Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-14-2016 PC Correspondence - Item 1 (Cooper)From: Allan Cooper [. Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 5:20 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcprev@slocity.org>; Davidson, Doug <ddaviidson@slocjty.org>; Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.orrg> Subject: Avila Ranch Development Draft EIR Dear Tyler, Doug or John Meeting: PL IT - H- I te Item: S RECEIVED CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DEC 14 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Would you kindly forward the attachment below to the Planning Commission before tomorrow's (December 14, 2016) meeting? Thanks! - Allan To: Re From Date: Meeting. l z. I �. I U P C/ Item: RECEIVED CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DEC 14 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SLO Planning Commission i �- December 14, 2016:175 Venture Drive. GENP 1319-2015 & SPEC/ER-1318-2015: Review of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Avila Ranch Development Project Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo December 13, 2016 Unfortunately, I will be unable to attend your meeting tomorrow night so I am writing you this letter. I agree with the findings in this draft EIR stating that air quality, noise, land use and transportation and traffic impacts created by this project will be significant and unavoidable. However, I wish to add two additional findings to the significant and unavoidable land use impacts. Under "LUCE Performance Standards a footnote appears stating that a "Density bonus program for affordable housing would allow additional units, consistent with existing City policies. Source: (City of San Luis Obispo 2014a)". This may be true but it should be stated that this City policy, when applied to this site, is in conflict with Paragraph 2 of the California Government Code Section 65589.5 which states that "a local agency shall not disapprove a housing development project, unless ... the development project... is proposed on land zoned for agriculture or resource preservation and is surrounded on at least two sides by land being used for agricultural or resource preservation purposes...". This is indeed the case regarding this Avila Ranch Development Project. 1 The second finding which should be added to this draft EIR is as follows: The California Legislature "also recognizes that premature and unnecessary development of agricultural lands for urban uses continues to have adverse effects on the availability of those lands for food and fiber production and on the economy of the state. Furthermore, it is the policy of the state that development should be guided away from prime agricultural lands..." Thank you for your time and consideration. 1 "The Project site is surrounded by a mix of incorporated City and unincorporated County lands, with urban uses within the City to the north and west and rural and agricultural uses within the County of San Luis Obispo (County) to the south and east... Unincorporated County lands immediately abutting the site to the south and east are generally rural agricultural."