HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/07/1966Roll Call
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
November 7, 1966 - 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL
Present: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
City Staff
Present: B. Walter, Acting Planning Director; J. H. Fitzpatrick, City
Clerk; J. Stockton, Assistant Park and Recreation Director;
H. Johnson, City Attorney; R. D. Miller, Administrative
Officer; D. F. Romero, City Engineer; L. Schlobohm, Fire Chief;
D. Englert, Police Captain.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the minutes of the
meetings of August 31, September 29, October 3, October 11 and October 24, 1966
were approved. Motion carried.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, claims against
the City for the month of November 1966 were approved subject to the approval of the
Administrative Officer. Motion carried.
1. Mrs. E. Polk requested that her item dealing with access from her property on
Chorro Street to Parking lot No. 11 be dropped from the agenda.
2A. The City Council discussed the need of additional limited parking on Meinecke
Street and Murray Street north of Broad Street as the students from the Tropicana
Development who have been forced to move from Broad Street are now parking on the
' side streets and prohibiting the property owners from using their property.
Mr. C. R. Roberts, 76 North Broad Street, appeared before the City Council request-
ing that the signs placed on Broad Street prohibiting parking be changed to include
two hour parking day and night including Sunday and holidays, and no parking 3:00
to 6:00 A.M.
R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, reported to the City Council that the signs
presently on Broad Street are temporary signs and that the regular signs which have
been ordered will include the wording similar to that requested by Mr. Roberts.
The Traffic Committee was requested to study the matter of additional restricted
parking in the vicinity of the Tropicana Student Housing Development.
The Traffic Committee was also requested to look into the need for a loading zone
on Ramona Street adjacent to the Polin Shopping Center.
2B. At this time the City Council discussed setting the date for the developer of
Tropicana Development to meet the ratio of male and female students as provided in
the approved precise plan of the Housing Development,
Mayor Whelchel suggested that September 1, 1967 be the date when the Baker Brothers
must comply with the use permit of the planned development and bring the ratio of
male and female students to the original application.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, that the Council
grant Baker Brothers until September 1, 1967 to comply with the original use permit
requirement stating the ratio of male to female students in the development.
Mr. Murphy, Attorney representing the developers of Tropicana, asked that the City
Council extend the time limit to September 1, 1968.
Mr. Baker, Developer of Tropicana, appeared before the City Council stating that
based on past student occupant growth, he felt it would take until September 1,
1968 to comply with the requirement of female students in the Tropicana Village
building.
Mayor Whelchel stated that Mr. Baker could apply to the Planning Commission and the
City Council for an amendment to his planned development regarding the ratio of male
to female students.
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 2
Motion carried.
Mayor Whelchel asked Mr. Baker when would the bridge be, installed giving two way
access to the rear parking lot at the Tropicana Development.
Mr. Baker stated that depending upon the weather it would take at least two weeks
construction time. I
Mr. Romero, City, Engineer, explained that only 227'spaces at the ,Tropicana Develop-
ment meet all City standards, this being some 35.'5paces short of the requirements
of the original use permit. He expanded on the basis for rejecting some of the
spaces provided.
Mr. Baker stated he would put in the Ramona Street extension bridge as soon as
weather permits allowing two weeks for construction.
Mr. Baker continued that he would send a letter to the City Council relative to
this agreement of installing a bridge on Ramona Street.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, that the matter of
compliance of the one way bridge and the twelve parking spaces at the Islander be
referred to the Planning Commission to see if they comply with City requirements.
Motion carried.
Mr. Baker stated that the bridge and parking spaces at the Islander were on the plan
presented and he assumed that when the plan was approved that this bridge would be
adequate and that the parking spaces met City requirements.
Mr. Baker was referred to the Planning Commission where this matter would be studied
as requested by the City Council.
3. Communication from the Planning Commission recommending that the City Council '
update the Industrial Economic Survey as this is an extremely valuable document
for the City and for persons wishing information regarding the community.
The Planning Commission also recommended that the comments of Mr. Wallace, the
City's Economic Development Director, be included in this recommendation.
Communication from Mr. Fran Wallace recommending that the City Council proceed with
the updating of the Economic and Industrial Survey prepared by Larry Wise but he
recommended that instead of one report that consideration of this report be divided
into three sections, one for public use, one a comparison section for staff use and
one portion to be a separate report to be used by persons or companies actually
developing in the Community.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Blake, that the City
notify Mr. Larry Wise that they are interested in updating the first phase of this
report but asked for his proposal based on the suggestion of Mr. Wallace. Motion
carried.
4. Communication from the Chamber of Commerce requesting permission to conduct a
parade at 4:00 P.M. on Tuesday, December 13, 1966 with live alaskan reindeer was
approved on motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring. Motion
carried.
5. Mr. Johnson, City Attorney, presented for the Council's consideration an '
easement encroachment agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and the San
Luis Garbage Company which would allow the Garbage Company to build a building over
the City sewer easement.
A1r. Johnson explained the conditions of the agreement which protected the City and
the Garbage Company.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the Mayor was
authorized to sign.the.agreement on behalf of the!City'. Motion carried. Councilman
Miller voting no.
6. Communication from the Planning Commission recommending that the City Council
x
grant an exception' to the sidewalk requirements ai'422 Lemon Street on the property
owned by-Joe P. Middleton.
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 3
TM Planning Commission stated that they could see no reason for the sidewalk at"
this time but that the exception would be granted on the provision that a covenant
be signed by the property owner;to install sidewalks at such time as the City may
require.
Mr. Walter, Acting Planning Director, explained to the City Council the consider-
ations given to this request.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the requested
exception was denied. Motion carried. Mayor Whelchel voting no;
9. Communication from the City Clerk regarding a poll of the property owners
regarding the removal of the street light recently installed in:the alley between
Mission and Almond Streets.
The City Clerk reported that four property owners wished -the light to stay as 1:6.
two asked to have it removed ... agd one -had no- ,preference,.'and one property owner
asked if the light were moved could it be put on the pole behind his property.
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, was asked to look into the placement of a shade over the
street light in order to accommodate the property owner who has complained of the
light flooding his bedroom.
11. Mr. Romero, City Engineer, reported as follows on the drainage pipe being
installed between the Polin and Baker properties on Ramona Drive:
He explained that in his initial letter to Mr. Polin regarding the drainage
connection he called for a total length of 6 to 8 feet. Mr. Polin had accomplished
-this transition in two feet, creating a completely unacceptable hydraulic character-
' istic which would result in plugging of the facility."
Mr. Martin Polin stated that he felt that he had complied with the City Engineer's
requirements as to the connection of these two sections of drainage pipe, and now
could not understand what was lacking or why the City Engineer was dissatisfied.
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, explained the problem by a drawing and explained the
hydraulic problems involved..
Mr. Polin stated that to take out the pipe connection he had presently installed
would be.very expensive and could not a baffle welded into the pipe section take
care of the objection of the City Engineer.
On motion of Councilman Miller,.seconded by Councilman Gallagher, that the City
Council approve Polin 's pipe connection as installed with the additional install-
ation of a baffle at the upper end to eliminate sioppage to be approved by the City
Engineer.._
Mr. Romero stated that Mr. Polin was informed by the City Inspector on the job that
the pipe connection as installed was not adequate and not approved by the City.
Mr.. Polio stated his installation was approved by a Los Angeles Engineer and he was
r,.
sure this proposal would meet City standards. '
Motion carried.
13. R. D: Miller, Administrative Officer, presented for the Council's consider-
ation the conditions for advertising a lease for a service- station site on.Prado
Road as followsc Minimum of °$550 per month with the variable being the number of
cents per gallon and length of the lease term to•be 15 years.
14" The City Clerk reported on the bids received for the Influent Pump No. 42 City
Plan No. 5 -670
Gleim -Crown Pump;-Inc. - $132889.00
Fresno, California
On motion of- Councilman Gallagher, seconded by.Councilman Miller, the bid of
Gleim -Crown Pump, Inc. was accepted. Lotion carried.
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 4
16. On motion of Councilman Mille r, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the.foll-ov-
ing resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1619, a resolution regarding
combination of surplus property over and under 82,500e
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES•; None
ABSENT None
17. On motion of Councilman Spring,seconded by Councilman -Xila ri, the follow-
ing resol-ttlon was introduced. Resolution No. 1615., a resolution amending
...Resolution No, 1573 (1966 Series ) regarding salary of City Attorney.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES Emmons Bl#e, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES ; None
ABSENT : None
18. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the follow -
contract payments were approved and ordered paid.
A -1 ELECTRIC COMPANY
Traffic Signal Installation
A -1 ELECTRIC COMPANY
Traffic Signal Installation
C. S. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Street Resurfacing Project
BURKE COT ?STRUCTION COMPANY
Municipal Parking lot # 11
Est # 6 (100% complete)
Est. # 7 (Final )
Est. # 1 (20% complete)
Est. # 1 (26% complete)
WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Est. #5 (100 % complete}
Edna Road Sewer Project
WEST COAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Est. #6 ( Final )
Edna Road Sewer Project
Motion carried.
$ 302.68
3,029.15
5,468.40
3,157.13
28,152.48
11,796.41
23. Mr. Romero, City Engineer, asked for Council guidance on the agreement
between the City of San Luis Obispo and Young Brothers for hookup to the sewer and
water on Edna Road.
After discussion by the City Council and on motion of Councilman Blake, seconded
by Councilman Gallagher, that the Young Brothers Market utility hookup be assessed
on the same basis as the Westside Auto Parts hookup. Motion carried.
190 R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, announced the appointment of John
Campbell as Utility Plant Operator I, at the Sewer Plant effective November 9,
1966 at Step..l, $ 405 per month, subject to a probationary period of one dear.
20. On motion of Councilman Spring, seconded by Councilman Miller, the .Mayor
was authorized to acdept and record on behalf of the ity the following grant deed
and street widening agreement.
Grant Deed :and. Agreement • from Union Oil Company of California for street
widening on Broad Street.
Motion carried.
f]
1
f!
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 5
21. Mr. Romero;, City _Epgineer, presented..a progress report dated November 7, 1966
on street widening acquisitions by the. City as follows:
FOOTHILL BLVD. BETWEEN BROAD AND CHORRO
Ferrini Widening: Turned over to City Attorney 11 -7 -66.
' FOOTHILL BLVD. BETWEEN CHORRO AND SANTA ROSA STREET
Polin- Truchan Widening: The Engineering Department staff has made numerous
unsuccessful.attempts to contact Burt Polin. He simply refuses to call back
and.is, not present when we have been by his place of business.. Mr. Truchan
appears receptive to the widening under certain conditions but will not make
a decision not concurred in by Mr. Polin; therefore, negotiations are now at.a
stalemate. The widening was turned over to the City Attorney 11 -7 -66.
Martin Polin Widening: I wrote to Texaco on.oct. 25, 1966 asking the status
of my previous request regarding widening at the corner of Santa Rosa and
Foothill. I have received no reply to date.
NORTH SIDE OF.FOOTHILL BLVD. - BETWEEN CHORRO AND SANTA ROSA ST. (Main Widening)
Turned over to City Attorney 11 -7 -664
SANTA ROSA.STREET BETWEEN PALM AND MONTEREY
Modifications to Barcellos perch out to bid. Bids to be.received Nov. 10,°
19662 2 :00 P.M:
JOHNSON AVE.- BETWEEN UNDERPASS AND.BRECR ST. :.
Sodeman Widening:. Turned over to City Attorney 11- 7 -66..
After some discussion by the City Council as to street widening priorities, the
City - Council again reiterated that the - following streets would be widened in the
1966/67 fiscal year.
1. South side of Foothill Boulevard, Broad Street to Santa Rosa Street.
IA. Monterey Street realignment:and Mission Plaza.
2. Johnson Avenue, Breck Street to the underpass and Lizzie Street to the
underpass.
3. Santa Rosa•Street, Palm Street to Monterey Street, west side.
4. Santa Rosa Street, Mill Street to Palm Street, west side.
22. -R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer, announced the appointment of-Ronald 'D:
Young as Director of Planning and - Building effective January 10, 1967 at Step 4,
$935 per month, with recommendation that he be considered for the top.step in one
year.
On motion of.Councilman.Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the - Council
approved the fourth step in.the.:.salary , range for R. D. Young. Motion carried.
8. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the appeal by the Shell
Oil Company from a decision -of the Planning Commission denying their request for
rezoning from R -4 to C -N that property located at the east corner of'Johnson
Avenue and Marsh Street, more commonly known as 1305 and 1319 Marsh Street.
Mr. Walter, Acting Planning Director, reported'to the City Council on the public .
hearing held by the Planning Commission on this matter and.the considerations ..
given prior to denying the requested-rezoning::
Mayor..Whelchel declared the public hearing open.
Mr. G. Shipsey, Attorney, appeared before the City Council on behalf of the Shell
Oil Company and briefly explained for the Councils information the actions taken
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 6
by the Planning Commissionduring the past hearing on this matter.
Mr. Shipsey stated that the plans for the property owned by the Shell Oil Company
are to construct a modern'siiper service station on this corner to serve the mobile
public of the City.
an�Mr. Shi se reviewed for the Council actions taken by the City by prior actio�.of
aps, zoning maps, and general plan maps, that since 1957 have shovin this
area to be future commerical and further that the Council planning consultant had ,
recommended to the City Planning Commission that Marsh Street to the Southern
Pacific Company tracks be considered- commercial property.
Mr..Shipsey further presented information that Johnson Avenue was a major thorough.
fare a residential development area including the County Hospital, Library
and Heath Department and residential development and felt that in view of this
growth that the proposal between Shell Oil Company at this location is a logical
development for the property.
Mr. Shijsey continued that under the newly adopted Zoning Ordinance of the City
the FlannIng Commission has _full control of the development of a service station
by use permit.
He further felt that the construction of this station would be an asset to the
growth of the area and to the City as a whole...
Mr. Shipsey then presented the.ne -nes of six property owners in the immediate area
of the proposed service station who were in favor of this development.
Mr. J. Dan O'Donnell 1363 Marsh Street, spoke in favor of the requested rezoning
which he'fe t was in accordance with the general plan for development of the area.
Mrs. Laverne Schneider appeared before the City Council objecting to the requested
rezoning and asked Mat the City Council protect the residents of this area from '
additional encroachment in the neighborhood by commercial development particularly
a service station which she felt was the poorest type of development for the.area.
She stated that there are fourteen service stations within four block area of the
suggested property and felt that this was enough stations to handle the needs of the
neighborhood for many years to come.
She stated she appeared before the City Council on behalf of her neighbors who live
on Marsh Street, requesting that the City Council deny this rezoning in order to
protect the residential nature of the neighborhood.
Mr. C. Diel, 1326 Pacific Street, stated that the City Council should take into
consideration that the majority of the neighbors to this proposed development object
to this rezoning and hoped that the City Council would protect residents of the
area.
Mr. J. Berkemeyer, stated he was opposed to the construction of a service station
on this site at this time as he felt the proposal was premature as the residential
buildings in the area were well kept by the property owners who have lived there
for many years.
Mr. Polin, Attorney representing the North property at 1320 Marsh Street. stated
that if oth sides of Marsh Street were rezoned to commercial he would recommend
that the property owners.approve the rezoning. But if his clients property were '
not rezoned then he would oppose this proposal.
Mrs. Schneider again appeared before the City Council opposed to this rezoning
on the grounds that it was premature and that the residential development should
be protected by the City Council.
Mabel Rotzel, 1310 Aarsh Street, Btv#et, stated she objected to the rezoning as she felt
there was no need to rezone this property for a service station as she felt there
were enough stations in the immediate area toL Serve this area.
Mr. T. Coull, 1306 Higaera Street, stated that he had just moved from this address
due to a service station having been built directly behind his home on Monterey
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 7
Street and that this operation was so annoying to him and his family that they
had to move because the station operated at all hours of the day and night.
He wished to warn the residents near the proposed service station of the annoyances
that would be received if this were allowed to be built.
He felt there were enough stations in the City at this time, particularly within
the four block area of the property being requested for rezoning.
G. Shipsey again stated reasons to the City Council for approving this rezoning
so that the Shell Oil Company could develop a nice service station on this corner.
Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing closed.
Councilman Spring presented to the City Council the history of this property and the
number of times it had been proposed for this development and stated he opposed the
rezoning at this time as he felt there was no need for a service station in this
area.
Councilman Gallagher stated he opposed the rezoning as he felt there. was no need
for a service station in this nice residential area but felt that he would be in
favor of professional office development and construction on Marsh Street,
Mayor Whelchel stated that he was also opposed to the rezoning as he felt it was a
premature request and would be an annoyance in this type of residential area and he
further felt some day the area would develop commercially but that he would look to
residential office development favorably and not commercial.
On motion of Councilman Spring, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, that the appeal
of Shell Oil Company be denied and that the decision of the Planning Commission be
upheld. Motion carried.
7. At this time the City Council held a public hearing on the recommendation of
the Planning Commission to rezone from R -2 to R -0 property located at 2225, 22312
2241 and 2251 Broad Street.
Mr. Walter, Acting Planning Director, briefed for the City Council the action and
studies made by the Planning Commission relative to this rezoning.
Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before the City Council on this matter.
Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following
ordinance was passed to print. Ordinance No. 357, an ordinance rezoning property
on Broad Street from R -2 to R -0.
Introduced and passed to print on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald q. 1411ler, Clell W. Whelchel
' NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10. Me. Romero, City Engineer, presented to the City Council two proposals for
bridging San Luis Creek at Andrews Street (1) with a high bridge and (2) a low
level concrete crossing at this point.
Dr. Harper appeared before the City Council stating that the children in the area
need this bridge to cross San Luis Creek in order to go to school where in winter
months they are forced to take the long way by California Boulevard to get to school.
Dr. Harper recommended that the high level bridge be installed for greater safety
of the children.
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 8
Mr. Hobbs, resident of the area, recommended the high level bridge as he was afraid
debris plugging up the low level structure would not allow the children to go to
school without getting wet or sliding down the banks.
Mr. Loper appeared before the City Council warning them of a potential danger to
placing an obstruction in the center of the Creek which would be required by the
high level structure as debris could hang up on this pier causing damage to I
properties upstream.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the City Engineer
be instructed to prepare plans and specifications for the high level bridge and
raise the level of the bridge two feet over Andrews Street level for clearance of
debris.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1616, a resolution increasing the 1966/
67 budget.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
12. At this time the City Council discussed ways and means to clean up and
beautify the Creeks going through the City of San Luis Obispo.
Mayor Whelchel suggested that possibly service groups or other groups interested I
in City development could get together and clean up the Creek banks before all the
debris is washed back into the Creek when the water rises after the rains.
Mr. Floyd Abbott, representing the Boy Scouts of America, proposed to the City
Council that they make a scout project to clean out the Creek on the weekend of
November 19, 1966 and that they would clean on the Creeks in the downtown area that
are accessible and all that they asked was that the City furnish the truck or
trucks to haul the debris to the dump.
Mr. Abbott stated that the Boy Scouts could pick up the debris and carry it to the
intersections or crossings and then load the debris into City trucks for the dump.
Mr. Dunin, Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce Tourist and Convention Committee,
urged that the City do what it could to clean up the creeks in the City to make the
City more attractive to the tourists and residents.
He felt that the City should organize a clean up spruce up combined to clean up
the entire City so that everyone can be proud to live here.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, that the City
participate with the Boy Scouts of America on Creek clean up on the weekend of
November 19, 1966. Notion carried.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, that the City
personnel use the City dump for dumping all debris other than clean fill collected '
in the City. Motion carried.
15. At this time the City Council considered the final passage or Ordinance No.
356, an ordinance adopting the Uniform Heating and Cooling Code by reference.
Mr. Loper appeared before the City Council and questioned the need for the adoption
of-this ordinance as he felt that by adopting a Code written by someone else that
it was only to the benefit of the contractors and not to the individual who wished
to do work on his own property which is covered by the Code.
Mr. Loper continued that as the Code establishes who may do work under this
ordinance, he stated an individual could not procure a permit as he would not be
City Council Minutes
November 7, 1966
Page 9
a qualified contractor. Therefore, each individual who wished work done on their
home would be required to hire a contractor to do the work or he would have to
bootleg the work himself without a permit. He stated that on this basis the control
the Council desires by passage of an ordinance would be lost as the unqualified
person would not-take -out a'permit as he- would"not.be considered qualified.
Mr. Loper also stated that the proposed ordinance does not clearly define who can
do work under the ordinance and who is qualified, other than -a contractor, to do
the work.
Mr. B. Walter, Acting Planning Director, explained to the City Council the reasons
for.= his.Department' recommending the adoption-of this Code as it is primarily to
controls ;new�constructioii'and:majoi remodelings but was -not--intended for a small vent
or changing of a wall heater. - = - 'I -
Mr:- Walter - added - that - the - reason - for -the permit- was" so -that-a-qualified-inspector--
could review the work when done by an individual not licensed as a contractor.
On motion of Councilman G611agher;1sec4inded'by Councilman Blake, the ordinance was
introduced for final passage.
Finally passed =on the following-roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher; Arthui'Fe Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
24. Communication from Robert H. Newdoll, Cement Contractor,-who was a subcontractor
on the Sandercock reconstruction project appealing the request by the City Council
to repair the sidewalk at 144 Cypress Street which was ordered repaired by the City
Council as the sidewalk is failing.
Mr. Newdoll stated that he had hired a soils engineer and that the trouble is not
with the concrete sidewalk but that the under soil is saturated with water and this
is contributing to the breaking up of the sidewalk. In view of this opinion, Mr.
Newdoll asked that the City Council reconsider their decision for him to replace
this sidewalk in accordance with the contract guarantee.
Mr. Romero, City Engineer, explained to the City Council that he and his staff
had investigated this problem and agreed that there was a great amount of saturation
under the base for this sidewalk and felt that this contributed to the damage that
has been caused.
Mr. Romero also stated that in an area on Cypress Street when the concrete was
placed for the sidewalk it had too much water in it resulting in cracking of the
sidewalk.
After discussion by the City Council it was moved by Councilman Miller, seconded by
Councilman Spring, that the Council deny the appeal of Mr. Newdoll and further
Instruct the City Engineer to notify the contractor to make the necessary repairs
to the subject sidewalk. Motion carried.
' On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman.Miller, the meeting adjourned
to 1:30 P.M. Thursday, November 10, 1966. Motion carried.
Approved: November 21, 1966
,/4. H. FiT2PATRicK
CITY CLERK