Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-17-2017 Item 14 Safety Enhancement Zones Amendment - Ordinance Introduction Meeting Date: 1/17/2017 FROM: Deanna Cantrell, Chief of Police Prepared By: Jeff Smith, Police Captain SUBJECT: SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATION Introduce an Ordinance amending section 9.22.040 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code regarding Safety Enhancement Zones to designate an additional city-wide safety enhancement period prior to and inclusive of St. Patrick’s Day. DISCUSSION Background In December 2004 Council enacted Chapter 9.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code which created a process to designate the entire City as a safety enhancement zone during specific dates/times based upon a finding by the Council that such a designation is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Luis Obispo. Since 2004, Council has adopted and amended several public safety related Municipal Code codes which have higher fines when a safety enhancement zone is in effect. These ordinances include: Chapter 9.04 Possession or consumption of alcohol in public Chapter 9.05 Social Host - minors consuming or possessing alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urinating in public Chapter 9.22 Unruly Gathering Fines for these Municipal Code violations outside of the safety enhanc ement zone period are $350 for a first offense, $700 for a second offense within a 12-month period, and $1,000 for third or subsequent offenses in a 12-month period. Violations during the safety enhancement period are double with a first offense fine of $700 and second and subsequent offenses fined at $1,000 in a 12-month period.1 A violation under this chapter may be prosecuted either criminally or administratively pursuant to Chapter 1.24. (Administrative Code Enforcement Procedures). Violations of the Unruly Gathering ordinance are $700 for a first offense to the individuals found responsible for the gathering or $350 first time fine for those that are in attendance. During the safety enhancement time period those found responsible for the gathering are fined $1,000 for a first and subsequent offenses in a 12-month period. Participants found in violation of an unruly gathering are fined $700 for a first offense and $1,000 for subsequent offences in a 12-month period. 1 Government Code sections 36901 53069.4 limits the amo unt of a fine for violation of a local ordinance to $1,000. Packet Pg. 239 14 The Police Department conducts extensive outreach annually to inform students and residents of the St. Patrick’s Day Safety Enhancement Zone ordinance. Over the past several years, the “Avoid Party Regret” theme has included neighborhood outreach, a media release, paid ads in the New Times and Mustang News, paid social media ads, and flyers/posters distributed throughout both Cal Poly and Cuesta College. Cal Poly publicity includ es in-person presentations to student organizations on campus and in the neighborhoods. Outreach is also done at Cuesta College with an e-blast to students and distribution of Avoid Party Regret posters. Cal Poly assists with video screen ads in the UU & poster distribution on campus. The Police Department also collaborates with the Downtown Association’s Food, Beverage, and Service Committee to distribute posters throughout downtown. The public relations campaign budget is $4000 for the St. Patrick’s Day Holiday. Safety Enhancement Zone History The Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance had previously been adopted in December of 2004 for the February Mardi Gras time period due to the impact of the nuisance behaviors and civil unrest associated with this event. Implementation of the ordinance was found to be a successful outreach and enforcement tool. Within a short period of time, the problems typically associated with the Mardi Gras festivities largely stopped. Over time, other key dates were identified as periods of nuisance partying and adverse behaviors that impacted the health and safety of our residents. In May 2010, Council approved the use of the safety enhancement zone for Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day. In August 2013, Council approved the use of the safety enhancement zone for the start of the Cal Poly school year. Designating safety enhancement zone periods, coupled with outreach and education, has shown to be an effective deterrent to address behaviors associated with alcohol, noise, and other neighborhood wellness concerns. St. Patrick’s Day and St. Fratty’s Celebrations Currently, Council has approved the safety enhancement zone on St. Patrick’s Day to extend from 12:01 a.m. the morning of the 17th to the morning of the 18th at 7:00 a.m. St. Patrick’s Day was viewed as a heavily impacted occasion that would require additional police resources and outreach in order to handle adverse party behavior and alcohol violations occurring both in the downtown and neighborhood areas. In order to avoid the specific day of March 17th and associated increased fines, organized efforts have been made to plan and encourage participation in similar party related activities outside of this one-day safety enhancement time period. This event, typically a pre-cursor to St. Patrick’s Day, is referred to as “St. Fratty’s Day”. Over several years St. Fratty’s Day has been loosely organized and celebrated in our community. Traditionally, the event has occurred in the early hours of a weekend day in the month of March, prior to St. Patrick’s Day. Knowledge of the date and time is not readily known to law enforcement and it is difficult to predict exact timing to have appropriate resources available to deal with noise complaints, alcohol violations and other adverse behaviors. The celebration has drawn thousands of participants who converge into the residential areas on the north side of town Packet Pg. 240 14 near the perimeter of the Cal Poly campus. Much of the hype around this event has been coordinated by word of mouth or social media outlets. No one group claims responsibility for promoting the event, however, several Greek organizations and other student groups are known to coordinate parties in residential neighborhoods and actively endorse participation. Although some of the organizations attempt to offer controlled or private parties, the nature of the atmosphere causes individuals to participate in mass and roam the impacted neighborhoods. Roof Collapse in 2015 St. Fratty’s Day has had a history of occurring in the 300 block of Hathaway (and surrounding area) to include a residence termed as the “Pink House”. In the early morning hours of March 7, 2015 thousands of college age participants converged on this residential area. Several dozen students climbed onto the top of a nearby garage roof and the weight of the numerous bodies caused the garage to collapse. Fortunately, no one was seriously injured in this incident. This event created a great deal of attention to the university and community. The police department was not prepared with staffing to safely manage the magnitude of the event. There was a need to request mutual aid assistance from outlying police agencies to include Cal Poly Police, the California Highway Patrol and the Sheriff’s Department. The incident prompted a criminal investigation by the Police Department, however, no charges were filed. Additionally, an investigation was completed by the Cal Poly Student Affairs Office where one of the conclusions of their investigative report stated, “students attempting to hold an annual event outside the ‘period of increased fines’ for city code violations are contributing to a lack of preparedness and early response.” Although St. Fratty’s Day had been occurring in our community for several years the unpredictable situation involving the roof collapse in 2015 was very concerning and prompted the Police Department to evaluate staffing and put measures in place to discourage future unacceptable behavior. In working with Cal Poly, the police department embarked on a media campaign to educate the student age residents on being responsible neighbors and taking ownership in the community in which they live. 2016 St. Fratty’s Day preparation In order to prepare for potential disturbances for 2016 St. Fratty’s Day celebrations the police department intensified community outreach prior to the month of March. Outreach included social and print media as well as directing officers to visit residences that had historically been identified as problem locations. Focused outreach was directed to the Greek community who were known to organize St. Fratty’s Day activities. This early intervention was necessary to establish expectations, educate potential participants of neighborly responsibilities and advise of enforcement outcomes for non-compliance. As in years past, determining the exact date of “St. Fratty’s” in 2016 was a moving target. The event tends to be “spontaneous” requiring the department to do some investigations to determine the exact date and time. Even in light of specific intelligence, there remained conflicting reports causing the department to speculate on exact timing in order to be prepared. Early information revealed that the event was going to take place the first weekend in the month Packet Pg. 241 14 of March (4th & 5th). In order to be responsive, the department went to a full deployment of officers and dispatchers in order to be prepared for increased activity. Inclement weather during this weekend last year appears to be one of the factors in keeping things calm and there were no significant reports related to St. Fratty’s activities. Nonetheless, the department had to prepare staff using overtime and incurred unbudgeted expenses dedicated to this possible occurrence. After the weekend of March 4th & 5th, the department received specific information that the St. Fratty’s celebration would begin on Sunday, March 13th at 5:00 a.m. It was necessary for the Police Department to once again plan for a full deployment, to include the use of overtime, for officers and dispatchers on both March 12th and 13th to mitigate any potential disturbances. The neighborhood impacts in 2016 compared to 2015 were substantially reduced. With a full deployment of officers to respond to service calls, address parties and confront negative behaviors quickly, provided for a well-managed event. The crowds were estimated to be approximately two thousand and were relatively calm and well mannered. Some party hosts were organized and provided ID/license checks at the door or only allowed invited people int o gatherings. The successful transition from 2015 to 2016 was due to the fact that significant outreach occurred prior to the event and the deployment of additional police personnel on the day of the event allowed for clear messaging and a clear police presence for crowd integration and enforcement if needed. Although the planning and preparation for St. Fratty’s in 2016 was successful, an environment persists in the surrounding neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly that encourages people to plan parties and circulate in mass in the neighborhoods. Violations of law continue to occur and other neighborhood wellness concerns (particularly crowd size and noise) are constant. Although 2016 was relatively calm compared to years past, even with additional Cal Poly resources patrolling areas within one mile of the campus, there are still numerous noise violations, excessive alcohol consumption and persons engaged in other adverse behaviors requiring the Police Department to over staff officers and dispatchers (many on overtime pay) to safely monitor this event. In 2016 the police department tracked operational expenses (personnel and outreach materials) to manage St. Fratty’s and the amount was estimated at $31,000. Recommended period of time for St. Patrick’s Day safety enhancement changes It is proposed that the safety enhancement time period cover the first seventeen days of March, beginning at 12:01 a.m. on the first day of March and ending on the morning of the eighteenth day of March at 7:00 a.m. Should March 17th fall on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday the safety enhancement period would continue through the weekend, ending on M onday morning at 7:00 a.m. The reasoning for this time period is to cover the weeks leading up to the St. Patrick’s holiday and the weekend following March 17th. Historically, the weeks leading up to St. Patrick’s Day, the Police Department sees an increase in the number of party related calls for service in the neighborhoods. Outreach The Police Department has coordinated several outreach opportunities to address the proposed changes to the Safety Enhancement Zone during the month of March, which was consistent with Packet Pg. 242 14 the Public Engagement Manual. Meetings have included the Cal Poly Inter Fraternal Council, Panhellenic, Associated Students Inc.(ASI) representatives, the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC), the Downtown Association’s Food, Beverage & Service Committee and a presentation was made at a neighborhood community forum in October which included a number of citizens and community representatives. Generally, outreach identified some key themes that created consternation about the passage of this ordinance as written, to include:  The Safety Enhancement period covering 3/4 quarters of the month of March is excessive and too restrictive.  Increased fines, coupled with fines imposed by landlords, is too punitive and targeted toward a college age population, many of which have other fi nancial constraints and obligations.  The City needs to engage in other areas of collaboration to establish boundaries and not solely rely of fines or other forms of punishment to restrict behavior.  The City will continue to absorb additional costs to staff the 21+ day period should the ordinance pass. These funds should be utilized in other productive ways to reduce crime.  The City needs to become engaged with students prior to writing any ordinance that impacts their demographic in order to obtain true feedback and perspective amongst the entire San Luis Obispo community.  Noise Violations should be excluded from the Safety Enhancement amendments. Excluding noise violations would not diminish the effectiveness of the attended plans purpose. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Amendment of the City’s Safety Enhancement Zone is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and enforcement actions are categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15321(b). FISCAL IMPACT In general, revenue resulting from violations does not cover the costs of providing law enforcement services nor can the City create a scheme by which the revenue from fines pay for specific services. No new enforcement resources are being added to support the additional safety enhancement period. The proposed ordinance expands the time period for existing safety enhancement zone designations. It is unknown the amount of revenue that may be generated from safety enhancement zone violations since it is not yet known to what extent violations will increase or decrease. However, changes that result in increased fines are not likely to generate significant revenue to offset the existing enforcement costs. Staffing costs for this time period would be consistent with the costs during the 2016 St. Patrick’s Day deployments. Those cost were estimated to be $31,000. Packet Pg. 243 14 ALTERNATIVE Do not introduce the ordinance. Staff does not recommend this alternative as safety enhancement has proven to be an effective deterrent to address negative behaviors. Attachments: a - CAR - Safety Enhancement 12-7-2004 b - CAR -Halloween & St. Pat's 4-20-10 c - CAR -Cal Poly Start of School 7-2-2013 d - Cal Poly Roof Collapse Report - 2015 e - Ch.9.22 Amendment St Fratty's Redline consistent f - Ordinance Introduction - Ch.9.22 Packet Pg. 244 14 council MatiwDe December 7 2004 AGEnaa nEpout N1301 n CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: Deborah Linden, Chief of Police Prepared by: Daniel R. Blanke, Police Captain SUBJECT: INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE ENABLING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, AND ESTABLISHING A CITY-WIDE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE DURING MARDI GRAS CAO RECOMMENDATION That the City Council introduce an ordinance adding Chapter 9.22 to Title 9 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that would: 1. Enable the designation of Safety Enhancement Zones in the City of San Luis Obispo to temporarily increase fines and penalties for certain Municipal Code violations for a designated time period; and 2. Establish a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during the period of Mardi Gras each year. DISCUSSION Background At the September 21, 2004 meeting of the City Council, Police Department staff presented a planning update for Mardi Gras weekend 2005, which included a series of strategies designed to prevent a recurrence of the dangerous and violent activity witnessed during the 2004 Mardi Gras weekend. During this report to Council, staff requested Council consider a new strategy being successfully used in the City of Newport Beach called a Safety Enhancement Zone. Each year, Newport Beach experiences significant problems with alcohol, noise, and parties along their beach area on July 4. The City enacted an ordinance that created a Safety Enhancement Zone that encompasses the problem area and is posted as such prior to the July 4 holiday. When the Safety Enhancement Zone is activated, all fines for Municipal Code violations are automatically tripled. The Police Department does extensive outreach prior to the holiday to notify residents of the enhancement zone and increased fines. This ordinance has proven very effective in increasing the safety of residents in the area by deterring unlawful behavior because potential violators know the resulting fines will be tripled in "The Zone." At the September 21, 2004 meeting, Council approved the concept of Safety Enhancement Zones in San Luis Obispo during Mardi Gras, and directed staff to return with an appropriate ordinance. Packet Pg. 245 14 ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page 2 Feedback from Community Stakeholders When the concept of Safety Enhancement Zones was first introduced to Council, staff felt that the Zones would be most effective if they encompassed specific geographic areas, such as the Foothill/California area and the downtown corridor. This model is patterned after the ordinance being utilized in Newport Beach. Since that time, staff and Council have received feedback from community members concerned about the designation of specific geographic zones, and urging staff to consider the idea of a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during Mardi Gras weekend. In the weeks following that meeting, staff received comments from and met with various community members and groups to discuss the Safety Enhancement Zone concept and any concerns these stakeholders may have. Specifically, staff met with the Mardi Gras subcommittee of the Student Community Liaison Committee ( SCLC), which is comprised of student leaders from Cal Poly and Cuesta, as well as Cal Poly staff members, community representatives, and city staff. Police Department staff also met with representatives from Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN). The prevailing opinion was that designating specific geographic zones during Mardi Gras weekend, especially in the Foothill/California area, would give the perception that students were being unfairly targeted for enforcement and, at the same time, could drive unruly people into other areas of the City simply because they would not have to be concerned about the enhanced penalties associated with the Safety Enhancement Zones. Stakeholders felt that the problems.associated with Mardi Gras were significant throughout the City, including in neighborhoods not included in the originally conceived geographic zones. During these meetings, the concept of a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during Mardi Gras was discussed and received strong support. Staff and stakeholders believe it would provide a significant deterrent to criminal behavior throughout the City during Mardi Gras without risk of shifting the problems to different areas of the City, or being perceived as targeting only students for enforcement. Staff believes a city-wide zone would still meet our advance messaging objectives by alerting potential visitors in advance that fines will be tripled throughout the City during Mardi Gras. At the October 21, 2004, SCLC meeting, a motion was introduced to support the concept of a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during Mardi Gras weekend. The motion was approved unanimously by the voting members present. RQN has expressed their support for the same city- wide concept. How would the Safety Enhancement Zone work? The proposed ordinance would provide Council with a means, by ordinance or resolution, to designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" for a specified period of time, upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The ordinance would also designate the City of San Luis Obispo as a Safety Enhancement Zone for the period of Mardi Gras each year, defined as the period from 12:01 am on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 am on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday." D— ZPacket Pg. 246 14 1 J/ ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page 3 When an area is designated by Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone for a specified time period, such as the entire City during Mardi Gras, then fines are tripled' for violations of the following Municipal Code provisions: Chapter 9.04 Possession of open containers or consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places Chapter 9.05 Hosting a gathering where underage persons consume alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urination in public Staff is recommending limiting the fine increases to these specific Municipal Code provisions because each is directly related to the problems the City experiences during Mardi Gras, such as excessive and illegal alcohol abuse, and out-of-control parties. These violations are a major contributor to subsequent violence, injuries, and arrests. Tripling the fines for such conduct provides law enforcement with a tool to better prevent and control misconduct, and allows the citizens of San Luis Obispo to send a loud and clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated here during Mardi Gras. Council has the ability to amend this list of violations, or to apply the Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance to all Municipal Code violations. Notification that certain Municipal Code fines in the City of San Luis Obispo would be tripled during Mardi Gras would be made well in advance of the effective date. The City is undertaking a significant Mardi Gras multi-media messaging campaign and the new ordinance would be included as part of that messaging. A Safety Enhancement Zone ordinance would not apply to violations of state law, such as public intoxication and inciting a riot, since the Council does not have the legal authority to increase fines for these violations. The addition of an ordinance that enables Council to designate Safety Enhancements Zones provides Council a means to create, enhance, repeal, or modify zone locations, days, or hours by resolution when necessary. For example, Halloween has been a significant public safety problem in other communities and we are beginning to experience increased problems here in San Luis Obispo associated with this holiday. Should these problems become significant, Council would have the legal authority to create Safety Enhancement Zones if they desire, and upon appropriate findings as outlined in the ordinance. Penalties for violations committed in the Safety Enhancement Zone The Police Department, in coordination with the City Attorney and Finance Department, has determined that the City's existing administrative citation process would be most appropriate to process citations issued for violations of Municipal Codes under the umbrella of the Safety Enhancement Zone ordinance. Police officers would issue administrative citations for violations of the designated Municipal Code provisions, and the City Attorney's Office would be 1 The maximum fine for a third infraction offense understate law is$1,000. Hence,a third violation is not actually tripled. U-3Packet Pg. 247 14 ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page-4. responsible for prosecuting violations. The attached ordinance provides that violations may also be prosecuted criminally. Normally, these violations are prosecuted as infractions, which currently carry the following penalties, per section 1.12.040 of the Municipal Code: First offense: 100 fine Second offense within l year: 200 fine Third or more offenses within 1 year: 500 fine Violations committed while a Safety Enhancement Zone is in effect, including during the specified period of time during Mardi Gras, would carry the following penalties: First offense: 300 fine Second offense within 1 year: 600 fine Third or more offenses within 1 year:1,000 fine The City Attorney also has the option of prosecuting a violation as a misdemeanor if the same individual commits three or more violations, or if the seriousness of a particular violation warrants it. CONCURRENCES As mentioned in this report, the city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone concept is supported by Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN), the Student Community Liaison Committee SCLC) and Cal Poly Associated Students, Inc. (ASI). FISCAL IMPACT The cost of printing new administrative citation books for use by officers would cost approximately $875.00. There would be some additional staff time required in the Police and Finance Departments, and the City Attorney's Office to process the citations issued during Mardi Gras. Staff from these departments have met and concur that the additional workload would be manageable using existing resources. It is anticipated that fine revenues would exceed the associated costs. ALTERNATIVES Alternative#1 Adopt an Ordinance Desigriating Multiple Safety Enhancement Zones within the City. The City Council could adopt an ordinance designating specific geographic areas as Safety Enhancement Zones, as originally described during the September 21, 2004 Council meeting. The recommended zones are a Foothill / California Safety Enhancement Zone, and a Downtown Safety Enhancement Zone. The Foothill / California Safety Enhancement Zone would comprise the area bounded by Murray and Taft Streets on the south, Kentucky and Hathway Streets on the east, the City Limit on the north and Santa Rosa Street on the west. Along the southern and eastern boundaries, the Zone would encompass the residential and commercial properties on both Io`/Packet Pg. 248 14 ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page 5 sides of the roadway boundary. Notice of the Safety Enhancement Zone designation would be posted with signs around the perimeter of the Zone. The Downtown Safety Enhancement Zone would comprise the area permanently designated as a no skateboarding" zone that encompasses the downtown core. The Safety Enhancement Zone is bounded by Pacific Street on the south, Santa Rosa Street on the east, Palm Street on the north, and Nipomo Street on the west. Notice of the Safety Enhancement Zone designation would be posted with signs at the locations where signs are currently posted giving notice of the downtown skateboarding prohibition. This alternative is not recommended, as feedback from community stakeholders indicates that a City-wide Safety Enhancement Zone would be more effective overall and would alleviate concerns about student perception and the potential shifting of problems to non-zone areas. Alternative#2 Decline to adopt the ordinance. This action is not recommended. Staff believes that this ordinance will be an effective tool in discouraging bad behavior during Mardi Gras weekend, and will provide Council with necessary authority and flexibility to create or modify safety enhancement zones as a strategy to quell criminal behavior during specific periods of time. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Ordinance adding Chapter 9.22 to the Municipal Code, enabling Safety Enhancement Zones in the City of San Luis Obispo, and establishing a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during the specified period of Mardi Gras (recommended ordinance). 2) Draft Ordinance adding Chapter 9.22 to the Municipal Code, enabling Safety Enhancement Zones in the City of San Luis Obispo, and establishing Foothill/California and Downtown Safety Enhancement Zones during the specified period of Mardi Gras alternative#1). G:Wgenda-Ordinances-Resol\Safety Enhancement Zone-Agenda Rpt.DOC iv- sPacket Pg. 249 14 Attachment #1 ORDINANCE NO.2004 Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING CHAPTER 9.22 TO TITLE 9 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES, INCREASING FINES AND PENALTIES FOR MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS IN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE FOR THE TIME THE DESIGNATION IS EFFECTIVE,AND DESIGNATING THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AS A SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE DURING THE EXTENDED MARDI GRAS WEEKEND (12:01 AM ON THE THURSDAY PRECEDING"FAT TUESDAY" UNTIL 7:00 AM ON THE WEDNESDAY FOLLOWING "FAT TUESDAY OF EACH YEAR") WHEREAS, the potential for future incidents of public disorder and serious misconduct on a large scale requires that Council have the ability to establish Safety Enhancement Zones in specific locations and for specific time periods; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo has gained international notoriety for being the destination for participating in the largest Mardi Gras celebration west of the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras, San Luis Obispo is the site of numerous large parties, with throngs of young people traveling between them carrying open alcohol containers, urinating in public, and committing a variety of other alcohol-related violations; and WHEREAS, crowds, excessive alcohol consumption, and associated violent behavior during Mardi Gras have steadily increased over the last 10 years; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, a riot occurred at the intersection of Foothill and California Boulevards in San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, police made 200 arrests and issued 130 citations; and WHEREAS, the cost was approximately $500,000 for law enforcement and other public services required to control the chaos of Mardi Gras 2004; and WHEREAS, the increased penalties for citations will reduce the amount of criminal activity in San Luis Obispo during the period of Mardi Gras, and reduce the potential for a major disturbance by providing law and code enforcement officers with additional tools to obtain prompt compliance with all applicable statutes and ordinances; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo is a charter city with the authority to adopt ordinances and resolutions governing matters pertaining to municipal affairs, and the provisions of this ordinance are designed to protect the health safety and welfare of the residents of, and Packet Pg. 250 14 n Ordinance No.2004 Series) Page 2 visitors to, San Luis Obispo by enhancing the penalties for the violation of municipal ordinances to minimize the potential for a major disturbance and ensure appropriate responses to requests for emergency medical assistance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 9.22 is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 9.22 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES 9.22.010 Designation Process. The City Council may by ordinance, or by resolution upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare, designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" and specify the date and or time that the designation is effective upon a finding that the geographical area is subject to unique conditions and circumstances during a specific period of time that create the potential for a significant threat to public health and safety and that the threat would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The ordinance or resolution establishing a Safety Enhancement Zone shall contain the following provisions: (a) a description of the geographical area comprising the Safety Enhancement Zone, and (b) the date and time, or other specific description of the time period during which the Safety Enhancement Zone designation is applicable to the geographical area. 9.22.020 Safety Enhancement Zone Penalties and Violations. A. Any violation of designated sections of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that is committed within an area that has been designated by the City Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone, and during the time that designation is effective, shall be subject to the following: 1.A fine not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300.00) for a first violation; 2.A fine not exceeding six hundred dollars ($600.00) for a second violation of the same section within one year; 3.A fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each additional violation of the same section within one year. B. Safety Enhancement Zone Violations. Fines for violations committed in the Safety Enhancement Zone shall apply to the following provisions: Chapter 9.04 Possession of open containers or consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places), Chapter 9.05 (Hosting a gathering where underage persons consume alcohol), Chapter 9.12 (Noise control), Chapter 9. 16 (Dangerous and deadly weapons), and Chapter 9.20 0-7Packet Pg. 251 14 Ordinance No. 2004 Series) Page 3 Urination in public). A separate offense shall be deemed to have been committed whenever a person repeats the act that constitutes the violation. 9.22.030 Prosecution Criminally or Administratively. A violation under this Chapter may be prosecuted either criminally or administratively pursuant to Chapter 1.24. 9.22.040 City of San Luis Obispo Safety Enhancement Zone. The City Council designates as a Safety Enhancement Zone the entire area within the City Limits of San Luis Obispo. This designation is effective from 12:01 AM on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 AM on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday" during each year that the designation is in effect. SECTION 2. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the names of the Council members voting for and against it, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage, in The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance will go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the 7`h day of December, 2004, and adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the _ day of 2004, upon motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: David F. Romero, Mayor ATTEST: Audrey Hooper City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jonathan P. Lowell City Attorney 10-fPacket Pg. 252 14 Attachment #2 ORDINANCE NO.2004 Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING CHAPTER 9.22 TO TITLE 9 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES, INCREASING FINES AND PENALTIES FOR MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS IN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE FOR THE TIME THE DESIGNATION IS EFFECTIVE,AND DESIGNATING THE DOWNTOWN CORE AND AN AREA IN NORTH SAN LUIS OBISPO AS SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES DURING THE EXTENDED MARDI GRAS WEEKEND (12:01 AM ON THE THURSDAY PRECEDING "FAT TUESDAY" UNTIL 7:00 AM ON THE WEDNESDAY FOLLOWING "FAT TUESDAY OF EACH YEAR") WHEREAS, the potential for future incidents of public disorder and serious misconduct on a large scale requires that Council have the ability to establish Safety Enhancement Zones in specific locations and for specific time periods; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo has gained international notoriety for being the destination for participating in the largest Mardi Gras celebration west of the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras, San Luis Obispo is the site of numerous large parties, with throngs of young people traveling between them carrying open alcohol containers, urinating in public, and committing a variety of other alcohol-related violations;and WHEREAS, crowds, excessive alcohol consumption, and associated violent behavior during Mardi Gras have steadily increased over the last 10 years; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, a riot occurred at the intersection of Foothill and California Boulevards in San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, police made 200 arrests and issued 130 citations, and 40% those arrests and 42% of the citations occurred in the Foothill / California area;and WHEREAS, Downtown San Luis Obispo has also traditionally been a focal point of Mardi Gras related activity and, along with the FoothilUCalifomia area, the Downtown is the site of a disproportionate number of alcohol-related arrests and citations, compared to the rest of the City; and WHEREAS, the cost was approximately $500,000 for law enforcement and other public services required to control the chaos of Mardi Gras 2004; and WHEREAS, the increased penalties for administrative citations will reduce the amount of criminal activity in the FoothillICalifornia and Downtown Areas of San Luis Obispo Packet Pg. 253 14 Ordinance No. 2004 Series) Page 2 during the period of Mardi Gras, and reduce the potential for a major disturbance by providing law and code enforcement officers with additional tools to obtain prompt compliance with all applicable statutes and ordinances; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo is a charter city with the authority to adopt ordinances and resolutions governing matters pertaining to municipal affairs, and the provisions of this ordinance are designed to protect the health safety and welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, San Luis Obispo by enhancing the penalties for the violation of municipal ordinances to minimize the potential for a major disturbance and ensure appropriate responses to requests for emergency medical assistance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 9.22 is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 9.22 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES 9.22.010 Designation Process. The City Council may by ordinance, or by resolution upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare, designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" and specify the date and or time that the designation is effective upon a finding that the geographical area is subject to unique conditions and circumstances during a specific period of time that create the potential for a significant threat to public health and safety and that the threat would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The ordinance or resolution establishing a Safety Enhancement Zone shall contain the following provisions: (a) a description of the geographical area comprising the Safety Enhancement Zone, and (b) the date and time, or other specific description of the time period during which the Safety Enhancement Zone designation is applicable to the geographical area. 9.22.020 Safety Enhancement Zone Penalties and Violations. A. Any violation of designated sections of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that is committed within an area that has been designated by the City Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone, and during the time that designation is effective, shall be subject to the following: 1. A fine not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300.00) for a first violation; 2.A fine not exceeding six hundred dollars ($600.00) for a second violation of the same o_ ace within one year; 3.A fine not exceu eding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each additional violation of the same ordi&nce within one year. I Cilzr,. p-/0Packet Pg. 254 14 Ordinance No.2004 series) Page 3 B. Safety Enhancement Zone Violations. Fines for violations committed in the Safety Enhancement Zone shall apply to the following provisions: Chapter 9.04 Possession of open containers or consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places), Chapter 9.05 (Hosting a gathering where underage persons consume alcohol), Chapter 9.12 (Noise control), Chapter 9.16 (Dangerous and deadly weapons), and Chapter 9.20 Urination in public). A separate offense shall be deemed to have been committed whenever a person repeats the act that constitutes the violation. 9.22.030 Prosecution Criminally or Administratively. A violation under this Chapter may be prosecuted either criminally or administratively pursuant to Chapter 1.24. 9.22.040 California-Foothill Safety Enhancement Zone. The City Council designates as a Safety Enhancement Zone the area bounded by Murray and Taft Streets on the south, Kentucky and Hathway Streets on the east, the City Limit on the north and Santa Rosa Street on the west. Along the southern and eastern boundaries, the California-Foothill Safety Enhancement Zone will encompass the residential and commercial properties on both sides of the roadway boundary. This designation is effective from 12:01 AM on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 AM on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday" during each year that the designation is in effect. 9.22.050 Downtown Safety Enhancement Zone. The City Council designates as a Safety Enhancement Zone the area permanently designated as a "no skateboarding" zone that encompasses the downtown core. The Safety Enhancement Zone is bounded by Pacific Street on the south, Santa Rosa Street on the east, Palm Street on the north, and Nipomo Street on the west. This designation is effective from 12:01 AM on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 AM on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday" during each year that the designation is in effect. SECTION 2. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the names of the Council members voting for and against it, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage, in The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance will go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the 7h day of December, 2004, and adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the _ day of 2004, upon motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Packet Pg. 255 14 Ordinance No. 2004 Series) Page 2 during the period of Mardi Gras, and reduce the potential for a major disturbance by providing law and code enforcement officers with additional tools to obtain prompt compliance with all applicable statutes and ordinances;and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo is a charter city with the authority to adopt ordinances and resolutions governing matters pertaining to municipal affairs, and the provisions of this ordinance are designed to protect the health safety and welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, San Luis Obispo by enhancing the penalties for the violation of municipal ordinances to minimize the potential for a major disturbance and ensure appropriate responses to requests for emergency medical assistance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 9.22 is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 9.22 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES 9.22.010 Designation Process. The City Council may by ordinance, or by resolution upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare, designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" and specify the date and or time that the designation is effective upon a finding that the geographical area is subject to unique conditions and circumstances during a specific period of time that create the potential for a significant threat to public health and safety and that the threat would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The ordinance or resolution establishing a Safety Enhancement Zone shall contain the following provisions: (a) a description of the geographical area comprising the Safety Enhancement Zone, and (b) the date and time, or other specific description of the time period during which the Safety Enhancement Zone designation is applicable to the geographical area. 9.22.020 Safety Enhancement Zone Penalties and Violations. A. Any violation of designated sections of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that is committed within an area that has been designated by the City Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone, and during the time that designation is effective, shall be subject to the following: 1.A fine not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300.00) for a first violation; 2.A fine not exceeding six hundred dollars ($600.00) for a second violation of the same section within one year; 3.A fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each additional violation of the same section within one year. Packet Pg. 256 14 Ordinance No. 2004-Series) Page 4 David F. Romero, Mayor ATTEST: Audrey Hooper City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jonathan P. Lowell City Attorney 0 -/3Packet Pg. 257 14 RED FILE Associated StudentsMEETING AGENDA, Inc.. DATCGLt7/ California Polytechnic University SEM # San Luis Obispo Resolution#05-03 Support for a Citywide Safety Enhancement Zone During Mardi Gras 2005 Whereas: ASI is the official voice of the Cal Poly student body, and Whereas: The city council approved the concept of a safety enhancement zone on September 21"in the areas of Foothill, California, and the downtown areas during the week of Mardi Gras 2005, and Whereas:This strategy would isolate a section of the community during this week and would target a perceived demographic, and Whereas:The city needs to send a unified message that Mardi Gras is a San Luis Obispo issue and not a student issue, and Whereas:The city should not send a message that some neighborhoods are more valuable than others, and Whereas: Zoning a perceived population would hinder community relations and divide the community. Therefore Be it resolved: Cal Poly students support the creation of a citywide safety enhancement zone, and Furthermore Be it resolved:Members of the community.including students and long term residents should be equal partners and share the same equitable rights as citizens of San Luis Obispo. CERTIFIED as the true and correct copy, in witness thereof, I ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Board of have set my hand and Seal of the Associated Students,Inc. Directors by unanimous vote on November 10,2004. this 10th day of November 2004. ASIS retary I it of a Board ASI President Sponsored by: Joe Vaccaro, Vice Chair ASI Board of Directors, College of Engi Li UNCIL DD DIRBlakeBolton, ASI President CAO ten Salinas, ASI Board of Directors, College of Engineering ACAO IN DIR' RECEIVE®an Ficalora, ASI Board of Directors, College of Liberal Arts ATTORNEY IRE CHIEF CLERK ORIG p'N DIR DEC G 1 2C0't DF-PT A0S POLICE CHF R=C DIR SLO CITY CLERK uriL DIR HR DIRPacket Pg. 258 14 FROM: Deborah E. Linden, Chief of Police Prepared by: Chris Staley, Police Captain SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION TO ENACT SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE DURING SPECIFIED TIME PERIODS RECOMMENDATION 1. Introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 9.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code as follows: a. Amend section 9.22.020A to modify the fine schedule for safety enhancement zone violations; b. Amend section 9.22.020B to add Chapter 9.13 – Unruly Gatherings – to the list of eligible violations; c. Delete section 9.22.040 – City of San Luis Obispo Safety Enhancement Zone. 2. Adopt a resolution to designate a city-wide safety enhancement zone for the time periods encompassing Mardi Gras, St. Patrick’s Day and Halloween. 3. Direct staff to implement a biennial review process for safety enhancement zone designations. DISCUSSION Background In December 2004 the Council enacted Chapter 9.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code which created a process to designate a geographic area in the City as a safety enhancement zone during specific dates/times based upon a finding by the Council that such a designation is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Luis Obispo. Violations of the following Municipal Code ordinances during the enactment of a safety enhancement zone result in higher fines than violations when a safety enhancement zone is not in effect: Chapter 9.04 Possession or consumption of alcohol in public Chapter 9.05 Hosting a gathering with minors consuming or possessing alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urinating in public April 20, 2010 Packet Pg. 259 14 Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 2 Violations of these Municipal Code sections during a safety enhancement zone period result in a fine of $350 for a first offense, $700 for a second offense within a 12-month period, and $1000 for third or subsequent offenses in a 12-month period. At the time the safety enhancement zone ordinance was enacted in 2004, the regular fines for the Municipal Code sections above began at $100 for a first offense and increased for subsequent offenses within a 12-month period. When a safety enhancement zone was in effect, the fines essentially tripled, which acted as a strong deterrent to violating the law. However, since 2004, the Council has approved increases to the regular fines for alcohol, noise and urinating violations. As a result, the fines in effect during a safety enhancement zone period are the same as the regular fines for the violations listed above ($350/$700/$1,000). On September 29, 2009, during a study session with the Council, staff presented several strategies to reduce neighborhood noise and party disturbances and requested the Council provide direction to staff regarding the proposed strategies. During this study session, staff presented the need to amend the safety enhancement zone ordinance to update the fine structure. Staff also requested the Council provide direction regarding enacting a safety enhancement zone during other times of the year, such as Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day, in order to deter increasingly disruptive behavior. The Council directed staff to return with amendments to the ordinance and with proposed dates for the enactment of the safety enhancement zone ordinance. Ordinance Amendments Fine Structure The existing safety enhancement zone ordinance specifies the fine amounts for violations of certain ordinances when a safety enhancement zone is in effect. Since the regular fines for the listed violations have been increased, the fine amounts levied when a safety enhancement zone is in effect are no greater than the regular fine. Staff recommends amending the ordinance to read that fines for violations of the listed Municipal Codes shall be doubled, up to $1000 maximum, during a safety enhancement zone period. The maximum allowable fine for administrative violations under the City’s Municipal Code is $,1000. By amending the language to double the existing fines, the Council will retain the ability to adjust fines for specific Municipal Code chapters without having to amend the safety enhancement zone ordinance each time. The effect of doubling the fines during safety enhancement zone periods would be: Regular Fine Fine during Safety Enhancement Zone Period 1st offense $350 $700 2nd offense within a 12-month period $700 $1000 3rd or subsequent offense within a 12-month period $1,000 $1,000 Packet Pg. 260 14 Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 3 Add Unruly Gathering to list of Offenses On April 20, the Council will consider the final adoption of a new unruly gathering ordinance (Chapter 9.13 of the Municipal Code). Should the Council adopt the unruly gathering ordinance, staff recommends Chapter 9.13 be added to the list of offenses that would be subject to increased fines during safety enhancement zone periods in order to act as an additional deterrent during those times of the year when party activity is at its highest. Should the Council add Chapter 9.13 to the list of offenses, the following Municipal Code chapters will be included in the safety enhancement zone ordnance: Chapter 9.04 Possession or consumption of alcohol in public Chapter 9.05 Hosting a gathering with minors consuming or possessing alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.13 Unruly gatherings Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urinating in public Should the Council decide not to adopt the unruly gathering ordinance, staff will delete Chapter 9.13 from the list of offenses specified in the safety enhancement zone ordinance. Delete section 9.22.040 Designating a Safety Enhancement Zone When the safety enhancement zone ordinance was initially adopted in 2004, the Council included section 9.22.040 which designated a citywide safety enhancement zone during the period encompassing Mardi Gras. The Mardi Gras riot had occurred earlier that year and the safety enhancement zone ordinance was one of the strategies implemented to prevent a recurrence of the violence. Staff recommends deleting this section from the ordinance and instead, adopting a resolution designating the same period of time (Mardi Gras) a citywide safety enhancement zone. By creating the safety enhancement zone by resolution rather than including the language in the actual ordinance, the Council can more easily modify or eliminate the safety enhancement zone designation in the future without having to go through the cumbersome process of amending the ordinance. Resolution designating Safety Enhancement Zones Currently, the only designated safety enhancement zone is in effect citywide for the period of time encompassing Mardi Gras. Staff believes this designation has been particularly effective in quelling the violence associated with Mardi Gras and that it is very important to maintain this designation in order to ensure the large crowds and disruptive behavior associated with Mardi Gras does not return. Other communities have experienced the return of large unruly celebrations once special enforcement provisions have been lifted, and this risk exists for Mardi Gras in our City. The continuation of the safety enhancement zone designation will help ensure this does not occur. Therefore, staff recommends continuing the designation of Mardi Gras as a safety enhancement zone period by adopting a resolution to that effect. If the Council adopts the concept of a biennial review of safety enhancement zone designations, the Council will have future opportunities, beginning in 2012, to review the need for the safety enhancement zone designation during Mardi Gras. Packet Pg. 261 14 Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 4 Additionally, two occasions have become increasingly problematic in the City: Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day. Large crowds, parties, and excessive and illegal alcohol use have become associated with these occasions, posing a significant threat to public health and safety and resulting in increased crime and arrests. The Police Department is at maximum staffing during both events and incurs significant overtime costs as a result. Staff is concerned that these celebrations will continue to grow, as has occurred in other college communities such as Chico and Isla Vista. Staff believes the designation of citywide safety enhancement zones for the periods of time encompassing Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day would act as an effective deterrent to the unlawful behavior. Staff further recommends that when Halloween falls on or near a weekend (Thursday through Sunday), the citywide safety enhancement zone designation encompass the entire weekend in order to deter multi-night celebrations. Biennial Review Safety enhancement zone periods are meant to deter and address problems associated with certain occasions in San Luis Obispo, such as Mardi Gras. These occasions can change over time or new ones may become problematic. In order to ensure the designation of safety enhancement zone periods are still necessary, staff recommends implementing a biennial (every two year) review process by the Council of existing safety enhancement zone designations. This provides staff and the Council a regular opportunity to examine the continued need for existing safety enhancement zone designations, and to eliminate or add designations. If the Council directs staff to implement a biennial review process, the first review would be conducted in 2012 and every two years thereafter, unless there are no safety enhancement zone designations in effect. However, this does not prevent additions or modifications within the two year window if a need is identified. CONCURRENCES In developing the recommendations contained in this report, staff met with representatives from Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN) and Cal Poly Associated Students, Inc. (ASI). RQN supports the staff recommendations. ASI supports the biennial review of existing safety enhancement zone recommendations to ensure they are still necessary. FISCAL IMPACT Staff is unable to estimate the revenue that may be generated from safety enhancement zone violations since it is not known to what extent violations will increase or decrease as a result of the actions recommended in this report. When the safety enhancement zone designation went into effect during Mardi Gras, disturbances decreased substantially. Feedback from stakeholders was that the increased fines acted as a significant deterrent to noise and party violations. It is possible that administrative citation revenue could decrease during designated safety enhancement zone periods because of this deterrent effect. ALTERNATIVES Packet Pg. 262 14 Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 5 1. Should the Council desire significant modifications to the recommended ordinance or resolution language, staff suggests the Council provide direction to staff and staff will return with new recommendations at a later date. 2. Should the Council desire simple changes to the ordinance or resolution language, the Council may direct staff to make these changes immediately. 3. The Council could choose to make no changes to the safety enhancement zone ordinance in which case the fines will not be greater than those in place during other time periods. ATTACHMENTS 1. Legislative draft of proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 9.22 2. Ordinance amending Municipal Code Chapter 9.22 3. Resolution designating citywide safety enhancement zones during the time periods encompassing Mardi Gras, Halloween, and St. Patrick’s Day. T:\Council Agenda Reports\Police CAR\2010\Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance Amendments\CAR - Safety Enhancement Zone 4-20-10.DOC Packet Pg. 263 14 FROM: Steve Gesell, Chief of Police Prepared By: Christine Wallace, Neighborhood Outreach Manager SUBJECT: SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDATION Introduce an Ordinance to specify the safety enhancement zones in the City and designate an additional city-wide safety enhancement zone for the time period encompassing the start of school for California Polytechnic University (Cal Poly) beginning on move-in day for Cal Poly housing and ending the second Monday morning following the beginning of the fall academic year. DISCUSSION On May 21, 2013, Council received a report identifying the health and safety issues experienced in the neighborhoods at the start of the academic school year and the strategies being considered to address the challenges it poses. The thrust of the report focused on initiating a collaborative effort with Cal Poly, Cuesta, and Neighborhood Groups to develop short, medium and long term strategies to address neighborhood issues. The Council supported the establishment of a Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort with representatives from the City, Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and Neighborhood Groups with the goal to enhance the quality of life for all residents, with particular emphasis on building positive relations between residential and student–aged neighbors through a cultural shift in social behaviors. Cal Poly is concurrently enacting a variety of initiatives to require and encourage students to participate in planned activities with housing and orientation groups. University Police will also be assisting the City’s Police Department in response to off-campus violations and disturbances that may involve students. Cal Poly ASI has also introduced a campaign relating to campus culture referred to as “The Mustang Way,” which encourages students to carry out their personal conduct in manner that reflects the principals of pride, responsibility and character both on and off campus. Safety Enhancement In May 2010, Council approved the use of the safety enhancement zones for Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day. The Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance had previously been adopted for the Mardi Gras time period beginning in 2004. Safety enhancement has shown to be an effective deterrent to address several types of behaviors. For example, during Halloween noise calls and subsequent citations have reduced by 50%. Minor in possession of alcohol and urinating in public citations showed the greatest decline. More significantly, open container citations have decreased by 70%. The Police Department believes the decrease in violations is the primary result of educational outreach efforts highlighting the increase in fines. This has translated into behavioral changes and an increase in voluntary compliance with the requirements of City ordinances. Meeting Date Item Number July 2, 2013 Packet Pg. 264 14 July 2, 2013 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE AMENDMENTS Page 2 The data below shows that the start of school time period is a time when a significant number of minor in possession of alcohol, drunk in public, open container and urinating in public citations and arrests occur. Including the start of school in safety enhancement could reduce the number of negative behaviors and in turn, enhance student success and safety. Start of School Minor in Possession Drunk in Public Open Container Urinating in Public Unruly Gathering Social Host Noise Party Calls Noise Party Citations 9/15/09-9/27/09 23 28 37 13 0 0 173 23 9/15/10-9/26/10 74 25 45 29 0 2 97 20 9/14/11-9/25/11 66 21 60 14 0 0 122 40 9/13/12-9/23/12 67 30 20 27 0 0 97 27 Additional data was gathered to show the significant decline in arrests and citations following second week and weekend of the academic year. Second weekend Minor in Possession Drunk in Public Open Container Urinating in Public Unruly Gathering Social Host Noise Party Calls Noise Party Citations 9/28/09-10/4/09 1 11 12 8 0 0 47 12 9/27-10-10/3/10 8 9 25 4 0 0 64 15 9/26/11-10/2/11 0 9 6 0 0 0 55 22 9/24/12-9/30/12 2 19 4 6 0 0 42 11 Staff recommends the safety enhancement time period begin on move-in day for Cal Poly housing and end the second Monday morning following the beginning of the academic year. The addition of this safety enhancement zone in combination with the other initiatives being brought forth by Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and the City collaboratively are anticipated to significantly increase voluntarily compliance, change cultural norms, and reduce adverse impacts in neighborhoods relating to the start of each academic year. FISCAL IMPACT In general, revenue resulting from violations does not cover the costs of providing law enforcement services. No new enforcement resources are being added to support the additional safety enhancement period. The proposed ordinance expands the time period for existing safety enhancement zone designations. It is unknown the amount of revenue that may be generated from safety enhancement zone violations since it is not yet known to what extent violations will increase or decrease. However, changes that result in increased fines are not likely to generate significant revenue to offset the existing enforcement costs. Packet Pg. 265 14 July 2, 2013 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE AMENDMENTS Page 3 ALTERNATIVE Do not introduce the ordinance. Staff does not recommend this alternative as safety enhancement has proven to be an effective deterrent to negative behaviors. ATTACHMENT Ordinance designating additional safety enhancement zones \\chstore4\Team\Council Agenda Reports\2013\2013-07-02\Safety Enhancement Zone Amend (Gesell-Wallace) Packet Pg. 266 14 MARCH 7, 2015, INCIDENT FINAL REPORT Cal Poly Student Affairs | studentaffairs.calpoly.edu Packet Pg. 267 14 Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 2 Introduction Over the last few years, Cal Poly students 1 have celebrated St. Patrick’s Day on a large scale. This St. Patrick’s Day celebration, also known by students as St. Fratty’s Day, has been held on or before St. Patrick’s Day. A former Cal Poly student, who was part of a Greek organization and lived at the “Pink House” residence located on 348 Hathaway Avenue, created this event approximately six years ago. Others living in the residence have continued to keep the event alive as a tradition. The number of students and others attending has consistently increased over time. In recent years, the City of San Luis Obispo has taken actions to address large and unruly gatherings by increasing fines and patrols for high student traffic locations. As is common practice, Dean of Students Jean DeCosta sent an e-mail to all Cal Poly students on Wednesday, March 4, 2015, with a message of student safety for Spring Break activities and end-of-quarter celebrations, including St. Patrick’s Day (Appendix A). The message also included reminders that double fines for certain municipal code violations would be going into effect – a practice implemented by the City of San Luis Obispo to address the problems associated with large and unruly gatherings in the neighborhoods, such as St. Fratty’s Day celebrations in the past. On Thursday morning, March 5, 2015, Cal Poly’s Greek Life Office met with a fraternity president regarding an email warning of a pending social gathering that would occur the weekend of March 7, 2015. The fraternity president also indicated that he had sent an e-mail to his chapter to not attend any social gatherings during the upcoming weekend. He wanted the university to know that he was not participating and would be out of town. All Greek chapters were on “social probation” during this time and were not permitted to have chapter-related social events. The Greek Life Office requested a copy of that e-mail from the fraternity president, which was received and sent to the Greek Life Office and the Dean of Students. Later that day, the Dean of Students Office spoke with the University Police Department regarding the status of Greek social probation and the alleged social gathering that might potentially occur on the weekend of March 7–8, 2015. In response, University Police contacted the SLO Police Department with this information to coordinate staffing, review information, and to collaborate on how to best prepare for the weekend. No one anticipated that the social gathering would begin on Saturday morning, March 7, at 4:30AM. The e-mail information received from the fraternity president did not contain that information. 1 The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. The university must have written permission from a student in order to release any information from that student’s education record. Therefore, we will not include in this report any identifying information about specific students. Packet Pg. 268 14 Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 3 Incident Overview Early on Saturday, March 7, 2015, at approximately 6:30AM, the Dean of Students and other university officials received information from San Luis Obispo and University Police that a roof had collapsed and that there were a large number of students gathered at or around 348 Hathaway Avenue, also known as the “Pink House.” Dean of Students Jean DeCosta went down to Hathaway Avenue immediately to conduct interviews with students to determine how the roof collapsed, to gather any other relevant information, and to provide university support to Cal Poly students. During the course of several interviews, Dean DeCosta learned that residents of the Pink House invited 20 to 30 people over for a social gathering that was to begin around 6:30AM. The residents told Dean DeCosta that they were having a social gathering to keep up with a long- standing tradition involving their residence, and that the gathering was a Bring Your Own Alcohol (BYOB) party. The residents stated that they called 911 at 6:00AM, just prior to the roof collapsing, because they realized that the gathering had gotten too big and was beyond their control. Dean DeCosta also learned that a resident next door (where the roof collapsed) was told by his landlord that the residents were not to participate in any social gathering as the landlord had heard rumors on Friday night that something big was going to happen over the weekend. The resident reported that he complied, waking up the next morning to large numbers of people in his yard and on his roof. Around 7:30AM, representatives from the Dean of Students office (the Dean and two Assistant Deans) came into the office to field phone calls from parents and other concerned parties as well as to determine who was hurt during the roof collapse. Dean DeCosta then visited a local hospital where the injured students were taken to ensure they received support. The two Assistant Deans of Students remained on campus to field phone calls until approximately 2:00PM. University Preliminary Investigation Process On Monday, March 9, 2015, the Dean of Students department through the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities (OSRR) made a plan to address the situation. OSRR sent an e-mail Wednesday, March 11 at 8:48PM to approximately 90 students requesting help on gathering information concerning the events of Saturday, March 7, 2015 (Appendix B). The students were identified by police, faculty, and staff as students who may have direct knowledge of the events that occurred and led up to the roof collapse. Students were identified by the following: Packet Pg. 269 14 Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 4 • Received a citation from police; • Posted something about the event on social media (e.g., Twitter, Instagram, Facebook); or • Lived in one of the houses near the event. On Thursday, March 12, 2015, a number of administrators interviewed over 60 students in the evening. Over the course of the week of March 16, 2015, OSRR identified another 25 students who may have had direct knowledge of the events leading up to and including the roof collapse. Although students were informed in the notification letter that they must attend the meeting or face possible judicial action on the part of the university, students were told when they arrived that their participation was optional. All students responded to written questions with varying degrees of knowledge relevant to the incident. The interviews lasted from ten minutes to one hour per student, depending on his or her knowledge. Preliminary Investigation Findings On Monday, March 23, 2015, OSRR submitted a preliminary report to the Dean of Students, with recommendations for next steps. Key points in that report are as follows: • In response to the anticipated increased fines, students living in the Pink House moved their St. Fratty’s Day celebration before St. Patrick’s Day and before Finals week. • Many students suggested that social media applications such as Twitter, Yik Yak, Instagram, and Snapchat contributed to the large gathering. Two days before the incident students posted items about “throw back Thursday” with pictures of last year’s event. Students reported that there was no centralized forum for disseminating information about the event – some students knew when/where up to two weeks in advance, others heard the night before. • Many students went to Hathaway with no expectation of alcohol being provided, but 40% of the interviewed students stated that there was alcohol at the event, brought by individuals. Most students intentionally became intoxicated prior to the event because there was no expectation of alcohol being provided at the event. Packet Pg. 270 14 Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 5 • Many students participated in the activity known as Brewfing (drinking on a roof). This is a recent social phenomenon that Cal Poly students engage in as part of the party culture. • Interviewed students reported that, based on their estimation, approximately 65% of the attendees were Cal Poly students. Students estimated that the rest of the attendees were either Cuesta College students or students from other institutions. • Interviewed students reported that many Greek members attended the event based on Greek letters being worn by individuals, social media messaging from known Greek members, and the volume of Greeks living in the residence halls who traveled to Hathaway. No evidence supports that the Greeks officially promoted or marketed the event; however, first-year Greek life members from the residence halls likely used word- of-mouth and social media to promote attending the event. • One student reported that more than half of residence hall students gathered and walked down to Hathaway together. • Members of the Pink House knew that the event was going out of control and tried to mitigate the damage by calling 911 and posting messages on social media to not come to the residence. • It was reported by students that there were a number of simultaneous house parties occurring in the residences near 348 Hathaway, which contributed to the large number of students in the central location. • They estimated that “every other house” was having a party. • The general feeling from students was that the further into the crowd students got, the more “unsafe” and “out of control” it felt – students on the periphery stated that it was “boring” and “hard to move around” because people were just standing around with no specific agenda or plan. • The majority of students stated that they did not have “fun” at the event – they simply attended because it was tradition. Further Investigation To delve deeper into the facts surrounding the incident, the university decided to hire an external investigator to conduct further investigatory interviews with a select number of students who were identified through the preliminary interview process as having direct knowledge of the events leading up to the social gathering. On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, university administration met to identify potential external investigators. On Friday, April 24, Packet Pg. 271 14 Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 6 2015, the university hired an external investigator, Mr. Ralph Latino. Mr. Latino has had extensive experience as an administrator in the CSU system. In addition, he has served in an interim role directing the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities at Cal Poly. From April 27–29, 2015, the external investigator conducted interviews with students identified from the preliminary investigation. Findings On Thursday, April 30, 2015, the external investigator provided his findings to OSRR for review. The key findings confirmed earlier information. The facts were as follows: • Students indicated that the marketing for the party was via text/word-of-mouth and that they couldn’t identify specific individuals or organizations that were hosting/organizing/marketing the event. • The interviewed students reported that they collaborated to determine a specific date for the event, specifically to avoid double fines. • Because many social media platforms are public and anonymous, as soon as there was enough “word of mouth,” and it was confirmed that the event was occurring on Saturday, March 7, 2015, many social media outlets “went viral” with information and ideas on what to do to celebrate the event (pre-game) and where to attend the event (Hathaway). • Many students engaged in pre-gaming. Pre-gaming means to drink alcohol prior to attending a social gathering, usually with close friends, with the intent to become intoxicated. • Students reported that this event as a “tradition” had an influence on how the event rose to the level of involving thousands of students. • While some members of Greek organizations helped rally groups of Greeks and non- Greeks, from the residence halls, surrounding areas, and so forth, there is no evidence that a specific Greek affiliated chapter or Greek leadership played a role in facilitating the event and the gathering. • Sitting, standing on, and hanging out on roofs (Brewfing) has been a frequent occurrence for the last few years. Very few students realized that there was any danger because it is such a common practice. Packet Pg. 272 14 Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 7 Conclusions In an era where social messaging platforms are students’ main form of communication with each other and the outside world, we have further realized the challenges of monitoring the multitude of platforms that students use to disseminate information. Social Media platforms can make a topic “trending” or “viral,” meaning that a large number of students will learn a very specific piece of information very quickly, thereby potentially instigating large crowds of students to, for example, attend a social gathering. Therefore, we will research, collaborate across CSU campuses and others, and identify ways to use this platform to help better inform when events are being planned. Initial action plans include the following: • Consider establishing a calendar for “traditional” and “common” student social events, with locations, dates, and who traditionally participates in those events. Disseminate this information to potentially impacted parties (both Cal Poly and community) for preventative purposes to help to plan and prepare accordingly. Use the calendar to contact and meet with individuals/groups that have historically planned the events, and educate the students on good risk management practices, potential harm should an event exceed safety and well-being, and keeping the event in compliance with City codes and university policies. In addition, use student judicial code to hold students accountable should a violation occur. • Consider developing stronger social media campaigns, discouraging students from attending and contributing to potentially unruly social gatherings, and educating students on the potential impact of these choices on their student status at Cal Poly. Develop and deliver media campaigns that particularly target freshmen students, intrigued by past events, to educate, inform, and discourage attendance. Involve ASI Student Government in assisting with messaging and outreach to students. • Meet with key stakeholders to explore developing more on-campus venues to encourage students to remain on campus during key celebration times. • Review establishing a team of staff and students designed to address off-campus events/parties. The team should be nimble and easy to bring together to review known information, have contacts in the student population that could help with gathering facts, and outreach quickly and easily to others who could be helpful in adding or confirming information. This team should advise campus leaders on strategies for immediately addressing a concern. • Partner with students to develop a community service campaign that will be completed by Fall Quarter 2015, aimed towards incoming students. The campaign will be, in part, created by students who were found responsible for the organization and dissemination of information that led to this event, and include guidance from Cal Poly staff and faculty. The purpose of this campaign is to address first-year students and the Packet Pg. 273 14 Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 8 importance of good citizenship, why one should avoid large social gatherings, what it means to be a “Mustang,” and the steps the university will take when a student violates the Standards for Student Conduct. • Students attempting to hold an annual event outside the “period of increased fines” for city code violations are contributing to a lack of preparedness and early response. Therefore, collaborating with the City of San Luis Obispo and Student-Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) to explore strategies and ideas designed to address this issue is recommended. Outcomes On Monday, May 4, 2015, OSRR charged students with violating the Standards for Student Conduct. FERPA prevents the university from providing information that could identify a student who went through a disciplinary process, and in this case, identifying how many students were charged may unmask the identities of those students. By Thursday, May 14, 2015, the students charged all agreed to sanctions via a Settlement Agreement. The students who were determined to have organized and disseminated information leading to the event were held responsible for their actions through the student conduct process 2, including both punitive and educational sanctions with the ultimate goal of preventing a situation like the one that occurred on Saturday, March 7, 2015, from ever occurring again. No single Greek chapter organized the event; however, many Greek members disseminated information regarding the event logistics and participated. To the best of our knowledge, the students who were residing in the Pink House on 348 Hathaway were not given the opportunity to renew their lease for the 2015-2016 school year. See the above suggestions for further training and outreach. 2 FERPA prevents the university from providing what sanctions students agreed to without express written permission from those students. Packet Pg. 274 14 Appendix A Page 1 From: "Dean of Students" <deanofstudents@calpoly.edu> To: cpstudents@calpoly.edu Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 11:08:33 AM Subject: St. Patrick's Day Dear Cal Poly Student: In the next few weeks you will have the opportunity to recognize St. Patrick’s Day, Cesar Chavez Day, and the successful completion of the quarter. If you choose to celebrate, please be mindful of the choices you make and, most important, to take care of each other. For Greek chapters, once social probation has been lifted remember to successfully register your event with the Greek life office. Whether you participate in activities on and off campus this weekend or over the spring break, please take precautions to ensure your safety and the safety of others. * Don't go out alone; travel with someone you trust. * If you go out, go with a group of friends, check in with each other often, and make sure to leave together. * If you're of legal age, limit alcohol and make good decisions. * Avoid risky situations; it's always safest to stay sober. * Never place your safety in the hands of a person under the influence, including yourself. * If someone becomes sick and needs emergency room help, please, please, please dial 911 for advice and assistance. Please note that the emergency room is a safe zone. You will not get in trouble helping a friend get to the emergency room. I also want to remind you to be aware of the consequences you might face for inappropriate and/or illegal behavior. Violation of campus policies or criminal laws regarding alcohol may result in severe academic sanctions or a permanent criminal record. The campus police and San Luis Obispo City Police are stepping up patrols with larger deployment of officers and increase in fines for the weekend. It is important for me to let you know that the Social Host Ordinance will be strictly enforced in the City of San Luis Obispo; that includes severe sanctions and double fines starting at $700. * If you host a party or gathering, you are responsible for making sure no one under the age of 21 possesses or consumes alcohol. * If anyone under 21 is drinking at your party, you could be held criminally liable: 1st offense is $2,000. * Keep your social gatherings small and in control. * Be aware and respectful of your neighbors. Packet Pg. 275 14 Appendix A Page 2 If you go downtown, I ask that you please remember you are always a Mustang. How you behave on and off campus reflects not only on you, but also on the University. Cal Poly has a great reputation. As citizens of this campus and of the community, I ask that you help us keep our reputation strong. Finally, it is all of our responsibility to protect the safety of one another. If you see someone that needs help, please call the University police or the SLO City police by dialing 911. Sincerely, Jean DeCosta, Ph.D. Dean of Students -- Jean Jean DeCosta, PhD Dean of Students Building UU 217 (805)756-0327 Packet Pg. 276 14 Appendix B Page 1 From: "Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities" <osrr@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:48:30 PM Subject: Required Informational Meeting Notice (URGENT) Dear student: We need your help. We are trying to understand the events that led up to a “St. Fratty’s Day” Party, which was held on Saturday, March 7, 2015 starting at 4:30 AM on Hathaway Avenue. We have scheduled some time to meet with you tomorrow, Thursday March 12, 2015 at 5:00 PM in Chumash Auditorium. We will provide food and beverages for this meeting because it’s during normal dining hours. The goal of this meeting is to collect as much information as we can regarding the March 7, 2015 event. Please come prepared to be open and helpful. You are REQUIRED to attend this meeting, but the meeting is not punitive; it is focused on gathering information and learning facts. You have the right to bring an adviser to this meeting. We know that this is close to final's week, so we will try to make every accommodation that we can to ensure that you have an interview during a time that meets your schedule. If you do have a conflicting appointment, please contact my office at 805-756-2794 immediately (during normal business hours) so that we can arrange another time to meet, or so that we can arrange a better time for you during our scheduled meeting. We cannot stress enough the importance of being open and honest, and any information that you provide will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Duane P. Rohrbacher, Jr., JD, PhD Assistant Dean of Students Student Rights & Responsibilities Building 52 - E7 Packet Pg. 277 14 9.22.040 City of San Luis Obispo safety enhancement zone. A. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone during the Mardi Gras period, effective from 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday preceding “Fat Tuesday” until seven a.m. on the Wednesday following “Fat Tuesday.” B. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone effective from 12:01 a.m. on March 1 17th (St. Patrick’s Day) until seven a.m. on March 18th of each year (St. Patrick’s Day is March 17 and St. Fratty’s Day varies in early March) .If March 1 falls on a Saturday, the safety enhancement period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Friday preceding March 1 until seven a.m. on March 18. If March 17 falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement period will be effective from 12:01 am. on March 1 until seven a.m. on the Monday following March 17. C. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on October 31st (Halloween) until seven a.m. on November 1st of each year. If Halloween falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement zone period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday falling on or preceding October 31st until seven a.m. on the Monday following October 31st. D. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on the first day of Cal Poly University’s housing move-in day until seven a.m. of the Monday following the first weekend of the fall academic school year. (Ord. 1590 § 2, 2013) Packet Pg. 278 14 O ______ ORDINANCE NO. _____ (2017 SERIES) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9.22.040 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE THE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE TIME PERIOD SURROUNDING ST. PATRICK’S DAY AND ST. FRATTY’S DAY WHEREAS, the Council previously added Chapter 9.22 to the Municipal Code designating specific geographical areas as safety enhancement zones during specified times, and imposed double fines for violations of the Municipal Code in those zones and times, in order to protect the public health, welfare and safety; and WHEREAS, Section 9.22.040 B of that chapter designated the entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo as a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on March 17th (St. Patrick’s Day) until seven a.m. on March 18th of each year; WHEREAS, the City Council has observed activities and considered information regarding annually recurring incidences of conduct during on varying dates in March before and around March 17 (St. Patrick’s Day) associated with an event locally known as “St. Fratty’s Day”, impacting public and private property and the public peace, safety and tranquility of city residents, and resulting in unreasonable noise, extensive public consumption of alcohol, public urination, underage drinking, personal injuries, property damage, traffic hazards, and littering; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to expand the safety enhancement zone period associated with St. Patrick’s Day and St. Fratty’s Day, in order to prevent public harm and address the threat to public health and safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The City council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. That activities during the period of time surround St. Patrick’s Day and a local event known as St. Fratty’s Day have regularly created conditions and circumstances through the city that have previously resulted in and annually create significant threats to public health and safety, including large crowds, excessive and illegal alcohol consumption, and public drunkenness B. That conditions and circumstances associated with these events are not isolated to any one area of the City and impact many different neighborhoods and the downtown. C. That the threats to public peace and safety would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. D. That these findings are based on the knowledge and observations of the City Council, as well as data and information provided by City residents and the Police Department Packet Pg. 279 14 Ordinance No. _____ (2017 Series) Page 2 O ______ regarding increased instances of activities and criminal behavior threatening the public peace and safety throughout the City during the time periods specified herein. SECTION 2. Section 9.22.040 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 9.22.040 City of San Luis Obispo safety enhancement zone. A. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone during the Mardi Gras period, effective from 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday preceding “Fat Tuesday” until seven a.m. on the Wednesday following “Fat Tuesday.” B. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone effective from 12:01 a.m. on March 17th (St. Patrick’s Day) 1 until seven a.m. on March 18th of each year (St. Patrick’s Day is March 17 and St. Fratty’s Day varies in early March). If March 1 falls on a Saturday, the safety enhancement period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Friday preceding March 1 until seven a.m. on March 18. If March 17 falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement period will be effective from 12:01 am. on March 1 until seven a.m. on the Monday following March 17. C. The entire area within the city limits of Sa n Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on October 31st (Halloween) until seven a.m. on November 1st of each year. If Halloween falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement zone period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday falling on or preceding October 31st until seven a.m. on the Monday following October 31st. D. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on the first day of Cal Poly University’s housing move-in day until seven a.m. of the Monday following the first weekend of the fall academic school year SECTION 3. Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Ordinance or the application of this Ordinance to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. SECTION 4. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the ____ day of ____, 2017, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the ____ day of ____, 2017, on the following vote: AYES: Packet Pg. 280 14 Ordinance No. _____ (2017 Series) Page 3 O ______ NOES: ABSENT: ____________________________________ Mayor Heidi Harmon ATTEST: ____________________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, this ______ day of ______________, _________. ______________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk Packet Pg. 281 14 Page intentionally left blank. Packet Pg. 282 14 MARCH 7, 2015, INCIDENT FINAL REPORT Cal Poly Student Affairs | studentaffairs.calpoly.edu Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 2 Introduction Over the last few years, Cal Poly students 1 have celebrated St. Patrick’s Day on a large scale. This St. Patrick’s Day celebration, also known by students as St. Fratty’s Day, has been held on or before St. Patrick’s Day. A former Cal Poly student, who was part of a Greek organization and lived at the “Pink House” residence located on 348 Hathaway Avenue, created this event approximately six years ago. Others living in the residence have continued to keep the event alive as a tradition. The number of students and others attending has consistently increased over time. In recent years, the City of San Luis Obispo has taken actions to address large and unruly gatherings by increasing fines and patrols for high student traffic locations. As is common practice, Dean of Students Jean DeCosta sent an e-mail to all Cal Poly students on Wednesday, March 4, 2015, with a message of student safety for Spring Break activities and end-of-quarter celebrations, including St. Patrick’s Day (Appendix A). The message also included reminders that double fines for certain municipal code violations would be going into effect – a practice implemented by the City of San Luis Obispo to address the problems associated with large and unruly gatherings in the neighborhoods, such as St. Fratty’s Day celebrations in the past. On Thursday morning, March 5, 2015, Cal Poly’s Greek Life Office met with a fraternity president regarding an email warning of a pending social gathering that would occur the weekend of March 7, 2015. The fraternity president also indicated that he had sent an e-mail to his chapter to not attend any social gatherings during the upcoming weekend. He wanted the university to know that he was not participating and would be out of town. All Greek chapters were on “social probation” during this time and were not permitted to have chapter-related social events. The Greek Life Office requested a copy of that e-mail from the fraternity president, which was received and sent to the Greek Life Office and the Dean of Students. Later that day, the Dean of Students Office spoke with the University Police Department regarding the status of Greek social probation and the alleged social gathering that might potentially occur on the weekend of March 7–8, 2015. In response, University Police contacted the SLO Police Department with this information to coordinate staffing, review information, and to collaborate on how to best prepare for the weekend. No one anticipated that the social gathering would begin on Saturday morning, March 7, at 4:30AM. The e-mail information received from the fraternity president did not contain that information. 1 The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. The university must have written permission from a student in order to release any information from that student’s education record. Therefore, we will not include in this report any identifying information about specific students. Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 3 Incident Overview Early on Saturday, March 7, 2015, at approximately 6:30AM, the Dean of Students and other university officials received information from San Luis Obispo and University Police that a roof had collapsed and that there were a large number of students gathered at or around 348 Hathaway Avenue, also known as the “Pink House.” Dean of Students Jean DeCosta went down to Hathaway Avenue immediately to conduct interviews with students to determine how the roof collapsed, to gather any other relevant information, and to provide university support to Cal Poly students. During the course of several interviews, Dean DeCosta learned that residents of the Pink House invited 20 to 30 people over for a social gathering that was to begin around 6:30AM. The residents told Dean DeCosta that they were having a social gathering to keep up with a long- standing tradition involving their residence, and that the gathering was a Bring Your Own Alcohol (BYOB) party. The residents stated that they called 911 at 6:00AM, just prior to the roof collapsing, because they realized that the gathering had gotten too big and was beyond their control. Dean DeCosta also learned that a resident next door (where the roof collapsed) was told by his landlord that the residents were not to participate in any social gathering as the landlord had heard rumors on Friday night that something big was going to happen over the weekend. The resident reported that he complied, waking up the next morning to large numbers of people in his yard and on his roof. Around 7:30AM, representatives from the Dean of Students office (the Dean and two Assistant Deans) came into the office to field phone calls from parents and other concerned parties as well as to determine who was hurt during the roof collapse. Dean DeCosta then visited a local hospital where the injured students were taken to ensure they received support. The two Assistant Deans of Students remained on campus to field phone calls until approximately 2:00PM. University Preliminary Investigation Process On Monday, March 9, 2015, the Dean of Students department through the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities (OSRR) made a plan to address the situation. OSRR sent an e-mail Wednesday, March 11 at 8:48PM to approximately 90 students requesting help on gathering information concerning the events of Saturday, March 7, 2015 (Appendix B). The students were identified by police, faculty, and staff as students who may have direct knowledge of the events that occurred and led up to the roof collapse. Students were identified by the following: Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 4 • Received a citation from police; • Posted something about the event on social media (e.g., Twitter, Instagram, Facebook); or • Lived in one of the houses near the event. On Thursday, March 12, 2015, a number of administrators interviewed over 60 students in the evening. Over the course of the week of March 16, 2015, OSRR identified another 25 students who may have had direct knowledge of the events leading up to and including the roof collapse. Although students were informed in the notification letter that they must attend the meeting or face possible judicial action on the part of the university, students were told when they arrived that their participation was optional. All students responded to written questions with varying degrees of knowledge relevant to the incident. The interviews lasted from ten minutes to one hour per student, depending on his or her knowledge. Preliminary Investigation Findings On Monday, March 23, 2015, OSRR submitted a preliminary report to the Dean of Students, with recommendations for next steps. Key points in that report are as follows: • In response to the anticipated increased fines, students living in the Pink House moved their St. Fratty’s Day celebration before St. Patrick’s Day and before Finals week. • Many students suggested that social media applications such as Twitter, Yik Yak, Instagram, and Snapchat contributed to the large gathering. Two days before the incident students posted items about “throw back Thursday” with pictures of last year’s event. Students reported that there was no centralized forum for disseminating information about the event – some students knew when/where up to two weeks in advance, others heard the night before. • Many students went to Hathaway with no expectation of alcohol being provided, but 40% of the interviewed students stated that there was alcohol at the event, brought by individuals. Most students intentionally became intoxicated prior to the event because there was no expectation of alcohol being provided at the event. Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 5 • Many students participated in the activity known as Brewfing (drinking on a roof). This is a recent social phenomenon that Cal Poly students engage in as part of the party culture. • Interviewed students reported that, based on their estimation, approximately 65% of the attendees were Cal Poly students. Students estimated that the rest of the attendees were either Cuesta College students or students from other institutions. • Interviewed students reported that many Greek members attended the event based on Greek letters being worn by individuals, social media messaging from known Greek members, and the volume of Greeks living in the residence halls who traveled to Hathaway. No evidence supports that the Greeks officially promoted or marketed the event; however, first-year Greek life members from the residence halls likely used word- of-mouth and social media to promote attending the event. • One student reported that more than half of residence hall students gathered and walked down to Hathaway together. • Members of the Pink House knew that the event was going out of control and tried to mitigate the damage by calling 911 and posting messages on social media to not come to the residence. • It was reported by students that there were a number of simultaneous house parties occurring in the residences near 348 Hathaway, which contributed to the large number of students in the central location. • They estimated that “every other house” was having a party. • The general feeling from students was that the further into the crowd students got, the more “unsafe” and “out of control” it felt – students on the periphery stated that it was “boring” and “hard to move around” because people were just standing around with no specific agenda or plan. • The majority of students stated that they did not have “fun” at the event – they simply attended because it was tradition. Further Investigation To delve deeper into the facts surrounding the incident, the university decided to hire an external investigator to conduct further investigatory interviews with a select number of students who were identified through the preliminary interview process as having direct knowledge of the events leading up to the social gathering. On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, university administration met to identify potential external investigators. On Friday, April 24, Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 6 2015, the university hired an external investigator, Mr. Ralph Latino. Mr. Latino has had extensive experience as an administrator in the CSU system. In addition, he has served in an interim role directing the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities at Cal Poly. From April 27–29, 2015, the external investigator conducted interviews with students identified from the preliminary investigation. Findings On Thursday, April 30, 2015, the external investigator provided his findings to OSRR for review. The key findings confirmed earlier information. The facts were as follows: • Students indicated that the marketing for the party was via text/word-of-mouth and that they couldn’t identify specific individuals or organizations that were hosting/organizing/marketing the event. • The interviewed students reported that they collaborated to determine a specific date for the event, specifically to avoid double fines. • Because many social media platforms are public and anonymous, as soon as there was enough “word of mouth,” and it was confirmed that the event was occurring on Saturday, March 7, 2015, many social media outlets “went viral” with information and ideas on what to do to celebrate the event (pre-game) and where to attend the event (Hathaway). • Many students engaged in pre-gaming. Pre-gaming means to drink alcohol prior to attending a social gathering, usually with close friends, with the intent to become intoxicated. • Students reported that this event as a “tradition” had an influence on how the event rose to the level of involving thousands of students. • While some members of Greek organizations helped rally groups of Greeks and non- Greeks, from the residence halls, surrounding areas, and so forth, there is no evidence that a specific Greek affiliated chapter or Greek leadership played a role in facilitating the event and the gathering. • Sitting, standing on, and hanging out on roofs (Brewfing) has been a frequent occurrence for the last few years. Very few students realized that there was any danger because it is such a common practice. Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 7 Conclusions In an era where social messaging platforms are students’ main form of communication with each other and the outside world, we have further realized the challenges of monitoring the multitude of platforms that students use to disseminate information. Social Media platforms can make a topic “trending” or “viral,” meaning that a large number of students will learn a very specific piece of information very quickly, thereby potentially instigating large crowds of students to, for example, attend a social gathering. Therefore, we will research, collaborate across CSU campuses and others, and identify ways to use this platform to help better inform when events are being planned. Initial action plans include the following: • Consider establishing a calendar for “traditional” and “common” student social events, with locations, dates, and who traditionally participates in those events. Disseminate this information to potentially impacted parties (both Cal Poly and community) for preventative purposes to help to plan and prepare accordingly. Use the calendar to contact and meet with individuals/groups that have historically planned the events, and educate the students on good risk management practices, potential harm should an event exceed safety and well-being, and keeping the event in compliance with City codes and university policies. In addition, use student judicial code to hold students accountable should a violation occur. • Consider developing stronger social media campaigns, discouraging students from attending and contributing to potentially unruly social gatherings, and educating students on the potential impact of these choices on their student status at Cal Poly. Develop and deliver media campaigns that particularly target freshmen students, intrigued by past events, to educate, inform, and discourage attendance. Involve ASI Student Government in assisting with messaging and outreach to students. • Meet with key stakeholders to explore developing more on-campus venues to encourage students to remain on campus during key celebration times. • Review establishing a team of staff and students designed to address off-campus events/parties. The team should be nimble and easy to bring together to review known information, have contacts in the student population that could help with gathering facts, and outreach quickly and easily to others who could be helpful in adding or confirming information. This team should advise campus leaders on strategies for immediately addressing a concern. • Partner with students to develop a community service campaign that will be completed by Fall Quarter 2015, aimed towards incoming students. The campaign will be, in part, created by students who were found responsible for the organization and dissemination of information that led to this event, and include guidance from Cal Poly staff and faculty. The purpose of this campaign is to address first-year students and the Cal Poly | March 7, 2015, Incident - Final Report Page 8 importance of good citizenship, why one should avoid large social gatherings, what it means to be a “Mustang,” and the steps the university will take when a student violates the Standards for Student Conduct. • Students attempting to hold an annual event outside the “period of increased fines” for city code violations are contributing to a lack of preparedness and early response. Therefore, collaborating with the City of San Luis Obispo and Student-Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) to explore strategies and ideas designed to address this issue is recommended. Outcomes On Monday, May 4, 2015, OSRR charged students with violating the Standards for Student Conduct. FERPA prevents the university from providing information that could identify a student who went through a disciplinary process, and in this case, identifying how many students were charged may unmask the identities of those students. By Thursday, May 14, 2015, the students charged all agreed to sanctions via a Settlement Agreement. The students who were determined to have organized and disseminated information leading to the event were held responsible for their actions through the student conduct process 2, including both punitive and educational sanctions with the ultimate goal of preventing a situation like the one that occurred on Saturday, March 7, 2015, from ever occurring again. No single Greek chapter organized the event; however, many Greek members disseminated information regarding the event logistics and participated. To the best of our knowledge, the students who were residing in the Pink House on 348 Hathaway were not given the opportunity to renew their lease for the 2015-2016 school year. See the above suggestions for further training and outreach. 2 FERPA prevents the university from providing what sanctions students agreed to without express written permission from those students. Appendix A Page 1 From: "Dean of Students" <deanofstudents@calpoly.edu> To: cpstudents@calpoly.edu Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 11:08:33 AM Subject: St. Patrick's Day Dear Cal Poly Student: In the next few weeks you will have the opportunity to recognize St. Patrick’s Day, Cesar Chavez Day, and the successful completion of the quarter. If you choose to celebrate, please be mindful of the choices you make and, most important, to take care of each other. For Greek chapters, once social probation has been lifted remember to successfully register your event with the Greek life office. Whether you participate in activities on and off campus this weekend or over the spring break, please take precautions to ensure your safety and the safety of others. * Don't go out alone; travel with someone you trust. * If you go out, go with a group of friends, check in with each other often, and make sure to leave together. * If you're of legal age, limit alcohol and make good decisions. * Avoid risky situations; it's always safest to stay sober. * Never place your safety in the hands of a person under the influence, including yourself. * If someone becomes sick and needs emergency room help, please, please, please dial 911 for advice and assistance. Please note that the emergency room is a safe zone. You will not get in trouble helping a friend get to the emergency room. I also want to remind you to be aware of the consequences you might face for inappropriate and/or illegal behavior. Violation of campus policies or criminal laws regarding alcohol may result in severe academic sanctions or a permanent criminal record. The campus police and San Luis Obispo City Police are stepping up patrols with larger deployment of officers and increase in fines for the weekend. It is important for me to let you know that the Social Host Ordinance will be strictly enforced in the City of San Luis Obispo; that includes severe sanctions and double fines starting at $700. * If you host a party or gathering, you are responsible for making sure no one under the age of 21 possesses or consumes alcohol. * If anyone under 21 is drinking at your party, you could be held criminally liable: 1st offense is $2,000. * Keep your social gatherings small and in control. * Be aware and respectful of your neighbors. Appendix A Page 2 If you go downtown, I ask that you please remember you are always a Mustang. How you behave on and off campus reflects not only on you, but also on the University. Cal Poly has a great reputation. As citizens of this campus and of the community, I ask that you help us keep our reputation strong. Finally, it is all of our responsibility to protect the safety of one another. If you see someone that needs help, please call the University police or the SLO City police by dialing 911. Sincerely, Jean DeCosta, Ph.D. Dean of Students -- Jean Jean DeCosta, PhD Dean of Students Building UU 217 (805)756-0327 Appendix B Page 1 From: "Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities" <osrr@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:48:30 PM Subject: Required Informational Meeting Notice (URGENT) Dear student: We need your help. We are trying to understand the events that led up to a “St. Fratty’s Day” Party, which was held on Saturday, March 7, 2015 starting at 4:30 AM on Hathaway Avenue. We have scheduled some time to meet with you tomorrow, Thursday March 12, 2015 at 5:00 PM in Chumash Auditorium. We will provide food and beverages for this meeting because it’s during normal dining hours. The goal of this meeting is to collect as much information as we can regarding the March 7, 2015 event. Please come prepared to be open and helpful. You are REQUIRED to attend this meeting, but the meeting is not punitive; it is focused on gathering information and learning facts. You have the right to bring an adviser to this meeting. We know that this is close to final's week, so we will try to make every accommodation that we can to ensure that you have an interview during a time that meets your schedule. If you do have a conflicting appointment, please contact my office at 805-756-2794 immediately (during normal business hours) so that we can arrange another time to meet, or so that we can arrange a better time for you during our scheduled meeting. We cannot stress enough the importance of being open and honest, and any information that you provide will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Duane P. Rohrbacher, Jr., JD, PhD Assistant Dean of Students Student Rights & Responsibilities Building 52 - E7 council MatiwDe December 7 2004 AGEnaa nEpout N1301 n CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: Deborah Linden, Chief of Police Prepared by: Daniel R. Blanke, Police Captain SUBJECT: INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE ENABLING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, AND ESTABLISHING A CITY-WIDE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE DURING MARDI GRAS CAO RECOMMENDATION That the City Council introduce an ordinance adding Chapter 9.22 to Title 9 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that would: 1. Enable the designation of Safety Enhancement Zones in the City of San Luis Obispo to temporarily increase fines and penalties for certain Municipal Code violations for a designated time period; and 2. Establish a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during the period of Mardi Gras each year. DISCUSSION Background At the September 21, 2004 meeting of the City Council, Police Department staff presented a planning update for Mardi Gras weekend 2005, which included a series of strategies designed to prevent a recurrence of the dangerous and violent activity witnessed during the 2004 Mardi Gras weekend. During this report to Council, staff requested Council consider a new strategy being successfully used in the City of Newport Beach called a Safety Enhancement Zone. Each year, Newport Beach experiences significant problems with alcohol, noise, and parties along their beach area on July 4. The City enacted an ordinance that created a Safety Enhancement Zone that encompasses the problem area and is posted as such prior to the July 4 holiday. When the Safety Enhancement Zone is activated, all fines for Municipal Code violations are automatically tripled. The Police Department does extensive outreach prior to the holiday to notify residents of the enhancement zone and increased fines. This ordinance has proven very effective in increasing the safety of residents in the area by deterring unlawful behavior because potential violators know the resulting fines will be tripled in "The Zone." At the September 21, 2004 meeting, Council approved the concept of Safety Enhancement Zones in San Luis Obispo during Mardi Gras, and directed staff to return with an appropriate ordinance. ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page 2 Feedback from Community Stakeholders When the concept of Safety Enhancement Zones was first introduced to Council, staff felt that the Zones would be most effective if they encompassed specific geographic areas, such as the Foothill/California area and the downtown corridor. This model is patterned after the ordinance being utilized in Newport Beach. Since that time, staff and Council have received feedback from community members concerned about the designation of specific geographic zones, and urging staff to consider the idea of a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during Mardi Gras weekend. In the weeks following that meeting, staff received comments from and met with various community members and groups to discuss the Safety Enhancement Zone concept and any concerns these stakeholders may have. Specifically, staff met with the Mardi Gras subcommittee of the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC), which is comprised of student leaders from Cal Poly and Cuesta, as well as Cal Poly staff members, community representatives, and city staff. Police Department staff also met with representatives from Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN). The prevailing opinion was that designating specific geographic zones during Mardi Gras weekend, especially in the Foothill/California area, would give the perception that students were being unfairly targeted for enforcement and, at the same time, could drive unruly people into other areas of the City simply because they would not have to be concerned about the enhanced penalties associated with the Safety Enhancement Zones. Stakeholders felt that the problems.associated with Mardi Gras were significant throughout the City, including in neighborhoods not included in the originally conceived geographic zones. During these meetings, the concept of a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during Mardi Gras was discussed and received strong support. Staff and stakeholders believe it would provide a significant deterrent to criminal behavior throughout the City during Mardi Gras without risk of shifting the problems to different areas of the City, or being perceived as targeting only students for enforcement. Staff believes a city-wide zone would still meet our advance messaging objectives by alerting potential visitors in advance that fines will be tripled throughout the City during Mardi Gras. At the October 21, 2004, SCLC meeting, a motion was introduced to support the concept of a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during Mardi Gras weekend. The motion was approved unanimously by the voting members present. RQN has expressed their support for the same city- wide concept. How would the Safety Enhancement Zone work? The proposed ordinance would provide Council with a means, by ordinance or resolution, to designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" for a specified period of time, upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The ordinance would also designate the City of San Luis Obispo as a Safety Enhancement Zone for the period of Mardi Gras each year, defined as the period from 12:01 am on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 am on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday." D— Z 1 J/ ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page 3 When an area is designated by Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone for a specified time period, such as the entire City during Mardi Gras, then fines are tripled' for violations of the following Municipal Code provisions: Chapter 9.04 Possession of open containers or consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places Chapter 9.05 Hosting a gathering where underage persons consume alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urination in public Staff is recommending limiting the fine increases to these specific Municipal Code provisions because each is directly related to the problems the City experiences during Mardi Gras, such as excessive and illegal alcohol abuse, and out-of-control parties. These violations are a major contributor to subsequent violence, injuries, and arrests. Tripling the fines for such conduct provides law enforcement with a tool to better prevent and control misconduct, and allows the citizens of San Luis Obispo to send a loud and clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated here during Mardi Gras. Council has the ability to amend this list of violations, or to apply the Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance to all Municipal Code violations. Notification that certain Municipal Code fines in the City of San Luis Obispo would be tripled during Mardi Gras would be made well in advance of the effective date. The City is undertaking a significant Mardi Gras multi-media messaging campaign and the new ordinance would be included as part of that messaging. A Safety Enhancement Zone ordinance would not apply to violations of state law, such as public intoxication and inciting a riot, since the Council does not have the legal authority to increase fines for these violations. The addition of an ordinance that enables Council to designate Safety Enhancements Zones provides Council a means to create, enhance, repeal, or modify zone locations, days, or hours by resolution when necessary. For example, Halloween has been a significant public safety problem in other communities and we are beginning to experience increased problems here in San Luis Obispo associated with this holiday. Should these problems become significant, Council would have the legal authority to create Safety Enhancement Zones if they desire, and upon appropriate findings as outlined in the ordinance. Penalties for violations committed in the Safety Enhancement Zone The Police Department, in coordination with the City Attorney and Finance Department, has determined that the City's existing administrative citation process would be most appropriate to process citations issued for violations of Municipal Codes under the umbrella of the Safety Enhancement Zone ordinance. Police officers would issue administrative citations for violations of the designated Municipal Code provisions, and the City Attorney's Office would be 1 The maximum fine for a third infraction offense understate law is$1,000. Hence,a third violation is not actually tripled. U-3 ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page-4. responsible for prosecuting violations. The attached ordinance provides that violations may also be prosecuted criminally. Normally, these violations are prosecuted as infractions, which currently carry the following penalties, per section 1.12.040 of the Municipal Code: First offense: 100 fine Second offense within l year: 200 fine Third or more offenses within 1 year: 500 fine Violations committed while a Safety Enhancement Zone is in effect, including during the specified period of time during Mardi Gras, would carry the following penalties: First offense: 300 fine Second offense within 1 year: 600 fine Third or more offenses within 1 year:1,000 fine The City Attorney also has the option of prosecuting a violation as a misdemeanor if the same individual commits three or more violations, or if the seriousness of a particular violation warrants it. CONCURRENCES As mentioned in this report, the city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone concept is supported by Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN), the Student Community Liaison Committee SCLC) and Cal Poly Associated Students, Inc. (ASI). FISCAL IMPACT The cost of printing new administrative citation books for use by officers would cost approximately $875.00. There would be some additional staff time required in the Police and Finance Departments, and the City Attorney's Office to process the citations issued during Mardi Gras. Staff from these departments have met and concur that the additional workload would be manageable using existing resources. It is anticipated that fine revenues would exceed the associated costs. ALTERNATIVES Alternative#1 Adopt an Ordinance Desigriating Multiple Safety Enhancement Zones within the City. The City Council could adopt an ordinance designating specific geographic areas as Safety Enhancement Zones, as originally described during the September 21, 2004 Council meeting. The recommended zones are a Foothill / California Safety Enhancement Zone, and a Downtown Safety Enhancement Zone. The Foothill / California Safety Enhancement Zone would comprise the area bounded by Murray and Taft Streets on the south, Kentucky and Hathway Streets on the east, the City Limit on the north and Santa Rosa Street on the west. Along the southern and eastern boundaries, the Zone would encompass the residential and commercial properties on both Io`/ ESTABLISHMENT OF SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES Page 5 sides of the roadway boundary. Notice of the Safety Enhancement Zone designation would be posted with signs around the perimeter of the Zone. The Downtown Safety Enhancement Zone would comprise the area permanently designated as a no skateboarding" zone that encompasses the downtown core. The Safety Enhancement Zone is bounded by Pacific Street on the south, Santa Rosa Street on the east, Palm Street on the north, and Nipomo Street on the west. Notice of the Safety Enhancement Zone designation would be posted with signs at the locations where signs are currently posted giving notice of the downtown skateboarding prohibition. This alternative is not recommended, as feedback from community stakeholders indicates that a City-wide Safety Enhancement Zone would be more effective overall and would alleviate concerns about student perception and the potential shifting of problems to non-zone areas. Alternative#2 Decline to adopt the ordinance. This action is not recommended. Staff believes that this ordinance will be an effective tool in discouraging bad behavior during Mardi Gras weekend, and will provide Council with necessary authority and flexibility to create or modify safety enhancement zones as a strategy to quell criminal behavior during specific periods of time. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Ordinance adding Chapter 9.22 to the Municipal Code, enabling Safety Enhancement Zones in the City of San Luis Obispo, and establishing a city-wide Safety Enhancement Zone during the specified period of Mardi Gras (recommended ordinance). 2) Draft Ordinance adding Chapter 9.22 to the Municipal Code, enabling Safety Enhancement Zones in the City of San Luis Obispo, and establishing Foothill/California and Downtown Safety Enhancement Zones during the specified period of Mardi Gras alternative#1). G:Wgenda-Ordinances-Resol\Safety Enhancement Zone-Agenda Rpt.DOC iv- s Attachment #1 ORDINANCE NO.2004 Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING CHAPTER 9.22 TO TITLE 9 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES, INCREASING FINES AND PENALTIES FOR MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS IN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE FOR THE TIME THE DESIGNATION IS EFFECTIVE,AND DESIGNATING THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AS A SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE DURING THE EXTENDED MARDI GRAS WEEKEND (12:01 AM ON THE THURSDAY PRECEDING"FAT TUESDAY" UNTIL 7:00 AM ON THE WEDNESDAY FOLLOWING "FAT TUESDAY OF EACH YEAR") WHEREAS, the potential for future incidents of public disorder and serious misconduct on a large scale requires that Council have the ability to establish Safety Enhancement Zones in specific locations and for specific time periods; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo has gained international notoriety for being the destination for participating in the largest Mardi Gras celebration west of the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras, San Luis Obispo is the site of numerous large parties, with throngs of young people traveling between them carrying open alcohol containers, urinating in public, and committing a variety of other alcohol-related violations; and WHEREAS, crowds, excessive alcohol consumption, and associated violent behavior during Mardi Gras have steadily increased over the last 10 years; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, a riot occurred at the intersection of Foothill and California Boulevards in San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, police made 200 arrests and issued 130 citations; and WHEREAS, the cost was approximately $500,000 for law enforcement and other public services required to control the chaos of Mardi Gras 2004; and WHEREAS, the increased penalties for citations will reduce the amount of criminal activity in San Luis Obispo during the period of Mardi Gras, and reduce the potential for a major disturbance by providing law and code enforcement officers with additional tools to obtain prompt compliance with all applicable statutes and ordinances; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo is a charter city with the authority to adopt ordinances and resolutions governing matters pertaining to municipal affairs, and the provisions of this ordinance are designed to protect the health safety and welfare of the residents of, and n Ordinance No.2004 Series) Page 2 visitors to, San Luis Obispo by enhancing the penalties for the violation of municipal ordinances to minimize the potential for a major disturbance and ensure appropriate responses to requests for emergency medical assistance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 9.22 is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 9.22 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES 9.22.010 Designation Process. The City Council may by ordinance, or by resolution upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare, designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" and specify the date and or time that the designation is effective upon a finding that the geographical area is subject to unique conditions and circumstances during a specific period of time that create the potential for a significant threat to public health and safety and that the threat would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The ordinance or resolution establishing a Safety Enhancement Zone shall contain the following provisions: (a) a description of the geographical area comprising the Safety Enhancement Zone, and (b) the date and time, or other specific description of the time period during which the Safety Enhancement Zone designation is applicable to the geographical area. 9.22.020 Safety Enhancement Zone Penalties and Violations. A. Any violation of designated sections of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that is committed within an area that has been designated by the City Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone, and during the time that designation is effective, shall be subject to the following: 1.A fine not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300.00) for a first violation; 2.A fine not exceeding six hundred dollars ($600.00) for a second violation of the same section within one year; 3.A fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each additional violation of the same section within one year. B. Safety Enhancement Zone Violations. Fines for violations committed in the Safety Enhancement Zone shall apply to the following provisions: Chapter 9.04 Possession of open containers or consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places), Chapter 9.05 (Hosting a gathering where underage persons consume alcohol), Chapter 9.12 (Noise control), Chapter 9.16 (Dangerous and deadly weapons), and Chapter 9.20 0-7 Ordinance No. 2004 Series) Page 3 Urination in public). A separate offense shall be deemed to have been committed whenever a person repeats the act that constitutes the violation. 9.22.030 Prosecution Criminally or Administratively. A violation under this Chapter may be prosecuted either criminally or administratively pursuant to Chapter 1.24. 9.22.040 City of San Luis Obispo Safety Enhancement Zone. The City Council designates as a Safety Enhancement Zone the entire area within the City Limits of San Luis Obispo. This designation is effective from 12:01 AM on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 AM on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday" during each year that the designation is in effect. SECTION 2. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the names of the Council members voting for and against it, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage, in The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance will go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the 7`h day of December, 2004, and adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the _ day of 2004, upon motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: David F. Romero, Mayor ATTEST: Audrey Hooper City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jonathan P. Lowell City Attorney 10-f Attachment #2 ORDINANCE NO.2004 Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING CHAPTER 9.22 TO TITLE 9 OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES, INCREASING FINES AND PENALTIES FOR MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATIONS IN AN AREA DESIGNATED AS A SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE FOR THE TIME THE DESIGNATION IS EFFECTIVE,AND DESIGNATING THE DOWNTOWN CORE AND AN AREA IN NORTH SAN LUIS OBISPO AS SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES DURING THE EXTENDED MARDI GRAS WEEKEND (12:01 AM ON THE THURSDAY PRECEDING "FAT TUESDAY" UNTIL 7:00 AM ON THE WEDNESDAY FOLLOWING "FAT TUESDAY OF EACH YEAR") WHEREAS, the potential for future incidents of public disorder and serious misconduct on a large scale requires that Council have the ability to establish Safety Enhancement Zones in specific locations and for specific time periods; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo has gained international notoriety for being the destination for participating in the largest Mardi Gras celebration west of the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras, San Luis Obispo is the site of numerous large parties, with throngs of young people traveling between them carrying open alcohol containers, urinating in public, and committing a variety of other alcohol-related violations;and WHEREAS, crowds, excessive alcohol consumption, and associated violent behavior during Mardi Gras have steadily increased over the last 10 years; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, a riot occurred at the intersection of Foothill and California Boulevards in San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, during Mardi Gras 2004, police made 200 arrests and issued 130 citations, and 40% those arrests and 42% of the citations occurred in the Foothill / California area;and WHEREAS, Downtown San Luis Obispo has also traditionally been a focal point of Mardi Gras related activity and, along with the FoothilUCalifomia area, the Downtown is the site of a disproportionate number of alcohol-related arrests and citations, compared to the rest of the City; and WHEREAS, the cost was approximately $500,000 for law enforcement and other public services required to control the chaos of Mardi Gras 2004; and WHEREAS, the increased penalties for administrative citations will reduce the amount of criminal activity in the FoothillICalifornia and Downtown Areas of San Luis Obispo Ordinance No. 2004 Series) Page 2 during the period of Mardi Gras, and reduce the potential for a major disturbance by providing law and code enforcement officers with additional tools to obtain prompt compliance with all applicable statutes and ordinances; and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo is a charter city with the authority to adopt ordinances and resolutions governing matters pertaining to municipal affairs, and the provisions of this ordinance are designed to protect the health safety and welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, San Luis Obispo by enhancing the penalties for the violation of municipal ordinances to minimize the potential for a major disturbance and ensure appropriate responses to requests for emergency medical assistance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 9.22 is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 9.22 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES 9.22.010 Designation Process. The City Council may by ordinance, or by resolution upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare, designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" and specify the date and or time that the designation is effective upon a finding that the geographical area is subject to unique conditions and circumstances during a specific period of time that create the potential for a significant threat to public health and safety and that the threat would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The ordinance or resolution establishing a Safety Enhancement Zone shall contain the following provisions: (a) a description of the geographical area comprising the Safety Enhancement Zone, and (b) the date and time, or other specific description of the time period during which the Safety Enhancement Zone designation is applicable to the geographical area. 9.22.020 Safety Enhancement Zone Penalties and Violations. A. Any violation of designated sections of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that is committed within an area that has been designated by the City Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone, and during the time that designation is effective, shall be subject to the following: 1. A fine not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300.00) for a first violation; 2.A fine not exceeding six hundred dollars ($600.00) for a second violation of the same o_ ace within one year; 3.A fine not exceu eding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each additional violation of the same ordi&nce within one year. I Cilzr,. p-/0 Ordinance No.2004 series) Page 3 B. Safety Enhancement Zone Violations. Fines for violations committed in the Safety Enhancement Zone shall apply to the following provisions: Chapter 9.04 Possession of open containers or consumption of alcoholic beverages in public places), Chapter 9.05 (Hosting a gathering where underage persons consume alcohol), Chapter 9.12 (Noise control), Chapter 9.16 (Dangerous and deadly weapons), and Chapter 9.20 Urination in public). A separate offense shall be deemed to have been committed whenever a person repeats the act that constitutes the violation. 9.22.030 Prosecution Criminally or Administratively. A violation under this Chapter may be prosecuted either criminally or administratively pursuant to Chapter 1.24. 9.22.040 California-Foothill Safety Enhancement Zone. The City Council designates as a Safety Enhancement Zone the area bounded by Murray and Taft Streets on the south, Kentucky and Hathway Streets on the east, the City Limit on the north and Santa Rosa Street on the west. Along the southern and eastern boundaries, the California-Foothill Safety Enhancement Zone will encompass the residential and commercial properties on both sides of the roadway boundary. This designation is effective from 12:01 AM on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 AM on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday" during each year that the designation is in effect. 9.22.050 Downtown Safety Enhancement Zone. The City Council designates as a Safety Enhancement Zone the area permanently designated as a "no skateboarding" zone that encompasses the downtown core. The Safety Enhancement Zone is bounded by Pacific Street on the south, Santa Rosa Street on the east, Palm Street on the north, and Nipomo Street on the west. This designation is effective from 12:01 AM on the Thursday preceding "Fat Tuesday" until 7:00 AM on the Wednesday following "Fat Tuesday" during each year that the designation is in effect. SECTION 2. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the names of the Council members voting for and against it, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage, in The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance will go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the 7h day of December, 2004, and adopted by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at a meeting held on the _ day of 2004, upon motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Ordinance No. 2004 Series) Page 2 during the period of Mardi Gras, and reduce the potential for a major disturbance by providing law and code enforcement officers with additional tools to obtain prompt compliance with all applicable statutes and ordinances;and WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo is a charter city with the authority to adopt ordinances and resolutions governing matters pertaining to municipal affairs, and the provisions of this ordinance are designed to protect the health safety and welfare of the residents of, and visitors to, San Luis Obispo by enhancing the penalties for the violation of municipal ordinances to minimize the potential for a major disturbance and ensure appropriate responses to requests for emergency medical assistance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 9.22 is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 9.22 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONES 9.22.010 Designation Process. The City Council may by ordinance, or by resolution upon a finding that there is a need to take immediate action to protect the public health, safety and welfare, designate a specific geographical area as a "Safety Enhancement Zone" and specify the date and or time that the designation is effective upon a finding that the geographical area is subject to unique conditions and circumstances during a specific period of time that create the potential for a significant threat to public health and safety and that the threat would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The ordinance or resolution establishing a Safety Enhancement Zone shall contain the following provisions: (a) a description of the geographical area comprising the Safety Enhancement Zone, and (b) the date and time, or other specific description of the time period during which the Safety Enhancement Zone designation is applicable to the geographical area. 9.22.020 Safety Enhancement Zone Penalties and Violations. A. Any violation of designated sections of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code that is committed within an area that has been designated by the City Council as a Safety Enhancement Zone, and during the time that designation is effective, shall be subject to the following: 1.A fine not exceeding three hundred dollars ($300.00) for a first violation; 2.A fine not exceeding six hundred dollars ($600.00) for a second violation of the same section within one year; 3.A fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for each additional violation of the same section within one year. Ordinance No. 2004-Series) Page 4 David F. Romero, Mayor ATTEST: Audrey Hooper City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jonathan P. Lowell City Attorney 0 -/3 RED FILE Associated StudentsMEETING AGENDA, Inc.. DATCGLt7/ California Polytechnic University SEM # San Luis Obispo Resolution#05-03 Support for a Citywide Safety Enhancement Zone During Mardi Gras 2005 Whereas: ASI is the official voice of the Cal Poly student body, and Whereas: The city council approved the concept of a safety enhancement zone on September 21"in the areas of Foothill, California, and the downtown areas during the week of Mardi Gras 2005, and Whereas:This strategy would isolate a section of the community during this week and would target a perceived demographic, and Whereas:The city needs to send a unified message that Mardi Gras is a San Luis Obispo issue and not a student issue, and Whereas:The city should not send a message that some neighborhoods are more valuable than others, and Whereas: Zoning a perceived population would hinder community relations and divide the community. Therefore Be it resolved: Cal Poly students support the creation of a citywide safety enhancement zone, and Furthermore Be it resolved:Members of the community.including students and long term residents should be equal partners and share the same equitable rights as citizens of San Luis Obispo. CERTIFIED as the true and correct copy, in witness thereof, I ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Board of have set my hand and Seal of the Associated Students,Inc. Directors by unanimous vote on November 10,2004. this 10th day of November 2004. ASIS retary I it of a Board ASI President Sponsored by: Joe Vaccaro, Vice Chair ASI Board of Directors, College of Engi Li UNCIL DD DIRBlakeBolton, ASI President CAO ten Salinas, ASI Board of Directors, College of Engineering ACAO IN DIR' RECEIVE®an Ficalora, ASI Board of Directors, College of Liberal Arts ATTORNEY IRE CHIEF CLERK ORIG p'N DIR DEC G 1 2C0't DF-PT A0S POLICE CHF R=C DIR SLO CITY CLERK uriL DIR HR DIR FROM: Steve Gesell, Chief of Police Prepared By: Christine Wallace, Neighborhood Outreach Manager SUBJECT: SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDATION Introduce an Ordinance to specify the safety enhancement zones in the City and designate an additional city-wide safety enhancement zone for the time period encompassing the start of school for California Polytechnic University (Cal Poly) beginning on move-in day for Cal Poly housing and ending the second Monday morning following the beginning of the fall academic year. DISCUSSION On May 21, 2013, Council received a report identifying the health and safety issues experienced in the neighborhoods at the start of the academic school year and the strategies being considered to address the challenges it poses. The thrust of the report focused on initiating a collaborative effort with Cal Poly, Cuesta, and Neighborhood Groups to develop short, medium and long term strategies to address neighborhood issues. The Council supported the establishment of a Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Effort with representatives from the City, Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and Neighborhood Groups with the goal to enhance the quality of life for all residents, with particular emphasis on building positive relations between residential and student–aged neighbors through a cultural shift in social behaviors. Cal Poly is concurrently enacting a variety of initiatives to require and encourage students to participate in planned activities with housing and orientation groups. University Police will also be assisting the City’s Police Department in response to off-campus violations and disturbances that may involve students. Cal Poly ASI has also introduced a campaign relating to campus culture referred to as “The Mustang Way,” which encourages students to carry out their personal conduct in manner that reflects the principals of pride, responsibility and character both on and off campus. Safety Enhancement In May 2010, Council approved the use of the safety enhancement zones for Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day. The Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance had previously been adopted for the Mardi Gras time period beginning in 2004. Safety enhancement has shown to be an effective deterrent to address several types of behaviors. For example, during Halloween noise calls and subsequent citations have reduced by 50%. Minor in possession of alcohol and urinating in public citations showed the greatest decline. More significantly, open container citations have decreased by 70%. The Police Department believes the decrease in violations is the primary result of educational outreach efforts highlighting the increase in fines. This has translated into behavioral changes and an increase in voluntary compliance with the requirements of City ordinances. Meeting Date Item Number July 2, 2013 July 2, 2013 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE AMENDMENTS Page 2 The data below shows that the start of school time period is a time when a significant number of minor in possession of alcohol, drunk in public, open container and urinating in public citations and arrests occur. Including the start of school in safety enhancement could reduce the number of negative behaviors and in turn, enhance student success and safety. Start of School Minor in Possession Drunk in Public Open Container Urinating in Public Unruly Gathering Social Host Noise Party Calls Noise Party Citations 9/15/09-9/27/09 23 28 37 13 0 0 173 23 9/15/10-9/26/10 74 25 45 29 0 2 97 20 9/14/11-9/25/11 66 21 60 14 0 0 122 40 9/13/12-9/23/12 67 30 20 27 0 0 97 27 Additional data was gathered to show the significant decline in arrests and citations following second week and weekend of the academic year. Second weekend Minor in Possession Drunk in Public Open Container Urinating in Public Unruly Gathering Social Host Noise Party Calls Noise Party Citations 9/28/09-10/4/09 1 11 12 8 0 0 47 12 9/27-10-10/3/10 8 9 25 4 0 0 64 15 9/26/11-10/2/11 0 9 6 0 0 0 55 22 9/24/12-9/30/12 2 19 4 6 0 0 42 11 Staff recommends the safety enhancement time period begin on move-in day for Cal Poly housing and end the second Monday morning following the beginning of the academic year. The addition of this safety enhancement zone in combination with the other initiatives being brought forth by Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and the City collaboratively are anticipated to significantly increase voluntarily compliance, change cultural norms, and reduce adverse impacts in neighborhoods relating to the start of each academic year. FISCAL IMPACT In general, revenue resulting from violations does not cover the costs of providing law enforcement services. No new enforcement resources are being added to support the additional safety enhancement period. The proposed ordinance expands the time period for existing safety enhancement zone designations. It is unknown the amount of revenue that may be generated from safety enhancement zone violations since it is not yet known to what extent violations will increase or decrease. However, changes that result in increased fines are not likely to generate significant revenue to offset the existing enforcement costs. July 2, 2013 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE AMENDMENTS Page 3 ALTERNATIVE Do not introduce the ordinance. Staff does not recommend this alternative as safety enhancement has proven to be an effective deterrent to negative behaviors. ATTACHMENT Ordinance designating additional safety enhancement zones \\chstore4\Team\Council Agenda Reports\2013\2013-07-02\Safety Enhancement Zone Amend (Gesell-Wallace) FROM: Deborah E. Linden, Chief of Police Prepared by: Chris Staley, Police Captain SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION TO ENACT SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE DURING SPECIFIED TIME PERIODS RECOMMENDATION 1. Introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 9.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code as follows: a. Amend section 9.22.020A to modify the fine schedule for safety enhancement zone violations; b. Amend section 9.22.020B to add Chapter 9.13 – Unruly Gatherings – to the list of eligible violations; c. Delete section 9.22.040 – City of San Luis Obispo Safety Enhancement Zone. 2. Adopt a resolution to designate a city-wide safety enhancement zone for the time periods encompassing Mardi Gras, St. Patrick’s Day and Halloween. 3. Direct staff to implement a biennial review process for safety enhancement zone designations. DISCUSSION Background In December 2004 the Council enacted Chapter 9.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code which created a process to designate a geographic area in the City as a safety enhancement zone during specific dates/times based upon a finding by the Council that such a designation is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Luis Obispo. Violations of the following Municipal Code ordinances during the enactment of a safety enhancement zone result in higher fines than violations when a safety enhancement zone is not in effect: Chapter 9.04 Possession or consumption of alcohol in public Chapter 9.05 Hosting a gathering with minors consuming or possessing alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urinating in public April 20, 2010 Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 2 Violations of these Municipal Code sections during a safety enhancement zone period result in a fine of $350 for a first offense, $700 for a second offense within a 12-month period, and $1000 for third or subsequent offenses in a 12-month period. At the time the safety enhancement zone ordinance was enacted in 2004, the regular fines for the Municipal Code sections above began at $100 for a first offense and increased for subsequent offenses within a 12-month period. When a safety enhancement zone was in effect, the fines essentially tripled, which acted as a strong deterrent to violating the law. However, since 2004, the Council has approved increases to the regular fines for alcohol, noise and urinating violations. As a result, the fines in effect during a safety enhancement zone period are the same as the regular fines for the violations listed above ($350/$700/$1,000). On September 29, 2009, during a study session with the Council, staff presented several strategies to reduce neighborhood noise and party disturbances and requested the Council provide direction to staff regarding the proposed strategies. During this study session, staff presented the need to amend the safety enhancement zone ordinance to update the fine structure. Staff also requested the Council provide direction regarding enacting a safety enhancement zone during other times of the year, such as Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day, in order to deter increasingly disruptive behavior. The Council directed staff to return with amendments to the ordinance and with proposed dates for the enactment of the safety enhancement zone ordinance. Ordinance Amendments Fine Structure The existing safety enhancement zone ordinance specifies the fine amounts for violations of certain ordinances when a safety enhancement zone is in effect. Since the regular fines for the listed violations have been increased, the fine amounts levied when a safety enhancement zone is in effect are no greater than the regular fine. Staff recommends amending the ordinance to read that fines for violations of the listed Municipal Codes shall be doubled, up to $1000 maximum, during a safety enhancement zone period. The maximum allowable fine for administrative violations under the City’s Municipal Code is $,1000. By amending the language to double the existing fines, the Council will retain the ability to adjust fines for specific Municipal Code chapters without having to amend the safety enhancement zone ordinance each time. The effect of doubling the fines during safety enhancement zone periods would be: Regular Fine Fine during Safety Enhancement Zone Period 1st offense $350 $700 2nd offense within a 12-month period $700 $1000 3rd or subsequent offense within a 12-month period $1,000 $1,000 Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 3 Add Unruly Gathering to list of Offenses On April 20, the Council will consider the final adoption of a new unruly gathering ordinance (Chapter 9.13 of the Municipal Code). Should the Council adopt the unruly gathering ordinance, staff recommends Chapter 9.13 be added to the list of offenses that would be subject to increased fines during safety enhancement zone periods in order to act as an additional deterrent during those times of the year when party activity is at its highest. Should the Council add Chapter 9.13 to the list of offenses, the following Municipal Code chapters will be included in the safety enhancement zone ordnance: Chapter 9.04 Possession or consumption of alcohol in public Chapter 9.05 Hosting a gathering with minors consuming or possessing alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.13 Unruly gatherings Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urinating in public Should the Council decide not to adopt the unruly gathering ordinance, staff will delete Chapter 9.13 from the list of offenses specified in the safety enhancement zone ordinance. Delete section 9.22.040 Designating a Safety Enhancement Zone When the safety enhancement zone ordinance was initially adopted in 2004, the Council included section 9.22.040 which designated a citywide safety enhancement zone during the period encompassing Mardi Gras. The Mardi Gras riot had occurred earlier that year and the safety enhancement zone ordinance was one of the strategies implemented to prevent a recurrence of the violence. Staff recommends deleting this section from the ordinance and instead, adopting a resolution designating the same period of time (Mardi Gras) a citywide safety enhancement zone. By creating the safety enhancement zone by resolution rather than including the language in the actual ordinance, the Council can more easily modify or eliminate the safety enhancement zone designation in the future without having to go through the cumbersome process of amending the ordinance. Resolution designating Safety Enhancement Zones Currently, the only designated safety enhancement zone is in effect citywide for the period of time encompassing Mardi Gras. Staff believes this designation has been particularly effective in quelling the violence associated with Mardi Gras and that it is very important to maintain this designation in order to ensure the large crowds and disruptive behavior associated with Mardi Gras does not return. Other communities have experienced the return of large unruly celebrations once special enforcement provisions have been lifted, and this risk exists for Mardi Gras in our City. The continuation of the safety enhancement zone designation will help ensure this does not occur. Therefore, staff recommends continuing the designation of Mardi Gras as a safety enhancement zone period by adopting a resolution to that effect. If the Council adopts the concept of a biennial review of safety enhancement zone designations, the Council will have future opportunities, beginning in 2012, to review the need for the safety enhancement zone designation during Mardi Gras. Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 4 Additionally, two occasions have become increasingly problematic in the City: Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day. Large crowds, parties, and excessive and illegal alcohol use have become associated with these occasions, posing a significant threat to public health and safety and resulting in increased crime and arrests. The Police Department is at maximum staffing during both events and incurs significant overtime costs as a result. Staff is concerned that these celebrations will continue to grow, as has occurred in other college communities such as Chico and Isla Vista. Staff believes the designation of citywide safety enhancement zones for the periods of time encompassing Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day would act as an effective deterrent to the unlawful behavior. Staff further recommends that when Halloween falls on or near a weekend (Thursday through Sunday), the citywide safety enhancement zone designation encompass the entire weekend in order to deter multi-night celebrations. Biennial Review Safety enhancement zone periods are meant to deter and address problems associated with certain occasions in San Luis Obispo, such as Mardi Gras. These occasions can change over time or new ones may become problematic. In order to ensure the designation of safety enhancement zone periods are still necessary, staff recommends implementing a biennial (every two year) review process by the Council of existing safety enhancement zone designations. This provides staff and the Council a regular opportunity to examine the continued need for existing safety enhancement zone designations, and to eliminate or add designations. If the Council directs staff to implement a biennial review process, the first review would be conducted in 2012 and every two years thereafter, unless there are no safety enhancement zone designations in effect. However, this does not prevent additions or modifications within the two year window if a need is identified. CONCURRENCES In developing the recommendations contained in this report, staff met with representatives from Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN) and Cal Poly Associated Students, Inc. (ASI). RQN supports the staff recommendations. ASI supports the biennial review of existing safety enhancement zone recommendations to ensure they are still necessary. FISCAL IMPACT Staff is unable to estimate the revenue that may be generated from safety enhancement zone violations since it is not known to what extent violations will increase or decrease as a result of the actions recommended in this report. When the safety enhancement zone designation went into effect during Mardi Gras, disturbances decreased substantially. Feedback from stakeholders was that the increased fines acted as a significant deterrent to noise and party violations. It is possible that administrative citation revenue could decrease during designated safety enhancement zone periods because of this deterrent effect. ALTERNATIVES Safety Enhancement Zone Amendments Page 5 1. Should the Council desire significant modifications to the recommended ordinance or resolution language, staff suggests the Council provide direction to staff and staff will return with new recommendations at a later date. 2. Should the Council desire simple changes to the ordinance or resolution language, the Council may direct staff to make these changes immediately. 3. The Council could choose to make no changes to the safety enhancement zone ordinance in which case the fines will not be greater than those in place during other time periods. ATTACHMENTS 1. Legislative draft of proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 9.22 2. Ordinance amending Municipal Code Chapter 9.22 3. Resolution designating citywide safety enhancement zones during the time periods encompassing Mardi Gras, Halloween, and St. Patrick’s Day. T:\Council Agenda Reports\Police CAR\2010\Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance Amendments\CAR - Safety Enhancement Zone 4-20-10.DOC 9.22.040 City of San Luis Obispo safety enhancement zone.  A. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone  during the Mardi Gras period, effective from 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday preceding “Fat Tuesday” until  seven a.m. on the Wednesday following “Fat Tuesday.”    B. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone  effective from 12:01 a.m. on March 1  17th (St. Patrick’s Day) until seven a.m. on March 18th of each  year (St. Patrick’s Day is March 17 and St. Fratty’s Day varies in early March) .If March 1 falls on a  Saturday, the safety enhancement period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Friday preceding March 1  until seven a.m. on March 18.  If March 17 falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety  enhancement period will be effective from 12:01 am. on March 1 until seven a.m. on the Monday  following March 17.       C. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from  12:01 a.m. on October 31st (Halloween) until seven a.m. on November 1st of each year. If Halloween  falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement zone period will be effective at  12:01 a.m. on the Thursday falling on or preceding October 31st until seven a.m. on the Monday  following October 31st.    D. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone  from 12:01 a.m. on the first day of Cal Poly University’s housing move‐in day until seven a.m. of the  Monday following the first weekend of the fall academic school year. (Ord. 1590 § 2, 2013)  O ______ ORDINANCE NO. _____ (2017 SERIES) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9.22.040 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE THE SAFETY ENHANCEMENT ZONE TIME PERIOD SURROUNDING ST. PATRICK’S DAY AND ST. FRATTY’S DAY WHEREAS, the Council previously added Chapter 9.22 to the Municipal Code designating specific geographical areas as safety enhancement zones during specified times, and imposed double fines for violations of the Municipal Code in those zones and times, in order to protect the public health, welfare and safety; and WHEREAS, Section 9.22.040 B of that chapter designated the entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo as a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on March 17th (St. Patrick’s Day) until seven a.m. on March 18th of each year; WHEREAS, the City Council has observed activities and considered information regarding annually recurring incidences of conduct during on varying dates in March before and around March 17 (St. Patrick’s Day) associated with an event locally known as “St. Fratty’s Day”, impacting public and private property and the public peace, safety and tranquility of city residents, and resulting in unreasonable noise, extensive public consumption of alcohol, public urination, underage drinking, personal injuries, property damage, traffic hazards, and littering; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to expand the safety enhancement zone period associated with St. Patrick’s Day and St. Fratty’s Day, in order to prevent public harm and address the threat to public health and safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The City council hereby finds and determines as follows: A. That activities during the period of time surround St. Patrick’s Day and a local event known as St. Fratty’s Day have regularly created conditions and circumstances through the city that have previously resulted in and annually create significant threats to public health and safety, including large crowds, excessive and illegal alcohol consumption, and public drunkenness B. That conditions and circumstances associated with these events are not isolated to any one area of the City and impact many different neighborhoods and the downtown. C. That the threats to public peace and safety would be reduced by enhanced penalties for violations of provisions of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. D. That these findings are based on the knowledge and observations of the City Council, as well as data and information provided by City residents and the Police Department Ordinance No. _____ (2017 Series) Page 2 regarding increased instances of activities and criminal behavior threatening the public peace and safety throughout the City during the time periods specified herein. SECTION 2. Section 9.22.040 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section is amended to read as follows: 9.22.040 City of San Luis Obispo safety enhancement zone. A. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone during the Mardi Gras period, effective from 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday preceding “Fat Tuesday” until seven a.m. on the Wednesday following “Fat Tuesday.” B. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone effective from 12:01 a.m. on March 1 until seven a.m. on March 18th of each year (St. Patrick’s Day is March 17 and St. Fratty’s Day varies in early March). If March 1 falls on a Saturday, the safety enhancement period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Friday preceding March 1 until seven a.m. on March 18. If March 17 falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement period will be effective from 12:01 am. on March 1 until seven a.m. on the Monday following March 17. C. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on October 31st (Halloween) until seven a.m. on November 1st of each year. If Halloween falls on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, the safety enhancement zone period will be effective at 12:01 a.m. on the Thursday falling on or preceding October 31st until seven a.m. on the Monday following October 31st. D. The entire area within the city limits of San Luis Obispo is designated a safety enhancement zone from 12:01 a.m. on the first day of Cal Poly University’s housing move-in day until seven a.m. of the Monday following the first weekend of the fall academic school year SECTION 3. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in The Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the ____ day of ____, 2017, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the ____ day of ____, 2017, on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ____________________________________ Ordinance No. _____ (2017 Series) Page 3 Mayor Jan Marx ATTEST: ____________________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________________ J. Christine Dietrick City Attorney IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, this ______ day of ______________, _________. ______________________________ Carrie Gallagher City Clerk 9/1/2015 1 Safety Enhancement Zone Amending the Ordinance for St. Patrick’s Day January 17, 2017 Recommendation Introduce an ordinance amending section9.22.040 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code regarding Safety Enhancement Zones to designate an additional city-wide safety enhancement period prior to and inclusive of St. Patrick’s Day 9/1/2015 2 What is the Safety Enhancement Zone In December 2004 Council enacted Chapter 9.22 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. This created a process to designate the entire City as a safety enhancement zone during specific dates/times to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Luis Obispo. Chapter 9.04 Possession or consumption of alcohol in public Chapter 9.05 Social Host - minors consuming or possessing alcohol Chapter 9.12 Noise control Chapter 9.13 Unruly Gathering Chapter 9.16 Dangerous and deadly weapons Chapter 9.20 Urinating in public Fine Structure Current Fines First Offense: $350.00 Second Offense (in 12 mo. Period): $700.00 Third and subsequent (in 12 mon period) $1,000.0 CAL POLY ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY (only for noise & alcohol infractions) Safety Enhancement Zone fines or “Double Fines” First Offense: $700.00 Second Offense (in 12 mo. Period): $1,000.00 Third and subsequent (in 12 mon period) $1,000.0 CAL POLY ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY (only for noise & alcohol infractions) 9/1/2015 3 Impacted Safety Enhancement Zone Periods Start of School to include Cal Poly move-in to first full week of instruction Halloween Day (to include attached weekend Thur - Sun) St. Patrick’s Day St. Patrick’s Day Celebrations Safety Enhancement Zone Time Period In May 2010 Council approved the addition of St. Patrick’s Day to the Safety Enhancement Zone St. Patrick’s Day was viewed as a heavily impacted day requiring increased police resources St. Patrick’s Day Time Period Start – 12:01 AM March 17 th End – 7:00 AM March 18 th 9/1/2015 4 Police Department Outreach “Avoid Party Regret” Media Releases Ads in New Times and Mustang News Social Media Ads Flyers/Posters distributed on both Cal Poly & Cuesta Campus Student Organization Presentations e-blast to Cuesta Students Video Ads at Cal Poly UU Collaboration with Downtown Association to distribute Posters throughout downtown Walk and Talks Outreach budget of $4000 “St. Fratty’s Day” The event is a pre-cursor to St. Patrick’s Day Organized to avoid increased fines and the quarter timing puts St. Patrick’s Day during finals week Over several years loosely organized event Early morning event traditionally held during weekend morning Date and time of event not know to law enforcement and difficult to predict The event has drawn thousands of participants who converge in residential areas near Cal Poly campus 9/1/2015 5 “St. Fratty’s Day” 2015 Extensive planning for event by SLOPD Varied dates (March 5th, 6th, 12th, 13th) Unpredictable Behavior Resource Heavy (people and equipment) SLOPD, Cal Poly PD, SO, CHP Community History of Riots (1990, 2004) Neighborhood Wellness Expensive (over $30k) “St. Fratty’s Day” 2016 9/1/2015 6 Why an Ordinance Change Public Health and Safety Neighborhood Wellness Potential for dangerous acts and violence Accountable for adverse behaviors Personal responsibility, awareness and concern Direction provided by City Council Why an Ordinance Change? 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Noise ‐Party (NSPY)  NSPY 1993 SNAP  First Deployed Safety  Enhancement Zone &Admin  Fines Civility Report   &  Cal Poly MOU Noise  Ord. change ‐1  DAC ‐Increase Fines ‐ Prop Owners Resp.  Start of School  Saftey Enhancement Zone 2016Party  Registration &  St. Patrick’s SEZ Unruly Gathering  &  Social Host  Neighborhood Wellness  Major City Goal   &  Other Important  Objective Neighborhood Officer  Program Safety Enhancement  Zone Halloween & St.  Pat's Unruly Gathering  and Social Host  Ordinance  Neighborhood  Services/Outreach  Manager 9/1/2015 7 St. Patrick’s Day Proposed Safety Enhancement Zone Period Ends at 7:00 a.m. Starts at Midnight St. Patrick’s Day Proposed Safety Enhancement Zone Period Ends at 7:00 a.m. Starts at Midnight 9/1/2015 8 That’s a long time Spontaneous and unpredictability of event Preparation is cumbersome and resource intensive Seems excessive and unfair Public safety & neighborhood wellness is priority Neighborhood impacts with mass attendance The City needs to engage more with students The City does extensive outreach with students both on and off campus Exclude Noise Violations from Amendment Noise Violations (related to parties) tend to be the police departments highest calls for service, which are the root of many large gatherings Identified Areas of Concern QUESTIONS? FROM: Deanna Cantrell, Chief of Police Prepared By: Brian Amoroso, Police Lieutenant SUBJECT: SORNA (SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT) GRANT APPLICATION RECOMMENDATION 1. Authorize staff to pursue a grant application submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, California Sex Offender Registry, for a total amount not to exceed $25,000 for equipment and training that will enhance our ability to manage our local sex offender population. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary grant documents, and appropriate the grant amount into the Police Department’s budget upon grant award. DISCUSSION The San Luis Obispo Police Department is required to register and manage all registered sex offenders that reside in the City of San Luis Obispo. We currently have approximately 59 registrants, with almost half listing ‘transient’ as their address. All registrants are required to report to the Police Department and register in scheduled intervals. In addition, pro-active compliance checks are conducted to ensure registrants are living at the locations they claim. With many of our registrants listing areas of public open space, bridges and creeks as their residence, Officers are required to search these out of the way areas in an attempt to make contact at these locations. GRANT DETAILS In late October of 2016, staff received notification of the availability of a federal grant to fund the purchase of equipment and training to enhance the management and notification process of sex offenders in our community. Funds for the expansion of existing registration and notification programs will be used for computers, cameras and training related to sex offender registration and notification. The grant request includes the purchase of and associated training for an Aerial Drone to facilitate compliance checks in difficult to reach areas. The use of the drone will enable Officers conducting compliance checks to locate and observe hidden encampments prior to walking in on foot, reducing the risk of entering into a dangerous environment. All operation of the drone will be conducted in accordance with departmental policy and existing FAA regulations. All pilots will be required to maintain a current FAA Unmanned Aerial Systems license. The Police Department will conduct community outreach through media releases, community meetings, neighborhood newsletters and social media. Information provided will be related to the operation, function, capabilities and limitations of the Aerial Drone as well as current legal and constitutional considerations related to its use. We will also collaborate with other City Departments including Parks and Recreation and Natural Resource Management to mitigate environmental impacts and concerns. The grant application deadline was November 10, 2016. Due to the delayed awareness of the grant and timeliness considerations, staff timely submitted the application prior to receiving City Council approval. Should Council not support the submittal of the effort, staff would withdraw the application. FISCAL IMPACT The grant specifically requires that approved expenditures be funded initially by the agency, then reimbursed by the grant after invoicing. All grant expenditures must be expended, invoiced, and reported to the California Department of Justice prior to May 15th, 2017. Additionally, purchased items cannot be removed from an existing budget and purchased with Grant funds. The San Luis Obispo Police Department will be required to comply with grant reporting and auditing requirements on funding usage. ALTERNATIVE Council may direct staff to withdraw the application for federal grant funding. Staff does not recommend this alternative, as the funding will enhance the Police Department’s ability to register, notify and manage our local sex offender population. 1/18/2017 1 Voluntary Party Registration Pilot Program City Council Study Session – January 17, 2017 Recommendations 1. Receive a presentation on voluntary party registration program options 2. Provide guidance to staff regarding initiation of a municipal voluntary program 1/18/2017 2 Background • Neighborhood Wellness/Community Civility Working Group formed in 2013 • Vision: a community in which year-round residents and students actively collaborate to build community and communicate in an environment that fosters mutual respect and understanding. • Goal: enhance the quality of life for all residents. • May 19, 2015 the Civility Report was presented to Council detailing a variety of recommendations that supported the vision and quality of life in the neighborhoods Civility Report – Implemented Recommendations 1. MOU with SLOPD & UPD to allow UPD citation powers for municipal ordinances up to 1 mile off campus (noise, open container, public urination, unruly gathering) 2. Rental Housing Inspection Program 3. Blight Education 4. Walk & Talks – Police & Code Enforcement 5. Unruly gathering ordinance amendment 6. Creation of an annual communication plan 1/18/2017 3 The International Town Gown Association recognized the efforts of the Civility Working Group with the Larry Abernathy Award at the 2016 ITGA Conference in Chicago, Illinois. Neighborhood Wellness Initiatives • Noise ordinance amendment – limited warnings, increased fines, included landlord fines • Adopted Unruly Gathering ordinance • Safety Enhancement Zone amendment – September dates added • Focused education & outreach in neighborhoods and on Cal Poly & Cuesta campuses to encourage voluntary compliance with City regulations related to noise, property maintenance & parking 1/18/2017 4 2584 2238 2013 1644 1729 1841 1779 1148 785 638 540 513 549 448 206 263 206 245 245 253 235 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Noise Party Data NSPY CALLS DACs CITES Existing Programs – What is the goal of party registration? 1. Educate hosts on responsible event planning. 2. Offer an incentive based approach to reduce the need for police interventions for noise disturbances. 3. Have quieter neighborhoods. 1/18/2017 5 University/City Reg  Form  Due Contact  #s Must  live at  house Eligible  Days Time to  end the  party Location Age of  registrant Violations Laws Misc Boulder, Colorado Program  managed by  University of  Colorado  Boulder Noon,  Friday 2YesFriday &  Saturday 20 min Party may only  be at place  indicated on reg form, registrants  must be on site 18 y/o Houses that  receive 2  consecutive  warnings lose  registration privileges for  four (4) months Must comply  with all laws No common areas Program Structure – Boulder, Colorado 1/18/2017 6 University/City Reg  Form  Due Contact  #s Must  live at  house Eligible  Days Time to  end the  party Location Age of  registrant Violations Laws Misc Fort Collins,  Colorado Co‐managed by  City &  University I week  prior 2Yes Fridays,  Saturdays  and  specified  holidays 20 min Party may only  be at place  indicated on  reg form,  registrants  must be on site 18 y/o If a warning or  citation is issued  at a reg party,  no parties can  be registered  for 6 months Must  comply with  all laws Criminal or MC  violations other  than noise will  result in  immediate police  action w/o a  warning call No common  areas Amplified music  must be inside Program Structure – Fort Collins, Colorado 74 47 75 18 3 574 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2013 2014 2015 Warnings & Citations from Registered Parties warnings citation Citation issued w/o warning 1/18/2017 7 Program launched on September 12, 2016 175 registered parties 11 warning calls No citations issued to registered parties University/City Reg  Form  Due Con. #s Must  live at  house Eligible  Days Time  to end  the  party Location Age of  registrant Violations Laws Misc Non Reg Parties Amherst, Massachusetts Program  managed by  UMASS  One  week  prior 1 Not  specified Fridays &  Saturdays  only 20 min Party may  only be at  place  indicated on  reg form,  registrants  must be on  site 18 y/o If ciation is  issued to  registered  event, no  parties may be  registered at  the property  for the  remainder of  the semester Must  comply  with all  laws Greek & other  recognized  organizations NOT  eligible to reg Non registered  parties don’t get the  benefit of a warning Registered parties  are not guaranteed a  warning either if  complaints are made Program Structure - Amherst, Massachusetts University/City Reg  Form  Due Contact  #s Must  live at  house Eligible  Days Time to  end the  party Location Age of  registrant Violations Laws Misc Clemson, South Carolina Program  managed by  Clemson PD 2 days  prior  to  event 2Yes 7 days a  week 20 min Party may only  be at place  indicated on  reg form,  registrants  must be on site 18 y/o 3 NVN, no more  parties may be  registered for  the year Must comply  with all laws Reg parties not  guarantee the host or  attendees are relieved  of legal consequences  arising from conduct  associate with parties Program Structure - Clemson, South Carolina 1/18/2017 8 69 86 76 86 35 10 14 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2012 2013 2014 2015 Warnings  & Citations  for Registered Parties Warnings Citation Program Flow 1/18/2017 9 Recommendation Re-cap 1. Receive a presentation on voluntary party registration program options 2. Provide guidance to staff regarding initiation of a municipal voluntary program YES NO 1. Direct staff to create a voluntary party registration pilot program? 2. If yes, what features are important to be included? a) 20 minute warning period to end noise? a) Specific days of the week? If yes, which days? a) Cost or fee for registration? a) In person registration? a) Person must live at property being registered? a) Common areas may be registered? a) Person must be 18 years of age or older? 3. Return to Council after specific period to report results? 4. Allow for program to be administratively managed through PD? Focus Questions