HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-19-2016 Item 12 - Margarita & Foothill Lift Station Replacements Spec No. 91214 Contract Amendment No. 1
Meeting Date: 1/19/2016
FROM: Carrie Mattingly, Director of Utilities
Dave Hix, Deputy Director - Wastewater
Prepared By: Jennifer Metz, Utilities Project Manager
SUBJECT: MARGARITA & FOOTHILL LIFT STATION REPLACEMENTS, SPEC.
NO. 91214, CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Approve a contract amendment of $104,854 for the design services for the Margarita and
Foothill Lift Station Replacements, Spec. No. 91214; and
2. Approve a Budget Amendment Request of $104,854 from Sewer Fund Working Capital to
the project’s design phase to support this request; and
3. Approve increases in the 2016-17 construction budget from $1,100,000 to $1,600,000 and
the construction management budget from $125,000 to $155,000 for the Foothill Lift Station
Replacement.
DISCUSSION
The Margarita lift station was put into service in 1971 and serves approximately 25 acres with 91
parcels as well as planned development in the Margarita Specific Plan Area. The equipment at
Foothill lift station was originally installed in 1962 to serve the Broad Street and Orcutt area, but
was removed and warehoused, then reconfigured and installed in its present location in 1986.
The station serves approximately 20 acres with 43 parcels on the west end of Foothill Boulevard
near the City limits. Because of their age and condition, these lift stations and associated force
mains were prioritized for replacement in the 2015-16 and 2016-17 fiscal years.
On November 19, 2013 the City Council approved the issuance of the Request for Proposals
(RFP) for Design Services for the Margarita and Foothill Lift Station Replacement project. On
December 19, 2013 the City received proposals from five consulting firms to provide the
requested services. The City awarded a contract for design services for the Margarita and
Foothill lift station replacements, Spec. No. 91214 to Michael K. Nunley & Associates (MKN)
on March 4, 2014 for $199,852. The design phase of the project includes preparing a set of plans
and specifications for the replacement of each lift station. To date, MKN has completed 90
percent plans and specifications for the Margarita lift station replacement and is on schedule to
complete the construction documents in 2016. For the Foothill lift station replacement, MKN
completed a feasibility study which identified significant constraints including limited site area,
12
Packet Pg. 260
access, and storm drain infrastructure at the existing site forcing the City to identify another site
for the replacement station. A potential site was identified southwest on Foothill Boulevard. This
site would also accommodate future service to property identified in the LUCE Update
completed in November 2014.
The revised design services scope for the Foothill lift station replacement includes a new
feasibility study, design of an additional 560 feet of gravity main and an additional 950 feet of
force main components, design of approximately 1,750 feet of fiber optic conduit for SCADA
communication, surveying, geotechnical investigation, utility research, potholing, property
research, preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits, and construction phase engineering
support. Additional scope was also added to the Margarita lift station replacement associated
with the project’s easement acquisition.
The additional design services scope is further described in Attachment A. The scope related to
property acquisition negotiations for the Foothill lift station replacement is described in
Attachment B.
Replacing the Foothill lift station at the alternate site will result in additional construction and
construction management costs for the construction of the additional gravity main, force main,
and fiber optic conduit for SCADA communication. These costs are estimated at $500,000 and
$30,000 respectively increasing the project’s construction budget from $1,100,000 to $1,600,000
and construction management budget from $125,000 to $155,000. Costs associated with serving
future development in the Foothill lift station flow basin would be addressed through Sewer
Fund development impact fees.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The recommended actions to amend a design services contract and increase the project’s
construction and construction management budget are not a project under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because no direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect
physical change in the environmental will result because of this approval. Once design is
complete, further environmental review will be performed.
FISCAL IMPACT
The 2015-17 Financial Plan, Capital Improvement Plan, pages 3-65 through 3-68 identified a
budget of $950,000 for construction of the Margarita Lift Station in 2015-16 including funding
for construction management and easement acquisition. Replacement of the Foothill Lift Station
is planned for the 2016-17 fiscal year with a budget of $1,275,000 for construction including
funding for construction management and easement acquisition.
The Sewer Fund currently has a balance of $10,082,000 in Working Capital to accommodate
Contract Amendment No. 1. The project budget is displayed below.
12
Packet Pg. 261
Fiscal Impact Summary
Costs By Type
Margarita Lift Station Current Proposed Change
Design 120,977 131,512 10,535
Easement acquisition 50,000 50,000 -
Construction 800,000 800,000 -
Construction management 100,000 100,000 -
Total 1,070,977 1,081,512 10,535
Costs By Type
Foothill Lift Station Current Proposed Change
Design 78,876 173,195 94,319
Property acquisition 50,000 50,000 -
Construction 1,100,000 1,600,000 500,000
Construction management 125,000 155,000 30,000
Total 1,353,876 1,978,195 624,319
Funding By Source
Current Proposed Change
Sewer Fund Working Capital 10,082,000 9,447,146 634,854
Total 10,082,000 9,447,146 634,854
A Budget Amendment Request in the amount of $104,854 is needed from the Sewer Fund
Working Capital to support this request for Contract Amendment #1.
ALTERNATIVES
Elect not to approve the contract amendment. The City Council may elect not to approve the
contract amendment at this time. Council may select this alternative if it believes the lift station
replacement should be deferred. Staff does not recommend this alternative due to the age and
condition of the lift stations.
Attachments:
a - Foothill Margarita LS Contract
b - Amendment to Agreement
12
Packet Pg. 262
MKN & Associates, Inc.
P O Box 1604
Arroyo Grande CA 93421
Tel: 805 904 6530
Scope Amendment #1 – Margarita and Foothill Lift Station Replacements
December 29, 2015
Jennifer Metz
City of San Luis Obispo
879 Morro Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Scope Amendment #1 – Margarita and Foothill Lift Station Replacements
Dear Ms. Metz,
The City has identified an opportunity to relocate the existing Foothill Lift station to an adjacent parcel.
The new lift station will receive flows that are currently directed to the existing Foothill Lift Station. To
accomplish this, the existing Foothill Lift Station will be converted or replaced with a manhole, and a
new gravity sewer line will be designed to the new site. It is assumed that a portion of the new gravity
sewer line will be located in Foothill Blvd. A new force main will be designed in Foothill Boulevard to
deliver flows to an existing manhole at Foothill Boulevard and Los Cerros Road.
MKN has developed this Scope Amendment to incorporate this revision to the project scope. The
revised scope includes the following additional work:
1. Design of approximately 560 feet of new gravity sewer.
2. Design of approximately 950 feet of new force main.
3. Design of approximately 1750 feet of fiber optic conduit and pull boxes between the proposed
lift station and Patricia Drive. MKN will specify conduit, pull boxes, and connection box at the
lift station control panel. It is assumed City will provide MKN with fiber Specification and tie-in
details at the traffic control box.
4. Preparation of a new feasibility study for the proposed lift station.
5. Topographic and boundary survey to include:
a. Acquire and review PTR for the following property affected by the proposed sewer
design: 052-351-041 (church property)
b. Research, determine and map the recorded property boundaries of the following
property: 052-351-041
c. Perform a design level topographic survey on the following properties:
APN 052-351-041 covering approximately 1.57 acres
Northwesterly portion of APN 052-351-037 covering 1,600 SF
d. Prepare easement legal description and exhibit for the following property: 052-351-041
e. Perform a strip topographic survey along Foothill Boulevard from the proposed lift station
to Patricia Drive.
6. Utility research along the proposed alignment
7. Geotechnical investigations and revised geotechnical report
a. The additional scope will include drilling three borings for the revised route and lift station
location. One boring will be in a landscape area of the church, one in the widened
shoulder on the north side of Foothill, and one in the southwest corner of the church
12.a
Packet Pg. 263
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Jennifer Metz
Page 2
Scope Amendment #1 – Margarita and Foothill Lift Station Replacements
property at the new lift station location. We have assumed that the City will prepare and
coordinate access agreements with the subject property owners of the church. Furthermore,
our planned work does not involve traffic control or removal of fences or trees. The borings
will be drilled to depths of 15 to 20 feet, as conditions dictate and allow, using a truck-
mounted Mobile Drill rig equipped with a 6-inch outside diameter hollow stem auger. During
the course of drilling, various soil samples will be obtained by means of ring-lined barrel
samplers and Standard Penetration Test samplers. Bulk soil samples will be obtained from
auger cuttings. Soils will be classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil
Classification System
8. Preparation of PGE service application
9. Preparation of Preliminary Design Report
10. Project meetings and coordination
11. An allowance of $10,000 to perform potholing in Foothill Blvd. is recommended to support
design of the new gravity sewer and force main. It is our understanding that Fiber-optic, high
pressure gas, and petroleum pipelines exist in the vicinity of the project. A recommendation
on the final extent and cost of potholing will be provided to the City once the presence of
potentially conflicting utilities is further identified.
12. Construction phase engineering support
13. Right of Way and Property Acquisition Support, Foothill Lift Station (Not Included)
It is our understanding that the City will negotiate these elements with the owner without
assistance from MKN. The proposed Scope of Work and fee does not include appraisal,
planning stage coordination and entry agreement support, or ROW acquisition for the church
property at 51 Foothill Blvd. We can provide these services at the request of the City for
additional fee. Our base scope includes obtaining a Preliminary Title Report from the property
to support the survey and basemap.
A budget spreadsheet is attached detailing the new task items. A summary of the additional
requested budget is presented below.
12.a
Packet Pg. 264
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Jennifer Metz
Page 3
Scope Amendment #1 – Margarita and Foothill Lift Station Replacements
The revised total contract amount would be $299,816. Work will be performed on a time and
materials basis, not to exceed the budgeted amount without prior authorization from the City.
Please sign and return a copy of this letter, indicating your authorization of this requested Scope
Amendment #1.
Sincerely,
Jon Hanlon, PE
Attachments: Budget Spreadsheet
12.a
Packet Pg. 265
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Sc
o
p
e
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
#1
‐
Ma
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
an
d
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
Li
f
t
St
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
‐
Sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
No
.
91
2
1
4
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Drafting
Administrative Assistant
Total Hours
ODCs
Subconsultant (AECOM)
Subconsultant(Earth Systems)Subconsultant(Survey)Subconsultant (Hamner‐Jewell)Subconsultant(Potholing)Total MKN Labor Total Cost
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ki
c
k
o
f
f
Me
e
t
i
n
g
1
1
2
1
7
$
300$ 317$
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
St
u
d
i
e
s
Me
e
t
i
n
g
1
2
3
1
7
$
435$ 452$
De
s
i
g
n
Co
n
f
i
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Me
e
t
i
n
g
1
2
3
1
7
$
435$ 452$
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
Ki
c
k
o
f
f
,
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
an
d
De
s
i
g
n
Co
n
f
i
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Me
e
t
i
n
g
s
2
2
4
5
0
$
600$ 650$
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
De
s
i
g
n
Re
p
o
r
t
s
Me
e
t
i
n
g
2
2
4
1
7
$
600$ 617$
50
%
De
s
i
g
n
Su
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
‐
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
2
2
4
600$ 600$
90
%
De
s
i
g
n
Su
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
‐
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
2
2
4
600$ 600$
Fi
n
a
l
De
s
i
g
n
Su
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
‐
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
2
2
4
5
0
$
600$ 650$
Mo
n
t
h
l
y
PM
re
p
o
r
t
s
8
8
1,320$ 1,320$
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
PM
an
d
Si
t
e
Vi
s
i
t
s
/
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
(A
l
r
e
a
d
y
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
)
17
1
7
2,805$ 2,805$
QA
/
Q
C
8
8
1,320$ 1,320$
Ta
s
k
1 Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
4
6
1
5
0
0
0
6
1
1
6
8
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 9,615$ 9,783$
De
v
e
l
o
p
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
Se
w
e
r
,
FM
,
an
d
La
y
o
u
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
4
1
0
4
8
2
6
3,110$ 3,110$
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
St
u
d
y
Re
p
o
r
t
48
2
4
2
2
0
2,380$ 2,380$
Ta
s
k
2
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
8
1
8
6
1
2
2
4
6
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 5,490$ 5,490$
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Ap
p
r
a
i
s
a
l
(M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
,
Al
r
e
a
d
y
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
)
4
4
1
,
6
5
0
$ 660$ 2,310$
RO
W
Ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
(F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
)
2
6
8
810$ 810$
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
an
d
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
(a
l
r
e
a
d
y
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
)
16
1
0
8
3
4
4,430$ 4,430$
Ta
s
k
3 Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
2
2
0
1
0
1
4
0
4
6
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ 1,650$ ‐$ 5,900$ 7,550$
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
Re
p
o
r
t
(F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
)
2
2
4
3
,
2
7
8
$ 600$ 3,878$
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
Ma
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
Le
g
a
l
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(A
l
r
e
a
d
y
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
)
4
4
1
,
6
5
0
$ 660$ 2,310$
PT
R
Ch
u
r
c
h
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
(0
5
2
‐35
1
‐04
1
)
2
2
,
5
0
0
$
270$ 2,770$
Ne
w
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
Su
r
v
e
y
an
d
2 Ch
u
r
c
h
Le
g
a
l
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
s
(T
C
E
an
d
Pe
r
m
.
)
2
4
2
8
9
,
0
7
5
$ 1,030$ 10,105$
Po
t
h
o
l
i
n
g
Al
l
o
w
a
n
c
e
44
10,000$ 540$ 10,540$
Ta
s
k
4 Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
8
1
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
,
5
0
0
$
‐
$
3,278$ 10,725$ ‐$ 10,000$ 3,100$ 29,603$
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
1 ‐
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Me
e
t
i
n
g
s
an
d
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
2 ‐
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
St
u
d
y
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
3 ‐
Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
Ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
4 ‐
Su
r
v
e
y
,
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
an
d
Po
t
h
o
l
i
n
g
12.a
Packet Pg. 266
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
Dr
a
f
t
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
De
s
i
g
n
Re
p
o
r
t
(F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
)
4
1
8
6
8
4
4
0
4,600$ 4,600$
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
Fi
n
a
l
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
De
s
i
g
n
Re
p
o
r
t
(F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
)
48
4
4
2
2
2
2,610$ 2,610$
Ta
s
k
5 Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
8
2
6
1
0
1
2
6
6
2
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 7,210$ 7,210$
Fo
o
t
h
i
l
l
Li
f
t
St
a
t
i
o
n
Ra
d
i
o
Su
r
v
e
y
(N
o
t
In
c
l
u
d
e
d
)
0
‐$ ‐$
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
Re
s
e
a
r
c
h
2
4
6
590$ 590$
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
La
n
s
c
a
p
e
Sh
e
e
t
s
(e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
)
2
1
6
2
2
0
2,650$ 2,650$
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
50
%
De
s
i
g
n
8
2
4
1
6
4
8
6
1
6
$
5,840$ 6,456$
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
90
%
De
s
i
g
n
8
1
6
2
4
4
8
5
0
$
61
6
$
5,400$ 6,066$
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
Fi
n
a
l
De
s
i
g
n
8
1
6
1
6
4
0
5
0
$
61
6
$
4,760$ 5,426$
Fi
b
e
r
Op
t
i
c
De
s
i
g
n
(2
sh
e
e
t
s
an
d
Su
r
v
e
y
)
4
8
1
6
1
,
3
2
0
$ 3,020$ 4,340$
As
‐Ne
e
d
e
d
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
(e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
)
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
‐$ 10,000$
Ta
s
k
6 Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
3
0
8
2
0
7
8
0
1
6
2
1
0
,
1
0
0
$
1,
8
4
8
$
‐
$ 1,320$ ‐$ ‐$ 22,260$ 35,528$
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
AP
C
D
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
0
‐$ ‐$
Ta
s
k
7 Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
00
0
0
0
0
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
Su
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
Re
v
i
e
w
(1
5
)
2
0
2
0
2,700$ 2,700$
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
RF
I
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
(5
)
8
8
1,080$ 1,080$
As
‐Bu
i
l
t
s
46
1
0
1,020$ 1,020$
Ta
s
k
8 Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
0
3
2
0
6
0
3
8
‐
$
‐
$
‐
$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4,800$ 4,800$
TO
T
A
L
BU
D
G
E
T
1
2
2
1
8
5
2
6
1
2
4
8
4
3
5
1
2
,
7
6
8
$
1,
8
4
8
$
3,278$ 12,045$ 1,650$ 10,000$ 58,375$ 99,964$
Bi
l
l
i
n
g
Ra
t
e
s
$/
h
r
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
16
5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
13
5
Se
n
i
o
r
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
15
5
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
11
5
Dr
a
f
t
i
n
g
80
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
45
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
to
be
re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
d
at
IR
S
ra
t
e
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
5 ‐
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
De
s
i
g
n
Re
p
o
r
t
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
6 ‐
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
7 ‐
Pe
r
m
i
t
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ta
s
k
Gr
o
u
p
8 ‐
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ph
a
s
e
Su
p
p
o
r
t
12.a
Packet Pg. 267
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Mike@mbslandsurveys.com
Michael B Stanton, PLS 5702 Msg: 805.594.1960
3563 Sueldo Street, Unit Q Cell: 805.440.4215
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Fax: 805.594.1966
December 23, 2015
Robert A Lepore, GISP rlepore@mknassociates.us
Michael K. Nunley & Associates, Inc.
PO Box 1604, Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
(P) 805.904.6530, (F) 805.904.6532
RE: Revised Proposal for Surveying Services – City of San Luis Obispo, Foothill Lift Station
Survey
APN 052-351, 037, & 041
Dear Robert:
Per your request, I am providing you with this revised proposal for surveying services required for
the Foothill Road Sewer Lift Station project. This proposal includes an optional task for the
topographic survey to include a 950’ long strip along Foothill Blvd. between Los Cerros Drive and
Patricia Drive. We have assumed that since this project is paid for with public funds, all field
employees will need to be paid prevailing wages. Based on the materials you have provided us,
we have determined the following scope of work.
OPTION 1A: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BAPTIST CHURCH SITE ONLY
(Portion of APN 052-351-037, APN 052-351-041, and Foothill Blvd)
This will include a field survey of the Baptist Church parcel and Foothill road sufficient to produce a
one-foot contour map, with planimetric features including; footprint of existing structures with,
surface evidence of utilities, trees (over 4” dia.), fencing, walls, curbs or edge of pavement and other
items which are visible and present and the time of the survey. The map will be drawn at 1”=20’
scale on 24” by 36” sheets. The vertical datum will be based on an official City of San Luis Obispo
bench mark.
Deliverables:
Hardcopies on 24”x36” bond
AutoCAD civil 3D files
PDF files
Estimated Fee range: $3850-4400
OPTION 1B: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR BAPTIST CHURCH SITE AND FOOTHILL ROAD
(Portion of APN 052-351-037, APN 052-351-041, and Foothill Blvd from Los Cerros to Patricia Dr.)
The project area will include all of the Baptist Church Street and the Portion of Foothill Blvd which fronts
the Church Property in addition to a strip of land 100’ wide and 950’ long extending from Los Cerros Drive
on the west end to Patricia Drive on the east end as indicated on the maps provided to us. This task will
include aerial photography over the site, the aerial control survey and compiling the topographic map.
MBS Land Surveys will provide survey control and the map will be compiled by an aerial sub-consultant.
This will involve obtaining new aerial photography suitable for compiling a topographic map with the
following specifications:
• Finish mapping scale 1”=20 feet
• Contours at 1-foot intervals
12.a
Packet Pg. 268
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Michael K. Nunley & Associates, Inc.
December 23, 2015
Page 2
•Product delivered in AutoCAD Civil 3d format
In addition to topography, the map will show planimetric features including; roads, buildings, fences,
power poles, trees, brush, and other features according to standard practice. Accuracy will equal or
exceed National Map Accuracy Standards for topographic maps compiled by photogrammetric methods.
The aerial flight can usually be scheduled within one week of the award of the contract. The aerial sub-
consultant will need two weeks to compile the topographic map after the date of flight. The vertical
datum will be based on an official City of San Luis Obispo bench mark.
Deliverables:
Hardcopies on 24”x36” bond
AutoCAD civil 3D files
PDF files
Estimated Fees –
Aerial Control Survey - Estimated Fee: $ 900
Supplemental utility survey: $1,800
Aerial Photogrammetric Mapping - Estimated Fee: $2,900
Total $5,600
2.RECORD BOUNDARY AND PLOT EASEMENTS
(APN 052-351-041)
This will include locating survey monuments in the vicinity of the project sufficient to orient record
boundary lines and record right-of-way lines along Foothill from the original map to the topographic
base map. Easements will be plotted from a current title report provided by the client.
Client Responsibilities:
Provide current Preliminary Title Report and all backup documents.
Deliverables:
Hardcopies on 24”x36” bond
AutoCAD civil 3D files
PDF files
Estimated fee: $1000-1350
3.LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
This will include preparation of legal descriptions and exhibit maps for the lift station site and
appurtenances. We will also address check comments from the City of San Luis Obispo.
Deliverables:
8.5”x11” Signed and sealed hardcopies
AutoCAD civil 3D files
Estimated fee range: $850-1250 per description
12.a
Packet Pg. 269
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Michael K. Nunley & Associates, Inc.
December 23, 2015
Page 3
Terms and Conditions:
The product will be delivered (weather permitting) within 30 days of receiving this signed contract. Payment is due
within 30 days of invoice date, with interest charged at 1% per month for past due invoices. AutoCAD files will be
released after full payment is received. Hourly Rates are as follows: Two-Person Field Crew: $185.00 per hour, Office
Tech: $75-90.00 per hour, One-Person Field Crew: $150.00 per hour, and Land Surveyor:$110.00 per hour. Extra
Services will be handled on an hourly basis after your authorization. Either party, with verbal or written notice, can
terminate this contract. This proposal is valid for 90 days.
Sincerely, Authorized to proceed:
_______________________________________
Michael B. Stanton, PLS 5702 Michael K. Nunley & Associates, Inc. Date
\\mbs-sbs\MBS Land Surveys\PROPOSALS\PROPOSALS SENT\Foothill Road - San Luis Obispo Lift Station-REV2.doc
12.a
Packet Pg. 270
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
a
-
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
L
S
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 1
THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered in the City of San Luis Obispo on
_______________________, by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a municipal
corporation, herein after referred to as City, and MICHAEL K. NUNLEY & ASSOCIATES, hereinafter
referred to as Contractor.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, in March 2014 the City entered into an Agreement with Contractor for Design
Services for the Margarita and Foothill Lift Station Replacements, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the scope of services to services related to design of
additional gravity and force mains, fiber optic conduit, surveying, geotechnical investigation,
utility research, potholing, property research, legal descriptions, construction phase engineering
support, and easement acquisition phase engineering support, and Contractor has submitted a proposal
for this purpose that is acceptable to the City.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations and covenants
hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The scope of services and related compensation is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit
A attached hereto.
a. Additional work to expand the scope of the project for the Margarita and Foothill
Lift Station Replacements to include the additional services per memorandum
dated December 29, 2015 at cost not to exceed $104,854.
2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed the day
and year first written above.
ATTEST: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
____________________________________ By:____________________________________
Jon Ansolabehere, Interim City Clerk Katie Lichtig, City Manager
12.b
Packet Pg. 271
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTRACTOR
_____________________________________ By:____________________________________
Christine Dietrick, City Attorney Jon Hanlon, MICHAEL K. NUNLEY &
ASSOCIATES
12.b
Packet Pg. 272
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
b
-
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
1
2
3
5
:
M
a
r
g
a
r
i
t
a
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
Page intentionally left
blank.