HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-06-16 PRC Agenda Packet
Regular Meeting on Wednesday, April 6, 2016 @ 5:30p.m., Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Whitener
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Susan Olson, Douglas Single, Susan Updegrove and Jeff Whitener
Public Comment Period. At this time, you may address the Commission on items that are not on the agenda but are of interest to the
public and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Commission may not discuss or take
action on issues that are not on the agenda other than to briefly respond to statements made or questions raised, or to ask staff to follow
up on such issues.
PRC Meeting Agenda
1. Consideration of Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 3, 2016
2. Election of Chair and Vice Chair (Committee – 10 minutes)
3. Conceptual Design of Righetti Ranch Proposed Park Developments (Dave Watson – 60
minutes)
4. Community Focus Input – Sports (Ogden - 30 minutes)
5. Director’s Report (Stanwyck – 5 minutes)
6. Subcommittee Liaison Reports
Committee Liaison
Adult and Senior Programming
Bicycle Advisory
City Facilities (Damon, golf, pool, joint use)
Jack House Committee Updegrove
Tree Committee Olson
YSA Single
7. Communications
Adjourn to Regular Meeting of May 4, 2016 @ the Ludwick Community Center
APPEALS: Administrative decisions by the Parks and Recreation Commission may be appealed to the City Council in
accordance with the appeal procedure set forth in Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code.
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and activities.
Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance.
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
1
Council Chambers
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Wednesday, March 2, 2016, 5:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Whitener called the meeting to order at 5:31p.m.
ROLL CALL: Chair Jeff Whitener, Vice-Chair Ron Regier, Commissioners Ryan Baker,
Susan Olson , Michael Parolini, Douglas Single, Susan Updegrove
ABSENT: Ryan Baker
COUNCIL: None
STAFF: Shelly Stanwyck, Melissa Mudgett, Rich Ogden
Public Comment
Mary Jane Leimer thanked Commissioner for Open Space and trails. Advocate for more open space for dog
off-leash and dog parks. She commented that the $600 citation for dog off-leash is too steep and that the
Laguna Lake Park only area in San Luis to let dogs exercise freely. She identified that the community is
underserved in dog services and proposed Terrace Hill, Sinsheimer Park, and French Park as possible locations
for dog parks.
Directors Stanwyck clarified that the City has a leash law applicable to parks and open space areas and that
that the City Council adopted a major city goal to protect open space through maintenance and active patrol.
The $561 off-leash infraction includes Superior Court fees of over $450. Staff will return to Commission at a
later date with some discussion of off leash dog park locations and costed associated.
1.CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2016.
MOTION: (Updegrove/Regier) Approve the Minutes of February 3, 2016 as amended.
Approved: 6 yes: 0 no: 1 absent
2.PICKLE BALL PILOT PROGRAM UPDATE (Ogden/Mudgett)
City Recreation Supervisor, Rich Ogden, presented a summary of results for the Pickle ball Pilot Program. The
Program began in March 2015 with the intent to provide Pickleball programming over a 12-month period to
assess the community need and impacts to existing oversubscribed resources. Existing City court surfaces of
the Ludwick Community Center, Meadow Park and Stoneridge Neighborhood Park (all basketball courts) were
identified as having the potential for shared use and have been used for Pickleball and other programming this
past year.
SLOPB (Pickleball) Club representatives, John Stocksdale and Bobbi Binder, provided an overview of the
pickleball sport and the success of the newly formed pickleball club which has grown to 120 members.
City staff sought Commissions input regarding the pilot program offerings, criteria and about possible next
steps for the Pickleball Pilot Program and possible direction to staff.
Meeting Minutes
Parks and Recreation Commission
1-1
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
2
Public Comment
Peggy Koteen, SLO Resident and tennis advocate, was not in support of multi-use by Pickleball at French Park
as this location is already impacted and the city is underserved in tennis facilities.
Bob Goldman and Sally Brooks-Shulke, Board members for SLOPB Club, spoke about their love of the sport.
Weekly there are 20-40 people waiting to play Pickleball and encouraged the Commission to consider
expansion of the emerging sport.
Vicente Del Rio, tennis advocate, commended the pickleballers on their efforts. He was worried about
emerging conflicts between the tennis and pickleball groups. While he supporting use of pickleball, he did not
want to see this sport expand at the expense of tennis as tennis facilities are woefully underserved in San Luis
Obispo. He reminded the Commission about the tennis survey last year that provided 134 responses about the
needs of the tennis users.
Kathryn Thomas, Morro Bay Pickleball Ambassador, said there was a new type of paint for pickleball court
striping to be used on tennis courts. She added that there have been two pickleball tournaments in Morro Bay,
drawing players from all over.
Colin Jones, tennis and pickleball player, acknowledged that there are limited recreational court resources in
SLO City and supported a reasonable sharing of facilities at French Park on a temporary basis.
Barry Franz, Stoneridge Park resident and speaking on behalf of this wife – Barbara Franz, asked when the
painting specifications will be developed for permanent court markings at this location. He added that a local
contractor has offered these painting services for free.
Steve Davis, Tennis Advocate, shared a letter from community member (Scott Cleare) about concerns of
temporary tape lines and multi-use at French Park. With the SLO Highs School tennis courts under
construction this summer, it will push more tennis users to Sinshiemer, French and Islay Park tennis courts,
reducing the time for recreational tennis. Mr. Davis said he would be in support of shared use with a clear
delineation of time. He would like to see clear communications and the tennis/pickleballers work together to
advocate for facilities.
Several pickleball enthusiasts (Greg Macedo, Karen Howard, Robert Broughton, Kevin Duffy and Dave
Buckner) concluded the public comment period with testimony about their love of the sport and the physical
and social benefits pickleball adds to the quality of life. They urged the Commissioners to consider shared use
at the French Park location twice weekly.
Commission Feedback
1.Continued Pilot Program. The Commission was in support continuing the Pickleball Pilot Program
at its current level.
2.Expansion of Pilot Program. The Commission would support expansion of programming for
facilities that are identified as being currently underutilized.
3.Use of the French Park Tennis Court and Facility Use Feedback. The Commission requested
staff to develop additional public outreach and engagement which included a recommendation for a
user survey about the current and future uses at existing locations, including French Park, before any
program expansion occurs. The intent for this survey and the public engagement would be to identify
impacts to current users and to continue to lay the foundation for success and the possible expansion
of the Pickleball sport.
1-2
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
3
4.Five Year CIP. The Commission was not in support of dedicating the New Parks Amenities Capital
project (CIP in 2017-19) funding for pickleball. The Commission would, however, be in support of
reviewing future budget requests vetted as part of the City’s financial planning process. The
Commission urged the Pickleball group to consider fund raising efforts in support of dedicated court
construction. The Commission encouraged pickleball players to work collaboratively with the tennis
and basketball players for shared facility use. The Commission shared that it has been engaging
developers about this emerging recreational need in hopes to address pickleball as part of future
community designs.
5.COMMUNITY FOCUS INPUT – RECREATIONAL SPORTS (Ogden)
This item was postponed to next month to allow for greater outreach.
6.STATEMENT TO COUNCIL REGARDING PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
(Regier/Single)
MOTION: (Regier/Single) Authorize Parks and Recreation Commission Chair, Jeff Whitener, to submit a
letter to City Council expressing their desire of an update of the Parks and out of date Recreation Element of
the General Plan.
Approved: 6 yes: 0 no: 1 absent
7.DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Director Stanwyck addressed the three current Parks and Recreation Commissioner vacancies and encouraged
the Commissions to share this Advisory Body opportunity with any interested parties. She presented an
overview of Parks and Recreation Department upcoming items which included Rangers workday this week (35
members of Psi Kappa Phi) and cleared 7,500 pounds of trash. Monthly Ranger reported about citations issued
for dog off leash, smoking and night hiking infractions. Most citations were written for Cerro San Luis Open
Space. The annual Egg Hunt will be held this year at the Laguna Lake Golf Course March 26. Director
Stanwyck noted that this is a busy time with staff getting ready for Spring Break Camps and minimum
childcare days.
8.SUBCOMMITTEE LIAISON REPORTS
•Adult and Senior Programming: Commissioner Baker was absent, no report.
•Bicycle Advisory: Vice Chair Regier said the BAC did not meet, no report.
•City Facilities (Damon Garcia, Golf, Pool & Joint Use Facilities): Commissioner Parolini said the
Golf Restroom is currently under construction. The Golf Course hosted the first ever “Night Golf”
with approximately 40-50 rounds played. He said it was a lot of fun.
•Jack House Committee: Commissioner Updegrove reported that the Jack House elevator restoration
project is progressing. Friends of Jack House have joined “Art After Dark” with monthly events on
the first Friday of the month.
•Tree Committee: Commissioner Olson said there was a routine Tree Committee Meeting. Nothing
additional to report.
•Youth Sports: Commissioner Single said YSA reported $12,000 in program funding. Youth Rugby
reported an increase in participation.
9.PRESENTATION OF APPRECIATION PLAQUE FOR COMMISSIONERS REGIER,
PAROLINI AND BAKER (Stanwyck)
Plaques of appreciation for outgoing Parks and Recreation Commissioners, Ryan Baker, Michael Parolini and
Ron Regier were presented.
10.COMMUNICATIONS
1-3
City of San Luis Obispo, Title, Subtitle
4
Staff Mudgett reminded the Commission about the Public Art Master Plan Community Workshop on May 6th
at the Ludwick Community Center.
Commissioner Parolini asked that the Parks and Recreation Commission be involved in the Open Space
Roundtable Adhoc Committee. Director Stanwyck said she would share this request with the Natural
Resources Manager, Bob Hill.
Commissioner Olson urged the Commission to consider being proactive in designated off-leash dog park areas.
Director Stanwyck said this item will return to the Commission at a future meeting
Commissioner Updegrove encouraged all Commissioners to complete the #PixonPeaks challenge. She added
that #PixonPeaks received an Award of Excellence for marketing campaign through the California Parks and
Recreation Society (CPRS).
Adjourned at 7:57pm to the April 6, 2016 Regular Meeting in Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San
Luis Obispo.
Approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission on April 6, 2016.
________________________________________________
Melissa C. Mudgett, Parks and Recreation Department Manager
1-4
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: Study Session: Conceptual Review of the Neighborhood, Trail Junction, Linear, and Pocket public park proposals for the Righetti Ranch Project (VTM#3063) in the Orcutt Area Specific Plan (OASP).
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3987 Orcutt Road BY: David Watson, Contract Planner
CITY FILE NUMBER: TR / ER 114-14 FROM: Shelly Stanwyck, Director
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
(1) Receive presentation on proposed parks by the applicant; and
(2) Provide review/comment on proposed park improvement features and provide direction to
the applicant for preparation of Final Design Review materials to be presented to the
Commission at a future date. (Note: It is at that future time, a recommendation from the
PRC to City Council would be formulated for Council review prior to recordation of the
initial the Final Map for this subdivision.)
SITE DATA
Applicant Ambient Communities
Travis Fuentes, Dante Anselmo
Representative Chris Dufour, RRM Design Group
Zoning R-1-SP, R-2-SP & R-3-SP (Residential
designations) Open Space, Parks
Orcutt Area Specific Plan (OASP)
General Plan Low-, Medium- and High-Density
Residential, Open Space, Parks
Site Area 143.82 acres
Environmental
Status
A previously certified EIR (2010)
and an Initial Study-Mitigated
Negative Declaration (2015) were
adopted as part of the subdivision
processing.
1.0 BACKGROUND on DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IN THE OASP
Since adoption of the OASP, three (3) subdivision projects have been approved, and three (3)
additional projects have been applied for and are undergoing review at this time. These projects
total 702 residential units, and an estimated resident population of 1,643 persons, as follows:
Taylor-Wingate VTM#3044 approved October, 2013 142 units / 324 est’d residents
Righetti Ranch VTM#3063 approved May, 2015 304 units / 763 est’d residents
Meeting Date: April 6, 2016
Item Number: _______
VTM #3083
Righetti
Ranch
2-1
Righetti Ranch Public Park Proposals (3987 Orcutt Road)
Orcutt Area Specific Plan
Page 2
Jones Ranch VTM#3066 approved May, 2015 66 units / 136 est’d residents
West Creek VTM#3083 pending 2016 172 units / 374 est’d residents
Imel Ranch VTM#3094 pending 2016 18 units / 46 est’d residents
Of the five (5) projects, the Taylor-Wingate project is providing 1.0 acres of improved public
parklands as a part of their development, and the Righetti Ranch project is providing 15.0 acres,
which is the majority of the public parklands planned for the OASP.
2.0 SUMMARY of APPLICANT’S PROPOSED PARK PROJECTS
Tract 3063 (Righetti Ranch) would construct four (4) city parks, on-site trails and bike paths to
connect to nearby public trails, and also tie into the City’s regional networks of roadways, water,
wastewater and recycled water utilities.
Four (4) specific public parks are planned to be developed in phases under the approvals granted
in 2015 for the Vesting Tentative Tract Map. These include:
1. The planned “Neighborhood Park” of approximately 11.6 acres for the entire Orcutt
Specific Plan neighborhood.
2. An approximate 1.8 acre “Trail Junction Park” would be developed along the northern
boundary of the Righetti Hill open space area, and serve pedestrian and bicycle trails,
picnic-viewing areas, and a starting point for Righetti Hill and Edna Valley hiking trails.
3.A “Linear Park” of approx. 1.3 acres is planned for the western edge of the OASP to
provide resting/information points for systems of bicycle and pedestrian trails in the area.
4. An approximately 0.2 acre “Pocket Park” is planned along “D” Street.
The locations of these parks is generally as follows:
A complete set of parks exhibits is provided with your packets for Commission review.
2-2
Righetti Ranch Public Park Proposals (3987 Orcutt Road)
Orcutt Area Specific Plan
Page 3
Highlights of the proposed park amenities are as follows:
Righetti Ranch VTM#3083 Public Park Features
Park
Park
Features
Neighborhood
Park
Trail Junction Park Linear Park Pocket Park Maintenance
Park Size /
Acres-SF
11.6 acres
505,005 SF
1.8 acres
78,400 SF
1.3 acres
56,600 SF
0.2 acres
8,700 SF
Dedication
Occurs
Phase 1 Phase 1 and Phase 2 Phase 1 Phase 1
Construction
Occurs
Rough Grade in
Phase 1; Complete
Park in Phase 2
Construct Phase 2 Construct Phase 1 Construct Phase 1
Active Play
Courts
4 = Tennis Courts
1 = Basketball Courts
3 = Pickleball Courts
1 = Fitness station
1 = Pump track Public
Active Play
Fields
1 = Kids Playground
1 = Soccer (U19)
2 = Soccer (U8)
1 = Ranch-themed
Kids Playground
1 = Flexible Turf
area
1 = Climbing wall
1 = Synthetic
multi-use lawn
area
Public
Restrooms 1 = Restroom with
Maintenance Shed
Public
Community
Garden
12-20 plots
Orchard
Tool Shed
Produce Stand
Private - HOA
Picnic-BBQ
Facilities
and
Pavilions
BBQ pits w/Shade
Picnic Tables
Picnic Tables
View deck/telescope
Picnic Tables
Gazebo Pavilion
BBQ w/Picnic
Outdoor fireplace
Public
Lighting Security Public
Parking 94 car parking Bicycle parking 8 car parking Bicycle parking Public
Trails Pedestrian
promenade; Multi-
use
Dirt trail (hillside);
Multi-use; Hydration
station
Bike trail and UPRR
overcrossing to
Industrial Way
Hydration station Public
Kiosk-Info
Materials
Informational
Kiosk
Informational
Kiosk Public
Remaining (Future) OASP Public Park Features
Park
Park
Features
Taylor-Wingate
VTM#3044
Garay Ranch
(Program 2.3.3b)
Possible San Luis
Coastal School Site
(Program 2.3.3e)
Maintenance
Park
Size Acres ~ 1.0 acres ~0.9 acres ~4.0 acres TBD
Improvements TBD TBD TBD TBD
2-3
Righetti Ranch Public Park Proposals (3987 Orcutt Road)
Orcutt Area Specific Plan
Page 4
3.0 COMMISSION’S PURVIEW
The Parks and Recreation Commission is tasked with reviewing of the proposed park facilities
for the Righetti Ranch in the context of the Conditions of Approval (COAs) for the project, as
well as the guiding policies and programs contained in the OASP and Parks and Recreation
Element of the General Plan. Relevant excerpts from the VTM COAs, and the OASP are
included in the Project Analysis section of this report for the Commission’s reference.
Conditions of approval require the Righetti subdivider to present a detailed plan of
improvements to the Parks Commission, before proceeding with the recordation of the first final
map for the project.
The Parks and Recreation Commission’s guidance tonight will be used to provide directional
items to the applicant, so that they may return with a final design that the PRC can review, and if
found acceptable, recommend City Council acceptance of the plans concurrent with recordation
of the initial final map.
4.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS
The applicants have provided a written description of their proposal for public parks in
Attachment 2, and conceptual park plans for the four (4) proposed parks in Attachment 3. The
details of these outlines will be the focus of the applicant’s pr esentation tonight, so we have not
repeated these elements here.
The following excerpts from the project COA’s and the OASP are provided for ready reference
in the event any questions arise that may benefit from these references.
COA #111. The subdivider shall dedicate all public lands, including the neighborhood park (Lot 312), with the
initial final map. This neighborhood park will be designed under the direction of the City’s Parks &
Recreation Commission with a recommendation to the Architectural Review Commission and City Council, who
will be responsible for the final design approval of the park.
COA #52. Separate plans shall be submitted for the public park improvements and for any deferred private site
development. Parking lot designs shall comply with the parking and driveway standards and Engineering
Standard 2010. All parking spaces must be designed so that vehicles can enter in one maneuver. Furthermore,
all spaces shall be designed so that vehicles can exit to the adjoining street in a forward direction in not more
than two maneuvers.
COA #44. Street trees are required as a condition of development. Street trees shall generally be planted
at the rate of one 15-gallon street tree for each 35 lineal feet of property frontage. Landscape plans may
include grouping of trees to vary this standard, to achieve visual variety within the subdivision.
COA#32. Rough grading of the park lot and completion of bicycle and pedestrian paths connecting Tract 3063,
Tract 3066, and adjoining OASP neighborhoods with the existing park facilities at Islay Park shall be required
with Phase 1 of the map.
COA #31. All bikeways shall be constructed per City Engineering Standards and the Highway Design Manual.
Final details of the bikeway connections to the adjoining streets shall be approved by the City. The proposed
path located between Street D-3 and the UPRR shall be revised to connect to Street C and Tank Farm Road in
accordance with the OASP.
2-4
Righetti Ranch Public Park Proposals (3987 Orcutt Road)
Orcutt Area Specific Plan
Page 5
COA# 11. Unless otherwise waived or deferred by the City, the subdivider shall improve all neighborhood trail
extensions to the limits of open space Righetti Hill Lot 328 to the satisfaction of the Natural Resources
Manager.
COA #9. The final location of the boundary between HOA open space Lot 322 and City open space Lot 321
shall be approved to the satisfaction of the City Natural Resources Manager depending upon the final trail head
location off Street D-2 and the area of the private/public maintenance interface.
COA #5. The subdivider shall dedicate Righetti Hill, all public Open Space and all public Park Land in fee to
the City, consistent with the OASP, in conjunction with or prior to the Phase 1 map recordation. The land shall
be granted free and clear of all encumbrances to the satisfaction of the City. Unless otherwise amended by the
City, the public lots include Lot 307, 311, 312, 316, 319, 320, 321, 324, 325, 326, and 328.
OASP Program 2.3.3a: Based on Policies 2.2.1, 2.2.2, and 2.2.3, and the anticipated unit development for the
Orcutt Area shown in Table 1-1. The OASP identifies 16.30 acres of active and passive parkland, including a
12-acre neighborhood park, a .25-acre pocket park at the end of ‘D’ Street, 1.54 acres of linear parkland
associated with the regional detention basin and a 2.5 acre ‘trail-junction’ park consisting of passive parkland.
In addition to these 16.3 acres, the City will pursue the development of approximately 4 acres of parkland as
part of a joint use facility with the San Luis Coastal Unified School District if a new school is developed within
or near the Orcutt Area.
OASP Program 2.3.3b: A 12-acre centrally located neighborhood park will be developed in the Orcutt Area.
10 acres shall be dedicated during Phase I development, and construction of the neighborhood park will occur
as identified in the Public Facility Financing Plan (PFFP) in Chapter 8. Facilities may include a playground
for young children, soccer and baseball fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, sand volleyball, picnic tables
and restrooms. Security lighting will be provided in the parking lots and at the restrooms but to avoid glare
impacts to surrounding residences, major night lighting will not be used at the park or ball fields. An example
of this park is shown in Figure 2.5: Neighborhood Park Plan. If development occurs on the Garay property, its
required parkland dedication (0.9 acres) shall occur in such a way as to augment the central neighborhood
park.
OASP Program 2.3.3c: A 2.5 acre ‘trail-junction’ park will be developed along the northern boundary of
Righetti Hill. Dedication of acreage and construction of the linear park will occur in as identified in the PFFP,
Chapter 8. The linear park will have multiple uses including paths for recreational bicycling and walking;
picnic areas for viewing the Edna Valley and a starting point for hikers to access Righetti Hill.
OASP Program 2.3.3d: 1.5 acres of park will be developed along the western portion of the Specific Plan Area
adjacent to the stormwater detention basin and wetland areas. The two pocket parks will provide resting points
and information areas in support of the Class I bicycle/pedestrian path. The bicycle/pedestrian path will
connect to the existing Class I bicycle path along the UPRR right-of-way and to the neighborhood park,
allowing for multiple recreational opportunities for residents and visitors to the park. Picnic tables, benches,
viewpoints, and educational signage about the wetland habitat project will provide additional recreational and
educational opportunities for users of the park (Figures 2.6 and 2.7). This park area will not have night lighting
to avoid impacts to wildlife.
Staff has met with the applicants and their team of consultants on several occasions and is
generally supportive of the conceptual designs and park improvements suggested in the
Attachment 3 graphics. Subject to PRC feedback, these individual park features can be
revised/modified to reflect a final recommendation by the Commission.
2-5
Righetti Ranch Public Park Proposals (3987 Orcutt Road)
Orcutt Area Specific Plan
Page 6
5.0 RECOMMENDATION & NEXT STEPS
The Commission should use the above Conditions of Approval (COAs) for the tract and OASP Program
criteria to evaluate the applicant’s park proposals. The purpose of this Study Session and is to provide
comments/suggestions about each park for future response by the applicant. Comments and suggestions
can include: approval, desired changes, direction that the proposal does not meet the PRC’s interpretation
for parks, and/or requests for added information and revisions.
Again, PRC final design review consideration will occur at a future public hearing.
For purposes of this study session staff recommends that the PRC provide specific feedback on each of
the four parks individually:
1.Neighborhood Park
2.Trail Junction Park
3.Linear Park
4.Pocket Park
ATTACHMENTS
1. OASP Vicinity and Ownership Map
2.“Righetti Parks” Introduction and Proposal, including demographic considerations, park
improvement and maintenance costs, and phasing
3. Righetti Ranch VTM#3063 Illustrative Parks and Open Space Plans (RRM Exhibits)
Figure 1 - Righetti Ranch
Tract 3063 Lots and Land Use/Zoning Configurations
2-6
Righetti
Ranch
Approved
2015
Imel
Pending
2016
Jones
Approved
2015
West
Creek
Pending
2016
Taylor-
Wingate
Approved
2013
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
R
i
g
h
e
t
t
i
R
a
n
c
h
P
a
r
k
s
P
R
C
4
-
6
-
1
6
2
-
7
Attachment 2
Righetti Ranch Parks
PRC 4-6-16
2-8
Attachment 2
Righetti Ranch Parks
PRC 4-6-16
2-9
Attachment 2
Righetti Ranch Parks
PRC 4-6-16
2-10