HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-27-16 PC Correspondence - Item 2 (Cooper)To: San Luis Obispo Planning Commission
From: Allan Cooper
Date: 04/24/16
RECEIVED
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APR 2 5 2016
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 you will be reviewing a proposed 2015 Urban Water
Management Plan.
Meeting: PC -4.2 7, f tp
Item:
In an April 24, 2016 Tribune article, John Lindsay stated the following: "Many renowned
climatologists believe that these warmer (ocean) temperatures are contributing to the persistent
high pressure over the West Coast, nicknamed the "Ridiculously Resilient Ridge", that has
directed many storms to the north and the possible atmospheric rivers they could bring". William
Patzert, a respected climatologist with Cal Tech's NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena,
stated the following: "...today the rules have changed. Manmade climate change is warming
and drying the West as well as much of the Middle East, India, China and many other regions.
Concerns about the world's freshwater supplies are accelerating".
With climate change in mind, I applaud Jennifer Metz's, Carrie Mattingly's and Aaron Floyd's
suggested amendments to the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage
Contingency Plan. Their "Proposed Stages for the 2015 Water Shortage Contingency Plan" is a
useful guide in determining when the cessation of new water connections and when water
demand offsets will be required. However, I believe it would be useful at this time for you to
discuss in more detail a more aggressive "Water Offset Program" which could take effect during
the proposed "Severe", "Extreme" and "Critical" stages of water shortage. I am also
recommending that you adopt tiered restrictions for a building permit or water connection
moratorium (similar to the one that is being used in Pismo Beach) and that these restrictions
begin to take effect at the "Severe" stage when there is less than three years of available water
supply.
Like Cambria, CA, San Luis Obispo should have an aggressive demand offset program. Like
Danville, CA the developer should not only implement onsite water conservation measures but
also pay $6,000 per housing unit to offset twice the expected water demand. These funds could
be used to pay for retrofit projects—such as plumbing fixture replacements, sub -metering,
installation of gray water systems, and creating water budgets, such as Paso Robles' required
Water Supply Assessments (see more examples of these offsets below). Like Pismo Beach',
San Luis Obispo should implement tiered restrictions for a building permit or water connection
moratorium beginning with the "Severe" stage of water shortage and progressing through to the
"Critical" stage of water shortage.
I am therefore recommending for discussion purposes the following modifications (shown in red
type) to Table 2: "Proposed Stages for the 2015 Water Shortage Contingency Plan":
1 Pismo Beach
Tier 1: Restrict permits for vacant lots
Water usage equal or less than previously
Tier 2: No building permits except those in process
New development must restrict water demand by 15%
Tier 3: New development & redevelopment must restrict water demand by 30%
Warning
< 4 years of available water supply
City implements Water Allotment Program and Water Offset Program2 for new connections. City
implements mandatory conservation measures including outdoor irrigation restrictions
(examples: 3 or 2 days a week watering and only serving water upon request at restaurants).
Water Supply Assessments.
95 gcd per capita goal
Severe
< 3 years of available water supply
City implements Water Allotment Program and Water Offset Programa for new connections.
Additional outdoor irrigation restrictions may be added (such as no spray irrigation).
Restrict permits for vacant lots. Water Supply Assessments. Increase leak repair and detection
90 gcd per capita goal
Extreme
< 2 years of available water supply
2Water Demand Reduction Offset Program: 2:1 or Water Neutral (1:1)
Retrofit program exceeding requirements of State law
(e.g., Water Demand Offset Residential Green Credits or Rebates)
For New Construction, Remodels and Replacement:
Waterless urinal
Low flow shower heads
Faucet aerators
Water efficiency washing machines
Hot water recirculation
Upgraded water meters or sub -metering
Toilet leak detection systems
Toilet tank displacement bags
Installation of grey water systems
Rainwater collection tanks
Dry toilets
a Capital improvements: installation of municipal:
Water pipes
Greywater - potable water conversion system
Vegetated infiltration bioswales
Stormwater capture
Dry wells
Underground drip irrigation systems
City continues to implement a Water Allotment Program with reduced levels. Water Offset
Program4 for new connections may be increased. Outdoor irrigation may be prohibited for all
uses. Cps ti fi_of may-bs-re c e eE No building permits except those in
process. Keep the following vegetation alive: trees, shrubs, perennials. Adequate commercial
water with restrictions. No hydrant use except for fire safety. Possible water lease or purchase.
85 gcd per capita goal
Critical
< 1 year of available water supply
City continues to implement a Water Allotment Program at further reduced levels (minimum for
public health and safety). Outdoor irrigation prohibited for all uses. Water Offset Program to
cease and no new connections permitted. Sustain some mature trees, but recognize there may
be a major die -off of lawns,trees and shrubs. Maintain adequate supply for indoor and
emergency use for 12 month period.
80 gcd per capita goal
4 Increase Mandatory requirements beyond what currently exists:
Air cooled ice machines
Water efficient air conditioning
Prohibit use of water to wash down buildings or structures for purposes other than
immediate fire protection
Failure to repair a controllable leak(s) within a reasonable period after having been given notice
directing the repair of such leak(s)