HomeMy WebLinkAbout0143I I
o?iDT-p,e 143 (1959 Series)
g
A-1-4 CRE'liNAYTICIE GRANTWK) CEELTAIN PROPERTY TO MARSHALL MW PATUCIA I'MYNTLISIS
a
,AHIEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo heretofore entered into and p"rported
tp com-ply a certain arrement vith Marshall and Patricia V. Reynolds pro-
viding, for exchange of certain properties for sheet widening purposes; and
VUIUAIS, by mistake the city did not effect conveyance to Reynolds of tile
pr9ijerty so provided Ar.-Or in said agreement; and
HHHEIREAS, the city is now ixt a position to cc=
.1.%7 1,;Jth said id prio2� a"greemerat
and to corroct the mistake heretofore made;
R I
I-T-R, UMIRIEFOU, be it ordained by the Council of the City of San L-aig
crbi5po sxs follrAIs:
ISRC79190 I.- That .the D.'ayor shnil be and is hereby authorizzed to o:racute ca
behalf oE the City of Sun LiAs Obispo that certa in dead dated. Daces 72
1959, cowrayirig strip.of property lying ad eljatent to Serrano Drive to,arshall
c Ift"'t-rici E.I
a . yak eynolds.
Tru". 10DUCE-1) AND PAS RI) TO PRtNT this 7th day of December, 1959, by the
following vote-
AYES: Xonneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, C.=,Id W. Shipsey, Dr. J. Yjarr7
Sinith and Fred H,, Waters
YS OB 8 . Noz%w
ABSEN4'. None
AXTEST:
1�,-5
FINALLY PASUD thi , 21st day of December 1959, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Kenneth W. Jones, Donald Q. Miller, Gerald W. Shipsey, J. Barry Smith,
Fred M. Waters
VOES: None
ABSENT: None
Ai"?°BST:
y4
Mayor _
MzMVAAiNVVM
P ' r
TO ------------- City Engineer _ .D Nov-30, 1959
- - - - -� ATE----------------- - - - -- ------------------------------------------
FROM__________ Cites Clerk _ _ SUBJECT - - - - -- Marshall Reynolds re uestto
correct error made in trans-
ferring property
This matter was referred to you by the City Council at their last
meeting on November 16, 1959.
SCH WASACH ER- FREY CO. FORM SO -1
City Council
City of San Luis Obispo
California
Gentlemen:
511 Serrano Drive
San Luis Obispo
California
October 6, 1959
Early in March of this year when I started construction
of our residence at 511 Serrano Drive, the City Engineer's
office presented me with two deeds. It was explained
that a ten feet strip of land between our property and
the street was owned by Mrs. Nellie Penman and that this
prevented secure access to the street. Mrs. Penman
was to deed five feet of this strip to the City and five
feet of it to my wife and me. in return for having our
property brought up to the city access, we were to sign
the other deed giving the North West corner of our
property to the City. Both deeds were signed and recorded.
It has just come to my attention that at an earlier date
Mrs, Penman had deeded the entire above mentioned ten
fmot strip to the City and that'we were bordering on
city property all of the 'time, and that the deed from
Mrs. Penman could not convey fe us Land previously
deeded to the City. I have also learned that after
deeding the corner of our lot, the city property comes
to approximately the footing of our structure.
In view of the fact that this transaction was based on
an error that originated in the City Engineer's office .
and must have been mutual, I would Like to know if the
City Council will consider deeding back t® my wife and
me the corner of our lot.
fa
o C,
Respectfully yours,
Marsha I I Reyno ds