HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/04/1990, C-13 - COST RECOVERY PROGRAM FOR SECOND RESPONSES TO NOISE DISTURBANCES. �����II►II►�I�NIIIIIIIIII�IIIIII "J r 4 MEETING91440
I►���►►� ci o san lugs og�spo
WMarmeCOUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBEF:/�
�16
FROM: James M. Gardiner, Chief of Police�V"'
SUBJECT: Cost recovery program for second responses to
noise disturbances.
CAO ION:
Give final passage to Ordinance No. 1163 implementing a cost
recovery program for second responses of police personnel to
noise disturbances.
DISCUSSION:
On March 6, 1990 the Council passed to print Ordinance No. 1163
establishing a cost recovery ordinance for second response by
police personnel to noise disturbances. While enforcement of the
noise ordinances and other applicable violations are actively
pursued, the Department believes that the person responsible for
creating this disruption of the public peace and second response
should bear the costs of these police services. These services
and associated costs are above and beyond those normally
provided. This ordinance is designed to defray costs associated
with multiple responses to noise disturbances, and will also
serve as an effective deterrent after a first response to a
disturbance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A number of agencies who have adopted similar ordinances have
seen reductions of over 50% in the number of repeat responses.
This ordinance will provide . for a written warning to be given to
the person responsible for the disturbance at the time of the
initial police response. In the event this person is a minor,
the parents or guardians of the minor will be the responsible
person. Cost recovery would apply to a second response within a
twenty four hour period. These persons will be liable for the
City's costs of personnel and equipment up to a maximum of
$500.00 for each subsequent response. There will be no charge
assessed for cost recovery for the initial response and warning.
Regardless of the ordinance, the City may separately pursue
compensation for any injury to police personnel or damage to City
equipment. The cost recovery program would be administered in
the Department similar to the current program for persons
arrested for driving under the influence.
I\_
MAR 2 3 1990
1 aTv CLERK 3
SAN LUIS OBISP C
���H��>III►IullHlll�l► IIN�N city of San tuts OBlspo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
ALTERNATIVE:
1. The Council could choose not to adopt this ordinance. The
Department would continue to respond to calls and take
appropriate enforcement action under existing ordinances and
state law. We would not be able to charge back for these
second response police services.
CONCURRENCES:
C
OHN DUNN
ISTRATIVE OFFICER
We 5 19
0 EN
I A
BILL TLER i
FINANCE DIRECTOR
1. Ordinance
I
2 -/3 -
ORDINANCE NO. 1163 (1990. Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADDING CHAPTER 9.21, SECTIONS 9. 21. 010 THROUGH 9. 21. 050
TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING
TO CHARGES FOR POLICE SERVICES
WHEREAS, City Council finds that the. control of large parties,
gatherings or assemblages ("the events") on private property is
necessary when such events are determined to be a threat to the
public peace, health, safety or general welfare; and
WHEREAS, police department personnel are frequently required
to make subsequent responses to the location of events in order to
maintain the public peace, health, safety and general welfare; and
WHEREAS, the return of police department personnel to a
location constitutes a drain on personnel and resources;.
WHEREAS, the above situation may create a. hazard to the safety
of police department personnel and to the general public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 9 .21, Sections 9.21. 010 through 9. 21. 050,
is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to read as
follows:
Chapter 9.21 Second Response Cost Recovery
Section 9.21. 010 Issuance. of Written Warning.
When a police officer determines that a party, gathering, or
assemblage ("the event") is a threat to the public peace, health,
safety or general welfare, the police officer shall issue a written
warning to the person responsible for control of the location of
the event and/or the person responsible for the event, or if either
01163
Ordinance No. 1163 (1990 Series)
Page Two
of those persons is a minor, the parents or guardians of that
minor.
Section 9.21.020 Content of Warning.
The written warning shall state that if police department
personnel are required to return to the location of the event
within the following twenty four hour period and the responding
personnel determine that the subsequent event is a threat to the
public peace, health, safety or general welfare, each such response
shall constitute the provision of special security services. The.
warning shall state that the person receiving the warning shall be
charged for the cost of the City providing such special security
services for the event.
Section 9. 21. 030 Costs for Special Security Services.
The costs of providing these special security services shall
include but not be limited to all direct and indirect costs
attributable to the subsequent response to the event.
Section 9.21. 040 Collection of Costs.
The collection costs for these special security services shall.
not be in excess of five hundred dollars for each subsequent
response. The City shall have the option to pursue any other legal
remedies for recovery when such costs exceed five hundred dollars
per response.
Section 9 .21. 050 Debt Owed to City.
The amount of such costs charged shall be deemed a debt to the
City of the person or persons responsible for use of the special
Ordinance No. 1163 (1990 Series)
Page Three
security services and, if minors, their parents or guardians. Any
person required to pay such costs shall be liable in an action
brought in the name of the City for recovery of such costs,
including reasonable attorneys' fees.
SECTION 2 . This ordinance, approved by the City attorney,
together with the ayes and noes, shall be published at least three
(3) days prior to its final passage in the Telegram-Tribune, a
newspaper published and circulated in said City, and the same shall
go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its said
final passage.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo at the meeting held on the 6th day of March
1990.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by
Councilman Reiss and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss , Pinard, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None dwnp�
ayor Ron Dunin
ATTE
.()
Pam Voges, Cit Clerk
Ordinance No. 1163 (1990 Series)
Page Four
1
APPROVED:
City dministrative Officer
�L
At or y
jP0lice 'ef
Director of Finance