Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutr 10429 city legislative action platform for 2013 & appt council member & staff liaison bet city slo & league of ca citiesRESOLUTION NO . 10429 (2013 Series ) ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CITY LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM FOR 201 3 AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNCIL MEMBER AND STAFF TO ACT AS LIAISO N BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND TH E LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIE S WHEREAS,a major objective of the City Council is to adopt a coordinated legislativ e action platform which strengthens local government, promotes City goals and promotes local Cit y control against legislative actions by State and Federal governments that would weaken loca l government authority and/or take away traditional revenue sources ; and WHEREAS,it is vital to the fiscal health and the self determination of the City t o effectively communicate with State Legislators and Federal representatives in order to favorabl y influence State and Federal legislation, regulations and grant requests ; and WHEREAS,the League of California Cities conducts a legislative analysis and advocac y program on behalf of cities for State issues and major Federal issues ; an d WHEREAS,the City desires to be proactive and involved in the governmental decisio n making processes directly affecting the City legislative priorities identified in Exhibit "A", th e League of California Cities federal priorities identified in Exhibit "B", the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District's legislative program identified in Exhibit "C," the San Luis Obisp o Council of Governments' legislative program identified in Exhibit "D" and other selected issues a s may from time to time be recommended by the League of California Cities ; and WHEREAS,a key component of the City's Legislative Action Platform is face-to-fac e meetings between City representatives and elected officials at the Federal, State, and County levels , and coordination with similar efforts made by other local government entities . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Lui s Obispo does hereby : 1.Establish the Legislative Action Platform for 2013 as set forth in the attached Exhibits "A," "B," "C" and "D" and authorize staff to take positions on legislation generally consistent wit h the Legislative Action Platform and such other resolutions and recommendations of the League o f California Cities as may be from time to time presented to the City ; an d 2.Appoint Mayor Jan Marx to act as Council Member legislative liaison and City Manage r Katie Lichtig and City Attorney J . Christine Dietrick to act as staff legislative liaisons with th e League of California Cities . R 10429 Resolution No . 10429 (2013 Series ) Page 2 Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Carpenter, an d on the following vote : AYES :Council Members Ashbaugh and Carpenter, Vice Mayor Smith an d Mayor Marx NOES :Non e ABSENT : Non e The foregoing resolution was adopted this 19 th day of March 2013 . a ; or an Mar x ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM : Maeve Ke dy Gr i City Clerk Christine Dietric k City Attorney Exhibit A CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISP O LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM FOR 201 3 Community Developmen t 1.Promoting reforms of the entire State mandated HCD Regional Housing Need Allocation s process to recognize local resource limitations . 2.Promoting funding sources to accomplish retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings . 3.Promoting funding of on campus housing at Cal Poly for student and faculty housing . 4.Preserving local control of planning and zoning matters . 5.Supporting efforts to increase funding for affordable housing and supportive housing service s for very low, low and moderate income individuals and/or families for all cities an d communities and opposing the erosion of local inclusionary housing and in-lieu fee programs . 6.Promoting additional state funding to implement SB 375 through local general plan updates tha t implement the regional sustainable communities plan and alternative planning strategy, i f needed . 7.Promoting funding for the identification, acquisition, maintenance and restoration of histori c sites and structures . 8.Supporting continued or expanded funding for CDBG program . 9.Supporting reinstatement of protections from imposition of additional building or site condition s prior to issuance of a building permit for seismic related improvements to buildings subject to a mitigation program established according to state law (our URM Program) as previousl y provided in Government Code Section 8875 .10 (this section was repealed effective January 1 , 2009). 10.Supporting continued local control over mobile home park rent stabilization and the conversio n of mobile home parks to other uses . Encourage the amendment of Section 66427 .5 of th e California Government Code and other relevant law for the purpose of ensuring that mobil e home park residents are not involuntarily removed from homes or otherwise economicall y impacted if parks are subdivided or converted . 11.Promoting a legislative "fix" to lending constraints that prevent implementation of AB 81 1 property-assessed clean energy districts . 12.Encouraging a legislative "fix" to inclusionary housing provisions and Costa-Hawkins Act . 1 Exhibit A 13.Encouraging consistency in state legislation dealing with transportation, housing and land us e issues and eliminating potential conflicts between regional housing requirements, smart growt h mandates and environmental legislation . 14.Enabling the issuance of parking citations on private property . 15.Advocating full funding of authorized programs under the McKinney-Vento Homeles s Assistance Act, including providing more flexibility in the use of Federal funds on the loca l level to address housing for the homeless . 16.Supporting responsible review and revision of CEQA to ensure sound environmenta l determinations . Economic Developmen t 17.Promoting funding and/or legislation using tax credits or other incentive programs to encourag e research and development by businesses in California . 18.Supporting funding and policies for the promotion of California as a place to locate businesses . 19.Supporting funding for the state tourism promotion program . 20.Supporting the effective and efficient use of all communications technologies including voice , video, data, and information services over wired and wireless transmission technologies . 21.Supporting telecommunications reform legislation and other measures that preserve local control over public rights-of-way, protect local resources and guarantee access to, funding for , and local flexibility in utilizing funds for public, educational and government (PEG) acces s television . 22.Developing or expanding the list of financial tools to finance infrastructure to provide economi c development opportunities . 23.Promoting development of green business and head of household jobs . Financ e 24.Continuing to support efforts to protect the City from loss of revenues due to State take-away s and unfunded State or Federal mandates . 25.Endorsing legislation that provides local government with a fair share tax on catalog an d Internet sales ; and opposing legislation that limits state or local authority to tax catalog o r Internet sales . 26.Supporting the continuation of California Specialized Training Institute activities within Sa n Luis Obispo County . 2 Exhibit A Human Resources/Employee Relations/Human Relation s 27.Supporting additional workers compensation reforms that lower employers' costs while stil l protecting workers . 28.Supporting pension and retiree health benefits reform efforts in concert with the League o f California Cities and the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) Board o f Directors . 29.Opposing the expansion of the "Peace Officers' Bill of Rights," "Firefighters' Bill of Rights," o r other attempts to curtail management rights . 30.Supporting legislation that provides funding sources for appropriate human service agencies tha t support the mission of the Human Relations Commission . 31.Supporting legislation to protect the City's continued ability to administer its Cafeteria Benefi t Plan. 32.Supporting reforms that limit the financial impacts of joint and several liability on publi c entities . 33.Supporting the clarification, modification or repeal of AB 646 fact finding requirements . Public Safety 34.Continuing State and Federal funding support for school safety, disaster preparedness , earthquake preparedness, Homeland Security, hazardous material response, State COP S program and other local law enforcement activities . 35.Preserving the City's authority to investigate police misconduct . 36.Preserving the City's authority to establish both medical and non-medical emergency servic e levels . 37.Supporting efforts to expand the scope of parental responsibility for crimes committed b y minors . 38.Preserving the authority of local control on issuance of concealed weapons permits . 39.Supporting legislation to help curb alcohol-related criminal behavior and underage drinking . 40.Opposing new or increased state fees for state provided law enforcement services . 41.Supporting the fair and efficient allocation of radio spectrum that provides quality frequencies , free from interference, for all local public safety communication needs . 3 Exhibit A 42.Supporting efforts to reduce retention periods for video monitoring tapes . 43.Preserving the City's right to regulate activities with adverse health and safety impacts on loca l streets, sidewalks and right-of-ways . Public Works 44.Supporting increased the availability of grant funding to replace aging infrastructure of all types , e .g. streets, bridges, water, sewer and storm sewer systems, etc . 45.Supporting increased funding for projects that improve flood protection for the City . 46.Ensuring cooperation and prompt approval from Federal and State regulatory agencies (such a s the Department of Fish & Game, Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Army Corps o f Engineers) for necessary projects involving the City's creek system . 47.Exempting assessments for vital infrastructure from Proposition 218 requirements . 48.Supporting monetary incentives or grant funding for alternative fuel vehicles for replacement o f municipal fleet equipment . 49.Supporting monetary incentives or grant funding for retrofitting municipal buildings wit h Energy Management Systems to centrally control all lighting and HVAC systems . 50.Supporting realistic municipal clean stormwater requirements at the State Board or legislativ e level . Parks and Recreation and Natural Resource s 51.Supporting State and Federal funding and other measures to promote the acquisition, protection , preservation and restoration of natural resources, open space, coastal resources, signature lan d forms, wetlands and park development, including continued funding for the Land and Wate r Conservation Grant Program and for the California Conservation Corps . 52.Supporting the expansion of National Marine Sanctuary off the coast of San Luis Obisp o County to protect this fragile habitat from offshore oil and gas development . 53.Opposing any development under existing or new offshore oil and gas leases off the coast o f San Luis Obispo County . 54.Supporting measures to prohibit discharge of pollutants into the ocean (e .g . selenium contaminated waters from the San Joaquin valley). 55.Encouraging the Resources Agency and its departments to reinstate and expedite the distributio n of bond funds and other funds resulting from special legislation and voter-approved bon d 4 Exhibit A measures, to take advantage of the many favorable opportunities for land and easemen t acquisition and enhancement project contracting that exist at this time . 56.Seeking legislative exemption from property taxes on lands dedicated to open space purpose s which are outside the boundaries of the jurisdiction owning such lands . 57.Protecting funding for vital regional and community services that negatively impac t Californian's access to parks, open space, after school programming, senior services, facilitie s that promote physical activity, protect natural resources, and strengthen safety and security . 58.Promoting policies that recognize the benefits of parks and recreational facilities in th e advancement of "sustainable communities" and curbing greenhouse gas emissions, including : strengthening policies that fund parks, open-space, bike lanes and non-motorized trails throug h the development and implementation of a carbon credit and offset program, and advocating fo r the strong integration of local and regional park and non-motorized transportation improvement s into "Smart Growth Scenarios" pursuant to SB 375 . 59.Supporting access to joint use of schools ; parks and open space ; development of streets an d trails that encourage physical activity and healthy living . Transportatio n 60.Supporting changes in gas tax laws that allow local tax for transportation purposes based on a majority vote of the public . 61.Supporting the continuation of, and increased funding sources for street maintenance projects , transportation improvements, transit operations and bicycle facility projects . 62.Supporting clean air transit funding for San Luis Obispo County, in particular funding that provides for alternative modes of transportation with clean air benefits . 63.Supporting actions to : (1) promote cooperation and mutual support between metropolita n planning organization (MPO) agencies and local transit providers, and (2)discourage trends toward MPO agencies/regional "control" of local transit providers . 64.Encouraging private transportation companies (such as Union Pacific Railroad) to reac h agreements for sharing of properly secured right of way corridors for other compatible uses suc h as bicycle and pedestrian facilities . 65.Opposing the proposed diversion of any funding source for transportation that reduces amount s designated for transit operations . 66.Supporting funding for projects to implement adopted complete street plans demonstrated t o improve public health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions . 5 Exhibit A Utilitie s 67.Supporting clean water funding programs . 68.Supporting recycling and waste diversion programs such as green waste composting an d enhancing local government's ability to comply with solid waste reduction requirements . 69.Supporting measures that require the State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Wate r Quality Control Boards establish a process to evaluate, in advance of adoption, the costs o f compliance for pending and future regulatory actions on NPDES permitees . 70.Supporting legislation that requires the State's environmental agencies to conduct peer revie w of proposed regulations to ensure that the proposal is based on sound science . 71.Supporting measures that require the State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Wate r Quality Control Boards establish a process to evaluate, in advance of adoption, the costs o f compliance for pending and future regulatory actions on NPDES permitees . 72.Supporting the elimination of mandatory penalties for violations of NPDES Requirements an d returning discretionary control to the Regional Water Quality Control Board Executive Officers (i .e . repeal SB 709). 73.Supporting measures to ensure reasonableness in the administration of NPDES permit governing City operations, including pursuing a municipal representative on the Regional Wate r Quality Control Boar d 74.Promoting the safe, responsible, and cost-effective reuse of Exceptional Quality or bette r biosolids . 75.Streamlining the state regulatory processes . 76.Supporting sustainable energy programs . 77.Supporting incentives for distributed energy generation projects such as solar power . 78.Supporting legislation allowing cities/agencies to establish fees for the costs of operatin g mandated water quality programs such as, but not limited to, municipal storm water and tota l maximum daily loading . 79.Supporting federal legislative action to transfer Salinas Reservoir from Army Corps o f Engineers Military Project to Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Project . 80.Supporting the implementation of the California Urban Water Conservation Council's Bes t Management Practices regarding urban water conservation and compliance with AB 1420 . 6 Exhibit A 81.Supporting amendments to the Urban Water Management Planning Act to recognize pas t investment in water conservation and the City's ability to comply with SBx7-7 . 82.Supporting legislation eliminating departing load charges which discourage the use of alternative energy resources . 83.Allowing the use of Public Goods Funds for the development and installation of energy savin g or green energy generating projects to benefit local government . 84.Promoting the protection of water resources, including water quality, watershed protection, an d treatment discharge measures . 85.Supporting the protection of our natural resources from invasive species . 86.Promoting sustainability of our water resources through the use of recycled water and other bes t practices . Countv/Regional Prioritie s 87.Supporting legislation to expand funding for the delivery of case management, drug, alcohol , and detoxification services, mental health services, and the establishment of shelter facilities . 88.Working with the County to assure land use practices that are consistent with the Memorandu m of Agreement adopted by the City Council and County Board of Supervisors in 2005 regardin g development near the edges of the City . 89.Encouraging participation by County in providing nearby parking for County employees an d clients, and alternate transportation and parking demand reduction . 90.Supporting County development of a local ordinance providing additional local oversight an d regulation of the land application of Pollutant Concentration (PC) or better biosolids . 91.Working cooperatively with the County to solve City/County flood problems . 92.Supporting the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District's legislative program , where consistent with the City's adopted policies and platform . 93.Supporting the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments' legislative program, where consisten t with the City's adopted policies and platform . 94.Supporting County efforts to enhance dangerous animal regulation and enforcement . 7 EXHIBIT B 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 9581 4 Phone : (916) 658-8200 Fax : (916) 658-824 0 www .cacities .org 2013 FEDERAL PRIORITIE S SEQUESTRATION/DEFICIT REDUCTIO N With enactment of H .R . 8, the Job Protection and Recession Prevention Act of 2012 , the Federal government delayed the date of the FY 2013 sequester order by tw o months to March 1, 2013 . The League fully understands the need for fisca l responsibility and tough choices that are required to achieve a balanced budget a s cities during this economic downturn have been forced to make challenging, painful cut s annually . We urge the President and Congress to adopt a bipartisan and balance d approach to address the sequester and long-term deficit reduction by minimizin g spending cuts with additional revenues . California cities have already faced dee p reductions in spending, forcing cuts to a number of critical local services and dramati c job losses for first responders and critical local government services . The additional cut s scheduled to occur through sequestration will imperil the services that city resident s desperately need . PROTECTING LOCAL REVENUE AND LAND USE AUTHORIT Y California local governments continue to endure difficult fiscal circumstances in th e national economic downturn, but are beginning to see the economy turn around . Now i s not the time to restrict the already limited options to generate revenue to provid e valuable services . Local government land use and revenue authority is critical to th e federal-state-local partnership effort to advance community and economic developmen t and must be preserved . As such the League urges Congress to : •Support legislation that will help state and local governments recover taxes fro m remote sellers . •Oppose legislation that would reduce or eliminate local government resources b y providing a tax moratorium for the expanding and profitable cellula r telecommunications industry ; •Oppose legislative and regulatory efforts by online travel companies to circumven t remittance of transient occupancy taxes to local governments from hote l reservations purchased using the internet ; •Oppose legislation that would preempt California local government's ability t o regulate and collect revenue derived from state and local use taxes ; •Ensure that federal legislation addressing eminent domain does not severely impac t states, like California, which have strong laws that limit the use of the tool and hav e strong protections for property owners ; an d LrE A IG U E ' O CAI I'OKN I ACITIES EXHIBIT B •Ensure that local polices retain as much discretion as possible in the time, place , and manner in which telecommunications equipment may be sited on public an d private property . COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN T With the statewide unemployment rate hovering around 10% and ongoing state debt o f over $30 billion that has resulted in severe cuts in local budgets, California cities nee d jobs and economic investment to overcome the national economic crisis . The Leagu e urges Congress to : •Preserve full funding for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program , which is critical in assisting urban and rural cities throughout California with creatin g jobs, providing affordable housing, revitalizing communities and leveraging ne w economic investment . In addition, seek flexibility in the CDBG state program t o enhance the use of the program by California's 314 non-entitlement cities (citie s under 50,000); an d •Maintain the tax exempt status of municipal bonds and oppose proposals to cap th e investor tax deduction on municipal securities investments, which are a critical too l used by local governments to finance much needed community and capita l improvement projects . AFFORDABLE HOUSIN G As the state's population continues to grow and California grapples with the effects o f the national mortgage crisis, our cities are deeply concerned with the need fo r affordable housing . The League urges Congress to support : •Resource Efficient Development Support legislation and proposals that provid e incentives and resources to expand local redevelopment planning policies tha t integrate housing, transportation and land use and assist in the reorganization an d replacement of existing infrastructure to support California's growing population ; •Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers :Preserve full funding of the Section 8 program , which assists the elderly, disabled and very low-income families afford decent an d safe housing ; •Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME)Program :Preserve funding for th e HOME program, which directs formula grants to local governments to creat e affordable housing for low-income households ; •Preservation of Affordable Housing:Support initiatives that provide a variety o f financial restructuring options, such as loan forgiveness, payment deferrals, grants , loans and loan guarantees to preserve rental housing for long-term affordable use ; an d •Housing Tax Incentives :Seek tax incentives to promote investment in the productio n of multifamily rental housing, including expanding the Low Income Housing Ta x Credit to create mixed income developments . EXHIBIT B WATER AND WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTUR E California cities' water and wastewater systems need a significant overhaul to keep th e world's eighth largest economy moving . There has been almost no new investment i n California's water and wastewater systems in more than 30 years . This delay put s increasing pressure on th e State for action as California is expected to grow by 10 million by 2020 and is working t o meet new, more stringent standards for safe drinking water and clean water . Th e League urges Congress to : •Provide adequate and reliable long-term financing solutions for municipal wate r delivery, maintenance and treatment needs to meet federally mandated water qualit y standards and maintain the vital infrastructure necessary to ensure the availability o f clean water for an increasing population . •Enact legislation that would exempt Private Activity Bonds for water and sewag e facilities from the state volume caps and expand the application of innovativ e financing mechanisms to local water infrastructure projects in the 2013 Wate r Resources Development Act (WRDA), such as the Innovative Finance Pilo t provisions included in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's draf t WRDA reauthorization bill introduced late in the 112th Congress . PUBLIC SAFETY/HOMELAND SECURITY/DISASTER PREPAREDNES S California's cities are on the front line of the war on terrorism and crime . To strengthe n California's homeland security, emergency preparedness and crime-fighting efforts, th e League urges Congress to : •Maintain federal investment in resources critical to enabling local law enforcement t o adequately provide public safety, including full funding for the Byrne/Justic e Assistance Grants (JAG) program and the Community Oriented Policing Service s (COPS) program, and renew suspension of the COPS grant's local cost shar e requirement ; •Maintain full funding for the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Respons e (SAFER) and the Assistance to Firefighters grant programs and retain the local cos t share waiver for both programs ; •Maintain funding for disaster preparedness, prevention, recovery, and response fo r all-hazard threats, including investment in assisting communities with necessar y upgrades to existing flood control systems ; an d •Support full funding for the Urban Area Security Initiative ; and maximize firs t responder funding to California cities, as well as flexibility in the use of funds t o assist areas of need (i .e . personnel, training, and target hardening). ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RESOURCE CONSERVATIO N In California, 31 million of the state's 38 million residents live in cities . For this population California's cities continue to work collaboratively with its state and regiona l partners to implement community development strategies that increase energ y efficiency to reduce pollution and improve public health . This effort has been effective in reducing local government operating costs and relieving the strain of the national EXHIBIT B economic downturn on struggling communities . To continue these successfu l campaigns and effectively accomplish the goals of local governments under thes e initiatives, the League urges Congress to : •Support federal resources to assist regional and local governments in developin g and implementing energy efficiency and conservation strategies that maximiz e available resources, reduce costs, expand community access and protect publi c health ; •Support federal incentives that assist local governments in integrating new growt h into existing communities, and develop and implement transportation, land use an d building policies that encourage maximum use of resources and lower energ y consumption ; an d •Ensure that local governments can continue, and not be preempted in, their effort s to achieve economic improvements through increased energy efficiency an d conservation plans that seek to decrease carbon emissions . TRANSPORTATIO N California has more than 186,000 miles of roadway and one of the most develope d transit systems in the nation . California's cities and counties are responsible fo r administering the local streets and roads that connect with the state and federa l highway system, a total of 82% of the total roadway miles in the state . Ou r transportation systems face rapidly growing vehicle use by an ever increasing numbe r of new drivers . The cost of building new lane miles rises much faster than inflation an d road maintenance needs increase with the age of the freeway system . In a recent survey of cities and counties, California's local streets and roads system was found t o be at risk of falling into "poor" condition . In order to bring the local streets and road s system up to best management practices — the most cost effective condition — Californi a local governments need additional funding of $82 .1 billion over the next 10 years . With MAP-21 set to expire September 30, 2014, Congress will begin discussions o n priorities to include in the next iteration of the surface transportation law during th e 113th Congress . Questions remain on how transportation programs will be funded i n the future . As Congress considers options to address the shortfall in the highway trus t fund and other areas of transportation, the League urges Congress to : •Adopt a long-term transportation authorization that provides a stable and reliabl e revenue stream for transportation . •Ensure robust funding is available to support current and future federal, state an d local transportation priorities and identify new funding streams capable of supportin g future transportation needs ; an d •Make reconstruction and preservation of the existing system a high priority fo r expenditures ; and target funds for maintenance to local agencies, which are charge d with administering the system . •Make reconstruction and preservation of the existing system a high priority fo r expenditures ; and target funds for maintenance to local agencies, which are charge d with administering the system . EXHIBIT C San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control Distric t 2013 Legislative Platfor m The San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District will : 1.Encourage and support legislation that facilitates achievement and maintenance of Stat e and Federal ambient air quality standards . 2.Encourage and support legislation that retains local control over air quality programs , and oppose legislation that would move overall air program responsibility from the loca l level to the state or federal level . 3.Encourage and support legislation that retains local control over the use of motor vehicl e registration surcharge fees for implementing California Clean Air Act requirements an d reducing emissions from motor vehicles . 4.Encourage and support legislation that provides latitude to air districts in their program s to meet air quality goals, does not remove important emission reduction programs fro m consideration by the districts, and does not unduly limit the ability of local boards t o provide the resources needed to conduct these programs . 5.Support legislation that encourages cooperation and reduces or eliminates overlap an d duplication among air districts and other local entities, and/or increases the efficienc y and effectiveness of the regulatory process . 6.Support legislation that continues the California motor vehicle emission contro l program . 7.Support legislation that retains and/or strengthens requirements for zero, ultra-low an d low emission vehicles and encourages development of advanced hybrid, electric and fue l cell vehicles . 8.Support legislation that encourages or provides incentives or funding for the use o f cleaner fuels or alternative transportation . 9.Support legislation that increases the viability of walking, biking, public transit and othe r transportation alternatives to private vehicle travel . 10.Support legislation that assists local businesses in reducing greenhouse gas emissions t o meet state and federal requirements . 11.Support legislation that prohibits or reduces the release of cancer causing and othe r toxic emissions in quantities that pose a significant health risk to the public . 12.Support legislation that maintains or enhances state and/or federal funding fo r mandated air quality programs and/or provides funding for new air quality program s adopted at the state or federal level . 13.Support legislative programs to maintain or increase incentive funding available t o districts for programs such as Carl Moyer that provide funding to assist businesses , agriculture and other entities in achieving voluntary early compliance with state an d federal emission reduction requirements . 14.Oppose legislation to eliminate or reduce the effectiveness of air quality program s currently in place in State and Federal Law . 15.Oppose legislation that would divert or eliminate any source of District revenue provide d or passed through from the State . EXHIBIT D SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT S Adopted 2013 Federal Legislative Progra m Issue Goals Implementation Strategie s A .Federal funding fo r high priority projects of regiona l significance Secure funds for priorit y projects throug h appropriations process o r other source . Work with local agencies, Central Valley COGs, State Legislators, the Federal Congressiona l delegation to assertively advocate for funding for high priority projects in the RTP with a particula r emphasis on funding to complete high priority projects on US Highway 101 and Routes 41 & 4 6 East and discretionary funding for smaller transit operators to purchase replacement buses , maintenance facilities and transit centers . B .Reauthorization of Moving Ahead fo r Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) 1 .Increase fundin g allocated to States & Metropolitan Planning Organization s (MPOs) and protec t programmin g authority of smal l MPO's 2 .Provide states , regions and loca l governments maximum flexibility t o addres s transportation syste m needs and priorities a)Address decline in purchasing power of federal gasoline excise tax and the resultan t deterioration in condition of national infrastructure by raising new user-fee based revenue s sources to bring the Highway Trust Fund into solvency, including : indexing Federal Gas ta x to keep the pace with inflation and substantially increasing funding at a level high enoug h (25% to 50% based on numerous studies) to assure that needs for system maintenance , operation and improvement are addressed . b)Increase funding sub-allocated to States and regions under the Surface Trans . Progra m (STP) & Transportation Alternatives (TAP) program, at a minimum, to the level provided i n SAFETEA-LU (TAP/TE funding was reduced 20% in MAP-21). c)Require States to sub-allocate 62 .5% of STP and TAP funds to regions based on a population & road miles with remaining 37 .5% allocated to the State . (Prior to MAP-21 , which provided a 50/50 split, regions were allocated 62 .5% of STP and TAP/TE fund s d)Reinstate dedicated formula allocations and increase funding for the following programs : discretionary urban & rural grants for bus acquisition, bikeways, pedestrian facilities, rura l bridge replacements, safety improvements on rural roads and transportation alternatives . e)Retain the current minimum population of 50,000 for an urbanized area to authoriz e designation of an MPO and oppose actions to phase or eliminate such MPO's . f)Require STP, TAP and other funding be sub-allocated to MPO's with an urbanized are a population of 50,000 to 200,000 according to same policies funding is allocated to MPO s with an urbanized area population of 200,000 or more . g)Preserve and increase funding for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) and Saf e Routes to Schools (SR2S) Programs . h)Reinstate dedicated funding to "improve High Priority Routes on the National Highwa y System & seek designation of US 101 and State Route 46 as High Priority Routes . 1 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Adopted 2013 Federal Legislative Progra m Issue Goals Implementation Strategie s C . Americans with Disabilities (ADA ) Compliance 1 Limit retroactiv e application of AD A Compliance guidelines Support efforts by Caltrans and the Administration to equitably resolve FHWA interpretatio n of ADA compliance guidelines requiring retroactive implementation of costly curb-ram p upgrades within the boundaries of federally-funded projects . 2 .Provide formula fundin g to address AD A compliance . Support legislation to provide a dedicated source of formula Federal funding to States to fo r sub-allocation to regions to allocate for projects needed to comply to AD A D .Passenger Rai l Service 1 .Provide passenger rai l service between Lo s Angeles, SLO and Sa n Francisco . Work cooperatively with Federal Railroad Administration, Caltrans Division of Rail, Amtrak , LOSSAN and Union Pacific Railroad to provide passenger rail service between Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo and San Francisco . 2 .Maintain and Increas e funding for intercit y passenger rail in th e LOSSAN Corridor a) Assure completion of National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) document for th e Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) North Corridor Improvements t o increase viability of Federal grant applications for rail improvements . b)Support legislative efforts to stabilize and even increase funding for passenger rail capita l improvements and operating costs . 3 .Seek appointment of Californi a Representative to th e Amtrak Board Work with California legislative delegation, LOSSAN and other state partners to rais e awareness of the importance of having a California representative on the Amtrak Board an d seek qualified applicants for a Presidential Appointment . 4 .Support adequate level of funding fo r Amtrak Support provision in annual appropriation bill and Amtrak reauthorization legislation for a fai r share allocation to California for capital improvements and vehicle acquisition . 2