HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-12-2015 REOC agenda Packet
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Agenda
Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission
Monday, Oct 12, 2015
5:30 pm
SPECIAL MEETING
Council Hearing Room
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Kardel
ROLL CALL: Jeri Carroll, Amy Kardel, Ken Kienow, Michael Multari, and
Hilary Trout
MINUTES: Minutes of May 4, 2015. Approve or amend.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
At this time, people may address the Commission about items not on the agenda.
Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and city of
residence. Comments are limited to five minutes per person. Items raised at this time
are generally referred to the staff and, if action by the Commission is necessary, may
be scheduled for a future meeting.
BUSINESS ITEMS
1. 2014-15 Local Revenue Measure Year-end Expenditures. Review unaudited
operating and capital expenditures of revenue generated from local half-percent
sales tax in last fiscal year. (James David)
2. Revisit the Tracking Spreadsheet. Discuss categories being measured and how
best to communicate the information to the public. (James David)
3. Annual Community Report Basics. What has this report been in the past, and how
does the Commission want to innovate going forward. (James David)
COMMENT & DISCUSSION
4. Staff Communications
a. Staff transitions in the City (Derek Johnson)
b. 2015-17 Budget in Brief now available (James David)
c. Agenda Forecast – Is there support for session on Municipal Finance led by
Commissioner Multari at future REOC meeting?
5. Commission Communications
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
CITIZENS’ REVENUE ENHANCEMENT
OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
MINUTES
May 4, 2015
5:30 p.m.
Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, California
CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the Citizens’ Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission was called to order on
Monday, May 4, 2015, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
California, by Chair Kardel.
ROLL CALL
Commission Members
Present: Commission Members Jeri Carroll, Michael Multari, Hilary Trout, Vice Chair Ken
Kienow, and Chair Amy Kardel,
Commission Members
Absent: None
Others Present: Katie Lichtig, City Manager; Wayne Padilla, Finance and Information Technology
Director; James David, Principal Analyst; and Anthony Mejia, City Clerk
1. CITIZENS’ REVENUE ENHANCEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION MINUTES OF
MARCH 16, 2015
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MULTARI, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARROLL,
CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Citizens’ Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission
meeting minutes of March 16, 2015, as amended.
PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no members of the public desiring to speak.
Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission Minutes – May 4, 2015 Page 2
2. 2015-17 LOCAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES
Principal Analyst David narrated a PowerPoint presentation entitled “Citizens’ Revenue
Enhancement Oversight Commission, Meeting #3” and responded to Commission inquiries.
During the course of discussion, the Commission reviewed the draft Measure G Expenditure List
and Measure G Operating Cost List; discussed the propriety of utilizing Measure G funds for the
Restroom Replacement and Remodeling” item and whether the “Monterey & Osos Traffic
Signal Safety Upgrades” are appropriately categorized as “Bike Lanes and Sidewalks.”
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TROUT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARROL,
CARRIED 5-0, to find that the proposed expenditures list, as identified in the Commission
Agenda Report, meets the intent and purpose of Municipal Code Section 3.15.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TROUT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARROLL,
CARRIED 5-0, to recommend that the City Council approve use of local sales tax revenue for the
capital and operating expenditure list, as outlined in the Commission Agenda Report, which was
drafted through the City’s Financial Planning Process.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MULTARI, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TROUT,
CARRIED 5-0, to endorse the “Measure G Criteria” categories with the following modifications:
1. “Senior Programs and Facilities” to read as “Parks and Recreation/Senior Programs and
Facilities.”
2. “Traffic Congestion Relief” to read as “Traffic Congestion Relief/Safety Improvements.”
3. “Bike Lanes and Sidewalks” to read as “Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements.”
4. “Other Vital Services” and “Other Capital Improvement Projects” be deleted.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MULTARI, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TROUT,
CARRIED 5-0, to re-categorize the following expenditure items as follows:
1. “Restroom Replacements and Remodeling” be re-categorized from “Other Capital
Improvements” to “Parks and Recreations/Senior Programs and Facilities.”
2. “Monterey & Osos Traffic Signal Safety Upgrade” be re-categorized from “Bike Lanes and
Sidewalks” to “Traffic Congestion Relief/Safety Improvements.”
Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission Minutes – May 4, 2015 Page 3
5. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Finance and Information Technology Director Padilla provided the Commission with an update
regarding the 2015-17 Financial Plan process.
Principal Analyst David reviewed the Citizens’ Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission
Agenda Forecast.
6. COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS
Chair Kardel noted that the Commission previously authorized Commissioner Carroll and herself
to author a “viewpoint” article on the purpose and goals of the REOC; advised that it may be
premature to author the article at this time and suggested that it be deferred to a later date. It was
agreed by the Commission to defer the “viewpoint” article until there is more information to
report.
The Commission agreed to schedule the next two meetings on October 12, 2015 at 5:30 p.m. and
November 16, 2015 at 5:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MULTARI, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARROLL,
CARRIED 5-0, to adjourn at 7:48 p.m.
Anthony J. Mejia
City Clerk
Approved: XX/XX/15
Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission
October 12, 2015
FROM: James David, Principal Analyst
SUBJECT: LOCAL REVENUE MEASURE YEAR-END EXPENDITURES (FY 14-15)
RECOMMENDATION
Review unaudited operating and capital expenditures of local half-percent sales tax revenue in
the last fiscal year.
DISCUSSION
Local Revenue Measure Uses
The Measure Y Funding Summary Schedule for the 2014-15 Fiscal Year (FY) lists unaudited
expenditures for operating and capital project costs (Attachment 1). Expenditures are broken into
the following categories: Preservation of Essential Services, Traffic Congestion Relief, Open
Space Preservation, and Infrastructure Maintenance & Improvements.
Actual operating expenditures for FY14-15 were approximately $2.6M, and capital expenditures
were about $4.1M, totaling approximately $6.7M. Historically, annual local sales tax
expenditures have been approximately 40 percent operating and 60 percent capital. In FY 2014-
15, this trend continued with 39% of total local revenue measure uses being operating, and 61%
being capital expenditures.
1. Operating Uses ($2.6M)
97 percent of budgeted local revenue measure operating program funds were expended in FY 14-
15. The 3 percent balance remaining was likely due to salary variances and hiring gaps. The
entire City budget assumes a 2 percent savings overall on operating costs. The largest use of
local revenue measure funding for operating costs was for Preservation of Essential Services,
specifically for Public Safety. Examples of these costs were salaries for Downtown Patrol
Officers and Fire Prevention personnel.
2015-17 Local Revenue Expenditures Page 2
2. Capital Uses ($4.1M)
46 percent of available local revenue measure capital project funds were expended in FY 14-15.
Available funds are a combination of what was budgeted in FY 14-15 and what was carried over
from past fiscal years. This is typical of capital improvement projects that usually span a five-
year timeframe. Project phases don’t always align with fiscal years, and project schedules are
subject to variables that cause delays. Budgeted funds for capital projects carry over year to year
until the project is completed. The total amount of local revenue measure funding that carried
forward to FY 15-16 is approximately $4.7M.
Specific details on which capital projects are carrying a balance and why are included in
Attachment 1. Any funding remaining once projects are completed will be transferred into a
Local Revenue Measure Completed Projects account. This funding could be used for other
approved local revenue measure projects that end up costing more than what was budgeted
(subject to City Manager approval), or be reprogrammed to other capital projects that meet local
revenue measure criteria subject to Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission (REOC) and
Council approval during the Mid-Year or Supplemental Budget process.
The largest capital expenditures funded by the local revenue measure in FY 14-15 were for
Infrastructure Maintenance & Improvements, specifically for the Santa Rosa Skatepark, Street
Reconstruction and Resurfacing, and Downtown Renewal projects.
2015-17 Local Revenue Expenditures Page 3
3. Net Available for Future Appropriations
The balance of local revenue measure funding available for future uses was approximately
$2.4M at the end of FY14-15. All of this one-time funding has already been programmed by the
City Council into the 2015-17 Financial Plan.
Local Revenue Measure Revenues
Unaudited revenues from the local half-percent sales tax totaled $7.1M in FY 14-15. This is a
five percent increase from last fiscal year. The local revenue measure has generated over $50M
since its original adoption in 2006. FY 14-15 revenues from the local half-percent sales tax
exceeded what was forecasted:
FY 14-15 Budgeted Revenues (per 2015-17
Financial Plan Forecast)
$6,976,000
FY 14-15 Year End Revenues $7,136,000
Non-forecasted Measure Y/G Revenues $160,000
Non-forecasted revenues will be reprogrammed by the Council with recommendations from the
REOC during the Mid-Year or Supplemental Budget process.
FY 15-16 revenue from the local revenue measure is forecasted to be about the same as actuals
in 14-15 ($7.1M), with an increase in forecasted revenues for FY 16-17 ($7.4M). This forecast of
revenues will change over time. The next updated forecast will be presented to Council during
the Mid-Year Budget review.
CONCLUSION
Uses of local revenue measure funding in FY 14-15 continued the historical split of about 60
percent capital expenditures and 40 percent operating expenditures. A shift towards more capital
expenditures and less operating (about 70/30) should be expected in future fiscal years given the
Council’s new direction on local revenue measure priorities in the 2015-17 Financial Plan.
Categories for tracking local revenue measure expenditures will be different moving forward.
The REOC’s recommended categories were approved by Council in June 2015. Those categories
are Open Space Preservation, Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements, Traffic Congestions
Relief/Safety Improvements, Public Safety, Neighborhood Street Paving, Code Enforcement,
Flood Protection, and Parks and Recreation/Senior Programs and Facilities. In addition, the
new local revenue measure sub-fund of the General Fund has been created in the financial
tracking system (Fund 101).
ATTACHMENT
1. Fiscal Year 2014-15 Measure Y Funding Summary Schedule
A
m
o
u
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
e
d
A
c
t
u
a
l
S
p
e
n
t
P
r
i
o
r
Y
e
a
r
s
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
(
A
)
A
m
o
u
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
e
d
(
B
)
A
c
t
u
a
l
S
p
e
n
t
(C
)
A
m
o
u
n
t
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
t
o
FY
1
5
1
7
(
A
+
B
-
C
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
a
t
u
s
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
E
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Po
l
i
c
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
9
2
4
,
0
7
3
9
1
4
,
9
5
2
-
-
-
-
Po
l
i
c
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
-
-
14
1
,
3
7
9
17
5
,
6
0
0
26
6
,
9
7
0
50
,
0
0
9
O
n
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
t
i
l
l
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
b
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
.
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
M
o
b
i
l
e
D
a
t
a
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
s
-
-
18
4
,
5
0
0
18
8
,
0
0
0
-
37
2
,
5
0
0
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
w
o
y
e
a
r
s
b
e
h
i
n
d
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
.
Fi
r
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
&
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
45
0
,
4
2
1
44
5
,
3
3
6
-
-
-
-
E
x
t
r
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
-
-
-
-
-
-
Fi
r
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
/
T
r
u
c
k
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
-
-
-
24
7
,
5
0
3
24
7
,
4
8
3
-
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
2
R
e
m
o
d
e
l
-
-
2,
0
7
0
27
,
8
0
0
18
,
5
1
4
11
,
3
5
6
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
.
Q
u
i
c
k
e
s
t
R
o
u
t
e
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
-
-
1,
9
7
0
-
1,
9
7
0
-
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
St
r
e
e
t
s
,
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
n
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
7
7
,
0
5
5
17
4
,
0
9
5
-
-
-
-
Cr
e
e
k
&
F
l
o
o
d
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
45
5
,
8
2
4
44
7
,
1
4
0
31
,
0
2
1
45
0
,
0
0
0
53
,
1
6
2
42
7
,
8
5
9
St
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
b
u
t
b
e
h
i
n
d
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
u
e
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
i
t
i
e
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
s
o
i
l
,
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
a
n
d
C
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
Pa
r
k
s
77
,
8
3
7
77
,
8
3
7
56
9
,
6
2
5
58
0
,
0
0
0
50
4
,
5
0
0
64
5
,
1
2
5
Si
n
s
h
e
i
m
e
r
P
l
a
y
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
i
s
pr
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
f
o
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
s
t
a
r
t
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
&
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
11
3
,
2
5
3
11
1
,
1
3
0
-
-
-
-
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
W
e
l
l
n
e
s
s
En
h
a
n
c
e
d
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
&
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
1
1
8
,
2
6
8
10
7
,
2
7
3
-
-
-
"S
N
A
P
"
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
53
,
0
7
9
53
,
0
7
9
-
-
-
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
C
o
d
e
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
i
s
t
s
14
7
,
3
6
8
11
6
,
7
6
9
-
-
-
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
C
o
n
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
R
e
l
i
e
f
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
R
e
p
o
r
t
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
-
-
25
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
6,
0
4
5
43
,
9
5
5
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
u
s
e
d
a
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
b
e
c
o
m
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
-
-
30
,
0
0
0
-
-
30
,
0
0
0
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
u
s
e
d
a
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
b
e
c
o
m
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
10
0
,
3
5
1
91
,
2
9
5
-
-
-
-
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
-
-
-
40
,
0
0
0
-
40
,
0
0
0
L
a
r
g
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
g
n
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
e
f
f
o
r
t
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
.
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
-
81
,
0
6
4
10
0
,
0
0
0
29
,
6
6
6
15
1
,
3
9
8
Mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
s
u
c
h
a
s
C
h
o
r
r
o
a
n
d
M
i
l
l
,
a
n
d
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Gr
ee
n
L
a
n
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
-
15
,
1
5
4
20
,
0
0
0
11
,
3
7
4
23
,
7
8
0
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
d
i
v
e
r
t
e
r
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
F
i
x
l
i
n
i
.
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
N
L
U
I
S
O
B
I
S
P
O
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
ME
A
S
U
R
E
Y
F
U
N
D
I
N
G
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
FO
R
T
H
E
F
I
S
C
A
L
Y
E
A
R
E
N
D
E
D
J
U
N
E
3
0
,
2
0
1
5
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
1
Item 1 Attachment 1
A
m
o
u
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
e
d
A
c
t
u
a
l
S
p
e
n
t
P
r
i
o
r
Y
e
a
r
s
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
(
A
)
A
m
o
u
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
e
d
(
B
)
A
c
t
u
a
l
S
p
e
n
t
(C
)
A
m
o
u
n
t
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
t
o
FY
1
5
1
7
(
A
+
B
-
C
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
a
t
u
s
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
N
L
U
I
S
O
B
I
S
P
O
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
ME
A
S
U
R
E
Y
F
U
N
D
I
N
G
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
FO
R
T
H
E
F
I
S
C
A
L
Y
E
A
R
E
N
D
E
D
J
U
N
E
3
0
,
2
0
1
5
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
Op
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
-
-
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
t
i
n
u
i
n
g
t
o
w
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
i
n
U
p
p
e
r
C
u
e
s
t
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
t
h
a
t
re
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
h
i
g
h
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
F
r
o
o
m
R
a
n
c
h
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
-
-
2
,
6
8
7
-
2
,
6
8
7
-
R
a
n
g
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
S
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
5
7
,
0
2
8
5
4
,
4
2
6
-
-
-
-
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
W
i
l
d
f
i
r
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
5
,
0
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
&
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Sa
n
t
a
R
o
s
a
S
k
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
-
-
1
,
2
0
9
,
9
8
7
-
9
4
9
,
5
2
1
2
6
0
,
4
6
6
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
St
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
&
R
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
i
n
g
-
-
4
6
1
,
1
2
8
1
,
1
7
4
,
3
0
0
4
5
8
,
2
0
3
1
,
1
7
7
,
2
2
5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
w
o
r
k
w
a
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
s
u
m
m
e
r
a
n
d
s
o
m
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
w
ill be
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
a
f
t
e
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
d
u
e
t
o
g
o
o
d
b
i
d
s
.
A
s
e
c
o
n
d
p
a
v
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
un
d
e
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
u
s
e
t
h
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
s
,
a
n
d
s
o
m
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
r
a
m
p
s
.
Br
o
a
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
C
r
e
e
k
B
a
n
k
R
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
-
1
5
,
6
2
9
9
,
7
3
6
5
,
8
9
3
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
s
t
a
r
t
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
7
i
f
t
h
e
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
h
o
l
d
s
.
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
68
7
,
5
0
0
5
5
4
,
4
0
4
1
3
3
,
0
9
6
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
-
-
2
7
,
9
7
1
9
4
,
0
0
0
4
0
,
6
1
8
8
1
,
3
5
3
20
1
3
-
1
5
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
8
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
6
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
2
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
e
r
e
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
b
u
d
g
e
t
s
f
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
-
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
pa
i
n
t
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
ga
z
e
b
o
a
t
t
h
e
J
a
c
k
H
o
u
s
e
.
T
h
e
H
V
A
C
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
r
e
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
in
c
o
d
e
,
n
o
w
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
u
n
i
t
s
.
T
h
e
g
o
o
d
b
i
d
p
r
i
c
e
s
fo
r
w
o
r
k
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
d
e
l
a
y
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
c
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
h
a
v
e
re
s
u
l
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
c
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
.
Ja
c
k
H
o
u
s
e
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
-
-
2
5
,
0
0
0
-
2
5
,
0
0
0
-
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
Jo
h
n
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
P
u
m
p
-
-
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
-
7
8
,
7
9
9
1
1
1
,
2
0
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
Mi
s
s
i
o
n
P
l
a
z
a
R
a
i
l
i
n
g
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
-
-
3
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
3
8
,
8
2
1
2
1
,
1
7
9
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
P
o
o
l
R
e
p
l
a
s
t
e
r
i
n
g
-
-
1
9
,
4
7
5
3
1
0
,
0
0
0
3
,
6
0
6
3
2
5
,
8
6
9
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
a
t
h
w
a
y
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
-
-
-
6
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
,
0
0
0
-
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
-
-
-
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
1
,
7
3
3
3
,
2
6
7
Re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
w
il
l
b
e
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
2
0
1
5
-
1
6
f
unding to complete
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
r
e
p
a
i
r
w
o
r
k
.
Tr
e
e
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
-
-
1
0
0
,
4
0
0
-
-
1
0
0
,
4
0
0
O
r
d
e
r
e
d
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
-
2
0
3
,
1
4
1
-
3
3
,
7
5
0
1
6
9
,
3
9
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
S
i
n
s
h
e
i
m
e
r
Pl
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
.
S
i
n
s
h
e
i
m
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
B
l
d
g
.
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
-
-
2
6
,
7
7
6
-
-
2
6
,
7
7
6
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
S
i
n
s
h
e
i
m
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
P
a
v
i
n
g
-
-
79
,
8
3
4
-
7
9
,
8
3
4
-
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
P
l
a
z
a
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
-
-
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
10
0
,
0
0
0
Ne
g
o
t
i
a
t
i
n
g
w
o
r
k
s
c
o
p
e
w
i
t
h
t
o
p
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
fo
r
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
I
.
T
.
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
F
u
n
d
-
-
3
8
3
,
9
3
4
-
3
8
3
,
9
3
4
-
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
-
-
20
6
,
5
2
1
-
20
6
,
5
2
1
-
To
t
a
l
s
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
2,
6
7
9
,
5
5
7
2
,
5
9
8
,
3
3
2
4
,
3
6
4
,
2
6
6
4
,
4
3
4
,
7
0
3
4
,
0
8
6
,
8
5
1
4
,
7
1
2
,
0
9
8
2
A
m
o
u
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
e
d
A
c
t
u
a
l
S
p
e
n
t
P
r
i
o
r
Y
e
a
r
s
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
(
A
)
A
m
o
u
n
t
Bu
d
g
e
t
e
d
(
B
)
A
c
t
u
a
l
S
p
e
n
t
(C
)
A
m
o
u
n
t
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
t
o
FY
1
5
1
7
(
A
+
B
-
C
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
a
t
u
s
CI
T
Y
O
F
S
A
N
L
U
I
S
O
B
I
S
P
O
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
ME
A
S
U
R
E
Y
F
U
N
D
I
N
G
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
FO
R
T
H
E
F
I
S
C
A
L
Y
E
A
R
E
N
D
E
D
J
U
N
E
3
0
,
2
0
1
5
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
:
Ca
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
f
r
o
m
2
0
0
6
-
0
7
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
0
7
-
0
8
5
,
9
9
6
,
5
9
5
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
0
8
-
0
9
5
,
6
4
1
,
3
9
3
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
0
9
-
1
0
5
,
2
5
2
,
5
0
9
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
0
-
1
1
5
,
6
1
6
,
3
3
2
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
1
-
1
2
6
,
2
3
7
,
4
6
8
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
6
,
4
9
3
,
8
3
6
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
1
4
6
,
7
7
4
,
3
6
5
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
4
-
1
5
7
,
1
3
6
,
2
9
7
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
5
0
,
1
4
8
,
7
9
5
Us
e
s
:
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
0
7
-
0
8
(
1
,
4
6
3
,
6
9
3
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
0
7
-
0
8
(
2
,
4
3
4
,
1
0
7
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
0
8
-
0
9
(
2
,
4
1
8
,
2
9
5
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
0
8
-
0
9
(
3
,
6
8
4
,
4
0
5
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
0
9
-
1
0
(
2
,
2
6
7
,
1
0
3
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
0
9
-
1
0
(
2
,
1
6
1
,
1
9
7
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
1
0
-
1
1
(
2
,
4
3
0
,
1
8
5
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
1
0
-
1
1
(
3
,
4
4
3
,
0
1
5
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
1
1
-
1
2
(
2
,
2
0
3
,
8
9
0
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
1
1
-
1
2
(
3
,
9
6
7
,
5
1
0
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
(
2
,
2
2
5
,
1
2
5
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
1
2
-
1
3
(
2
,
3
2
0
,
7
1
2
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
1
3
-
1
4
(
2
,
4
4
4
,
6
6
2
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
1
3
-
1
4
(
2
,
8
6
1
,
3
3
6
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
2
0
1
4
-
1
5
(
2
,
5
9
8
,
3
3
2
)
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
2
0
1
4
-
1
5
(
4
,
0
8
6
,
8
5
1
)
To
t
a
l
U
s
e
s
(
4
3
,
0
1
0
,
4
1
8
)
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
(
4
,
7
1
2
,
0
9
8
)
Ne
t
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
y
e
a
r
s
(
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
e
d
)
(
2
,
4
2
6
,
2
7
9
)
To
t
a
l
(
5
0
,
1
4
8
,
7
9
5
)
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Y
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
U
s
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission
October 12, 2015
FROM: James David, Principal Analyst
SUBJECT: REVISIT THE TRACKING SPREADSHEET
RECOMMENDATION
Discuss categories being measured and how best to communicate the information to the public.
DISCUSSION
The Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission (REOC) endorsed a draft tracking matrix
earlier this year that was initially drafted by Commissioner Multari (Attachment 1). This matrix
was reviewed by the Council during the 2015-17 Financial Planning process.
Staff has taken the initial steps to add all of the approved local revenue measure expenditures
into the matrix (Attachment 2). A few changes have been made to the matrix:
1. The “Measure G Criteria” column has been eliminated because expenditures are
organized by Measure G criteria subheadings.
2. Expenditure amounts are included for both fiscal years delineated by operating and
capital costs. This eliminates the need for a specific “Operating/Capital” column.
3. “Relation to City Goals” column is now labeled “MCG/OIO”, which means Major City
Goal/Other Important Objective.
4. “Leverage” column has been eliminated (for now) because the intended metric is unclear.
5. Other detail columns in the “Operations” section have been consolidated into the
“New/Existing” column and the “Details” column.
6. A “% Complete” column has been added.
All of the categories are open for discussion and improvement. The Public Works department
plans on entering these metrics into their capital project management software once the REOC
has finalized the categories to be tracked. Additional ideas may be to include an “actual” column
next to the budgeted amounts, or include contact info of the project manager on each capital
expenditure.
The REOC should also consider how best to communicate this information to the public. Staff
recommends that this information be made available on a Local Revenue Measure webpage, with
periodic updates to the list. Furthermore, it may be helpful to select five to ten signature projects
that the REOC and staff could highlight online with in-depth information, maps, photos, etc.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Commissioner Multari Draft Tracking Spreadsheet
2. Revised Local Revenue Measure Tracking Spreadsheet
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
r
Mu
l
t
a
r
i
Dr
a
f
t
Lo
c
a
l
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Me
a
s
u
r
e
Tr
a
c
k
i
n
g
Ma
t
r
i
x
Ne
w
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
or
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
As
s
e
t
s
Le
v
e
r
a
g
e
Ne
w
st
a
f
f
or
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
st
a
f
f
These operational costs are non‐staff cost onlyOngoing or short term projectLeverage
Li
s
t
e
d
ex
a
m
p
l
e
of
se
r
v
i
c
e
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ma
j
o
r
Ci
t
y
Go
a
l
Do
t
ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
re
s
u
l
t
l
s
Ot
h
e
r
es
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
se
r
v
i
c
e
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ot
h
e
r
Ii
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
Ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
Ot
h
e
r
?
Ot
h
e
r
:
Pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
ad
o
p
t
e
d
go
a
l
,
GP
go
a
l
,
ot
h
e
r
La
g
u
n
a
La
k
e
dr
e
d
g
i
n
g
:
CE
Q
A
an
d
Pe
r
m
i
t
s
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
pa
r
k
s
M
a
j
o
r
ci
t
y
go
a
l
x
/
y
do
t
s
ca
p
i
t
a
l
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
n
o
NA
NANANAFirst step in multi‐year program
Ne
w
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
co
d
e
en
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ot
h
e
r
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
x/
y
do
t
s
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
N
A
NA
Ne
w
st
a
f
f
po
s
i
s
t
i
o
n
n
o
ongoingnoExpansion of program
St
o
r
m
Dr
a
i
n
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
fl
o
o
d
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Ot
h
e
r
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
x/
y
do
t
s
ca
p
i
t
a
l
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
n
o
NA
NANANAPart of on‐going city wide upgrades
Cu
e
s
t
a
gr
a
d
e
op
e
n
sp
a
c
e
ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
op
e
n
sp
a
c
e
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
ma
j
o
r
ci
t
y
go
a
l
x
/
y
do
t
s
ca
p
i
t
a
l
ne
w
Ye
s
:
$3
.
0
M
to
t
a
l
va
l
u
e
NA
NANANAcontingent on grants; wil llikely require increased O&M costs in future
Fi
r
e
Ma
r
s
h
a
l
l
$
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
pu
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
Pa
s
t
ma
j
o
r
ci
t
y
go
a
l
(?
)
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
NA
NA
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
se
r
v
i
c
e
/
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
st
a
f
f
po
s
i
t
i
o
n
noOngoingnoContinuation of position funded through local sales tax since 2008
NO
T
E
:
TH
E
IT
E
M
S
BE
L
O
W
AR
E
MA
D
E
‐UP
AN
D
AR
E
FO
R
IL
L
U
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
ON
L
Y
OF
HO
W
TH
E
CR
I
T
E
R
I
A
CO
U
L
D
BE
US
E
D
TO
FU
R
T
H
E
R
SORT PROPOSED EXPENDITURESOther Comments
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ti
t
l
e
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
Ne
x
u
s
to
Me
a
s
u
r
e
G
Re
l
a
t
i
o
n
to
Ci
t
y
Go
a
l
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
in
p
u
t
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
or
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Item 2 Attachment 1
20
1
5
-
1
6
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
2
0
1
5
-
1
6
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
1
L
a
g
u
n
a
L
a
k
e
D
r
e
d
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
4
5
0
,
00
0
L
L
L
a
g
u
n
a
L
a
k
e
C
o
n
s
e
r
vation Plan implementation
2
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
O
S
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
g
r
e
e
n
b
e
l
t
:
C
u
esta Canyon area (Miossi and Ahearn Ranches)
3
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
2
8
5
,
0
0
0
2
8
5
,
0
0
0
5
7
0
,
0
0
0
O
S
T
r
a
i
l
h
e
a
d
e
n
h
a
ncement and deferred maintenance
4
R
a
n
g
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
P
i
c
k
u
p
T
r
u
c
k
(
3
i
n
1
5
-
1
6
)
1
3
9
,
0
0
0
1
3
9
,
0
0
0
O
S
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
1
)
,
F
l
e
e
t
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
(
2
)
5
Na
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
W
i
l
d
f
i
r
e
F
u
e
l
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
)
5
,
0
0
0
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
O
S
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
:
F
i
r
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
6
R
a
n
g
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
(
R
a
n
g
e
r
S
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
;
F
T
E
=
2
)
1
2
1
,
5
9
0
1
2
9
,
5
3
0
2
5
1
,
1
2
0
O
S
T
w
o
n
e
w
r
a
n
g
e
r
s
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
1
,
9
2
0
,
1
2
0
7
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
T
M
i
s
c
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
identified in Bicycle Transportation Plan
8
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
I
m
p
l
e
m
en
t
a
t
i
o
n
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
T
I
m
provements at Highland/Chorro, Prado, Chorro/Foothill, Laurel/Orcutt
9
B
i
k
e
B
r
i
d
g
e
a
t
P
h
i
l
l
i
p
s
L
a
n
e
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
T
E
x
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
T
r
a
i
l
from California/Phillips to Phillips/Pepper
10
B
o
b
J
o
n
e
s
T
r
a
i
l
O
c
t
a
go
n
B
a
r
n
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
5
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
T
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
B
o
b
J
o
n
e
s between Octagon Barn and LOVR
11
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
6
,
0
0
0
6
,
0
0
0
D
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
12
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
a
t
h
w
a
y
M
a
in
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
,
0
0
0
1
6
0
,
0
0
0
T
Pavement for pathways and Class I bikeways
13
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
L
i
g
h
t
e
d
C
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
o
n
H
i
g
u
e
r
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
4
3
,
5
0
0
4
3
,
5
0
0
D
,
T
Replacement of aging system that has exceeded service life
14
Sa
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
I
m
pr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
a
c
h
e
c
o
a
n
d
Bi
s
h
o
p
P
e
a
k
4
5
,
0
0
0
4
5
,
0
0
0
T
On Foothill Road at Ferrini
15
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
n
d
T
r
e
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
N
,
D
,
T
Removing trip hazards, rebuilding tree wells, DT mission-style sidewalk
16
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
R
a
m
p
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
4
5
,
0
0
0
4
5
,
0
0
0
T
Accessible curb ramps coordinated with paving projects
17
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
M
a
r
k
i
n
g
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
2
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
,
0
0
0
T
Crosswalks, stop bars, lane lines
18
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
nd
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
(
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
,
Bi
k
e
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
o
r
;
F
T
E
=
1
.
6
)
1
7
3
,
7
9
9
1
7
5
,
9
4
8
3
4
9
,
7
4
7
T
Engineers and Bicycle Coordinator
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
1
,
7
6
9
,
2
4
7
19
M
o
n
t
e
r
e
y
&
O
s
o
s
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
al
S
a
f
e
t
y
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
T
Reconstruct traffic signal
20
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
,
0
0
0
N,
T
Improve traffic conditions in existing neighborhoods
21
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
u
d
y
8,
3
3
3
8
,
3
3
3
M
i
n
o
r
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
G
F
,
m
o
s
t
l
y Parking Fund
22
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
L
i
f
t
T
r
u
c
k
9
1
,
0
0
0
9
1
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
23
S
o
u
t
h
&
P
a
r
k
e
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
M
e
d
i
a
n
3
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
T
Concrete median safety measure
24
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
3
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
T
Misc projects identified in Annual Traffic Operations Report
25
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
5
,
0
0
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
T
Misc projects identified in Annual Traffic Operations Report
26
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
a
d
a
r
T
r
a
i
l
e
r
1
5
,
0
0
0
1
5
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
27
S
i
g
n
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(
T
e
c
hn
i
c
i
a
n
;
F
T
E
=
1
)
9
6
,
8
6
6
9
8
,
1
2
7
1
9
4
,
9
9
3
T
S
i
g
n
a
l
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
6
8
4
,
3
2
6
% Complete
FY
2
0
1
5
-
1
7
L
O
C
A
L
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
u
s
e
s
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
r
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
g
o
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
,
th
e
s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
v
o
t
e
r-
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
L
o
c
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
G
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
'
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Enhancement Oversight Commission (REOC).
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
C
o
n
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
R
e
l
i
e
f
/
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
#
MC
G
OI
O
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
p
u
t
N
e
w
/
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Op
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
C
I
P
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
2-
y
r
T
o
t
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
Ma
j
o
r
C
i
t
y
G
o
a
l
(
M
C
G
)
=
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
(
O
S
)
;
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
(
H
)
;
M
u
l
t
i
-
M
o
d
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
)
Ot
h
e
r
I
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
(
O
I
O
)
=
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
W
e
l
l
n
e
s
s
(
N
)
;
L
a
g
u
n
a
L
a
k
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
L
)
;
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
(
D
)
;
F
i
s
c
a
l
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
/
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
(
F
)
10/6/15Item 2 Attachment 2
20
1
5
-
1
6
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
2
0
1
5
-
1
6
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
% Complete
FY
2
0
1
5
-
1
7
L
O
C
A
L
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
u
s
e
s
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
r
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
g
o
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
,
th
e
s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
v
o
t
e
r-
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
L
o
c
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
G
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
'
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Enhancement Oversight Commission (REOC).
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
#
MC
G
OI
O
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
p
u
t
N
e
w
/
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
C
I
P
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
2-
y
r
T
o
t
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
28
9
1
1
P
h
o
n
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
29
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
-
A
i
d
e
d
D
i
s
p
a
t
c
h
2
5
,
0
0
0
25
,
0
0
0
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
f
o
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
t
o
C
o
u
n
t
y
d
i
s
p
a
tch
30
F
i
r
e
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
P
a
t
i
e
n
t
C
a
r
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
5
3
,
8
0
0
2
5
,
7
0
0
7
9
,
5
0
0
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
P
a
t
i
e
n
t
R
e
c
o
r
d
s
M
a
nagement for emergency response
31
F
i
r
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
F
o
r
k
l
i
f
t
5
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
32
F
i
r
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
S
U
V
9
9
,
4
0
0
9
9
,
4
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
33
F
i
r
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
V
a
n
w
i
t
h
A
m
b
u
l
a
n
c
e
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
34
F
i
r
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
S
U
V
(
2
i
n
1
5
-
1
6
)
9
1
,
0
0
0
9
1
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
35
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
R
a
m
p
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
1
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
S
e
t
t
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
w
i
t
h
e
x
isting driveway as Station #2
36
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
R
e
s
t
r
oo
m
a
n
d
D
o
r
m
s
P
r
i
v
a
c
y
Mo
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
6
0
,
0
0
0
1
6
0
,
0
0
0
A
D
A
u
p
g
rades & modernize facilities to support female firefighters
37
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
e
d
a
n
3
8
,
5
0
0
3
8
,
5
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
38
P
o
l
i
c
e
C
A
D
h
a
r
d
w
a
r
e
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
25
0
,
0
0
0
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
e
r
v
e
r
s
p
a
c
e
for Police dispatch system
39
P
o
l
i
c
e
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
S
e
d
a
n
s
(
2
i
n
1
5
-
1
6
)
6
6
,
6
0
0
6
6
,
6
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
40
P
o
l
i
c
e
P
a
t
r
o
l
S
e
d
a
n
s
(
2
i
n
1
5
-
1
6
,
3
i
n
1
6
-
1
7
)
8
3
,
5
0
0
1
2
9
,
7
0
0
2
1
3
,
2
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
41
P
o
l
i
c
e
P
a
t
r
o
l
S
U
V
5
3
,
0
0
0
5
3
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
42
P
o
l
i
c
e
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
P
i
c
k
u
p
3
1
,
4
0
0
3
1
,
4
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
43
P
o
l
i
c
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
M
o
t
o
r
c
y
c
l
e
s
(
2
,
1
)
6
3
,
4
0
0
3
4
,
2
0
0
9
7
,
6
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
44
P
o
l
i
c
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
S
i
t
e
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
4
5
,
0
0
0
4
5
,
0
0
0
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
s
p
a
c
e
n
e
e
d
s
a
n
d
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
ng site
45
P
a
t
r
o
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
(
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
,
S
e
r
g
e
a
n
t
;
F
T
E
=
4
)
7
6
4
,
7
4
1
7
8
6
,
6
5
5
1
,
5
5
1
,
3
9
6
P
a
t
r
o
l
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
,
P
o
l
i
c
e
S
e
r
g
e
a
n
t
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
3
,
2
8
6
,
5
9
6
46
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
P
i
c
k
u
p
T
r
u
c
k
3
1
,
5
0
0
3
1
,
5
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
47
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
&
R
e
s
u
r
f
ac
i
n
g
1
,
5
6
6
,
8
1
7
1
,
6
3
0
,
7
0
0
3
,
1
9
7
,
51
7
T
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
;
L
o
c
a
l
a
nd Collectors in northern part of City (Areas 1 and 8)
48
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
G
r
i
n
d
e
r
&
T
r
a
i
l
e
r
M
o
u
n
t
8
9
,
1
0
0
8
9
,
1
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
49
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
B
a
c
k
h
o
e
1
2
8
,
0
0
0
1
2
8
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
50
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
T
r
u
c
k
s
6
9
,
0
0
0
6
9
,
0
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
51
C
I
P
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
(
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
o
r
;
F
T
E
=
1
)
1
0
9
,
2
3
4
1
1
6
,
2
5
8
2
2
5
,
4
9
2
F
i
e
l
d
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
o
r
I
I
I
52
St
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Wo
r
k
e
r
;
F
T
E
=
1
)
8
0
,
5
9
7
8
5
,
0
0
3
1
6
5
,
6
0
0
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
W
o
r
k
e
r
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
3
,
9
0
6
,
2
0
9
53
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
P
l
a
z
a
R
a
i
l
i
n
g
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
3
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
,
0
0
0
D
,
T
A
D
A
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
p
i
c
k
e
t
s
p
a
c
i
n
g
i
n
guardrails
54
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
(
C
o
d
e
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
,
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
i
s
t
s
;
F
T
E
=
3
)
2
4
7
,
1
8
5
25
6
,
6
3
9
5
0
3
,
8
2
4
N
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
,
Neighborhood Services Specialists
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
5
6
3
,
8
2
4
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
i
n
g
Co
d
e
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ma
j
o
r
C
i
t
y
G
o
a
l
(
M
C
G
)
=
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
(
O
S
)
;
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
(
H
)
;
M
u
l
t
i
-
M
o
d
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
)
Ot
h
e
r
I
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
(
O
I
O
)
=
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
W
e
l
l
n
e
s
s
(
N
)
;
L
a
g
u
n
a
L
a
k
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
L
)
;
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
(
D
)
;
F
i
s
c
a
l
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
/
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
(
F
)
10/6/15
20
1
5
-
1
6
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
2
0
1
5
-
1
6
2
0
1
6
-
1
7
% Complete
FY
2
0
1
5
-
1
7
L
O
C
A
L
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
E
X
P
E
N
D
I
T
U
R
E
S
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
u
s
e
s
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
r
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
g
o
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
,
th
e
s
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
v
o
t
e
r-
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
L
o
c
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
G
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
'
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Enhancement Oversight Commission (REOC).
D
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
#
MC
G
OI
O
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
p
u
t
N
e
w
/
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
C
I
P
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
2-
y
r
T
o
t
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
i
t
l
e
55
B
r
o
a
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
a
n
k
R
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
4
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
,
0
0
0
O
l
d
G
a
r
d
e
n
C
r
e
e
k
-
b
a
n
k
s
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
56
F
l
o
o
d
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
P
i
c
k
u
p
T
r
u
c
k
2
8
,
5
0
0
2
8
,
5
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
57
M
a
r
s
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
r
i
d
g
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
7
3
4
,
0
0
0
7
3
4
,
0
0
0
D
,
T
B
u
i
l
t
i
n
1
9
0
9
,
n
e
e
d
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
58
S
t
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
5
4
8
,
5
0
0
5
7
4
,
3
0
0
1
,
1
2
2
,
8
0
0
N
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
c
o
r
r
u
g
a
t
e
d
metal pipes
59
T
o
r
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
a
n
k
S
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
5
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
S
a
n
L
u
i
s
C
r
e
e
k
-
b
a
n
k
s
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
60
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
F
l
o
o
d
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
(C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
O
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
s
,
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
;
F
T
E
=
6
)
5
7
7
,
8
7
8
5
8
3
,
7
9
4
1
,
1
6
1
,
6
7
2
N
Stormwater Code Enforcement Officer, Stormwater Collection Operators, Stormwater Management Plan
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
3
,
1
3
6
,
9
7
2
61
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
P
i
c
k
u
p
T
r
u
c
k
2
8
,
5
0
0
2
8
,
5
0
0
F
l
e
e
t
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
62
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
P
o
o
l
R
e
p
l
a
s
t
e
ri
n
g
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
shell plaster is 17 years old, underwater lights are 33 years old
63
P
a
r
k
M
a
j
o
r
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
&
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
8
6
,
0
0
0
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
6
,
0
0
0
S
p
o
r
t
s
C
o
u
r
t
s
,
S
p
o
r
t
s
L
i
g
h
t
s
,
B
l
e
a
c
h
e
r
s
,
F
e
n
cing
64
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
R
e
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
8
0
,
0
0
0
4
8
0
,
0
0
0
D
G
o
l
f
c
ourse restroom construction, Mission Plaza restroom design
65
O
c
t
a
g
o
n
B
a
r
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
2
0
6
,
0
0
0
2
0
6
,
0
0
0
66
J
a
c
k
H
o
u
s
e
E
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
2
2
,
0
0
0
2
2
,
0
0
0
67
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Wo
r
k
e
r
;
F
T
E
=
1
)
7
7
,
6
5
8
7
8
,
6
5
7
1
5
6
,
3
1
5
P
a
r
k
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
W
o
r
k
e
r
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
1
,
4
8
8
,
8
1
5
2
,
2
5
4
,
5
4
8
2
,
3
1
5
,
6
1
1
7
,
0
7
2
,
8
5
0
5
,
1
1
3
,
1
0
0
1
6
,
7
5
6
,
1
0
9
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
/
S
e
n
i
o
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
To
t
a
l
L
o
c
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
U
s
e
s
Fl
o
o
d
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Ma
j
o
r
C
i
t
y
G
o
a
l
(
M
C
G
)
=
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
(
O
S
)
;
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
(
H
)
;
M
u
l
t
i
-
M
o
d
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
)
Ot
h
e
r
I
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
(
O
I
O
)
=
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
W
e
l
l
n
e
s
s
(
N
)
;
L
a
g
u
n
a
L
a
k
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
L
)
;
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
(
D
)
;
F
i
s
c
a
l
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
/
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
(
F
)
10/6/15
Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission
October 12, 2015
FROM: James David, Principal Analyst
SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMMUNITY REPORT BASICS
RECOMMENDATION
Discuss what the annual community report has been in the past, and how the Commission wants
to innovate going forward.
DISCUSSION
Chapter 3.15 of the Municipal Code (the Essential Services Transactions [Sales] and Use Tax)
includes specific citizen oversight and fiscal accountability provisions. One of these provisions
requires an annual community report:
Annual Community Report. A written report shall be reviewed at a public hearing by the
Revenue Enhancement Oversight Commission, and a summary will be provided annually to
every household in the community detailing how much revenue is being generated by the
measure and how funds are being spent (MC 3.15.040.E).
The community report is produced annually based on revenues and expenditures from the
previous fiscal year. The most recent report was published for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013-14. In the
past this report was titled “Measure Y Integration Report” (Attachment 1), and included:
1. Background of the sales tax measure
2. Details on integration with the budget and goal-setting process
3. How local revenue measure priorities are determined
4. How local revenue measure funds were used
5. Detailed local revenue measure funding schedule
The REOC should consider how to enhance this report for the public. Some ideas for
improvement are including more graphics and charts, translating some of the “government
jargon” into meaningful and simple terms, eliminating some of the narrative, making the report
shorter or producing a one-page version for public distribution, and emphasizing how resident
input was integrated into the spending priorities and uses.
The following list includes examples of recent compelling and graphic reports the REOC may
want to draw from when thinking through how to prepare the next annual community report:
1. 2015-17 City of San Luis Obispo Budget in Brief
2. The Mile Marker: A Caltrans Performance Report
3. City of Sacramento Budget in Brief
4. City of Palo Alto Budget in Brief
ATTACHMENT
1. 2013-14 Measure Y Integration Report
Measure Y Integration – 2013-14 Fiscal Year Item 3 Attachment 1
MEASURE Y INTEGRATION REPORT - OVERVIEW
The purpose of this report is to provide the Council with information about the reporting, uses,
accountability, and priorities of Measure Y funds during the most recently completed fiscal year,
2013-14.
Background
Measure Y was approved by City voters in November 2006 to preserve essential services for the
community. Measure Y established a one-half percent local sales tax with an eight-year sunset
clause. The original measure would have expired on March 31, 2015, however voters approved
its extension for an additional eight years during the 2014 General Election when they passed
Measure G. This Measure Y Integration Report details how Measure Y revenue was integrated
into the budget during the most recently completed fiscal year, 2013-14, and illustrates how
Measure Y expenditures supported Council goals. In the future, this report will be adjusted to
report on Measure G priorities, including the additional fiscal accountability provisions
contained in the new measure.
Measure Y includes provisions to ensure that consideration of this important revenue source is
integrated into the financial planning process. The City’s goal-setting process is designed to meet
two of these requirements, as follows.
1.Integration into the City's budget and goal-setting process. The estimated revenue and
proposed use of funds generated by this measure shall be an integral part of the City's budget
and goal-setting process, and significant opportunities will be provided for meaningful
participation by citizens in determining priority uses of these funds.
2.Annual citizen meeting. An invitation will be extended each year to the entire community
asking Community members to participate in a forum to review and discuss the use of
the revenue generated by this measure. City staff will also be available to meet with any
group that requests a specific briefing with their members to discuss and answer questions
about the revenues generated by the measure and their uses.
It is important to know that Measure Y is a general purpose measure, and the proceeds are not
restricted to specific purposes. However, the language on the ballot measure approved by voters
in 2006 provides examples of the types of uses that would be funded. The language on the ballot
was:
“To protect and maintain essential services - such as neighborhood street paving and pothole
repair; traffic congestion relief; public safety, including restoring eliminated traffic patrol, Fire
Marshal and fire/paramedic training positions; flood protection; senior citizen
services/facilities; neighborhood code enforcement; open space preservation and other vital
general purpose services - shall the sales tax be increased by one-half cent for eight years only,
with citizen oversight and independent annual financial audits?”
Measure Y Integration – 2013-14 Fiscal Year
2013-15 Measure Y Priorities
Preservation of Essential
Services (Public Safety,
Maintenance Services)
Infrastructure Maintenance
Neighborhood Wellness
Open Space Preservation
Transportation (Traffic
Congestion Relief)
In short, while the ballot language provided examples of the types of uses that could be funded -
based on community input received before placing the measure on the ballot - Measure Y is a
general purpose tax providing Council with flexibility to respond to new circumstances and
challenges.
DISCUSSION
How are Measure Y priorities determined?
Measure Y is a general purpose revenue source and the
City Council maintains discretion over decisions
regarding how these funds are allocated. Initially the City
did surveying and public education/outreach so staff
would know where to start, but priorities can change over
time, depending upon circumstances. The Measure Y
ballot language is always an important source of
information when determining Measure Y priorities. The
public goal setting process also plays an important role,
which is why the public has an opportunity to weigh in
on Measure Y priorities during the Community Forum.
Ultimately, the Council provided priority guidance on the
use of Measure Y funds when they adopted the 2013-15
Financial Plan, and again when the Supplement and
2014-15 Budget was adopted. The Council has made
great efforts in the past to connect Council goals with
Measure Y priorities, and it is anticipated that this will continue to be the case as Measure G
priorities are reviewed as part of the 2015-17 Financial Plan goal-setting process.
How are Measure Y Funds Used?
Measure Y funds have been used for both ongoing operations and capital projects to address the
priorities identified. The following table identifies that approximately $2.44 million of Measure
Y funds were incorporated into day-to-day operations during the 2013-14 fiscal year.
Measure Y Integration – 2013-14 Fiscal Year
Operating Program Operating Program
Public Safety Sweeper Operator 54,264$
Traffic sergeant 163,547$ Stormwater management plan:81,344
Police patrol officer 175,883 Parks Maintenance Worker 73,102
Police Sergeant 200,199 CIP Project Management
Downtown Patrol 310,400 Field Engineering Inspector II/III 102,617
Fire Marshall 140,289 Transportation (Mobility and Safety)
Fire Training Officer 176,687 Building Code Enforcement Officer 91,940
Fire Administrative Assistant 81,000 Permit Technician (0.25)18,906
Streets & Sidewalks Student Neighborhood Assistance Pro53,079
Street Maintenance worker 71,368 Neighborhood Code Enforcement Sp137,905
Signal & Streetlight Tech 92,120 Traffic Engineer 92,520
Creek & Flood Protection Open Space Preservation
Storm Water Code Enforcement Officer91,945 Ranger Services 47,534
Collection Operator 184,580 Open Space Wildfire reduction 3,433
Total Measure Y funding allocated to operating programs 2,444,662$
Measure Y funding allocated to ongoing day-to-day operations in 2013-14
To the degree that these operating programs remain priorities, the amount of Measure Y funding
available for capital projects, or additional operating programs, is the difference between this
amount and the total amount of Measure Y funding available. If Measure Y is expected to
generate $7 million during the 2015-16 fiscal year, and $2.5 million is devoted to these ongoing
operating programs, $4.5 million would be available to accomplish other Measure Y priorities.
During the upcoming goal-setting process, Council will be asked to affirm if the ongoing
operating programs remain a priority use of local sales tax revenues, and to prioritize the use of
these funds.
Provided at the end of this report is a list of the Measure Y uses during 2013-14. This list is
included in the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and is currently being
audited by the City’s independent auditors. It provides information on the operating and capital
expenditures during 2013-14 as well as a reconciliation of all Measure Y revenues and uses since
2006-07.
SUMMARY
The City’s local sales tax measure is now expected to provide over $7 million in funding each
year to enable the City to provide important and valued services to the community; for both day-
to-day operating programs and one-time capital improvements. It is the Council’s obligation to
prioritize the use of this resource, just as it is their job to prioritize the use of all City resources.
For this reason it is important that as the Council sets goals for the 2015-17 Financial Plan, it
also considers the prioritized use of local sales tax revenue.
Measure Y Integration – 2013-14 Fiscal Year
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
MEASURE Y FUNDING SUMMARY SCHEDULE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
Operating Programs Capital Improvement Plan
Budget Actual Budget Actual
Encumbered
/ Assigned
Preservation of Essential Services
Public Safety
Police Services 869,583 850,029 - - -
Police Vehicles - - 172,800 31,421 141,379
Public Safety Mobile Data Computers - - 184,500 - 184,500
Fire Prevention & Training 399,656 397,976 - - -
Extrication Equipment - - 60,400 60,115 -
Fire Engine/Truck Replacement: Debt
Service - - 128,920 128,920 -
Fire Station #2 Remodel - - 2,700 630 2,070
Quickest Route Software - - 20,600 18,630 1,970
Maintenance Services
Streets, Sidewalks and Traffic Signal
Operations 180,836 163,488 - - -
Creek & Flood Protection 529,059 412,133 316,400 285,379 31,021
Parks 76,581 73,102 620,000 50,375 569,625
Project Management & Inspection 108,030 102,617 - - -
Neighborhood Wellness
Enhanced Building & Zoning Code
Enforcement 113,441 110,846 - - -
"SNAP" Enhancement 53,079 53,079 - - -
Neighborhood Code Enforcement
Specialists 139,183 137,905 - - -
Traffic Congestion Relief
Traffic Safety Report Implementation - - 25,000 - 25,000
Traffic Operations Report Implementation - - 30,000 - 30,000
Traffic Engineer 92,520 92,520 - - -
Traffic Sign Maintenance - - - - -
Bicycle Facility Improvements - - 100,000 18,936 81,064
Neighborhood Traffic Improvements - - 20,000 4,846 15,154
Measure Y Integration – 2013-14 Fiscal Year
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
MEASURE Y FUNDING SUMMARY SCHEDULE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
Operating Programs Capital Improvement Plan
Budget Actual Budget Actual
Encumbered
/ Assigned
Open Space Preservation
Open Space Acquisition
- - 200,000 - 200,000
Ranger Services Staffing
59,300 47,534 - - -
Open Space Wildfire Reduction
5,000 3,433 - - -
Infrastructure Maintenance &
Improvements
Santa Rosa Skatepark - - 1,226,300 16,313 1,209,987
Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing - - 1,400,700 939,572 461,128
Central Irrigation Controller
Replacement - - 163,323 163,323 -
Facility Maintenance - - 54,000 26,029 27,971
Jack House Exterior Painting - - 25,000 - 25,000
Johnson Avenue Underpass Pump - - 190,000 - 190,000
Library Restroom Remodel - - 39,000 39,000 -
Marsh Street Bridge Replacement - - 19,300 19,300 -
Mission Plaza Railing Upgrade - - 30,000 - 30,000
Olympic Pool Replastering - - 25,000 5,525 19,475
Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway
Maintenance - - 60,000 60,000 -
Sidewalk Repairs - - 25,000 25,000 -
Tree Maintenance Equipment - - 100,400 - 100,400
Sinsheimer Parking Lot Paving - - 80,000 166 79,834
Mission Plaza Master Plan - - 100,000 - 100,000
I.T. Replacement Fund - - 500,000 116,066 383,934
Facility Maintenance Reserve - - 500,000 293,479 206,521
Totals Current Projects 2,626,268 2,444,662 6,419,343 2,303,025 4,116,032
Measure Y Integration – 2013-14 Fiscal Year
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
MEASURE Y FUNDING SUMMARY SCHEDULE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
Operating Programs Capital Improvement Plan
Budget Actual Budget Actual
Encumbered
/ Assigned
Prior Year Encumbered/Assigned
Amounts
Transportation (Mobility and Safety)
Traffic Safety Report Implementation - - 12,611 12,608 -
Traffic Sign Maintenance - - 44,600 44,600 -
Open Space Preservation
Froom Ranch Improvement - - 10,934 8,247 2,687
Infrastructure Maintenance and
Improvements
Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing - - 114,516 114,516 -
Broad Street Creek Bank Reinforcement - - 18,318 2,689 15,629
Olympic Pool Heater Replacement - - 176,721 166,345 -
Playground Equipment Replacement - - 373,083 169,942 203,141
Maintenance Services
Streets, Sidewalks and Traffic Signal
Repairs - - 31,612 31,584 -
Creek & Flood Protection - - 35,000 - -
Sinsheimer Stadium Bldg. Assessment - - 34,556 7,780 26,776
SUB-TOTAL PRIOR YEAR AMOUNTS $851,951 $558,312 $248,233
Totals 2,626,268 2,444,662 7,271,294 2,861,337 4,364,265
Measure Y Integration – 2013-14 Fiscal Year
Measure Y Revenues & Uses Summary
Revenues:
Carryover from 2006-07 1,000,000
Revenues for 2007-08 5,996,600
Revenues for 2008-09 5,641,400
Revenues for 2009-10 5,252,500
Revenues for 2010-11 5,616,300
Revenues for 2011-12 6,237,500
Revenues for 2012-13 6,493,800
Revenues for 2013-14 6,774,365
Total Revenues 43,012,465
Uses:
Operating programs 2007-08 (1,463,700)
Capital improvement plan 2007-08 (2,434,100)
Operating programs 2008-09 (2,418,300)
Capital improvement plan 2008-09 (3,684,400)
Operating programs 2009-10 (2,267,100)
Capital improvement plan 2009-10 (2,161,200)
Operating programs 2010-11 (2,430,200)
Capital improvement plan 2010-11 (3,443,000)
Operating programs 2011-12 (2,203,900)
Capital improvement plan 2011-12 (3,967,500)
Operating programs 2012-13 (2,225,125)
Capital improvement plan 2012-13 (2,320,712)
Operating programs 2013-14 (2,444,662)
Capital improvement plan 2013-14 (2,861,337)
Total Uses (36,325,235)
Contingency Reserve 2014 (1,700,000)
Encumbered or assigned for carryover for future year expenditures (4,364,265)
Net available for future year appropriations 622,964