HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/05/1960r" � e
JUL b It=
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING
July 5, 1960 - -- 6:00 P. M.
MOTEL INN
The Citv Council met in Special Session with Mayor Fred. M. Waters presiding.
ROLL CALL: Present - Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey,
Fred M. Waters
Absent - J. Barry Smith
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Abraham, City Clerk Fitzpatrick, '
City Attorney Houser, Administrative Officer Miller,
City Engineer Romero.
The City Council discussed Item No. 13 .on the agenda for the Regular Meeting
of July 5, 1960, the appeal of Lindero Investment Company from a decision
of the Planning Commission in denying a variance of 3'6" on lots 2, 6, 11,
17, and 22 Block A, and lots 3 and 6 Block B, and a variance of 4' on .lots
4, 7, 9, 13, 14, and 23 Block A, and lots 1, 7, 8, and 10 Block B, of Tract
No. 138.
The City Council received reports on the matter from the City Engineer, City
Building Inspector, and Planning Director.
On motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W. Jones, the meeting
adjourned.
Approved this 18th day of July, 1960.
City CITrIt
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
July 5, 1960 - -- 7:30 P. M.
CITY HALL
The City Council met in Regular Session with Mayor Fred M. Waters presiding.
Invocation was given by Rev. W. Klandrud, Mt. Carmel Lutheran Church.
ROLL CALL: Present - Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey,
Fred M. Waters.
Absent - J. Barry Smith
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Abraham, City Clerk Fitzpatrick,.
Park and Recreation Superintendent Flory, City
Attorney Houser, Administrative Officer Miller, 1
City Engineer Romero, Police Chief Schofield, Water
Superintendent Thompson, Battalion Chief Wainscott.
Minutes for Regular Meeting of June 20, 1960 were approved as read, on motion
of Donald Q. Miller, seconded by Gerald W. Shipsey.
Claims for the month of July, 1960 were approved on motion of Kenneth W. Jones,
seconded by Donald 0. Miller, subject to the approval of the Administrative
Officer.
JUL, 5 MU
393
1. The„City, ql.e k_ presented „the following report on unofficial results of the
Yoakum Annexation Election, held June 28, 1960.
1. Number of registered voters in area 114
2. Number of votes cast in area 56
3. Number of YES votes cast 47
4. Number of NO votes cast 9
5. Number of Absentee Ballots issued 4
6. Number of Absentee Ballots returned 3
At this time the City Council set themselves as an Election Board to
canvas the absentee ballots of the Yoakum Annexation Election. Mayor
Waters acted as Inspector, Councilman Shipsey acted as Judge, Councilmen
' Jones and Miller acted as Clerks
Three Absentee Ballots received, three Absentee Ballots counted, with the
following result:
YES - 3 votes
The City Council then canvassed the unofficial tallies of the June 28, 1960
election with the following results:
C� . YES - 50 votes
re� NO - 9 votes
Cr On motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W. Jones, the results
°-� were declared official, and the following Ordinance was introduced and
passed to print on the motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W.
Jones:
ORDINANCE NO. 168 (1960 Series), "An Ordinance of the City of San Luis
Obispo Approving the Annexation to the City of San Luis Obispo of Certain
Inhabited Territory Designated as 'Yoakum Annexation "'.
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey, Fred M.
Waters.
NOES: None
ABSENT: J. Barry Smith
2. A) On motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W. Jones, Mayor
Waters was authorized to accept and record Grant Deeds from the
following:
1. Walter R. & Elizabeth Johnston, and Walter Richard Johnston
2.. Martin Polin
B) City Attorney Houser explained for the City Council's benefit the
conditions of the grant of easement from Ernest, Melvin, and Florino
Dalidio, and Thelma F. Perozzi for the sewer line to serve the Laguna
Park Homes properties.
On motion of Kenneth W. Jones, seconded by Donald Q. Miller, Mayor
Waters was authorized to accept and record the deed of easement.
3. The following report was given by City Clerk Fitzpatrick on bids received
and opened for construction of traffic signals at the Higuera and Santa
Rosa Streets intersection:
A- C- Electric Company
Bakersfield, California $ 4,240.00
' Sherwin Electric Company
Los Angeles, California $ 5,283.00
Howard Electric Company
San Jose, California $ 4,273.00
A -1 Electric
San Luis Obispo, California $ 3,892.00
(City Engineer's Estimate - $ 4,500.00)
� 4. JUL 5 . 196U
4. The following report was given by City Clerk Fitzpatrick on bids received
and opened for purchase of two 3 -wheel Patrolsters:
San Luis Cyclery
(Cushman) Westcoaster
Item #1
One Patrolster, F.O.B.
San Luis Obispo,
(excluding all federal
excise taxes and all
state and local sales
taxes) $ 1,149.20 $ 1,485.00
Less Trade -In 400.00 497.00
NET BID ITEM - #1 $ 749.20 $ 988.00
Item #2
One Patrolster, (same
conditions as Item #1) $ 1,149.20 $ 1,485.00
Less Trade -In 400.00 497.00
NET BID ITEM #2 $ 749.20 $ 988.00
TOTAL ITEMS 1 and 2 $ 1,498.40 $ 1,976.00
Deviation from Published Specifications
1. San Luis Cyclery (Cushman) "Equipment for these units has to be
purchased from three sources, and we cannot guarantee August 8, 1960
delivery date ".
2. Westcoaster No deviation from specifications.
Administrative Officer Miller recommended that the low bid-of San Luis.
Cyclery be accepted, and that - monies left over be placed in the unallocated
reserve within the Equipment Replacement Fund.
On motion of Kenneth W. Jones, seconded by Gerald W. Shipsey, Mr. Miller's
recommendation was accepted.
5. City Engineer Romero requested that the consideration of Resolution
Adopting Budget and Approving Memorandum of Agreement for Expenditure of
Gas Tax Allocation for Major City Streets be held over.
6. RESOLUTION N0. 681 (1960 Series), "A Resolution Increasing the 1959 -60
Budget ", was introduced and passed on motion of Gerald id. Shipsey, seconded
by Donald Q. Miller, on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey,-Fred M.
Waters.
NOES: None
ABSENT: J. Barry Smith
7. On motion of Kenneth W. Jones, seconded by Donald Q. Miller, the following
contract payments were approved and ordered paid:
Guido Ferini - Grand Avenue Reconstruction
Estimate # 3-------------------- ------------ - - - - -- $ 8,623.57
Walter Brothers - Richard Street Assessment District
Estimate # 3------------ -- ------------=---== - - - - -= $ 8,554.25
8. Communication from agents of Knuthson Investment Company requesting the
City Council to proceed with annexation of a portion of the Perozzi property
at the corner of Johnson Avenue and Smee Lane, was received and filed.
9. Communication from Radio Communications Service submitting a quotation
of $10.00 per month to maintain all fire department monitors on a parts
included basis, effective June 1, 1960.
On the recommendation of Administrative Officer Miller, the City Council
accepted the offer, and Radio Communications Service was authorized to
maintain fire department monitors on a monthly basis, on motion of Kenneth W.
Jones, seconded by Donald Q. Miller.
1
1
1
JUL 5 Eduu
10. Administrative Officer Miller briefed the contents of a letter from
Bookman, Edmonston, and Gianelli, relative to a meeting between the
Cayucos water organizations and the Whald Rock Construction Committee.
Communication received and filed.
11. The following salary step increases were approved on motion of Kenneth W.
Jones, seconded by Donald Q. Miller:
H. E. BLUMHORST - Fireman - from step 4 $460 per month to step 5
$488 per month, effective August 1, 1960.
' ELTON R. HALL - Fireman - from step 3 $435 per month, to step 4
$460 per month, effective August 1, 1960.
12. ORDINANCE NO. 167 (1960 Series), "An Ordinance Adding Part 2, to Chapter 2,
Article VIII of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Providing for Back -
Water Traps ", was finally passed on motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded
by Kenneth W. Jones, on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey,
Fred M. Waters.
�1 NOES: None
r- ABSENT: J. Barry Smith
Q 13. At this time, Mayor Waters declared a Public Hearing open on appeal of
`D Lindero Investment Company from a decision of the Planning Commission
in denying a variance of 3'6" on lots 2, 6, 11, 17, and 22 Block-A, and
lots 3 and 6 Block B, and a variance of 4' on lots 4, 7, 9, 13, 14, and
23 Block A, and lots 1, 7, 8, and 10 Block B, of Tract No. 138.
1) City Clerk Fitzpatrick read the following report of the City Planning
Commission regarding the denial of the variances for the Southwood
Subdivision:
"This variance is requested on lots 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, 22,
and 23 of Block A and 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10 of Block B, Tract 138
Southwood Subdivision.
The request is to allow overhanging eaves, to encroach into the
required front yards of these lots.
Recognizing the importance of this type of architectural feature
in the design of housing, as a means of breaking up the monotony of
tract development, the planning commission has adopted a resolution
of policy, allowing cornices, eaves, and canopies to project into
the required front yard set back a maximum of 24 inches.
395
The request of Lindero Investment Company is for variances in excess
of the above amount by an additional 24 inches, on 10 dwelling units and
18 inches on 7 other units. The commission has denied this type
of request in the past and has required that the eaves be cut back
to meet Planning Commission Policy as stated above.
In order to grant any variance, Section 9200.17 (E)(2) of the
Municipal Code requires that the Commission findings be that there
are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances which apply only
to the property involved. That the granting of the request is
necessary for the preservation of the applicants property rights
and that the granting of the request will not have a detrimental
effect on the general welfare of the neighborhood and the Community
as a whole. The commission cannot approve a variance without an
affirmative finding on all three items as required above.
In this particular application, the planning commission has found
that:
I. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applying to the land, building or use referred to in
the application, which do not apply generally to land, buildings,
or uses in the same district.
3 t r U-L .5 IybU
90
2.. The granting of the variance is not necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights of the applicant.
3. Any hardship which the applicant may feel imposed upon him was
created by his own acts, and he is not entitled to relief.
The applicant is the subdivider and developer of the land involved
and has therefore had complete control of the design of the lands
as well as the design of the structures upon the land.
4. The applicant has not proved that the ordinance.works a hardship
on his property so that it would be difficult or impossible to
construct a conforming use. It is the opinion of the Commission
that a conforming use can be built on this property as evidenced
by the fact that the applicant has constructed dwellings on
properties with similar conditions adjacent to these properties .
included in the request.
5. Work in violation of the ordinance was completed prior to the
request and the commission feels that this is not properly
considered as::a hardship which would justify the granting of a
variance.
6. A variance in this particular case is not necessary to promote and
protect the health, safety and general welfare of the neighborhood
or community.
7. The variance if granted would be detrimental to the neighborhood
.and the City of San Luis Obispo due to the fact that the granting
.of this variance would amount to a special privilege not enjoyed
by other properties in like zones."
Mr. Morgan Flagg appeared before the City Council on behalf of his appeal
from the decision of the Planning Commission, and stated that he had a problem
in this matter, and was sure that any omis §ion was made innocently, by both
his firm and the City Building Department. Further, that he had the plans
checked by the City and at that time, no one had called his attention to any
violation of overhanging roofs, and the violations were not caught until after
the buildings had been built, and for this reason he was requesting a variance
1
to allow the encroachment of the overhang onto the front set back, as the
removal of the overhang would take away from the appearance of the buildings,
damage them financially, and might affect his FHA and VA committments.
Mayor Waters asked Mr. Flagg to explain to the City Council the new application
for a variance of one foot on the front set back line, as 17 buildings are set
back 19' instead of 20' as required by Ordinance.
Mr. Flagg explained that his surveying crew had been granted permission by
the City Engineer to temporarily offset stakes 1' onto the sidewalk so they
would not be destroyed during construction. During construction the foundation
contractor assumed the offset points were at the property line thus setting
the building one foot too close to the street.
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, explained for the City Council the violations
and location of all properties in violation, both the encroachment of 1'
of the foundations, and also the houses with encroachment of overhang.
At this time the City Council.discussed the.possibility of advisability
of the City Council discussing both violations of the building set backs and
the overhangs, or whether they should be decided separately, as the Planning
Commission had not as yet received the report of the Board of Adjustments
relative to the 19' front yard set back violation.
City Attorney Houser explained for the City Council the requirements of
the City Ordinance relative to the granting of variances and the procedure
necessary for granting them.
Mr. Burt Walter, Assistant Building Inspector, stated that the buildings
in the subdivision were still under construction when the builder was notified
that the eaves were in violation, in fact, he stated that he believed that
the roofs were not even started when Mr. Flagg was notified of the eave
overhang violations.
JUL D iytiu
-11_F 9.7
City Engineer Romero stated to the City Council that Mr. Flagg had
full knowledge of the violation of the encroachment of the eaves while
still in the construction state, but had elected to proceed on the
assumption that a variance would be granted.
Mr. Robert Carpenter, Chairman of the City Planning Commission, appeared
before the City Council and stated the Planning Commission feeling that
the violation had been continued after being brought to Mr. Flagg's
attention, and the Planning Commission could find no grounds for granting
a variance. Mr. Carpenter further reported that in two other recent
instances, violations of the same type were corrected by having the eaves
cut back to conform with City Ordinance.
' Mr. Whitlock Jones, respective purchaser of one of the homes in violation
appeared before the City Council stating he had no objection to the
encroachment, but would object if the overhang of the eaves were cut off.
Mr. James Kookum, property owner of Lot 17, Block A of Southwood asked
if his lot were in violation of either eaves overhang or front set back.
City Engineer Romero stated that this property was not in violation.
r-w
Q0 Mr. Ira Bogard, property owner, asked when could he move into his house,
as his is one of the properties with a double violation.
Mr. Bill Miller appeared before the City Council suggesting that the City
require a more rigid control of the Building inspection, and that the
City shake up the Building Department so that the property owners can be
protected by more adequate building inspection.
Planning Director Abraham stated that the plot plan for.the-Southwood
tract showed the 20' set back for the buildings but that they were built
in violation thereof.
Mr. Flagg again appeared before the City Council stating that his plot
plan showed only the main house set back, but not the roof line or eaves
as these building components are shown on the building plans which are
1 checked by the Building.Department.
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, stated that the plans were not clear in this
respect and that discovery of the eave overhang violation during the
plan check would have required scaling of the plans which is beyond the
scope of a normal plan check.
Councilman Miller asked Mr. Flagg if he knew that.these violations
existed prior to the completion of the roofs, etc.
Mr. Flagg stated yes, he was aware of the violations, but that he had
financial committments with landing institutions which be believed
more important than violation of the City Ordinance, which could be
corrected by a variance.
Mayor Waters then urged that the City Council consider not only the
overhang and eves violation, but also the set back .violation, so as not
to prolong the matter and continue the inconvenience to the purchasers
in preventing them from being able to move into their homes.
City Attorney Houser stated that the Municipal. Code required that the
Planning Commission hold a hearing on these variances and then recommend
to the City Council for the.Council's final decision. If no decision
is reached then, the City should take action to see that the buildings
' conform to the City Code.
Councilman Donald Q. Miller moved that the City Council first consider
the 19' set back problem, and then consider the eaves overhang. The
motion died for lack of a second.
It was moved by Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Donald Q. Miller, that
the City grant a 1' variance in the set back of.the property, making the
front.set back 19'.
391 a 7_1
JUL 5 1yw
Chairman Robert Carpenter of the Planning Commission, stated that.he
believed that the matter should go to the Planning Commission first for
its recommendation, the required procedure as contained in the City
Ordinance. Otherwise, individuals would be bringing their variance problems
directly to the City Council for decision.
After discussion, Gerald W. Shipsey.withdrew his motion, and Donal "d Q.
Miller his second.
Donald Q. Miller then moved that the City Council grant a variance as
requested on roof and eave overhang. Motion died for lack of a second.
It was then moved by Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded:by Donald Q. Miller that
the City Council deny the appeal of Lindero Investment Company for a
variance; on the-following-roll call.vote:
AYES: Gerald W. Shipsey
NOES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Fred M. Waters
ABSENT: J. Barry Smith
Councilman Jones asked for clarification of both violations according to
the sketch-marked Exhibit "A ".
Motion of Kenneth W. Jones, seconded by Donald Q. Miller, that the City
Council grant the variances on the roof and eave overhang on all properties
in v16lation, passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Fred M. Waters.
NOES: Gerald W. Shipsey
ABSENT: J. Barry Smith
Mayor Waters then declared the Hearing closed.
14. City Engineer Romero presented to the City Council for its information a
map showing traffic committee recommendation on one -way streets, using
Pismo Street westbound, and Buchon.Street_ eastbound. Mr. Romero also
explained the street signing and traffic channelization that would be
required on this proposal.
The City Council discussed the .proposal.
It was moved by Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W. Jones, that the
City Council hold a Public Hearing on the proposal to establish a one -way
couplet on Pismo and.Buchon Streets.to be held July 18, 1960.
15. A) Order of the Boundary Commission, County of San Luis Obispo, approving
the annexation of uninhabited territory, designated as Elks Lodge
Annexation, was received and.filed..
B) Communication from Elks Lodge No. 322 protesting the assessment for
sewer facilities on proposed annexation area of $1,120 and enclosing a
check for $140 for assessment of one acre which they will be using for
their Club House.
"San Luis Obispo Elks Lodge #322 has received a letter from the City
Engineer, David F. Romero, stating that in accordance with Section 7500
of-the Municipal Code, the Elks Club would -be requested to pay to the
City the sum of $1,120 as a proportionate share of the cost of the City
sewerage facilities serving their property. This charge is based on
an eight acre plot at $140 per acre.
It is the feeling of the Board of Trustees and the general membership
of Elks Lodge #322 that they are not adding to the load carried by the
City sewer system, since they are-merely changing locations, and that
they are, by being annexed to the City of San Luis Obispo, increasing
the City's revenue by some $1500 per year in City Taxes. And, also,
that the Elks Lodge,.over the past 65 years.of its existence in San Luis
Obispo, has paid a very substantial part of the sewerage facilities
serving the City and should not be requested to pay.them twice.
The amount of property that the lodge buildings will occupy will be
approximately one acre, and the sewage load for these buildings will
be approximately that of a single -2 bathroom home. In view of these
facts we feel that a just and reasonable charge for tying into the City
sewer system would be $140.
1
1
1
JUL a i ,Jw W
We respectfully request that the City Council and Mayor accept our
check in the amount of $140 as their just and equitable share of
connecting into the City sewer system."
City Engineer Romero read for the City Council's information the applicable
sections of the Municipal Code relative to charges for sewer connections
after annexation.
Donald Q. Miller moved that the Elks Club pay the full sewer charge as
outlined in the Municipal Code. Motion died for lack of a second.
It was then moved by Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W. Jones,
that the Elks Club pay one -half of the sewer service charge of the
usable acreage, or 4 acres, and file an agreement with the City that
they would deposit the balance when and if the other 4 acres were put
to use.
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey, Fred M.
Waters
NOES: None
ABSENT: J. Barry Smith
r+w
16. 'TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT
m60 -6 -1C "The Traffic Committee has studied the request of the Don
< Motel for installation of a pipe- mounted sign reading "hotel loading zone"
Q in the..white zone which exists in front of the motel.
°'D
This particular parking space has been a continual problem since its
original installation several years ago. It was first designated as
a green 10- minute parking space, and we had countless complaints from
the management on the lack of enforcement. The committee then recommended
a white passenger loading zone, and we have also had many complaints on
the ineffectiveness of this zone, particularly at night time when it is
difficult to distinguish it from plain marked curbing. It should be
noted that except for one-or two isolated cases, motels have not been
provided with passenger loading zones because they have their own off -
street panting and hct el loading zones are really intended for a
' different purpose -- to keep the area in front of the motel clear in case
of fire and a large number of people emerging from one exit, plus of
course, the fact that hotels ordinarily do not have off - street parking
nearby. It is the recommendation of the Traffic Committee that the
present white loading z6ne7.in. -fr6nt of the Don Motel be eliminated and the
curb returned to its original unmarked state."
Mr. John Seitz appeared before the City Council on behalf of his request
for a motel loading zone in front of the Don Motel at 1473 Monterey Street.
Mr. Seitz stated in reviewing the recommendation of the Traffic Committee,
he had no objections to the establishment of a red zone at the location,
but would rather have a white motel zone or sign, rather than eliminate
an additional parking space for the businesses in the neighborhood during
the day. The motel zone was needed primarily at night.
After some discussion by the City Council, it was moved by Kenneth W.
Jones, seconded by Donald 0. Miller, that authorization be granted for
the motel owner to provide a motel loading zone sign in front of the
Don Motel at 1473 Monterey Street subject to the filing of a letter
holding the City harmless.from accidents, also a certificate of insurance
protecting the City.
Establishment of the motel sign to be on a 6 -month trial basis.
17. Report of Council committee consisting of Councilmen Jones and Miller, on
acquisition of drainage easement for Parking Lot No. S was held over.
18. Report of City Planning Commission on request of Carlos Moerman to
purchase a portion of street right -of -way, portion of lot 14, block 2,
Monterey Heights, as requested by the City Council.
The City Planning Commission requested that the City Council not authorize
the sale of this property as the City -owned property would be needed for
street widening, either for street right -of -way, or for slope easement
due to steep side slopes at this location.
On motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W.-Jones, the
recommendation of the Planning Commission was accepted.
Q. 9A
JUL 5 MU
�G
19. Communication from Councilman Donald Q. Miller requesting consideration by
the City Council on appointing Mrs. R. Wallace Reynolds to the City Library
Board to complete the term of Mrs. Frances Campbell, who has resigned.
On motion of Donald Q. Miller, seconded by Gerald I1. Shipsey, Mrs. R. Wallace
Reynolds was appointed to complete the term of Mrs. Campbell to June 30, 1963.
20. City Engineer Romero presented a report from Harry Jenks, consulting
sanitary engineer, malting a Waste Discharge Report application tb the Water
Pollution Control Board. Mr. Romero explained that the requirements of
the Water Pollution Control Board would determine the type of sewage
effluent disposal and was a necessary step in Mr. Jenks study.
on motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by Kenneth W. Jores, the request
was approved, and Mr. Romero authorized to make the application.
It was the concensus of the Council that Mr. Jenks represent the City at
the Hearings.
21. Communication from County of San Luis Obispo Planning Department for Council
information regarding the Santa Margarita Lake general development plan.
Water Superintendent Thompson presented for the Council's consideration
a recommendation which provided among other things, that the County of San
Luis Obispo be asked to provide certain safeguards before increasing the
recreational use of the lake, and that additional costs of said recreation
be absorbed by the County.
After discussion by the City Council, the matter was referred to Water
Superintendent Thompson and City Attorney Houser, to prepare an answer
stating the City's position to the Board of Supervisors.
22. Resolution No. 292 -60 of the City Planning Commission, recommending that
the City Council extend the filing period for Tract No. 166 for a period
of one year, was accepted on motion of Gerald W. Shipsey, seconded by
Donald Q. Miller.
23. Communication from C. A. Maino bringing to the attention of the City
Council the fact that sidewalks in downtown area are still being torn up
by utility companies, and placing the City on notice relative to future
repairs, was received and filed.
24. Communication from Gary Hayes, requesting installation of a water meter
on his property in the Yoakum area, recently annexed to the City. Request.
was approved, and water meter authorized to be installed, subject to
the filing of a letter by Mr. Hayes stating that with the installation of
the meter at this time, he would not expect to be excused in the future
from special assessments for water systems.
25. Communication from County of San Luis Obispo Department of Public Works
informing the City Council that Favorite Bakery, 638 Marsh Street, ha's been
notified to cease all operation as a bakery, because of building and health
violations, was received and filed.
26. For Council information, communication from the Department of Water Resource s
to the Cayucos area water organization, relative to said agreement, was
received and filed.
27. Communication from E. H. Atkinson, chairman of Chamber of Commerce Highway
Committee, reporting relative to progress on the cross - country highway
through Kern County and San Luis Obispo County, was received and filed.
28. Administrative Officer Miller announced the following appointments
DON H. BURNS - Fireman - effective July 1, 1960 at $390 per month.
IA14RENCE J. STOCKTON - Park and Recreation Supervisor, effective
July 1, 1960; at $265 per month with increase July 1, 1960 to
$280 per month.
29. Administrative Officer announced the following persons to full time
temporary summer positions:
SUSAN COLE - Stenographer - Administrative Office - starting June 16,
1960, at $265 per month, with increase July 1, 1960 to $280 per
month.
17
1
1
JUL 5 Mu
MANUEL W. LUIZ - Labor /Equipment Operator - Street Department - starting
July 5, 1960 at $330 per month.
ALLAN MARSHBURN - labor /Equipment Operator - Street Department - starting
July 5, 1960 at $330 per month.
30. A notice of condemnation by Building Inspector of property located at
1235.Peach Street, was received and filed.
31. Progress report No. 8 on General Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo
by.Hahn, Wise and Barber, Inc., was received and filed.
32. Communication from Division of Highways District V, announcing the
' appointment of Mr. Delwyn Roberts as City and Cooperative Projects Engineer
for the district, replacing Mr. Wm. S. Dolliver, who has retired, was
received and filed.
33. Minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting of June 16, 1960 were
received and filed.
34. Administrative Officer Miller reported to the City Council that the
,#+ Veterans of Foreign Wars have taken over the placement of flags in front
of the various business establishments on holidays authorized to fly .
r�. the American Flag. Mr. Miller stated that the V.F.W. had no pick -up
< trucks to haul flags from the Veterans Building to the street locations,
e[ and requested authorization to use City -owned pick -up trucks.
11—D
Mr. Miller stated.that the insurance company had been contacted, and
they stated that this'would be with City permission, and the V.F.W.
members could drive the pick -up_ trucks.
The City Council had no objection to use of 2 trucks on five holidays a
year.
35. Administrative Officer Miller requested authorization of the City Council
Mayor Waters asked Mr. Abraham if the Planning Consiultant, Mr. Wise,
was of the opinion that the area around the lake should be rezoned.
Mr. Abraham said he had talked of this with Mr. Wise, and he.had
recommended this action to prevent uses incompatible with those proposed
for the recreational development of the lake.
With approval of the Council, Mayor Waters instructed Mr. Abraham to
take the course of action he felt necessary on this matter.
On motion of Kenneth W. Jones, seconded by Donald Q. Miller, the meeting
adjourned. .
' Approved this 18th day of July, 1960
City C r
4 ,01
to
advertise for bids for replacement
of police department and fire
department
radios, as soon as
specifications are ready.
'
By
common consent of the City
Council, permission was granted.
36. Planning
Director Abraham asked
the City Council for clarification of
its
feeling relative to zoning
of the Laguna Lake area in the County,
but
adjacent to the lake.
Mayor Waters asked Mr. Abraham if the Planning Consiultant, Mr. Wise,
was of the opinion that the area around the lake should be rezoned.
Mr. Abraham said he had talked of this with Mr. Wise, and he.had
recommended this action to prevent uses incompatible with those proposed
for the recreational development of the lake.
With approval of the Council, Mayor Waters instructed Mr. Abraham to
take the course of action he felt necessary on this matter.
On motion of Kenneth W. Jones, seconded by Donald Q. Miller, the meeting
adjourned. .
' Approved this 18th day of July, 1960
City C r
4 ,01