Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES 2009-2010CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES 2009/2010 SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of January 26, 2009 The meeting convened at 5`.30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Chuck Crotser, Katy Davis, Lynne Landwehr, Dean Miller, Vice -Chair John Fowler, and Chair (vacant position) Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: Paula Carr provided historic information on the people and history associated with three houses in the Railroad Historic District. The houses are proposed for demolition in conjunction with a mixed-use development project considered at the December CHC meeting. She also provided the Committee with checklists for evaluating potentially- historic structures and suggested information sources for historic evaluations. Ms. Carr announced a historic research seminar sponsored by the National Preservation Institute to be held in San Simeon in March 2009. There were no further public comments. ELECTIONS: Vice -Chair Fowler noted that Chairperson Elise Wheeler had resigned from the Committee and requested a motion to endorse an approach for conducting meetings until April when regular officer elections will be held to elect committee members as Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson for one year. On a motion by Committee Member Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Breska, the Committee voted to appoint John Fowler as interim Chair to fulfill the remaining term of Elise Wheeler. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Crotser, Davis, Landwehr, Miller, and Fowler NOES: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote On a motion by Committee Member Davis, seconded by Committee Member Miller, the Committee voted to appoint Chuck Crotser as interim Vice Chair. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Crotser, Davis, Landwehr, Miller, and Fowler NOES: None CHC Minutes January 26, 2009 Page 2 The motion passed on a 6:0 vote PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: 1204 Nivomo Street and 464 Buchon Street. ARC 1-07; Review relocation of the historic Parsons House and proposed demolition of accessory structure; C -D zone; Jules Rogoff, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Jeff Hook noted that staff work on this item was expected to be completed by next month and suggested the Committee continue the item to a date uncertain. No action was taken on this item and the hearing will be noticed for a subsequent hearing. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff Staff provided a forecast of the two agenda items tentatively scheduled for the February 2009 meeting. b. Revisions to Cultural Heritage Committee Bylaws — Staff Staff presented the proposed change to CHC By-laws for Committee review. The amendment requires that CHC members be citizens and registered voters of the City of San Luis Obispo. On a motion by Committee member Landwehr, seconded by Committee member Breska, the Committee approved the draft bylaws amendment as presented. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Crotser, Davis, Landwehr, Miller, and Fowler NOES: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote C. Meeting with Council Liaisons to the CHC. The Committee and City Council members Ashbaugh and Carter, liaisons to the CHC, discussed expectations of the Council and the Committee. The Committee expressed the need for a Historic Preservation Ordinance to provide guidance and certainty in the review process. Council liaisons expressed appreciation for the work the CHC performs and provided feedback as to how the CHC's recommendations are considered as part of the Council's decision-making process. Committee members requested Council support when the CHC requests additional historic documentation from applicants. The Council liaisons and CHC discussed the upcoming goal -setting priorities in light of the financial shortfall the City must address. Specific examples of recent projects were discussed and feedback from both Committee and Council members was provided. CHC Minutes January 26,.2009 Page 3 Comments from the Public: Paula Carr — suggested that the City invite the Main Street program and State Office of Historic Preservation staff to visit and comment on downtown historic preservation efforts. She also suggested the City do an in-depth study of contextual historic themes prior to updating the historic resources inventory to help understand significance of any potential resource. Bob Vessely — indicated that grants may be available to help fund an update of the City's historic resources inventory and provided an example of the Getty Foundation's involvement with the City of Los Angeles. He indicated that historic preservation should be treated in the same manner as other development standards as part of a predictable development review process. Other business: Committee Member Crotser indicated that the Advisory Body handbook references review of all advisory body functioning by a citizen's committee every five years. He questioned whether this has occurred and the Committee asked.staff to provide information. Committee Member Landwehr displayed three books — two by Guy Crabbe regarding historic businesses along Monterey and Higuera and a book by Ken Haggard regarding San Luis Architecture. The Committee requested that staff acquire these books for the historic library. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary Approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee on February 23, 2009. Jeff Hook, Senior Planner SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of February 23, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members, Barbara Breska, Katy Davis, Lynne Landwehr, Dean Miller, Acting Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser, and Acting Chairperson John Fowler (one vacant seat). Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of December 15, 2008, and January 26, 2009, were approved as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1) 762 Higuera Street. CHCMA 127-08; Request to nominate the Warden Block, a Contributing Property, to the Master List of Historic Resources and enter into a Mills Act �- Historic Preservation contract; C -DH zone; Robin Rossi, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, requesting to forward a recommendation to the City Council to add the Warden Block to the Master List of Historic Resources, and to approve the applicant's request to be part of the Mills Act Historic Preservation program and endorse the attached draft Mills Act Contract, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Committee Member Miller requested clarification on signage and marquee proposed. Mr. Hook will follow up with committee members on signage clarification. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the Committee. On motion by Acting Vice -Chair Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Breska to nominate the Warden Block, a Contributing Property, to the Master List of Historic Resources, based on findings: Findings: The property qualifies for nomination to the Master List of Historic Resources based on CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 2 Historic Criteria (eligibility criteria I, II, III, V and VI) of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 2. With nomination to the Master List of Historic Resources, the property located at 762 Higuera Street has been recognized as a historic asset in the community. As such, maintaining the structure will meet the City's goals for historic preservation listed in Conservation and Open Space Element Policies 3.3.1 through 3.3.5. The motion carried, 6:0. On a motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Landwehr, the Committee recommended the City Council approve a Mills Act contract for 762 Higuera Street, subject to the addition of an Item #4 to Exhibit A to the contract: Repair and replace brick paving as necessary to provide smooth walking surface at ramps to Queenie Warden Bridge, to be completed within six years, to the approval of the Community Development Director. Findings: Conservation and Open Space Element program 3.6.2 indicates the City will participate in financial assistance programs such as property tax reduction programs that encourage maintenance and restoration of historic properties. "- 2. The Warden Block, located at 762 Higuera Street, has been recognized as a historic asset in the community as evident by CHC's recommendation to Council to add the property to the Master List of Historic Resources. If Council supports Master List nomination, maintaining the structure will meet the City's goals for historic preservation listed in policies 3.3.1 through 3.3.5 of the Conservation and Open Space Element. 3. The Cultural Heritage Committee has reviewed and approved the proposed site and building changes, which are incorporated into the Mills Act Program for the property. Condition: 1.Exhibit A of the Mills Act contract shall include an Item #4 which requires the property owner to repair and/or replace brick paving as necessary to provide a smooth walling surface at ramps to the Queenie Warden Bridge, to be completed within six years, to the approval of the Community Development Director. AYES: Committee Members Miller, Crotser, Landwehr, Davis, Breska, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. On motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Landwehr to forward to the City Council for final action to enter into Mills Act Historic Preservation contract. CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 3 The property is located in the Downtown Historic District; Downtown Commercial with Historic Overlay zone; with a 4`h condition for the applicant to repair or replace the pedestrian surface. AYES: Committee Members Miller, Crotser, Landwehr, Davis, Breska, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. 2) 1204 Nipomo Street and 464 Buchon Street. ARC/ER 1-07; Review relocation of the historic Parsons House and proposed demolition of accessory structure; C -D zone; Jules Rogoff, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Jeff Hook, presented the staff report, to (1) Recommend to the ARC that based on conformance with prior City Council direction (per Resolution No. 9900) and subsequent evaluation, the proposed relocation of the Parsons House be approved subject to noted finding and conditions; and (2) Recommend the ARC approve the proposed demolition of the 2 -story accessory structure subject to findings and conditions noted; and (3) Recommend the ARC approve relocation of the structure at 464 Buchon from the front to the rear portion of the lot subject to findings and conditions which staff outlined. Randy Dettmer, project architect, and Jules Rogoff, applicant, explained the relocation plans and responded to the staff report. Committee Member Miller read a statement describing his concerns with the project's review process and reasons why he could not support the proposed relocation. After a lengthy discussion, the Committee took three actions: PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. COMbIITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Landwehr requested that wording of the historic plaque required in Condition #9 be run by the CHC before plaque installation. Committee Member Breska asked the applicant and architect if they understood and agreed to the proposed conditions. Applicant replied that they did and would comply with the conditions. Committee Member Miller noted that he could not support this project, and read a statement describing his concerns with and objections to the project and process by which it was approved. He added that the building should be moved to a corner lot. On a motion by Acting Vice -Chair Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Breska, the Committee recommended to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) that, based on conformance with prior City Council direction (per Resolution No. 9900) and subsequent evaluation, the proposed relocation of the Parsons House be approved subject to the findings and conditions recommended by staff with changes to recommended Conditions 9 and 11 and an CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 4 added Condition 12. Findings: 1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and Historic Preservation Program, and with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitation, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings, because it will not result in a substantial adverse change such that the significance of the historical resource will be materially impaired. 2. With the incorporation of mitigation measures to ensure the retention of character -defining features, the project will not cause a substantial change in the significance of the historical resource and, therefore, will not have a significant negative effect on the environment. 3. Based on compliance with mitigation measures identified in the initial study evaluating potential impacts to cultural resources that could result from the project, the relocation of the house will not cause potentially -significant impacts and will allow the house to return to its original context, configuration, and use. 4. Demolition of the garage structure will not cause adverse impacts to historic resources due to its context in the overall proposed relocation project; and the contributing status of the structure to the Parsons House has been evaluated by a qualified historic consultant; and it has been found that potential impacts will be mitigated to less than significant levels with HABS documentation and implementation of all other mitigation measures required with the relocation proposal. Conditions: 1. Plans submitted to the Building Division for the relocation of the Parsons House shall be consistent with plans approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee and shall demonstrate compliance with mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study (ER 1-07), as identified in this staff report, and reflect any additional information and/or direction provided by the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) to ensure compliance with said mitigationmeasures. 2. Building permits for relocation of the Historic Parsons House from 1204 Nipomo Street to 464 Buchon Street shall not be approved unless all necessary fees have been paid and permits have been issued for the new mixed-use project to be approved by the Architectural Review Commission for 1204 Nipomo Street. Relocation of the Parsons House and demolition of the accessory structure shall not be allowed unless construction of the new proposed mixed-use project is imminent. 3. A surety bond shall be posted to cover any damages to City infrastructure resulting from the relocation of the Parsons House and to guarantee compliance with mitigation measures and any related Secretary of Interior Standards in an amount acceptable to the Community Development Director. The applicant shall provide an estimate from a qualified professional documenting the actions and associated costs of complying with the mitigation measures based upon an evaluation of structural measures required to protect the Parsons House during demolition of the accessory structure, moving, and relocation. CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 5 — 4. Final occupancy for the redevelopment project at 1204 Nipomo Street shall not be granted unless all mitigation measures have been satisfied and final occupancy has been granted for the Parsons House and relocated existing structure at 464 Buchon Street. 5. Prior to building permit issuance, an agreement signed by both property owners showing acknowledgement of project conditions of approval and demonstrating how the project will be coordinated between the two properties shall be submitted. 6. Original gable eaves, fascia, and decorative rafter tails shall be restored to the approval of the Community Development Director to their original condition prior to when these features were cut off and altered. 7. A study consistent with the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to issuance of any building or demolition permits for the project. The HABS survey must include the Parsons House and the contributing detached accessory structure. The HABS survey shall meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering Documentation. The "short format" report may be submitted provided all other mitigation measures relating to the relocation are followed. 8. The original exterior walkway configuration leading up to the front porch shall be shown on building plans for the relocation of the Parsons House to 464 Buchon Street and shall be installed in accordance with those plans prior to final occupancy of the Parsons House. 9. Final plans submitted for Architectural Review Commission approval shall include conceptual plans on informational signage or public art feature suitable to convey to the public the importance of the Parsons House and family to the history of San Luis Obispo. At a minimum, the plan shall include information on the Parsons House, brief family history, a small vignette or illustration, and the location of the relocated Parsons House at 464 Buchon Street with directions to be approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee before installation. 10. To address potential impacts to archaeological resources on both project sites (1204 Nipomo Street & 464 Buchon Street), a monitoring plan shall be submitted by a City - approved archaeological consultant prior to issuance of any building or demolition permits for the project. The monitoring plan shall be consistent with all requirements of ER #1-07 and include all required elements of the monitoring program from mitigation measure #5. The monitor shall be present during site- disturbance activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources, or cultural materials, then construction activities which may affect them shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified • archaeologist. If pre -historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native �- American monitor should be called to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws. CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 6 11. Submitted building plans shall reflect that no exterior modifications shall be made to the Cordova House at 464 Buchon Street unless it can be demonstrated the proposed modifications are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and will not create the appearance that the house located at 464 Buchon Street is historically related to the historic Parsons House, to the approval of the Community Development Director. 12. Prior to issuance of building permits, an agreement running with the land and binding upon the Owner's successors shall be recorded with the County Recorder noting all required conditions of approval and mitigation measures for the property located at 464 Buchon Street. The final form and language of the agreement are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and City Attorney. AYES: Committee Members Crotser, Davis, Breska, and Fowler NOES: Committee Members Miller and Landwehr RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 4:2 vote. On a motion by Committee Member Landwehr, seconded by Vice -Chair Crotser, the Committee recommended the ARC approve the proposed demolition of the two-story accessory structure subject to findings and modified conditions noted in motion 1. AYES: Committee Members Crotser, Davis, Breska, Miller, Landwehr, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. On motion by Committee Member Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Davis, to recommend to the ARC approval of the relocation of the structure at 464 Buchon from the front to the rear portion of the lot subject to findings and conditions. AYES: Committee Members Crotser, Davis, Breska, Miller, Landwehr, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. 3) City -Wide. GPI 165-08; Re -consideration of nominating properties located at 743, 796, and 797 Caudill Street, 778 Francis Avenue, 2502, 2536, 2663, and 2691 Victoria Avenue, 2950 McMillan Street, and 753 Woodbridge Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic - Resources; and consideration of removing properties located at 750 and 756 Woodbridge Street from the Contributing Properties list of Historic Resources, South Broad Street Corridor Plan CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 7 Area Historic Resources; City of San Luis Obispo - Community Development Department applicant. (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook presented the staff report to: (1) Recommend to the City Council to add properties located at 743 and 796 Caudill Street, 778 Francis Avenue, 2502, 2546, 2663, and 2691 Victoria Avenue, and 753 Woodbridge Street to the Contributing Property List; and (2) Determine the houses located at 750 and 756 Woodbridge are non-contributing and recommend the City Council remove them from the Contributing Property List of Historic Resources, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Nancy Hams, applicant, spoke in opposition to historic listing of her property at 778 Francis Avenue. Ms. Hams provided Staff information regarding the property. Committee Member Breska requested clarification on auxiliary properties to the site if the site was both a contributing and historic property designation. Jeff Hook replied with designation context and test for contributing properties. Committee Member Miller requested clarification if the 2950 McMillian property was recommended for historic listing and Mr. Hook replied that it was not. Mike Kaney, property owner, spoke against historic listing of 793 and 797 Caudill. He discussed the structural integrity of the houses at 793 and 797 Caudill. Mr. Kaney referenced pictures shown to the Commission. Mr. Kaney felt the properties did not have contributing style significance to Little Italy. He said historical listing would result in financial hardship to him and his family. Jeff Hook replied that for the time and the place these sites were representative of Little Italy. The buildings do not represent a specific style in structure. John and Marsha Hischier spoke against the historical designation. They own 2691 along with the neighboring property and disagree with the Staff report concerning their properties. They purchased properties with the intent for investment as a commercial site. Historical designation will be a financial hardship. Steven Sanke stated that he was opposed to historic listing of 2050 McMillian. Caitlin Kaney spoke against historical designation of her family's property at 793 and 797 Caudill. She noted her concerns for multi -use site across from Cattaneo Properties future retail building. Pam Ricci gave clarification of remodels and adaptive re -use of property with a historical designation which was supported by Jeff Hook. Mrs. Hischier requested clarification on acts prohibited with historical designation. Jeff Hook responded with reference to information provided by Staff. CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 8 CJeff Jamison, resident of Victoria, supported historical designation. Bob Vessely spoke against historic designation of 2050 McMillan. There were no further public comments. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Landwehr noted the lack of consensus of property owners supporting historic designation. Ms. Landwehr stated the protests noted the antagonism for historic designation in the area. She asked if there were other approaches available. Jeff Hook replied that there could be other approaches but if the Committee found that this project met the guidelines then the Committee should make a decision based on this criteria. Committee Member Breska suggested that each property could be considered individually. Committee Member Miller does not feel the McMillian property is a part of this project. He does not support considering individual designation. Committee Member Davis supported Committee Member Miller. She does not support considering individual designation. Committee Member Crotser supported Davis and Miller. He does not feel a neighborhood presence in consideration of requirements of historical designation for properties considered. He supported a form -based code approach. Acting Chairperson Fowler does not feel that designation meets all requirements. He noted that Ms. Harris' attorney had contacted him for the record. Committee Member Crotser suggested further meetings with property owners to address benefits and clarify points of contention brought up in this meeting. Committee Member Miller requested a continuance for Staff to look at alternatives supporting the Little Italy look that is equitable. Acting Vice -Chair Crotser suggested voting on each site. Committee Member Landwehr stated that voting on each site individually could provide greater inequity. Committee Member Breska stated responsibility to the City and should vote on each site. Committee Member Davis felt that there was still public confusion surrounding project. Jeff Hook, replied that staff would support a continuance suggesting resident participation. CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 9 Pam Ricci, Staff, noted that listing can be contentious. It is not a popularity contest and addresses historic nature recognition. Chairperson Fowler supported moving forward on this project. Chairperson Fowler noted that 797 Caudill and 2950 McMillian have been suggested by Staff' as not to be included in historic designation. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Davis to exclude 796 Caudill and 2950 McMillian from the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources. AYES: Committee Member Fowler NOES: Committee Members Crotser, Davis, Breska, Miller, and Landwehr RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion failed on a 1:5 vote COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Staff suggested that the public be able to speak on 2950 McMillian as it had not been open for discussion earlier. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Paul Allen, San Luis Obispo, does not support the inclusion of 2950 McMillian in the Contributing Properties List. He provided a letter to Committee and Staff. Steve Sanke, San Luis Obispo, does not support the inclusion of 2950 McMillian. Terry Boyer, San Luis Obispo, owner of 2950 McMillian does not support inclusion. He referenced his letter to Committee and Staff. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Landwehr asked if 2950 McMillian was the only property included that had been recently annexed. Staff replied on annexation. Motion by Acting Vice -Chair Crotser to include 2950 McMillian and exclude 797 Caudill was withdrawn. Staff suggested a motion to continue until further information was gathered from a subcommittee including Staff and representatives from properties involved. CHC Minutes February 23, 2009 Page 10 On a motion by Acting Chairperson Fowler, seconded by Committee Member Miller, the Committee voted 6:0 to continue the item with direction to staff to schedule a meeting with property owners, staff, and a subcommittee of CHC members to discuss historic listing and the Draft South Broad Street Corridor Plan. Committee Members Crotser, Miller, and Breska volunteered to serve on the subcommittee. AYES: Committee Members Crotser, Davis, Breska, Miller, Landwehr, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote COMMUNICATIONS: a. Re -Dedication of Mission — Chairperson Fowler b. Agenda Forecast — Staff c. Committee ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary the Cultural Heritage C,pmmittee on March 23, 2009. Planner SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of March 23, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Katy Davis, Lynne Landwehr, Dean Miller, Acting Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser, and Acting Chairperson John Fowler (one seat vacant) Absent: Barbara Breska Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Senior Planner Jeff Hook, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: Uta Birkmayer, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the cultural heritage of the area. She noted that cultural heritage should be thought of as more than just the buildings that the Committee considers at meetings. It is also derived from people, culture, and spirit of a place. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the cultural heritage of the Downtown. He agreed with Ms. Birkmayer's comments history is more than just buildings — it includes people and events. There were no further comments from the public. Chairperson Fowler, Committee members, and staff thanked Lynne Landwehr for her service on the Cultural Heritage Committee. MINUTES: Minutes of February 23, 2009, were approved as amended. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844,848,868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street 847 861 863 & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street. ARC 69-05; Conceptual review of revised design for the Chinatown Project; C -D -H zone; SLO Chinatown, LLC, Applicants. (Pam Ricci) Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to continue the project and provide the following direction: (1) Provide additional information regarding how portions of the existing Blackstone and Sauer Bakery buildings will be retained and used in the remodeled structures; and (2) Modify the design of the proposed hotel at the comer of Palm and Morro CHC Minutes March 23, 2009 Page 2 Streets to improve its compatibility with the Chinatown Historical District, based on findings and subject to conditions which were outlined in the staff report. Committee members requested clarification on the scale of the buildings and on the structural fagade items that will be retained on both the Blackstone and Sauer buildings. Ms. Ricci replied that detail would be provided in future discussions. Tonight's architectural plans were intended to show project changes and general architectural treatment, and the applicant and staff were looking for Committee direction to refine plans. Mark Rawson, Architect for the project, spoke in support of the design and project development. Chris Harleson, applicant representative, spoke in support of the project design. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project. He felt that the proposed Blackstone Hotel redevelopment was likely to be a reconstruction rather than an "adaptive re- use" project, since very little of the original building could be reused. He felt the porthole windows were not consistent with the proposed architectural design of the Blackstone Hotel building and did not need to be incorporated into the proposed design. He supported staff's recommendation to modify the hotel design, including more variation in the hotel's roof heights. Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, supported the retention of more of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery Buildings, as proposed, but believed the current proposal would ultimately be a reconstruction, not rehabilitation. He would like to see how the applicant proposes to re -use the Ah Louis bricks and how public accessibility to the preserved -in-place Sauer ovens will be accomplished. He further stated that he supported the redesign of the site and the contemporary design of the hotel. William Watson, San Luis Obispo, supported the project, including the applicant's efforts to preserve more portions of historic buildings and the contemporary architecture of the hotel. He noted support for both the hotel and the applicant's sensitivity to the project. Elizabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, supported the project but stated it was a reconstruction project. She noted her concern over public accessibility to the Sauer Bakery oven. Joseph Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, agreed with prior public speakers. Mr. Abrahams would like to see the project be more child -friendly. He requested that the retail history of the buildings that had been a part of the old parking area be included in the project. Vangeli Evangelopoulos, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project, but was concerned about the overall "feel" and usability of the Monterey Street pedestrian plaza. He recommended amore prominent entry be provided to lead pedestrians to the hotel and plaza. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern with the slide showing the approved Ah �- Louis mixed-use project and its height above the historic Ah Louis Store. He felt that higher buildings are not part of the quality of the architecture of San Luis Obispo. CHC Minutes March 23, 2009 Page 3 Mark Rawson, Architect for the project, noted that the project was considered adaptive re -use, not reconstruction as defined in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings. He stated that the Sauer ovens would be preserved in place and would be available for the public to view. There were no further public comments. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Landwehr requested that the design of the Blackstone Hotel be consistent with a specific point in its history. She felt the portholes would be inconsistent with design period the architect has selected. She would like to see the design period consistently addressed in the design of the Blackstone building. She expressed her support for the general direction of the project design. Vice -Chair Crotser asked how the architect weighed project decisions in the context of City General Plan goals and Community Design Guidelines. Mr. Rawson responded that the project had been reshaped through the EIR, public input, and advisory body direction. Committee Member Davis noted that the new design responds to direction from prior meetings and expressed support for the revised project. Committee Member Miller suggested that the applicant work with adjacent property owners for a - better flow of pedestrian walkways. Chairperson Fowler supported the progression of the project. He looked forward to seeing the project in the next phase. He supported the architect's relocation of the hotel to the Pahn Street side of the site. Vice -Chairperson Crotser noted the project seemed to be a reinterpretation of an earlier style, rather than a true "reconstruction" of the Quintana Building and Sauer Bakery Building. He suggested exploring the "re -interpretation" the Blackstone and Sauer buildings since there may not be enough integrity remaining in the buildings to rehabilitate them. He presented a modification to the staff report to include wording under recommended condition #1 to clarify the architectural response in terms of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On a motion by Vice -Chair Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Davis, the Committee voted to recommend the continuation of the project based on the direction outlined in the staff report, with a change to Item #1, as follows: 1. Expand on how the reuse of building features and portions of building walls of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings will be accomplished. Clarify the architectural response in terms of the Secretary of the Interior Standards. 2. Incorporate building colors, roof features, tile work, and railings in the hotel building to play on Chinese art and motifs. CHC Minutes March 23, 2009 Page 4 3. Provide ideas for creative public art proposals to be incorporated into project plans that build on the project's Chinatown theme. 4. Modify the architectural detailing of the hotel to be more compatible with its setting in the Chinatown Historical District by incorporation of the following items: a. Provide a greater amount of variation in roof height and more articulation at the roof/wall juncture. b. Include a more regular window pattern on the upper floors. c. Minimize the size of the terra cotta screen facing Palm Street. d. Further articulate and highlight the entries to the hotel from Palm Street and the central walkway.. e. Increase the amount of upper floor balconies and other projections to the Palm Street elevation. AYES: Committee Members Davis, Landwehr, Miller, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Breska, The motion passed on a 5:0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff provided a brief preview of upcoming agenda items, including the swearing in of new Committee members and election of officers. b. Committee — The Committee discussed the upcoming Mayor's Advisory Body lunch on April 9`h. Katy Davis volunteered to attend on behalf of the Committee. c. Member Landwehr thanked the members, staff, and public for helping to make her experience on the Committee such an enjoyable one. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary Approved bLthe CWwrak Heritage Ccgmmittee on April 27, 2009. J U SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES April 27, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. OATH OF OFFICE: Assistant City Clerk Elaina Cano administered the oath of office to new members Dan Carpenter and Jeff Oliveira. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Acting Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser, and Acting Chairperson John Fowler Absent: None Staff: Associate Planner Brian Leveille, Assistant Planner James David, Senior Planner Jeff Hook, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ELECTION: Election of Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson On a motion by Committee Member Breska, seconded by Committee Member Miller, Committee Member Fowler was nominated to serve as Chairperson for one year. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. On motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Breska, Committee Member Crotser was nominated to serve as Vice Chairperson for one year, AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. MINUTES: On a motion by Committee Member Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Davis, the minutes of March 23, 2009, were approved on a 5:0 with Committee members Carpenter and Oliveira abstaining. CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 2 ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 756 Palm Street. ARCMI 26-09; Review rear addition to a Contributing historical resource; demolition of a non -historical rear dwelling unit; and construction of a garage at the rear of the property with a replacement one -bedroom apartment above; R -4-H zone; Ralph Peters, applicant (James David) James David presented the staff report, recommending the Committee find the project to be consistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Robert Adams, applicant's representative, supported the project. Comm. Member Oliveira requested clarification on the replacement element of the lattice work -- with trellis. Ralph Peters, applicant, noted the existing decorative porch braces were not historic features; he had made them to match and replace the original braces. Comm. Member Oliveira requested clarification on the project's potential impact to a Mission - era rock wall on the property. James David responded that the 2001 Historical and Subsurface Archaeological Survey concluded that existing rock features onsite are not historically significant. He also stated that a certified archaeological site monitor will need to be present during construction as a condition of architectural approval. Chairperson Fowler asked if the historical consultants were available at the meeting to address Committee questions. Staff replied that neither historian Betsy Bertrando nor archaeologist Nancy Farrell were present. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, did not support the staff recommendation. Mr. Vessely felt the addition mimics the original house too closely and is, therefore, inconsistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties. David Brody, San Luis Obispo, felt the project is not consistent with the buildings surrounding the Mission and advised the Committee to avoid reviewing historic resources in isolation. There were no further public comments. CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 3 Chairperson Fowler suggested that the report documenting historical resources on site made site monitoring important during project construction. Committee Member Miller expressed concern about the scale of the addition and the architectural integrity of the original, modestly -sized house at the Palm Street frontage, the garage door design, and porch details. He added that a 1,000 -square -foot building addition, as proposed, should not be considered a small addition in this context. Committee members asked the applicant to differentiate the new building from the old in terms of architecture. Committee Member Breska agreed with Committee Member Miller's comments and felt the previous project on this site was more in scale with the original house. She felt the garage door design was too "modem" and not consistent with the building's architectural character and would like to see the project scaled down. Committee Member Crotser moved to determine that the proposed project was consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and to refer the item to the Community Development Director with a recommendation to approve the plans subject to the following findings and conditions. Committee Member Davis seconded the �y motion. Findings As conditioned, the project is consistent with the General Plan because it provides mitigated protection of potential archaeological finds, encourages neighborhood compatibility and preservation, rehabilitation of existing downtown housing, the conservation of historical Contributing properties, and residential uses within walking distances of schools, work, and shopping. 2. The project is consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines because the historic building and fagade will be retained and repaired, the addition is in the rear, and both the proposed addition and the rear unit could be removed without impairing the historical integrity of the Contributing Property located at 756 Palm Street. 3. The project is consistent with the Community Design Guidelines because the addition and rear unit will match the materials and colors of the historic house, and the massing and scale is not readily apparent from the street. 4. Demolition of the rear dwelling located at 754 Palm Street will not adversely affect the historic district because it is not listed in the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines as a Contributing property and does not meet any of the criteria under Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA guidelines. 5. Rock features and recovered manmade artifacts onsite do not meet the criteria of being a significant archaeological resource because the items uncovered were primarily small CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 4 fragments with better examples existing from nearby areas (Farrel/Bertrando Historical and Subsurface Archaeological Survey, 2001). 6. The project is exempt from environmental review under Class 1 and Class 3, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, and Section 15303, New Construction of Small Structure, of the CEQA Guidelines. Conditions Staff will work with the applicant and cultural resource consultant to update the cultural resource report to evaluate the effects, if any, of project revisions on cultural resources. A certified archaeologist shall be present as an observer during the demolition and all earthmoving phases of the project. If intact features (such as trash pit, privy, or hearth) or substantial concentrations of cultural materials are found during the above activities, the archaeologist shall evaluate the significance of the materials and follow the procedures outlined in Section 4.60 of the City of San Luis Obispo Archaeological Resource Preservation Guidelines. 2. The applicant shall excavate an exploratory backhoe trench across the "footprint" of the rear building at 754 Pahn Street, because this is the most likely area in which to find an intact feature such as a privy, if such still exists, on the property. If a feature is located by means of the exploratory trench, the feature area should be excavated as part of a 1 x 1 meter (minimum) controlled excavation unit. 3. Applicant shall evaluate the historic significance of the decorative porch brackets and, if these are found to be original "signature" design features, shall retain them in the house design. 4. Garage door design and materials shall be revised to be consistent with the overall project design, to the approval of the Community Development Director. Comm. Member Carpenter noted concern for the new building with the garage. He supported the project because it maximizes the use of the property and provides downtown infill in accordance with General Plan policy. Comm. Member Davis noted concern for the artifacts on site, and felt that adequate controls to protect them were included in the motion. Chairperson Fowler expressed concern about the size of the house addition and the lack of architectural differentiation between old and new buildings. He would like to see the larger structure located toward the back of the property. Vice -Chairperson Crotser felt the porch brackets needed further research to determine if they were original building features or matched original features, e.g. "signature building elements," and, if so, they should be retained. He was comfortable with the conditions for onsite monitoring and felt the project respects the context of the neighborhood. CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 5 AYES: Committee Members Carpenter, Davis, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: Committee Members Miller and Breska RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 5:2 vote. 2. 375 Chorro Street. CHC 21-09; Review of proposed remodel and addition, request for nomination to Master List of Historic Resources, and request to enter into a Mills Act Historic Preservation contract; R-1 zone; Michael Mulvihill, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Brian Leveille presented the staff report, recommending the CHC recommend the Community Development Director approve the proposed remodel and addition, and that the CHC recommend the City Council approve the nomination of the property to the Master List of Historic Resources and enter into a Mills Act historic preservation contract, based on findings and subject to conditions. Chairperson Fowler questioned why the project design, Master List request, and Mills Act were, grouped together on the same agenda report. He felt it may be more appropriate to have separate votes on the three items. Mr. Leveille explained that the items are interrelated and should be considered together and agreed that it may be more appropriate to have separate motions. Comm. Member Miller supported the design but noted concern that with the proposed revisions, the project may not qualify for the Master List of Historic Resources. Vice -Chair Crotser asked if the Mills Act approval could be tied to the renovation proposed. Staff replied that, with direction from the Committee, this would be a possibility. Greg Wynn, applicant's representative, thanked the staff for their work and indicated it would not be a problem to tie the proposed renovation project to the Mills Act Contract because the property owners intended to follow through with building the project exactly as shown in plans and to comply with Committee direction. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Comm. Member Oliveira requested information on the creek located on site and whether archaeological artifacts were likely. Mr. Leveille replied that artifacts were not likely to be disturbed or uncovered, since the proposed project was generally within the area already disturbed by the existing house and no recommendation for further study was made by the historic consultant, Betsy Bertrando. Comm. Member Carpenter requested information on landscaping. Mr. Wynn provided clarification on landscaping for the site and the efforts to ensure preservation of existing trees along the project frontage. CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 6 There were no further comments made from the Committee. The Committee approved two motions: Motion 1: On a motion by Committee Member Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Breska, the. Committee found the proposed house additions to and renovation of the Chris Anholm House to be consistent with Historic Preservation Guidelines and recommended that the Community Development Director approve the proposed remodel and addition and that the City Council add the property to the Master List of Historic Resources, subject to findings and one condition. Findines The project is consistent with Historic Preservation Guidelines since the addition and renovations will further promote its architectural style and character. 2. The Chris Anholm House can be found historically significant by the criteria of City Historic Preservation Guidelines under Historical Persons criteria (VI.), Historical Event criteria (VII.), and Historic Context (VIII.); and the property can be found significant under criteria 1 & 2 of the California Public Resources Code since it is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. -- 3. The Chris Anhohn House is recommended for nomination to the Master List of Historic Resources and will be recognized as a historic asset in the community by its designation as a Master List Historic Property. As such, maintaining the structure will meet the City's goals for historic preservation listed in policies 3.3.1 through 3.3.5 of the Conservation and Open Space Element. Condition Staff shall contact the cultural resource consultant to determine if further cultural resource evaluation is needed based on City policies and standards. If additional study is needed, the applicant shall be responsible to pay consultant costs. The motion carried, 6:1 (Committee Member Miller voting no). Motion 2: On a motion by Committee Member Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Breska, the Committee recommended that the City Council approve a Mills Act contract for the Chris Anholm House, subject to a finding and a condition.. Finding 1. Conservation and Open Space Element program 3.6.2 indicates the City will participate in financial assistance programs such as property tax reduction programs that encourage maintenance and restoration of historic properties. CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 7 Condition 1. The Mills Act contract shall include provisions that tie contract implementation to construction of the CHC -approved project design. The motion carried, 6:1 (Committee Member Miller voting no). Committee took a break from 7:20 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. 3. Ci -Wide. GPI 165-08; Re -consideration of nominating properties located at 743, 796, and 797 Caudill Street, 778 Francis Avenue, 2502, 2546, 2663, and 2691 Victoria Avenue, 2950 McMillan Street, and 753 Woodbridge Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources; and consideration of removing properties located at 750 and 756 Woodbridge Street from the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources: Draft South Broad Street Corridor Plan Area Historic Resources; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Continued from the February 23, 2009, CHC Meeting) (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook presented the staff report, recommending the following: 1. Recommend the City Council add properties located at 743, 796, and 797 Caudill Street, 778 Francis Avenue, 2502, 2546, 2663, and 2691 Victoria Avenue, and 753 Woodbridge Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic; and 2. Determine the houses located at 750 and 756 Woodbridge are non-contributing and recommend the City Council remove them from the Contributing Property List of Historic Resources. Vice -Chair Crotser asked if it would be possible for owners to apply for inclusion after the Broad Street Plan was completed in the event the committee decided not to include any properties tonight. Staff replied that this was a possibility. PUBLIC COMMENTS: John and Marcia Hischier, San Luis Obispo, objected to inclusion of 2961 & 2663 Victoria Street on the list of nominated properties. They do not believe their properties meet requirements for historic listing. Nancy Harris, property owner, and Craig Driver, both of Paso Robles, objected to the inclusion of 778 Francis Street on the list of nominated properties. Mr. Driver discussed County Assessor information on the property in terns of the Maino family's past ownership and the building's age; factors which he felt did not support historic ownership. Mrs. Harris noted that this is the only commercial property being considered and felt it was not historic. Paul Allen, San Luis Obispo, spoke against inclusion of 2950 McMillan on the behalf of owner Terry Boyer. Jeff Jamieson, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support for the inclusion of 2546 Victoria Street on the list of nominated properties. He requested sewer upgrade and parking development for the property. CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 8 Michael Kaney, San Luis Obispo, spoke against inclusion of 743, 796, and 797 Caudill. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Vice -Chairperson Crotser said he could not support historic nomination, since he could not make the third finding for the eight properties, i.e. `when viewed in the context of their surroundings, the properties contribute to the historic character of the area." (City Council Resolution No. 6424 1988 Series). He felt the number of properties had been "whittled down" from the original number of about 20 properties being considered and, consequently, had lost its "critical mass." Comm. Member Miller felt that the planning area should be considered as a whole, possibly in the context of a historic district. He suggested that many properties in the area that were not included should have been considered along with the listings for consideration at this meeting. Comm. Member Oliveira supported the process of voting on the inclusion of all the properties as a group instead of considering each property separately. Committee Member Breska made a motion to accept Staff's recommendation presented as follows: 1. Recommend the City Council add properties located at 743, 796, and 797 Caudill Street, 778 Francis Avenue, 2502, 2546, 2663, and 2691 Victoria Avenue, and 753 Woodbridge Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic; and 2. Determine the houses located at 750 and 756 Woodbridge are non-contributing and recommend the City Council remove them from the Contributing Property List of Historic Resources. The motion died for lack of a second. On motion by Vice -Chair Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Breska, to exclude item number two and accept the Staff recommendation for number one only, based on recommended findings. Member Carpenter does not support the motion as he noted the area should be considered a historical district rather than only eight properties for inclusion. Member Miller does not support the motion and felt that more properties should be considered for historic nomination, possibly as part of a historic district. AYES: Committee Members Oliveira, Breska, and Fowler NOES: Committee Members Carpenter, Miller, Davis, and Crotser RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion failed on a 4:3 vote. , CHC Minutes April 27, 2009 Page 9 Chair Fowler polled the Committee to see if the adaptive re -use PowerPoint prepared by staff would change opinion of any member in reference to prior voting. Committee decided not to view the PowerPoint. To clarify the Committee's action, Mr. Hook noted that by not forwarding a nomination to the City Council, no further action would be taken on the Committee's previous historic nomination and that the item would not go to the City Council for consideration. Committee members indicated that a discussion of possible historic district status for the South Broad Street area may be useful. Chairperson Fowler requested that this item come back to the Committee in the form of possible consideration of a historic district rather than separate property listings as presented tonight. Committee Member Miller moved that the question of Historic District status for the South Broad Street planning area be placed on a CHC agenda for discussion. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Carpenter and carried 7:0. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Interpretive Signage for Juan Bautista de Anza Trail. Staff showed photos of the proposed public information plaque to be located in Mission Plaza and provided background. The Committee supported installation of the sign, with staff to determine appropriate location. b. Agenda Forecast — Staff. Staff provided an agenda forecast. c. Committee - Committee Member Miller requested a discussion of Master List designation at an upcoming meeting, and other Committee members agreed. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The minutes of April 27, 2009 Frere approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee on June 15, 0 SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES June 15, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Acting Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser, and Acting Chairperson John Fowler Absent: None Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry and Senior Planner Jeff Hook MINUTES: On a motion by Committee Member Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Carpenter, the minutes of April 27, 2009 were approved, 7:0. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Review Cultural Heritage Committee role and procedures for historic property nomination and Mills Act contracts. Jeff Hook gave a brief introduction, noting that at its April 27, 2009, meeting the Committee had directed staff to schedule this item for discussion. He added that the two main areas of CHC concern appeared to be the historic property nomination process, and the timing of Mills Act contract requests. Some Committee members questioned the appropriateness of reviewing requests for Mills Act program participation at the same meeting at which the property owner was requesting nomination to the Master List of Historic Resources, especially when historic significance depends upon proposed rehabilitation or remodeling. Committee members discussed Mills Act property improvement requirements, architectural integrity, and at what point changes to historic buildings affect historic significance, and criteria for historic nominations. Committee unanimously agreed on the following direction to staff: 1) The basis for Historic nomination should be clearly documented in staff recommendations and more detailed significance criteria should be considered for inclusion as part of a Historic Preservation Ordinance, particularly with regard to architectural integrity. 2) To qualify as historic, properties must meet at least one Council -adopted eligibility criterion; however, historic nomination is not automatic. A property that meets one criterion may still not merit historic nomination if the Committee determines it does not possess architectural integrity, or achieve a level of significance appropriate for the type of property. CHC Minutes June 15> 2009 Page 2 3) City should consider aligning its historic significance standards more closely with state and federal standards. 4) City should require more specific information on planned improvements to historic properties and how those changes impact historic integrity; and a schedule for completing those improvements as part of Exhibit A in Mills Act contracts. 2. Review tentative agenda and schedule for a Cultural Heritage Committee and Architectural Review Commission workshop on architectural compatibility and historic preservation. Mr. Hook summarized the agenda report and asked the Committee to consider the proposed training dates and work scope and provide direction to staff. Several Committee members noted they would not be able to attend the proposed training date of July 13-14, 2009. The Committee asked staff to work with the consultant to reschedule the training and suggested alternate dates of July 27-28 or August 10-11, 2009. Committee members endorsed the proposed training work scope, as described in Winter & Company's May 29, 2009, letter. Committee members also wanted to make sure time was allocated in the program for questions and answers after each of the agenda topics and that some of the case studies presented were drawn from San Luis Obispo City. COMMUNICATIONS: A. Agenda Forecast — Staff. Staff presented the agenda forecast for the July 27, 2009 CHC meeting. B. Committee: The Committee asked staff to present possible fall CHC retreat dates at the July 27, 2009 meeting. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jeff Hook The minutes of June 15, 2009, were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its July 27, 20092 ting. e nior Planner O SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of July 27, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser, and Chairperson John Fowler Absent: Committee Member Jeff Oliveira Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. MINUTES: Minutes of June 22, 2009 were approved as submitted. PUBLIC DARING ITEMS: 1. City -Wide. CHC 85-08; Introduction to the Updated Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook presented the staff report, recommending the Committee review the agenda report and Draft Guidelines, review written public comments on the Guidelines, take public testimony, and continue the item to the August 24, 2009 meeting with direction on any changes or additions. Committee Member Miller requested a glossary of acronyms for terms and abbreviations used in the Guidelines be included. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Barry Price, San Luis Obispo, commended staff and the CHC for the guidelines. Mr. Price requested a close look at the Professional Qualification Standards. He strongly recommended requiring affiliation with the Register of Professional Archeologists for archaeological consultants. This organization provides standards, a code of conduct and consequences for unethical conduct. Committee Member Miller questioned if a code of ethics could be added to the language as an amendment for consultants. Committee Member Miller does not support limiting the pool of qualified consultants. He recognized that there could be the possibility of individuals with education and experience that are not affiliated with the Register of Professional Archaeologists. CHC Minutes July 27, 2009 Page 2 Staff agreed and supported being inclusive rather than exclusive. Elizabeth Thyne, San Luis Obispo, supported adoption of the updated guidelines. Hearing no further comments, Chairperson Fowler closed the public hearing. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee directed to staff to provide a handout which defined and clarified the acronyms used in the Guidelines. The Committee discussed the use of the Registry of Professional Archaeologists v. Secretary of the Interior professional standards and decided to keep the wording in the Draft Guidelines unchanged, since it would allow the broadest possible pool of qualified professionals. Committee Member Miller noted concern for both the interior and exterior areas affected by remodels/seismic, retrofits and excavations in a sensitive historic resource area. Mr. Hook replied that Staff would add language clarifying that both interior and exterior work in sensitive areas would require, at a minimum, an archaeological resource study. Committee members revised wording for several paragraphs throughout the document, including Sections 1.4, 1.5, 2.10, 2.20, 3.10, 3.50.2, 4.40.5.1, 5.40.1, 7.40.2 and the Glossary. Vice -Chair Crotser noted concern for 3.10 with a reference to phasing. Mr. Crotser asked that "Phase 1", "Phase 2" or "Phase 3" designations be used throughout the Guidelines, along with their respective names, to clarify their meaning. Vice -Chair Crotser suggested that the CHC have access to archaeological records. Staff replied that the CHC would be included in the list of those having access to archaeological records, Section 4.40.5. Committee Member Carpenter noted the use of language such as "appropriate" be noted for security measures and asked staff to clarify Section 4.40.3.2. Vice -Chair Crotser questioned the language under Section 8.17 referring to "normally" versus "could be" exempt in reference to "sensitive sites." Mr. Hook noted the definition would be clarified. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On a motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Breska, voted to continue this item to the August 24, 2009 meeting. AYES: Committee Members Carpenter, Miller, Davis, Breska, Vice -Chair Crotser and Chairperson Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None CHC Minutes July 27, 2009 Page 3 ABSENT: Committee Member Oliveira The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS: A. Agenda Forecast — Staff Jeff Hook provided an agenda forecast and noted the next meeting would be the CHC/ARC training on August 17 and 18, 2009. He also asked the Committee to consider alternate dates for a fall CHC retreat. After a brief discussion, the Committee scheduled the retreat on Wednesday, October 2151, from 5:30 to 9 pm at the Ludwick Center in San Luis Obispo. Committee members also supported a possible field trip to the City of Monterey in the fall and felt a Monday day trip would be workable. B. Committee Committee member Carpenter explained his ideas about a possible name change from Cultural Heritage Committee to Historic Preservation Commission, and increased meeting frequency from one to two meetings per month. After discussion, Committee members felt a name change was not appropriate at this time, and that increased meeting frequency may be appropriate on a temporary, trial basis during the Committee's work on a historic preservation ordinance. They supported meeting twice a month as needed by scheduling special meetings rather than amending the Committee's by-laws. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee on August 24, SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES August 24, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser, and Chairperson John Fowler Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: On a motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Crotser, the minutes of July 27, 2009, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 3897 S. Hiauera Street & 120 Tank Farm Road. ARC 170-07; Review of a proposed commercial development on the historic Long-Bonetti Ranch property; M -SP zone; Long Street Farm, LLC, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Phil Dunsmore, Associate Planner, presented the staff report recommending the Committee determine that the development plan, with staff's recommended revisions, will be consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the adaptive reuse plan for the property and forward the item to the Architectural Review Commission based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Vice -Chairperson Crotser asked staff to discuss condition #4. Mr. Dunsmore explained the language and noted that wording could be strengthened with Committee direction. Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, noted the significance of the Granary building. Chairperson Fowler requested clarification on the landscape planting and expressed concern for removal of landscape materials. Mr. Dunsmore provided clarification on the proposed landscape. Chairperson Fowler asked if the Granary could be moved to the east. Mr. Dunsmore noted that it would actually be moved to the west. Mr. Fowler noted flexibility in movement of the Granary may help preserve the structure. CHC Minutes August 24, 2009 Page 2 Carol Florence, applicant representative, showed slides of the project and introduced project architect Jason Henry and historic preservation architect Robert Chattel to explain the project. Committee Member Oliveira requested clarification on the contemporary reconstruction and salvage of the barn materials. Ms. Florence noted that the intent was to salvage as much as possible. Mr. Oliveira requested the feasibility of reuse. Ms. Florence noted the project's land use and design intent. Mr. Henry discussed the intent of close interpretation on the reconstruction. Mr. Chattel provided the standard requirements that would need to be met with adaptive reuse. Committee Member Oliveira asked if there was an educative and interpretive element as part of the conditions. Mr. Hook replied that a display area is required as part of the property's approved adaptive reuse plan; however no display area is shown in the proposed plan. Committee Member Oliveira expressed concern that the proposed rehabilitation plans for the water tower differed from the tower's historic appearance as shown in photos from the 1980s. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Miller supported a shingled portion on the barn roof. Committee member Oliveira suggested that the barn door be inset. On a motion by Vice -Chairperson Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Miller, the Committee determined that the development plan, with staff's recommended revisions on condition #4, is consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the property's adaptive reuse plan and to forward the item to the Architectural Review Commission with a recommendation to conditionally approve the project. Committee members then discussed the motion. Committee Member Breska requested that the upper barn roof be corrugated material with wood shake or shingle on the two lower barn roofs. Vice -Chair Crotser voiced support for Committee Member Miller's suggestion that the footprint of the Granary be integrated into the project. Vice -Chair Crotser felt the Granary was a distinctive part of the historic property and supported rewording the language of condition #4 to support its preservation. Committee Member Carpenter agreed that the Granary should be preserved and respected in the rehabilitation. Mr. Carpenter supported enclosing the bottom of the water tower to match its original design. Mr. Carpenter noted concern for the proposed contemporary barn door design and felt the original barn door's appearance should be preserved. CHC Minutes August 24, 2009 Page 3 CCommittee Member Oliveira shared Committee Member Carpenter's concern for the barn door design and suggested the contemporary store front design be recessed behind a reconstruction of the original barn doors. He supported the preservation and rehabilitation of the Granary building. Committee Member Miller suggested that "for onsite energy" be removed from condition #5. He also recommended removing the second sentence of #4 and supports the materials be defined for the barn exterior. He questioned the ridge and design of building `B" which is roughly L- shaped. Mr. Miller suggested mimicking the Granary footprint. Mr. Henry noted that this could be considered. Chair Fowler noted concern for the opening to the barn and Granary preservation. Vice -Chair Crotser amended his motion to change condition #4 to ensure the Granary was preserved and be integrated into the new project. Mr. Dunsmore noted that this would be a reconstruction which would be required to meet certain standards. Vice -Chair Crotser supported refining the language of condition #3 to note that the original barn design shall be preserved. The roof material shall match the original treatment and be directed to be corrugated metal on the upper roof with shake or shingle lower roofs. Vice -Chairperson Crotser suggested the last sentence of condition #5 be revised to require that the windmill shall be operational and the lower portion of the water tower is enclosed to match its original appearance as shown in photographs. Committee Member Carpenter does not support the language of item #3. Chair Fowler recommended the barn roof material should be specified as galvanized metal or similar materials, but not "Corten steel." There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion made by Vice -Chairperson Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Miller, the Committee determined that the development plan, with staff's recommended conditions, including revisions to conditions #3, #4, #5, is consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the adaptive reuse plan for the property and forward the item to the Architectural Review Commission with a recommendation to conditionally approve the project. Conditions: 1. Site landscaping shall be designed to respect the historic ranch by preserving all surviving original landscape specimens surrounding the historic farmhouse. 2. The proposed project shall comply with the Historic Preservation Agreement recorded with the property including preservation and treatment of significant historic structures C and provision of an historic farm implement display. The farm implement display shall be clearly shown on a site plan for review by the Architectural Review Commission. CHC Minutes August 24, 2009 Page 4 3. The proposed exterior design of the barn shall be modified for consistency with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Reconstruction. Specifically, no exterior elements such as aluminum storefronts or other doors or windows that are not a part of the original barn design shall be allowed. Exterior roof treatment shall match historic roof treatment and may be shake or corrugated steel. Surviving barn materials shall be incorporated into the reconstruction. The footprint and orientation of the barn shall match original, and structural supports shall be consistent with the barn's original character and period of construction, consistent with the Secretary's Standards and Historic Building Code, to the Director's approval. Revised exterior plans for the barn shall be completed for review by the Architectural Review Commission. 4. The granary building shall be rehabilitated and integrated into building B, recessed slightly and oriented west. Plans shall be revised to the approval of the Community Development Director prior to proceeding to the Architectural Review Commission. 5. The reconstruction of the water tower and windmill shall be performed consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Reconstruction and shall replicate original construction, material, design, placement, and scale. The windmill shall be operational. The lower portion of the water tower shall be enclosed with siding to replicate the original design. 6. New buildings shall respect and complement the historic ranch design theme by utilizing agrarian architecture. Materials such as corrugated steel, wood (or simulated wood) siding, and related products shall be used as exterior treatment. 7. Plans shall include pervious paving (or gravel and decomposed granite where feasible) in the ranch area, consistent with its agricultural character, subject to Director's approval. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. 2. City -Wide. CHC 85-08; Review of the updated Draft Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report which recommended the Committee forward the Draft Guidelines to the City Council with a recommendation that the Council affirm the Director's environmental determination and approve the Draft Archaeological Guidelines. Committee Member Miller would like to see the report lead with the acronyms associated with �- previous terms related to phasing. Mr. Miller provided staff with a list of acronyms he noted. Mr. Hook noted that acronyms could be listed alphabetically in the Glossary and Committee members supported this approach. CHC Minutes August 24, 2009 Page 5 Committee Member Oliveira requested clarification in reference to the Director as noted on page 9 and throughout the report. Mr. Hook replied that the Guidelines implement California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements and that the Community Development Director is responsible for ensuring CEQA requirements are met. Mr. Oliveira noted that the language should be refined for Phases 3 and 4 archaeological determinations. Mr. Hook discussed the proposed eligibility criteria for the List of Qualified Professional Archaeologists, and Mr. Oliveira supported the approach of including the Registry for Professional Archaeologists (RPA) as meeting eligibility requirements. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. On motion by Vice -Chair Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Davis, the Committee recommended the City Council affirm the Director's environmental determination and approve the Draft Archaeological Guidelines. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff b. Committee 1. Vice Chairperson Crotser would like to see the Committee included in the review of plans to install fire sprinklers in the historic, City -owned Jack House. 2. Mr. Hook explained that plans for an information -gathering trip to the City of Monterey retreat was in the planning stages. 3. Plans for a CHC retreat on Wednesday, October 20, from 5 - 9 p.m., at the Ludwick Center had been firmed up. More information would follow soon. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller CHC Minutes August 24, 2009 Page 6 Recording Secretary The minutes of August 24, Septem qr 28,2009, meeting. Senior Planner 2009, were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of September 28, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser, and Chairperson John Fowler ABSENT: None STAFF: Senior Planners Jeff Hook and Pam Ricci, Deputy Director Kim Murry, Associate Planner Tyler Corey, Civil Engineer Michael McGuire, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Recognition of Chairperson John Fowler for his service on the Cultural Heritage Committee. MINUTES: Minutes of August 24, 2009, were approved as amended. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. INFORMATION ITEM: 536 Marsh Street. Historic Jack House fire sprinkler installation project. (Michael McGuire, Civil Engineer) Vice -Chair Crotser requested clarification on the riser pipe. Mike McGuire, Civil Engineer, described the location and installation of the pipe and measures being taken to minimize the visibility and architectural impact of the fire sprinkler work. Chairperson Fowler requested clarification on the timeline of the design for the project. Mr. McGuire discussed the length of the timeline and need for the installation. Chairperson Fowler asked if there was a protocol for reviewing this project. Mr. Hook noted that, because the Jack House is a public facility and both its interior and exterior are historically and architecturally significant, this project would normally be reviewed by the CHC. The project had Jack House Committee review; however, staff felt it was important to bring the project to the CHC as an information item at this point. The Committee thanked Mr. McGuire for his presentation. CHC Minutes September 28, 2009 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844, 848,868, 870, & 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street. ARC 30-09; Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed -Use Project; C -D -H zone; SLO Chinatown, LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, with the recommendation to determine that the revised project design is appropriate in the Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts, and recommend final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission and City Council, based on findings, and subject to conditions. Mark Rawson, applicant architect, explained the revised project plans. Chris Harrelson, Brand Allen Architects, spoke in support of the project on behalf of the hotel proposed on the site. Committee Member Carpenter questioned the use of the porthole windows since they were not a part of the original Quintana building design. Mr. Rawson acknowledged that the windows were not a part of the original building but felt that they were existing architectural elements that added a balance and symmetry that tie in with the architectural design. Vice -Chair Crotser asked if there would be public access to the historic ovens in the Sauer Bakery building. Mr. Rawson noted that a specific tenant had not yet been secured for the proposed space and that access would need to be worked out with the tenant in the future. He stated that incorporating the ovens was a creative addition to the space and that the applicant wanted flexibility on how a tenant would use the space. Pam Ricci noted that the Council action on accepting the historical reports for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings had required that the ovens should be accessible by the public. Chairperson Fowler requested clarification on the Sauer Bakery ovens. Mr. Rawson described the state of the ovens and noted that their protection would be carried out during the renovation project. Committee Member Miller requested clarification on the chimney -type features on the new building adjacent to Muzios and felt they were inconsistent with Community Design Guidelines. Mr. Rawson noted that these would be used to screen venting and other roof -mounted equipment. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Elizabeth Thyne, San Luis Obispo, supported the project. Ms. Thyne noted that the current plans presented at this meeting were a tremendous improvement from previous versions. Ms. Thyne requested clarification on how handicapped access was provided and asked if the model would be available for the public to view. CHC Minutes September 28, 2009 Page 3 Vangeli Evangelopoulos, San Luis Obispo, supported the revised project scale and how it complemented downtown. He supported the larger windows on the Chorro elevation of the remodeled Blackstone/Quintana Building, the turf areas in the linear park, and the way that the pedestrian walkways divided the site into two blocks. He suggested that Chinese sculptural elements be used along the main paseo entry points. Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, disagreed with use of the term "adaptive reuse" to describe the proposed changes to the historic Blackstone Hotel because of the extent of demolition proposed. He suggested that the reuse of Ah Louis bricks in the project needs to be a condition. He added that public access to the historic Sauer Bakery ovens was required by the Council and should not be a tenant option as suggested by the applicant. He submitted a detailed letter outlining his comments on the EIR Addendum and CHC staff report. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Vice -Chair Crotser suggested that changes to the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings should be identified as a reinterpretation rather than adaptive reuse. Committee Member Carpenter noted that the entries to the linear park provided an excellent opportunity to introduce Chinese features. Committee Member Oliveira mentioned the importance of archeological monitoring at this site and how it would need to include provision for having a Native American monitor on site during grading and construction activities. He suggested that the project include some type of display for artifacts found on the site as a part of archaeological fieldwork. Ms. Ricci pointed out that the CHC had previously reviewed a draft archaeological fieldwork plan and commented on proposed cultural resources mitigation measures. She noted that the RFP for the EIR had taken into account that archeological services would be required for the project and that the contract for the work could be approved by the City Manager, rather than requiring a new, separate review by the City Council. Committee Member Miller was pleased with the Chorro Street elevation and paseo areas in the project. He supported an improved streetscape design along Monterey Street with the elimination of the driveway and a white -on -white color scheme for the Quintana building. There were no further comments made from the Committee. and recommend final approval of the project design to the ARC and City Council based on the in other parts of the proiect and provision of public access to the ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building. CHC Minutes September 28, 2009 Page 4 Findings As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form, and materials of the existing Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts and complement the architectural character of the surrounding buildings and area consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourages projects to be pedestrian -oriented and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures. 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the Land Use Element including providing pedestrian -oriented spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper -floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007, with the certification of the Chinatown Project EIR & Update and the recently -completed Addendum. Conditions Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans reviewed by the CHC and ARC and ultimately approved by the City Council. A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that lists all conditions and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Detailed rehabilitation/restoration plans shall be submitted for both the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings along with building permit applications for seismic upgrades. Plans shall clearly delineate building features to remain, including Ah Louis bricks to be retained in place or to be reused in other parts of the project, and provide precise details on features that will be created to replicate historical architectural elements as shown on elevations. Public access to the historic baking ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building shall be maintained and reflected on plans submitted for a building permit. 3. Plans shall include window details indicating the style and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds, recesses, and other related window features. 4. Plans shall clearly show the depth of molding features, details on all railings, balconies, balustrades, and other decorative architectural details, and storefront details. 5. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth -troweled or sand finish. CHC Minutes September 28, 2009 Page 5 6. The applicant shall prepare an archaeological monitoring plan for the seismic upgrade and remodel projects for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. Consistent with the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, the plan shall include provision for a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor to be present during construction activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources, or cultural materials, then construction activities shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist. If pre -historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws and pertinent EIR mitigation measures. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. The Committee took a 10 -minute break at 7:30 p.m. 2. 863 Pacific Street. ARC 51-09; Review of three new dwelling units on a Master List Historic property; O zone; SLO investments, INC., applicant. (Tyler Corey) Tyler Corey, Associate Planner, presented the staff report with the recommendation that the CHC recommend the ARC approve the project, based on findings and subject to conditions. Committee Member Oliveira requested information on the historical inventory preparation for the historic property. Mr. Corey replied that the information was prepared by trained volunteers in the early 1980's. Chairperson Fowler requested clarification on the condition regarding demolition. Mr. Corey replied that the project is not proposing to demolish any structures on the site. Committee Member Oliveira requested clarification on the timing and need for historical surveys. Staff replied that surveys are typically required at property listing or with significant property alterations or historic building modifications. Vice -Chair Crotser requested clarification on the location of the addition in relation to the existing buildings. Staff provided clarification on proposed setbacks and connections of the new building to the existing structures. Carol Florence, applicant representative, requested language modifications to conditions 2, 3 and 4 which replaced the wording "match" with "be compatible with." Ms. Florence provided a CHC Minutes September 28, 2009 Page 6 project overview and noted that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards state that new additions should be clearly differentiated from the original historic buildings. Steve Puglisi, applicant representative, discussed the reasons for the proposed roof pitch. Mr. Puglisi noted that he was open to Committee suggestions on the proposed drive isle entry archway visible from Pacific Street. Mr. Puglisi noted concern for wood windows due to long- term maintenance issues. Mr. Puglisi noted the difficulty in locating diamond shape composition roof material to match the existing buildings. Committee Member Miller requested clarification on the hardy plank trim band at the corners of the building. Mr. Puglisi noted that a metal clip would be used to form a fitted corner rather than a wood trim band to match the historic church. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Vice -Chair Crotser supported the project and noted the craftsman architectural style complements the site and historic building. Mr. Crotser supported a change in language for conditions 2 & 3 which replaced the wording "match" with "be compatible with". Mr. Crotser also supported the proposed roofing material, noting the potential difficulty in locating the diamond shape material and supported the use of vinyl clad windows for the building. Chairperson Fowler supported Ms. Florence's proposed language modifications to conditions 2, 3 and 4 from "match" to "be compatible with." Mr. Fowler suggested that language contained in condition #1 be clear that the historic building will not be damaged or changed in appearance. Committee Member Carpenter supported the use of wood clad for the windows on the new building rather than the proposed vinyl clad. Committee Member Miller supported the proposed roof pitch and materials There were no further comments made from the Committee. On a motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Vice -Chair Crotser, the Committee recommended the ARC approve the proposed project subject to the following findings and conditions: Findings: As conditioned, the proposed colors, materials, and architectural details of the new building are compatible with the historic building and consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. 2. The project is consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines because the proposed new building complements the architectural style of the historic building. CHC Minutes September 28, 2009 Page 7 Conditions: The historic building shall not be demolished or substantially changed in outward appearance consistent with the Secretary of Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and Conservation and Open Space Policies 3.3.2 and 3.3.4. 2. The texture, style, and lap width of the exterior siding material proposed on the new building shall match that of the historic building, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 3. The proposed composition roof material shall match the shingle shape, color, and dimensions of the composition roof material on the historic building, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 4. The window style, proportions, dimensions, and trim of the new building shall match the rectangular rear double -hung windows on the historic building, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 5. Consistent with the Archaeological Preservation Program Guidelines, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor to be present during site disturbance activities associated with the construction project. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources, or cultural materials, then construction activities which may affect them shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist. If pre -historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws. Committee members discussed the motion. Committee Member Miller requested language modifications to conditions 2, 3 and 4 to replace the wording "match" with "be compatible with", add the word "color" after the word "style"; and to modify language in condition 3 from "match" to "be compatible with." The motion maker agreed to the amendments and the motion passed on a 7:0 vote AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff gave an agenda forecast. CHC Minutes September 28, 2009 Page 8 b. Committee Discussion. The Committee discussed the status of construction at 375 Chotro Street. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Crotser, and Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. a. Elections for Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson will be held in October or November, when the new Committee member is sworn in. b. The Committee Retreat. Staff reminded the Committee that the CHC retreat would be held on October 21, 2009, at the Ludwick Center. c. Committee field trip to Monterey was discussed. Committee members agreed that, due to the coming busy holiday months, the field trip should be postponed to next year. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The minutes of September 28, 2009 were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its November 23, 2009, meeting. Senior Planner ?: SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of November 23, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. OATH OF OFFICE: New Committee Member Kenneth "Buzz" Kalkowski was sworn in by Elaina Cano, City Clerk. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Buzz Kalkowski, and Vice -Chair Chuck Crotser Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Planning Intern Amber Piona ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR On a motion by Committee Member Carpenter and seconded by Committee Member Breska, Chuck Crotser was elected Chairperson on a 7:0 vote. On a motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Davis, Dan Carpenter was elected Vice -Chairperson on a 7:0 vote. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of September 28, 2009, were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: City -Wide. 72-09; General Plan Implementation — Historic District study as part of preparation of a Historic Preservation Ordinance and work program review; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Jeff Hook introduced Amber Piona who presented the staff report. She described the selected sample cities and how their ordinances and programs could be used as references for development of the City's historic preservation ordinance. She discussed the methodology and work program to prepare historic district descriptions for the City's five historic districts which will be included in updated historic preservation program guidelines. Mr. Hook explained the draft work program for preparation of a historic preservation ordinance and historic guidelines update. CHC Minutes November 23, 2009 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. COMNUTTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Breska felt that some of the sample cities' examples such as Santa Cruz and Danville were better organized than others such as Monterey. She noted that the City of Davis had a well -organized presentation of historic criteria. Ms. Breska also noted that some jurisdictions allow a birthplace or grave to be designated as a landmark. She liked that Danville's standards began with the purpose of the standards. Committee Member Kalkowski indicated that Santa Cruz's version was easy to read but may not provide, as much direction to staff. He liked that Monterey's ordinance addressed permit expiration but noted that it did not include a definition of "landmark." He noted the Davis example (page 9) dealing with demolition of historic resources and indicated that the City may want to address intentional destruction of a historic resource and require reconstruction. He questioned whether in cases of hardship, the City could help fund repairs and then put alien on the property to recoup costs. Staff responded that it might be possible but there are concerns of nexus and funding issues. Mr. Kalkowski indicated that any penalties for not maintaining historic properties should be.significant and clearly defined in the ordinance. Committee Member Carpenter thought the City of Campbell had an easy -to -read document. He liked the idea that one member of the Historic Preservation Board is appointed to serve as an advisor to projects and provides help with development review and on-site consultation. Committee Member Miller recommended that staff review Nantucket's ordinance. He indicated that it has an effective purpose statement and provides narratives describing periods of history and why they are important to the physical character of the city. He would like to see something similar for San Luis Obispo. Mr. Miller believes the ordinance should establish a more comprehensive district defined by the core of City and then develop tighter requirements within named sub -districts (Old Town, Mill Street, Railroad, etc.). Committee Member Oliveira noted the Santa Cruz ordinance addresses archaeology and this is not addressed in the other cities' ordinances. He questioned whether this would be addressed separately. Staff indicated that much of this is addressed in the newly -updated Archaeological Preservation Guidelines which will be referenced as part of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Committee Member Breska noted the Santa Cruz ordinance addresses "engineering" resources (such as bridges) as part of the historic significance criteria for consideration. She recommends the CHC consider this in proposed ordinance. Committee Member Miller noted the Southside addition was important to the City and wanted to know how the City can preserve the history of this portion of the City. Staff responded that a historic inventory and research of properties in the area would need to be completed. Subsequent to that work, a historic overlay could be considered by CHC and Planning Commission and Council. Mr. Miller wants to consider this in conjunction with an overall historic designation of the original town boundaries. CHC Minutes November 23, 2009 Page 3 Chairperson Crotser indicated that these examples show the importance of surveys. He would support identifying non-contributing properties rather than trying to identify historic resources. Committee Member Miller indicated that 1983 survey work was acceptable but believes the City can do a much better job now. Historic District narratives could help define importance of various areas of City and help educate the community. The Committee discussed the Certified Local Government Program and the amount of grant funding that is typical for jurisdictions. Mr. Oliveira requested clarification for timing of inventory work and wanted to know if the ordinance will address how the inventory will be done, historic resource nomination, and appeal processes. Staff indicated that much of this information is contained in the guidelines. Chairperson Crotser indicated that the Campbell and Monterey examples were very cumbersome. He thought Danville provided a good example and Davis had good definitions. Santa Cruz didn't provide enough information. He expressed a concern for the ordinance examples that required property owner consent for designation. He liked the idea of a designated committee member stand-in to cover for times when a quorum was not present. He liked the idea of identifying non -contributors within districts. Committee Member Carpenter questioned whether existing districts will be codified in the ordinance and staff clarified that this would be included in guidelines. Committee Member Breska questioned whether a proposed demolition of a 50 -year-old structure will be addressed in ordinance. Staff indicated that the current demolition ordinance requires historic documentation of these older structures. If documentation indicates historic potential, these projects are referred to CHC. The Committee discussed the work program schedule for review and, outreach associated with development of the Historic. Preservation Ordinance. and selection of sample cities. The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. preservation ordinance. The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. 2. Ci -Wide. Draft concept design for new historic district sign in the Old Town Historic District; Pierre Rademaker, applicant. CHC Minutes November 23, 2009 Page 4 Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the draft concept and recommended continuing the item to the December 14`h CHC meeting. Committee Members Kalkowski and Miller indicated the images shown on proposed sign do not reflect the history of San Luis Obispo. Committee Member Oliveira indicated that there is some merit to show conceptualized images but that carriage is not reflective of City history. Committee Member Carpenter would like to hear from the designer and would encourage him to attend the December meeting. The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff provided the agenda forecast for December 14th meeting. b. Staff presented the architectural design standards associated with seismic strengthening of historic resources that were approved in March 2005. Committee Members Miller and Carpenter took exception with the provision that "minor exterior building changes consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards" could be exempt from CHC review. The CHC would like to provide input to the Community Development Director on these standards and the determination regarding consistency. Staff suggests bringing the item back with additional information related to the seismic retrofit program and will schedule this item for future review. Staff further clarified the Minor and Incidental review process as requested by CHC. c. Wineman Hotel tour— The architect will lead a tour for the CHC of the Wineman Hotel renovation project on November 30t at 11 a.m. d: Committee — Committee Member Oliveira reminded CHC of an invitation to the Octagon Barn APA/AEP mixer on December 10`" at 5:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Kim Murry Recording Secretary The minutes of November 23, 2009, were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its Decem�F4 14, 2009, meeting., Planner SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of December 14, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Katy Davis, Buzz Kalkowski, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Vice -Chair Dan Carpenter, and Chair Chuck Crotser. All members were present. STAFF: Economic Development Manager Claire Clark, Senior Planner Jeff Hook, and Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry PUBLIC COMMENT: Council Member John Ashbaugh discussed the possibility of National Historic District status for Downtown San Luis Obispo and asked the Committee to consider the possibility of such historic listing. MINUTES: Minutes of November 23, 2009, regular meeting, were unanimously approved as submitted. PRESENTATION ITEM: Wineman Hotel Project — Presentation by Craig Smith, Architect, on the historic rehabilitation of the Wineman Hotel. Craig Smith gave a presentation on the rehabilitation of the Wineman Hotel and Committee members thanked him for his work on the project. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Seismic Retrofit Review — Review status of City's Seismic Procedures and Retrofit Program. (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and Claire Clark, Economic Development Manager, explained the history of the seismic retrofit program and its status. She added that the program had been very successful and that only 13 buildings remained to be retrofitted out of the City's 126 unreinforced masonry buildings. PUBLIC COMMENTS: David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, complimented the architect and the City on completion of the Wineman Hotel Rehabilitation and spoke in support of Downtown Historic Preservation. Elizabeth Abrahms, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern about "pseudo -historic" buildings proposed in the Chinatown Mixed -Use development in the Downtown. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: CHC Minutes December 14, 2009 Page 2 The Committee discussed the retrofit program and agreed that it has been highly successful and did not see a need for new or changed procedures. The item was for information only and no Committee action was taken. 2. Proposed Historic District Sign (Old Town) — Consideration of a proposed sign for the Old Town Historic District; Pierre Rademaker, applicant. (Jeff Hook) Mr. Hook presented the staff report and Pierre Rademaker, graphic designer, explained the proposed sign design. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee members generally liked the sign and asked Mr. Rademaker to consider changes to relate more closely to the Old Town Historic District and its period of historic significance. Committee Member Miller and Vice -Chair Carpenter indicated that it might be premature to approve the sign until the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance was reviewed. On a motion of Committee Member Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Davis, the Committee continued consideration of the proposed historic district sign with the suggestion the graphic designer revise the sign to reflect the Committee's discussion and come back to the Committee when ready. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, Oliveira, Crotser, and Kalkowski. NOES: Committee Members Miller and Carpenter RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 5:2 vote. 3. Historic Preservation Ordinance — Historic District Description: GPI 72-09; Review Draft Description of the Old Town Historic District; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Amber Piona) Mr. Hook presented the staff report and asked for Committee input on the draft Old Town Historic District description. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. CHC Minutes December 14, 2009 Page 3 COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee members discussed the draft Old Town Historic District description and, in general, supported the format and content. Committee members liked the sample descriptions from the Cities of Davis, California, Wales, South Carolina, and Stapleton, Colorado. The Committee suggested that staff consider Committee input and develop similar descriptions for the four remaining historic district descriptions. There was no Committee action taken. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff Staff provided an agenda forecast for the CHC's January 25, 2010, meeting. Kim Murry explained that future CHC minutes will follow an abbreviated, "action minutes" format. b. Committee — The Committee asked staff to draft a letter on the National Register nomination of the Shipsey House for the Chair's signature. ADJOURNMENT — The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kim Murry Recording Secretary The minutes of December 14, 2009, were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its January 25, 2010, meeting. Jeff Hook, Senior Planner CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES 2010 SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of January 25, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Katy Davis, Buzz Kalkowski, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Vice -Chair Dan Carpenter, and Chair Chuck Crotser Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Associate Planner Brian Leveille, Assistant Planner James David, Planning Intern Britni Parsons, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of December 14, 2009, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 453 Chorro Street. ARCMI 115-09; Review and remodel and addition to a Contributing residence in the R-1 zone; Peter & Lynda Robson, applicants (Brian Leveille) Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the Community Development Director approve the proposed remodel and addition with incorporation of project modifications recommended by Staff. Committee Member Kalkowski requested clarification on the garage door and the window above. Staff provided the information and directed any further clarification to the applicant representative. Committee Member Miller requested clarification on the garage setback. Staff provided the information. Keith Hall, applicant representative, discussed the project. Mr. Hall requested the Committee consider handicap access and environmental materials to address cost. Chairperson Crotser disclosed for the record that he has met with Mr. Hall regarding the project. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Will Whelan, San Luis Obispo, noted he is the neighbor living adjacent to the proposed addition on the north side of the property. Mr. Whelan stated he was concerned about the mass and length of the addition that would be adjacent to his property and asked whether this was CHC Minutes January 25, 2010 Page 2 something that had been considered. Mr. Whelan also asked about whether any studies had been done on solar access and shading. Associate Planner Brian Leveille provided some background on the approval process and that the revised plan under consideration was a preferred alternative to provide additional floor area in comparison to the previously -proposed second level. Mr. Leveille provided some background on setback requirements in the City of San Luis Obispo and that solar access studies are not needed since the setback requirements are already designed to ensure adequate solar access. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Members Breska and Oliveira requested clarification on ADA compliance. Mr. Hall suggested the revised front entrance was the best alternative and provided descriptions. Committee Member Kalkowski noted concern and requested clarification on the windows and French door design. Mr. Hall described the dimensions and custom construction elements. Committee Member Kalkowski noted a concern that the proposed design does not meet the requirements for a contributing property. Committee Member Breska stated that the wood door and windows on the front elevations would be more appropriate than the fiberglass materials the applicant was proposing. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Oliveira, to recommend that the Community Development Director approve the proposed remodel and addition with incorporation of project modifications recommended by Staff with the following changes: (1) The alternative design for the front gable with the additional small gable feature and increased width for handicap access can be incorporated into final building plans. Final details shall be approved by the Community Development Director; (2) French doors to replace the existing triple set of 2 over 1 windows shall be of painted wood type with dividers to match the existing set of 2 over 1 windows; (3) Condition #3 requiring the increase in offset to six feet shall be modified to allow the four -foot offset shown on plans. The garage door shall be wood material as indicated in condition #3; (4) Condition #6 shall be modified to allow use of concrete tile subject to final approval of file design details by the Community Development Director. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, and Kalkowski NOES: Committee Members Carpenter and Crotser RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 5:2 vote. CHC Minutes January 25, 2010 Page 3 C 2. 116 Chorro Street. ARCMI 115-09; Request to add Contributing residence to Master Lot of Historic Resources and build replacement garage for non -historic carport addition; R-1 zone; Bob & Andrea Kamm, applicants. (James David) James David, Assistant Planner, and Britni Parsons, Planning Intern, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee support a recommendation to the City Council to add the property located at 116 Chorro Street to the Master List of Historic Resources, remove it from the Contributing Properties List, and approve demolition of non -historic carport and replacement garage, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Committee Member Carpenter noted concern for reviewing Master list eligibility and the replacement garage at the same hearing. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. and Mrs. Kamm, applicants, provided a brief overview of the project and personal stories about improvements to the house. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Miller questioned if the applicant would be okay with calling the historic property the "Halpin -Morris" House. The applicant was agreeable. Committee Member Breska thanked staff and applicant for including Betsy Bertrando's contribution. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On a motion by Committee Member Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Kalkowski. recommending to the City Council to add the property located at 116 Chorro Street to the Master List of Historic Resources, remove it from the Contributing Properties List, and recommending the Community Development Director approve demolition of the non -historic carport and garage. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, Oliveira, Kalkowski, and Crotser NOES: Committee Members Carpenter and Miller RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 5:2 vote. The Committee adjourned for a 10 -minute break at 7:50 p.m. 3. City -Wide. GPI 72-09; Introduction to the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Department, applicant. (Jeff Hook) CHC Minutes January 25, 2010 Page 4 Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee: (1) start reviewing the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Table of Contents and first two chapters of the Draft Guidelines; (2) Review public testimony; and (3) Continue the Draft Ordinance and Draft Guidelines update to the February 22, 2010, Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee suggested scheduling a special meeting for this item. The Committee requested information be provided earlier for consideration. Staff requested direction on Committee suggestions for stakeholders. The Committee requested that Staff send suggestions in addition to Committee consideration. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Breska, to continue the item to the February 22, 2010, CHC meeting. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, Miller, Oliveira, Kalkowski, Carpenter and Crotser NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff b. Committee: Chairman Crotser noted that his term on the Committee would expire in March 2010. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The minutes of January 25, 2010 were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its February 22, 2010 meeting. CHC Minutes January 25, 2010 Page 5 116ft*Ioi, Senior Planner C, SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of February 22, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. I:ZI] N WIRIM- A Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Buzz Kalkowski, and Chairperson Chuck Crotser Absent: Committee Member Dan Carpenter Staff: Senior Planner Jdff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of January 25, 2010, were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENT: Larry Hoyt, 868 Chorro Street, requested that the second item be taken off tonight's meeting agenda because he did not feel adequate public notice had been given. Chairperson Crotser explained that this was a continued item from the January 25, 2010, public hearing and that public notice had been provided, consistent with City standards. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1435 Broad Street. ARCMI 8-10; Review of garage demolition and proposed replacement structure on Master List Historic property; R -2-H zone; John and Melissa Louch, applicants. (Brian Leveille) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee adopt a resolution recommending the Community Development Director approve the proposed garage demolition and replacement garage with incorporation of the project modifications recommended by staff, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jim Duffy, applicants' representative, provided a brief overview of the project. Mr. Duffy requested that condition 1 be modified to require a minimum side and rear -yard setback of 18 to 24 inches, rather than three feet as recommended. Mr. Duffy also explained that a large Olive tree adjacent to the driveway would be retained but asked permission to remove two Olive trees to allow additional sun in the backyard patio. Melissa Louch, applicant, reiterated their request and explained that it was a relatively small lot and that there were nine trees in the backyard. There were no further public comments. C February 22, 2010 Page 2 COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Kalkowski voiced support for setback of at least one foot to match eave overhang and to allow for maintenance. Committee Member Breska discussed concern for the scale of the garage design. Committee Member Miller suggested that a small setback is needed for roof drainage and maintenance and indicates that proposed garage "fish scale pattern" needs to be differentiated from the house. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Kalkowski, seconded by Committee Member Oliveira, to approve a recommendation to the Community Development Director for the demolition and replacement of a garage with incorporation of the proiect modifications recommended by staff. Modifications will be made as follows: (1) Condition #2 will be changed to state that a minimum of one -foot setback for the left side yard and zero setback for the rear yard are recommended, to the approval of the Community Director. C(2) The condition, under which two or more trees to be removed and replaced, shall be amended to read, "to the approval of the City Arborist." AYES: Committee Members Miller, Breska, Davis, Oliveira, Kalkowski, and Crotser NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Carpenter The motion passed on a 6:0 vote.. Preservation Ordinance and Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. AYES: Committee Members Miller, Breska, Davis, Oliveira, Kalkowski, and Crotser NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Carpenter The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. 2. City -Wide. GPI 72-09: Continue discussion of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Department, applicant. (Continued from January 25, 2010, meeting) (Jeff Hook) February 22, 2010 Page 3 Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to: 1) Approve review protocol; 2) receive public testimony; 3) begin reviewing the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and, time permitting, the Draft Guidelines; 4) provide direction to staff on public outreach; and 5) continue the Draft Ordinance and Draft Guidelines update to a special CHC meeting to be held on March 8, 2010. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Larry Hoyt said he did not support the penalty provisions in the draft ordinance. He requested that homes affected by the agenda item receive proper notification. Mr. Hoyt discussed his concerns with the List of Historic Resources, accuracy of historic surveys, and possible fines for lack of building maintenance. He supported the City's efforts to become a Certified Local Government through the California State Historic Preservation Office. Vangeli Evangelopoulos, San Luis Obispo, requested that the City prepare a map showing the addresses and locations of properties on the Master and Contributing Lists of historic resources. There were no further public comments. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee and Staff reviewed the draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, section by section, noting changes and additions. Staff noted the changes electronically on a "CHC Draft" version of both documents, as the Committee reached consensus on the proposed changes. The Committee requested that the proposed moratorium on building permit issuance following violation of the preservation ordinance be changed from "up to 10 years" to "up to five years" but asked to let the record note specifically that up to 10 years had initially been considered. The Committee took a 10 -minute break at 6:35 p.m. Committee members continued with their review of Draft Guidelines. There was no motion made on this item. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff Staff provided an agenda forecast. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller February 22, 2010 Page 4 Recording Secretary The minutes of February 22, 2010, were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Special Meeting of March 8, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Katy Davis, Buzz Kalkowski, Jeff Oliveira, Vice -Chair Dan Carpenter, and Chairperson Chuck Crotser Absent: Committee Member Dean Miller Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller Staff, , Committee members, and members of the public thanked outgoing Chairperson Crotser for his service to the Community. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: No minutes were considered. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: City -Wide. GPI 72-09; Continued discussion of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Department, applicant. (Continued from February 22, 2010, meeting) (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee: 1) establish a review protocol; 2) receive public testimony; 3) continue reviewing the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Guidelines; and 4) continue the Draft Ordinance and Draft Guidelines update to the regular CHC meeting on March 22, 2010. The Committee agreed to proceed with the review section by section, taking public comments and making Committee comments as questions arose. PUBLIC & COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Warren Sinsheimer, San Luis Obispo, noted that the ordinance definition of the word "disaster" does not address the loss of a single structure due to fire, flood, earthquake, etc. The Committee requested staff consider language revisions. CHC Minutes March 8, 2010 Page 2 Warren Sinsheimer indicated concern with the definition of "deterioration' and the proposed code enforcement of ordinary wear, tear, and weathering. CHC directed staff to consider language revisions to clarify intent. Warren Sinsheimer indicated that fines based on assessed value of property may be unfairly applied due to Proposition 13 impact on property values. The Committee directed staff to consider other options such as fixed fee amounts. Ted and Tem Hiltel, San Luis Obispo/Three Rivers, requested clarification of how their property had been designated as a listed cultural resource. Paula Carr requested that "accessory structures" be considered on their own merits. Chair Crotser requested that the accessory structure definition be clarified to add language: "accessory buildings may have achieved historic significance in their own right." Paula Carr requested the addition of "integrity or" under the definition of Adverse Effects. The Committee agreed and directed staff to make changes. The Committee took a break from 7.00 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. Pierre Rademaker, San Luis Obispo, noted that the history of the people is as important as the structure in considering preservation. Paula Carr requested that "sense of place" be added to section 2.2. The Committee agreed and directed staff to reword language. Pierre Radernaker suggested that 2.3c include "historic contexts." The Committee directed staff to make language changes. The Committee discussed the definition of "contributing resources" and whether resources in this category must be visible to the public. After discussion, the Committee opted not to change the criteria. Paula Can: questioned the standard of "Anglo-American history" as part of the criteria under 3.3.1c of the Guidelines. The Committee discussed the language and directed staff to remove "of primarily Anglo American History (circa 1850)" language. Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, commented that the criteria for a person to be associated with a structure for at least two generations (i.e. 40 years) is not an appropriate threshold. The Committee agreed and directed staff to edit the language under Historic Criteria, 3.3.2 (a). Chair Crotser requested that the guidelines include graphics and pictures with better resolution. Chair Crotser suggested merging 5.1.2 and 5.1.3. Staff noted that language can be reconsidered. Pierre Rademaker requested reference to the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties be included in section 5. CHC Minutes March 8, 2010 Page 3 There were no further comments. There was no motion made at this time. COMMUNICATIONS: a. Agenda Forecast — Staff ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The minutes of the March 8, 2010 meeting were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its March 22, 2010 meeting. ��k, Senior Planner SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of March 22, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Katy Davis, Jeff Oliveira, Buzz Kalkowski, and Vice -Chair Dan Carpenter Absent: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dean Miller, and Chairperson Chuck Crotser Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Associate Planner Tyler Corey, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. 101Q1I11x.� a. Minutes of February 22, 2010, were approved as amended. b. Minutes of March 8, 2010, were approved as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: John Ashbaugh, City Council of San Luis Obispo, informed the CHC and public that an upcoming article in the SLO Journal will highlight his support for Historic Preservation. There were no further comments from the public. CONSENT ITEMS: 1. 1415 Morro Street. CHC 22-10; Consideration of removing property in the Old Town Historic District from the Contributing Property List of Historic Resources; R -4-H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Jeff Hook) 2. City -Wide. Historic Photo -documentation Standards; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Jeff Hook) On motion by Committee member Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Davis to approve Consent Items 1 and as recommended in the respective agenda reports AYES: Committee Members Davis, Oliveira, Kalkowski, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Miller, Breska, and Crotser The motion passed on a vote of 4:0. C PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: CHC Minutes March 22, 2010 Page 2 3. 1121 Islay Street. ARCMI 89-09; Review of remodel and additions to a contributing historic property in the Old Town Historic District; R -3-H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Jeff Hook) Tyler Corey, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, to recommend Community Development Director's approval, based on the findings and subject to conditions outlined in the staff report. Frank Cullen, applicant, provided an overview in support of the project. Mr. Cullen discussed the challenges in making changes to a property considered historic in San Luis Obispo. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Ron Yukelson, a neighbor, spoke in support of the project. There were no further comments from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee briefly discussed the project. On motion by Committee Member Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Davis, the AYES: Committee Members Davis, Oliveira, Kalkowski, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Miller, Breska, and Crotser The motion passed on a vote of 4:0. 4. 1119, 1123, -1127& 1127 Garden Street and 712, 720, 748, 736, 722, & 728 Marsh Street. ER 124-006; Reaffirm previous determination of EIR adequacy in terms of cultural resources and receive presentation on project redesign, Final EIR, and Planning Commission recommendation; C -D -H zone; Garden Street SLO Partners, LP, applicant. (Tyler Corey). Tyler Corey, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the CHC reaffirm the previous determination of EIR adequacy related to cultural resources based on a finding outlined in the staff report; and to receive a presentation on the project redesign, Final EIR, and Planning Commission recommendation. Committee Member Oliveira questioned whether the EIR had been re -circulated for public comment due to changes in project design. Staff responded that re -circulation of the EIR was not required because changes made to the project were in response to material contained in the Draft EIR, which reduced environmental impacts in a number of issue areas. CHC Minutes March 22, 2010 Page 3 l Carol Florence, applicant representative, spoke in support of the project. She further noted this was a project design still in progress and architectural design changes would be presented later to the CHC and ARC for review. George Garcia, applicant representative, provided a brief presentation on building design and spoke in support of the project. Committee Member Kalkowski requested clarification on the descriptions of Marsh and Garden towers noted in design. Mr. Garcia noted that that the Marsh and Garden towers are elevator and HVAC towers with a height of 68 ft. and 74 ft. respectively. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, discussed the interpretation of the guidelines for rooftop additions. Mr. Vessely suggested that the applicant engage an architectural historian to assist in project redesign and rehabilitation of the historic buildings. Paula Carr, San Luis Obispo, supported keeping the design consistent with the cultural heritage of the community. Ms. Carr suggested that the local setting should take precedence. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, felt the project needed to respond to the historic context of the area. He cited recent San Luis Obispo examples where historic character and integrity were adversely affected by new development. Mr. Brodie requested that the Committee consider the character and setting when considering this project. Vangeli Evangelopoulos, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of developing a Garden Street alley pedestrian design plan and incorporating pedestrian circulation for the entire block. The plan should address lighting, safety, and creating pleasant spaces. Joseph Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns about the project's frontage on Broad Street and light access to the interior courtyards. Mr. Abrahams requested the applicants develop a three-dimensional scale model of the project. Sara McEre, San Luis Obispo, does not support the Spanish architecture design and height of the project. Elizabeth Thyne, San Luis Obispo, supported the EIR as presented. Ms. Thyne is concerned with retention of the historic structures on Garden Street and the possibility of incidental damage during project construction. The Committee took a break between 7:00 p.m. — 7:15 p.m. Elisabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, did not support the project because she felt its scale and massing were inconsistent with the character of Garden Street. Ms. Abrahams would like to see the historic Laird Building remain intact. There were no further comments from the public. J CHC Minutes March 22, 2010 Page 4 Ms. Florence noted that the applicant had retained a historic architect to work on the project and said all of the historic buildings on Garden Street would remain in the project design. Staff discussed mitigation measures included in the FEIR that address issues of preservation during project construction, such as requiring a pre -construction structural engineering site survey and a cash surety to protect historic resources. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Oliveira recommended that the EIR project file include a memo explaining why the FEIR did not require re -circulation. Vice -Chair Carpenter discussed the importance of Garden Street in terms of the City's cultural heritage and noted that the project will bring traffic impacts to the pedestrian -oriented street. He indicated that the revised project will be evaluated as a new project when it comes back to the CHC for review of the subsequent design. There were no further comments from the Committee. with the comments from the Committee and the public regardingRroiect denim- and comments related to clarifying the CEOA process. AYES: Committee Members Davis, Oliveira, Kalkowski, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Miller, Breska, and Crotser The motion passed on a vote of 4:0. 5. City -Wide. GPI 72-09; Continued discussion of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Update of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Department, applicant. (Continued from March 8, 2010 special meeting) (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the CHC: 1) Establish a review protocol; 2) receive public testimony; 3) continue reviewing the Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; and 4) continue the Draft Ordinance and Draft Guidelines update to the regular CHC meeting on April 26, 2010. Vice -Chair Carpenter acknowledged letters received from the public for the record. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Gerald Johnson, San Luis Obispo, requested information on how location of properties in historic districts affects new buildings on vacant lots. CHC Minutes March 22, 2010 ^ Page 5 (�\ Paula Carr, San Luis Obispo, noted the distinction between additions to accessory structures and those to primary resources. Ms. Carr supported flexibility when reviewing additions to historic resources if additions reflect construction materials that would have been appropriate during the time the resource was built. The Committee discussed language edits to section 5.1.5. Staff clarified that the Committee had flexibility in interpreting the Guidelines, but that the Draft Guidelines should start with clear, concise wording to help the public, applicants, and decision makers understand the City's expectations and improve predictability. Members of the public provided input regarding the proposed language. Tom Jess, San Luis Obispo, suggested edits to include "consistent with materials used of a period addition." Mike Wise, San Luis Obispo, supported clarity of language for owners of master list property. There were no further comments from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee directed Staff to reword the language of section 5.1.5 per discussion of Committee and public direction. The Committee discussed architectural compatibility under 5.1.7 before continuing the item to the next meeting on April 26, 2010. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On a motion by Committee Member Kalkowski, seconded by Committee Member Oliveira the By unanimous voice vote, the Committee voted to schedule a special meeting to consider the Draft Ordinance and Draft Guidelines update on May 3 2010. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: 6. Staff a. Agenda Forecast —Staff provided a forecast of the April 26`h CHC meeting. 7. Commission ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. CHC Minutes March 22, 2010 Page 6 Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The minutes of the March 22, 2010 meeting were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee C SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of April 26, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. OATH OF OFFICE: New Committee Member Hemalata Dandekar and re -appointed Committee Member Dean Miller were sworn in by City Clerk Elaina Cano. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Hemalata Dandekar, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, and Jeff Oliveira Absent: Committee Member Buzz Kalkowski Staff: Senior Planner Jeff Hook, Associate Planner Brian Leveille, Assistant Planner James David, Intern Amber Piona, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ELECTION OF OFFICERS: On a motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Breska, Dan Carpenter was elected Chairperson on a unanimous vote. Fi ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of March 22, 1010, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 148 Broad Street. CHCMA 17-10; Request to enter into a Mills Act contract with the City for the historic "Vard Shepard" House; R-1 zone; Barry Jones, applicant. (James David) James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee adopt a resolution recommending City Council approval of a Mills Act Historic Preservation program contract for the historic Vard Shepard House, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Barry Jones, applicant, spoke in support of the item. CHC Minutes April 26, 2010 Page 2 A letter was received from Richard Schmidt, San Luis Obispo resident, opposing a Mills Act contract due to concerns about the house being a rental; recent subdivision of the property; and property improvements which he indicated were not consistent with historic preservation goals. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Miller suggested the item be continued because historic documentation regarding the property was not provided. Committee Member Breska questioned if there were regulations that addressed concerns expressed in the letter. Staff replied that use of the property as a rental was not a Mills Act issue. Staff added that under the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, however, if a "use change" occurred that affected the house's exterior appearance or condition, it could result in a breach of the Mills Act contract. Vice -Chair Oliveira requested that the historic documentation be included in all future proposals for Mills Act. There were no further comments from the Committee. information addressingfencing, encing, garage condition, and propertyb. istory. The motion carried, 5:1 (Committee Member Breska voting no). AYES: Committee Members Carpenter, Dandekar, Davis, Miller, and Oliveira NOES: Committee Member Breska RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Kalkowski The motion passed on a 5:1 vote. 2. 1352 Pacific Street. CHC 19-10; Request to add property to the Master List of Historic Resources; R-2 zone, Matt and Sara Ritter, applicants (James David) James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee adopt a resolution recommending City Council add the property located at 1352 Pacific Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Mr. David noted that the applicant requested that this item be continued to the next hearing since he could not be present at the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. CHC Minutes April 26, 2010 Page 3 COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Miller questioned whether the property met Master List and Mills Act eligibility criteria, and voiced concern regarding consistent application of listing criteria. Staff stated that the property appeared to meet the criteria for Contributing Property status, but asked for Committee direction regarding the property's eligibility for Master List designation. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Miller, seconded by Committee Member Davis, to continue the item to a date certain of May 24, 2010, with the request that additional information on environmental setting and context be provided. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Dandekar, Davis, Miller, and Oliveira NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Kalkowski The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. 3. 535 Islay Street. CHCMA 23-10; Request to enter into a Mills Act contract; R -2-H zone; Gordon and Stacy Edmonds, applicants. (Brian Leveille) Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee adopt a resolution recommending City Council approval of the applicant's request to be part of the Mills Act Historic Preservation program and approve a Mills Act Contract. Committee Member Miller questioned the timing of the request given that the house remodel had not yet been completed. Staff replied that the item met the requirements to adopt a Mills Act Contract. Committee Member Breska questioned the deadline for completing the list of planned improvements accompanying the draft Mills Act contract. Staff replied that there was a ten-year period within which the planned improvements must be completed. Committee Member Breska requested a picture of the chimney. The applicant noted that the chimney was not present when they purchased the property and could not be restored. Staff noted that a drawing of the chimney was included in the report. Stacy Edmonds, applicant, spoke in support of the project. Ms. Edmonds discussed the importance of accurate restoration in response to the timeline. Gordon Edmonds, applicant, discussed the cost involved in a restoration that would meet the Mills Act Standards. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments. CHC Minutes April 26, 2010 Page 4 COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Breska and Committee Member Davis supported the item for Mills Act designation. Vice -Chair Oliveira requested information on the process for inspection, conditions, and compliance. Staff provided information on the verification process. Committee Member Dandekar noted that most of the planned exterior house changes had been completed to meet City standards, so she felt the timing of the Mills Act contract was appropriate. Committee Member Dandekar questioned the landscape proposed for the site. Chairperson Carpenter noted that consideration of the house for Mills Act was a contract that could be reviewed to meet requirements at a future date. Committee Member Dandekar requested language be added to address the landscaping. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Breska, seconded by Committee Member Davis, to adopt a resolution recommending the City Council approve the applicant's request to be part of the Mills Act Historic Preservation program and adopt the attached draft Mills Act Contract. The Committee added to item G the inclusion of historical plantings and landscape plan to the Community Development Director's approval. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Dandekar, Davis, Miller, and Oliveira NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Kalkowski The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. 4. 1590 Lizzie Street. ARCMI 20-10; Review stabilization project for historic La Loma Adobe; R-1 zone, City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, and Amber Piona, Intern, presented the staff report, recommending the CHC determine that the stabilization plans for the La Loma Adobe are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for. the Treatment of Historic Properties and the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and approve the plans as proposed, with details and materials to be approved by the Community Development Director, based on findings and subject to conditions which Staff outlined. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project. Mr. Vessely provided material and design information. CHC Minutes April 26, 2010 Page 5 Gina Nelson, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project. Ms. Nelson noted the need to secure the fence to the property for safety issues. Ms. Nelson discussed the interesting variety of landscape. Mr. Vessely noted that the primary security was on entry to the house but that there was a need for the City to maintain the fencing. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: On motion by Committee Member Dandekar, seconded by Committee Member Breska, the Committee approved the stabilization as proposed with details and materials to be approved by the Community Development Director. Committee Member Miller requested that the language of the motion be changed to approval by the CHC rather than the Community Development Director. Staff responded by suggesting approval include the Design Engineer of Record (Mr. Vessely). The initial motion was amended and on a motion by Committee Member Dandekar, seconded by Committee Member Breska_ to annrove the stabilization as nronosed with details and materials There were no further comments made from the Committee. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Dandekar, Davis, Miller, and Oliveira NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Kalkowski The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. 5. City -Wide. GPI 72-09; Discussion of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Update of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Dept., applicant. (Jeff Hook) Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee: 1) receive public testimony; 2) continue reviewing the Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; and 3) continue the Draft Ordinance and Draft Guidelines update to the special meeting scheduled for May 11, 2010. COMMITTEE AND PUBLIC COMMENTS: By Committee suggestion, broader language inclusion under section 5.1.9 was clarified. Shelly Johnson, San Luis Obispo, questioned the benefit of being potentially historic resources when the property either is or isn't other than providing restrictions to owners. CHC Minutes April 26, 2010 Page 6 There were no further comments made from the Committee and Public. On motion by Committee Member Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Miller, the item was continued to May 11, 2010. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Carpenter, Dandekar, Davis, Miller, and Oliveira NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Kalkowski The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: 6. Staff a. Agenda Forecast — Staff 7. Commission — The Commission thanked Jeff Hook for his service to the Cultural Heritage Committee. Committee Member Breska requested that Jeff Hook be available to complete item 5. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The minutes of the April 26, 2010, meeting were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its May 24, 2010, meeting. Kim Murry Deputy Community Development Director SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Special Meeting of May 11, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Hemalata Dandekar, Buzz Kalkowski, Committee Member — Vacant Position, Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: Committee Members Barbara Breska and Katy Davis Resignation of Committee Member Dean Miller was announced. Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Consultant Jeff Hook, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: No minutes were submitted. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: City -Wide. GPI 72-09; Continued discussion of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Update of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Dept., applicant. (Continued from April 26, 2010, meeting) (Kim Murry) Kim Murry, Deputy Community Development Director, presented the staff report, recommending to: 1) receive public testimony; 2) continue reviewing the Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; and 3) continue the Draft Ordinance and Draft Guidelines update to the regular CHC meeting on May 24, 2010. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Randy Dettmer, San Luis Obispo, discussed his concerns with: 1) the eligibility criteria should be aligned with the CA Register; 2) the eligibility criteria should include a provision addressing integrity; 3) The Secretary of the Interior Standards should provide primary design guidance; 4) make it clear what will be considered in determining whether a project has maintained 75% of the structure; and 5) the style guide in section 5.3 should be referenced to A Field Guide to American Houses if it is necessary to include a style guide. Barry Williams, San Luis Obispo, noted support for an outside peer review/consultant to provide insights from a user's point of view. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, noted the value of a historic resource is related to its setting and connection to what a place was at the time the resource was constructed. Mr. Brodie voiced strong concern for saving historical structures — errors cannot be reversed. He asked for pro- active enforcement of the "demolition by neglect" provisions and active enforcement of penalty CHC Minutes May 11, 2010 Page 2 provisions. Mr. Brodie requested a member of the Committee be designated as code violations enforcement officer. Mr. Brodie also suggested that the public could also volunteer to form code violation policing group. Ermina Karim, San Luis Obispo, expressed support for the history of the community and recognition for historic preservation's role as an economic driver. She supported an outside peer review/consultant review of the draft ordinance and guidelines. Ms. Karim expressed concern with the definition of historic resources including the words "potentially eligible." Betsy Bertrando, San Luis Obispo, supports the completion of this Ordinance and Guidelines. Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, discussed the need for strong fines for unauthorized demolition and expressed concern that structural reports could be commissioned by applicants and believes this to be a conflict of interest. Greg Wynn provided clarifying comments as the Committee edited language of the draft guidelines. Bob Vessely asked for language in section 3.7.4 of the Guidelines to be clarified to reflect that feasibility related to structural feasibility and not economics. He recommended that the draft ordinance use state eligibility criteria with local adaptation and additional details currently contained in the guidelines. Russell Brown expressed concern about the objectivity of an applicant -provided structural report regarding feasibility of restoring or repairing a historic structure. Bob Pavlik indicated that the City has an obligation to exercise independent judgment and to review the information submitted to ensure it is accurate and complete. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee evaluated the draft Ordinance section by section and provided comments and clarifications in response to public input and Committee recommendations. Staff made changes to the documents as CHC members agreed upon language changes. Commr. Kalkowski commended Jeff Hook on his work for the Historic Preservation Ordinance and Historic Preservation Program. There were no further comments from the Committee. On motion by Vice -Chair Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Dandekar, the item was continued to May 24, 2010. AYES: Committee Members Dandekar, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Breska, Davis, and Vacant Member Position CHC Minutes May 11, 2010 Page 3 The motion passed on a 4:0 vote. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: 2. Staff a. Agenda Forecast — Staff provided a forecast of the May 24`h meeting. 3. Commission ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary The minutes of the May 11, 2010, special meeting were approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee at its May 24, 2010 meeting. bw au-� Kim Murry Deputy Community opment Director SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of May 24, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room, San Luis Obispo City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Hemalata Dandekar, Katy Davis, Buzz Kalkowski, Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: Vacant Position Staff: Deputy Director of Community Development Kim Murry, Assistant Planner James David, Planning Intems Amber Piona and Britni Parsons, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of April 26, 2010, and May 11, 2010, were approved as presented. -1 PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. i J PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 148 Broad Street. CHCMA 17-10; Request to enter into a Mills Act contract with the City for the historic "yard Shepard" House; R-1 zone; Barry Jones, applicant. (Continued from April 26, 2010, meeting) (James David) James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending adoption of the resolution recommending the City Council approve a Mills Act Historic Preservation Program contract for the historic Vard Shepard House as described in the draft contract, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Dr. Barry Jones, applicant, noted that Mills Act contracts are of benefit to the community as it encourages maintenance of historic buildings which contribute to the character of the community. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jeff Dillion, San Luis Obispo, noted that replacement of cedar shingles may not be allowed due to current fire standards. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: CHC Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 2 Committee Member Dandekar requested information regarding the lighting fixtures on the side of the structure and asked whether the applicant had ideas regarding the style of a replacement fence for the driveway that would be time period appropriate. Committee Member Kalkowski expressed a desire to prioritize replacement of the driveway fencing and repair of the front picket fence. Staff noted that language could be modified to indicate these two items would be addressed within a two-year time period. On motion by Committee Member Davis, seconded, by Vice -Chair Oliveira, the AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Vacant Position The motion passed on a vote of 6:0. 2. 1352 Pacific Street. CHC 19-10; Request to add property to the Master List of Historic Resources; R-2 zone; Matt and Sara Ritter, applicants. (Continued from April 26, 2010, meeting) (James David) James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the City Council add the property located at 1352 Pacific Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources, instead of Master List, based on findings which he outlined. Matt Ritter, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the application and noted that the house represents the first Pedder home built in San Luis Obispo. He noted these homes can be distinguished by the stucco belt on the body of the house and the rafter end cut-out on the fascia boards. Betsy Bertrando, San Luis Obispo, discussed her report and noted that the house is not a "kit home." Ms. Bertrando noted important historic factors related to "event" and to "person" qualified this property for Master Listing. Charles Kelly worked for the company that brought electricity to Camp San Luis Obispo, Camp Roberts, and to Hearst Castle. She noted that the post -WWI effort to bring affordable housing to San Luis Obispo was a significant event in the history of the community. The use of Pedder plans was a state-wide movement; however, it only lasted for 2'/z months. in San Luis Obispo, and this house is the first example in the City and should be recognized. CHC Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Kalkowski noted that the person and event were significant enough to consider placement of the property on the Master List of Historic Resources. Committee Member Breska supported placing the property on the Master List due to importance of the event and the building style. Committee Member Dandekar noted concern that the property is not unique and was constructed from stock plans provided by Pedder. She further indicated that the person associated with the property only becomes important because of their association with the house and not visa versa. Committee Member Dandekar indicated that the neighborhood was full of similar structures and questioned why these had not been added to the Contributing Properties list. She indicated that the structure was not unique and did not meet the criteria to be on the Master List. Vice -Chair Oliveira noted that the house appeared to meet the qualification of a Contributing resource but not for Master List recognition. Committee Member Davis supported the Master List designation. Chairperson Carpenter did not support the property for Master List designation. Mr. Carpenter noted that this property qualified as a Contributing property. He observed that the Pedder houses were constructed within a 2'h -month time frame, and it could be argued that the property did not reflect the craftsmanship and rare style expected of a Master List property. AYES: Committee Members Dandekar, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, and Kalkowski RECUSED: None ABSENT: Vacant Position The motion failed on a vote of 3:3. the property located at 1352 to the Master List of Historic Resources. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, and Kalkowski NOES: Committee Members Dandekar, Oliveira, and Carpenter CHC Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 4 RECUSED: None ABSENT: Vacant Position The motion failed on a vote of 3:3. On a motion by Committee Member Davis, seconded by Committee Member Kalkowski, the item was continued to a date uncertain in order for the applicant to provide further information on the event and person under consideration for this item. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, Kalkowski, and Oliveira NOES: Committee Members Dandekar and Carpenter RECUSED: None ABSENT: Vacant Position The motion passed on a vote of 4:2. Committee Member Breska requested that the applicant provide information on other Pedder Plan Master List homes in the State of California. 3. City-wide GPI 72-09; Continued discussion of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Update of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Dept., applicant. (Continued from May 11, 2010, Special Meeting) (Kim Murry) Kim Murry provided an update of the graphics under development for inclusion in the Guidelines and summarized Architectural Review Commission (ARC) recommendations and staff response. COMMITTEE AND PUBLIC DISCUSSION: Craig Smith, consultant; discussed the style guides he is developing for the Guidelines. Greg Wynn, ARC member, indicated that the graphics portion of guidelines is critical and expressed concern that graphics not be developed in a way that functioned as a "pattern book" that would limit flexibility. He also indicated that the preservation tools and incentives chapter should include an education component with reference materials. Jeff Dillon, architect, questioned whether the CHC library was available to the public and recommended the word "complementary" be removed from 4.1.10 of the Guidelines. Committee Member Dandekar wanted to ensure that graphic details don't limit the ability to propose contemporary infill. CHC Minutes May 24, 2010 Page 5 Vice -Chair Oliveira expressed that using line drawings to show hypothetical additions to actual historic buildings in San Luis Obispo may be problematic in that it could imply that the example shown is the only approach that would be supported. The Committee discussed the idea of peer review and how to get feedback from the local AIA chapter to assist the City in evaluating the draft ordinance and standards. There were no further comments. On a motion by Vice -Chair Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Dandekar, to continue this item to the CHC meeting of June 28. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Davis, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion carried on a vote of 6:0. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: 4. Staff a. Agenda Forecast — staff provided a forecast of the June 28"' meeting. b. Staff indicated that a PowerPoint of the "Design Review in Historic Districts" workshop attended by staff and Committee Member Kalkowski could be presented later in the summer.. 5. Commission —none. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary Approved by the Cultpgaal Heritage Committee on _June 28, 2010 Supervisirr§*dministrative Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of June 28, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Buzz Kalkowski, Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: Committee Members Katy Davis and Hemalata Dandekar Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Assistant Planner James David, Planning Intern Amber Piona, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of May 24, 2010, were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments. Committee Member Hemalata Dandekar arrived at 5:40 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 951 Marsh Street. ARCMI 42-10; Review of courtyard remodel at historic First Presbyterian Church; C -D zone; First Presbyterian Church, applicant. (James David) James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the CHC determine the proposed courtyard remodel at the First Presbyterian Church is consistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Jim Duffy and Chris Weber spoke in support of the project. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee discussed the unique stone structure, texture of concrete, the wood's natural color use, and trellis construction. There were no further comments made from the Committee. CHC Minutes June 28, 2010 Page 2 Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Dandekar, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Breska The motion passed on a vote of 5:0. 2. City-wide. GPI 72-09; Continued discussion of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Draft Update of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Dept., applicant. (Continued from May 24, 2010 meeting) (Kim Murry) Kim Murry, Deputy Director, presented the staff report, recommending to; 1) Receive public testimony; 2) Complete review of the Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; and 3) Recommend approval of both the Draft Ordinance and Update Guidelines to the City Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Craig Smith, Consultant to the City, elaborated on the graphics proposed as part of the Guidelines. .Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, requested information regarding the proposed language referencing Integrity" as part of the Guidelines and supported inclusion of the language. Pierre Rademaker, San Luis Obispo, supported the language changes developed by the Chamber subcommittee that have been incorporated into the draft under review. Jeff Dillion, San Luis Obispo, requested specific language for defining"demolition." Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, suggested that the topic of demolition be tied to integrity. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Members supported having the Project Review Matrix available as a handout and concurred with changes to the draft Guidelines as recommended in the staff report. CHC Minutes June 28, 2010 Page 3 There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Vice -Chair Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Breska, to approve the item with the recommended changes. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Dandekar, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Davis The motion passed on a vote of 5:0. COMMUNICATIONS: 3. Staff a. Agenda Forecast — Staff provided a forecast of the July 26th meeting. 4. Commission — Committee Member Oliveira indicated he would not be in attendance at the July 26th meeting. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary Approved by the Cultural He ' age Committee on _July 26, 2010_ Ryan Be Supervipft Administrative Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of July 26, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. OATH OF OFFICE: Swearing in new Committee Member Enrica Costello Elaina Cano, City Clerk, administered the oath of office to Enrica Costello. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee. Members Barbara Breska, Enrica Costello, Hemalata Dandekar, Katy Davis, Buzz Kalkowski, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira Staff: Senior Planner Phil Dunsmore, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Associate Planner Brian Leveille ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: _ The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of June 28, 2010, were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 276 Tank Farm Road. ER 92-08; Review of the Environmental Impact Report work program to evaluate cultural resources that may be discovered as part of the Chevron remediation and development project; Chevron, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report explaining the background of the Chevron Tank Farm Project and how the Phase II archaeological research design will be used in the EIR. Staff indicated that site remediation will require grading, excavation, and other ground disturbance which will affect large areas of the project site. Eric Snelling, applicant project consultant, further discussed the historical features of the project site, extent of contamination, and proposed cleanup methods. Mr. Snelling also discussed the proposed restoration on the project site and permitting requirements of other agencies before the Phase II testing can commence. Committee members requested clarification on several issues. Staff and the project representative responded with information. CHC Minutes 07/26/2010 Page 2 Items clarified included the intent of restoration plan which is to return the historical drainage areas of the site to a more natural state suitable for native plants and wildlife. The site contamination in some places exists as far as 60 feet below the surface, but remediation activities are not proposed to exceed 5 feet in depth. Mr. Snelling explained the capping process and the intent of the remediation to break risk pathways to human and ecological receptors and that the project does not propose excavation to remove all contaminants. Mr. Snelling clarified that only some of the restoration was on open space and that portions of the remediation are within planned development areas which will be capped for future development. Mr. Snelling stated that some bio -remediation would occur in the water, topsoil will be added to help with re -planting, some gravel will be imported, and some but not all contaminated soil is proposed for removal. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, stated that the area should have some importance as a _ cultural landscape, including the remaining tank berms and questioned how to mitigate the impacts that will result from the project. Mr. Snelling stated that some berms will remain to maintain habitat for the Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp and that features such as Reservoir 2 may be considered culturally important features. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Kalkowski supported Mr. Vessely's comments regarding the landscape as a significant historic feature. Several CHC members expressed interest in a tour of the site. No motion was made nor required at this time. 2. Study Session. Review of California Preservation Foundation workshop "Design Review in Historic Districts" — Presented by Buzz Kalkowski and Kim Murry Kim Murry, Deputy Director, and Buzz Kalkowski, Committee Member, provided a presentation developed by Leslie Dills, Architect, from a workshop both attended entitled, "Design Review in Historic Districts." PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. CHC Minutes 07/26/2010 Page 3 COMMITTEE COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the Committee. COMMUNICATIONS: 3. Staff a. Agenda Forecast — Staff provided an agenda forecast for the August and September meetings. b. Staff provided an update of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and Draft Ordinance outreach efforts. 4. Committee a. Chair Carpenter referred to a letter submitted by Greg Wynn, requesting postponement of consideration of 375 Chorro Street from the August meeting to a meeting in September and also requesting that a CHC subcommittee be identified to discuss direction for the Anholm House. Staff suggested that a draft letter be prepared for the Chair's signature to the architect describing information the CHC will need in order to consider the item. ACTION: Moved by Kalkowski/Dandekar to move the reconsideration of the Anholm House Master List status from the August CHC meeting to the September 27th meeting (6:0). Direction was given to staff to prepare a letter for the Chair's signature. b. Committee Member Dandekar provided feedback from the Mayor's luncheon she recently attended. c. Committee Member Davis shared news of her upcoming marriage to Ed Tafflinger. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Phil Dunsmore Recording Secretary Approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee on _September 27, 2010 Ryqoetz JSIvising Administra ' Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES September 27, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Enrica Costello, Hemalata Dandekar, Buzz Kalkowski, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: Committee Member Katy Davis and Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira Staff: Senior Planner Phil Dunsmore, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Associate Planner Brian Leveille, Assistant Planner James David, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller PUBLIC COMMENT: Dorothy Graves, San Luis Obispo, spoke against the changes to 535 Islay, known as the Sandercock House. Mrs. Graves felt that the Master List and Mills Act designations were no longer appropriate. Staff will provide an update on changes made since the May review. There were no further comments from the public. MINUTES: Minutes of July 26, 1010, were approved as submitted. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. CONSENT: 1. 50 Hiquera Street. CHC 93-10; Review of a street widening project in front of 50 Higuera Street, the Historical Cal Trans Building; C -R -MU zone; City of San Luis Obispo — Public Works Dept., applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Phil Dunsmore, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to determine the proposed widening of Higuera will not change the context of the Master List Historic property and to forward this recommendation to the State Historic Preservation Office based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. On motion by Committee Member Kalkowski, seconded by Committee Member Breska Preservation Office.. AYES: Committee Carpenter NOES: None Members Breska, Costello, Dandekar, Kalkowski, and CHC Minutes September 27, 2010 Page 2 RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Davis and Oliveira The motion passed on a 5:0 vote. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 2. 1352 Pacific Street Master List of Historic (James David) CHC 19-10; Request to add a residential property to the Resources; R-2 zone, Matt and Sara Ritter, applicants. James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee approve a resolution recommending the City Council add the property located at 1352 Pacific Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Matt Ritter, applicant, spoke in support of adding the property to the Master List. Mr. Ritter discussed the historical nature of the site. Betsy Bertrando, applicant representative, discussed how the project met all of the criteria for Master List designation.. Committee Member Breska questioned the length of time the Kellys lived in the house. Mrs. Bertrando replied that Charles Kelly had lived there for 20 years before he died, and his wife continued to live there an additional 10 years. Committee Member Costello questioned if there were many affordable housing projects during this era. Mrs. Bertrando replied that there were not and that this house was special and controversial at that time. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Eric Meyer, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the Master List designation because it was the first of its kind. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Kalkowski suggested the Committee look at the home in its historic context. He disagreed with the staff conclusion and felt Pedder Plan affordable homes were a significant event in San Luis Obispo history. Committee Member Kalkowski also felt Charles Kelly made significant contributions to the community by bringing electricity to the Central Coast. He supported Master List designation for the property with a plaque describing Kelly's contribution. Committee Member Breska agreed with Committee Member Kalkowski's comments. She noted the importance of the building and the people involved. CHC Minutes September 27, 2010 Page 3 Committee Member Dandekar agreed with staff and did not support a Master List designation because it is not architecturally significant. She noted that the recently - constructed unit behind the Pedder Home significantly detracts from the historic context. Committee Member Dandekar noted Charles Kelly's history is not compelling. Committee Member Costello supported the Master List designation because of the event, construction of attractive postwar affordable houses, and the person associated with the house. There were no further comments made from the Committee. Master List Property with conditions that a plaque is installed that identifies the historic significance of Charles Kelly's work and the Master Listing is for the front house only. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Costello, Davis, Kalkowski, and Carpenter NOES: Committee Member Dandekar RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Davis and Oliveira i The motion passed on a 4:1 vote. 3. 1318 Pacific Street. CHC 76-10; Request to add a residential property to the Master List of Historic Resources; O -S zone; Thom Brajkovich, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Committee adopt a resolution recommending the City Council add the property located at 1318 Pacific Street to the Master List of Historic Resources, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Thom Brajkovich, applicant, spoke in support of the project. Mr. Brajkovich noted that the architecture and people involved supported the Master List designation. Mary Kay Harrington, applicant, spoke in support of the project. Ms. Harrington discussed the history of Louisiana Clayton Dart. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Eric Meyer, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the Master List designation. Mr. Meyer noted that the home was a great example of properties that warrant the Master List of Historic Resources. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: CHC Minutes September 27, 2010 Page 4 CCommittee Member Dandekar supported the Master List designation. Committee Member Breska thanked the applicants for bringing the property to the Committee's attention. Committee Member Breska supported the Master List designation. Committee Member Kalkowski supported the Master List designation. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Breska, seconded by Committee Member Dandekar, adopt a resolution recommending the City Council add the property located at 1318 AYES: Committee Members Breska, Costello, Dandekar, Kalkowski, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Davis and Oliveira The motion passed on a 5:0 vote. 4. 375 Chorro Street. CHC 21-09; Determination of continued eligibility for the Master List of Historic Resources (Anholm House) and Mills Act contract; R-1 zone; Michael Mulvihill, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Committee Member Breska recused herself from this item. Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to find the Anholm House continues to meet the eligibility criteria for the Master List of Historic Resources and should remain under a Mills Act contract with the City, based on findings of consistency with prior project approvals. Committee Member Kalkowski requested clarification of the importance of the historical criteria for the Anholm house. Staff responded with the detail provided in the initial reports and included in attachments. Committee Member Costello requested the percentage of the structure that represents the original versus the percentage of newer additions. Staff referred the question to the applicant representative Greg Wynn. Committee Member Dandekar requested clarification from Staff on parameters the Committee can review. Staff noted that the Committee can decide if the changes that were made from prior project approvals are significant enough that the property no longer qualifies for the Master List of Historic Resources. CHC Minutes September 27, 2010 Page 5 Greg Wynn, applicant representative, spoke in support of maintaining Master List status. Mr. Wynn discussed that the restoration was in line with the initial project approval. Mr. Wynn noted the care and respect put into the project. Ryk Kluver, applicant representative, discussed the restoration and reconstruction process. Mr. Kluver noted that approximately 15% of the original materials could be put back into the restoration. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Vessley, San Luis Obispo, discussed that the project needed to maintain most of its historical integrity and authenticity to remain a listed historic resource. Dean Miller, San Luis Obispo, spoke against keeping the house on the Master List. Mr. Miller stated that the project was a reconstruction, not a renovation. He stated that the project deviated significantly from the original and he does not support Mills Act for the site. Chuck Crotser, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the staff recommendation. Anne Hodges, San Luis Obispo, did not support the property's continued historic designation. Ms. Hodges noted that the house is representative of poor Committee decisions on historical designation. Ms. Hodges noted that the house has changed 90% from the original and does not deserve a Mills Act contract. Michael Mulvihill, property owner, spoke in support of the project. Mr. Mulvihill defended the original designation given to his property and reminded the committee that he fulfilled his obligations to complete the project consistent with approved plans. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Kalkowski commented on the beauty of the home. He did not support eligibility for the City's Master List. Committee Member Dandekar commented that the historical nature of the person living at the residence was important and the owners had met the conditions of the approved plans and Mills Act contract. She supported the Master List designation. Committee Member Costello noted the dedication of the work the owners had put into the home. Committee Member Costello noted that although she did not agree with prior project approvals, the scope of review was whether the applicants complied with previous project approvals. Committee Member Costello questioned if there had been any area of the contract broken. Staff noted that the discussion for tonight was to address that topic specifically, CHC Minutes September 27, 2010 Page 6 and staff responded that the applicants did finish the project consistent with the Mills Act contract and prior project approvals. Committee Member Kalkowski noted that there should have been better communication with the applicants as this was a demolition rather than a restoration. There were no further comments made from the Committee. criteria for the Master List of Historic Resources and should remain under a Mills Act contract with the City. AYES: Committee Members Costello, Dandekar, and Carpenter NOES: Committee Member Kalkowski RECUSED: Committee Member Breska ABSENT: Committee Members Davis and Oliveira The motion passed on a 3:1 vote. COMMUNICATIONS: 5. Staff a. Agenda Forecast — Staff b. Palm-Nipomo Parking Structure Ad Hoc Committee Appointment — 2 volunteers. Committee Member Breska agreed to be on the committee. The second position is still to be determined. 6. Commission ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary Approved by the mal Heritage Committee on _October 25, 2010_ Ryan gqtz Supgkiing Ad SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES �. Regular Meeting of October 25, 2010 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Enrica Costello, Hemalata Dandekar, Katy Davis, Buzz Kalkowski, Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: None Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Senior Planner Phil Dunsmore, Associate Planner Brian Leveille, Assistant Planner James David, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller PUBLIC COMMENT: Paul Reese, San Luis Obispo, stated there has not been sufficient noticing for the review of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Mr. Reese presented information on behalf of Shelly Johnson, San Luis Obispo, who was unable to attend and requested that the City start over with preparation of the ordinance. Mr. Reese requested the members attend the. council meeting and support a continuation of the Ordinance. Craig Lindeman, San Luis Obispo, spoke against the draft Historic Preservation Ordinance. He stated the ordinance should differentiate between homeowners and income -generating properties. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the draft Historic Preservation Ordinance. He stated that people who maintain their property will not be in violation of the ordinance. There were no further comments from the public. MINUTES: Minutes of September 27, 2010, were approved as amended. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 868 Chorro Street. ARCMI 95-10; Review of three new residential units on a Master List Historic Property with the Mancillas/Frietas Adobe; R-4 zone; Lary Hoyt, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Community Development Director find the proposed residential units and site improvements consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and CHC Minutes October 25, 2010 Page 2 recommend the Director approve the proposed residential units and site improvements based on findings and subject to conditions. Vice -Chair Oliveira suggested that an Initial Study should be conducted on the site pursuant to CEQA regulations due to potential archaeological resources on the site. He stated that a Phase II investigation should be completed. Tom Jess, applicant representative, spoke in support of the project. Committee Member Kalkowski noted that the property looked vacant and neglected. He mentioned broken window panes, trash, and evidence of termite infestation on the site. He noted that maintenance of the Adobe should be addressed as a project condition. Committee Member Dandekar requested information regarding the protection of the Adobe during construction. Mr. Jess indicated that damage -prevention measures would be taken and noted that the construction of the adjacent parking structure had created drainage issues. He indicated the proposed project would address site conditions and help protect the adobe. Committee Member Dandekar expressed concern regarding the dilapidated nature of the structure and site and questioned if the applicant had a plan for preserving the adobe. Mr. Jess noted that the owner intends to repair the structure and was not opposed to the Committee addressing this issue within conditions of approval. Committee Member Costello questioned the use of brick materials proposed in the development. Mr. Jess responded that the brick is proposed as a transition from the adjacent commercial properties to the residential development in the design. Chairperson Carpenter questioned the long-term plan for the adobe. Mr. Jess stated that the applicant did not have long-term plans for the adobe at this time and the intent is to keep the wood -clad additions around the adobe which have protected the adobe structure within. Mr. Jess stated the applicant was in poor health and the property and proposed development will be passed on to family members. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, stated he thought the overall project design for the site was good but that he had concerns regarding potential archaeological resource impacts and the lack of information on how the adobe is to be treated. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, spoke of the need to have consistent standards for how archaeological preservation issues are reviewed. Mr. Brodie suggested the landscape is important. He supported the project design but felt the project should detail the condition of the adobe and describe stabilization measures to be taken during construction. _ Gordon Edmonds, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project. CHC Minutes October 25, 2010 Page 3 Diane Orrell, San Luis Obispo, noted that the removal of landscaping adjacent to her property would eliminate screening and requested clarification of required parking and setbacks. Sara McErte, San Luis Obispo, noted her concerns with the architectural design of the project. Mr. Jess responded to several questions and noted that he did not know what the rental status of the Adobe would be once the residences are built. Mr. Jess stressed the property owner's intent to preserve the historic building. There were no further comments made from the public. The Committee took a break from TOO p.m. to 7:10 p.m. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Kalkowski supported the design of the project. He noted concern that the Historic Adobe is in danger due to poor property maintenance and requested a condition be added that the adobe be secured immediately after which the adobe house should be inspected and necessary repairs made. He also stated that care should be taken to ensure the adobe is not damaged during construction. Committee Member Costello supported Committee Member Kalkowski's comments. She requested that staff keep the Committee informed of inspection and required repairs. Committee Member Breska and Committee Member Davis supported the design and further supported Committee Member Kalkowski's recommended conditions. Vice -Chair Oliveira stated the Adobe cannot be separated from the site's construction. He requested staff to come back and present the project with the recommendations made by the Committee along with review of a mitigated negative declaration with appropriate mitigation measures. He stated the archaeological resource value can be confirmed with a Phase II investigation. Chairperson Carpenter supported a detailed presentation of the impact and evaluations of the Adobe. Chairperson Carpenter supported continuing to a date uncertain. Committee Member Kalkowski suggested that staff determine the soundness of the structure based upon the suggestions of a City inspector. On motion by Vice -Chair Oliveira, seconded by Committee Member Davis to continue the yrroiect to a date uncertain in order for the applicant to address the Committee's concerns of the historic adobe's condition and following preparation of an initial study prepared pursuant to CEQA regulations. CHC Minutes October 25, 2010 Page 4 Mr. Jess responded that the applicant would find exception to the additional conditions at this phase of the project. Mr. Jess noted that the applicant was being held to a higher level of detail than normally required at the planning review stage. Vice -Chair Oliveira noted support for the project design but that the Committee needed to have the CEQA issue addressed prior to recommending approval. Committee Member Kalkowski asked if this project could be expedited through the development review process. Staff replied that the CHC's request to review a Phase II investigation would significantly delay the approval process and he suggested the initial study could be prepared for subsequent approvals which are already required for the project rather than bringing the project back for CHC review. Vice -Chair Oliviera noted the Committee is providing tacit support for the project but that he felt the CEQA issue had to be addressed first. The Committee would like the applicant to understand the Committee supports the design of the project. AYES: Committee Members Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. Breska, Costello, Dandekar, Davis, Kalkowski, 2. 535 Islay Street. ARCMI 102-10; Review of proposed two -car garage (carriage house) on a Master List Historic Property with the Sandercock House; R -2-H zone; Gordon Edmonds, applicant. (James David) James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the proposed modifications are consistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Gordon and Stacy Edmonds, applicants, spoke in support of the project. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Chair Carpenter and Committee Member Davis supported the project as presented. Committee Member Breska questioned if the original design for the house had a garage. Mrs. Edmonds replied that the proposed pool house had actually been the original garage. Committee Member Dandekar supported the adaptive re -use. Committee Member Dandekar noted the design maintained authenticity in keeping with contemporary use of site. CHC Minutes October 25, 2010 Page 5 Committee Member Kalkowski supported moving the garage 5 to 10 feet back, consistent with the historic pattern of development. Mrs. Edmonds made the argument, based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, that the new location for the garage differentiates enough from the traditional neighborhood pattern so that it does not lead the public to believe that it is an original feature of the property. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Committee Member Kalkowski, seconded by Vice -Chair Oliveira, to support the proposed modifications as consistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties based on findings and subject to conditions which staff outlined. AYES: Committee Members Breska, Costello, Dandekar, Davis, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. Committee Member Costello recused herself from Item #3 because she is the applicant. 3. 1027 Leff Street. ARCMI 86-10. contributing property in the Old Town applicants. (James David) Review of garage with studio above on historic district; Enrica & Trampas Costello, James David, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the CHC determine the proposed garage and artist's studio is consistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Trampas and Enrica Costello, applicants, spoke in support of their project. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: CHC Minutes October 25, 2010 Page 6 AYES: Committee Members Breska, Dandekar, Davis, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: Costello ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: 4. Staff a. Staff provided an agenda Forecast b. Committee Member Dandekar presented her recently -published book to the Committee. c. Budget Workshop — Goal Setting Staff presented on overview of the Advisory Bodies' role in the 2011-2013 budget process. The Committee discussed the fiscal constraints of the City's financial planning in light of economic conditions and recommended the following budget goals: ■ Apply to become a certified local government based on an adopted Historic Preservation Ordinance. • Conduct a historic character assessment of City districts. Using community volunteers, review and update the City-wide historic resources inventory. ■ Sponsor public education efforts including historic building tours and outreach materials. ■ Collaborate with Cal Poly to stabilize and rehabilitate the City -owned Butron adobe and grounds. 5. Commission — Committee Member Kalkowski indicated he will be talking with property owner about preparing a nomination for the CHC to consider for the Sunset Drive-in Theater as one of the few remaining drive-in theaters in the state of California. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary Approved by the Cultural Heritage Committee on November 22, 2010 RyanDREZ Supe i ing Administrative Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO C CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES November 22, 2010 ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Enrica Costello, Hemalata Dandekar, Katy Davis, Buzz Kalkowski, Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: Committee Member Barbara Breska Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Doug Davidson, Senior Planner Phil Dunsmore, and Associate Planner Brian Leveille ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of October 25, 2010, were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENTS: I \ Alan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, would like to nominate Dan Carpenter for City Council.. \ / There were no further comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 868 Chorro Street. ARCMI 95-10; Continued hearing to review three new residential units on a Master List historic property with the Mancilla/Frietas Adobe; R-4 zone; Lary Hoyt, applicant. (Brian Leveille) Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Community Development Director find the proposed residential units and site improvements consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and approve the project subject to conditions and mitigation measures which he outlined. Committee Member Oliveira was concerned with staff's recommendation to require the Phase II archeology study at a later date prior to issuance of building permits. He recommended strengthening the mitigation measures by adding language to bring the Phase II test results back to the Committee, prior to implementation. He also recommended that if Phase III occurs, the Committee should review the Data Recovery Plan and its results. Committee Member Dandekar asked if staff had considered potential impacts of new construction on existing Adobe structures and suggested protection of the entire structure, not just the Adobe. CHC Minutes November 22, 2010 Page 2 ( Brian Leveille, staff planner, responded that it was not anticipated that special mitigation measures would be necessary since the proposed construction had ample separation from the adobe. Committee Member Costello suggested the Phase II archeology study should be submitted now, not later. Thom Jess, applicant representative, commended the staff for their efforts on reviewing the project in a timely manner, and requested the CHC recommend approval of the project. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, was concerned with a possible discrepancy between mitigation measures and conditions. He also noted what appeared to be a Mission -era reservoir at the front of the property or possibly an ancient water channel. He suggested that archiving the collected material should be determined prior to a phase III archeology recovery. Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, spoke about the historic significance of the building and supported its preservation. He supported the design of the project and noted the front wood frame addition existed in the mid 1800's and should be considered historic even l though it is not proposed for demolition. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, spoke about the future uses of the Adobe building and asked if they could be discussed. He pointed out that the City has the opportunity to acknowledge a very significant resource. Elizabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, spoke about her concerns of future use and the condition of the property and protection of the Adobe. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Vice -Chair Oliveira recommended the Phase II Study come back to the Committee prior to implementation. He also recommended that Phase III return to the Committee with a Data Recovery plan and its results. Committee Member Costello recommended an archeological study should be submitted now, not later. She was concerned with a lack of maintenance to the property and archeology research. Committee Member Dandekar was concerned about the equity between treatment of the property and other lots. She stated that she would like to see the entire structure be protected, not just the Adobe. CHC Minutes November 22, 2010 Page 3 Vice -Chair Oliveira stated that he could support moving a recommendation without the Phase II at this time since it is consistent with City practice for similar lots proposed for development. He requested the Committee discuss Phase II archeology as a general process and how this will be handled in the future. He suggested the Committee should review results of Phase II and III in a public hearing condition and that a condition should be added to inspect the historic adobe structure before and after construction. Committee Member Costello questioned the distance between proposed new construction and the adobe structure. Committee Member Katy Davis supported the project's approval. Committee Member Dan Carpenter supported the condition to look at a landscape plan that reflects history and agreed with the Phase II Study to return to the Committee. There were no further comments made from the Committee. Property (Historic Mancilla/Frietas Adobe) in the High Density Residential Zone (R-4), based on findings and conditions with the addition of the following conditions: 1. The results of the Phase 2 archeology report shall be reported back to the CHC. If a Phase 3 archeology report is recommended, the Phase 3 methodology shall be reviewed by the CHC with a recommendation to the Community Development Director. 2. The existing structure shall be inspected for its structural condition prior to and following completion of the development project. AYES: Committee Members Oliveira, Carpenter, Davis, Kalkowski, Dandekar, and Costello NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Breska The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. Dan Carpenter left the Council Hearing Room at 7:00 p.m. 2. 1029 —1039 Chonro Street ARC 30-10; Review of a demolition of a non -historic building; relocation and rooftop additions to historic building; and a new, two-story commercial building on a Master List property in the Downtown Historic District; C- l D -H zone; Naman Family Trust, applicant. (Brian Leveille) J Brian Leveille, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approve the proposed demolition, relocation, CHC Minutes November 22, 2010 Page 4 Cand redevelopment of the project; and recommend the ARC adopt the mitigated negative declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). i Carol Florence, applicant representative, discussed the project and its proposed relocation approach. Robert Chattel, applicant representative, discussed the National Park Service document titled "Moving Historic Buildings." He also discussed the feasibility of the project. Marty Landes, applicant representative, discussed the technical details of the relocation portion of the project. Pierre Rademaker, applicant representative, presented a model of the project. Committee Member Dan Carpenter returned at 7:15 p.m. during the applicant's presentation. Vice -Chair Oliveira asked how the Committee could ensure that the plan to move the building will be successful and how to ensure preservation of materials. The project architect reviewed the sequenced methods of relocation. He also asked about the location of construction equipment. The applicant team discussed operations. (\ Committee Member Kalkowski asked about the ongoing security of a portion of the paseo area adjacent to the elevator. Carol Florence stated there will be future discussion with the City on the status of public access through the property. Tim Rhonda, project architect, responded that the area adjacent to the elevator will likely be closed and gated at late hours. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project and congratulated the applicant's team on their efforts and outreach to the Save Our Downtown Group. He supported the design of the project and asked if the wall at Native Lounge will be left blank or have public art on it. He also asked where Pithy -Little Wine Company will relocate to. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, was concerned with the accessibility of the elevator. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Vice -Chair Oliveira asked staff what the protocol will be if, in the implementation phase of the project, significant historic features cannot be saved as proposed. Associate Planner Brian Leveille responded that the project may have to stop and come back for CHC review if changes are significant enough to potentially threaten the building's continuing historic listing status. CHC Minutes November 22, 2010 Page 5 1 Committee Member Costello supported the project. Committee Member Dandekar commented how the complex project was presented very clearly. Committee Member Kalkowski supported the project and stated it will enhance the vicinity. He suggested the Committee add a condition to not allow a Mills Act contract for at least one year following construction. Committee Member Davis noted the extra effort put into this project and how it will be a nice addition to the Downtown. Committee Member Dan Carpenter commented how the relocation can be a sensitive issue, but this particular project differs from the usual relocation since the buildings are being relocated on the adjacent property in the same context and the relocation is to avoid demolition. He suggested staff closely monitor the evolution of the project. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On motion by Vice -Chair Oliveira. seconded by Committee Member Davis. to recommend the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approve the demolition, relocation, and redevelopment of the project: and recommend the ARC adopt the miti4ated negative declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act C( EQA). AYES: Committee Members Oliveira, Carpenter, Davis, Kalkowski, Dandekar, and Costello NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Breska The motion passed on a 6:0 vote. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION: 3. Staff a. Agenda Forecast presentation. 4. Committee — Discussed potential "special' meeting date since December 20, 2010 may not work due to the possibility that the Committee might not have a quorum on December 20th. Staff to follow-up. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. C Respectfully submitted by, Phil Dunsmore, Recording Secretary CHC Minutes November 22, 2010 Page 6 C' Approved by the Cultural eritage Committee on December 13, 2010. Ryan B SuDervisina Administrative Assistant SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES December 13, 2010 ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members Hemalata Dandekar, Buzz Kalkowski, Vice -Chair Jeff Oliveira, and Chairperson Dan Carpenter Absent: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Enrica Costello, and Katy Davis Staff: Senior Planner Phil Dunsmore, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. MINUTES: Minutes of November 22, 2010, were approved as presented. I PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments from the public. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1028 A Islay Street. CHC 124-10; Consideration of 1028 A Islay Street for placement on the Contributing List of Historic Resources; R -3-H zone, City of San Luis Obispo — Community Development Dept., applicant. (James David) Phil Dunsmore, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the CHC approve the draft resolution recommending the City Council add the property located at 1028-A Islay Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: The Committee members noted the property was an excellent example for the Contributing List of Historic Resources. On motion by Committee Member Kalkowski seconded by Committee Member Dandekar, to adopt the draft resolution recommending the City Council add the property located at 1028-A Islay Street to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources AYES: Committee Members Dandekar, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None CHC Minutes December 13, 2010 Page 2 RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Breska, Costello, and Davis The motion passed on a 4:0 vote. 2. Staff a. Agenda Forecast b. Review of 2011-2013 Cultural Heritage Committee Budget Goals 3. Committee Committee Member Kalkowski expressed a desire to review a set number of properties for historic assessment on a future agenda. Committee Member Dandekar suggested considering identifying districts rather than focusing on specific properties. Staff suggested a future agenda item to update the historic resourcesinventory and a separate look at the boundary of historic districts. On motion by Committee Member Kalkowski, seconded by Committee Member Dandekar, to aaendize and have Staff develop a framework for assessina AYES: Committee Members Dandekar, Kalkowski, Oliveira, and Carpenter NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Members Breska, Costello, and Davis The motion passed on a 4:0 vote Chairperson Carpenter suggested that staff and the Committee begin encouraging members of the public to consider volunteering to serve on the CHC. Since Committee Member Breska's term will expire at the end of March, the Committee will have a vacancy. A new committee member could be appointed for the April hearing. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary Approved by the Cultyrfal Heritage Committee on February 28, 2011. SupeNsing Administrative Assistant