HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/18/19830
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. -
Page 2
On- motion of Counci- lwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Settle,-.to
appoint Leslie Ramsey to the Promotional Coordinating Committee to fill
the unexpired teim of Linnaea Phillips, with term to:expire 3 /31/84.
Motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey; Settle, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C 0 N S E. N T. I T• E: M S.
C -1 -- CLAIMS AGAINST THE -CITY
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin; - .claims
against the city for the month of January 1983 be approved and ordered
paid 'subject to the approval'of the Administrative.Officer. Motion
carried, Councilman Dunin absent.
C -2 CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY - R. RAPP
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, claim
against the city by Roland Rapp in the amount of $155,000 for property
damage and personal injury caused from car accident be denied. Motion
carried; Councilman Dunin absent.
C -3 DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS
On motion of Councilman.Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5032 (1983 Series),
a resolution of'the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving the
destruction of certain City. Clerk' records.:
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig'.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C =4 SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION EXPENSES
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, that the
report by the City Clerk on election expenses for the Special Municipal
Election held November 2, 1982, be received and filed. Motion carried,
all ayes.
C -5 COPYING SERVICES CONTRACT
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5033 (1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City-of San Luis Obispo awarding
contract to Mike's Copy Room for copying services to the City of San
Luis Obispo for one year and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
1
1
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 3
C -6 REPORT ON BIDS - WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DIGESTER NO. 1 MIXER
CONVERSION PROJECT'.
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was:introduced: Resolution.No. 5034.(1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo awarding
contract'to C. Boyd Construction for "Wastewater Treatment Plant Digester
No. 1 Mixer Conversion Project "; City Plan No. F -17; bid estimate
$26,726, without contingencies, in the amount of $32,400.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
:AYES:. Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
:NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C -7 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - SEWERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, that
plans and specifications for "Sewerline Improvement Project a) Higuera
Street,'Nipomo to Chorro and Chorro.Street - Higuera to San Luis Creek;
b) Pacific Street, Chorro to Morro and Morro Street, Pacific to Buchon ";
City Plan Nos. F -13 and E -17; bid estimates $57,500 and $54,635 respec-
tively, without contingencies, be approved and staff authorized to call
for bids. Motion carried, Councilman Dunin absent. .'
C -8.: QUARTERLY-WATERLINE.AGREEMENT - .VETTER
On.motion of'Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following:resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5035 (1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the,City of San Luis Obispo approving an
agreement between the City and Craig Vetter for construction of a
waterline in Parker Street as part.of .the•$25,000 Quarterly Waterline
Improvement Project (city's share to be $12,500).
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C= 9:.QUARTERLY- WATERLINE AGREEMENT, = PROMONTORY PROJECT
'Council consideredia resolution approving an agreement with Higuera Hill
Development for a $25,000 Quarterly Waterline Improvement Project in
Dana Street for the Promontory Project (Higuera Hill Development)
(City's share to be $10,000).
After :.brief discussion it was moved by Councilman.Settle; seconded by
Councilwoman Dovey, to continue this item to the February 1, 1983,
Council meeting for additional staff report to includeralternatives and
cost benefits relative to city needs.
Motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, 'Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES :' None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C -10 TRAFFIC WORK ORDERS
On motion'of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5036 (1983 Series),
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00•p:m..
Page 4
a resolution of the Council of the City of' San Luis Obispo approving
traffic work orders for the months of October, November and December
1982 as submitted.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call voter
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig�
NOES: None-
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin . ,
C -11 = FACILITY USE AT CAL POLY - PUBLIC SAFETY FITNESS /MEDICAL AGREEMENTS
A. On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5037 (1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City of'San Luis Obispo approving an
agreement with Cal Poly for facility use for Public Safety Health
Fitness-Program.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote: .
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
B. On motion of Councilman Settle,;seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5038 (1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving
medical testing agreements with Dr.. James Webb and Dr. David Bernhardt
and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
Passed and.adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C -12 ADVISORY BODY HANDBOOK
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced:. Resolution No. 5039 (1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving the
revised Advisory Body Handbook and rescinding Resolution.No.'4533.(1981
Series).
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES:. Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None-
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C -13 ANIMAL REGULATION REDEMPTION FEES
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following Ordinance was introduced: Ordinance No. 945 (1983 Series), an
ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending section 4112.2 of the
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to conform with the new.rate:scbedule
established by County Animal Control which would increase animal redemp-
tion fees.
Introduced_and passed to print-on-the following roll call.vote:
1
Fj
1
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 5
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C -14 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - PARISER VS. CITY
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5040 (1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approving an
agreement between the City and Eric Pariser for settlement affecting
real property at 528 Hathway Street.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
C -15 PARKING METER COLLECTION AGREEMENT
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilman Griffin, the
following resolution was introduced: Resolution No. 5041 (1983 Series),
a resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo awarding
contract to Brinks Inc., (estimated one year cost approximately $26,400)
for collection and counting of parking meter revenues.
Passed and adopted on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
' NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
P U B L I C H E A R I N G S
1. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE NO. 943 - FIRE CODE REGULATIONS
Council held a public hearing to consider the final passage of Ordinance
No. 943, an ordinance adopting the 1982 Fire Code Regulations as amended
(continued from 1/4/83).
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open.
Tom Priest, Chairman of the Architectural Review Commission, reviewed
the concerns of the ARC and again reiterated that he would urge the
Council to delete from the adoption of the amendments to the Fire Code
section 10.502 (a) relating to the wood shingle or shake roofs and,
further, request that the city determine and designate specific areas
Mike Dolder, Fire Chief, reviewed the Council agenda report (file no.
763) giving a review of the three key issues: 1) Sprinkler systems
would be required in all new buildings (except owner- occupied single
family residences) larger than 4500 square feet in area; 2) wood shake
and wood shingle roofs would not be allowed on any new construction; and
3) transportation of nuclear waste or irradiated reactor fuel would
require a permit from the Fire Department. He stated that in addition
to past citizen input, Pacific Gas and Electric Company was notified of
the proposed permit for nuclear waste transportation. He stated a
communication was received late today from the Architectural Review
Commission objecting to the prohibition of wood shake and shingles as a
roof covering. The Fire Department had also been concerned with the
visual impact and the aesthetics of the city, he felt the safety afforded
'
by this amendment was more important; and he would stand by his original
recommendation.
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open.
Tom Priest, Chairman of the Architectural Review Commission, reviewed
the concerns of the ARC and again reiterated that he would urge the
Council to delete from the adoption of the amendments to the Fire Code
section 10.502 (a) relating to the wood shingle or shake roofs and,
further, request that the city determine and designate specific areas
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 6
within the city as "fire sensitive sites" which would prohib t.certain
building materials or require certain fire suppression and control
systems as a trade -off for using combustible exterior material.
Vic Montgomery, Architect for Richmond, Rossi and Montgomery, questioned
the Fire Department's estimate of 85 cents to $1.25 a square foot for
sprinkling of residential structures. To demonstrate the true\f -figure of
such a modification; he. used as an .example a condominium project of four
units or more. being . divided .into:individual.ownership. Such.a:project
would`be over 4500 square foot; it wouid be required to -be sprinkled and
necessitate individual.sprinkler.systems for each:unit; increasing this
cost to closer to $2.00 a square foot. Piercing of the walls to allow
for the sprinkling was very costly.
John Rarig, President of,the Contractors' Association and Steel:Building
Association, stated it was the position of both groups that they would
be opposed.to the.adoption of -this ordinance with the recommended
amendments. Primarily, their concern was with the sprinklers and the
future growth for the City of San Luis Obispo. With regard tolthe
sprinklers, they felt that any businessman desiring to expand his
business would likely be taxed over his limits to.comply:as.4500 square
feet was a very small space. He felt the Fire Department failed to make
any realistic correlation betweenicost and.square footage. Their second
concern was with future growth in San Luis Obispo. It is vital that the
economic life -in San: Luis Obispo County be preserved. The ordinance
would supersede both national and building code regulations. He-failed
to understand why the city should try to supersede far larger agencies
whose only goal was to set necessary standards. He did not feel that
the Fire Department has kept in mind.the topography, geographic and
climatic conditions of San Luis Obispo in making their recommendations.
His organizations would be opposed to the suggested amendments but not
to the code as previously adopted.
In response Chief Dolder stated that the sprinkler costs were not a
result of Prop 13 and that the Fire Department did look at topograph-
ical, geographical and climatic conditions. He stated it was unfortun-
ate that these comments had come at such a late hour. The Fire'Depart-
ment had held a study session on November 16, 1982, to answer questions
and receive input:by the public but unfortunately did not receive any at
that time.
Jay Whisenant, architect representing MDW, apologized for his late
comments stating that he had submitted several of:his comments.to, staff.
He did not elaborate:on the wood shake shingle issue; however, he was
opposed to the restriction. He felt that the 52 percent of "shake roofs
existing in San Luis Obispo would not constitute a one -mile radius
negative condition-. He-was primarily concerned with the cost impacts.
He requested a moratorium be set for at least three months to keep the
developments :thatiare already underway from having to:go backland
retrace their steps. He was concerned. with Section 10.301A concerning
approved automated smoke detector systems: He felt the costs were
extremely expensive and dependability was questionable. He felt build-
ings over 4500 square feet required to be sprinkled should be studied
further. There was also no 25 percent.addition rule. He would like
common standards referenced in the document. Regarding Section 10.309
concerning sprinkler systems, he felt the scope was much too broad. The
cost of 85 cents and a $1.25 was unrealistic. Non- combustible buildings
were excluded from the document and should be acknowledged...He would
figure the cost to be close to $2.00 to $2.50 a square foot for sprinkler
design and installation. He would like to see the cost benefits analyzed
1
for the 4500 square feet.
T. Keith Gurnee was opposed to both.the wood shingle requirement and
sprinklers. He felt that a balance needed to be made between beauty and
cost. He felt the Architectural Review Commission should be given
sufficient time to adequately review the ordinance. He did not feel a
total ban of wood shingles should be required and questioned how many
fires had been caused in this manner.. With regard to' -the sprinklers, he
felt the costs were prohibitive.' Currently, his employer has six
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 7
projects; and they have estimated the cost to be between $1.45 and $3.40
a square foot if this sprinkler requirement was implemented. A sprinkler
requirement for condominiums was especially bad and would pose a negative
effect on rental housing. He urged an exhaustive cost benefit analysis
be performed prior to adoption of the amendment.
Vic Montgomery cited the Cedar Condominiums on Madonna Road as being a
prime example for reviewing the cost implications.
' Ron Bearce stated he could support the ordinance. It would be a protec-
tive ordinance and could work.
Mike Dolder stated there was flexibility in the ordinance to look at
individual projects separately. He agreed the retroactive costs are in
redesign of existing buildings and would be much higher than new construc-
tion. He stated that the residential units would not require a complete
comprehensive system. He did not feel the ordinance had taken a "cadillac"
approach. He cited other Central Coast cities with similar ordinances
including Santa Barbara City and County. Further, the communities of
Ventura City, Ventura County, Oxnard and Carlsbad also had ordinances
similar to the wood shake shingle restrictions.
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing closed.
Councilwoman Dovey felt there was sufficient flexibility in the ordinance
for the Fire Department to look at individual projects. She felt that
the safety be the first consideration, and we should try to reduce
dangers currently existing.
Councilman Griffin felt the Fire Code was not a static document and
would urge the speakers not to drop their concerns but to continue their
dialogue with safety officials. He would support the ordinance as
currently recommended.
Councilman Settle stated he would also support the fire ordinance as
proposed. He would, however, change the effective date to either 60 or
90 days later. He would like the ordinance to come back for review in
one year.
Mayor Billig felt it was unfortunate that the comments were not received
earlier. The Council was very concerned about aesthetics but held
safety and welfare as most important, even if this might increase the
cost of construction. She would support a six -month to one -year review.
After brief discussion it was moved by Councilman Settle, seconded by
Councilman Griffin, to give final passage to the following Ordinance:
Ordinance No. 943 (1983 Series), an ordinance of the City of San Luis
Obispo adopting the 1982 Fire Code Regulations as recommended with the
effective date to be in 90 days and review within one year.
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
' 2. FINAL PASSAGE OF ORDINANCE NO. 944 - TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS
Council held a public hearing to consider the final passage of Ordinance
No. 944, an ordinance amendment to the traffic regulations concerning
visibility obstruction at intersections (continued from 1/4/83).
Dave Romero, Public Works Director, reviewed the Council agenda report
(file no. 772) stating that the ordinance was necessary to eliminate
conflict with the recent zoning ordinance revisions and would urge its
final passage.
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 8
Mayor Billig declared the public hearing open. No one spoke for or
against the final passage. Mayor Billig declared the public hearing
closed.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Councilman Griffin, to give
final passage to the following Ordinance: Ordinance No. 944 (1983
Series), an ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo amending the
traffic regulations concerning visibility obstruction at intersections.
Finally passed on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Griffin, Settle and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
3. RESOLUTION OF CONDEMNATION
Council considered a resolution condemning property located at 861 Palm
Street (Shanghai Low Restaurant) required for construction of city's
parking garage (continued from 1/4/83).
George Thacher, City Attorney, briefly reviewed the Council agenda
report (file no. 554) and explained that Tom Dankert had been hired to
work with the appraisers and negotiate a property settlement with the
property owners and business people within the area of the project for
acquiring it and to aid the tenants in relocation.
Roger Lyon, attorney representing George Gin, owner of Shanghai Low
Restaurant, stated he was requesting a two week continuance so that the
good faith negotiations could result in a settlement agreeable to both
parties (see letter dated January 18, 1983). At that time staff could
monitor the progress of the negotiations and report back to the Council.
If the good faith negotiations continue as they have been, it would be
requested that the matter again be continued for two weeks with the hope
that one month from now rather than considering a resolution to commence
the condemnation lawsuit, the Council could instead be executing a
negotiated agreement which would serve the interest of both his client
and the people of San Luis Obispo.
Councilman Griffin would expect that the one month period be a productive
one. In two weeks he would like a joint progress report so that Council
could give further direction for the final resolution.
Mayor Billig stated she was pleased that the family was cooperating with
the city. She too would like a progress report within two weeks to be
reviewed by the Council. She emphasized the Council's willingness to
work with the family, property owner and his family, and resolve the
situation.
After brief discussion and upon general consensus, Council continued
this item for two weeks for a staff report on the negotiation of set-
tlement (4 -0 -1).
4. ELECTRONIC GAME AMUSEMENT CENTERS
Council considered an ordinance to establish special regulations pertain-
ing to electronic game machines and electronic game amusement centers
(continued from 3/8/82 and 7/13/82).
George Thacher, City Attorney, briefly reviewed the Council agenda
report (file no. 705) and stated there was a pass -to -print ordinance
before the Council which would regulate electronic game amusement
centers. The interim ordinance has been in effect for close to 12
months. Principle among the proposed amendments was a procedure placing
with the Council the authority to grant or deny a license based on
information provided by the applicant and center staff. The Police
Chief would complete a background investigation and submit a
1
1
1
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p:m.
Page 9
recommendation.to the.Council. The ordinance would take care of potential
conflicts between the city's current amusement device machines, tax
regulations and the electronic game license regulations proposed here.
It also would amend the zoning regulations essentially to delete.the C -N
district as a permitted location for electronic game amusement centers
and require.a use permit for centers.to be approved by the Community
Development Director. This was.a.fairly restrictive.ordinance.,-but these
-were the changes.as suggested.by.the,Council at.its last.meeting. One
1 amendment which he would suggest come back after,this,ordinance is
adopted would be the deletion of the requirement that 18 year olds and
under would be prohibited from playing.any of,the.machines. 'He stated
that this condition has not been enforced, and it was his recommendation
fo remove the prohibition.
Councilman Griffin stated-that it was unfortunate this ordinance had not
come.before the.CounciL sooner as:there.may have been prospective
applicants that may have been held up waiting for staff to bring this
back to the Council.
Mayor Billig asked for public input. No one appeared for or against the
proposed ordinance.
Councilwoman Dovey suggested the following rewording on page.6 of the
ordinance, paragraph (g) "Bicycle racks shall be placed within 25 feet
of any center, providing at least one bicycle stall for each electronic
y. .:game in-the center. "; (h) "Centers shall be closed from 2:00 a.m. to
6:00 a.m. and such other times as the Council may require in approving a
license. Page 5, 3. (d) "Centers shall have on duty at all times at
least one responsible adult supervisor whose primary duty..."
Councilman Settle stated he could in no way support the ordinance. In
his. opinion it-:was total_.prohibit on. of any. amusement, c enters. or. video
-, games. Rather than a regulation, it was.a prohibition. These machines
could well be a passing phenomenon. As a result, he would not support
the-ordinance.
Councilman Griffin stated he was concerned with the proliferation of
this type of activity. He would encourage those who seek to engage in
this business to keep up interchange with city officials and bring
inequities to the Council's attention.-
Mayor Billig.stated we have had very few,applications. She did not feel
it was .unduly..restrictive but rather.a new land use much like when
billiards first-came into being.. She felt the Council was being proactive,
not reactive.
Councilman Settle did not feel the, city would ever know how restrictive
they've been because many applicants would simply not bother to apply.
After brief discussion it was moved by Councilwoman Dovey,,seconded by
Councilman Griffin, the following ordinance was introduced to print:
Ordinance No. 946 (1983 Series), an ordinance of the City of San Luis
Obispo establishing special regulations pertaining to electronic game
machines and,electronic• game amusement centers.,
Introduced and passed to print on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Griffin and Mayor Billig
1 NOES: Councilman Settle
ABSENT: Councilman Dunin
. ............
C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
A. OCS LEASE SALE 73
After-;brief discussion staff was.directed,to prepare a letter for the
Mayor's signature objecting to the EIS process concerning OCS lease sale
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, January 18, 1983 - 7:00 p.m.
Page 10
73 and including specific comments on the scope of what the EIS should
include (4 -0 -1).
B. BUDGET CUTS AFFECTING OCS STAFFING
After brief discussion staff was directed to prepare a letter to Governor
Deukmejian for the Mayor's signature, expressing concern regarding
proposed budget cuts affecting the Coastal Commission, thereby compromis-
ing funding available for OCS staffing (4 -0 -1). ,
C. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPRESENTATIVE
Mayor Billig stated she had received a letter from the Chamber of
Commerce requesting increased City /Chamber communications and to that
end they would send a Chamber representative to future Council meeting
to act as the liaison for their Legislative Committee. Communication
received and filed (4 -0 -1).
D. VANDALISM & LITTER IN CITY PARKING LOTS
Mayor Billig stated she had received information from concerned citizens
regarding the litter and vandalism in city -owned parking lots and if any
of the other Councilmembers were receiving like complaints, to please
forward them on to appropriate staff.
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor
Billig declared the meeting at 8:55 p.m. to Monday, January 24, 1983,
for closed session. '1
I
i
f
amela Voges, C i" erk
APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 3/1/83
I
M I N U T E S
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
MONDAY, JANUARY 24, 1983 - 12:15 P.M.
COUNCIL HEARING ROOM, CITY HALL, 990 PALM STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
STUDY SESSION
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers
Present: GlennaDeane Dovey, Ron Dunin, Robert Griffin, Allen
Settle and Mayor Melanie C. Billig
Absent: None
City Staff ,
Present: George Thacher, City Attorney
12:20 p.m. City Council adjourned to Closed Session to discuss Personnel
matters, all Councilmembers present.
1:21 p.m. City Council reconvened, all Councilmembers present.