HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/03/2009, PH1 - CONSIDERATION OF 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND RE council MsevaD.eV31D
aGenaa RepoRt I�N. p.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Michael Codron, Housing Programs Manager
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT (CDBG) DRAFT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND
REALLOCATION OF PRIOR YEAR CDBG FUNDS.
HRC RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution allocating CDBG funding for the 2009 program year and reallocation of
CDBG funds from previous program years, including $134,659 for the Railroad Museum and
$40,000 for Judson Terrace Homes termite treatment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution approving the HRC recommendation, except that funds should be allocated
for two Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) projects, curb ramp improvements ($100,000)
and new, accessible restrooms at Santa Rosa Park ($74,659), rather than for the Railroad
Museum and Judson Terrace Homes projects.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF
As part of the annual CDBG process, the City Council is being asked to determine how to
allocate $620,000 of anticipated CDBG funds for the 2009 program year. The City Council is
also being asked to consider reallocation of prior year funds totaling $74,659. This reallocation
comes primarily from program administration projects, and is necessary because of a new
interpretation of HUD rules that is now being applied.
The Human Relations Commission (HRC) is the advisor to the Council on community needs and
funding recommendations and has made a recommendation to the City Council regarding how
these funds should be spent. The staff recommendation differs from the HRC recommendation
with respect to funding the Railroad Museum project and the Judson Terrace Homes termite
treatment project. Staff is recommending that funding be allocated to two ADA projects instead,
in consideration of Council adopted priorities and the current general fund crisis. To the extent
that CDBG funding can be used to offset a known general fund expenditure, more of the general
fund will be available to address the top goals adopted by the City Council for the 2009-2011
financial plan.
The recently enacted Federal stimulus package includes up to $1 billion in additional funding for
the CDBG program. Although it is not clear how this money will be allocated, staff will return to
the HRC and City Council with recommendations for funding additional projects if additional
funds become available.
Al
2009 CDBG Funding Recommendations Page 2
DISCUSSION
Situation
The City's annual CDBG review process provides Council with an opportunity to provide early
input in the grant award process and assists Council with prioritizing community needs. The
focus is on maintaining an open, inclusive and fair giant application process. The HRC is the
advisor to the Council on community needs and funding recommendations. The four major steps
in the CDBG review process are as follows:
1. HRC hosts a "Needs Workshop": The HRC hosts a public hearing, held on September 3,
2008, to inform the public about upcoming funding amounts, how to apply for grants and to
hear community views on grant funding needs. The HRC also recommends funding priorities
to the City Council.
2. Council priority-setting hearing: On September 16, 2008, the City Council held a public
hearing to adopt funding priorities.
3. CDBG applications hearing: On November, 5, 2008, the HRC held a public hearing to
review the 2009 CDBG applications and develop funding recommendations to forward to
City Council.
4. CDBG Program hearing: The subject of this agenda report, the Council will hold a public
to consider the HRC and staff recommendation and approve the City's 2009 CDBG Program.
This action is submitted to the County for inclusion in the final 2009 CDBG Action Plan.
On September 16, 2008, the City Council adopted the following priorities for allocating CDBG
funds during the 2009 CDBG program year:
1: Enhance and develop housing affordable to low and very-low income persons.
2. Emergency shelter, homelessness prevention and services.
3. Education concerning and/or removal of architectural barriers for the disabled and
elderly.
4. Economic development (to include seismic retrofit, economic stability, low and moderate
income jobs).
These priorities were used by staff and the HRC to develop their recommendations for funding
the 2009 CDBG applications.
2009 CDBG Applications
Attachment 1 includes a list of each application submitted to the City for CDBG funding and the
funding amounts recommended by the HRC. Attachment 2 includes the minutes from the
November 5, 2008, HRC hearing when the recommendation was made. Attachment 3 includes
the complete staff recommendation.
2009 CDBG Funding Recommendations Page 3
The recommendations from the HRC and the staff differ this year. The HRC has recommended
$100,000 in funding for the City's Railroad Museum application, to continue improvements to
the Historic Southern Pacific Freight Warehouse building. The staff recommends allocating this
funding to the City's ADA Street Improvements—Curb Ramps project.
HRC Recommended 2009 CDBG Funding
Applicant Project Funding
EOC Maxine Lewis Homeless Shelter $93,000
HASLO Anderson Hotel Window Replacement $35,000
City of SLO ADA Street Improvements— Curb Rams $0
City of SLO Santa Rosa Park ADA Restrooms $268,000
City of SLO Railroad Museum $100,000
City of SLO CDBG Administration $40,000
City of SLO Housing Element Implementation $84,000
Total $6207000
While both projects fall under Priority 3, listed above, the staff is recommending funding for the
curb ramp project to offset a known general fund expense. According to Federal law, new ADA
curb ramps must be installed when the City repaves streets and the existing curb ramps do not
meet the latest accessibility design standards. Therefore, CDBG funding helps to directly offset
this cost to the City as street improvement projects proceed.
Restoring the City's neighborhood paving and downtown paving programs are listed as the top
City goal in the 2007-2009 Financial Plan in response to Measure Y priorities, and infrastructure
maintenance was recently adopted by the Council as the top goal ,for the 2009-2011 Financial
Plan. Therefore, staff supports CDBG funding to facilitate accomplishment of this top goal,
which also makes more general fund dollars available to accomplish other City goals. During a
time when the general fund is in crisis, with many programs (including street maintenance) being
slashed, ever dollar counts.
Staff Recommended CDBG Funding
Applicant Project Funding
EOC Maxine Lewis Homeless Shelter $93,000
HASLO Anderson Hotel Window Replacement $35,000
City of SLO ADA Street Improvements—Curb Rams $100,000
City of SLO Santa Rosa Park ADA Restrooms $268,000
City of SLO Railroad Museum $0
City of SLO CDBG Administration $40,000
City of SLO Housing Element Implementation $84,000
Total $620 000
The Railroad Museum project has received CDBG funding in the past to eliminate immediate
issues associated with a blight condition, but the current funding proposal is considered more
discretionary than curb ramps. The building is now secured with a new roof,windows, doors and
siding and is not deteriorating further for lack of completing the project. The HRC recommended
approval of funding for the Railroad Museum project because the City's portion is nearing
P-4 - 3
2009 CDBG Funding Recommendations Page 4
nearing completion, and the project is expected to be a major asset to the Railroad District once
completed and occupied by the Railroad Museum.
The Railroad Museum project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and
if the City Council does not allocate CDBG funds to the project, funding the project through the
CIP may be considered as part of the 200-2011 Financial Plan, or through grant funding if
available. The Railroad Museum application, which describes the remaining steps needed to
complete the project, is attached (Attachment 4).
Reallocation of Prior Year Funds
Accounting for 20% Cap on Program Administration Spending
In addition to awarding 2009 CDBG funding, Council is being asked to reallocate $74,659 in
funding from prior years. These funds include balances remaining from two completed 2004
projects — Transitions Mental Health Shelter Rehabilitation and City Fire Station No. 2 ADA
Access — totaling $4,140. The remaining $70,519 includes program administration funds that
must be reallocated to other eligible projects so that the City does not exceed its program
administration cap for the current year.
The CDBG program limits program administration funding to 20% of the total funds allocated to
each jurisdiction in a given year. In the past, the City (and all other jurisdictions in the Urban
County) has insured compliance with the 20% cap by allocating no more than 20% of its total
CDBG funding for program administration purposes during each year. However, a clarification
of HUD rules during the past year has called this practice into question. The clarification by
HUD now requires that the City never spend more than 20% of its current year allocation for
program administration activities.
Going forward, the City will now reallocate any available program administration balances at the
end of each fiscal year to insure that the 20% cap is not exceeded during the next fiscal year. In
the future, the amount to reallocate is likely to be very small or none at all, but this year the
amount is large because there is a pool of program administration funding allocated during prior
years that has not been spent.
Recently, the City has established the practice of allocating all of its program administration
funding to the Housing Programs Manager position for two activities, CDBG Program
Administration and Implementation of the Housing Element, which includes administration of
the City's Inclusionary Housing Program. Going forward, allocating program administration
funds in this manner will insure that all of the funds are spent in a timely manner, according to
CDBG regulations.
However, in 2005, 2006 and 2007 other projects were awarded program administration funds,
including Homeless Planning Services by HomeBase (in conjunction with the 10-fear-Plan to
End Chronic Homelessness) and Hotline 2-1-1, which was awarded for a capacity building study.
In addition, a vacancy in the Housing Programs Manager position during 2008 caused other
program administration funds to be carried over to the current program year.
2009 CDBG Funding Recommendations Page 5
Reallocation Recommendations
The HomeBase project is now completed with a remaining balance of $17,154 and the 2006
Hotline 2-1-1 project was completed without the use of$8,600 in CDBG funding allocated by the
City. As a result, these funds are now available to reallocate. The remaining reallocation of
Program Administration funding, $44,765, will need to be taken from the 2008 Housing
Programs Manager allocation to avoid carryover into the next fiscal year.
On February 4, 2009, the HRC recommended reallocating the total, $74,659, to two project
applications submitted for 2009 funding. These include the Judson Terrace Homes Termite
Repair project for$40,000 and the Railroad Museum project for an additional $34,659.
During their review of the 2009 CDBG applications, the HRC was favorable to Judson Terrace
Homes project, but ultimately decided that the HASLO project to complete a window
replacement project at the Anderson Hotel more closely reflected Priority 1 because the new
windows will enhance housing affordable to low-income households. The Judson Terrace
Homes project, by contrast, was decided to be important maintenance, but not an enhancement
and less consistent with the established priorities. With limited CDBG funds available to
allocate, this type of hair-splitting over priorities is common. Therefore, when City staff returned
to the HRC with additional funds to reallocate, the HRC was pleased to have the opportunity to
support the Judson Terrace Home request in full. Their application is attached (Attachment 5).
HRC Recommended CDBG Funding Reallocations
From/To Applicant Project Funding
From Transitions 2004—Completed Shelter Rehab $500
From City of SLO 2004—Completed Fire Station ADA $3,640
From Hotline 2006 — Capacity Study (project $8,600
completed without these CDBG funds
From Homebase 2006/2007 — Completed Homeless $17,154
Services Planning
From City of SLO 2008—Imp. of Housing Element $10,297
From City of SLO 2008 —CDBG Administration $34,468
Total From $749659
To Judson 2009 — Termite Treatment and $40,000
Terrace Rehabilitation
To City of SLO 2009—Railroad Museum $34,659
Total To $74,659
While recognizing that maintenance of our existing affordable housing stock is very important,
City staff recommends that these funds be allocated to the City's Santa Rosa Park ADA
Restroom project. The Santa Rosa Park Restroom project is a mandatory expense relating to the
City's requirements under ADA and its agreement with the Justice Department. Use of CDBG
funds for this known general fund expense frees more dollars to be allocated by the City Council
to support the core City services that we know will be reduced during the two-year financial plan
and budget processes. If the City Council.is supportive of the Judson Terrace Homes application,
T� i -S
2009 CDBG Funding Recommendations Pace 6
it is recommended that they direct the applicant to either apply to the Affordable Housing Fund
for assistance, or reapply for next year's round of CDBG funding.
Staff Recommended CDBG Funding Reallocations
From/To Applicant Project Funding
From Transitions 2004—Completed Shelter Rehab $500
From City of SLO 2004—Completed Fire Station ADA $3,640
From Hotline 2006 — Capacity Study (project $8,600
completed without these CDBG funds
From Homebase 2006/2007—Homeless Services Planning $17,154
From City of SLO 2008 — Imp. of Housing Element $10,297
From City of SLO 2008 —CDBG Administration $34,468
Total From $749659
To City of SLO 2009—Santa Rosa Park ADA Restrooms $74,659
Total To $749659
Next Steps
The 2009 CDBG Program adopted by the City Council will be forwarded to the County Board of
Supervisors for inclusion in the 2009 Urban County Action Plan, which includes funding
allocations for all of the participating jurisdictions. Although the CDBG fiscal year begins on
July 1, 2009, funds for projects awarded by the City Council are not expected to be available
until October.
Federal Stimulus Package and CDBG
Staff would also like to note for the City Council that the recently enacted American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes up to $1 billion of additional CDBG funding. HUD has
not made any statements regarding how this money might be allocated, but there is a chance that
the current funding estimate for the 2009 CDBG program year is too low. While minor
differences between the estimate and award are resolved by the City Manager, staff will return to
the HRC and Council to allocate any significant additional CDBG funding that is received.
FISCAL IMPACTS
Decisions made regarding CDBG funding determine how the limited pool of funds the City
receives through the County allotment is spent. To the extent that projects are funded through
CDBG, the burden on the City's general fund to pay for those projects is reduced. As a result,
projects that receive CDBG funding have a positive fiscal impact on the City if they otherwise
would have been paid for out of the general fund.
ALTERNATIVES
1. The Council may modify the proposed funding amounts.
2009 CDBG Funding Recommendations Page 7
2. The Council may continue consideration of funding for the CDBG 2009 program year.
Direction should be given to staff regarding additional information needed to make a
decision on funding levels.
ATTACHMENTS
1. HRC Recommendation - 2009 CDBG Funding
2. HRC Meeting Minutes, 11-5-08
3. Staff Recommendation- 2009 CDBG Funding
4. City of SLO Railroad Museum 2009 CDBG application
5. Judson Terrace Homes 2009 CDBG application
6. Draft resolution adopting the 2009 CDBG Program and reallocating $74,659 in prior year
funds
COUNCIL READING FILE
2009 CDBG applications submitted to the City for funding consideration
G:\CD-PLAN\MCODRON\Housing\CDBG\CARS\CDBG2009(fundingCAR).DOC
L (
- = Attachment 1
00000 0700 O O O O
0 (--) o O O O O O Cl O O O O
oco C CD0 00 o O o o m
O CCS N O LD r to O V O v to
In M n fo O b r 00f
CD O O O
• O
p 0 C M ' C O G
C m rID
O O LL. O A C
S ? j ni
• Q T CCD
000 0 o c o f
cc M N 00 CD 0 0 to m
c3 o vI0)Nna
LL CL
Z �. N
CD -
C
O O O 0 0 O
VQ�l4
Q� V O 0
_Nm
_OO Op
O O 00 O O O
Cli C4 L16 0) 0OON
Q. Z N (D Cl) E
CL m 0m
N
Mrs O O O 00 OO LO Lp O 00 o U) O m
LIDO CO O O 00 000 O O 00 0 w t N
3 � r
CD 0000 o0v_ a o 00 40 o $ a
(' = C Ca Oi r O LO Ln r O to Co N O LV CO O y C
.!C O E lt1 N N M f� O CM N O r M c U
G mO
m o n
c rn MIn
w
N o _o 0
m y
GD CNo m O N C a 0 B Co -0 n
d V 0 cLn f'LO 00 m 0 CO w p m m h 2
o � m = m m o M 0 o c
wa 3 3 a � ' In Ca
m ' c c .1 oa Co
w m C C 'II C V D O `� 'C C
7 Q m E ' @ c Q O m y y _a o
E mom c `°a3r_ 0 -t5Eo _mE E aD $ mow
S c m a Lo Mo C N CO a m
O y V x o o m d y ; rn 0O o C a
> t0 0 c 2 2 .. CO N Q O O :-. 7 O N N y
V Q J C6 m c c � m 0 :+ O CD Ina d f�`0 C o
O 75
O m b m N v0i "�' O rn rn 5 •C �.
O .. i (/� (� O C C = U Lp m C6
COM Ci X 'aa � E@mmo 2 La vuDu, m Eo- N
m m av -a E Q c •- w a a a E
rn � m m m c c m D Lo Lm u 0 0 -0 m c rn c a
Vy H QQ � Qco � tfl = SQU o a (D
IL 0 CD _o In
N ami
CD R E p m v
v EO li
fA _ NN C m C O ll 0)
V d U Z w S E C d C N
o
C J oa'u000 � 4 OSJ cm2
Q 3a O c cE c-Oj O00M LL toCoInO O •o m
0o0Ja >
-
MmC, O J J O O O ECL Qu to CD O OCn U
jQQ � m00 o X
awww S = = ¢ aOu0 (n
CL UN U) Q wr ¢
o
Zr N Lt Cn -e �. 0 0 0 0 OD r OI r N ri
Attachment 2
Human Relations Commission Minutes
November 5, 2008
Page 2
Brief HRC discussion ensued. Commissioners concurred the shelter needs continued
to rise and thanked Director Torres for her report.
PUBLIC HEARING
Item 2. REVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDBG) APPLICATIONS. (CODRON/MURRY)
Housing Programs Manager Codron gave an overview of the CDBG program and
proposed staff recommendations for this year's CDBG cycle.
Chairperson Lamb opened the public hearing.
Linda McGregor, Executive Director of HOTLINE, reported she recently located the
paperwork regarding HOTLINE's unused CDBG grant of$8,600 from 2006. She urged
the HRC to support redirecting those funds toward purchasing a software program for
HOTLINE to track why clients call HOTLINE. The program would also indicate if the
clients actually received the help they needed. Part of the funds would also be used to
hire a consultant to install the software and to train HOTLINE staff.
Housing Programs Manager Codron pointed out the $8,600 CDBG grant awarded to
HOTLINE in 2006 was for a different purpose. He noted in order to reallocate the funds
both the City Council and County Board of Supervisors would need to approve the
request.
Brief HRC discussion ensued. Commissioners expressed concern regarding how
HOTLINE's CDBG funds were managed and allocated. They had reservations about
reallocating the funds to another HOTLINE project and wanted to consider other
alternatives.
Housing Programs Manager Codron assured commissioners the decision to
reallocate the unused $8,600 grant did not need to be made immediately. Since the
original project was completed without using the funds, the original grant application
was now defunct. Therefore, the HRC could make a recommendation as to how to
reallocate the funds at another time.
Michael Axelrod, representing Project Amend, urged the HRC to support Project
Amend's two CDBG applications; one for repairs to their facility and one for public
service funds to provide residential treatment for clients who suffer from drug and
alcohol addiction.
G. :`.Documents and Settings\mcodron`,Local Settin>s\Temporary Internet Files\OLK95\November 5 2005 Mumtes
'nn' '2nnv1�i e 2008 Nfi d
Attachment 2
Human Relations Commission Minutes
November 5, 2008
Page 3
Brief HRC discussion ensued.
Chairperson Lamb applauded the efforts of Project Amend but explained the City
Council had historically directed all allowed CDBG public service funds to be awarded
to the Maxine Lewis Memorial Homeless Shelter. He urged Mr. Axelrod to seek public
service funds for Project Amend though the City's Grants in Aid process. He directed
staff to contact Mr. Axelrod to explain the process. He further noted Project Amend's
facility is leased and not owned. He questioned whether using CDBG funding for
repairs to improve private property was appropriate.
Arnold Jonas, representing the Railroad Museum, reviewed the progress their
organization has made toward the completion of the Railroad Museum. He urged the
HRC to support their request to make the facility accessible by adding a handicapped
ramp, an additional set of stairs, and railings on the elevated platform.
Brief HRC discussion ensued. Commissioners were generally supportive. They
suggested seeking other additional funding sources, exploring branding, and creating a
financial plan.
Arnold Jonas, responded the Railroad Museum had developed a forty-year master
plan in place that corresponds with the forty-year lease with the City. He stated they
also have members who would offer in kind assistance such as sprinklers, etc.
Roger Jump, administrator of Judson Terrace Homes, urged the HRC to fund their
application even though staff was not supportive. In order to maintain the affordable
housing facility and keep it from deteriorating, Judson Terrace needed to complete
extensive termite work. Mr. Jump was hopeful if the HRC approved their request, he
would be able to obtain matching funding.
Seeing no further speakers, Commissioner Lamb closed the public comment portion
of the meeting.
Commissioner Gingg expressed support for the staff recommendations.
Commissioner Pronsolino concurred with Commissioner Gingg but also expressed
concern about funding HOTLINE's reallocation request.
Commissioner Sant was generally supportive of staff recommendations; however, he
had some reservation regarding the Railroad Museum and was concerned with their
dependence on City funds. He would like to see the organization make serious efforts
to bring other groups "on board" to assist with funding.
GC:\Docunents and Settinbs\mcodron\Local Settinas\Temporary Internet Files\OLK95\November 5 2005 Minutes
2 .dor ^H /_ I b
Attachment 2
Human Relations Commission Minutes
November 5, 2008
Page 4
Chairperson Lamb spoke in support of directing CDBG funding from the curb ramp
application to the Railroad Museum project because he wanted to see the money go to
community resources.
Commissioner Gingg agreed, and noted the HRC recommended funding curb ramps
during the last CDBG cycle. He was supportive of funding something else.
Commissioner Blonsley was not supportive because he wanted to see the Railroad
Museum create an aggressive comprehensive financial plan.
ACTION: Moved by Pronsolino/Rosales to move $75,000 from ADA curbs
project and ramps and railings to Railroad Museum project for a combined total
of$100,000; motion carried 6:1 (Blonsley)
Vice Chairperson Rosales voiced concern about Judson Terrace deteriorating should
their grant be denied.
Commissioner Duffy concurred and noted it seemed to him the request could be tied
to CDBG's first priority.
Commissioners debated what could be done for the Judson Terrace project. They
agreed if HRC recommended partially funding the request, the grant could be used
where it was most needed and it was likely they would be able to get matching funding
from other sources.
ACTION: Moved by Pronsolino/Duffy to reallocate the $12,740 of unused
CDBG funds from prior years and apply them to the Judson Terrace termite
project; motion carried 7:0.
Housing Programs Manager Codron advised the HRC they could direct staff to
reallocate the other unused $8,600 CDBG funds tonight or defer the decision to another
time.
Commissioner Pronsolino recommended placing the reallocation of the unused 2006
CDBG funds on a future HRC agenda. Commissioners agreed by consensus.
ACTION: Moved by Sant/ Gingg to approve the staff recommendations with the
modifications approved in the previous motions; motion carried 7:0.
GC:'-Documents and Settings\mcodron\Local Settin s\�Temporary Internet Files\OLK95UVovember 5 2008 Minutes
2 .doc P44 1 _ 11
Attachment 3
OOO OO OO O O 0 O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O
R ocom ' ooBoo ' o 0 0 ' o m
CO N O LLQ r O t0 r O b
O MLO 01 Mf` 000 O N O
F r r r M Lp eW
m 0 G O O
• CD
O
aR C O C'l � O
m
> > o I ti ~ c
= LL
Q ? U ::
• C
Co m
000 0 0 o pm
� a N CD
0CDCo o o m a •`-
m
•
U. Z v LNN
LO Csr a m
N z r r C
N
O O O OOO O O O 0
R W r O CD O OO OO O O O al m
o G O Cr
0)M ci vil cei O COO O . �' N N N d
CL N V Z r N ler O E
CL
Q m o
E a,
C') r� O O O 00 00LO O O 00 O LO O N++ y LOO Co OO 00 000 O O 00 O Co L O
C r-_ CDCo 0000 oov_ a o 00O o `oa
0 � O m r O r O Lo Lf) r O Lci CO N O N CG O "' m.
TLO O d' r Mt` OOO O v � r M CD
Y E O r N N r CV) N O r Ch L= U
CQ r r O O
m C O O
0 m
a0 E y Op O 7 Ca
O `' m E m N U 2 a m
Cf C CO C Co C (n O 609
>t d9 L M a 7 E .�. Co .� i 7 CD Wt m
O R cul N C m 0 w Cc d > \° ccCo m V p
mCL o coo M ¢ Co � ccam
to 0 c c o c U p o �� � O CN
V v
Co C O d CL CNO �` v
3 Q m E ¢ m m
0 vi
2 c m —ma m � m m Mo m E E c p CO a
E rn m x E o o m E tL y Co `pl �Ol c N CCS m
U � mU � amiaci = = v muni ' m QQ o � � eA Nm ��-,
_j CO E c c m0 � � oaac�on c moo
CD p e m o o m Cr y _ o rn rn v �, c a' n
0 0 c 0 Lo = V E2 E U m y O C C .0 U R } (D Co
N Ce x m m c c aEl D Lco LL N 3 5 E m a m o m
m L m m V r o 0 o m CM c
¢ ¢ � ¢ cn � e» 2 2Q U0 0
E Co
m
CL c a 0 o o
U) ClL"a E c
E = u
ul 'Q = m ul7 C m C LL CA
R to H of Im a °a000 � 10
QO O = F 2Co
MLLcnCOcn EU) cnO d
O c c00co O O a: > Q
CL H y O J J O O O H O O Cn F- v Co
owwwQ = 00 o ¢ ¢ 3 ._ �� o x a
awwtA x = x ¢ aUUc� w CL UNW Q U,
cLO too ~
Z r N M et O fG n Co O Os �j , 1 CV tM
��-I 1 - 12-
U
_ Attachment 4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR
SANLuisOBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING
976 OSOS STREET • ROOM 200 • SAN LUIS OBISPO • CALIFORNIA 93408 • (805)781-5600
Promoting the Wise Use of Land •Helping to Build Great Communities
Organization Name: City of San Luis Obispo
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
To be considered for CDBG assistance, please submit this completed application with any exhibits, budgets
or beneficiary data as needed. Applications can be mailed to one of the participating jurisdictions listed in
this application or to: Tony Navarro, Planner III, Department of Planning and Building, 976 Osos Street,
Room 300, San Luis Obispo, CA., 93408 or hand delivered to Tony Navarro at 1035 Palm Street, Room
370, San Luis Obispo, CA., faxed to (805) 781-5624, or e-mailed to tnavarro@co.slo.ca.us. The
application deadline is 5:00 P.M., Tuesday, October 14, 2008. Applications must.be received by the
County or one of the participating cities(Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, Grover Beach, Paso Robles, San Luis
Obispo) prior to close of the business day. POSTMARKED DATED MAIL RECEIVED AFTER THE
DEADLINE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
NOTE:
(1) Please review the CDBG regulations and guidelines and the Request for Proposals before
completing this proposal. The CDBG regulations are available at www.slonlanniniz.org
under"Housing Grants." Also,please call County and/or city CDBG staff with any questions
about how to complete the form or about the rating criteria and process.
(2) If the information for any of the questions below requires more room to provide
a complete explanation of your proposed project or program,please attach additional sheets.
CONTACT INFORMATION
1. Name and mailing address of applicant organization, with contact person, phone and fax
numbers,and e-mail address:
Name: Public Works and Community Development Departments, City of San Luis Obispo
Address (mailing and physical address requested if different): 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
93401-3218
Contact person/title: Michael McGuire,Project Engineer/Jeff Hook, Senior Planner
Phone: (805) 783-7716/(805) 781-7176
Fax: (805) 781-7198/(805)781-7173
E-mail address: mmcguire@slocity.org/jhook@slocity.org
Is the organization a Faith Based Organization? Yes❑ No
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 1 OF 10 '
APPLICATION FOR FUNDING DURING 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN Luis OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILD]NG SL.OPLANNING.ORG
... .. .......
- - Attachment 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2. Title/nameladdress of proposed project or program: Complete Historic SP Freight Warehouse
Rehabilitation/1940 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, California. The property consists of a
2.55-acre site with a 108-year old railroad building, 108-space parking lot for autos and public transit
(busses),bicycle parking and railroad spur track for educational displays.
3. Please describe the proposed project or program. In one or two short paragraphs, include a brief
project/program description, the groups who will benefit and an explanation of how they will benefit
from the proposed project or program. For projects, describe the location of the project(be as specific
as possible, e.g. street address). For programs, state the location from which the program will be
operated and/or describe the geographic area served by the program. Also,please include a schedule of
project/program milestones.
The project consists of three components: 1) Completion of a rehabilitation of the historic Southern
Pacific Freight Warehouse building, and within the rehabilitated warehouse, 2) development of an
approximately 1000 square foot transit driver lounge and restrooms, and 3) removal of architectural
barriers to an approximately 5400 square foot space to be used as a public Railroad Museum.
Attachment l shows the project location and setting. The project will benefit low/moderate income
persons by removing architectural barriers for access to a public museum, and by providing lounge
and restroom space used by public transit drivers for layovers between shifts, operating local and
regional busses. Once rehabilitation is complete, the building will be ready for tenant
improvements to be used as a publicly owned and operated museum by the San Luis Obispo
Railroad Museum, a non-profit educational organization. Not only will it become a destination for
tourists but will provide an educational resource for SLO County students, historians and
researchers. Also, it will benefit the surrounding community by completing the safety and aesthetic
improvements to transform what was once a blighted, abandoned railroad structure into an attractive,
useful community facility which complements the Railroad Historic District.
SCHEDULE OF PROJECT MILESTONES
MILESTONE COMPLETED? COMPLETION
DATE
1. Stabilization of the Foundation&Main Structure Yes November 2004
2. Repair of Structural & Interior Architectural Yes November 2004
Components
3. Roof Structural Repairs and Replacement Yes November 2004
4.Exterior Architectural Improvements(painting, Yes June 2008
windows,doors)
5. Accessibility Improvements, Reshooms and No Pending
Utility Hook-ups,Universal Restrooms
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 2 OF 10
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
Attachment 4
Completion of these milestones will bring the building into compliance with building code standards for
safety and Americans with Disabilities accessibility requirements, and will allow the building to be used
for public transit layovers, and will allow San Luis Obispo Railroad Museum to install tenant
improvements needed to operate the building as a public museum.
4. Will the services offered by your organization increase or expand as a result of the CDBG
assistance? If yes,please answer the following questions:
a. What new programs and/or services will be provided? Completion of the rehabilitation project will
provide indirect benefits to persons using public transit by and support existing and future expanded
public transit services by providing layover facilities for local and regional transit routes. It will also
expand universally-accessible educational opportunities in the City and Central California Coast,
highlighting the role, technology, and economic importance of the railroad in San Luis Obispo County's
growth and development. The Railroad Museum Association, a Non-Profit organization, has entered a
binding agreement with the City of San Luis Obispo to install tenant improvements, administer and to
financially support the new museum (Attachment 3). The City will manage and operate the public
transit layover facility,with anticipated support from the regional transit authority.
b. Describe how existing programs and/or services will be expanded and what percentage of an
increase is expected? There are no public transit layover facilities serving the southern portion of San
Luis Obispo. This facility will provide a daily layover facility for the Regional Transit Authority(RTA)
bus operations and to provide access to restrooms for drivers and field personnel. This will be a
significant benefit for the timely and efficient delivery of public transit services. Nationwide, statistics
show that public transit ridership consists primarily of students, disabled persons and low income
persons.
5. Check.any of the following eligible activity categories that apply to the proposed project or
program: (Refer to CDBG regulations and the Guide to Eligible CDBG Activities).
Acquisition of real property
Disposition of real property
X_Public facilities and improvements(may include acquisition, construction,
reconstruction,rehabilitation or installation)
Privately owned utilities
Clearance and remediation activities
Public services
Interim assistance
Relocation of individuals, families,businesses,non-profit organizations, and/or farms
Loss of rental income
COMMUNRY DEVELOPMENT BLOOK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 3 OF 10
APPUCATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG '
Attachment 4
Removal of architectural barriers
Housing rehabilitation
New housing construction(under limited circumstances)
Homeownership assistance
Housing services
Code enforcement
X Historic preservation
Commercial or industrial rehabilitation
Special economic development
Technical assistance and planning studies
6. Describe the need and the degree of urgency for the proposed project or program.
What would be the consequences if the proposed project or program is not funded in
the next year?
The Freight Warehouse Rehabilitation project is approximately 80 percent complete; however the
building is currently vacant and must remain so until all safety and accessibility improvements have
been completed to allow occupancy. While empty and unused, the historic warehouse is highly
vulnerable to graffiti, vandalism, break-ins and fire damage. Completion and occupancy of the
warehouse will allow tenant improvements to be installed and the beginning of public use of the facility,
anticipated in December 2009. It will also deter the loitering of transients around the building and in the
immediate area, a past problem in the railroad area which has led to at least two serious structure fires—
both resulting in serious damage to historic buildings.
State and local financial resources have been seriously impacted by national and regional economic
factors, and the City's Capital Improvement Program must be prioritized to enable completion of a
limited number of priority projects. Priority projects are those projects that meet a federal or state
mandate, allow completion of a substantially completed project, and meet a Council-adopted goal or
program objective. This project meets those criteria by: 1) meeting federal mandates to make City
buildings and streets handicapped accessible, 2) to complete a project that is approximately 80 percent
complete, that already has had an investment of public funds of approximately $625,000 ($500K in
Transportation Enhancement Act (TEA) funding and $125K in Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) fimds) and 3) the project implements a primary objective of the Council-adopted Railroad
District Plan, and promotes City economic goals by enhancing heritage tourism.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 4 OF 10
APPLICATION FOR Tri 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN Luis OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BuILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
.............
Attachment 4
If not fimded in the 2009 grant year, project completion is lilcely to be significantly delayed, as an
increasing number of public and private, non-profit applications vie for CDBG firading due increasingly
limited grant funding for community programs and services. Until the rehabilitation is complete,
building maintenance and security is a significant responsibility borne entirely by the City. With
completion of the rehabilitation, occupancy will increase building security and tenants will assume some
funding and some maintenance responsibilities.
7. Please describe the specific organizational method used to implement the proposed
project or program(single or multiple group,public agency, non-profit,for-profit,
experience in operating similar programs,etc.):
See Attachment 3,Agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and the Railroad Museum.
& Does the project require the issuance of a permit (from local, state or federal agencies)?
Yes ❑ No ❑
a. If yes, please identify the permits necessary to complete the project. City of San Luis Obispo
Planning and Building approvals have already been granted, and a negative declaration of
environmental impact has been approved. The State Historic Preservation Office has reviewed and
approved the project as being consistent with the Secretary's Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties.
b. Have the necessary permits been issued? Please provide proof of permit issuance. City Building
Permit Numbers 5007 (4-7-08), 22158 (6-11-07), and 19157(5-17-04).
c. If permits are required but not yet obtained, when will the permits be issued?
NATIONAL OBJECTIVES CRITERIA
9. Does the proposed project or activity meet one of the three national objectives of the
CDBG program? Please check one of the objectives below that applies to the
proposal,and explain how the project or activity meets that national objective.
a. X_Benefits low- and moderate-income persons as defined by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development(HUD).
Select one:
❑ Low/Moderate-Income Area Benefit—The project serves only a limited area which is proven
by 2000 Census data or survey to be a predominately (51% or more) low/moderate-income area.
Applicants choosing this category must be able to prove their project/activity primarily benefits
low/moderate-income households.
M Low/Moderate-Income Limited Clientele — The project benefits a specific group of people
(rather than all areas in a particular area), at least 51% of whom are low/moderate-income persons.
Note: Income verification for clients must be provided for this category. The following groups are
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 5 OF 10
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANUNG.ORG
Attachment 4
presumed to be low/moderate-income: abused children; elderly persons;battered spouses; homeless
persons; adults meeting census definition of severely disabled; persons living with AIDS; and
migrant farm workers
❑ Low/Moderate-Income Housing — The project adds or improves permanent residential
structures that will belare occupied by low/moderate-income households upon completion.
❑ Low/Moderate-Income Jobs—The project creates or retains permanents jobs, at least 51% of
which are taken by low/moderate-income persons or considered to be available to low/moderate-
income persons.
Explain: This last phase of rehabilitation primarily consists of making the transit
layover facility and museum building universally accessible and complying with
ADA requirements. These improvements (path-of-travel improvements,
restrooms, platform safety rails, and flooring improvements are presumed to
benefit a Low/Moderate Income Limited Clientele, namely elderly persons and
severely disabled persons. Secondarily, the project will complete the
rehabilitation of a designated historic resource of local and statewide significance
that is potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
NOTE: To meet this national objective,the proposed activity must benefit a specific
clientele or residents in a particular area of the County or participating city, at least 51
percent of who are low- and moderate-income persons.
b. X Aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight.
Explain: This project will complete the process of repairing and rehabilitating an
unsafe, blighted building with a safe, code-compliant and attractive historic
resource which will be an asset to both the community and the Railroad Historic
District. It is expected to leverage substantial private investment and support
through the Railroad Museum donations Attachment 5).
Select one:
❑ Addressing Slums or Blight on an Area Basis -
® Addressing Slums or Blight on a Spot Basis —This project will prevent or eliminate specific
conditions of blight or physical decay,including unsafe steps,platforms,roofing, walls and electrical
connections, lack of plumbing facilities, lead-based paint, and unoccupied building which has been
an attractive nuisance in the Railroad District, and mixed-use neighborhood including residential and
commercial uses. Activities are limited to clearance, historic preservation, rehabilitation of
buildings, but only to the extent necessary to eliminate conditions detrimental to public health and
safety.
Is the project located in a Redevelopment Area? Yes ❑ No
If yes, attach a map of the area with the site highlighted, and provide the Redevelopment Project
Area(excerpts accepted)which documents the existence of slum/blight. Also, document the specific
redevelopment objectives pertaining to the proposed project.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE B OF 10
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN Luis OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG j
�1-41- 1g
Attachment 4
NOTE: To meet this national objective,the proposed activity must be within a designated
slum or blighted area and must be designed to address one or more conditions that
contributed to the deterioration of the area.
C. Meets community development needs having a particular urgency where existing conditions
pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and no other funding
sources are available,i.e., a major catastrophe such as a flood or earthquake.
Explain:
NOTE: To meet this national objective,the proposed activity must deal with major
catastrophes or emergencies such as floods or earthquakes.
10. If the project or program is designed to meet the national objective of providing benefit to low-
and moderate-income persons, please estimate the number of unduplicated number of persons(or
households) to benefit from the project and break that estimate down by income group
(unduplicated means the number who are served, i.e., the grant will allow 25 children to
participate in preschool—not 25 children x 5 days x 52 weeks=6,500).
a. Total number of persons or households who will benefit from the project or
program(regardless of income group):
An estimated 225 Persons per Week; 225X52=11,700 persons/year will be served by the proposed
San Luis Obispo Railroad Museum.
b. Of the total number of persons or households entered above,how many will be
low-income(earning 51%- 80%or less of the County median-income)?
An estimated 75 Persons per Week (33% of total visitors) will be low or very-low income
(including disabled persons); 75X52=3,900 low-income persons/year will be served by the proposed
San Luis Obispo Railroad Museum.
c. Of the total number of persons or households entered above, how many will be
very low-income(earning 50%or less of the County median-income)?
Persons/households (circle the applicable unit)
11.Who are the clients of your organization? (Example: low- to moderate-income persons, elderly
persons,severely disabled persons,migrant farm workers, battered spouses,etc.)
Residents of and visitors to the City of San Luis Obispo.
12. How will the clients benefit from this project?
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRAM(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 7 OF 10
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
Attachment 4
Both in terms of supporting local and regional public transit operations, and in providing a public education
facility available for citizens,visitors,educational and youth groups, special needs groups,civic and railroad
history groups, and many others.
BENEFICIARY DATA
13.How do you currently collect demographic data on the beneficiaries of the proposed project or
program? (Example: racial/ethnic characteristics)*
n/a
14. How do you currently document income status of each client? (Example: very low, low- and
moderate-income)*
n/a
15.Provide the following information for the person(s) in your organization responsible for the
preparation and submittal of the quarterly reports and for collecting and reporting the
beneficiary data to the Urban County.
Contact person/title: Michael Codron—Housing Programs Manager
Phone number: (805) 781-7175
E-mail address: mcodron@slocity.org
*NOTE: You are required to provide beneficiary data at the end of each quarter and year end data of the
fiscal year.
If your proposal involves economic development, i.e., directly benefit a business, private property
owner, business, involves facade improvements, provide technical assistance to a new or existing
business, job creation, loan guarantee, the beneficiary must obtain a Dun and Bradsteet (DUNS)
number that must be reported to HUD. Please contact Tony Navarro, (805) 781-5787,
navarro@slo.co.ca.us for information on how to obtain a DUNS number prior to incurring and
obligating the federal funds.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
16.Total amount of CDBG funds requested: $206,406 (plus$12,740 in reallocated CDBG funds)_
$219,146
Please identify the jurisdiction(s)to which you are applying*:
City of San Luis Obispo
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLACK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 8 OF 10
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
pN �_�
Attachment 4
If you are requesting CDBG funds from more than one jurisdiction,please break down the
amount shown above by the jurisdiction listed below.
City of Arroyo Grande: City of Paso Robles:
City of Atascadero: City of San Luis Obispo: X
City of Grover Beach**: County of San Luis Obispo:
*NOTE: If you are applying to one or more cities, please provide a copy of the application to the
County by the application deadline of October 14,2008.
** The City of Grover Beach reserves the option to award the maximum 15%of their grant funding
allocation for public service needs. However,the City will award no less than $3,000 per award.
Please submit your application accordingly.
17.Please describe the budget for the proposed project or program. Itemize all sources of funding
expected to be available and used for this project
a. Revenues:
1. 2009 CDBG Funds requested $206,405
2. Other Federal fund(s) (please describe below) $ 12,740 (Reallocated CDBG funds)
3. Balance,TEA Grant Funds $ 48,577
4. Required City match for TEA Grant Funding $ 6,436
5. Other funds(please describe below) $ 0
Total Revenues $274,158
b. Expenditures: List below by item or cost category.
Refer to Attachment 2, Phase 4 Construction Budget, dated September 29, 2008
18.How do you plan to fund the operation and maintenance costs (if any) associated with this
project? Are these funds available now? If not, when will they be available? And from what
source(s)?
O&M costs for the Railroad Museum will be the responsibility of the Railroad Museum organization,
per the executed agreement with the City of San Luis Obispo. Transit layover facilities and general
building maintenance will be the responsibility of the City, with assistance from RTA.
19. Will CDBG funds be used to match/leverage other funds? List below funding sources and
amounts and identify award dates of these sources.
See 17 above.
I certify that the information in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and ability.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 9 OF 10
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN Luis OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
................ .
Attachment 4
(0 lob
Signature Vate
Kim Murry Deputy Director, Community Development, City of San Luis Obispo
Printed or typed name Title
Note to applicant:
The County and cities require all of the grant recipients to maintain general liability, automobile and
workman's compensation insurance with limits of not less than$1 million*. If you are successful in
obtaining an award, you will be asked to provide documentation regarding ability to provide the required
coverage.
* Liability coverage may vary by jurisdiction. Please call the city/county contact to verify limits.
Prior to HUD's release of grant conditions and/or funds for the CDBG-funded project, a review of the
project's potential impact on the environment must be conducted by the awarding jurisdictions and
approved by the County of San Luis Obispo prior to obligating or incurring project costs. The County
must certify to HUD that it has complied with all applicable environmental procedures and requirements.
Should project costs be obligated or incurred prior to the completion of the necessary environmental review,
the project shall not benefit from the federal funds.
If you need assistance or have questions regarding this application,please contact any of the persons listed
below. Your application(s) can be dropped off or mailed to the following locations:
• Jim Bergman,Community Development Dept.,City of Arroyo Grande,214 E.Branch Street(P.O.Box 550),
Arroyo Grande,CA 93421, (805)473-5420.
• Valerie Humphrey, Public Works Dept.,City of Atascadero,6907 El Camino Real,Atascadero,CA 93422,(805)
470-3460.
• Janet Reese,Community Development Dept.,City of Grover Beach, 154 S.Eighth St.,Grover Beach,CA 93433,
(805)473-4520.
• Ed Gallagher,Community Development Dept.,City of Paso Robles, 1000 Spring St.,Paso Robles,CA 93446,
(805)237-3970.
• Michael Codron,Community Development Dept.,City of San Luis Obispo,919 Palm St.,San Luis Obispo,CA
9340I, (805)781-7175.
• Tony Navarro,Dept.of Planning and Building, 976 Osos Street,Room 300, San Luis Obispo,CA 93408, (805)
781-5787.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 10 OF 10
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 8,2008
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLA/NINNIING..ORG
Y P l
-H -
R-3-H R-3-H Att R
�• oma `Q� 000G
2
R-3-H _ Off, G� Q4 R-2
C-S-S-H tiF
R-3-H -S-H -yam
�p R-2 00
R-2-S G
-R-S-
-2 G�J� 3
00
-3- R-2
R-2 v�2
2 _
JQ
R- �a R-2
a
m R-2-S
a Site
m
0 C-S-HIx
o R-2 a R-1-PD
v R-2
C-S-H
HIGH
A
N R-2 C-S-H C-S-H R-2-S
C H
VICINITY MAP 2009 CDBG Applic tib
1940 Santa Barbara Avenue
Pk t-a3
... .... .... Attachment 4
Attacnent
�O o O O O e^n O O O tM+�i OOm 000
t(pp O
F N Q m M Mf N O N ^N�p N Ny m{}•
idi 1 (
.,t
oo c o0 0 o c 'y
�• V] �.j O � N O l�- �1
lL�' rre 1Y
` FY .tL
~~ A E
sCo
e
Q
dd o '� iIQ ;
E = E m a;
� m m
SS
Le CL
ob q m 1 m m c
cE �° m m c .1 E t
o ' fi c v `rt7yc'yi _a ,
9 � A � � rn N O � $ m 1i� � •xY
_ H.2 •� E Yn
Q 2 is a 3
BC
J a'Y•a a -
C
$J It
U iY � LL g 0 LL
8 $ z
Pg i-a'T-
f
Attachment 4
Attachment 3 LJ
SANBlSPJ
T
San Luis Obispo Railroad Museum
Post Office Box 13260,San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-1320
October 9, 2008
Stephen Lamb, Chairman
Human Relations Commission
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Re: Community Development Block Grant Funding Application for Restoration of Railroad Warehouse
Dear Chairman Lamb,
The Board of Directors and Members of the San Luis Obispo Railroad Museum (SLORRM) strongly support
the CDBG application for completion of restoration of the historic Southern Pacific Railroad Freight House. This
project has been underway for approximately ten years. A relatively small amount of additional capital now will
allow completion of building rehabilitation, and establishment of the railroad museum which our community has
been anxiously awaiting. Initiation of museum operations will provide additional cultural and educational
resources for citizens of all ages, and will have a favorable multiplier effect on city revenues through Sales and
Transient Occupancy Tax revenues. A recent visit to the nearly restored structure by the Cultural Heritage
Committee has generated their enthusiastic support for the project.
The current grant proposal will restore the building to a state where museum improvements can be made and
the facility then opened for public use. Interactive and static exhibits, many on a rotating basis, public meeting
space, a research library, a model railroad depicting our area, and a museum store are all proposed for the
building interior. Additional exterior displays of operating and static full size railroad equipment will also be
provided. To this end SLORRM has been fundraising and building an artifact resource base to allow speedy
establishment of the museum once the building is ready.
To help complete the museum building SLORRM can provide substantial assistance beyond our own
responsibility for tenant improvements by donation of professionally installed sprinkler and security systems,
obtaining donations of electrical and other utility work, and most importantly matching private funds for other
work. The key to providing these resources is the willingness of the city to provide funding at this time. Timing
is critical. The potential of private sector participation will wane if constant progress and a realistic conclusion
are not evident The CDBG grant is the best source for funding the remaining city portion of the project.
Thank you for Commission consideration and support of this grant proposal. The city and residents will all
benefit from its approval.
Sincerely,
Brad LaRose, President
San Luis Obispo Railroad Museum
i
PAI-aS
- Attachment 4
Attach ent 3
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND
THE SAN LUIS,OBISPO RAILROAD MUSEUM
FOR USE OF CI'T'Y PROPERTY .
This Agreement is made by and between the City of San Luis,Obispo(herein refen-ed to as Muy)
And the San Luis. Obispo Railroad Museum, a non-profit organization (herein referred to as
"SLORRMJ
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the City owns a former Southern Pacific Railroad freight house,and restores
water tower and
WHBREAS, the City-0wned &eight•-house has a special historical heritage in that it is a
unique, limited and diminishing resource, and a prime means of encouraging knowledge and
enjoyment of California and local history;and
WHEREAS, SLORRM, a nonprofit corporation, has proposed to establish and operate a
railroad museum utilizing the historic freight house,recognizing.its individual qualities and �ay
in which it could eventually be a part of the Gay's educational and cultural heritage, and
promotional functions;and
WHEREAS, both parties wish to work together toward the attainment of mutual goals for
the stabilizationprotection,restoration,and productive use of the historic freight house;and
WHEREAS, because of. the above, the Councilfinds that this agreement-serves an
important•municipal purpose. NOW TIE MORE, in consideration of their mutual promises,
obligations,au&covenantshereinafter contained,the parties hereto agree as follows: ,
TERMS
I. I:pcation of Property. The City will allow the SLORRM to use City-owned.railroad `
facilities:shown as Area A on Exhibit:.A, the extent•of which may be amended.
tlpnsugh
agreement_of the parties and is hereinafter referred to as"Premises" to operate a railroad
museum..aid perforin associated_ activities -for the, tei;n -Of this agreement. Leased -
property includes•the old.-Southern Pacific Railroad,freight, house,adjoining landscape
area on the Santa Barbara..Street side of�the`building and 4hat portion of the property
reserved for e�tenti�al' railroad track fol. display..purposes. It does not include any
sidewalks-ori.bikeways.
Pu�-a�
Attachment 4
Attachment 3
2. Purpose of Agreement. The SLORRM agrees:to lease Premises, surd to develop and
operate a museum for the term of the Iease, which will-'serve to meet the intent-of this
agreement. The City will have no•obligation•for development.and/or. operation of the
museum., including any tenant improvements. Any costs incurred for development and .
operation of the museum shall be the sole responsibility of the SLORRM.-
I .
LORRM.,I . Term of Agreement. The tern of this agreement shall commence upon execution by both
parties and.expire on December 31, 2040. The SLORRM will reserve the,first right to
negotiate an additional terra upon mutual agreement of the City and the SLORRM not to
exceed fifirren (15) years, for purposes outliiied in the intent of this agreement. The .
SLORRM shall submit any notice of interest in an extended term no less than one(1)year
prior to termination of the base term of the lease agreement.
4. Termination of Agreement The City reserves the right to terminate this agreement by
notifying SLORRM in writing.sixmonths prior to termination should the City need the-
propertyfor official City business. Additionally, should SLORRM.be unable.to complete
the proposed interior tenant improvements and establish a museum withinthreeyears of the
date of acceptance of the Historic Fkrdght'House Structure from the CiM the lease may be
terminated, and,,at the City's option, all tenant improvements will become the property of
the City or the site shall be delivered free and clear of all tenant-improvements.
In.the event of early termination of this agreement by the City after completion of'the tenant-
improvemea% for reasons other than failure to meet the terms of this agreement,the City
shall have the option to buy out permanent improvements at the proportional rate of90%.of
actual construction costs if cancellation.is .within the fust five{5) years,70%betwic i six
(6)and fifteen(15)years,508/6-betwe'en sixteen(16)and twenty-five'(25).years.and.7aothing . .
thereafter. The above "buyout' provisions shall be in lieu of any other compensation,
including but not limited to,relocation assistance.
S. Termination,of Agreement by SLORRM. SLORRM may terminate this agreement-by
notifying the City in writing six months prior to termination. In the event that SLORRM
chooses to exercise this option,all permanent improvements{excluding removable exbibits)
shall revert to the City.
6. Relationship of Parties. Under this agi eeiment;.the City shall be solely and exclusively a
les'so% i and:SSLORRM shall be solely.�and•exclusively a lessee. SLORRM shall not be
considered a.partner, agent, officer or employee of the City. SLORRM's officers,
members, affiliates, volunteers, employees and independent contractors shall not•be
considered agdnts,officers or employees of the City.
7. Rent. In recognition of the benefits the SLORRM provides the community,the Cityagrees
to allow the SLORRM the use of Premises for$1 per year,payable on the anniversary date
of this agreement each Year.'.
8. Emr"t sled Conditi& df Pres*e& SLORRM shall accept the Premises "as is". Tlas
agreement shall not•obligate the City to guarantee the suitability of Premises,the suitability
o the Prenmises for the intendt d use by SLORRM,the duration that Premises maybe safely
occupied, or,the availabilityof alternate facilities: Should any occurrence (such as-fire,
earthquake,hood or the need to repair-or imp2ove Premises by the'City),necessitate closing
2
Attachment 4
attachment
Premises, or a portion of Premises, to the public, the SLORRM shall have no recourse to
the City-for any loss incurred.
9. Historic Freight House
a. The SLORRM shall accept the Historic Freight House and-environs, as defined on
Attachment-A as Area A,•-for use subsequent to,aenovatiow of the structure and
grading by the City of adjacent area for installation of railroad--track by the
SLORRM,with the understanding that installation of interior museum facilities will
be the obligation of SLORRM Once all landscaping and public art; if any, are in
place, the City will consider proposals from SLORRM.for possible temporary use
of Area B on Exhibit A. The:final decision on any such use-will be made by the
City Council after appropriate staffreview and any regulatory approvals.
b. Following completion of rehabilitation of the historic freight house by the City in
compliance with Americans vnth Disabilities Act-(ADA)regulations,the SLORRM
agrees to assumd fail responsibility for insuring that the facility continues to comply
with ADA requirements.
c. In addition to the interior space designated for museum purposes, thq Historic"
Freight House shall contain a small employee lounge and bathroom,with a separate.
outside entrance,for the use of regional transit employees,as shows in Exhibit B.
d. City may elect at a Rum date to establish and.operate'a passenger transit transfer--
facility in the vicinity of the Historic Freight House. Interior space cu=*
designated for museum purposes may bei required for the transit faoility •Should,
such a change in use become necessary, ..City .and. SLORRM .shall work_
cooperatively to reallocate an. aporopriate, space .in -a mummer that nfinimizes
disruption of the musetun use.'
1.0..'. SLORRM Responsibility for Maintenance of Premises. SLORRM shall:
a 'Provide all repair and replacement needed for any personal property installed or
improvements constructed on the interior or exterior by.SLORRM after the City
completes its rehabilitation of the Historic Freight House.
b,. Provide all graffiti removal from-the outside of the-building.
c....Provide all janitorial service neede4 except for the area used exclusively by•t wisit
drivers,to the satisfaction of the City.
d Purchase and restock any consumable supplies needed.in the:day-to-clay operation
of the building, including janitorial supplies and light bulbs and lamps,escept for
-,•-those*)les needed for the area used exclusively by transit drivers.
11. •City Responsibi ty forMalntmmiq of Premises. The City shall:
a.: Provide all repair and maintenance on the exterior of the building,exceptJim
.10(a):and(b)above .
Attachment 4
Attachment. 3
b. Provideall repair and replacement needed for any equipment installed or
improvements constructed by the City on the interior or exterior. .
C. Provide all maintenance service needed for the grounds and-landscape.
d. Through a separate agreement, the City and the regional transit,authority shall
determine responsibility for maintenance of that area used exclusively.by the transit
drivers.
12. Cost pf Operations. The SLORRM shall bear the entire cost of its operations on Premises,
including:
a. Paying all utility bills, including water, electricity, natural gas, .cable television
service, telephone and garbage (along with recycling) except for.those portions of
expenses which relate to the area used exclusively by the transit drivers.
b. Paying the Cost of any maintenance foi which SLORRM.is.responsib le. I
c. Paying any taxes and fees related to its occupancy of the Premises, including all
possessory-interest taxes that may be imposed.
13. Miiihmum Hours of Operation. The SLORRM agrees to keep the museum open:to the
public for a'minimum of three..(3) hours on Saturday and three (3) hours on Sunday,•
commencing one year following:accept2nce of the Historic Freight House structure from 1
the City. Prior to the completion of.the first year,the museum shall be opened a monthly-. '
average of a Minimtmr of 16 hours-per month. The hours of operation shall be re=evaluated
-by-SLOR'RM and the City at the begirming of each calendar year and adjusted upward
whenever possible given SLORRM volunteer resources. During public hours of.operation
all parts of the actual museum, iinchiding the proposed model railroad,room, will be r
available to visitors: In addition, once construction•ofthe model railroad has progressed td
a condition of being operable for display.purposes, the model railroad mom.sbA be inade;
separately available•to the public one evening.per month during which time the.model
railroads will in operation.
14. ,Alterations to Premises..The City shall be notified of and consider approval of any-exterior
`alterations, or any interior structural alterations made to Premises, prior to their
commencement. Approval of alterations, such as the installation of exterior displays .
associated with the museum within areas approved for such use, shall not be unreasonably
withheld by the City. SLORRM shall•comply with all:applicable procedures of thi City's
Community Development Department,. Building ..Division, Architectural. Review,
Commission and Cultural Heritage Committee and all applicable-building codes in-mak ng•.
ady alterations to structural, electrical,-plumbing, interior and/or exterior systems and
finishes.ofPrrmises.
15. Expansion of Museum Fae itles. Should.additional railroad related.-facilities become
property of the City in the future, the City .agrees to explore with the SLORRM the
possibility of their incorporation into the-mihoad museum.
4
Pyr-�j
Attachment 4
attachment 3
.16. Labor Code Requirements The SLORRM certifies that A is aware of the provisions of
the Labor Code of the State of Caiifomia, which require every employer to-be insured`
against liability for workers compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with
the provisions of that Code, and it certifies that it.will comply with such provisions
throughout the tern of this agreement.
17:. Proofvf Insurance. The SLORRM agrees to provide proof of inamce,in accordance
-with the requirements established in Exhibit C•.
I& Indemnification. The SLORRM hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City,
its officers,agents,and employees against
a. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against the City, its officers,.
agents or employees:by reason of anj.injury or;death of any person.10f corporation
caused by any negligent act or otm§%on of the SLORRM'Under this agreement or of
SLORRM empltlyees or agents;
b. Any and all damage to or destruction of the-property of the City,its officers,agents,
or employees, occupied or used by or iu the care, custody, or control of the
SLORRM, caused by any negligent act or omission.of the SLORRM under.ttus
agreement;
c. Any and an claims and demands which may be made against'the City;its officers,
agents, or employees by reason of any injury'to or death of or damage.suffered or
sustained by an employee or agent of the SLORRM under this agreement,.however
caused, excepting, any such claims or-demands which are the result•'of the
negligence or willful misconduct of the City,its officers,agents,or employees;
d. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against the City, its officers,
agents or employees by.reason..of infringement or.alleged infringement of any patent
rights or claims caused by the use of any.,appal-4tus, .appliance, or materials
famished by the SLORRM undei this agreement; and
e. Any and all penalties imposed or damages sought on account of violation of any-
law
nylaw or regulation or of any tern or condition of any permit,when said violation of
airy law or regulation or of any term or-condition of any permit is due to'neglig
ce
on the part.of the SLORRM.
f. The SLORRM, at its'own costs, expense,and risk shall defend any and all shits,
actions,or other legal proceedings that may.be�brought against of for employees nn
any such claim or demand of such third persons,or to enforce any such penalty,and
pay:and satisfy any judgment or decree that may be rendered.against the City; its
officers, agents, or employees in any such-suit, action, or other legal proceeding,
when same were due to negligence of the SLORRM.
19. Enforcenteat Costs and.AttornWs Fees;, The.prevailing party in any action between the -
pardes to this.agent,brought to enforce time ternins of this agreement,may recover from .
the.other party its reasonable costs and attorney's fees:in correction with such an action.
5 ,
Attachment 4
Attachment '
3
20. Non-Discrimination. There shall be no discrimination against'or segregation of any
person or group of persons on account of race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national
origin, age, physical,.mental or,economic status•in the construction, operation, lease;
sublease, use, occupancy, tenure or enloymcnf of the Property or the improvements
thereon, or any part thereof, and SLORRM, or any person claiming:tinder`or through it,
shall not establish or permit any such practice of discrimination or segregation;with
reference to the construction of the Project Improvements, or the selection, location,
number, use or occupancy of employees, contractors, subcontractors, laborers or
materialmen, tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees, invitees or Yen'dees of the Property
or the improvements thereon,or any part thereof.
SLORRM shall not restrict access.or use of the Property or the improvements thereon, or
any portion thereof•;on the basis of race,religion,.sex,sexual orientation,national•origin,. .
age,physical,menial or economic status of any person.
21. AssigumenL SLORRM shall not assign this agreement to another party without the
City's prior written consent,which maybe denied,*at the City's sole discretion. .
22. Emirety and Integrity of Agreement. This document.represents the entire and integrated
agreement between the City and SLORRM. This document supersedes and negates.;all
prior negotiations; representations, agreements and amendments, either written or oral,-
regarding Premises and the operation of a railroad museum.on Premises. Binh parties also
recognize that some issues may not have been anticipated or addressed herein, and that
changes to the agreement may be warranted. Thus,this agreement may be amended upon
written consent of both parties, to the approval of.the City Administrative Officer and the
City Attomey and-as provided by law.
23. Notices. All official notices required under`this agreement shall be given in writing and
submitted by.certified mail,postage prepaid,and addressed as follows:
City: City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm.Street
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
SLORRM: President
San Luis Obispo Railroad Museum
P.O.Box 13260
San Luis Obispo,CA 93406-3260
24. Authority to Execute Agreement. Both City and SLORRM do covenant that each .
}ndividital.execnting this agreement on behalf,of each party is a person duly authorized 'and.
empowered to execute Agreements for such party. . ;
6
Attachment 4
Attachm'ent 3
This AgremeW is executed this .day of 2000 , in the
City of San Luis Obispo,State of California
THE SAN LUIS OBISPO RAILROAD MUSEUM
yPP ZZ--2_c 3a
PiWdent V Date
Brad LaRose
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
May Date
Attest
City Clerk
Appmved as to form:
y
7
i' 1I i
F
41,
wll 6!
� z,
If
ii
�a
Attachment 4
Fxh►b;f B
CIZI
i 1
ti 1.
1 � i
I
I 1
1 1
i I
i I Q
1 �
1 I
s 1 Q
I 1 � y
1 h O
I I
1 � I
I 1 8
I
1 i
I 1
. 1 I
I I
I 1
1 I
I 1
I I
I 1 -
I I
i
LillLu.
, y �
I s
I 1 .
1
I ,
1 I
I I
. I I
I I
1 '
1 i
i 1
I I
I I
1 1
i
,
i
PN 1 -3q
Attachment 5
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM
` APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR
i1;:::w1L.rwv:...Y..Aa:.+.J:l\•li=�4L'T:1aiiYii`;.:LC^.i$?. iiLY.C'...hf]..T'`Au:?'."1%=A:.1..1A-Ingl.:::n.:].-lI[R'^_:.w..'..aGi'Y...:.MI 1`q."i.'.'1. 1..51.Si-..1•.:'1:Wr1C:t'ti..':.N?!ti.`S�.C.
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING
976 OSOS STREET • ROOM 200 • SAN LUIS OBISPO • CALIFORNIA 93408 • (805)781-5600
Promoting We Wrse Use of Land •Helping to Build Great Communities
organization Name: Judson Terrace Homes
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
To be considered for CDBG assistance,please submit this completed application with any exhibits, budgets
or beneficiary data as needed. Applications can be mailed to one of the participating jurisdictions listed in
this application or to: Tony Navarro, Planner III, Department of Planning and Building, 976 Osos Street,
Room 300, San Luis Obispo, CA., 93408 or hand delivered to Tony Navarro at 1035 Palm Street, Room
370, San Luis Obispo, CA., faxed to (805) 781-5624, or e-mailed to tnavarro@co.slo.ca.us. The
application deadline is 5:00 P.M., Tuesday, October 14, 2008. Applications must be received by the
County or one of the participating cities(Arroyo Grande,Atascadero,Grover Beaclh,.Paso Robles, San Luis
Obispo)prior to close of the business day. POSTMARKED DATED MAIL RECEIVED AFTER THE
DEADLINE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
NOTE:
(1) Please review the CDBG regulations and guidelines and the Request for Proposals before
completing this proposal. The CDBG regulations are available at www.sloplanning org
under"Housing Grants." Also,please call County and/or city CDBG staff with any questions
about how to complete the form or about the rating criteria and process.
(2) If the information for any of the questions below requires more room to provide
a complete explanation of your proposed project or program,please attach additional sheets.
CONTACT INFORMATION
1. Name and mailing address of applicant organization, with contact person, phone and fax
numbers,and e-mail address:
Name: Judson Terrace Homes
Address(mailing and physical address requested if different):
3000 Augusta St
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
Contact person/title
Roger C.Jump,Administrator
Phone: (805)544-1600
Fax: (805)544-1645
E-mail address: rjump@abhow.com
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 1 OF 11 ;.
APPLICATION FOR FUNDING DURING 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 14,2008
SAN Luis OalsPo COUNTY PLANmr,&Bu=wG SLOPLANNING.ORG
i
P44i -3-�)
Attachment 5
Is the organization a Faith Based Organization? Yes X No ❑
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2. Titlelnameladdress of proposed project orprogram:
Preservation of Affordable Housing for low income elderly residents
Judson Terrace Homes,3000 Augusta St.,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
_ 3. :Please descrilte t#te proposed projector program. In one or two short paragraphs, include a brief
,proieqyprogram,description, the groups who will benefit and an explanation. of how they will benefit
from.tha proposed.project or program. For projects, describe the location of the project (be as specific
a' .possible, e:g 1 s'x et address). .For programs, state the location from which the program will be.
-operated andlor describe the geographic area served by the program. Also,please include a schedule of
projectlprogram milestones.
-Judson Terrace Homes fust opened its doors at 3000 Augusta Street in the City of San Luis Obispo
in'October.1;,1970. .0ar non-profit, non-sectarian affordable housing community is comprised of i07
apartments, has,been,serving generations of elderly, low income County residents for 38 years. The
property is near the corner of Augusta Street and Laurel Lane. It runs parallel to Johnson Avenue
(map attached). . Judson Terrace Homes is a Section 202 project funded by the U.S. Department of
HUD.
The residents are all 62 years and older. The median age of our residents is 80. Their primary source
of Mcome.is.Social.Security and some have small pensions as additional income. All these residents,
who are among.the most vulnerable of all County residents, are those who will benefit from the
Project proposed herein. Due to the age of the property (38+ years), there are increasing capital
needs. Resident rents including HUD subsidies alone are not adequate to keep up with all of the
needs. HUD.has.requested that we seek other sources of funding to assist with these physical needs.
One of the greatest threats to the preservation of Judson Terrace Homes is termite and dry rot
damage. An inspection done about one year ago by Clark Pest Control uncovered $39,325 in needed
treatment and wood replacement. Due to a lack of funds,we have not been able to proceed with the
work,and are seeking CDBG assistance to prevent further deterioration of the buildings where our
residents reside.
Prosect Milestones
Obtain Grant(Contract signed by all parties)-Day 1
Secure completed bids by Day 30
Review and execute contract by Day 60
Commence work by Day 90
Complete work by Day 120
CON7NUNRY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG).PROGRAM .. PAGE 2 Of 11
APPLICATION FOR T42009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOaER 14.2006
SAN LUIS OBLSPO.000NTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNiNG.ORG '
. ._ .. . �L` fI✓lam .;
-% Attachment 5
4. Will the services offered by your organization increase or expand as a result of the CDBG
assistance? If yes,please answer the following questions:
This proposed,project is to address the preservation of a beautiful property where over 100 of
our seniors reside. If the property is not maintained appropriately,the useful life will be reduced
and future generations who might have been cared for at Judson Terrace may not have access to .
affordable housing. This project will expand the useful life of this affordable housing community
if granted CDBG assistance.
a. What new programs and/or services will be provided?
Futuregenerations of low to extremely low income residents will.be provided with affordable
housing and:services. Without this assistance,the property may not exist as far into the future for
low income seniors.
b.. Describe.how existing programs and/or services will be expanded and what percentage of an
increase is expected?
The useful life of the project would be extended many more years into the future and many
future low income seniors will be cared for. This could easily expand the useful life of Judson Terrace
for 20 more years and as many as 20-50%more low-income seniors could benefit
5. Check any of the following eligible activity categories that apply to the proposed project or
program: (Refer to CDBG regulations and the Guide to Eligible CDBG Activities).
Acquisition of real property
Disposition of real property
Public facilities and improvements(may include acquisition,construction,
reconstruction,rehabilitation or installation)
Privately owned utilities
Clearance and remediation activities
Public services
Interim assistance
Relocation of individuals, families,businesses,non-profit organizations,and/or farms.
Loss of rental income
Removal of architectural barriers
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM - PAGE 3 0F.1`I '
APPucnnON FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 14 2008
SAN LUIS 0=PO COUNry PLANNING&.BUILDING SLOPLANNING ORG
7N1 3
Attachment 5
X Housing rehabilitation
New housing construction(under limited circumstances)
Homeownership assistance
X Housing services
Code enforcement
Historic preservation
Commercial or industrial rehabilitation
Special economic development
Technical assistance and planning studies
6. Describe the need and the degree of urgency for the proposed projector program.
What would be the consequences if the proposed project or program is not funded in
the neat year?
Each year the termite control and wood replacement work is delayed it will threaten the
longevity,of oars prdable housing and allow for further deterioration of the structures. The work
can be done.2 years or 5 years into the future, but the costs .will be multiplied. The most cost-
effective
ost
effective strategy,is'to correct the problems as early as possible; the least cost-effective method is to
prolong the work until the deterioration is greater and more expensive to correct.
7. Please describe the specific organizational method used to implement the proposed
project or program(single or multiple group,public agency,non-profit,for-profit,
experiencein operating similar programs,etc.):
A;reputable;licensed pest control company will perform the work according to specifications
which we require.. Our Management Agent, American Baptist Homes of the West, routinely
requn es.references,scope of work and specifications,proof of worker compensation,liability,anis
auto insurance for the contractor,and an AIA Contract to be executed.
8. Does the project require the issuance of a permit(from local,state or federal agencies)?
•. . . .. Yes E] No
A." If yes,please identify the permits necessary to complete the project.
b. Have the necessary permits been issued? Please provide proof of permit issuance.
N/A
Cammu ITY DEwLopmeu.BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM - PAGE 4 OF 11:.
APPucanON F•pR THE, CWPA00RAM YEAR OCTa3r: 14.2008
SAN LUIS 06WQ,GOUPft PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
�Nf �3�
Attachment 5
Q If permits are required but not yet obtained, when will the permits be issued?
N/A
NATIONAL OBJECTIVES CRITERIA
9. Does.the proposed projeet or activity meet one of the three national objectives of the
CDBG program? Please check one of the objectives below that applies to the
proposal,and explain how the project or activity meets that national objective.
a. Benefits low and moderate-income persons as defined by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development(HUD).
- i
Select one:
Q• Low/Moderate-Income Area Benefit—The project serves only a limited area which is proven
by 2000 Census data or survey to be a predominately (51% or more) Iow/moderate-income area.
Applicants choosing this category must be able to prove their projectlactivity primarily benefits
low/moderate-income households.
X0 Low/Moderate-Income Limited Clientele—The project benefits a specific group of people
(rather than all areas in a particular area), at least 51%of whom are low/moderate-income persons;.
Note: Income verification for clients must be provided for this category. The following groups are
presumed to be low/moderate-income: abused children; elderly persons; battered spouses; homeless
persons; adults meeting census definition of severely disabled; persons living with AIDS; and
migrant farm workers
XD Low/Moderate-Income Housing — The project adds or improves permanent residential
structures that will be/are occupied by low/moderate-income households upon completion.
0Low/Moderate-Income Jobs—The project creates or retains permanents jobs, at least.51% of
v rhich are taken by low/moderate-income persons or considered to be available to low/moderate-
income persons.
Explain: Judson Terrace serves only low income elderly residents; 1001/a range
from extremely low income to low income.
NOTE: To meet this national objective,the proposed activity must benefit a specific
clientele or residents in a particular area of the County or participating city, at least 51
percent of who are low-and moderate-income persons.
b. Aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENj BLOCK GRANT(CDBG).PROGRAM PAGE 5 OF'1
APPLICATION FOR THEAN PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER'14 2W8
SAN LUIS QBISPO COUNTY PLANNING 8:BUILDING $LOPLANNING.ORG
.. ...... . ................................ ........
Attachment 5
Explain:
Select one:
❑ Addressing Slnms or Blight on an Area Basis-
❑ Addressing Slums or Blight on a Spot Basis—This project will prevent or eliminate specific
conditions of blight or physical decay. Activities are limited to clearance, historic preservation,
rehabilitationW.buildings, but only to the extent necessary to eliminate conditions detrimental to
public health and safety.
Is the project located in a Redevelopment Area?.. Yes❑ No .®
If yes,.attach:a map of the area with the site highlighted, and provide the Redevelopment Project
Area(excerpts,accepted)which documents the existence of slum/blight. Also,document the specific
redevelopment objectives pertaining to the proposed project.
NOTE: To meet this national objective,the proposed activity must be within a designated
slum or blighted area and must be designed to address one or more conditions that
contributed to the deterioration of the area.
c. Meets community development needs having a particular urgency where existing conditions
pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and no other funding
sources are available,i.e.,a major catastrophe such as a flood or earthquake.
Explain:
NOTE: To meet this national objective,the proposed activity must deal with major
catastrophes or emergencies such as floods or earthquakes.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT.(CDBG).PROGRAM . PAGE 6 OF 11.
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 14;.2068
SAN Luis OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING O&OiMi 14,2ORG
Attachment 5
10.If the.project or program is designed to meet the national objective of providing benefit to low-
and' moderate-income persons,please estimate the number of unduplicated number of persons (or
households) to benefit from the project and break that estimate down by income group
�(upduplieated means the number who are served, Le., the grant will allow 25 children to
participate in preschool—not 25 children a 5 days z 52 weeks=6,500).
a. Total number of persons or households who will benefit from the project or
program(regardless of income group):
110* Persons/households(circle the applicable unit)
(*At any given time, but since this work is expected to result in an expanded life time for
Judson Terrace,)the actual number would be much greater over the extended life of the facility.)
b. Of the total number of persons or households entered above,how many will be
low-income(earning 51%-80%or less of the County median-income)?
100%* Persons/households(circle the applicable unit)
c. Of the total number of persons or households entered above,how many will be
ygm low-income(earning 50%or less of the County median-income)?
74% Persons/households(circle the applicable unit)
11. Who are the clients of your organization? (Example: low- to moderate-income persons, elderly
_ persons,severely disabled persons,migrant farm workers,battered spouses,etc.)
Our residents are all low to extremely low income elderly age 62 or older. The average age of
our residents is 80.
12. How will the clients benefit from this project?
The physical structures will be saved from deterioration,thereby providing quality affordable
housing for current and future generations of low-income seniors.
C0MMUWTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)-PROGRAM PAGE 7 0FA I"'
APPLICATION FOR TH82009 PROGRAM YEAR -
OCTOBER 14,2008
SAN L.uls OBISPotm'IY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOP�LAAISIM G.ORG'"
V{ r I I I
Attachment 5
BENEFICIARY DATA
13.How do you currently collect demographic data on the beneficiaries of the proposed project or
Program? (Example: racial/ethnic characteristics)*
As a HUD property, we are required to document applicant's eligibility for affordable housing.
Each applicant is required to fill out an application including certain types of demographic
information. Age is verified by birth.certificate or a state-issued document (driver's license or. state
I.D. card). Racial/ethnic data is collected directly from residents when completing their move-in
process.
14. How.do you currently document income status of each client? (Example: very low, low- and
moderate-income)*
In the application process,HUD requires owners to collect thud party verification of income and
assets (Le., verification is collected directly from the source of income or asset holder). If this is not
possible, we are allowed to copy documents held by the applicant from the sources of income or
assets. Furthermore,annual management reviews are conducted by HUD contract administrators to
verify that these procedures are followed and that the files are in accordance with HUD regulations.
In the past three annual management reviews, Judson Terrace Homes rated an "Above Average"
with no verification or calculation errors.
15.Provide the following information for the person(s) in your organization responsible for the
preparation and submittal of the quarterly reports and for collecting and reporting the
beneficiary data to the Urban County. .
Contact person/title: Roger C.Jump
Phone number: (805)544-1600
E-mail address: rjump@abhow.com
*NOTE: You are required to provide beneficiary data at the end of each quarter and year end data of the
fiscal year.
If your proposal involves economic development,i.e.,directly benefit a business,private property
owner, business,involves faVade improvements,provide technical assistance to a new or existing
business,job creation,loan guarantee,the beneficiary must obtain a Dun and Bradsteet(DUNS)
number that must be reported to HUD. Please contact Tony Navarro,(805)781-5787,
tnavarro@slo.co.ca.as for information on how to obtain a DUNS number prior to incurring and
obligating the federal fands.
COMMLINmy DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM . PAGES OF 1 i -
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR
OCTOBER 14;2008
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
....... . ... ....... _.
i
Attachment 5
FINANCIAL INFORMATION,
16.Total amount of CDBG funds requested: S $40.000
Please identify the jurisdiction(s)to which you are applying*:
City of San Luis Obispo
If you.are requesting CDBG funds from more than one jurisdiction,please break down the
amount shown above by the jurisdiction listed below.
City of Arroyo Grande: City of Paso Robles:
City of Atascadero: City of San Luis Obispo:
City of Grover Beach**: County of San Luis Obispo:
*NOTE: If you.are applying to one or more cities, please provide a copy of the application to the
County by the application deadline of October 14,2008.
;* The City of Grover Beach reserves the option to award the maximum 15%of their grant funding
allocation for public service needs. However,the City will award no less than$3,000 per award.
Please submit your application accordingly.
17.Please describe the budget for the proposed project or program. Itemize all sources of funding
expected to be available and used for this project
a. Revenues:
1. CDBG Funds requested $ 40.000
2. Other Federal fimd(s)(please describe below) $
3. State source(s)(please describe below) $
4. Local source(s)(please describe below) $
5. Other funds(please describe below) $ 3,929*
Total Revenues $ 43.929
* The$3,929 is from the property's operating budget for maintenance expenses.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CD$G)PROGRAM PAGE 8 OF 11
APPUCATION FIR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 14,.2008
SAN WIS OBI$I�o COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING .SLOPLANNING.ORG '/
Attachment 5
b. Expenditures: List below by item or cost category.
Please see the attached imspecdonby Clark Pest Control. .Because.-this inspection`is -+gated.
10/22!07, in consultation with the inspector,we have added a contingency of 10%. The total termite
and wood replacement costs in this inspection are $39,325. A 10% contingency is $3,932. Therefore,
we estimate the costs to be:
10/22/07 Inspection $39,325
10% contingency 3,932
Total $43457
At our instructions,Clark Pest Control is cnrrently,conducting another inspection to update then
proposal. When this inspection,is complete, we will submit this report to the city to add to this
application. We anticipate that by the time the grant is approved and the contracts are executed with
the city, the additional costs will be higher than 10%. If the CDBG funds are approved, however,
Judson Terrace is committed to this work and will expeditiously find the additional funds needed in
operating revenue or some other source of funding.
18.How do you -plan to fund the operation and maintenance costs (if any) associated with this":
project? Are these funds available now? If not, when will they be available? And'from what
sources}?
No additionaloperating and maintenance costs are anticipated as a result of this project. ' If '
anything, it will reduce maintenance costs because smaller pest control contracts which are
normal will be reduced. On-going pest control inspections and corrective procedures are
currently budgeted and will remain in place.
19. Will CDBG funds be used to _match/leverage other funds? List below funding sources and
amounts and identify award dates of these sources.
With a CDBG of$40,000,Judson Terrace will be able to pay for amounts over the$40;000 out of
its operating budget. We simply would not be able to fund the full amount'of these costs without the
Above grant, but with the grant,we can fund the remainder of the costs. Our estimate above is that
we will need about $3,932 from our operating budget, but we anticipate that the actual amount will
probably be higher by the time funds actTially become available.
Furthermore, on a broader scale, Judson Terrace Homes is subsidized by the HUD Section 8
program by approximately $2479000 per year. Resident rents totaled $428,056 last year. Also,
Judson Terrace has received grants from the American Baptist Homes of the West Foundation of
Approximately $140,000 over the past 10 years. All repairs and replacements are usually made from
these funds, so essentially the repairs as a whole to Judson Terrace are heavily leveraged by all of
these sources.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CABG)PROGRAM .` PAGE 10 OF 1'1 .
APPLICATION FOR'THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCYOBER U.2008'
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY PLANNING&.BUILDING BLOPLANNING.ORG'
Attachment 5
„ 1 certifythat.tbe mfonmation in this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and ability.
Si tore
Roger C.Jump Administrator
Printed or typed name 'Title
Note to applicant:
The County and cities require all of the grant recipients to maintain general liability,automobile and
workman's compensation.insurance with limits of not less than$1 million*. If you are successful in
obtaining an award,you will be asked to provide documentation regarding ability to provide the required
coverage.
* Liability coverage may vary by jurisdiction. Please call the city/county contact to verify limits.
Prior to HUD°s release of grant conditions and/or funds for the CDBG-funded project,a review of the
Project's potential impact on the environment must be conducted by the awarding jurisdictions and
approved by the County of San Luis Obispo prior to obligating or incurring project costs. The County
Must certify to HUD that it has complied with all applicable environmental procedures and requirements.
Should project costs be obligated or incurred prior to the completion of the necessary environmental review,
the project shall not benefit from the federal.funds.
If you need assistance or have questions regarding this app ication,please contact any of the persons listed
below. Your application(s)can be dropped off or mailed to the following locations:
• Jim Bergman,Community Development Dept.,City of Arroyo Grande,214 E.Branch Street(P.O.Box 550),
Arroyo Grande,CA 93421,(805)473-5420.
• Valerie Humphrey,Public Works Dept.,City of Atascadero,6907 El Camino Real,Atascadero,CA 93422,(805)
470-3460.
• Janet Reese,Community Development Dept,City of Grover Beach, 154 S.Eighth St,Grover Beach,CA 93433,
(805)473-4520.
• Ed Gallagher,Community Development Dept.,City of Paso Robles, 1000 Spring St,Paso Robles,CA 93446,
(805)237-3970.
• Michael Codron,Community Development Dept,City of San Luis Obispo,919 Palm St.,San Luis Obispo,CA
93401,(805)781-7175.
• Tony.Navarro,Dept of Planning and Building,976 Osos Street,Room 300,San Luis Obispo,CA 93408,(805)
'781-5787.
COMMUNfrY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)PROGRAM PAGE 11 OF 11
APPLICATION FOR THE 2009 PROGRAM YEAR OCTOBER 14.2008
SAN LUIS 0810O COUNTY PLANNING&BUILDING SLOPLANNING.ORG
1
i
Attachment 5
WOOD DESTROYtr%G PESTS AND ORGANISMS INSPEv f10N REPORT
Building Na Street Gty LP Dalo of lnspeaiw+ Nwnberd Papas
3000 Augusta St San Luis Obispo 93401.5859 10/22/07 8
Clark Pest Control A LICENSED PEST CONTROL
OPERATOR IS AN EXPERT IN
2315 Meredith Lane, Suite M HIS/HER FIELD. ANY QUESTIONS
ILINCULCONMILma
Santa Maria REATM TQ THIS REPORT
s C 93455-1144 SHOULD BE REFERRED TO
Tel 866.441-8793 Fax 805-739-2554 HBVHER.
Registration#:PR226 Report#: 1844339
Ordered byProperty Owner and/or Party of Interest: Report sent to:
Judson Terrace Homes* Judson Terrace Homes Judson Terrace Homes
3000 Augusta St 3000 Augusta St Attn:Roger Jump
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 3000 Augusta St
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859
i
COMPLETE REPORT❑ LIMITED REPORT® SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT❑ REINSPECTION REPORT❑
General Description: Inspection Tog Posted:
Two story,apartment buildings,occupied,furnished,slab foundations.
Utility Closet
Other Tags Posted:
An Inspection has been made of the shuchae(s)shown on the diagram In acoordance with the Structural Pest Control Act.Detached porches,detached steps,
stacked decks and other strueWres not on the diagram were not inspected.
Subterranean Termites® :Drymod Termites® Fungus/Dryrot® Other Findings❑ Further Inspection❑
It any of the above bolas are checked,it Indicates that there wem visible problants in accessible areas.Read the report for detalls on checked Rom.
1=Subterranean Termites 2=Drywood Temtites 3-F i 4=011w Findincs 5=Unknown Further 1 'on
WfA.7/2e 3AIWA7 sA WAkimb
.... 'ri;i;.;`.; sXXXINV
?<ss
tA ': :j✓ a
t 2Ar2AI ZA"I
3Asc
1A
>n
ti
36
r :.
::. Bulldin
1
>C
yy�yrr�y y},i
1 I
I I
I I
tA@AI ,r
Diagram Not To Scale / /�
Inspected By: Chad Dabbs License No.: FR39989
Signature:_.:'You {//!
You are entitled to obtain copies of,a8 reports and completion notices on tris property repofted to the trucbxal Pest Control Board duiingthe-procading two years. To obtain
coplas-contact:Struetlual Rost Control Board,1418 Howe Avenue.Suite 18,Sacramento.CeGfomla.95825-3204.
NOTE Questions or problems concerning the above report should be directed to me manager of the company. Urimsolved questions or problems with services
.. •perfonrled may be directed to ft Structural Pest Control Board at(916)561-8708,(800)737.8188 or y -Rlls;Moard a oov, -'4314-41(REV.10/01)
- Attachment 5
WOOD DESTROY 3 PESTS AND ORGANISMS INSPf_ JON REPORT
BWWrrg No Strad City Zip Daleofinspeclion Numberd Pages _
3000 Augusta St San Luis Obispo 83401-5859 IOTZ2 07 8
Clark Pest Control A LICENSED PEST CONTROL
OPERATOR IS AN EXPERT IN
12315 Meredith Lane, Suite M HIS/HERFIELD. ANY QUESTIONS
C3L"K 0Santa Maria CA 93455-1144 RELATIVE TO THIS REPORT
�PMCOMOLMN t t SHOULD BE REFERRED TO
Tel 866-441-8793 Fax 805-739-2554 HIM/HER.
Registration#:PR226 Report#:18-14339 -
Ordered by. Property Owner and/or Party of Interest: Report sent to:
Judson Terrace Homes* Judson Terrace Homes Judson Terrace Homes
3000 Augusta St 3000 Augusta St Attn:Roger Jump
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 3000 Augusta St
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859
COMPLETE REPORT❑ LIMITED REPORT.® SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT O REINSPECTION REPORT❑
General Description: Inspection Tag Posted:
Two story,apartment buildings,occupied,furnished,slab foundations. Utility Closet
Other Tags Posted:
An Inspection has.been made of the stricture(s)shown on the diagram in accordance with the Struchrral Pest Control Act.Detached porches,detached steps,
detached decks and my other structures not on the diagram were not inspected.
Subterranean Termites® Drywood Termites® Fungus/Dryrot® Other Findings❑ Further Inspection❑
If any of the above home aro checked,tt Indicates that ftrere were visible problems In accessible areae.Read the report for details on checked items.
Ker, 1=Subterranean Termiles 2=Drywood Termites 3=FunguarDirvirot 4=Other FMIngs 5=Unknown Further Inspection
`:•?:::''•:'t'::���r: :�:�>�:> <��:�::':;�;:;:;:?::tri: :22:
2N7Atf18 EE; }: J: }$:'.•:ty;:ist::::•:•:::::::y?i {{_::i; is};:;
BUILDING ;:;: ;: ;:2 :;:r `:: !/
94 •::'i::.:
1
:•: •::'.::'�:.•:•:',
I
>A
%�j/'7 ZAQk1719
Y
- L[./-�Ll � lig:�>:':':�'•'�•'��}i: :"r:':;:;iso::?;:�'ti;•::� ;���:�::�t�: :`�:•::::.
se
#8
IV
�:t`:BUILD:•:::
t-X:N:::<: .. ....................
............
.:::::.......
... • :::::.�:.:� t
;:;: :
Diagram Not IQ Scale
Inspected By: Chad Dabbs License No.: FR39989 Signature: iJi/.��
Y.au are enticed o obtain espies of alireports and conrple9on not(cea on this property reported to die Structural Pest Control Seem during the preceding two years. To.obtain -
caliIesbontact Situbtural Pest Contiof-Board•1418 Howe Avenue.Suite 18,Socar,ame•CafiforMa•9Sa25.32o4. _ -
. NOTE:Questions or problems conceming the above report should b"irected to fhemanager of the company. Unresolved questions or problems with services
'performed May to directed to the stnstraal Pest Control Board an(916)561-0708;(800)737-8198 or www.ecslbosrd w.aov. 43M41(REV.10/01) •/I .
s
Anacnment 5
WOOD DESTROI 3 PESTS AND ORGANISMS INSPL .'ION REPORT
Bukdmg No. Street Clry Zip Data or Impaction Number of Pages
3000 Augusta St San Luis Obispo 93401-5859 tQ(Z Q 8
Clark Pest Control A LICENSED PEST CONTROL
ism OPERATOR IS AN EXPERT IN
2315 Meredith Lane, Suite M HS/HER EEL ANQUESTIONS
TO THIS RT
�1��.M Santa Maria, CA, 93455-1144 SHOULD BE REFERRED To
Tel 866-441-8793 Fax 805-739-2554 HIM/HER.
Registration#:PR226 Report#:18-14339
Ordered by: Property Owner and/or Party of Interest Report sent to:
Judson Terrace Homes' Judson Terrace Homes Judson Terrace Homes
3000 Augusta St 3000 Augusta St Attn:Roger Jump
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 3000 Augusta St
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859
COMPLETE,REPORT❑ UMrrEDREPO RTS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT El REINSPECTION REPORT❑
General Description Inspection Tag Posted:
Two story,apartment buildings,occupied,furnished,slab foundations. Utility Closet
Other Tags Posted:
Inspection has been made of the structure(s)shown on the diagram in accordance with the Structural Pest Control Act.Detached porches.detached steps,
etached decks and any other structures not on the diagram were not frigpected.
Subterranean Termites® :Drywood Terrrdtes® Fungua(Dryrot® Other Findings❑ Further Inspection❑
U any of the above boxes are checked,It Indicates that there mere visible Problems In aeoassible areas.Read the report for details on ehecimd Items.
KLy, 1=Subterranean Termites ' :2 a Orywood Termiss 3=Fu ret 4=Other Findincis 5=Unknown Fuhrer Insbectbion
2AFZA 111M
::: ... .;2AAA.11213
p^�T BUILDING ,
2[At2A.M26 2Al2A.1126
2MA.1128 2AM&Ir2B 2AM&II28:.2Af2A.1126
r __
•'`•` BUILDiN
Xvix
G
W .
TVG i
#a
r2?: ::: •:::.�•`4,;;:'�;:;•::.; ;:. zAr2il.tr .::>: :>::;:>..:< >:•:i..; :: : ::
JA
Diagram Not To Scale
Inspected By Chad Dabbs License No.: _ FR39989 Signature: 'K `
You are entitled to obtain,00ples of aft reports and completion notices on this property reported to the Structural Pest control Board during the preceding two years. To obtain '
COpfeS COmaet Structural Pest Control Board.1418 Howe Avenue.Suite 18,Sacramemck California,95825.3204. _
(VOTE:Questions or problems concerning the above report should be directed tote manager ofthe company. Unresolved puesbons or problems wbh services j
performed maybe directed to this Structural Pest Control Board at(918)581.8708,(Boo)737-8188 or www.gV=mrd.Ce.00Y. 43M•41(REV.10/91) -
�.�l-fig
Attachment
WOOD DESTROY, 4 PESTS AND ORGANISMS INSPE ION REPORT
Bulldnp W. Street City Zip Date of Inspection I Number of Pages '
3000 Augusta St San Luis Obispo 93401-5859 +0 Z 9 8
Clark Pest Control A LICENSED AN CONTROL
AN
OPERATOR IS EXPERT IN
■2315 Meredith Lane, Suite M H[S/I-IER FIELD. ANY QUESTIONS
Santa Maria CA, 83455-1144 RELATIVE TO THIS REPORT ;
192SPESTCONFROL r SHOULD BE REFERRED TO
Tel 866-4414793 Fax 805.739-2554 mMMER•
Registration#:PR226 Report#:18-14339
Ordered by: Prop"Owner and/or Party of Interest epos sent to:
Judson Terrace Homes' Judson Terrace Homes Judson Terrace Homes
3000 Augusta St 3000 Augusta St Attn:Roger Jump
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859 3000 Augusta St
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5859
COMPLETE REPORT El LIMITED REPORT 19 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT❑ REINSPECTION REPORT❑
General Description: Inspection Tag Posted:
Two story,apartment buildings,occupied,fumished,slab foundations. Utility Closet
Other Tags Posted:
inspection has'bt en made of the struoYure(s)shown on the diagram in accordance with the Structural Pest Control Act.Detached parches,detached steps,
detached decks and any other structures not on the diagram were not Inspected.
Subterranean Termites® Drywood Termites® Fungus/Dryrot® Other Findings❑ Further Inspection❑
a or the above boxes aro checked,H Indicates@tat them were visible robleaq In aecessibte areas.Read the for detaRs on checked items.
1=Subterranean Termites 2=D mm mmTerrnrnmites 3 FurrilUSETY10t 4=Other Fridintis 5=Unlaoown Further InsDection
f>
udlo�.
BWidin
9 2: i A11
L/
II:. . . ::::1C
•::::• : ... :.....:•- YAfLU
. 3c m
b1rLl 1A / anaaaa
39
:::i:,'::3::::i:: ::::::: :: :;:;:;: ::•:;•Dining Hall
F}'['}'••i}ii`:::'•:{t};t}j
WAG :;{:;•j BEI _
f ::::.;;::._ _3l
Diagram Not To Scale /
Inspected By, Chad Dabbs License No.: FR39989 . signature: �L
-. "You are enOtled to.obtaln espies of all reports and completion notices an this property reported to the Structural Pest Control Board during the preceding two years. To obtain
capies'oontact Stnxluial Pest Control Board,1418 Howe Avenue.Suite 18,Sacramento,California,95825:U04.
NOTE:puestioos or problems concerning the above report should be directed to the manager of the company. Unresolved questions or problems with services
parf&mod may be directed to the Structural Post Control Board at(916)561-8708.(800)737-0188 or www.eestboard.ea goy 43M-41(REV.1Wl) _
PA( -�
- - Attachment 5
WOOD DESTROY, i PESTS AND R ANISMIJ INSPE ,ION R PO T
r3"
No: Zip care of irm,ecuon
00 Augusta St San Luis Obispo 93401-5859 10/22/07
Disclaimer
UNINSPECTED AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT PER 8516(b)(8): Except as noted below we did not inspect detached
structures or decks. We did not inspect any wood member that was covered by insulation, plaster, paint, stucco, tile or any other
material.We did not Inspect wood members hidden by floor covering,chattels,or furniture.We did not Inspect the interior of hollow
walls, or the spaces between a ceiling or soffit below. Conditions conducive to an infestation or infection by wood destroying
organisms could exist in any, uninspected area. This report expresses no opinion regarding the condition of uninspected areas.
Although it appears to be.not practicable to open these areas for inspection, Clark Pest Control will inspect any of them at your
direction and additional expense.We do not have the expertise to inspect for building code violations or the quality of work completed
by others.We recommend that you contact a licensed engineer for opinions beyond the scope of our license.Structural Pest Control
Board Rules& Regulations prohibit destructive testing of wood members without prior authorization by the owner. Any wood which
was suspected to be or was found to be infested or infected was tested within the limits of S.P.C.B. Rules and Regulations.This
process involves sounding the wood and in some cases a limited brashness test In the opinion of this inspector all the wood
members appear to be performing the structural function for which they were designed except as listed in any findings below. If
further information regarding the structural integrity of any wood members Is desired you are advised to contact a licensed structural
engineer.
For information as to the condition of electrical systems,plumbing,and appliances(including leaks),we recommend that you employ
a home inspection.service. THE EXTERIOR OF THE ROOF COVERING WAS NOT INSPECTED. IF YOU WANT THE WATER
TIGHTNESS OF THE ROOF.DETERMINED,YOU SHOULD CONTACT A ROOFING CONTRACTOR WHO IS LICENSED BY THE
CONTRACTOR'STATE LICENSE BOARD.
t
i
THERE MAY BE HEALTH-RELATED ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE FINDINGS REFLECTED iN THIS REPORT.WE ARE NOT
QUALIFIED TO AND DO NOT RENDER AN OPINION CONCERNING ANY SUCH HEALTH ISSUES. THE INSPECTION
REFLECTED BY THIS REPORT WAS LIMITED TO THE VISIBLE AND ACCESSIBLE AREAS ONLY.QUESTIONS CONCERNING
HEALTH RELATED ISSUES, WHICH MAYBE ASSOCIATED WITH FINDINGS OR RECOMMENDATIONS REFLECTED IN THIS
REPORT, THE PRESENCE OF MOLD, THE RELEASE OF MOLD SPORES OR CONCERNING THE INDOOR AIR QUALITY
SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO A CERTIFIED INDUSTRIAL HYGIENIST.
This company will reinspect repairs done by others within four months of the original inspection.A charge,if any, can be no greater
.than the original inspecction.fee for each reinspection. The reinspection must be done within ten (10)working days of request.The
reinspection is a visual inspection and if inspection of concealed areas is desired, Inspection of work in progress will be necessary.
Any guarantees must be received from parties performing repairs. This bid is based on what is visible and accessible today
10/22!2007. If the crewperson(operator)finds more damage a supplemental report and a new bid will be given.
Unless specified in writing,Clark Pest Control warrants from the day of completion all work for a period of 1 year with the exception of
plumbing repairs, which have a 30 day warranty. Nothing in this report is intended to certify, approve or warranty corrective work
performed by persons not employed by Clark Pest Control.We did not supervise the work,unless noted in a prior reinspection report
We did not.inspect the_adjacent areas exposed when the work was in progress, nor were we requested to provide interim
inspections.Any person Involved in the purchase or sale of the real property which is the subject of this report is advised to directly
contact the licensed contractor or individual who completed the work, to determine the nature and extent of any corrective work
performed. You are.further advised to obtain copies of any required building permits prior to the transfer of bile on the above
structure.
This Is a limited inspection and report at the request of Roger Jump.This report is limited to the following portions of the structure:
exteriors. To determine the full extent of infestation or infection, we recommend a complete inspection of the structure. This bid is
based on.what is visible and accessible today 10122/2007. If the crewperson(operator)finds more damage a supplemental report will
be issued. Upon a full inspection being completed,the house may qualify for our yearly Term-Alert warranty program.
Description of Findings
SUBTERRANEAN TERMITES
NOTE: Painting not Included(one coat of primer paint only).Owner is advised to keep these areas
well sealed and painted to avoid future problems.
Finding: 1A Subterranean termites are tubing out of the soil at the exterior foundation and
interior wall of Building 1,3,and the dining hall
Recommendation: Scrape down the accessible tubes. To prevent termites from reconstructing
mud tubes between the soil and the substructure. wood members, apply
Termidor SC to the soil at Building 1, 3, and the dining hall. Treatment to be
applied by our State licensed applicator per.current label instructions. Post a
completion tag listing the materials tis'd This.structure may qualify for our
exclusive Term-AlertTM warranty service atter the-one(1)year warranty expires.
Contact Clark Pest Control at 1-800 WE NEED YOU.
Finding: 1B There are subterranean termite damaged wood members at the trim. Pli I,
5
Attachment 5
. , Recommendation: remove and replace the damaged wood n, .uers. Inspect adjacent wood
members.List any additional findings,recommendations and additional charges in a
supplemental report
Finding: 1C The owner has requested proactive subterranean termite treatment for Buildings 2,
4,5,6,7,6,9, 10, 11 and office.
Recommendation: To prevent termites from constructing mud tubes between the soil and the
substructure wood members, apply Termidor SC to the soil in accordance with
current label instructions. Post a completion tag listing the materials used.
Treatment to be applied by our State licensed applicator per current label
instructions.As an additional quality control measure, Clark Pest Control will with
your authorization, install Term-AIertTM Interceptors adjacent to the foundation and
at prime foraging areas. For one full year we will monitor and service the Term-
Alert7m Interceptor sites a minimum of four times during the year. If foraging
subterranean termites sneak past the Interceptors and attack the structure, Clark
will treat the infestation at no additional cost It is understood that the Term-AlertTM
Interceptors are the property of Clark Pest Control and may be removed atter one
year. "Consumer Advisory: Be sure your termite company has explained their
obligations as to frequency of inspections, system performance and warranties, if
any, before you sign the contract" A separate agreement is attached for this j
recommendation.
DRYWOOD TERMITES
NOTE: Painting not included(one coat of primer paint only).Owner is advised to keep these areas
well sealed and painted to avoid future problems.
The owner is to contact a licensed roofer to inspect and repair the damaged roof covering
incurred by the repairs.
The owner is to contact a licensed roofer to inspect and repair the damaged roof covering
incurred by the repairs.
Finding: 2A Drywood termites are infesting the structure at the deck, handrail and exterior
wail,trim,eaves and patio cover as indicated on the diagrams.
Recommendation: Seal the entire structure and fumigate it with Vikane.Use Chloropicrin(tear gas)
as a warning agent.The structure must be vacated and aired out for a minimum
of 6 hours after tarps are removed, depending on weather conditions and
temperature. Remove or mask any visible fecal pellets. Occupants must sign
the "Occupants Fumigation Notice" and comply with all instructions. Owners
and occupants must receive and sign copies of the CaIEPA Department of
Pesticide Regulation Fact Sheet regarding Vikane. WE WILL RETURN IN
APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR TO INSPECT THE STRUCTURE UPON
OWNERS REQUEST. IF WE FIND EVIDENCE OF REINFESTATION, WE
WILL RETREAT THE AREA AT NO ADDITIONAL COST.AFTER ONE YEAR,
THE STRUCTURE MAY BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR OUR PROACTIVE
TERMALERT TM PROTECTION PROGRAM.
Finding: 2A.1 Drywood termites are infesting the structure at the deck, handrail and exterior wail,
trim,eaves and patio cover as indicated on the diagrams.
Recommendation. At the request of Roger Jump, we have been instructed to suggest a secondary
substandard treatment. Local treatment is not intended to be an entire structure
treatment method. If infestations of wood-destroying pests extend or exist beyond
the area(s) of local treatment, they may not be exterminated. SECONDARY,
SUBSTANDARD RECOMMENDATION: We strongly recommend fumigation to
eliminate all possible drywood termite infestations throughout the structure. As a
secondary, substandard recommendation (without warranty), drilling a series of
holes in and adjacent to the visible active infestation, inject Ternidor SC at 20 p.s.I.
into the infested wood and adjacent members.This method will not eradicate other
undetected Infestations. Any structural repairs, or restoration costs caused by
completing this recommendation will be completed only at owner's direction and at
additional cost. Limited chemical treatment may force termites to relocate to an
untreated area from which they may reinfest the treated area.
Note:
At the request of Roger Jump,Clark Pest Controls exclusive proactive Term-AIertTM
Interceptors were installed adjacent to the foundation($1000.00 Installation Cost).
For one full year, Clark Pest Control will service the Tern-AlertTM Interceptors. We
will service the Interceptor sites a minimum of four times during the year to be billed
at$450.00 quarterly; If foraging subterranean termites sneak past the Interceptors
and attack the structure;Clark will treat the infestation at no additional cost. It is
understood that the Temt-AlertTM Interceptors are the property of Clark Pest Control
and may be removed upon contract expiration. "Consumer Advisory: Be sure your
termite company has explained their obligations as to frequency of inspections,
Attachment 5
.ystem performance and warranties, If any, 1.__.,re you sign the contract." A
separate agreement is attached for this recommendation.
Finding: 213 There are drywood termite damaged wood members at the deck,fascia, wood trim
and patio cover.
Recommendation: Remove and replace the damaged wood members. Inspect adjacent wood
members.list any additional findings,recommendations and additional charges in a
supplemental report.
FUNGUS/DRYROT
NOTE: Painting not included(one coat of primer paint only).Owner is advised to keep these areas
well sealed and painted to avoid future problems.
The owner is to contact a licensed roofer to inspect and repair the damaged roof covering
incurred by the repairs.
Finding: 3A Wood decay fungi is infecting and damaging the trim and handrail.
Recommendation: Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members. A supplemental
report will be issued with any additional findings, recommendation and
additional charges.To arrest fungi and extend the useful life of the wood, treat
the infected wood and adjacent members with Bora Care.This treatment should
arrest the decay fungi. To maintain the effectiveness of this treatment the
homeowner must maintain this area in a dry condition.Treatment to be applied
by our state licensed applicator per Structural Pest Control Board regulations.
Owner is advised to have this area periodically inspected.
Finding: 38 Wood decay fungi is infecting and damaging the doors as indicated on the
diagrams.
Recommendation: Install a new door utilizing existing hardware.Painting not included.
Finding: 3C Wood decay fungi is infecting and damaging the beam.
Recommendation: Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members. A supplemental report
will be Issued with arty additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.
To arrest fungi and extend the useful life of the wood, treat the infected wood and
adjacent members with Bora Care.This treatment should arrest the decay fungi.To
maintain the effectiveness of this treatment the homeowner must maintain this area
In a dry condition. Treatment to be applied by our state licensed applicator per
Structural Pest Control Board regulations. Owner is advised to have this area
periodically inspected.
Finding: 3D Wood decay fungi Is infecting and damaging the deck framing.
Recommendation: Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members. A supplemental report
will be issued with any additional findings, recommendation and additional charges.
To arrest fungi and extend the useful life of the wood,treat the infected wood and
adjacent members with Bora Care.This treatment should arrest the decay fungi.To
maintain the effectiveness of this treatment the homeowner must maintain this area
in a dry condition. Treatment to be applied by our state licensed applicator per
Structural Pest Control Board regulations. Owner is advised to have this area
periodically inspected.
Finding: 3E Wood decay fungi is Infecting and damaging the support post_
Recommendation: Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members. A supplemental report
will be issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.
To arrest fungi and extend the useful life of the wood,treat the infected wood and
adjacent members with Bora Care.This treatment should arrest the decay fungi.To
maintain the effectiveness of this treatment the homeowner must maintain this area
in a dry condition. Treatment to be applied by our state licensed applicator per
Structural Pest Control Board regulations. Owner is advised to have this area
periodically inspected.
Finding: 3F Wood decay fungi is infecting and damaging the patio cover.
Recommendation: Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members. A supplemental report
will be issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.
To arrest fungi and extend the useful life of the wood, treat the infected wood and
adjacent members with Bora Care.This treatment should arrest the decay fungi.To
maintain the effectiveness of this treatment the homeowner must maintain this area
in a dry condition. Treatment to be applied by our state licensed applicator per
Structural Pest Control Board regulations. Owner Is advised to have this area PN ' S -
Attachment 5
ariodically inspected. �1
Finding: 3G Wood decay fungi is infecting and damaging the eave framing.
Recommendation: Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members. A supplemental report
will be issued with any additional findings, recommendation and additional charges.
To arrest fungi and extend the useful fife of the wood, treat the infected wood and
adjacent members with Bore Care.This treatment should arrest the decay fungi.To
maintain the effectiveness of this treatment the homeowner must maintain this area
in a dry condition. Treatment to be applied by our state licensed applicator per
Structural Pest Control Board regulations. Owner is advised to have this area
periodically inspected.
Thank you for calling Clark Pest Control;we sincerely appreciate your business.If you have any questions regarding this report,
please contact our office and ask for Chad Dabbs.(dr)
J
Attachment .5
NOTICE:REPORTS ON THIS STRUCTURE PREPARE !VARIOUS COMPANIES SHOULD LIST THE SAME F. .SGS(i.e.TERMITE INFESTATIONS, TERMITE
DAMAGE,FUNGUS DAMAGE,etc.).HOWEVER,RECOMMENDATIONS TO CORRECT THESE FINDINGS MAY VARY FROM COMPANY TO COMPANY.YOU HAVE A
RIGHT TO SEEK A SECOND OPINION FROM ANOTHER COMPANY.
,NOTICE: THE CHARGE FOR SERVICE THAT THIS COMPANY SUBCONTRACTS TO ANOTHER REGISTERED COMPANY MAY INCLUDE THE CCMPANY'S
CHARGES FOR ARRANGING AND ADMINISTERING SUCH SERVICES THAT ARE IN ADDITION TO THE DIRECT COSTS AS90CIATED WITH PAYING THE
SUBCONTRACTOR,YOU MAY ACCEPT CLARK PEST CONTROLS BID OR YOU MAY CONTRACT DIRECTLY WITH ANOTHER REGISTERED COMPANY LICENSED
TO PERFORM THE WORK. IF YOU CHOOSE TO CONTRACT DIRECTLY WITH ANOTHER REGISTERED COMPANY, CLARK PEST CONTROL WILL NOT BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ACT OR OMISSION IN THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK THAT YOU DIRECTLY CONTRACT WITH ANOTHER TO PERFORM.
Pesticides are the products Clark Pest Control uses to control the target pests listed in your agreement.Pesticides make a bather fife for an by helping control disease carriers
and wood destroying insects,thus protecting our health and property.When property used,pesticides pose no problems to humans or the environment Your Technician is a
State certified applicator whose knowledge Is constantly being upgraded through regularly scheduled training sessions. If you have any questions,please call us at our toll
free number.866-441-8793 or write to:Clark Pest Control,2315 Meredith Lane,Suite M,Santa Maria,CA,93455-1144.
State Law Requires That We Provide You With The Following Information:
PESTICIDE NOTICE(SECTION 8538)
CAUTION:PESTICIDES ARE TOXIC CHEMICALS.Structural Pest Control Operators are licensed and regulated by the Structural Pest Control Board,and apply pesticides
which am registered and approved for use by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Registration is
granted when the State finds that based on existing scientific evidence there are no appreciable risks if proper use conditions are followed or that the risks are outweighed by
the benefits.The degree of risk depends upon the degree of exposure,so exposure should be minimized.
PESTICIDES;AggresZor 75 WSP(Imidadoprid),Bora-Care(Disodlum Octaborate Tetrahydrate),Bodd(Orthoboric Acid(bodcacid)),Cy-hock C&C Pressurized Residual
(Cyfluthrbn)i CyKidk CS(Cyfluthrin),Cy-hick CS Pressurized C&C Residual(Cyquthrin),Demon TC(Cypermethrin),Dragnet SFR(Permethrin),Drione(Pyrethrins,Piperonyl
Butoxide;Technical, Amorprphous Silica Gel), EcoEXEMPT IC (2)(Rosemary OiIX FirstLine GT Plus Termite Bait Station (Sulfuramid), Firstune Termite Bait Station
(SufBummid); I Maxx Pro (imidadoprid), Impel Rods (Anhydrous Dhsodlum Octaborate), Maxfonte Carpenter Ant Bait Gel (Fipronil), Phantom (Chlorfenapyr), Prelude_
(Permattidn); Premise 0:5-SC (Imtdactopdd); Premise 2 0midactoprid), Premise 75 (Imidacloprid), Premise Foam (Imidacloprid), Premise Get (Imidadoprid), Premise
Granules (lmidaclopnd);,Premise.Pre=Construclion (Imidacloprid), Pro Foam Platinum (Sulfates Disodium Lauroampho Diacetate), ProCiba-DL (d-Urrronene), Shatter
(Hezatlumumn);Suspend SC(Deltamethrin),Termidor SC(Rpronfp,Timbor(Disedlum Octaborate Tetrahydrate)Clark Post Control will not apply any compound not
authorized for use In Cardornla.
If within 24 hours following an application you experience symptoms similar to common seasonal illness,comparable to the 8u,contact Clark Pest Control(866-441-87931
,your phy*jan,and/or your Poison Control Center.For the Poison Control Center,contact the following:(1-800-876-4766).
FURTHER INFORMATION:Contact any of the.following:Your pest control operator is Clark Pest Control,(866-441.8793);for Regulatory Intortnation call the Structural Pest
Control Board(916-561.5708),or write 1418 Howe Ave.,Suite 18,Sacramento,CA,95825-3204.For answers to your health questions,call the County Health Department
(see list below)and for application information,contact the County Agriculture Commissioner(see list below).
County Health Dept, Ac.Comm. Courtly Health Dept. Ag.Comm. County Health Dept, Aa.Comm.
.Alameda: (51 D)5675700 (510)670-5232 Marin: (415)499.6841 (415)4996700 Santa Clara: (408)885.4214 (408)916.4600
Alpha. (530)694-2146 (530)621-5520 Mariposa: (209)966.3689 (209)966-2075 Santa Cruz: (831)4644066 (831)763-8080
Amador. :(209)'223.6407 (209)223-6481 Mendocino: (707)4634134 (707)463-4208 Shasta: (530)225.5591 (530)224-0949
Butte: (530).538-7581 (530)538-7381 Merced: (209)385-7391 (209)385-7431 Sierra: (530)9935700 (530)283-6365
Calaveras: (209)754-6460.(209)754-6504 Monterey: (831)647-7654 (831)647-7629 Siskiyou: (530)841-4047 (530)841.4025
Colusa: (530)458-0380.(530)458-0580 Napa (707)253-4461 (707)253.4357 Solana: (707)421-6629 (707)421-7465
Contre.Costa (925)646-5225 (925)646-5250 Nevada: (530)285-1450 (530)273-2646 Sonoma: (707)555.4401 (707)565-2371
El Dorado: (530)6215100 (530)621-5520 Placer: (530)8897119 (530)889-7372 Stanislaus: (209)558.7774 (209)5254730
Fresno: *(559)'445-M7 (559)456-7510 Plumas (530)2835330 (530)283.5365 Butter: (530)822-7215 (530)822-7500
Glenn: (530)934-3588 (530)934-3501 Sacramento: (916)875-5981 (916)875.6603 Tehama: (530)52746824 (530)527-4504
Inyo: (760)878-0242 (760)873-7860 San Benito: (831)6375367 (831)637-5344 Trinity: (530)623-8209 (530)623-1356
Kem: (661)868-0301 (661)868-6300 San Francisco: (415)5542500 (415)285-5070 Tulare: (559)737-4660 (559)685-3323
King: (559)582-3211 (559)582-3211 San Joaquin: (209)468-3400 (209)468-3300 Tuolumne: (209)533.7400 (209)533-5691
Lake: (707)263-1090 (707)263-0217 San Luis Obispo: (805)781-5544 (805)7815910 Ventura: (805)6525916 (806)933-8415
Lassen: (530)251-8183 (530)251-8110 San Mateo: (650)573.2757 (650)3634700 Yolo: (530)666.8649 (530)666-8140
Madera: (559)675-7893 (559)675-7876 Santa Barbara: (805)6815102 (805)681-5600 Yuba: (530)741$366 (536)741.6484
Under the California Mechanics Lien Law any.structural pest control company which contracts to do work for you,any contractor,laborer,supplier or other person who helps
to improve your property,,but is not paid for his or her work or supplies,has a right to enforce a claim against your property.This means that after a court hearing your
property could be sold by a court officer and the proceeds of the sale used to satisfy the indebtedness.This can happen even if you have paid your structural pest control
company in fug if the subconbactor,laborers or suppliers remain unpaid.
To preserve their right to file a claim or lien against your property,certain claimants such as subcontractors or material suppliers am required to provide you with a document
entitled'Preliminary Notice".Prime contractors and laborers for wages do not have to provide this notice.A Preliminary Notice is not alien against your property.ICs purpose
Is to notify you of pamns who may have a right to file a lien against your property if they are not paid.
Clark Pest Control,License Number PR226
1
q s�
Attachment 5
^.'Clark Pest Control
2315 Meredith Lane, Suite M �
Santa Maria, CA, 93455-1144 _ q
COST BREAKDOWN
owner Judson Terrace Homes
Address of Property inspected: 3000 Augusta 8t
Inspection Date: 10/22/07 Report No.: 18-14339
Title Company&Escrow No.: # ..
Item No. Item
Inspection Fee $0.00
SUBTERRANEAN TERMITES
1A Scrape down the accessible tubes.To prevent termites from reconstructing mud tubes $3,250.00
between the soil and the substructure wood members,apply Termidor SC to the soil at
Building 1,3,and the dining hall.
IB Remove and replace the damaged wood members:Inspect adjacent wood members.List any $425.00
additional findings,recommendations and additional charges in a supplemental report.
1C To prevent termites from constructing mud tubes between the soil and the substructure wood $8,200.00
members,apply Temtidor SC to the soil
DRYWOOD TERMITES
2A Vikene Fumigation BID UPON REQUEST
2A.1 Local drill and treat for drywood termites.NO WARRANTY $4,500.00
2B Remove and replace the damaged wood members.Inspect adjacent wood members.List any $8,750.00
additional findings,recommendations and additional charges in a.supplementai report
FUNGUS/DRYROT
3A Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members.A supplemental report will be $1,575.00
issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.To arrest fungi
and extend the useful life of the wood,treat the infected wood and adjacent members with
Bora Care.
3B Install new doors utilizing existing hardware.Painting not included. $2,200.00
3C Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members.A supplemental report will be $1,175.00
issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.To arrest fungi
and extend the useful life of the wood,treat the infected wood and adjacent members with
Bora dare.
3D Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members.A supplemental report will be $7,500.00
issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.To arrest fungi
and extend the useful life of the wood,treat the infected wood and adjacent members with
Bora Care.
3E Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members.A supplemental report will be $750.00
issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.To arrest fungi
and extend the useful rife of the wood,treat the infected wood and adjacent members with
Bore Care.
3F Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members.A supplemental report will be $425.00
issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.To arrest fungi
and extend the useful rife of the wood,treat the'infected wood and adjacent members with
Bora Care.
3G Remove and replace the visibly damaged wood members.A supplemental report will be $575.00
issued with any additional findings,recommendation and additional charges.To arrest fungi
and extend the useful 6 ~.the wood,treat the infected wood and adjacent, ..nbers with Attachment 5
Bora Care.
TOTAL OF WORK TO BE COMPLETED BY CLARK PEST CONTROL
After ap,reoomrnendations have been completed,we warrant materials and workmanship for one year. in the event that only part of
the recommendations are completed by this tympany there maybe an increase in the cost of each item that we'do complete. This
proposal expiries'30 days from°the date of the original inspection.
:j
i
i
i
i
1
P14 1- 5
Map of Judson Terrace Homes,?"')Augusta St San Luis Obispo, CA by D` 'Quest Page 1 of 1
Attachment 5
MAPOWESTthe
Barry!When of pri t directly from the browser your lickingor rrmp may Doti print eoroeWy.Fur best resuha,try elktlrrg PrhderFriendly button.
Judson Terrace Homes
3000 Augusta St
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805)5441600
Sgonsord Links censored Links
Del Webb 3-Day Event Retirement Communities San Luis Obispo Rehab Guide to San Luis Ob1spQ
Experience the Del Webb Search SeniorOutlookcom® Highest Quality Treatment Free Visitor's Guide!
lifestyle -View For Drug Plan Your trip to San Luis
at our special event from Prices, Photos,Floorplans& 8 Alcohol Abuse.Call For Obispo
Oct 17-19 More Consult! www.VisitSLO.com
WWabbcom/5ale-Calcrado wxw.Seni rOullookmm www.PacHils.com :!
p��...(�., (rte r,yp�C• i � CIO _
Rounciftouse Wi�r/� ,� 1. \ oe•.._
V i„sa kcafts or . , yt ' `} ..eta
i \ ,Sprshe mer ?:0�t1[SOR '.�_+i
=7:. t t r
, QeStVie16'Or
czar
TanglewooQ tk
L Y _
Ile ,� al
MAPOVIEST 12
?ate :.Q�<q ®20W tkpGuesi,nc.Map oatn,O2008
All rights reserved.Use subject to LicenselCcpydght Map Legend
Directions and maps are informational only.We macre no warranties on the accuracy of their content,road conditions or
route usability or expeditiousness.You assume all risk of use.MapQuest and its suppliers shall not be Gable to you for
any Ices or delay resulting from your use of MapQuest Your use of MapQuest means you agree to our Terms.of Use
� ( a
httpJ/www.mapquest.com/maps?name=Judson+Terrace+Homes&city=San+Luis+Obisp... 10/14/2008
Attachment 6
RESOLUTION NO. (2009 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE 2009 CDBG PROGRAM AND REALLOCATING $74,659 OF
FUNDING FROM PREVIOUS CDBG PROGRAM YEARS
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a participating jurisdiction in the San Luis
Obispo Urban County, along with the cities of Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, Grover Beach, and
Paso Robles and the County of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, said cities and County cooperatively administer several federal grant
programs under the provisions of the Cooperative Agreement approved by the San Luis Obispo
City Council on July 13, 1999 and as amended on September 7, 1999, and under applicable U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Department(HUD)rules; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said agreement, the Urban County Public Participation Plan and
HUD rules, the City Council held a public hearing on March 3, 2009, to consider funding
recommendation by the Human Relations Commission (HRC), to review applications for federal
grant funding, and to consider public comments on community needs and the use of such funds;
and
WHEREAS, The Council has considered applications for Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds, public testimony, the Urban County's proposed One-Year Action
Plan, the HRC and staff recommendations included in the agenda report; and
WHEREAS, the Council has also considered previous years' CDBG funding allocations
and determined that amendments are necessary to re-allocate unused funds, or to re-allocate
funds from program administration activities to other eligible uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The Council hereby determines that the
proposed funding actions are not "projects" as defined by Section 21065 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), since they will not cause a direct or indirect physical change
in the environment and do not involve the issuance of a lease, permit, license, certificate or other
entitlement. Consequently,no further CEQA review is necessary.
SECTION 2. 2007 Community Development Block Grant Program. The City's 2009
Community Development Block Grant Program is hereby approved, as shown in Exhibit A. The
CAO is authorized to approve final dollar amounts once HUD releases allocations with the
direction to make up differences in the two amounts with funding for the 2009 Curb Ramp
project.
�1-f1-58
R
Attachment
Resolution No. (2009 Series) Attachment 6
Page 2
SECTION 3. Community Development Block Grant Program Amendments. The
2004,2005, 2006,2007 and 2008 CDBG Programs are hereby amended, as shown in Exhibit B.
SECTION 4. Board of Supervisors Consideration. The Council hereby forwards the
above actions to the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors for consideration prior to the
Board's final action on the Urban County's 2007 Consolidated Plan.
SECTION 6. City Manager Authority. The City Manager is authorized to act on
behalf of the City in executing grant agreements and other actions necessary to implement the
approved Consolidated Plan and CDBG Program, including minor revisions to funding amounts
for the 2009 CDBG Program if the City's actual CDBG allocation is different than expected.
Upon motion of , seconded by
and on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 3rd day of March, 2009.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Audrey Hooper
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jona>an� well
City Attorney
Hyl-S�
Attachment 6
CD 0a - o
a+ OO O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O OIli O O
O
t OMf MCT COD O V. CoN N
N 1 r 0
G r
O
� o Z
o
N
•
N
C
O
M I O 0000 O O C O w O 00 w
O
d Un0w 0o00 000 o O 00o w
0 r� to t0 O O O O O C tF •R O O O O O
CL O d r CA r O lf) Cn r O CO CO N O N CO O
CL E 3 O N N M N.
O COON O r -M
Q Q r r
c
C9rn
J9 c m om
o E o
om NY �, E y NUx
m CO 0 Q C O. O m � ' ' •C
d9 M ° 'O 7 E C13 «�+ C4 .� r
m CA C`4 m O .� CA M y
E CL 3 CM 3 e � Ca o c c c X o
CL > LO m0 v o o ° Q o N Ca m ° C d
vm c c Up o0 �� � c m
> a °' o CD c CL c y E M a E ECo
rno
01cn O N c N cc
y m x E o o a� E 4 y C c CMM K c
Q d m10 cc e c � m yg 2 Qaa 'Q c
o � p _mm ° v � � m = oc cyZN c
C •p r CV4 d CD ° .c O` CD4 d• •m .N C Cc � E
vi x — -° � E < — I N ° ° E a m
M@ m CL C C. d p Co c4 r O O '0 C4 `
0 e°'9 � a. y FmQQx Qcno ea = = QU c o
V a.
2
O Z w a. O Q V`
N E p w
y = 0) N 3 C_ O 'E
m 3 Q) Z m O 0) L w
v a U :. x E a C
c (D a a) 0 —0000 Q a o 02 a 2
CL Cn
O N o00c°nu000 � R o o -10
Q 300 o � Q QO = '�'� M 0 ._ � j a
CL LU W N x 2 SQaUU, U W a U UN Cn Q W
o � nn I '
d N M w CO OD w Owf r ° 1 o f.6o
Exhibit B
CDBG Reallocations
From/To Applicant Project Funding
From Transitions 2004—Completed Shelter Rehab $500
From City of SLO 2004—Completed Fire Station ADA $3,640
From Hotline 2-1-1 2006 — Capacity Study (project completed $8,600
without these CDBG funds)
From HomeBase 2006/2007—Homeless Services Planning $17,154
From City of SLO 2008—Imp. of Housing Element $10,297
From City of SLO 2008—CDBG Administration $34,468
Total From $749659
To City of SLO 2009—Santa Rosa Park ADA Restrooms $74,659
Total To $749659
Aft- 6�
Page 1 of 1
Council, SloCity
From: John Ewan Dewan@alteryourenergy.com] Sent: Mon 3/2/2009 10:37 AM
To: Council,SloCity
Cc:
Subject: CDBG funding
Attachments:
Dear Council People
Please follow the HRC recommendation to fund the Railroad Museum with CDBG moneys. The Railroad
Museum will play an essential role in revitalizing the Historic Railroad District. Revitalizing the business district
will generate tax revenue for the city, create jobs for residents, and keep purchasers of goods and services
from traveling out of town. As the museum installs exhibits and begins to be known it will increase tourism to
our area, giving tourist a reason to "spend another night' while they take in a larger variety of attractions.
Railroad museums are known for there ability to attract tourist and railroad buffs from throughout the country,
making this aspiration as a tourist destination a sure bet.
Please support the Museum and local business by funding the museum request as proposed by the HRC.
Thank you
John Ewan
John R. Ewan
Pacific Energy Company HAIUp COUNCIL 2'CDD DIR
= RED FILE �AeCH''Q6a 2'FIN DIR
2121 Santa Barbara St C'ABAOAW'trine.Z'FIRE CHIEF
— MEETING AGENDA O'�TORNEY DPW Din
San Luis Obispo — OCLERK/ORIG ErPOLICE CHF
DATE ITEi`3 rT 841 ❑ DEPT HEADS 12 REO Din
CA 93401 ZIUTIL dill
Tl2�Bun1� UHR DIE
Vc. 805-544-4700 Time-s .SNC(L.
Fx. 805-544-3411 C«RK
Hours 1".-30 M-F 11-4:00 Sat.Closed Sundays
RECEIVED
MAR 0 2 2009
SLO CITY CLERK
https://mail.slocity.org/exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/CDBG%20funding.EML?Cmd=open 3/2/2009
L
3/3/09
The City Manager's office received a voice mail message from Larry Brooks of Brooks
Woodcraft urging the Council to support the request for grant funds to the Railroad
Museum.
COUNCIL C'CDD DIR
kC�v/1tG2 CAIN DIR
RED FILE ! [r � O-
� e- FIRE CHIEF
g [ ' 1TORNEY LVPW DIR
MEET ii':G AGEF,,"r)A ^49 CLERK/ORIG 3"POLICE CHF
El pAT[---3J3 o f B 71!1 EPS HEADS L�'REC DIR
CTUTIL DIR
TlLtC3c� RHR DIR
n/G�.JT/piEs �Cot�wCfL