Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-07-2017 Item 01 Presentation - Police Department End of 2016 UpdatePolice Department 2015/2016 Council Update 2015/2016 crime comparison 1015/2016 J 2015 2016 %Dif Murder 0 0 0 Rape 32 38 19% Robbery 13 21 62% Agg Assault 146 118 -19% Burglary 245 251 +2% Larceny 1,501 1,730 +13% MV Theft 98 95 -3% Part I violent 191 177 -7% Part I property 1,844 2,076 +13% Total Part 1 2,035 2,253 +11% Property crime $2.501A $2.401A -$100k J 2015/2016 2015 2016 %Dif Murder 0 0 0 Rape 32 38 19% Robbery 13 21 62% AggAssault 146 118 -19% Burglary 245 251 +2% Larceny 1,501 1,730 +13% MV Theft 98 95 -3% Part I violent 191 177 -7% Part I property 1,844 2,076 +13% Total Part 1 2,035 21253 +11% Property crime $2.50M $2.40M -$100k California Police Chiefs Association Part I Property Crime J Rote/I," Populeflon] Pm lnml W14N IVa SO I" 19TD %on 1974 I^M WAN 1910 loot IMI [W IM 1190 1607 :0`6 IW IM 2" M XMI 2016 IlM 7MO Mu M19 MIS Figure 2. Property Crime CA w U5, 1960-2035 60M 5500 Som 45M 4000 3500 Som ism Part I Property Crime (Rate / 1p00 Population) 20M 206 2007 30M 2009 ]010 IO]1 2012 1011 2014 201' i. S OS ev'A �C, ifar ma Figure 4. Property Crime CA vs U5, 2006-2015 Violent Crime Rate Change Ovulation Rate Chance. California ARenc Agg Violent Group Pop Cities I Murder I Rape Robbers I < e 1. U Table 1. Violent Crime Rate Changes in CA Cities California Police Chiefs Association Page 15 Violent Crime Rate Change (Gross Group Population Rate Change, non -California Agencies, 2015/2014) Group Pop (tides Murder Robbery `lgg Assault Violent It Ra Gl >250,000 64 8.84% 4.5696 -3.82% 0.23% -1.199A G2 100,000-249.999 156 SAW 8.969A -6.06% 1.45% -0.96% G3 50,000-99.999 367 17.17% 4.53% -4.13% 0.08% -1.00% G4 25,000-49.999 750 7.25% 11.40% •5.96% 7.82% 3.74% GS 10,000.24.999 1,653 12.28% 6.95% -4.06% 1.57% 0.34% G6 <10,000 5,942 8.74% 7.46% -0.66% 2 40n 1.99% G100 >100'000 220 8.18% 5.94% •4.13% 0.66% 0.9900A Gs 1,000.100,000 7,922 11.77% 7.58% -4.27% 2.81% ].08% Table 2. Violent Crime Rate Changes in non -CA US Cities Property Crime Rate Change (Gross Group Population Rate Change, CaliforniaAlleFKies, 2015/2014( (;")Up POP (titles Burglary Larceny PI Prop ('rime G3 >250.000 15 -2.99% 10.0.4 6.74,* G2 100,000.249.999 55 -5,08% 7.42)6 5.43% G3 50,000-9%999 107 -4.SS% 10.69% 8.09% 64 25,000 49,999 91 -3.92% 11-66% 9.15% GS 10,00024,999 98 -2.44% 13.73% 10.59% G6 I <10,000 94 -11.58% 17 -1.98% GS00 •100,000 wi -3.89% 9.3 6.47% Gs 1.000-100.000 1 382 -4.62%1 ILOBM 8.35% I able 3. Property crime Rate changes in CA cities Property Crime Rate Change (Gross Grojp Population Rate Change, nor California Agencies, 201S/2014) I:nnys PoP ( ides Burglun• Lumens 1't Prop Crime G1 >250,000 64 -9.34% -3.14% -4.62% 72 100,0062490999 156 .12.49% -2.75% .4.09% G3 50,00699,999 367 -8.99% -4.04% -4.70% 4 25,000-09,999 750 -10.24% -4.44% -5.16% 5 10,00624,999 1,653 -10.93% -S.OS% -S-9S% G6 c10,000 5.942 -8.20% -3.93% G 100 >300,000 220 -10.389 -3.03% -4.45% s 1,000-100A00 1 7,9221 q 64%1 4.37% -5-0776 I able 4. Property Crime Rate changes in non -(A US Cities Collisions Pedestrian Bike Traffic cites Warnings DUI arrests 2014/2015 Other comparison Traffic 7015 2016 % Dif 511 495 -3% 34 33 -3% 54 54 0% 4949 5630 •12% 4815 5750 •16% 394 426 .8% Noise Homeless & Downtown O n 0 L—A 2015 2016 % Dff Noisecomplaints 1779 1572 -13% Cites 235 223 -50/0 DACS 448 472 .5% UTL 264 134 -97% Neg Violation 767 697 -10% Landlord cites 126 137 .8% Homeless & Downtown O n 0 L—A Traffic 2015 2016 % Dif Collisions 511 495 -3% Pedestrian 34 33 -3% Bike 54 54 0% Traffic cites 4949 5630 +12% Warnings 4815 5750 +16% DUI arrests 394 426 +8% Noise 2015 201 Noise complaints 1779 157 Cites 235 22 DACS 448 47 UTL 264 13 Neg Violation 767 6' Landlord cites 126 1- Homeless SLO City & County SLO C.I_r 2013 2015 % Dif Sheltered 148 158 +6% Unsheltered 602 324 -46% Total 750 482 -35% SLO County 2013 2015 % Dif Sheltered 235 392 +66% Unsheltered 1951 1123 -42% Total 2186 1515 -30% Homeless Calls for Service uh "a"idecens 2015 5499 I7% 2016 6284 19% %cFanre •127. Total Calls for Service 2015 31,924 2016 32,713 %Dif .2% Or Records rani %o-ansa=ded 1015 oi� Pepmrr 8629 8908 a3% Glee 6619 7049 •6% Evidence ,cis 201, icaderc IsWwd 73M 7542 FPP 431 716 •39YA Mental Health related ` Calls for Service Us rani %o-ansa=ded 2015 349 111 31% 2016 288 87 30% %,h age -21% -Z2% Total Calls for Service 2015 317924 2016 327713 % Dif +2% Homeless Calls for Service Calls % of citywide calls 2015 5499 17% 2016 6284 19% % change +12% 31924 - 32713 prezi.com is now full screen. Press Esc to exit. wntown Calls for Service Calls % of citywide calls 4424 14% 4950 16% ge +2% 31924 - 32713 Downtown Calls involving homeless Calls % of DT calls % of City calls 2015 1223 28% 2016 1404 28% % change +15% 4424-4950 3% 4% Mental Health related Calls for Service Calls Transports 2015 349 111 2016 288 87 % change -21% -27% % transported 31% 30% Reports Cites Records 2015 8629 6619 2016 8908 7049 Evidence Evidence Booked PRR % change +3% +6% 2015 2016 % change 7354 431 7542 +2% 716 +39% Police Department 2015/2016 Council Update BaJonImIwy,p,,ml,T T,,, Strategies Crime reduction Intelligence Led Policingefforts Community outreach and education Innovative enforcement strategies Workload realignments Researching CFS reduction initiatives Workload and staffingstudy , and..., Pawnnne hipwith ALLresidents townAssodation and outre ch Hen4esrshlp with homeless CalPoly"Cuesta °unach and collaboration Inn"'ased enforcement efforts Crime reduction Intelligence Led Policing efforts Community outreach and education Innovative enforcement strategies Workload realignments Researching CFS reduction initiatives Workload and staffing study and.... Partnership with ALL residents and Downtown Association Continued partnership with homeless outreach agencies Cal Poly and Cuesta outreach and collaboration Increased enforcement efforts Challenges and projects PF Challenges • Meeting community needs while addressing increases in workload with limited resources Projects IN • Homeless and transient impacts (workload nning for marijuana legalization impacts • Neighborhood wellness mmunity/youth outreach initiatives • Increased special events plementation of the strategic plan • Continued impacts from Prop 47 nning for a new facility and staffing/ study Challenges Meeting community needs while addressing increases in workload with limited resources Homeless and transient impacts Neighborhood wellness Increased special events • Continued impacts from Prop 47 Pro • Planning for marijuana legalization • Community/youth outreach • Implementation of the strategic • Planning for a new facility and workload study ion; Police Department 2015/2016 Council Update �OnnHMWSS"Khs��