HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-13-2016 MTC Minutes FINALFINAL Minutes – Mass Transportation Committee Meeting of January 13, 2016 Page 1
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson James Thompson called the meeting to order at 2:37 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Elizabeth Thyne, James Thompson, Denise Martinez, Michelle Wong, John
Osumi, Louise Justice, and Cheryl Andrus
Absent: Diego-Christopher Lopez, Heidi Harmon
Staff: Gamaliel Anguiano (Transit Manager), Megan Cutler (Transit Assistant)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Eric Veium, 1174 Osos St., reported that he was not allowed to load his electric-assist bike on to
the bus bike rack and asked for explanation of the policy that prohibits such storage and asked
that the policy be reviewed.
Geoff Straw, RTA, noted that RTA allows electric bikes on a case by case basis and that the
policy was mainly created due to the excessive weight of earlier electric bike versions; he felt
current models were more streamlined and weighed less.
MINUTES
Approval of December 4, 2015 Special Meeting Minutes
Mr. Thompson requested an approval of the December 4, 2015 draft minutes.
Ms. Justice requested an amendment to the draft minutes to record that Mr. Thompson asked
for a motion to adjourn meeting.
The minutes were amended accordingly.
Mr. Thompson requested an approval of the minutes as corrected.
FINAL Minutes
MASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Ludwick Community Center, 864 Santa Rosa St., San Luis Obispo,
Wednesday, January 13, 2016 – 2:30 pm
FINAL Minutes – Mass Transportation Committee Meeting of January 13, 2016 Page 2
Ms. Thyne moved to approve the minutes as amended. Ms. Justice seconded the motion.
The motion passed unanimously.
ACTION ITEMS
Agenda Item #1: Selection of MTC RFP Observer
Mr. Anguiano discussed the MTC RFP and scoring process and suggested that an MTC member
join the process as an observer.
Ms. Thyne moved to appoint Mr. Thompson as the RFP observer. Ms. Justice seconded the
motion, which passed unanimously.
Mr. Thompson accepted the position.
Agenda Item # 2: SRTP Recommended Route Changes Presentation by
LSC, Inc.
Gordon Shaw, LSC Inc. representative, discussed the presentation overview which studied the
financial and operational plans for the transit system, as well as financial and operationa l
aspects of proposed route alternatives for SLO Transit and RTA.
Mr. Straw discussed the Executive Summary plan.
Mr. Shaw reported that alternative routes explored for SLO Transit fixed route services
addressed increased frequency during peak hours, reductions in runs, shorter routes and bi-
directional service. He also pointed out that one key issue with current service is that there is
not sufficient time for driver breaks.
In discussing the Project Status Summary and outlining the next steps, Mr. Shaw presented
highlight information of various current and proposed SLO Transit Service Plan routes, including
details based on a financially-constrained list, a financially-unconstrained list, and information
that proved not to work within the framework. He addressed service coverage,
advantages/disadvantages, net reduction of vehicles, cost savings/increases, and
ridership/revenue numbers for the following:
• Routes 1 & 3
o Alternative 1: Two One-Way Opposite Loops, with Route 3 Extension on Broad
Street
FINAL Minutes – Mass Transportation Committee Meeting of January 13, 2016 Page 3
o Alternative 2: Bi-Directional Routes with Route 1 on Broad Street, Route 3 on
Johnson Avenue
o Alternative 3: Bi-Directional Routes with Route 1 on Johnson Avenue and Route
3 on Broad Street
o Alternative 4: Reverse Existing Routes
• Route 2
o Alternative 1: Minor Revision to Serve New Development
o Alternative 2: Large 1-Way Loop on Higuera Street, Los Osos Valley Road and
Madonna Road
• Route 2 & 4
o Large 1-Way Loop: Higuera, Los Osos Valley Road, Madonna Road
• Routes 4 & 5
o Alternative 1: Revise Route 4 to 2-Way Hourly Service on Madonna Road and
Revise Route 5 to Serve California Boulevard
o Alternative 2: Revise Route 4 to 2-Way 30-Minute Service on Madonna Road and
Revise Route 5 to Serve California Boulevard
Mr. Thompson and Ms. Thyne noted that the “jog” from Mill Street to Pepper
Street was still appearing in Routes 4, 5 and 6. It had been agreed at an earlier
date that this “jog” would be eliminated, due to complaints from neighborhood
residents.
o Alternative 3: Combined 2-Way Route
• Route 6A/B
o Alternative 1: Two Half-Hourly Routes
o Alternative 2: One Hourly Route Providing 30-Minute Frequency
o Alternative 3: Two Half-Hourly Routes Providing Service Every 15 Minutes in
Peak Periods
FINAL Minutes – Mass Transportation Committee Meeting of January 13, 2016 Page 4
o Alternative 4: Large Bi-Directional Loop Providing Service Every 20 Minutes in
Peak Periods
While they appreciated the level of details being considered, Ms. Justice and Ms. Thyne stated
they were especially concerned that overall service efforts should be focused on serving the
residents as well as student population.
Mr. Shaw provided recap chart information on the SLO Transit Alternatives Impact on Annual
Operating Subsidy and discussed Span of Service details pertaining to:
• Extended Hours of Operation During the School Year
• Providing Evening Service in the Summer
Ms. Justice raised a concern regarding the discussion considering schools and not considering
residents in transit schedule planning.
Mr. Anguiano acknowledged that this is a challenge SLO Transit faces, the root of this issue
being money. He also noted the possibility of planning summer service to be more equivalent
to school year (K-12) service. Cal Poly subsidy also had major influence on service frequency
and duration during school year. Ridership and levels of service also correlate. However, SLO
Transit was interested in all demographics when planning the system: community members,
students, transit dependent and choice riders.
There was Committee discussion regarding Route 1 loss of service resulting from service
changes.
Mr. Anguiano acknowledged that Route 1 service will be accounted for with alternative service
that may require a transfer.
There was discussion regarding Senior/Disabled/Low-income population and question
regarding whether the Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan (CHSTP) will be
considered for the crafting of the Short Range Transit Plan.
Mr. Anguiano suggested the opposite approach of the CHSTP considering for the Short Range
Transit Plan.
Mr. Straw acknowledged that the CHSTP is a subset of the SRTP.
Mr. Shaw acknowledged survey results indicated a desire for longer service duration, especially
evening service in the summer, and to potentially provide hourly service for Routes 2, 3, 4, 6A,
and 6B.
Mr. Shaw continued the presentation discussion:
FINAL Minutes – Mass Transportation Committee Meeting of January 13, 2016 Page 5
• Extended Trolley Hours of Service
Mr. Shaw shared survey results indicating the desire to extend Trolley evening service.
Currently, Friday service (June through Labor Day) and Saturday service (April through October)
ends at 9:00 PM. There was a suggestion to extend service to midnight.
Mr. Shaw continued the presentation discussion:
• Crosstown Route
Mr. Shaw discussed a crosstown route traveling from Madonna Road Promenade area to the
Brickyard area, requiring approximately an hour-long round trip. Route option may reduce
travel time for passengers traveling crosstown, but may also require an additional transfer. Mr.
Shaw suggested revising the schedules to make better transfers downtown, rather than add a
new route that serves this area.
Mr. Shaw concluded his MTC presentation and stated that any comments could be either
emailed to Mr. Anguiano, GAnguiano@slocity.org, or to GordonShaw@lsctahoe.com.
It was agreed that further discussion of SRTP would be included at the March MTC meeting and
the April RTAC meeting and that another joint meeting was still under consideration.
DISCUSSION ITEM
Agenda Item # 3: Transit Manager’s Report
None.
Committee Comments
Mr. Thompson asked for motion to adjourn meeting.
Ms. Thyne moved to adjourn the meeting at 4:42 p.m. to the next regular meeting of
Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. Ms. Justice seconded the motion. The motion passed
unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa Woske and Megan Cutler
APPROVED BY THE MASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE: 03/09/2016