HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-05-2016 Item 09 - Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Meeting Date: 1/5/2016
FROM: Carrie Mattingly, Utilities Director
Prepared By: David Hix, Deputy Director - Wastewater
SUBJECT: RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY
RECOMMENDATION
Approve an agreement with Water Systems Consultants (WSC) for development of a Recycled
Water Facilities Planning Study in an amount not to exceed $150,000.
DISCUSSION
Background
On February 3, 2015, the City Council received an update on the Water Resource Recovery
Facility (WRRF) Upgrade Project. At that meeting Council approved a resolution to submit a
grant application for Proposition 13 funding to study maximizing production and distribution of
recycled water.
At this same meeting, the City Council additionally authorized the Utilities Director to execute
the grant contract if the grant application was successful and approved matching grant funds in
the amount of $75,000 (Attachment A). In July of 2015, a grant application was submitted to the
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for a Recycled Water Facil ities Planning Study.
On November 9, 2015, the City was notified the grant had been approved and the Utilities
Director received and signed the grant document on November 16, 2015 (Attachment B).
The Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
The Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study will evaluate five alternatives for the recycled
water produced at the WRRF.
1. Cal Poly
a. Deliver recycled water to Cal Poly
b. Construct a small scale satellite WRRF to serve Cal Poly
2. Irrigation in Edna Valley
3. Potable Reuse
a. Provide groundwater recharge for Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR)
b. Provide Direct Potable Reuse (DPR)
9
Packet Pg. 47
The scope for the project was developed to strengthen the data required to make knowledge -
based decisions for the City’s recycled water program and to provide th e basis for selection of
alternatives through a triple bottom line analysis. The five alternatives will be screened and it is
anticipated the top two will be carried forward for full evaluation. This study will collect data
and perform resource evaluations and is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
Consultant Selection
Staff recommends using WSC for the study. WSC possesses extensive knowledge and
experience in the recycled water discipline. WSC is currently working with West Valley Water
District on a recycled water master plan, the City of Pismo Beach’s recycled water project, and is
the City’s program manager for the WRRF Upgrade project. The WRRF upgrade project has a
goal to maximize recycled water production. WSC has submitted a scope of work which will
result in a comprehensive study of the alternatives and provide recommendations for recycled
water treatment and distribution requirements. The study will coordinate the findings with the
WRRF Upgrade project design and future recycled water capital improvements (Attachment C).
WSC was selected as an engineering consultant through the City’s on-call services Request for
Proposals (RFP) for engineering services in 2014. On-call engineering services were envisioned
to be utilized for studies of this nature.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study will cost $150,000, of which $75,000 is
reimbursable through the approved grant funding. A total of $450,000 remains available in
WRRF Upgrade project (2015-17 Financial Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, pages 3-72 to 3-75)
under the study phase for the City’s portion of the study amounting to $75,000.
Attachments:
a a - Feb 3, 2015 Council Report and RW Resolution
b b - Recycled Water Facilities Planning Grant
c c - WSC RWFPS Proposal 11-20-2015
9
Packet Pg. 48
9.a
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
e
b
3
,
2
0
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
R
W
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.a
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
e
b
3
,
2
0
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
R
W
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
e
b
3
,
2
0
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
R
W
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.a
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
e
b
3
,
2
0
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
R
W
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.a
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
e
b
3
,
2
0
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
R
W
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.a
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
e
b
3
,
2
0
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
R
W
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
e
b
3
,
2
0
1
5
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
R
W
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 71
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 75
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 76
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 77
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 78
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 79
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 80
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
9.b
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
PO Box 4255 l San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 l Phone: (805) 457‐8833 l Fax: (805) 888‐2764 l www.wsc‐inc.com
11/20/2015
Mr. Dave Hix
Wastewater Division Manager
City of San Luis Obispo
879 Morro Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP A RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY
Dear Dave,
Per your request we have prepared a proposal to develop a Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
(RWFPS) for the City of San Luis Obispo. The purpose of the study is develop and evaluate recycled
water use alternatives, and to identify a preferred alternative with the greatest potential for beneficial
use that will help the City meet their goals. The preferred alternative for increasing recycled water use
would be selected and implemented in coordination with the Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF)
Project.
The study will focus on evaluating the following five alternatives:
1. Deliver Title 22 recycled water from the WRRF to agricultural customers in the Edna Valley;
2. Deliver Title 22 recycled water from the WRRF to Cal Poly;
3. Provide groundwater recharge within the San Luis Obispo Valley Basin for indirect potable reuse
(IPR);
4. Construct a new satellite WRRF to serve Cal Poly and the surrounding areas; and
5. Provide direct potable reuse (DPR).
The scope of the study intends to strengthen the quality and quantity of data required to make
knowledge‐based decisions about the City’s recycled water program, and to provide the basis for
selection the most beneficial alternative(s) through a triple bottom line analysis. An initial screening of
the five alternatives will be conducted and the top two alternatives will be carried forward for detailed
evaluation.
The estimated cost for this scope of services is $150,000 as shown in the attached cost proposal.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this proposal. Please feel free to contact us if you
have any questions. We can be reached at 457‐8833; Jeff is ext. 101 and Jasmine is at ext. 109.
9.c
Packet Pg. 82
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
Mr. Dave Hix, page 2 11/20/2015
PO Box 4255 l San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 l Phone: (805) 457‐8833 l Fax: (805) 888‐2764 l www.wsc‐inc.com
Sincerely,
Water Systems Consulting, Inc.
Jeffery M. Szytel, PE, MBA
Program Manager
Jasmine Diaz, EIT
Assistant Program Manager
Enclosures:
Scope of Work for Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study dated 6/26/15
Cost Proposal for Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study dated 6/26/15
9.c
Packet Pg. 83
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 1 of 12
Introduction
The City of San Luis Obispo (City) owns and operates a tertiary treatment Water Resource Recovery
Facility (WRRF) which discharges a portion of the effluent to San Luis Obispo Creek for habitat
enhancement and the rest to a recycled water storage tank before it is distributed to customers
throughout the City. The City is currently developing a project to upgrade the WRRF (WRRF Project) to
increase effluent water quality through complete nitrogen removal and reduction of disinfection
byproducts. During the initial planning phase of the WRRF Project, “maximizing sustainable resource
recovery” was identified as a key objective. Although the City must maintain a minimum effluent
discharge of 1.6 million gallons per day (MGD) to the creek for protection of native wildlife habitat, a
significant portion of the WRRF effluent remains available for recycled water use. The purpose of this
study is to develop and evaluate recycled water use alternatives, and to identify a preferred alternative
with the greatest potential for beneficial use that will help the City meet their goals.
Through conversations with the City, five (5) recycled water use alternatives were identified for possible
evaluation during the City’s Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study (RWFPS):
1. Deliver Title 22 recycled water from the WRRF to agricultural customers in the Edna Valley;
2. Deliver Title 22 recycled water from the WRRF to Cal Poly;
3. Provide groundwater recharge within the San Luis Obispo Valley Basin for indirect potable reuse
(IPR);
4. Construct a new satellite WRRF to serve Cal Poly and the surrounding areas; and
5. Provide direct potable reuse (DPR).
The scope of this study intends to strengthen the quality and quantity of data required to make
knowledge‐based decisions about the future of the City’s recycled water program, and to provide the
basis for selecting the most beneficial alternative(s) through triple bottom line (TBL) analysis. An initial
screening of these five alternatives will be conducted and the top two alternatives will be carried
forward for detailed evaluation. As a result of the study, it is envisioned a preferred alternative for
increasing recycled water use would be selected and implemented in coordination with the WRRF
Project, which is scheduled for completion by 2020.
9.c
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 2 of 12
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study Scope of Work
TASK 0.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS
0.1 Project administration
Project schedule
(1) Prepare project schedule and update as‐required based upon actual progress and City
direction. Submit revised schedules to the City as necessary.
Progress reports
(1) Prepare progress reports to be submitted with each monthly invoice. The reports will
include: 1) summary of activities accomplished in the current month; 2) outstanding
information and/or coordination needs; and 3) schedule updates.
Deliverable: WSC will provide a preliminary project schedule at the Kickoff Meeting and will
provide updated project schedules as‐needed throughout the project. WSC will provide
monthly progress reports with project invoices.
0.2 Kickoff Meeting
WSC will plan, organize and facilitate a Kickoff Meeting with City staff.
The purpose of the meeting will be to:
(1) discuss the goals and objectives of the RWFPS including the Study Parameters identified
in the Plan of Study approval by the SWRCB;
(2) discuss the context of the RWFPS as it relates to the Utilities Department operations and
current projects;
(3) discuss how the project relates to the City’s Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF)
Project and WRRF Facilities Plan;
(4) review the scope and schedule of the project including assumptions and proposed
methodologies;
(5) identify data needs and sources;
(6) define coordination requirements;
(7) confirm level and nature of SWRCB involvement during the project;
(8) discuss and develop strategies for stakeholder involvement;
(9) discuss recycled water market/opportunities as identified in prior analyses including the
City’s 2014 Draft Recycled Water Master Plan (RWMP); and
(10) review and refine previously identified conceptual alternatives.
Budget is based on a 3‐hour meeting attended by WSC’s Project Manager, Project Engineer and
Staff Engineer, and HDR’s Senior Engineer and Project Engineer (by phone).
9.c
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 3 of 12
0.3 Alternatives Screening Workshop
Coordinate a workshop with City staff to screen the conceptual alternatives and select two (2)
conceptual alternatives for further evaluation.
Review the proposed facility upgrades in the City’s WRRF Facilities Plan as the no project
alternative.
Review the materials prepared under Task 6.2 and perform a preliminary screening of
conceptual alternatives on the basis of volume of use, potable water supply implications, facility
requirements and costs, regulatory requirements, and benefits/beneficiaries.
Select two (2) conceptual alternatives for further evaluation.
Budget is based on a 3‐hour meeting attended by WSC’s Project Manager, Project Engineer and
Staff Engineer, and HDR’s Senior Engineer and Project Engineer (by phone).
Deliverable: Agenda and meeting materials; meeting notes.
0.4 Alternatives Evaluation Workshop
Coordinate a workshop with City staff to evaluate the two (2) conceptual alternatives selected
during the Alternatives Screening Workshop, and to select a preferred alternative.
Review the materials prepared under Task 6.3 and further develop evaluation criteria that are
consistent with the triple bottom line objectives in the WRRF Project Charter.
Evaluate and compare the conceptual alternatives by applying the selected screening/evaluation
criteria.
Select the preferred project alternative, which may combine aspects/components of more than
one conceptual alternative.
Budget is based on a 3‐hour workshop attended by WSC’s Project Manager, Project Engineer
and Staff Engineer, and HDR’s Senior Engineer and Project Engineer (by phone).
Deliverable: Agenda and meeting materials; meeting notes.
0.5 Deliverable Review Meeting
Deliverable Review Meeting: Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
(1) Plan, schedule and lead a meeting to review the draft recycled water facilities planning
study
(2) Budget is based on a 2‐hour meeting attended by WSC’s Project Manager, Project
Engineer and Staff Engineer, and HDR’s Senior Engineer and Project Engineer (by
phone).
Deliverable: Agenda and meeting materials; meeting notes.
9.c
Packet Pg. 86
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 4 of 12
0.6 Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC)
WSC will provide quality control of the work items being prepared for delivery to the City.
TASK 1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 Study area
Utilize the City’s Draft 2014 RWMP, the WRRF Facilities Plan and other references to prepare a
summary of the Study Area that includes:
(1) Narrative description of the Study Area
(2) Descriptive maps and diagrams showing vicinity, jurisdictional boundaries, proposed
annexation areas, regional topography/geography, groundwater basin boundaries,
hydrologic features, and current and projected land use.
The proposed Study Area shall include the current City limits, proposed annexation area(s),
agricultural land inside and outside of City limits and potential locations for offsite recycled
water storage.
1.2 Goals and objectives
Summarize goals and objectives defined during the Kickoff Meeting.
TASK 2.0 WATER SUPPLIES AND CHARACTERISTICS
2.1 Water supply characteristics
Summarize current and projected water supplies from the City’s 2015 Draft Water Master Plan
(2015 WMP).
2.2 Water demand characteristics
Summarize current and projected water demand from the 2015 WMP and customer data.
2.3 Water pricing
Summarize the City’s current water rate structure and any planned or upcoming rate increases.
TASK 3.0 WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS AND FACILITIES
3.1 Existing facilities
Utilize the City’s WRRF Facilities Plan, Wastewater Collection System Infrastructure Renewal
Strategy (WCSIRS) and other relevant documents to:
(1) Describe existing WRRF including capacity, current flows, description of treatment
processes and design criteria
(2) Summarize the City’s existing waste discharge requirements
(3) Characterize current and projected future influent flows
(4) Characterize current and projected effluent water quality including any seasonal
variation
(5) Summarize source(s) of industrial or other problem constituents (including high‐TDS
infiltration) and control measures
9.c
Packet Pg. 87
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 5 of 12
(6) Summarize current wastewater flow variations including peaking factors for average dry
weather flow with Cal Poly (ADWFCP), average annual (AA), maximum week (MW),
maximum month (MM), maximum day (MD), and peak hour (PH)
(7) Summarize existing rights to use of treated effluent after discharge
Utilize the City’s 2014 Draft RWMP to:
(8) Describe existing recycling including infrastructure, users, quantities, and contractual
and pricing arrangements
3.2 Future facilities
Outline expected future waste discharge requirements based on the City’s Time Schedule Order
(No. R3‐2014‐0036), conversations with the City staff, review of the Basin Plan, and
conversations with staff from the Regional Water Quality Control Board
Describe plans for new wastewater treatment facilities to achieve regulatory compliance as
identified in the City’s WRRF Facilities Plan
TASK 4.0 TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Recycled water quality requirements
Summarize current recycled water regulations, including water qualities and/or treatment
requirements and approved uses for each category of potential recycled water use:
(1) Title 22 unrestricted use
(2) Indirect and direct potable reuse
Describe Basin Plan requirements for recycled water use
Describe water quality related requirements of the RWQCB to protect surface or ground water
Describe operational and on‐site requirements for recycled water (such as backflow prevention,
buffer zones, etc.)
Describe regulatory requirements and developments related to indirect potable reuse (IPR) and
DPR.
4.2 Tentative water recycling requirements of RWQCB
Contact RWQCB to determine how expansion or modification to the existing recycled water
treatment and distribution system would affect the existing Master Reclamation Permit and the
existing waste discharge requirements.
TASK 5.0 RECYCLED WATER MARKET/OPPORTUNITIES
5.1 Update and expand market analysis
Review and update market analysis in the 2014 RWMP for Title 22 recycled water delivery to Cal
Poly and Edna Valley, and expand market analysis to include potable reuse and groundwater
recharge use types based on discussions from the Kickoff Meeting. Describe validation and
market update methodology. For each identified user or category of potential user, summarize:
9.c
Packet Pg. 88
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 6 of 12
(1) type of use;
(2) expected annual use, peak use and seasonal variation;
(3) estimated internal capital investment required (on‐site conversion costs);
(4) desire to use recycled water;
(5) date of possible initial use of recycled water;
(6) present and future source(s) of water and quality of use;
(7) cost, quality and reliability needs; and
(8) wastewater disposal methods.
Develop a tabular summary and map for existing and prospective users, their type of use and
magnitude of existing and/or projected demands.
5.2 Preliminary hydrogeological assessment
Provide description of the geology and hydrogeology of the San Luis basin, including
documented estimates of recharge, basin levels, groundwater production, groundwater quality,
and storage. Provide descriptive graphics, to the extent available, including basin cross
section(s).
Research and summarize relevant data for considering conceptual alternatives to develop a
groundwater recharge project to utilize recycled water.
Evaluate the conceptual feasibility of disposing of water through the use of injection wells.
Summarize the facilities required to accomplish the disposal/recharge through injection
concept. The discussion of conceptual facilities will include:
(1) Injection/recharge rates potential
(2) Potential well construction design and materials
(3) Potential well location(s)
(4) Well depths
(5) Well spacing
(6) Estimated construction costs
Evaluate the conceptual feasibility of disposing of water through the use of infiltration basins.
Summarize the facilities required to accomplish the disposal/recharge through surface spreading
concept. The discussion of conceptual facilities will include:
(1) Infiltration rate potential
(2) Potential infiltration basin design and materials
(3) Potential infiltration basin location(s)
(4) Required setback from municipal wells
9.c
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 7 of 12
(5) Estimated construction costs
TASK 6.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
6.1 Planning and design assumptions
Develop relevant planning and design assumptions and criteria that will be used when
evaluating project alternatives. These assumptions should include:
(1) Delivery and system pressure criteria (average and peak)
(2) Use type regulatory criteria
(3) Cost basis: key assumptions; cost index; cost escalation and contingency factors;
discount rate; evaluation term for present worth analysis; etc.
(4) Planning period
(5) Conceptual infrastructure design criteria
6.2 Preliminary alternatives screening
Prior to the Alternatives Screening Workshop, develop information to support a preliminary
screening of the recycled water use alternatives identified. Compare each potential alternative.
Screening of each alternative is expected to include:
(1) Use volume
(2) Potable water supply implications
(3) Infrastructure requirements and estimated costs
(4) Regulatory requirements and/or considerations
(5) Potential benefits and beneficiaries
(6) Relevant data and conclusions from prior studies
(7) Abbreviated triple bottom line assessment
It is anticipated that the materials developed under this task will be used to conduct the
screening of conceptual alternatives during the Alternatives Screening Workshop. Materials will
be distributed to the City one (1) week prior to the workshop.
Based on results of the screening and discussions with City during the Alternatives Screening
Workshop, identify two (2) conceptual alternatives to carry forward for further analysis and
evaluation.
6.3 Alternatives analysis and evaluation
Prior to the Alternatives Evaluation Workshop, develop a preliminary list of TBL evaluation
criteria for the conceptual alternatives that align with the WRRF Project Charter, which may
include:
(1) Cost (capital, O&M, NPV, EAC and $/AF)
(2) Social benefits and impacts
9.c
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 8 of 12
(3) Environmental benefits and impacts, including basin and watershed water quality
considerations
(4) Consistency with recycled water regulatory framework
(5) Potential impact and/or benefit to local Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP)
(6) Water supply benefits
(7) Sustainability and expandability
(8) Sequencing/phasing/schedule considerations
(9) Consistency with project goals/objectives and the WRRF Project
Evaluate two (2) conceptual alternatives identified in Task 6.2. The analysis for each alternative
will include:
(1) Summary of the anticipated end users and location of use.
(2) Description of potential use types and volume of use, including seasonal variations
(3) Storage, pumping and distribution infrastructure requirements
(a) Narrative description including summary of required infrastructure, key
considerations and land requirements
(b) Conceptual maps depicting locations and layout of necessary infrastructure
(c) Infrastructure sizing estimates with calculations
(4) Required treatment upgrades
(a) Narrative description and summary of required unit processes that were not
previously identified in the WRRF upgrades scope
(b) Simplified process flow diagram
(c) Conceptual maps depicting locations and layout for necessary improvements
(5) Summary of anticipated regulatory requirements specific to the use type of each
conceptual alternative
(6) Triple bottom line benefits to the utility, community and/or region
(7) Costs
(a) Prepare preliminary estimates of construction, non‐construction and annual O&M
costs
(b) Estimate net present value, equivalent annual cost and cost per acre‐foot of supply
(8) Discussion of advantages, disadvantages and potential limitations or concerns
It is anticipated that the materials developed under this task will be used to conduct the
evaluation of conceptual alternatives during the Alternatives Evaluation Workshop.
9.c
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 9 of 12
6.4 Water rights considerations
Working with City water rights counsel, summarize impacts the expansion of the recycled water
program will have on the City’s water rights and the local efforts related to compliance with the
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). WSC assumes that City water rights
counsel will be available to assist in the development of water rights considerations section.
6.5 No project alternative
Utilize the City’s WRRF Facilities Plan to define the no project alternative
Include a brief evaluation of the no project alternative based on the information presented in
the WRRF Facilities Plan and include in alternatives analysis
6.6 Water conservation/reduction analysis
Summarize the City’s current and future plans for water conservation. WSC will utilize the City’s
2010 UWMP, 2015 Draft WMP and current water conservation program documentation as basis
for water conservation summary.
Describe potential impacts to the recycled water program due to conservation.
6.7 Conceptual alternatives analysis results
Summarize the outcome from Alternatives Evaluation Workshop including:
(1) Evaluation criteria
(2) Results from the evaluation
(3) Preferred conceptual alternative
TASK 7.0 RECOMMENDED FACILITIES PROJECT PLAN
7.1 Preferred alternative
Summarize proposed facilities and basis for selection
Develop preliminary design criteria and conceptual pipeline routes for the preferred alternative
Update conceptual maps, figures, process flow diagram(s), and layouts to reflect the preferred
alternative including treatment, storage and distribution infrastructure
Update cost estimates based on final configuration and expected time of construction
Update list of all potential users, quantity of recycled water use, seasonal variations in use,
water quality considerations or concerns, and peak demand
Summarize on‐site improvements and retrofits required including cost
TASK 8.0 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
8.1 Stakeholder outreach
Conduct stakeholder meetings to coordinate project objectives, elements, etc. Document
stakeholder outreach efforts.
Support City in meetings and outreach to potential partners.
9.c
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 10 of 12
Budget assumes 11 hours of WSC support.
8.2 Public outreach
Provide project updates at public meetings as requested by the City, including preparation of an
explanatory presentation and/or graphics presenting the analysis and/or conclusions contained
within the Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Document public outreach efforts.
Budget assumes 11 hours of WSC support.
TASK 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
9.1 Permitting requirements
Identify and summarize the probable permitting requirements for implementing recycled water
projects or retrofitting existing recycled water facilities. Utilize previously completed recycled
water studies as the basis for developing the summary of probable permitting requirements.
9.2 Environmental documentation requirements (CEQA)
Utilize the City’s WRRF Facilities Plan to summarize the necessary environmental documentation
requirements to expand a recycled water program or retrofit existing recycled water facilities.
9.3 Coordination and governance
Determine needed coordination, agreements, ordinances and/or governance for implementing
the preferred alternative recycled water system.
Discuss ability of users to make on‐site improvements and connect to the recycled water
system.
Summarize any customer assurances obtained to‐date. Provide recommendations for obtaining
remaining assurances from proposed recycled water customers.
9.4 Construction financing plan and revenue program
Summarize potential grant and loan funding opportunities for which the project may be eligible
based on the WRRF Funding and Financing Plan
Incorporate the recycled water project into the WRRF Project Funding and Financing Plan and
Cash Flow Model, based on conclusions of the Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study.
Support the City in developing a proposed pricing policy for the selected recycled water
alternative
Evaluate costs that can be allocated to water pollution control
9.c
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 11 of 12
9.5 Conceptual schedule
Prepare a conceptual schedule for the implementation of the recycled water project and
incorporate into the WRRF Project schedule, including permitting, planning, design,
construction, critical milestones from the financing and revenue program and on‐site customer
improvements. Provide narrative description of phasing considerations/recommendations in
the preferred project plan, specifically considering implications and/or conflicts related to the
WRRF Program schedule presented in the WRRF Facilities Plan.
TASK 10.0 PREPARE RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY
10.1 Prepare Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Prepare draft Executive Summary and compile draft report including title page(s),
acknowledgements, table of contents, list of figures, list of tables, draft chapters, reference list
and appendices. Describe how the recommendations from this project will interface with the
ongoing WRRF Project.
Deliverable: Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
10.2 Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Prepare Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study based on comments received from
the City and any identified stakeholders on the draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Deliverable: Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
10.3 Final Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
Prepare Final Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study based on comments received from the
City on the Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study.
Deliverable: Final Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study
9.c
Packet Pg. 94
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
City of San Luis Obispo Scope of Work
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study 6/26/2015
Page 12 of 12
Deliverable Summary
Task Deliverable Description Format/Copies Due Date
0.1 Project Schedule Emailed PDF and 11x17
hardcopies for all meeting
attendees
At Kickoff Meeting and
revised as‐needed
0.2 Kickoff Meeting Agenda and Minutes Emailed PDF See project schedule
0.3 Alternatives Screening Workshop Agenda and
Minutes
Emailed PDF See project schedule
0.4 Alternatives Evaluation Workshop Agenda and
Minutes
Emailed PDF See project schedule
0.5 Deliverable Review Meeting Agenda and
Minutes
Emailed PDF See project schedule
10.1 Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study Emailed PDF and four (4)
hardcopies
See project schedule
10.2 Final Draft Recycled Water Facilities Planning
Study
Emailed PDF and four (4)
hardcopies
See project schedule
10.3 Final Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study Emailed PDF and four (4)
hardcopies
See project schedule
9.c
Packet Pg. 95
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)
Ci
t
y
of
Sa
n
Lu
i
s
Ob
i
s
p
o
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
St
u
d
y
Cleath‐Harris
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
Se
n
i
o
r
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
II
I
Se
n
i
o
r
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
II
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
I
St
a
f
f
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
II
Cl
e
r
i
c
a
l
/
Ad
m
i
n
To
t
a
l
La
b
o
r
Ho
u
r
s
T
o
t
a
l
Fe
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
5
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
5
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
4
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
1Admin / ClericalTotal Labor HoursTotal FeeLabor CostTotal Labor CostExpensesTotal Fee
0P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
an
d
Me
e
t
i
n
g
s
2
3
0
0
3
0
2
5
1
0
8
8
$
1
5
,
8
0
7
2
4
0
1
3
2
1
2
5
1
$
1
1
,
4
9
3
$
0
$
2
5
,
7
6
9
$
1
,
5
3
1
$
2
7
,
3
0
0
0.
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
15
4
1
0
2
9
$
4
,
1
0
3
1
2
1
2
$
1
,
6
2
8
$
0
$5,430$301$5,731
0.
2
K
i
c
k
o
f
f
Me
e
t
i
n
g
3
4
6
1
3
$
2
,
3
4
4
3
3
6
$
1
,
4
5
9
$
0
$3,596$208$3,804
0.
3
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Sc
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
3
4
6
1
3
$
2
,
3
4
4
3
.
5
4
1
8
.
5
$
1
,
9
4
3
$
0
$4,043$244$4,287
0.
4
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
3
4
6
1
3
$
2
,
3
4
4
3
.
5
4
1
8
.
5
$
1
,
9
4
3
$
0
$4,043$244$4,287
0.
5
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
a
b
l
e
Re
v
i
e
w
Me
e
t
i
n
g
2
3
3
8
$
1
,
5
1
7
2
2
4
$
9
7
3
$
0
$2,318$172$2,490
0.
6
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
As
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
/
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Co
n
t
r
o
l
(Q
A
/
Q
C
)
1
2
12
$
3
,
1
5
3
1
2
1
2
$
3
,
5
4
8
$
0
$6,338$363$6,701
1
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
0
0
0
2
9
0
1
1
$
1
,
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
1
,
5
5
0
$
0
$
1
,
5
5
0
1.
1
S
t
u
d
y
ar
e
a
1
6
7
$
9
7
7
0
$
0
$
0
$977$0$977
1.
2
G
o
a
l
s
an
d
ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
1
3
4
$
5
7
3
0
$
0
$
0
$573$0$573
2W
a
t
e
r
Su
p
p
l
i
e
s
an
d
Ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
0
0
0
3
1
6
0
1
9
$
2
,
6
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
2
,
6
6
3
$
0
$
2
,
6
6
3
2.
1
W
a
t
e
r
su
p
p
l
y
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
1
4
5
$
7
0
8
0
$
0
$
0
$708$0$708
2.
2
W
a
t
e
r
de
m
a
n
d
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
1
8
9
$
1
,
2
4
7
0
$
0
$
0
$1,247$0$1,247
2.
3
W
a
t
e
r
pr
i
c
i
n
g
1
4
5
$
7
0
8
0
$
0
$
0
$708$0$708
3W
a
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
an
d
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
$1
6
8
1
0
2
.
5
1
3
0
1
6
.
5
$
2
,
6
5
5
$
0
$
2
,
6
2
6
$
1
9
7
$
2
,
8
2
3
3.
1
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
0.
5
0
.
5
$
8
4
0
.
5
1
.
5
8
1
0
$
1
,
5
9
2
$
0
$1,558$118$1,676
3.
2
F
u
t
u
r
e
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
0.
5
0
.
5
$
8
4
0
.
5
1
5
6
.
5
$
1
,
0
6
3
$
0
$1,068$79$1,147
4T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
Re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
$
1
6
8
2
0
4
6
0
1
2
$
2
,
2
2
3
$
0
$
2
,
2
2
7
$
1
6
5
$
2
,
3
9
1
4.
1
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
wa
t
e
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
0.
5
0
.
5
$
8
4
1
2
4
7
$
1
,
2
5
6
$
0
$1,247$93$1,340
4.
2
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
wa
t
e
r
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
of
RW
Q
C
B
0
.
5
0
.
5
$
8
4
1
2
2
5
$
9
6
7
$
0
$979$72$1,051
5R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Ma
r
k
e
t
/
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
1
0
0
6
1
6
0
2
3
$
3
,
5
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
2
$
5
9
1
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
,
9
6
8
$
1
4
4
$
1
9
,
1
1
2
5.
1
U
p
d
a
t
e
ma
r
k
e
t
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
4
1
6
2
0
$
2
,
9
3
0
0
$
0
$
0
$2,830$100$2,930
5.
2
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
hy
d
r
o
g
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
1
2
3
$
5
9
0
2
2
$
5
9
1
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$16,138$44$16,182
6P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
6
8
0
2
7
6
6
0
1
0
7
$
1
7
,
4
6
8
1
4
0
4
5
6
9
0
1
2
8
$
2
2
,
7
1
7
$
0
$
3
7
,
9
0
2
$
2
,
2
8
3
$
4
0
,
1
8
5
6.
1
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
an
d
de
s
i
g
n
as
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
1
2
2
5
$
8
6
0
2
6
8
1
6
$
2
,
8
9
5
$
0
$3,540$214$3,755
6.
2
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
sc
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
2
4
8
2
0
3
4
$
5
,
7
0
2
2
1
4
2
2
3
8
$
6
,
4
4
8
$
0
$11,473$678$12,150
6.
3
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
an
d
ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
2
4
8
3
6
5
0
$
7
,
9
6
1
6
2
4
3
2
6
2
$
1
0
,
9
8
7
$
0
$17,834$1,114$18,948
6.
4
W
a
t
e
r
ri
g
h
t
s
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
6
2
9
$
1
,
6
3
2
1
1
$
2
9
6
$
0
$1,805$122$1,927
6.
5
N
o
pr
o
j
e
c
t
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
1
$
1
6
8
1
1
3
5
$
9
2
1
$
0
$1,021$68$1,089
6.
6
W
a
t
e
r
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
1
6
7
$
9
7
7
1
1
$
2
9
6
$
0
$1,251$22$1,273
6.
7
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
re
s
u
l
t
s
1
1
$
1
6
8
1
4
5
$
8
7
5
$
0
$978$65$1,043
7
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Pl
a
n
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
1
4
$
2
,
1
2
1
3
0
8
1
8
0
2
9
$
5
,
0
2
0
$
0
$
6
,
6
6
9
$
4
7
2
$
7
,
1
4
1
7.
1
P
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
4
1
0
1
4
$
2
,
1
2
1
3
8
1
8
2
9
$
5
,
0
2
0
$
0
$6,669$472$7,141
8S
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
In
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
6
0
0
6
1
0
0
2
2
$
4
,
0
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
3
,
8
8
3
$
2
0
0
$
4
,
0
8
3
8.
1
S
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
3
3
5
1
1
$
2
,
0
4
2
0
$
0
$
0
$1,942$100$2,042
8.
2
P
u
b
l
i
c
ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
3
3
5
1
1
$
2
,
0
4
2
0
$
0
$
0
$1,942$100$2,042
9
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
0
0
0
8
1
4
0
2
2
$
3
,
4
3
2
5
0
8
1
4
0
2
7
$
5
,
0
3
2
$
0
$
7
,
8
9
1
$
5
7
3
$
8
,
4
6
4
9.
1
P
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
0
$
0
1
4
8
1
3
$
2
,
2
1
7
$
0
$2,053$164$2,217
9.
2
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
(C
E
Q
A
)
0
$
0
1
2
6
9
$
1
,
5
4
6
$
0
$1,432$115$1,546
9.
3
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
go
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
3
6
9
$
1
,
4
1
3
0
.
5
0
.
5
$
1
4
8
$
0
$1,450$111$1,561
9.
4
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
fi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
pl
a
n
an
d
re
v
e
n
u
e
pr
o
g
r
a
m
3
8
1
1
$
1
,
6
8
3
0
.
5
0
.
5
$
1
4
8
$
0
$1,720$111$1,831
9.
5
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
2
2
$
3
3
6
2
2
4
$
9
7
3
$
0
$1,237$72$1,309
10
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
St
u
d
y
3
0
0
3
6
5
6
0
9
5
$
1
4
,
9
6
3
5
0
4
8
6
0
0
1
1
3
$
1
9
,
3
2
5
$
0
$
3
2
,
2
5
7
$
2
,
0
3
1
$
3
4
,
2
8
8
10
.
1
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
Dr
a
f
t
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
St
u
d
y
1
1
0
1
6
2
7
$
4
,
2
9
2
2
1
4
1
8
3
4
$
5
,
8
6
9
$
0
$9,526$635$10,161
10
.
2
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
Fi
n
a
l
Dr
a
f
t
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
1
1
6
2
4
4
1
$
6
,
3
7
9
2
2
2
2
8
5
2
$
8
,
8
4
3
$
0
$14,367$855$15,222
10
.
3
F
i
n
a
l
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
St
u
d
y
1
1
0
1
6
2
7
$
4
,
2
9
2
1
1
2
1
4
2
7
$
4
,
6
1
3
$
0
$8,363$542$8,905
39
8
‐
12
4
22
2
10
40
3
$
6
5
,
9
4
3
56
‐
12
9
182 12 378.5$69,057$15,000$142,405$7,595$150,000
6/
2
6
/
2
0
1
5
ALL FIRMS
Co
l
u
m
n
To
t
a
l
s
HDR
WS
C
Ta
s
k
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Ta
s
k
No
.
Pa
g
e
1 of
1
9.c
Packet Pg. 96
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
c
-
W
S
C
R
W
F
P
S
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
1
1
-
2
0
-
2
0
1
5
(
1
2
1
9
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
u
d
y
)