HomeMy WebLinkAboutARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES 2012COMMISSION
MINUTES
2012
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
January 9, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Michelle McCovey-Good, Greg
Wynn, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioner Hopkins and Vice -Chair Duffy
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Planning Technician Marcus Carloni, and
Recording Secretary Allison Zike
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of November 21, 2011 were approved as presented.
The minutes of December 12, 2011 were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 297 Madonna Road. ARC -S 138-11; Review of Madonna Road -oriented, ten -foot
diameter wall signage for Chipotle Mexican Grill; C-R zone; Chipotle Mexican Grill,
applicant. (Marcus Carloni)
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission adopt the draft resolution approving an exception to the Sign Regulations
allowing a wall sign, of smaller scale than proposed by the applicant, on a building face
that does not have a public entry, based on findings and subject to conditions he
outlined.
Commr. Curtis inquired if Panera Bread, occupant of the tenant space adjacent to
Chipotle, would be subject to ARC review of their existing signs once applications are
received, due to Panera Bread installing these signs without permit.
Staff responded that the applicant would have an option to modify sign plans to comply
with sign regulations or be subject to ARC review.
Commr. Ehdaie asked if the Commission could approve an exception to the sign
regulations or Community Design Guidelines to allow the Chipotle wall sign as proposed
with a ten -foot diameter.
ARC Minutes
January 9, 2012
Page 2
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, stated that the proposed ten -foot diameter wall sign could
be approved by the ARC if based on findings of consistency with the sign regulations
and Community Design Guidelines.
Commr. Wynn asked staff to clarify the portion of the building face area calculated for
the purpose of the wall sign percent coverage calculation.
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, explained that building face area was calculated
excluding the windows that are prominent on the building face which resulted in a 16 -
foot by 16 -foot area for sign placement.
George Garcia, project architect, presented several images of the project site showing
the proposed ten -foot diameter wall sign and explained existing site conditions. He
emphasized that the subject building is not included in the Madonna Plaza master sign
program and that actual building height should be calculated as 23 -feet tall based on a
landscape berm built up on the north-west facade and that, based on that height, the
maximum allowed signage should be 120 square feet. He stated that the building
meets criteria for sign regulation exceptions including its unusual building design and
the orientation of the building where signs facing entrances may not have adequate
visibility from the right of way.
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, stated that the Madonna Plaza master sign program does
not apply to the building, but that the sign program was used to evaluate compatibility
and equality with surrounding businesses. She agreed with the applicant that a wall
sign on a building face without an entrance is appropriate in this case since past
businesses had located a smaller sign here. She reinforced that staffs main issue was
the scale of the proposed sign since it is for a fourth sign for the business which
occupies a relatively small space rather than an anchor tenant. Furthermore, she stated
that the visible portion of the wall area on the north side of the building is utilized for
evaluating the size and proportion of an appropriate wall sign, not the area buried by the
berm.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wynn agreed with staff that a sign should be allowed on the north side of the
building because there are other signs in Madonna Plaza with signs oriented toward
Madonna Road. He stated that a ten -foot diameter sign is excessive but that a five-foot
diameter sign is relatively small compared to the building face area.
Commr. McCovey-Good agreed with staff that a sign should be allowed on the north
side of the building. She asked for clarification regarding the building face calculation
and if it is appropriate to discount the window area in that calculation.
ARC Minutes
January 9, 2012
Page 3
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, stated that the Community Design Guidelines
state wall signs should be proportional to the "scale of the wall to which they are
attached" rather than the "building face."
Commr. Curtis raised a concern with Finding 2 in the draft resolution and suggested
modifying the finding to remove the reference to "superior design" and referencing Sign
Regulation 15.40.610 C.
Commr. Ehdaie supported a sign on the north-west side of the building at the proposed
scale with a ten -foot diameter.
Chair. Palazzo stated that the proposed sign does not comply with previous ARC
approvals and the sign is not necessarily unique according to guidelines.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie to approve the draft
resolution with the modification of Findina 2 to strike "the sign exception is for sunerior
oriented toward Madonna Road.
Commr. Wynn commented that the proposed motion allows the applicant to maintain
the medallion -shape of the sign.
Commr. Curtis stated that he did not support the motion allowing an eight -foot diameter
medallion sign and that the smaller sign allowance as originally recommended by staff
was more appropriate.
AYES: Commrs. McCovey-Good, Wynn, and Ehdaie
NOES: Commr. Curtis, and Chair Palazzo
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Hopkins and Vice -Chair Duffy
The motion passed on a 3:2 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects including a site
improvement review, a mixed-use project at Taft and Kentucky, and an office
addition at French Hospital. She also presented an update on the Fresh & Easy
project at Broad and Santa Barbara.
ARC Minutes
January 9, 2012
Page 4
3. Commission:
Based on staffs presentation and Commission discussion, the ARC agreed that the
conduit extending out of the top of the electrical service box at the Fresh & Easy project
facing Broad Street should be screened.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Allison Zike
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on February 13, 2012.
Ryan
AdminiisCrrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
`- ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
February 13, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commrs. Ken Curtis, Steven Hopkins, Michelle McCovey-Good, Vice -
Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commrs. Greg Wynn and Suzan Ehdaie
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Planning Technician Marcus Carloni, and
Recording Secretary Anu Dhaliwal
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of January 9, 2012, were approved as presented..
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 796 Foothill Boulevard. ARCMI 145-11; Review of horse statue at the comer of
Foothill Blvd. and North Chorro Street for Black Horse Coffee Shop; C -N zone; SLO
Uptown LLC, applicant. (Marcus Carloni)
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission adopt the draft resolution which grants final approval to the project, based
on findings, and subject to conditions which he outlined.
Commr. Curtis inquired if there was a clear coat substance to apply to the statue to
eliminate possible rust or bleeding from the metal. He asked who the artist of the statue
was and noted that the second finding in staff report regarding compliance with the
CEQA Guidelines is not applicable with the project.
Staff responded there were different products that could be applied to the metal
sculpture to protect against rusting and bleeding, but no specific treatment was
recommended to applicant. Staff acknowledged that the draft resolution contained a
typing error and would be amended.
Vice -Chair Jim Duffy questioned if there was any discussion about installing
landscaping around the statue.
ARC Minutes
February 13, 2012
Page 2
Staff stated landscaping ideas were discussed with the applicant but not specifically
recommended because of concerns that it could obstruct the existing pathway to the
Black Horse Coffee Shop.
John Tricamo, project applicant, explained a local artist from northern San Luis Obispo
County created the statue. Mr. Tricamo supported staffs recommendations and
conditions and does not know yet what product will be used to seal the statue.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Vice -Chair Jim Duffy recommended in -lieu of coating the statue there should be a
foreground of small-scale planting around the base of the statue to coordinate with the
existing landscaping.
Chairperson Palazzo supported the project as recommended by staff without additional
conditions.
- There were no further comments made from the Commission.
identified in the staff report, and with a correction to the CEQA finding to reference the
pertinent categorical exemption.
AYES: Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wynn and Ehdaie
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
2. 1340 Taft Street. ARC 50-09; Conceptual review of mixed-use project with 3,900
sq. ft. of commercial space and seven residential units; C -N zone; ICON at SLO,
applicant. (Brian Leveille)
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the Commission.
ARC Minutes
February 13, 2012
Page 3
On a motion by Commr. Curtis, seconded by Vice -Chair Duffy to continue Item 2 to the
March 5, 2012, ARC meeting.
AYES:
Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
None
ABSENT:
Commrs. Wynn and Ehdaie
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci provided a forecast for upcoming agendas. She provided an update on
ARC recruitment noting that Vice -Chair Duffy was being recommended to serve a
second four-year term. She also reminded the Commission about the upcoming
Advisory Body Recognition Event scheduled for Thursday, March 1St, at 5:30 p.m.,
in the Council Chamber at City Hall.
4. Commission:
Commr. Hopkins mentioned that the landscaping at Prefumo Creek Commons was
nicely installed and adds to the attractiveness of the project. He also mentioned the
recent URM remodel at Broad and Higuera Streets and how the project could benefit
from some pedestrian -level signs.
The Commission discussed the City improvements being installed along Higuera Street
in the downtown core. The topic of street trees came up. Staff suggested to the
Commission that the City Arborist attend a future meeting to provide a presentation
about plans for street trees in the downtown core.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 5:46 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Anu Dhaliwal
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on March 5, 2012.
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
March 5, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Michelle
McCovey-Good, Greg Wynn, Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson
Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commr. Ehdaie
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Deputy Director Doug Davidson, and Director
Derek Johnson
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of February 13, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1340 Taft Street. ARC 50-09; Conceptual review of mixed-use project with 3,900
sq. ft. of commercial space and seven residential units; C -N zone; ICON at SLO,
applicant. (Continued from February 13, 2012, meeting) (Doug Davidson)
Doug Davidson, Deputy Director, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission conceptually review project plans and provide direction on issues outlined
in the staff report relating to the proposed site plan and building design. He provided an
overview of the project history, its current components, and outlined the topics where
feedback from the Commission was desired.
Commr. Curtis questioned the intent of the amenity space over the proposed
commercial space.
Staff responded the amenity space was intended to serve the residences and required
no additional parking as an accessory use. He further responded the applicant planned
to eventually create condominium units here, the alley at the rear of the site was public
right-of-way, and that the commercial spaces would be small, low -impact type uses. He
noted that staffs research had found that the parking lifts proposed have been utilized
in many projects and that they do require some on-going maintenance.
ARC Minutes
March 5, 2012
Page 2
Eran Fields, applicant, spoke in support of the project. He provided a brief introduction
and reiterated his motivation to improve the site with the project.
Jay Blatter, applicant's architect, explained the preference for alley access for safety
and maneuvering. He provided an overview of the project including the intent of the
amenity space, a fully -independent mechanical lift parking system, the proposed green
wall at the back of residential units, and materials to be used for the project. The
materials described include: stucco, Rheinzink Siding (tile pattern), fiber cement siding
and metal awnings. He stated that more architectural details will be presented with the
final review.
Commr. Wynn questioned how the green plant wall will work, and Mr. Blatter clarified
that the wall will be planted with vines or succulents.
Vice -Chair Duffy asked about the idea of corrugated metal siding for pop -outs. Mr.
Blatter stated that they were flexible with some of the material choices.
Commr. Hopkins asked if there are any proposed changes to the existing alley. Mr..
Blatter responded by saying that the plans include taking down the wall.
- . Commr. Curtis asked if the parking is two or three tiered and where the affordable unit's
parking is located. Mr. Blatter responded that the mechanical parking is two levels and
1.2 feet high, and the affordable unit's parking space is located in the surface parking lot.
Commr. Curtis questioned why the roof terrace is shared and if the amenity space for
residents is separately leasable. Mr. Blatter explained there would be a low height
division like a planter on the roof terraces and affirmed that the amenity space would not
be separately leasable so that it is maintained for residents.
Commr. McCovey-Good questioned if there would be any roof -mounted equipment, and
Mr. Blatter described that it would be screened by the building parapet.
Commr. Wynn asked about the height clearance in the lift area. Mr. Blatter stated that it
is high enough to accommodate most people.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Edith Jakes, San Luis Obispo, noted concerns with the scale of the project and on -
street parking creating visibility issues.
Frank Jakes, San Luis Obispo, stated that he thinks the project is architecturally
attractive but is too large in scale. He also expressed concern for alley access,
specifically that delivery trucks could block the alley for other traffic. Other points he
raised included that the den could become a bedroom, on-site parking is already taxed,
and the amenity space could be converted.
ARC Minutes
March 5, 2012
Page 3
Isabel Marques, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project. She stated there are 14 parking
spaces currently served off the alley as well as garbage service. She is against
removing the retaining wall and thinks that access should be from the street instead of
the alley. She stated there is not enough parking provided by the project..
Carolyn Smith, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern the project would be too high in
density and serve more of the student population. She was also concerned with the
safety of the parking lifts.
Gil Bastidas, San Luis Obispo, supported the project because the site is currently a
blight of the area and the project will be a visual and safety improvement.
Thom Jess, San Luis Obispo, spoke of his experience with parking lifts and stated that
Klaus is a high-quality manufacturer and this application is a good use of the lift.
Traitt Vance, San Luis Obispo, mentioned that the project meets its parking
requirements without asking for the available 30% mixed-use reduction.
Ellen Goodwin, San Luis Obispo, stated there should be further analysis of parking
(including maintenance) and potential impacts on alley access. She added that the
affordable unit should be bigger with a parking/bike space, the overall project scale and
bulk reduced, and mechanical equipment screening included in final plans.
Grant Robbins, San Luis Obispo, noted the project can limit the number of cars that
residents can have and the alley access to project parking is a superior design. He also
mentioned that the project provides the opportunity for retail presence along the street.
Shawn Reed, San Luis Obispo, supported the project's redevelopment and infill of the
site and believed the proposed access is safe. He also pointed out that tenants won't
necessarily be students.
Aaryn Abbott, San Luis Obispo, supported the project as a mixed-use urban lifestyle
that promotes pedestrian movement. He added that the project is more attractive than
many older projects and parking is not the primary project feature.
Chris Bertilacchi, San Luis Obispo, supported the project. He called attention to the use
of the site by homeless and as an illegal dumping ground.
Sandra Rowley mentioned a letter she prepared for Residents for Quality
Neighborhoods (RQN). She suggested the project leave the retaining wall in place and
that project traffic take access from the project site rather than the alley.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Curtis mentioned the importance of signage to properly direct commercial
customers to on-site parking but was not convinced that alley access would work for the
commercial tenants. He recommended that the idea of an on -street delivery loading
ARC Minutes
March 5, 2012
Page 4
zone -be explored. He emphasized the mechanical parking should be maintained in
good condition at all times. He suggested upper floor setbacks to modulate massing
and reduce the project scale along Kentucky Street.
Commr. Hopkins supported the idea of an alley access if other issues are addressed..
He appreciated the size and bulk of the project as the entrance to the neighborhood.
Commr. McCovey-Good stated that roof equipment could add to the bulk of the project
but stated the mechanized parking is a good use of space.
Commr. Wynn noted concern that commercial customers will not find the on-site parking
provided off the alley. He suggested keeping the portion of the site near the street
intersection clear of access points. He further recommended removing some height out
of the interior volumes and asked the architect to confirm the overall building height. He
supported the idea of mechanical parking and asked that uses for the amenity space be
clarified in final project plans.
Vice -Chair Duffy mentioned exploring an alternative to widen the existing alley to
address some of the access issues raised. He suggested reducing the scale of decks
for units but appreciated the building articulation along the streets. He asked that final
plans show the scale and location of surrounding buildings to better understand the
project. He supported mechanical parking because it provides a smaller footprint to
accommodate a denser infill project.
Chairperson Palazzo shared concerns with the amount and mix of traffic on the alley
and requested more detail of the rear elevation.
On a motion by Commr. Hopkins, seconded by Commr. McCovey-Good, to continue the
project to a date uncertain with the following directional items:
1. Provide more information and staff analysis on use of the alley for project access
including:
a. On-site directional signage for the commercial parking;
b. Loading space and access for delivery vehicles;
c. Potential widening of the alley to serve the project; and
d. Potential for project access off the north side of Kentucky.
2. Make the affordable unit more in keeping with the high level of design quality
provided for the market -rate units in the project.
3. The mass and scale of the project was generally found to be appropriate. Provide
more detail of the rear building elevation and show the scale and locations of
adjacent buildings in elevation views.
4. Provide more information on the potential for lifts to accommodate a greater range of
vehicles and on-going maintenance plans.
5. Provide all the information required for final architectural review as detailed on the
City's checklist including architectural detail and a complete colors and materials
board with actual samples and paint chips. The Commission specifically noted that
the use of corrugated metal siding would not be appropriate at this location.
ARC Minutes
March 5, 2012
Page 5
AYES: Commrs. Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Curtis, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Ehdaie
The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
3. Commission:
Commr. Hopkins mentioned that removal of an awning and new sign for the flip-flop
store on Higuera Street created an unfinished appearance.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approved by the.ArchitectLiKal Review Commission on March 19, 2012.
Ryan 13etV
S, uperv!Xnq Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
- ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
March 19, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Michelle
McCovey-Good, Greg Wynn, Vice -Chair Jim Duffy, and Chairperson
Anthony Palazzo
Absent: None
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Principal Transportation Planner Peggy
Mandeville
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of March 5, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. No Specific Address. ARC 11-12; Architectural and landscape design review of
the Los Osos Valley Road and Highway 101 interchange; City of San Luis Obispo -
Public Works Dept., applicant. (Peggy Mandeville)
Peggy Mandeville, Principal Transportation Planner, presented the staff report,
recommending that the Commission grant final approval to the project design, based on
findings and subject to conditions which she outlined. She provided background on the
project design and introduced other team members.
Matt Griggs, Dokken Engineering, described the planned improvements in detail noting
that the existing highway overcrossing will remain in place so that the new bridge needs
to be complementary in design.
Michael Cripe focused on the proposed landscaping. He mentioned that the team had
met with Caltrans to coordinate landscaping and other improvements. He emphasized
- . that the selected plant palette is principally grasses and native shrubs and is intended to
blend with its surroundings, rather than to be showy.
ARC Minutes
March 19, 2012
Page 2
Commr. McCovey-Good raised some questions about the height, material, and -graffiti-
resistance of the retaining walls. Mr. Griggs responded that the tallest retaining wall
would be 6'-10' with a 2 -foot barrier on top and, although other wall surfaces including
cobble had been considered, the fractured rib was ultimately selected because its 2 -
inch relief discouraged graffiti over other flatter surfaces.
Commr. Wynn asked about the need for lighting on the bridge and the percentage of the
project budget allocated to aesthetics. Mr. Griggs noted that the lights were
recommended to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists using the bridge and that
about 5% of the project budget was allocated to aesthetics with about 3% of that budget
currently allocated to various improvements.
Vice -Chair Duffy inquired about the lifespans of the two bridges. Mr. Griggs explained
that the new bridge had a projected lifespan of 100 years and that the existing bridge
about 40 years. He explained that, if the highway was expanded to 6 lanes in the
future, then the old bridge columns would conflict with the design.
Commr. Hopkins asked if the Mission bell recession was the only place where color was
proposed with the design. Mr. Griggs indicated that it was and the general difficulty of
matching color.
Commr. Ehdaie asked about the possibility of adding color tiles. Mr. Griggs noted that
Caltrans had issues with any added surfaces to bridges that could ultimately come
loose and fall on vehicles. Ms. Mandeville explained that public art could potentially be
a project component to add color and interest to the overall design.
Commr. Curtis asked about the idea of integrating entryway signage into the bridge
design and having vine planting on retaining walls. Ms. Mandeville responded that
entryway elements were a good idea and that Caltrans would be consulted about the
feasibility of vine planting.
Chairperson Palazzo mentioned that a bridge in Atascadero had incorporated
embellishments into its design and inquired whether that could be done with this project.
Mr. Griggs responded that materials such as stamped concrete or inlaid brick may be
possible because they require less maintenance.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Chuck Crotser, San Luis Obispo, characterized the bridge as an opportunity to create a
gateway structure and encouraged the bridge design to incorporate additional
decorative elements. He showed examples of a bridge overpass in Colorado that
incorporated innovative architectural details, materials, and landscaping.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Vice -Chair Duffy indicated that he agreed with the comments of Mr. Crotser in terms of
the design putting its best foot forward here and providing more of a gateway, rather
ARC Minutes
March 19, 2012
Page 3
than just matching what is -currently there. -He recommended that the design
incorporate lower -level pedestrian lighting built into bridge walls rather than the
proposed Cobra -head lights.
Commr. McCovey-Good agreed with Vice -Chair Duffy's comments. She added that the
bridge might include some elements of downtown beautification and suggested a nicer
railing treatment.
Commr. Wynn stated that the proposed design was a good attempt but not a strong
enough statement. He did not support the fractured rib material for the abutments and
suggested an alternative material with some color. He suggested that the design
should be continued and additional information such as retaining wall elevations and
views of improvements from a driver's level submitted. He added that he would like to
see more participation by the community in the design.
Commr. Ehdaie inquired of the ramifications of a continuance on the project schedule.
Mr. Griggs replied that 60% drawings had been submitted to Caltrans for review. Ms.
Mandeville noted that project construction was not planned until 2014-15.
Commr. Curtis supported continuing the item noting that most of the suggested changes
were superficial. He suggested that integral color be used to differentiate project
elements such as the bridge form the abutments. He recommended vine planting for
the retaining walls and making the bridge design more of a gateway that incorporated
entry identification.
Commr. Hopkins appreciated the simplicity of the design and catering it to the natural
environment.
On motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Commr. Curtis, to continue action to a date
uncertain with the following direction (7:0):
1.. Include lower -level, pedestrian lighting built into bridge walls, rather than the
proposed cobra lights.
2. Utilize a different treatment for the abutments than the proposed fractured rib
concrete.
3. Provide a more dynamic gateway element with the bridge design that identifies
the City's entrance.
4. Include retaining wall elevations and renderings of views of the walls from car
level.
AYES: Commrs. Wynn, Curtis, McCovey-Good, Duffy, Palazzo, Hopkins, and
Ehdaie
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Ehdaie
The motion passed on a 7:0 vote.
ARC Minutes
March 19, 2012
Page 4
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
3. Commission:
There was a general discussion about changes to projects that occur after the
ARC's approval and the process for handling them. The Commission mentioned
the URM remodel at the corner of Broad and Higuera Streets and questioned
changes to the canopy design.
Commr. Hopkins mentioned how the landscaping installed at the Prefumo Creek
Commons shopping center improved the streetscape and overall project
appearance.
Commr. McCovey-Good noted how the drainage from downspouts at the ROEM
apartments at the Village at Broad was staining the awnings.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci,
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on April 2, 2012.
ng Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
April 2, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Greg Wynn, and Chairperson
Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioners McCovey-Good and Hopkins and Vice -Chair Duffy
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Recording Secretary Donre Wright
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of March 19, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PRESENTATION:
1. Measure Y: Your '/z -cent sales tax
expenditures, and issues concerning
Measure. (Michael Codron)
at work. A presentation about revenues,
reauthorization of the Essential Services
The Commission received a presentation from City Manager Katie Lichtig, Assistant
City Manager Michael Codron, and Finance Director Charles Bourbeau. The
Commission discussed the information presented and provided feedback and insights
about renewal of Measure Y.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
There were no public hearing items.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
ARC Minutes
April 2, 2012
Page 2
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects
including the ICON project and the French Hospital project. She also announced
there likely would not be a meeting on May 21St, because there are no items
currently on the aglenda. She noted that Jim Duffy will be sworn in at the next
meeting of April 16 , and the elections for Vice -Chair and Chair will take place.
b. Community Design Guidelines update
The ARC advised staff about items that could be accomplished as minor revisions
to the Guidelines in a relatively short timeframe versus those that would take
further analysis. The Commission suggested that PowerPoint slides with
legislative drafts of new or modified language along with any proposed graphics
would be a good approach to reviewing changes.
3. Commission:
Chairperson Palazzo commented on the sign recently installed on the wall near the
corner at the Mix at Monterey and asked if it had been shown on approved plans. Pam
Ricci stated that she would contact the project planner and check into that question.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Donre Wright
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on April 16, 2012.
Ryan Betz
Supervisi Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
April 16, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Michelle McCovey-Good, Greg Wynn, Vice -Chair Jim
Duffy, and Chairperson Anthony Palazzo
Absent: Commissioners Hopkins, Ehdaie, and Curtis
Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Doug Davidson, Associate
Planner Brian Leveille, and Recording Secretary Donre Wright
ELECTION: The Commission decided to postpone the election until the next ARC
meeting on May 7m
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of April 2, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 667 Monterey Street. ARC 43-11; Conceptual review of mixed-use project with 23
residential units and 24,000 square feet of commercial space; C -D -H zone; Michael
Hodge, applicant. (Brian Leveille)
Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to continue
the item to a date uncertain with direction on items to be addressed in plans submitted
for final architectural review.
Mr. Leveille provided an overview of the project and review process. He outlined several
staff -recommended directional items discussed in the staff report.
Mr. Leveille stated that staff had an additional directional item. The item stated that the
false windows should be consistent with the appearance of the functional windows or an
alternative design treatment should be considered.
Commr. Wynn questioned the status of the parking structure. Mr. Leveille answered
that they are looking into EIR proposals and the status is still uncertain at this point.
ARC Minutes
April 16, 2012
Page 2
Mike Hodge, applicant spoke in support of the project, and introduced Thom Jess, --the
architect.
Tom Jess, also spoke in support of the project and provided more detail on the design.
Commr. Wynn questioned if the banquet rooms in the lower level would co -exist with
the restaurant. Mr. Jess responded that the restaurant may provide catering services,
and that the bed and breakfast may use the restaurant. He stated that there are not
many places in downtown to rent out a banquet room for weddings, meetings, or other
uses.
Vice -Chair Duffy questioned if they had considered breaking down each individual
building into a separate architectural style. Mr. Jess responded, no, they had them
broken down the design and building levels by uses instead.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project. He expressed concern
with not seeing the elevations of the Children's Museum. He made a comment about
new buildings should not shield sunlight and thought that at the creek, there should be
at least another setback, to prevent shading.
Vicente Del Rio, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project. He expressed
concern with the views from the creek. He suggested other ways to articulate the
facade and suggested public use on the rooftops. He was also concerned with parking
and passenger loading.
Dave Hannings, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern that his driveway lines up with the
Paseo. He was concerned with the stucco, and thought terra cotta, or color would be
an improvement over the plain white appearance. He commented on the trees that
were in the plan, and that the planting palette may not be functional or appropriate.
Overall, he stated his satisfaction of a project moving forward on the site since the site
has been vacant and the Leitcher building in a dilapidated state.
Elisabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern with the creek and the
sunlight. She urged the Commission to take the walk around the creek, to get a better
idea of the sunlight.
Sara McEre, San Luis Obispo, agrees with the terra cotta. She suggested a richer color
and trees to make it lively.
David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern for the need of a model of the
proposed project. He expressed concern about the creek, and how it is a major
resource, and urged the Commission to please recognize the importance of the creek..
ARC Minutes
April 16, 2012
Page 3
Vangeli Evangelopoulos, San Luis Obispo, He expressed concern with the shadows
and questioned the proposed shadow height. He suggested using native plants. He
questioned if this project design had a connection to the Arts building.
Joseph Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern with the height of the building,
specifically on the creek side.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Chairperson Palazzo questioned staff if shadows were a part of the EIR report. Staff
replied that they will be conducting a more detailed report, including shadows and an
initial study with overall aesthetics.
Commr. Wynn spoke in support of the project. He expressed concern with the
monotony of the three buildings as viewed from the creek.
Vice -Chair Duffy spoke in support of the project, but expressed concern with the
massing and the roof forms. He agreed that there was a lot of stucco and would like to
see more detail.
Commr. McCovey agreed with Vice -Chair Duffy and Commr. Wynn about the monotony
of the three buildings connected from the creek side view. She thought variations would
enhance the project. She loved the paseo idea, and how it connects to the public
parking lot.
Chairperson Palazzo commented on the monotony, and would like to see more
information on shading and potential impacts to the creek.
Commr. Wynn commented on integrating more variety in the project..
Vice -Chair Duffy commented on considering keeping the architecture consistent per
massing on all four sides of the building.
Chairperson Palazzo stated that the roof forms appeared similar to a Craftsman
Bungalow style which is not consistent with buildings this large.
Commr. Wynn commented that cornice rooftops would be appropriate.
Chairperson Palazzo commented that the rooftops should be more similar to what is in
the downtown.
Chairperson Palazzo commented on a directional item to provide more building
articulation, especially at the edges of the buildings.
ARC Minutes
April 16, 2012
Page 4
Commr. Wynn commented there should be more vertical articulation. -
Chairperson Palazzo commented that the stucco finish would improve with the addition
of some color.
Chairperson Palazzo commented that there should be more openness on the
pedestrian walkways from the parking lot. Commr. Wynn commented on having some
type of clear delineation that the pedestrian access was accessible to the public.
Vice -Chair Duffy commented on the massing and use of materials.
The Commission discussed various directional items to reflect Commission comments.
massing on upper floors with a more delicate design.
2. More variation/distinction shall be provided for each building, and all buildings
shall have a consistent architectural treatment on all sides.
3. Reduce the appearance of overall mass by providing more vertical articulation
especially at the edges of buildings.
4. Explore cornice treatments for roof forms. The roof forms shall be authentic and
consistent with multi -story buildings in the downtown.
5. Create a more inviting entrance to the site at Monterey Street to clearly show the
pedestrian paseo leading into the site with landscaping or surfacing treatments
up to Monterey or across the right-of-way.
7. Plans submitted for final review shall include all details, cut sheets dimensions
and specifications as determined by staff to be necessary for final ARC review to
8. Plans submitted for final review shall include a revised sign program which
prohibits intemally-illuminated channel letters or cabinet signs.
AYES: Commrs. Duffy, McCovey-Good, Wynn, and Palazzo,
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, and Ehdaie
The motion passed on a 4:0 vote.
Commr. Wynn suggested a physical model. Vice -Chair Duffy thought it was not
significant since other projects did not require one. Chairperson Palazzo stated that the
ARC Minutes
April 16, 2012
Page 5
Commission can strongly urge the applicant, and that it would be helpful, but they
cannot make it a requirement.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Doug Davidson gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. He informed the
Commission that the ICON project is being resubmitted at the next meeting on Ma
7t'. He announced that it is still likely there will not be a meeting on May 215 ,
because there are no items currently on the agenda.
3. Commission:
Chairperson Palazzo asked if it would be possible to hold the next meeting in the
Council Chamber due to the large turnout from a previous ICON meeting. He
announced that the elections would take place at the next meeting on the 7t'.
Commr. Wynn questioned if there was any level of review of solar panels at
schools. Chairperson Palazzo answered no because it is run through the state.
Commr. Wynn commented that he liked the looks of the new Luis Wine Bar.
Commr. McCovey-Good commented that the Railroad Square looks nice.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Donre Wright
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on May 7, 2012.
n ptz
ising Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
May 7, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo, Greg Wynn,
Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioner Curtis
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Deputy Community Development Director Doug Davidson,
and Recording Secretary Donre Wright
ELECTION: On motion by Commr. Wynn, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, Commr. Duffv was
elected Chairperson. On motion by Commr. Ehdaie, seconded by Commr. Wynn Commr.
McCovey-Good was elected Vice -Chairperson.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of April 16, 2012 were approved as amended.
-- PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1340 Taft Street. ARC 50-09; Review of mixed-use project with 3,900 sq. ft. of commercial
space and seven residential units; C -N zone; ICON at SLO, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the Commission adopt
the Draft Resolution, which grants final approval to the project, based on findings, and subject to
conditions, which she outlined. She provided an overview of the project and focused on the
changes that were made to address the directional points that the ARC identified with their
conceptual review of the project on March 5th.
Commr. Wynn questioned if the Kentucky area was currently in a parking district. Ms. Ricci
replied that it was not.
Commr. Wynn asked whether the location for the electrical supply cabinet for the building had
been determined and how it would be screened. Ms. Ricci stated that the details were not yet
known, but that a condition could be added to require screening.
Nigel Gomersoll, applicant representative, summarized the revisions made to plans to address
ARC directional items.
ARC Minutes
May 7, 2012
Page 2
C; Commr. Wynn asked for clarification as to whether corrugated siding was still proposed on the
building. Mr. Gomersoll indicated that it was only proposed on sloping roofs, not for flat wall
siding which would be Rhinezink.
Commr. Palazzo questioned the details on the handrails and canopies. Mr. Gomersoll
responded the handrails would be flat bar rails.
Commr. Ehdaie inquired about on-site parking for the commercial use. Mrs: Ricci answered that
the uncovered parking spaces behind the building off the alley were set aside for the commercial
uses, guest parking for the residences, and the affordable housing unit.
Chairperson Duffy asked if both lower and upper awnings are proposed per the detail on the
Page A9.2. Mr. Gomersoll responded yes.
Commr. Ehdaie questioned how the space between the rails and the deck surfaces would be
finished. Mr. Gomersoll responded that the drawings did not fully depict the railings, but that the
flat bar rail would infill this space.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Aaryn Abbott, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project, noting that it was a good design
for the site.
Grant Robbins, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project, mentioning that the changes
made since the last meeting were positive and that the project would be an asset to the
community.
Isabel Marques, San Luis Obispo, did not support the project. She expressed concern about the
proposed project access and increased traffic on the alley. She opposed a third floor level at this
site and recommended that the height be decreased.
Lois Barber, Shell Beach, supported the project, noting that the applicant has developed
attractive projects.
Carolyn Smith, San Luis Obispo, did not support a final ARC approval action at this meeting.
She mentioned that the project design was inconsistent with several City policies and had issues
with building height, parking, traffic, and headlights shining into the residences along the alley.
She questioned why a solar shading study had not been completed.
Edith Jakes, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project, finding that it was not compatible with the
neighborhood. She had concerns with traffic safety, deliveries, and removal of the alley
retaining wall.
Sandra Rowley, San Luis Obispo, urged the Commission to not let this be the final meeting for
the project. She was concerned about building height and suggested removing the third floor
level to be more compatible with the neighborhood. She stated that the applicant had not
responded fully to ARC direction such as providing expanded streetscape renderings.
ARC Minutes
May 7, 2012
Page 3
-Ellen Goodwin, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern with the height of the building,
recommending that story poles be erected and that the third floor be stepped back from the
alley. She suggested that the spaces around the garage lifts be increased to accommodate a
greater range of vehicles.
Thom Jess, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project and supported the parking lifts
being utilized in San Luis Obispo.
Truitt Vance, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project including the parking lifts, noting
that it was maximizing density and a pedestrian friendly design.
Devin Gallagher, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern about alley access not creating a logical
flow pattern for cars or pedestrians. He added that he would like to see more pedestrian
connectivity, especially since Kentucky Street is a major corridor to Cal Poly.
Gil Bastidas, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of this project and thought that it would be a
good project for the area.
Karen Adler, San Luis Obispo, stated that she initially thought the project was good, but is
concerned about insufficient parking and the height of the third story.
There were no further comments made from the public.
Mrs. Ricci responded to some of the comments made from the public. She reiterated that the
ARC with its conceptual review of the project had expressed support for building footprints,
overall scale, and project access. She stated that staff had advised the Commission at the last
meeting, that a solar shading analysis was not required because the project meets C -N height
and setback requirements. She added that there was a fencing requirement for the housing
directly across the alley from the project to screen headlights and provide privacy.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Palazzo stated the revised plans do not fully respond to previous ARC direction and
suggested that the project be continued.
Commr. Hopkins stated he supported the project and its scale and massing. He was concerned
that the submitted renderings did not show adequate detail of the relationship of the project to
the neighborhood.
Commr. Wynn noted that the residential uses within the project provided the benefit of adding
more "eyes on the street' (24-hour presence). He noted that a solar shading study would likely
show that the area to be shaded would be the on-site surface parking rather than nearby
residences given distance and orientation.
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good spoke in support of the project.
Commr. Ehdaie spoke in support of the project. She had some concerns with circulation and
traffic.
ARC Minutes
May 7, 2012
Page 4
Chairperson Duffy spoke in support of the project though he would like to see the project
continued to obtain more details and information. He suggested stepping the third level of the
building back from the alley and replacing the mass closer to Taft Street.
Commr. Palazzo stated the directional items #3, #4, #5 from. March 5w still need to be
addressed.
Mrs. Ricci stated the Commission could continue the project with direction or grant final approval
with added conditions to address lingering concerns. She noted that another option would be to
have specific items return to the ARC at a later date.
Commr. Ehdaie asked staff to discuss loading space requirements for the project. Ms. Ricci
stated that there is not a requirement to provide a designated commercial loading space on-site,
but that an on -street loading space on Taft would be a benefit if it could be provided safely.
Chairperson Duffy allowed the applicant and owner of the property, Eran Fields to speak. Mr.
Fields asked the Commission for further clarification on the directional items, specifically the
suggestion about stepping back the third floor level from the alley.
Commr. Palazzo suggested the elevations should match the renderings, the color board and
details.
Chairperson Duffy requested color elevations on all sides.
There were no further comments made from the Commission..
residential neighborhood along Kentucky.
4.lnclude information on the locations of any electrical boxes and proposals for screening
5.Verify the project's accessible parking requirement. If the requirement is exceeded then
between different surface materials..
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Wynn, Duffy, and Palazzo
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Curtis
ARC Minutes
May 7, 2012
Page 5
(_ The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. -
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
1. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. She stated the May 21St meeting
would be cancelled and that the June 4t" hearing would be held in the Council Chamber.
2. Commission:
Commr. Palazzo mentioned that some recently -mounted roof equipment for the new restaurant
at the Mix on Monterey Street was not screened from views on Johnson Avenue.
Commr. Hopkins brought up some detail changes in colors and materials for the newly -installed
canopy of the building located at the comer of Broad and Higuera Streets.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Donre Wright
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on June 4, 2012.
ng Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
June 4, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Anthony Palazzo, Greg Wynn, Suzan Ehdaie, Ken Curtis,
Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioner Steven Hopkins
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Planning Technician Marcus Carloni, and
Recording Secretary Tammy Stone
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of May 7, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
Sara Mikkelson, San Luis Obispo, commented on the noise and pollution issues
associated with the new Quiky Carwash that recently opened on Broad Street. She
suggested a sound barrier be installed.
Pamela Nenedal, San Luis Obispo, also spoke about concerns with the carwash. She
commented on the pollution and the bright lights.
There were no further comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2959 Broad Street. ARC -S 41-12; Review of a wall sign and pole sign with
attached electrical message center (EMC) sign for Quiky Carwash; C -S -S zone;
Westpac, applicant.
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, presented the staff report, recommending the
Commission adopt the draft resolution approving the proposed wall sign and approving
a modified pole sign design with removal of the proposed electronic message center,
based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined.
Commr. Curtis asked staff about alternative locations for the proposed signs and the
encroachment of the pole sign into the public right-of-way.
ARC Minutes
June 4, 2012
Page 2
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, described the constraint of limited suitable
locations for a freestanding, street -oriented, sign which was the rationale for staff
supporting an exception to allow the pole sign with a 0 -foot setback. He noted that, as
proposed by the applicant, two feet of the EMC would encroach over the right-of-way,
and staff is recommending the EMC be removed.
George Garcia, applicant's representative, noted his support for portions of staffs
recommendation but provided a basis for approving the 15 -foot pole sign with EMC as
designed. He described the variety of uses at the site and the site constraints. He
showed examples of other taller signs within the Broad Street corridor.
Commr. Wynn asked about the possibility of creating a greater setback for the pole
sign.
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, noted that a five-foot setback for a pole sign
would compromise access to the three required parking spaces for the on-site
residences.
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, explained that it was the City's intention to have
conservative standards for EMC signs to limit their use and size. She noted that the
Broad Street EMC shown in the applicant's presentation had been denied by the ARC
and was appealed to the City Council who ultimately approved the EMC sign.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Sara Mikkelson, San Luis Obispo, opposed the pole sign with EMC and felt that
requested exceptions should be denied. She also thought that the business's hours of
operation should be posted.
Dave Bolduan, San Luis Obispo, mentioned the excessive brightness of site lighting and
was concerned that the proposed signage would exacerbate this problem. He noted
that the lighting adversely affected nearby residential units.
Scott Marcotte, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project because of the carbon monoxide
produced by vehicles entering the car wash near his house. He also opposed
approving exceptions to the City's sign regulations to accommodate the proposed signs.
Pamela Nenadal, San Luis Obispo, questioned if the�signage will be lit for 24 hours.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Ehdaie asked about the location of the existing monument sign at the site.
Marcus Carloni, Planning Technician, pointed out that Luna Rustica had a monument
sign to the south of the proposed pole sign along the Broad Street frontage.
ARC Minutes
June 4, 2012
Page 3
Commr. Curtis stated that he does not find sufficient justification to support findings for
the pole sign. He also noted that the City has strict limitations for EMC signs and that
he does not support approving exceptions to those standards.
Commr. Ehdaie concurred with Commr. Curtis in terms of not supporting the pole.sign
and EMC but could support the proposed wall sign.
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good supported staffs recommendations. She felt that the pole
sign should be limited in height and not include an EMC because of its proximity to
nearby residences, as recommended by staff.
Commr. Wynn did not support the proposed EMC at this location, as recommended by
staff. He stated the existing non -permitted directional signage should be removed and
appropriately placed to direct vehicles to the carwash entry. He supported the wrap-
around wall sign but had concerns with the pole sign.
Commr. Palazzo agreed with the alternative that staff presented for a monument sign in
lieu of a pole sign.
Chairperson Duffy supported the wrap-around wall sign and a monument sign.
On motion by Commr. Palazzo, seconded by Commr. Wynn, to continue action to a
date uncertain to allow the applicant to submit a comprehensive sign program for the
carwash that includes all proposed sians with direction to include: 1) a monument-stvle
area and respect the site's location near residential uses: and 2) appropriately -located
directional signs.
AYES: Commrs. Palazzo, Wynn, Curtis, Ehdaie, and Duffy
NOES: McCovey-Good
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Hopkins
The motion passed on a 5:1 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Staff gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects and stated the July 2nd
meeting will be canceled.
ARC Minutes
June 4, 2012.
Page 4
3. Commission:
The Commission again discussed the URM remodel at the corner of Broad and Higuera
Streets and questioned changes to the canopy design. They asked staff to report back
about the circumstances for approving the modifications.
Commr. Palazzo mentioned that some recently -mounted roof equipment for the new
restaurant at the Mix on Monterey Street was not screened from view on Johnson
Avenue. The Commission then discussed strategies for screening equipment. There
was general discussion about organizing a field trip to look at some recently -approved
projects in the field as a group.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Tammy Stone
Recording Secretary
Approved by ttW Architectural Review Commission on June 18, 2012.
Ryan, 315fz �—
Sup ry ing Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
June 18, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo, Greg
Wynn, Ken Curtis, Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, and Chairperson
Jim Duffy
Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Doug Davidson and Senior
Planner Pam Ricci
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of June 4, 2012, were approved as amended.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 1340 Taft Street. ARC 50-09; Review of mixed-use project with 3,900 sq. ft. of
commercial space and seven residential units; C -N zone; ICON at SLO, applicant.
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report recommending that the
Commission adopt the draft Resolution, which grants final approval to the project, based
on findings and subject to conditions, which she outlined. She provided an overview of
the project and focused on the changes that were made to address the directional
points that the ARC identified with their previous review of the project on May 7m
Jay Blatter, applicant representative, summarized the revisions made to plans to
address ARC directional items, including stepping back the third floor of Building B next
to the alley and stairwell changes to Building A to minimize the scale and improve the
appearance of the rear elevation.
Commr. Curtis questioned project massing. Mr. Blatter responded that he did not feel
that -the project had the appearance of a podium project and described how the massing
of Building B stepped back from Kentucky Avenue and the alley.
Commr. Duffy had questions regarding the building's base material and railing details.
Mr. Blatter explained that the base would be a split -face block material in a color which
ARC Minutes
June 18, 2012
Page 2
is darker than the adjoining stucco, and that the upper deck railing design was different
than those used on lower floors because the upper floor railing was not a code mandate
and, therefore, was not required to have as tight of spacing for the rails.
Commr. Palzzo asked for confirmation that railings, rather than guard rails, were
proposed on the roof terraces. Mr. Blatter responded that they were railings.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Isabel Marques, San Luis Obispo, did not support the project as designed. She
expressed concern about the proposed project access from the alley and supported
removal of the third floor level. She indicated that the traffic study was flawed because
counts did not take into account Cal Poly traffic because of the time of year that they
were conducted.
Edith Jakes, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project, finding that it was not compatible
with the neighborhood. She had concerns with traffic safety, parking impacts, and
removal of the alley retaining wall. She recommended that the frontage of Taft Street
be red -curbed.
Aaryn Abbott, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project, noting that it was a
good example of infill development with a well -articulated design and pedestrian
orientation. He added that the design screened parking from street views, provided
needed housing close to Cal Poly, and would provide economic benefits to the
community.
Grant Robbins, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project, mentioning that the
project prompted pedestrian activity and conforms to property development standards
without the need for exceptions. He mentioned that the units will appeal to a variety of
households and that the massing design minimizes the project's scale.
Brent Spiegel spoke in support of the project, noting that it would appeal to those
desiring a more urban lifestyle.
Richard Garcia spoke in support of the project, pointing out that it will be a vast
improvement and eliminate the current eyesore.
Saeed Davar, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project, noting that he was a
fellow landlord who agreed with the development of new housing.
Sandra Rowley, San Luis Obispo, stated that the neighbors spoke best about project
concerns. She expressed concern with the rooftop terraces and safety issues.
There were no further comments made from the public.
Mrs. Ricci noted that Condition No. 23 required red -curbing along Taft Street unless a
traffic analysis demonstrated that a loading space could safely be provided.
ARC Minutes
June 18, 2012
Page 3
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wynn stated that the design would result in a nice project and that the applicant
had responded to the Commission's direction. He noted that this location would benefit
from added bike parking. He recommended that Condition No. 2 have language added
that the metal proposed on sloping roofs should match the siding and that Condition No.
8 add wording about the screening of electrical equipment.
Commr. Hopkins supported the project and agreed with Commr. Wynn's suggestions on
the minor revisions to the resolution.
Commr. Ehdaie spoke in support of the project as it provided affordable housing and
commercial uses mixed with the housing.
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good spoke in support of the project.
Commr. Curtis noted that he would not be voting in support of the project. He indicated
that his main concern was the project's scale and massing along Kentucky Avenue and
that the added 3'6" setback of the building from the alley was not sufficient. He did not
support the proposed roof decks.
Chairperson Duffy spoke in support of the project as a good example of site and
building planning.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
1. Add final sentence to Condition No. 2: 'The sloping awnings shall match the vertical
metal (no corrugated siding)."
2. Modify Condition No. 8 to add the words "and electrical" to the first sentence and to
add the following final sentence: "This condition applies to initial construction and
later improvements."
AYES: Commrs. Ehdaie, Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Wynn, and Duffy
NOES: Commrs. Palazzo and Curtis
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: None
The motion passed on a 5:2 vote..
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
ARC Minutes
June 18, 2012
Page 4
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. She stated the July 2nd
meeting would be cancelled.
4. Commission:
There was a general discussion about the lack of speck guidelines related to mixed-
use projects in the Community Design Guidelines (CDG). Staff pointed out that Section
5.4 was intended to apply to new multi -family projects in residential zones rather than
mixed-use projects in commercial zones such as the Icon project which is zoned C -N,
Neighborhood -Commercial. However, when there is not explicit direction in the CDG on
a particular project type, either general principles or provisions of similar sections are
pointed out as guidance on project design.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approved by the
Review Commission on July 16th, 2012.
Administrative Assistant
�� i
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
July 16, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Greg Wynn,
Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioner Palazzo
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Principal Transportation Planner Peggy
Mandeville, and Recording Secretary Donre Wright
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of June 18, 2012 were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 2959 Broad Street. ARC -S 41-12; Review of a wall sign and 12 -foot tall pole sign
for Quiky Carwash; C -S -S zone; Westpac, applicant. (Marcus Carloni)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner noted that the item was recommended to be continued to a
date certain of August 6, 2012, to allow staff further time to coordinate with the applicant.
on their sign proposals.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the Commission.
On motion by Commr. Curtis, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, to continue to a date
certain of August 6, 2012.
AYES: Commrs. Wynn, McCovey-Good, Duffy, Hopkins, Ehdaie, and Curtis
ARC Minutes
July 16, 2012
Page 2
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Palazzo
The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.
2. No Specific Address. ARC 11-12; Continued consideration of architectural design
review of the Los Osos Valley Road and Highway 101 interchange; City of San Luis
Obispo — Public Works Dept., applicant. (Peggy Mandeville)
Peggy Mandeville, Principal Transportation Planner, presented the staff report,
recommending that the Commission adopt the Draft Resolution which grants final
approval to the project, based on findings and subject to conditions which she outlined.
She provided background on the project design, and outlined the directional items from
the Commission's last March 19, 2012, meeting. She thanked the design professionals
Chuck Crotser and Pierre Rademaker who volunteered their time on the project.
Ms. Mandeville noted that entry signage could be incorporated into the bridge design if
incorporated into the abutment or retaining walls and that the City would be required to
maintain the sign. She mentioned that the lights could be green like in the downtown or
another color such as black. She described the engineer's rendering noting the
placement of the pilasters and lighting. She added that colors could be added to some
concrete surfaces such as the sign wall, but would not be allowed on the bridge girders.
Commr. Curtis asked staff to clarify the differences between the alternative design
developed by the local designers and the engineer's rendering. Ms. Mandeville noted
that the rendering showed the engineer's recommended spacing between light fixtures,
which are centered above pilasters centered on bridge support columns, and that the
preliminary design concept showed these features offset from the columns and would
have resulted in twice the number of fixtures. Commr. Curtis preferred the pilasters and
lighting in alignment with columns from an aesthetic point of view.
Chuck Crotser commented that the columns are set back from the edge of the bridge
and the perspective is going to vary depending on where you are. He commented that
they were thinking of sconce lighting instead of vertical pole lights on the end abutments
to light the sidewalk. He mentioned that the abutment could be longer to improve its
massing and appearance.
Commr. Wynn asked what the material of the interior pilasters and end abutments was.
Mr. Croster answered smooth pre -cast concrete.
Commr. Curtis questioned if the two end architectural features were decorative or
functional. Mr. Crotser answered that they provide a visual anchor, but are not
structural.
ARC Minutes
July 16, 2012
Page 3
Commr. Curtis questioned if sconce lighting rather than the light standards was
considered. Mr. Crotser mentioned that there was discussion of sconce lighting at the
original meeting. However, he and Pierre Rademaker incorporated the standards in
their design because the vertical elements create a nice rhythm.
Commr. Wynn questioned the proposed spacing of the pilasters and the pole lights. Mr.
Crotser answered that the original spacing was 32 feet, but that the engineer had
recommended a spacing of 64 feet.
Commr. Hopkins questioned if the lamps are conceptual. Mr. Crotser answered that the
lamps would be similar to the lamps downtown, and that more detail on the light levels
and fixtures could be provided.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Curtis supported the project overall and thought the decorative features could
be minimized. He appreciated the simpler entry sign design at this location and the less
decorative railing detail submitted by Mr Crotser at the meeting. He preferred sconce
lighting, but could support the lighting standards if they were lowered and less ornate.
Commr. Wynn commented that the proportion and spacing of the lighting is important.
He suggested lower and fewer lighting standards centered on columns.
Vice Chair McCovey-Good agreed with Commr. Wynn's comments. She added that the
scale of the end abutments should be increased and supported the simpler railing
design presented at the meeting.
Commr. Hopkins agreed with included simplified details for the lighting and railings.
Commr. Ehdaie agreed with increasing the length of the abutments and lower scale
lighting.
Chairperson Duffy would like to see a perspective drawing with additional pilasters and
the end abutments increased in length. He noted that the lighting appeared too
ornamental and that the addition of pedestrian wall sconces should be explored with the
deletion of pole lights.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On a motion by Vice -Chair McCovey-Good, seconded by Commr Wynn to grant final
U approval to the project with modifications to Conditions 2. 3 & 4 as follows 2 Bridae
ARC Minutes
July 16, 2012
Page 4
AYES: Commrs. Wynn, McCovey-Good, Duffy, Hopkins, Ehdaie, and Curtis
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Palazzo
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
4. Commission:
Staff responded to questions regarding the status of various projects.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:33 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Donre Wright
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Archit ctural Review Commission on August 6th, 2012.
I//& Af�
Ryan B90
Supe i nq Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
�i ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
August 6, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Steven Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo,
Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Greg Wynn
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Assistant Planner Marcus Carloni, and
Recording Secretary Dawn Rudder
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was amended to hold the public hearing for Item # 2 prior to Discussion
Item # 1.
MINUTES:
The minutes of July 16, 2012, were approved as amended.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
DISCUSSION ITEM:
1. Bridge surface replacement in Mission Plaza.
Michael J McGuire, Engineer 111 with the Public Works Department, presented the staff
report regarding the necessary repairs for the Warden Bridge deck, including the
proposed timeline of the project. He pointed out that the project has three major
components, which are: 1) repairs to the bridge deck; 2) modifications to the guardrail;
and 3) repairs to damaged pilasters.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Chairperson Duffy questioned how long the project is expected to take. Mr. McGuire
indicated it should take approximately 4-6 weeks.
Commr. Curtis asked how the railings will be attached and what the height of the railing
will be. He also questioned if the construction will affect just the bridge or other
ARC Minutes
August 6, 2012
Page 2
surrounding areas. Mr. McGuire stated the details of how the railings were going to be
attached were not available at this time. He indicated the bridge will be completely shut
down during construction to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
Chairperson Duffy inquired if the additional guardrails will have any artistic creativity to
update the look of guardrail. Mr. McGuire replied the option for including an artistic
railing was not part of the project scope and would be more costly.
Commr. Curtis questioned if there were any additional funds to upgrade the railing
within the current project's budget. Mr. McGuire replied there was no additional funding
to upgrade the railing within the project's budget.
Commr. Palazzo mentioned permeable pavers would be beneficial to the adjacenttree.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. 2959 Broad Street. ARC -S 41-12; Review of a wall sign and 10 -foot tall
freestanding sign for Quiky Carwash, C -S -S zone; Westpac, applicant.
Marcus Carloni, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the
Commission adopt the draft resolution approving the proposed wall sign and approving
a modified freestanding sign, based on findings, and subject to conditions which he
outlined. He provided an overview of the project recommendation to lower the free
standing sign to a maximum height of 8 feet.
George Garcia, applicant's representative, noted that the current proposal was for two
signs, which were the wall/projecting sign and a 10 -foot freestanding sign. He added
that the third carwash entry sign and the Electronic Message Center on the pole sign
had been eliminated. He provided photo simulations of the proposed 10 -foot high
freestanding sign and showed some examples of larger signs for vehicular businesses
in the vicinity of the site.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Scott Marcotte, San Luis Obipso, expressed concerns with use of the freestanding sign
by future tenants at the subject location if the carwash business was not successful.
Mr. Carloni stated that staff supported the location of the sign; however staff is
recommending the freestanding sign be a maximum of eight feet in height to provide
consistency with signs in the neighborhood. He also stated future signage will require
review by the Community Development Director to determine consistency with the
character and context of the building, and the Director may forward this review to the
JARC if it appears excessive or out of character with the project site.
ARC Minutes
August 6, 2012
Page 3
Dave Bolduan, San Luis Obispo, expressed gratitude to the applicant for the revised
sign proposal, but would prefer an 8 -foot high freestanding sign, rather than the 10 -foot
sign being proposed.
Pamela Nenadal, San Luis Obispo, was concerned with the signs hours of illumination.
Mr. Carloni indicated the sign will not be illuminated after 10:00 p.m. or close of
business, whichever is earlier.
There were no further comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Curtis appreciated the applicant's changes to the sign program and would
support lowering the freestanding sign to 8 feet, but did not have strong concerns with
the proposed height of 10 feet.
Commr. Hopkins supported the proposed freestanding sign at a maximum height of 10
feet.
Vice -chair McCovey-Good and Commr. Palazzo concurred with Commr. Hopkins.
There were no further comments made from the Commission
#7 which requires Community Development Director review, and possible ARC review,
of future signage at the subject location.
AYES: Commrs. Palazzo, Hopkins, Curtis, McCovey-Good, and Duffy
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commrs. Wynn and Ehdaie
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
ARC Minutes
August 6, 2012
Page 4
4. Commission:
Commr. Hopkins mentioned that he had taken a recent tour of the remodeled
Granada Hotel on Morro Street. He was very impressed with all of the changes
made and the quality of the construction.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:39 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Dawn Rudder
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Archit ural Review Commission on August 20th, 2012.
IZ141 /!�-
Ryan
Supe4isinq Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
August 20, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Steven Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo, Greg
Wynn, Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioner Suzan Ehdaie
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Principal Transportation Planner Peggy
Mandeville, and Recording Secretary Dawn Rudder
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of August 20, 2012, were approved as amended.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
No Specific Address. ARC 11-12; Continued consideration of architectural
design review of the Los Osos Valley Road and Highway 101 interchange; City of
San Luis Obispo — Public Works Department, applicant. (Continued from July 16,
2012, ARC Meeting) (Peggy Mandeville)
Peggy Mandeville, Principal Transportation Planner, presented the staff report,
recommending approval of a lighting scheme and bridge colors, based on findings, and
subject to conditions, which she outlined. She presented three alternate options:
1. Use of 8 -foot standard poles mounted on the crash barrier;
2. 6 -foot poles mounted on pilasters; and
3. 6 -foot poles mounted on alternate pilasters with recessed lighting used on
remaining pilasters.
Chuck Crotser, applicant representative, described the pros and cons of the various
lighting alternates noting that Alternates 1 & 2 were preferred because they provided
more vertical interest with a greater number of light poles. He pointed out the energy
ARC Minutes
August 20, 2012
Page 2
efficiency of the LED lights and described the contemporary fixture selected to address
the concerns of ARC members that the previous fixture was too ornate. He mentioned
that a more traditional, but less ornate fixture than the original one depicted on plans,
was used for the Niblick Bridge.
Staff discussed several criteria for the color choices and circulated a colors board used
for the entry sign at Highland and Santa Rosa for some color examples. Chuck Crotser
mentioned that the white color would not be appropriate for the bridge but that a tan
similar to the Mission -style sidewalk could work.
Commr. Curtis questioned if the color will be applied to both sides of the bridge. Staff
answered that the color will only be applied to the south side and that the existing bridge
will be untouched.
Commr. Wynn wanted clarification that the addition will have no gap. Ms. Mandeville
indicated there will be no visible gap.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Wynn supported Alternate #3 and recommended that everything above the
deck stay one color of Mission tan. He recommended an alternative pole light fixture
attached to the staff report with coordinating wall sconces.
Commr. Hopkins concurred with Commr. Wynn and added that a light fixture like the
one on the Niblick Bridge might work with coordinating sconces.
Commr. Curtis also supported Alternate #3 and the energy efficiency of the LED lights
but agreed that a different pole light fixture should be selected.
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good also supported Alternate #3 with a different pole light fixture.
Commr. Palazzo supported Alternate #2 and a more traditional pole light fixture.
Ms. Mandeville provided a picture of the Mission -style lights used at Prefumo Creek
Commons.
Chairperson Duffy supported Alternate #3 with the Mission bell light fixture presented at
the meeting.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
ARC Minutes
August 20, 2012
Page 3
Color 34 W) for upper bridge elements above the superstructure.
AYES: Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, Palazzo, Wynn, McCovey-Good, and Duffy
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Ehdaie
The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.
2. 3807 Broad Street. ARC -C 59-12; Conceptual review of a development plan for
Sesloc Credit Union; BP -SP zone; Sesloc Federal Credit Union, applicant. (Pam
Ricci)
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good recused herself due to a potential conflict of interest
because her company will have a role in preparing the plans for the project.
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to continue the
project to a date uncertain with direction to staff and the applicant on items to be
addressed in plans submitted for final approval. She provided an overview of the
proposed project and how it conformed to goals and guidelines of the Airport Area
Specific Plan.
Commr. Curtis questioned why the parking spaces provided in the project exceeded the
code requirements by such a substantial amount. Ms. Ricci stated that the applicant
intended to provide more spaces to make sure that the parking needs of both customers
and staff were satisfied.
Commr. Curtis asked about bus access for the project. Ms. Ricci indicated that there
was a bus stop on the opposite side of the street at the Marigold Shopping Center and
that a stop on the same side of the street as the project would be clarified in final plans.
Commr. Curtis pointed out that the design of the southerly driveway off of Broad Street
varied between the site and landscaping plans. Ms. Ricci stated the design is still
somewhat conceptual but that improvements would be made to the driveway design
(such as a "pork chop") to limit turns into, and out of, the driveway to right turns.
Geri LaChance, applicant representative, provided an overview of Sesloc's history in the
community and stated that Specialty Construction will be the contractor on the project.
Pat Blotie, applicant's architect, responded to the Commissioners' questions regarding
the parking. He stated that the applicant preferred having ample parking for their
members. He also stated the bus stop locations will be addressed as they finalize
street improvement details.
ARC Minutes
August 20, 2012
Page 4
_ Scott Martin, applicant representative, provided an overview of the building design.
Commr. Wynn questioned what the status was for use of onsite parking by the adjacent
ball fields for overflow parking. Staff indicated that the City and applicant continue to
discuss potential options.
Commr. Palazzo expressed concern with the proposed green "copper" roof because the
color often does not come across as intended with the factory finishes. Mr. Blotie
indicated that they were looking at doing something similar to the roof used on the
Mountainbrook Community Church off Calle Joaquin near KSBY. He acknowledged
that color may not be accurate on the slide and plans.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Palazzo recommended that an alternative color be selected for the roof and
supported the additional parking spaces shown on plans to be used by the customers
and staff.
Commr. Wynn also supported the additional parking spaces. He asked about whether a
bike lane was planned along the "boulevard" on the west side of the project. Mr. Blotie
responded that a pedestrian pathway was planned there.
Commr. Curtis expressed concern that the parking is too dominant a site feature and
recommended that additional trees be provided to break up the long expanses of
parking. He asked that a bus stop on the same side of the street be shown on final
plans. He supported the color of the green metal roof, but would like to see entries
emphasized more. Overall, he was impressed with the project design and expressed
that it was moving in a positive direction.
Chairperson Duffy was not concerned with the additional parking provided. He
generally supported building colors and materials with the exception of the copper roof
because of concerns with its long-term appearance. He recommended that the entry
monument sign be of the same character as the buildings and that the design of the
south entry closest to Broad of the office headquarters be further studied.
Ms. Ricci asked for clarification on the green metal roof. Mr. Blotie indicated it was
intended to have the appearance of a patina copper and will investigate options.
Commr. Palazzo voiced strong opposition to the proposed green roof. Comms. Wynn
concurred with Commr. Palazzo regarding the green metal roof and encouraged a
brown color.
ARC Minutes
August 20, 2012
Page 5
Chairperson Duffy stressed the importance of providing actual physical samples of
materials with final review of the project.
Commr. Curtis supported the idea of planting larger trees along Broad Street.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On a motion by Commr. Palazzo, seconded by Commr. Hopkins, to continue action to a
date uncertain with directional items to be addressed in plans submitted for final
mechanical equipment. 6) If a separate ATM kiosk is pursued, plans shall include a
location and details of the improvements. 7) Final plans shall include information on
where convenient bus stops to serve the site are located.
AYES: Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, Palazzo, Wynn, and Duffy
NOES: None
RECUSED: Commr. McCovey-Good
ABSENT: Commr. Ehdaie
The motion carried on a 5:0 vote.
3. No Specific Address. ARC 22-12; Review of updates to the Community Design
Guidelines regarding storm water programs; City of San Luis Obispo — Community
Development Department, applicant. (Pam Ricci)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommended the adoption of the
Draft Resolution, which approves the recommended changes and additions to the
Community Design Guidelines and revisions to reflect new storm water and Low -
Impact Development (LID) State requirements.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
There was general discussion by the Commission as staff presented recommended
changes to Chapter 1.4C, 2.1C & F, 3.1A & C, 3.213, 4.213, 6.3, 6.3E, 6.5, and 7.1 of the
Community Design Guidelines.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On a motion by Commr. Palazzo, seconded by Vice -Chair McCovey-Good to adopt the
Draft Resolution, which approves the recommended changes and additions to the
ARC Minutes
August 20, 2012
Page 6
Community Design Guidelines and revisions to reflect new storm water and Low Impact
Development (LID) State requirements.
AYES: Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, Palazzo, Wynn, McCovey-Good, and Duffy
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Ehdaie
The motion carried on a 6:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
4. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
5. Commission:
The Commission agreed to cancel the meeting of September 10th since there were
no projects ready for review on that date.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Dawn Rudder
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on September 17th, 2012.
ng Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
September 17, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Steven Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo, Greg Wynn, and Vice -
Chair Michelle McCovey-Good
Absent: Commr. Suzan Ehdaie and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Recording Secretary Dawn Rudder
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of August 20, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
OUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. No Specific Address. ARC 22-12; Review of minor updates to the Community Design
Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Department, applicant.
(Continued from August 20, 2012, ARC Meeting)
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the adoption of the Draft
Resolution, which approves the recommended changes and additions to the Community Design
Guidelines in the following sections based on findings she outlined.
• 4.2D.5.e related to materials used for awnings in the downtown
• 6.1 F trash and recycling facilities in the downtown
There was a general discussion between Commissioners to further clarify the language contained in
Section 4.2D.5.e regarding metal awnings. The ARC agreed that the existing wording in Sections 3.1
B.11 and 4.1 DA.e. should remain and that, if changes are desired, there would need to be more
extended outreach to the community.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
"'COMMISSION COMMENTS:
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
ARC Minutes
September 17, 2012
Page 2
On motion by Commr. Curtis, seconded by Commr. Hopkins, to adopt the draft resolution approving
the proposed changes to the Community Design Guidelines in Sections 4.2D.5.e and 6.1 F
may be appropriate."
AYES: Commrs. Curtis, Hopkins, Palazzo, Wynn, and Vice -Chair McCovey-Good
NOES: None
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Ehdaie and Chairperson Duffy
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects.
3. Commission:
The ARC again praised the efforts to remodel the Granada Hotel on Morro Street. Commr. Wynn
specifically mentioned the quality and superior craftsmanship of the windows.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Dawn Rudder
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Archite raI Review Commission on October 1 st, 2012.
Rya etz
Sue ising Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
October 1, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Anthony
Palazzo, Greg Wynn, and Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good
Absent: Chairperson Jim Duffy
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Associate Planner Brian Leveille, and
Recording Secretary Dawn Rudder
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of September 17, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 667 and 679 Monterey Street. ARC 43-11; Review of a rehabilitation and
adaptive re -use of Contributing historic Leitcher Building and mixed-use project with
23 residential units and 24,000 -square feet of commercial space; C -D -H zone;
Michael Hodge, applicant (Brian Leveille)
Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending adoption of
the Draft Resolution, which recommends to the City Council that the revised project
design be approved, based on findings, and subject to conditions which he outlined.
Comms. Curtis asked about existing lot lines and project phasing. He also questioned
staff on the status of the environmental review and what type of document was
anticipated. Brian Leveille responded that there are several lots that would be required
to be merged prior to development and the phasing consists of two phases with Phase
1 including all of the lot at 667 Monterey Street behind the Leitcher building and
adjacent to the Children's Museum, and Phase 2 consisting of the single, mixed-use
building behind 679 Monterey Street. He also stated that staff is currently in the
process of preparing the initial study and is anticipating that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration will be recommended.
Thom Jess, applicant representative, provided a presentation of the changes made to
the project design since the ARC's conceptual review in April, and he summarized
modifications to the Leitcher Building rehabilitation following the July 23rd CHC meeting.
ARC Minutes
October 1, 2012
Page 2
Commr. Ehdaie asked about how parking is provided for the project. Thom Jess
commented that there was no onsite parking and that the parking requirement would be
met through payment of in -lieu parking fees. Mr. Jess added that the applicant would
like to negotiate an agreement with the City to allow parking for the project to be
provided in the City parking lot across Monterey Street.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Dave Hannings, San Luis Obispo, was opposed to the size of the proposed structures.
He noted that the buildings still appear out of scale with the neighborhood and that the
vegetation shown in the visual simulations that screen the project are not reflective of
year-round conditions.
Dixie Cliff, San Luis Obispo, voiced concerns with the size of the development and its
proximity to the creek area.
Elizabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, was disappointed that the developer did not
present a physical model of the project as requested and was concerned that the
project will impact the creek walk area.
Sandra Lakeman, San Luis Obispo, commended the architect on the architectural
detailing and had questions on the functional operation of the project including loading
and unloading for the commercial uses. She was concerned about the mass of the
project along the creek area.
Joseph Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, supported the applicant's conscientious efforts to
make changes to the project design to address previous comments, but still had
concerns with the overall bulk and height of the project.
Ursula Bishop, San Luis Obispo, stated the Commission should not approve the
proposed project based on the parking in -lieu concept being proposed. She concurred
that a physical model of the project should be prepared.
Ellen Goodwin, San Luis Obispo, commented that she thought the project is intense in
size but is appropriate for its Downtown -Commercial Zoning. She appreciated the 3D
models that were presented; however, she suggested that additional portions of the
edges of buildings be scaled back.
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, stated that the parking issue will be going before the
Planning Commission. She. also indicated the commercial businesses hours of
operation and loading will be addressed under the use permit conditions. She pointed
out that the 3-D model was used in place of a physical model for the purpose of this
meeting..
There were no further comments made from the public.
ARC Minutes
October 1, 2012
Page 3
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commr. Curtis questioned how the commercial delivery will be accommodated and if
the elevator access is sufficiently sized to serve the residential units. Mr. Jess pointed
out there is a ramp cut into the sidewalk which is controlled for certain hours of the day
which will be determined through the Planning Commission guidelines. He also stated
there is one 3,500 -pound elevator, specific for residents, which is specifically upgraded
for moving purposes.
Commr. Curtis questioned why there was only one elevator proposed. Mr. Jess
answered the Bed & Breakfast elevator is separate due to security purposes and that
provision of one elevator for the residential units exceeds minimum requirements for a
project of this size
Commr. Wynn commended the applicant on the level of detail in plans, and
presentation of the 3-D model. He stated he would support a recommendation of
approval of the project to the Council.
Commr. Curtis was opposed to the project as presented. He stated the changes from
conceptual review did not go far enough to reduce the mass of the buildings along the
creek.
Commr. Hopkins was in favor of the color palate and the architectural design and noted
the project is consistent with goals for development in the downtown. He noted this
project could help to provide vibrancy to this area of the downtown and that he would
support the project.
Commr. Ehdaie was opposed to the project. She noted the project is too massive for
the area.
Commr. Palazzo noted that he supported approval of the project.
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good concurred with Commr. Palazzo and stated the changes to
the project responded to prior ARC direction.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
findings, and subject to conditions.
AYES: Commrs. Hopkins, Palazzo, Wynn, and McCovey-Good
NOES: Commrs. Curtis and Ehdaie
RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commr. Duffy
ARC Minutes
October 1, 2012
Page 4
The motion passed on a 4:2 vote.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 2013 planning dates for
January meeting dates will be the 7th and the 14th if needed. February meetin
dates will be the 4th and the 11tH if needed. September meeting dates will be the 9t
and the 16tH
3. Commission:
Commr. Curtis asked about the procedure for reviewing projects where the ARC is
making a recommendation to the City Council on the final design. He raised the
point of whether the ARC would again review the design if the Council requested
significant changes to the design that the ARC recommended approval of. Ms.
Ricci commented that, in other cases such as Garden Street Terraces and
Chinatown, where the City Council had requested to have the final review of the
project design, they did not make any significant changes to the ARC's
recommended conditions. She noted that, ultimately, it would be up to the City
Council's discretion as to whether or not changes to a project design would need to
return to the ARC for review.
Commr. Wynn commented that any substantial changes made to the architecture
should be brought back to the Architectural Review Commission.
Commr. Curtis concurred. Mr. Leveille and Ms. Ricci stated that there would be a
statement in the Council agenda report noting the ARC's preference to review the
project design again if the Council requested substantial changes.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Dawn Rudder
Recording Secretary
Approved b the Architectural Review Commission on October 15, 2012.
R n Betz
pervising Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
October 15, 2012
"ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Anthony Palazzo, Vice -Chair Michelle
McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioners Greg Wynn and Ken Curtis
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Assistant Planner Marcus Carloni, and Recording Secretary
Dawn Rudder
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES: The minutes of October 1, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 3807 Broad Street. ARC 59-12; Final design review of credit union offices and retail branch
building; BP -SP zone; Sesloc Federal Credit Union, applicant. (Continued from August 20,
2012, ARC meeting) (Pam Ricci)
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good recused herself due to a potential conflict of interest on Item No. 1 since
her firm will be working on the construction plans.
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending adoption of the draft resolution,
which grants final design approval to the project, based on findings and subject to conditions, which
she outlined.
Commr. Hopkins asked whether the roofing color would change over time or would there be a sealant
applied to retain the finish. Ms. Ricci suggested that this question be directed to the architect.
Commr. Ehdaie questioned whether the eucalyptus tree removals within the project would need to be
reviewed by the Tree Committee. Ms. Ricci responded that, since the tree removals were supported
by the City Arborist and considered as part of the ARC plans, they would not need to be separately
reviewed by the Tree Committee.
Pat Blote, applicant representative, reiterated their request to allow two signs on the ATM kiosk for
both onsite and offsite visibility. He also commented the copper roof selection will have a factory
finish and should not age over time. He pointed out the refinements made to plans based on
comments from the previous ARC meeting in regard to roof color, entry redesign, and additional tree
planters in parking areas.
Commr. Hopkins asked about the sizes of the wall signs on the kiosk. Ms. Ricci noted that the sign
program was still somewhat preliminary and precise sign areas had not been fully formulated. She
added that, as long as the two ATM kiosk signs were small in scale, they could be supported.
ARC Minutes
October 15, 2012
Page 2
Commr. Palazzo questioned how the window details will relate to the face of the building. Mr. Blotie
indicated the windows will be compatible with the color scheme of the building, may be lightly tinted
for sun screening, and recessed a small amount.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments made from the public.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:.
Commr. Hopkins noted his support for the revised project design.
Commr. Palazzo indicated the project design is strong, but would like to see a condition added
regarding certain building details being incorporated into final working drawings to the review and
approval of the Community Development Director.
Commr. Ehdaie concurred with Commr. Palazzo.
Chairperson Duffy commented that, based on the applicant's thorough submittal that included
enlarged views of certain building features and perspective views, that he was comfortable that
--.,architectural details had been adequately presented for the ARC's review. He added that he was
confident that the architectural details would be provided in a similar competent fashion as part of
working drawings.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
Development Director: 5.c. Signage for the freestanding ATM kiosk shall be limited to two wall signs
AYES:
Commrs. Palazzo, Hopkins, Ehdaie, and Duffy
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good
ABSENT:
Commrs. Wynn and Curtis
The motion passed on a 4:0 vote.
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good rejoined the meeting for the 2id item on the agenda.
2. 2293 San Luis Drive. ARCMI 32-12; Review of single-family residence on sensitive site at the
end of San Luis Drive; R -1 -Saone; Charles Blomfield, applicant (Marcus Carloni)
Marcus Carloni, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, noting that the recommendation was for
a continuance based on concerns that the design was inconsistent with the Community Design
Guidelines. He discussed the revised design submitted by the applicant after the staff report was
published. He noted that staff could support approval of the revised design and had prepared a draft
resolution granting final approval to the project, based on findings and subject to conditions.
ARC Minutes
October 15, 2012
Page 3
Commr. Hopkins clarified that the revised design is being submitted for the ARC's consideration
tonight. Mr. Cadoni indicated that was correct.
Tony Blomfield, applicant's representative, commented that the revised design fully addressed all
issues that staff had with the original design and that the project is now in compliance with the
Community Design Guidelines.
Chairperson Duffy questioned how the proposed revisions fit in with the neighborhood. Mr. Carloni
pointed out that there were other contemporary house designs in the vicinity. He also stated the
revised design is consistent with neighboring residences based on the use of articulation and varied
finish materials. Pam Ricci noted that the neighborhood included an eclectic blend of architectural
styles and that many of the houses had been substantially remodeled and enlarged overtime.
Commr. Ehdaie asked what types of materials would be used on the proposed residence. Mr. Cadoni
answered that the main wall surfaces would be stucco and that there were also tile features and
decorative landscaped walls.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There were no comments from the public.
ZOMMISSION COMMENTS:
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good indicated the revised plan is an improvement but asked that wording be
added to Condition #3 that the color selection of the exterior finish be an earth tone.
Commr. Palazzo commented that limiting the white color scheme will take away from the architectural
design.
Mr. Carloni pointed out that the use of white is acceptable, but not stark white, and a color chip would
need to be provided with plans submitted for a building permit.
Mr. Blomfield noted he agreed with not using a stark white.
Chairperson Duffy concurred with the added wording per Vice -Chair McCovey-Good about using an
earth -tone color.
Vice -Chair McCovey-Good observed that the selected tile on the two interior walls and planter box
should be a natural -appearing material selection.
There were no further comments made from the Commission.
On a motion by Commr. Hopkins, seconded by Vice -Chair McCovey-Good to adopt a draft resolution
prantinp final approval to the project, based on findings with the following changes to conditions (41
ARC Minutes
October 15, 2012
Page 4
�, shall clearly show the details of all windows to the satisfaction of the Community Development
Director.
AYES: Commrs. Hopkins, McCovey-Good, Palazzo, Ehdaie, and Duffy
NOES: None
RECUSED: None.
ABSENT: Commrs. Wynn and Curtis
The motion passed on a 5:0 vote.
Commr. Wynn joined the meeting.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
3. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast
Senior Planner, Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. She indicated the
next meeting will be held on November 5th.
4. Commission:
The ARC suggested that the Commission, at their next meeting, further discuss checklists for
final architectural review and the potential need to embellish the guidance relating to building
details such as windows, railings, and eaves.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Dawn Rudder
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on November 5th, 2012.
Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
November 5, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Greg Wynn,
Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioner Anthony Palazzo
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci and Recording Secretary Dawn Rudder
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of October 15, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
There are no public hearing items on this agenda.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
1. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast — Pam Riccigave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects
noting that the next scheduled regular meeting of November 19, 2012, would
be cancelled. She noted that an upcoming APA webinar entitled "Design
Guidelines in Historic Neighborhoods" is planned for December 5th from 1 to 2
p.m. in the Council Hearing Room. Vice -Chair McCovey-Good and Chair Duffy
expressed interest in attending.
b. Budget Workshop — Goal Setting for 2013-2015 Financial Plan
Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, provided a staff presentation regarding the City's
2013-2015 Financial Plan review process and provided an overview on the
status of the ARC's 2011-2013 budget goals and work program items. The
Commission reviewed the goals from the previous budget cycle and instructed
staff on desired changes as follows:
1) Downtown Beautification & Maintenance
ARC Minutes
November 5, 2012
Page 2
The Commission continued to feel that the vitality and appearance of the
downtown was important. The goal related to on-going maintenance was
retained as composed in the last set of budget goals. In terms of
beautification efforts, the Commission wanted more flexibility with the goal
language (i.e. not to just limit it to extending the Higuera demonstration
block street furniture improvements). To that end, the ARC simplified the
language to state: "Expand the streetscape improvements to other areas."
They added reasons for the importance of the goal and included public-
private partnerships and an emphasis on low-cost improvements as ways to
make things happen.
Commr. Ehdaie left the meeting early.
2) Alternative Transportation Incentives
This goal was generally maintained as it was composed in the last set of
budget goals. The ARC eliminated the specific reference to electric cars
and replaced the word "Vespas" with the general reference of "scooters" to
be more inclusive.
3) Community Design Guidelines (CDG) Update
After discussion, the ARC concluded that updating the CDG was an on-
going work program that would occur periodically and did not need to be
flagged as a budget goal. The Commission felt that, as the City's design
review board, they should include a more visionary goal. They added four
ideas for various public projects that had been discussed as potential
projects in the past.
The Commission then discussed the priority order of their three goals.
Commr. Wynn suggested making the visioning ideas the first priority
followed by Alternative Transportation and Downtown Beautification.
Commrs. Curtis and McCovey-Good concurred with Commr. Wynn.
The Draft 2013-2015 ARC Budget Goals are as follows:
a) Visioning Ideas:
• Implement three City gateway improvements
• Expand and improve Mission Plaza to the Broad Street dogleg
• Expand and improve facilities along the downtown creek -walk
• Implement pedestrian plaza in front of Government Center on
Monterey Street
b) Alternative Transportation Incentives:
ARC Minutes
November 5, 2012
Page 3
• Encourage using in -lieu parking fees and other transportation
revenue sources for the development of bicycle circulation and
improvements and encourage the development of spaces in
conventional parking lots and structures to accommodate scooters
and other alternative transportation vehicles
c) Downtown Beautification & Maintenance:
• Provide funding for on-going maintenance activities like shrub and
flower planting in landscaped areas and the steam cleaning of
sidewalks to improve the appearance of the downtown
• Expand the uniform streetscape improvements to other areas
Why It's Important:
• Improves citizens' enjoyment of community
• Provides a diversity of experiences
• Promotes economic distribution throughout the downtown core
• Makes downtown an attractive environment to encourage mixed-use
developments
How to Make it Happen
• Encourage public-private partnerships with the Downtown
Association and individual businesses to take on the responsibility of
downtown maintenance
• Emphasize low-cost improvements over costly capital projects
c. Checklist — Building Details — This item was postponed to December 3'd.
2. Commission:
Chairperson Duffy brought up concerns with a variety of City projects and the lack
of attention to finish details such as landscaping.
Commr. Hopkins mentioned that the new utility box art around town was a nice
addition.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Dawn Rudder
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Arphitectural Review Commission on December 3, 2012.
Ryan
ing Administrative Assistant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
December 3, 2012
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Ken Curtis, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Greg Wynn,
Vice -Chair Michelle McCovey-Good, and Chairperson Jim Duffy
Absent: Commissioners Steven Hopkins and Anthony Palazzo
Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci
ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
The agenda was accepted as presented.
MINUTES:
The minutes of November 5, 2012, were approved as presented.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS:
There were no comments made from the public.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 12350 Los Osos Valley Road. ARC 124-12; Review of fagade upgrades, including
an illuminated entry feature, for the Toyota dealership; C -S -S zone; John Frangie,
applicant. (Continued to a date uncertain) (Marcus Carlon)
As noted on the agenda, this item was continued to a date uncertain without
discussion.
COMMENT AND DISCUSSION:
2. Staff:
a. Agenda Forecast— Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming agendas.
She noted that the December 17th ARC meeting would be cancelled.
b. Review Consolidated Budget Goals — Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, summarized
the ARC's discussion of the budget goals on November 3`d. She noted that
tonight's meeting provided the Commission with an opportunity to review the
draft language and consider any additional changes in light of the consolidated
goals from all of the other advisory bodies.
The ARC made some refinements to the budget goals after an extended
discussion.
ARC Minutes
December 3, 2012
Page 2
Commr. Curtis suggested that there be a preamble to the "Visionary Ideas" goal
to help clarify the purpose and context.
Commr. Wynn recommended that the gateway idea become its own separate
goal.
The Commission ultimately decided that the "Visionary Ideas" goal get renamed
"Downtown Concept Plan" as the ideas all were related to that visionary plan.
The suggested preamble was added referencing the various project ideas as
updates of the Downtown Concept Plan. The order was modified to have the
Downtown Concept Plan as the top priority followed by Gateway Projects, then
Alternative Transportation Incentives, and Downtown Beautification and
Maintenance.
The Commission's final version of the goals to be forwarded to the City Council
includes the following:
1) Downtown Concept Plan:
Update and further expand the Downtown Concept Plan with focus on the
following:
• Enlarge and improve Mission Plaza to the Broad Street dogleg
• Extend and improve facilities along the downtown creek -walk
• Implement pedestrian plaza in front of Government Center on
Monterey Street
2) Gateway Projects:
Implement three previously -identified City gateway improvements.
3) Alternative Transportation Incentives:
Encourage using in -lieu parking fees and other transportation revenue sources
for the development of bicycle circulation and improvements and encourage the
development of spaces in conventional parking lots and structures to
accommodate scooters and other alternative transportation vehicles.
4) Downtown Beautification & Maintenance:
• Provide funding for ongoing maintenance activities like shrub and
flower planting in landscaped areas and the steam cleaning of
sidewalks to improve the appearance of the downtown
• Expand the uniform streetscape improvements to other areas
Why It's Important
• Improves citizens' enjoyment of community
• Provides a diversity of experiences
ARC Minutes
December 3, 2012
Page 3
• Promotes economic distribution throughout the downtown core
• Makes downtown an attractive environment to encourage mixed-use
developments
How to Make it Happen
• Encourage public-private partnerships with the Downtown Association
and individual businesses to take on the responsibility of downtown
maintenance
• Emphasize low-cost improvements over costly capital projects
2. Commission:
Commr. Wynn mentioned that the Quiky Car Wash entry wall sign had not yet been
removed per ARC conditions.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Pam Ricci
Recording Secretary
Approved by the Architectural Review Commission on January 14, 2013.
Ryan BAW
Supe sing Administrative Assistant