Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/24/1993City Council Meeting Page 8 Tuesday, August 17, 1993 - 7:00 P.M. COMMUNICATIONS COMM.1. Mayor Pinard asked Buff to analyze the process to move structures especially Building Department and City requirements (consensus). 1:20'A.M. Council remained in open session; Jeff Jorgensen. City Attorney confirmed Council concurrence with direction in the matter of San Luis Medical Clinic vs. Home Federal Trust, at al., (general consent). 1::2 A.M. there being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Pinard adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, August 24, 1993 at 1:30 P.M. APPROVED BY COUNCIL 9/7/93 is DRG:cm R. Gla well, C' Clerk MINUTES STUDY SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TUESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1993 - 1:30 P.M. CITY /COUNTY LIBRARY - COMMUNITY ROOM - 995 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to order by Vice -Mayor Roalman. anti r•_e� � Council Members Present: Council Member Dave Romero, Allen K. Settle, Vice -Mayor BIB Roalman, and Mayor Peg Pinard (arrived at 1:43 PM) Absent: Council Member Penny Rappa City Staff Present: John Dunn, City Administrative Officer, Jeff . Jorgensen, City Attorney; Diane Gladwell, City Clerk; Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administrative Officer Ann Slate, Personnel Director, Bill Statier, Finance Director; Mike McCluskey, Public Works Director, Bob Neumann, Fire Chief There were no public comments. 1. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF ANNEXATION (File No. 238) 1. INTRODUCTION - PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP City Council Meeting Tuesday, August 24, 1993 - 1:30 P.M. Page 2 John Dunn. City Administrative Officer, introduced the workshop and environmental and financial analysis of annexations. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS - WHAT IS 177 Angus McDonald, Study Session Facilitator, defined fiscal Impact as a comparison of on -going costs and revenue. He stated that traditional sources of funding for public Improvements were no longer available, therefore, development- related Infrastructure needed to be funded via Impact fees and reimbursed over time through other mechanisms. He defined impact as the difference between two courses of action; for example, to annex vs. not to annex. Fiscal Impact analysis entailed forecasting the local economy, then describing land uses In enough detail to determine the costs to serve. those land uses. Land uses need to be market sensitive, and he recommended a fiscal team comprised of City Department Heads to determine mitigation measures for the negative fiscal impacts. He recommended applicants fund capital facilities planning and engineering studies up front and that fiscal analysis be done as a whole process (totality of area) rather than on a project-by- project basis. He discussed annual monitoring of environmental impact reports, consistency In fiscal analysis, maintaining balance, and providing benefit assessment districts in areas where special benefits were realized. Ill. EXPERIENCE IN OTHER CITIES Bill Feldmeier. Director of Financial Planning from the City of Davis, described their process of establishing 1 a municipal service company that comprised various city services and recognized assets. J_Qy Fraser. Principal Planner for the City of Santa Maria, described their process to Incorporate 3,500 acres within their sphere of influence. He described the anticipated process to complete annexation of the area, Including LAFCO requirements for school mitigation plans. Dale Pfeiffer. Director of Public Works for the City of Vacaville, described their modeling techniques and water rights purchase program. He reviewed the annexation of the Lower Lagoon Valley and various issues. IV. SUMMARY /QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Council discussed a variety of issues including service standards, master contracts with counties, and development in the county. Sandi Sigurdson, San Luis Obispo, asked if it was viable to state preferred infrastructure technology and the timing of its implementation. Anaus McDonald. Study Session Facilitator, suggested a managed growth /team concept to establish that program. Pat Veesart. San Luis Obispo, expressed concern about constant growth and levels of service. Richard Schmidt, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns about changes State policy. J&M San Luis Obispo, stated that there was a lessening demand for commercial development in San Luis Obispo because of increasing commercial development in other cities. ..::..... . City Council Meeting Page 3 Tuesday, August 24, 1993 - 1:30 P.M. After further discussion, Mayor Pinard adjourned the meeting 4:58 P.M. to August 31, 1993 at 5:00 P.M. APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 9/24/93 lane R. Glad wel Ity Clerk DRG:cm MINUTES . ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TUESDAY, AUGUST 31, 1993 - 5:00 P.M. CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 990 PALM STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL: Council Members Present: Council Member Penny Rappa, Dave Roalman, Allen K. Settle, Vice -Mayor Bill Roalman, and Mayor Peg Pinard Absent: None City Staff ' Present: John Dunn, City Administrative Officer, Jeff Jorgensen, City Attorney; Kim Condon, Assistant City Clerk; Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administrative Officer; Mike McCluskey, Public Works Director; Arnold Jonas, Community Development Director; Bob Neumann, Fire Chief; Ron Whisenand, Development Review Manager PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD There was no public comment. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. TENTATIVE MAP - 953 ORCUTT (ORCUTT 11) (File No. 463) Council held a public hearing to consider a request (PD/TR 220 -92) to create an office /industrial park on an 11.75 acre parcel on property located on the south side of Orcutt Road, west of the S.P.R.R. tracks (953 Orcutt Rd.) including: A) Planned Development Rezoning - to change the zoning from M (Manufacturing) to M -PD (Manufacturing - Planned Development) including the extension of Sacramento Drive to intersect with Orcutt Road; and B) Tract 2134 (City File No. TR 220 -92) - A Vesting Tentative Map creating seven lots from two lots; Parkside Research Center Association, applicant (continued from 8/17/93). Council Member Raooa stated that she had listened to the tape of the August 17 discussion on this item. Moved by Raooa /Romero to extend Sacramento Drive through the subject property; motion carried (3-2, Mayor Pinard and Vice Mayor Roalman voting no).