Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-16-2015 PH1 Ashbaugh_ �S NP 5 Office of the City Council 990 Palm Sf, °et Sian Luis Obispo CA 93401 -3249 805 781 P14 locity orq June 16, 2015 To: City Council Colleagues From: John Ashbaugh, Vice Mayor Re: Water Rate Subsidy from the General Fund Dear colleagues, JUN 16 ?015 COUNCIL MEETING: OCP ITEM NO.: _ _ Pte_.__ It has been suggested that the Council should consider, as part of our review of the proposed water rate increase, subsidizing our Water Utility with General Fund revenues. The rationale for this proposal, as I understand it, is to provide rate relief to our water customers. We should not, in my opinion, give this proposal any further consideration. Here are my reasons for rejecting this proposal: It is inconsistent with long - standing City budget policy: I cited these policies at our last meeting on June 2. Here is the applicable policy, taken verbatim from our adopted Budget Policies and contained on page 62 -45 of the Financial Plan document we are reviewing now: "Water, Sewer and Parking. The City will set fees and rates at levels which fully cover the total direct and indirect costs — including operations, capital outlay, and debt service —of the following enterprise programs: water, sewer and parking." This policy is further augmented by this policy concerning enterprise fund debt capacity: "Enterprise Fund Debt Capacity. The City will set enterprise fund rates at levels needed to fully cover debt service requirements as well as operations, maintenance, administration and capital improvement costs. The ability to afford new debt for enterprise operations will be evaluated as an integral part of the City's rate review and setting process." 2. It would violate our promises to the voters: To use general fund revenues to subsidize any of our enterprise funds would fly in the face of the commitments we made regarding fiscal responsibility in asking them to approve Measure G last year. 3. It conflicts with our Goal - Setting Process: Any General Fund revenue that is diverted to subsidize our enterprise funds will reduce the funds available to public safety, code enforcement, open space, affordable housing, and other Major Council Goals forged by a consensus of the Council after extensive public outreach through our Goal- Setting Process. 4. It sends exactly the wrong message to our ratepayers: At a time when we are relying on them more than ever before to reduce water use in the face of a catastrophic statewide drought, we would be telling them that it's OK to use more water because we have magically discovered unused revenues in our General Fund for which no higher purpose exists than to enable them to avoid further conservation efforts.