HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-19-2016 Item 14, White 2COUNCIL MEETING: O t9 'Zc7 ( (.�
ITEM NO., 1'-t
To: Maier, John Paul RECf `7
Subject: RE: 48 Buena Vista
F540 AN 1 9 2016
From: Codron, Michael CITY CLERK
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:59 AM
To: Linda White; Bell, Kyle
Cc: Maier, John Paul
Subject: RE: 48 Buena Vista
The plans provided to the City Council are the same plans reviewed by the Planning Commission on 10/28/15.
Michael Codron
Director of Community Development
aCITY OF
SHR LUIS OBISPO
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 -3249
E mcodron0slocity.orc
T 805.781.7187
C 805.540.0767
Community Development
Helping people turn their dreams into reality.
Bcc: City Council
From: Linda White ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:40 AM
To: Codron, Michael; Bell, Kyle; E -mail Council Website; Marx, Jan; Carpenter, Dan; Rivoire, Dan; Ashbaugh, John;
Christianson, Carlyn; Lichtig, Katie; Johnson, Derek; Dietrick, Christine
Subject: 48 Buena Vista
I am so confused by the many notices that I have received from the City over the past weeks regarding: postponement of City Council
hearing, addition of ARC meeting, cancellation of the same ARC meeting, additional memos added to the Council packet, wrong
plans posted in the Council packet on line, etc.
I have a few simple questions:
Does the Council have the same plans that were used by the Planning Commission when they denied the project at their October 2015
meeting?
If not, why not? The CC is hearing an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. The CC should be using the same information
that the PC used. They should not have different or enhanced information that was not available to the PC at the time of their decision.
I would like an answer to my questions SOON (as within two hours) as I have been preparing for tonight's meeting and want to make
sure that I am not the victim of a bait and switch scheme.
Linda White