HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-05-2013 B1 FrankGoodwin, Heather
In: Grimes, Maeve
.it: Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:06 PM
To: Goodwin, Heather
Subject: FW: Resignation vs. Open Seat
Please distribute for Item 61 on the February 5th Agenda.
Thank you.
maeve kenneby c1pimes
City Clerk
MY Of Sdn lids OBISPO
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
phone: (805) 781 -7102
MAIL mgrimes @slo_city.or�
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Carpenter, Dan
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:39 PM
To: Grimes, Maeve
,'ect: FW: Resignation vs. Open Seat
Please include in council correspondence.
DC
Dan Carpenter
San Luis Obispo City Council
805 - 431 -3174
From: Frank [frankslo805 @yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:53 PM
To: Carpenter, Dan; Smith, Kathy; Ashbaugh, John; Marx, Jan
Subject: Resignation vs. Open Seat
Good afternoon Council,
X
SLO CITY CLERK
AGENDA
CORRESPONDENCE
DateELL rs ltem#---. _�
I had a question regarding Council member Carpenters comments on the Dave Congalton show Monday. He stated that
there is a different in process regarding appointing someone for the seat, because it was a "resignation" instead of an
"open seat" due to the election, like 2010.
My question is, does this change the requirement for people to apply? And Also, does how the seat opened up make a
difference in the entire process and decision making moving forward?
), could you please explain the rationale behind the mindset and explain why there is a true policy difference.
I expect many people to apply, and would like to have a clear understanding. And please explain the requirements for
applying.
Thank you,
Frank