HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/22/1972MINUTES
SPECIAL CALLED MEET114G OF THE CITY COUIJCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
September 22, 1972 - 5:00 P. M.
City Hall
Roll Call
Present: Emmons Blake, John C. Brown, Myron Graham,
T. Keith Gurnee, Kenneth E. Schwartz
City Staff
Present: R. D. Miller, Administrative Officer;
A. J. Shaw, City Attorney; D. F. Romero,
City Engineeri R. D. Young, Planning Director.
---------------------------------------------------------7------------
The Council met at 5:15 P. M. in emergency session upon approximately
two hours notice. All five Councilmen were present. Three members of
the news media were present, and all parties requesting notification
of Council meetings had been notified.
The meeting was called by the Mayor at the request of Councilman Gurnee
for the discussion of one issue of an emergency nature; namely, whether
or not massive grading, filling and stockpiling operations then in
progress upon French Hospital property under a City permit were contrary
to City requirements and whether or not they should be halted at once
before further damage was done.
Attorney Charles French and Bob Williams, engineer for the French
Hospital development, were present.
Mayor Schwartz opened the meeting by asking D. F. Romero, City Engineer,
to review the history of this grading operation.
D. F. Romero stated that two grading permits were granted to the French
Hospital Corporation in mid -1971 totalling 123,000 cubic yards. The
first permit was granted June 28, 1971, for 43,000 yards of one site
grading with the work being done by Jack Foster. No material was to be
taken from the hill without prior Council approval. A seconde permit
was granted September 16, 1971, to move 80,000 yards from Terrace Hill
to the hospital site.
Later, a slide condition developed with official note being taken by
State geologists. Mr. Romero called this to Mr. William's attention
and asked for repair, in a letter dated February 15, 1972.
On September 13, 1972, the French corporation started work on the slide
without a permit and the public works department halted the work:. On
September 19, 1972, a grading plan was submitted for the moving of
5,000 yards and a permit was granted. In Mr. Romero's opinion, the
work would not create environmental damage. Some material was also
being moved from the hospital site to the rear of the hospital along
with material from the hill, under the extended permit. Initial grading
operations last year had left a thirty -foot bank. This grading would
create a two to one slope.
Mavor Schwartz asked Councilman Gurnee for his comments.
Councilman Gurnee stated he had just discovered the grading operation.
The tree committee, of which he was a member, had discussed the matter
earlier in the week and had approved removal of some trees if a grading
permit was approved. Substitute trees were to be planted. Mr. Gurnee
had voted against the proposal. In any event, he was more concerned
at that time, with the loss of the trees than any grading. He stated
he should have asked the City Engineer about the grading at that time.
City Council Minutes
September 22, 1972
Page 2
Councilman Gurnee was concerned that the City Engineer did not feel
enough of an impact to refer the matter to the Planning Commission.
He also felt the grading operation and permit might be in violation of
the planned development ordinance. He was distressed about the absence
of notice to the Council and the fact that plans for the new development
behind the hospital were only in the preliminary stage. He did not wish
to argue about remedying of the slide area, but objected to depositing
the fill material on a site which did not have a precise plan.
R. D. Young, Planning Director, stated the grading operation was
separate from the planned development. He said that Mr. Romero had
discussed with the Planning Commission the fact that grading would
occur.
Councilman Gurnee stated that this was a good example of how impotent
the Planned Development Ordinance was.
Councilman Blake disagreed.
Councilman Brown said that the Council had delegated to the Engineer,
the right to determine whether or not the environmental impact was
great.
_...
Councilman Gurnee said that this had been a mistake.
Councilman Blake said the work was being done under a valid grading
permit and did not feel that it abrogated the planned development
procedures.
Councilman Brown agreed.
Councilman Gurnee stated he did not feel the City Engineer should be
making environmental decisions and that there appeared to be a lack of
coordination between the City Engineer and City Planner.
Mayor Schwartz stated his main concern was the loss of faith to the
public. There had been no chance for the public to participate in
plans for the new development.
In answer to a question, City Attorney Shaw said he felt the grading
should really await the development and approval of a precise plan.
In other words, he felt that planned development rezoning ordinances
controlled over grading permit ordinances.
Charles French said he really didn't want to fir, the slide area. It
was costing him a lot of money, and he certainly didn't want to place
this material on another part of the hill. He had selected a site for
deposit of the fill which did not front on other residential properties.
After further discussion, Councilman Gurnee made a motion to put an
immediated stop order on the grading permit, pending a hearing on the
planned development.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilman Blake moved that the grading permit be allowed to continue
with the understanding that the developer was proceeding at his own
risk in view of the fact that the fill created might not conform to the
terms of the precise plan which would be finally approved at some time
in the future. Mayor Schwartz seconded the motion.
Mayor Schwartz said he felt the Planning Commission should consider the
question of making grading plans a mandatory part of any preliminary
plan development plan.
City Council Minutes
September 22, 1972
Page 3
Motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Emmons Blake, John C.'Brown, Myron Graham,
Kenneth E. Schwartz
NOES: T. Keith Gurnee
ABSENT: None I
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:30 P. M.
APPROVED: November 6, 1972
Richard D. Miller, City C e k Pro Tem
FJ
11