Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/06/1981City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 2 C -4. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY - LINDA VERNEE LEWIS On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, claim against the city in the amount of $20,000 for damages to claimant's reputation and emotional distress to alleged improper conduct by police investigating officer be denied. Motion carried, all ayes. C -5. PARKING SURVEY Councilman Dunin indicated that he had met with the B.I.A. Board and they have now indicated that they would be willing to share a portion of the costs for parking survey. After brief discussion it was moved by Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following resolution be introduced: Resolution No. 4623 (1981 Series), a budget resolution appropriating $5,500 for Community Parking Project Public Information Brochure. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None C -6. JOINT RECREATIONAL USE OF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY COMMITTEE On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 906 (1981 Series), an ordinance outlining terms of office and general guidelines for the Joint Recrea- tional Use of.School District Property Committee. Introduced and passed to print on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None C -7. $25,000 QUARTERLY WATER FUNDING A. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4624(1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an agreement between the City and Cuesta Valley Properties for "Lincoln Street Waterline ". Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None B. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4625 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an agreement between the City and the "Victorian Group" a partnership (John King) for "Beach Street Waterline ". Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig Til2 ABSENT: None City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 3 C -8. TRAFFIC ORDERS On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4626 (1981 Series), a resolution of.the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving Traffic Orders for the period of July 1, 1981, through September 30, 1981. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None C -9. JOHNSON AVENUE WIDENING City Clerk's report of five bids received for "JOHNSON AVENUE WIDENING, STATIONS 41 +18 TO 45 +65 ", City Plan No. D -19, bid estimate $18,320 without contingencies, bids opened 10/2/81. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the follow- ing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4627 (1981 Series), a resolution awarding the contract to Walter Bros. Construction Co., in the amount of $17,574.22. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None C -10. CORPORATION YARD SUBGRADE , City Clerk's report of five bids received for "CORPORATION YARD SUBGRADE GRADING PLAN ", City Plan No. F -21, bid estimate $127,000 without contin- gencies, bids opened 10/2/81. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the follow- ing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4628 (1981 Series) a resolution awarding the contract to R. Burke Corporation in the amount of $80,516. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None C -11. UTILITIES DIVISION REORGANIZATION On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, that the report by the Public Services Director on a proposed reorganization of the Utilities Division of the Public Services Department be approved. Motion carried, all ayes. C -12. LAFCO ACTIONS Council considered report by City Attorney on actions of the Local Agency Formation Commission ( LAFCO) regarding annexation of certain public streets. 17 City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00.p.m. Page 4 After brief discussion it was moved by Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4634-(1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo authorizing and directing the Mayor to make application with the San Luis Obispo County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to delete a LAFCO amendment to city's proposed annexation of portions of certain public streets and to delete Post Office facility on Madonna Road. IPassed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None C -13. EROSION CONTROL PROGRAM After brief discussion it was moved by Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Dunin, that the following resolution be introduced: Resolution No. 4629 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an agreement between the City. and San Luis Obispo Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 9, establishing a Cooperative Program for Erosion Control Projects within the city. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 1 C -14. APPOINTMENT TO REHABILITATION LOAN COMMITTEE On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, to appoint Francine Pryer, member, and Lee Ybaben, as alternate, to fill recent vacancy on the Rehabilitation Loan Committee. Motion carried, all ayes. C -15. APPOINTMENT TO MASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE On motion of Councilman.Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, to appoint Ruby Seigal to serve as HRC's representative to the Mass Transporation Committee to replace Walt Lambert; term to expire 8/1/84. Motion carried, all ayes. C -16. BUS PASSES - DISABLED VETERANS Request from Joe L. Cooper, retired disabled veteran, asking Council to reconsider the senior citizen bus pass discounts to include disabled veterans. Councilman Dunin asked that the record reflect that he felt that disabled veterans deserve the same recognition as senior citizens and would like that passed on to the Mass Transportation Committee for information. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, to refer this item to the Mass Transportation Committee for report. Motion carried, all ayes. ' C -17. WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Council considered plans and specifications for "WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - OSOS STREET, PEACH TO MONTEREY ", City Plan No. E -52, bid estimate $45,074 without contingencies. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 5 On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, to approve plans and specifications and authorize staff to call for bids. Motion carried, all ayes. C -18. UNITIZED HOT PATCHER BIDS City Clerk's report of bids received for the purchase of one Unitized Hot Patcher, bids opened September 18, 1981, bid estimate $15,500. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4630 (1981 Series), a resolution awarding the low bid to P -B Sales Company in the amount of $17,331. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 1. ABANDONMENT OF LELAND TERRACE AND BUENA VISTA STREET Council held a public hearing to consider the final abandonment of Leland Terrace and Buena Vista Street, north of Haskin Street on the southwest side of Terrace Hill. Dave Romero, Public Services Director, stated that the Engineering Division had additional input and would request that the Council continue this public hearing to a future date. He stated that there was no immediate need for abandonment at this time due to lack of access and utilities which would be provided when improvements for Tract 758 were constructed. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one spoke for or against the proposed abandonment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilman Griffin, seconded by Councilman Settle, to con- tinue the hearing to a future date for additional report by the Engineer- ing Department. Motion carried, all ayes. 2. DOWNTOWN LOAN PROGRAM GUIDELINES Council held a public hearing to consider recommendations from the Rehabil- itation Loan Committee to change the Downtown Loan Program Guidelines. Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that on September 18, the Rehabilitation Loan Committee discussed the status of the City's Block Grant Program. Representatives from the Housing Authority . presented a status report and based on the limited success of the downtown program, the committee studied various options of changing the program to make it more effective, that is, attract more participants. The Loan Committee would recommend that the Council adopt the program guidelines for the Downtown Rehabilitation Loan Program. Councilman Dunin questioned why there was such a lack of applications. Henry Engen responded that he felt that the high interest rate, mixed ownership, and the involvement with the federal government had much to do with lack of participation. Councilman Dunin felt that this may be possibly due to the many attach- ments and the restrictions required by the application. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 -.7:00 p.m. Page 6 Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. Steve Nelson, representing the Housing Authority, stated that he would agree with Mr. Engen and that he did not feel that Councilman Dunin was correct in his statement that the applications were that difficult or had that many strings attached to them. Councilman Dunin stated he would like to have staff report back on the reasons for the low participation by applicant. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. Councilwoman Dovey stated that she could go along with the resolution but would request that the third paragraph be amended to read, "Whereas, the amendment of the guidelines is required to provide for loans to projects within a central portion of the community consistent with the housing objectives spelled out in the city's 1980 Block Plan application." On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4631 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the program guidelines for the Downtown Rehabilitation Loan Program as amended by Mrs. Dovey. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None Further, staff and the Committee were directed to bring back an analysis 1 and report within two weeks on the reasons for the low number of applica- tions received. 3. FINAL MAP FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION 80 -163 Council held a public hearing to consider the final map for Minor Sub- division No. 80 -163 combining eight lots into three lots and to reflect abandoned Marsh Street, located at 1500, 1508 and 1540 Marsh Street; Mayor - Schanberger, subdividers. Dave Romero, Public Services Director, stated that staff had received the final map and conditions of the approved tentative map had been met. He would recommend that Council adopt the resolution approving the final map and authorize the City Clerk to record the Marsh Street abandonment as outlined by Resolution No. 4264 with the Mayor to execute grant deeds as noted. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one spoke for or against the final map. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4632 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting approval of the final map for Minor Subdivision SLO -80 -163, located at 1500, 1508 and 1540 Marsh Street. Further, to record Marsh abandonment and authorize the Mayor to execute the grant deeds. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES:. Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 7 4. TENTATIVE MAP FOR TRACT 940 Council held a public hearing to consider the Planning Commission rec- ommendation to approve the tentative map for Tract 940 to create a ten - lot residential subdivision located at 1531 Andrews Street, R -1 -S and A /C -40 zones; Anthony Wolfe, subdivider (continued from 8/18/81). Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that on August 18 the City Council had held a public hearing to consider the proposed ten- tative map. Following considerable testimony and discussion by the Council, the matter had been continued to permit the subdivider and staff to respond to some of the concerns expressed by the Council as follows: 1. Drainage Analysis The applicant's consultants had submitted to the City Engineer a drainage analysis, which in effect fulfilled proposed condition #6 of the tentative map. The conclusion was that the drainage improvements proposed as part of the subdivision would significantly reduce, if not totally eliminate, the current drainage impacts around the perimeter of the tract. 2. Traffic Analysis Wayne Peterson had received a memorandum from Dan Lloyd stating that at full development the subdivision would add 108 trips per day to the neighborhood which, measured at San Luis Drive and California Blvd., results in an increase from 1450 to about 1560. This was well within the acceptable traffic levels for single - family low - density neighborhoods as defined in the SLO Regional Transporta= tion Plan EIR standards. 3. Fire Protection Wayne Peterson received a report from the Fire Department which stated that the weeds had been abated where possible and that the Fire , Department remained convinced that the subdivision would enhance fire protection capabilities in the area owing to increased water fire flow through establishment of hydrants and improvement of lines, together with improved access to the open space area via flag lot #3. They did not feel that the greenbelt treatment to lot 10 would be warranted in view of the type of fuel evident behind that lot and the steepness of the .property. He stated that staff would support restoring the condition proposed to the Planning Commission which prohibited placement of structures on the open space easement area for both fire protection reasons and for retention of aesthetic values. 4. Building Envelope /360 Ft. Elevation No structures would be allowed above the 360 ft. elevation which was the water service limit and all sites would be declared sen- sitive and.require.Architectural Review Commission approval before development. Staff would recommend adoption of the resolution with modification to restore the original-recommended condition #15a: "a. No structures will be placed or erected on said premises." Councilman Dunin stated that he was concerned with not having fire emergency access to the back of the property and that the inlets we're:: below the flood drainage. Mayor Billig suggested a provision be included to allow for emergency access. Councilman Settle stated that he was concerned that an open space ease- ment be included both the city and county property. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:OO.p.m. Page 8 Dave Romero responded that he felt that the drainage improvements would actually improve the neighboring area rather than worsen it. Councilman Dunin and Mayor Billig were also concerned that as many trees as possible be saved along the creek channel where improvements were proposed. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. A. H. Brazil, 1794 Corralitos and on the corner of Andrews Street, stated that he was in support of this development and felt that the issue of traffic was nonsense. He also felt that the addition of ten houses and the improvements that would be required would help cut down the drainage problem that presently exists, not increase them. Rich Tietje stated that he was a neighbor and had lived in this area for 20 years, and he did not feel that the drainage was a problem. In fact, his only concern was parking. He would urge the Council to leave the alley behind his property as is. He understood that most of the property behind was going to be left in open -space which he felt un- fortunate as he would like to be able to purchase a portion, maybe one or two acres. He did not feel that the city needed to give the neigh- borhood a free park. Dan Lloyd, representing both MDW Associates and the property owner, stated that in response to Council's concerns at the last meeting, they had provided additional analysis as requested. With regard to fire concerns, he stated that the city presently has a weed abatement law which should be sufficient to see that the weeds are kept cleared regardless of who owns the property. With regard to the removal of some of the trees to improve the creek channel, he felt that this was necessary in order to ensure the slowing down of the velocity of the water run off. He had talked with the Mullers 1839 Conejo, and would plant trees to their liking to replace those trees that will be removed. Councilman Dunin was still concerned as to access to the hillside property for fire vehicles. Randal Cruikshanks, 1792 Conejo, stated he was very angry that many of the - neighbors' and Council's questions that were brought up at the last meeting were still unanswered. He would like the answers responded to in writing. Three questions still not mitigated were (1) drainage, (2) traffic, (3) fire protection. He stated there was no traffic contol in the area which poses a very dangerous situation. He would hope that maybe a cooperative agreement could be worked out between the city, developers, and the neighbors which included the possibility of having an assessment. Michael Devitt, 1690 San Luis Drive, stated that he disagreed with Mr. Cruikshanks and that neighbors were properly notified with flyers that had been distributed throughout the neighborhood. He had also been a neighbor for some time, and he had no problem with the proposed develop- ment. He felt the neighborhood would be better off with the drainage and fire problems presently in existence. He would urge the Council's approval of this development. Marian Sinsheimer stated that she did not feel there had been sufficient cooperation from staff and the developers with the neighbors in any attempt to alleviate their fears and concerns that this development raises. A. V. Muller asked if he could submit a letter on behalf of Lee Balatti. He then read the letter into the record: "My Dear Mayor and members of the City Council: Reference is made to proposed 10 lot hillside Subdivision 940. We live at 1869 Corralitos Avenue and purchased our house in 1963. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 Page 9 Lot 10 of the proposed subdivision is immediately and direc- tly in back of our home with the elevation on the rise up the hillside. Last July we were two of the original signers of the petition which opposed this proposal. Our concerns are still the same and are briefly as follows: 1) During our 18 years at our address, we have had two occa- sions when heavy rains have caused flooding in our home with considerable damage to our bedroom which is adjacent to lot 10 of the proposed subdivision. Although our property is considerably lower than the homes on either side of us, flood waters come from the area of lot 10. The two canyons on the slopes in back of the proposed sub -. division form a natural basin and during heavy seasonal rains; water cascades off the hillsides. These hills rise over a 30 percent grade for approximately 1000 ft. Putting 10 roof taps, with carports, garages, driveways and concrete walks will only escalate flood conditions in an area which seems to receive more rain than other parts of the city. Drainage arrangements should be started well above the 300 ft. level of these hillsides. 2) Fire protection, there has been two fires on these slopes in the past 16 years. Our concern is the ability of large fire fighting apparatus to maneuver and effectively curtail a fire of large properties. 3)...Earth Erosion and Unstable Hillsides: During the past 16 years, we have noticed.large amounts of dirt constantly coming down the hillsides during average rains above the proposed subdivision and also during heavy storms, large areas have become dislodged. Respectively submitted, Mr. and Mrs. Lee Balatti." He then read into the records his own letter which was dated October 6. "Dear Mayor Billig and Council Members: I own the home property at 1839 Conejo Avenue, San Luis Obispo, California. This ownership dates back to 1956. This present letter reflects my concerns and views relative to the protection of my home. Easterly of us is a small cree$. In heavy winter rains water comes cascading down it, mainly from two steep canyons above and situated on the property of the proposed subdiv- ider, Dr. Wolf. In his preliminary map he discloses his plans, work details and memoranda for a new subdivision. In them he indicates, among other things: 1) A row of trees as all being just beyond the easterly line of my property. This is not true. It would be helpful if the subdivider or the City Engineer, after survey, would put iron stakes upon the ground to clarify the precise loc- ation of this line. A like step should be taken with refer- ence to the southern boundary line of my property. 2) His intention to substitute the.smail, natural creek bed through which, since time immemorial, overflow water from the mentioned canyons has been permitted to run. He wants to bulldoze a new ditch outlet approximately 12 feet wide, a mere 2z feet deep, and a distance of only two feet from the easterly boundary line of my home. The natural creek bed runs parallel with my property and approximately 15 ft. from my property line. It may well be that such a water diversion would make Dr. Wolf's subdivision more valuable, but at my expense. I cannot subscribe to such an arbitrary, capricious and wholly uncon- scionable action. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:OO.p.m. Page 10 The grounds for my position are quite simple: 1) The trees along my easterly boundary provide a root system which now protects against erosion. From what has been said, it would appear that it would be in the best interests of all concerned that an adequate all weather pipeline be buried by the subdivider along the center line of the existing creek, or that it be permitted to con- tinue to handle overflow waters from the above mentioned canyons as it has been doing for many years last past. A water problem also presents itself along the back of my property. The subdivider intends "to run a concrete ditch along the back of my property to carry off part of the water flowing down the two canyons mentioned above. Inside of my fence and within about 30 inches of the property line, I have one large avocado tree, a large lemon tree, a large pine tree and a tall Hollywood Juniper. By bulldozing along the fence line, the subdivider could very well destroy the roots of these trees, which could also destroy the trees themselves. The lemon and avocado trees both have a shallow root system. I.am fearful that at times of heavy sudden rainfall the run off of water from both canyons would quickly converge at the easterly corner of my property. Without a catch basin to slow down and accumulate the water where it would make a 45 degree angle turn, it could easily run over the drainage ditch, push over the back fence of my property, and flood my backyard and house. The drainage system for the subdivision should be so planned that such sudden rain- fall is properly handled, not only by the existing creek but by providing an adequate catch basin for the protection of all properties below the subdivision. The concrete drainage ditch running along the rear of my property should have the northerly part thereof protected by a steel- reinforced concrete wall five feet high with an adequate foundation base of at least three feet. This ditch should be located at least 20 feet beyond my property line. May I be privileged to suggest that notes appropriate to my above requests and suggestions be added to any final map that ' may be approved and ordered filed in response to the presently filed application for the formation of a new subdivision em- bracing lands adjacent to my home? Additionally, your files will indicate that I am one of the neighbors opposed to the subdivision, as disclosed by a letter dated August 11, 1981, and which has been filed with you. Respectfully submitted, A. V. Muller." He would urge the Council to address these concerns prior to giving tenta- tive map approval. 2) Bulldozing as requested would only present environmental problems, but could very well mangle and tear out the pro- tective root system of my trees, with their ultimate destruc- tion as well. 3) The existing creek is evidence of the presence of a soil capable of erosion. The existence of a clump of trees, which was planted or permitted to grow there, indicates a desire by the proposed subdivider, or of antecedent property owners, to combat this erosion problem by slowing down the natural speed of water flow through the creek. 4) Should the proposed new ditch be permitted, who will supervise its construction and maintenance? Who will protect my property against health and accident hazards and who will protect my property from erosion damages and /or undercutting and flooding? The City? From what has been said, it would appear that it would be in the best interests of all concerned that an adequate all weather pipeline be buried by the subdivider along the center line of the existing creek, or that it be permitted to con- tinue to handle overflow waters from the above mentioned canyons as it has been doing for many years last past. A water problem also presents itself along the back of my property. The subdivider intends "to run a concrete ditch along the back of my property to carry off part of the water flowing down the two canyons mentioned above. Inside of my fence and within about 30 inches of the property line, I have one large avocado tree, a large lemon tree, a large pine tree and a tall Hollywood Juniper. By bulldozing along the fence line, the subdivider could very well destroy the roots of these trees, which could also destroy the trees themselves. The lemon and avocado trees both have a shallow root system. I.am fearful that at times of heavy sudden rainfall the run off of water from both canyons would quickly converge at the easterly corner of my property. Without a catch basin to slow down and accumulate the water where it would make a 45 degree angle turn, it could easily run over the drainage ditch, push over the back fence of my property, and flood my backyard and house. The drainage system for the subdivision should be so planned that such sudden rain- fall is properly handled, not only by the existing creek but by providing an adequate catch basin for the protection of all properties below the subdivision. The concrete drainage ditch running along the rear of my property should have the northerly part thereof protected by a steel- reinforced concrete wall five feet high with an adequate foundation base of at least three feet. This ditch should be located at least 20 feet beyond my property line. May I be privileged to suggest that notes appropriate to my above requests and suggestions be added to any final map that ' may be approved and ordered filed in response to the presently filed application for the formation of a new subdivision em- bracing lands adjacent to my home? Additionally, your files will indicate that I am one of the neighbors opposed to the subdivision, as disclosed by a letter dated August 11, 1981, and which has been filed with you. Respectfully submitted, A. V. Muller." He would urge the Council to address these concerns prior to giving tenta- tive map approval. City Council Minutes. October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 11 Anne Cruikshanks stated that she felt that this would have a severe impact on the neighborhood.'s Prevention Program, with the additional traffic, and she was also concerned about the drainage. Ruth Bostrom, 1933 San Luis Drive, stated that she was supportive of the development. She felt it was unfair of the neighbors to expect the development to take care of problems that were already in existence when these people bought their homes. The fire protection and drainage problems have always been there. She felt this was a good development and that it was going to help mitigate some of these problems, and she urged the Council's support. Fred Hamlin, 1767 Conejo, felt that the problem of drainage should be left to the engineers and that Council should accept their word that the drainage problems would be decreased. He also felt that the traffic and fire objections were not real. Steve Nelson, 1868 Corralitos, stated that he was supportive of the project for several reasons. He stated that this proposal was much better than those before it, had lower density, and, as he himself was a neighbor, he looked forward to it coming into the area. He felt it was going to help problems such as fire and drainage. The developer was paying for enlargement of a water line which had been inadequate for years. Further, he felt a property owner should be able to do, within restraints, what he wanted with his own property; and he would urge Council's support. As another side issue, he would like the Council to address the problems of sidewalks in the area, as there are none there now, and he felt that it was presently unsafe. He would hope that possible stop signs, speed bumps, etc., could be installed to help slow the traffic down. Dan Lloyd, MDW, in response to Councilman Settle's question regarding the sewer pump, stated he would like to see condition #3:amended to allow a sewer pump on Lot 10 if desired. Keith Crowe, Central Coast Engineering and the Drainage Analyst, resonded to the drainage issue. He felt that this would create only a marginal increase.in water run -off, which was not a marked difference as far as city requirements at all, and was within one percent allowed under county requirements. Doug Flaherty, Fire Marshall, stated that the Fire Department was extrem- ely satisfied as to the fire protection measures. He did not feel this area was conducive to the endangerment of any of the neighborhood homes as this was not a high fuel, a difficult brush area like that in Southern California areas. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. 9:05 p.m. Mayor Billig declared a. recess. 9:30 p.m. City Council recon- vened, all Councilmembers present. Dave Romero, Public Services Director, responded to Mr. Muller's concerns regarding the trees, drainage channels, traffic, etc. Councilman Dunin.stated that he felt that the majority of the neighbors were not against this project. He did feel that the creek was a part of the problem, but the water run -off he felt was minimal; he felt the Fire Department was remiss in the past regarding weed abatement but would expect that this does not continue in the future. He felt that with the added greenbelt it would be sufficient although he did still have some concerns regarding Mr. Muller's comments. Wherever possible, Councilman Dunin would like to see that the trees remain and that the drainage channel would be moved further away from the property line. He felt that the traffic problem would be mitigated with proper signing and speed limits enforced. He would still like to see another joint meeting between the neighbors, the developer, and staff in a last effort to convince the neighborhood that their fears were no longer warranted. 1 1 C� City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 12 Councilman Griffin stated that he supported the project and concept. He also agreed with comments made by the other councilmembers. He felt the 25 conditions now required by the developer were sizeable. He felt that the traffic was not a problem but felt that a comprehen- sive traffic analysis might be appropriate later on. He felt the drainage problem still needed to be addressed. Councilman Settle felt that many of these problems had been here for some time and this development could not be expected to mitigate all of them. He would like to see a fire break behind the homes. He felt the drainage should not be diverted. Homes should be subject to ARC review. Structures should not be constructed in the open -space area and the easements should be both within and outside the city limits. He would like to see lots 9 and 10 combined, but he could approve the project with those modifications. Councilwoman Dovey, stated that she felt that this area already had many problems of long- standing but that this project would help to mitigate many of them to a large extent. Further, the developer would be paying for these.Inprovements,-not the neighbors. She would like to see Section 113 of the resolution remain the same, with possibly the addition of adding a provision that any house built on lot 10 be required to build at the southern end of the lot, with plumbing located in such a manner as to avoid necessity of sewer pump on site. She would like to see condition 1115 changed to add the open space, to include the county area, and to also put back in condition 1115a with the exception that the approval be made by the Community Devel- opment Director as opposed to the ARC. She would expand condition 4116 that measures be taken to keep the trees wherever possible and would also not like to see drainage diverted on lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Councilman Griffin stated that he supported the project and concept. He also agreed with comments made by the other councilmembers. He felt the 25 conditions now required by the developer were sizeable. He felt that the traffic was not a problem but felt that a comprehen- sive traffic analysis might be appropriate later on. He felt the drainage problem still needed to be addressed. The Council then took Section 413, Conditions 111 through 25, one by one, making the following changes: Condition 116,.add the following at the end of the paragraph to read, "and, at the discretion of the City Council, may be required to participate in other off -site drainage improvements." Condition 418, add a sentence at the end to read, "A buffer of fire resis- tive planting shall be provided between the open space easement hillside area and lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and the rear lot lines of developed pro- perties along Corralitos Avenue (Lots 9 through 20 of Tract 43) to the approval of the Fire Department and Community Development-Department." Change Condition 1115 to read, "...(95.9 acres both in and outside of the city) subject to the approval..." Add Condition 1115a. back into read as follows, "No buildings will be placed or erected on said premises and no structures, except as permitted hereafter, without the approval of the City Council." The first sentence of Condition 1116 changed to read as follows, "The drainage structure along Lot 9, and the grading to the Mayor Billig stated she agreed with most of the comments made by the other councilmembers. She felt that:this was a much better develop - ment. Fire protection was still a concern and she felt that an access for a fire break should be required, and possibly addition of sprinkl -. lers to the roofs. She did not feel that traffic was a problem. She would like to see condition 25 amended to add pedestrian signing or safety bumps. The drainage channel of condition 1116 should possibly be realigned and trees saved wherever possible. She would agree that the undeveloped property-both in and outside of the city should be in the open space. Add back in condition 4115a. She felt the building envelopes should be closely defined and have minimal grading. She felt that the downstream flooding was still a real concern. She would like to see the maintenance program on clean out of drainage channels start earlier in the year. With regard to the creek overflowing, she felt that a possible assessment district might be the answer and add it to the CIP. She suggested that staff relook at the pipe near Alisal and possibly make that larger,spliting the cost between the city and the neighborhood. She would like to see all the sewers be gravity flow, not pumps. The Council then took Section 413, Conditions 111 through 25, one by one, making the following changes: Condition 116,.add the following at the end of the paragraph to read, "and, at the discretion of the City Council, may be required to participate in other off -site drainage improvements." Condition 418, add a sentence at the end to read, "A buffer of fire resis- tive planting shall be provided between the open space easement hillside area and lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and the rear lot lines of developed pro- perties along Corralitos Avenue (Lots 9 through 20 of Tract 43) to the approval of the Fire Department and Community Development-Department." Change Condition 1115 to read, "...(95.9 acres both in and outside of the city) subject to the approval..." Add Condition 1115a. back into read as follows, "No buildings will be placed or erected on said premises and no structures, except as permitted hereafter, without the approval of the City Council." The first sentence of Condition 1116 changed to read as follows, "The drainage structure along Lot 9, and the grading to the City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 13 rear of Lot 7, will be redesigned to save as many existing trees as possible. Upon council approval of such revised plans, selective existing trees along creek channel at the end of Conejo Avenue may be removed." Condition 1120 changed to read as follows, "Subdivider shall install such on and off -site control /safety signs and on -site street lights as required by the City Engineer." Condition 1125 to be amended as follows, "Sidewalks along Andrews Street extended, and Conejo Avenue cul -de -sac frontage of the tract, are hereby waived." Condition 1126 added to read as follows, "Buildings within the tract shall be located within the building envelopes shown on Attachment 2." On motion of Councilman-Griffin; seconded -by "Coiincilmah Dunin, the following resolution was intrbduced 'Resolution--No. 4633 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo granting approval of the tentative map for Tract 940 located 1451 Andrews Street as amended. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Dunin, Dovey, Settle, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 5. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0974) - LOS VERDES Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the Plan- ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element map, conservation/agricul - ture to interim agriculture, and text to establish certain prerequisites for eventual residential use, for land between Los Verdes and San Luis Obispo Creek; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Henry Engen stated that on September 10 the Planning Commission voted 3 -0 to recommend approval of the amendment.. He stated that while the Commission and the Council had initiated this application with even- tual low- density residential use in mind,.after the property owner objected at the public hearing, the Commission decided not to specify the density. Commission did not want to include in the policies a prerequisite that fire protection for any residential project be approved by the Fire Marshall. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. Dan Lloyd, MDW and representing the property owner, urged the Council's support of the project and stated that the subdivider had no problem with the suggested change. Clyde Hostetter, 48 Los Palos Drive, stated that his concern was that this property should be left as a residential area and would urge Council to support that. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. After brief discussion it was moved by.Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilwoman Dovey, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4635 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to change the designation of a portion of the land between Los Verdes and San Luis Creek from conservation /agriculture to interim conservation/ open- space, as recommended by the Planning Commission with the area to be precisely defined based on final Engineering report to be prepared regarding flood line limit; city to maintain a sizable ease- ment to the creek; and prerequisites to include: 1) flood control, 2) fire protection, and 3) equitable financial contribution to cost of Los Osos Valley Road overpass - connection. 1 1 City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:OO.p.m. Page 14 Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, Settle, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 11 :00 p.m. Mayor Billig declared a recess. At 11:05 p.m. City Council reconvened, all Councilmembers present. 6. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0937) - HUMAN SERVICES CENTER Council held a public hearing to consider a recommendation by the Planning Commission to amend the Land Use Element policies to allow utility com- pany offices within the area plan for a consolidated social services center at 3190 -3230 South Higuera Street; Walter Brothers Construction, applicant. Henry Engen, Community Development Director, stated that the Planning Commission of September 10 voted 3 -0 to recommend approval of the amend- ment. He noted that if the Council approved the amendment that they also initiate a change to the Zoning Regulations' Text to permit utility offices within the PF zone. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. Sandy Merriam, MDW, reviewed the history of the project going back to 1978 and, subsequent -lease that the county signed to eventually lease 21,OOO.sq. feet of the Walter Bros. Building. He felt there was general sentiment by the county and the city that the primary complex county - buildings be left downtown with the Human Services offices being allowed to move into this building. He stated that with the recent recession, the county.had had severe financial cutbacks. The County Administrative Officer was now indicating the county may be unable to lease what they had originally agreed to. Hence, they were requesting this change to allow utility companies to also lease a portion of the building sites. Don Walters, applicant, added that the county had given themselves an out in the lease stating that they could renege if financial cutbacks were imposed. Councilman Dunin states that he did not wish to put the city in the position of bailing out the developer who may have made a mistake which was what he felt was the situation. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilwoman Dovev, seconded by Councilman Griffin, to deny the amendment to allow utility companies in the Social Services Center. Councilman Dunin suggested that possibly other businesses be allowed here on a temporary basis, but he would not support utility companies as he feels that they are rightfully in the downtown area where they are most convenient for the citizens. Councilman Settle felt that this situation posed extreme economic and extenuating circumstances, and he would favor allowing the utility companies to come in. Councilman Griffin felt that the burden should be on the proponent. He would not support changing the zoning regulations to allow for this. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 15 Councilwoman Dovey said that she felt this was totally an inapprop- riate proposed use. She felt the Human Services complex should have related groups in the same buildings, afraid of setting a precident to allow in other areas this same sort of thing. She felt that-the utility companies could back out as easily as the county did and then where would the developer be. She suggested that maybe this area should be designated something entirely different. Mayor Billig stated that..this problem goes back a long way. She was on the Planning Commission when they first made this concession in an effort to cooperate with the county. She felt the city had been con- sistent with what they have wanted in this area. She did not feel the utility companies were quasi - public. She did not feel this was a city problem. To change the zoning regulations every time a prop- erty owner made a bad investment, would make our laws meaningless. She also suggested that maybe the cost for the square footage was too high. She felt strongly that this should be a human services center. She was not supportive of the Social Security building being where it was on Los Osos Valley Road and would encourage the county to take as much space as possible in this building for human services uses. Henry Engen stated that he had written the county informing them that many of their temporary -use permits could be pulled hoping that this would encourage them to go into Mr. Walters' complex. He stated that the Board of Supervisors should be _hearing this request within two weeks.. It was suggested a letter be sent to the Board of Supervisors with a clear message explaining the city's position. Mayor Billig stated that when several of these businesses had their temporary -use permits renewed, they were given a clear direction at that time that they would only be renewed for a limited amount of time, so they should have been looking for other permanent areas. Councilman Griffin suggested that the city put the county on notice of its intention not to renew the temporary -use permits in the future and direct staff to write the letter stating Council's concerns. On motion by Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Griffin, to deny requested amendment to allow utility companies in the Human Services Center. Motion carried, all ayes. On motion of Mayor Billig, seconded by Councilman Settle, to reaffirm previous Council position that temporary -use permits of Human Services properties currently in the city having be allowed to be expired as originally designated. Motion carried, all ayes. 7. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0938) - HIGUERA COMMERCE PARK Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the . Planning Commission to amend the Land Use Element to change the desig- nation of about 30 acres east of South Higuera Street and north of Tank Farm Road from interim agriculture to service commercial /light industrial; Robert Hibshman, applicant. Henry Engen stated that the Planning Commission voted 3 -0 to recommend approval of the amendment and that the Commission continued its meeting to discuss an amendment on the Higuera Commerce Park Specific Plan.on rezoning for October 14. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. Rob Strong, representing the applicant, spoke in support-of the project and urged the Council's support. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:OO p.m. Page 16 On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the follow- ing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4636 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to change the designation of about 30 acres from interim agriculture to service commercial /light industrial. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: ' AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Dunin, Griffin, Settle, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None After brief discussion staff was further directed to forward Council's concerns to the developer regarding, 1) traffic signals, 2) possible financial contribution to cost of Los Osos Valley overpass connection, and 3) Tank Farm Road Realignment. 8.. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0879) - COUNTY REFERRAL PROCEDURE Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the Plan- ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element text to delete the require- ment for a public hearing at the City level for applications referred by, and under the jurisdiction of, the County. Henry Engen stated that the Planning Commission voted 3 -0 to affirm their previous action recommending approval of the amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one spoke for or against the proposed amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the follow- , ing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4637 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the.City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to delete the requirement for City hearings.on Councy referrals. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dunin,-Sett le Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Mayor Billig, that staff be directed to put County referral items of major significance on the consent agenda and those items considered less significant to be handled admini- stratively. Motion carried, all ayes. 9. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0978) = OPEN SPACE POLICIES Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the Plan- ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element policies and map legend to change the.names of agricultural (open space) designations and to add policies concerning those designations; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. ' Henry Engen stated that the.Planning Commission voted 3 -0 to recommend approval of the amendment. The Commissioners.thoughtthe map legend should include a note that "conservation /open space" include private as well as public lands, as a caution to those who might construe the name of the designation as an invitation to enter the property. City...Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 17 Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one appeared for or against the proposed amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public heal- ing closed. On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4638 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to change the map legend and add policies concerning open space designations. Estimated criteria and conditions to be met before changing from OS to IOS'(i.e., prerequisite for development and landscape change). Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 10. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0975) - SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the Plan- ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element map to designate the sewage treatment plant and certain adjacent land now shown as conservation/ agriculture and service commercial /light industrial, as public /semi- public; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Henry Engen stated that the Planning Commission voted 3 -0 to recommend approval of the amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one appeared for or against the proposed amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Settle, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4639 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to designate the sewer treatment plant and certain adjacent land as public /semi - public. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle, Dunin, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 11. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0976) - ELKS LANE Council held a public hearing to consider the recomm ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element map to of about 18 acres at and near the Elks Lane drive -in vation /agriculture to interim agriculture, and amend identify and establish prerequisites for an ultimate Luis Obispo, applicant. :ndation by the Plan - change the designation theatre from conser- the policies to use; City of San Henry Engen stated that the Planning Commission voted on a 3 -0 vote to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one appeared for or against the proposed amendment. Mayor Billi.g.declared the public hearing closed. n 1 1 City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 18 After brief discussion and on motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Dunin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4640 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to change the designation of about 18 acres from conservation /open space to interim conservation /open space. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: 1 AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT:. None On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Dunin, to initiate general plan amendment to include the two nearby properties (nursery/ vacant lot). Motion carried, all ayes. 12. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0977) - MARGARITA AVENUE Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the Plan- ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element map to change the desig- nation of about ten acres south of Margarita Avenue and east of South Higuera Street from medium -high density residential to medium- density residential; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Henry Engen stated that the Planning Commission voted 3 -0 to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. . Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one appeared for or against the proposed amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hear- ing closed. On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4641 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to change the designation of about 10 acres from medium -high density residential to medium- density residen- tial. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Griffin, Dunin, Settle, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 13. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0979) - LOW DENSITY LIMIT Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the Plan- ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element policies to increase the low- density residential maximum from six to seven dwellings per net acre; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Henry Engen declared the public hearing open. No one appeared for or against the proposed amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman.Dunin, the follow- ing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4642 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to increase the maximum density of the low- density residential catagory. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 19 Passed and adopted on-the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey,.Dunin, Griffin, Settle,.and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 14. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP 0951) - SANTA ROSA STREET /OFFICE VS. RESIDENTIAL Council held a public hearing to consider the recommendation by the Plan- ning Commission to amend the Land Use Element map to refine the boundary between office and residential designations within the area generally bounded by Santa Rosa Street, Highway 101, Toro Street, and Mill Street, to coineide with the present zone boundary; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Henry Engen stated that the Planning Commission voted on a 4 -1 to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. Shauna Sullivan, Miller and George, and representing Mr. Richard Warner, stated that Mr. [darner was appealing the San Luis Obispo City Planning Commission approval of and transmittal to the City Council of this gen- eral plan amendment 0951. Mr. Warner was appealing the introduction and initiation of this general plan amendment at this time as the dec- ision and the action Warner vs. City of San Luis Obispo in court case No. 54959 was still pending. On behalf of Mr. Warner, she submitted that the City should not act on this general plan amendment until.a decision had been rendered in the Superior Court action or that the . general plan amendment retain the Land Use designation of PO for Mr. Warner's Mill Street property. Upon question,George Thacher, City Attorney, stated this was basically an interpretation question to be decided by the courts, but he did not feel that the court's decision would reflect any decisions made..by the Council on the remaining general plan amendment. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. On motion of Councilman Griffin, seconded by Councilman Settle, the fol- lowing resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 4643 (1981 Series), a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the Land Use Element of the general plan to adjust the boundary between residential and office designations. Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey, Dunin, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 15. ORDINANCE NO. 905 - REZONING PORTIONS OF D014NTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS AREA Council considered the final passage of Ordinance No. 905, an ordinance amending the official zone map of the City to rezone property . in the Central Business Area from C -R to C -C. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one spoke for or against the proposed final passage. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00.p.m. Page 20 On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Griffin, to give final passage to Ordinance No. 905. Finally passed on the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Griffin, Dunin, Settle, and Mayor Billig NOES: None ABSENT: None 16. CORPORATION YARD ARCHITECTURE CONSULTANT Council considered a report by Public Services Director recommending staff negotiate with Ross, Levin & MacIntyre for contract to provide archit- ectural services on the Corporation Yard. Dave Romero, Public Services Director, stated that the City had sent letters to all the local architectural firms and the American Institute of Architecs soliciting proposals for professional services for the Corporation Yard design. Five firms had submitted proposals and of those, two firms were not further considered due to lack of experience in either metal building or corporation yard design. On September 22, Bill Hanley, Henry Engen, and himself.sat as a committee to interview MDW, Richmond, Ross and Montgomery, and Ross, Levine and MacIntyre. Each firm gave a 45- minute presentation, and the conclusions of the committee were that Ross Levine MacIntyre presented the best combination of experience and capability. The committee has recommended that the Council authorize staff to negotiate with Ross, Levine & MacIntyre for the contract to provide architectural services. There was brief discussion on the method architects. Mayor Billig suggested that was to make every effort not to show any firms on equitable basis. Jay Whisenant, representing MDW, briefly and willingness to work with the City on that staff used to select on all major projects, staff favortism but to treat all reviewed his firm's advantages major projects. After brief disucssion it was moved by Councilman Griffin, seconded by Councilman Settle, to authorize staff to negotiate with Ross, Levine & MacIntyre to provide architectural services and further, that staff be directed to review the resolution establishing the method of selection of professional contractors and report back to the Council. 17. ENERGY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN Council considered the six -month review of the Energy Element adopted on April 7, 1981. After brief discussion it was moved by Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Mayor Billig, to approve the suggested additions and changes in the language of Energy Element. Motion carried, all ayes. COMMUNICATIONS C -1. REVIEW OF SLO COG POLICIES After brief discussion Mayor Billig was authorized to work with Council- woman Dovey, to write a letter to SLO COG reflecting the Council's policies on five items outlined in COG's letter dated 9/10/81. Motion carried, all ayes. 1:15 a.m. Council convened to Closed Session. 2:10 a.m. City Council reconvened, all Councilmembers present. City Council Minutes October 6, 1981 - 7:00 p.m. Page 21 There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Billig adjourned the meeting to Friday, October 9, 1981, at 5:00 p.m., at City Hall. 17a� 6 P ela Voges, C' Clerk APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 11/3/81 1 M I N U T E S ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FRIDAY., OCTOBER 9, 1981.- 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL HEARING ROOM, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Councilmembers Present: GlennaDeane Dovey, Ron Dunin, Robert Griffin, Allen Settle, and Mayor Melanie C. Billig Absent: None City Staff Present: Bill Hanley, Interim Administrative Officer ------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 5:00 p.m. Mayor Billig adjourned the meeting to Closed Session to discuss Personnel Matter. 6:30 p.m. Council reconvened in Regular Session, all Councilmembers present. There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Billig adjourned the meeting to Monday, October 12, 1981, at 12:00 p.m. P 4 a Voges, Cit rk APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 10/27/81 1