Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-03-2017 Item 11 Appeal (Filed by David Brodie) of the ARC's decision to approve a new four story mixed-use building 1042 Olive Street Meeting Date: 1/3/2017 FROM: Michael Codron, Community Development Director Prepared By: Kyle Van Leeuwen, Planning Technician SUBJECT: REVIEW OF AN APPEAL (FILED BY DAVID BRODIE) OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION’S DECISION TO APPROVE A NEW FOUR STORY MIXED-USE BUILDING INCLUDING GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE, 17 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL ROOMS AND A REQUEST FOR A MIXED USE/SHARED PARKING REDUCTION OF 25%, WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution (Attachment A) denying the appeal and upholding the Architectural Review Commission’s approval of a new four story mixed-use building including ground floor commercial/retail space, 17 extended stay hotel rooms, and a mixed use/shared parking reduction of 25%, with a categorical exemption from environmental review. SITE DATA Applicant Garcia Family Trust Representative George Garcia, Garcia Architecture and Design Zoning Tourist Commercial (C-T) General Plan Tourist Commercial Site Area 0.515 acres (22,454 s.f.) Environmental Status Categorically Exempt from environmental review under Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. REPORT IN BRIEF The applicant submitted an application for architectural review of a proposed four-story building with 3,512 square-feet of commercial space on the ground floor, and 17 extended-stay hotel rooms on the upper floors (Attachment H, Project Plans). This project is located on Olive Street in the Tourist Commercial (C-T) zone. The project also includes a request for a 25% parking reduction for shared and mixed-use parking (Zoning Regulations Section 17.16.060 (B) & (C)). New commercial projects within the City require review by the Architectural Review Packet Pg. 153 11 Commission (ARC) as stated in the City’s Municipal Code1 and the Community Design Guidelines (Section 1.2). The proposed project was reviewed and approved in a vote of 3:2 by the ARC on October 3, 2016 (Attachment D, ARC Resolution & Attachment E, ARC Minutes). On October 13, 2016, the ARC approval was appealed by David Brodie on the grounds that the ARC did not follow or properly apply the Community Design Guidelines (CDG) and other applicable regulations (Attachment F, ARC Appeal and Supplemental Letter). Appeals of the Architectural Review Commission may be filed within 10 days of the ARC’s decision. Appeals of the ARC are referred to the City Council for action. The review of the project by the City Council will constitute a new hearing (de novo). In other words, the City Council is not limited in its review to the items brought up in the appeal letter, or discussed by the ARC at the hearing, but may cover all aspects of the project that are subject to the City’s discretionary review through the design review process. This includes project compliance with Zoning Regulations requirements as well as compliance with applicable guidelines from the Community Design Guidelines. The scope of this report is to evaluate the appeal and provide the City Council with an assessment of the project in terms of its consistency with the Community Design Guidelines and other applicable City policies and standards. The Council is being asked to review the proposed project, the concerns raised by the appeal, and provide a final determination on the project, upholding or denying the Architectural Review Commission’s approval. One new issue raised by the appeal and discussed in this report is the potential for long-term occupancy of hotel units within the project. As an extended stay hotel, it is expected and anticipated that some of the rooms may be occupied for longer than thirty days. When this occurs, hotel operators may file a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) exemption form with the City along with their normal remittance of Transient Occupancy Tax, as provided for by the City’s Municipal Code (SLOMC 3.04). However, the number of units that may be operated in this fashion is limited by the residential density standards of the Tourist Commercial zoning district. As a result, a new condition of approval is recommended that will limit the number of units to 6 of the 17 total rooms in the project that can be occupied at any one time for a period of longer than 30 days. The staff recommendation is to deny the appeal and uphold the ARC’s approval of the project, based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. If the Council approves the project, the project will have all necessary entitlements needed to move forward for building permits. The following report provides additional background and analysis of the proposed project an d the appeal. 1 San Luis Obispo Municipal Code chapter 2.48.050 Projects subject to architectural review A. Architectural review shall be required for all structures and physical improvements except individual -built single- family dwellings and small residential development projects. Packet Pg. 154 11 BACKGROUND Site Information/Setting: Site Size 22,454 square feet (0.515 acres) Present Use & Development Vacant Lot Topography Elevation: Min. 221.7 feet; Max. 224.1 ft. Slope: 4% Access From Olive Street Surrounding Use/Zoning North: C-T (Motel & Residential) East: C-T (Restaurant) South: C-T (Restaurant & Hotel) West: C-T (Motel) The project site is an existing 22,454 square foot vacant lot located on Olive Street. The site is located on the north side of Olive Street, west of Santa Rosa Street. The parcel is in the Tourist Commercial (C-T) zone, and all adjacent properties are also zoned C-T. The site is relatively flat, with access from Olive street, and has been vacant for over 20 years. Project Description A summary of the project is included below (Attachment G, Project Description & Attachment H, Project Plans): 1. Development: New 45-foot tall, four story mixed-use building (23,967 square feet) that includes:  17 extended-stay hotel rooms;  Three commercial/retail tenant spaces totaling 3,512 square feet;  115 square feet (s.f.) fourth-floor common area terrace;  35 parking spaces (9 covered and 26 uncovered spaces); and 2. Design: Modern/Contemporary style that includes the following materials:  Cement plaster;  Metal panels;  Stained wood siding;  CMU block; and  Aluminum storefront system. Packet Pg. 155 11 Project Statistics Item Proposed 1 Standard 2 Setbacks Street Yard 53 feet (main structure) 10 feet Other Yards 0 feet Same as adjacent (0 feet) Max. Height of Structure(s) 45 feet 45 feet Max. Building Coverage (footprint) 36% 75% Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) 1.02 2.5 Parking Spaces 35 30 Notes: 1. Applicant’s project plans as approved by ARC 2. Zoning Regulations chapter 17.16: Property Development Standards Parking Space Requirements The applicant’s proposal provides 35 parking spaces. This is five more than the minimum standard requirement based on a parking ratio of one space per 300 square feet of commercial floor area for a general retail use. The applicant has also requested a parking reduction of 25% to accommodate future commercial tenants that may have higher parking requirements, such as restaurants, salons, etc. Providing extra parking spaces and securing a parking reduction during the initial entitlement of the project provides flexibility to allow the mix of businesses within the project to change without unnecessary delay or additional physical improvements. DISCUSSION Background On October 3, 2016 the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) held a meeting to review the proposed project at 1042 Olive Street. The applicant proposed to develop a 45-foot tall, four- story mixed-use project that includes commercial, hotel and a 25% mixed-use/shared parking reduction (described above). The ARC approved the project on a 3:2 vote with findings of Figure 1: Perspective view of the proposed project from Olive Street Packet Pg. 156 11 consistency with the Design Guidelines and applicable City policies and standards. The minutes from this meeting are included as Attachment E. Appeal On October 13, 2016, David Brodie filed an appeal of the ARC’s decision to approve the project. The appellant provided 21 bulleted comments expressing concerns regarding the project and its consistency with the applicable regulations and guidelines. (Attachment F, Appeal and Supplemental Letter). Staff has addressed the appellant’s comments by grouping the concerns into themes in the Project Analysis section below. PROJECT ANALYSIS Staff evaluated the appellant’s concerns in the context of the City’s General Plan, Zoning Code, and Community Design Guidelines. Based on the evaluation provided below, staff is recommending the City Council uphold the ARC’s decision and approve the project. Mixed-Use The proposed mixed-use project is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and with the City's Zoning Regulations as an allowed use within the CT zone. The project complies with the development standards and parking requirements for the project at this site. The appeal makes the assertion that “the project is not a hotel but designed to be a residential project for long term rental…”. The City’s Zoning Regulations define a Hotel (or Motel) as “a facility with guest rooms or suites, with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging; for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, personal services, etc. Also includes accessory guest facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities, accessory retail uses, etc.”. While the Zoning Regulations’ definition refers to additional services that may be provided in a hotel, these are not a requirement and the Design Guidelines do not provide language regarding design or amenities required of a hotel. This project has been reviewed by City departments as a hotel, including applicable building and fire code requirements. The City’s Zoning Regulations do not differentiate between short-term and extended stay hotels, which may have different designs and amenities to meet their patrons needs. However, in practice many hotels within the City offer long term stays (e.g. longer than 30 days). The City’s Municipal Code also provides a definition for “Hotel” in relation to the uniform transient occupancy tax ordinance (SLOMC Chapter 3.04). This definition states that hotels are structures designed for occupancy by transients 2, and “Transients” are defined as any person who 2 San Luis Obispo Municipal Code chapter 3.04.020 Definitions. A. “Hotel” means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodginghouse, roominghouse, apartment house, dormitory, public or private club, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location, or other similar structure or portion thereof. Packet Pg. 157 11 is entitled to occupancy for a period of 30 consecutive days or less 3. This would imply that at the time a guests stays in a hotel for longer than 30 days, they are no longer considered a transient, and therefore would be considered a resident living in a unit that is subject to the use regulations and density limitations of the Zoning Regulations. In addition, when a hotel room is occupied for more than 30 days, the ordinance provides for an exemption form for the otherwise applicable Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). In keeping with residential density standards for the C-T zone, the number of rooms used for guests who stay longer than 30 days must be consistent with the residential density provisions for the C-T zone. Residential density requirements would also apply to any possible conversion of the spaces into permanent residences, as well as use of hotel rooms for long term stays (e.g. longer than 30 days). A condition of approval has been added to the Resolution denying the appeal (Attachment A, Resolution to Deny the Appeal, Condition No. 6) to clarify residential density requirements, as follows. The building shall comply with residential density standards for any room, or groups of rooms, that are occupied by the same person, or persons, for a period lasting more than 30 consecutive days. Based on the size of the property and the residential density regulations of the C-T zone, the total number of hotel rooms in the project that can be occupied for longer than 30 days at any one time is six. Further details regarding land use policies, development standards and parking analysis are found in the attached ARC staff report (Attachment C). Design Objectives for Commercial Projects The project proposes a structure that is four stories with a flat roof (45 feet in height) in an area with two and three-story structures with varying roof pitches and overall heights. This includes a single-story structure to the south with a flat roof (approx. 15’), a single-story structure to the east with high walls and medium pitched roof (approx. 25’), two two-story structures to the west and southwest with a low pitched roof (approx. 30’), and a two-story structure to the north with a steep roof pitch (approx. 35’), as seen in Figure 2 below. While the proposed structure is taller than existing development, the Architectural Review Commission found the project consistent with the Community Design Guidelines, including Chapter 3.1 (A.1.)4, because the variations in scale of the surrounding neighborhood creates a context in which this height would be appropriate. Additionally, the proposed structure is set back from the street frontage and located 3 San Luis Obispo Municipal Code chapter 3.04.020 Definitions. G. “Transient” means any person who exercises occupancy or is entitled to occupancy by reason of concession, permit, right of access, license or other agreement for a period of thirty consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. Any such person so occupying space in a hotel shall be deemed to be a transient until the period of thirty days has expired unless there is an agreement in writing between the operator and the occupant providing for a longer period of occupancy. In determining whether a person is a transient, uninterrupted periods of time extending both prior and subsequent to the effective date of this chapter may be considered. 4 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 A. Overall design objectives for commercial projects. 1. Consider San Luis Obispo’s small town scale and demonstrate sensitivity to the design context of the surrounding area. Packet Pg. 158 11 in proximity to the tallest existing building, which is adjacent to the north property line. The project proposes a structure that has a modern architectural style that includes the use of rectilinear forms and offset wall planes. The Design Guidelines state that new development should “avoid “boxy” structures with large, flat wall planes by articulating building forms and elevations to create interesting rooflines, building shapes, and patterns of shade and shadow.”5 The proposed structure is consistent with the Design Guidelines because it includes wall offsets and setbacks that break up the rectilinear building form and provide varied shade and shadowing patterns along the building’s facades. The project site is located in a neighborhood that has been the home of several motels, inns and restaurants for many years, but the area is not designated as a historic neighborhood. The closest historic structure to the site is the Heritage Inn located at 978 Olive Street, 200 feet southwest from the proposed site. Therefore, the proposed structure, while different in architecture than those in the immediate area, does not negatively impact any historic significant structures or neighborhood6. 5 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 A. Overall design objectives for commercial projects. 6 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 A. Overall design objectives for commercial projects. 3. Preserve Figure 2: Images of structures within the surrounding neighborhood Packet Pg. 159 11 Architectural Style and Neighborhood Compatibility The surrounding neighborhood includes structures with an array of building heights (approximately 15-35 feet), materials, rooflines and design details. The Design Guidelines state that no particular architectural style or design theme is required in the City, and a wide range of architectural characteristics adds to the City’s overall image7. The proposed contemporary architecture of the project includes subtle design elements and characteristics that are found in surrounding buildings, such as flat roofs and the use of metal design elements, while also contributes a unique design that adds to the diversity of architecture found in the neighborhood. This is consistent with the Design Guidelines, which specifically state that certain “canned” or “trademark” building designs used by franchise businesses are discouraged4, and that each site should both maintain its own identity and be complimentary8. The only clearly cohesive building design among buildings in the immediate area is that of the Ramada and Budget Inn, which display a typical motel look in the design and layout of these buildings. To incorporate elements of these specific structures would detract from the neighborhood’s identity and architectural variety. Form and Mass The proposed structure meets the Design Guidelines’ language for form and mass9 through the use of articulation and design elements as discussed above in the Design Objectives for Commercial Projects Section. The articulated form is carried around all four sides of the structure through various wall offsets, different materials that vary in thickness and color. Human scale is provided through the use of elements that overhang the ground level store fronts, which give the effect of recessed entries, and larger retractable glass windows (Figure 3). the design integrity of architecturally or historically significant structures and neighborhoods adjacent to the commercial area. 7 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 B. General architectural design guidelines. 1. Architectural style. No particular architectural style or design theme is required in the City nor can San Luis Obispo be defined by any particular architectural style. A wide range of architectural characteristics adds to the City’s overall image. While variety in design is generally encouraged, the compatibility of new projects with the existing built environment should be a priority. The goal is to preserve not only the historic flavor of the community but, equally important, its scale and ambience. “Canned” or “trademark” building d esigns used by franchised businesses in other cities may not be acceptable in San Luis Obispo, as they can collectively have the effect of making the commercial areas of the City look like anywhere in California. 8 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 B. General architectural design guidelines. 2. Neighborhood compatibility. In designing a building, it is important to analyze the areas surrounding the building site to find elements of compatibility that can be used in a new design. Simply duplicating the character of surrounding buildings, however, should not be a design goal. It is important for each site to both maintain its own identity and be complementary to its surroundings. Thus, a new building can be unique and interesting and still show respect f or and compatibility with the architectural styles and scale of other buildings in its vicinity. 9 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 B. General architectural design guidelines. 4. Form and mass. A building’s design should provide a sense of human scale and proportion. Horizontal and vertical wall articulation should be expressed through the use of wall offsets, recessed windows and entries, awnings, full roofs with overhangs, second floor setbacks, or covered arcades. Packet Pg. 160 11 Building Materials and Colors The project proposes to use dark grey concrete blocks, white smooth finish plaster, charcoal colored metal panels, with other grey shades and matte black on similar materials. The rear of the building also features a green wall (vertical plantings) to grow on galvanized metal sections. The Design Guidelines state that “building materials shall be carefully chosen to enhance the consistency of the architectural theme and design.”10 The Design Guidelines call for materials that enhance the consistency of the architectural theme and design. The Design Guidelines do not state that materials need to be consistent with nearby development, just that they be consistent with the theme and design that the structure presents. These colors and materials are used to give interest and articulation to the structure, and are compatible with the colors and materials in the area. The colors of the proposed building were discussed by the ARC at their October 3, 2016 hearing, and a condition was modified that recommends “the applicant modify the proposed color palate to include additional and/or more muted colors” (Attachment D, ARC Resolution, Condition No. 7). Site Planning The Design Guidelines call for new development to demonstrate consideration for the existing conditions on and off site.11 The existing conditions are such that the surrounding developed properties, and their orientation to the project site, do not provide opportunities to create physical or visual links and do not create substantial concerns for privacy. The northerly and westerly properties are not oriented toward the subject property, as the walls near the property lines do not 10 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 B. General architectural design guidelines. 11 Community Design Guidelines chapter 3.1 C. Site planning. 1. Consider neighboring development. Each development proposal should demonstrate consideration for the existing conditions on and off the sit e Figure 3: Ground level commercial storefronts Packet Pg. 161 11 have primary windows or pedestrian spaces that are exposed to the property. Additionally, the property to the east has parking adjacent to the project, which is also physically separated by a block wall along the property line. These properties are oriented away from the subject property, which reduces privacy impacts and opportunities for linkages to surrounding development. Landscaping As part of the overall landscaping guidelines, the Design Guidelines state that landscaping should be integrated with the building design, enhance appearance and enjoyment of the project, and soften the visual impacts of buildings and paving.12 Planting of trees along streets in compliance with the City’s Tree Regulations is also required. The landscape design provides areas of planting along much of three of the four property lines, which provides screening for parking as well as a shading, and also softens the visual impact of the building as called for by the Design Guidelines. The building design also incorporates elements of vegetation into the structure itself. The ARC discussed the appropriateness of the proposed landscaping and added specific language about where more landscaping should be included as a condition of approval (Attachment D, ARC Resolution, Condition No. 14). Parking The Design Guidelines call for the visual impact of parking lots to be minimized b y locating parking towards a portion of the site that is least visible from the street and by providing adequate screening13. While the area closest to the street frontage is used for parking spaces, the project is consistent with this guideline because more than two thirds of the provided parking (24 of 35) is located to the rear of the lot. While parking areas are separated to meet this guideline, a condition is included (Attachment A, Resolution to Deny the Appeal, Condition No. 5) to ensure that this parking separation does not result in parking designated exclusively for the hotel or commercial tenants, and that all spaces are available to all tenants and uses on the site. The project also provides landscaping as screening for the parking located at the front of the lot. The ARC discussed the appropriateness of the proposed landscaping and added a specific condition regarding the addition of a landscape island in the front parking area to break up the line of parking (Attachment D, ARC Resolution, Condition No. 14). CONCURRENCES The project has been reviewed by Building, Fire, Public Works, and Utilities staff. Their comments have been incorporated into the resolution as conditions, where appropriate. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt under Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects; Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project is consistent with General Plan policies for the land use designation and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations . The project site occurs on a property of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses that has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, and can be 12 Community Design Guidelines chapter 6.2 A. Goals for landscaping. 13 Community Design Guidelines chapter 6.3 B. Siting and screening. Parking lots should not dominate street views of projects. Wherever possible, parking lots should be placed behind buildings. Packet Pg. 162 11 adequately served by all required utilities and public services. FISCAL IMPACT When the General Plan was prepared, it was accompanied by a fiscal impact analysis, which found that overall the General Plan was fiscally balanced. Accordingly, since the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, it has a neutral fiscal impact. There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of this project. ALTERNATIVE Approve the appeal, thereby denying the project. The Council can deny the project by upholding the appeal, based on findings of inconsistency with the Community Design Guidelines, and other applicable City regulations and policies (See Attachment B, Resolution to Uphold the Appeal). Attachments: a - Resolution to Deny the Appeal b - Resolution to Uphold the Appeal c - ARC Staff Report d - ARC Resolution e - ARC Minutes (10-3-16) f - Appeal and Supplemental Letter g - Project Description h - Project Plans Packet Pg. 163 11 R _______ RESOLUTION NO. __________ (2017 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL FILED BY DAVID BRODIE AND THEREBY APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW FOUR STORY MIXED-USE PROJECT INCLUDING GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE, 17 EXTENDED-STAY HOTEL ROOMS, AND A 25% MIXED-USE AND SHARED PARKING REDUCTION, WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, AS REPRESENTED IN THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED JANUARY 3, 2017 (1042 OLIVE STREET, APPL-4010-2016) WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on October 3, 2016, with a three-two vote approved the project, subject to the findings and conditions of ARC Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARCH-2946-2016, Garcia Family Trust, applicant; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, David Brodie, the appellant, filed an appeal of the Architectural Review Commission’s action on October 3, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on January 3, 2017, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under APPL-4010-2016, David Brodie, appellant; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the City Council makes the following findings to deny the appeal (APPL-4010-2016) of the Architectural Review Commission decision, thereby granting final approval to the project (ARCH-2946-2016): 1. The project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because the project complies with development standards for the Tourist Commercial (C-T) zone, including, but not limited to, standards for height, setbacks and lot coverage and is compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood comprised of restaurants, motels, and residential uses. Packet Pg. 164 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ 2. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for this location because the project proposes to construct a building that includes commercial and hotel uses that are allowed within the Tourist-Commercial zone. 3. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element policies 3.6.2 & 3.6.2 (Tourist Commercial Uses) and 3.8.5 (Mixed Uses), because the project provides a mix of uses within a commercial district that is appropriate and compatible with the existing neighborhood in close proximity to major transportation corridors, such as Highway one and 101, and transit opportunities along Santa Rosa Street. 4. The project design maintains consistency with the City’s Community Design Guidelines by providing architectural interest through the use of articulation and a variety of building materials, and an attractive style that includes, but is not limited to, flat roofs and metal design elements, which complements the character and scale of the existing neighborhood. 5. The proposed height, mass and scale of the project will not negatively impact the neighboring properties because the project respects the privacy of neighboring buildings and protects solar access through site planning and street-yard setback. 6. As conditioned, the 25% shared/mixed-use parking reduction for the project to reduce the required parking from 30 parking spaces to 23 parking spaces will not result in poor on-site circulation or adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood, because the hotel and commercial uses will have peak parking demand that will not coincide. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is categorically exempt under Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects; Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project is consistent with General Plan policies for the land use designation and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project site occurs on a property of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses that has no value as habitat for endangered, and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. SECTION 3. Action. The City Council does hereby deny the appeal of the Architectural Review Commission’s action to approve the proposed project, hereby granting final approval of the application ARCH-2946-2016 for a new four story Mixed-Use project including ground floor commercial/retail space, 17 Extended-stay hotel rooms, and a 25% shared/mixed-use parking reduction, subject to the following conditions: Conditions Planning 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in Packet Pg. 165 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ the defense against an Indemnified Claim. 2. Architectural approval of this project will expire after three years if construction has not started. On request, the Community Development Director may grant a single, one-year extension. 3. Final project design and construction drawings submitted for a building permit shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans approved by the ARC. A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that lists all conditions and code requirements of project approval listed as sheet number 2. Reference shall be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 4. The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining and updating the current parking calculation for the commercial component of the project upon the submittal of Planning and Building permits for tenant changes or improvements to ensure the site does not become under-parked, and to ensure compliance with the requirement that peak hours will not coincide between uses. 5. All onsite parking areas shall be open to the parking needs of both the hotel and commercial uses. No section of parking shall be exclusively designated/reserved for any specified tenants. 6. The building shall comply with residential density standards for any room, or groups of rooms, that are occupied by the same person, or persons, for a period lasting more than 30 consecutive days. 7. The applicant shall submit building plans that include a trash enclosure design that is finished with high quality materials to match the architecture of the project buildings which shall be fully screened from upper stories with a trellis or other horizontal cover; the design of the enclosure is subject to the Community Design Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 8. Plans submitted for a building permit shall call out the colors and materials of all proposed building surfaces and other improvements. Materials shall be consistent with the color and material board submitted with Architectural Review application. The ARC recommends that the applicant modify the proposed color palate to include additional and/or more muted colors. 9. The ARC recommends that the applicant explore the possibility of incorporating a public art installation to the proposed development. 10. Plans submitted for a building permit shall include window details indicating the type of materials for the window frames and mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall Packet Pg. 166 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surround recesses and other related window features. 11. Plans submitted for construction permits will include elevation and detail drawings of all walls and fences. Fences, walls, and hedges will comply with the development standards described in the Zoning Regulations (§17.16.050 –Fences, Walls, and Hedges). 12. The locations of all lighting, including bollard style landscaping or path lighting, shall be included in plans submitted for a building permit. All wall-mounted lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. All wall - mounted lighting shall complement building architecture. The lighting schedule for the building shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut-sheets on the submitted building plans. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to insure that light is directed downward consistent with the requirements of the City’s Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Chapter 17.23 of the Zoning Regulations. 13. Mechanical and electrical equipment shall be located internally to the building. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of the building, which clearly show the sizes of any proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment. If any condensers or other mechanical equipment is to be placed on the roof, plans submitted for a building permit shall confirm that parapets and other roof features will provide adequate screening. A line-of-sight diagram shall be included to confirm that proposed screening will be adequate. This condition applies to both initial project construction and later building modifications and improvements. 14. A final landscaping plan, including irrigation details and plans, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department along with working drawings. The legend for the landscaping plan shall include the sizes and species of all groundcovers, shrubs, and trees with corresponding symbols for each plant material showing their specific locations on plans. 15. The final landscaping plan shall incorporate additional landscaping, including tree types that provide full canopies near the street frontage parking spaces and a landscaped island in the front parking area to break up the line of parking. 16. Planters shall be placed after each six parking spaces in any row, and at the end of each row of parking spaces, in compliance with Parking and Driveway Standards Section 1.1 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 17. The location of any required backflow preventer and double-check assembly shall be shown on all site plans submitted for a building permit, including the landscaping plan. Construction plans shall also include a scaled diagram of the equipment proposed. Where possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, equipment shall be located inside the building within 20 feet of the front property line. Where this is not possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, the back flow preventer and double-check assembly shall be located in the street yard and screened using a combination of paint color, landscaping and, if deemed appropriate Packet Pg. 167 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ by the Community Development Director, a low wall. The size and configuration of such equipment shall be subject to review and approval by the Utilities and Community Development Directors. 18. Any proposed signs are subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department and subject to a sign permit. The Community Development Director shall refer signage to the ARC if signs need an exception or appear to be excessive in size or out of character with the project. 19. The subject property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner at all times; free of excessive leaves, branches, and other landscape material. The applicant shall be responsible for the clean-up of any landscape material in the public right-of-way. Engineering Division – Public Works/ Community Development 20. Projects involving the construction of a new structure requires that complete frontage improvements be installed or that existing improvements be upgraded per city standard. MC 12.16.050 21. A separate encroachment permit shall be required from Cal Trans for any construction or construction staging within or affecting the Cal Trans right-of-way. 22. The building plan submittal shall show and label the property line dimensions and bearings. The building footprint and required setbacks in accordance with the California Building Code shall honor the record property line dimensions and bearings unless an alternate measured dimension can be supported. 23. The building plan submittal shall show the new driveway approach to be upgraded to comply with current standards. The current city and ADA standard requires a 4’ accessible sidewalk extension behind the ramp. All other driveways are to be removed and replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalk per City Engineering Standards. 24. Development of the driveway and parking areas shall comply with the Parking and Driveway Standards for dimension, maneuverability, slopes, drainage, and materials. Alternate paving materials are recommended for water quantity and/or quality control purposes and in the area of existing or proposed trees and where the driveway or parking area may occur within the dripline of any tree. Alternate paving material shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 25. The building plan submittal shall show all required short-term and long-term bicycle parking per M.C. Section 17.16, Table 6.5, and in accordance with standards contained in the 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan, 2010 Community Design Guidelines, and any project specific conditions to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. Include details and detail references on the plans for the proposed bicycle parking facilities and/or racks. The building plans shall provide a detailed site plan of any racks. Show all dimensions and Packet Pg. 168 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ clearances to obstructions per city standard. 26. The building plan submittal shall include complete details of the secured bicycle storage area. Include any specialized rack designs and clearance in accordance with City Engineering Standards and Community Design Guidelines or as approved by the City. 27. The building plan submittal shall include a complete site utility plan. All existing and proposed utilities along with utility company meters shall be shown. Existing underground and overhead services shall be shown along with any proposed alterations or upgrades. The existing terminal joint pole shall be removed and services to the new structure shall be underground from the existing joint pole across Olive Street. All work in the public right-of- way shall be shown or noted. 28. The City shall review and approve the preliminary PG&E handout package prior to building permit issuance. The City shall review and approve the final PG&E handout package prior to building permit final. 29. The building plan submittal shall show the two existing monitoring wells to be abandoned per City Engineering Standards. 30. Provisions for trash, recycle, and green waste containment, screening, and collection shall be approved to the satisfaction of the City and San Luis Obispo Garbage Company. The respective refuse storage area and on-site conveyance shall consider convenience, aesthetics, safety, and functionality. The building plan submittal shall show the trash enclosure to be designed in accordance with City Engineering Standard 1010.B. 31. The building plan submittal shall include a complete grading and drainage plan. The grading and drainage plan shall show existing structures and grades located within 15’ of the property lines in accordance with the grading ordinance. The plan shall consider historic offsite drainage tributary to this property that may need to be accepted and conveyed along with the improved on-site drainage. This development may alter and/or increase the storm water runoff from this site or adjoining sites. The improved or altered drainage shall be directed to the street and not across adjoining property lines unless the drainage is conveyed within recorded easements or existing waterways. 32. The building plan submittal shall show compliance with the Post Construction Stormwater Requirements as promulgated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for newly developed sites. Include a complete Post Construction Stormwater Control Plan Template as available on the City’s Website. 33. The soils engineer shall review and provide specific recommendation regarding the proposed stormwater and drainage strategy. The soils report shall include infiltration testing to justify the proposed design. Otherwise provide additional storage volume in compliance with the post construction stormwater requirements. Packet Pg. 169 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ 34. An operations and maintenance manual will be required for the post construction stormwater improvements. The manual shall be provided at the time of building permit application and shall be accepted by the City prior to building permit issuance. A private stormwater conveyance agreement will be required and shall be recorded prior to final ins pection approvals. 35. This development shall comply with the Waterways Management Plan. The building plan submittal shall include a complete drainage report along with grading, drainage, and erosion control plans in accordance with the Waterways Management Plan Volume III, Drainage Design Manual. The drainage report shall include a summary response to all items in Section 2.3.1 of the manual. 36. The building plan submittal shall show all existing trees on the property with a trunk diameter of 3" or greater. Offsite trees along the adjoining property lines with canopies and/or root systems that extend onto the property shall be shown for reference. The plan shall note which trees are to remain and which trees are proposed for removal. Include the diameter and species of all trees. Tree canopies should generally be shown to scale for reference. The City supports the proposed palm tree removal with the proposed compensatory tree plantings. 37. The building plan submittal shall show new street trees in accordance with City Engineering Standards. One 15-gallon street tree is required for each 35 linear feet of frontage. New street tree plantings shall be located in the sidewalk area in tree wells in accordance with city engineering standard #8130 which includes a decorative metal tree grate. Utilities Department 38. The property’s existing sewer lateral to the point of connection at the City main must pass a pipeline video inspection (visual inspection of the interior of the pipeline), including repair or replacement, as part of the project. The pipeline video inspection shall be submitted during the Building Permit Review Process for review and approval by the Utilities Department prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Additional information is provided below related to this requirement:  The pipeline video inspection shall be submitted on USB drive and shall be in color.  The inspection shall be of adequate resolution in order to display pipe.  Material submitted shall include the project address and a scaled plan of the building and the lateral location to the connection at the City sewer main.  The inspection shall include tracking of the pipeline length (in feet) from the start of the inspection to the connection at the City sewer main.  It is optional to provide audio on the report to explain the location, date of inspection, and pipeline condition observations. Code Requirements 1. Potable city water shall not be used for major construction activities, such as grading and dust Packet Pg. 170 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ control, as required under Prohibited Water Uses; Chapter 17.07.070.C of the City’s Municipal Code. Recycled water is available through the City’s Construction Water Permit program. Upon Motion of ___________, seconded by _____________, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was adopted this ___________day of ___________ 2017. ______________________________ Mayor Heidi Harmon ATTEST: ______________________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ________________________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, this _______day or ______________, _________. ______________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk Packet Pg. 171 11 R ______ RESOLUTION NO. __________ (2017 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING AN APPEAL FILED BY DAVID BRODIE THEREBY DENYING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW FOUR STORY MIXED-USE PROJECT INCLUDING GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE, 17 EXTENDED-STAY HOTEL ROOMS, AND A 25% MIXED-USE AND SHARED PARKING REDUCTION, WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, AS REPRESENTED IN THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED JANUARY 3, 2017 (1042 OLIVE STREET, APPL-4010-2016) WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on October 3, 2016, with a three-two vote approved the project, subject to the finding and conditions of ARC Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARCH-2946-2016, Garcia Family Trust, applicant; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, David Brodie, the appellant, filed an appeal of the Architectural Review Commission’s action on October 3, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on January 3, 2017, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under APPL-4010-2016, David Brodie, appellant; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the City Council makes the following findings to deny the appeal (APPL-4010-2016) of the Architectural Review Commission decision, thereby granting final approval to the project (ARCH-2946-2016), based on the following findings: 1. The project design is inconsistent with the City’s Community Design Guidelines because the architectural style, character, and scale are incompatible with the neighborhood and adjacent development. 2. That the proposed project height is inconsistent with the Community Design Guidelines Packet Pg. 172 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ because the project’s height and scale does not provide a smooth transition between the immediate neighborhood of predominantly one and two story buildings and the proposed development would create an abrupt discrepancy in height and massing and overwhelm the neighboring properties. 3. The proposed height, mass and scale of the project will negatively impact the neighboring properties because the project does not respect the privacy of neighboring buildings and protect solar access. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is statutorily exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15270 (Projects which are disapproved). SECTION 3. Action. Based on the above findings and evidence submitted in support thereof, the City Council does hereby deny application ARCH-2946-2016. Upon Motion of ___________, seconded by _____________, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was adopted this ___________day of ___________ 2017. ______________________________ Mayor Heidi Harmon ATTEST: ______________________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ________________________________________ J. Christine Dietrick Packet Pg. 173 11 Resolution No. ______________ (2017 Series) R ______ City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, this _______day or ______________, _________. ______________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk Packet Pg. 174 11 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: Architectural review of a new four story mixed-use building including ground floor commercial/retail space, and 17 extended stay hotel rooms. Include a request for a mixed use/shared parking reduction of 25%, with a categorical exemption from environmental review. PROJECT ADDRESS: 1042 Olive Street BY: Kyle Van Leeuwen, Planning Technician Phone Number: (805) 781-7091 e-mail: kvanleeuwen@slocity.org FILE NUMBER: ARCH-2946-2016 VIA: Tyler Corey, Principal Planner FROM: Doug Davidson, Deputy Director RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Draft Resolution (Attachment 1) which approves the project, based on findings, and subject to conditions. SITE DATA Applicant Garcia Family Trust Complete Date August 11, 2016 Zoning C-T General Plan Tourist Commercial Site Area 0.515 acres (22,454 s.f.) Environmental Status Categorically Exempt from environmental review under Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. SUMMARY The applicant, Garcia Family Trust, is proposing to construct a new four story building with commercial/retail at the ground level (3,512 sq. ft.) and 17 extended stay hotel rooms with parking located in front and behind the building in the C-T (Tourist Commercial) zone. The project has been designed to be consistent with the Community Design Guidelines (CDG). The proposal includes a request for a shared/mixed-use parking reduction of 25%, which reduces the required parking from 30 spaces to 23 parking spaces. 1.0 COMMISSION’S PURVIEW The ARC’s role is to review the project in terms of its consistency with the Community Design Guidelines and applicable City policies and standards. Meeting Date: October 3, 2016 Item Number: 3 Packet Pg. 175 11 ARCH-2964-2016 1042 Olive Street Page 2 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 Site Information/Setting Site Size 22,454 sq. ft. (0.515 acres) Present Use & Development Vacant Lot Land Use Designation Tourist Commercial (C-T) Topography Elevation: Min. 221.7 feet; Max. 224.1 ft. Slope: 4% Access From Olive Street Surrounding Use/Zoning North: C-T (Motel & Residential) East: C-T (Restaurant) South: C-T (Restaurant & Hotel) West: C-T (Hotel) 2.2 Project Description A summary of the significant project features is included below (Attachment 3, Project Description): 1. Development: New four story mixed use building (23,967 sq. ft.), with surface parking consisting of 9 covered and 26 uncovered spaces.  17 extended-stay hotel rooms  Three commercial/retail tenant spaces totaling 3,512 square feet  45-foot maximum height (53 feet for architectural features)  Fourth-floor common area  25% shared/mixed-use parking reduction, creating 12 extra spaces to accommodate future tenants with varying parking requirements 2. Design: Modern/Contemporary style that includes the following materials;  Cement plaster, Metal panels & Stained wood siding  CMU Block  Aluminum storefront system 2.3 Project Statistics Item Proposed 1 Standard 2 Setbacks Street Yard 53 feet (main structure) 10 feet Other Yards 0 feet Same as adjacent (0 feet) Max. Height of Structure(s) 45 feet 45 feet Max. Building Coverage (footprint) 36% 75% Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) 1.02 2.5 Parking Spaces 35 30 Notes: 1. Applicant’s project plans submitted 7/21/2016 2. Zoning Regulations 3.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS The proposed development must be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, and applicable design standards of the Community Design Guidelines (CDG). Staff has evaluated the project’s consistency with relevant requirements and has found it to be in substantial compliance, as discussed in this analysis. Packet Pg. 176 11 ARCH-2964-2016 1042 Olive Street Page 3 3.1 Consistency with Community Design Guidelines The CDG state that site planning for commercial projects should consider neighboring development, the location of buildings and parking, landscaping, and appropriate screening, as well as the location of refuse, storage and equipment area (CDG, Chapter 3.1C). Neighboring development: The project site is bordered by two story structures that are built directly adjacent to the north and west property lines, with the property to the east consisting of a small single-story building setback from the property line. The massing of these structures do not contribute to a cohesive pattern for the area. This is particularly evident when looking at the north property line where the massing of the apartment building and the existing motel are clearly inconstant, giving the apartment building the appearance of a three-story structure. This non-cohesive massing of neighboring development would not preclude the introduction of a four story structure to the area. The proposed project will not impede on privacy or solar access for the neighboring properties because the existing buildings adjacent to the property line do not contain primary windows, balconies or usable yard area that would be directly blocked by the orientation of the project on the subject property. Site Plan: The CDG calls for the visual impact of parking lots to be minimized by locating parking towards a portion of the site that is least visible from the street and providing adequate screening. While the area closest to the street frontage is used for parking spaces, more than two thirds of the provided parking (24 of 35) is located to the rear of the lot. This site plan layout provides for easily discernable parking availability for the commercial spaces and screens the remainder of the parking, which will primarily serve the hotel patrons. Trash/recycling enclosures: The CDG calls for refuse containers to be located so that their use does not interfere with circulation or parking areas, and for their locations to be out of view. The site plan calls out the location of the trash enclosure to the left of the vehicular entrance to the site, 10-feet from the property line. While the location of the enclosure meets the minimum setback requirements, the proposed location is not consistent with the intent of the CDG. Conditions No. 5 has been included in the Draft Resolution which requires a 25-foot setback for the trash enclosure and requires the enclosure be covered as to avoid direct visibility of refuse containers from upper floors of the proposed structure. Building Design: The CDG state that variety in design is encourage within the City, with compatibility to the existing built environment as a priority. It is important for each commercial site to create its own identity and be complimentary to its surroundings. Building materials should be consistent in quality and detailing throughout all elevations that enhance the architectural Figure 1: Buildings at north property line Packet Pg. 177 11 ARCH-2964-2016 1042 Olive Street Page 4 theme and design (CDG, Chapter 3.1B). The project architecture is a modern/contemporary style with strong use of vertical and horizontal rectilinear forms. The project makes use of significant articulation and projections with building forms and architectural details. This includes a variety of building materials, such as smooth plaster and metal panels on the upper floor elevations, and primarily dark grey colored concrete masonry units (CMU) for the lower floor. The structure demonstrates a consistent use of colors, materials, and detailing throughout all elevations of the building that are visually interesting and receive interesting architectural treatments. Parking: The applicant is requesting a 25% shared/mixed-use parking reduction. To achieve the requested 25% parking reduction, the project must meet findings that all uses will share parking areas and that the times of maximum parking demand from various uses will not coincide. The project meets the requirement for a shared and mixed-use parking reduction because the project includes commercial and hotel uses and it is anticipated that the times of peak parking demand would not coincide. A 25% parking reduction would reduce the number of required spaces to 23 spaces. However, the total number of parking spaces provided is 35. These additional spaces will allow for flexibility in accommodating future tenants of the commercial spaces, as some allowed uses would require that more parking be provided. Staff has provided findings for approval of the requested parking reduction and recommends the following conditions of approval. These conditions include a requirement that the property owner must submit a running total of the site’s parking requirements with the submittal of any building permit for tenant improvements, and/or each business license (Condition #3). In addition, the parking that is located to the rear of the property will need to be available to the commercial units. A condition prohibiting the exclusive use of this parking for the hotel portion has been included (Condition #4). 3.2 Consistency with General Plan and Zoning Regulations The project is zoned Tourist-Commercial (C-T). The project must be consistent with applicable property development standards of the C-T zone and must also be consistent with General Plan Policies. The project is consistent with applicable property development standards of the C-T zone in terms of height, setbacks, and lot dimensions, and staff has found the project consistent with the following Land Use Element Policies: LU 3.6.2: Basis for Tourism: The City shall promote San Luis Obispo as an attractive place for short-term stays, as well as an attractive destination for long-term visitors featuring its community character, natural qualities, historic resources, and its educational and cultural facilities. The City should emphasize conference and visitor-serving facilities which have a low impact upon the environment and upon existing land forms and landscapes, and which provide low-impact visitor activities and low-impact means of transportation. LU 3.6.2. Locations: The City shall encourage integration of visitor-serving uses with other types of uses, including overnight accommodations Downtown, near the airport, and near the train station… Visitor-serving uses are especially appropriate where such uses have already concentrated: along upper Monterey Street; at the Madonna Road area; at certain freeway Packet Pg. 178 11 ARCH-2964-2016 1042 Olive Street Page 5 interchanges; and in the Downtown. Land Use Element Policy, LU 3.8.5. Mixed Uses. The City encourages compatible mixed uses in commercial districts. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt under Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects; Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project is consistent with General Plan policies for the land use designation and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project site occurs on a property of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses that has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened s pecies as the site is located in an area with existing developed properties. 5.0 OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS The requirements of the other departments are reflected in the attached Draft Resolution as conditions of approval and code requirements, where appropriate. 6.0 ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION 6.1. Continue the project with direction to the applicant and staff on pertinent issues. 6.2. Deny the project based on findings of inconsistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, Community Design Guidelines, or other applicable City policies and standards. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Project Description 3. Reduced Project Plans Included in Commission member portfolio: project plans Available at ARC hearing: color/materials board Packet Pg. 179 11 RESOLUTION NO. ARC-1026-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW FOUR STORY MIXED-USE PROJECT INCLUDING GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL/RETAIL SPACE, 17 EXTENDED-STAY HOTEL ROOMS, A 25% MIXED-USE AND SHARED PARKING REDUCTION WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, AS REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED OCTOBER 3, 2016, 1042 OLIVE STREET (ARCH-2946-2016) WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on October 3, 2016, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARCH-2946- 2016, Garcia Family Trust, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing, and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Architectural Review Commission hereby grants final approval to the project (ARCH-2946-2016), based on the following findings: 1. The project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because the project will be compatible with site constraints and the scale and character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for this location since the project proposes to construct a building that includes commercial and hotel uses that can be utilized for such uses within the Tourist-Commercial zone. 3. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element policies 3.6.2 & 3.6.2 (Tourist Commercial Uses) and 3.8.5 (Mixed Uses), because the project provides a mix of uses within a commercial district that is appropriate and compatible with the existing neighborhood in close proximity to major transportation corridors and transit opportunities. 4. The project design maintains consistency with the City’s Community Design Guidelines by providing architectural interest and an attractive style which complements the character and scale of the existing neighborhood. Packet Pg. 180 11 Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 ARCH-2946-2016 (1042 Olive Street) Page 2 5. The proposed height, mass and scale of the project will not negatively alter the overall character of the neighborhood or the streets appearance because the project involves the development of a vacant lot, which will not result in a negative impact on the neighboring properties in terms of privacy or solar exposure. 6. As conditioned, the 25% shared/mixed-use parking reduction for the project to reduce the required parking from 30 parking spaces to 23 parking spaces will not result in poor on-site circulation or adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood, because the hotel and commercial uses will have peak parking demand that will not coincide. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is categorically exempt under Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects; Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project is consistent with General Plan policies for the land use designation and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project site occurs on a property of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses that has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species as the site is located in an area with existing developed properties. SECTION 3. Action. The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) hereby grants final design approval to the project with incorporation of the following conditions: Conditions Planning 1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim. 2. Final project design and construction drawings submitted for a building permit shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans approved by the ARC. A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that lists all conditions and code requirements of project approval listed as sheet number 2. Reference shall be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 3. The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining and updating the current parking calculation for the commercial component of the project upon the submittal of Planning and Building permits for tenant changes or improvements to ensure the site does not become Packet Pg. 181 11 Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 ARCH-2946-2016 (1042 Olive Street) Page 3 under-parked, and to ensure compliance with the requirement that peak hours will not coincide between uses. 4. All onsite parking areas shall be open to the parking needs of both the hotel and commercial uses. No section of parking shall be exclusively designated/reserved for any specified tenants. 5. The applicant shall submit building plans that include a trash enclosure that shall be designed and finished with high quality materials to match the architecture of the project buildings which shall be fully screened from upper stories with a trellis or other horizontal cover; the design of the enclosure is subject to the Community Design Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 6. Plans submitted for a building permit shall call out the colors and materials of all proposed building surfaces and other improvements. Materials shall be consistent with the color and material board submitted with Architectural Review application. The ARC recommends that the applicant modify the proposed color palate to include additional and/or more muted colors. 7. The ARC recommends that the applicant explore the possibility of incorporating a public art installation to the proposed development. 8. Plans submitted for a building permit shall include window details indicating the type of materials for the window frames and mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surround recesses and other related window features. 9. Plans submitted for construction permits will include elevation and detail drawings of all walls and fences. Fences, walls, and hedges will comply with the development standards described in the Zoning Regulations (§17.16.050 –Fences, Walls, and Hedges). 10. The locations of all lighting, including bollard style landscaping or path lighting, shall be included in plans submitted for a building permit. All wall-mounted lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. All wall- mounted lighting shall complement building architecture. The lighting schedule for the building shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut-sheets on the submitted building plans. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to insure that light is directed downward consistent with the requirements of the City’s Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Chapter 17.23 of the Zoning Regulations. 11. Mechanical and electrical equipment shall be located internally to the building. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of the building, which clearly show the sizes of any proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment. If any condensers or other mechanical equipment is to be placed on the roof, plans submitted for a building permit shall confirm that parapets and other roof features will provide adequate Packet Pg. 182 11 Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 ARCH-2946-2016 (1042 Olive Street) Page 4 screening. A line-of-sight diagram shall be included to confirm that proposed screening will be adequate. This condition applies to both initial project construction and later building modifications and improvements. 12. A final landscaping plan, including irrigation details and plans, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department along with working drawings. The legend for the landscaping plan shall include the sizes and species of all groundcovers, shrubs, and trees with corresponding symbols for each plant material showing their specific locations on plans. 13. The final landscaping plan shall incorporate additional landscaping, including tree types that provide full canopies near the street frontage parking spaces and a landscaped island in the front parking area to break up the line of parking. 14. The location of any required backflow preventer and double-check assembly shall be shown on all site plans submitted for a building permit, including the landscaping plan. Construction plans shall also include a scaled diagram of the equipment proposed. Where possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, equipment shall be located inside the building within 20 feet of the front property line. Where this is not possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, the back flow preventer and double-check assembly shall be located in the street yard and screened using a combination of paint color, landscaping and, if deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, a low wall. The size and configuration of such equipment shall be subject to review and approval by the Utilities and Community Development Directors. 15. Any proposed signs are subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department and subject to a sign permit. The Community Development Director shall refer signage to the ARC if signs need an exception or appear to be excessive in size or out of character with the project. 16. The subject property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner at all times; free of excessive leaves, branches, and other landscape material. The applicant shall be responsible for the clean-up of any landscape material in the public right-of-way. Engineering Division – Public Works/ Community Development 17. Projects involving the construction of a new structure requires that complete frontage improvements be installed or that existing improvements be upgraded per city standard. MC 12.16.050 18. A separate encroachment permit shall be required from Cal Trans for any construction or construction staging within or affecting the Cal Trans right-of-way. 19. The building plan submittal shall show and label the property line dimensions and bearings. The building footprint and required setbacks in accordance with the California Building Code shall honor the record property line dimensions and bearings unless an alternate measured Packet Pg. 183 11 Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 ARCH-2946-2016 (1042 Olive Street) Page 5 dimension can be supported. 20. The building plan submittal shall show the new driveway approach to be upgraded to comply with current standards. The current city and ADA standard requires a 4’ accessible sidewalk extension behind the ramp. All other driveways are to be removed and replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalk per City Engineering Standards. 21. Development of the driveway and parking areas shall comply with the Parking and Driveway Standards for dimension, maneuverability, slopes, drainage, and materials. Alternate paving materials are recommended for water quantity and/or quality control purposes and in the area of existing or proposed trees and where the driveway or parking area may occur within the dripline of any tree. Alternate paving material shall be approved to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. 22. The building plan submittal shall show all required short-term and long-term bicycle parking per M.C. Section 17.16, Table 6.5, and in accordance with standards contained in the 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan, 2010 Community Design Guidelines, and any project specific conditions to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. Include details and detail references on the plans for the proposed bicycle parking facilities and/or racks. The building plans shall provide a detailed site plan of any racks. Show all dimensions and clearances to obstructions per city standard. 23. The building plan submittal shall include complete details of the secured bicycle storage area. Include any specialized rack designs and clearance in accordance with City Engineering Standards and Community Design Guidelines or as approved by the City. 24. The building plan submittal shall include a complete site utility plan. All existing and proposed utilities along with utility company meters shall be shown. Existing underground and overhead services shall be shown along with any proposed alterations or upgrades. The existing terminal joint pole shall be removed and services to the new structure shall be underground from the existing joint pole across Olive Street. All work in the public right-of- way shall be shown or noted. 25. The City shall review and approve the preliminary PG&E handout package prior to building permit issuance. The City shall review and approve the final PG&E handout package prior to building permit final. 26. The building plan submittal shall show the two existing monitoring wells to be abandoned per City Engineering Standards. 27. Provisions for trash, recycle, and green waste containment, screening, and collection shall be approved to the satisfaction of the City and San Luis Obispo Garbage Company. The respective refuse storage area and on-site conveyance shall consider convenience, aesthetics, safety, and functionality. The building plan submittal shall show the trash enclosure to be designed in accordance with City Engineering Standard 1010.B. Packet Pg. 184 11 Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 ARCH-2946-2016 (1042 Olive Street) Page 6 28. The building plan submittal shall include a complete grading and drainage plan. The grading and drainage plan shall show existing structures and grades located within 15’ of the property lines in accordance with the grading ordinance. The plan shall consider historic offsite drainage tributary to this property that may need to be accepted and conveyed along with the improved on-site drainage. This development may alter and/or increase the storm water runoff from this site or adjoining sites. The improved or altered drainage shall be directed to the street and not across adjoining property lines unless the drainage is conveyed within recorded easements or existing waterways. 29. The building plan submittal shall show compliance with the Post Construction Stormwater Requirements as promulgated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for redeveloped sites. Include a complete Post Construction Stormwater Control Plan Template as available on the City’s Website. 30. The soils engineer shall review and provide specific recommendation regarding the proposed stormwater and drainage strategy. The soils report shall include infiltration testing to justify the proposed design. Otherwise provide additional storage volume in compliance with the post construction stormwater requirements. 31. An operations and maintenance manual will be required for the post construction stormwater improvements. The manual shall be provided at the time of building permit application and shall be accepted by the City prior to building permit issuance. A private stormwater conveyance agreement will be required and shall be recorded prior to final inspection approvals. 32. This development shall comply with the Waterways Management Plan. The building plan submittal shall include a complete drainage report along with grading, drainage, and erosion control plans in accordance with the Waterways Management Plan Volume III, Drainage Design Manual. The drainage report shall include a summary response to all items in Section 2.3.1 of the manual. 33. The building plan submittal shall show all existing trees on the property with a trunk diameter of 3" or greater. Offsite trees along the adjoining property lines with canopies and/or root systems that extend onto the property shall be shown for reference. The plan shall note which trees are to remain and which trees are proposed for removal. Include the diameter and species of all trees. Tree canopies should generally be shown to scale for reference. The City supports the proposed palm tree removal with the proposed compensatory tree plantings. 34. The building plan submittal shall show new street trees in accordance with City Engineering Standards. One 15 gallon street tree is required for each 35 linear feet of frontage. New street tree plantings shall be located in the sidewalk area in tree wells in accordance with city engineering standard #8130 which includes a decorative metal tree grate. Packet Pg. 185 11 Resolution No. ARC-1026-16 ARCH-2946-2016 (1042 Olive Street) Page 7 Utilities Department 35. The property’s existing sewer lateral to the point of connection at the City main must pass a pipeline video inspection (visual inspection of the interior of the pipeline), including repair or replacement, as part of the project. The pipeline video inspection shall be submitted during the Building Permit Review Process for review and approval by the Utilities Department prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Additional information is provided below related to this requirement:  The pipeline video inspection shall be submitted on USB drive and shall be in color.  The inspection shall be of adequate resolution in order to display pipe.  Material submitted shall include the project address and a scaled plan of the building and the lateral location to the connection at the City sewer main.  The inspection shall include tracking of the pipeline length (in feet) from the start of the inspection to the connection at the City sewer main.  It is optional to provide audio on the report to explain the location, date of inspection, and pipeline condition observations. Code Requirements 1. Potable city water shall not be used for major construction activities, such as grading and dust control, as required under Prohibited Water Uses; Chapter 17.07.070.C of the City’s Municipal Code. Recycled water is available through the City’s Construction Water Permit program. Information on the program is available at: http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=5909 On motion by Commissioner Root, seconded by Chair Wynn, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Root, Vice-Chair Ehdaie, and Chair Wynn NOES: Commissioners Nemcik and Soll REFRAIN: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day of October, 2016. _____________________________ Doug Davidson, Secretary Architectural Review Commission Packet Pg. 186 11 Minutes ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION Monday, October 3, 2016 Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order on Monday, October 3rd, 2016 at 5:02 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Greg Wynn. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Amy Nemcik, Allen Root, Angela Soll, Vice-Chair Suzan Ehdaie, and Chair Greg Wynn Absent: None Staff: Community Development Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Associate Planner Rebecca Gershow, Assistant Planner Kyle Bell, Planning Technician Kyle Van Leeuwen, and Recording Secretary Brad T. Opstad Chair Wynn noted the two remaining Commission seat vacancies and informed that a recommendation had been forwarded to City Council for deliberation on at least one of the replacements. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Donald Hedrick, San Luis Obispo, discussed degradation of a tourist-destination starting with a lack of sensitivity by developers to the City’s historic value. PRESENTATIONS P1. Leadership SLO Water Wise Demonstration Garden Presentation of a drought-tolerant demonstration garden designed and installed on Morro Street by volunteers from Leadership SLO Class 24. City Associate Planner Gershow represented Leadership SLO Class #24 from 2015 in presenting the Demonstration Garden legacy project across from the Utilities Department on Morro Street. Chair Wynn provided suggestions for informational signage for the project. Packet Pg. 187 11 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission for October 3, 2016 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 870 Industrial Way. ARCH-3144-2016: Review of a new two story industrial building that includes 30,275 square-feet of industrial/warehousing space and a 10% parking reduction to accommodate the expansion of the existing business, with a categorical exemption from environmental review; M-S zone; Dave Schlossberg, applicant. Associate Planner Bell presented the staff report, previewing the two-story industrial building expansion and provided PowerPoint presentation with project description, contextual map, and design renderings. Commissioner Root inquired about the performance history of the bicycle parking spaces provided for projects, which proposes them toward parking reduction requests. Chair Wynn referenced Condition #24 and inquired about the proposed use of ex isting private water well; inquired about the noise generation from within the facility as it pertains to a roll-up door on an installation room as opened toward neighboring residences. Commissioner Soll requested viewing of the landscape plan in ensurin g that the requisite number of trees would be planted in the parking area. APPLICANT PRESENTATION Thom Jess, Arris Studio Architects, and Dave Schlossberg, owner of Poly Performance, Inc., discussed the vacant portion of the current business site devoted to its proposed expansion. Commissioner Root inquired whether there would be any mechanized communication system, such as a conveyor, between the operation’s two buildings. In response to Chair Wynn’s inquiry, Director Davidson suggested that the conflict over whether or not an elevator was a Condition of Approval would be best handled by adding the words “or as approved by the Chief Building Official” to Code Requirement #2. PUBLIC COMMENT Donald Hedrick, San Luis Obispo, spoke as a resident neighboring project site; indicated that the Commercial-Industrial Zone in development has created a streetscape in which there is insufficient lighting; spoke in favor of the project. COMMISSION DELIBERATION AND DISCUSSION In response to Chair Wynn’s inquiry, Associate Planner Bell pointed out that the examples existed of access to private wells being used for landscape watering specifically; indicated that reclaimed water would have been required, had it been more immediately available to the site. Packet Pg. 188 11 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission for October 3, 2016 Page 3 Chair Wynn and Commissioners Root, Soll & Nemcik spoke in the support of encouraging Applicant to consider further articulation to the long, flat walls. Owner Schlossberg discussed having employed high, unadorned windows for allowing increased natural light. ACTION: UPON MOTION BY VICE-CHAIR EHDAIE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NEMCIK, the Architectural Review Commission adopted the Draft Resolution which approves the project, with the following amendments: A.) Code Requirement #2 to read: “Elevator access shall be provided to the second floor offices in accordance with CBC 11-B-206.2.3 or as approved by the Chief Building Official.” B.) Condition #8 to read: “Plans submitted for a building permit shall include window details indicating the type of materials for the window frames and mullions, their dimensions, and colors. The Applicant is encouraged to provide additional articulation along the elevations of the building. Plans shall include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds recesses and other related window features.” on the following 5:0:0:0 vote: AYES: Ehdaie, Nemcik, Root, Soll, Wynn NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 2. 1144 Chorro Street. ARCH-3773-2016: Review of modifications to a previously approved remodel of an existing commercial structure (ARCH-1376-2015) which includes a request for a marquee sign and other exceptions from the Sign Regulations, with a categorical exemption from environmental review; C-D-H zone; Discovery San Luis Obispo, applicant. Associate Planner Bell provided staff report on the proposed modifications to the commercial storefront; displayed PowerPoint slides which included background of the project review process by both the Cultural Heritage Committee and the Architectural Review Commission; presented two (2) Discussion Items pertaining to the proposed sign package modifications. Chair Wynn suggested referring to the multiple signs in proposal by numbers to mitigate confusion in discussion. APPLICANT PRESENTATION Jeremy Pemberton, Managing Partner of Discovery, and Scott Martin, RRM Design Group, discussed the operational design of the of the project and the inclusion of the functional marquee sign in the proposal. Packet Pg. 189 11 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission for October 3, 2016 Page 4 PUBLIC COMMENT David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, discussed how providing exceptions for the marquee signage can only lead to unwelcome precedents being set; informed that Save Our Downtown supports Staff’s recommendation to reduce number of signs in conformance with Sign Regulations. Camille Small, San Luis Obispo, advocated for the citizenry to be able to hold on to that “degree of special” that SLO possesses; voiced that she considers it audacious to compare proposed marquee sign to that of the iconic Fremont Theatre. COMMISSION DELIBERATION AND DISCUSSION Commissioner Nemcik commented favorably on the laser cutout of corten metal panel and less favorably on the backlit faux-marquee element. Commissioner Root suggested making the bowling ball & music notes logo more discrete; commented on scale of raised letters of word “Discovery” and suggested its reduction by 30%. Commissioner Soll commented that proposed signage does create a modicum of clutter when considered cumulatively. Vice-Chair Ehdaie inquired whether marquee sign was allowed under Community Design Guidelines or Land Use Ordinance. Chair Wynn voiced disagreement with Public Comment that approving marquee sign would grant special privilege to Applicant; commented that extension of the marquee’s underside could create an integrated solidity which would aesthetically enhance the streetscape; proposed Conditioning the LED lighting of the illuminated backdrop of faux-marquee to be dimmable. Applicant Representative Martin displayed a PowerPoint slide of another of the Applicant’s Discovery venues with an alternatively-scaled “Discovery” sign. The Commissioners voiced varying opinions on the appropriate dimensions for the marquee’s projection. ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROOT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SOLL, the Architectural Review Commission adopted the Draft Resolution which approves the project, with the following amendments: A.) Finding #5 to read: “The proposed marquee sign is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Sign Regulations and will not result in visual clutter or constitute a grant of special privilege toward the property or those in the vicinity, because the sign is of a superior design specific to the concert venue which is typical of other theater-like uses and is architecturally compatible with affected structures and the character of surrounding development. The marquee sign in this location is appropriate because it identifies a separate concert venue, one that sells tickets and is located on a downtown side street.” Packet Pg. 190 11 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission for October 3, 2016 Page 5 B.) Condition #4 to read: “Plans submitted for a building permit shall eliminate the Raised Logo sign over the entrance of the business along the Chorro Street elevation, and may be replaced with two pedestrian scale signs at the main entry, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. C.) Condition #5 to read: “Tenant signage shall be limited to a maximum of six signs for all types of signs, including pedestrian scale logo signs, sandwich-board signs or larger window signs (excluding the Marquee sign).” D.) Condition #6 to read: Plans submitted for a building permit shall limit the projection of the Marquee sign to be no more than six feet and six inches over the width of the public sidewalk; the underside of the Marquee sign shall be solid and substantially integrated with the building to the ceiling of the recessed entry, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Chief Building Official. E.) Newly crafted Condition #7 to read: “The Raised Letter sign (Discovery) shall be reduced in size to 75% of what has been proposed with the submitted project plans dated August 31, 2016, approximately 66 square feet.” F.) Condition #8, formerly Condition #7, to read: “Plans submitted for a sign permit shall call out the colors and materials of signage and shall clearly indicate which portions of the signs do/do not illuminate. All proposed exterior illumination including signage and the transom window panels shall be designed to be dimmable with appropriate colors consistent with Chapter 17.23 of the Zoning Regulations (Night Sky Preservation), to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The portion of the marquee sign that is the marquee shall not be internally illuminated or resemble an illumination style such as a cabinet sign which is prohibited downtown. G.) With newly crafted and inserted Conditions, Condition #9 is the former Condition #8, and so forth. on the following 5:0:0:0 vote: AYES: Root, Soll, Nemcik, Ehdaie, Wynn NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Chair Wynn instituted five-minute recess. 3. 1042 Olive Street. ARCH-2946-2016: Architectural review of a new four story mixed-use building including ground floor commercial/retail space, and 17 extended stay hotel rooms, including a request for a mixed use and shared parking reduction of 25%, with a categorical exemption from environmental review; C-T zone; Garcia Family Trust, applicant. Director Davidson introduced Technician Van Leeuwen who provided Staff Report on the proposed development on the vacant site. Commissioner Nemcik inquired about the relocation of the trash enclosure. In response to Vice-Chair Ehdaie’s inquiry, Director Davidson clarified that the parking statistics, Packet Pg. 191 11 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission for October 3, 2016 Page 6 in which the provisioned number of spaces exceed what is allowed, build in a flexibility for future Uses that might require more parking. Chair Wynn inquired about the potential offset for vertical-height tree growth outside of the parking area. APPLICANT PRESENTATION George Garcia, project architect, provided clarification on the trash enclosure being located in an area to better accommodate trash company loaders; discussed background of design process and displayed PowerPoint renderings of the project. Commissioner Root inquired about the intended user market for the extended-stay concept. Commissioner Soll inquired about the street trees on the site. Vice-Chair Ehdaie inquired about the building access for overnight occupants; inquired about the vertical living wall elements for controlled landscaping and their maintenance. Chair Wynn inquired about the easement between the site and the neighboring Taco Bell parcel; inquired about how to not value-engineer the green living wall, integral to the articulation, out of the project. PUBLIC COMMENT David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, indicated that Staff is misrepresenting the project as a hotel; shared concern that design does not fit in the prevailing context of existing neighborhood. Camille Small, San Luis Obispo, cited general principles of the “explicit” Community Guidelines and indicated this building is inconsistent with the scale of the existing neighborhood context. Gita Patel, San Luis Obispo, spoke as proprietor of neighboring Ramada Olive Tree Inn; shared concerns that the project downgrades the existing businesses. Matt Sansome, spoke in enthusiastic support about further development promoting growth in the manner in which this project is being proposed with its modern elements. COMMISSION DELIBERATION AND DISCUSSION Commissioner Root noted that the project is not requesting any exceptions; favored both the expanded Use of the front-planted area and further building articulation in order to enliven its facades. Commissioner Soll voiced support for paying stricter attention to Community Guidelines; indicated there is a lack of transition between project and its existing surroundings. Packet Pg. 192 11 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission for October 3, 2016 Page 7 Commissioner Nemcik concurred with Commissioner Soll and indicated that, while architecturally elegant, the scale and massing are too oversized for the area’s context. Vice-Chair Ehdaie voiced that the design might not befit the current area, but did allow that future developments might point to this project as being an anchor toward inspiration. Chair Wynn indicated that the scale of, and degree of articulation on, the project are both appropriate according to Community Guidelines; voiced own struggle with what project should specifically emulate in surrounding neighborhood; indicated this project could commence a trend and become a landmark to which future proposals aspire; requested some consensus and direction from Commission. ACTION: UPON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROOT, SECONDED BY CHAIR WYNN, the Architectural Review Commission adopted the Draft Resolution which approves the project, with the following amendments: A.) Condition #5 to read: “The applicant shall submit building plans that include a trash enclosure that shall have a minimum street yard setback of 25 feet along Olive Street be designed and finished with high quality materials to match the architecture of the project buildings; which shall be fully screened from upper stories with a trellis or other horizontal cover; the design of the enclosure is subject to the Community Design Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. B.) Condition #6 to read: “Plans submitted for a building permit shall call out the colors and materials of all proposed building surfaces and other improvements. Materials shall be consistent with the color and material board submitted with Architectural Review application. The ARC recommends that the applicant modify the proposed color palate to include additional and/or more muted colors” C.) Condition #7 added to read “The ARC recommends that the applicant explore the possibility of incorporating a public art installation to the proposed development.” D.) Condition #13 added to read “The final landscaping plan shall incorporate additional landscaping, including tree types that provide full canopies near the street frontage parking spaces and a landscaped island in the front parking area to break up the line of parking.” E.) Vice-Chair Ehdaie and Commissioners Nemcik & Soll provided recommendations for new, additional Conditions pertaining to 1.) Increased transitional landscaping in 5-to-7- foot area in front of property; 2.) Encouragement of Public Art inception over paying in - lieu fees; 3.) Possibility of canopied trees installed within parking islands; and 4.) Encouragement for re-visiting color palette scheme to satisfaction of CDD; both motion- maker Root and seconding Wynn concurred. on the following 3:2:0:0 vote: AYES: Root, Wynn, Ehdaie NOES: Nemcik, Soll ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None Packet Pg. 193 11 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission for October 3, 2016 Page 8 COMMENT & DISCUSSION Director Davidson provided the Agenda Forecast: October 17th: Southtown 18 response to ARC direction; 2017-19 City Budget process goal- setting. November: Broad Street Collection, south of Crossroads @ Broad & Orcutt (3229 Broad Street); 399 Foothill mixed-use project; French Hospital Master Plan modification Director Davidson informed that City Council would announce former Commissioner Ken Curtis’ replacement on or about October 18th; informed that December 19th is potential date for a last-of- year ARC convening; speculated on further open dates for future meetings during holiday season and first-of-new-year. Commissioner Nemcik inquired about the possible reasons for projects requested by ARC to be viewed in tandem, Southtown 18 & The Lofts @ Nipomo, would not be occurring; Director Davidson informed of Cultural Heritage Committee’s having returned the latter back to Applicant for complete revisions. Informal discussion ensued on the Ikahn project at Taft & Kentucky Streets and State Assembly Bill 1069 dealing with second dwellings on properties which has implications on City Ordinance. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:11 p.m. APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION: 11/07/2016 Packet Pg. 194 11 Filing Fee Date Received Tree Appeal: $113.00 RECEI VED All Other Appeals: $281.00 Sfln LmS OBISPO Received by:~ OCT 13 2016 -CITYOF S LO rrrv r1 i::: 'K APPEAL TO T HE CITY COUNCIL SECTION 1. APPELLANT INFORMATION David Brodie 873 Chorro St. San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Name Mailing Address and Zip Code 805 544-0409 Phone Fax David Brodie 873 Chorro St. San Luis Obispo CA 93401 Representative's Name Mailing Address and Zip Code David Brodie 805 544-0409 Title Phone Fax SECTION 2. SUBJECT OF APPEAL 1. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (copy attached), I hereby appeal the decision of the: Architectural Review Commission (Name of Officer, Committee or Commission decision being appealed) 2. The date the decision being appealed was rendered : _O_c_to_b_e_r_3_, _2_0_1 _6 ______ _ 3. The application or project was entitled: 1042 Olive St. Retail/Hotel 1042 Olive St. Retail/Hotel 4. I discussed the matter with the following City staff member: JoHN PAUL MA IER , C1'1:Y CLERK OFFon_k ..... 0"'---___._7 _--__.1 __ 6...___ (Staff Member's Name and Department) (Date) 5. Has this matter been the subject of a previous appeal? If so, when was it heard and by whom: No SECTION 3. REASON FOR APPEAL Explain specifically what action/s you are appealing and why you believe the Council should consider your appeal. Include what evidence you have that supports your appeal. You may attach additional pages, ff necessary. This form continues on the other side. Page 1of3 Packet Pg. 195 11 Reason for Appeal continued This project was approved as submitted with a 3 yes - 2 no vote based on the conclusion that the surrounding cohesive context comprised of the Ramada motel, the Budget motel, the Best Value Inn and the historical Heritage Inn would soon be replaced with buildings similar in scale and appearance to 1042 Olive St. Not only is this not likely, but neither staff nor the ARC made any attempt to follow the Community Design Guidelines. The opposing votes by Angela Sol and Amy Nemcik in fact stated that this was the case. SECTION 4. APPELLANT'S RESPONSIBILITY The San Luis Obispo City Council values public participation in local government and encourages all forms of citizen involvement. However, due to real costs associated with City Council consideration of an appeal, including public notification , all appeals pertaining to a planning application or project are subject to a filing fee of $28f, which must accompany the appeal form. Your right to exercise an appeal comes with certain responsibilities. If you file an appeal, please understand that it must be heard within 45 days from filing this form. You will be notified in writing of the exact date your appeal will be heard before the Council. You or your representative will be expected to attend the public hearing, and to be prepared to make your case. Your testimony is limited to 10 minutes. A continuance may be granted under certain and unusual circumstances. If you feel you need to request a continuance, you must submit your request in writing to the City Clerk. Please be advised that if your request for continuance is received after the appeal is noticed to the public, the Council may not be able to grant the request for continuance. Submitting a request for continuance does not guarantee that it will be granted; that action is at the discretion of the City Council. I hereby agree to appear and/or send a representative to appear on my behalf when said appeal is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council. ~~/ 10-/3-/.6 (Signature of Appellant) (Date) *Exceptions to the fee: 1) Appeals of Tree Committee decisions are $113. 2) The above-named appellant has already paid the City $281 to appeal this same matter to a City official or Council advisory body. This Item is hereby calendared for _____________________ _ cc: City Attorney City Manager Department Head Advisory Body Chairperson Advisory Body Liaison City Clerk (original) 07/16 update Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 196 11 Appellants of ARC decision on October 3, 2016 for ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street: Kirit Patel Sanjay Mistry Jadish Panchal Mabhu Patel David Brodie James Lopes Cheryl McClean Allan Cooper Russell Brown Packet Pg. 197 11 Appeal. Comments about ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street: The proposed project does not comply with standards and guidelines as follows. Appellant comments are written in bullets with bold text. A. STAFF REPORT The staff report does not make individual citations of standards or guidelines in most sections. This appeal demonstrates that many standards and guidelines were not addressed or not reviewed with any detail or focus in meet ing the intended, legislated meaning. The staff report does not provide an accurate analysis of the conditions in the vicinity or of the project proposal. It provides a sketchy, pejorative criticism of the neighboring development instead as not being cohesive, although most of it was built before the City was even aware of design guidance. References are scant and individual design guidelines are not quoted, so that a commissioner or reader has to make guesses which of the applicable guidelines were reviewed. The analysis should have a full list of citations of individual guidelines which pertain to the project, preferably in a table format. Subject The Subject section states that the project is mixed-use hotel and commercial uses; however, the unit floor plans clearly show residential designs with two bedrooms, full closets, two bathrooms, kitchens and dining areas. • The project is not a hotel but is designed to be a residential project for long-term rental, such as to students or other individuals. Key is the very small lobby space on the ground floor, merely an alcove to the elevator and stairs. Therefore, Multi- Family Residential design and parking standards should be required and reviewed for project consistency. B. ZONING STANDARDS 17 .08.072 Mixed Use Projects This Section provides standards for the design of mixed use projects. A. Design considerations. A mixed use project shall be designed to achieve the following objectives ... 3. The design of the mixed use project shall take into consideration potential impacts on adjacent properties and shall include specific design features to minimize potential impacts. • The staff report did not analyze this and other standards for a residential project. 4 . The design of a mixed use project shall ensure that the residential units are of a residential character and that privacy between residential units and between other uses on the site is maximized. • The staff report did not analyze this standard in regard to residents' privacy from other residents and visitors along outside corridors. 5. The design of the structures and site planning shall encourage integration of the Packet Pg. 198 11 street pedestrian environment with the nonresidential uses through the use of plazas, courtyards, walkways, and street furniture. • The design of the project does not encourage integration of the street pedestrian environment with the commercial uses; not does it attempt to include plazas, courtyards, walkways and street furniture. E. Performance standards. 2. Noise. All residential units shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts from non-residential project noise, in compliance with the City's noise regulations. • The design is not clearly mitigating traffic noise. C. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.1 Consistency with Community Design Guidelines 3.1.A Overall design objectives for commercial projects The design of each project should work toward achieving the following objectives. 1. Consider San Luis Obispo' s small town scale and demonstrate sensitivity to the design context of the surrounding area. 2 • The project and staff review do not analyze nor demonstrate sensitivity to the single and two-story context of this charming tourist commercial area or its small- town scale. A conforming project would include many similar massing, height, site placement, and stylistic references and features. 2. Avoid "boxy" structures with large, flat wall planes by articulating building forms and elevations to create interesting rooflines, building shapes, and patterns of shade and shadow. See Figure 3-1. • The project was approved with a "boxy" structure with large extrusions and box cut-outs which are more confusing than interesting. This building form is out of character with the surrounding small-scale and casual semi-residential scale of development. A conforming project would have a one to three-story height, horizontal and vertical articulation in similar style details as the area, and rooflines which break up the massing. 3. Preserve the design integrity of architecturally or historically significant structures and neighborhoods adjacent to the commercial area. • The project contradicts and destroys the integrity of the neighborhood, especially with the historic character of existing motels, especially in relation to the historic bed and breakfast which was moved from downtown. A sensitive, conforming project would be in a similar site design and architectural style as the existing motels, with the building in front of parking. B. General architectural design guidelines. 1. Architectural style. No particular architectural style or design theme is required in the City nor can San Luis Obispo be defined by any particular architectural style. A wide range of architectural characteristics adds to the City's overall image. While variety in design is generally encouraged, the Appeal Comments about ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street Packet Pg. 199 11 3 compatibility of new projects with the existing built environment should be a priority. The goal is to preserve not only the historic flavor of the community but. equally important. its scale and ambience. "Canned" or "trademark" building designs used by franchised businesses in other cities may not be acceptable in San Luis Obispo, as they can collectively have the effect of making the commercial areas of the City look like anywhere in California. • The project and staff review ignore the important emphasis in this section, which speaks to achieving a compatibility between new projects and the built environment, and to preserve the historic flavor of the community and its scale and ambience. The project is intended to overwhelm the existing scale, dominate the neighborhood and create another kind of modern character than exists. 2. Neighborhood compatibility. In designing a building, it is important to analyze the areas surrounding the building site to find elements of compatibility that can be used in a new design . Simply duplicating the character of surrounding buildings, however, should not be a design goal. It is important for each site to both maintain its own identity and be complementaty to its surroundings . Thus, a new building can be unique and interesting and still show respect for and compatibility with the architectural styles and scale of other buildings in its vicin ity . Design factors that contribute to neighborhood compatibility include: a. Appropriate design theme; b. Proportional building scale/size; c. Appropriate building setbacks and massing; and d. Appropriate colors, textures, and building materials. • The project proposes a modern style in a boxy rendition of horizontal and vertical planes, which ignores compatibility with other style elements in the neighborhood. There is no evidence that elements of compatibility were sought. Therefore, the project is not complementary to its surroundings. Nor does the project show respect for the architectural styles which have evolved in this area and created a cohesive variety of buildings and styles. 4. Form and mass. A building's design should provide a sense of human scale and proportion. Horizontal and vertical wall articulation should be expressed through the use of wall offsets, recessed windows and entries, awnings, full roofs with overhangs, second floor setbacks, or covered arcades. • The proposal is a modernist art-work onto itself, with no traditional sense of entries, overhangs or arcades which would hint at human scale. Instead it is designed to overwhelm human scale in a modernist statement. The overstated protrusions on the front are not repeated on the sides as directed by the guidelines; there is not any significant wall articulation on the sides. No building setbacks are provided to scale the building down near its neighbors. 10. Building materials. Building materials shall be carefully chosen to enhance the consistency of the architectural theme and design. • The use of smooth plaster against rough bricks is not consistent with any other development nearby, and it will appear "thin" and be subject to immediate wear and weather patterns, as now showing at The Mix, a similar project by the architect. Appeal Comments about ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street Packet Pg. 200 11 4 12. Colors. The exterior colors of a building are as important as the materials in det~rmining how people think about the building and its surroundings. Colors should be compatible with the existing colors of the surrounding area but need not duplicate existing colors. a. The use of muted tones for the structure's base color is recommended. Color should not be used as an attention getting device. b. Accent colors should be used thoughtfully and complement the base color or a variation of its hue, either weaker or stronger. c. The transition between base and accent colors should relate to changes in building materials or the change of building surface planes. Colors should generally not meet or change without some physical change or definition to the surface plane. • The white/dark gray color choices are not compatible with existing colors in the surrounding area. They are either too white or too dark for comfortable compatibility. They are used as "hip" attention-getting devices. Muted colors at the base and accent colors in similar hues or in transitions should have been used. C. Site planning. Project site planning should comply with the following guidelines. 1. Consider neighboring development. Each development proposal should demonstrate consideration for the existing conditions on and off the site including the following: • The staff report does not analyze whether the project has done this adequately or at all. In fact, it argues against the existing condition as sub-standard and therefore not warranting any attention in the design. Staff in this section assumes that the surrounding development should have a consistent massing, by stating, "The massing of these structures do not contribute to a cohesive pattern for the area." Actually, the variety of single and two-story heights and massing express consistency, and lend a small-scale context. Paradoxically, the staff report then relieves the proposed project from any attempt to "demonstrate consideration" in its design for the scale of these buildings and character which they represent. a. The uses on, and site layout of neighboring properties; b. The architectural style, and the shape and massing of neighboring structures. • The four-story height of the building does not decrease at its edges or offer any reduction in scale to be in context with the adjacent buildings. • The applicant clearly intended to ignore the existing prevailing styles and propose a contemporary modern building instead, with no reference to the other buildings. This omission contradicts Guideline 3.1.C.1.g, which encourages new projects to have visual links with adjacent development, in addition to contextual architectural design as noted in b. above. The result is a jarring contradiction in the area's long-term developed character. c. Existing natural features (i.e., mature trees, landforms, etc); d. Opportunities to preserve or enhance views of the hills; Appeal Comments about ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street Packet Pg. 201 11 5 • The project at four stories is not reviewed for its blockage of fabulous views of Bishop Peak to the north from the street and public sidewalk. Several easily imagined and designed projects could break up massing, buildings and create low courtyards to preserve some public views of Bishop Peak and achieve the proposed uses. e. Privacy and solar access of the site and neighboring properties; • The project design does not provide any significant screening with landscaping to provide privacy to adjacent properties. f. Opportunities for new projects to provide physical links to adjacent development using sidewalks, and shared access drives and parking, whenever possible; and • The project design does not take any opportunities to provide physical links to adjacent development except through driveway access including pedestrians. g. Opportunities for new projects to provide visual links to adjacent development in the form of similar landscaping, trees, etc., in addition to contextual architectural design as noted in b. above. • The design does not take opportunities to visually link to adjacent development, especially with contextual architecture and landscaping and trees. 6.2 -Landscaping A. Goals for landscaping. The landscape design goals for the City include landscape that: 1. Enhances building architecture • The landscape plan does not provide landscaping which frames the building or softens views of the angular articulation. 4. Helps to preserve and create views • The landscape plan does not enhance, frame or preserve views of San Luis Mountain or Bishop Peak. 6. Provides aesthetic links and transitions between centers of activity • The plant selection, sizing and location do not address this important guideline to create aesthetic links such as between the street, sidewalk and the building entrances. No patio or courtyards are proposed in the landscape plan to enhance the commercial area's viability and enjoyment. 8. Provides shade, either seasonal or year round • It is the era of worsening climate change, and this project does not propose significant shading from trees, which would also contribute to carbon sequestration. If this is a Tree City, U.S.A., then the staff, ARC and your Council should have a priority of encouraging site designs which include generous Appeal Comments about ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street Packet Pg. 202 11 numbers of shade trees. The parking lots are not interspersed with tree planters which may not comply with the City ordinance for parking lot shading. B. Landscape design guidelines. The following guidelines are intended to assist in achieving the above goals. 1. Overall landscaping guidelines. Planting areas should be integrated with the building design, enhance the appearance and enjoyment of the project and soften the visual impact of buildings and paving. Landscaping should use a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Project plantings should blend with vegetation on nearby property ifthe neighboring greenery is healthy and appropriate. The City encourages innovation in planting design and choice of landscape materials. • The project is not integrated with a landscape plan which achieves this important guideline. Innovation in landscaping is not singularly the use of cacti and succulents, but these plants can be part of a broader palette which blends with the neighborhood and achieves the listed objectives. 3. Extent of landscaping. A site should be adequately planted on all sides, and within its interior. Trees must be planted along streets in compliance with the City's Tree Regulations, and should be selected from the City's "street tree" list. Trees not on the list may be used if approved by the City's Arborist. Trees may also be required at other locations on a site for screening. • The project design ignores this guideline, and leaves the impression of a barren, paved and built site. It should be "adequately planted on all sides, and within its interior." San Luis Obispo used to be known for generous areas of plantings throughout projects, and that aspect is part of the city's character, which should be continued as intended by this guideline. 6.3 -Parking Facilities B. Siting and screening. Parking lots should not dominate street views of projects. Wherever possible, parking lots should be placed behind buildings. 6 • Within a city, hotels are usually placed at or near the sidewalk, and parking is placed underneath, or in back if necessary. The site is within the urban core, not at a suburban edge, and the project should have been required to place the building in front of parking lots. This guideline sets a high expectation ("wherever possible") that a project meet this character defining objective. The parking lot does dominate the view of the project, partly due to its close proximity to the sidewalk and lack of screening landscaping. 4. Structured parking is encouraged to minimize "vast seas of parking" in large commercial projects. • Here again is the City's residents' intent to create urban, not suburban sprawl kinds of projects. The project is a large commercial project, and at least a two- level parking structure should have been required to meet the guideline. The use of frontage parking does create a sense of isolation of the building from the street. Appeal Comments about ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street Packet Pg. 203 11 C. Landscaping in parking areas. The City encourages landscaping in parking Jots to provide visual interest, buffers between land uses and shading for cars and people. 1. A minimum of five percent of the total area of a parking lot shall be devoted to landscaping, in compliance with the City's Parking and Driveway Standards. 7 • The staff and ARC did not require the project to be revised to meet this guideline, which in C.1 is stated as a standard ("shall") so that this minimum should be calculated and exceeded due to the height of the building. Otherwise, the building appears as in olden times when landscaping was not even considered important. Appeal Comments about ARCH-2946-2016; 1042 Olive Street Packet Pg. 204 11 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n 1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1 p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m The following project statement is a part of the Architectural Review and entitlement application submittal requirements for OMU, a proposed redevelopment project located at 1042 Olive Street, in the city of San Luis Obispo. The applicants are proposing to redevelop an existing commercial property into a new in-fill multi-story mixed use project. Property Background The existing vacant commercial parcel area totals 22,500 S.F. (0.517 acres). The property is currently zoned C-T Commercial Tourist. The existing project site is bounded by Olive Street to the south, an existing Taco Bell Restaurant and Santa Rosa Street to the east, an existing motel to the west, and an existing apartment complex to the north. All surrounding parcels are similarly zoned. The subject property is completely vacant, save for some existing unkept landscaping. Existing site topography is generally flat with an average cross-slope of approximately 4%, and generally slopes from the northeast side of the site to the south. In addition to the existing vegetation on this property, current off-site improvements include existing curb, gutter, concrete sidewalk and driveways which were used to previously access this site. Proposed site grading will require removal of on-site vegetation, as well as consolidation of the existing driveways into a single point of access. Replacement landscaping will include new drought-tolerant and BMP P r o j e c t S t a t e m e n t F o r : Olive Mixed Use 1 0 4 2 O l i v e S t r e e t , S a n L u i s O b i s p o , C a l I f o r n I a Version 3.0: 07/08/2016 Packet Pg. 205 11 p a g e 2 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n 1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1 p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m compatible plant material, along with new street trees set in a proposed new parkway “greenbelt” along the Olive Street property frontage. Project Description The proposed project involves construction of a new multi-story mixed use structure, with at- grade parking. The proposed project is adjacent to and fronting on Olive Street, and will continue to take ingress, egress, and all utilities directly from this public street. The project proposes pedestrian-level street oriented small shop and commercial retail spaces along the ground level. Lined with inviting glass storefronts and retro-style roll-up and/or sliding doors, these shop spaces are designed to encourage and promote pedestrian activity at the street level. The upper levels consist of a combination of 17 extended-stay hotel units, of varying size, scale and layout. Access to the upper level floors and hotel rooms are served via private elevator and stairs, with circulation on each upper floor unit provided via exterior single-loaded exterior walkway. These exterior open-air circulation “pedestrian streets” are intended to promote guest interaction via “micro-neighborhood” on each individual floor, while a common roof-top terrace will serve as a communal space available to all hotel guests. The extended- stay hotel rooms vary in size, from 1 bedroom / 1 bath units to 2-bedroom / 2 bath loft units, all of varying design, amenities and features to promote diversity in design and users. The ground-floor level contains at-grade parking for the entire complex, with parking for commercial tenants and customers available directly adjacent to the commercial spaces facing Olive Street, while parking for the hotel users and guests is relegated to the rear parking area, which also includes provisions for private secure motorcycle and bicycle storage. The main structure effectively splits the parking into two distinct areas for separate commercial versus hotel parking, which will minimize parking conflicts throughout the day. Centrally located common trash, mail and utility areas complete the proposed development, which encourage user interaction throughout the day. Other key components of the project include flexible commercial ground floor lease space, as well as environmentally responsible design elements, all packaged into a compact urban form style density. In addition, a beautiful roof-top terrace will be incorporated into the roof of the Packet Pg. 206 11 p a g e 3 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n 1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1 p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m project, which will provide a large common outdoor area for hotel guests to gather, relax, barbeque, or just enjoy the sunset views over the city. Lastly, with the sites’ excellent solar orientation and southern exposures, the project incorporates many sustainable and eco-friendly design features, including active and passive solar, passive cooling, thermal mass heating, and high efficiency day-lighting for all hotel and working spaces of the project. Design Approach Given the lack of a cohesive architectural context or common design vernacular for the surrounding built environment, the design team developed a building typology that is a direct product of exploring the nexus between the exterior and interior functions and use of the proposed project components, in particular the interplay between the lower commercial spaces and their relationship to the hotel uses above. In that spirit, OMU seeks to establish a local sense of place with a modern architectural language that will anchor this transitional neighborhood, while setting the standard for future redevelopment in this area. In a “form-follows-function” approach, the design team took inspiration from the very programmatic needs and requirements of the project itself. A complex yet straight-forward massing approach emerged from a detailed analysis of the interaction between the ground floor commercial units and the hotel rooms above. The result is a strikingly modern and contextual rich design solution, which endeavors to bring energy and vitality to this small stretch of Olive Street. The proposed architecture therefore reflects simple modern elements and shapes that also echo concepts envisioned by Le Corbusier’s “machine for living”. Simple, straightforward rectilinear massing and articulation, which adds movement and interest to the contemporary vocabulary, are integrated with modern and sustainable orientation strategies. The use of materials common to both commercial and residential uses was key to establishing an appropriate finish and color palette for the project. Concrete block, metal and wood siding, and Packet Pg. 207 11 p a g e 4 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n 1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1 p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m cement plaster building materials all pay homage to the existing buildings and uses surrounding this property. The intent is to simultaneously acknowledge context while integrating a new architectural lexicon into this existing transitional neighborhood. In order to put sustainable strategies in first position, all design decisions for this project were guided by ecologically sustainable considerations and green principals. This is primarily evidenced by the placement and orientation of all buildings and structures on the site, which are oriented and sited to gain maximum solar exposure. This deliberate southern orientation not only allows for maximum passive heating during winter months, but orients the buildings for optimum year-round solar access. All upper floor units are accessed from a single loaded exterior corridor, which affords natural cross-ventilation via location of operable fenestration on at least two opposing sides of each unit. This project therefore seeks to set new standards for sustainable and responsible urban in-fill mixed use redevelopment for San Luis Obispo. In addition to implementation of many Smart- Growth and L.I.D. concepts such as infill redevelopment, compact urban form, alternate transportation, and integrated mixed uses, the project has been designed to the highest standards in terms of energy efficiency and sustainable design. The proposed project qualifies for LEED certification, and is also designed to meet the Architecture 2030 Challenge. As members of SLO Green Build, the design team has also ensured compliance with the established SLO “Green Build Guidelines”. Provisions for traditional sustainable components such as thermal mass, correct solar orientated fenestration, passive heating and cooling, solar shading, and natural day-lighting are incorporated into the core design of all commercial and residential spaces of the project. In addition, contemporary sustainable features such as cool roof, smart-energy devices, and vertical gardens have also been incorporated into the facility. These sustainable and LID strategies, which illustrate the beauty of eco-friendly design coupled with responsible architecture and development, will be enjoy by all users and tenants alike. Packet Pg. 208 11 p a g e 5 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n 1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1 p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m Site & Landscape Design In conjunction with the proposed building improvements, new landscaping for this infill redevelopment project will include installation of on-site infiltration devices, as well as linear bio- swale planted parkway area along the street frontage, which will serve to minimize pollutant run- off from the parking lot areas as well as provide storm water management for the project. The existing multiple vehicular driveways off of Olive Street will be consolidated into a single vehicular access point for the project, in order to reduce traffic conflicts and provide more street exposure for pedestrian-oriented commercial uses. Where possible, additional on-site landscape areas will be provided to complement and enhance the aesthetics and green architecture of the proposed project. The strategically located upper level common decks not only provide an architectural break on each level, but will be furnished and treated as an inviting communal area to encourage interaction between the hotel guests. The exterior ground-floor commercial parking area will be finished in pervious paver materials, intended to enhance the pedestrian experience and provide human scale, while also serving to enhance on-site storm water mitigation. All new on and off-site plant material will be drought tolerant and irrigated with typical water-conserving systems. In addition, all required parking for the proposed project will be provided on-site via common surface parking lot. The project will also provide required motorcycle parking, as well as required short and long-term bicycle parking, designed to encourage alternate modes of transportation. Proposed commercial signage will consist of building or canopy-mounted identification signage to denote the various retail businesses on the ground floor, along with wall-mounted icon or individual logo signs to denote individual business within the development, as well as the hotel tenant. All business and directional signage will be integrated into the architecture of the project, including building and address numbers located along the public way. All proposed signage will comply with the city’s adopted sign regulations. Entitlement Strategy All proposed uses are allowed pursuant to the underlying C-T zoning for this parcel. Therefore, the applicant is seeking to secure the require Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approval for the overall design of this project. Packet Pg. 209 11 p a g e 6 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n 1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1 p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m Summary Olive Mixed Use will bring long anticipated redevelopment to a neglected, in-fill parcel of land along the Highway 1 corridor of San Luis Obispo. This environmentally responsible Smart Growth mixed use project will also generate additional retail and bed tax to the city, which will be to the benefit of all residents of San Luis Obispo. Packet Pg. 210 11 Packet Pg. 21111 Packet Pg. 21211 Packet Pg. 21311 Packet Pg. 21411 Packet Pg. 21511 Packet Pg. 21611 Packet Pg. 21711 Packet Pg. 21811 Packet Pg. 21911 Packet Pg. 22011 Packet Pg. 22111 Packet Pg. 22211 Packet Pg. 22311 Packet Pg. 22411 Packet Pg. 22511 Packet Pg. 22611 Packet Pg. 22711 Packet Pg. 22811 Packet Pg. 22911 Packet Pg. 23011 Packet Pg. 23111 Packet Pg. 23211 Packet Pg. 23311 Page intentionally left blank. Packet Pg. 234 11 Appeal of 1042 Olive Street Project Design is not in context•Will loom over other buildings•Uncharacteristic shapes Appeal of 1042 Olive Street2 Olive Street Context•Two‐story buildings•Divided massing•Local, historic character•Interesting gabled roofs•Porches and arcadesAppeal of 1042 Olive Street 3 Olive Street Context•Formal entries near the sidewalk•Small‐town, pedestrian scale•Eaves and moldings•Shading eaves•Decorative plantingsAppeal of 1042 Olive Street 4 Olive Street Context•Retail uses ‐at or near the sidewalks•Patios •Clearly defined entries•Complementary, pleasing colors Appeal of 1042 Olive Street 5 Local Precedents•Larger hotels with gabled roofs•Staggered rooflines•Cornices•Earth‐tone colors•Landscaping and pathsAppeal of 1042 Olive Street 6 Project design is boxy, within boxesOut of Scale•Four‐story wall next to Ramada Inn•Untrimmed rooflines•Massive wall sections •Office colors•Very little landscaping and no paths to sidewalkAppeal of 1042 Olive Street 7 Building rear looms over Ramada Inn•Two floors could be placed on pedestals over parking, to reduce height to two stories. Appeal of 1042 Olive Street 8 Alternative Project IdeasMore in Scale•Defined first floor•Stepped back upper floors•Staggered, defined rooflines•Divided wall sections •Warm, natural colorsAppeal of 1042 Olive Street 9 Request of AppellantsThat your Council:•Refer the project back to the Architectural Review Commission•Give direction to staff and the ARC:•To pay close adherence to the Community Design Guidelines, as noted in the appeal document.Appeal of 1042 Olive Street 10 Olive Street Mixed Use Project1042 Olive Street, San Luis Obispo, California City Council Appeal HearingPresentation Outline:1. Project Overview2. Design Process3. Project Renderings4. Sustainable Strategies5. Questions / CommentsPresentation Outline Project Overview Existing Context & NeighborhoodSITE Existing Architectural Character Design Process Concepts + GoalsProject Concepts + Design Goals:Reflect eclectic neighborhood diversity in project design approachCreate hierarchy of public, semi-public, and private use areasEncourage opportunities for small-shop commercial business entrepreneursAcknowledge eclectic tourist oriented business and zoning districtAddress climate change via sustainable building design and construction methodsArchitectural language to reflect priority on sustainable strategies Initial Design Studies Project Renderings View from Olive Street looking northwest Street-level small commercial retail storefronts View from rear parking area View from bike locker area View from Olive Street looking north View from rear parking area looking south View from roof terrace Interior view of typical suite Interior view of typical suite View from exterior corridor looking west Sustainable Strategies Climatic Responses + Building Performance East-West Building Orientation Solar Strategies Passive Cooling Response Bio-Infiltration / Storm Water Management On-Site Renewable Energy + Conservation Climatic Responses + Building Performance photo-sim from Olive Street looking west photo-sim from Olive Street looking east Aerial photo-sim looking north Questions / Comments?