Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-25-2016 TC PacketAgenda Tree Committee TREE COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA April 25, 2016 Meeting begins at 5:00 pm Corporation Yard - Conference Room A 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA The complete packet of applications may be reviewed at the front counter of the City Clerk's office during business hours which is located in City Hall at 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo. PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address. Comments limited to five minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred to staff, and if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting. MINUTES: Approval of Minutes for March 28, 2016 TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS: 1. 1520 Santa Rosa 93401 2. 1670 Cordova Dr. 93405 3. 2279 San Luis Dr. 93401 4. 873 Leff St. 93401 5. 996 Vista Del Collados 93405 NEW BUSINESS: Arbor Day Foundation webinar participation. OLD BUSINESS: Progress on creating a pamphlet or brochure explaining tree requirements pertaining to the development process. ARBORIST REPORT: Re -cap of the Urban Forest division's EI Nino preparations. ADJOURN to next meeting scheduled for Monday May 23, 2016 at 5:00 pm held at the City Corporation Yard located on 25 Prado Road Conference Room A. ® The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Corp Yard Office at (805) 781-7220 at least 7 days before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7107. Minutes Tree Committee Corporation Yard Conference Room, 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo Monday, March 28, 2016 at 5:00 pm MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Olson, Matt Ritter Angela Soil, Ben Parker, Scott Loosley STAFF PRESENT: Ron Combs Mr. Ritter called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT There were no public comments. MINUTES: Approval of Minutes of February 22, 2016 Mr. Parker moved to approve the minutes as amended. Ms. Olson seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS 1. 2912 Flora (Oak) The applicant discussed the removal request and stated the tree was a "volunteer" growing too close to the house and its roots were damaging the retaining wall and lifting the walkway. She also noted that the roots were running close to the water and gas lines. She discussed plans to re -landscape with drought -tolerant plants and to widen the walkway. Mr. Combs agreed the healthy tree was in a poor location and he could not make his necessary findings for removal. 2 Mr. Loosley saw evidence of the wall cracking but felt the sidewalk issues might be due to settling. He noted the tree would just get larger and cause more damage. Mr. Ritter agreed it was the wrong tree for the space. Mr. Parker moved to approve the removal request, based on promoting good arboricultural practice, and required one 15 -gallon tree to be chosen from the Master Street Tree list and planted within 45 days of the tree's removal. Mr. Loosley seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 2. 1583 Royal (Tri -trunk redwood) The applicant discussed the removal request, noting concerns with "ponding" and drainage issues. He stated he roots were lifting the driveway and wall, as were affecting the neighbor's driveway as well. Mr. Combs agreed there might be lifting at the neighbor's property, but he could not make his necessary findings for removal. Mr. Loosley did not see significant damage on the applicant's property, but agreed there were some issues caused on the neighbor's driveway. Mr. Parker and Ms. Olson felt the tree would cause significant damage in the future. Mr. Ritter moved to approve the removal request, based on doing so would not harm the character of the neighborhood or environment, and required one 15 - gallon tree to be chosen from the Master Street Tree list and planted within 45 days of the tree's removal. Mr. Loosley seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 3. 1705 Diablo (Redwood) Ron Rinnell, applicant's representative, discussed the removal request, noting the drought stress issues and that the roots were causing driveway damage, damage to the sewer lateral, and possibly damaging the neighbor property. Mr. Combs stated he could not make his necessary findings for removal. Mr. Parker agreed that there were root issues and that the garage door was being affected by lifting concrete. He felt the stressed tree was in failing health. Mr. Ritter agreed and felt the tree would cause worse issues as it grew. Mr. Parker moved to approve the removal request, based on undue hardship, and required one 15 -gallon tree to be chosen from the Master Street Tree list and planted within 45 days of the tree's removal. Ms. Olson seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 4. 275 Madonna There was no applicant or representative to speak to the item. 5. 1752 Oceanaire (Liquid ambar) The applicant discussed the removal request and noted the chronic leaf drop year-round and that the constant seed pod production cause pedestrian problems. He was very concerned about droppage with small children playing in the area. He stated the driveway had just been replaced and was concerned that the roots would cause damage in the future. He wanted to replace it with two jacaranda trees and had plans to re -landscape. Mr. Combs noted it was a relatively healthy street tree. Mr. Loosley noted the gutters were lifting and that the tree had co -dominant leaders. Mr. Ritter moved to approve the removal request, based on promoting good arboricultural practice, and required two 15 -gallon jacaranda to be planted within 45 days of the tree removals. Mr. Parker seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 4 6. 3480 S. Higuera (3 London plane; 3 strawberry) The applicant discussed the removal request and the plans to expand the parking area in the Tribune parking lot. He submitted new planting and expansion plans. Mr. Combs noted the trees were relatively healthy and he could not make his necessary findings for removal. Mr. Ritter felt the plan to expand the parking area was solid and agreed with the 1:1 replacement with Arbutus marina. Mr. Parker moved to approve the removal request, based on doing so would not harm the character of the neighborhood or environment, and required replacement planting to be implemented from the proposed plan. Ms. Soll seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 7. 546 Higuera (Ficus) The applicant discussed the removal request, outlining the improvements planned for the property and the red house. He noted the driveway/approach needed to be realigned and that the tree was lifting the sidewalk. Mr. Combs stated he could not make his necessary findings for removal. The Committee discussed the scope of the project with the applicant. Mr. Loosley moved to approve the removal request, based on undue hardship, and required two 24" box trees to be chosen from the Master Street Tree list and planted within 45 days of the tree's removal. Ms. Soll seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Ritter reported that Trey Duffy had resigned his Committee position and that replacement interviews were in process. 5 OLD BUSINESS Mr. Combs discussed the project funding opportunities presented by the Measure G "extra funding" allocation and how it could benefit the Urban Forest division. He discussed the part-time position that could be created for a staffing assistant. The Committee favored staffing support being available to the department. ARBORIST REPORT Mr. Combs gave a planning and development update. The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. to next meeting scheduled for Monday, April 25, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Woske, Recording Secretary Urban Forest Services SCANNED ' 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401.3218 j +i+ 805.781.7220_ fax 805.542.9868 — ---- t slodly org t TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development, see Section E on back. OWNER: Rob & Terry Davidson ADDRESS: 1334 Oceanaire Drive C San Luis Obispo ( 805 ) 546 8217 rob@radavidson.net ZIP. 93405 APPLICANT: Same as Owner ADDRESS: CITY: PHONE: (C EMAIL: ZIP. Entered/a/ I 1 Letter: 4-5(oc1 '7S77 Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes ❑ No ® Unknown ❑ Dog in the yard? YesJ,o No ©/ 4 Safety threat to occupants and neighbors — Reason for tree removal . Y � �c�C � � �, ,CSPlease draw a sketch map in box below. Show building outlines, streets and only tree() to be removed represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form. Tree Species Araucaria Araucana (Monkey puzzle) Proposed Replacement Tree(s) 15 gal city approved Address of Tree(s) 1520 Santa Rosa St, SLO Crass -Street Buchon # Trees 1 n s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to inspection. By signing this application I agree to City Arborist or as a condition of t*¢ Property Owner's Signature Applicant's Signature my property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by nted by Tree Committee. Permit valid forr6 months. �J Bate oG % ��I (U aCj� to,)/r rl /�llW M(6 Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombsCaD-slocity.org 1520 Santa Rosa Street Tree Removal Supplemental information. This "Monkey Puzzle" tree is over 70 feet tall with a pronounced lean towards the apartment building next door. It grows large seed pods that weigh over 10 pounds and fall from high in the tree. Recently is has begun dropping branches that can weigh more than 2001bs. All of which pose an imminent threat to those below. If the tree were to fall the direction it is leaning it would demolish the two storey apartment building next door. Attached is an article from NBC news in San Francisco about a Bunya pine which is a close relative ad has seed pods of similar size. We feel that this tree is a large threat and liability and are asking for a permit to remove it for the safety of our tenants and neighbors. Here is a nicture of the tree sl the lean and a dropped branch. (rP�h IBC ftBAYAREA CLS PRINTTHIS �Clickab,ldy Powered by EAST BAY I NORTH BAY I PENINSULA I SAN FRANCISCO I SOUTH BAY Navy Vet Sues Park Service After 16 -Pound Seed Pod Falls From Tree, Crushes His Skull in San Francisco By Lisa Fernandez A Navy vet visiting San Francisco during Fleet Week had his skull crushed when a 16 -pound seed pod fell on his head He's now suing the federal government. Kim Yonenaka reports. (Published Thursday, Oct. 8, 201 S) Navy veteran Sean Mace was visiting San Francisco during Fleet Week last October and had gotten what he thought was a great view to see the Blue Angels soaring across the sky. He got to the San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park at the Fort Mason Center early to secure his spot hours before the show. He read a book. And he fell asleep. F-7. San Jose Considers Changes to Rent Ordinance He woke up — the next day in a hospital — after a 16 -pound pine cone, or seed pod, fell from a tree at the park, crushing his skull and causing him to have permanent brain damage, short-term memory loss and other cognitive issues. "He still has a tremendous degree of anxiety," Mace's San Francisco attorney, Scott Johnson, told NBC Bay Area on Thursday. "He's in constant fear of getting hit on the head. It's like a bowling ball falling from the sky and hitting you on the head." A warning sign now appears outside the park warning of the giant seed pods from Johnson filed a lawsuit on Mace's behalf Sept. 4 in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, citing dangerous conditions of public property and negligence on the part of the U.S. Dept. of Interior, the National Park Service and the San Francisco Maritime National Historic Park. The suit seeks $5 million in damages and alleges the park should have known about the danger, and at least should have posted warning signs, which have since been put up on bright, orange fences around the property. the Bunya Pines. Photo credit: Courtesy Matiasic & Johnson, LLP Mace was injured Oct. 12, 2014 while visiting the Bay Area from Washington state after being laid off as a heating and air-conditioning worker, according to Johnson and the lawsuit. He was 50 at the time and had served in the Navy for two years in the 1980s. Johnson said Mace used his time off to see the Blue Angels, the U.S. Navy's flight demonstration squad, who are in town again this week performing aerobatics in the sky. i—`R Na BART Service Betwees!-Q ncord and Pittsburgi-DA}-Pain According to the lawsuit, Mace went to the park and sat under a grove of coniferous Araucaria bidwillii trees, also known as bunya pines or false monkey puzzle trees. The trees are not indigenous to San Francisco and were planted by park staff several decades ago. Their seed pods can grow 35 centimeters in diameter and exceed 40 pounds in weight. At some point, a 16 -pound seed pod fell on Mace's head. The Bunya Pine, native to Australia, produces massive pinecones, are seen in this file photo. Photo credit: FILE/LA Times via Getty Images Mace was rushed to San Francisco General Hospital, where he had an emergency craniotomy, and then aright hemicraniectormy, the lawsuit alleges, resulting in traumatic brain injury and "likely irreversible cognitive deficits." Mace is holding the park district responsible because there were no warnings posted about falling seed pods, no safety barricades and no netting, Johnson explained. Only afterward did park staff install safdty barricades and signage, according to the lawsuit. I—f Skaters Want Restroom Installed at SF Park Johnson said appellate courts have found in the past other national parks are not immune to situations during which heavy snow causes tree branches to break or rockslides to fall, and that juries have decided who is at fault. That's what he'd like for his client, too. But Johnson did say in all his research, he'd never found a case involving a falling seed pod that had crushed a park visitor's skull. • Brown If Trunip BecomesPresident, California Will Build Its Own Wall "I've not found another case that is factually similar," Johnson said. 'This is relatively novel." Mace has moved back to Washington state and is being cared for by family and friends. He also filed a formal claim against the entities named in the suit, which, according to Johnson, has "not been rejected, accepted or even acknowledged." Lynn Cullivan, spokesman for the San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, said Thursday he had no comment on the pending litigation. Cullivan directed inquiries to the U.S. attorney's office, which did not immediately return requests for comment. Published at 6:35 PM PDT on Oct 8, 2015 CONNECT WITH -�* v m vr m ® ED Im Find this article at: http:lAvww.nbcbayarea cominews/localli 6Pound-Seed- Pod- Fats-From-Tree-i-SarrFrancisco•Crushes-Navy-Vets-SkulF3313aa132.html Check the box to inckide the list of links referenced in the article. E, NBC Uni—W, Inc. I All Rights R,acn•cd Urban Forest Services ` 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 IU -781.7220 fax �.542.96sa______ SCANNED '� • h ' SIG"111.Gff; _-_- TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development, see Section E on back. For Office Use Only: Entered:3j2y L�, Letter: /D5110 #y5<2b OWNER: -rw, , � KIGti ��U � APPLICANT: °® ADDRESS: f(, 70 CC)I_dOUA T) r ADDRESS: CITY: SLG ZIP: G�3 y� CITY: ZIP: PHONE:( 2'25_iD 39 C, PHONE: ( ) EMAIL: ' � r o� CL C � P _(A c ) <zr,)v, EMAIL: .. . j ,�j Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Dog in the yard? Yes ❑ No"� Reason fo tree remova ? 7 t c i � _ , _P00i V�ti ,1I A a �xu ,CSPlease draw a etc map'in box halo . aw uil 'rrg outlines,"streets rind only trees} be removed represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form. Tree Species T , A � ,i,..!� Proposed Replacement Tree(s)' [u� t - Address of Tree(s) /� 70� Cross -Street # Trees i(A i ate' Ai 15 j314L-1 Is XXX v I'Dr✓ W ALL1� A WALL_ r .r 'IR I V t5_ LvA r X tree(s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to inspection. By signing this application I a Iree to repLPermit ) on my property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by City Arborist or as a condition bf the - 1,0granted by Tree Committee. Permit valid for 6 months. Property Owner's Sigrati�ire Date n Applicant's Signatur,,_�� Date 3 2 ZLl 0 Submit completed a application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs sloci .or Urban Forest Services 25 Prado Road, San Ltiis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 { 805.781,7226 fax 805,542.9868 _ SOC :; ori TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development, see Section E on back. For Office u�se'}onIT. Entered. u�7 Letter -4- 5 f K -* q+ C) OWNER: '� 1�� APPLICANT: ADDRESS: Z -Z7 1 ADDRESS: Z y CITY: "V\�,� 0 `I ZIP: q ;� ,� 1 CITY: Gvi'9 1 lv 13.E ZIP: PHONE: ( 1 — ) -2-1 PHONE: ( F�C�S ) S ' l �j (v — C�f't✓ !� EMAIL: +I 1009 td s EMAIL: C%,,t4 (f 1 cd, 71',ee C'6VY� 1 Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes ❑ NghrUnknown ❑ Reason for tree removal9ol 5Qe pctl�)Vf& y re Dog in the yard? Yes ❑ No )KPlease draw a sketch map in box below. Show building outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form. Tree Species AV-Lq S ml-r4��A Proposed Replacement Tree(s)/[ 5 Address of Tree(s) �� g S'�iZ9 i S �� Cross -Street ����`/ # Trees 1 SAN o l:5 k, X tree(s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to inspection. By signing this application I agree to replant tree(s) on my property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by City Arborist or as a condition of the $81.00 Permit granted by Tree Committee. Permit valid for 6 months. Property Owner's Sir Applicanfs Signature Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs(abslocity.org Waypoint, ANALYTICAL Anaheim Office Lab No. 16-047-0351 Path No. 138 February 28, 2016 Greenvale Tree Company 947 Cameron Ct. Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 Attn: Chris PATHOLOGY REPORT: COAST LI VE OAK — HERRERO PROJECT Samples that included twig clippings with attached foliage, root tissue, bark, and pieces of what were described as possible conk material, arrived in our plant clinic for detailed diagnostic testing. Information contained in the detailed letter accompanying the samples indicates that this mature Coast Live oak (Ouercus agfftA4 is in marked decline; exhibiting extensive twig diebadc and loss of some major limbs. Detailed below are the final results of requested pathogen testing. All received tissue samples were given a preliminary visual examination, which included microscopy work. Leaf tissue placed under the dissecting scope was found to harbor immature whitefly nymphs, which are secreting honey dew and fostering sooty mold growth. The 'gall -like' structures on the twigs are due to parasitic wasps. Active sporulation was observed in association with cankerous twig tissue. Mounts of the spores and spore bearing structures were made for further microscopy examination. Supplied bards pieces contained no signs of wood -boring insects, and was free of visible fungal fruiting bodies. As for the portions of material described as possible conk tissue obtained from the root collar, these were identified as burl knots; undifferentiated plant tissue. Aside from the visual exam conducted, we also cultured out branch/twig tissue, leave tissue, bark, and root tissue onto a series of agar plates. Sample I d. Pathogens from Pathogens from Pathogens from Pathogens from Roots Twigs Bark Leaves Qlver+us R440phthma - - - a rifo/ia None Gb -'MWM spp. annamomi None Comments and Recommendations Test results indicate that conditions at one time must have been conducive to Phytophthora infection, allowing the pathogen to gain entry into the root -collar or lower trunk. Once inside the trunk tissue, the pathogen can slowly progress and kill tissue even if conditions are no longer overly wet. 4741 East Hunter Ave., Ste. A Anaheim CA 92807 (714) 282-8777 (714) 282-8575 fax www.waypointanalytical.com Page 1 of 2 Waypoint, ANALYTICAL Page 2 Greenvale Tree Company February 28, 2016 In addition to the trunk rankers caused by Phytophthora, this oak is also suffering from the twig and small branch infecting fungus known as Coryneum. Trees that are stressed tend to be more prone to infeq partunistic pathogen. For the most part Coryneum is considered to be a disease of 1 o importance use it primarily affects twigs and not large scaffold branches es identified, the whiteflies are the most serious as they can cause premature leaf drop when their populations become numerous. The parasitic gall wasps rarely pose a health risk to oaks, and for the most part are a cosmetic issue. In some cases however, they can cause necrotic patches to develop on lewAsswd may girdle small twigs. From our description of the tree's condition it unds as though decline is in an advanced state. If that is indeed ng aggressive treatment for the various issues identified makes much sense; especially in light of planned development around the tree. In my professional opinion, the most pnxk!nt thing to do would be to have this tree removed. Efforts can be made to preserve the smaller tree that is said to be in excellent health. Please call if you have any questions. Paul F. Santos, M.S. Plant Pathologist FJnailed: infoftreenvaletree.com 4741 East Hunter Ave., Ste. A Anaheim CA 92807 (714) 282-8777 (714) 282-8575 fax www.waypointanalytical.com Page 2 of 2 Reasons For removal Tree #1— Larger Coast Live Oak We noted in early winter how poor this tree looked in comparison to other Oaks in the area. Lots of dead wood and defoliated branches. The leaves also had a yellow cast to them. The smaller Oak nearby was greener and its canopy was full. Now after some rain it looks better, however once the stress of summer comes the Oak is liable to decline further. Trunk examination found several smaller cankers and brown staining along lesions at the cankers. We had these and some twig and branch samples tested at Waypoint Analytical. I have attached the report for your review. My concern is three fold: 1) Phytophthora (this is not sudden Oak death) is a serious vascular plugging/root and crown rot. In addition Coryneum (also detected) is highly infectious. The combination of these two has made this tree decline. While there are fungicides that can be applied but with the amount of decline noted, fungicides applied now at this stage would be ineffective. Add to this construction stress and the possibility of these diseases spreading and we face a tree likely to succumb and possible spread to nearby trees_ 2) The tree has dropped large limbs that have become brittle. Both the vascular plugging from Phytophthora and the cankers caused by Coryneum are killing and desiccating branches. If a home is built below this tree this tree becomes a hazard. 3) Construction in the area is likely to add stress_ Likely part of the footprint will be touching the critical root zone. Severing even smaller roots will allow Phytopthora more entry places to infect. Once the home is built removing a dead tree becomes that much harder. Tree #2 — Smaller Coast Live Oak Since this is mostly an understory tree to the larger tree we see that this smaller tree has one sided growth (grew toward the light). I see no way to correct this through trimming. While we only had the larger Oak tested for disease it is highly likely that Coryneum has spread to the smaller Oak. It is also possible that Phytopthora can be found on its roots. R, Dark stain around lesions alerted me to possible pathogen. You can see cracked wood from drying of older canker. Areas tested positive for Phytophthora root and collar rot. Several of these spots around the tree. Urban Forest Services SCANNED 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 805.7 1,7229 ax 8Q5.542.9968 slocity org TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development, see Section E on back. For Office Use Only: Entered:/ J_ILL42 Letter: OWNER: _ APPLICANT: ADDRESS: f _ '` ADDRESS:7 r CITY: e!1iii o6 101p: o CITY: + IP PHONE: (b PHONE: ( ) EMAIL:7 O i0 EMAIL: E I Private tree removals Ly require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes 4No ❑ Unknorwn ❑ Dog in the yard? Yes El No ri Reason for tree removal? t �'� 1� � t k �R, \k\/t (JJ luV1 aAk 60, z -v ,Please draw a sketch map in box belo4. Show building outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed represented with an X or you may s^ubmit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this (application form. Tree Species _ ` [ i/'�'L li Proposed Replacement Tree(s) _ ,_l 4 Address of Tree(s) _.. 1 Cross -Street �► `6 yvU # Trees '�-)— X tree(s) must have rton o By signing this applicati n I agree to City Arborist or as a condition of thfy Property Owner's Signatu Applicant's Sig tape wrap around the trunk to identify prior to inspection. plant tr a o4nt y property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by 81.00 a it gd byTree Committee. Permit valid for 6 mouths; Date Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs(a�slocity.orQ f rte; Urban Forest Services SCANNED 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 a 805.781.7229 tax 005.542,9868 _ slocity.org TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION if related to development, see Section E on back. For Office Use Only: Entered:411 t Letter: _qj 1 Z J-& Lit C33 OWNER !- APPLICANT: ADORES f d ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: (� . r� 7v CITY: ZIP PHONE: (7� s,J, �-`'f PHONE: ( J EMAIL:/ 30 EMAIL: Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes ❑ No Unknown ❑ Dog in the yard? Yes ❑ No It Reason for tree removal? -7/1 To hC>(t S.- -3--4,6 ?W iJ A!SPlease draw a sketch map in box below. Show building outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form. r Tree Species: /!� Proposed Replacement Tree(s)t, Address of Tree(s) C f�a, Ail 11,2 A, Cross -Street C1 # Trees y X tree(s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to inspection. By signing this application I agree to replant tree(s) on my property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by City Arborist or as a condition of $81.00 Permit granted by Tree Committee. Permit valid for 6 months./ Property Owner's Signature - Date Applicant's Signatu ate Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs(&-slocity.org AK� } r d) vAVCE "\-STREET LIGMT TER METER VISTA DEL GOLLADOS ESGAN,5 /-FIRE HYDRANT Q