The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-23-2017 TC Packet.�Agenda TREE COMMITTEE TREE COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA January 23, 2017 Meeting begins at 5:00 pm Corporation Yard - Conference Room A 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA The complete packet of applications may be reviewed at the front counter of the City Clerk's office during business hours which is located in City Hall at 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo. PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, people may address the Committee about items not on the agenda. Persons wishing to speak should come forward and state their name and address. Comments limited to five minutes per person. Items raised at this time are generally referred to staff, and if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting. MINUTES: Approval of Minutes for December 12, 2016 TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS: 1. 990 Palm St. 93401 2. 1633 Pereira Dr. 93405 3. 4385 Wavertree St. 93401 4. 1050 E. Foothill Blvd. 93401 5. 642 Stoneridge Dr. 93401 6. 2466 Augusta St. 93401 NEW BUSINESS: Discuss potential revisions to Street Tree Lists OLD BUSINESS: Tree replanting requirement enforcement ARBORIST REPORT: Discuss Tree Committee roles pertaining to Development Review ADJOURN to next meeting scheduled for Monday February 27, 2017 at 5:00 pm held at the City Corporation Yard located on 25 Prado Road Conference Room A. ® The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Corp Yard Office at (805) 781-7220 at least 7 days before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781- 7107. Minutes - DRAFT w TREE COMMITTEE Monday, December 12, 2016 Regular Meeting of the Tree Committee CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Tree Committee was called to order on Monday, December 12, 2016 at 5:03 p.m. in Conference Room A of the Corporation Yard, located at 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Ritter. ROLL CALL Present: Committee Members Alan Bate, Scott Loosley, Angela Soll, Jane Worthy, Vice -Chair Ben Parker, and Chair Matt Ritter Absent: Committee Member Rodney Thurman Staff. Urban Forest Supervisor & City Arborist Ron Combs, Community Development Principal Planner Tyler Corey, Community Development Associate Planner Rachel Cohen, and Recording Secretary Brad Opstad PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES ACTION: MOTION BY VICE CHAIR PARKER, SECONDED BY COMMITTEE MEMBER SOLL, the Minutes of the Tree Committee Meeting of October 24'h, 2016, were approved on the following 6:0:1 vote: AYES: Parker, Soll, Bate, Loosley, Worthy, Ritter NOES: None ABSENT: Thurman TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS 1. 857 Santa Rosa Street Property Manager Bill Carpenter provided a brief overview of the damage the subject fcus tree has posed to the property and surrounding area, including sidewalk damage, destruction of the foundation of the structure, and liability concerns over the raised and cracked foundation; presented a report from J.R. Spencer Construction. City Arborist Ron Combs stated the scope of his review and acknowledged the challenging maintenance issues raised by the tree; explained that root pruning may not be a viable solution because of the number of roots present and the extent of the damage; referred to a street maintenance employee for confirmation that the roots do pose a trip -hazard to the public. In response to Committee inquiry, City Arborist Combs confirmed it has been several years since the last heavy pruning of the trees limbs and at least 4 years since the last root pruning. PUBLIC COMMENT: Matt Quaglino, San Luis Obispo, spoke in favor of tree removal and replacement. Chuck Lowe, San Luis Obispo, urged the Committee to consider heavy pruning of the tree rather than removal. Committee discussion ensued. ACTION: MOTION BY VICE CHAIR PARKER, SECONDED BY COMMITTEE MEMBER BATE, to allow for the ficus tree removal, based on both the presentation of undue hardship to property owners and the promotion of good arboricultural practices, and for its replacement in City -approved, minimum 24 -inch box, the specific location to be determined by City Arborist. Motion passed 4-2-1 on the following roll call vote: AYES: Parker, Bate, Loosely, Ritter NOES: Soll, Worthy ABSENT: Thurman 2. 1234 Santa Rosa Street Owner Chelsea Ruiz presented her application for the replacement of four Ginkgo Biloba trees, stating her desire to plant a species more compatible with the environmental factors of her property, specifically a drought -tolerant California native. City Arborist Ron Combs stated his findings of one healthy tree and three trees in need of extra care; spoke in favor of removal. PUBLIC COMMENT Christine Husk, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern over the tree removal and aesthetic impact to the neighborhood. Committee discussion followed, during which members discussed alternatives to removal such as better care and maintenance. DRAFT Minutes — Tree Committee Meeting December 12, 2016 Page 2 In response to public inquiry, the Committee stated the property owner is responsible for proper maintenance, including watering of the trees; stated there is no basis to assume the trees are causing an undue hardship for the homeowners. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER LOOSLEY, SECONDED BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, to allow for the gingko biloba tree removal, second -from - right in the progression of four (4), based on the promotion of good arboricultural practices, and for its replacement with a 15 -gallon tree of the same species; on the following 6:0:1 vote: AYES: Loosley, Parker, Bate, Soll, Worthy, Ritter NOES: None ABSENT: Thurman 3. 3057 S. Hizuera Street Association Manager Caleb Lim, presented an application for the removal of three pine trees based on proximity to the building, concern for safety of residents, potential liability, and financial hardship; expressed desire to replace the pine trees with something more appropriate for the property and its residents. City Arborist Ron Combs stated he cannot present basis for removal due to the healthy nature of the trees. Chair Ritter acknowledges the applicant as a representative of a Home Owners Association and requests submission of a roll call vote as evidence of the governing board's desire to move forward with this application. PUBLIC COMMENT Bill Rich, homeowner, spoke against the tree removal, stating there was no formal decision of his HOA to apply for the tree removal. Bill & Vicki Ann Richardson, Jo Anne Howell, and Nona Ward, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns over tree removal, specifically proper identification of trees being removed and safety of physically challenged residents. ACTION: MOTION BY CHAIR RITTER, SECONDED BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, to table the Item to a date of Hearing to be determined and at such time that further required evidence would be made available for presentation to the Committee; on the following 6:0:1 vote: AYES: Ritter, Parker, Bate, Loosley, Soll, Worthy NOES: None ABSENT: Thurman DRAFT Minutes — Tree Committee Meeting December 12, 2016 Page 3 4. 990 Palm Street ACTION: The Tree Committee removed the Item from the Agenda for lack of Representative Applicant and tabled it for a Committee Hearing at a future date to be determined. **Action on Items S & 6pending review by.sigg'due to the lack ofprecedentfor decision a tied vote. ** 5. 2119 San Luis Drive Applicant Mary Kay Harrington presented an application for tree removal. City Arborist Ron Combs confirmed the presence of decay on the sycamore tree, stating it is of marginal health with some potential for failure; stated the oak tree has been heavily pruned and is outside of the original footprint of the building, confirming the diameter of the tree. PUBLIC COMMENT Kelsey Reynold, San Luis Obispo, spoke in opposition of the tree removal. Committee discussion included potential for the trees to cause structural damage based on their proximity to the approved building plans for the property and the financial hardship applicants would face through loss of building permit fees paid to the City. ACTION: MOTION BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, SECONDED BY COMMITTEE MEMBER LOOSLEY, to allow for the sycamore tree removal based on promotion of good arboricultural practices, and for its replacement; on the following 5:1:1 vote: AYES: Parker, Loosley, Bate, Soll, Worthy NOES: Ritter ABSENT: Thurman ACTION: MOTION BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, SECONDED BY CHAIR RITTER, to allow for the oak tree removal based on presentation of undue hardship to the property owners, and for its replacement with a 15 -gallon live oak on the property; on the following 3:3:1 vote: AYES: Parker, Ritter, Worthy NOES: Bate, Loosley, Soll ABSENT: Thurman DRAFT Minutes — Tree Committee Meeting December 12, 2016 Page 4 6. 2159 San Luis Drive Applicant Steve Simoulis presented an application for the removal of a live oak tree to accommodate approved building plans and to avoid potential damage to the structure and the tree itself. City Arborist Ron Combs stated the tree is healthy therefore, he cannot find basis for removal. PUBLIC COMMENT Kelsey Moe, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns over the City approving plans that would require later removal of trees; suggested property owners consider the placement of existing trees before submitting plans that conflict with available space. Jesse Bilsten, San Luis Obispo, spoke in favor of preserving the current placement of the tree; suggested modifying plans to accommodate the tree or considering replacing the tree with equal aesthetic value. Committee discussion ensued. ACTION: MOTION BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, SECONDED BY COMMITTEE MEMBER WORTHY, to allow for the live oak tree removal based on promotion of good arboricultural practices, and for its replacement with a live oak; on the following 3:3:1 vote: AYES: Parker, Worthy, Loosley NOES: Bate, Soll, Ritter ABSENT: Thurman 7. 1610 Colina Court Brenda Lunceford, owner, presented her application for the removal of a Red Flowering Gum (Eucalyptus) tree based on home owner's allergy to the tree as well as concerns over the tree's apparent lean toward the home on the property. City Arborist Ron Combs, stated no basis for removal. In response to Committee inquiries, the applicants provided information about their allergy to the tree; expressed plans to replace the tree with another species that would not only relieve them of challenges to their health but also complement the existing trees in the neighborhood. DRAFT Minutes — Tree Committee Meeting December 12, 2016 Page 5 ACTION: MOTION BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, SECONDED BY COMMITTEE MEMBER SOLL, to allow for the third (#3) eucalyptus tree removal based on presentation of undue hardship to the property owners, and for its replacement; CARRIED on the following 6:0:1 vote: AYES: Parker, Soll, Bate, Loosley, Worthy, Ritter NOES: None ABSENT: Thurman 8. 1628 Mill Drive Michael Harkness, owner, presented his application for the removal and replacement of a liquid amber tree. City Arborist Ron Combs stated no basis for removal under his purview. No Committee discussion. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER LOOSLEY, SECONDED BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, to allow for the liquid amber tree removal based on promotion of good arboricultural practices, and for its replacement with a 15 -gallon little gem dwarf southern magnolia tree; CARRIED on the following 5:0:1:1 vote: AYES: Loosley, Parker, Soll, Worthy, Ritter NOES: None ABSTAIN: Bate ABSENT: Thurman 9. 1545 Tanglewood Drive Applicant Diane Helbert, presented an application for the removal and replacement of a single plum tree and two palm trees. City Arborist Ron Combs stated he could not offer complete approval under his purview. ACTION: MOTION BY CHAIR RITTER, SECONDED BY VICE -CHAIR PARKER, to allow for the single plum tree and two (2) palm trees' removal based on promotion of good arboricultural practices; CARRIED on the following 5:1:1 vote: AYES: Ritter, Parker, Bate, Loosley, Soll NOES: Worthy ABSENT: Thurman DRAFT Minutes — Tree Committee Meeting December 12, 2016 Page 6 NEW BUSINESS 1. 71 Palomar Drive Associate Planner Rachel Cohen provided a brief overview of the development plan, requesting feedback from the committee and members of the public. PUBLIC COMMENT The following San Luis Obispo residents spoke in opposition of tree removals as described in the proposed development plan: Alan Cooper, David Brody, Camille Small, Lydia Mourenza, Mila Vujovich- La Barre, Cheryl McLean, Carolyn Smith, Peter Croft, Bob Mourenza, and Cathy Wydell. Chip Tamagni, local arborist, supported the findings of the arborist report. Chair Ritter opened for discussion and comments from the committee and staff. In response to committee inquiry, Associate Planner Cohen confirmed there was one site visit by the non-partisan arborist to provide an arborist report; stated a biological assessment was conducted which included recommended mitigation in the initial study. Committee Member Soll commented that she attended previous CHC and ARC meetings regarding the subject site and these advisory bodies were interested in comments provided by the Tree Committee. Committee Member Loosley mentioned he was surprised by some of the findings and inaccuracies of the arborist report, but also noted that if you look at the trees as structures the information provided by both arborist is not that far off; topped eucalyptus can be hazardous, and while the trees are very old they are not unique specimens. But in terms of the historical landscape, the trees are very significant. In particular, the planting location of the Norfolk Island Pines and the Canary Island Date is very traditional and is seen with old historic homes. Committee member Loosley also commented that he did not agree that trees should be removed to move the house, but a project should be designed around the existing large trees. Committee Member Loosely also opined that the project would have a significant impact on aesthetics, and bird and bat habitat and that that stating that the project would have a less than significant impact is a misrepresentation. Chair Ritter commented that the Rincon report contained many errors and inaccuracies including species identification and tree heights. Chair Ritter noted that he measured the Norfolk Island Pine at 95 feet tall and conducted a survey of other Norfolk pines in the City and made the observation that the subject site has the second tallest specimen in the City. Committee Member Ritter commented that the committee needs more time to evaluate the trees on the site since the report does not provides sufficient or correct information. Committee Member Soll questioned whether the tree removals were mitigatable. Chair Ritter responded that he did not have an answer to that question. DRAFT Minutes — Tree Committee Meeting December 12, 2016 Page 7 Committee Members Bate and Parker concurred with the comments made by Committee Member Loosley and Chair Ritter. Chair Ritter commented that the Rincon report states that the City's Ordinance does not provide mitigation requirements for trees that are removed. Chair Ritter read an excerpt from the Tree Ordinance that mentions that a property owner be required to plant a new tree unless the tree replacement is waived by the tree committee. City Arborist Combs mentioned that the City Council, ARC and Tree Committee can require mitigation. Chair Ritter suggested the Architectural Review Commission devalue the Rincon report due to the gross inaccuracies of information; stated the challenge in forming a valuable recommendation in the absence of an accurate and thorough tree assessment. City Arborist Combs urged the Committee and staff to consider mitigation a key factor in addressing the concerns of the public as well as a responsible effort to preserve the City's urban forest. In response to Committee inquiry, Associate Planner Cohen clarified that the final decision, as it pertains to the trees on the property, will be made by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) after consideration of the Tree Committee's comments and feedback. Committee Members summarized their comments as follows: inaccuracies and inconsistencies found in the consultant arborist report; expressed a need for more time to review the information provided in the initial study, specifically relating to the errors in citing species and height of trees; suggested a review of the site's historical and cultural landscape versus a review of individual trees and a more in-depth biological report. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. The next Regular meeting of the Tree Committee is scheduled for Monday, January 23, 2016, at 5:00 p.m., in Conference Room A of the Corporation Yard, located at 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, California. APPROVED BY THE TREE COMMITTEE: XX/XX/2016 DRAFT Minutes — Tree Committee Meeting December 12, 2016 Page 8 Urban Forest Services SCANNED 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 805.781.7220 lax 805.542.9868 slocity.org TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development, see Section E on back. For Office Use Only: a L d Entered:ffi-q / I it, ADDRESS: 99 0 �9 �� ADDRESS: ��/�- r -G O Letter: ZIP: 73q61 *5 -7 -1 Qs PHONE: (g0 5 ) `1 3 r - 2-5-q 7 PHONE: EMAIL: L) �, ,� Vvk5� 44 G , 6r % 0 OWNER i` � a L d APPLICANT: )) r Q� ADDRESS: 99 0 �9 �� ADDRESS: ��/�- r -G O CITY: �- G o ZIP: 73q61 CITY: 5- li o ZIP: Q-� IM/ PHONE: (g0 5 ) `1 3 r - 2-5-q 7 PHONE: EMAIL: L) �, ,� Vvk5� 44 G , 6r % EMAIL: Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a yC'ty Street Tree? Xes El. No ElUnknown El/ Dog in the yard? Y�s No ElbaS ,10myyCe�e v�+ i� &noI.✓ i'pr wood d'eCdY .� �r� Pn 0A Reason for tree tem ova I? --/f{ G Iv S� fo a �S 5 7 ,@SPlease draw a sketch map in box below. Show building outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape ! site plan along with this application f rm. L -e /)-'00 [� v � J a C a r a rc(O- Tree Species Proposed Replacement Tree s) Address of Tree(s) Pa �� Cross -Street th I rr D S of # Trees 9 X tree(s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to inspection 00 o� By signing this application I agree to replant tree(s) on my property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by '- - City Arborist or as a condition of thel$,81..00 a it granted by Tree Committee. Permit valid for 6 months. C Property Owner's Signature Date q ��v� N �. Applicant's Signature � Date � V � / � � � Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombsCa)-slocity.ora y, o 0 Williams, Steve am: Collins, Andrew .3ent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:32 AM To: Williams, Steve Cc: Combs, Ron Subject: RE: problem trees Attachments: George AT&T Hello Steve, It appears that the remaining eucalyptus are in a similar condition to the previously removed trees, in that, they are exceedingly tall, growing very long and spindly at the tops, are beginning to seriously overhang the pedestrian and parking areas, and are beginning to experience random failures resulting in very large, heavy branches falling from a height of 50 -feet and more. Needless to say, should anybody be in the drop zone at the time of one of these failures, the results could be disastrous. To avoid a repeat of the recent past (a large eucalyptus branch falling and totaling a city vehicle) or any greater incident of personal or property damage, it would be best to replace the existing trees with something less risky and more manageable. Additionally, our neighbor (AT&T) has offered to assist with funding of removal. I will attach to this email contact information for the AT&T representative that I spoke with. Thank you for your time and consideration. 1 ,-Cndrew Collins Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 1 c� Public Works Facilities Maintenance 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E acollins@slocity.org T 805.781.7219 C 805.431.0582 slocity.org From: Williams, Steve Sent: Thursday, November 03, 201610:53 AM To: Collins, Andrew <acollins@slocity.org> Cc: Combs, Ron <rcombs@slocity.org> Subject: problem trees "ease weigh in on removing the rest of the eucs around the AT&T building. .vouid also be very helpful if you gave me the contact info for the super on that building. bid you mention that he may have funds available? Thank you, Urban Forest Services r 'CANNED 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 805.781,7220 rax 805.542.9868 slocity.org r TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION if related to development, see Section E on back. For Office Use Only: Entered:a/21 J-1 ! Letter: I I /UIL 4S43If0 I-- - - ".—,j - - . .., Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yesl�(No ❑ Reason for tree A Dog in the yard? Yes ❑ No ,CSPlease draw a sketch map in box below. Show building outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form. Tree Species.. 122i L11 Proposed Replacement Tree(s) L?Iokl. ale4— Address of Tree(sy4�:z 3 Ii !�-y e-1'xzfD Gross -Street l" NWO 01 # Trees N. e � It Lel X tree(s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to inspection. By signing this application I agree to replant tree(s) on my property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by City Arborist or as a condition of the $81.00 Permitmanted bar Tree Committee. Permit valid for 6 months. I 1A ! Property Owner's Si ature l/ Applicant's Signature Date Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs slocity.org e C Gil IV, _30 --/0/ Urban Forest Services SCANNED For offireUse Only: 25 PIrdU Rodd, San Luis OWS130. GP, 93401-3218 I I L" ' ' 205381.1220 fax 805.;142.9808 Entered— Letter: TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development, :,tire Sec ion E on eck. OWNER:t�� APPLICANT: N ADDRESS: 3 �`� ADDRESS: (P CITY: ��_U ZIP: CITY ZIP: PHONE: (60 S ) S+i —Zi'L� �(,�,,, �} PHONE: (b � b ) 1.4 23 G C-,�� I EMAIL: I�t+et��Cat a( EMAIL: Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Dog in the yar ? Yes ❑ No Reason for tree removal? i SR "fie `'t' I�pv .ePlease draw a sketch map in box below. SkI bu ding outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed represented with an X�or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form, \ Tree Species ` ; Proposed Replacement Tree(s) oL C.c.V A cA_(_ Address of Tree(s) r _ Cross -Street _��LVLl_ # Trees S -N X treeor duct tape wrapped ` (s) must hav �ribbon ` � p Aped around'the trunk to identify prior to inspection. By signing this applicatioil,l a' rr• City Arborist or as n conditl an r. Property Owner's Sig Applicant's Signature replant tree(s) on my property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by $81.00 Permit granted by Tree Committee. Permit valid for 6 m �7ths V_ '� Daie � X71 1 6 Date f 2a(�} Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs(cDsfocitv.org _TC 0�-, Urban Forest Services 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401.3218 , u i 05.781.72_-20_ tax 805.542. 8 slocily.org 0 v SCANNED TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development, see Section E on back. For Office Use Only: Enteredl�_Ldy_t� /�/ Letter: I -1 _1b d -L i� 5899 OWNER: cGAN _ OePF APPLICANT:&„YoN &W,,_S Tp-r� S�,?vie-c ADDRESS: lnSd £ ADDRESS: 53-15 Rc( . CITY: 6�v ZIP: jj 3 J{v t CITY: St.c7 ZIP: q6'(0 I PHONE: ($pC� ) (ys 40 PHONE: (&� ) sy-+ - 14o3 EMAIL: EMAIL: LovficLCA (2 buvtl h rS r �+- Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes ❑ No E Unknown ❑ Dog in the yard? Yes ❑ No Reason for tree removal? S;W6 PAW&C F -TIz v% l IAIP,D TI, l,44 f T�V- 41AP4 IJNVL PW I . ,Please draw a sketch map in box below. Show building outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form. Tree Species @CDwWA Proposed Replacement Tree(s) Fft- (W4 460(►u #IV- Address of Tree(s) X056 �. �coTlfj�a, �LVa, Cross -Street 5OLA� �` # Trees Z Q000 "A SAr4TA X tree(s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to ioo By signing this application I agree to replant tree(s) on my property within 45 da a_oflree removal, if required by City Arborist or as a condition of t8,�1.00?,efr_pit grand by Tree I tee. Permit valid for 6 months. Property Owner's Signature Applicant's Signature Date Date '{DM tOtip Submit completed application to addrezfs above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs(&slocity.ora �L ti Urban Forest Services D v SCANNED 25 Prado Road. San Luis 0b'see CA 93401.321 c += 805.781.7220 fax 805.542.9888 g!pCil!; o: -g TREE- REMOVAL APPLICATION If related to development,. see S41on E -on back. For Office Use Only. Entered: L-) L Letter: �i I 01 OWNER: � � �r zu s d T.' APPLIQkNT: s-, "M"ESS:6'f2 S'f-an21-`-V a Dr ADM'MS-. CIN: L�;s. 06;f -1P: y3,9,01 CITY: ZIP PHONE: a Y PHONE: ( ) EMAIL: R v T r � S LO [F )",_9hoo . Co M r� FMAIL: Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City,Street Tree removals must be replaced with aspecies from the .Street Tree Master List - see website. -Is Chris a r0ity Stfeet Tree? Yes ❑ No P,Unk-mmn ❑ t in the yard? Yes ❑ ,No Reason for tree removal? TOO c%.re'/0 "es`1/eAcG ; fvl c w41 -a/ ,AK. mease-draw a sketch map in box. below. Shows building outlines; stree represented With an X or you may submit a detailed landscape t site plan Tree Species Qyee!' POJ^s 0) Proposed Replacem ,Address ofTree(s) 461`2 -5t" Cross -Street_ a Ni R.Y I O r CsARA tri r DR�v�y�c�~i IX � 0 S vR PYAL-kt X trees) must have ribbon or duct tape mwdpped around the trunk By signing this application I agree to City Arborist oras a condition of tom. Property Owners Si Applicants Signa v.and onlytree(s) to beiremoved long with this application form. t Trees) IV -, a e- ,prd e'F.O/ -# Trees 3 identiffy prior to inspection. 'tree(s) "y property within 45 days of tree removal,, if required by Perm ra ed by -Tree Committe, Permit valid for 6, months. ' I Date ! -',I9 // I Submit completed applicationto address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scanjand -email to rcombsCcDslocity.org Urban Forest Services AUG 2 6 2DI6 25 Prado Road, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 + = : _a(15,781.7220 r x 805.542.986 slocity.org TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION if related to development, see Section E on back �)G,mtS 111 oS ADDRESS: CITY: Lr✓o► _,_ ✓ 6A PHONE: ( EMAIL For Office Use Only: Entered:1/loifl Letter: _ I V /n #52-7 18 APPLICANT: 5-W., ✓�� Y�� 6 M � �42� ADDRESS: �Ob�%iiSuPrc�S�✓sD�; Svi� t(3U ZIP: 92G l G� CITY: &,, L�; s Obi slpo ZIP: 99gol PHONE: EMAIL:�� Q.S'�werlG. Lb✓✓1 Private tree removals may require replacement tree(s) to be planted on site as a condition of approval. City Street Tree removals must be replaced with species from the Street Tree Master List - see website. Is this a City Street Tree? Yes ❑ Nog Unknown ❑ Dog in the yard? Yes ❑ No Reason for tree removal?fi �'Ijq 61-14621114-r „✓4t, r �l�l ahu-�e ;4jh,1WtV,y+ 4"sw-04M &Y ppv� raw( ,Please draw a sketch map in box below. Show building outlines, streets and only tree(s) to be removed o represented with an X or you may submit a detailed landscape / site plan along with this application form. I Carlfw„+SP P , P��1t,�-�vc�lyp�-I,� Ca.4y1110'ioh j,(Corrr-i'UVo_D ) Tree Species ".4 Proposed Replacement Tree(s)Myr I L Address of Tree(s) ;W Cross -Street Sao CA1161 # Trees ,fesu a -4t k4 4 X tree(s) must have ribbon or duct tape wrapped around the trunk to identify prior to inspection. By signing this application I agree\ to reply t tree a property within 45 days of tree removal, if required by City Arborist or as a condition of the $81.r1h Per gr to by Tree Committee. Permit valid for 6 months. Property Owner's Signature Date Applicant's Signatu Date I 6 i Submit completed application to address above, fax to 805.542.9868 or scan and email to rcombs(cDslocity.org V� Aga -4<40 I sem ova eo vo. v` (' - - - - --Sly - -- . 4V4 pS VM7/¢- a-OCty Ls'15iG�.tl f�}d1;n f l�I�c1L A(,G.Git, 4j '54ams Ii! - r l! D 7--. /SS td corrugated metal pipe stormdmin / SS / sanifsry srn-er l,na \l / portion of (e) driveway to be removed �' swimming pool and spa ' 1 \ / -S loolprint of (e) tv o ar garage to remain 10'sewer and starrtldrein easemerd portion of (e) driveway to ramaln c \ \ footprint of (e) residence to remain � �r � •ti ' ' jjj P� 24.6 '•., \ �' a ug lista ` / �..: prod patio : t '14 axsling paved ddve 10 be removed 1. sewer mein ------- 0 site plan SCALE: 1"=20'4r —�✓o�DOS�'trWrL.nnOvra� portion of (e) driveway to be removed loolpdrh of (e) two -oar garage to rerrran rp w - errd storrridraln aasemenl portion of (e) driveway to remain ISS 18' corrugated metal pipe stomxireinSS E sanitary sewer line f 1 r � / / / / CD o sewer man J\ �. 7 c site plan SCALE: 1'=2014)' existing paved drive to be removed