Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-21-2017 Item 8, RugglesCOUNCIL MEETING: R COVED ITEM NO.: FEB 21 2017 SLQ CITY From: Ruggles Joanne [ Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 2:46 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncii@slocity.org> Subject: Concerns About Night Hiking on Bishop Peak Madame Mayor and City Council members, My husband and I have had the privilege of living on the slope of Bishop Peak for 25 years. We designed our home with the assistance of two on my former architecture students that I taught years before at Cal Poly. That home (heavily scrutinized because it was in the city's viewshed) won an Obispo Beautiful award the year after it was completed. Because of our desire to use native plantings including over two dozen oak trees, many birds and animals now reside on or visit our 2 1/2 acre site that directly borders the open space on Bishop Peak. During the time we have been here, we have never considered fencing our property because it is clear that these wild animals consider this land their own, and that our occupancy is temporary. We have just been advised that the city council is once again considering whether night-time use of this open space should be allowed. For that reason we are writing to ask that you please be aware that the city's consideration of night-time hiking on Bishop's Peak poses serious problems for our existing neighborhood, as well as for the animals that reside in this wild area at the city's edge. Nighttime use puts the homes, property and citizens in our Bishop Peak neighborhood at increased jeopardy of fire. While our daytime temperatures are generally mild, nighttime hikers (or overnight campers) who experience our region's cold night weather are more likely to consider a camp fire as a good idea to keep warm. Unfortunately a wildfire that starts at night on the mountain could likely prove to be disastrous to a sleeping neighborhood. Nighttime users are less likely to read existing signs providing the regulations that inform their use of the trail and open space. Hiking after dark increases the likelihood of individuals leaving the trails, and getting lost or injured. If rescue activities increased as a result, our city would face additional cost and liability exposure for those efforts. Furthermore residents of the existing neighborhood who have a reasonable expectation of the quiet necessary for sleep can similarly be compromised by nighttime use and the associated rescue activities occurring on the mountain. Nighttime use will compromise the health and vitality of the animal and bird populations that exist within this open space area. Most animals come out under the protection of darkness to hunt and feed. Only when water or food supplies are low, do you see these animals in daylight. After living on this property for 25 years we know that many songbirds, owls, hawks, turkeys, wild cats, coyotes, foxes, deer, and other wild animals share this beautiful place with us. While it is not often that we see them out in the daytime, we have see them enough (or find evidence of them) to know they are living here with us. We are sharing a few photos of the animals we have observed on our property. k 01 ,JiK.,;- r F.-. (My husband took these rare telephoto shots last summer of a bobcat who was crossing on the side of our property next to the hiking trail.) 3 ' 'w; lam• . � ' vi To Vii- _ c.:•+-�.} . _. vo Ar tiho► lopit / '�'�'.•� ` +fie r �; - •+. , �' ^ i % �- ' � �.. These wild creatures should not be denied their natural habitat. Because their primary time to hunt and feed is at night, we have an ethical duty to help them survive and our grandchildren deserve to find them still thriving in the wild. For these many reasons, we do not believe allowing nighttime access to Bishop Peak is wise. Thanks for listening to our concerns. Joanne and Philip Ruggles San Luis Obispo, CA