HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-08-2013 pc carterI RECEIVE D
Goodwin,Heather JAN 07 201 3
From:Grimes, Maev e
~ent :Monday, January 07, 2013 2 :28 P M
To :Goodwin, Heathe r
Subject:FW : Goal Setting Historical Dat a
Attachments :Council Goal Rankings Over Time .pdf; Community Priorities Over Time .pdf; City
Problems, Measure Y Surveys .pd f
Heather, please distribute for Community Forum .
Thank you .
maeve kenneey grime s
City Cler k
city of san Luis oslsp o
990 Palm Stree t
San Luis Obispo, CA 9340 1
phone : (805) 781-710 2
emAIL :mgrimes@slocity .org
From :Lichtig, Katie
Sent:Monday, January 07, 2013 2 :03 P M
"'To : Grimes, Maev e
Cc: Department Head s
Subject :FW : Goal Setting Historical Data
Maeve –
Please distribute this as part of the public correspondence for the Community Forum . Thanks .
Katie E . Lichti g
City Manage r
City of San Luis Obispo, C A
990 Palm Stree t
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-324 9
805-781-711 4
www .slocity .orq
From :Carter, Andre w
Sent:Wednesday, December 26, 2012 3 :56 P M
To :Lichtig, Katie
Subject:Goal Setting Historical Dat a
BCC to Council :
.You may find this historical data helpful as you get ready for goal setting .
Andrew Carter
SLO CITY CLERK
Council Member
City of San Luis Obisp o
•
•
2
•
•
2011 Goal Settin q
2009 Goal Settina Scorecar d
2007 Goal Setting Scorecar d
Issue
Economic Developmen t
Essential Serv/Fiscal Health
Neighborhood Wellnes s
Traffic Congestion Relie f
Open Space Preservatio n
Infrastructure Maintenance
Planning
Afford . Housin /Homele s
Damon-Garcia Field s
Climate Protectio n
Historic Preservation
Ashbau • h Car nter Carter Tota l
2 1
2 1
2 0
1 7
1 6
1 6
1 4
1 2
1 0
1 0
6
Marx Smith
Total 33 33 33 33 33 165
Majo r
Goals
Othe r
Goal s
As
Resource s
Permit
Issu e
Traffic congestio n
Balanced budget/fiscal healt h
Infrastructure maintenance
Economic develo . ment
LUE & Circulation Elemen t
Open space acquisition
Greenhouse gas reductio n
Downtown beautification
Historic preservation
Mid-Higuera flood control
Homeless program s
Street trees
Skate park
Total 40 39 40 40 40 19 9
Romero Settle Ashbaugh Marx Carter Tota l
23
23
22
20
1 6
1 5
1 5
1 4
12
Majo r
Goal s
Othe r
Goals
Address
as
Resource s
Permit
Meanin • of Scores
5 Most im 'orient
Tota l
24
23
22
22
2 1
1 7
1 6
1 6
1 6
1 5
Issue
Traffic congestio n
Police & Fire improvement s
Street pavin g
Flood contro l
Sr . Center im p rovement s
Roller rink
Downtown im•rovements
RR Safety Trai l
Homeless program s
Code enforcemen t
Open space acquisition
Affordable housing
New Police HQ
LUE & Circulation Element
Laguna Lake dredgin g
Underground utilities
Street tree s
Community partnership s
RR History Museu m
Ni•htsk ordinanc e
Total
Major
Goal s
Othe r
Goal s
Addres s
as
Resources
Permi t
Compiled by Andrew Carter Dec. 26, 2012 Page 1 of 2
2005 Goal Setting Scorecard
•Romero Settle Brown Mulholl . Ewan Total
Majo r
Goal s
Othe r
Goals
Addres s
as
Resource s
Permi t
•
Issue
Joint use facilitie s
Balanced budget/fiscal healt h
Infrastructure maintenanc e
Bicycle trail s
Downtown improvement s
Traffic congestio n
Open space acquistio n
Sales tax/TOT
Laguna Lake master plan
Adobes & RR museu m
Affordable housing
Neighborhood wellnes s
Broad Street cooridor a n
Upper Monterey St . parkin g
Nacimiento water suppl y
Street tree s
Gateway improvement s
Sr. Center improvements
Total
Meanin• of Score s
B Mostim•ortan t
Compiled by Andrew Carter Dec . 26, 2012 Page 2 of 2
•
Community Priorities — Utilities Survey
2005 2007 2009 2011 201 3
Item Rank Rank Rank Rank Ran k
Homeless issues ---13 14 15 1
Affordable housing 1 8 1 5
Infrastructure maintenance ------2 2
Street repair/neighborhood paving 3 1 1
Other infrastructure (sidewalks,5 6storm drains, etc .)
Fiscal health ---------6 3
Preservation of essential services ------3
Open space preservation 9 3 2 5 4
Traffic congestion relief 2 2 3 4 5
LOVR Overpass 7
Improve intersections/widen streets 10 1 1
Bikeway improvements 11 7 10 9 6
Neighborhood wellness 4 10 7 12 8
Downtown preservation 6 9 8 ---9
Economic development ---------7 1 0
Public safety 12 4 4
Senior services & facilities ---6 5
For/Against big box 5
Limit'control/stop growth 7 1 2
Library support 8
Parks & recreation 13 14 1 2
Long-term water supply 1 4
Transit improvements 15 15 1 3
Reduce salaries and benefits ---------1
Spending reductions ------9 8
Reduce positions ---------1 0
Reduce overtime ---1 1
Pension reform ------1 2
Eliminate/modify binding arbitration ------11 14
Note :The Community Priorities Survey is not a scientific survey
Compiled by Andrew Carter Dec. 26, 201 2
Problems Facing the City Measure Y Survey s
•
Serious/Somewhat Serious Not too serious/Not a problem
Item 2005 2006 2010 2011 2005 2006 2010 201 1
Affordable housing 93 86 79 6 10 1 5
Good paying jobs 82 82 77 14 12 1 9
Access to health care 63 34 46 32 51 52
Senior services 28 13 25 46 56 58
Recreation programs 20 29 16 67 64 78
Quality schools 34 30 27 51 51 5 8
Crime 27 32 19 71 68 7 9
Alcohol-related prob .57 59 60 39 40 3 7
Homelessness 70 75 70 25 24 2 9
Firefighter response 7 6 11 67 77 7 7
Police response NA 12 9 NA 76 7 6
Neighborhood quality NA 19 17 NA 80 8 2
Street repair 70 53 46 29 46 5 3
Traffic congestion 66 37 45 33 62 5 5
Storm drainage 35 33 18 57 66 7 7
Too much growth/devel .49 41 42 46 58 5 8
Loss of open space 44 38 33 52 60 6 5
State budget cuts 76 65 55 19 29 40
City waste/inefficiency 46 55 40 33 34 54
City taxes/fees 36 44 37 55 49 59
Item Ranking 2005 2006 2010 201 1
City waste/inefficiency Very serious 16 26 1 6
Somewht serious 30 29 2 4
Subtotal 46 55 4 0
Not too serious 21 22 3 3
Not a problem 12 12 2 1
Subtotal 33 34 5 4
DK/NA 20 11 7
Item Ranking 2005 2006 2010 201 1
City taxes/fees Very serious 11 20 1 5
Somewht serious 25 24 22
Subtotal 36 44 3 7
Not too serious 28 26 33
Not a problem 27 23 2 6
Subtotal 55 49 5 9
DK/NA 8 8 3
Most Serious Problem 2005 2006 2010 201 1
Affordable housing 39 1 4
Growth 18 9
Traffic congestion 9 9
Economy 8
Jobs 3 7
Government waste 6
Neighborhood quality 6
Other (4% or less)25 1 9
Don't know 9 9
Nothing 1 3
Compiled by Andrew Carter Dec. 26 201 2