Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-05-2017 Item 08 - Public Hearing - Mission Plaza Concept Plan Meeting Date: 9/5/2017 FROM: Daryl R. Grigsby, Director of Public Works Prepared By: Manny Guzman, Construction Engineering Manager SUBJECT: MISSION PLAZA CONCEPT PLAN RECOMMENDATION Receive a presentation regarding the Mission Plaza Concept Plan, provide input on design features and authorize staff to proceed with preparation of a master plan document, as well as fiscal and environmental study of Plan implementation. DISCUSSION Background Mission Plaza in downtown San Luis Obispo has a unique and special character that reflects our community’s culture and history. Since, September 1, 1772, when Father Junipero Serra conducted the founding mass at Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa, the Mission has become the community’s geographical, cultural and recreational center. The area in front of the church, the site of Mission Plaza, has been used for public gatherings of various sorts, including bull fights, from its earliest days until about 1800. However, as the community and the street network grew, the land in front of the Mission no longer functioned as a public gathering space. Instead, Monterey Street and private land holdings made up the area between the Mission and San Luis Creek. On November 22, 1970, almost 200 years after the founding of the Mission, and 20 years after local citizens began planning for the rebirth of a downtown gathering place; Mission Plaza was dedicated to the City. Since the 1970’s the Mission Plaza has been used for numerous festivals and gatherings. In the 2013-15 Financial Plan, the City funded a project to solicit community input to review the Mission Plaza’s present conditions and current uses. In addition, the City sought input relative to the expansion of the Mission Plaza into the adjacent Broad and Monterey Streets through permanent or temporary street closures. The Process During the past 24 months, the City’s consultant, RRM Design Group, has performed a series of tasks to evaluate the Mission Plaza’s uses, existing infrastructure conditions, and the feasibility of expanding the Mission Plaza into Broad and Monterey Streets. A summary of the meetings and workshops held to gather feedback includes: 1. Individual interviews of 62 stakeholders 2. Two Mission Plaza Community Workshops (February 20th & June 29th) 3. Three Downtown Concept Plan Creative Vision Team meetings (July 12th, September 1st & January 17th) 4. Two Chamber of Commerce meetings (October 8th & August 3rd) 5. Joint Study Session between City Council & Planning Commission (October 4th) Packet Pg. 235 8 6. Parks & Rec Commission Meeting (January 4th) 7. Cultural Heritage Commission Meeting (February 27th) 8. Architectural Review Commission Meeting (March 20th) 9. Planning Commission Meeting (May 10th) Using the information gathered during the stakeholder and community meetings, RRM developed the conceptual Mission Plaza Plan (Attachment A). The concept plan includes features that were identified through the public engagement process as important to the community. Proposed features include new public restrooms, lighting, directional signage, public art, historic and educational information, enhanced storm water management features, and improved ADA accessibility and multi-modal opportunities (modes of transport, walking, cycling, automobile). Figure 1: Mission Plaza Design Concept The conceptual Mission Plaza Plan also includes design elements such as the two-way shared street (which is being recommended for the “dogleg” at Broad to Monterey Streets). A shared street is a design concept which transforms streets from car-centric space to shared space for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. A visual example is included in the figure below. Packet Pg. 236 8 Figure 2: Shared Street design concept In addition, the proposed Plan includes a sculpture garden, a café adjacent to the public restrooms, and a new central plaza. The proposed central plaza will be replacing the amphitheater. On January 4, 2017, the Parks & Rec Committee (PRC) provided feedback on possible design features and amenities of the plan. The PRC in general supported the plaza layout, and the public arts sculpture garden. A few committee members, however, did express some concern about the safety of the shared street design and intermingling vehicles and pedestrians/bicycle’s on Broad and Monterey. A summary of the issues and comments heard during the Parks & Rec Committee meeting are included in the attachments. On February 27, 2017, the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) also provided feedback on the plan. Again, a lot of the comments were in support of the design and layout, including the replacement of the amphitheater. A few members, however, expressed concern with the proposed location of the splash pad and requested educational art pieces throughout the plaza. Feedback provided by the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) on March 20th also supported the design and layout. Many comments in this forum supported the shared street design on Broad and Monterey and the splash pad. However, a few committee members also expressed their desire to move the splash to a different location. On May 10, 2017, the Planning Commission (PC) provided feedback which was similar to that heard by other committees. The PC in general supported the design and comments expressed were to request more permanent sitting, relocation of the splash pad closer to the History Cent er and to close Broad and Monterey to vehicles permanently. Packet Pg. 237 8 Next Steps Upon conceptual adoption of the plan by Council, Staff will request funding at the next financial plan, 2019-2021, to complete technical reports, generate a Master Plan (30% construction documents), and evaluate the plan for environmental impacts (CEQA). Any environmental impacts identified in the environmental documents, will be incorporated into the final project documents. The more detailed plans and project description elements will be included for environmental review and for advisory body evaluation of the master development plan of the Mission Plaza. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The conceptual review of the project is exempt from CEQA because the project involves only the conceptual review for possible future actions which the City Council has not approved, adopted, or funded which does not require the preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration. The conceptual review does constitute a project identified under §21065 because the activity does not involve the issuance of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement, at this time. FISCAL IMPACT This project was identified in the 2013-15 Financial Plan and funded with $95,000. This amount was anticipated as sufficient to complete a concept plan, environmental review and a project phasing plan. However, as the Mission Plaza Project progressed, increased outreach, and necessary coordination, technical reports, and level of detail necessary to complete all items of work exceeded the project’s budget. Consequently, additional funding is needed to complete the environmental review and project phasing work. An additional $200,000 is currently estimated to complete these additional items of work and will be requested at the 2019-21 Financial Plan. Attachments: a - Draft Concept Plan b - Notes from Interviews c - Notes from Mission Plaza Community Workshop - February 20, 2016 d - Notes from Mission Plaza Community Workshop - June 29, 2016 e - Joint Study Session CC & PC Minutes f - Parks & Rec Minutes g - CHC Minutes h -ARC Minutes i -PC Minutes Packet Pg. 238 8 LIMIT OF MASTER PLAN AREAMISSION SAN LUIS OBISPO de TOLOSA HISTORY CENTER MUSEUM OF ART Private Residence BROAD STMONTEREY ST MONTEREY ST Luna Red CHORRO STPALM ST BROAD STSAN LUI S O BI S P O C R E E K Creeky Tiki SLO Brew The Network Mission Mall Celadon Frog & PeachNovo Warden Building History Center Future Expansion Metro Brewing Company WARDEN BRIDGEMAIN PLAZACENTRAL PLAZA SCULPTURE GARDEN ADOBE PATIO KEY to FEATURES 1. Scramble Crossing 2. Main Entrance 3. Performance Platform 4. Interactive Recirculating Water Feature (at-grade) 5. Trellis 6. Flag-Poles 7. Reconfigured Steps 8. Bear Fountain 9. Emergency Access 10. Bench, typical. 11. Murray Adobe Interpretive Center 12. Creek Overlook 13. Pedestrian Bridge 14. Picnic Table, typical. 15. Living Holiday Tree 16. Interactive Art Node - Native Animals 17. Cafe 18. Restroom 19. Maintenance Storage 20. Moon Tree Interpretive Exhibit 21. Elevated Boardwalk to Creek 22. Woonerf (with option for full street closure) 23. Bollard for Traffic Control 24. Lawn 25. Bike Racks 26. Interpretive Exhibits 27. Potential Future Creek-Walk Connection Underneath Broad Street Bridge 28. Relocated El Camino Real Bell 29. Bus Stop / Pedestrian Drop-Off 12456 7 8 9 10 12 12 13 14 15 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 23 24 3 NOTES A. Museum of Art building shown reflects the approved renovation/expansion design. B. History Center complex shown reflects a potential future expansion vision, and not an approved design. C. Vehicular access across Warden Bridge will be preserved. D. Lighting and electrical service (240V) will be upgraded and distributed throughout plaza. E. Murray Adobe will be rehabilitated subject to further technical studies. 14 1126 27 25 29 MISSION PLAZA SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 0’40’20’10’60’ AUGUST 1, 2017SCALE 1” = 20’DRAFT CONCEPT PLAN Packet Pg. 239 8 Events Variety of Spaces Children's Day in the Plaza Stage could be next to Museum of Art Stage could be in the Arbor Area Don't compete with views Graduation High School; Graduation Middle School; Wedding (mostly Saturday) Funerals during week; Mass; Quinceaneras Only a problem with amplified music; need to formalize an agreement between Mission and City for events. Need to designate a corridor access in front of Mission steps Could move music west toward Broad would be helpful 2,000 person events in Plaza; Jazz Festival Cooking only allowed on dog leg 60 events/year Police will be in area but handled through event coordinator; a bit of control in place; events end by 9:00; not a lot complaints; events are fenced off Location of restrooms - need to consider neighbors Love concerts in the Plaza and movies; concerts in the Plaza need more work Space to spread out- want to expand toward Broad Street and maybe close off dog leg during events; could bring back Taste of SLO Constraints for events - need to understand Annual graduation for Mission Prep; annual dinner and auction for Mission Prep; Love SLO- community-wide day of service Concern with noise; respect Mission sanctuary activities such as mass and weddings Parking is an issue Raise rate of space so it is utilized Concerts and Santa; could be used for Taste of SLO; Via dei Colori chalk painting Need entrance element at Museums of Art entrance Greek Festival- 7th year- sharing food, culture, music. Music is part of the festival and there can be conflicts with church (2 days); Bring in a porta potty Villa de Colori- chalk; surface needs to be smooth; design that integrates access so we can minimize number of…. Need a place for banners; power; access to Historic Museum parking lot limits length of area of dogleg Concerts in the Plaza- More flat surfaces; stairs make it difficult to use; 1,500-2,500 people; Could use a wider paved area; more open-less chopped; get complaints from residents all the way down Dana street about noise Jazz festival- S1100 Stage; main entrance near Mission; 11-13 security guards; planter by Mission slopes should be removed; 1,600-2,000 capacity Chalk festival- paved, smooth surface Cleaning- have to vacuum and minimize run off to storm drainage creek Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback Packet Pg. 240 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback Security- Fri thru Sun Saturday night- dog leg bollard off but cars run through it; more permanent bollards would be helpful Circulation/ Dogleg Close Monterey from Plaza to Nipomo Street. Want the community to decide Concerned with traffic implications Like - removable bollards or self retracting Like- need to close it up to Historic Center Parking One way could be a phased approach Open air market Remain open one way - dominant direction of traffic Carefully consider impacts to traffic Opportunity for roundabout at corner of Broad and Monterey near Museum of Art Maintain 2 ways from Broad to Nipomo Not a bad idea, too close Need to have an agreement to clean up any overflow trash Need to retain access to parking lot by museum Bus zone Need free access Would love to see it permanently closed Just need fire truck clearance; if closed, then need to close all of dogleg Don't use bulb-outs like at Broad and Monterey they don't function well Temporary closure but not permanent; use bollards to be able to attractively closed off If you closed Monterey to Chorro then would need a round-about over parking lot; could make street and sidewalk all one elevation - more like walking street Drug sales behind restroom Don't close dog leg; major thoroughfare; closing would give transients more area to hang out unobserved If closed then it would attract homeless; no activity Need to expand to Broad not up side of Mission If closed; Broad street good for pedestrians Add greenery; open to closing of dog leg Don’t want to lose parking Traffic- the less traffic the better time In favor of expansion of Mission Plaza + Cultural District Confuses tourists Walkability desired City staff who clean restroom. Park at dog leg. Dangerous for pedestrians crosswalk - not respected by cars Ambivalent on complete closure but need a good reason to do it. Need a traffic surveyPacket Pg. 241 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback See a lot of trucks on Monterey Who uses it for traffic where are they going? Could be a phased approach As a parent, like the closure Issue is with parking; people who work at the event are not allowed to park or leave car overnight Have to leave sidewalks open even when street is being used for pedestrians only - would love to see Would need to be able to unload for events if closed dog leg Get rid of Broad St/dog leg to create ambiance Would love to see it permanently closed Restrooms The more the merrier Can we integrate into SLO Museum of Art as Phase I? Need to relocate- not at Termino Don't like location Need restrooms Could we put new restrooms in History Center? Many people use the restrooms inside the Mission Needs more storage; get cleaned between 11-3am Lighting yellow Not enough Pay restroom; self cleaning Need lighting; inadequate size; dark and dreary more open air May be part of Museum of Art Had locking bathrooms downtown and it attracted homeless and drug issues Like Laguna Lake bathrooms Currently put porta pottys at corner of Mission and dumpster Veterans Pasadena restrooms are awesome; clean and architecturally appealing No workable doors; vandal resistant, need to be inviting to public First question to Chamber- "Where is the Mission" , then where is the restroom? "Bubblegum Alley"? Close restrooms after bars close History Center gets restroom overflow because of transient and homeless Self-sanitizing - charge for restroom Analyze other spaces Need major upgrade - clean Stopped using because not clean or safe Horrifying Transient population; uninviting No soap Packet Pg. 242 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback Amphitheater Underutilized Need to be bigger Community movie events - May Rotary Club built the Amphitheater Useful Have not seen much use. Could there be improvements? Good plan for amplified music to not conflict Like grass- can lose some of it; movies; booths block 3 times a tear. 75-100 plus bike Ducky Derby Never see it get used Needs a rethinking; slope is too steep; could be bigger; be sensitive to planting too much grass; use drought tolerant planting Use for kids in Plaza Event Should be used by field trips and summer camps Show movies Face to downtown instead of neighborhood; raise grade Only used by transients Don’t use it; some people sit there and eat Ramp up for quality for bigger events Kids climb up art structure Bring up elevation so it is more useable. Make all grass and raise Security Get rid of grass to help minimize the homeless 5 Cities Security come through - the security hired by church Crosswalk at Broad Dog leg not safe Homeless; thefts; amphitheater not so much loitering of homeless in arbor; bike test patrol; keep fire clearance through plaza will not walk at night; line of sight issues; shadows; needs lighting; homeless congregate where there is less visibility May be discussion of public cameras More lights on creek would help Safety an issue Crosswalk at Broad Dog leg not safe - duplicate? Raised crosswalk; speed bump might help Need more police patrol; surveillance and lighting Feels not safe Not being enjoyed by residents Packet Pg. 243 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback Adobe Educational component Could start docent-lead tour Like coffee shop idea Concession at Achievement House for food and beverages Used for Downtown Association and recreation support It is a waste, underutilized A lot of visitors in Mission so the Adobe could be used for: visitor center; police substation; café Gets used for storage at events; hot spot for drugs Could put a display about Walter Murray Has exposed brick that needs protection Concession opportunity Charge too much for renting it Used for storage overnight; not used during festival; door to homeless Arbor Area Underutilized Heavy trellis; light is not good Coffee shop; or vendors; outdoor kiosk Underutilized; bring up to grade; eliminate Need to create a gathering space all through different times of the day Dead zone; use for VIP furniture Used for art vendors Signage/ Amenities Better Signage Not an issue per se; small sign at corner of Mission Need wayfinding signs; history walk signs; interpretive sign on Broad St. Use balloon for events flyers; need a place to hang banner Need for place for banner to advertise event and sponsors Outdoor theatre 500 people Motion lights might be helpful for portico More lights and motion lighting Sitting areas, relaxing areas Liked the previous design where walkway line of sight terminus was at the History Museum Need more lighting; lighting in the trees Lighting would help Sensor lights Santa Barbara- constant control has helped Had lighting but gets behind Warden Building Lighting is key Strong LED lighting Don’t light too much like car dealership; light the trees Railings need retrofitting for safety Packet Pg. 244 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback Miscellaneous Park and event location Didn't realize how long the plaza is Preserve traditions Vast changes will not go over well with people Community with Mission Bridges - Architects Bridges Art Museum Trolley- Consider a stop here Public Art at center of intersection Standards for Mission should be applied to east side of bridge Taxi service drop off and pick up areas Is there ways to formalize the use agreements about uses in the Plaza and Events? Mission Portico can become a camping space Wall- people like to climb on it Food Trucks- policy to allow on Broad Street Grass- events in plaza has to put down plywood which can be an issue Creek walk should be part of Mission Plaza and great opportunity Parking - 18 public spaces Outdoor pavilion - i.e., Pike Place Market with concessions Splash pad enclosed so kids can go in - Thousand Oaks Information Desk- Chamber Plant rose bushes and cactus Policy - noise ordinance Trees- eucalyptus trees - are reaching their lifespan Grass under eucalyptus trees a problem Could make entry longer Electric outlets- get used for cell phones; should get locked and only open for events Hazardous traffic cueing at intersection of Chorro and Monterey May be need for flashing crosswalk Landscape design key to line of sight safety; keep trees trimmed up Novo pedestrian bridge connection - align with door of History Museum Art Museum- timing at 3 million need a total of 5 million; 15 months building process; will load on Broad Street for art museum Art Museum future design will open up onto Plaza Would like to see a sculpture garden that connects Art Museum to the Bear Fountain not pop art Like the Bear Fountain Take care of existing conditions, i.e., flatness of tile, stairs uneven walkways, transients Southside of creek needs to be included in planning Homeless in Plaza and near Monterey Deliveries on Broad - park and wheel Packet Pg. 245 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback Parking behind Warden Building- 3-4 cars, 7 days a week; 7:00 am- 5:00 pm They (Downtown Association) let them know when there will be an event SLO Brew will activate creek/plaza People congregate Families moving downtown; need places for kids to play The more families that are in the plaza the better Treehouse Pull Mission theme over creek and into surrounding business and building Materials - durable Vegetation in creek - keep access for kids Homeless and drugs Southside of creek needs to be included Area behind Mission Mall - City owns to creek Bridge- can be slippery Brooks are in need of repair - dark and moist Homeless/migrant vagrant- free camping area (16-24 years old) Lighting would help under bridge More police Any nook and corner is abused by homeless Concern with flow of traffic on Broad St. Concerned with Monterey, Palm can't support that traffic if dog leg closes Noise level concerns Need sidewalk access properly Easement- City used easement but doesn’t keep up the City's side of the bargain; maintaining landscape Pedestrian easement does not make sense City needs to maintain Need to expand exhibit to show . . . Put fence up on roof to keep homeless out- homeless camp on roof Ambient music to drive away camping Love events in Plaza La Fiesta- was one of the best community events New yellow signs Find location for Holiday Tree Bridges could be treated as works of art Bathrooms could include art Art should be included Bridges are different to walk on and unwelcoming; incline is different Utilize for students Art - "Interactive" artwork Packet Pg. 246 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback SF market near Jewish museum has interactive chairs- great example of interactive art Vision- what should this space be? Park with greenery Everyone loves eucalyptus trees Love the wisterias on Mission Park with events capacity Welcome and safe - balance aesthetics and lighting Grassy knoll next to Arbor not easy to work with Want area near adobe to be family-oriented during concerts Chorro and Monterey - change of parking at intersection Strategically located hook-ups near events; water bottle filler Need to look at both sides of Creek Get all business along Creek to do a Public/Private partnership Outlets: need a 220 outlet where events are located; avoid cords across plaza Need to keep Farmers Market on Higuera Paving: Want smooth pavement for chalk painting but don’t want this to drive Don’t want it to be slippery Could integrate art Integrate Museum of Art Place for people to interact for all ages Place for kids Seating for lunch Art in Public Places Master Plan- "Should be reviewed" Consider no curbs- so people can roll in a piano during events Space for pop-up entertainment; permitted entertainers Old Mission School- uses church; for ceremony Plaza is uneven paving so impacts auction event Expanding plaza Paving under trees, will kill trees next to Mission, it will make unstable Homes on Broad Palm Street residents are against closure Interview Linnea Phillips- part of the City when Plaza opened Historic Center- remove grass Park as Plaza- Issue as Park designation Could have big screen to watch World Cup Parks permit events - maybe revise policies about who maintains it Millennials need places to go after hours that are not alcohol-oriented Adverting space - with children and families Neighbors need to be informed well in advance Crosswalks - no respect for pedestrians in crosswalks Packet Pg. 247 8 Mission Plaza Master Plan Project February 18th, 2016 Stakeholder Meetings - Feedback Varied pavement and rise in grade Ashland Oregon - Creek development Think sewer main has been removed Don’t plant trees or build structures over utility lines Steelhead trout in creek so fine sediment and steep slopes need to be revegetated Shade over creek is good Invasive species- Tree of Hewn or stink tree or Somark - can push up sidewalk Ongoing water quality Opportunity to do nature vegetation education- botanical signage CA Nature Plant Society, Cal Poly, Cal Conservation Core, Planting Palette, erosion control Grass is a maintenance issue, grass attracts social issue when not visible, grass is well liked Eucalyptus - are fine and part of ambiance There is an add-hock committee for looking at creek vegetation Power- need more Parking - 18 public spaces Vending- need power; extra trash, dumpsters, place for vendors Packet Pg. 248 8 IDEAS & AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Mission Plaza Master Plan Project Open House/Workshop in Mission Plaza February 20th, 2016 Comments from Walking Tour Site Map Hand Outs Restroom Bathrooms Eliminate Restrooms at Monterey and Broad St. Get rid of restrooms Like the current restrooms, they're in a good area and the building compliments the Mission More public restrooms Move restrooms to less prominent location- closer to museum. Put in museum parking lot Newer or better restrooms somewhere else Put restroom into design of ART center and/or history center. Make ADA compliant. Current restroom should be turned into a drop off area/ circular drive or an extended seating area for historic adobe Quasi public- within a open café or such in order to monitor users Re-do restroom area Remove and locate new restrooms in expanded history center. Open (Chorro St. entrance) up to street Restroom major problem. Close and relocate. The area is not supervised after hours. A modern facility with changing tables for infants Restroom upgrade, keep central location. Increase capacity and security Restrooms Restrooms- needed; there is a design solution (I don’t know what it is). Keep reasonably central Update restrooms/ clean leave here, but remodel Signage/ Amenities "…?" tables and places for families and pedestrians Add more seating options Add Wi-Fi Art Installations Better lighting for drama and highlight trees and mission Change to drought tolerant landscape Get rid of the grass! Improve Lighting Kids activities More benches More benches and seating More benches and tables (in shade) More electricity/ Outlets More people to sit but not transients More tree lighting- ambiance and safety Plants- keep lawn as visual rest and cooling Provide Bicycle parking at Mission Plaza and at Museum Remove some grass- not all Walking lights not too bright- soft lighting Packet Pg. 249 8 IDEAS & AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Mission Plaza Master Plan Project Open House/Workshop in Mission Plaza February 20th, 2016 Comments from Walking Tour Site Map Hand Outs Events Better stage More events when Palm and Monterey are closed Rise the Lawn(?) for tents and concessions Stage for Concerts (where arbor is today) Amphitheater Amphitheater under utilized Amphitheater: See what Grand Performances has done in DTLA www.grandperformances.org. SLO's amphitheater is was under used. Amphitheatre- Enlarge Downward Amphitheater Improve amphitheater Make amphitheater bigger (a few more rows of seats) Make amphitheater bigger and revised for bigger acts- like plays Partially enclosed amphitheater- Cooperative effort with SLOLT Upward rising amphitheater Wheelchair access to amphitheater and to Arbor Adobe Adobe - Coffee shop with table and chairs and/or café with Museum of Art Adobe brick was vital to the SW US indigenous cultures, etc. Olvera Street in DTLA has a section with recreated displays and actors etc. Adobe bldg.: turn into a living museum recreating what life was like during the time it was built. Adobe could be info center for visitors Adobe- For this building, engage history center to use it for exhibit space- possibly a tea house Adobe lighting Adobe needs more activity, not sure what- tourist info center, less grass and less places for transients to loiter. Good idea have bike police officers; lose the trellis Adobe- repurpose with History related materials, tourist information center Adobe- tie to history center Improve overall lighting Make adobe a tourist info center Move Chamber of Commerce Murray adobe added to history museum Murray Adobe for history exhibit Police bicycle office Provide ADA ramp from the dogleg behind (east of) Murray Adobe Reduce grass Remove wall on west side of Adobe, provide lighting, remove grass, provide open access, sign no camping etc.; city code so has to be enforceable Reprise Adobe for Homeless outreach. Destroy the Magnolia at Arbor Volunteers could be docents at Adobe Packet Pg. 250 8 IDEAS & AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT Mission Plaza Master Plan Project Open House/Workshop in Mission Plaza February 20th, 2016 Comments from Walking Tour Site Map Hand Outs Arbor Area Arbor area is well- used on Fridays Open up Naman Property (Arbor) for plaza activity uses. Raise plaza area and open to Vista of Mission Raise the arbor, add seating Remove bushes in front of Arbor area. Open up the area Remove steps (one set) and install a ADA ramp in center Reuse Arbor to street level The Arbor- has a potential to be a great space, perhaps a seating area or space for extra seating (for the amphitheater) Miscellaneous Align visual entrance with Monterey (Thanks Lief) Art museum doesn’t feel part of the plaza Balance water hungry grass with places for people to sit/lie down. Some grass but strategic for use. Better connection to restaurants and businesses on east side- active elements Better control of panhandlers Better flow around Plaza, not just through Build new design of "Iconic Mission Plaza Elements" Adelaide Stone Walls, "Bear Fountain", Mission Façade, Eucalyptus Trees Don’t object to carefully sited tall building but views from plaza to hill very important. Expand walking path further down Broad and/or Monterey (around SLOMA and History Center How can we connect the creek walk under Broad St Keep buildings 1-2 stories. Not 3! Keep historical feel of mission Keep trees and green aspects of plaza- not all concrete Less cars. I love more walking/ biking thoroughfares so we have less reliance on cars downtown, make it easier to get around on bike/ by foot. Similar to a town such as Burlington, UT. Lots of lights at night. Mission theme good More flowers or gardening Native trees New trees- spend the money for nature at the beginning Open up views/paths to creek Preserve sky and town views from plaza Respect for the Mission and its primary purpose as a church Shops/food Take down wall near historic adobe- Open up for marriage ceremony, memorials, or? With a little elbow grease that area can be significantly improved. Visual impact of new museum- removal of trees? Constricts views Packet Pg. 251 8 Packet Pg. 252 8 Packet Pg. 253 8 Council Minutes City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo Tuesday, October 4, 2016 Regular Meeting of the City Council CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the San Luis CouOncil Heariispo n Room, ll was called located at 990to order on Palm Street, San Luys October 4, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. in theg Obispo, California, by Mayor Marx. ROLL CALL Council Members Present: Council Members John Ashbaugh, Carlyn Christianson, Dan Rivoire, Vice Mayor Dan Carpenter, and Mayor Jan Marx. Council Members Absent: None City Staff Present: Katie Lichtig, City Manager; Christine Dietrick, City Attorney; Derek Johnson, Assistant City Manager; and Carrie Gallagher, City Clerk; were present at Roll Call. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS Stewart Jenkins spoke regarding the Rental Housing Inspection Ordinance. End of Public Comment --- CLOSED SESSION A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code § 54956.9: No. of potential cases: One. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code § 54956.9: No. of potential cases: One. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the legislative body of the local agencyon the advice of its legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the local agency. These facts and circumstances that might result in litigation, the local agency believes are not yet known to a potential plaintiff or plaintiffs. (Government Code § 54956.9 (e)(1)) Page 1 San Luis Obispo Packet Pg. 254 8 San Luis Obis o City Council Minutes of October 4 2Ulfi Pae 2 C. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code § 54957.6 Agency Negotiators: Monica Irons, Katie Lichtig, Derek Johnson, Greg Zocher, J. Christine Dietrick, Jon Ansolabehere, Garret Olson, Rick Bolanos Represented Employee Organization: International Association of Firefighters Local 3523 D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL —EXISTING LITIGATION Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Govei iment Code § 54956.9; Name of case: San Luis Obispo Police Officers Association v. City of San Luis Obispo; State of California Public Employment Relations Hoard Case No. LA -C E -729-M E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: One case. RECESSED AT 5:30 P.M. TO REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 2016 TO BEGIN AT 6:00 P.M. Packet Pg. 255 8 San Luis Obispo City Council Minutes of October 4, 2016 Pa 7e 3 CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the San Luis Obispo City Council was called to order on Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Mayor Marx. ROLL, CALL Council Members Present: Council Members John Ashbaugh, Carlyn Christianson, Dan Rivoire, Vice Mayor Dan Carpenter, and Mayor Jan Marx. Council Members Absent: None City Staff Present: Katie Lichtig, City Manager; Christine Dietrick, City Attorney; Derek Johnson, Assistant City Manager; and Carrie Gallagher, City Clerk; were present at Roll Call. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Mayor Dan Carpenter led the Pledge of Allegiance. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION City Attorney Dietrick stated that there was no reportable action for Closed Session Items A through E. INTRODUCTIONS 1. SHMA SCOTT - ASSOCIATE PLANNER AND STEVEN SHEATS - CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Community Development Director Codron introduced Shawna Scott as a new Associate Planner and Steven Sheats as a new Code Enforcement Officer. PRESENTATIONS 2. PRESENTATION BY PETER WILLIAMSON REPRESENTING SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS SLOCOG REGARDING PLEDGE TO MAKE A SMART COMMUTE CHOICE DURING RIDESHARE WEEK OCTOBER 3-7 2016 Peter Williamson representing; San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) provided a presentation regarding their pledge to make a smart commute choice during Rideshare Week, October 3-7, 2016. Packet Pg. 256 8 San Luis Obis o City Council Minutes of October 4 20 10 Pa e 4 3. PROCLAMATION - DENTAL HYGIENE MONTH Mayor Marx presented a Proclamation to Chantel Arnold, Julie Dodson, Kristina Mankins, Brittany Soto, Maureen Titus and Melanie Water, declaring October as "National Dental Hygiene Month." 4. PROCLAMATION - COMMUNITY PLANNING MONTH Mayor Marx presented a Proclamation to Community Development Director Michael Codron, declaring October as "Community Planning Month." PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Dia Hurd, San Luis Obispo spoke regarding a lack of community outreach and noticing of City Council and Planning Commission agenda items. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo stated that Council regularly ignores Community Design Guideline recommendations provided to them by the different Advisory Bodies. Eric Meyer, San Luis Obispo mentioned Ridesliare Week, he noted that electric bikes are extremely popular and are currently not allo n°cd on City busses; he asked that C minci l reconsider this restriction. Camille Small, San Luis Obispo stated her belief that the Architecture Review Commission's approval of a lighted flashy marquee sign does not fit the downtown area it is intended for. End of Public Comment --- CONSENT AGENDA ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER ASHBAUGH, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHRISTIANSON, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Consent Calendar Items 5-6. 5. WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES CARRIED 5-0, to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances as appropriate. 6. JENNIFER STREET SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT AWARD SPECIFICATION NO. 91185 CARRIED 5-0, to: Award a contract to Specialty Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,493, 870 for the Jennifer Street Sewer Line Replacement Project, Specification No. 91185; and 2. Approve a transfer of $756,870 from Sewer Fund working capital to the project account. RECESSED AT 6:29 PM TO THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Packet Pg. 257 8 San Luis Obis o City Council Minutes of October 4 2016 Pa e 5 JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Marx ROLL CALL: Council Members John Ashbaugh, Carlyn Christianson, Dan Rivoire, Vice Mayor Dan Carpenter, and Mayor Jan Marx Planning Commissioners Hemalata Dandekar, Daniel Knight, John Larson, and Chairperson Charles Stevenson ABSENT: Planning Commissioner Ronald Malak and Vice Chairperson John Fowler STUDY SESSION 7. DOWNTOWN CONCEPT PLAN UPDATE Community Development Director Codron and Associate Planner Gershow reviewed the contents of the report. Loreli Cappel of Michael Baker International, provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council and Planning Commission inquiries. Public Comment: Ken Schwartz, San Luis Obispo stated his belief that the voice of the people is buried and that the presentation provided tonight was not easily understood. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo speaking on behalf of Save our Downtown noted findings of an online survey and at recent workshops. Anne Wyatt, representing Bike SLO County noted her appreciation of the current plan, thanked the Council for their work and stated that Bike SLO County members feel " heard" by the Council. Eric Meyer, San Luis Obispo County Planning Commissioner speaking as a private citizen requested careful consideration for future planning for the last 20% of available building space in the City. Karen Kile, San Luis Obispo, Executive Director of the San Luis Obispo Museum of Art sliolce on change coming to the area and asked Council to listen to the voice of the people in regards to comments provided in recent workshops. Keith Gurnee, San Luis Obispo noted providing feedback to Council in writing, he stated liking many aspects of the proposed plan however added that he has many concerns. Kyle Wiens, San Luis Obispo resident and local business owner speaking on behalf of his employees noted the need for a parking structure on the North side of town. Paul Rys, San Luis Obispo spoke regarding the need to provide proper noticing to residents affected by proposed projects; he rejects the idea of channeling traffic. End of Public Comment--- Packet Pg. 258 8 San Luis Obispo City Council Minutes of October 4 2016 Pa re 6 By consensus, the City Council and Planning Commission received the report and provided input to staff regarding the working draft of the Downtown Concept Plan and accompanying mobility diagrams. Mayor Marx called for a recess at 9:03 p.m. The City Council and Planning Commission returned to the dais at 9: 18 p.m. 8. MISSION PLAZA A5SESSMENT AND MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT Senior Civil Engineer Guzman reviewed the contents of the report. City consultant's Debbie Rudd and Leif McKay with RRM Design provided the PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council and Planning Commission inquiries. Public Comment: Ken Schwartz, San Luis Obispo stated his confusion of the process used by Council; noted that he asked that the progress be tied together with landscape in order to breed artistic efforts; wants an open space free of anything with wheels. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo spoke on behalf of Save Our Downtown; read a proposal that was included in the Council agenda packet; voiced the importance of the creek and asked for Council to not rush into a decision. Dominic Tartaglia, San Luis Obispo Executive Director of the Downtown District spoke regarding the significance of the amphitheater and its uses, he feels the Council needs to consider the implication these plans have on the future of the City. Keith Gurnee, San Luis Obispo felt the consultants provided a good range of choices for the public, he noted his involvement in the public input process. End of Public Comment --- By consensus, the City Council and Planning Commission received the report and providedinputtostafftoproceedwiththedevelopmentofapreferredplanusing; elements from Concept Plans A and B and other sources. MAYOR MARX ADJOURNED THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND PLANING COMMISSION MEETING AT 10:55 P.M. RECONVENE AT 10:56 P.M. TO THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. ACTION: MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER ASHBAUGH, SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIVOIRE, CARRIED 5-0 by consensus, to continue the meeting past 11:00 p.m. Packet Pg. 259 8 San Luis Obispo City Council Minutes of October 4, 2016 Page 7 STUDY SESSION 9. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS Utilities Director Mattingly and Utilities Wastewater Deputy Director Hix provided a PowerPoint presentation and responded to City Council inquiries. Public Comment: Paul Rys, San Luis Obispo believes in preventative maintenance, spoke on clogged sewer lines. Todd Katz, San Luis Obispo noted that much clarity is needed regarding this proposal; he mentioned additional services available to deal with roots intruding into sewer lines and believes that residents will not obtain permits if required. End of Public Comments --- By consensus, the City Council received and filed the Wastewater Collection System Capacity Constraints Report. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS Written Council Liaison Reports were received from Council Member Christianson and Mayor Marx. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:17 p.m. The next Regular City Council Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 4:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. Carrie Gatagher City Clerk APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 12/13/2016 Packet Pg. 260 8 Minutes PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 4 January 2017 Regular Meeting of the Advisory Body Committee Commission CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order on the 4th day of January, 2017 at 5:31 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Whitener. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Greg Avakian, Susan Olson, Keri Schwab, Douglas Single, Rodney Thurman, Vice Chair Susan Updegrove and Chair Jeff Whitener Absent: Commissioner Schwab, Commissioner Single, Vice Chair Updegrove Staff: Parks and Recreation Director Shelly Stanwyck, Recreation Manager Melissa Mudgett, Senior Civil Engineer Manny Guzman, Consultant RRM Design Group Leif McKay, Consultant JFR Consulting John Rickenbach. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None PRESENTATIONS, INTRODUCTIONS, APPOINTMENTS None CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES ACTION: APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 7, 2016 AS AMENDED, MOTION BY AVAKIAN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER THURMAN. 1. Consideration of Minutes CARRIED 4:0:0:3 to approve the minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Body for the meetings of 12/07/16. AYES: AVAKIAN, OLSON, THURMAN, WHITENER NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: SCHWAB, SINGLE, UPDEGROVE, PUBLIC HEARINGS AND BUSINESS ITEMS 2. Presentation of the Preferred Mission Plaza Concept Plan Packet Pg. 261 8 Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of January 4, 2017 Page 2 Senior Civil Engineer, Manny Guzman, and design consultant (Leif McKay of RRM Design Group) presented to the Commission the preferred conceptual design of the Mission Plaza Master Plan. Staff Guzman said the Mission Plaza Master Plan was developed based on community, business, and City feedback which included a year of public review and input through various community workshops, which was used to develop the preferred design concept. Mr. McKay shared that RRM Design Group also evaluated the Mission Plaza’s uses, existing infrastructure conditions, and the feasibility of expanding the Mission Plaza into Broad and Monterey streets. Mr. McKay added that the Mission Plaza Master Plan design as presented to the Commission balances both the active and passive recreational needs, presents options for activating the space to improve safety and encourage positive uses, improves connectivity within, and to, the Mission Plaza, and creates more flexible and functional spaces. Mr. McKay presented the main features of the preferred design Mission Plaza concept, which include the following elements: Main Plaza with a formal entrance Raised platform for special event staging Water feature in Main Plaza ADA accessible pedestrian bridge crossing the creek Central Plaza with outdoor café and patio Historic Adobe retrofitted as an interpretive building Remodel of public restrooms Amphitheater renovated to improve functionality and accessibility Sculpture Garden adjacent to the SLO Museum of Art with pathway to accessible bridge crossing Dog-leg” section of Broad Street converted as an extension of the plaza to encourage a more pedestrian and bicycle friendly street (parking preserved and opportunity for a new bus stop location) Mr. McKay added that the Mission Plaza Master Plan preferred concept improves ADA and Emergency Vehicle accessibility to the Plaza. The project could be phased-in over the next decade as funding becomes available. Public Comment None Commission Comments followed. Commissioner Avakian asked about the size of the stage areas. Mr. McKay responded that it was similar to a performance platform which would be approximately 18” high; allowing flexibility for multiple uses. Commissioner Avakian asked if there were historic trees at the plaza that would need to be removed as a result of this design concept. Mr. McKay responded that all heritage trees would be preserved and in accordance with City adopted arboriculture practices. Commissioner Avakian stated he was in support of the multi-functional use of the Mission Plaza. Commissioner Avakian also asked if plaza elements would be added to deter skateboarding. Commissioner Olson was in support of modifying the current amphitheater to a more functional space. Commissioner Olson asked if the Sculpture Garden would include both temporary and permanent public artworks. Mr. McKay responded that the Sculpture Garden is still in the concept stage and would be fully explored at a later date through the City’s Public Art Program. Packet Pg. 262 8 Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of January 4, 2017 Page 3 Commissioner Thurman stated he was in support of the water feature but recommended consideration of an alternative location other than the main entrance to the plaza. Commissioner Thurman asked if there were vehicle barriers proposed for the “Dog-Leg” to limit the interaction between vehicles and pedestrian/bicycles. Mr. McKay responded that the design is conducive to vehicles slowing down but would not completely limit vehicle access. He added that the concept would require further review and study by the City’s Traffic Engineering program. Commissioner Thurman asked about use of permeable paving materials in the construction of the plaza to capture stormwater and he encouraged the use of drought tolerant turf. Chair Whitener asked about if bicycle racks would be added to the Mission Plaza and if complete closure of the “Dog-Leg” was considered. Mr. McKay responded that the City is required to provide street and parking access to the residents located on this “Dog-Leg”. Chair Whitener read a question aloud from Vice Chair Updegrove regarding the location of the restrooms in which Mr. McKay responded that the restroom location is conceptual. The Parks and Recreation Commission is asked to comment on all design features and amenities of the draft Master Plan, including but not limited to the following: 1) Is the Commission in support of the overall Mission Plaza design style which includes the Woonerf design concept for the “dogleg” (Broad to Monterey Street), outdoor café, public restroom location and replacement of the amphitheater with a flat surface plaza? The Commission was in support of the preferred Mission Plaza design concept as presented. 2) Does the Commission have any significant concerns regarding the general site layout, plaza design, proposed recreational facilities or use? The Commission expressed some concern about the safety of the “Dog- Leg” with the proposed Woonerf design and intermingling of vehicles and pedestrian/bicycle traffic but recommend approval with further review and study by the City’s Traffic Engineering program. 3) What other types of active or passive recreation would the Commission like to see incorporated on-site? No additional recreation types were recommended by the Commission. 4) Is the Commission in support of the proposed “sculpture garden? The Commission was in support of the proposed public art sculpture garden. 3. Review and Determination of Avila Ranch’s Parks General Plan Policy Conformity; Review of Parks in Construction Phases One through Three; and Feedback on Parks Construction Phases Four through Five. John Rickenbach, JFR Consulting, provided background on the Avila Ranch Development plan. The applicant team received the Commission’s prior feedback in September and Packet Pg. 263 8 Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of January 4, 2017 Page 4 November 2015 and have responded with a modified proposal that is consistent with the General Plan Park and Recreation. The applicant is seeking the Commission’s approval of 18 acres of parks, which include detailed park plans for Parks A through E, and conceptual designs for Parks F through I. Stephen Peck, Avila Ranch Project Applicant, said that specific effort was made to incorporate the Commission’s feedback into a modified design to include many design features and elements that the Commission had earlier expressed was absent in the original design. He added that the proposed Community Facilities District would provide dedicated funding through the assessment of property tax and for the maintenance of the project’s parks, open space trails and facilities within this development through a restricted fund. Melanie Mills, Landscape Architect for the project, shared with the Commission park design features and how the landscape celebrates the existing characteristics of the site. She added that the park landscape will focus on drought resistant native species, neighborhood turf areas, use of recycled water, bioretention integration areas that would receive and integrate stormwater, and low impact development bioretention areas for use of recycled water. Ms. Mills provided a review of the proposed parks within the Avila Ranch Development phases 1 through 5. The Commission was asked to provide feedback on the proposed park plans and recommend the City Council’s approval for the following recommendations: 1. Recommend to the City Council that the project parks proposal is consistent with the Parks & Recreation Element of the General Plan. 2. Approve detailed park plans for proposed Parks A through E. 3. Review and provide recommendations on conceptual designs for Parks F through I Public Comment Jean Hyduchak, Ambassador for National Pickleball Association and SLO Pickleball Club, spoke about the popularity of pickleball and asked the Commission to recommend that the applicant consider changing the proposal to add pickleball courts to Neighborhood Park G. Commission Comments followed. Commissioner Thurman thanked the project applicant for their thoughtful use of landscape and bioretention in the modified design. He added that the turf could be removed from Park B and that trees planted in decomposed granite typically fail to thrive. Commissioner Thurman expressed concern about the level of water and care needed for an orchard to produce. He added his support for a separate dog park and recommended permanent concrete seating for the farmer’s market area. Commission Thurman was also in support of dedicated pickleball courts. Commissioners Olson and Avakian were in support of the turf area in Park B. Commissioner Olson was in support of the proposed dog park and asked for separate consideration for larger and smaller dogs. Commissioner Olson asked if water would be a cost issue for the community gardens. Director Stanwyck responded that the proposed gardens would most likely use recycled water. Commissioner Olson was in support of dedicated pickleball courts in Park G. Commissioner Avakian asked about the density of the R2 development. Applicant Steven Peck said R2 is low density and is typically 4 to 6 housing units. He added that Park A could be considered as a potential location to add a basketball half-court. Commissioner Avakian asked about BBQ areas and Ms. Mills responded that the neighborhood park does include some BBQ areas. Commissioner Avakian asked if there was a standard size for the community gardens. Director Stanwyck responded that the typical size is a 10x10 raised garden bed and that Packet Pg. 264 8 Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of January 4, 2017 Page 5 construction would be responsive to the surrounding housing. Commissioner Avakian was in support of dedicated pickleball courts for Park G. Chair Whitener asked if the bioretention areas are calculated into the open space requirement for park acreage. Director Stanwyck added that the applicant has provided a comprehensive proposal for parks. Chair Whitener expressed concern about maintenance and safety of the proposed orchard. Chair Whitener added his support for additional soccer turf fields in Park G. ACTION: RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT THE AVILA RANCH DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED PARK PLANS FOR PARKS A THROUGH I, AS CONSISTENT WITH THE PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER THURMAN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER AVAKIAN. CARRIED 4:0:0:3 to recommend Council Adoption. AYES: AVAKIAN, OLSON, THURMAN, WHITENER NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: SCHWAB, SINGLE, UPDEGROVE, 4. Review and Recommend to Council Adoption of the Proposed Recreation Agreement between the City and San Luis Obispo County YMCA Director Stanwyck provided an overview of the proposed recreation agreement between the City and the YMCA. The Parks and Recreation Department and the YMCA desire to continue to collaboratively offer programming together and avoid duplication of programs and efforts by memorializing their partnership via this proposed agreement. Director Stanwyck noted that for the past year, staff from both parties have met to develop this recreational partnership agreement that memorializes the longstanding relationship between the City and the YMCA. Public Comment Monica Grant, Chief Executive Officer of the SLO County YMCA, thanked the Commission and Parks and Recreation staff for their support in seeking creative partnership opportunities with the City to continue to offer affordable recreational opportunities for the community. Commission Comments followed. The Commission thanked Parks and Recreation staff and the YCMA for their joint efforts in providing affordable and accessible recreational opportunities. Commissioner Thurman asked for background information about the Ken Hampian hockey rink. Commissioner Avakian asked about the fiscal impact of the agreement, how the fees were calculated and how they will be collected. Staff Mudgett explained the methodology and the tiered-payment recommendation for the 4-year term of the Agreement. ACTION: RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED RECREATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Y.M.C.A. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER AVAKIAN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OLSON. Packet Pg. 265 8 Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of January 4, 2017 Page 6 CARRIED 4:0:0:3 to recommend Council Adoption. AYES: AVAKIAN, OLSON, THURMAN, WHITENER NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: SCHWAB, SINGLE, UPDEGROVE, COMMITTEE COMMUNICATIONS 5. Director’s Report Director Stanwyck provided a brief update of current Parks and Recreation programming and City updates: Community Forum on January 10th at 6:30pm at the Ludwick Community Center. She added that Advisory Body goals have been forwarded to the City Council and encouraged Commissioners to attend the Forum. City Council Goal Setting will be held on January 28th at the Library Community Room. Sinsheimer Playground project will begin construction after January 23, 2017 and completion is anticipated by Summer 2017. LIAISON REPORTS 6. Subcommittee Liaison Reports Adult and Senior Programming: Commissioner Single was absent. No report. Bicycle Advisory Committee: Commissioner Olson said there was no meeting. No report. City Facilities (Damon Garcia, Golf, Pool & Joint Use Facilities): Commissioner Avakian reported the planting of nine trees at the Course and field closures due to rain. Tree Committee: Commissioner Thurman said there was no meeting. No report. Jack House Committee: Vice Chair Updegrove was absent. No report. Youth Sports: Commissioner Schwab was absent. No report. Commission Communications ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m. to the regular Parks and Recreation Commission scheduled for 01, February, 2017 at 5:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION: 02/01/2017 Packet Pg. 266 8 Minutes CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE Monday, February 27, 2017 Regular Meeting of the Cultural Heritage Committee CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Cultural Heritage Committee was called to order on Monday, February 27, 2017 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Hill. ROLL CALL Present: Committee Members Sandy Baer, Craig Kincaid, Shannon Larrabee, James Papp, Leah Walthert, Vice-Chair Thom Brajkovich, and Chair Jaime Hill Absent: None Staff: Senior Planner Brian Leveille and Recording Secretary Monique Lomeli. Other staff members presented reports or responded to questions as indicated in the minutes. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. End of Public Comment-- APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION: MOTION BY VICE CHAIR BRAJKOVICH, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER KINCAID, CARRIED BY CONSENSUS 7-0 to approve the minutes of the Cultural Heritage Committee meeting of January 23, 2017 as amended: Page 1: Correct Roll Call section to reflect Committee Member Baer’s absence. Page 2: Add Committee Member Kincaid’s question on review of the tree removals PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Mission Plaza Concept Plan. OTHR-0172-2017: Conceptual review and discussion of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan within the Downtown Historic District; discussion of this item is not subject to CEQA; C-D-H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Packet Pg. 267 8 Minutes – Cultural Heritage Committee Meeting of February 27, 2017 Page 2 Debbie Rudd, RRM Design Group, narrated a PowerPoint presentation providing background information and an overview of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan. Senior Planner Leveille provided information on the next steps for review of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan. Ms. Rudd responded to Committee inquiries and requests for clarification. In response to inquiry by Chair Hill, Manny Guzman, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the conceptual nature of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan does not currently include design detail, noting that once funding is obtained, design details will be developed and reviewed. In response to inquiry by Committee Member Papp, Ms. Rudd clarified the two existing pedestrian bridges are not accessible to the handicapped and clarified the intent and accessibility of the proposed new bridge. Public Comments: Chair Hill opened the public comment. Saro Rizzo, suggested incorporation of a simple play area to offer an amenity for children and parents using the area. End of Public Comment-- Committee Member Larrabee voiced support for the concept and stated she especially appreciated the effort put into making the area handicap accessible. Committee Member Baer stated she enjoys the amphitheater and is unsure of whether she would like to see it changed but is otherwise pleased with the concept. Chair Hill stated the current design is not functional for families with small children and stated she would like to see more turf in southeast portion of the plan and voiced concern regarding the splash pad at the entrance of the plaza dissuading locals from doing business in the area. Committee Member Papp stated he admires the outreach efforts extended to the community; commented on the historical importance of the area and asked that its rich history be incorporated into the plans for signage, sculpture, and other placemaking efforts. Committee Member Brajkovich stated he thought the concept was thorough and incorporated the feedback from the community. He suggested the plan include a play area for children and recommended closing off Broad Street to accommodate the increase in pedestrian traffic. Packet Pg. 268 8 Minutes – Cultural Heritage Committee Meeting of February 27, 2017 Page 3 2. 116 Chorro Street. HIST 4114-2016: Review of a Historical Preservation Agreement Mills Act Contract) for the Master List Historic Michael C. Halpin House, with a categorical exemption from environmental review; R-1 zone; Robert and Shawn Harper, applicants. Assistant Planner Walter Oetzell presented the staff report with use of a PowerPoint presentation. Public Comments: Chair Hill opened the public hearing. Buzz Kalkowski, inquired about the process monitoring maintenance of Mills Act properties. In response to Mr. Kalkowski, Chair Hill and Senior Planner Leveille provided information on the City’s process to review Mills Act improvements. Shawn Harper, applicant, inquired about the City’s purview for improvements or renovations to historical homes. End of Public Comment-- Chair Hill responded to the home owner’s question, stating each property has a unique agreement but generally, for private residences, the City’s concern is related to the exterior design. In response to Committee Member Papp, Senior Planner Leveille stated the intent of the Mills Act contract is to enhance and present the historic character of the property. Committee Member Papp requested staff consider reducing the Mills Act application fees. Senior Planner Leveille stated that such consideration is underway. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER PAPP, SECOND BY COMMITTEE MEMBER LARRABEE, CARRIED BY CONSENSUS 7-0 to forward a recommendation to City Council to approve the applicant’s request to be a part of the Mills Act Preservation Program. 3. 1020 Railroad Avenue. ARCH 2769-2016 & USE-2770-2016: Review of the installation of a new wireless telecommunications facility, including two new “chimney cupola” screening elements to be constructed on a Contributing List Resource within the Railroad Historic District with a categorical exemption from environmental review; C-R- S-H zone; Verizon Wireless, applicant. Chair Hill acknowledged receipt of correspondence from John Grady prior to the meeting. Packet Pg. 269 8 Minutes – Cultural Heritage Committee Meeting of February 27, 2017 Page 4 Assistant Planner Walter Oetzell presented the staff report with use of a PowerPoint presentation. In response to inquiry by Committee Member Papp, Assistant Planner Oetzell stated the City does not allow uncovered wireless telecommunications facilities. Public Comments: Chair Hill opened the public hearing. Applicant Representative, Robert McCormick, explained the current proposed design and responded to Committee inquiries regarding the necessity of the design, location and size of the antennas. Saro Rizzo, Building Owner, provided background information for the building and requested constructive feedback if a redesign is required. Chair Hill closed the Public Comment Period. End of Public Comment-- Vice-Chair Brajkovich suggested an architectural redesign. Chair Hill requested staff provide information on the building height, particularly from Church Street. Committee Member Papp commented on the design and stated the building does not fit in with the essence of the railroad district and the design guidelines for the district cannot be elegantly applied to this building. Committee discussion ensued regarding the project’s consistency with historic preservation guidelines. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMITTEE MEMBER PAPP, SECOND BY CHAIR HILL, CARRIED BY CONSENSUS 7-0 to continue the item to a date uncertain with direction to simplify the screening enclosure. Chair Hill left the room at 7:22 p.m. and returned at 7:24 p.m. LIAISON REPORTS Senior Planner Leveille presented a Memorandum of Understanding (included in the agenda packet) between the City and the Friends of the La Loma Adobe and responded to Committee inquiries. Packet Pg. 270 8 Minutes – Cultural Heritage Committee Meeting of February 27, 2017 Page 5 Chair Hill provided information regarding the potential uses of the space and invited Buzz Kalkowski to provide input on behalf of Friends of La Loma. Mr. Kalkowski provided background information on the property. Senior Planner Leveille provided an agenda forecast and information regarding training opportunities. Committee Member Papp requested the Committee agendize discussion regarding community outreach and cultural heritage education. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:39 p.m. The next Regular Meeting of the Cultural Heritage Committee is scheduled for Monday, March 27, 2017 at 5:30 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. APPROVED BY THE CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE: 03/27/2017 Packet Pg. 271 8 Minutes ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISION Monday, March 20, 2017 Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order on Monday, March 20, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Wynn. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Amy Nemcik, Allen Root, Angela Soll, Vice Chair Suzan Ehdaie arrived at 5:05 p.m.), and Chair Wynn Absent: Commissioner Brian Rolph Staff: Community Development Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Associate Planner Kyle Bell, and Recording Secretary Monique Lomeli. Other staff members presented reports or responded to questions as indicated in the minutes. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER NEMCIK, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SOLL, CARRIED BY CONSENSUS 4-0-2 to approve the Minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meetings of January 9, 2017 and January 30, 2017 as presented. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 135 Ferrini Road. ARCH-2451-2015: Continued review of a three story multi-family residential project that includes five residential units, with a categorical exemption from environmental review; R-4 zone; Zac Missler, applicant. Associate Planner Kyle Bell presented the staff report with use of a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Packet Pg. 272 8 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission Meeting of March 20, 2017 Page 2 As requested by Chair Wynn, Associate Planner Bell provided a brief overview of the traffic impacts associated with the project. Applicant Truitt Vance expressed appreciation for the consideration showed by the Commission and responded to Commission inquiries. Public Comment: Ed Hazencamp requested information regarding the barrier between the project and his property. End of Public Comment-- Associate Planner Bell confirmed the barrier between Mr. Hazencamp’s property and the project will be a 6 -foot wooden fence. Commission discussion followed. Applicant Truitt Vance responded to Commission comments regarding the revised color palette, stating the palette is not as mute as it appears in the presentation and that another project in the neighborhood used a similar palette with positive feedback from the community. Chair Wynn requested paint samples be provided on future color boards. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROOT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SOLL, CARRIED BY CONSENSUS 5-0-1 to approve the project as presented in the staff report with the following amendment to condition #4: 4. The applicant shall work with staff to revise and refine the colors and materials to provide lighter colors and consider utilizing wood siding on the upper levels. The applicant shall note the use of smooth finish stucco on the building plans to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 2. Mission Plaza Concept Plan. OTHR-0172-2017: Conceptual review and discussion of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan within the Downtown Historic District; discussion of this item is not subject to CEQA; C-D-H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Debbie Rudd, RRM Design Group, presented an in-depth review of the conceptual plan with use of a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Commission inquiries. Public Comments: Chuck Crotser, San Luis Obispo, provided feedback on various elements of the concept plan and suggested future collaboration with the Downtown Concept Plan Creative Vision Team. Packet Pg. 273 8 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission Meeting of March 20, 2017 Page 3 Ken Schwartz spoke in favor of the project, provided background information on the concept, and suggested incorporating a cultural center. Dean Miller provided background information on the plaza and feedback on the current concept plan, and suggested the intersection at Chorro and Monterey Street become part of the plaza concept. End of Public Comment-- Commissioner Root spoke in favor of the concept; stated an archway at the entrance would create a sense of confinement and he would prefer to see an alternative to that archway; expressed interest in Chorro and Monterey Streets becoming part of the concept. Commissioner Soll spoke in favor of the concept; stated she would like to see the splashpad relocated closer to the children’s museum and is not in favor of the archway entrance. Vice-Chair Ehdaie spoke in favor of the wheel-free space and expressed interest in more information about connectivity from the creek-side path to the other side of the bridge. Commissioner Nemcik spoke in favor of the concept and voiced support for the removal of the amphitheater; stated she would like to see the adobe repurposed as a living museum. Chair Wynn spoke in favor of the concept and agreed with previous comments regarding the archways, relocation of the splash pad, and possible expansion of the project to include Chorro and Monterey; stated he would like to see a reduced number of switchbacks. COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION Deputy Director Davidson provided an agenda forecast. There was a brief discussion regarding the future appointment of two new members and the end of Vice-Chair Ehdaie’s term on the ARC. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:52 p.m. The next Regular meeting of the Architectural Review Commission is scheduled for Monday, April 3, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION: 05/15/2017 Packet Pg. 274 8 Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, May 10, 2017 Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order on Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Stevenson. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Kim Bisheff, Scott Mann, Nicholas Osterbur, Hemalata Dandekar, and Chair Charles Stevenson. Absent: Commissioner Ronald Malak and Vice-Chair John Fowler. Staff: Assistant City Attorney Jon Ansolabehere, Community Development Deputy Director Xzandrea Fowler, Recording Secretary Monique Lomeli. Other staff members presented reports or responded to questions as indicated in the minutes. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Stevenson led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MANN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER DANDEKAR, CARRIED 5-0-2 to approve the minutes of the Joint Council and Planning Commission meeting of April 12, 2017 as amended: Commissioner Dandekar requested mixed-housing options in the downtown area with a greater consideration to affordability. Commissioner Mann referenced his written correspondence, suggesting softening intersections to slow traffic as it approaches the downtown core. Chair Stevenson recommended removal of the Cannabis Regulation and Climate Action Plan Implementation white papers to be replaced with categories focused on healthy communities and incentive-driven housing programs.” Packet Pg. 275 8 Minutes – Planning Commission Meeting of May 10, 2017 Page 2 BUSINESS ITEM 1. 609 Palm Street. USE-0388-2017/EID-0349-2017: Conceptual review of the proposed Palm/Nipomo Parking Garage project that includes commercial space and the San Luis Obispo Little Theatre and the public scoping meeting to discuss the work-scope of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) being prepared for the project; O-H & R-3 zones; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Parking Manager Scott Lee provided a brief history of the proposed project. Contract Environmental Planner Shauna Callery, Rincon Consultants, Inc., presented an in-depth staff report. Deputy Director of Public Works Tim Bochum responded to Commission inquiries. Public Comments: David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, read from written correspondence submitted by Allan Cooper. Dave Hannings, San Luis Obispo, spoke in favor of the project and expressed concerns regarding noise impacts. Babak Naficy, San Luis Obispo, expressed opposition to the project and submitted written correspondence. Rachel Drake, San Luis Obispo, spoke in favor of the project and voiced concerns regarding environmental impacts. Ken Schwartz, San Luis Obispo, commented on the cultural significance of the site. End of Public Comment-- Commission discussion followed, with direction to staff to include an additional study regarding greenhouse gas emissions and to modify the EIR scope as follows: 1. Include a rooftop public access space. 2. Consider the adverse impact to a scenic vista a potentially significant impact versus a less than significant impact. Commission recessed at 7:27 p.m. and reconvened at 7:35 p.m., with all Commissioners present. 2. Mission Plaza Concept Plan. OTHR-0172-2017: Conceptual review and discussion of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan within the Downtown Historic District; discussion of this item is not subject to CEQA; C-D-H zone; City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. Packet Pg. 276 8 Minutes – Planning Commission Meeting of May 10, 2017 Page 3 Engineer Manny Guzman briefly introduced the project consultant and invited the Commission to provide feedback on the conceptual design. Design Consultant Leif McKay, RRM Design Group, presented an overview of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan, identifying areas to be revised with the intent to incorporate public feedback, and responded to Commission inquiries. Public Comment: Ken Schwartz, San Luis Obispo, voiced disagreement with the boundaries of the conceptual design urged the Commission to recommend expanding the vision of the plaza. David Drake, San Luis Obispo, echoed the sentiments of Mr. Schwartz and suggested integrating more cultural emphasis. Rachel Drake, San Luis Obispo, spoke in favor of the plan and suggested possible expansion of boundaries. Dave Hannings, San Luis Obispo, spoke in favor of the conceptual plan and suggested expanding the plan. End of Public Comment-- Commission discussion followed with the following recommendations: 1. Include additional permanent seating near the amphitheater. 2. Incorporate opportunities to encourage appropriate use of space. 3. Provide greater consideration to safety within multimodal areas. COMMENTS AND DISCUSSION Deputy Director Fowler provided an agenda forecast. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:07 p.m. The next Regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: 06/28/2017 Packet Pg. 277 8 Page intentionally left blank. Packet Pg. 278 8 THENewspaper of the Central Coast MBUNE AUG 5.l.�ry a 3825 South Higuera • Post Office Box 112 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406-0112 • (805) 781-7800 In The Superior Court of The State of California In and for the County of San Luis Obispo AD #3244982 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. County of San Luis Obispo I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not interested in the above entitled matter; I am now, and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of THE TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general Circulation, printed and published daily at the City of San Luis Obispo in the above named county and state; that notice at which the annexed clippings is a true copy, was published in the above-named newspaper and not in any supplement thereof — on the following dates to wit; AUGUST 26, 2017 that said newspaper was duly and regularly ascertained and established a newspaper of general circulation by Decree entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, on June 9, 1952, Case # 19 i 39 under the Government Code of the State of California. I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (Sign re of Principal Clerk) DATE: AUGUST 26, 2017 AD COST: $176.32 Clrff OF &MLI S OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The San Luis Obispo City Council invites all interested persons to attend a public hearing on Tuesday, September 5, 2017, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obi- spo, California, relative to the following: 1. UowNTOwH CONCEPr PE.AN A public hearing to consider the following: As recommended by the Planning Commis- sion, the City Council will consider adop• tion by resolution of the Downtown Con- capl Plan as a long range vision and a guide forpubiic and private investment In the downtown. The Downtown Concept Plan i5 categorically exempt from Califor- nia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); City of San Luis Obispo, applicant. For more information on this item, you are Invited to contact Rebecca Gershow of the City's Community Development Depart- ment at (805) 781-7011 or by email at %p rrshow.0 sloclty.oro 2. MISSION PLAZA CONCEPT PLAN A public hearing to consider conceptual re- view and discussion of the Mission Plaza Concept Plan within the Downtown Historic District: discussion of this item is not sub- ject to Calffomla Environmental Quality Act (CMA). For more information on this item, you are Invited to contact Manny Guzman of the City's Public Works Department at (805) 781.7423 or by email atnlguzmsn@sloci ,: M Reports for this meeting will be available for review in the City Clerk's Office and on- line at www.slpcitv.ora on Wednesday, August 30, 2017, Please call the City Cler- k's Office at (805) 781-7100 for°more infor- mation. The City Council meeting will be televised live on Charter Cable Channel 20 and live streaming on www.slocity.org. Carrie Gallagher Oily Clerk City of San Luis Obispo August 26, 2017 3244992 Mission PlazaAssessment and Concept Plan UpdateDraft Concept PlanCity Council PresentationSeptember 5, 201709-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Provide a long term vision for Mission Plaza and the Broad Street “dog-leg”Respect the plaza’s relationship to the Mission, the creek, and downtownPreserve Mission Plaza’s unique sense of placeImprove functionality and flexibility for a variety of usesAddress ongoing maintenance and operational issuesEnhance accessibility (ADA)Coordinate with Downtown Concept PlanProject Goals09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Monterey Street (pre 1970’s)A history of changeHistory & BackgroundImage courtesy of Ken Schwartz09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation A history of changeHistory & BackgroundImages courtesy of Ken Schwartz195519641963196309-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Street closure approved 1966Opened to the public in 1971History & BackgroundA history of changeSource: Telegram-Tribune09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Existing Conditions09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Existing Conditions|Ongoing Maintenance09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Two Community WorkshopsStakeholders meetingsReviewed previous studies and designsConducted initial technical studiesResearched other similar public spacesTranslated community input into two concept plan alternativesJoint Council/Planning Commission study sessionCombined alternatives into one conceptPRC, CHC, ARC, and PCWhat have we done so far?09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation What we have heardBROAD STThe Concept Plan needs to balance a variety of needsKeep the existing charm while providing a long term visionPark-like setting vs.an active plazaQuiet serene spaces vs.flexible space for events and activitiesAttracts a variety of ages and is accessible to allPhoto: Downtown Association09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation MONTEREY STMission San Luis Obispo de TolosaCHORRO STBROAD STWhat we have heardActivate spacesto improve safety and encourage positive uses09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation MONTEREY STMission San Luis Obispo de TolosaCHORRO STBROAD STWhat we have heardImprove connectivitywithin and to Mission Plaza09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation MONTEREY STMission San Luis Obispo de TolosaCHORRO STBROAD STWhat we have heardCreate more flexible andfunctionalspaces09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation MONTEREY STMission San Luis Obispo de TolosaCHORRO STBROAD STWhat we have heardTake a completely new look at the amphitheater area09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Murray AdobeExisting bridgesBear fountainPrivate access easementEmergency accessBROAD STFeatures to be Preserved09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Historic and Chumash educational featuresNew restroomNew lighting and electrical serviceNew signageConsistent furnishingsDurable, low-maintenance pavingPublic artImproved storm water managementImproved accessibilityProposed Museum of Art footprintConcept Plan will include, at a minimum:09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |Main PlazaLUNA REDTHE NETWORKMISSIONWARDEN BRIDGEExisting View09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |Central PlazaPhoto: Andy F.MISSIONADOBEWARDEN BRIDGE09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |Sculpture GardenPhoto: Austin KirkMUSEUM OF ARTBROAD ST09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |Dog-LegExisting ViewMISSIONHISTORY CENTERPALM STBROAD STMUSEUM OF ART09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |Flexibility for EventsPhoto: Downtown AssociationPhoto: Downtown Association09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan: How will it be used?Provide a long term visionGuide future improvements Pursue funding opportunities09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Next StepsFinish scoping the restroom concept designPrepare soils report, archeological report, biological report and hydrology & hydraulic reportEvaluate the plan for environmental impactsGenerate a phasing work plan09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Thank You09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |Existing vs Proposed09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |Improved Site Access09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Downtown Concept PlanMission Plaza09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Draft Concept Plan |AmphitheaterOption: Amphitheater renovated to improve functionality and accessibilityOption: Amphitheater filled in to create more level, flexible plaza space09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Design AlternativesKey Differences:Overall design style, Broad Street dog-leg, restroom location, caféAB09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation Option A: CHORRO MONTEREYBROADBROADConcept AA09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation CHORRO MONTEREYBROADBROADConcept BB09-05-2017 Item 8 - Staff Presentation