HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-01-16 ARC Correspondence - Item 1 (dehaan)RECEIVED
From: SLO CITY CLERK
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 4:20 PM
To: Advisory Bodies
Subject: 71 Palomar/Sanford House
Attachments: 20160801_150452jpg;20160801_150504jpg;20160801_150531jpg;20160801_
150558jpg;20160801_150612jpg
I would like this site developed without loss of historic trees and development enhancing Italian Renaissance style of Sanford House
ee have seen this with Serrano Sircle. The dwelling were built around trees and the street narrowed to keep huge Eucalyptus
trees. Also they build 2 houses s t ound the old farm house enhancing the entire development and neighborhood.
Sent from my T -Mobile 4G LTE device
RECEIVED
AUG 01 2016
SW CITY CLERK
From:
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 4:25 PM
To: Advisory Bodies
Subject: 71 Palomar/Sanford House (cont.)
In addition to developments that enhances neighborhoods is on the corner of Laurel and Johnson Ave. Again the existing house is left
intact, like the old farmhouse on Serrano and new construction build around the existing house and trees.
Sent from my T -Mobile 4G LTE device
AUG 01 2016
From: -SZO CITY CLERK
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 4:42 PM
To: Advisory Bodies
Subject: 71 Palomar/Sanford House
Attachments: 20160801_144425jpg;20160801_144601jpg;20160801_144645jpg;20160801_
144944jpg;20160801_144645jpg
Here are the photos of the Laurel - Johnson development. At both sites the new structures were built around the trees. So it seems
criminal to destroy the historic house built by Chauncy H. Philipps one if our areas founders, a banker contemporary of banker &
builder of Jack house. Also this is one of the last house built in the Italian Renaissance style by firm of Julius C. Mathews & Sons
(father of California archtecture). So Sanford House is not only important to San Luis Obispo but State of California. If anything is
built it should enhance and preserve the site not destroy it. Thank you, Elizabeth De Haan
Sent from my T -Mobile 4G LTE device
tz 517
t
1 _ t `
`.
F^\'
Air
it
MIA
Iffli am-
.- t
d q
jq �L
it
�� ��liniiiii
•.vis,}
P7hFk ).
��'4£�l°
'f.
I t ! I
.v I
11
h�ta
No
�l
y` :oot
-
...al i
�Wc !3
$ h. t y Whi Y
x ti
to I
Nk
�..-� Nv, Ir
A
la
i qaa
--
ar 4t a`
Ito- p
Ott
�- 'L '
IV
{., 4 ri`i1L�tr,;+(s �Tlt i qY
�4f ts fJJ
(],
y sy L '
4
4a\ 1 '1 .F
syE r' tP 11
, f(" r
61
61
f It
Or
itt*�, a .•", t- "
41 1
a
Iti.
a" 19 Utill
K ��r
x If .eye,
to
y., �. 11
i f �ilf
14
A, OIL
to
z
y
tt; f2
Iq
tit tr
AC S ,Y. 1 .,, = 1 r
- % Y
40".46.
Tomet
IL
3, o
S , -
, 44
O.
it
AIL.,;✓semi f '
is s< aItGr: �r" O 672` os -
rIF
c �4P�1/I CJ//Gd(%LG�P Itol .
N Amok
' , at
p i
■ l �
1/�
r�-o �"y -�"'s frr� s mss J�� y� � r� .
_ . � r�e� �jrr r srt �, Uc s't ,f � s' � s
,�` �r'�s' ^r
-" � 'yf'`rr'��
.�r�� '
�� ., � �� i
,.. �
� - � .-.� � � �-,' � r x �
r - 1.. � �� �' lJ
:" � �
.� .x
- .y
_ Y
� � � "�
i � % / i
Y �
�r
_ � !
�w
y K / P
� �. >fi
"`-.,,_�
"""-_
� z ¥�
: