Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-09-2016 - MTC Agenda PacketService Complaints: Complaints regarding bus service or routes are to be directed to the Transit Coordinator at 781-7531. Reports of complaints/commendations are available to the public upon request. MISSION: The purpose of the Mass Transportation Committee is to assist with the ongoing public transit program in the City and Cal Poly. As requested, the Committee provides advisory recommendations and input to the Council regarding routes, schedules, capital projects, fares, marketing and additional services. ROLL CALL: Elizabeth Thyne (Chair – Senior), John Osumi (Vice Chair – Business), Cheryl Andrus (Cal Poly), Denise Martinez (Disabled), Louise Justice (Member at Large), James Thompson (Technical), Diego-Christopher Lopez (Alternate), Vacant (Student), Vacant (Alternate) ANNOUNCEMENTS: New Member Oath – Justin Frentzel (Student Rep) 5 min. PUBLIC COMMENT: 10 min. At this time, the public is invited to address the Committee concerning items not on the agenda but are of interest to the public and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Mass Transportation Committee. Public comment is limited to three minutes per person. The Committee may not discuss or take action on issues that are not on the agenda other than to briefly respond to statements or questions, or to ask staff to follow up on such issues. MINUTES: September 7, 2016 (Attachment 1) ACTION ITEMS: 1. City Council Goals (Xenia Bradford, Att 2) 30 min. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 2. Committee Items 10 min. a) Downtown Transit Center Funding (SLOCOG Rep) b) Insert item and make additional sections if necessary 3. Staff Items 20 min. a) Bike About – Ebicycle rental program (M. Maxwell & T. Boynton) b) Transit Manager’s Report (Att 3) c) SRTP Service Expansion – Concept Schedule (Att 4) ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting will be held January 11, 2017 The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and activities. Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance. Agenda Mass Transportation Committee Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo Wednesday, November 9, 2016 – 2:30 pm Page 1 ACTION ITEMS: Agenda Item 1: City Council Goals (Xenia Bradford, Att 2) During the City budgeting process, Major City Goals are developed in order to help identify funding priority projects. Advisory body input largely shapes these adopted goals. Staff Recommendation: Adopt a top-five list of MTC recommendations for Major City Goal Adoption. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Agenda Item 2a: Downtown Transit Center Funding (SLOCOG Rep) Presentation by a SLOCOG Rep regarding the apportionment of grants funds towards a dedicated transit facility. Agenda Item 3a: Bike About – Ebicycle rental program (M. Maxwell & T. Boynton) Presentation by owners of an e-bike rental start-up and discussion on how service can complement with transit. Agenda Item 3b: Transit Manager’s Report (Att 3) Transit Manager’s Report – Verbal report on various transit related stats, happenings, events, promotions, etc. Agenda Item 3c: SRTP Service Expansion – Concept Schedule (Att 4) With adoption, by the City Council, of the Short Range Transit Plan new route alignments have been approved. A draft concept for public schedules has been developed for comment. The next meeting will be held: January 11, 2017 ATTACHMENTS: (list all attachments) 1. Minutes of the September 7, 2016 MTC meeting 2. City Council Goals Presentation 3. Transit Manager’s Report G:\Transportation Division\_Transportation Committees\MTC Committee\FY 2017 Page 2 Minutes - DRAFT MASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 7, 2016 Rescheduled Meeting of the Mass Transportation Committee CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Mass Transportation Committee was called to order on Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 2:33 pm in the Council Hearing Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Thyne. ROLL CALL Present: Committee Members Cheryl Andrus, Denise Martinez, Louise Justice, James Thompson, Vice-Chair John Osumi, and Chair Elizabeth Thyne Absent: Committee Member Diego-Christopher Lopez Staff: Transit Manager Gamaliel Anguiano, Transit Coordinator Dee Lawson, Transit Assistant Megan Cutler, Recording Secretary Kevin Christian. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA There was no public comment. ANNOUNCEMENTS Transit Manger Anguiano announced that the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) is on the City Council Agenda of September 20th. The committee discussed their desires to speak to City Council in support of the plan as individuals and as members of the Mass Transportation Committee (MTC). ACTION: MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER JUSTICE, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER THOMPSON, CARRIED 6-0, to delegate Chair Thyne to speak on behalf of the Mass Transportation Meeting and that individual members who wish to speak should identify themselves as members of the committee, but that they are representing their individual viewpoints. Page 3 DRAFT Minutes – Mass Transportation Committee Meeting of September 7, 2016 Page 2 MINUTES Amendment to Minutes of the Mass Transportation Committee, meeting of July 13, 2016, Item 5, addition: Active Transportation Manager Fukushima stated that he will do further research on electric bicycle batteries and report his findings to the committee. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OSUMI, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER ANDRUS, CARRIED 6-0 to approve the Minutes of the Mass Transportation Meeting on July 13, 2016 as amended. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Senior/Disabled Discounted One Day Pass Chair Thyne introduced the idea of offering a discounted Senior/Disabled one-day pass. Transit Manager Anguiano explained the requirements for discounted Senior/Disabled passes and the operational rational for the current pass offerings. Transit Manager Anguiano noted that consolidation of types of passes makes the system more efficient but that the pass structure has not been changed since 2008 and staff will be reviewing it as part of the SRTP implementation. The committee expressed that they would like a discounted Senior/Disabled one-day pass to be considered. Public Comment: Geoff Straw, Executive Director for the Regional Transit Authority, noted that the South County Transit system has recently implemented a discounted Senior/Disabled day pass and could share use data with the City as it becomes available. The Committee discussed the range and type of passes currently offered and Transit Manager Anguiano described potential changes resulting from the SRTP implementation. 2. Transit Manger Report Transit Manager Anguiano reviewed the timeline and steps for adoption of the SRTP, noting that implementation depends upon funding. Fare negotiations with Cal Poly were reported to have been extended by one year, which may allow for the SRTP effects to be known prior to renegotiation. A review of the current ridership report showed that SLO Transit had over 1.2 million riders for fiscal year 2015-16. It is anticipated that continued increases in ride demand will be seen in fiscal year 2016-17. It was noted that the Kennedy Library Tripper service has successfully mitigated some of the ridership volume demand for Routes 4 and 5. Finally, it was reported that the double-deck bus repair has been delayed and will not be available for service as promised by the start of the Cal Poly School year. Page 4 DRAFT Minutes – Mass Transportation Committee Meeting of September 7, 2016 Page 3 Transit Coordinator Lawson reviewed the current and planned route detours and delays which impact various route’s service, noting that on-time performance has not been negatively impacted. In response to committee questions, Transit Manager Anguiano reported that the SRTP examines projected future ridership due to development in both currently undeveloped areas, as well as in developed locations with projected increased density development. Transit Assistant Cutler reported a 60% increase in use over 2015 for the San Luis Drive Tripper service in the first two weeks of the school year. Rideshare Week, October 3rd 7th, was announced, with SLOTransit offering free rides for the promotion. The committee expressed various opinions on the playing of the current transit promotional advertisements on the busses and requested that staff review the practice for its effectiveness. 3. Triennial Review Update Transit Manager Anguiano reported that SLO Transit was reviewed by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May, 2016. Transit Manager Anguiano explained that the FTA conducts these reviews every three years in order to help transit systems comply with the various FTA requirements and expectations for use of Federal tax funding. Findings are issued for areas which need addressing by the recipient. In the seventeen topic areas reviewed, five findings were noted. A summary of the five finding areas was presented, along with explanations for planned improvements, modifications, and remediation actions. ADJOURNMENT ACTION: MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER OSUMI, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER JUSTICE, CARRIED 6-0 to adjourn the meeting at 4:01 p.m. to the next Regular meeting of the Mass Transporation Committee, November 9, 2016 at 2:30 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. APPROVED BY THE MASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2016 Page 5 Role of Advisory Bodies in the Budget Process 2013-15 Financial Plan 1 1 2017-19 Financial Plan Goal Setting Process Role of Advisory Bodies 2 Budget Process & Goal Setting City has numerous long-term policies and plans: General Plan (all elements) Area & Specific Plans Water Master Plan Wastewater Master Plan Pavement Management Plan Parking Management Plan Short-Range Transit Plan Bicycle Plan Public Art Policy Downtown Plan IT Strategic Plan Capital Improvement Plan The budget is the key tool for implementing these plans by allocating the resources available to do so. Page 6 Role of Advisory Bodies in the Budget Process 2013-15 Financial Plan 2 3 Linking Goals and Resources This requires a process that: Clearly identifies the “highest priority, most important” things for us to do during the next two years at the beginning of the process. Establishes reasonable timeframes and organizational responsibility for getting them done. Allocates required resources. Goal-Setting Input Advisory Bodies Goal-Setting and the Budget Process Community Surveys Community Forum January 10, 2017 Letters from Individuals Status of Current 2-yr Goals ** Letters from Community Groups Fiscal Forecast * Council Goal Setting Workshop January 28, 2017 Major City Goal Work Programs and “Strategic Budget Direction:” April 18 Preliminary Budget: May 15 Budget Workshops: June 1, 6 Adopted Budget: June 20, 2017 Long-Term Plans, Goals & Policies * ** November 15, 2016 “Setting the Stage” Workshop * December 6, 2016 “Budget Foundation” Workshop 4 Page 7 Role of Advisory Bodies in the Budget Process 2013-15 Financial Plan 3 2015-17 Major City Goals and Important Objectives Major City Goals • Open Space Preservation • Multi-Modal Transportation • Housing Other Important Objectives • Neighborhood Wellness • Laguna Lake Restoration • Fiscal Sustainability and Responsibility • Downtown 5 6 Advisory Body Goals Scope:What are the most important, highest priority things for the City to do over the next two years? From the perspective of the advisory body’s “portfolio.” Other perceived community-wide concerns and issues. Valued by Council and Staff:Many or most advisory body goal recommendations have been reflected in past Financial Plans in some fashion. Page 8 Role of Advisory Bodies in the Budget Process 2013-15 Financial Plan 4 7 Dates for 2017-19 Advisory body goal recommendations due: 11-7-16 Staff provides consolidated list of all advisory body goals back to advisory bodies 11-10-16 Each body can decide for themselves if a second review is desirable based on the consolidated goals Revised goal recommendations (if any) due: 12-5-16 8 Current Financial Context “Steady Progress” Continued slow economic expansion Continued increase in development review activity Containment of operating costs Uncertainties and challenges remain looming Retirement and insurance costs Need to fund deferred maintenance of infrastructure Diablo Canyon Power Plant Page 9 Role of Advisory Bodies in the Budget Process 2013-15 Financial Plan 5 9 Guidelines for Advisory Body Goals Succinctly state: What you are proposing for the community. Why it’s important. Any creative ideas on how to achieve it from a resource perspective: Alternative service delivery approaches? Partnering with others? New revenues? Re-allocating resources from other areas? 10 More or Fewer Goals? There is no “rule,” but . . . “Highest priority” implies fewer versus more. Council members are asked to submit 5 to 7 “highest priority goals.” Page 10 09/01/1509/30/15 09/30/1607/01/1607/01/1509/01/1609/30/15 09/30/16CurrentPercent ChangeFiscal YearPercent ChangeTo To To ToTable A: Ridership Trends by Fare ComponentCurrent PeriodFiscal YearGeneral Fare39,019 34,550 116,804 103,525-11.45% -11.37%CalPolyTotal54,909 45,258 85,373 64,765-17.58% -24.14%REVENUE1 Ride Pass -96.41% -77.78%1957288641-Day Reg Pass-7.35%-9.43%7767192,0991,9013-Day Reg Pass-25.99%-19.13%4042991,0408415-Day Reg Pass-13.01%-0.47%2922546386357-Day Reg Pass-80.28%-57.81%71141285431 Day Reg Pass14.01%-2.88%1,4701,6764,3074,18331-Day Student Pa11.49%17.40%2,1942,4462,4022,820Amtrak0004Cal Poly-17.94%-20.83%54,29444,55380,69963,891CP Invalid Card14.63%-81.30%6157054,674874DAP Pass-2.53%3.36%1,1451,1162,8282,923Pass Override-53.54%-47.57%325151782410Punch Reg Pass9.27%-27.48%151165433314Punch SD Pass-25.42%-81.55%5944775143Reg Day Pass-4.44%-15.06%1,7791,7005,2804,485Regional Pass-21.89%-11.52%7,0005,46819,37017,139Regular Cash-12.09%-8.38%8,6677,61923,51921,548Run About8400.00%9800.00%21703297SR / DIS Cash4.02%-6.34%2,0642,1476,7676,338SR / DIS Pass-10.76%-7.65%7,6746,84822,15520,461Prado Token-25.99%-16.67%8356182,4422,035NON-REVENUEChild Under 521.01%12.00%6908352,4592,754Courtesy Ride-16.00%-12.12%25216658Free Ride Event100.00%33.33%2434Free Token144.44%58.62%9222946Newcomer-100.00%0010Promo Pass15.00%62.96%20235488Transfers-15.05%-23.16%1,4351,2194,6903,604VIP24.30%6.34%7539362,5722,735Youth-97.05%-34.55%9822911,6747,641TOTAL-15.03%-16.76%93,92879,808202,177168,290Page 11 09/01/1509/30/15 09/30/1607/01/1607/01/1509/01/1609/30/15 09/30/16CurrentPercent ChangeFiscal YearPercent ChangeTo To To ToTable B: Revenue Hours and Revenue Miles Current PeriodFiscal Year-15.03%-16.76%Passengers93,928.0079,808.00202,177.00168,290.00-12.63%-15.77%Weekday83,119.0072,623.00176,084.00148,318.00-34.79%-26.88%Saturday6,266.004,086.0015,516.0011,345.00-31.79%-18.44%Sunday4,543.003,099.0010,577.008,627.005.69%2.16%Revenue Hours2,848.603,010.707,768.507,936.107.12%3.84%Weekday2,480.982,657.566,597.056,850.36-6.76%-12.74%Saturday214.14199.66672.64586.930.00%0.00%Sunday153.48153.48498.81498.81-19.61%-18.52%Passengers per Revenue Hours32.9726.5126.0321.2111.32%8.04%Revenue Miles34,031.0037,885.0094,569.00102,168.0012.40%8.44%Weekday29,586.0033,256.0080,904.0087,732.002.23%3.35%Saturday2,468.002,523.007,319.007,564.006.53%8.29%Sunday1,977.002,106.006,346.006,872.00-23.68%-22.95%Passengers per Revenue Miles2.762.112.141.65Page 12 10/01/1510/31/15 10/31/1607/01/1607/01/1510/01/1610/31/15 10/31/16CurrentPercent ChangeFiscal YearPercent ChangeTo To To ToTable A: Ridership Trends by Fare ComponentCurrent PeriodFiscal YearGeneral Fare43,223 38,010 160,027 141,535-12.06% -11.56%CalPolyTotal108,104 99,927 193,477 164,692-7.56% -14.88%REVENUE1 Ride Pass -72.73% -77.42%226310701-Day Reg Pass-29.27%-14.47%7145052,8132,4063-Day Reg Pass1.99%-13.79%3523591,3921,2005-Day Reg Pass-23.63%-5.61%1821398207747-Day Reg Pass-18.82%-42.25%856921312331 Day Reg Pass0.30%-2.13%1,3171,3215,6245,50431-Day Student Pa-1.91%8.78%1,9371,9004,3394,720Amtrak-50.00%150.00%2125Cal Poly-7.72%-13.35%107,09298,824187,791162,715CP Invalid Card8.99%-65.23%1,0121,1035,6861,977DAP Pass-12.59%-0.86%1,0178893,8453,812Pass Override-37.24%-44.48%3332091,115619Punch Reg Pass61.06%-9.16%113182546496Punch SD Pass-14.40%-72.22%125107900250Reg Day Pass5.08%-10.75%1,4381,5116,7185,996Regional Pass-18.62%-13.12%5,6444,59325,01421,732Regular Cash-18.67%-10.93%7,7566,30831,27527,856Run About18000.00%11850.00%11814478SR / DIS Cash-12.66%-7.67%1,8011,5738,5687,911SR / DIS Pass-19.40%-10.43%6,8655,53329,02025,994Prado Token-14.31%-16.14%6995993,1412,634NON-REVENUEChild Under 5-23.05%3.13%8336413,2923,395Courtesy Ride61.54%0.00%13217979Free Ride Event-7.18%-7.17%9,9569,2419,9599,245Free Token-84.62%14.29%1324248Newcomer500.00%0616Promo Pass-50.00%19.32%341788105Transfers3.32%-17.86%1,1731,2125,8634,816VIP10.40%7.30%7988813,3703,616Youth-34.51%0411,6747,645TOTAL-8.85%-13.37%151,327137,937353,504306,227Page 13 10/01/1510/31/15 10/31/1607/01/1607/01/1510/01/1610/31/15 10/31/16CurrentPercent ChangeFiscal YearPercent ChangeTo To To ToTable B: Revenue Hours and Revenue Miles Current PeriodFiscal Year-8.85%-13.37%Passengers151,327.00137,937.00353,504.00306,227.00-8.70%-12.69%Weekday135,791.00123,977.00311,875.00272,295.00-18.35%-23.47%Saturday10,328.008,433.0025,844.0019,778.006.13%-10.33%Sunday5,208.005,527.0015,785.0014,154.002.05%2.62%Revenue Hours3,096.943,160.4110,813.4611,096.510.88%3.56%Weekday2,683.812,707.519,228.889,557.870.54%-9.04%Saturday259.65261.05932.29847.9825.00%5.88%Sunday153.48191.85652.29690.66-10.68%-15.58%Passengers per Revenue Hours48.8643.6532.6927.604.45%7.02%Revenue Miles37,225.0038,881.00131,794.00141,049.002.78%6.83%Weekday32,212.0033,106.00113,116.00120,838.003.62%3.43%Saturday3,063.003,174.0010,382.0010,738.0033.38%14.19%Sunday1,950.002,601.008,296.009,473.00-12.73%-19.06%Passengers per Revenue Miles4.073.552.682.17Page 14