HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/2010, PH 4 - ADOPTION OF 2010-11 BUDGET C�
council Moog Dm June 15,2010
j AQcn0A REpoat pq
CITY O F SAN LU IS O B I S P O
FROM: Katie Lichtig, City Manager
Debbie Malicoat, Acting Director of Finance & Information Technology '
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF 2010-11 BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution approving the 2009-11 Financial Plan Supplement and 2010-11 Budget.
DISCUSSION
Consistent with the City's two year approach to the budgetary process, the 2010-11 Budget
presented for formal Council adoption at this time has been prepared using the 2009-11 Financial
Plan as its primary foundation. It also incorporates the analysis presented to Council as part of the
2009-10 mid-year review on February 23, 2010; the enterprise fund rate reviews held on June 1,
2010; and other budget changes affecting 2010-11 approved by the Council since the adoption of
the 2009-11 Financial Plan such as the community development block grant program.
A comprehensive analysis of the significant budget issues facing the City for 2010-11 along with
recommended supplemental appropriations are included in the Introduction(under Budget Message
and Budget Highlights) of the accompanying Preliminary 2010-11 Budget. In preparing the 2010-
11 Budget the City faced a projected funding gap of about $3 million. This gap was closed by
reducing both operating programs and capital improvement projects(CIP).
Appropriations for operating programs—day-to-day delivery of services—total $76.6 million for
2010-11 summarized as follows:
Operating Programs: 2010-11
Governmental
Funds Funds Tot.
Public Safety 24,612,500 24,612,500
Public Utilities 18,933,100 18,933,100
Transportation 3,030,200 4,193,800 7,224,000
Leisure, Cultural &
Social Services 6,752,100 525,400 7,277,500
Community
Development 7,021,100 7,021,100
General Government 7,210,500 4,349,400 11,559,900
Total 1$48,626,400 1$28,001,700 1$76,628,100_
A summary of significant operating program changes – both reductions required to balance the
budget and increases needed to maintain basic services–is provided in the Expenditure Summaries
part of Section D.
N irl
Adoption of 2010-11 Budget Page 2
The following chart summarizes the operating reductions recommended in the Financial Plan
Supplement by function and funding source.
Operating Reductions by Function 2009-10 2010-
Public Safety 69,100 173,400
Public Utilities 50,000
Transportation 156,500 226,800
Leisure, Cultural &
Social Services 24,600 119,500
Community Development 21,000 135,900
General Government 162,100 130,20.0
Total $433,300 $835,800
operating 6C9 A 0 0
General Fund 311,400 652,900
Parking Fund 12,100 35,500
Transit Fund 100,000 92,400
Golf Fund 9,80.0 5,000
Water Fund 28,000
Sewer Fund 22,000
Total $433,300 $835,800
In addition to the operating program reductions listed above, the Preliminary 2010-11 Budget
includes $1.98 million in reductions to capital projects, summarized as follows:
Capital Project Savings
Bishop/Augusta Creek Bank 28,000
Gateway Paving 500,000
CMP Storm Drains 260,000
CIP Reserve 442,100
,Completed Projects 747,800
Tota1CIP Reductions $ 1,977,900
In summary,the Preliminary 2010-11 Budget proposes appropriations of$96.7 million as follows:
TotalGovernmental Enterprise
Funds Funds
Operating Programs 48,626,400 28,001,700 76,628,100
CIP 4,581,600 5,434,000 10,015,600
Debt Service 3,016,900 7,068,200 10,085,100
Total $56,224,900 $40,503,9001 $96,728,800
ATTACHMENT
Resolution approving the 2009-11 Financial Plan Supplement and adopting the 2010-11 Budget
ENCLOSURE
Preliminary 2009-11 Financial Plan Supplement and 2010-11 Budget
GAFinancc\Budget Folders\Fit=cial Plan Supplements\2010-11\Council Agenda Report,Budget Adoption
i
I I
Attachment,
RESOLUTION NO. (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE 2009-11 FINANCIAL PLAN SUPPLEMENT AND
ADOPTING THE 2010-11 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Council adopted the 2009-11 Financial Plan on June 16, 2009, which
established comprehensive financial and policy guidelines for fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010-11;
and
WHEREAS, the 2009-11 Financial Plan included appropriations for fiscal year 2010-11;
and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed proposed changes to the 2009-11 Financial Plan to
be effective for fiscal year 2010-11 after holding noticed public hearings; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has submitted the 2009-11 Financial Plan Supplement and
Preliminary 2010-11 Budget to the Council for their review and consideration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby approves the 2009-11 Financial Plan Supplement and adopts the 2010-11 Budget.
Upon motion of seconded by ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was adopted on June 15,.2010.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano,City Clerk
APP VED AST ORM:
r
Christine Dietrick, City Attorney
�N �'3
'o
G'COUNUL p"CDD DIR
RED FILE 11GAe eaY ink ErFIN DIR
EYA@A6R55re--*1 W-2TIRE CHIEF
M ING AGENDA U- CRNEY a?w DIR
®q Id ITEM # �'N�( ETC-LERK/ORIG a?OLICECHF
❑ DEPT HEADS 2-REC DIR
Lr E'UTIL DIR
rn- 0-HR On
- �— -
11 AW rld(5:5- /C°pud i,lL
To: San Luis Obispo City Council
From: Jan Howell Marx, City Council Member �r
Re: Budget(Public Hearing#4)
Date: June 15,2010
In general I support the budget as proposed and commend staff for all the hard
work that went into it.
However, I cannot support the below four proposed "reductions required to
balance the budget"in 2010-2011 because they are Measure Y Priorities and because
cutting them would have a"Significant Impact" on public safety service. Preservation of
essential services is also a major city goal, and our fire department is certainly an
essential service. Firefighter training is not a luxury.
The cuts I do not support are:
21. Reduction in overtime for Emergency response personnel.to
Attend mandated training(D-27)..........................................9500
22. Reduction in Education and Training.................... ..................2000
23. Reduction in training aids (D-28) .................................... 1500
25. Reduce Special Assignment Engineer training (D-29)...............22500
Because the following cut would eliminate the CERT program, I also will not be
supporting:
26. Eliminate Public Education Co-ordinator(D-30)........................6400
$41,900
I plan to move to eliminate the above cuts and ask staff to come back to council
with recommendations as to where else to make reductions to balance the budget(unless
staff has time to prepare recommendations prior to the council meeting..
RECEIVE®
JUN 15 2010
SLO CITY CLERK