires into underground
conduit. The district extends along Broad Street approximately from Orcutt Road southward to
the City limits, and was established as a joint project between the City and the County. At the
time that the district was established, the proportional responsibilities between the City and the
County were determined to be 68% City and 32% County. As such, the City is responsible for
68% and the County is responsible for 32% of the underground funding allocation for the project.
Rule 20A funds are monies which are managed by PG&E and are used to fund the PG&E cost of
these Underground District construction projects. The money is collected through a small portion
of the monthly PG&E billings paid for by PG&E customers. As these funds accrue, the various
cities and counties within the PG&E service area are allocated a specific balance of Rule 20A
funds available to be used for Underground District construction projects. Currently, the City has
a reported balance of $1,183,193 of Rule 20A funds available, and accrues an additional
$333,000 each year. PG&E has a policy of allowing cities and counties to borrow up to five years
worth of future fund allocations for these projects, which effectively provides the City a current
available balance of about $2,848,000.
Typically in an underground district, PG&E will act as the lead utility company in assembling a
construction contract for undergrounding of all of the utility lines within the project. The idea is that
a single contractor performing work for several utility companies would result in lower costs for
each of the utility companies. This type of activity is referred to as a "joint trench" project. In this
particular project, PG&E procured a contractor to perform the work under the assumption that each
of the utility companies would participate in the contract and contribute toward their prorated
portion of the costs.
Broad Street Underground District—City/County Memorandum of Agreement Page 2
Broad Street is a State Highway owned and operated by Caltrans. As work was being planned,
Caltrans notified the County Underground District Coordination Committee of the scheduled
paving of Broad Street from South Street to Tank Farm Road. This paving work was scheduled
to occur during the summer of 2009; therefore, Caltrans mandated that the installation of the
conduit be completed by May of 2009. In order to complete the conduit installation by May, the
utility companies needed to expedite the work. The underground conduit was successfully
installed by May 2009, however the accelerated construction schedule was a contributing factor
resulting in higher costs.
In addition to the accelerated construction schedule, the lack of other utility companies participating
in the PG&E contract also resulted in higher costs. When PG&E obtained a contractor and provided
the other utility companies with their costs to participate in the project, the other companies, which
included AT&T, Charter Communications, and Unified Metropolitan Area Network (UMAN —
owned by San Luis Coastal Unified School District), determined that the cost was too high. Those
other companies then decided to hire a different contractor and to perforin their work separately
from PG&E for their needed construction. These three utility companies participated in their own
joint trench project, while PG&E contracted its work separately. Due to the accelerated
construction, and without the benefit of all the utility companies contracting with PG&E, the PG&E
costs were about 50%higher than originally estimated.
Construction on the project began in early 2009 with the installation of underground conduit
from Orcutt Road to Tank Farm Road. This first stretch has been referred to as "Phase 1" of the
project. Installation of the underground conduits in Phase 1 was coordinated and completed prior
to the paving of Broad Street by Caltrans. Due to the higher PG&E costs of the project, which are
paid for out of the City's allocation, the City's responsibility for the project cost exceeds the
amount currently available in its allocated balance. In order to complete the project, the County
of San Luis Obispo must loan the City a portion of its Rule 20A allocation to cover the costs to
complete the project.. As stated earlier in this report, the "costs" are not actual dollars in the
City's budget, but rather are cost allocations which are budgeted and managed by PG&E. With
limited City authorization on how PG&E manages these projects, cost overruns are not subject to
prior City Council authorization.
Broad Street Underground District-Breakdown of Proiect Costs
Prior cost estimate $3,600,000
New Project Cost(estimated) $5,200,000
City's Current Allocation Balance $1,183,193
Total Amount Available(including 5-year borrow) $2,848,193
City's portion of cost responsibliby(68% of total) $3,536,000
The most recent estimate of total PG&E costs of the Broad Street Underground District project is
about $5,200,000. As stated above, the project is set up to be funded by both the City's and the
County's Rule 20A funds with 68% of the project cost to be funded by the City's allocation.
With 68% of$5,200,000 calculating out to be about $3,536,000, the City's available allocation
C�-a
Broad Street Underground District—City/County Memorandum of Agreement Page 3
balance is $687,807 less than the amount needed to complete the project. Due to this shortfall of
allocated City funds, PG&E has temporarily stopped construction of the project until such time
that the City's allocation accrues to a balance sufficient for funding of the project, or until the
County provides PG&E authorization to deduct necessary fund allocations from the County's
balance in order to complete the project.
The County Underground District Committee has discussed this issue and supports the concept
of using County fund allocations to cover the shortfall with a condition that the City will
reimburse the County its Rule 20A fund allocation as the City's allocation builds over the next
three years. Upon Council approval of the recommended action, the issue will then be brought to
the County Board of Supervisors for final approval of the Memorandum of Agreement.
The attached Memorandum of Agreement outlines the terms of a City/County agreement and
authorizes the City to borrow up to $900,000 of County fund allocations. The exact amount will
be based on actual costs incurred, and as shown on the previous table, is estimated to be
$687,807.
The City will not be able to implement another Underground District until the County is
reimbursed and the City balance accumulates. With the assumption that the project will be
completed in its entirety, it is estimated that the City's balance, including the five-year borrow
amount, will not be available to implement the next City Underground district until about 2014.
No future underground district projects have been scheduled, however, the current adopted
priority list shows the next underground district project to be Higuera Street from Marsh to High,
followed by Monterey Street from Santa Rosa to US 101.
CONCURRENCES
The County's Underground District Coordination Committee has discussed the issue in recent
meetings and is supportive of the agreement.
This agreement is contingent upon the approval by the County Board of Supervisors. This issue
is scheduled for the County Board of Supervisors action on June 8, 2010.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact to the recommended action. As stated in this report, these projects
are funded by PG&E.
ALTERNATIVES
Council could elect to complete only the first phase of the project. This option is not
recommended because the project is based on a joint effort between the City and the County. The
County is fully intent on completing the project, as evident in the proposed Memorandum of
Agreement. Electing to only complete a portion of the project would be contrary to the intent of
the prior City Council action adopting the resolution in 2003. Additionally, as these projects are
0-S-3
Broad Street Underground District-City/County Memorandum of Agreement Page 4
scheduled by PG&E, failing to fulfill the previous commitment would put into question any
resolutions adopted by the City for future undergrounding districts.
ATTACHMENT
Memorandum of Agreement
T:\Council Agenda Reports\Public Works CAR\2010\CIP\90945 Broad Street Underground District\90945 City-Council Funding
Agreement.doc
CS-�
ATTACHMENT
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FOR THE CITY TO BORROW UP TO $9009000 OF RULE 20A FUNDING
ALLOCATIONS FROM THE COUNTY
This Agreement entered into the day of 2010,between the
County of San Luis Obispo (hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY") and the City of San
Luis Obispo (hereinafter referred to as "CITY");
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS,the CITY and the COUNTY are currently participating in a joint
utility underground project on Broad Street from approximately 150 feet north of Orcutt
Road to the southern City limits at Farm House Lane(hereinafter referred to as
"PROJECT"); and
WHEREAS, the costs of the PROJECT are paid for out of CITY and COUNTY
allocated Rule 20A funds at the established ratios of 68% CITY and 32% COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, the total project cost has been estimated by PG&E at $5,200,000—
thus obligating the CITY contribution of its Rule 20A allocated funds to be$3,536,000;
and
WHEREAS, the City's portion of project costs exceeds its current available
allocation of Rule 20A funds; and
WHEREAS, the County has excess Rule 20A funds available; and
WHEREAS, the total project cost estimated by PG&E are subject to future
adjustment based on actual costs incurred by PG&E; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo County Underground Utility Coordinating
Committee (UUCC) advises the COUNTY on the use of Tariff Rule 20A funds which
PG&E allocates to various agencies for undergrounding of utilities that benefit the
general public; and
WHEREAS,the UUCC supports the proposed loan to the City of up to $900,000
of Rule 20A funds allocated to the County in order to meet the costs required to complete
the PROJECT.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of San Luis Obispo and the County of San Luis
Obispo, in consideration of the common objective of completing the PROJECT, agree as
follows:
A. The CITY shall maintain full responsibility for funding 68% of the cost of the
PROJECT, and the COUNTY shall maintain full responsibility for funding 32% of the
cost of the PROJECT,
- ATTACHMENT
B. The COUNTY shall loan to the CITY up to $900,000 of available COUNTY
Rule 20A allocated funds, the exact amount to be determined by PG&E,
C. The CITY shall fully repay the COUNTY the borrowed funding allocation
through one or more adjustments to the CITY's Rule 20A allotment within the next three
years.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF CITY and COUNTY have executed this contract on the day
and year first hereinabove set forth.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By: By:
David F. Romero Chairperson of The Board of Supervisors
Mayor County of San Luis Obispo
ATTEST: ATTEST:
City Clerk Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
City of San Luis Obispo County of San Luis Obispo
By: By:
Elaine Cano Deputy Clerk
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL EFFECT: AND LEGAL EFFECT:
5 B By:
'stine Dietrick County Counsel
City Attorney
C 5=(:�::7