HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/21/1969Adjourned City Council Minutes
April 14, 1969
Page 7
B10. Communication from.Dr.. Joseph Sarullo, M.D.; requesting sick leave in excess
of five days.for Gerald Dorman who has been under his care.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the request for
sick leave in excess of five days for Gerald Dorman was approved. Motion carried.
Bll. The City Council adjourned to executive session to discuss property acquisi-
tion involving potential litigation.
B12. On motion of Councilman.Gal-lagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the meeting
was adjourned. Motion carried.
APPROVED: . FITZTrATRICK, CITY CLERK
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
April 21, 1969 - 7;00 P.M.
City Hall
Pledge
Invocation: Rev. Paul S. Ray, First Baptist Church
Roll Call
Present: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
' City Staff
Present: R. D. Young, Planning Director; J. H. Fitzpatrick, City Clerk;
J. Stockton, Park and Recreation Supervisor; H. Johnson, City
Attorney; R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer; D. F. Romero,
City Engineer; E. Rodgers, Police Chief; L. Schlobohm, Fire
Chief.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the minutes of
the meeting of March 17, 1969 were approved as presented.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, claims against the
City for the month of April, 1969 were approved and ordered paid subject to the
approval of the Administrative Officer.
--------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ - - - - -0
1. Petition (32 signers) from residents•of San Luis Drive requesting that the
pedestrian bridge which crosses San Luis Creek at Andrews Street be removed and
replaced with a pedestrian bridge that will not be a flood debris menace from
future rains, as it is obvious that the present bridge as constructed could, in
the future, during heavy rains, again become a flood debris dam, thereby causing
damage to homes along San Luis Drive and Andrews Street.
' D. F. Romero, City Engineer, explained the solutions available to the City Council.
(1) To remove the bridge in its entirety and replace the bridge with an at grade
crossing.
(2) Remove the center pier on the existing bridge and /or
(3) Raise the bridge three feet, at an estimated cost of $2500 to $5000.
6ouncilman Spring urged that the bridge should only be reconstructed to allow a
foot bridge.for children to go to school.
City Council Minutes
April 21, 1969
Page 2
A. E. Ruda, 1779 San Luis Drive,.felt that the bridge should not be removed-or
raised, but felt that by removing the center pier it would eliminate debris
hang up and future flood damage.
Francis F. Whitney, 1789 San Luis Drive, showed a number of colored slides of the
condition before, during and after the January rainstorms, which showed damage in
the vicinity of San Luis Drive and Andrews Street caused by the debris caught in
the bridge.
Richard Enos, 1830 San Luis Drive, felt that removing the center pier would -
eliminate most of the problem, as during the storm he and his neighbors had to
remove debris caught on the bridge.
Mayor Whelchel suggested that the matter be continued until the new Council takes
office in May.
2. Rev. Paul S. Ray, First Baptist Church, Vice- president of Judson Terrace
Homes, appeared before the City Council on behalf of his request for a waiver of
the various City fees involved in the Judson Terrace Homes senior citizens project.
He continued that the reason for this request was not because of the Church's
involvement, as the housing project would be for people of all religions, colors
and creeds. The reason for the requested waiver of fees is that the project
has taken so long to put together that the cost has risen and the grant applied
for will not be enough to cover the necessary City fees. He felt this could be
the City's contribution to this worthwhile project.
R.D. Young, Planning Director, presented the following figures on the amount of
The building permit and the plan check fees being requested waived for the senior
citizen's housing project.
Estimated Total Valuation: $693,000
Building Permit Fee: $ 819.50'.
Plan Check Fee: 409.75
Electrical Permit Fees:
10 Permits Total 339.00
Plumbing Permit Fees:
10 Permits Total 635.00
Heating Permit Fees:
9 Permits Total 563.00
Grand Total $20766.25
Councilman -Blake suggested -that -this-request be continued until after Rev:-Rav-
has met with representatives of HOD. He felt that at that time the Council could
consider waiving a portion of the fees.
Councilman Spring stated that he agreed with Councilman Blake's suggestion and that
he would like to hear the overall program of financing before any fees were waived.
The matter was continued until Rev: Ray has had a chance to meet with representa-
tives of ROD.
3. Greg Cole and Fred Christiansen of the School of Architecture at Cal Poly
appeared before the City Council proposing that the Council extend the boundaries
of Santa Rosa Park to include a portion of Stenner Creek, including a parcel
owned by Tom Baumberger.
G. Cole continued that the existing boundary of Santa Rosa Park has failed to
realize the potential use of Stenner Creek as'an asset to the park system and sug-
gested that if the boundaries of the park were changed to- include the creek, it
could become one of the nicest creek areas in the City.
1
L
City Council Minutes
April 21, 1969
Page 3
He'urged the City Council to take the necessary action to acquire this property.
G. Cole with the assistance of Fred Christiansen, then presented a slide program
of existing conditions in this portion of Stenner Creek and their suggestions for
integrating it into the park.
Councilman Syrinx stated that he felt the City should complete the acquisition
and - completion of South Side Park before purchasing additional land for Santa
Rosa Park or any other park in the City as he felt the City Council had made a
commitment to this development.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Millet, the City Attorney
was instructed to open negotiations with the property owner for acquisition or
lease of this property. Motion carried.
Communication.from the Park and Recreation Commission supporting the -recommendation
of Greg Cole for acquisition of additional land for Santa Rosa Park.
4. At this time the City Council.held a public hearing on the appeal.of Checker-
board Properties (Jack -In -The -Box Drive -In) from a denial by the Planning Commis-
sion of a requested rezoning of 47 Santa Rosa Street from R -0 to C -N.
R.D. Young, Planning Director, presented the following recommendation from the
Planning Commission for denying the requested rezoning.
(1).'.The.subject property is located at the northwest corner of Santa Rdsa and
Meinecke Streets. It is bounded on the north, south and east by an R -0 District
and on the west by an R -1 District. The General Plan proposes high density
residential: office uses in this general area. Several new offices have been
established along Santa Rosa Street in the R -0 District.
(2) The'rezoning as proposed constitutes spot zoning and could not be considered
an orderly expansion of an existing C -N District.
(3) It was the consensus of the Commission that property owners in this area
have relied on the General Plan and that the approval of C -N zoning would-encourage
similar applications along $anta Rosa Street leading to the eventual strip com-
c mercial zoning of Santa Rosa between' Foothill Boulevard and U.S. Highway 101.
(4) It was the opinion of the Commission that the entire Santa Rosa Street
frontage should not be allowed to develop with 'heavy traffic generating uses
-permitted in'the C -N and R -C Districts since this would tend to negate the function
of Santa Rosa Street as a major traffic carrier.
Mayor Whelchel declared the public-hearing open.
A.,Renetzky appeared before the City Council on behalf of Checkerboard Properties,
Inc. explaining the proposal denied by the Planning Commission. He stated that
he disagreed with the Planning Commission as he felt that the property owners
adequately, protect adjacent residential property. He stated he felt that the
financial advantages to the City in- property tax and sales tax would far outweigh
any disadvantages.
He: continued he felt that the Jack -In- The -Boa Drive- ln would.be an asset to the
community and urged the City Council.to overrule the decision of the Planning
Commission.
D..Delana, Vice- President of Jack -In- The -Boat, appeared before the City Council
urging-that-they overrule the decision-of the Planning Commission and rezone the
property for development of a drive- in.restaurant..
B. Williams ,'Jack -In- The -Boat Drive -In real estate representative, urggddthe Council
to rezone ft_�property for development of a drive -in as he felt the proposed site
would be well developed and would be an asset to the City, not only for its
customers but for the City's tax revenue.
City Council Minutes
April 219 1969
Page 4
.Dr. Clawson, property.owner,'objected to the proposed rezoning as he,felt.-At u-
would generate traffic in a residential area not only during the day but also in
the late.night hours adding noise.and confusion to a nice .residential area:.
Also,he questioned the construction of a drive- in.restaurant near Meinec_ke :. Street
where the City Council had recently approved the development of a convalescent
hospital.
He urged that the Council protect the adjacent-property owners by upholding,the
decision of.the Planning Commission:
Miss Maxwell objected to the requested rezoning and urged the City Council to
uphold-the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the application.':;,She
continued that the City must protect the people who live in the area•and,not:c::
allow a hodge podge of junky drive -ins on.Santa Rosa Street. i
G:� Cole urged that the City Council deny the application and not change•.Ithe -:'.
present zoning.
G. Veatch, Meinecke Street, objected to the requested rezoning and urged:that..
the City Council protect residential property:and only allow R -0 zoning:
B. Kelso, 950 Meinecke Street, objected to the rezoning and stated he did not
feel the development would be an asset -to the'neighborhood.
Dr. Field, 84 Santa Rosa Street, objected to the rezoning which would allow
another drive -in on Santa Rosa.Street as he -and Dr..Cox - had built their..clinic-
in'the'belief that they would be protected by R -0 zoning. _ •(-;
-_ ',,:.:
B. Barrows, 870 Meinecke Street, objected to the.proposed use of the property -and
urged that the Council deny the requested rezoning:
Dr. Van Eeckhout, 191 Santa Rosa.Street, objected to the commercial; >usesion
Santa Rosa Street and urged that the Council not open Santa Rosa to more.,com- s
mercial use, but keep it for office and residential uses.
Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing closed.. .,,•:.
Councilman Blake Atated that he.-concurred in the action of the Planning Commission
and would deny the application.
Councilman Spring stated he would:not object to the requested rezoning . as;_he -felt
that the development of the convalescent hospital' on Meinecke opened the _area,;to
commercial development.
Councilman Gallagher stated that he had viatted Santa Rosa. Street and studied
its uses and felt that he would deny the requested rezoning of Santa Rosa Street
as he .is in favor of the development-of good:.office and residential .uses on the
street.
Councilman Miller stated that he,would support the-Planning Commission'!and::deny
the requested commercial use as he felt that the area should develop.into:.R -0
uses.
on motion of Councilman' Gallagher, seconded-by Councilman Blake; that-the,applica-
tion for requested rezoning of 47'Santa Rosa:Street be denied. Motion-:carried,
Councilman Spring voting no.
5. At this time, the City.Council. held a-public hearing on.the recommendation'of
the Planning Commission to rezone:from R- 3' to -R- 0 :that.property.located'atr' •-.
2929 and 2939 Augusta Street...
R. D. Young, Planning Director, presented the following recommendation•.:_from, the
Planning Commission regarding -the requested rezoning. - L e •.1
1
1
City Council Minutes
April 21, 1969
Page 5
(1) The subject property is contiguous to an existing R -0 parcel to the east,
'bounded by a C -H District to the south and to an R=-3 District on the west and
north.
(2) The community's General Plan proposes development of retail commercial,
manufacturing research, and high density residential uses'in this general area.
(3) Approval of the requested-rezoning would not be inconsistent with the exist-
, ing zone pattern or in conflict with the recommendations of the General Plan.
Mayor'Wbelchel declared the public hearing open.
No one appeared before the City Council.
Mayor Whelchel declared the public hearing closed.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following
Ordinance was introduced. Ordinance-No. 450, an ordinance rezoning property
located at 2929 and 2939 Augusta Street from R -3 to R -0.
Passed to print on the following roll call vote:
••AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher,•Arthur F. Spring, Donald Q. Miller
-'' Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
6. Report from Wood's Animal Shelter for the months of January, February and
Maich on' animal control within the City of San Luis Obispo.
D. Duncan, representing Wood's Animal Shelter, stated that the biggest problem
facing the humane officers was that they were not allowed to issue citations to
the ' oinieis =of dogs found running loose, and that this made it extremely difficult
to control the dogs.
He felt that if the City Council would allow humane officers to issue citations
and take the dog owners to court, many of the problems would be eliminated.
H. Johnson, City Attorney, stated that the Penal Code of the State of'California
had been amended and had taken away the option of obtaining the classification of
peace officer for the humane officers. He added that the City Council could,• by
ordinaace,�allow humane officers to give citations.
E. Rodgers, Police Chief, stated he had no objection to humane officers issuing
citations but they should be properly instructed. He stated that the City
Attorney would have to represent the City in court for citations issued by the
humane officers. He agreed that the leash law must be enforced without favor
throughout the City.
Councilman - 'Blake stated that he felt the leash law should be enforced. He also
stated that if adequate fees were charged they would provide a good source of
revenue for the animal shelter.
..Councilman Spring stated that this has been one of the biggest problems and the
one for which he has received the most calls from citizens, concerning the apparent
lack of control and enforcement of the leash law.
-D: Duncan stated that the impound fees and board fees should be enforced in order
to-make it tougher on the dog owners who let their dogs run loose.
The matter was continued to the budget session of the City Council.
7. .Traffic Committee Report of April 17, 1969.
City Council Minutes
April 210 1969
Page 6
69- 4 -13C. The Traffic Committee has taken a look at the proposed channelization
improvements on the west side of Higuera north of Madonna Road and has discussed
the proposed red curbing with the service station. They have no objection; .and.
we recommend that the improvements be installed.
69- 4 -15T. The Traffic Committee-has had a request for a stop sign on.FloratStreet
at Laurel Lane stopping southbound traffic on Flora. We concur in the request
and recommend that such a stop sign be installed.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1936, a resolution establishing,a no=
parking zone on Higuera Street and establishing a stop sign on Flora Street.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
69- 4. -14T. The Traffic, Committee has received a request -from Bob's;Car Wash for
an extension to the present driveway for eight or ten feet in a westerly direction.
This would facilitate traffic movements in and out of the car vlash and we feel
that the Council should grant an exception for the normal driveway�vidth. The
car wash is also asking for permission to move the existing sign approximately
eight to ten feet to the west and we feel that this would be advisable but the
matter will have to be referred to the Planning Commission for consideration.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, that•the recom-
mendation of the Traffic Committee be approved. Motion carried.
69- 4 -16T. The Traffic Committee has received a request from the E1ks'.Club for'
an additional -light to the south of the southerly driveway ramp. We recommend.
that a 175 watt lamp be installed on the existing pole at that location and that
an additional light be installed two poles to the south in front of the trailer
park entrance.
On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, the recommendation
was approved. Motion carried.
8. Communication from the Planning Commission recommending that an,.ord.inanee,
establishing a building setback line on San Luis Creek not be adopted was continued.
9. Communication from D. F. Romero, City Engineer, recommending a change;in the
subdivision ordinance which would require that all subdivision improvements'he
completed before recordation of the final map and the issuance of building,.,
permits is allowed.
Communication from W. L. Leonard, 3108 Flora Street, regarding storm damage in
the vicinity of 3108 Flora Street caused by an imcomplete subdivision...; -
D. F. Romero reported that the sewer line in the. vicinity of 3108 F1ora:Street.
had been repaired and that several breaks were found in the line. He added that
the sewer line had not been completely backfilled but would be completed.-as-soon
as the contractor could free equipment.to do the work.
Councilman Miller stated that he was informed that raw sewage was still leaking
and hoped that the City Council would authorize the City Engineer to keepLan, eye
on the problem in order to eliminate health•hazards. He urged the use'of ;City;
forces, if necessary, to clear up this problem.
ly
L. Blaser, developer, stated he has been attempting to correct any difficulties
in the sewer line which might cause a health hazard.and is ready to make any
corrections that are necessary.
1
City Council Minutes
April 21, 1969
Page 7
H. Johnson, City Attorney, presented for the Council's consideration Ordinance
No. 452, an ordinance amending the subdivision regulations to require completion
of improvements prior to acceptance of the final map.
L. Blaser appeared before the City Council and vehemently protested and objected
to the proposed ordinance, prohibiting acceptance of the final map of new sub-
divisions until all the improvements are complete. He felt this was unfair and
he stated that this ordinance would further hinder housing developments in the
' community. He continued that the subdivision requirements in the City of San
Luis Obispo were so strict that it is almost impossible to develop property in
this area. He urged reconsideration and rejection of the proposed ordinance by
the City Council.
On motion of.Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Miller, the following
ordinance was introduced. Ordinance No. 452, an ordinance amending the subdivision
regulations to require comp]e tion of improvements prior to acceptance of the final
.:map• _.�,..
Passed to print on the follbwing roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10. At this time the City Council considered an agreement between the City of
San Luis Obispo and Fiesta Mobile Homes for development of a mobile home park at
Higuera and Prado Road.
D. F. Romero, City Engineer, recommended that.the agreement be approved by the
City Council subject to the following conditions:
(1) The Developer shall install-curb, gutter and sidewalk on Higuera Street and
bring the portion to be widened to gubgrade. The City will install base and
paving on the portion being foidened.
(2) Widening needed for Prado Road and Higuera Street and the drainage easement
shall be,offered for dedication at this time. The City will accept these parcels
upon.satisfactory completion of improvements designated on the plans and speci-
fications.
(3) The City will initiate proceedings to abandon those portions of Higuera Street
surplus to the requirements shown on the Higuera Street official Building Setback
Line maps.
(4) The Developer shall improve Prado Road (Co. Rd. 8107) between Lots 49 and
67 with curb and gutter, full depth base and prime coat for a full half street
width. The City will pay $3700.00 to cover excess cost beyond fully improving
1/2 of a local street along this frontage. Payment to be made upon completion
of the improvement and acceptance by the City.
_.(5) The Developer shall pay the City the sum of $4,128.60 (11.796 ac at.$35b /ac.)
water fees at the time of connection tbathe utility. This fee does not cover the
property owned by Developer south of Prado Road.
(6) The City will pay, upon satisfactory completion of the improvement, for the
' difference in cost between an 8 inch and a 12 inch water.main to:be• installed in
Prado Road from Higuera Street to Lot 69.
(7) The developer shall be entitled to such reimbursements as are specified
under Section 7410.6 of the Municipal Code.
On motion.of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by Councilman Blake, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1935.
City Council Minutes
April 21, 1969
Page 8
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10A. B. Adderson, representing Fiesta Mobile Homes, asked the City Council if
it was possible to pay the $4,128.60 at the time the mobile home park was'con-
nected to the City water system.
D. F. Romero stated that this has been done in other cases and he had no objections.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the request was
approved. Motion carried, Councilman Gallagher and Councilman Miller voting no.
11. Communication from the Attorney General of the State of California notifying
the City Council that the state is preparing to file treble damage antitrust
action against certain manufacturers of asphaltic petroleum products used in
road building and road maintenance, 'and Asking'if the City wishes to be a plain-
tiff and receive a share of any damages which may be assessed against the
defendants.
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Spring, the following
resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1939, a resolution authorizing the
Attorney General of California to conduct legal proceedings.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
12. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the follow-
ing resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1937, a resolution reducing various
equipment replacement budget items to-reflect unspent portions thereof and'ma_king
inter -funds transfers from various funds to the equipment replacement'fund.-
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
13. On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the follow-
' i
ing resolution was introduced. Resolution No. 1938, a resolution increasingthe
1968 -69 budget.
Passed and adopted. on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
14. Communication from the State Department of Finance, informing the City Council
that as of March 1, 1969 the official population of the City of San Luis Obispo
is 27,100L°
li
1
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
April 21, 1 %9
Page 9
15..,. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Gallagher, the follow-
ing Ordinance was introduced for final passage. Ordinance No. 449, an ordinance
rezoning property located between Los Osos Road, Royal Way and Madonna Road
extended from U to R -1, R -2 -S, R -H -S and R -O -S.
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur'F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
16. On motion of Councilman Gallagher, seconded by'Councilman Blake, the follow-
ing salary steps were approved. Motion carried.
Bashaw, John J. - Fireman
From Step 2 or $582 to Step 3 or $617
Cox, Dennis E. - Groundskeeper
From Step 1 or $430 to Step 2 or $455
Fennell, Arthur L. - Utility Plant Operator I
From Step 1 or $455 to Step 2 or $480
Grant, Gary H. - Police Officer
From Step 3 or $652 to Step 4 or $690
Floyd, Ruth I. - Stenographer
From Step 1 or $405 to Step 2 or $430
Headley, Donald L. - Utility Plant OperatorI
From Step 2 or $480 to Step 3 or $508
Ioppini, Robert H._- Maintenance Man II
From Step 3 or $508 to Step 4 or.$535
Pinedo, Paul E. - Groundskeeper
From Step 2 or $455 to Step 3 or $480
17. Mayor Whelchel brought tothe Council's attention a proposed new state aid
program for developing a senior citizen's recreation program in cooperation with
the cities of California:
He stated that he understood that in the first year the State paid for 757. of the
cost•of tbe..program. The second year 50%, and the third and final year 25 %. He
urged that the City Council look into the program as it was needed in the community
and felt.it could be self- supporting from dues and fees.
The matter was continued for fuither discussion by the City Council.
18..'Communication from the Free Students Union, a group of high school and college
students, requesting permission from the City Council to hold a street dance in
the Mission Plaza on Thursday, April 24, 1969 from 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M.
Tony Rassebaum, representing the Free Student Union, stated that this was to be
a free dance and no fees were to be charged.
He continued that Olnie Ruiz was to be the adult advisor for the group. .He
stated that he had contacted Father Steiger of the Old Mission and that he had
no objections to the dance being held in the Mission Plaza. He also contacted
B. Corcoran, President of the Downtown Association, who stated he approved of
The dance on a trial basis.
City Council Minutes
April 21, 1969
Page 10
On motion of Councilman Blake, seconded by Councilman Miller, the request fot a
dance in the Mission Plaza was approved. The Police Chief was instructed'to have
some of his Police Officers look in on the dance during the evening. Mot.ion''
carried. m
19. Communication from Boyd C. Medlin, requesting an exception to the installation
of curb, gutter and sidewalk at 536 South Street as he is not planning on building
on this lot at this time. Therefore he felt it would not serve any.useful purpose
to construct curb, gutter and sidewalk at this time as he does not know what type
of building will be on the lot, or where to place the sidewalks.
After discussion by the Council it was moved by Councilman Miller, seconded by
Councilman Sprint;, that the request be denied and B. Medlin be required to install
curb, gutter and sidewalk on his property at 536 South Street. Motion carried.
Councilman Miller voting no.
20. On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by'Councilman Gallagher, the meeting
adjourned to 11:30 A.M., April 22, 1969.
J. FITZPATRICK, CITY CLERK
APPROVED: June 2, 1969
MINUTES
ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
April 22, 1969 - 11:30 A.M. -
City Hall
Roll Call '
Present: Emmons Blake, Frank Gallagher, Arthur F. Spring,
Donald Q. Miller, Clell W. Whelchel
City Staff
Present: J. H. Fitzpartick, City Clerk; R. D. Miller, Administrative
Officer
1. City Clerk, J. H. Fitzpatrick, presented his certificate of the official
results of votes cast in the General Municipal Election held on April'15, 1969.
On motion of Councilman'Spring, seconded by Councilman Miller, the"certificate-
of the City Clerk was accepted. Motion carried.
1 - Number of registered voters in City 11609
Number of votes cast in City 6267'
Number of absentee votes cast in City
2 - Tabulation of votes by person
For Mayor
Clell W. Whelchel
Kenneth E. Schwartz
For Councilman
Emmons Blake
Myron J. Graham
Per C. Mathiesen
Herbert L. Miles
Jack G. Rogers
Dennis B. Wheeler
-'' 2821
3359
3271
2926
1432
710
`''739
2542
1
1
3,
GENERAL MUNICIPAL
CITY PRECINCTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
REGISTERED VOTERS
332
522
433
625
369
363
366
183
635
474
MAYOR
Whelchel
59
134
56
89
86
89
121
33
141.
76
Schwartz
89
194
145
147
91
140
122
69
205
125
COUNCILMEN
Blake
74
191
108
108
88
132
155
42
170
97
Graham
86
190
114
114
93
128
102
52
163
83
Mathiesen
31
53
36
64
43
48
43
22
86
55
Miles
14
37
33
41
13
32
27
19
38
37
Rogers
16
19
25
39
26
11
12
21
47
48
Wheeler
57
120
58
76
54
90
123
36
133
66
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Trustee Area No. 2
Nagano
99
243
136
152
105
164
184
72
248
135
Stagg
35
53
30
54
50
50
30
20
60
53
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Trustee Area No. 3
French
87
157
87
113
69
108-
128
52
152
76
Hysen
80
157
`84
104
72
106
138
49
151
80
Woolpert
80
172
87
111
82
116
158
51
160
95
Grisham
23
45
43
53
39
39
29
22
58
48
Lunn
23
-'48
24
38
46
39
32
18
58
50
TjOden Tjaden
47
142
96
105
67
95
78
37
145
95
Verdult
23
47
24
32
39
44
32
15
63
48
Wirshup
39
122
86
74
65
95
87
43
143
70
JUNIOR COLLEGE
Loomis
119
249
152
187
119
185
191
73
266
136
Bryant
92
198
117
140
113
139
149
63
228
120
BOARD OF EDUCATION
District No. 2
Blanchard
79
259
146
BOARD OF EDUCATION
District No. 5
Porter
114
224
134
180
122
183
170
TOTAL
149
1332
201
237
181
233
245
102
348
203
PERCENT
45
64
46
38
49
64
67
56
55
43