Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-28-2014 TC Packets". 4 � Y 'Y 4 3' } Agenda Tree Committee TREE COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Monday April 28, 2014 Corporation Yard Conference Room 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA The complete packet of applications may be reviewed at the front counter of the City Clerk's office during business hours, located in City Hall at 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo. PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address. Comments limited to five minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred to staff, and if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting. OATH OF OFFICE: Swearing in re -appointed Committee member Ben Parker and Parks & Rec Representative Craig Kincaid to the Tree Committee. MINUTES: Approval of Minutes for March 24, 2014 TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS: 1. 257 Chorro St. 2. 2363 Leona Ave. 3. 902 Peach St. (continuance) 4. 1145 Murray St. NEW BUSINESS: Laguna Shores HOA request for a replanting extension for an approved tree removal from October 2013 at 1351 Vista Lago. OLD BUSINESS: Grange Hall: Landscape plan review. ARBORIST REPORT: Recap of the 31St Arbor Day celebration at Laguna Lake Park. ADJOURN to next meeting scheduled for Tuesday May 27, 2014 at 5:00 pm at the City Corporation Yard located on 25 Prado Road - Conference Room A. TREE COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2014 Corporation Yard Conference Room 25 Prada Road, San Luis Obispo MEMBERS PRESENT: Jane Worthy, Trey Duffy, Ben Parker and Scott Loosley STAFF PRESENT: Ron Combs PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. MINUTES: Approval of Minutes of February 24, 2014 Ms. Worthy moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Mr. Loosley seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS 1. 1309 Richard St./ 1425 Woodside Dr. (3 eucalyptus; pine) Joshua Moody, applicant, discussed the removal request and the plans for a new residential lot/configuration. He stated that the eucalyptus has experienced falling limbs in the past and presented a safety hazard, and that the trees were in a poor location regarding plans for installing a retaining wall, landscaping, and a pool. He also stated that the tree in the back would shade proposed solar panels and that the pine was in the way of the driveway retaining wall. He wanted to plant new trees along the property line to block the view of the adjacent commercial property. Mr. Combs reported that the pine tree's health was questionable, but the eucalyptuses were healthy. He agreed they were in a poor location for the proposed site development. Mr. Loosley felt the development excavation would affect the root zone of the eucalyptus and agreed the pine had health issues. Ms. Worthy felt the tree #3 was out of the development zone and might be retained. 2 Mr. Duffy felt that any removals should be contingent upon the development plan approval. Mr. Parker agreed with Mr. Duffy. Mr. Duffy moved to approve the removal request, based on undue hardship to the property owner, with replacement plan as proposed by applicant. He stipulated any removals were contingent upon the site development plans being approved. Mr. Loosley seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 2. 1229-1239 Fredericks (4 pines) The applicant discussed the removal request, stating that the large pines were creating damage issues with the irrigation lines, water main, sidewalks, and the foundation. Mr. Combs reported the large trees were healthy and causing some minor displacement. Joseph Bayshore, tenant, did not favor removing the skyline trees. He felt doing so would harm the character of the neighborhood, which was run-down. He also noted they provided a significant amount of needed shade and that other property tenants agreed with retaining the trees. Mr. Duffy did not see significant evidence of damage due to roots and stated the trees were an enhancement to the area. Ms. Worthy agreed. Mr. Loosley felt one of the trees had possible structural issues, but the other ones were healthy, signature trees. Mr. Parker agreed with Committee comments. Mr. Loosley moved to approve the removal of Tree #2 only, based on promoting good arboricultural practice, and required replacement planting of one 15 -gallon tree to be chosen from the Master Street Tree List and planted within 45 days of tree's removal. He further moved to deny the removal of the remaining three trees, as he could not make the necessary findings. Mr. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 3 3. Lot next to 918 Felicia Way (Pepper) Steve Franzman, applicant's representative, discussed the issues a neighbor had pertaining to severe allergies to the tree in question, due to pollen and root suckers, and stated that legal action might be considered, due to distress. Mr. Combs stated that the tree was healthy and he could not make his necessary findings for removal. Mr. Loosley was conflicted about removal, as the tree was beautiful and no official documentation regarding the allergy condition had been submitted and the afflicted neighbor was not present to discuss the matter. Mr. Parker agreed that medical documentation regarding the allergies was warranted if that was the basis for allowing removal. Mr. Parker moved to deny the removal request, as he could not make the findings necessary for removal. Ms. Worthy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. The Committee agreed to hear the matter again, should health documentation be presented with the removal request. 4. 750 Industrial Way (Eucalyptus) Albert Hummel, applicant, discussed the removal request and reported about past root failure and fallen tree due to armalloria being present in the soil and was concerned about this tree suffering as well. He also noted the area was filled with transients and there were plans by Marigold Center to try to "clean up" the area. Mr. Combs agreed with the issue of soil contamination. Mr. Loosley felt the large tree had poor structure. Ms. Worthy and Mr. Duffy agreed. Mr. Loosley moved to approve the removal request, based on promoting good arboricultural practice, and required replacement planting of one 15 -gallon tree to be chosen from the Master Street Tree List and planted within 45 days of tree's removal in conjunction with their land scape plan. Ms. Worthy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. rd 5. 1076 Pacific St. (3 liquid ambers) David Bowin, applicant, discussed the removal request and stated the trees were too large for the area, that their debris was creating trip hazard, and he was concerned the roots would cause damage. He wanted to replace the trees with a more contained species. He also stated that he could not fix the retaining wall with the trees in place. He discussed a replacement -planting plan. Mr. Combs reported that the trees were healthy, but agreed with the applicant's concerns. Jim Hugh, Greenvale Tree Co., stated the insurance company had indicated they might not continue coverage with the trees in place as is. Carol Tangeman, 1055 Pacific, felt if the new owner had replanting plan in place, she could favor the removal. Ms. Worthy agreed the two front yard trees could be removed, but favored retaining the backyard tree. Mr. Loosley felt the trees were in good shape, but approved of the replacement plan presented. Mr. Parker felt the trees in the front could be pruned. Mr. Duffy moved to approve the removal request, based on doing so would not harm the character of the neighborhood or environment, and supported the applicant's replacement plan as proposed. Mr. Loosley seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 6. 902 Peach (3 eucalyptus) Ken Carpenter, applicant's representative, discussed the removal request and reported that the sidewalk had been uprooted and the driveway was cracked and that the sewer had been impacted with roots. He felt the trees were too large for the small lot and removing them would not harm the character of the neighborhood. He felt they posed a liability issue due to limb droppage. 5 Mr. Combs stated that there had been some sidewalk and driveway displacement. Mr. Loosley felt pruning could mitigate the risk to building and data line interference. Mr. Parker agreed that a certified arborist could safety prune the trees. He would further consider the item if an arborist affirmed there was hazard and the applicant submitted a replacement -planting plan. Mr. Parker moved to deny the removal request, as he could not make the findings necessary for removal. Mr. Duffy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 7. 109 Highland (2 liquid ambers) Brian Uder, applicant, discussed the removal request and the displaced sidewalks and noted the roots were in the sewer line. He did not think the non-native trees were skyline trees and wanted to replace them with Western Redbud. Mr. Combs reported that they were healthy street trees that caused a good amount of displacement. Mr. Parker felt some of the driveway damage was due to settling. Mr. Duffy moved to approve the removal request, based on undue hardship to the property owner, and required replacement planting of two 15 -gallon trees to be chosen from the Master Street Tree List and planted within 45 days of trees' removals. Ms. Worthy seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. The Committee suggested using Eastern Redbud species instead. I NEW BUSINESS The Committee discussed Arbor Day ceremony, which will be held on April 19, 2014 beginning at 9 a.m. Mr. Parker discussed the cooperative city/residential tree -planting program in Oregon and suggested investigating whether there was grant money available for our area. OLD BUSINESS There was on-going Committee discussion on how to improve the removal application, with a thought of needing to go to two pages for including all information pertaining to the removal request. Mr. Parker noted there was a bad link on the City page leading to the Master Street Tree list. Mr. Combs distributed updated Grange Hall landscaping plans. The Committee agreed to review and discuss it at the next meeting, requesting that representatives from the Grange Hall be present for the discussion. ARBORIST REPORT Mr. Combs reported that he sent out a penalty/fine letter regarding the illegal tree removal at California/Marsh streets. The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. to next regular meeting scheduled for Monday, April 28, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Woske, Recording Secretary SC101'0 CITY % SA1 ! LUIS 0151 SpV 25 Prado Road . San Luis Obispo; CA 93401 (805) 781-7220 TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION **If your tree removal is related to property development or a remodel, submit your request through the Planning Department at 919 Palm Street as part of your Planning Application.** IMPORTANT: A tree removal application will only be considered if accompanied by a "sketch -man.' Include the street, sidewalk, buildings and all trees proposed for removal marked with an X. Please draw on the back of this form or a separate sheet of paper. This information will help during the Arborist's site visit and will expedite the application process. For Office Use Only: Entered Letterer="`'/ NOTE: If a tree does not meet the City Arborist's criteria for a non -fee removal, your application will be referred to the Tree Committee for review. If the removal is approved at the Tree Committee Meeting, a permit will be issued 10 days later, after the required posting period. Tree Permits are $81 per address, payable by cash or check only to City of San Luis Obispo. Tree removal applications must be received by the 2"d Monday of the month to be considered for the Tree Committee meeting held on the 0 Monday of the month. Owner's Name: Mailing Address: tv Applicant (if other than owner)q e.e- ra- Phone �D Zip Code--� C Phone (%S) , Applicant's Address: &bX /3 a3% Zip Code /L Address of Tree � X Street li? to # of Trees Type of Tree (common name Lki i tA- Dog in Yard? Yes orCN Reason for Proposed rt *Street Trees must be replaced with an approved tree from the Master Street Tree List available on our website ht_ttp:1f\,tN.w.s1odty.or L blic�nrcrl�stdccur e rs.asp�#sttrees . Private tree replacement is at the owner's choice. Application will be considered only if entirely filled out and signed by owner. If consideration of this application goes to Tree Committee, you or your agent are required to attend the meeting and will be notified. If lane closure is required to perform the tree removal work, an encroachment permit must be obtained from the City Public Works Department at 919 Palm Street. ow Any required "replacement trees" must be installed within 45 days after removal. Since tree removal permits are valid for 6 months, you may wait to pick up your permit until you are sure a replacement tree(s) can be installed. TREES MUST BE BANDED AT SHOULDER HEIGHT WITH TAPE OR RIBBON PRIOR TO ARBORISTS INSPECTION. MAIL or FAX comr Owner's Signature Applicant's Signatt The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in a8 of it services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 7Ai-7411 Rev. 5113 Mar 14 14 07:58a F76 Val a' -v,,;t.-, ail X !T.IS vAll p.2 SCANNED 3 C tact" -:c D. T -as -e ovz-1 applicailJo.�s ra- S"' t.e --14: 1j: '..-U ii n! a -3 23 Lr n 4-, as ;I io urnel ov %72- S SC i ep )C- 'Do Yij - LJ 43.tfj A�rs— LoA41,- - ^&,3 ET ro -e is,-C�I' be :-SpIpced vvit�h an, anlprovsd, ,,Be f( -Om `6-18 al .-vzJlable cm, ol-rll -a ici.J1 as cons;dered Only H en-tirelyfille'd cw anCi --js Eipphc;al:,O- gc;es tv T,.-ap- Committee, you, &, ,-c,,LI- agan,' &;-a requ be n3tifi�-&. 0 i L,.; I : 0 V o s D e p a r io -1 a r t a: 91alt -i 1 S C et. raj-laW '. L aes" mus'L- be inst-alled vvithin 40- doy:-z a -."Ce- . i -Se 3 710 va �71 A I" S i:, val!'d �Q- 5 Voll :i!?;; 1-V21A tc p dk up your permil' Ln6l -rojz= slj"- !. 'ec!I ,�PU- F7'SL . FtDt-.'s-'. 2-= Prade, G868 Ci R pi's S' -m —11 S. o. - Sar. Luis Obispc To i:,dude the disablod in all of it sZrvices, prograr,,s and accimi'-s. Mar 14 14 07:580 elm isE Lo 0, 3c, �w �m $ Ub O>y Po Q 9 S BUSHNELL ST..& s 9 FLORENCE ST. 2.'.90 7M4 7.%7.• �9 z —J� s LEONA ST � 06+-76 p.3 NOW, Q 1 0.0, Sp O- Qp 9N I Ip 4 r �* 47 {f.97 4r -m 30 N ra�om�a�c��=®tip n �- s LEONA ST � 06+-76 p.3 NOW, Q Mar 14 14 07:58a P.1 a 77 To: San Luis Obispo City Arborist - Attn: Ron _... _ Combs Fax number: 805.542.9868 # of Pages (including cover sheet): 3 Arbor First - From: Robert Schreiber 170 Terra Street i, Fax number: 805.772.5400 Morro Bay, CA 93442 805.772.5400 E-mail: arborfirst@sbcglobal.net www.arborfiirst.com Date: 3/14/2014 Regarding: Tree Removal Application 2363 Leona Ave., SLO Phone number for fallow -up: 805.441.3715 Comments: Dear Ron: i Attached please find the San Luis Obispo TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION for 2363 Leona Avenue as well as a sketch map. The trees are along the side of the property between 2363 & 2359 Leona Avenue. They have been marked with colored tape for clear identification. As indicated on the application, the trees are destroying the house foundation and walkways and are intruding into the water lines and storm sewers. I believe that they should be removed as soon as possible. Thanks for your consideration of this application as soon as possible. Sincerely, Robert Schreiber city of San lul s OBISPO 25 Prado Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7220 For Office Use Only: SCANNED TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION **i, your tree removal is related to. property development or a remodel, submit your request Entered�J�/� through the Planning Department at 919 Palm Street as part of your Planning Application.** Letter 10 IMPORTANT: A tree removal application will only be considered if accompanied by a "sketch -map." Include the street, sidewalk, buildings and all trees proposed for removal marked with an X. Please draw on the back of this form or a separate sheet of paper. This information will help during the Arborist's site visit and will expedite the application process. NOTE: If a tree does not meet the City Arborist's criteria for a non -fee removal, your application will be referred to the Tree Committee for review. If the removal is approved at the Tree Committee Meeting, a permit will be issued 10 days later, after the required posting period. Tree Permits are $81 per address, payable by cash or check only to City of San Luis Obispo. Tree removal applications must be received by the 2nd Monday of the month to be considered for the Tree Committee meeting held on the 4th Monday of the month. Owner's Name: No e.l C.4 $±I I ) qzi n $ Phone (yd f) 13 $3 S56 Mailing Address:.. Q%1 3 0 0- l b eni Zip Code 7 57""0 -�z- U Applicant (if other than owner) Phone (-6 o —�d 9 3 �j-,`�— Applicant's Address:_'z i `�D �o�� �,� Leh. Zip Code 3 5 Aadress of Tree _IqOo2 Ile, 6 C.h X Street F, _� # of Trees______ Type of Tree (common name) /z-,, s Dog in Yard? Yes or No Reason for removal: A a L,,�s �e j- s Y, . �,, , „ -1 . `i-= o Proposed replacement tree (required*) *Street Trees must be replaced with an approved tree from the Master Street Tree List available on our website http://www.slocity.org/publicworks/documents.asp#sttrees . Private tree replacement is at the owner's choice. ➢ Application will be considered only if entirely filled out and signed by owner. If consideration of this application goes to Tree Committee, you or your agent are required to attend the meeting and will be notified. ➢ If lane closure is required to perform the tree removal work, an encroachment permit must be obtained from the City Public Works Department at 919 Palm Street. ➢ Any required "replacement trees" must be installed within 45 days after removal. Since tree removal permits are valid for 6 months, you may wait to pick up your permit until you are sure a replacement tree(s) can be installed. TREES MUST BE BANDED, AT SHOULDER HEIGHT WITH TAPE OR RIBBON PRIOR TO ARBORIST'S INSPECTION MAIL or FAX completed form to: City Arborist 25 Prado Rd., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Fax (805) 542-9868 (,.Yner's Signature Date Applicant's Signature Date 3 ` The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to includ he disabled in all of it services, programs and activities. Telecom unications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410. Rev. 5/13 +„f w � :; .� _ .. 03x'06/2014 16:56 14088677687 THE UPS STORE 1291 PAGE 01/01 March 6, 2014 Re: Tree Removal To Whom It May Concern: I authorize Ken Carpenter, on behalf of :me, Noel Castellanos, to act as my agent. I have a tree removal request on any property at 902 Peach Street, San Luis Obispo, CA. Thank you, bel Castellanos 20430 Williams Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 930-8380 9 �IIIIIIIIII) IIIIIIIII ` �� SCANNED r" ,l •ii r����; kNif� y, 4 , ' clay of San WI s OBISPO 25 Prado Road _ San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7220 For Office Use Only: .TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION Entered4//14f14 **If your tree removal is related to property development or a remodel, submit your request through the Planning Department at 919 Palm Street as part of your Planning Application.** Letter IMPORTANT: A tree removal application will only be considered if accompanied by a "sketch -map." Include the street, sidewalk, buildings and all trees proposed for removal marked with an X. Please draw on the back of this form or a separate sheet of paper. This information will help during the Arborist's site visit and will expedite the application process. NOTE: If a tree does not meet the City Arborist's criteria for a non -fee removal, your application will be referred to the Tree Committee for review. If the removal is approved at the Tree Committee Meeting, a permit will be issued 10 days later, after the required posting period. Tree Permits are $81 per address, payable by cash or check only to City of San Luis Obispo. Tree removal applications must be received by the 2nd Monday of the month to be considered for the Tree Committee meeting held on the 4th Monday of the month. Owner's Phone (�)_"� Mailing Address:`a ���\C' �. ���cm L C�� \ Zip Code<�(-I` R Applicant (if other than owner) `(�\'c`c��Q��O \SOQ�'(��C3h.) Phone Applicant's Address:\\VaD �cx � cue , c � . S� Zip Code Q O Address of Tree\\y-5 X Street # of Trees 1 Type of Tree (common name)Dog in Yard? Yes or No Reason for remova Proposed replacement tree (requi *Street Trees must be replaced with an approved tree from the Master Street Tree List available on our website http://www.slocity.or.q/publicworks/documents.asp#sttrees. Private tree replacement is at the owner's choice. ➢ Application will be considered only if entirely filled out and signed by owner. If consideration of this application goes to Tree Committee, you or your agent are required to attend the meeting and will be notified. ➢ If lane closure is required to perform the tree removal work, an encroachment permit must be obtained from the City Public Works Department at 919 Palm Street. ➢ Any required "replacement trees" must be installed within 45 days after removal. Since tree removal permits are valid for 6 months, you may wait to pick up your permit until you are sure a replacement tree(s) can be installed. TREES MUST BE BANDED AT SHOULDER HEIGHT WITH TAPE OR RIBBON PRIOR TO ARBORIST'S INSPECTION. MAIL or FAX completed form to: City Arborist 25 Prado Rd., San Luis Obispo, CA .93401 Fax (805) 542-9868 Owner's Sig Applicant's Signatmr-js= The City of San Luis Obispo is 781-7410. Date —\ -\k-\- the disabled in all of it services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) Rev. 5/13 po itr 004 t4 CI - 0 10 1,0 Ferguson, Julie From: Combs, Ron Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 2:34 PM To: Ferguson, Julie Subject: FW: Laguna Shores tree removal Add this under New Business From: JANET WOOD ,[mailto:bwmgtl gmail.coml Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:14 PM To: Combs, Ron Cc: Dottie Thompson; Harriet Ross; Heitzman, Suzanne; Lloyd, Danielle; Seymour, Sharon; Triplett, Will; Tupper, Andrew Subject: Re: Laguna Shores tree removal Ron, in regards to the trees removed at Laguna Shores, the HOA would like to be added to the agenda at the next Tree Committee meeting April 28 to request an extension. What time and where do they meet? Thank you, Janet Wood B&W Management On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Combs, Ron <rcombs ,slocit .ororg> wrote: Hi Janet, The reason this did not go to Tree Committee for review is that the trees were to be replaced. The existing pines did show signs of Beatles and Pitch Canker. They can hang on for years sometimes before fully succumbing to the disease and sometimes they die completely in six months. I felt it was appropriate to approve knowing they would be replaced as stated on the application. I believe that there are neighbors that are willing to water until irrigation can be updated as part of your long term landscape plans. I do not have the ability to grant an exception to our requirement. I will hold off on any further action If you would like to address this item at the next Tree Committee Meeting. I can arrange to put you on our next agenda. The next Tree Committee Meeting is April 28th. Let me know by April 10th and I will be able to agenize your item. Thank you, From: JANET WOOD [mailto:bwmgt10gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 11:28 AM To: Combs, Ron Cc: Bunyon Bros. Tree Service Subject: Laguna Shores tree removal Mr. Combs, I am the property manager for Laguna Shores and understand a resident has complained about the tree removal done by the HOA. At the time, we were unaware of an ordinance that requests trees be replanted within 45 days. Laguna Shores is undergoing landscape refurbishment to improve the property with draught tolerant plants. They have divided the development up into phases. The area where trees were removed was labeled as phase 2. Phase 1 is scheduled to be planted next week. Laguna Shores has contracted with All Seasons Landscape for architectural plans and installation. After phase 1 is complete, they expect to start the planning process for phase 2 with install in the near future. This is a five year project and will progress as funds allow but as you can understand, water costs are making it difficult to move any faster than they are. I request the City to grant an exception to Laguna Shores for an extension of the time to replant trees. I would be happy to send you the Board's accepted landscape plan for phase 2 when its available. Thank you for your consideration. Janet Wood B&W Management 135 S Halcyon Rd.. Arroyo Grande, Ca 93420 805-489-0864 fx 805-489-0883 1111 "III IY�04 CG (7) K L. IIIIIIII {III i�►►�IIIIII�';�If►�I c+ A city of sAn tui s OBISPO 25 Prado Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7220 JCnl �''YCAtr mam � For office Use Only: TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION Entered_J_J **If your tree removal is related to property development or a remodel, submit your request through the Planning Department at 919 Palm Street as part of your Planning Application.** Letter__J_/ IMPORTANT: A tree removal application will only be considered if accompanied by a "sketch -map." Include the street, sidewalk, buildings and all trees proposed for removal marked with an X. Please draw on the back of this form or a separate sheet of paper. This information will help during the Arborist's site visit and will expedite the application process. NOTE: If a tree does not meet the City Arborist's criteria for a non -fee removal, your application will be referred to the Tree Committee for review. If the removal is approved at the Tree Committee Meeting, a permit will be issued 10 days later, after the required posting period. Tree Permits are $81 per address, payable by cash or check only to City of San Luis Obispo. Tree removal applications must be received by the 2nd Monday of the month to be considered for the Tree Committee meeting held on the 4th Monday of the month. Owner's Nam Mailing Addre lone ( p Code Applicant (if other than owner) Applicant's Address: Address of T Code 3 7 � �p5 (\ �,Dx Street �l -�117� # of Trees 2— \r Type of Tree (common name) WAJTV ZV Dog in Yard? Yes or Reason for removal:f 4 ✓fps gD Proposed replacement tree (required*) 2y PKCP 0 *Street Trees must be replaced with an approved tree from the Master Street Tree List available on our website http://www.slocity.org/publicworks/documents.asp#sttrees . Private tree replacement is at the owner's choice. ➢ Application will be considered only if entirely filled out and signed by owner. If consideration of this application goes to Tree Committee, you or your agent are required to attend the meeting and will be notified. ➢ If lane closure is required to perform the tree removal work, an encroachment permit must be obtained from the City Public Works Department at 919 Palm Street. > Any required "replacement trees" must be installed within 45 days after removal. Since tree removal permits are valid for 6 months, you may wait to pick up your permit until you are sure a replacement tree(s) can be installed. TREES MUST BE BANDED, AT SHOULDER HEIGHT WITH TAPE OR RIBBON PRIOR TO ARBORIST'S INSPECTION. MAIL or FAX completed form to: City Arborist 25 Prado Rd., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Fax (805) 542-9868 prowk Owners Slgnatu 2 Date d ( I I , Applicants Signature Date 113 The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to in ude the disabled in all of it services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 761-7410. Rev. 5/13