HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/04/1990, C-6 (B) - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR AN UMTA SECTION 18 DISCRETIONARY GRANT TO PURCHASE TWO �ul,�{I - - MEETING DATE:
II
��u11ill1uj city of san Luis oBispo 9- -gro
48)
WRIMN COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT ITEM NUMBER /
FROM: Ren Hampian, Assistant City Ad#nistrative Officer
Prepared by: Harry Watson, Transit Manager
SUBJECT: A Resolution authorizing the Application for an UMTA
Section 18 Discretionary Grant to purchase two transit coaches.
CAO RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution authorizing staff to apply
for a new UMTA Section 18 Discretionary Grant to purchase two
transit coaches.
DISCUSSION:
Background
Three of our existing six bus fleet were purchased in 1982 as used
equipment, using UMTA funds. The expected useful life of a Transit
vehicle is 10 years. One bus that .we use for the Cal Poly tandem
is a 13 year old vehicle that we lease from Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
at a cost of $1,150.00 per month.. This grant application is to
fund the replacement of our leased bus and provide for one
additional bus.
The future, starting next year is questionable as to the
availability of grants to assist transit operators. At this time
the funding of the entire Urban Mass Transit Act is the subject of
discussion in Congress. The current funding cycle that this grant
application would fall into was funded through a previous budget .
authorization. It is a matter of speculation as to whether any
future UMTA grants will be available to both large and small
transit operators. For this very reason, it is timely that we make
application at this time for any discretionary funds that might be
available in the current cycle of UMTA funding. Discretionary
grant applications are awarded by CalTrans based on the percentage
of Transportation Development Act, monies that each applicant uses
in providing its public transit. After that criteria has been met,
the grant applications become a competition based on perceived
need, the amount of service offered, and the level of match.
The percentage of matching funds that a .local agency is willing to
participate with in the grant process is weighed heavily. The
percentage of match is the equivalent of a self-help county when
looking for highway dollars. Recent history has shown that a 25%
match is the minimal amount to be considered in the grant
application process with those participating at a higher percentage
being rated above those who do not.
CalTrans has moved the deadline for Discretionary Grants up by
several months to the end of September. The due date has
traditionally been in mid-December.
C:'fi
QN111111ifX1111 city or San tui s OBISPO
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Two
SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS:
The availability of new, reliable equipment would relieve the City
from the burden of the monthly lease costs that we currently pay
to Laidlaw Transit, Inc. for the use of the tandem bus. This
tandem bus is necessary to transport the peak ridership of the Cal
Poly student population currently using this system.
The existing four routes that San Luis Obispo Transit operates is
the same basic system that has been in operation for the past 7
years. With the growth of the City in the past 7 years, it is an
ongoing and compounding problem to attempt to stay on schedule with
our four routes as they are laid out today. Lack of adhering to
schedule has been the number one complaint voiced by the public to
the Mass Transit Committee and the numbers of complaints are
growing. Overshadowing the complaints are the numbers of people
who no longer use the system due to our consistently running late.
The addition of one unit to our rolling stock would give us the
option to restructure our routing schedule, and to once again be
able to maintain headways that could be relied on by the transit-
using public.
CONCURRENCES:
A first step in any UMTA grant application process is to have the
proposed project spelled out in the PROGRAM OF PROJECTS as
formulated by the local transportation fund. In San Luis Obispo's
case this is administered by the San Luis Obispo Coordinating
Council. Attached to this Agenda item is a letter of intent
submitted by the San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council,
spelling out its intent to include our grant application in its
program of projects for fiscal year 1990-91.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
The amount of the grant application for the purchase of two 3511 ,
lift equipped, kneeling transit coaches is in the amount of
$340,000. To be considered in the grant application process, San
Luis Obispo should be willing to participate at a minimum rate of
26%. SLO's contribution from its Transportation Development Act
(TDA) Enterprise Fund would have to be increased by $88,400.00,
which is 26% of the grant amount. The match would be necessary
during the last quarter of Fiscal Year 1990-91 or the first quarter
of Fiscal Year 1991-92, depending on the manufacturers delivery
period.
�-G •e2
d,����u��►IIIII�II�� ►��I�U city of san Luis osispo
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Council Agenda Report
Page Three
Sufficient funds exist in the 1989-91 Transit Fund, fund balance,
end of year projection which is $201,900.00.
If we are successful with the grant application, we would be able
to effect a savings annually in the amount of $13,800, which is
what we are currently spending to lease the one tandem bus from
Laidlaw Transit, Inc. Over the ten year expected life of the bus,
that would amount to a savings of $138,000.
FINAL APPLICATION:
The grant application, when completed, will be available for review
in the City Clerk's office. Given the accelerated application
deadline, however, the application will not be completed until the
first or second week in September. . Through this staff report,
staff is requesting authorization to pursue grant funding so that
the application can be submitted as soon as possible after
completion.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Do not submit the application. The city will continue to
lease the transit coach from the contractor as we do now. No
adjustment of current routing would be considered to rectify
our running late as we are now.
2. Submit the application. This is the recommended alternative.
If the grant is approved, the City would purchase. two transit
coaches during Fiscal Year 1990-91 and discontinue leasing the
tandem bus from Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution
2) Letter of intent from the Area Coordinating Council
capendarep
RESOLUTION NO. (1990 SERIES)
C
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR AN UMTA SECTION 18 DISCRETIONARY
GRANT TO PURCHASE TWO TRANSIT COACHES
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of. the City of San Luis Obispo;
Section 1: To authorize the application for as UMTA Section
18 Grant to purchase two transit coaches.
Section 2: To authorize the City Administrative Officer or
his designee to sign all documents pertinent to the application. ,
Section 3: To appoint the City Administrative officer or his
designee as the agent of the City of San Luis Obispo to conduct all
negotiations, execute and submit all documents pursuant to the
City's Purchasing Manual. All original documents including, but
not limited to, the applications, agreements and amendments are to
be retained in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 4: The City Clerk is hereby directed to furnish an
executed copy of this resolution for attachment to approved
C application and other supporting materials as may be required for
forwarding to:
Cal Trans, Department of Transportation
District 5, 50 Higuera Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
Cal Trans, Division of Mass Transportation
1120 N Street
Sacramento, CA .95811
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that authorizing an application
for an UMTA Section 18 Discretionary Grant to purchase two transit
coaches is hereby approved.
On motion of seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
�1
Resolution No. (1990 Series) '
Page Two
Upon motion of seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was adopted this day of
1990.
Mayor Ron bunin
ATTEST:
Pam Voges, City Clerk
APPROVED:
ityrinistrative Officer
tai me
hw\umta
San Luis Obispo--Area Coordinating council Arroyo GAtaran
Grover City
Morro Bay
and Regional Transportation Planning Agency Paso Robles
Pismo Beach
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo County
August 6, 1990
Hairy Watson
San Luis Obispo Transit
P.O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo CA 93403
Dear Mr. Watson:
We spoke about the current UMI'A Section 18 grant application you are
currently Ping, and I wish to record my support for the bus p z&Aase
Project. Miere is no possibility at this time of recording the relative
Priority of your project and others in the region, as the program of
Projects has not been reviewed as of this date, but projects such as yours
fall into the first priority, according to San Luis Obispo Area
Coordinating Council policy. We will be working with you to see that
needed buses are acquired.
It may be useful to note that the PY 1990/91 Transportation Development
Act Claim Resolution, adopted by the Area Council on July 11, 1990, shows
that San Luis Obispo is using 100% of their jurisdictional allocation for
transit. Priority is given to projects for Mich other funds are not
available.
Please call me at 549-5711 if there is anything I can do to assist
further.
Sincerely,
Ronald L. De Carli
Dan Herron
Transportation Planner
County Government Center, San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 (805) 549-5710