Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES 2004ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES 2004 SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES January 5, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Associate Planner Buzz Kalkowski ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, encouraged the public to attend these public hearings. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 805 Aerovista Place. ARC -S 157-03; Architectural review of sign program for Aerovista Business Park; C -S -PD zone; Aeroloop, LLC, applicant. (Buzz Kalkowski) Associate Planner Buzz Kalkowski presented the staff report through a detailed PowerPoint presentation, and recommended approval of the sign program, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. Steven Pults, project architect, spoke in support of the project, providing background of the project, signage color selection, signage sizes, types, and lettering, and the creation of the art sculpture and its proposed location. There was some discussion on the appropriateness of the proposed public art piece, and extensive discussion on signage areas and types of signage. Proposed conditions of approval were individually reviewed. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission concluded that a larger entry sign for the business park project was warranted given the large size of the project site and scale of existing and proposed buildings. The Commission was convinced that the applicant's proposed plan to utilize ARC Minutes January 5, 2004 Page 2 �) monument signs for buildings that listed tenants was preferable to individual wall signs, and ultimately would result in lower overall signage totals for the site. They also felt that the proposed sign program resulted in a uniform look and coordinated well with the project architecture. entry sign off Airport Drive shall not encroach into the ADA sidewalk circumventing the driveway curb cut. 5. Prior to the issuance of the sign permit, an agreement shall be entered into between the property owner of each four (4) parcels and the City to ensure that the sign program will continue under future ownership on each of the four parcels consistent with the ARC approvals and without changes unless first approved by the Director or the ARC. The agreement shall be recorded with the San Luis Obispo County Recorder for each of the four subject parcels prior to the issuance of the sign permit. 6. Individual tenants are not allowed to have separate wall signs. 7. Proposed building directory signs for Buildings B. C. & D shall be limited in height and area to the Director. Seconded by Commr. Smith. .. AYES: Commr. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Howard, Lopes, Smith and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None It was clarified that the public art would go before the Art Jury along with direction given at this meeting, and then back to the Commission for an action. Much discussion ensued with clarification needed as to whether this piece is a sculpture, a logo, or signage. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 4. Staff Agenda Forecast: Planner Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for Wednesday, January 21, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room. Respectfully Submitted by Diane Stuart Management Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES JJanuary 21, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Principal Administrative Analyst Betsy Kiser ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES The minutes of April 7, 2003, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: MaryBeth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, voiced her concern that housing in SLO is too '1 costly. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: There were no public hearing items presented at this meeting. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: Staff A. Public Art Projects and Review Procedures (Ann Ream. SLO Arts Council• Betsy Kiser, Principal Administrative Analyst). The ARC discussed some specific cases that have come before them where questions have arisen about the appropriateness of the proposals as public art. The Commission provided specific recommendations on the proposed changes to the criteria for public art that the Council will soon be considering. They generally supported the new criteria with some editorial suggestions and the shifting of the purview for some criteria between the ARC and Public Art jury. The Commission recommended that the City Council establish a minimum dollar threshold for public art. Projects that fell below the threshold would pay the in -lieu fee rather than developing public art in their project. ARC Minutes January 21, 2004 Page 2 B. Ideas and approaches to garner more public participation at ARC meetings. The ARC directed staff to explore some ideas about getting more members of the public to attend their meetings including: a. Small display ads, rather than standard legal ad notification in the classified section of The Tribune; b. Look at providing news releases with visuals to generate interest; c. Add agendas to the Community Channel; d. Consider an "info-mercial" that would highlight the ARC and would appear on the Community Channel. C. Discussion of schedule and agenda for City Attorney study session The ARC set the following items as issues to discuss with the Assistant City Attorney on the rescheduled regular meeting of February 23, 2004: a. Guidance on the ARC's ability to require performance in excess of City standards; b. Responsibilities & discretion of the ARC in terms of standards included in the Zoning Regulations and policies in the General Plan; c. Discretion of the ARC to deviate from the Community Design Guidelines. D. Agenda Forecast Planner Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming items. 2. Commission A. Budget Feedback The ARC discussed the two-step budget process after reviewing Bill Statler's memo dated 12-9-03, which was a part of their agenda packet. Some members thought that the two-step process was worthwhile, resulting in a more collaborative process. This camp believed that it was important to see what the other advisory bodies were proposing prior to finalizing the Commission's goals. However, a majority of the ARC found that the two-step process was not worth the additional time and expense. Despite the majority's negative take on the two-step approach, the ARC was overall very complimentary of the City's budget process, finding it to be very open and well organized. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned The ARC provided the following feedback on some recent projects ARC Minutes January 21, 2004 Page 3 C. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned The ARC provided the following feedback on some recent projects: • Trader Joe's — nice landscaping in parking lot area; • Creekside Project on South Higuera — liked two-story construction and building detailing; • Brezden Pest Control — nice rhythm & building colors; and • Orcutt & Broad commercial — concern that are too many public signs along the site's frontage & suggestion to consolidate signal poles and equipment. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. to a regular meeting scheduled for Monday, February 2, 2004, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully Submitted by Diane Stuart Management Assistant , SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES February 2, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commr. Greg Wilhelm Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Planning Technician Jaime Britz, and Dan Gilmore, Utilities Engineer, Matt Horn, Utilities Engineer ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES The minutes of June 2, 2003 were approved as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 225 N. Chorro Street. ARC 76-03; Architectural review of a proposed demolition and construction of four new apartment buildings with 16 total units; R-4 zone; D. A. Fetyko, Incorporated, applicant. (Michael Codron) Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report, recommending final approval to the project design. Carol Florence, applicant's representative, spoke in support of the project, noting the Planning Commission had accepted the previous recommendations made by the ARC, and agreeing with the recommended conditions of approval. Kim Hatch, project architect, detailed the architectural changes that were made to the project as a result of the ARC's direction. PUBLIC COMENTS There were no public comments. ARC Minutes February 2, 2004 Page 2 COMMISSION COMENTS A majority of the Commission supported the innovative design. There was some discussion about the appropriateness of the proposed metal siding in a residential area. AYES: Commrs. Root, Boudreau, Stevenson, Howard and Smith NOES: Commr. Lopes ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 5:1 vote. 2. 1423 Calle Joaquin. ARC -S 118-03; Architectural review of new signage for an auto dealership, including exceptions to the sign regulations; C -S zone; Kimball Motor Company, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Planner Ricci presented the staff report recommending approval of the revised wall signs and modifications to an existing pylon sign, based on findings, and denial of the request of an exception to the Sign Regulations to allow three roof signs, based on findings which she outlined. Nick Russell, applicant's representative, gave a history of the project and how the specific request originated in relation to dealer franchises and agreements pertaining to signage. He requested approval of the proposed sign program. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. COMMISSION COMMENTS: There was much discussion on the location of the dealership as it relates to signage, signage design and location, and recommended options and direction. ARC Minutes February 2, 2004 Page 3 was not supported. (e) Look into the possibility of an enhanced design for the Chevrolet pylon sign. Seconded by Commr. Smith. AYES: Commrs. Root, Boudreau, Stevenson, Howard, Lopes and Smith NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote. 3. Open Space. ARC 12-04; Courtesy review of design of new water storage tank to replace existing tank in open space area above General Hospital; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Planner Ricci presented the staff report, recommending the Commission provide preliminary comments to the applicant and staff on the new replacement water tank. Dan Gilmore, Utilities Engineer, gave a detailed report on the existing water tank and explained the need to replace it with a new tank, which he described. Andrew Merriam, Cannon Associates, presented an in-depth visual analysis by means of a PowerPoint presentation, including several simulations, and answered questions of the Commission. Kris Vardas, Padre Associates Environmental Consultants, provided additional information. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Brain Rolph and Charles Braun, asked questions of City staff about the proposed location, screening, and grading for the water storage tank. There were no further public comments. COMMISSION COMMENTS: After reviewing a visual analysis of the project, which is a replacement water storage tank for the City of San Luis Obispo in the open space area above General Hospital, the ARC asked that revised plans return to them and provided the City with the following direction, by a maiority consensus: a) submit a revised sectional drawing that is true to scale; (b) include -grading information and provide information about the proposed soil to species proposed for screening. ARC Minutes February 2, 2004 Page 4 COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 4. Staff A. Agenda Forecast Planner Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 5. Commission A. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned With no further business before the Commission the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. to a regular meeting scheduled for Monday, February 23, 2004, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Diane Stuart Management Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES February 23, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, and Assistant City Attorney Gil Trujillo ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made from the public. DISCUSSION ITEM: ` 1. Discussion with City Attorney regarding Commission purview issues. Assistant City Attorney Gil Trujillo provided a general background discussion of the Commission's responsibility in reviewing projects in terms of General Plan policies, Zoning Ordinance requirements, and the Community Design Guidelines. He clarified that the intent of exception processes are not to require performance in excess of City regulations. He noted that with certain regulations the ARC could request, but not require, performance in excess of City standards. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. 1515 Fredericks Street. ARC 106-03; Architectural review of plans to develop a new sanctuary, family center and administration offices; R-1 zone; United Methodist Church, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Commr. Wilhelm stepped down from participation because of his role as a project representative. Commr. Lopes stepped down because of his membership in that church. Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report, recommending final approval, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. Jack Auldhouse Sr., applicant's representative, spoke in support of the request and `-J gave a 3-D presentation illustrating how the proposed window recesses add depth and shadows to the building elevations. He detailed the parking lot lighting, as well as ARC Minutes February 23, 2004 Page 2 project lighting, screening of the HVAC units, and tower location. Debbie Black, project landscape architect, gave a visual presentation addressing the east property line planter, the preferred solution of a meandering sidewalk, and the conceptual landscape master plan for the entire campus. PUBLIC COMMENT Joe Timmons, from the church's construction committee, spoke in support of the request and asked the Commission to approve the project. Charles Greenall, 1631 Fredericks Street, expressed support for the revised project. Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, voiced her support for the project. COMMISSION COMMENTS The ARC was impressed with the changes made to the project to respond to their earlier direction. Commr. Howard .moved final approval, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements as noted in the staff report. Seconded by Commr. Root. motion maker and seconder agreed to the amendment. AYES: Commrs. Root, Boudreau, Stevenson, Howard, and Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Commrs. Wilhelm and Lopes The motion carried on a 5:0 vote. 3. 3595 Sueldo Street. ARC 116-03; Architectural review of three new commercial buildings and site improvements; C -S -SP zone; Maino Construction, applicant. (Pam Ricci) This item was continued without discussion to the ARC meeting scheduled for March 15, 2004. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 4. Staff A. Agenda Forecast ARC Minutes February 23, 2004 Page 3 Planner Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. to the regular meeting scheduled for Monday, March 1, 2004, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully Submitted Diane Stuart Management Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES March 1, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Associate Planner Michael Codron, and Deputy Community Development Director Ronald Whisenand ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES The minutes of May 5, May 19 and June 16, 2003 were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane expressed her appreciation of the job that the ARC does for the community. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 817 Palm Street. ARC 192-03; Architectural review of the placement of a series of photovoltaic solar collectors on the roof of an existing building; C -D -H zone; Jim and Patty Dee, applicants. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Michael Codron presented the staff report, recommending the Commission grant final approval, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. PUBLIC COMMENT: Rachel Rosenthal, expressed her support for the project, noting how unattractive air conditioning units are on existing buildings and all the utility lines in the City, and that this option will be more aesthetically pleasing. ARC Minutes March 1, 2004 Page 2 Commr. Stevenson noted that a letter had been received from Alex and Ann Goth, 964 Chorro Street, supporting the project, which was read into the record. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Howard moved the staff recommendation. Seconded by Commr. Root. The Commission discussed City policies that support the proposed installation and discussed the visibility of the collectors from the surrounding streets. The Commission determined that future development of the adjacent property would make it unlikely that visibility would be an issue. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Howard, Lopes, Smith and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 7:0 vote. 2. City Wide. TA/ER 26-04; Review of modifications to the City's Sign Regulations, and environmental review; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Michael Codron presented the staff report by means of an in-depth PowerPoint presentation. The goal of this meeting was to discuss and agree on the purpose and scope for the update process, review and discuss Articles I — III of the Sign Regulations Update (I General Provisions; II Exempt Signs and III Prohibited Signs), schedule a subsequent meeting date to review and discuss Articles IV — X, and provide any other preliminary comments and/or direction to staff on the Sign Regulations Update. PUBLIC COMMENT: Sean Beecham, South Paw Sign Company, expressed his opinion that San Luis Obispo has one of the best Sign Programs he has ever worked with. He noted that in historically significant areas, signs are being regulated to the extent that they are not noticed. He explained problems he has had throughout the state with very restrictive sign programs that do not allow national or corporate logos that don't fit within those restrictions, size restrictions, and the historical value of neon. He also noted that some cities offer a "bonus" in size for more attractive signs. He offered copies of several cities' sign programs for review by the Commission. There were no other public comments. ARC Minutes March 1, 2004 Page 3 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The ARC reviewed the first three chapters of the Draft Sign Regulations and provided direction to staff on additional information needed. There was much discussion on sign clutter and whether it should be addressed in the Sign Regulations or the Design Guideline, temporary signs, and window signs. Article III created discussion on vehicle signage, flashing signs or messages, roof signs, banners, billboards, determination of obscene signs and public art. It was the consensus of the Commission to complete review the Sign Regulations at the April 5t' meeting. No formal action was taken. 3. 1095 Marsh Street. ARC 15-03; Review of public art at Chinese Garden; C -D zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Buzz Kalkowski) Associate Planner Michael Codron presented the staff report recommending the Commission grant approval to the proposed Chinese bell, based on the finding that it is consistent with the City's criteria for public art, and subject to conditions, and to grant approval to the entry gate design, based on findings. Alice Loh, applicant's representative, spoke in support of the project and gave a brief presentation on the request. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission supported the proposed public art for the Chinese Garden. The discussion focused on the mounting of the proposed bell and the details of the proposed gateway. applicant consider using additional design details to enhance the metal support posts of the gateway. Seconded by Commr. Boudreau. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Howard, Lopes, Smith and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 7:0 vote. ARC Minutes March 1, 2004 Page 4 COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 4. Staff A. Agenda Forecast Planner Codron gave an agenda forecast of upcoming items. 5. Commission A. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned The Commission discussed the colors of the recently completed remodel of the Royal Oak Hotel on Madonna Road and asked staff to research whether the Commission approved the green color. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for March 15, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room. Respectfully submitted by Diane Stuart Management Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES March 15, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commr. Allen Root Staff: Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, and Supervising Civil Engineer Rob Livick ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: MaryBeth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed her opinion of city government and noted that R-1 zones are disappearing this city. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 3595 Sueldo Street. ARC 116-03; Review of three new commercial buildings and site improvements, and a 15 -foot street yard setback for a tower element of the building where a 20 -foot setback is required; C -S -SP zone; Maino Construction, applicant. (Continued from February 23, 2004) (Pam Ricci) Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the project, based on findings, including findings in support of a street yard exception for the tower element of Building 3, and subject to conditions and code requirements. Ron Livick, Supervising Civil Engineer, reported on the Circulation Plan for this project. Randy Rey, applicant's representative, discussed the existing adequacy of parking for this project, explained various ways to achieve compliance, and noted they are still looking for clarification. He asked the ARC to grant the tower element exception, noting they could meet all the conditions. Tom Maino, Maino Construction, explained they are trying to provide a project with adequate parking. ARC Minutes March 15, 2005 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Vice -Chair Boudreau moved final approval, based on the findings and subject to the Commr. Howard. The Commission suggested that a condition be maintained that the signage come back to the ARC. AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Howard, Wilhelm, Boudreau, Smith, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Root ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote. 2. 888 Ricardo Court. ARC 190-03; Review of development of eight commercial tenant space buildings and site improvements; M zone; Quaglino Properties, applicant. (Phil Dunmore) (To be continued to a date uncertain.) This item was continued without discussion to a date uncertain because environmental initial study has not yet been completed. 3. 1464 Auto Park Way. ARC -PA 148-01; Review of public art for a new auto dealership; C -S -PD zone; Gordon Giacomazzi, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report requesting the Commission to find that the proposed artwork meets the City's Guidelines for Public Art in Private Projects. Carol Florence, Project Planner, gave a brief presentation of the proposed art Jim Jacobson, project sculptor, described the proposed sculpture and its function. He gave a brief history on how they came to choose this particular piece and what each of the abstracts represent. ARC Minutes March 15, 2005 Page 3 Jim Trast, California Water Gardens, explained how the water would flow through the pump and out through the sculpture. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Lopes moved the staff recommendation, with additional conditions: Condition 5. The artwork shall be located at the corner landscape area at Los Osos Valley Road 7. to select a height, given the slope at the site and location near the street to highlight. the sphere, and add up -lighting.. Seconded by Commr. Howard. Vice -Chair Boudreau felt this is the wrong piece for the location and felt it should be for vehicle viewing, and could not support the motion. Commr. Smith concurred with Commr. Boudreau and could not support the motion. AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Howard, Wilhelm, and Stevenson NOES: Commrs. Boudreau and Smith ABSENT: Commr. Root ABSTAIN: None. The motion carried on a 4:2 vote. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 4. Staff Agenda Forecast: Planner Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 5. Commission A. Minutes The minutes of July 7, 2003, were approved as submitted. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned Chairperson Stevenson commented on a response by an applicant from lessons learned. U ARC Minutes March 15, 2005 Page 4 C. Elections of Chair and Vice -Chair for the coming year. Commr. Charles Stevenson was elected as Chairman, with Commr. Zeljka Howard elected as Vice -Chair, effective April 5, 2004. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for April 5, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 5, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Associate Planner Tyler Corey and Senior Planner Pam Ricci SWEARING IN: City Clerk Lee Price swore in reappointed Commissioner Michael Boudreau. ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, complimented the ARC for their work they do and expressed her support that Commissioner Boudreau was reappointed. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 286 California Boulevard. ARC 94-03; Architectural review of a proposed 4 -unit residential development; C -N zone; Kevin and Anna Kelso, applicant. Continued to a date uncertain. The applicant requested that this item be continued to a date uncertain so that they could review and possibly revise the scale of the project. It was the consensus of the Commission to continue this item to a date uncertain 2. Citywide. ER/TA 26-04; Review of modifications to the City's Sign Regulations, and environmental review; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Senior Planner Pam Ricci gave a brief summary on the Sign Regulations program. Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report and explained the goals for this meeting are to provide any further preliminary comments and/or direction to staff on ARC Minutes April 5, 2004 Page 2 Articles I - III of the Draft Sign Regulations; to review and discuss Articles IV - X of the Draft Sign Regulations; and to schedule a subsequent meeting date to review and discuss requested document modifications, including research topics, the proposed Sign Gallery, and requested changes to Articles 1 -III. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Pierre Rademaker, Mill Street, voiced concern with the definitions section and types of signs that are listed. He pointed out that the term "freestanding" encompasses a range of different signs and that the proposed names of some of the sign categories were misleading. He added that the type of sign described as a "freestanding monument" was not technically a monument sign. He discussed the sign standards table on page 14 and noted that signs area should not be figured by "premises'. He questioned why the City uses English standards rather than a metric system. Patricia Wilmore, SLO Chamber of Commerce representative, noted that a letter had been sent to the Commission and that the issues brought up by Mr. Rademaker were also pointed out in that letter. She noted the concerns of Bill Thoma, and concerns of business owners with the City regulating window displays. Mark Rawson, 1028 Peach Street, concurred with the sign standards table referring to allow areas by tenant, rather than premises. He commented that the language on awning signs is prohibitive and felt there could be a simpler way to address them. Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane suggested the Sign Regulations be simplified. Deborah Cash, SLO Downtown Association representative, pointed out that from a Main Street point of view, signage standards should be flexible enough to allow unique designs, which tie in with the Main Street philosophy regarding signs being coordinated with building design. Josephine Malone, Arroyo Grande, expressed her opinion that she is being heard at ARC level, but not at other committees or commissions. She noted the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Association have voices that are heard, but hers as a citizen of the community is being ignored. Sean Beechum offered some comments regarding sign fabrication. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: The Commission gave individual comments and made suggestions to modify the City's Sign Regulations. ARC Minutes April 5, 2004 Page 3 It was the consensus of the Commission to obtain more information on the window display regulations before making a decision. Staff agreed to come back with more information. It was the unanimous consensus of the Commission to continue discussion of the City Sign Regulations to the meeting of April 19, 2004. No formal action was taken. 3. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. B. Advisory Body Roster - each commissioner updated their personal information. C. UCLA Local Design Review Seminar -Chairperson Stevenson mentioned there is a course on design and that the City has offered to send one or two commissioners. 4. Commission: APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: A. The minutes of July 21, August 4, August 18, and September 2, 2003, and January 5, January 21, and March 15, 2004, were accepted as presented, with minor amendments to the minutes of July 21 st ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for April 19, 2004, in Council Hearing Room. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 19, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commissioner Jim Lopes. Staff: Associate Planners Tyler Corey, Buzz Kalkowski and Phil Dunsmore ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed her support for the Commission and for what they do for the community. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 1.645 Tanglewood Drive. ARCMI 39-04; Review of a request to convert an existing garage to living space and add a replacement garage; R-1 zone; Rick and Michelle James, applicant. (Buzz Kalkowski) Associate Planner Buzz Kalkowski presented the staff report recommending approval of the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. Rick James, applicant, explained that personal financial limitations prohibited a second floor addition and that using the backyard for adding space would reduce the play area for the children. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, voiced her opposition to all garage conversions in the R-1 zone because they look bad in the neighborhoods, and she felt they are not appropriate. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Chairperson Stevenson and Vice -Chair Howard expressed concerns regarding the structure's U-shaped footprint after the additions and the proposed garage door facing the street. The possibility of gaining additional living space by adding a second floor or ARC Minutes April 19, 2004 Page 2 going into the back yard was questioned. Other concerns were the need to go through the proposed utility room to enter the "den" and the lack of architectural details surrounding the proposed garage door and the small window facing the street in the existing garage. Commr. Wilhelm moved approval with the condition that the project return for specific direction regarding the fascia of the existing garage and the detail surrounding the new garage door. Seconded by Commr. Smith, Chairperson Stevenson noted he could not support the project because he felt that the conversion is not compatible with the neighborhood, and that there are other alternatives that could be explored. Vice -Chair Howard concurred with the comments made by Chairperson Stevenson. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Smith, Root, and Boudreau NOES: Commrs. Howard and Stevenson ABSENT: Commr. Lopes ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 4:2 vote. - 2. 215 Bridge Street. GP/R, PD and ER 64-03; Conceptual review of site plan and building elevations for a residential and commercial planned development; M -PD and R -2 -PD proposed zoning; Bridge Street Corporation, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report, requesting the Commission review the preliminary design concept and offer direction to the applicant and staff on the building elevations, site plans, parking layout and circulation plan. George Garcia, Garcia project architect, gave an in-depth PowerPoint presentation of the project, highlighting building design issues and some concepts that are driving the project. Tom DeSanto, project designer, gave a brief explanation on the sustainable building features. Laura Joines-Novotny, site designer, gave a brief explanation on the sustainable site features. Mr. Garcia summarized the proposal and explained how the run-off from the hill would be addressed. PUBLIC COMMENTS: ARC Minutes April 19, 2004 Page 3 Mary Jenny, Exposition Drive, voiced concerns with the flooding that occurs in this area and felt that Meadow Park is not set up to handle that amount of rainwater. Roxanne Winterbourne, Woodbridge Street, voiced her opposition to the aesthetics of the project, specifically the bright colors, suggesting colors that are more compatible with the neighborhood. She also expressed concern with flooding in the area. Jim Neilson, Exposition Court, questioned the bright colors, noting it does not blend with the environment, and expressed his opposition to inverted roofs. Judy Neilson 2277 Exposition Court, expressed concern with the three-story height, which will obscure the views. Sean Beechum, Shell Beach, felt this project has addressed all the issues of a building project. Helene Finger, SLO, Civil Engineer, expressed her opinion that the proposed project has been incorrectly represented concerning the open space, and felt there are issues that are not included in the staff report. She felt this property is protected as permanent open space, but this was not reflected in the staff report. She presented a letter to the Commission for the record concerning open space. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The ARC reviewed the site plan and building elevations and offered feedback on the design. The general theme of the comments was positive and the commissioners welcomed the design approach that utilized sustainable features and innovative design methods. It was the consensus of the Commission that the location of the buildings was acceptable and that the aesthetic impacts to the neighborhood were less than significant. They found that development up to the 190400t contour was acceptable at this location and liked the use of color and described the design approach as beautiful. Some concerns were expressed regarding the commercial site plan and the parking layout. Direction was given to reserve a commercial loading zone and to give additional attention to vehicle maneuvering within the commercial parking area. The Commission discussed the site plan and parking. Chairperson Stevenson was concerned that there might be some issues with maneuvering vehicles around the trash enclosure. Commr. Root expressed a concern on the configuration of the drop-offs and suggested a truck -maneuvering requirement. No formal action was taken on this project. ARC Minutes April 19, 2004 Page 4 3. City-wide. TA 26-04; Review of modifications to the City's Sign Regulations; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant; (Continued from April 5, 2004) (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report, asking the Commission to comment on the draft update to the Draft Sign Regulations (Articles IV -X). The Commission made their changes to the City's Sign Regulations. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Sean Beechum, Shell Beach, commented on awnings and pole signs and offered the Commission his perspective. Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, commented that all sign programs should not allow inappropriate signs. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission made modifications to the Draft Sign Regulations. It was the consensus of the Commission to continue review of the Draft Sign Regulations to the meeting of May 17, 2004. 4. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Corey gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 4. Commission: A. Minutes: The minutes of September 15, and October 6; 2003 and February 2, and February.23, 2004 were accepted as presented. ADJOURNMENT: With. no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for May 3, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 3, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Associate Planner Phil .Dunsmore ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 805 Aerovista Place. ARC PA 157-03; Architectural review of a public art piece for the Aerovista Business Park; C -S -PD zone; Aeroloop LLC, applicant. (Buzz Kalkowski) This item was continued without discussion to the meeting of May 17, 2004, at the request of the applicant. 2. 214 Madonna Road. ARC MOD 81-02; Request to modify the building color and landscape plan to an approved project; C -T zone; Dilor Inc., applicant. (Tyler Corey) To be continued to May 17, 2004. This item was continued without discussion to the meeting of May 17, 2004. 3. 888 Ricardo Court. ARC and ER 190-03; Review of eight (8) commercial tenant space buildings and site improvements, including environmental review; M zone; Quaglino Properties, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the building and site designs, exception to the creek setback standards and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, subject to findings, conditions and code requirements.. Draft ARC Minutes May 3, 2004 Page 2 Planner Dunsmore noted that condition 10, as noted in the staff report, was included in error and suggested it be removed. Steven Pults, project architect, provided some background on the proposed project and discussed why a path should not go through the creek setback area. He offered some information on the proposed color scheme and discussed the rear elevations, noting there is no reason to have doors in the back of the building. Steve Caminetti, landscape architect, gave a brief summary on the landscaping and explained that he would prefer leaving the turf as it is presently proposed. He mentioned they could plant some trees in the creek area, although they are not necessary. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Discussion focused on the need for architectural embellishments for buildings facing the railroad tracks and other properties to the north. Conditions of approval were added to add architectural treatment similar to other building elevations. The proposed creek setback exception to allow a pedestrian path was viewed as a project amenity and was unanimously supported by the ARC. The commission appreciated the design theme and supported the use of an art deco/manufacturing combination for this location as proposed. Commr. Wilhelm moved the staff recommendation, with changes to Conditions 2 5 6 7 and 11, and Conditions 9 and 10 deleted. Seconded by Commr. Root. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Howard, Boudreau, Lopes, Smith, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 7:0 vote. 4. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. Draft ARC Minutes May 3, 2004 Page 3 4. Commission: Commr. Lopes requested that they be educated on what the proper water supply is for fire prevention. He also requested that staff look into what the jurisdiction is. A. Minutes: October 20, 2003; March 1, 2004; and April 5, 2004. The minutes of October 20, 2003, and March 1 and April 5, 2004, were approved as submitted. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned. Commissioners requested that staff invite City Fire and Utilities staff to a future ARC meeting to discuss the location and design options for backflow prevention devices in commercial projects. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for May 17, 2003, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 17, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Associate Planner Tyler Corey and Senior Planner Pam Ricci ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, voiced her disappointment that downtown SLO is eroding away due to new development outside the downtown core area. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 2005 Dalidio Drive. ARC PR and ER 108-02. Review of a proposed shopping center development; SLO Marketplace, LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report requesting comments from the Commission on overall site planning and the revised building designs. Bill Bird, project representative noted that Macy's would no longer be a tenant because they cannot afford the changes that are required by the Design Guidelines. He explained why large-scale retailers are not more pedestrian oriented, and mentioned that there will be 60 units of affordable housing. Brian Wolfe, senior architect, presented a brief summary on the parking lot landscaping and the pedestrian access. He explained that the design is intended to be laid out like a campus and explained the tower element for Tenant L. He noted the possibility of adding an east -west pedestrian pathway with the potential for another north -south pedestrian path. Michael Cripe, landscape architect, gave a description of the proposed landscaping plan for the project. He provided a new section at the first driveway past the interchange, and explained Lowe's loading area. ARC Minutes May 17, 2004 Page 2 Commr. Stevenson felt bioswales could be incorporated into the parking lot for additional diversion of drainage. Michael Cripe noted that the trees need to be outside of the swales so they don't get over -saturated. Commr. Lopes felt 10 feet was adequate for a naturalistic planting approach. Commr. Boswell questioned the size of the tree wells, which was identified as 5 -feet by 5 -feet. Commr. Root noted the porous pavers don't appear to be included. Bill Bird responded that they were eliminated in an effort to get water off the site as quickly as possible. He explained that clarifiers would be routinely'cleaned. Commr. Stevenson suggested that tenants not be labeled as "major' because it could be confusing, especially in terms of signage. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, asked why the City wants to open up so many shopping centers that will hurt San Luis Obispo's downtown. Brett Cross, 17 Mariner's. Cove, questioned if this project will meet provisions for bicycle parking. Michael Sullivan, 1127 Seaward Drive, raised issues with land use allocations. He felt this exercise is premature because the plan has not been decided by the Council or Planning Commission. He expressed his opinion that this project has been compromised because of Macy's pulling out, and felt that the types of businesses that are beneficial to the project should be analyzed prior to the details being discussed. He questioned if this project follows the City's General Plan, and noted his opinion that some things in the site plan are inconsistent with the General Plan such as parking and lighting, and noted his concern that the pole lights are too high. He noted viable alternatives were noted in the EIR, and questioned the amount of open space in the p roject. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Lopes felt the buildings should be oriented closer to the street with single- to double -loaded parking bays, and that a pedestrian connection to the residential areas should be apart from the collector street. He suggested the landscaping be varied in width for more substantial tree planting, smaller tenants eliminated, and that the larger buildings be moved closer to the street: He suggested .safer pedestrian paths at the intersections, and also questioned if structured parking was viable. ARC Minutes May 17, 2004 Page 3 Commr. Smith wanted to ensure that affordable housing was addressed. Commr. Howard noted the site plan does not meet the Guidelines or General Plan surface parking requirements. She felt the site is not being used efficiently and suggested a more compact site plan. She felt the major tenants should face Dalidio Drive, and expressed her disappointment that Macy's will not be a part of the project. Commr. Root noted that circulation needs to be improved. He did not agree that major tenants should face Dalidio Drive, and supported the varying degrees of sizes and uses. He supported water features, art, and trellises to help the pedestrian experience. He noted he likes the continuity in building forms. Commr. Wilhelm expressed the need for a larger landscaped buffer along the street, and suggested taking advantage of the wind by using kinetic sculptures. He felt the elevations facing the interior of the project are good and highly articulated, however, there was not enough detail for the elevations facing the streets. Commr. Stevenson felt the views of the project are overwhelming from the highway, and noted concern with roof -mounted equipment from the highway interchange. He felt the need for better efforts to deal with on-site drainage and to utilize the Costco solution on planters. Commr. Boudreau noted he likes the architectural style of the proposed buildings. The Commission forwarded comments on to the applicant, staff, Planning Commission, and City Council, which in summary included: • Provide details on screening of loading and outdoor sales areas with final plans. • Look at a more naturalistic approach to perimeter landscaping. • Explore shared & mixed-use parking reductions. • Return with varied lighting heights at various locations in the project (20' high parking lot standards on edges of site; 30' high on interior; 14' along main boulevard through site; and bollard lights along pedestrian walkways. • Strengthen some proposed pedestrian connections and add another west -east pathway through the center of the project. • Add taller tree planting along Dalidio Drive where it is highly elevated above the site and use berming in more level areas. • Look at parking lot planters similar to those approved for the Costco project that allow for clusters of trees. • More articulation for some building elevations to assure consistency with the Community Design Guidelines. 2. 1892 Oceanaire Drive. ARC 48-03. Review of a garage conversion and replacement covered parking; R-1 zone; David Schmitt, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending final approval to the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. ARC Minutes May 17, 2004 Page 4 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Brett Cross, 17 Mariner's Cove, expressed concerns with the proposed roof form, interior floor plan, and ability of the applicant to re -orient the existing garage to face Oceanaire Drive and build an addition along the southerly property line where the new garage is proposed. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Discussion focused on the project modifications from the previous ARC review and how the new design was in keeping with the architectural style and character of the site and surrounding neighborhood because of a 2 -car garage design, new roof form over the entry, variation in setback between the existing and proposed garages, pedestrian walkways and repainting of the entire structure. The Commission felt the applicant did a good job of modifying the proposal to address both ARC and City Council concerns and direction. roof The Commission noted that the garage conversion on this project works better than most because of the large lot. Commr. Lopes stated that he could not support the motion because it is out of scale with the neighborhood. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Howard, Boudreau, Smith and Stevenson NOES: Commr. Lopes ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6 :1 vote. 3. 805 Aerovista Place. ARC PA 157-03. Review of a public art piece for the Aerovista Business Park; C -S -PD zone; Aeroloop, applicant. (Buzz Kalkowski) Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending the Commission deny the request based upon the art jury's determination and non- compliance with the Community Design Guidelines. ARC Minutes May 17, 2004 Page 5 Pierre Rademaker, sculpture/designer, gave a brief description of the proposed art. The Commission had much discussion on the denial from the art jury. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Peggy Walls, SLO, expressed support for the project. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Discussion focused on the denial recommendation from the Art Jury and whether the piece meets the criteria for public art. Ultimately, the ARC conditioned the project to be modified so it does not appear as a logo identifying the property's business identity. Commr. Howard moved approval of the project with the following added conditions: The piece shall be modified and the font style on the existing and future signage shall not resemble the shape, color or form of the art piece;, and the angle of sculpture element "B" shall be modified, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Seconded by Commr. Root. Commr. Lopes noted that he could not support the motion because of art jury determination. AYES: Commr. Howard, Root, Wilhelm, Boudreau, Smith and Stevenson NOES: Commr. Lopes ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6: 1 vote. 4. 214 Madonna Road. ARC MOD 81-02; Review of a request to modify the building color and landscape plan to an approved project (Royal Oak Hotel); C -T zone; Dilor Inc., applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending approval of the requested modifications based on findings and subject to one condition. Peggy Walls, PR Construction, apologized for some modifications that were made that were not consistent with the plans approved by the ARC. Suzanne Morrison, project landscaper, gave a brief explanation on the trees that were planted and noted after they mature, they will screen the motel from the street. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. ARC Minutes May 17, 2004 Page 6 COMMISSION COMMENTS: Discussion focused on whether changes to the building color and landscape plan were compatible with the architectural style and location of the building. Ultimately the ARC approved the proposed modifications subject to conditions that require additional street trees, shrubs and planting variation along the Madonna Road frontage. In addition, a new banister was required along the retaining wall in front of the porte cochere to help screen the parking area, as well as, an additional wall color for trim and bay area detailing to provide visual interest and variety to current building color. Commr. Lopes moved staff's recommendation with changes to condition 1 that the plan include a total of 8 street trees that adequately shade the parking lot area, and plant vehicle screening to be maintained at a minimum of 36 -inches at all times, and provide additional planting to break up the existing row configuration, condition 2 provide wheel compatible with the City's street tree list and Madonna Road area. Seconded by Vice - Chair Howard. Commr. Boudreau could not support the motion because of the handicap railing. AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Howard, Wilhelm, Root, Smith and Stevenson NOES: Commr. Boudreau ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None. The motion carried on a 6: 1 vote. 5. Citywide. TA and ER 26-04; Review of modifications to the City's Sign Regulations; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Tyler Corey) To be continued to June 7, 2004. This item was continued to June 7, 2004, without discussion. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 6. Staff A. Agenda Forecast Tyler Corey gave an agenda forecast of upcoming items. 7. Commission A. Minutes: October 20, 2003, March 1, April 5, and May 3, 2004 were accepted as presented. ARC Minutes May 17, 2004 Page 7 ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for June 7, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES June 7, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commr. Wilhelm Staff: Associate Planner Tyler Corey ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as amended. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed her opinion of local government and that the Dalidio property should be developed. Michele Berry, requested that Item 5 on the agenda be heard first. The Commission agreed to hear Item 5 first. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Citywide. TA and ER 26-04; Modifications to the City's Sign Regulations and environmental review; City of SLO, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Tyler Corey gave a brief update of the Sign Regulations and asked if the Commission had any additional modifications. There was much discussion on whether or not murals should be considered as a signs. The Commission modified the language on roof signage and suggested a Section (J) be added to the regulations under Roof Signs that address those rare circumstances where roof signs can be allowed, provided findings found in Section 15.4.60-1,2,3, and 4 can be made. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: ARC Minutes June 7, 2004 Page 2 Discussion focused on allowing projecting signs in the Tourist Commercial (C -T) zone, and include language for when and where roof signs may be appropriate and the required findings for approval. architectural or unique features may be considered for signs where findings found in Section 15.40.610.A numbers 2.34 4 can be made." Seconded by Commr. Howard.. AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Howard, Root, Lopes, and Stevenson NOES: Commr. Smith ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 5:1 vote. 2. 1540 Froom Ranch Way. ARC MOD 173-00; Review of modification to an ARC - approved design; C-R zone; Costco Wholesale, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report recommending final approval to some of the requested modifications, based on findings, and subject to conditions. Jeff Wilson, Mulvaney G2 Architects, Belvue, Washington, expressed disagreement with two items in the report, explained why they requested the modification, and described the proposed materials. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission felt they could approve three of the four requested project modifications. The proposed terra cotta colored the accent band on the east and north building elevations and change to the column widths at the front of the building was supported as submitted. The request to substitute scored concrete with colored asphalt at the front of the store and site entry from Froom Ranch Way was approved with one of the proposed colors modified from "slate" to "concrete gray" to blend with color tones used for pedestrian areas throughout the project. The Commission could not support the requested change to the roof elements and directed the applicant to work with staff on alternatives to screen the bakery roof vents proposed on the southwest roof element. Two alternatives that were offered by the ARC were: 1) to expand the southwest corner roof element to screen the proposed bakery roof vents, and 2) Install a chimney on the southwest roof element that would be large enough to accommodate the roof vents. ARC Minutes June 7, 2004 Page 3 Commr. Boudreau. moved approval of three of the four requested proiect modifications excluding the request to change the roof features, based on findings and subject to conditions noted. Seconded by Commr. Howard. AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Howard, Root, Lopes, Smith, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6: 0 vote. 3. 1041 Mill Street. ARC 53-04; Review of a mixed-use office/residential project; O zone; Mill Street Partners, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report and asked the Commission to review the preliminary design concept and offer direction to the applicant and staff on the building design, site plan and parking layout. George Garcia, Garcia Architecture and Design, gave a PowerPoint presentation of the proposed project and offered an explanation on the building design, site plan and parking layout. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission reviewed the site plan and building elevations and provided feedback on the design. The general theme of the comments was positive. All Commissioners agreed that the site layout and mixed-use component was good, however some of the Commissioners felt the project was not compatible with the surrounding development or consistent with the Community Design Guidelines. Commr. Howard supported the project and stated that the neighborhood is in transition and the project could serve as an example to future redevelopment of other properties in the area. Commissioner Root liked the research and thought that went into the project and suggested that there be more articulation on the building elevations that introduce some circular or rounded features. He also supported the roof garden design.. Commissioner Boudreau stated that form follows function and that he can support the bold statement. Commissioner Lopes did not support the project in the proposed location and suggested modifications to the front (Mill Street) building elevation. ARC Minutes June 7, 2004 Page 4 Commissioner Stevenson liked the architectural style of the building but felt it was in the wrong location considering surrounding development. He suggested several architectural design motifs that could be incorporated into the project to help the structure blend with site and surrounding neighborhood. 4. 12350 Los Osos Valley Road. ARC -S 84-04; Review of an 8'x16' illuminated monument sign replacing a 5'x13' pole sign; C -S -S zone; Toyota of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Jaime Britz) This item was continued without discussion to the meeting of June 21, 2004. 5. 1941 Monterey Street. ARC -S 69-04; Request to allow a pole sign; C -T -S zone; Morgan Flagg, applicant. (Jaime Britz) Associate Planner Tyler Corey presented the staff report requesting denial of a pole sign, based on findings and subject to conditions. Morgan Flagg, applicant, explained the various opportunities to enhance the property and felt that a sign could help them overcome their deficit. He apologized for overlooking the need for ARC approval to move this sign and noted they are looking for an affordable modification. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Kimberley Castro stated that the subject sign is in violation of the City's Sign Regulations and requested that no pole sign be allowed in the City. Isaac Mueller, Days Inn and Super 8 Motel, stated they were required to remove their pole sign and replace it with a monument sign, and that allowing this pole sign in the proposed location would be precedent setting. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Discussion focused on past project approvals requiring monument signs as opposed to pole signs along Monterey Street, concern about the pole sign extending over the sidewalk and the precedent setting nature of the request. The ARC directed staff to research whether the commercial loading zone in front the building could be relocated or eliminated to improve views of the signage, explore other ways to improve views (i.e. tree trimming) and develop findings for a projecting sign in the C -T zone. The ARC directed the applicant to consider a projecting sign on the building that would be below the eve or a monument sign with additional height. �. uommr. Lopes moved to continue discussion to the July 6 2004 regular meeting and directed staff. to research whether the commercial loading zone in front of the building could be relocated or eliminated to improve views of the signage explore other ways to ARC Minutes June 7, 2004 Page 5 improve views (i.e. tree trimming) and develop findings for a projecting sign in the C -T zone and directed the applicant to consider a projecting sign on the building that would be below the eve or a monument sign with additional height. Seconded by Commr. Howard. AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Smith, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Wilhelm ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6: 0 vote. 6. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Corey gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 4. Commission: A. Minutes: The minutes of April 19, 2004 were accepted as presented. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for June 21, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES June 21, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Michael Boudreau, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commrs. Zeljka Howard and Allen Root Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 12350 Los Osos Valley Road. ARC -S 84-04; Review of an 8 -foot x 16 -foot illuminated monument sign replacing a 5 -foot x 13 -foot pole sign; C -S -S zone; Toyota of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Continued from June 7, 2004. (Jaime Britz) Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report recommending approval of the modification to the comprehensive sign program which would allow the replacement of the existing pole sign with a new monument, based on findings, which include approval of exceptions to the Sign Regulations. Jim Nelson, Nelson Signs, applicant's representative, felt the proposed sign is aesthetically pleasing to the eye, is more attractive that previous signage, and helps keep the attention of the customer as they drive by. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Boudreau moved to approve the monument.sign per staff recommendation with one additional condition: Introduce or revisit the landscaping around the base with ARC Minutes June 21, 2004 Page 2 large shrubs at the narrow ends and lower shrubs at the face.. Seconded by Commr.. Wilhelm. The Commission added two additional findings that staff read into the record regarding the superior design of the sign, which allowed for consolidated signage, and the sign's height allowing for unimpaired visibility of vehicles on display.. AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Wilhelm, Lopes, Smith, and Chairperson Stevenson NOES: None. ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Root ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 5 : 0 vote. 2. 399 Foothill Boulevard. ARC 76-04; Conceptual review of a redevelopment proposal to include two commercial lease spaces and multistory apartments; C -N -S zone; Stephen Barasch, applicant. (Buzz Kalkowski) Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report, requesting conceptual review, which would allow the applicant to present the proposed project to the ARC and provide a forum for neighborhood input on the project as proposed. She asked the Commission to provide preliminary comments as direction to the applicant and staff on overall site planning and building designs. Steve Barasch, applicant, explained that this is a difficult site to work with and has a long history. He mentioned that he is doing something that is more compatible with the area and gave a brief explanation of the proposed revised. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Brock Miller, 1816 Tassajara, SLO, expressed concern with the height of the building and noted he would like to see story poles placed on the site to illustrate how tall the new buildings will appear. He pointed out that because there is no commercial property in this neighborhood, this project does not fit the neighborhood. He suggested that a traffic study be done because of potential problems with the first driveway near the intersection and the bus route. He pointed out that the project is out of the parking district and there should be sufficient spaces provided on-site for the commercial component. He also noted that the storm drain easement through the project should remain public. Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, spoke against more development in the city. Naoma Wright, 400 Foothill Blvd., SLO, expressed concerns with flooding that occurs in this area because the culvert cannot hold all the water. She gave a brief history of the site. ARC Minutes June 21, 2004 Page 3 John McGee, 23 Tassajara, SLO, voice concern with the drainage pipe in this location because during heavy rains, the pipe cannot accommodate the amount of water that needs to pass through. He pointed out that there could be traffic and circulation issues and that three stories is too tall at this location. Steve Hilstein, 19 South Tassajara, SLO, voiced his opinion that the project was nicely designed but not appropriate in this neighborhood because of its single-family residential character. He pointed out that there is a shortage of on -street parking because of the parking district and that students park on the street and take the bus to Cal Poly. He noted concerns about this being apartments, which will attract students, and felt that the height of the structure will block his view of the mountain. Brett Cross, 1217 Mariner's Cove, SLO, pointed out this project is not consistent with the surrounding neighborhood; he felt it is too high, under -parked, and not in character with the neighborhood. He felt that the lofts would be used as bedrooms. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Chairperson Stevenson expressed a concern that the project is too intensive and does not fit into the neighborhood. He felt there is a lack of yard area for people who would live in these buildings. He suggested lower -scale duplex units on this site, which would be more compatible with the neighborhood character. Commr. Smith felt this site could be developed with two duplexes did not see the need for commercial uses on this property. He commented that nothing should be built on the drainpipe and it should remain in the ownership of the City. Commr. Boudreau commented that the commercial portion of the project is an improvement, and that the residential design has some good features, but expressed a concern with the two together, because of the inability to meet the parking standards. Commr. Wilhelm commented that he is struggling with the scale of this project given the contest of the site. He stated that a mixed-use project works better where there is a blend of parking and noted the two separate driveways are a concern. He noted that this project is too big, too high, and does not integrate well with the neighborhood. Chairperson Stevenson noted that a small-scale commercial use could work in the front building which is truly neighborhood serving and less intensive. It was the consensus of the Commission that they could not support the project as proposed, but suggested it be more in scale with the neighborhood. They suggested that there be more sufficient parking and that the parking layout be more practical. The Commission suggested coming back with an integration of commercial and residential, which would allow them to integrate. ARC Minutes June 21, 2004 Page 4 4. Commission: A. Minutes The minutes of November 3, 2003 were approved as amended. B. Downtown Street Trees Chairperson Stevenson provided a PowerPoint presentation illustrating streetscape improvements in Coeur D'Alene, Idaho. He pointed out the open, lacy canopy of the street trees and the coordinated way that street furniture was installed. C. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned Commr. Smith mentioned conducting a recent inventory of Monterey Street signage and not finding any particular pattern or trend. No agenda forecast of upcoming projects was given. ADJOURNMENT: - . With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 6, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 69 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, commented on the change of location of this meeting. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1941 Monterey Street. ARC 69-04; Review of a proposed pole sign; C -T -S zone; Morgan Flagg, applicant. Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending denial of the modified pole sign and second story projecting sign, based on findings and subject to conditions. Morgan Flagg, applicant, gave a brief explanation of his proposal. Michele Berry, 1364 8th Street, Los Osos, applicant's representative, addressed the commercial loading zone and noted their agreement with the City staff. She pointed out that the previously approved ARC sign was 16 feet and briefly explained their reasons for a new submittal for the pole sign. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Isaac Mueller, 1529 Mill Street, expressed concerns with the signage as it relates to the commercial loading zone, the unfair competition resulting from the existing illegal sign, and the unfair disadvantage created by shorter frontages. He presented a letter to the Commission outlining his concerns. ARC Minutes July 6, 2004 Page 2 Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, commented that the one sign is adequate enough and that too many signs will cause a cluttered look. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commissioners reviewed several options for the placement of appropriate signage on this site considering the sign regulations, the site constraints and testimony from adjacent property owners. Commr. Wilhelm moved approval of a projecting sign on the building to be mounted below the upstairs window and a monument sign that will comply with the City's Sign removed: each sign may utilize architectural sign face. Seconded by Commr. Howard. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Lopes, Smith and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 7:0 vote. 2. 892 Aerovista Place. ARC 91-04; Conceptual review of a proposed development plan and architectural style for an auto dealer/repair use; C -S -PD zone; Brent Smith, applicant. Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report, asking the Commission to review the preliminary design concept and offer direction to the applicant and staff on the preferred building design, site plan and parking layout. Carol Florence, Oasis Associates, gave a brief history of the property and offered a brief summary on what they are trying to achieve with their timeline, noting there is a real move to have the dealership out of the downtown. Brian Starr, Higuera Street, gave a brief explanation of the proposed project site. Brent Smith, dealership owner, commented that he looked for a location in San Luis Obispo for a long time and noted there has not been any land in downtown for the past 20 years. He explained that this parcel came up when Stanley Motors moved. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, expressed concern that this dealership will impede on the airport and does not want anything to interfere with the expansion of the airport and their runways; if it does she opposes the project. ARC Minutes July 6, 2004 Page 3 There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The general consensus leaned away from an agrarian design since existing buildings within the airport area have a modern, flight related design. Commissioners preferred the clean, modern lines of the applicant's preferred design to an agrarian approach, even though the Airport Area Specific Plan suggests agrarian architecture. Commissioners felt the design should be carried a step further however, and suggested the introduction of curvilinear wall features, additional covered vehicle display areas, and additional architectural embellishments to help relieve the stark building appearance. Some thought was given to use a mixture of contemporary and agrarian styled architecture. The final consensus was to support the site plan but adjust the building elevations to a modern interpretation of agrarian style architecture. 3. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for July 19, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 199 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Vice -Chair Zeljka Howard Absent: Chairperson Charles Stevenson Staff: Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, voiced her opposition to large development in the city. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 1041 Mill Street. ARC 53-04; Review of a mixed-use office/residential project and possibe building height exception; O zone; Mill Street Partners, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the project based on findings and subject to conditions. George Garcia, Garcia Design, gave a PowerPoint presentation, offered a visual look at the proposed project and briefly explained the architecture,, parking, and neighborhood compatibility. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jonnie Biagini, 1037 Mill Street, SLO, commented that Mr. Garcia has proposed a beautiful building, but expressed her concern that it does not fit into this neighborhood. She noted that the bungalows are disappearing and felt that if this site is developed, the type of architecture that makes San Luis Obispo what it is will all be gone. She voiced concern with parking in this area and requested that more thought be given to the parking situation in this area. Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, opposed this type of mixed development in this neighborhood because it destroys the type of architecture that San Luis Obispo is known for. ARC Minutes July 19, 2004 Page 2 Eric Meyer, 1235 Mill Street, SLO, noted that he restores bungalows and felt that all types of architecture are needed in San Luis Obispo to avoid a Knott's Berry Farm look. He expressed support for this project and mixed styles of development. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Wilhelm moved approval of this project based on the findings and subject to the conditions and code requirements proposed by staff, with an added condition to include Commr. Smith. Commr. Lopes opposed the motion because he felt the design does not speak to the neighborhood and the project does not fit well into this neighborhood. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Smith, Root, Boudreau, and Howard NOES: Commr. Lopes ABSENT: Commr. Stevenson ABSTAIN: None. The motion carried on a 5:1 vote. 2. 852 Hiquera Street. ARC 66-04; Review of a facade change, signage, and ADA bathroom modification; C -D -H zone; Gary Wallace, applicant. (Phil Dunmore) Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the project, based on findings and subject to conditions as recommended by staff. Warren Hamrick, Hamrick Associates, gave a brief summary of the proposed project and explained that if they have to recess the door, they would also have to recess the ramp. He stated he agrees with the rest of the conditions. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Boudreau moved approval of the groiect as noted in the staff reportwith an added condition: The applicant should explore the Possibility of a transparent cover on the awning. Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm. AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Wilhelm, Root, Lopes, Smith, and Howard ARC Minutes July 19, 2004 Page 3 NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Stevenson ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote. 3. 207 Higuera Street. ARC 51-04; Review of a new mixed-use development; C -S -MU zone; Mike Taylor, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval of the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. Thomas Brajkovich, Project Architect, gave a summary of the proposed project and its design, and noted the applicant wants to change the look of Mike's Towing with a type of mixed-use development that would be best for this area. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: facilitating, and to coordinate a new trash enclosure to fit within the neighborhood design: Doors shall be recessed off the face of the enclosure and have a steel frame and steel hinge that will be in filled with an opaque solid material such as wood planking Steel shall be fabricated to match the color scheme of the project and Commr. Lopes. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Lopes, Root, Boudreau, Smith, and Howard NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Stevenson ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 4. Royal Oak Hotel: Per ARC MOD 182-02, two additional street trees were required along Madonna Road for the project. Applicant is requesting a consistency determination with condition #1 of project approval for the installation of two ARC Minutes July 19, 2004 Page 4 Magnolia trees to fulfill the project's street tree requirement. (Tyler Corey) The Commission determined that the applicant's plan was consistent with Condition 1.. 5 Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: There was brief discussion on the agenda forecast. 6 Commission: A. Minutes: Minutes of June 7 and July 6, 2004 were approved as submitted B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for August 2, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 16, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and acting Chairperson Michael Boudreau Absent: Commrs. Zeljka Howard and Charles Stevenson Staff: Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as amended. Item 4 was moved to Item 1 due to a scheduling conflict. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed concerns with the referendum circulating throughout the town. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 1400 Osos Street. ARC PA 109-04; Review of Public Art proposal at Mitchell Park; PF -H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending that Commission find that the proposed public art meets the City's Public Art Guidelines. Commr. Root stepped down from this item due to a conflict of interest. Sandy Stanner, P.O. Box 2059, SLO, gave a brief presentation of the proposed art piece to be located in Mitchell Park, explaining that it is in memory of a young child. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, commented that Mitchell Park is getting too cluttered and suggested this proposed art piece be located in Santa Rosa Park where there is more area to accommodate it. ARC Minutes August 16, 2004 Page 2 Mary Ellen Gibson, 125 Buchon Street, SLO, expressed support for this art piece and its - location in Mitchell Park. Ursula Bishop, Pismo Street, SLO, commented that the City has turned this park into a very desirable recreation area, and expressed full support for the art piece. Pete Newman, Mariposa Street, City's Park and Recreation Commission, commented on how impressed the committee was with this public art piece and noted they liked the concept of it being memory tree in honor of a child. He expressed support for the whimsical design of this art piece and felt it is appropriate for Mitchell Park. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission discussed the design and placement of the "Memory Tree". Parks and Recreation staff reminded the ARC that the location of the art was previously determined by the Parks Master Pan. The ARC discussed the possibility of coloring the galvanized metal finish in order to relate to a tree. Realizing the visual interest of the art and appreciating the time spent designing the piece, the ARC determined the art would be an appropriate and treasured addition to the park. Commr. Wilhelm moved the Commission recommend that the City Council approve the art as proposed. Seconded by Commr. Smith. AYES: Commr. Wilhelm, Smith, Lopes, and Acting Chair Boudreau NOES: None ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Chairperson Stevenson ABSTAIN: Commr. Root The motion carried on a 4 : 0 vote. 2. 286 California Boulevard. ARC 94-03; Review of a proposed two -unit apartment; R-4 zone, Kevin & Anna Kelso, applicant. Associate Planner Phil .Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the project based on findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements. Rick Gombes, project architect, briefly described the architecture of the proposed project. Anna Kelso, applicant, gave a brief description of the proposed landscaping. PUBLIC COMMENTS: ARC Minutes August 16, 2004 Page 3 There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission felt the site plan and redevelopment of the site was appropriate for this high density housing location. The discussion and comments focused on appropriately detailing the building elevations in order to be complementary to the neighborhood. Commissioner Wilhelm felt the item should be continued to address exterior design issues unless the Commission could agree on appropriate changes that can be conditioned into the project. The Commission agreed that the project would benefit from a steeper roof pitch, vertically oriented single hung windows, false balconies on the second story, and architecturally detailed roof vents. Commr. Wilhelm moved to -grant final approval to the 2 -unit apartment proiect with conditions for window changes and a steeper roof pitch to be reviewed by staff. Seconded by Commr. Root. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Lopes, Smith, and Boudreau NOES: None ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Stevenson ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 5 : 0 vote. 3. 3550 Broad Street. ARC -S 50-03; Review of new signs for a previously approved auto dealership; C -S zone; Jeff Cole, applicant. Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staffreport recommending final approval to the sign program based on findings and subject to conditions. Carol Florence, Oasis Associates, presented a modified rendition of the proposed sign for Cole Motors dealership. She commented on some modifications for the strict sign guidelines, and mentioned they concur with adding a base to the monument sign along with landscaping. She commented on the site plan design and location in relation to the dealership. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jeff Cole, applicant, commented that he is very proud of this project and noted they are setting a standard that will be hard for other dealerships to meet. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: ARC Minutes August 16, 2004 Page 4 The Commission was generally pleased to see an auto dealership with a tasteful sign program and felt that the total area devoted to signage was appropriate for the scale of the building and site, and agreed with staff's recommended condition to add a concrete base to the monument sign and require the sign to be externally illuminated. one condition revised to state that the sians are satisfactory as submitted with the a minimum of AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Lopes, Root, Smith, and Boudreau NOES: None ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Stevenson ABSTAIN: None The vote carried on a 5 : 0 vote. 4. 715 Tank Farm Road. ARC 78-04; Review of a new two-story office building and remodel to existing building; C -S -SP -PD zone; Bill Lee, applicant. Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the project, based on findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements. Bryan Starr, SDG Architects, gave a brief explanation of the project and offered a couple of exhibits to address concerns on the site plan. He noted that they concur with the conditions in the staff report. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The building design, site plan and landscape plan received positive comments from the Commission. The architectural renderings supplied by the applicant helped the Commissioners visualize the project at this sensitive view corridor. Commissioners stressed the need to preserve and move trees where possible instead of eliminating trees Commr. Wilhelm moved approval of the project with a revision to the first condition that the plans have a different date, and to add to condition 8 that two Sycamore trees be planted along the Broad Street frontage. Seconded by Commr. Lopes ARC Minutes August 16, 2004 Page 5 AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Lopes, Root, Smith, and Boudreau NOES: None ABSENT: Commrs. Howard and Stevenson ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 5 : 0 vote. 5. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. Commr. Wilhelm noted that he would be absent on September 7, 2004 6. Commission: A. Minutes: Minutes of November 17, 2003, were accepted as presented; May 17, 2004 were accepted as amended, and July 19, 2004 were approved as presented ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 7, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO C ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, September 7, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commrs. Zeljka Howard and Greg Wilhelm Staff: Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 4041 Broad Street. ARC 121-04; Review of a new commercial development for a revised PD office project; C -S -PD zone; Nick Tompkins, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report requesting preliminary feedback on the revised the building designs and locations. Mike Peachy, applicant's representative, gave an overview of the project and explained the proposed layout and detailed some of the proposed architectural elements. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Steve Delmartini, Mill Street, SLO, commented that he was curious on the tenant mix and expressed support for the commercial/business zoning on this project. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission compared the revised project to the commercial development that was originally envisioned for this location and offered feedback to the applicant for a revised design to return to the ARC. The Commission agreed that a number of amendments �,'' should be incorporated into the project prior to returning to the ARC. ARC Minutes September 7, 2004 Page 2 It was the consensus of the Commission to continue this item to a date uncertain. 2. 1605 Calle Joaquin. ARC -PR and ER 120-00; Review of revised plans for a 139 room hotel and environmental review; C -T zone; Ocean Park Hotels, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report requesting comments on the preliminary design concept and direction on the building design, site plan and parking layout. Jim Flagg, Ocean Park Hotels, applicant, gave a brief presentation on the project and offered some renditions of the proposed hotel. Jeff Palowski, gave a brief overview of the proposed parking layout. Casey Patterson, CJP Patterson, Atascadero, described the proposed landscaping. .PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission discussed the revised building plans and the realignment of Calle Joaquin while acknowledging the architectural improvements incorporated into the hotel project since the previous review. Commissioners recommended a number of items be amended prior to returning to the ARC. It was the consensus of the Commission to continue this item to a date uncertain. 3. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast Planner Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. Staff discussed the proposed Cinderella Carpets mixed-use project. B. Budget Goals C. Updates on KSBY flagpole lighting and Madonna Plaza pylon sign installation. The ARC asked staff to research the approved lighting for the flagpole near KSBY. 4. Commission: A. Minutes: The minutes of December 15, 2003, were accepted as presented, and ARC Minutes September 7, 2004 Page 3 the minutes of June 21, and August 16, 2004, were accepted as amended. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for September 20, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary N SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES September 20, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commr. Allen Root Staff: Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore and Deputy Community Development Director Michael Draze ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed her opinion that the City does not need more plazas. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 3510 Broad Street. ARC 127-04; Review of a new mixed-use commercial and residential project in the C -S zone; Cinderella Carpet One, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report requesting direction from the Commission on the site plan and elevations of the proposed development. Louisa Smith, project architect, discussed it being an archeological site and noted there has never been anything found on the site with the Phase One Analysis. She commented they are going to proceed with a phase 2 archeology study before coming back to the ARC. She further explained that an impact study was done and noted they were going to incorporate all the recommendations that were made. She briefly explained the proposed project. John Sexton, applicant, gave an explanation of the business and types of products that are distributed. He explained why the windows need to be positioned so high. ARC Minutes September 20, 2004 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, stated her opposition to all mixed-use projects. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Lopes requested that the residential units be placed further back and that parking be in front of the L shape part of this building. He requested that staff look into plan policies on view sheds. He did not support the residential patios facing Broad Street and felt the building should be moved counter clockwise so the patios face east. He suggested there be enclosed garages for the residential units. Commr. Wilhelm commented that he feels a disconnect between the apartments and the building. He suggested rotating them 90 degrees and putting the units over the warehouse. He felt the aesthetics are very monolithic and that some efforts need to be made on the west elevation. He suggested adding some awnings and taking the two story off of Broad Street. Vice -Chair Howard concurred. Commr. Boudreau felt the project has some interesting ideas and supported the parking that faces Capitolio Way. He concurred with Commr. Lopes' comments about the patios along Broad, and noted the entrances into the apartments are very narrow and have a motel look. He requested that a view study be done to see how the viewshed is affected. Chairperson Stevenson noted the Commission is supportive of mixed use, but noise may be an issue. He suggested the building be moved back away from Broad Street and that there be an area on the site that is accessible for the tenants so they could have a gathering area. He expressed concern that the two-story building in the front closes off the viewshed and suggested moving it to the back or lowering it. He pointed out there is little or no room for storage for the residential units. While the Commission did not take a formal action on the project, the following direction was given: 1. Provide additional background support for the noise analysis to justify construction of outdoor residential patios facing Broad Street (if design continues to seek this configuration). 2. Provide a barrier design between outdoor patios on the residential units to create reasonable privacy (six-foot height minimum). ARC Minutes September 20, 2004 Page 3 3. Reconfigure the site plan to allow a greater setback between the residential units and Broad Street and consider rotating the footprint ninety degrees in a clockwise fashion, placing the residential units above the warehouse building. 4. Consider the use of enclosed garages for the residential units. 5. Provide a perspective (photo simulations) of building as viewed from Broad Street showing off site views of the surrounding area and hills. 6. Provide for a common outdoor private open space for use of residential occupants that allows shelter from road noise. 7. Some parking is acceptable between building and Broad Street at this location instead of placing residential units close to street. 8. Consider use of metal or the roofing for units instead of asphalt composition shingles. 9. Building should provide additional significant articulation, especially facing Broad Street. Larger storefront windows are an important significant feature facing Broad Street. 2. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast Staff gave a brief agenda forecast of upcoming items. B. Review of a concept plan to establish a public plaza on Monterey Street between Santa Rosa and Osos Streets. (Mike Draze) Mike Draze, Deputy Director, gave a presentation on the proposed concept plan to establish a public plaza on Monterey Street. Chuck Crotser, architect, gave an overview of the proposed concept plan of the public plaza on Monterey Street. Gary Fowler, Mill Street, noted he is a long time resident of San Luis Obispo and is strongly against this project. He objected to the street being permanently closed off, noting the potential for group of activists that would gather in this plaza, creating a noise issue. Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, concurred with Mr. Fowler and opposed the plaza project. ARC Minutes September 20, 2004 Page 4 ' Eric Meyer, SLO, expressed concern with the circulation surrounding this project noting it would heavily impact the other streets surrounding the closed area of Monterey Street. 3. Commission: A. Minutes: September 7, 2004 were accepted as amended. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned Chairperson Stevenson expressed disappointment with public art location at the BMW building. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for October 4, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES - OCTOBER 4, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Michael Boudreau, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: None Staff: Associate Planner Tyler Corey, Deputy Community Development Director Ronald Whisenand, and Recording Secretary Irene Pierce ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed concerns with the City continuing to develop and that R-1 zones should be for single-family residences not manufacturing uses. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 153 Cross Street. ARC 155-03; Review of'a new wireless dish antenna on the roof of an existing building; C -S zone; Cellular One of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Associate Planner Tyler Corey recommended continuing this item to a date uncertain with direction to the applicant regarding changes to the overall design of the project to appear integral to the site and building. He offered some suggestions to bring this project into compliance. Dino Putrino, 733 Marsh Street, SLO, Cellular One Representative, responded to staff's recommended suggestions and extensively described the height, color, visibility, relocation, and incorporation of the antenna into a stealth feature. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, voiced concern that the dish would appear too massive and add visual clutter to the skyline. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: ARC Minutes October 4, 2004 Page 2 Commission discussion focused on the visibility of the proposed microwave dish from / several vantage points, rounded form of the dish as compared to the rectilinear forms of the building, location of the dish on the roof and ability to screen the dish with an architectural feature from the casual observer. Commr. Boudreau moved approval of the project, subject to the following conditions: 1. Any change to the approved design or other conditions of approval. must. be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. The proposed 6 -foot microwave dish antenna shall be screened by a solid enclosure on three (3) sides and an RF transparent face on one (1) side in a Development Director. 3. Development Director. 1 4. of Seconded by Commr. Root. AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Root, Wilhelm, Howard, Lopes, Smith and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 7:0 vote. 2. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Deputy Director Whisenand gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. Staff discussed the agenda for the October 18, 2004, regular meeting. Several Commissioners expressed concern that they will not be able to attend this meeting and requested that the items be rescheduled to a special meeting on October 21, 2004, or the next regular ARC meeting of November 1, 2004. 3. Commission: A. Budget Goals. Discuss and recommend potential Major City Goals for inclusion ARC Minutes October 4, 2004 Page 3 in the 2005-07 Budget. The Commission discussed the 2005-07 Budget Goals. The Commission unanimously voted to recommend the 5 goals to the City Council. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for November 1, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSOIN MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Zeljka Howard, Michael Boudreau, Jim Lopes, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commissioner David Smith Staff: Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore and Recording Secretary Irene Pierce ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, expressed her opinion on the state of the City. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 1605 Calle Joaquin. ARC and ER 120-00; Review of revised plans for a 139 room hotel in the C -T zone, and environmental review; Ocean Park Hotels, applicant. Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the building and site design to allow construction of the 129 -room hotel based on findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements, and adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. Jeff Polaski, PK Architects, 1620 North 80 Street, Phoenix, Arizona, gave a brief summary of the proposed materials, noting the pitch of the roof has been lowered, and they did not add gutters because it creates a band above it. Casey Patterson, Project Landscape Architect, gave a brief explanation of the proposed landscaping. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, spoke in opposition to the development. There were no further comments made from the public. ARC Minutes November 1, 2004 Page 2 COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Wilhelm moved the staff recommendation.. Seconded by Commr. Boudreau. Commr. Lopes spoke to several problems in the project concerning the preservation of the open space and significant impact of the viewshed in the. Urban Reserve Line buffer zone. He suggested changing the species of trees proposed in the buffer zone. He suggested an amendment to the motion that a condition be added to enhance the The motion maker and seconder agreed to the amendment. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Boudreau, Root, Howard, Lopes, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Smith ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6 : 0 vote. 2. 2049 McCollum Street. ARC MI 116-04; Review of a new one -bedroom house to a lot with an existing two-bedroom house in the R-1 zone; Barry Goyette, applicant. Associate Planner Philip Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval to the project, based on findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements. Tom Desanto, Project Architect, presented a PowerPoint presentation and explanation of the project. Barry Goyette, applicant, offered some information on the proposed landscaping for the project. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, SLO, expressed her opposition to development in residential zones. Evie Justinson, adjacent property owner, expressed support for the second dwelling on this large lot. Lance Bumberger, Point Hueneme, CA., spoke on behalf of his father who lives at 2011 McCollum Street, expressing his opinion that these neighborhoods have declined because the new tenants of these homes do not have much buy in. He expressed his feeling that these homes will remain rentals and might lend themselves to future development. Mike Macnamara, SLO, expressed support for the project. ARC Minutes November 1, 2004 Page 3 Jody Mello, SLO, expressed that her family has been in this county for over 100 years, noted she takes pride in San Luis Obispo and what happens here, and expressed support for the project. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: by Vice -Chair Howard. AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Howard, Wilhelm, Root, Lopes, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Smith ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6 : 0 vote. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 3. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Dunsmore gave an agenda forecast of upcoming items. 4. Commission: A. Minutes: September 20, 2004 were accepted as amended and October 4, 2004 were accepted as presented. B. Recent Project Review -Lessons Learned The ARC requested a study session to discuss having a greater orientation toward smart growth and sustainability. Chairman Stevenson asked to agendize a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss form -based zoning, along with a presentation by Paul Crawford. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 7:40 to the next regular meeting scheduled for Monday, November 15, 2004, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room. SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES November 15, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commrs. Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commr. Michael Boudreau Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Supervising Civil Engineer Barbara Lynch ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed her concern that the General Plan was not being followed. There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC_ HEARINGS: 1. City -Wide. ARC 195-04; Review new city standard for street tree wells; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Senior Planner Pam Ricci, presented the staff report, recommending approval of the new City standard for street tree wells because of their functionality, better maintenance, and aesthetics, based on two findings. There was some discussion on the potential retrofitting of existing tree wells and different patterns of tree wells available. Supervising Civil Engineer Barbara Lynch presented pictures of the tree wells to the Commission and stressed that these particular tree wells are the best because they allow for tree growth and ADA compliance. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mary Beth Schroeder, 2085 Wilding Lane, expressed her concern that the street tree species list and tree well design had not been properly analyzed. ARC Minutes November 15, 2004 Page 2 COMMISSION COMMENTS Commr. Root noted the potential for tripping hazards with open tree wells, and asked about the different patterns of tree wells available. Commr. Lopes noted that the Tree Committee is looking at street trees for the community and downtown, and that Public Works is working with Community Development staff to determine the best selection of trees in the downtown. He felt the proposed tree grate works well in the downtown and coordinates with other street furniture. Commr. Howard moved to -grant final approval to the design of the new street tree wells, as recommended by staff. Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm. The Commission supported the new tree wells and thought the new design seemed logical and more attractive than the current concrete coverings. There was some discussion about different design options and also future involvement with the selection of different species of trees in the city. Commissioner Stevenson asked staff that a discussion about appropriate street trees for the downtown be included on a future agenda. AYES: Commrs. Howard, Wilhelm, Root, Stevenson, Lopes, and Smith NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Boudreau ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 2. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast Senior Planner Pam Ricci provided an agenda forecast. B. Advisory Body Recruitment Ideas Senior Planner Ricci mentioned that the City Clerk had met with advisory body liaisons regarding the recruitment process. She asked for the Commission's input on the application forms and ideas to encourage people to apply for the ARC. The Commission provided specific recommendations on changes to the ARC's supplemental questionnaire, which staff will forward to the City Clerk for use in the next year's recruitment process. Commr. Lopes suggested that email be used to reach different professional organizations, such as Cal Poly, APA, and AIA. ARC Minutes November 15, 2004 Page 3 3. Commission: A. Minutes: November 1, 2004. The minutes of the November 1, 2004 meeting were approved as modified. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned The Commission briefly discussed Crossroads Deli, BMW lighting intensity and the sign at Pizza Brokers. C. Advisory Body Goals The Commission supported their goals, as presented. They also reviewed the goals of the Planning Commission and Tree Committee. Commr. Lopes noted that the City's budget for its street tree program lags behind many other communities. With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. to a regular meeting scheduled for Monday, September 7, 2004, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTUAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2004 ROLL CALL: Commrs. Allen Root, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, Greg Wilhelm, Vice -Chair Michael Boudreau, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson STAFF: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Planner Technician Jaime Hill, and Recording Secretary Irene Pierce ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 226 North Tassaiara Drive. ARC 196-04; Review of a request to convert an existing single car garage to a family room and development of detached garage; R-1 zone; Duncan L. Osborne, applicant. (Jaime Britz -Hill) Planning Technician Jaime Britz presented the staff report recommending approval of the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. Duncan Osborne, applicant, offered background information on the project and explained how the turnaround area at the rear of the site could be modified to allow vehicles to exit the site in a forward direction. He concurred with the conditions of approval. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission felt the garage conversion worked well in this case with the replacement parking located at the rear of the site. There was discussion regarding appropriate modifications to the street elevation. Seconded by Vice -Chair Howard. ARC Minutes December 6, 2004 Page 2 Commr. Boudreau felt that the condition regarding a vehicle turnaround area should be a recommendation rather than a requirement. Commr. Wilhelm suggested that the sliding glass doors be eliminated and that windows, or windows with a single French door, be added instead to match existing windows in the front of the house. Commr. Lopes suggested using the existing side door to lead to a side yard patio area, and that the front windows match the existing windows. Chairperson Stevenson suggested the required vehicle turnaround area utilize brick material or some other material other than concrete. AYES: Commrs. Boudreau, Howard, Wilhelm, Root, Lopes, Smith, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 7:0 vote. COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 2. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Senior Planner Pamela Ricci gave the agenda forecast of upcoming items. 3. Commission: A. Minutes The minutes of November 15, 2004 were accepted as presented. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned Pam Ricci reported that the new owners of Village Host Pizza recently installed new cabinet signs without permits and wish to retain these signs. She indicated that they will be coming forward with an application for architectural review of the revised sign program. The ARC would like to schedule a joint ARC/PC hearing to discuss form based zoning regulations and hear a presentation on the subject from Paul Crawford. Pam Ricci reported that staff is working on scheduling the joint meeting, but no date has yet to be �, selected. ARC Minutes December 6, 2004 Page 3 ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. to a regular meeting scheduled for Monday, December 20, 2004, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES December 20, 2004 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Greg Wilhelm, Allen Root, Zeljka Howard, Jim Lopes, David Smith, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson Absent: Commissioner Michael Boudreau Staff: Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, Senior Planner Pam Ricci, and Recording Secretary Irene Pierce ACEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1515 Fredericks Street. ARC MOD 106-03; Review of modifications to an approved project to allow materials changes to the main church building and phasing of a proposed parking lot; R-1 zone; United Methodist Church, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Commissioner Wilhelm stepped down from participation on this project due to a potential conflict of interest because he is the acting liaison for the project. Commissioner Lopes noted he is a member of this congregation and stepped down from participation on this project. Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report recommending final approval of the modifications, based on findings, and subject to conditions. Jack Althouse, project architect, provided a presentation utilizing computer modeling of the building to show how siding on different portions of the building would appear. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Ron Griffin, Church Pastor, 1515 Fredericks Street, expressed concern with the proposed siding in that it might look too "soft" and that the church should express "strength" in the community. He mentioned that parking would be addressed as a part of their initial plan, as well as the visual impact, and supported the request. ARC Minutes December 20, 2004 Page 2 Terry Hanauer spoke in support of the proposed modifications. He mentioned he would like the condition regarding postponement of the north parking lot retained to give the church added flexibility. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission was convinced that the limited use of siding on key building features near the entry and the bell tower was appropriate. AYES: Commrs. Howard, Root; Smith, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Boudreau ABSTAIN: Commrs. Wilhelm and Lopes The motion carried on a 4: 0 vote. 2. 12200 Los Osos Valley Road. ARC -S 214-04; Review of a request to allow a 92 square -foot pole sign where 72 square feet is normally allowed; C -S -PD zone; Signtech, applicant. (Jaime Britz -Hill) Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report recommending approval of the modifications to the sign program, and allow a replacement pole sign, based on findings, and subject to conditions, acknowledging the needed exception to the Sign Regulations. Steve Havens, Sign -Tech, 111 East Donovan Road, Santa Maria, concurred with the staff report but felt that reducing the height would create an unpleasing look and would be under -proportioned to the environment. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: A majority of the Commission was convinced that the unique oval shape of the sign warranted the consideration of an exception since the actual area of the oval was substantially in compliance with the 72 square -foot maximum allowed sign area. The Commission was also pleased to hear that the sign would be fabricated from high quality stainless steel. Vice -Chair Howard could not support the height exception. ARC Minutes December 20, 2004 Page 3 Commr. Lopes moved the staff recommendation. Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm. AYES: Commrs. Lopes, Wilhelm, Root, Smith, and Stevenson NOES: Vice -Chair Howard ABSENT: Commr. Boudreau ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 5 : 1 vote. 3. 4041 Broad Street. ARC 121-04; Review of a new commercial development for a revised PD office project; C -S -PD zone; Nick Tompkins, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending the Commission reaffirm the City Council's prior approval (July 10, 2001) of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (ER 148-00) and adopt the Addendum; and grant final approval to the building design, based on findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements. The ARC expressed a concern that this project has not followed . typical review procedures and requested they hear from the City Attorney on how they can proceed on this project. Because the original review included the gas station, the ARC expressed interest in reviewing the approved gas station plans along with the revised office plans. Mike Peachy, applicant's representative, 225 Prado Road, SLO, gave a brief explanation on the proposed project and offered some information on the types of materials and colors schemes they propose using. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Chairperson Stevenson suggested the gas station come back to the Commission because they approved a project that is being piece-mealed out. The Commission supported the new office development design within the planned development and added additional project conditions to improve pedestrian circulation through the landscape planters and additional relief to the building. The ARC expressed disappointment that the gas station at the corner was not a part of the architectural review. Chairman Stevenson requested that staff explore options of allowing the ARC to require design modifications to the approved design of the gas station to allow the gas station to be compatible with the revised office project. conditions The roof feature shall be adiusted by design to add a screened vented ARC Minutes December 20, 2004 Page 4 ire by Commr. Howard. AYES: Commrs. , Root, Howard, Wilhelm, Lopes, Smith, and Stevenson NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Boudreau ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 6: 0 vote. 4. 11175 Los Osos Valley Road. ARC 105-04; Review of a 60 foot tall wireless telecommunication antenna camouflaged as a pine tree including cables and associated equipment; PF zone; Sprint PCS, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report recommending final approval of the project, based on findings and subject to conditions and code requirements. Trisha Knight, representative of Sprint PCS, gave a brief explanation of the proposed camouflaged antenna. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission supported the proposed wireless telecommunications facility at Laguna Lake Golf Course. They felt the artificial pine tree was appropriate at this location and provided sufficient stealth of the wireless antenna panels that would be mounted on the pole disguised as a tree. Commissioner Root felt that wireless facilities should be mounted onto existing site improvements such as buildings or existing structures and therefore cast the dissenting vote. Commr. Wilhelm moved final approval to the project based on findings and subiect to conditions and code requirements; and added a condition to add several feet.of artificial limbs to the top of the tree to create a natural tapered appearance. Seconded by Commr. Smith. Commr. Root could not support the motion because he felt this is not the direction to go with this antenna. ARC Minutes December 20, 2004 Page 5 AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Smith, Howard, Lopes and Stevenson NOES: Commr. Root ABSENT: Commr. Boudreau ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a 5 : 1 vote. 5. Staff: A. Agenda Forecast: Planner Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 6. Commission: A. Minutes of December 6, 2004 were accepted as presented. B. Recent Project Review — Lessons Learned. The Commission entertained a motion referring to Item 3. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled for January 3, 2005, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Irene E. Pierce Recording Secretary