HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/17/1963On motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilman Whelchel that the City Council support
the leash -law ordinance to its fullest and require enforcement of the same. Motion carried.
Mayor Davidson suggested that the Police Chief, City Attorney and representatives of the Wood'
Animal Shelter Society get together on ways and means to enforce the Dog Ordinance as
approved by the City Council.
Mr. Schneider then asked that in the future all complaints regarding the service be forwarded
to him or the employees at the Shelter for their compliance.
' The City Council then discussed the possibility or advisability -of the animal shelter using a
citizen band radio for animal control.
R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, was requested to contact Commander Gullickson,
Assistant erector of Civil Defense, regarding inclusion of the Animal Society vehicles with .
the citizen band radios.
Councilman Miller left the meeting at 8:45 P. M.
2. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, brought to the Council's attention results of his
discussion with Mr. Wilson, Business Manager for the San Luis Obispo City School System,
stating that Mr. Wilson informed him that the School Board was disturbed at the rent the City
C Council wished to receive from use of the C ity -owned building at Mitchell Park on the basis
vthat the City had received free use of the park for many years. Further, that the School Distrii
�. only wished to extend the lease for six (6) months from October, 1963, with option to renew on
m a month to month basis thereafter.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the lead was approved fo:
a six (6) month period from cto er, with a month to month extension with sixty (60) day notice
of termination by either party. Motion carried.
3. The City Council then continued the study and review of the proposed 1963 -64 budget beginning
with page 172 and ending with page 233, the end of the proposed. bm "get.
4. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the meeting adjourned at
10:45 P.M.
APPROVED this 1st day of July, 1963.
FITZPATRICK, CITY CLERK
REGULAR MEETI14G OF CITY COUNCIL
June 173 1963 - 700 P. M.
CITY HALL
Invocation was given by Mayor Clay P. Davidson.
Roll Call
City Staff
Present: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
Present: P. Chapman, Director of Planning & Building; J. H. FITZpatrick,'
City Clerk; W. Flory, Superintendent of Parks & Recreation;
R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer; R. aosburgh,
Assistant City Engineer; J. Wainscott, Fire Battalion Chief;
W. Schofield, Police Chief; E. P. Thompson, Water Super-
intendent.
0
Minutes of the City Council meeting of June 3, 1963, were held over.
On motion of Councilman Itiller, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, claims against
the City for the month of June, 1963, were approved subject to the approval of
the Administrative Officer.
- --- - -- --- - - - - -- -- -- -. ---- ---------- rr- -r - - -- - s----------------- r---- - - - - -- --
1. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the follow-
ing resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1143, a resolution increasing
the 1962 -63 budget. (Acct. No.-950; Sewer Plant Construction, be increased
by $71,000.00.)
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Da•iidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret
I•IcNeil, Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. :•Ihelchel.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
la. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, the following
ordinance was introduced for final passage. Ordinance No. 265, an ordinance
conveying real property to Development.Associates.
Finally passed on the following roll call votes
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell'W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
2. At this time the City Council held a joint meeting with the City Planning
Commission to discuss zoning in general and t ?:e Roselip request in
particular.
Councilman Miller, stated that it was his idea to request a joint meeting between
t`ie City Council and Planning Commission in order to clear the air relative
to zoning and rezoning practices of the Planning Commissions
He stated that he fully appreciated the time the Planning Commission spent
on behalf of the City, but believed that much of the work being done by the
Planning Commission could be more properly handled by the staff members
which would allow the Commission to spend more time on actual planning the
development of the City.
Mr. Schwartz, Chairman of the Planning Commission, explained the reasons and
i-�Fe background for the Commission's denial of the request for the rezoning
by Walter Roselip.
Mr. Schwartz continued that one of the major items considered for the denial
was that there was a surplus of multiple zoning within the City on which no
development had taken place and there were no plans for a development on the
requested zoning.
Councilman Miller stated that he did not agree with Chairman Schwartz's
statement that there was too much 1IR -3" land zoned in the City as he believed '
that tie Planning Commission should make the proper studies and rezone to
"R -1" and "R -2" classifications properties that the Commission honestly be-
lieves are erroneously zoned "R -3" and that a reduction of the so- :called
surplus 1IR -3" zoning could be reduced and kept more in line with the growth
of the City.
He further stated that the general plan is now being considered by the
Planning Commission as a static document, as it has not been revised or even
studies made to consider changes since it was originally adopted by the City
and furt er, that the changes should be made to keep the plan up to date in
order to keep it current with the future growth of the City.
3,5
W. Willis -m B. Tumlin presented the following letter for the Council's
-consi era ion:
Councilman Graves stated that he believed that the Planning Commission has
one an o_u_t_staTMng job for the City in the past few years and that its members
are dedicated to their tasks, have listened to the public very courteously,
and further, that...the.City has moved ahead under their recommendations. He
then listed some of the accomplishments of the Commission over the past several
years, such as the new subdivison ordinance, the granding ordinance, etc.
Councilman Whelchel stated that he was prejudice due to his long association
with the Planning Commission and that he knew that t hey were doing a good con-
scientious job for the public and hoped that they would continue to do.so.
Councilwoman McNeil agreed, stating that as far.as. she was concerned, there
was no conflict etween the City Council and planning Commission and she thought
they were doing an excellent job.
Councilman-Miller stated that he could see that the City.Council was going to
pass out bouquets to the Planning Commission and not get to the crux of the
problem which was the lack of over -all planning.of the City by the Commission
and further, that the General Plan has not been revised.since its adoption and
yet it was admitted that many of.the proposals in the General Plan were in-
adequate and were to be studied by the Commission, He stated further that
he felt that the Planning Commission was a make -work organization and was doing
work that should be done by the City Staff members.
Commissioner Blake stated that Councilman Miller should attend a Planning
Commission meeting when the Commission is considering proposals for the general•
growth problems of the City and not just when Councilman Miller's property
is under discussion for rezoning.
"In view of the.recent apparent conflict c:nceming administrative procedures
of the San Luis Obispo City Planning Commission, this body, the San Luis Obispo
Land Use and Development-Advisory Committee, respectfully wishes to inform
interested parties of our intention of forming above committee. As long -
established representatives of the property owners of this city, and being
acutely aware of the importance of ,mainaining all the legal rights accruing
to such owners of property; we feel this letter is necessary.
. "This is to inform all concerned that a five man committee is being formed
to study the administrative procedures of the San Luis Obispo City Planning
Commission, and it's liaison with property owners and it's parent, the San
Luis Obispo City Council. This committee will represent the entire community
in cross = section, with timely reports and recommendations to the San Luis
Obispo City Council and Planning Commission.. Each profession will be represent-
ed by a qualified member, as we directly affect, and are affected by all and
any action taken by City Council and planning in this community. If required
we will be pleased to w:rk with planning and council in the best interests
of the community.
"Should this recommendation be favorable considered, names of our representa-
tives will be submitted at a later date."
m
Mr. Tummlin suggested that a committee of representatives from the Contractors
Association. the Real Estate Association, the Building trades a licensed Engineer
and a representative of the Financial Institutions be appointed by the City
Council so that they may pre- screen some of the problems coming before the
Planning Commission and City Council and further, these representatives would
be able to give the Planning Commission technical advice on matters affecting
the growth of the City.
Planning Commissioner Blake requested that the Planning Commission be given an
opportunity to answer ounce n Miller's statements before calling on the
public 'for its comment.
Mayor Davidson stated he was pe.sonally satisfied with the operations and actions
of e anning Commission and that he did not believe that the Planning
Commission was delatory.in their operations. Further, he did not believe that
there was any real conflict between the City Council and the Planning Commission
and that he thought that the PI.nning Commission was doing a good job.
Councilman Graves stated that he believed that the Planning Commission has
one an o_u_t_staTMng job for the City in the past few years and that its members
are dedicated to their tasks, have listened to the public very courteously,
and further, that...the.City has moved ahead under their recommendations. He
then listed some of the accomplishments of the Commission over the past several
years, such as the new subdivison ordinance, the granding ordinance, etc.
Councilman Whelchel stated that he was prejudice due to his long association
with the Planning Commission and that he knew that t hey were doing a good con-
scientious job for the public and hoped that they would continue to do.so.
Councilwoman McNeil agreed, stating that as far.as. she was concerned, there
was no conflict etween the City Council and planning Commission and she thought
they were doing an excellent job.
Councilman-Miller stated that he could see that the City.Council was going to
pass out bouquets to the Planning Commission and not get to the crux of the
problem which was the lack of over -all planning.of the City by the Commission
and further, that the General Plan has not been revised.since its adoption and
yet it was admitted that many of.the proposals in the General Plan were in-
adequate and were to be studied by the Commission, He stated further that
he felt that the Planning Commission was a make -work organization and was doing
work that should be done by the City Staff members.
Commissioner Blake stated that Councilman Miller should attend a Planning
Commission meeting when the Commission is considering proposals for the general•
growth problems of the City and not just when Councilman Miller's property
is under discussion for rezoning.
-4.0
Planning Commission Chairman Schwartz explained some of the problems faced by.
the Planning GoEaM8H IR-tneir deIFberaticn for proper land use and zoning
for the City. He then reviewed for the Council's information, Planning Commission
action on the General Plan, the 791 Planning Program, and the time spent to date
on the new zoning ordinance. He explained that as far as the Roselip rezoning
matter was concerned, the Planning Commission had studied all facets of the matter
-and after due consideration, the Commission recommended a denial of the re-
zoning to the Council and hoped that the Council would uphold the Commission in
this denial, but naturally would not be sad if.the Council reversed the Plann-
ing Commission's recommendation on this matter.
L. J. Morrison, 1661 Wilson Street, presented the following petition signed
by fifty one--051) residents of the City, urging that the City Council uphold
the Planning Commission in denying the rezoning request by Walter Roselip.
111. The placement of a large number of people in a small area would upset
the safety convenience and general welfare and undermine property- values in an
otherwise predominately.siftg ;e- family area.
112. 'Creation of a large concentration of population would disperse traffic
in all directions from the subject area where there are local streets, all of
which lends itself to congestion, confusion and accidents.
113• The streets adjoining the property under consideration, Park and Wilson,
are extremely narrow, and with*on street parking, which we have never had,
would become almost impassable, and very- dangerous.
114. Hillcrest and Wilson Street which lead into this property are very steep,
which also creates another factor in adding to the danger of t his.area.
"5• All school children in this area must pass the corner of Park and Wilson
in front of the property in question in order to get to Pacheco School.
116. -The excessive vacant or underdeveloped amount of land already zoned R -3
located in San Luis Obispo much of which lies in proximity to Cal Poly, would
be deprived o normal development if the proposal were approved.
"7. The Planning Commission has already denied this proposed zone change, we
wholeheartedly agree with their direction."'
Mr. Herbert Grundell, Attorney representing Mr. Roselip, appeared 16efore the
ityZr Council on-E -e f of his client's request for rezoning. He stated he could
not honestly see how the City Council could refuse the requested rezoning
as the City's own General Plan shows this area was set aside for future multiple
use gnd hoped the City Council would make this change now.
William Tumlin asked the City Council to separate the letter request persented
earlier in the evening from the present Roselip rezoning as the group he re-
presents has placed this letter on file with the Council in an honest attempt
to be of use to the City.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Mayor Davidson, that the letter
presented by Mr. Tumlin be re erred to a Counci-I study session to be held on
July 8, 1963.
Councilman Graves objected to.the formation of another committee to advise a
regularly appoin ed Commission.
Motion carried and the meeting is to be held on July 8, 1963•
Councilman "helchel stated that he felt that the Roselip request for rezoning
should not be al owed as there is too much multiple zoning in this area not being
used at this time and while it is true that the General Plan shows multiple
use in the area, he believed that until a need for this use is shown, no change
of zoning should take place, but that he would c nsider favorably a rezoning
if the property owners were to submit a pciential development plan for the property.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Councilman Graves, that the appeal
of Walter Roselip be deni8a an that the Planning Commission's recommendation
be upheld.
n
Councilman Graves stated that he seconded the motion on the basis that there
was too much multiple zoning in the City and particularly in this area, but
he too would favorably consider rezoning if a specific development or plan
was presented to the Planning Commission and Council.
Councilwoman McNeil stated she believed that the property should be re-
zoned to "R-311 at t s time.
Councilman Miller stated that he believed the property should be rezoned to
"R -3" at this time as it is so shown on the GenEral Plan.
Mayor Davidson stated he did not believe there was a need shown for multiple
zoning in this area now, as the requesting property owner owned adjacent multiple
zoned property and made no attempt to develop to multiple use, and further::
that this property could be developed under the Planned Development provisions
of the Municipal Code.
Motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson., R. L. Graves, Jr., Clell U. Whelchel
1,hr. Balearetti, Secretary- Manager of the local Chamber. of- .Commerce,. appeared be-
.fore the City Council urging the continuation of the contract between the
City of San Luis Obispo and the Chamber of Commerce, stating that the Chamber
had acccmplished all the requirements of the contract and that for the past
six (6) months had shown a deficit for the services required by the City
Council.
On motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that the con-
tract with the Chamber o ommerce be extended , jL964. Motion carried
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson,.R.. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil
NOES: Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
ABSENT: None
Councilman Whelchel suggested that this contract should be put out forbid just
as other City contracts are done with the City setting the minimum standards
for the-services required and allowing interested organizations to bid on these
services.
On motion of Councilman Whelchely seconded by Councilman Miller, that the con-
tract just extended with a Uh amber of Commerce be amen a to require that
financial reports be submitted to the City Council on a monthly basis.
Motion carried. Councilwoman McNeil voted no.
4. Mr. Kardel, Attorney, appeared before the City Council asking for City
support to the Economic Development Committee for financial aid to start the
Economic Development action program for the City.
Mr. Kardel reported on the activities of the Economic Development Committee
to date and their plans for the.retention of a consultant to prepare an
-action program for Economic Development.
It was moved by Councilman Miller that the City adopt the proposal and co-
operate.telthathe Economic Development Committee for an action program for
Economic Developmentof the City. Motion tabled for the lack of a second.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel) seconded by Councilman Riller, considera-
tion of this proposal was held-over to the meeting of July 1, 1963.
X. At this time Mayor Davidson brought up the matter of the Traffic Committee re-
port of June 13, Z9 agen a item 13) No. 63 -6 -7C, as follows:
NOES:
Miss
Margaret McNeil, Donald Q.. Miller
C
rc
Absent:
None
CG
3.. At.this
time the
City Council considered the continuation of the contract
between
the City
of San Luis Obispo and the Chamber of Commerce as the present
contract
expires
July 1, 1963.
1,hr. Balearetti, Secretary- Manager of the local Chamber. of- .Commerce,. appeared be-
.fore the City Council urging the continuation of the contract between the
City of San Luis Obispo and the Chamber of Commerce, stating that the Chamber
had acccmplished all the requirements of the contract and that for the past
six (6) months had shown a deficit for the services required by the City
Council.
On motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that the con-
tract with the Chamber o ommerce be extended , jL964. Motion carried
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson,.R.. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil
NOES: Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
ABSENT: None
Councilman Whelchel suggested that this contract should be put out forbid just
as other City contracts are done with the City setting the minimum standards
for the-services required and allowing interested organizations to bid on these
services.
On motion of Councilman Whelchely seconded by Councilman Miller, that the con-
tract just extended with a Uh amber of Commerce be amen a to require that
financial reports be submitted to the City Council on a monthly basis.
Motion carried. Councilwoman McNeil voted no.
4. Mr. Kardel, Attorney, appeared before the City Council asking for City
support to the Economic Development Committee for financial aid to start the
Economic Development action program for the City.
Mr. Kardel reported on the activities of the Economic Development Committee
to date and their plans for the.retention of a consultant to prepare an
-action program for Economic Development.
It was moved by Councilman Miller that the City adopt the proposal and co-
operate.telthathe Economic Development Committee for an action program for
Economic Developmentof the City. Motion tabled for the lack of a second.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel) seconded by Councilman Riller, considera-
tion of this proposal was held-over to the meeting of July 1, 1963.
X. At this time Mayor Davidson brought up the matter of the Traffic Committee re-
port of June 13, Z9 agen a item 13) No. 63 -6 -7C, as follows:
42
63 -6 -7C Uith regard to the letter from the County Administrative Officer which
is on this evening's agenda, the Traffic Committee recommends that the re-
quest be granted and that signs be installed on the north side of Monterey
Street from the driveway west of the County Garage and extending to.the corner
of Osos Street, reading "Emergency Vehicles Only - 30 minutes limit."
Mayor Davidson wished to bring this recommendation to the attention of the
public and that if the recommendation of the Traffic Committee was followed,
this would eliminate all.parking on the west side of Monterey Street between
Santa Rosa and Osos Streets and that he firmly believed this would be a detriment
to the businesses located on Monterey Street, particularly the Pacific Grey- 1
hound line which operates a bus depot on this street and which needs addition-
al parking for customers at this time. He suggested that instead of eliminat-
ing parking on Monterey Street, that the County should provide emergency park-
ing on Palm Street from Osos Street to the alley.
R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, then read the letter from the County
Administrative Officer requesting that the parking for the Sheriff's
Department be allowed on Monterey Street.
Chief Schofield stated upon question that he was sure that either Monterey
Street or Palm Street would be satisfactory with the Sheriff's Department ,
but was also sure that the Monterey Street parking would be preferable due
to the location of the elevator in the Courthouse basement. .
The City Council discussed the Traffic Committee reco;rnnendation and the ob-
jection of Mayor Davidson.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, that the
Traffic Committee recommendation 63 -6 -7C be- referred to the Traffic
Committee for additional study for recommendation to the City Council.
Motion carried.
5. On motion of Councilman Miller., seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the follow-
ing resolution was introTu—c—e27 Resolution No. 1146,, a reso u ion.tabulating
equipment replacement appropriations for the fiscal year 1963 -64, along
with total accumulations for each piece of equipment.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
6. On :notion of Councilman 14i.11er, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the following
resolution was intro ce esolution No. 1141., a reso u ion establishing
salary ranges for each classification, assigning city employees to classifica-
tions and salary steps within the respective ranges, describing methods of
advancement within said salary ranges and repealing all previous salary re-
solutions.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES::! Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret :McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
7. At this time the City Council 'held a public hearing on the adoption of the
1963 -64 budget.
R. D. Miller, Ad- iinistrative Officer, presented the final 1963 -64 budget
after the charges were made by the City Council during their study sessions.
The total, not including the bond issues, is $2,1197,902.01 and the final
budget including sewer and water revenue bonds is $11,696,968.01.
Mayor Davidson stated that he believed that this was a good budget for the
3
City of San Luis Obispo and that the Council had spent many hours going over the re-
quests appropriately and tried to prepare for present and future growth of the City
and further, after consideration, this budget with the substantial increase in ser-
vice for the citizens, he felt that contrary to his original thoughts regarding a
tax rate reduction, he felt that.the tax rate should be left as it is in order to
accomplish the program prop:.sed by the Council.
Mr. Shreffler appeared before the City.Council and objected to the City's plans for
planting trees on Chorro Street as he believed that the trees would be destroyed by
cars and trucks moving in and out of the parking area and further, he believed that
the choice of Chorro Street for tree planting by the City Council was the poorest
choice possible due to the narrowness of the street and sidewalk.
The City Council then discussed the matter of tree planting in the downtown area of
the City and also its relation with possible development of the Mission Plaza.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that the City Council
adopt the budget for the fiscal year 1963 -64 as revised by the City Council subject
to minor mathematical and clerical errors being corrected.
Adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. . L. Graves iss Margaret McNeil
.. Y Davidson, , � Jr.., s ,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
W
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
8. 9:00 P. M. - At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the report of the
Superintendent of Streets on the cost of the work for placing.cf sid6ralk,.6urb, and
gutter under the 1911 Act for the following properties:
Virginia Wasson
1 John T. & Grace M. Cook
Doris L. Bowles
Fred M. & Juanita Waters
Donald M. & Erna S. Andrews
David & Bethyl Ulansky
W. 0. Hall
1268 Sydney Street
1292 Sydney Street
907 -909 Sandercock Street
1303 Higuera Street
3107 Johnson Avenue
2515 Greta Place
1305 Marsh Street
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing open on assessment of costs for the
properties listed.
No one appeared before the City Council.
J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, reported that Donald M. Andrews and David Ulansky
had notified the City that they wished to take advantage of the Council's offer to
pay for the improvement over a three (3) year period.
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Councilman Miller, the following resolu-
tion was introduced. Resolution No. 1150, a resolution confirming costs of sidewalks
constructed under the 1911 Act.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote.
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Margaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
9. At this time the City Council considered the appeal of Francis S. & Anna J. TSinneavy
from a decision of the City Planning Commission requiring curb, gutter and sidewalk
as a condition of small subdivision.
10. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on a list of properties lacking
standard improvements of curb, gutter and sidewalk where 50% of the block is al-
ready improved.
44
Mayor Davidson declared the public hearing open.
J. H. FItzpatrick, City Clerk, then read the .list of properties and the work to be
done.
Mrs. Albert Gazin (File #56) appeared before the City Council and objected to the
requirement of placing sidewalk along her property as the placement of her sidewalk
would require the removal of trees that have been growing for twenty (20) years.
She stated that a nursery quoted her a loss of value of $2,900 for the removal of these
trees with the placement of the sidewalk which would kill the trees on the property.
She stated that the money was not the object but she wished to save the trees on
her property.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, that the City hold
over item #56 until the Council has had an opportunity to loo into the matter
of the trees.
Russ James appeared before the City Council stating that at the time.that he was in
the business in San Luis Obispo he had taken care of the trees for Mrs. Gazin by
removing the root structure on the street side and stated that if the sidewalk was
placed at this .ime the trees would be killed.
Mr. vernon L. Bryan (File #51) asked what type of sidewalk he would be required to
put in as he is willing to place the sidewalk if he knew the type, etc.; and asked
that the City Council send a representative of the Engineer's Office to show him
what to do.
A representative of the City Engineer's Office was to meet with Mr. Bryan on Tues-
day, June 18, 1963:
Mr. B. 0. Ligon, (File #47) also asked that a representative of the City'Engineer's
Office visit his property and explain what had to be done to place the sidewalk
adjacent to the bridge.
The City Engineer, D. F. Romero, was requested to send a representative to meet with
Mr. Ligon and report to the Gity Council.
Mr. E. L. Alberti (File #52) appeared before the City Council and asked permission
to place an integral sidewalk on Mission Street instead of a divided sidewalk with
a planter strip. The reason for his request was to keep the sidewalk as far away
from his house and as near to the street as possible.
Mr. Vosburgh, Design Engineer for the City, stated that a transition could be made
at this location without any problem.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Miller, the request of E. L.
Alberti for an in egr si ew is be allowed as requested.
Communication from Charles Jones (File #48) requesting a variance in the width of the
sidewalk required and also permussion to install an integral sidewalk on Mission
Street in order to save existing trees on the property.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, exception was
granted to allow a four oot integral sidewalk at i ssion Street to
preserve trees.
Mayor Davidsod, on behalf of Harry F. Wandling, (File #54) objected to the place-
ment of a sidewalk at 215 Lincoln'Avenue, Venable Street side, at this time due to
possible_damage to a.ten (10) year Marimosa tree located in the right of way, and since
this is a deciduous tree he is asking fora deferment on placing the sidewalk ;�o
that the tree can be moved during the dormant season around the first of the year.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the request of
Mr. Wandling was approved and the placement of the sidewa k was deferred until after
the tree is transplanted early in 1961.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, the following resolu-
tion was introduced. Resolution No. 1151, a reso lution permitting four (4) foot
sidewalk in certain areas.
45
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Puss i °Sargaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES i None
ABSENT: None
Flavor Davidson declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman hiller, seconded by Councilman Whelchel, that the list of
' properties lacking standard improvement be ordered improved except for parties being
deferred or excused by the City Council. Motion carried.
12.3esolution No. 1145, a resolution establishing no parking zone on Broad Street,
was held over b y the City Council.
13.Traffic Committee report of June 13, 1963.
63 -6 -8T lie have had a request for one red zone on the south side of Palm west of
Santa Rosa to allow the construction superintendent for the Court House Annex to
park his car off the street by means of a wooden driveway ramp. We feel that this
red zone will also be needed in the future to accommodate right hand turning move-
ments at this location.
63 -6 -9C In regard to the request for a study of the feasibility of cross walks on
iTi guera between Osos and Santa Rosa, we recommend against this because we do not
believe that there would be sufficient foot traffic to justify stopping vehicles at
this location.
63 -6 -10T We have received a request for a cross walk across Grand at McCollum for
sc o— �i- — ET -ldren and for the mail box, on the. southeast corner. However, we feel that
the Pacheco Home and School group and school authorities have done quite a bit of
work in encouraging the students to use the cross walk at Hays Street where we have a
crossing guard stationed, and an additional cross walk at McCollum would be con-
' fusing to the youngsters. For adults using the mail box, they should not hesitate
to cross at the McCollum intersection because they have the right of way regardless
of whether or not there is a cross walk installed.
63 -6 -11T The Police Department has noted an obstruction to visibility at the
southeast corner of Broad and Islay and if the Council has no objection, the City
Engineer will take steps to have the bushes at the location cut down to three feet.
63 -6 -12T - We have had a request for an additional street light at the tern in
Lincoln Street near Ciorro and recommended that a 2500 lumen lamp be placed at that
location.
63 -6 -13C In response to the request for stop signs at Luneta at South Tassajara,
stopping Luneta traffic, the Traffic Committee feels that such signs would be desirable.
On.'motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilman Graves, the following resolution
was introduced. Uesoluti on No. 1149, a resolution es a shing no parking zone on
Palm Street and stop sign on Luneta Street.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Clay P. Davidson, R. L. Graves, Jr., Miss Plargaret McNeil,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
14. Communication and resolution from the Planning Commission forwarding to the City
Council for their approval a tentative subdivision map of Tract No. 305, Johnson
Highlands No. 6. Planning Commission receommended to the City Council the approval
subject to the following conditions:
"l. The Cul-de -sac shall be 700' long.
112. Lot depth: Lot 2 - 1001; Lot 4 - 1001; Lot 10 - 1201; Lot 14 - 1051; Lot 19 -
110'-; Lot 21 - 120' and Lot 22 - 1101.
:
"3. Lot width: Lot 5 - 751•
"4. Frontage: Lot 3 - 50'; Lot 11 -401; staff to review water easement
between Lots 13 and 14.
"5. Sidewalk variances denied. Sidewalk will berequired to Lot 6 adjoining
E1 Cerrito.
"6. Excessive grading of 30% of total lot surface area approved subject to
review of grading plan by the staff and a report to the Commission.
"7. Tree planting variances denied. An average of two trees per lot required
subject to review by the staff.
"U. Water service above 460' contour subject to approval of the Water
Superintendent. (See report of E. P. Thompson.)
119• Use of Lot l approved subject to re- routing of utility easement to provide
building lot."
The following communication was received from E. P. Thompson, Water Superinted
ent, regarding water system for Tract No. 305:
"A part of this subdivision is above elevation 460, City Datum, which will en-
tail serious water supply problems. The water zone which is above elevation 460
is a long narrow, irregular strip about the City which is quite steep. There
probably will not be a continuous street pattern in which to lay a continuous
main to serve the zone.
"Developments will occur at scattered locations and timing will probably be such
as to preclude the possibility of the orderly development of an integrated water
system to serve the zone. In any case, a continuous system will require pumping
stations and continuous mains laid . over ru-ged terrain or dual mains.
"For the above reasons, it would appear that any developments in Zone 4 will
have to be served b small pumping stations and storage tanks sized to provide
fire flows in addition to domestic supply. Installation of adequate systems and
the proper operation and maintenance of the isolated units will be time consum-
ing and costly. It would appear also that the City has expended large sums
of money in making more easily developed land available for expansion. Provision
for water service in Zone 4 will be very costly and the City should not encoura6e
at this time any development which cannot be served by its proper zone. No
plan for water service above elevation 460 has been submitted to this office.
"I therefore recommend that water service above elevation 460 in this subdivision
be denied at this time."
Mr. Thompson then appeared before the City Council re- emphasizing his state-
ments regarding his objection to allowing any development above elevation 460.
Further, he wished to be extremely expensive for the City to.give adequate service.
Mr. Leonard Blaser, subdivider, app ared before the City Council regarding the
approval of the tenative map of Tract No. 305.
1
�1
Mr. Blaser stated that he understood the City's problem in furnishing water to
properties above elevation 460, but also wished that the City Council would realize
that he too had a problem and that he must be allowed to develop his property
and to grant his proposal to furnish water to his upper lots through a pumping
system that has been designed and should be adequate for this purpose and re-
questedthat the City Council approve his proposal to service the lots above the
460 elevation through this pressure system.
E. P Thompson, Water Superintendent, objected and stated that the proposed
water system, as designed, was inadequate and will never adequately serve the area
proposed and that if allowed b the Council, the water department would have
perpetual trouble with this system and further,that if the Council allowed this
development it would set a precedent for future development of scattered properties
above the 460 level.
The City Council then discussed the matter water service for Tract No..305 and
also water service in general to developments in Zone 4 above the 460 mark.
On motion of Councilman Puller, seconded by Councilman Graves, that the Council
r--
44
deny the development of lots above the 460 elevation until an adequate water ser-
vice and system is approved by the Water Superintendent.
15. Request from Chet nimble, 2030 Broad Street, that the City require the adjacent•
property owner to cut back the us es an weeds.hanging over the sidewalk to
enable him to back into and out of his .driveway, was referred to the Traffic
Committee on motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman I4cNeil.
' Councilman Miller left the meeting at 11:15 P. M, .
16. Report by the City Engineer regarding revision of the pedestrian traffic signal
mid -block on Higuera Street between Morro and Chorro Streets, was discussed by
the City Council
Mayor Davidson stated that Mr. Romero, City Engineer, had informed his that for
an expenditure of approximately a unit co a placed in the pedestrial
signal which would take it from the stop and go cycle to a flashing yellow cycle
in the evenings, Sundays and Holidays.
C9
O The•City Council discussed the matter of the pedestrial signal at length.
SOn motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that the ped-
estrian signal be left as is for six (6) months. otion lost on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Miss Margaret McNeil, R. L. Graves, Jr.
NOES: Clay P. Davidson, Clell W. Whelchel
ABSENT: Donald Q9, Miller
In'the matter of street improvement to Chorro from Peach to Palm Streets, D. F.
Romero, City Engineer, recommended to the Council that after patching and re-
pairing by the City forces, that a contract be let for a one inch (111) blanket
and seal coat to be done by contract at an estimated cost of $3,400.
The City Council accepted the recommendation -and instructed the Administrative
Officer to include this improvement in the current street maintenance budget.
18. The discussion of alternates to the concrete boat loading ramp at Laguna Park
was ordered held over to the next meeting.
19. The City Council discussed the installation of traffic signals which should be
placed next in order of importance to Johnson and Marsh Streets intersection.
The City Engineer's Office recommended that the Monterey- Johnson intersection
would be next in importance and that it was included in the 1963 -64 budget.
The City Council discussed potential intersections to be protected by the in-
stallation of automatic traffic signals.
On motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, that the in-
stallation of traffic signals at the intersection of an a Rosa and Mill Streets
be included in the 1963-64 budget.
Motion carried on the following vote:
' AYES: Clay P. Davidson, Miss Margaret McNeil, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: R. L. Graves, Jr.
ABSENT: Donald Q. Miller
20. Mr. R. Vosburgh, Design Engineer for the City, reported on the progress of the
restroom. specifications for Sinsheimer Park.
Mr. Vosburgh stated that the plans were ready and all that was needed was a final
check and review of the specifications.
The Engineer was instructed to proceed with plans and specifications for con-
sideration at the July 1, 1963 Council meeting.
21. The City Council discussed the removal of the public service posters in the
NLission Plaza area and on the Monterey -Grand Avenue intersection.
On motion of Mayor Davidson, seconded by Councilman Graves, that the company
owning the signs remove them both from the City property.. Motion carried.
Councilman Whelchel voted not.
22. The City Attorney's Office reported that Mr. Rothmeyer is slowly removing the
debris and junk from the I.O.O.F. Cemetery property on Lower Higuera Street.
23. At this time the.City Council discussed the proposal of the Public Administra-
tion Services to prepare an administrative study of the San Luis Obispo Police
Department.
The City Council discussed the proposal and its cost and requested that the
Administrative Officer get additional proposals from other companies.
211.. Communication from the Planning Commission recommending that the City Council
revoke use permit #96 -58 as the condition that the parking area be paved has
not been complied with, was referred back to the Planning Commission.on motion
of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Councilman Graves as the work of paving was
completed as of this time. „
25. For Council information, to be referred to the Planning Commission; petition from
Louis and Thelma F. Perozzi for annexation of sixteen (16) acrea to the City of
San Luis Obispo, 'Continuation of Ann Arbor Estates Tract), was orde_ed received
and filed.
26. Communication from Irvin J. Kogan, Chairman of the San Luis Obispo Pure Water-
Association, thanking the City Council-for their help in an effort to bring about
adequate regulation of domestic water supply from Santa Margarita Lake, was ordered
received and filed.
27. Report by the Park and Recreation Commission regarding proposals of Councilman
Miller for development of certain recreational activities at Laguna Lake Park,
was ordered received and filed.
28. Memorandum in opposition of the application of Pacific Airlines for a change in
service pattern before the C. A. B. by the City of Santa Rosa, California; was.
ordered received and filed.
29. Communication from California Bench Company requesting that the City Council
allow them to leave some of the bus benches in their location for the con-
venience of the public; City Engineer was requested to submit a list of how many
benches the company wishes to keep in San Luis Obispo and where they were
located.
30. Communication from Hawthorne School expressing their appreciation for having
the opportunity of touring Whale Rock Dam, was ordered received and filed.
31. Communication from Senator Vernon L. Sturgeon acknowledging receipt of a copy of
a letter sent to Mr. Foley by Mayor Davidson and informing Mayor Davidson that he
h has written to Mr. Womack expressing his interest in the matter of placing direction-
al signals on Highway No. 101, was ordered received and filed.
32. The City Council discussed replacements to the various Boards and Commissions.
Mayor Davidson nominated Richard Loomis to be a memberof the Park and
Recreation.
Nomination was seconded by Councilman Graves.
Councilwoman McNeil nominated Mrs. Gretchen Dilbeck to be amember of the Park
and Recreation Commission. Nomination was seconded by Councilman Graves.
Councilman Graves nominated John Heinz to be a member of the Library Board,
Councilman Graves suggested that the City Council meet with the nominees on
Tuesday, June 25, 1963.
33. J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, brought to the Council's attention the announcement
of the annual League Conference to be held in San Francisco on October 20 723,
1963, and if the Council wished reservations he would be very glad to make them
for the Council.
34. J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk, presented a notice of the quarterly meeting of Channel
Counties, Division of League of California Cities, to be held in Port Hueneme on
June 27, 1963-
35. The following report was received from the City Engineer regarding the size of
replacement trees:
"From experience of several bids, we have found that it is normal procedure for
nurseries to transplant from a 5 gallon container size to a 15 gallon size.
Thus, we find that the policy which would restrict City participation to a 10
gallon size tree-is somewhat unusable. I would suggest that we revise this policy
tospecify either 5 gallon size tree or a 15 gallon site tree.
"Dr. Smith has informed us that so far as he is concerned.,-he- would not accept
5 gallon size trees on his property. Therefore, if the Council determines that the
Z 15 gallon size is the standard, we must renegotiate with Dr. Smith.
CID "Lie have received a bid for the planting of trees and shrubs on Dr. Smith's property
consisting of a mixture of 5 and 15 gallon plants which in aggregate averages out
to a 10 gallon size, This may bean acceptable compromise, and if the Council
wishes we can negotiate on this basis."
It was the common consent of the Council that 15 gallon size trees be used as
a standard.
36. On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the City was
authorized to advertise;fcr replacement of four (4) police cars as approved in
the 1963-64 budget.
37. R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, reported to the.City.Council on bids received
for maintenance of the Police Department and'Fire Department radio system.
Mr. Miller stated the low bid was received from Pacific Communications of Santa
Maria-and-recommended that the low bid be accepted.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the low bid of '
Pacific Communication was accepted.
38. The City Council discussed the matter of the Highway.Patrol and the Department of
Motor Vehicles acquiring the City owned property on California Boulevard'for the
construction of buildings for the Highway Patrol and the Department of Motor Vehicles.
On motion of Councilman Whelchel, seconded by Mayor Davidson., that the City enter
into negotiation with the State for acquisition. Motion carried. Mayor Davidson
voted no.
39. Mayor Davidson; on behalf of-the Salvation Army, requested City permission to use an
apartment on City owned property on Monterey Street as a headquarters for the local
chapter of'the Salvation Army subject to the filing of.the- necessary.documents
holding the City harmless from any activity carried on by the Salvation Army.
City Council approved the request subject to a report from the Building Department
as to use and building conditions and subject to the preparation of a lease by
the City Attorney.
On motion of Councilman Graves, seconded by Councilwoman McNeil, the meeting ad-
journed•at 12:30 A. M. to Tuesday, June 25, 1963, at the Motel Inn at 12 :00 noon.
Approved the lst day of July, 1963.
�I. FITZF9TRICK, CITY CLERK