Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-16-2012 SS2 Reading File by Status
i"councit mcmoQAnc)um DATE: October 8, 2012 TO: City Council VIA: Katie Lichtig, City Manager FROM: Derek Johnson, Community Development Director BY: Kim Murry, Deputy Director of Community Development PA SUBJECT: Council Reading File for October 16, 2012 Agenda — LUCE Update Attached are three cross - tabbed reports of the 2012 community survey results: 1. Resident responses sorted by owner versus renter 2. Business owner responses 3. Resident responses sorted by status: student, employed, unemployed, retired, other Council Memo Template SLO GPU Mailer Surveys �Z�J POD E5q d SurveyHonkey a-rc 2012- 1. How would you rate the overall quality of life in San Luis Obispo? Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals High 91.4% 81.5% 50.0% 79.7% 76.1% 81.0% (74) (751) (2) (514) (70) (1,411) Medium 8.6% 17.6% 0.0% 18.6% 21.7% 17.7% (7) (162) (0) (120) (20) (309) Low 0.0% 0.9% 50.0% 1.7% 2.2% 1.3% (0) (8) (2) (11) (2) (23) answered question 81 921 4 645 92 1,743 skipped question 60 2. What do you see as San Luis Obispo's greatest problem? Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Count 73 577 77 860 replies 4 replies 1,591 replies replies replies answered question 73 860 4 577 77 1,591 skipped question 212 1 of 333 3. What do you see as San Luis Obispo's greatest strength? Which of the following best describes your status? Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired other Count 74 546 82 1,558 852 replies 4 replies re replies lies replies p' p answered question 74 852 4 540 82 1,558 skipped question 245 2 of 333 4. Listed below are several aspects of "quality of life" in San Luis Obispo. On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being LEAST important and 5 being MOST important, how would you rate the following? Which of the following best describes your status? 3 of 333 Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Natural environment (air quality, open 1.2% 2.1% 25.0% 2.5% 3.2% space) 1 (1) (20) (1) (17) (3) 1.2% 1.0% 25.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2 (1) (9) (1) (14) (2) 3.7% 3.7% 0.0% 6.7% 8.4% 3 (3) (35) (0) (45) (8) 24.7% 18.5% 0.0% 19.5% 17.9% 4 20 ( ) (174) (0) (131) (17) 5 69.1% 74.7% 50.0% 69.2% 68.4% (56) (704) (2) (465) (65) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (942) (4) (672) (95) (1,794) Job opportunities 2.5% 2.3% 25,0% 6.6% 5.3% 1 (2) (22) (1) (44) (5) 5.0% 4.1% 25.0% 14.0% 9.5% 2 (4) (39) (1 ) (93) (9) 8.8% 16.8% 0.0% 24.5% 20.0% 3 (7) (158) (0) (163) (19) 32.5% 33.0% 25.0% 28.2% 25.3% 4 (26) (311) (1) (187) (24) 51.3% 43.7% 25.0% 26.7% 40.0% 5 (41) (411) (1) (177) (38) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (941) (4) (664) (95) (1.784) Recreation opportunities 2.5% 1.2% 0.0% 2.7% 3.2% 1 (2) (11) (0) (18) (3) 3 of 333 1.2% 3.4% 25.0% 6.9% 7.4% 2 (1) (32) (1) (46) (7) 11.1% 17.9% 25.0% 23.0% 16.8% 3 (9) (169) (1) (154) (16) 35.8% 40.3% 0.0% 42.3% 40.0% 4 (29) (380) (0) (283) (38) 49.4% 37.2% 50.0% 25.1% 32.6% 5 (40) (350) (2) (168) (31) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (942) (4) (669) (95) (1,791) Entertainment opportunities 1.2% 1.6% 0.0% 2.7% 4.3% 1 (1) (15) (0) (18) (4) 1.2% 7.7% 25.0% 10.7% 17.0% 2 (1) (73) (1) (72) (16) 24.7% 34.3% 50.0% 32.8% 28.7% 3 (20) (323) (2) (221) (27) 37.0% 41.8% 0.0% 36.3% 31.9% 4 (30) (394) (0) (244) (30) 35.8% 14.6% 25.0% 17.5% 18.1% 5 (29) (138) (1) (118) (17) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.0.0..., 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (943) (4) (673) (94) (1,795) Educational opportunities 1.3% 1.8°!s 25.0% 4.2% 2.1% 1 (1) (17) (1) (28) (2) 1.3% 5.5% 50.0% 6.7% 10.5% 2 (1) (52) (2) (45) (10) 15.2% 16.5% 0.0% 18.4% 10.5% 3 (12) (156) (0) (124) (10) 21.5% 34.2% 0.0% 29.0% 25.3% 4 (17) (323) (0) (195) (24) 60.8% 41.9% 25.0% 41.8% 51.6% 5 (48) (396) (1) (281) (49) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (i) (944) (4) (673) (95) (1,795) 4 of 333 Shopping opportunities 1.2% 5.2% 0.0% 3.3% 8.5% 1 (1) (49) (0) (22) (8) 18.5% 16.1% 25.0% 10.6% 12.8% 2 (15) (152) (1) (71) (12) 33.3% 38.4% 75.0% 32.6% 34.0% 3 (27) (363) (3) (219) (32) 23.5% 29.1% 0.0% 32.9% 26.6% 4 (19) (275) (0) (221) (25) 23.5% 11.3% 0.0% 20.7% 18.1% 5 (19) (107) (0) (139) (17) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (946) (4) (672) (94) Pace of life 2.5% 2.4% 0.0% 2.7% 3.2% 1 (2) (23) (0) (18) (3) 3.7% 4.7% 50.0% 4.2% 2.1% 2 (3) (44) (2) (28) (2) 24.7% 17.9% 0.0% 17.4% 18.1% 3 (20) (168) (0) (116) (17) 35.8% 32.1% 0.0% 34.4% 34.0% 4 (29) (302) (0) (229) (32) 33.3% 42.9% 50.0% 41.3% 42.6% 5 (27) (403) (2) (275) (40) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (940) (4) (666) (94) Crime levels 2.5% 2.3% 25.0% 2.7% 5.3% 1 (2) (22) (1) (18) (5) 6.2% 2.4% 25.0% 3.9% 2.1% 2 (5) (23) (1) (26) (2) 9.9% 10.4% 0.0% 7.9% 7.4% 3 (8) (98) (0) (53) (7) 23.5% 21.5% 0.0% 25.4% 13.7% 4 (19) (203) (0) (170) (13) 5 of 333 1.00 (1 ,797) 1.00 (1,785) 1.00 (1.795) 1.00 (1,788) 1.00 (1 ,784) 58.0% 63.4% 50.0% 60.1% 71.6% 5 (47) (600) (2) (402) (68) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (946) (4) (669) (95) Opportunities to participate in government 5.0% 2.1'% 25.0% 4.2% 6.3% decisions 1 (4) (20) (1) (28) (6) 11.3% 9.5% 25.0% 6.4% 9.5% 2 (9) (89) (1) (43) (9) 30.0% 27.6% 0.0% 29.2% 28.4% 3 (24) (259) (0) (196) (27) 28.8% 36.5% 0.0% 33.5% 33.7% 4 (23) (342) (0) (225) (32) 25.0% 24.3% 50.0% 26.7% 22.1% 5 (20) (228) (2) (179) (21) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (938) (4) (671) (95) Traffic Safety and Congestion Management 2.5% 2.1% 25.0% 2.1% 6.5% (local travel and parking) 1 (2) (20) (1) (14) (6) 2.5% 5.0011(l 25.0% 5.7% 5.4% 2 (2) (47) (1) (38) (5) 25.9% 20.3% 0.0% 15.9% 21.7% 3 (21) (191) (0) (106) (20) 38.3% 36.1% 0.0% 29.9% 22.8% 4 (31) (340) (0) (199) (21) 30.9% 36.5% 50.0% 46.3% 43.5% 5 (25) (344) (2) (308) (40) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (942) (4) (665) (92) Transportation choices - bus service, 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 2.4% 5.3% bicycle and pedestrian facilities 1 (0) (22) (0) (16) (5) 6.2% 8.3% 50.0% 9.6% 7.4% 2 (5) (78) (2) (64) (7) 18.5% 21.2% 0.0% 22.2% 21.1% 3 (15) (200) (0) (149) (20) 6 of 333 1.00 (1.795) 1.00 (1,788) 1.00 (1 ,784) 7 of 333 1.00 (1,793) 1.00 (1,791) 1.00 (1,791) 23.5% 30.9% 25.0% 34.5% 31.6% 4 (19) (291) (1) (231) (30) 51.9% 37.3% 25.0% 31.3% 34.7% 5 (42) (352) (1) (210) (33) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (943) (4) (670) (95) Housing opportunities (cost and choice of 2.5% 2.4% 25.0% 3.7% 9.5% types) 1 (2) (23) (1) (25) (9) 3.7% 7.2% 50.0% 10.0% 7.4% 2 (3) (68) (2) (67) (7) 14.8% 23.8% 25.0% 26.2% 23.2% 3 (12) (224) (1) (175) (22) 29.6% 29.6% 0.0% 29.4% 21.1% 4 (24) (279) (0) (197) (20) 49.4% 36.9% 0.0% 30.6% 38.9% 5 (40) (348) (0) (205) (37) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (942) (4) (669) (95) Cultural diversity (people with different 6.2% 6.1% 0.0% 3.1% 3.2% backgrounds and interests) 1 (5) (57) (0) (21) (3) 22.2% 16.9% 25.0% 16.0% 16.8% 2 (18) (159) (1) (107) (16) 28.4% 32.1% 50.0% 31.8% 29.5% 3 (23) (302) (2) (213) (28) 18.5% 25.5% 25.0% 30.5% 34.7% 4 (15) (240) (1) (204) (33) 24.7% 19.5% 0.0% 18.5% 15.8% 5 (20) (184) (0) (124) (15) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (942) (4) (669) (95) Downtown character and activities 0.0% 2.2% 25.0% 4.5% 6.3% 1 (0) (21) (1) (30) (6) 7 of 333 1.00 (1,793) 1.00 (1,791) 1.00 (1,791) 3.7% 5.8% 25.0% 8.6% 7.4% 2 (3) (55) (1) (58) (7) 13.6% 18.4% 25.0% 19.4% 23.2% 3 (11) (173) (1) (130) (22) 34.6% 34.3% 0.0% 34.1% 26.3% 4 (28) (323) (0) (229) (25) 48.1% 39.3% 25.0% 33.4% 36.8% 5 (39) (370) (1) (224) (35) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -00 1.00 1.00 (81) (942) (4) (671) (95) (1,793) Property maintenance (upkeep, junk/litter 1.2% 2.2% 0.0% 3.1% 3.2% control) 1 (1) (21) (0) (21) (3) 8.6% 6.8% 50.0% 5.5% 6.4% 2 (7) (64) (2) (37) (6) 19.8% 21.6% 0.0% 18.4% 202% 3 (16) (204) (0) (123) (19) 42.0% 36.7% 25.0% 30.8% 31.9% 4 (34) (347) (1) (206) (30) 28.4% 32.7% 25.0% 42.2% 38.3% 5 (23) (309) (1) (282) (36) rating average 1.00 1.00 1 On 1.00 1.00 5.00 (81) (945) (4) (669) (94) (1,793) Access to healthy foods - fresh produce 1.2% 2.6% 25.0% 1.5% 4.2% and supermarkets 1 (1) (24) (1) (10) (4) 6.2% 5.6% 25.0% 5.5% 5.3% 2 (5) (53) (1) (37) (5) 14.8% 16,5% 0.0% 16.8% 14.7% 3 (12) (155) (0) (112) (14) 24.7% 30.1% 0.0% 30.1% 31.6% 4 (20) (283) (0) (201) (30) 53.1% 45.2% 50.0% 46.0% 44.2% 5 (43) (425) (2) (307) (42) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (940) (4) (667) (95) (1,787) 8 of 333 Other (please specify) 8 replies 172 replies answered question is 1 946 1 reply 142 20 343 replies replies 4 674 95 1,800 skipped question 3 5. Now, please indicate how satisfied you are with current conditions on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being VERY DISSATISFIED and 5 being very SATISFIED. Which of the following best describes your status? Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Totals Natural environment (air quality. open 1.3% 1.6% 0.0% 2.5% 2.1% space) 1 (1) (15) (0) (17) (2) 0.0% 2.9% 25.0% 3.3% 3.2% 2 (0) (27) (1) (22) (3) 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 7.9% 8.5% 3 (0) (54) (0) (53) (8) 31.3% 36.5% 25.0% 41.0% 44.7% 4 (25) (343) (1) (274) (42) 67.5% 53.3% 50.0% 45.2% 41.5% 5 (54) (501) (2) (302) (39) rating average 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (940) (4) (668) (94) (1,786) Job opportunities 6.2% 10.0% 25.0% 6.3% 17.4% 1 (5) (94) (1) (41) (16) 17.3% 23.5% 25.0% 18.2% 25.0% 2 (14) (220) (1) (119) (23) 43.2% 38.8% 0.0% 50.8% 31.5% 3 (35) (364) (0) (333) (29) 271% 22.9% 0.0% 20.0% 19.6% 4 (22) (215) (0) (131) (18) 6.2% 4.8% 50.0% 4.7% 6.5% 5 (5) (45) (2) (31) (6) 9 of 333 rating average 1.00 ($1) Recreation opportunities 0.0% 1 (0) 3.7% 2 (3) 23.5% 3 (19) 40.7% 4 (33) 32.1% 5 (26) rating average 1.010 {.81 } Entertainment opportunities 2.5% 1 (2) 9.9% 2 (8) 32.1% 3 (26) 35.8% 4 (29) 19.8% 5 (16) rating average 1.00 (81) Educational opportunities 1.2% 1 (1) 2.5% 2 (2) 13.6% 3 (11) 1.00 (938) 1.4% (13) 3.2% (30) 19.4% (182) 45.1% (423) 30.9% (290) 1.00 (938) 1.0% (9) 6.8% (64) 30.8% (290) 41.6% (392) 19.9% (187) 1.00 (942) 0.7% (7) 5.1% (48) 22.3% (209) 10 of 333 1.00 (4) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (2) 1.00 (4) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 1.00 (4) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 1.00 1.00 (655) (92) 1.4% 3.2% (9) (3) 4.7% 4.3% (31) (4) 25.8% 23.4% (171) (22) 45.6% 38.3% (303) (36) 22.6% 30.9% (150) (29) 1.00 1.00 (664) (94) 2.0% 4.3% (13) (4) 4.5% 7.4% (30) (7) 27.2% 26.6% (181) (25) 45.6% 41.5% (303) (39) 20.8% 20.2% (138) (19) 1.00 1.00 (665) (94) 1.5% 4.3% (10) (4) 5.1% 6.5% (34) (6) 18.7% 23.7% (125) (22) 1.00 (1 ,770) 1.00 (1.781) 1.00 (1,786) 1.00 (1.784) 1.00 (1,783) 1.00 (1,781) 37.0% 42.5% 25.0% 42.3% 33.3% 4 (30) (399) (1) (282) (31) 45.7% 29.4% 25.0% 32.4% 32.3% 5 (37) (276) (1) (216) (30) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (939) (4) (667) (93) Shopping opportunities 1.2% 3.2% 25.0% 7.5% 5.3% 1 (1) (30) (1) (50) (5) 7.4% 11.4% 0.0% 12.7% 8.5% 2 (6) (107) (0) (84) (8) 35.8% 27.7% 0.0% 25.8% 30.9% 3 (29) (260) (0) (171) (29) 38.3% 38.2% 50.0% 38.7% 35.1% 4 (31) (359) (2) (257) (33) 17.3% 19.6% 25.0% 15.4% 20.2% 5 (14) (184) (1) (102) (19) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (940) (4) (664) (94) Pace of life 1.2% 1.5% 25.0% 2.0% 5.3% 1 (1) (14) (1) (13) (5) 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 3.9% 5.3% 2 (0) (32) (0) (26) (5) 13.6% 15.1% 25.0% 17.2% 11.7% 3 (11) (142) (1) (114) (11) 43.2% 37.7% 0.0% 40.3% 43.6% 4 (35) (354) (0) (267) (41) 42.0% 42.3% 50.0% 36.7% 34.0% 5 (34) (397) (2) (243) (32) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (939) (4) (663) (94) Crime levels 2.5% 1.8% 25.0% 2.3% 4.3% 1 (2) (17) (1) (15) (4) 4.9% 7.9% 0.0% 11.5% 12.9% 2 (4) (74) (0) (76) (12) 11 of 333 1.00 (1.784) 1.00 (1,783) 1.00 (1,781) 12 of 333 100 (1,779) 1.00 (1 ,767) 1.00 (1,783) 17.3% 22.2% 0.0% 24.6% 23.7% 3 (14) (208) (0) (163) (22) 39.5% 43.0% 25.0% 43.9% 33.3% 4 (32) (403) (1) (291) (31) 35.8% 25.2% 50.0% 17.8% 25.8% 5 (29) (236) (2) (118) (24) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (938) (4) (663) (93) Opportunities to participate in government 5.0 % 2.4 % 25.0% 3.5% 4.4% decisions 1 (4) (22) (1) (23) (4) 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% 9.0% 7.7% 2 (5) (71) (0) (59) (7) 48.8% 37.9% 25.0% 35.5% 40.7% 3 (39) (354) (1) (234) (37) 27.5% 35.7% 25.0% 37.6% 35.2% 4 (22) (333) (1) (248) (32) 12.5% 16.4% 25.0% 14.4% 12.1% 5 (10) (153) (1) (95) (11) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (933) (4) (659) (91) Traffic Safety and Congestion Management 3.8% 6.0% 25.0% 8.8% 9.6% (local travel and parking) 1 (3) (56) (1) (59) (9) 150% 19.5 %n 0.0% 24.7% 22.3% 2 (12) (183) (0) (165) (21) 25.0% 29.7% 0.0% 25.8% 23.4% 3 (20) (279) (0) (172) (22) 41.3% 34.6% 0.0% 32.5% 36.2 % 4 (33) (325) (0) (217) (34) 15.0% 10.1% 75.0% 8.1% 8.5% 5 (12) (95) (3) (54) (8) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (938) (4) (667) (94) Transportation choices - bus service, 0.0% 3.2% 25.0% 2.6% 6.5% 12 of 333 100 (1,779) 1.00 (1 ,767) 1.00 (1,783) bicycle and pedestrian facilities 1 (0) (30) (1) (17) (6) 8.6% 14.6% 0.0% 11.0% 4.3% 2 (7) (137) (0) (73) (4) 17.3% 31.4% 0.0% 33.0% 22.8% 3 (14) (295) (0) (219) (21) 50.6% 36.4% 25.0% 36.9% 46.7% 4 (41) (342) (1) (245) (43) 23.5% 14.5% 50.0% 16.6% 19.6% 5 (19) (136) (2) (110) (18) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (940) (4) (664) (92) Housing opportunities 8.6% 11.5% 33.3% 5.4% 10.6% 1 (7) (108) (1) (36) (10) 21.0% 26.3% 33.3% 19.3% 17.0% 2 (17) (246) (1) (128) (16) 35.8% 36.6% 0.0% 46.5% 31.9% 3 (29) (343) (0) (308) (30) 24.7% 17.6% 0.0% 22.6% 29.8% 4 (20) (165) (0) (150) (28) 9.9% 7.9% 33.3% 6.2% 10.6% 5 (8) (74) (1) (41) (10) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (936) (3) (663) (94) Cultural diversity (people with different 14.8% 6.7% 25.0% 2.6% 8.5% backgrounds and interests) 1 (12) (63) (1) (17) (8) 19.8% 14.8% 0.0% 11.1% 9.6% 2 (16) (139) (0) (74) (9) 34.6% 42.8% 50.0% 41.1% 34.0% 3 (28) (401) (2) (273) (32) 14.8% 22.4% 0.0% 30.7% 36.2% 4 (12) (210) (0) (204) (34) 16.0% 13.3% 25.0% 14.5% 11.7% 5 (13) (125) (1) (96) (11) 13 of 333 1.00 (1,781) 1.00 (1.777) rating average 1.00 1.00 (81) (938) Downtown character and activities 0.0% 1.7% 1 (0) (16) 5.0% 6.0% 2 (4) (56) 13.8% 20.9% 3 (11) (195) 46.3% 43.3% 4 (37) (404) 35.0% 28.1% 5 (28) (262) rating average 1.00 1.00 (80) (933) Properly mainteswiiuu (uukuup. junk /litter 2.5% z.2 "In control) 1 (2) (21) 3.7% 9.2% 2 (3) (86) 22.2% 28.4% 3 (18) (267) 53.1% 44.4% 4 (43) (417) 18.5% 15.8% 5 (15) (148) rating average 1.00 1.00 (81) (939) Access to healthy foods - fresh produce 0.0% 1.5% and supermarkets 1 (0) (14) 3.8% 3.6% 2 (3) (34) 13.8% 17.3% 3 (11) (162) 45.0% 39.6% 4 (36) (370) 14 of 333 1.00 (4) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 1.00 (4) 33.3% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 66.7% (2) 1.00 (3) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 1.00 1.00 (664) (94) 3.5% 5.3% (23) (5) 10.4% 9.5% (69) (9) 21.5% 21.1% (142) (20) 42.1% 37.9% (279) (36) 22.5% 26.3% (149) (25) 1.00 1.00 (662) (95) 4.6% 6.4% (30) (5) 12.0% 15.1% (80) (14) 26.8% 20.4% (178) (19) 42.9% 41.9% (285) (39) 13.8% 17.2% (92) (16) 1.00 1.00 (665) (93) 1.7% 5.3% (11) (5) 4.7% 2.1% (31) (2) 19.5% 14.7% (129) (14) 43.2% 41.1% (285) (39) 1.00 (1,781) 1.00 (1,774) 1.00 (1,781) 6. One area of the city I particularly enjoy is: Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other 37.5% 38.0% 50.0% 30.9% 36.8% 760 replies 4 replies 5 (30) (355) (2) (204) (35) 386 rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (935) (4) (660) (95) (1,774) Other (please specify) 5 replies 133 replies 2 replies 68 15 223 replies replies answered question 81 944 4 670 95 1,794 skipped question 9 6. One area of the city I particularly enjoy is: Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Response Count 72 507 74 760 replies 4 replies 1,417 replies replies replies 59 answered question 72 760 a 507 74 1,417 skipped question 386 7. One area of the City I do not enjoy is (name one): Which of the following best describes your status? 15 of 333 Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Count 59 402 61 666 replies 4 replies 1,192 replies replies replies answered question 59 666 4 402 61 1,192 skipped question 611 15 of 333 8. Which of the following approaches to determining allowable growth in the City do you support? Please select all that apply. Which of the following best describes your status? 16 of 333 Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Totals 67.5% 62.4% 50.0% 75.3% 72.4% 67.8% Keep growth within available resources. (52) (564) (2) (458) (55) (1,131) Avoid harm to the natural environment (such as 66.2% 59.0% 50.0% 67.1% 64.5% 62.5% air quality). (51) (533) (2) (408) (49) (1,043) Look for opportunities to grow within City 35.1% 37.2% 25.0% 33.6% 38.2% 35.8% boundaries. (27) (336) (1) (204) (29) (597) Maintain the average residential growth rate at 26.0% 28.1% 25.0% 46.2% 46.1% 35.4% 1 %. (20) (254) (1) (281) (35) (591) Let the overall growth of the community follow 36.4% 35.6% 50.0% 31.9% 34.2% 34.3% from specific goals (for example, (28) (322) (2) (194) (26) (572) more head of household jobs or acquiring or 3.9% 7.4% 25.0% 6.9% 5.3% 7.0% preserving certain open space areas). (3) (67) (1) (42) (4) (117) 6.5% 7.6% 25.0% 8.2% 6.6% 7.8% Do not set growth limits. (5) (69) (1) (50) (5) (130) answered question 77 904 4 608 76 1,669 skipped question 134 16 of 333 9. If the city was to change the current residential growth rate of 1 %, which one of the following would you prefer? Which of the fallowing best describes your status? 17 of 333 Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Totals No change - maintain the average residential 48.6% 51.9% 50.0% 61.2% 52.4% 55.2% growth rate at 1 %. (35) (462) (1) (377) (44) (919) Some increase greater than 1 %, but slower than 11.1% 16.0% 0.0% 12.5% 11.9% 14.3% the state or the county as a whole. (8) (143) (0) (77) (10) (238) Growing no faster than San Luis Obispo County 6.9% 8.8% 0.0% 8.4% 16.7% 8.9% as a whole. (5) (78) (0) (52) (14) (149) Tie the residential growth rate to the rate of 23.6% 12.5% 0.0% 8.0% 4.8% 10.9% commercial development. (17) (111) (0) (49) (4) (181) 9.7% 10.9% 50.0% 9.9% 14.3% 10.7% I do not favor growth limits. (7) (97) (1) (61) (12) (178) answered question 72 891 2 616 84 1,665 skipped question 138 17 of 333 10. San Luis Obispo has worked to balance development and conservation to preserve the City's natural beauty, unique character and heritage while supporting housing opportunities and a vibrant economy. Do you think the City has not enough, enough or too much of the following types of development: Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Housing Not 26.9% 35.1% 33.3% 30.9% 34.4% enough (21) (326) (1) (201) (32) 67.9% 57.0% 33.3% 60.8% 60.2% Enough (53) (529) (1) (395) (56) 5.1% 7.9% 33.3% 8.3% 5.4% Too much (4) (73) (1) (54) (5) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 (78) (928) (3) (650) (93) Tourist/visitor serving Not 10.3% 8.6% 25.0% 9.4% 14.9% enough (8) (80) (1) (61) (14) 82.1% 79.7% 25.0% 79.7% 74.5% Enough (64) (743) (1) (518) (70) 7.7% 11.7% 50.0% 10.9% 10.6% Too much (6) (109) (2) (71) (10) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (78) (932) (4) (650) (94) Manufacturing Not 32.5% 45.8% 33.3% 41.3% 47.3% enough (25) (413) (1) (263) (44) 66.2% 50.4% 33.3% 53.1% 47.3% Enough (51) (455) (1) (338) (44) 1.3% 3.8% 33.3% 5.7% 5.4% Too much (1) (34) (1) (36) (5) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (902) (3) (637) (93) Business Park Not 11.8% 23.6% 0.0% 25.0% 21.5% 18 of 333 1.00 (1,752) 1.00 (1,758) 1.00 (1,712) 19 of 333 1.00 (1,716) 1.00 (1 ,758) 1.00 (1.763) 1.00 (1,751) enough (9) (215) (0) (158) (20) 82.9% 64.8% 75.0% 63.7% 74.2% Enough (63) (591) (3) (402) (69) 5.3% 11.6% 25.0% 11.3% 4.3% Too much (4) (106) (1) (71) (4) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (912) (4) (631) (93) Shopping /stores Not 18.2% 19.0% 0.0% 214.9% 27.7% enough (14) (176) (0) (163) (26) 70.1% 58.2% 50.0% 60.3% 55.3% Enough (54) (540) (2) (395) (52) 11.7% 22.8% 50.0% 14.8% 17.0% Too much (9) (212) (2) (97) (16) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (928) (4) (655) (94) Cultural /entertainment Not 39.2% 26.2% 25.0% 12.9% 26.6% enough (31) (243) (1) (85) (25) 59.5% 68.6% 50.0% 81.2% 71.3% Enough (47) (636) (2) (535) (67) 1.3% 5.2% 25.0% 5.9% 2.1% Too much (1) (48) (1) (39) (2) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (927) (4) (659) (94) Medical, legal, financial services Not 13.2% 14.5% 50.0% 13.8% 24.7% enough (10) (134) (2) (90) (23) 84.2% 76.0% 25.0% 79.8% 68.8% Enough (64) (703) (1) (521) (64) 2.6% 9.5% 25.0% 6.4% 6.5% Too much (2) (88) (1) (42) (6) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (925) (4) (653) (93) Government agencies /institutions Not 6.4% 4.2% 0.0% 4.3% 6.5% enough (5) (39) (0) (28) (6) 19 of 333 1.00 (1,716) 1.00 (1 ,758) 1.00 (1.763) 1.00 (1,751) 20 of 333 80.8% 66.5% 66.7% 73.7% 67.7% E ri ou g h (63) (616) (2) (480) (63) 12.8% 29.3% 33.3% 22.0% 25.8% Too much (10) (272) (1) (143) (24) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 (78) (927) (3) (651) (93) (1,752) answered question 79 938 4 662 94 1,777 skipped question 26 20 of 333 11. On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being no impact and 5 being substantial impact, how much do the following factors influence the character and quality of life in San Luis Obispo? Which of the following hest describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Air pollution 22.5% 15.1% 25.0% 15.7% 7.4% 1 (18) (142) (1) (104) (7) 18.8% 13.3% 0.0% 15.1% 11.6% 2 (15) (125) (0) (100) (11) 10.0% 16.6% 0.0% 21.7% 24.2% 3 (8) (156) (0) (144) (23) 21.3% 18.6% 25.0% 13.3% 20.0% 4 (17) (174) (1) (88) (19) 27.5% 36.4% 50.0% 34.2% 36.8% 5 (22) (341) (2) (227) (35) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (938) (4) (663) (95) Car /truck traffic noise 8.8% 5.4% 25.0% 7.1% 4.2% 1 (7) (51) (1) (47) (4) 13.8% 14.3% 0.0% 14.8% 7.4% 2 (11) (134) (0) (98) (7) 23.8% 23.2% 0.0% 25.5% 26.3% 3 (19) (217) (0) (169) (25) 35.0% 27.7% 25.0% 24.1% 23.2% 4 (28) (260) (1) (160) (22) 18.8% 29.3% 50.0% 28.5% 38.9% 5 (15) (275) (2) (189) (37) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (937) (4) (663) (95) Aircraft noise 27.5% 16.5% 25.0% 16.0% 10.5% 1 (22) (155) (1) (106) (10) 21 of 333 1.00 (1,780) 1.00 (1,779) rating avers Crowding /delay on streets 8 roads 23.8% 22.7% 2 (19) (213) 25.0% 30.3% 3 (20) (285) 17.5% 17.0% 4 (14) (160) 6.3% 13.5% 5 (5) (127) average rating average 1.00 1.00 (80) (933) Crowing /delay at parking facilities 5.0% 9.5% 1 (11) (88) 18.8% 18.7% 2 (15) (173) 28.8% 32.3% 3 (23) (299) 1.00 1.00 (80) (940) 3.8% 7.1% 1 (3) (66) 20.0% 15.5% 2 (16) (145) 26.3% 24.3% 3 (21) (227) 26.3% 27.4% 4 (21) (256) 23.8% 25.6% 5 (19) (239) rating avers Crowding /delay on streets 8 roads 23.8% 22.7% 2 (19) (213) 25.0% 30.3% 3 (20) (285) 17.5% 17.0% 4 (14) (160) 6.3% 13.5% 5 (5) (127) average rating average 1.00 1.00 (80) (933) Crowing /delay at parking facilities 5.0% 9.5% 1 (80) (927) 22 of 333 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 1.00 (4) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (2) � nn (4) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (2) 1.00 (4) 21.9% 16.8% (145) (16) 28.7% 34.7% (190) (33) 16.5% 22.1% (109) (21) 16.9% 15.8% (112) (15) 1.00 1.00 (662) (95) 6.8% 4.2% (45) (4) 16.5% 5.3% (109) (5) 26.9% 31.6% (177) (30) 23.4% 22.1% (154) (21) 26.4% 36.8% (174) (35) 1.00.. 1 00 (659) (95) 9.5% 5.4% (62) (5) 17.5% 11.8% (114) (11) 34.4% 37.6% (224) (35) 21.7% 18.3% (141) (17) 16.9% 26.9% (110) (25) 1.00 1.00 (651) (93) 1.00 (1,781) 1.00 (1.771) 1.00 (1.755) (11) (88) 18.8% 18.7% 2 (15) (173) 28.8% 32.3% 3 (23) (299) 23.8% 24.4% 4 (19) (226) 23.8% 15.2% 5 (19) (141) rating average 1.00 1.00 (80) (927) 22 of 333 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 1.00 (4) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (2) � nn (4) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (2) 1.00 (4) 21.9% 16.8% (145) (16) 28.7% 34.7% (190) (33) 16.5% 22.1% (109) (21) 16.9% 15.8% (112) (15) 1.00 1.00 (662) (95) 6.8% 4.2% (45) (4) 16.5% 5.3% (109) (5) 26.9% 31.6% (177) (30) 23.4% 22.1% (154) (21) 26.4% 36.8% (174) (35) 1.00.. 1 00 (659) (95) 9.5% 5.4% (62) (5) 17.5% 11.8% (114) (11) 34.4% 37.6% (224) (35) 21.7% 18.3% (141) (17) 16.9% 26.9% (110) (25) 1.00 1.00 (651) (93) 1.00 (1,781) 1.00 (1.771) 1.00 (1.755) At parks or recreation facilities 15.0% 13.1% 25.0% 12.4% 5.3% (12) (121) (1) (80) (5) 23.8% 24.1% 25.0% 21.2% 20.0% 2 (19) (223) (1) (137) (19) 31.3% 33.8% 0.0% 39.2% 35.8% 3 (25) (312) (0) (253) (34) 17.5% 17.1% 0.0% 15.0% 15.8% 4 (14) (158) (0) (97) (15) 12.5% 11.9% 50.0% 12.1% 23.2% 5 (10) (110) (2) (78) (22) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (60) ( 924) (4) (645) (95) Development on farmland, ranchland 6.5% 6.7% 33.3% 8.4% 8.6% 1 (5) (61) (1) (53) (8) 11.7% 11.4% 0.0% 12.8% 7.5% 2 (9) (104) (0) (81) (7) 20.8% 26.9% 0.0% 27.8% 23.7% 3 (16) (245) (0) (176) (22) 23.4% 21.2% 0.0% 19.9% 20.4% 4 (18) (193) (0) (126) (19) 37.7% 33.8% 66.7% 31.2% 39.8% 5 (29) (308) (2) (198) (37) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (911) (3) (634) (93) Development on creeks, marshes 7.8% 5.7% 33.3% 8.1% 6.4% 1 (6) (52) (1) (51) (6) 19.5% 9.4% 0.0% 9.9% 8.5% 2 (15) (85) (0) (62) (8) 14.3% 24.7% 0.0% 28.3% 23.4% 3 (11) (224) (0) (178) (22) 18.2% 18.9% 0.0% 18.4% 21.3% 4 (14) (172) (0) (116) (20) 23 of 333 1.00 (1,748) 1.00 (1,718) 1.00 {1,711) 1.00 (1.610) 1.00 (1,692) 40.3% 41.3% 66.7% 35.3% 40.4% 5 (31) (375) (2) (222) (38) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 (77) (908) (3) (62 0) (94 ) Form of Development 6.7% 3.8% 33.3% 5.8% 7.1% 1 (5) (32) (1) (35) (6) 13.3% 8.8% 0.0% 11.0% 7.1% 2 (10) (75) (0) (66) (6) 26.7% 34.7% 0.0% 30.2% 29.4% 3 (20) (294) (0) (181) (25) 22.7% 21.7% 0.0% 24.2% 20.0% 4 (17) (184) (0) (145) (17) 30.7% 31.0% 66.7% 28.7% 36.5% 5 (23) (263) (2) (172) (31) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 (75) (848) (3) (599) (85) Overall intensity of development 5.2% 3.8% 25.0% 5.1% 6.9% 1 (4) (34) (1) (32) (6) 15.6% 9.8% 0.0% 11.5% 5.7% 2 (12) (88) (0) (72) (5) 29.9% 309% 00% 78.3% 287% 3 (23) (277) (0) (178) (25) 22.1% 23.7% 0.0% 23.2% 14.9% 4 (17) (212) (0) (116) (13) 27.3% 31.8% 75.0% 31.8% 43.7% 5 (21) (285) (3) (200) (38) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (896) (4) (628) (87) Overall pace of life 2.6% 4.4% 25.0% 7.0% 4.4% 1 (2) (40) (1) (44) (4) 11.8% 7.7% 0.0% 13.4% 6.6% 2 (9) (69) (0) (84) (6) 23.7% 29.0% 0.0% 25.8% 27.5% 3 (18) (261) (0) (162) (25) 24 of 333 1.00 {1,711) 1.00 (1.610) 1.00 (1,692) 25 of 333 34.2% 23.6% 0.0% 20.1% 18.7% 4 (26) (212) (0) (126) (17) 27.6% 35.3% 75.0% 33.8% 42.9% 5 (21) (318) (3) (212) (39) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (900) (4) (628) (91) (1,699) answered question 80 940 4 666 95 1,785 skipped question 18 25 of 333 12. San Luis Obispo and the surrounding area include about 34% of the jobs in the county, and about 18% of the houses and apartments which results in commuting. On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being no effort and 5 being high effort, how much effort do you think should go into each of the following approaches to reduce commuting impacts? Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Expand roads and parking facilities to 21.8% 21.4% 66.7 % 14.9% 9.8% reduce congestion. 1 (17) (196) (2) (94) (9) 24.4% 16.9% 33.3% 14.6% 16.3% 2 (19) (155) (1) (92) (15) 21.8% 25.1% 0.0% 30.2% 34.8% 3 (17) (230) (0) (190) (32) 15.4% 19.5% 0.0% 17.9% 13.0% 4 (12) (179) (0) (113) (12) 16.7% 17.2% 0.0% 22.4% 26.1% 5 (13) (158) (0) (141) (24) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (78) (918) (3) (630) (92) (1,721) Discourage commuting by individual drivers 7.6% 14.1% 33.3% 11.8% 13.0% and encourage use of busses, van pools, 1 (6) (130) (1) (76) (12) bicycles, and carpools. 10.1% 10.0% 33.3% 11.8% 10.9% 2 (8) (92) (1) (76) (10) 21.5% 19.4% 0.0% 21.1% 21.7% 3 (17) (179) (0) (136) (20) 20.3% 19.4% 0.0% 23.4% 19.6% 4 (16) (179) (0) (151) (18) 40.5% 37.2% 33.3% 32.0% 34.8% 5 (32) (343) (1) (207) (32) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (923) (3) (646) (92) (1,743) 26 of 333 Discourage additional jobs in San Luis 50.6% 46.0% 66.7% 34.3% 39.6% Obispo. 1 (40) (420) (2) (215) (36) 11.4% 16.9% 33.3% 13.9% 9.9% 2 (9) (154) (1) (87) (9) 25.3% 20.3% 0.0% 28.4% 28.6% 3 (20) (185) (0) (178) (26) 3.8% 9.1% 0.0% 10.4% 9.9% 4 (3) (83) (0) (65) (9) 8.9% 7.8% 0.0% 13.1% 12.1% 5 (7) (71) (0) (82) (11) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (913) (3) (627) (91) (1,713) Encourage housing development in San 16.0% 19.3% 66.7% 20.8% 25.3% Luis Obispo. 1 (12) (176) (2) (132) (23) 18.7% 17.3% 33.3% 15.9% 12.1% 2 (14) (158) (1) (101) (11) 30.7% 24.8% 0.0% 30.8% 27.5% 3 (23) (226) (0) (196) (25) 17.3% 16.3% 0.0% 16.0% 15.4% 4 (13) (149) (0) (102) (14) 17.3% 22.3% 0.0% 16.5% 19.8% 5 (13) (204) (0) (105) (18) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (75) (913) (3) (636) (91) (1,718) Ili 59 Ili Other (please specify) 109 replies 1 reply 192 replies replies replies answered question 79 932 3 653 93 1,760 skipped question 43 27 of 333 13. To accommodate new housing in the city, I support: (Check all that apply.) Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Using vacant lots in existing neighborhoods for 100.0% 73.7% 57.7% buildings like those which have been built in the (650) (4) (45) neighborhood. (1,203) Using vacant lots in existing neighborhoods for 41.0% slightly more dense projects development. (32) Redeveloping underdeveloped sites with 71.8% buildings compatible with the neighborhood (56) Expanding the city's edges to accommodate 23.1% more housing. (18) Encouraging development of housing on the 42.3% same site as other office or commercial uses (33) (mixed use development). (379) Replacing commercial zoning to accommodate 19.2% housing. (15) answered question 78 72.1% 100.0% 73.7% 66.3% 71.8% (650) (4) (449) (55) (1,203) 32.2% 25.0% 27.9% 34.9% 31.2% (290) (1) (170) (29) (522) 63.3% 25.0% 62.2% 60.2% 63.0% (570) (1) (379) (50) (1,056) 20.9% 0.0% 19.4% 16.9% 20.2% (188) (0) (118) (14) (338) 55.5% 50.0% 47.6% 51.8% 51.8% (500) (2) (290) (43) (868) 25.5% 0.0% 17.7% 28.9% 22.5% (230) (0) (108) (24) (377) 901 4 609 83 1,675 skipped question 128 28 of 333 14. To accommodate new stores, banks, business park development and offices, I support: (Check all that apply.) Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals In existing commercial areas, using vacant lots for new buildings generally like ones which have 73.7% 78.7% 75.0% 81.8% 81.3% 79.7% (56) (690) (3) (475) (65) (1,289) been built there. In existing commercial areas, replacing smaller 35.5% 42.5% 25.0% 38.0% 46.3% 40.7% buildings with larger ones. (27) (373) (1) (221) (37) (659) Expanding at the city's edges to accommodate 17.1% 18.7% 0.0% 24.6% 22.5% 20.9% more commercial development. (13) (164) (0) (143) (18) (338) Encouraging development of commercial uses 39.5% 29.1% 50.0% 22.0% 28.8% 27.1% on the same site as housing. (30) (255) (2) (128) (23) (438) Replacing residential zoning to accommodate 5.3% 5.7% 0.0% 3.6% 6.3% 4.9% commercial development. (4) (50) (0) (21) (5) (80) answered question 76 877 4 581 80 1,618 skipped question 185 29 of 333 15. On a scale of 1-5, with 1 being LESS and 5 being MORE, Indicate below whether you would like to have less or more of the following types of land uses in certain areas, compared with current conditions. Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Small second dwellings ( "granny units ") in 7.5% 12.0% 25.0% 17.4% 11.8% areas that are mostly individual houses. 1 (6) (110) (1) (112) (11) 8.8% 6.1% 0.0% 9.2% 8.6% 2 (7) (56) (0) (59) (8) 46 % 3 V 31.8% 25.0% 39.0% 39_R% 3 (37) (292) (1) (206) (37) 21.3% 27.2% 0.0% 21.9% 20.4% 4 (17) (250) (0) (141) (19) 16.3% 23.0% 50.0% 19.4% 19.4% 5 (13) (211) (2) (125) (18) rating average 1.130 1 N 1.00 1.00 1 00 (80) (919) (4) (643) (93) Specialty stores (such as books or clothing) 3.7% 6.9% 25.0% 7.9% 13.0% in small neighborhood shopping centers. 1 (3) (64) (1) (51) (12) 6.2% 6.5% 0.0% 5.7% 6.5% 2 (5) (60) (0) (37) (6) 42.0% 30.9% 0.0% 33,1% 32.6% 3 (34) (285) (0) (213) (30) 34.6% 31.6% 0.0% 33.4% 19.6% 4 (28) (291) (0) (215) (18) 13.6% 24.1% 75.0% 19.9% 28.3% 5 (11) (222) (3) (128) (26) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (922) (4) (644) (92) Offices (doctors, lawyers) in small 5.0% 8.9% 25.0% 8.9°x"0 12.8% neighborhood shopping centers. 1 (4) (81) (1) (57) (12) 30 of 333 1.00 (1,739) 1.00 (1 ,743) 15.0% 12.0% 0.0% 7.8% 5.3% 2 (12) (110) (0) (50) (5) 53.8% 46.9% 25.0% 41.9% 47.9% 3 (43) (429) (1) (268) (45) 25.0% 21.2% 0.0% 26.9% 20.2% 4 (20) (194) (0) (172) (19) 1.3% 10.9% 50.0% 14.4% 13.8% 5 (1) (100) (2) (92) (13) rating average 1.00 1.00 1 7Q 1.00 1.00 3.00 (80) (914) i 1 (639) (94) (1,731) Nursing homes, churches, or schools in 12.3% 16.5% 25.0% 21.2% 15.2% areas that are mostly individual houses. 1 (10) (152) (1) (137) (14) 13.6% 13.4% 0.0% 12.4% 13.0% 2 (11) (124) (0) (80) (12) 59.3% 48.5% 25.0% 44.0% 44.6% 3 (48) (447) (1) (285) (41) 12.3% 15.6% 25.0% 15.5% 16.3% 4 (10) (144) (1) (100) (15) 2.5% 6.0% 25.0% 7.0% 10.9% 5 (2) (55) (1) (45) (10) rating average 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (922) (4) (647) (92) (1,746) Bars and nightclubs downtown. 11.1% 39.1% 25.0% 54.3% 45.7% 1 (9) (364) (1) (351) (43) 9.9% 14.7% 0.0% 17.5% 12.8% 2 (8) (137) (0) (113) (12) 48.1% 35.6% 50.0% 22.3% 31.9% 3 (39) (331) (2) (144) (30) 11.1% 4.7% 0.0% 2.9% 6.4% 4 (9) (44) (0) (19) (6) 19.8% 5.8% 25.0% 2.9% 3.2% 5 (16) (54) (1) (19) (3) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (930) (4) (646) (94) (1,755) 31 of 333 Restaurants and movie theaters downtown 5.0% 9.4% 25.0% 13.8% 12.9% 1 (4) (88) (1) (90) (12) 2.5% 8.2% 25.0% 11.8% 12.9% 2 (2) (76) (1) (77) (12) 57.5% 55.2% 0.0% 54.3% 52.7% 3 (46) (514) (0) (354) (49) 17.5% 16.6% 0.0% 14.6% 12.9% 4 (14) (155) (0) (95) (12) 17.5% 10.6% 50.0% 5.5% 8.6% 5 (14) (99) (2) (36) (8) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (932) (4) (652) [93) Retail stores downtown 3.7% 6.6% 0.0% 8.6% 8.8% 1 (3) (61) (0) (56) (8) 8.6% 4.8% 0.0% 4.9% 8.8% 2 (7) (45) (0) (32) (8) 63.0% 45.9% 0.0% 47.9% 52.7% 3 (51) (426) (0) (312) (48) 12.3% 26.1% 0.0% 24.1% 15.4% 4 (10) (242) (0) (157) (14) 12.3% 16.6% 1 00.0% 14.4% 14.3% 5 (10) (154) (4) (94) (13) rating avorago 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (928) (4) (651) (91) In residential areas, home businesses with 2.6% 8.7% 0.0% 16.4% 12.9% no employees other than residents of the 1 (2) (79) (0) (104) (12) house or apartment that may include small - scale product assembly or customer visits. 5.1% 6.9% 0.0% 10.4% 6.5% 2 (4) (63) (0) (66) (6) 53.8% 40.6% 33.3% 44.2% 36.6% 3 (42) (371) (1) (281) (34) 19.2% 25.4% 0.0% 17.5% 23.7% 4 (15) (232) (0) (111) (22) 32 of 333 1.00 (1,761) 1.00 (1,7.55) 19.2% 18.4% 5 (15) (168) 9.p0 1.00 (7$) (913) 3.7% 2.5% 1 (3) (23) 2.5% 3.5% 2 (2) (32) 28.4% 21.4% 3 (23) (197) rating average Neighborhood markets or fresh produce markets in residential areas. (79) (924) Small city parks in residential areas. 2.5% 2.2% 1 (2) 37.0% 39.0% 4 (30) (360) 29.6% 28.4% 33.6% 5 (23) (310) rating average 1.00 1.00 4 (81) (922) Auto repair downtown or in shopping 6.3% 14.4% centers. 1 (5) (133) (79) (924) Small city parks in residential areas. 2.5% 2.2% 1 (2) 16.5% 12.9% 2 (13) (119) 29.6% 67.1% 52.9% 3 (53) (489) 7.6% 13.9% 4 (6) (128) 2.5% 6.0% 5 (2) (55) rating average 1.00 1.00 (79) (924) Small city parks in residential areas. 2.5% 2.2% 1 (2) (20) 2.5% 1.1% 2 (2) (10) 29.6% 21.8% 3 (24) (202) 33 of 333 66.7% (2) 1.00 is 50.0% (2) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 1.00 (4 ) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (2) 1.00 (4) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 11.6% 20.4% (74) (19) 1.00 '1.00 (636) (93) 6.5% 4.3% (42) (4) 7.6% 11.7% (49) (11) 30.1% 26.6% (195) (25) 31.7% 23.4% (205) (22) 24.1% 34.0% (156) (32) 1.00 1.00 (647) (94) 19.7% 18.5% (127) (17) 17.0% 15.2% (110) (14) 48.0% 48.9% (310) (45) 10.5% 8.7% (68) (8) 4.8% 8.7% (31) (8) 1.00 1.00 (646) (92) 4.0% 4.3% (26) (4) 3.2% 3.2% (21) (3) 25.8% 27.7% (169) (26) 1.00 (1,723) 1.00 (1,748) 1.00 (1,745) 34 of 333 34.6 %a 30.8% 25.0% 30.7% 24.5% 4 (28) (286) (1) (201) (23) 30.9% 44.2 % 25.0% 36.3% 40.4% 5 (25) (410) (1) (238) (38) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (81) (928) (4) (655) (94) (1,762) 50 9 Other (please specify) 5 replies 104 replies 2 replies 170 replies replies answered question 81 935 4 663 94 1,777 skipped question 26 34 of 333 16. On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being less and 5 being more, do you think the city should provide less or more of each of the following services? Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Bicycle infrastructure (bike lanes, paths 2.6% 7.2% 50.0% 15.9% 9.3% and parking) 1 (2) (65) (2) (100) (8) 1.3% 4.8% 0.0% 9.1% 8.1% 2 (1) (44) (0) (57) (7) 44.2% 26.0% 0.0% 34.8% 30.2% 3 (34) (236) (0) (218) (26) 14.3% 20.8% 25.0% 19.8% 12.8% 4 (11) (189) (1) (124) (11) 37.7% 41.2% 25.0% 20.4% 39.5% 5 (29) (374) (1) (128) (34) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (908) (4) (627) (86) Bus service - more routes and more 1.3% 8.2% 25.0% 8.2% 5.8% frequent service 1 (1) (73) (1) (51) (5) 3.8% 6.6% 0.0% 7.5% 9.3% 2 (3) (59) (0) (47) (8) 38.5% 44.0% 25.0% 47.8% 52.3% 3 (30) (393) (1) (298) (45) 29.5% 21.6% 25.0% 18.5% 11.6% 4 (23) (193) (1) (115) (10) 26.9% 19.6% 25.0% 18.0% 20.9% 5 (21) (175) (1) (112) (18) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (78) (893) (4) (623) (86) Traffic congestion management 10.1% 7.5% 50.0% 6.3% 6.2% 1 (8) (67) (2) (39) (5) 3.8% 6.4% 25.0% 5.7% 4.9% 35 of 333 1.00 (1 ,702) 1.00 (1,684) 2 (3) (57) (1) (35) (4) 48.1 % 42.2% 25.0% 42.4% 37.0% 3 (38) (376) (1) (261) (30) 25.3% 25.2% 0.0% 24.0% 22.2% 4 (20) (225) (0) (148) (18) 12.7% 18.7 %n 0.0 %n 21.6% 29.6% 5 (10) (167) (0) (133) (24) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (892) (4) (6116) (81) (1,672) Neighborhood traffic management 15.6% 10.3% 0.0% 10.6 % 7.2 % 1 (12) (92) (0) (65) (6) 16.9% 10.2% 25.0% 7.4% 9.6% 2 (13) (91) (1) (45) (8) 46.8% 48.9% 25.0% 50.9% 39.8% 3 (36) (436) (1) (311) (33) 14.3% 16.4% 0.0% 16.4% 24.1% 4 (11) (146) (0) (100) (20) 6.5 % 14.1% 50.0% 14.7% 19.3% 5 (5) (126) (2) (90) (16) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (891) (4) (611) (83) (1,bub) Emergency services /disaster readiness 3.8% 6.6% 0.0% 6.9% 12.2% 1 (3) (59) (0) (43) (10) 5.1% 8.1% 0.0% 6.1% 6.1% 2 (4) (72) (0) (38) (5) 48.1% 53.5 %4 50.0% 47.7% 40.2% 3 (38) (477) (2) (297) (33) 31.6% 19.4% 0.0% 22.5% 13.4% 4 (25) (173) (0) (140) (11) 11.4% 12.4 % 50.0% 16.7% 28.0% 5 (9) (111) (2) (104) (23) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (892) (4) (622) (82) (1,679) 36 of 333 Flood prevention/control 11.5% 11.4% 25.0% 7.9% 13.3% 1 (9) (101) (1) (49) (11) 9.0% 12.0% 0.0% 10.3% 9.6% 2 (7) (107) (0) (64) (8) 56.4% 56.9% 75.0% 54.2% 49.4% 3 (44) (506) (3) (337) (41) 20.5% 11.9% 0.0% 16.2% 16.9% 4 (16) (106) (0) (101) (14) 2.6% 7.8% 0.0% 11.4% 10.8% 5 (2) (69) (0) (71) (9) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 (76) (889) (4) (622) (83) Preserving historic buildings 5.1% 5.7% 25.0% 9.6% 9.3% 1 (4) (51) (1) (60) (8) 11.4% 9.9% 0.0% 8.8% 9.3% 2 (9) (89) (0) (55) (8) 38.0% 39.3% 75.0% 45.2% 41.9% 3 (30) (352) (3) (283) (36) 22.8% 26.1% 0.0% 19.8% 11.6% 4 (18) (234) (0) (124) (10) 22.8% 19.0% 0.0% 16.6% 27.9% 5 (18) (170) (0) (104) (24) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (896) (4) (626) (86) Housing for low- income families 11.4% 17.9% 66.7% 15.8% 16.3% 1 (9) (161) (2) (99) (14) 11.4% 11.0% 0.0% 10.7% 11.6% 2 (9) (99) (0) (67) (10) 36.7% 35.5% 33.3% 33.8% 29.1% 3 (29) (318) (1) (211) (25) 26.6% 19.8% 0.0% 21.4% 16.3% 4 (21) (178) (0) (134) (14) 13.9% 15.7% 0.0% 18.2% 26.7% 5 (11) (141) (0) (114) (23) 37 of 333 1.00 (1,676) 1.00 (1,691) rating average 1.00 (79) Law enforcement: Violence /thefts 6.5% 1 (5) 9.1% 2 (7) 49.4% 3 (38) 22.1% 4 (17) 13.0% 5 (10) rating average 1.00 (77) Law enforcement: Traffic safety 12.8% 1 (10) 15.4% 2 (12) 52.6% 3 (41) 7.7% 4 (6) 11.6% 5 (9) rating average 1.00 (78) Law enforcement: Nuisances /zoning 28.2% 1 (22) 12.8% 2 (10) 44.9% 3 (35) 9.0% 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (897) (3) (625) (86) (1,690) 4.7% 25.0% 5.0% 4.8% (42) (1) (31) (4) 6.1% 0.0% 4.2% 7.1% (55) (0) (26) (6) 49.3% 25.0% 47.1% 39.3% (441) (1) (290) (33) 22.6% 0.0% 24.8% 19.0% (202) (0) (153) (16) 17.3% 50.0% 18.8% 29.8% (155) (2) (116) (25) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (895) (4) (616) (84) (1,676) 8.2% 25.0% 5.5% 4.8% (73) (1) (34) (4) 8.8% 0.0% 6.5% 9.5% (79) (0) (40) (8) 56.4% 25.0% 53.6% 46.4% (504) (1) (330) (39) 16.9% 25.0% 19.2% 21.4% (151) (1) (118) (18) 9.7% 25.0% 15.3% 17.9% (87) (1) (94) (15) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (894) (4) (616) (84) (1,676) 12.5% 33.3% 11.1% 10.7% (111) (1) (68) (9) 14.1% 0.0% 12.0% 13.1% (125) (0) (73) (11) 47.2% 66.7% 43.9% 52.4% (419) (2) (268) (44) 16.5% 0.0% 17.5% 13.1% 38 of 333 4 (7) (146) (0) (107) (11) 5.1% 9.7% 0.0% 15.4% 10.7% 5 (4) (86) (0) (94) (9) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (78) (887) (3) (610) (84) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 6.3% 5.9% 33.3% 9.9% 4.8% peaks & hillsides 1 (5) (53) (1) (62) (4) 2.5% 3.9% 0.0% 6.5% 4.8% 2 (2) (35) (0) (41) (4) 33.8% 27.8% 0.0% 29.4% 28.6% 3 (27) (251) (0) (184) (24) 25.0% 24.1% 33.3% 22.7% 22.6% 4 (20) (218) (1) (142) (19) 32.5% 38.4% 33.3% 31.5% 39.3% 5 (26) (347) (1) (197) (33) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (904) (3) (626) (84) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 8.9% 6.7% 25.0% 10.9% 8.3% farm, ranchland 1 (7) (60) (1) (67) (7) 5.1% 9.0% 0.0% 9.3% 13.1% 2 (4) (81) (0) (57) (11) 35.4% 44.5% 25.0% 45.4% 31.0% 3 (28) (399) (1) (278) (26) 21.5% 19.0% 25.0% 17.5% 22.6% 4 (17) (170) (1) (107) (19) 29.1% 20.8% 25.0% 17.0% 25.0% 5 (23) (187) (1) (104) (21) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (897) (4) (613) (84) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 5.1% 4.8% 25.0% 7.5% 3.7% creeks & marshes 1 (4) (43) (1) (46) (3) 7.6% 4.3% 0.0% 8.3% 6.1% 2 (6) (39) (0) (51) (5) 39 of 333 1.00 (1,662) 1.00 (1,697) 1.00 (1,677) 1.00 (1,587) 1,00 1.00 (1,674) 32.9% 34.6% 25.0% 36.0% 34.1% 3 (26) (313) (1) (222) (28) 27.8% 24.1% 25.0% 24.1% 25.6% 4 (22) (218) (1) (149) (21) 26.6% 32.3% 25.0% 24.1% 30.5% 5 (21) (292) (1) (149) (25) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (79) (9051 (4) (617) (82) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 5.1% 5.0% 25.0% 9.6% 4.8% City greenbelt 1 (4) (45) (1) (59) (4) 7.7% 4.9% 0.0% 7.8% 4.8% 2 (6) (44) (0) (48) (4) 39.7% 30.8% 25.0% 33.2% 31.3% 3 (31) (277) (1) (205) (26) 16.7% 25.7% 25.0% 23.2% 25.3% 4 (13) (231) (1) (143) (21) 30.8% 33.6% 25.0% 26.3% 33.7% 5 (24) (302) (1) (162) (28) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (78) (899) (4) (617) (83) Parking and access choices downtown 7.9% 11.6% 25.0% 12.4% 14.6% 1 (6) (104) (1) (76) (12) 10.5% 9.1% 0.0% 9.3% 7.2% 2 (8) (82) (0) (07) (6) 39.5% 46.7% 75.0% 43.0% 37.3% 3 (30) (419) (3) (264) (31) 17.1% 20.0% 0.0% 18.6% 14.5% 4 (13) (179) (0) (114) (12) 25.0% 12.6% 0.0% 16.8% 26.5% 5 (19) (113) (0) (103) (22) rating average 1 M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (897) (4) (614) (83) Parks /playfields 1.3% 5.6% 25.0% 7.6% 4.8% 1 (1) (51) (1) (47) (4) 40 of 333 1.00 (1,587) 1,00 1.00 (1,674) 41 of 333 3.9% 7.3% 0.0% 7.6% 6.0% 2 (3) (66) (0) (47) (5) 46.8% 42.8% 50.0% 52.2% 46.4% 3 (36) (387) (2) (322) (39) 26.0% 27.0% 0.0% 19.0% 17.9% 4 (20) (244) (0) (117) (15) 22.1% 17.3% 25.0% 13.6% 25.0% 5 (17) (157) (1) (84) (21) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (905) (4) (617) (84) (1,687) Performing arts 6.5% 10.5% 25.0% 12.2% 14.3% 1 (5) (95) (1) (76) (12) 13.0% 9.8% 0.0% 11.6% 9.5% 2 (10) (89) (0) (72) (8) 42.9% 50.6% 50.0% 54.1% 51.2% 3 (33) (457) (2) (336) (43) 22.1% 19.5% 0.0% 11.9% 13.1% 4 (17) (176) (0) (74) (11) 15.6% 9.6% 25.0% 10.1% 11.9% 5 (12) (87) (1) (63) (10) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (904) (4) (621) (84) (1,690) Public art 9.1% 15.6% 33.3% 19.1% 20Z% 1 (7) (141) (1) (118) (17) 10.4% 12.7% 0.0% 13.4% 8.4% 2 (8) (115) (0) (83) (7) 45.5% 44.5% 33.3% 48.0% 49.4% 3 (35) (403) (1) (297) (41) 18.2% 17.9% 0.0% 10.3% 9.6% 4 (14) (162) (0) (64) (8) 16.9% 9.3% 33.3% 9.2% 12.0% 5 (13) (84) (1) (57) (10) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 of 333 (77) Recreation programs 2.6% 1 (2) 7.8% 2 (6) 50.6% 3 (39) 26.0% 4 (20) 13.0% 5 (10) rating average 1.00 (77) Shelter for homeless 13.9% 1 (11) 8.9% 2 (7) 35.4% 3 (28) 26.6% 4 (21) 15.2% 5 (12) rating average 1.00 (79) Sidewalk improvements and pedestrian 2.6% connections 1 (2) 6.5% 2 (5) 50.6% 3 (39) 23.4% 4 (18) 005) 5.8% (52) 8.4% (76) 49.4% (445) 24.8% (223) 11.7% (105) 1.00 (901) 17.6% (160) 7.9% (72) 28.6% (261) 22.9% (209) 22.9% (209) 1.00 (911) 6.8% (62) 6.6% (60) 41.1% (374) 25.5% (232) 42 of 333 (3) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (2) 1.00 (`t) 50.0% (2) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (1) 25.0% (1) 1.00 (4) 33.3% (1) 0.0% (0) 33.3% (1) 33.3% (1) (1x19) (83) 9.8% 8.6% (60) (7) 10.1% 7.4% (62) (6) 55.3% 43.2% (340) (35) 16.1% 21.0% (99) (17) 8.8% 19.8% (54) (16) 1.00 1.00 (615) (81) 16.7% 19.8% (104) (17) 7.2% 10.5% (45) (9) 24.5% 24.4% (152) (21) 25.9% 11.6% (161) (10) 25.6% 33.7% (159) (29) 1.00 1.00 (621) (86) 7.3% 7.3% (45) (6) 8.2% 7.3% (50) (6) 41.6% 40.2% (255) (33) 22.2% 19.5% (136) (16) (1,6871 1.00 (1,701) 1.00 (1,685) 1.00 (1,689) 1.00 (1,686) 16.9% 20.0% 0.0% 20.7% 25.6% 5 (13) (182) (0) (127) (21) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (910) (3) (613) (62) Street maintenance 2.6% 3.8% 33.3% 4.5% 1.2% 1 (2) (34) (1) (28) (1) 3.8% 5.7% 0.0% 5.2% 4.8% 2 (3) (52) (0) (32) (4) 57.7% 49.1% 0.0% 40.0% 54.8% 3 (45) (445) (0) (247) (46) 23.1% 25.5% 33.3% 27.7% 16.7% 4 (18) (231) (1) (171) (14) 12.8% 15.9% 33.3% 22.7% 22.6% 5 (10) (144) (1) (140) (19) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (78) (906) (3) (618) (84) Street trees, landscaping along streets 1.3% 5.4% 33.3% 9.6% M% 1 (1) (49) (1) (59) (3) 3.8% 7.1% 0.0% 8.3% 12.0% 2 (3) (64) (0) (51) (10) 55.0% 41.3% 0.0% 44.7% 47.0% 3 (44) (373) (0) (276) (39) 22.5% 26.8% 33.3% 21.4% 18.1% 4 (18) (242) (1) (132) (15) 17.5% 19.4% 33.3% 16.0% 19.3% 5 (14) (175) (1) (99) (16) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (80) (903) (3) (617) (83) Street widening /signals 13.9% 15.2% 33.3% 12.1% 14.8% 1 (11) (136) (1) (74) (12) 13.9% 14.0% 0.0% 11.6% 11.1% 2 (11) (125) (0) (71) (9) 46.8% 44.3% 66.7% 44.4% 45.7% 3 (37) (397) (2) (271) (37) 43 of 333 1.00 (1,685) 1.00 (1,689) 1.00 (1,686) 15.7% (141) 10.8% (97) 1.00 (896) 9.8% (87) 11.5% (102) 45.1% (401) 19.6% (174) 14.1% (125) 1.00 (889) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 1.00 (3 ) 33.3% (1) 0.0% (0) 33.3% (1) 0.0% (0) 33.3% (1) 1.00 (3) Other (please specify) 0 replies 74 replies 1 reply answered question 80 920 44 of 333 4* 19.8% 18.5% (121) (15) 12.1% 9.9% (74) (8) 1.00 1.00 (611) (81) 9.1% 7.6% (55) (6) 8.5% 12.7% (51) (10) 47.9% 50.6% (289) (40) 17.9% 11.4% (108) (9) 16.6% 17.7% (100) (14) 1.00 1.00 (603) (79) 38 8 replies replies 651 89 skipped question 1.00 (1,670) 1.00 (1,651) 121 1,744 59 13.9% 4 (11) 11.4% 5 (9) rating average 1100 (79) Transit service - routes and frequency 2.6% 1 (2) 5.2% 2 (4) 40.3% 3 (31) 33.8% 4 (26) 18.2% 5 (14) rating average 1.00 (77) 15.7% (141) 10.8% (97) 1.00 (896) 9.8% (87) 11.5% (102) 45.1% (401) 19.6% (174) 14.1% (125) 1.00 (889) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 1.00 (3 ) 33.3% (1) 0.0% (0) 33.3% (1) 0.0% (0) 33.3% (1) 1.00 (3) Other (please specify) 0 replies 74 replies 1 reply answered question 80 920 44 of 333 4* 19.8% 18.5% (121) (15) 12.1% 9.9% (74) (8) 1.00 1.00 (611) (81) 9.1% 7.6% (55) (6) 8.5% 12.7% (51) (10) 47.9% 50.6% (289) (40) 17.9% 11.4% (108) (9) 16.6% 17.7% (100) (14) 1.00 1.00 (603) (79) 38 8 replies replies 651 89 skipped question 1.00 (1,670) 1.00 (1,651) 121 1,744 59 17. If you think the city should provide more of a certain service, indicate whether you would be willing to pay more for it. Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Bicycle infrastructure (bike lanes, paths 53.4% 55.0% 50.0% 42.0% 44.8% and parking) Yes (39) (481) (2) (240) (39) 46.6% 45.0% 50.0% 58.0% 55.2% No (34) (393) (2) (332) (48) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (73) (874) (4) (572) (87) (1.610) Bus service - more routes and more 47.3% 38.1% 50.0% 40.0% 31.8% frequent service Yes (35) (320) (2) (219) (27) 52.7% 61.9% 50.0% 60.0% 68.2% No (39) (519) (2) (328) (58) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (74) (839) (4) (547) (85) (1.549) Traffic congestion management 30.7% 36.1% 0.0% 42.4% 37.8% Yes (23) (300) (0) (236) (31) 69.3% 63.9% 100.0% 57.6% 62.2% No (52) (532) (4) (320) (51) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 (75) (832) (4) (556) (82) (1,549) Neighborhood traffic management 12.3% 26.7% 0.0% 33.1% 27.2% Yes (9) (215) (0) (177) (22) 87.7% 73.3% 100.0% 66.9% 72.8% No (64) (590) (3) (357) (59) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (73) (805) (3) (534) (81) (1,496) Emergency services /disaster readiness 39.5% 36.6% 33.3% 50.4% 38.0% Yes (30) (301) (1) (271) (30) 45 of 333 60.5% 63.4% 66.7% 49.6% 62.0% No (46) (522) (2) (267) (49) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (823) (3) (538) (79) (1,519) Flood prevention /control 19.7% 20.6% 0.0% 34.6% 24.1% Yes (15) (166) (0) (184) (19) 80.3% 79.4% 100.0% 65.4% 75.9% No (61) (640) (2) (348) (60) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (806) (2) (532) (79) (1,495) Preserving historic buildings 44.0% 35.9% 0.0% 36.1% 31.3% Yes (33) (303) (0) (203) (25) 56.0% 64.1% 100.0% 63.9% 68.8% No (42) (540) (2) (359) (55) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (75) (843) (2) (562) (80) (1,562) Housing for low- Income families 37.3% 33.0% 0.0% 41.8% 41.0% Yes (28) (281) (0) (240) (34) 62.7% 67.0% 100.0% 58.2% 59.0% No (47) (571) (3) (334) (49) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 (75) (852) (3) (574) (83) (1,587) Law enforcement: Violence /thefts 39.7% 36.4% 25.0% 50.5% 44.4% Yes (29) (301) (1) (276) (36) 60.3% 63.6% 75.0% 49.5% 55.6% No (44) (527) (3) (271) (45) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (73) (828) (4) (547) (81) (1,533) Law enforcement: Traffic safety 18.9% 24.1% 25.0% 39.2% 28.0% Yes (14) (197) (1) (214) (23) 81.1% 75.9% 75.0% 60.8% 72.0% No (60) (620) (3) (332) (59) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (74) (817) (4) (546) (82) (1,523) 46 of 333 Law enforcement: Nuisances /zoning 17.1% 22.4% 0.0% 31.5% 13.6% Yes (13) (184) (0) (174) (11) 82.9% 77.6% 100.0% 68.5% 86.4% No (63) (639) (3) (378) (70) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (823) (3) (552) (81) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 55.8% 58.5% 33.3% 49.7% 53.2% peaks & hillsides Yes (43) (502) (1) (292) (42) 44.2% 41.5% 66.7% 50.3% 46.8% No (34) (356) (2) (295) (37) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (77) (858) (3) (587) (79) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 39.5% 32.4% 33.3% 27.6% 28.6% farm, ranchland Yes (30) (267) (1) (153) (22) 60.5% 67.6% 66.7% 72.4% 71.4% No (46) (558) (2) (401) (55) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (825) (3) (554) (77) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 52.6% 51.8% 33.3% 46.9% 49.4% creeks & marshes Yes (40) (437) (1) (273) (38) 47.4% 48.2% 66.7% 53.1% 50.6% No (36) (406) (2) (309) (39) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (843) (3) (582) (77) Acquiring and maintaining open space for 46.1% 55.9% 33.3% 49.4% 50.0% City greenbelt Yes (35) (474) (1) (289) (39) 53.9% 44.1% 66.7% 50.6% 50.0% No (41) (374) (2) (296) (39) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (848) (3) (585) (78) Parking and access choices downtown 28.4% 22.2% 0.0% 28.3% 23.4% Yes (21) (185) (0) (159) (18) 47 of 333 1.00 (1,535) 1.00 (1,604) 1.00 (1,535) 1.00 (1.581) 1.00 (1,590) 71.6% 77.8% 100.0% 71.7% 76.6% No (53) (647) (3) (403) (59) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -00 (74) (B32) (3) (562) (77) (1,548) Parks /playfields 40.8% 43.3% 33.3% 33.2% 41.6% Yes (31) (363) (1) (185) (32) 59.2% 56.7% 66.7% 66.8% 58.4% No (45) (476) (2) (373) (45) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (76) (839) (3) (558) (77) (1,553) Performing arts 24.0% 25.6% 33.3% 21.8% 21.3% Yes (18) (213) (1) (118) (16) 76.0% 74.4% 66.7% 78.2% 78.7% No (57) (620) (2) (423) (59) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (75) (633) (3) (541) (75) (1,527) Public art 26.7% 23.2% 33.3% 17.2% 17.3% Yes (20) (194) (1) (94) (13) 73.3`Yo 76.8% 66.7% 82.8% 82.7% No (55) (643) (2) (454) (62) rating avpra0a 1 nn 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (75) (837) (3) (548) (75) (1,538) Recreation programs 30.6% 34.7% 33.3% 30.3% 36.8% Yes (22) (287) (1) (162) (28) 69.4% 65.3% 66.7% 69.7% 63.2% No (50) (541) (2) (373) (48) rating average 1. f?(± 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (72) (828) (3) (535) (76) (1,514) Shelter for homeless 48.6% 43.4% 0.0% 54.1% 43.2% Yes (36) (374) (0) (322) (35) 51.4% 56.6% 100.0% 45.9% 56.8% No (38) (488) (3) (273) (46) rating average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 (74) (862) (3) (595) (81) (1,615) 48 of 333 Sidewalk improvements and pedestrian 38.4% connections Yes (28) 61.6% No (45) rating average 1.00 (73) Street maintenance 32.4% Yes (24) 67.6% No (50) rating average 1.O0 (74) Street trees, landscaping along streets 33.3% Yes (25) 66.7% No (50) rating average 1.00 (75) Street widening /signals 24.3% Yes (18) 75.7% No (56) rating average 1.00 (74) Transit service - routes and frequency 44.0% Yes (33) 56.0% No (42) rating average 1.00 (75) 41.5% (346) 58.5% (488) 1.00 (834) 38.6% (318) 61.4% (506) 1.00 (824) 41.3% (344) 58.7% (489) 1.00 (833) 22.3% (183) 77.7% (638) 1.00 (821) 31.5% (256) 68.5% (556) 1.00 (812) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (3) 1.00 (3) 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2) 1.00 (3) 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2) 1.00 (3) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (3) 1.00 (3) 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2) 1.00 (3) Other (please specify) 1 reply 31 replies 0 replies answered question 80 925 4 49 of 333 46.3% 41.0% (260) (32) 53.7% 59.0% (301) (46) 1.00 1.00 (561) (78) 51.3% 41.0% (293) (32) 48.7% 59.0% (278) (46) 1.00 1.00 (571) (78) 39.4% 34.2% (217) (26) 60.6% 65.8% (334) (50) 1.00 1.00 (551) (76) 30.1% 20.8% (162) (16) 69.9% 79.2% (377) (61) 1.00 1.00 (539) (77) 32.5% 26.0% (178) (19) 67.5% 74.0% (369) (54) 1.010 1.00 (547) (73) 23 4 replies replies 650 91 1.00 (1,549) 1.00 (1,550) 1.00 (1,538) 1.00 (1,514) 1.00 (1,510) 59 1 ,750 skipped question 18. The public or private facility or service not available here which 1 would most like to be provided is: Which of the following best describes your status? 53 Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Count 24 254 replies 2 replies 165 23 468 replies replies replies answered question 24 254 2 165 23 468 skipped question 1,335 19. Please check all that apply. Which of the following best describes your status? 50 of 333 Response Student " "Employed Unemployed Retired Other Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% I live in the City of San Luis Obispo (81) (947) (4) (676) (95) (1,803) 53.1% 70.0% 50.0% 6.8% 40.0% 43.9% 1 work in the City of San Luis Obispo (43) (663) (2) (46) (38) (792) 1 own a business in the City of San Luis 1.2% 29.1% 25.0% 6.7% 28.4% 19.4% Obispo (1) (276) (1) (45) (27) (350) answered question 81 947 , 676 05 1,803 skipped question 0 50 of 333 20. For demographic purposes only, please indicate your age. Which of the following best describes your status? 51 of 333 Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Totals 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18-25 (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26-35 (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3649 (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 50-65 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 66+ (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Declined to state (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) answered question 0 r 0 0 0 skipped question 1,803 51 of 333 21. Please indicate your race. Which of the fallowing best describes your status? 52 of 333 Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Totals 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% White (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Black or African American 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Asian (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Pacific Islander (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Native American (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Two or More Races (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Other (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Declined to State answered question 0 0 0 0 0 0 skipped question 1,803 52 of 333 22. Do you own or rent your dwelling? Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response 23. Which of the following best describes your status? Which of the following best describes your status? Student Employed Unemployed Totals Own 2'5% 69.4 % 100.0% 85.4% 68.2% 72.3% (2) (630) (3) (554) (60) (1,249) Rent 97.5% 30.6% 0.0% 14.6% 31.8% 27.7% (78) (278) (0) (95) (28) (479) answered question 80 908 3 649 88 1,728 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% skipped question 75 23. Which of the following best describes your status? Which of the following best describes your status? 53 of 333 Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Response Totals Student 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% (81) (0) (0) (0) (0) (81) Employed 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 52.5% (0) (947) (0) (0) (0) (947) Unemployed 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% (0) (0) (4) (0) (0) (4) Retired 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 37.5% (0) (0) (0) (676) (0) (676) t tt, 0.0% 0.0% 0.00, 0.0% 100.0% 5.3% (0) (0) (0) (0) (95) (95) answered question 81 947 4 676 95 1,803 skipped question 0 53 of 333 24. Please provide a valid email address. Which of the following best describes your status? Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Count 0 0 0 0 replies 0 replies 0 replies replies replies answered question 0 0 0 0 0 skipped question 1,803 25. if you would like to give us any comments on the survey, the subjects it covers, or any other aspect of city government, please write them below. 1 2 13 Which of the following best describes your status? Response Student Employed Unemployed Retired Other Count 1 0 replies 14 replles 1 reply 8 24 replies reply answered question 0 14 1 8 1 24 skipped question 1,779 Student Employe Unemplo Retired Other d yed X 0 X 54 of 333 Response Text Matching development with Jun 4, 2012 3:23 PM resources and homelessness [Homeless] Becoming like everywhere Jun 4, 2012 3:33 PM else -big box stores, chain stores downtown - "Santa Barbara North" Out of control student Jun 4, 2012 3:49 PM rentals ruining neighborhoods Homeless people Jun 4, 2012 3:56 PM [Homeless]