HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-06-17 PRC AGENDA PACKETCity of San Luis Obispo, Agenda, Parks and Recreation Commission
Regular Meeting on Wednesday, September 6, 2017 @ 5:30p.m., Parks and Recreation
Conference Room, 1341 Nipomo
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Avakian
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Susan Olson, Keri Schwab, Rodney Thurman and Jeff Whitener
Public Comment Period. At this time, you may address the Commission on items that are not on the agenda but are of interest to the
public and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Commission may not discuss or take action
on issues that are not on the agenda other than to briefly respond to statements made or questions raised, or to ask staff to follow up on
such issues.
PRC Meeting Agenda
1. Consideration of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 7, 2017 and July 5, 2017
2. Review and Provide Feedback on the Draft Project Plan for the Parks and Recreation
Element Update (Gershow – 45 minutes)
3. Recommend Surface Maintenance of Laguna Lake Park Dog Off-Leash Area and Receive and
File 2017 Dog Off-Leash Area Survey Results (Mudgett – 20 minutes)
4. Selection of Wes Conner Awardee for 2017 (Avakian – 15 minutes)
5. Selection of Date and Approval of Route for Annual Park Tour (Stanwyck – 15 minutes)
6. Director’s Report (Stanwyck – 10 minutes)
7. Subcommittee Liaison Reports
Committee Liaison
Adult and Senior Programming Vacant
Bicycle Advisory Susan Olson
City Facilities (Damon, golf, pool, joint use) Greg Avakian
Jack House Committee Jeff Whitener
Tree Committee Rodney Thurman
Youth Sports Association Keri Schwab
8. Communications
Adjourn to Regular Meeting of October 4, 2017
APPEALS: Administrative decisions by the Parks and Recreation Commission may be appealed to the City Council in
accordance with the appeal procedure set forth in Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code.
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and activities.
Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance.
Minutes - DRAFT
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
7 June 2017
Regular Meeting of the Advisory Body Committee Commission
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order on the 7th day of June
2017 at 5:34 p.m. in the Parks and Recreation Administration Conference Room located at 1341 Nipomo
Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Avakian.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Greg Avakian, Vice Chair Rodney Thurman, and Commissioners Susan Olson, Keri
Schwab and Jeff Whitener
Absent: Commissioner Single
Staff: Parks and Recreation Director Shelly Stanwyck, Recreation Manager Melissa Mudgett
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None
CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
ACTION: APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 3, 2017, MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER WHITENER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER THURMAN.
1. Consideration of Minutes
CARRIED 5:0:0:1 to approve the amended minutes of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Body
for the meeting of 5/3/2017.
AYES: AVAKIAN, OLSON, SCHWAB, THURMAN, WHITENER
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: SINGLE
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND BUSINESS ITEMS
2. Review and Adopt Proposed Recreation Partnership Agreement Between the City of San
Luis Obispo and Central Coast Soccer.
Staff Melissa Mudgett presented an overview of the proposed recreational partnership
agreement between the Parks and Recreation Sports program and Central Coast Soccer (CC
Soccer) to offer adult soccer league programming at Damon Garcia Sports Fields. CC Soccer
has been providing adult soccer opportunities, with the support of the City, since 2008. The
proposed agreement memorializes the long-standing relationship and provides for improved
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of June 7, 2017 Page 2
liability management through standardized trainings and collection of liability waivers. Staff
Mudgett also added the proposed agreement is in alignment with adopted cost recovery policies
for adult recreational activities. She elaborated that the proposed agreement has the support of
CC Soccer, Parks and Recreation and Public Works Parks Maintenance staff, whom maintain
the sports fields.
Public Comment
Tim Townley, Vice President of CC Soccer, explained the adult soccer league program for the
Commissioners. Mr. Townley said that the soccer league is non-competitive and changes
teams every two months. CC Soccer provides additional assistance to the City, such as turning
on-off fields lights, which reduces the impact to City staff. Mr. Townley expressed CC
Soccer’s desire to continue to partner with the City. He said he was h opeful that the new
kikuyu grass will improve field conditions and allow for more play. He concluded that he
appreciated the Commission and Parks and Recreation Department staff and their support in
this program.
Gary Havas, SLO Resident, said he was supportive of the new kikuyu grass and is was nice to
see strong partnerships like this between the City and recreational groups.
Commission Comments followed.
Commissioner Whitener said he was supportive of the proposed agreement and that CC Soccer
has been a good partner for the City.
Commissioner Olson was in support of the one-year terms to reassess field conditions annually.
Vice Chair Thurman asked about the timeframe of the kikuyu grass renovation. Director
Stanwyck responded that is it expected to take the summer growing season. She added that
kikuyu grass is at the golf course and its growth responds well to recycled water. Director
Stanwyck concluded that the City will know how the grass responds after the first playing
season and if play can be expanded.
Chair Avakian asked if the 30% ratio of registration fees collected by CC Soccer is adequate.
Staff Mudgett responded that the revenue share equates to full (100%) cost recovery for the
City, although less teams this first year will mean less revenues received by the City.
ACTION: BY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT IS ADOPT A RECREATION
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND
CENTRAL COST SOCCER, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WHITENER, SECOND
BY COMMISSIONER SCHWAB.
CARRIED 5:0:0:1 to Recommend the City Council adopt a Recreation Partnership Agreement
between the City and Central Coast Soccer to provide an Adult Recreational Soccer League
program.
AYES: AVAKIAN, OLSON, SCHWAB, THURMAN, WHITENER
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: SINGLE
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of June 7, 2017 Page 3
3. Receive Preliminary Dog Off-Leash Survey Results and Consider a Recommendation to
Council that it Authorize staff to Pursue PetSAfe Bark for Your Park Grant.
Staff Mudgett provided a brief background of the Laguna Lake Dog Off-Leash Area. She said
that currently the City has an “off-leash” area at the Laguna Lake park but does not have an
enclosed “fenced” dog park. The closest fenced dog park is located at El Chorro Regional Park
(Highway 1 across from Cuesta College). Staff Mudgett provided an update of current
maintenance activities at the “off-leash” area. Staff Mudgett added that a recent community
survey was conducted to identify future needs of the “off-leash” area. The survey was intended
to solicit feedback from users to help shape current maintenance needs, as well as future
improvements to the area should funding become available (such as with grants or community
donations). Preliminary survey results identified top priorities to be all-surface material and
other amenities, such as a shade structure. Staff Mudgett responded that overall, the users are
happy with the “off-leash” area’s maintenance and do not wish to completely enclose it;
however, users were in support of adding a fenced-in dog park at another location within the
park.
Staff Mudgett presented on the benefits of an enclosed dog park and added that a nationwide
grant to fund construction of a dog park is being offered through PetSafe, Bark for your Park
program. Through the user survey and collaboration with Parks Maintenance staff, potential
locations were identified at the Laguna Lake Park for a “fenced” dog park. Parks and
Recreation staff requested the Commission’s approval to seek grant funding and pursue a more
shovel ready project at Laguna Lake Park and to provide feedback on these potential locations.
Staff Mudgett said that, should the City be awarded the dog park grant, there would be
significant public outreach efforts and staff would return to the Commission for direction
regarding public engagement, preliminary design, estimated project costs and construction
progress.
Public Comment
Bill Hallum, SLO resident and daily “off-leash” area user, as the Commission to consider a
broader policy and develop a City plan for dog parks. Mr. Hallum asked the Commission to
consider a more robust more discussion about dog park needs before seeking a grant. He
commended staff for their responsiveness to users. He expressed apprehension that he would
hate to be locked into a dog park “location” as a result of this grant opportunity.
Gary Havas, SLO Resident and former Parks and Recreation Commissioner, commented that it
had been a long time since an enclosed “fenced” dog park has been sought and he appreciated
staff efforts. He would like to see more dog parks within the City and expressed his support for
pursing the dog park grant.
Commission Comments followed.
Commissioners Olson, Thurman and Avakian were concerned if the PetSafe grant “locked” the
City into deciding a “fenced” dog park location in advance of more study and design efforts.
Director Stanwyck confirmed the dog park grant was restrictive to city-owned land only and
did not “lock” the city into a location should that change in the future. Staff Mudgett added
that, should the city be awarded the grant, funds would need to be expended within three (3)
years of award.
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of June 7, 2017 Page 4
Commissioner Olson expressed dissatisfaction with woodchips as an all-surface material for
dog parks and it is damaging to dog paws, preferring grass. She asked about the standard
“fenced” dog park size. Staff Mudgett responded that a typical dog park is .5 to 1 acre.
Commissioner Olson asked if receiving grant funds would preclude the City from applying for
future grants. Director Stanwyck did not believe this would have an impact on the City’s
competition for other grants.
Commissioner Schwab asked if other City Parks were considered. Staff Mudgett responded
that five potential city park locations were identified, however preliminary survey results
showed Laguna Lake Park as the top selection by survey takers. Director Stanwyck added that
having an enclosed “fenced” dog park at this location would be consistent with other uses.
Director Stanwyck provided additional information about Council’s support for an update of
Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan as part of the 2017-19 Financial Plan and future
dog park planning and long-term visioning would be a part of that future policy document and
plan.
Vice Chair Thurman asked if it made sense to have both a “fenced” and unfenced dog area
together. He was in support of more community analysis and incorporating dog park planning
into the Parks and Recreation Element update.
Commissioner Whitener as about the total cost of constructing a dog park. Staff Mudgett said
that, in collaboration with Parks Maintenance staff, it believed a dog park could be constructed
at this location for approximately $40,000 which assumes community donations of some
materials, in-kind services, volunteer efforts, and partnerships. Commissioner Whitener was in
support of the Laguna Park as a location for a “fenced” dog park. He was not in support of a
“fenced” dog park at another City park location if it took away from, or negatively impacted,
current uses.
Chair Avakian said he is a dog lover and past dog owner who often frequented the Laguna Lake
dog “off-leash” area. He supported the concept of a new dog park that had a large/small dog
separation. He appreciated knowing that the grant had flexibility in determining the exact
location of a “fenced” dog park. Chair Avakian asked if the area adjacent to the restrooms was
considered as a potential location. Director Stanwyck responded that area could encroach into
sensitive open space area and trails, and therefore was not recommended by staff.
ACTION: RECEIVE PRELIMINARY DOG OFF-LEASH SURVEY RESULTS AND
RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL THAT IT AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PURSUE
PETSAFE® BARK FOR YOUR PARK™ GRANT, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
OLSON, SECOND BY WHITENER.
CARRIED 3:2:0:1 to recommend to Council that it authorize staff to pursue a Bark for Your
ParkTM grant application submitted to PetSafe®for a total amount not to exceed $25,000 for
the design and construction of a new dog park at Laguna Lake Park.
AYES: AVAKIAN, OLSON, WHITENER
NOES: SCHWAB, THURMAN
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: SINGLE
COMMITTEE COMMUNICATIONS
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of June 7, 2017 Page 5
4. Director’s Report
Director Stanwyck provided a brief update of current Parks and Recreation programming and
City updates.
Council preliminarily included an update to the Parks and Recreation Element as part of
the Preliminary 2017-19 Financial Plan. Next steps will be adoption of budget on June
20th. Following that staff will return to the PRC with to focus on identifying new and
creative ways to engage the public (who recreate and who do not) in this process as well
as to develop a project plan. Community Development planner, Rebecca Gershow, will
be assisting with this effort.
Council provided clarifying direction to staff regarding the continued pursuit of a park in
the north of Broad Street neighborhood.
Public Art Olas Portola installation on Friday, June 9th. Dedication planned for early
August.
Strategic Plan Summit, sharing five months of subcommittee results on the six
Department Goals. There will be a presentation and annual report for the Commission.
Summer Planning frenzy! Summer Camps start on June 19th with 150 kids daily.
Recreation Swim starts June 12th. Jr Ranger Camp starts June 12th. Swim lessons
provided to over 1,000 patrons. Golf program, “Free for Kids” w/ paying adult - all
summer. Blues Games are under way. Friday Night Skate at the SLO Skate Park with
music.
Cancellation of August meeting and community whiffle-ball concept on agenda forecast.
Sinshiemer Park Playground construction updates. Construction severely delayed by
rain, but hopeful it will be completed before the SLO triathlon in July.
PixOnPeaks 2.0 Campaign launched June 1st and includes seven new “loop” hikes
LIAISON REPORTS
5. Subcommittee Liaison Reports
Adult and Senior Programming: Commissioner Single was absent. No Report.
Bicycle Advisory Committee: Commissioner Olson said the BAC had its annual traffic
safety report; lowest collisions on record for auto, bike related accidents up 12% (56
collisions). Half of severe injuries are due to speeding and DUIs. The BAC has not yet
concluded if it will lead the pedestrian plan. BAC will revisit at next meeting in July.
City Facilities (Damon Garcia, Golf, Pool & Joint Use Facilities): Chair Avakian reported
on the new pool ambassador program. Facility staff hosts have new polo shirt uniforms.
The Golf Course has had 26,000 rounds played to-date. Golf Course added a Super
Twilight rate.
Tree Committee: Vice Chair Thurman said there was no Tree Committee report.
Jack House Committee: Commissioner Whitener said the Jack House meeting was a
synopsis on past, present and future of the Jack House. Most of the art is off the walls
and awaiting analysis and cataloging and preservation (as most are in various states of
deterioration). City staff is working with the groups for future Recreational Partnership
agreements, implementation of operational best practices for historic homes managing
and training for volunteers. The Jack House is now a Blue Star Museum, which allows
military and their families a free tour of the home from Memorial Day to Labor Day.
Youth Sports: Commissioner Schwab said there was no YSA meeting.
Commission Communications
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of June 7, 2017 Page 6
Vice Chair Thurman corrected the pronunciation of “Sinsheimer” as “Sins-Heimer”.
Commissioner Olson shared there is a group called “See Spot Run” that is dedicating efforts towards the
City allowing a dedicate spot or trail in open space to hike with dogs off-leash.
Director Stanwyck added that the City is starting a new program called “Hikes with Hounds”, which is a
monthly Ranger led hike in the open space in June, July and August.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:11 p.m. to the regular Parks and Recreation Commission scheduled for 05,
July 2017 at 5:30 p.m., in the Parks and Recreation Department Conference Room located at 1341
Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, California.
APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION: 07/05/2017
Minutes - DRAFT
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
5 July 2017
Regular Meeting of the Advisory Body Committee Commission
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order on the 5th day of July
2017 at 5:33 p.m. in the Parks and Recreation Administration Conference Room located at 1341 Nipomo
Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Avakian.
ROLL CALL – QUORUM NOT MET. NO ACTIONS TAKEN
Present: Chair Greg Avakian, and Commissioners Susan Olson and Jeff Whitener
Absent: Vice Chair Thurman, Commissioner Schwab, resignation of Commissioner Single
Staff: Parks and Recreation Director Shelly Stanwyck, Recreation Manager Melissa Mudgett, Senior
Civil Engineer Michaele McGuire, Recreation Supervisor Devin Hyfield
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None
CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
1. Consideration of Minutes
ACTION: DEFER APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF
JUNE 7, 2017 TO THE SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 MEETING FOR QUORUM OF THE PARKS
AND RECREATION COMMISSION.
2. Consider Cancellation of August 2nd PRC Meeting
The consensus of the three members was to cancel the August 2nd meeting. Chair Avakian
reminded the Commission that it typically cancels the summer August meeting due to staff and
PRC Member’s travel schedules. He added that the next regular meeting of the Commission
will be on September 6, 2017. Staff Mudgett said that the cancellation of the August meeting
will be publicly noticed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND BUSINESS ITEMS
3. Laguna Lake Golf Course Club House Evaluation and Recommend Remodel Concept
Staff Mudgett provided the Commission with a brief background of the Laguna Lake Golf
Course and the pro-shop building assessment project. She added that all parks and recreational
facilities will be evaluated as part of the upcoming Parks and Recreation Element Update and
master planning efforts which would ideally prioritize any future capital projects as a result.
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of July 5, 2017 Page 2
Senior Civil Engineer, Michael McGuire, presented an overview of the golf course pro-shop
assessment which began in December 2015. Current pro-shop in significant disrepair and a not
a candidate for remodeling and represent new concepts to meet current recreational needs.
Consultant Joe Wilcox, KBZ Architects, Inc. offered the preliminary concept resulting from the
golf course building assessment which included the following elements.
1. Covered Storage for Golf Carts
2. Restrooms remain
3. Community Building (meeting space, restaurant, storage)
4. Pro-Shop (starters (view of greens), Golf staff offices)
5. Buildings situated to perform as a windbreak
6. Outdoor seating/dining/gathering area
7. Roof construction conducive to future solar panels (noted City Mayor’s support to
make the City a “Net Zero” City for energy usage)
A final report will be available to the Parks and Recreation Department. Staff McGuire said
that the assessment concludes this phase of work. He said the next phase would include
approval of final designs, prioritizing this construction project as a Capital Improvement
Project with allocation of funding and City Council’s approval.
Public Comment
None
Commission Comments followed.
By consensus, the Commission provided support of the conceptual design and elements as
presented.
4. Presentation: Whiffle Ball Fields Concept
Director Shelly introduced community member Bill Mott to present a unique recreational
opportunity and legacy project for Whiffle Ball. Mr. Mott shared with the Commissioners that
whiffle ball is experiencing its 7th annual tournament, called “Whiffle Fest”. He presented to
the Commission the concept of new Whiffle Ball Fields at Emerson Park, as drafted by Bill
Isaman. He added that the field could support a multi-use for miniature youth baseball, t-ball,
“challenger ball” for disabled youth, adult whiffle ball league or drop-in play. Whiffle Ball
would be seeking grants and fund raising efforts to construct future fields. Mr. Mott invited the
Commissioners to attend the next whiffle ball tournament in August.
Public Comment
None
Commission Comments followed.
Commissioners Olson asked about the availability of public restrooms. Director Stanwyck
answered that portable toilets could be provided as condition of a special event permit.
Director Stanwyck continued to add that the future update to the Parks and Recreation Element
would assess the park needs and address any needs to future public restrooms at this park.
Commissioner Olson asked about funding opportunities. Director Stanwyck responded that
private organizations or non-profits could be eligible for more specific grant opportunities than
the City.
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of July 5, 2017 Page 3
Commissioner Whitener was in support of the whiffle ball idea only if the current recreation of
Emerson park remained. Staff Devin Hyfield, Recreation Supervisor, responded the Rugby
uses this field in the summer to practice and drop-in play. Commissioner Whitener asked when
play would occur. Mr. Mott responded that games would typically occur on weekends when
parking lot and on-street parking would be available. Director Stanwyck added that
tournaments would be permitted as special events to regulate attendance and parking.
Chair Avakian was in support of the whiffle ball concept. He expressed concern about the
potential displacement of current recreational uses of the park. Mr. Mott said the park would
still be open for drop-in play. Chair Avakian asked about potential impacts to the surrounding
neighborhood regarding lights and/or noise. Director Stanwyck replied that lighting has
positive and negative impacts with one positive impact being better lighting at the park and
reduced undesirable nighttime activities.
Overall the Parks and Recreation Commission was in support for the Whiffle Ball concept.
Director Stanwyck spoke about “next steps” for this concept which would include a more
formalized design, formalized Commission support, a donation agreement for formal
acceptance by City Council, and funding raising/partnerships and grant opportunities to support
construction efforts.
COMMITTEE COMMUNICATIONS
5. Director’s Report
Director Stanwyck provided a brief update of current Parks and Recreation programming and
City updates.
• Council unanimously adopted the 2017-19 Financial Plan on June 20, 2017. Staff will
return to the Commission with a project plan for the Parks and Recreation Element
update and Master Plan in the Fall.
• Preliminary meeting with LDS Church to discuss options for a future park in the North
Broad Street area
• Water Safety Day on July 15th, included is free swim and water obstacle course
• Pool Jr. Lifeguards Program July 17th-28th
• Parks Supervisor, Jeff Hendricks, invites the Council for a field visit of Damon Garcia
Sports Complex to view the progress of kikuyu grass growth.
• Trailhead Kiosk dedication Terrace Hill on Thursday, July 6 at 3:00pm
• Friday Night Skate on July 7th
• Family Camp Out at Laguna Lake Park on August 12
• Movies in Mission on August 5th, 12th and 19th
• SLO Triathlon on July 23rd. Still in need of volunteers.
• Olas Portola public art dedication scheduled for August
• Youth summer camper and box art program event
• Progress on Sinsheimer Playground nearing completion. Pathways will be open for SLO
Triathlon. Unfortunately, playground elements will not be open prior to SLO Triathlon.
LIAISON REPORTS
6. Subcommittee Liaison Reports
• Adult and Senior Programming: No report.
DRAFT Minutes – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of July 5, 2017 Page 4
• Bicycle Advisory Committee: Commissioner Olson said the BAC meets this month on
July 20th. There was no report.
• City Facilities (Damon Garcia, Golf, Pool & Joint Use Facilities): Chair Avakian reported
golf course was testing of aeration equipment, golf revenue is up, kids play free program
had 67 kids, promotional programs have doubled, 1st Tee Camp starts July 17th.
• Tree Committee: Vice Chair Thurman was absent. No report.
• Jack House Committee: Commissioner Whitener was not in attendance of the last Jack
House meeting and asked Director Stanwyck to provide input. Director Stanwyck said
that a special meeting will be held on July 19th to address the current policy void for the
management of the historic home. She added that the Parks and Recreation element
update and master plan will assess this facility for future uses.
• Youth Sports: Commissioner Schwab was absent. No report.
Commission Communications
Director Stanwyck expressed that there are currently two vacancies on the Parks and Recreation
Commission, and noted that Commissioner Whitener will be terming-out effective March 2018. The
Department will be developing a flyer and actively recruiting for individual passionate about parks and
recreation.
Chair Avakian mentioned that he will be attending the Quarterly Mayor’s Meeting to report on recent
Parks and Recreation activities. He will be on vacation during the end of July.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 6:41 p.m. to the regular Parks and Recreation Commission scheduled for
September 6, 2017 at 5:30 p.m., in the Parks and Recreation Department Conference Room located at
1341 Nipomo Street, San Luis Obispo, California.
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
Agenda Report
Date: August 23, 2017
SUBJECT: Review and Provide Feedback on the Draft Project Plan for the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Element Update
Prepared by: Lindsey Stephenson, Administrative Analyst
Parks and Recreation
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends the review, discussion, and direction to staff on the Draft Project Plan for the
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Update.
DISCUSSION:
Background
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan was last updated in 2001; it was adopted concurrently as a
Parks and Recreation Element and Master Plan. With new parks being proposed at an
unprecedented rate, the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff lack current policy direction
as well as data regarding the community’s current and future needs. The focus of the Draft Project
Plan is the development of a Community Needs Assessment, Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
Maps, and Element Update.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
The Parks and Recreation Commission purview is to review and make recommendations for
changes which could have an impact on the City’s parks and park facilities. The Parks and
Recreation Commission’s guidance tonight will be used to make final recommendations to be
reflected in the Final Project Plan for Parks and Recreation Master Plan and General Plan Update.
NEXT STEPS:
Based on the feedback and direction received, a Final Project Plan will be presented to the
Commission for its final review, approval and recommendation to the City Council for adoption.
A draft request for proposal for consultant services will accompany the Final Project Plan also for
the Commission’s review and approval.
ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT PROJECT PLAN AND SCHEDULE
Meeting Date: 9/6/17
Item Number: 2
1
DRAFT Project Plan
Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Parks and Recreation General Plan Element Update
BACKGROUND
The development of a Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Element Update has been identified as the
top priority for the Parks & Recreation Commission. The City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan was
last updated in 2001; it was adopted concurrently as a P arks and Recreation Element and Master Plan.
It is out of date and its usefulness as a policy document is minimal. With new parks being proposed at a
historically unprecedented rate in association with multiple residential projects in in the City, the Parks
and Recreation Commission and staff lack current policy direction as well as data regarding the
community’s current and future parks and recreation needs.
This not only impacts future parks and recreation resources, but also the operational needs of the City’s
existing parks and facilities. Additionally, during the most recent drought a need was identified to
include sustainable operational practices in current and future parks so that water intensive plantings
are minimized. A Parks and Recreation Master Plan with a thorough Community Needs Assessment
component would address these issues, among many others.
Due to the elimination in 2010 of the second Recreation Manager Position for the Parks and Recreation
Department there are insufficient staff resources to conduct th is effort solely internally, therefore funds
were allocated through the FY2017 -19 Financial Plan to implement this project.
GOAL AND POLICY CRITERIA
1. Supports Major City Goal regarding Climate Action by identifying future park amenities that
are less water intensive and enhanced maintenance practices in existing parks to accomplish
the same as well as other operational and or programmatic changes in support of this goal.
2. Supports Major City Goal regarding Multi -Modal Transportation by identifying and addressing
connectivity between parks and open spaces via public transit, walking and cycling .
3. Supports the Major City Goal regarding fiscal health by prioritizing community needs for parks
and recreation that result in prioritized capital improvement projects and operations for the
same.
4. Supports the Housing Major City Goal by identifying resident and community needs and
Last Updated:
PURPOSE
The purpose of the update of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Master Plan) and Parks and Recreation General
Plan Element (Element) is to address the current and future needs for the City of San Luis Obispo’s parks, recreation
facilities, programs and services. The plan will include a Community Needs Assessment, illustrative maps, and a
prioritized action plan to ensure the most effective use of future community resources. The public will be engaged in a
positive and creative way so that the resulting plan is representative of community values, desires and needs.
2
supporting the implementation of new facilities and new programs in new City neighborhoods.
5. Supports the Parks and Recreation Commission’s longstanding goal to update the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan and Element to best serve the community
6. Supports implementation of the General Plan through the update of the Parks and Recreation
Element and accompanying policies and programs.
7. Supports the City’s recently updated Land Use Element of the General Plan, including policies such
as: “Areas preserved for open space should include public trail access, controlled to protect the natural
resources, to assure reasonable security and privacy of dwellings…” (LUE 1.10.3); downtown green space
and public parks, including pocket parks and parklets should be increased (LUE 4.10); walking paths
along San Luis Creek in the downtown should be included (LUE 4.15); and public art in projects should
be included (LUE 5.2.4), among others
8. Supports the City’s recently updated Circulation Elements of the General Plan, by identifying
how: parks and recreational areas can be conveniently reached by pedestrians or bicyclists (CE
Goal 1.7.3.7); and completing a continuous pedestrian network connecting residential areas
with major activity centers as well as trails leading into city and county open spaces (CE Policy
5.1.2), among others
9. Is intended to be consistent with the City’s Conservation and Open Space Element of the
General Plan, including: (COSE 8.5.1) “Public access to open space resources, with interpretive
information, should be provided when doing so is consistent with protection of the resources,
and with the security and privacy of affected landowners and occupants. Access will generally
be limited to non-vehicular movement, and may be visually or physically restricted in sensitive
areas” and (COSE 8.5.5) “The City will consider allowing passive recreation where it will not
degrade or significantly impact open space resources and where there are no significant
neighborhood compatibility impacts, in accordance with an approved open space conservation
plan. Passive recreation activities may include: hiking, nature study, bicycle use, rock climbing,
horseback riding or other passive recreational activities as permitted and regulated in the
Open Space Ordinance.”
10. Supports the goals and policies in the Public Art Master Plan
11. Implements the 2015 Open Space Maintenance Plan
12. Implements the adopted 2020 Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan (Action 1.4.4)
13. Considers implementation strategies in the Downtown Concept Plan (adoption expected in
September, 2017)
PROJECT STRATEGY AND SCOPE
The primary objectives for this project are to assess the existing parks and recreation facilities in the City;
identify the community’s needs, including levels of service and geographic service area deficiencies; and
update goals, policies and programs that relate to providing parks and recreation services within the City.
The planning process will include four major components:
1. Setting the Stage: Planning Framework
2. Determining Community Needs
3. Developing the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Plan)
4. Updating the General Plan Parks and Recreation Element (Element)
3
1. Setting the Stage-Planning Framework
To ensure City-wide understanding of the scope and context of the planning process, a planning
framework will be developed in a series of meetings with the staff team, Parks and Recreation
Commission, City Council and other interested stakeholders. The planning framework may include
discussion of core values, vision, mission, goals, policy and program categories and performance
measures, and will set the stage for the work ahead. A draft framework will be developed at the
start of the project that will be refined as the project progresses.
2. Determining Community Needs
To develop a solid foundation for the Plan, a Community Needs Assessment will be developed
with the following components:
▪ Community Engagement
▪ Park and Facility Analysis
▪ Recreation Services Analysis
▪ Management and Operations Analysis
These components are further described below:
• Community Engagement will be a critical part of the Community Needs Assessment. Early
input will be solicited from stakeholders and residents regarding their needs, preferences
and priorities related to parks, facilities, programs and activities, including active and
passive recreation. Engagement activities such as open houses, workshops, focus groups,
interviews, intercept surveys and online surveys will be planned to ensure the participation
of a diverse cross-section of the population, from youth to seniors, as well as diversity of
participants, from people with disabilities to organized sports leagues . A detailed
engagement plan will be developed in coordination with project consultants. Public
engagement findings will be summarized and used in conjunction with the analysis below.
(See page 7 for more information on the Community Engagement Plan.)
• The Park and Facility Analysis will help plan for future needs by understanding the City’s
current parks, facilities and open space areas, including active and passive recreation
opportunities as appropriate, that are available to residents. A park and facility analysis will
include:
o A demographic profile and description of the planning area;
o A park and facility inventory and assessment--documenting the type, number, and
condition of parks, facilities;
o Park and facility classifications and definitions;
o Park and facility standards analysis-analyzing the ratio of parks, facilities and open
space areas to population (current level of service), and anticipated need based on
population projections; evaluating level of service in comparable communities;
updating park and facility standards
o Maps to show existing parks, facilities and open spaces, and geographic service
areas to illustrate areas underserved by parks and facilities; and
4
o Summary of assessment of current parks, facilities and future needs to provide a
basis for the development of policies and programs.
• The Recreation Services Analysis will look at recreation programs and services data
provided by the City and other providers, recreation use findings from public engagement
activities, and state and national trends. Recreation service needs will be identified for the
next 20 years, which will provide a basis for the development of policies and programs.
• The Management and Operations Analysis will look at the cost of operating and
maintaining the City’s parks, facilities and open space including its operating budget, and
maintenance costs by type of park, facility, and open space to develop findings related to
the costs to operate and maintain future parks, facilities and open spaces.
3. Developing the Plan
In the second phase of the planning process, recommendations and priorities will be developed for
acquiring, developing, improving and managing parks and facilities for active and passive
recreation, and recreation programs and services in the City over the next 20 years.
We will evaluate input and develop updated goals, policies and programs based on the Community
Needs Assessment results and input from staff, the Parks and Recreation Commission, the general
public and stakeholder groups.
The plan will also include a plan map; prioritized implementation list; and a capital improvement
plan that includes order-of-magnitude cost estimates and projected operational costs of
implementing the capital projects proposed. Performance measures may be developed to assist in
evaluating the success of plan implementation.
Staff or consultants will be responsible for reviewing the Draft Plan for compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act. It is likely an initial study/mitigated negative declaration will
be prepared.
After thorough opportunities for the public to review proposed recommendations and priorities, a
Draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan will be developed for advisory body review and adoption by
the City Council.
4. Updating the Parks and Recreation Element
The Parks and Recreation Element will be developed concurrently with the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan—the Element is assumed to be all or a portion of the Master Plan. The Community
Needs Assessment will be included as an appendix or technical supplement to the Element.
Concurrent with or immediately following adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan the
Council will adopt the updated Parks and Recreation Element. It is assumed to be the same review
process for both components; details will be refined as part of the consultant selection process .
5
DELIVERABLES
✓ Community Needs Assessment Report
✓ Updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Map
✓ Updated Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan
PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS
1. Continued support from the City Council for sufficient staff and resources to complete the project.
2. The Parks and Recreation Commission will act as the project’s advisory body
3. The commitment of a cross-departmental staff team for project assistance, including
i. P&R staff for in-house work to fill consultant funding gap; possibilities include
implementation of communications plan (social media, graphics, community outreach at
events and activities, etc.)
ii. PW and Facilities staff for park and facility assessment work
iii. GIS staff for mapping
iv. Natural Resources and Active Transportation staff to ensure consistency and compatibility
with other goals and policies for passive recreation and multiuse paths
4. There will be a collaborative dialogue with available, wide-ranging stakeholders.
5. There will be broad public input upfront and throughout, within the scope of the project.
6. The consultant team will be a good fit for the community; able to integrate i deas from a variety of
sources and able to put in the time to do it right.
7. The team can get the information and data they need.
8. The plan will consider the goals and objectives of the 2020 Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan and
guide future Strategic Plan updates
9. The plan will consider recommendations from the Public Art Master Plan, the Downtown Concept
Plan, the Mission Plaza Concept Plan, the Open Space Maintenance Plan and the Open Space Vision
Plan, Saving Special Places Forever, and other related documents.
10. The plan will address both active and passive recreation. Passive recreation , where it will not
degrade or significantly impact open space resources and where there are no significant
neighborhood compatibility impacts. may include hiking, nature study, mountain biking, bird
watching, rock climbing, horseback riding or other activities as permitted and regulated in the Open
Space Ordinance (COSE 8.5.5).
11. The plan will address multiuse path needs in terms of connectivity to parks, facilities and open
space, and coordinate with the development of the Active Transportation Plan as appropriate.
PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND TEAM
Project Manager: Rebecca Gershow, Associate Planner
Project Sponsor: Shelly Stanwyck, Parks and Recreation Director
Project Steering Committee: Above, plus Lindsey Stephenson, Melissa Mudgett, Devin Hyfield, and
Megan Burger
Project Team:
1. CDD Xzandrea Fowler, Brian Leveille
2. P&R Other Doug Carscaden, Dave Setterlund & Sahvanna Ettestad
3. Administration Greg Hermann
4. GIS Mary Andrews
5. Bike / Pedestrian Adam Fukushima
6. Police Christine Wallace, CAT Team or Neighborhood Officers
6
7. Engineering (CIP) Matt Horn or designee
8. Building Maintenance Andrew Collins
9. Parks Maintenance Jeff Hendricks
10. Natural Resources Bob Hill
Consultation as needed:
SLO Transit
Special Events Committee
Fire Department
✓ The Project Manager is responsible for day to day project oversight, work plan tracking, project
billing and is the liaison to other staff and the project consultant(s).
✓ The Project Sponsor has ultimate accountability for the successful completion of the project and
provides strategic direction to the project manager and department head coordination.
✓ The Project Steering Committee has weekly or bi-weekly meetings to make sure the project
stays on track
✓ The Project Team will be a working team with team members expected to be a ctive participants
in the project. Members will meet with the project manager or others as needed to assist in
project development, provide necessary data, information or other work, and to review drafts of
plan components. Most participation will be outside of a “team meeting.” Team members are
also responsible for communicating project updates to their dep artment or division as
appropriate.
PROJECT ADVISORY BODY
The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) will serve as the project advisory body for the Parks and
Recreation Master Plan and Parks and Recreation General Plan Element Update. The PRC will serve this
role, as they are the commission that advises the City Council on park development and recreation
programs and provides general guidance to the Parks and Recreation Department.
There will be a standing project update at each monthly PRC meeting to keep the Commission apprised
of project tasks and upcoming deliverables. Approximately every other month the PRC will review
project deliverables and provide more detailed input and direction as necessary (see Project Tasks and
Schedule below and linked).
OTHER ADVISORY BODY REVIEW
The Planning Commission is the Advisory Body responsible for reviewing and recommending the City’s
long-range plans to the City Council, most notably the City’s General Plan. As such, t he Planning
Commission and City Council will each have the opportunity to review and provide input on components
of the project three times – to review the Draft Community Needs Assessment, to review the Draft
Master Plan and Element Update, and at the end of the project for final review and adoption.
Other City advisory bodies will also review and provide input on the draft plan, including but not limited
to the Cultural Heritage Committee, Jack House Committee, and Bicycle Advisory Committee. Additional
meetings will be scheduled as necessary. See the Project Tasks and Schedule section for more
information.
7
PRELIMINARY STAKEHOLDER LIST
Beyond the general public, stakeholders are organized groups of people we want to make sure we reach
out to and hear from as part of our public engagement process. After consultant selection, a detailed
Community Engagement Plan will be developed, and appropriate input opportunities will be identified.
City Committees/Boards:Community Partnerships
Bicycle Advisory Committee Arts Obispo
Cultural Heritage Committee Blues Baseball
Jack House Committee Cal Poly
Planning Commission CAPSLO
Senior Center Executive Board CCCMB
Center for Family Strengthening
Other or Former City -affiliated Groups:
Downtown Concept Plan Group
Open Space Working Group Central Coast Soccer
Former PRC & JHC Members Chamber of Commerce/Visit SLO
Tourism Business Improvement District Board Child Care Planning Council
Promotional Coordinating Committee Contract Class Instructors
County Library Staff
Parks and Recreation Users:Cuesta College
Community Gardens – volunteers Downtown Association
Contract Class Users: Karate, Gymnastics, Etc.Family Care Network
Jr. Giants History Center
Laguna Lake Golf Course Men’s and Women’s Club Jack House Volunteer Docents
Senior Center members Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa
SLO Rugby Prado Day Center and Homeless Services
SLO Skate Park / Hockey Rink Users Rita’s Rainbows
RQN/Neighborhood Groups
San Luis Coastal Unified School District (SLCUSD)
SLO Teen and CIT Families SESLOC (Damon Parking)
SLO Throwers SLO County Access For All
Sports (Adult Softball, Pickleball, Volleyball, Table SLO County Parks & Recreation
Tennis, Boomer Softball, Whiffle ball, Ultimate SLO County Parks & Recreation Commission
SLO Women’s Soccer Special Olympics
SLO Youth Baseball United Cerebral Palsy of San Luis Obispo County
Special Event Organizers?YMCA
SLO Tigers Baseball ECOSLO
Sun 'N Fun, Club STAR Families (Youth Services)Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County
Youth Sports Association (YSA)Sierra Club
Rotary
Other:Kiwanis
Large employers Soroptimist
Non-English speakers Leadership SLO
Non-resident park and facility users (drop-in)
Non-users
Resident Park and facility drop-in users
People with disabilities
Youth
YPNG - Young Professionals Networking Group
Project Advisory Body:
Parks & Recreation Commission
SLO Swim Center Ambassadors/Users (Monthly
Newsletter Users)
Central Coast Commission for Senior Citizens- Area
Agency on Aging
8
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN
A detailed Community Engagement Plan will be developed in coordination with the selected consultant.
As described on page 2 of the project plan, early Community Engagement will be a critical part of the
Community Needs Assessment. Early input will be solicited from stakeholders and residents regarding
their needs, preferences and priorities related to parks, facilities, open space, programs and activities,
including active and passive recreation. As the plan is developed, stakeholders will be re-engaged to
provide input along the way. The communication objective will be to collaborate with the community.
This includes an interactive process where the project team partners with the public to identify needs,
preferences and priorities, and identify preferred solutions.
Engagement activities will be planned to ensure the participation of a diverse cross-section of the
population, as described in the list of stakeholders above, as well as the general public. Components of
the community engagement plan may include the following. This list will be refined after consultant
selection, when the Community Engagement Plan is developed:
• Development of a project logo and branding
• Development of a social media communications plan
• E-updates—email outreach to generate interest, maintain participation, and develop mailing list
• Media Outreach—news releases on the key project milestones and key elements of the update
• Special event cross marketing by P&R Staff—distribution of project materials, postcards and intercept
surveys at special events
• City web page/project page regular updates
• On line survey: web-based, possibly graphic-based (using mapping software) with broad
distribution/publicity/incentives to ensure high participation and diverse representation.
• Open City hall updates with questionnaires or strategic questions
• Stakeholder focus groups or interviews
• Outreach to schools for youth participation
• Workshops and/or open houses, depending on the phase of the project and the input needed ,
including possible neighborhood meetings, or meetings in different areas of the City
Refer to the Public Engagement and Noticing Manual for more outreach tools and information on the levels
of engagement.
PROJECT TASKS AND SCHEDULE
For full project schedule and timeline go to: Project Timeline
Assumptions:
• The project tasks and schedule will be adjusted when the consultant contract is finalized (see task A5)
• Parks and Recreation Commission input is called out below for key deliverables, but project updates
will also be a standing item on all PRC agendas
• Planning Commission and City Council review will happen three times during the project
• Bicycle Advisory Committee, Cultural Heritage Committee and Jack House Committee will also review
the draft plan, and other advisory body review may be added to task D8.
• There will be regular meetings with the Project Steering Committee (staff), but they are not called
out below
9
See the link above or here for a more detailed project timeline.
A. Project Planning and Initiation
A1. Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) preliminary Project Plan review Sep 6, 2017
A2. PRC refined Project Plan approval Oct 4, 2017
A3. City Council (CC) Project Plan and RFP review/authorization Nov 7, 2017
A4. Post and Distribute RFP; responses due Nov 10-Dec 7
A5. Review/evaluate consultant proposals and set up interviews Dec 8-21
A6. Interviews; selection and contracting; finalize scope and work plan + PRC update Jan 5-Feb 8, 2018
B. Planning Framework
B1. Initial staff meeting(s); consultant review of background data, guidance documents,
existing plans and agreements, etc.
Feb 9-Mar 8, 2018
B2. Community Engagement Plan developed + PRC approval Feb 9-Mar 8
B3. Planning framework development + PRC input Mar 9-Apr 5
C. Community Needs Assessment
Public engagement to determine community needs:
C1. Develop Focus group lists; schedule; develop questions Mar 30-Apr 12, 2018
C2. Stakeholder focus groups-wide-ranging representation and various locations Apr 13-May 3
C3. Survey development Apr 27-May 17
C4. Kickoff Public Workshop-needs assessment initiation--online survey ready Week of May 18
C5. Online Survey Open May 18-June 21
C6. Intercept surveys, postcards, outreach at City events, parks, activities (promote
survey)
May 18-June 21
C7. Summary of needs assessment engagement findings + PRC review June 22-July 19
Park and Facility Analysis:
C8. Park and facility inventory and assessment-type, number and condition--in house with
intern assistance + PRC input
Oct 6, 2017-Apr 5
C9. Existing conditions analysis-demographic profile, planning area, existing resources April 6-May 3
C10. Park and facility classifications and definitions April 6-May 3
C11. Park and facility standards analysis/level of service recs + PRC input May 4-June 21
C12. Geographic and density analysis-existing resources and underserved areas; + PRC
input
May 4-June 21
10
C13. Summary of park and facility needs assessment findings + PRC input June 22-July 19
Recreation Services Analysis:
C14. Data collection of rec programs and services; national trends July 20-Aug 2
C15. Analysis of above with recreation use findings from public engagement Aug 3-Aug 23
Management and Operations Analysis:
C16. Data collection and analysis of cost of operating parks, open spaces and facilities July 20-Aug 23
Synthesis of Results:
C17. Development of Draft Community Needs Assessment Report + two public workshops Aug 10-Sep 8
C18. PRC study session on Draft Community Needs Assessment Oct 3, 2018
C19. PC study session on Community Needs Assessment (could be joint with PC or CC) Wk of Oct 5
C20. CC study session on Draft Community Needs Assessment Wk of Oct 12
C21. Finalize Community Needs Assessment Oct 19-Nov 8
D. Master Plan Development and Element Update
D1. Update goals, policies, programs based on Community Needs Assessment + PRC input Oct 19-Nov 29, 2018
D2. Development of Draft Plan maps + PRC input Nov 2-Jan 24, 2019
D3. Review of draft plan components and prioritization + PRC study session Dec 5, 2018
D4. Refinement of draft prioritized implementation list + PRC input Dec 7-Feb 7, 2019
D5. Development of draft Capital Improvement Plan with cost estimates + PRC input Feb 8-Apr 3
D6. Development of draft operational cost estimates for future improvements Feb 8-Apr 3
D7. Final Draft Plan + Public Workshop + PRC input
Apr 5-June 5
D8. CHC, Jack House, BAC, PC, CC review (and other Advisory Bodies as necessary) June-Aug, 2018
D9. CEQA review; preparation of Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (likely) Dec 7, 2018-Nov 15,
2019
E. Master Plan and Element Adoption
E1. Final Draft Master Plan and Element Update Aug 23-Nov 15, 2019
E2. Public Hearings (3):
PRC final public hearing/recommendation September 2019
PC public hearing/recommendation October 2019
CC public hearing/adoption November 2019
11
PROJECT RESOURCES
Line Item Description Account No.2017-18 2018-19
Staffing
Intern(s) for facility needs assessment 60100-5,000
Contract Services 145,000 0
Community Needs Assessment, Master Plan
Development, Element Update 60100-7227 135,000
Contingency 10,000
Other Operating Expenditures 10,000 0
Meeting notification; Outreach direct costs;60100-7425 10,000
document production.
Minor Capital 0 0
Total Operating Costs 160,000 0
Net Operating Costs 160,000 0
Supervisor Sign Off: Date:
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
AGENDA REPORT
1
SUBJECT: LAGUNA LAKE PARK DOG OFF-LEASH AREA SURFACE MAINTENANCE
AND USER SURVEY RESULTS
FROM: Shelly Stanwyck, Director of Parks and Recreation
Prepared by: Melissa C. Mudgett, Recreation Manager
RECOMMENDATION
1.Receive Update of Laguna Lake Park Dog Off-Leash Area Maintenance Activities and
Recommend Surface Material.
2.Receive and File 2017 Dog Off-Leash Area User Survey Results.
DISCUSSION
Background
In effort to improve animal safety at the Laguna Lake Park Dog “Off-Leash” area, the Public
Works Department have been busy with maintenance activities in the area. On May 3, 2017, staff
provided the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) an update of current and planned
maintenance activities in the off-leash area which included replacement of the temporary fence
panels adjacent to the parking area, installation of large landscape boulders to serve as boundary
lines for users (as the entire park is not available for off-leash use), installation of paver collars
and temporary snow fencing around water-logged areas and additional signage (Attachment 1 –
PRC Report). The Parks Maintenance Department temporarily deferred maintenance of the
surfacing in the off-leash area to allow for the ground to dry-out and to have the ability to take
survey feedback into consideration in determining how to best proceed.
Dog Off-Leash Area Maintenance Update and
Woodchip as a Surface Material Discussion
The turf (grass) at the off-leash area has been in decline for
years. At present, there is more bare soil than turf growing
and large cracks have developed this summer due to the
expansive nature of the soil.
Parks Maintenance cannot renovate the turf of the off-
leash area with the current irrigation system layout. The
existing irrigation system sprinkler heads in this area run
in a straight line, paralleling the road leading to the off-
leash area and is not constructed in a manner that allows
for isolated and focused renovation. For Parks
Maintenance to renovate the turf with the current irrigation
system, it would require a complete closure of the entire
off-leash area. The irrigation system would then need to be
redesigned and reinstalled in a “block pattern” that would
allow for portions of the area to be closed off and
Meeting Date: Sept. 6, 2017
Item Number:__3_____
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
AGENDA REPORT
2
renovated as necessary. It would be extremely costly to renovate an area of this size as installation
of a new irrigation system, earthwork and hydro seeding has not been budgeted for and is estimated
at approximately $41,000. Additionally, when replanting new turf from either sod or seed, the
newly renovated areas require irrigation multiple times daily to insure the seed/sod stays moist
throughout the day (during the grow-in period). The recent drought has only reinforced the
importance of using water more wisely. Parks and Recreation and Parks Maintenance staff would
need to further explore turf sustainability and best practices before proposing recommendations
that would meet the community’s social, environmental and economic needs.
Given these limitations, Parks Maintenance has recommended the application of woodchips to a
portion of the dog off leash area (300 ft of exposed dirt near the perimeter boulders). The large
ground cracks present a safety hazard to both animals and their owners (Attachment 2 –
Photographs). The woodchips can be provided for free (as a byproduct of other City tree
maintenance activities) and can be used to fill in the large fissures; thus reducing the risk of trip-
and-fall injuries. Woodchips were also identified as the second most popular choice by park users
in the Dog Off-Leash Area survey. Given that the support for this surface treatment was not
overwhelming in the survey, the PRC’s direction is being sought so that the public and
Commission may provide input. Staff is recommending this as an alternative to address immediate
safety concerns. Staff is also anticipating that longer-term solutions will be considered during the
needs assessment and Parks and Recreation Element update.
Recommendations for Surface Maintenance of Dog-Off Leash Area
The benefits resulting from the proposed short-term recommendation to apply woodchips as a
surfacing material for the existing dog off-leash public facility is provided in the table below:
Summary of 2017 Dog Off-Leash Area Survey Results for Receipt and Filing
In an effort to identify future needs, the Parks and Recreation Department conducted a user survey
about the existing Dog Off-Leash area at Laguna Lake Park. The survey had a dual purpose;
intended to both solicit feedback from users to help shape the current maintenance needs and to
identify and prioritize future improvements to the area should funding become available (such as
with grants or community donations). The survey also asked users to identify other City parks as
“potential locations” for a future fenced dog park. A summary of the 2017 Dog Off-Leash Area
survey results is provided below and as Attachment 3:
Play
•Increases the area of
play for dogs to
run/excercise when
fenced harzard areas are
removed
Saving Money
•Utilizing Woodchips
readily available from
City Tree program
activities saves money
Safety
•Improve Safety in the
Off-Leash Area for both
dogs and owners by
reducing trip & fall
hazards
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
AGENDA REPORT
3
178 Survey Takers Responded (78% Were SLO Residents)
56% of survey takers said they bring their dog(s) to Laguna Lake Park Dog Off-leash Area several
times per week. Approximately 95% of survey takers have 1-2 dogs. Of the dogs that utilize the
off-leash area, 74% are larger dogs (greater than 25 pounds) – which is typical for this location as
larger dogs require more area to run/exercise. Survey takers were asked to prioritize surface
material for the off-leash area in order of preference; 75% indicated grass as the preferred surface
material with 41% indicating woodchips as the second option.
Top 6 Features
(Should funding become available to make improvements)
56%
95%
74%75%
41%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Bring Dogs Weekly to
Park
Have 1-2 dogs Medium - Large Dogs Prefer Grass Prefer Woodchips
Survey Results Survey Takers
All-Weather
Surfacing
Clear Boundary Markers
(fence, boulders or other
visual demarcation)
Shade Structure (Congregation Area
for People)
Addition of Play Elements
Lighting
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
AGENDA REPORT
4
Top 3 City Park Locations for Future Fenced Dog Park
77% of the survey takers were supportive of City’s efforts towards constructing a fenced dog park
in the future, with 54% of respondents indicating interest in fund raising opportunities or volunteer
maintenance efforts (such as work days). The survey identified the top three City park locations
to pursue for a future fenced dog park in the event that funding was made available.
General Survey Comments
•Park users are happy with the Dog Off-Leash area’s maintenance and were understanding
the challenges faced with maintaining the surfacing of this area
•Park users do not wish to completely enclose the Off-Leash area, but are supportive of
adding a different fenced dog park at another location
•The Off-Leash area at Laguna Lake Park is more conducive to larger dogs that need the
area to run/roam. The City could benefit from a fenced dog park for smaller dogs.
•Amenities, such as shade or a gathering area for owners, is desired by current park users
Overall, the survey results indicated a majority of respondents had a favorable response for the
planned maintenance activities in the dog off-leash area. Additionally, respondents were in
support of future off-leash area improvements and a fenced dog park should funding become
available.
NEXT STEPS
Feedback received from the user survey will be integrated into current maintenance efforts as
funding permits and Parks and Recreation staff will continue to coordinate with Public Works staff
in the maintenance of the Dog off-leash areas at Laguna Lake Park. While the City was not
selected as a recipient of the 2017 PetSafe grant, staff will continue to actively seek grant
opportunities for dog park improvements as they are offered. Lastly as noted above the topic will
be a part of the Parks and Recreation Element Update and Master Planning process.
48%
22%
16%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Future Fenced Dog-Park Locations
City Parks
Laguna Lake Meadow Sinsheimer
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
AGENDA REPORT
5
ATTACHMENTS
1.PRC Report, May 3, 2017
2.Photographs of Dog Off-Leash Area Surface Cracks
3.2017 Dog Off-Leash Area User Survey Results
City of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
Parks and Recreation Commission
AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: UPDATES TO LAGUNA LAKE PARK DOG OFF-LEASH AREA
MAINTENANCE AND SURVEY
FROM: Shelly Stanwyck, Director of Parks and Recreation
Prepared by: Melissa C. Mudgett, Recreation Manager
RECOMMENDATION
Receive updates for Laguna Lake Park Dog Off-Leash Area maintenance activities and user
survey.
DISCUSSION
Background
The Dog Off-Leash Area at Laguna Lake Park began many years ago as a pilot program and
quickly evolved into a popular and consistently utilized recreation opportunity. Taking note of
this community need, the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council formally adopted
the area into the Park Master Plan in 2005. It is the only area of the City’s facilities and parks in
which owners may allow their canines to be off-leash, running freely, and interacting with other
dogs.
In the 2015-17 Financial Plan, $50,000 was allocated to fund the most immediate maintenance
needs of the Dog Off-Leash Area. This funding was intended to support the replacement of the
temporary fence panels adjacent to the parking area and the installation of large landscape
boulders to serve as boundary lines for users; as the entire park is not available for off-leash use.
Additionally, the Parks Maintenance Department will be providing supplemental signage and
maintenance of the surfacing in the off-leash area. Please refer to Attachment 1 for a complete
list of maintenance improvements coming to the Dog Off-Leash area in 2017.
Future Needs and Community Outreach
Dog parks have grown in popularity throughout the country as more people have pets and are
asking that communities provide these dog-friendly recreational opportunities. The City of San
Luis Obispo is no exception. Currently the City has an “off-leash” area at the Laguna Lake park
but does not have a “fenced dog park”. The closest fenced dog park is located at El Chorro
Regional Park (Highway 1 across from Cuesta College), which is approximately 4 miles outside
of city limits and about 9 miles from the Laguna Lake park.
In an effort to identif y future needs, the Parks and Recreation Department will be conducting a
user survey about the existing “Dog Off-Leash” area (Attachment 2). The survey is intended to
solicit feedback from users that will help shape the current maintenance needs, as well as future
improvements. As part of the survey, users will be asked to prioritize future improvements to the
area should funding become available (such as with grants or community donations). The survey
Meeting Date: May 3, 2017
Item Number:__4_____
ATTACHMENT 1
Laguna Lake Park Dog Off-Leash Area Maintenance and Survey Page 2
also identifies other City parks as “potential locations” for a future fenced dog park and users
will be asked to rank these park locations in the order of preference.
NEXT STEPS
Parks and Recreation Department staff will continue to actively seek grant opportunities for dog
park improvements as they are offered. Feedback received from the user survey will be analyzed
and integrated into current maintenance efforts as funding permits. It is anticipated that Parks
and Recreation staff could return to the Commission with the survey results as early as summer
2017.
ATTACHMENT
1.Maintenance Improvements for Dog Off-Leash Area Poster
2. 2017 User Survey
ATTACHMENT 1
LAGUNA LAKE PARK
DOG OFF-LEASH AREA
SURFACE PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs Taken August 17, 2017
ATTACHMENT 2
78.77%141
21.23%38
Q1 Do you live in the City of San Luis Obispo?
Answered: 179 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 179
__ Yes
__ No
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
__ Yes
__ No
80.45%144
19.55%35
Q2 Do you visit the Laguna Lake Dog Off-Leash Area with your dogs?
Answered: 179 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 179
__ Yes
__ No
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
__ Yes
__ No
Q3 If answered “Yes”, How often do you visit?
Answered: 148 Skipped: 31
1 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
16.89%25
15.54%23
23.65%35
14.86%22
23.65%35
5.41%8
TOTAL 148
Daily
Once per week
2-3 times per
week
Once a month
A few times a
year
Other:
____________...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Daily
Once per week
2-3 times per week
Once a month
A few times a year
Other: ________________________
Q4 How many dogs do you have that visit the park?
Answered: 155 Skipped: 24
2 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
63.87%99
30.97%48
4.52%7
0.65%1
TOTAL 155
1 dog
2 dogs
3-4 dogs
5+ dogs
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
1 dog
2 dogs
3-4 dogs
5+ dogs
31.84%57
74.86%134
Q5 Please indicate what size dog(s) you have?
Answered: 179 Skipped: 0
Total Respondents: 179
small dog(s)
(less than 2...
medium - large
dog(s) (more...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
small dog(s) (less than 25 lbs.)
medium - large dog(s) (more than 25 lbs.)
3 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
Q6 In the future, the City would like to improve the Laguna Lake Park
Dog Off-Leash area’s surface treatment to increase its all-weather
usability. Please rank the proposed surface material in order of
preference. (1 = most preferred, 4 = least preferred)
Answered: 177 Skipped: 2
16.95%
30
40.68%
72
21.47%
38
20.90%
37 177 2.54
74.58%
132
14.12%
25
7.91%
14
3.39%
6 177 3.60
2.82%
5
16.95%
30
35.03%
62
45.20%
80 177 1.77
5.65%
10
28.25%
50
35.59%
63
30.51%
54 177 2.09
Woodchips
Grass
Dirt
“Gravel” or
Sand
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 TOTAL SCORE
Woodchips
Grass
Dirt
“Gravel” or Sand
Q7 Please review the following features and rate the priority for each
should funding become available to make improvements. (Rank High = 1,
Low = 6)
Answered: 176 Skipped: 3
4 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
28.74%
50
18.39%
32
18.97%
33
14.94%
26
10.34%
18
8.62%
15 174 4.14
25.57%
45
13.07%
23
15.34%
27
16.48%
29
18.18%
32
11.36%
20 176 3.77
15.43%
27
14.86%
26
12.00%
21
14.86%
26
21.71%
38
21.14%
37 175 3.24
9.20%
16
16.09%
28
20.11%
35
21.84%
38
17.24%
30
15.52%
27 174 3.32
18.86%
33
25.14%
44
18.29%
32
19.43%
34
13.71%
24
4.57%
8 175 4.02
2.86%
5
13.14%
23
14.86%
26
12.00%
21
18.29%
32
38.86%
68 175 2.54
All-Weather
surface
Clear Boundary
Markers (e.g...
Fenced
Separation...
Addition of
Play Element...
Shade
Structure...
Lighting
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL SCORE
All-Weather surface
Clear Boundary Markers (e.g. fences, boulders or
other boundary demarcations)
Fenced Separation (e.g. keeping larger dogs
separated from smaller dogs)
Addition of Play Elements for dogs
Shade Structure and/or Congregation Area for
People
Lighting
Q8 Other City Parks have been identified as “potential locations” for a
future fenced “dog park”. Please rank these park locations in the order of
preference. (1 = most preferred, 5 = least preferred)
Answered: 177 Skipped: 2
5 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
48.30%
85
8.52%
15
6.82%
12
7.39%
13
28.98%
51 176 3.40
15.82%
28
28.81%
51
24.86%
44
18.08%
32
12.43%
22 177 3.18
22.16%
39
30.68%
54
27.27%
48
14.20%
25
5.68%
10 176 3.49
10.17%
18
17.51%
31
28.81%
51
28.25%
50
15.25%
27 177 2.79
3.95%
7
14.69%
26
11.86%
21
31.64%
56
37.85%
67 177 2.15
Laguna Lake
Park (curren...
Sinsheimer
Park (900...
Meadow Park
(2251 Meadow...
Islay Hill
Park (1511 T...
French Park
(1040 Fuller...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL SCORE
Laguna Lake Park (current dog off-leash area, 504 Madonna
Road)
Sinsheimer Park (900 Southwood Drive)
Meadow Park (2251 Meadow Street)
Islay Hill Park (1511 Tank Farm Road)
French Park (1040 Fuller Road)
77.09%138
Q9 Please indicate your support for a small fenced dog park. (Select
applicable statement)
Answered: 179 Skipped: 0
Yes, I support
the City’s...
No, I do not
support the...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes, I support the City’s effort to create a fenced dog park
6 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
22.91%41
TOTAL 179
No, I do not support the City’s effort to create a fenced dog park
28.25%50
18.08%32
26.55%47
51.41%91
Q10 If answered “Yes” to Question #9, Please indicate how you could
best offer your support and help “be a part of change” in the following
areas. (Select all that apply)
Answered: 177 Skipped: 2
Total Respondents: 177
fundraising
efforts
volunteering
efforts...
volunteer
workdays for...
I am not
interested i...
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
fundraising efforts
volunteering efforts (construction of new amenities)
volunteer workdays for ongoing maintenance
I am not interested in volunteering at this time
Q11 Should you wish to elaborate on any of the above items, please do
so here (optional)
Answered: 85 Skipped: 94
#RESPONSES DATE
1 irrigation of lawn areas at laguna dog park 5/28/2017 9:29 AM
2 dont really need a fence but tickets are ridiculous so...5/26/2017 10:19 AM
3 mow and water the current area and it will stay nice add one off leash hike trail 5/26/2017 10:18 AM
7 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
4 Keep it open and enlarge it to the large trees 5/26/2017 10:15 AM
5 Slow signs, dog pool, need lights and signs that say 5 mph and patrol for 2-3 months until people
learn
5/26/2017 10:13 AM
6 We need more dog parks thanks for working on this 5/26/2017 10:12 AM
7 toys and programs for dogs 5/26/2017 9:43 AM
8 I think it is really important that the park be fenced. There have been too many close calls with
dogs running into the parking area at the current dog park.
5/24/2017 9:23 PM
9 How about opening up the Settle ipen space to off-leash dogs for designated time periods. e.g. 9-
12am or 2-5pm
5/24/2017 7:12 PM
10 Dog parks are only part of the solutions. We need to have more off-leash opportunities. Does not
need to be 24/7 but some of the day. Cattle do a lot more damage.
5/23/2017 9:37 PM
11 Adding another dog park isn't going to solve the issue. We want to go hiking with our dogs off-
leash. We don't need all open spaces to be off-leas, but maybe just a few. It was never a problem
before, and now all of a sudden these tickets are super expensive. Another dog park is not
equivalent to going for a hike.
5/20/2017 10:16 AM
12 I recently stopped coming to the park after my small dog was attacked and almost killed by a big
dog. Over $1900 in vet bills and lots of suffering. This particular indecent happened by the road to
the parking lot but it is the same vulnerability when at the off leash area without separation of the
small and large dogs.
5/20/2017 5:22 AM
13 I would go to Laguna more often if it had some fenced in areas. It's hard to bring my large dogs
there when the small dogs are intertwined as my dogs like to pester them. Fences will make a
difference.
5/17/2017 4:17 PM
14 As a dog trainer I can provide information on dog behavior, body language, appropriate play,
training, and more. Not all dogs like the dog park or are appropriate to go, but most owners are
unaware and more education would help.
5/17/2017 7:07 AM
15 I support the idea of a fenced dog park, but only in the event that a non-fenced dog park is out o
the question. A fenced dog park is better than NO dog park.
5/16/2017 10:12 PM
16 Lacuna lake is an awesome spot, I love briningmy dog there, maybe you could make acorder so
we know where the dogs are able to go and maybe a gate to the parking lot? I love bringing my
dog here she lovessss the grass!
5/16/2017 1:55 PM
17 the unfenced laguna lake park is the best. because there is no boundary the dogs dont defend it
so there are almost no fights. also, please tell the current maintenance guy at the laguna park that
hes doing a wonderful job. we all talk about the way he clearly cares about the park and the dogs.
the new concrete/sand water bib is wonderful. the way hes filled holes and picked up balls before
mowing over them. we appreciate his kindness and efforts!!
5/16/2017 8:45 AM
18 The only reason we drive the extra 5 minutes to Laguna is because it's not fenced. We love the
openness and freedom for the dogs to run around.
5/16/2017 8:11 AM
19 Lights at night would make the dog park safer and allow for people who have jobs to bring their
dogs during winter hours. Making the park more all weather and creating clearly marked
boundaries would be ideal for animals and people alike. A fully fenced park is unnecessary but a
small enclosure for little dogs would be ideal. The Laguna Lake dog park is a great place to bring
canines for off leash play
5/16/2017 12:02 AM
20 I hope to see a dog park in Los Osos soon.5/15/2017 9:19 PM
21 We used to visit Lagunas dog park...We would like to hike Madonna Mt trail off leash !!!5/15/2017 6:05 PM
22 I do not support the addition of more dog parks 5/15/2017 4:01 PM
23 We need and want more off-leash hiking trails.5/15/2017 3:50 PM
24 I fully support more fenced dog parks in town, but am against other proposals circulating to allow
dogs off leash on hiking trails.
5/15/2017 1:38 PM
25 an active group of docents is needed to have a successful dog park 5/15/2017 9:09 AM
26 We need much more area for off-leash walking.5/15/2017 8:04 AM
27 Extend off leash area to Alan Settle Trail. Not all dogs want to play, just run 5/12/2017 1:36 PM
8 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkeyATTACHMENT 3
28 Love Laguna ,save $ and just keep grass instead of fences etc 5/11/2017 10:48 AM
29 This survey did not address the off leash issue. The fines should be reduced to more warnings
and then a smaller fine if the dog is aggressive
5/11/2017 10:08 AM
30 I would prefer if laguna dog park had fences up against the roads. I worry about dogs jumping over
or under the single wood barrier from the road in a moment of running energy. The cars arent
always cautious. And when there are events in the park (like recent shadang concert), many of the
dog park parking spots were taken by the concert attendees. A man was too far at the front of the
road to stop them from parking there.
5/10/2017 11:11 PM
31 I support leash laws in open spaces. I am a dog owner and it makes me very uncomfortable when
I am walking my dog on a leash and up bounds an unleashed dog.
5/10/2017 2:06 PM
32 The city of SLO so desperately needs a segregated (large and small) fenced in dog park. I hesitate
going to Laguna now because I have a small dog and am afraid she will be attacked by a larger
dog. When I am in Orange County there are so many dog parks to choose from and my dog has a
great time socializing with other small dogs and I can take her worry-free knowing she'll have fun
and I can socialize and chat with other dog owners. WE NEED A DOG PARK!!!!
5/9/2017 8:00 PM
33 City of Slo needs an off-leash dog park.5/9/2017 9:47 AM
34 My yellow lab recently died, but I walked him on a leash around our neighborhood. When my
husband ran him off leash the unleashed dogs behaved better.
5/9/2017 8:06 AM
35 As you can see from the help of the rain all you need to do is actually water the current ground
cover and it will grow. It only died because you cut off the water, yet all the other parks continued
to be watered.
5/8/2017 6:11 PM
36 No fencing of Laguna, better improvements for Laguna would be a drinking fountain, drainage of
big areas, or a wind break it is never got enough to need a shelter I carry a jacket in my car
because of the wind
5/8/2017 5:53 PM
37 El Chorro is close enough so I don't think valuable resources should be spent on another fenced
park. We need a park in the north Broad area for our human kids!
5/8/2017 4:48 PM
38 We have stopped using Laguna lake park because the clay soil is always wet & plugged up
around the watering area and leaves my dog a filthy mess. Even if no funds are forthcoming to
make the improvements you ask about; fixing the drainage should be a top priority.
5/8/2017 2:14 PM
39 Q 8: I answered by closest to my home. But by making Laguna my 5th doesn't feel right because
we love that park. I do feel like there's some creepy people in the distant parts of the park. I'd like
to see police patrol through park. I feel very uncomfortable walking there.
5/8/2017 2:40 AM
40 I really object to the City's decision to enforce dog the dog leash ordinance after decades of non-
enforcement unless there was a specific reason. Slapping dog owners with $500 fines has been
ridiculous and in my neighborhood near French Park had enraged responsible dog owners. This is
an example of an extreme reaction to solve a non-problem. Friends on the Parks Commission
have said staff wanted to enforce the leash law on nature trails but extended the enforcement to all
parks. We gave lived bear French Park for 25 years and dog owners enjoyed throwing balls for
their dogs in the evenings. The draconian fines and enforcement has really created a damper in
our neighborhood. This whole thing needs to be reconsidered!!
5/7/2017 10:17 PM
41 I have been on trails with absolutely no one around (e.g. South Hills) and have to keep a dog who
loves running leashed for fear of a huge fine (more exspensive than texting and driving or running
a stop sign). Cattle have grazed there, there is encroachment from development below which
harm the habitat and wildlife far more than a dog! Why not have some trails or certain time periods
(like Avila Beach) available for dogs off leash (if it is posted those adverse to dogs could go at
different times!). Why contribute to global warming by driving 20+ minutes to let my dog run when
a trail is a block away? As it is, I have to throw a ball for him in the street where he just has to be in
voice control when a big grassy area is a block away (often when no one is using certain of the
lawn areas at all!). There has got to be a solution that works for everyone...other cities take pride
in "dog friendliness" of their city on their tourist pages-can't say that here!
5/7/2017 9:30 PM
42 This survey is not addressing the issue of hiking areas for owners and dogs off leash. As far as the
Laguna dog park, grass is best for health and overall fun of all involved. It doesn't have to be
manicured like the childrens play areas, just some water to keep it semi-green.
5/7/2017 11:14 AM
43 We desperately need more of our public spaces to be "off-leash" areas 5/7/2017 8:10 AM
9 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
44 Laguna lake parking lot by dog park needs potholes fixed. When it rains or after the rain , the mud
out there is clay-like so putting a new all weather surface would be an awesome improvement!
Other than that, it's a great dog park!
5/6/2017 7:55 PM
45 Fenced dog parks are not the only option. The city should explore designated hours for dogs to be
off-leash in parks and open spaces.
5/6/2017 6:19 AM
46 The current park is wonderful! Some improvements would be drainage for the surface water and
improved watering stations. I supplied 3 water bowls and a pooper scooper, two bowls and the
scoopers are gone.
5/5/2017 10:43 PM
47 I don't think we should have off leash on any of the hiking trails and people do it all the time. When
you're going around the curve, any dog canknock you over at any age
5/5/2017 4:52 PM
48 El Chorro Dog park is a good example. More like that park, please 5/5/2017 6:08 AM
49 Dogs need large areas to run so "small fenced dog park" isn't sufficient. Fencing Laguna Lake area
would be ideal. At present, ai don't go there because my medium sized dog is a scent hound,
meaning he needs a fence to keep from following his nose into the hills irwirse, into traffic.
5/4/2017 9:04 PM
50 Old lady with medium sized dog. I would be much happier with fenced areas on the pocket parks.5/4/2017 6:50 PM
51 Every time I go to Laguna with my dog I'm astounded by the number of dogs off leash
EVERYWHERE. I find this stressful, and makes it less enjoyable for me to go there with my dog
(sometimes there are aggression issues in otherwise friendly dogs if one dog is leashed and
approached by an off-leash dog. I feel like enclosing this dog area could help this problem.
5/4/2017 3:54 PM
52 Loose running dogs are a safety hazard for wildlife and people. Please fence them in.5/4/2017 3:21 PM
53 First, thanks for the large mowed area this year. It's been great to see how much that space has
been used. With regard to the all-weather surface, there should be some discussion about what
part of the park receives a given treatment. Grass fields are great for running and ball tossing, but
in the high traffic areas near the benches and restrooms I doubt grass can be maintained. Will the
grass be irrigated? In AG they have a segregated park (small vs. large dog) and the big dogs were
too hard on the grass and they had to woodchip that whole area. The small dog area grass has
held up well. With regard to number 7, the congregation area MUST include shelter from the sun
AND the WIND. I'm not clear on the City's vision for this area. Are we considering an entirely
fenced dog park? Are we going to maintain the partial fencing? Partial fencing with clear
boundaries and signage seems the most economical (from both of the construction and
enforcement standpoints - if the City maintains its practice of massive fines for off-leash dogs.).
With regard to numbers 9 & 10 above, I don't know what the subject plans are so I am not willing
to say I support it - especially with the word 'small' tucked in there. The numbered statement says
'small' and the statement of support does not. I'd love to support efforts to improve our dog park(s)
as long as they are improvements. I do not support reducing the area to something 'small'.
5/4/2017 3:14 PM
54 No fences causes agression fix mud bog better parking 5/4/2017 2:50 PM
55 Please consider adding a water fountain for the humans.5/4/2017 12:53 PM
56 I may volunteer for maintenance but need more details.5/4/2017 12:42 PM
57 I don't necessarily want a completely fenced area.5/4/2017 10:36 AM
58 Please don't allow off-leash dogs on hiking trails!!5/4/2017 10:30 AM
59 FENCING the dog park is (or should be) a no-brainer!5/4/2017 10:25 AM
60 San Luis Obispo REALLY needs a fenced dog park!!!5/4/2017 8:46 AM
61 Whats wrong with wooded area to the right as you enter the current dog patk parking lot..Its a
perfect spot and under trees.
5/4/2017 8:30 AM
62 If gravel were used in lieu of sand ,I'd rank it #1 5/4/2017 6:54 AM
63 a dog swim area in the lake 5/4/2017 1:03 AM
64 No fences, no small vs large dog areas. This is a wonderful area as is for people who like and use
it. People that prefer fences have other options. Please leave it open and free.
5/4/2017 12:10 AM
65 Please allow dogs off-leash on Islay Hill.5/4/2017 12:06 AM
10 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
66 If we had a P&R Element and Master Plan in place already, we wouldn't have to flounder with
statistically inaccurate online surveys which collect no demographics other than do you own a
dog. Big miss again SLO.
5/3/2017 11:33 PM
67 Fence the park, fight opposition of such, not enough parking at French or Islam for a regional draw
like laguna dog park has, build at meadow and activate area more it will flush out transients in this
dirty park.
5/3/2017 11:29 PM
68 I would like a fenced dog area. I used to go to laguna lake dog park daily, but stopped because of
aggressive dogs, no fenced area, wood chips, mud.
5/3/2017 10:52 PM
69 Not all dogs are mean, I have a well disciplined sweet dog as most good dog owners do. Leash
laws should only be for dogs that are mean. Please only discipline the bad dogs, not all dogs, can
you not understand this?
5/3/2017 9:54 PM
70 Meadow Park would be an excellent choice!5/3/2017 8:50 PM
71 NO DOGS OFF-LEASH IN OPEN SPACES 5/3/2017 8:24 PM
72 Please leave plenty of room for dogs to run and chase a ball. I am so frustrated that a few
irresponsible owners have wrecked it for those of us who have well behaved and trained dogs who
like to hike with dogs off leash. I have high energy breeds who need to run with me on trails.
Hiking with my dog is important to me. The park has become a necessity so I can throw a ball to
burn off some of my dog's energy.
5/3/2017 8:21 PM
73 while fenced parks provide for socializing, they don;t offer needed exercise 5/3/2017 8:08 PM
74 I support a fenced in area. My dog has been sprayed by a skunk at Leguna Dog Park. Also fencing
to prevent dogs from running into the street. I know the water useage for grass is not 100%
feesable. Maybe astro turf installation in part of the park? It will keep the weeds down, water usage
down and make it easier for owners to clean up after pets.
5/3/2017 7:41 PM
75 I love my dogs but dog owners need to be mmore respectful of people especially children. And not
all people like dogs so don't make all these parks dog parks
5/3/2017 6:03 PM
76 I think this off leash survey is severely limited in scope. I would like to see limited time periods
such as early mornings, evenings when off leash is allowed in parks like Meadow or South Hill
such as the limits in place at Avila beach.
5/3/2017 4:52 PM
77 We need hiking trails dogs can be off leash!!! Not all dogs run to run or fetch or like to play with
other dogs and we need a way to exercise them and ourselves. It is rediculous that there is not a
single place to do this.
5/3/2017 4:12 PM
78 Should make some city open spaces accessible to off leash dogs under control of owner 5/3/2017 11:51 AM
79 I love laguna lake dog park how it is. I would suggest placing gates from the park to the parking
area, however so that dogs can not run into an area where cars are moving. While all weather
material might be nice, we don't go to the park if it's raining anyways. Another dog park in the
north eastern part of the city (closer to where we live) would be a preferred use of any funding. We
sometimes play at sinsheimer park already, and the linkage to the trail by the railroad tracks would
be a great point of connection.
5/3/2017 7:52 AM
80 Seperating larger dogs from smaller dogs seems like a complete waste of time and money.
Different sized dogs need to learn how to play and share space, it is an unjustifiable and
completely ridiculous worry of small dog owners that a larger dog is bad or going to cause harm,
when in fact it is often times the small dog that instigates or initiates any sort of negative
interaction. Dog owners need to learn how to train their dogs to behave better no matter the size of
the other dogs. currently small dogs and large dogs all play together just fine from what I have
seen. Please do not waste the little bit of funding you have on a fence to seperate small and large
dogs. Just make the improvements to the park such as play toys and decreasing the large mud
pools. The mud pools and tall grass are the big issues because we have no idea what bugs or
bacteria or animals may live in those areas that we cannot see. Solve those issues first and tell
people to train their dogs to be friendly, not separate large and small.
5/3/2017 7:46 AM
81 This is less about our input, and more about trying to craft the agenda. I agree with very few of
choices offered. None of the options for improvement are a priority from peer groups perspective.
We would like to see some shade and maintain the off leash grass area.
5/2/2017 5:08 PM
82 We need SHADE!5/2/2017 2:46 PM
11 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
83 Laguna was my last choice for a fenced park because I like that It's open. It is still my first choice
for a dog park.
5/2/2017 2:43 PM
84 Dog parks should be welcoming to dogs,fewer boundaries, see Bend Oregon 5/2/2017 2:25 PM
85 I fully support the City's effort to establish a permanent and City-approved fenced dog park. The
sooner the better so my one year old puppy can have a place to run year-round!!
5/2/2017 1:30 PM
Q12 (Optional). Name and contact information
Answered: 50 Skipped: 129
#RESPONSES DATE
1 mikeguerre@yahoo.com 5/28/2017 9:29 AM
2 debbie shelton 6357040 5/26/2017 10:15 AM
3 washslo@yahoo.com 5/26/2017 10:12 AM
4 Fran Prentis 805-544-3118 5/26/2017 10:03 AM
5 felix atencio felixthecat503@gmail.com 5/26/2017 9:43 AM
6 john mellor (email: goomba271@charter.net)5/25/2017 8:11 PM
7 randy harris slorandy@sbcglobal.net 5/24/2017 7:12 PM
8 Kkimball@calpoly.edu 5/21/2017 9:38 AM
9 Robert Wilcox, bgwpinc@gmail.com 5/20/2017 5:22 AM
10 Tom Soles 5/18/2017 9:14 PM
11 Lanestoeckle@yahoo.com 5/17/2017 4:37 PM
12 Becky Pesicka, Dogtastic Training. Dogtastictraining@gmail.com 5/17/2017 7:07 AM
13 Kristin Steer, chasinggreatness2k11@gmail.com 5/16/2017 12:02 AM
14 Los Osos 5/15/2017 9:19 PM
15 Steve Eddy, Morro Bay 5/15/2017 6:05 PM
16 Rob Davidson. Rad@radavidson.net 5/12/2017 1:36 PM
17 Maria Soles, slolvr85inc@gmail.com 5/9/2017 8:00 PM
18 Kelly Everling 5/9/2017 9:47 AM
19 Tim wymer Tmwymer@gmail.com 5/8/2017 5:53 PM
20 Robin Hee 805-801-8155 5/8/2017 2:40 AM
21 Jackie Parker 235-9354 - this is a poor survey. I was required to answer the questions about the
dog park at Labuan which I do not use and think does not deserve more funding. We need
additional dog parks, especially at French Park!
5/7/2017 10:17 PM
22 Debra Muse drmusedeb@gmail.com 5/7/2017 9:30 PM
23 Goldconcept@sbcglobal.net 5/7/2017 5:44 PM
24 Tim King tking1240@gmail.com 5/7/2017 11:14 AM
25 Ben Parker sloparker.ben@gmail.com 5/6/2017 8:41 PM
26 Laura Mullen 5/6/2017 1:43 PM
27 Trina Cisneros 805-234-3806 5/6/2017 7:44 AM
28 Karen Brower; slorose@hotmail.com 5/6/2017 6:19 AM
29 Rochelle Reed Smith 895-441-7294 5/4/2017 9:04 PM
12 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
30 Annie Yu 5/4/2017 9:00 PM
31 Pete Bedesem - email: Bedesem@gmail.com 5/4/2017 3:14 PM
32 Zoli Harway 805 459 1016 5/4/2017 2:50 PM
33 Nicole Sisneros 925-818-5572 5/4/2017 2:01 PM
34 Terry Pellisero, tpellisero@gmail.com 5/4/2017 12:42 PM
35 Jennifer phillip 5/4/2017 10:36 AM
36 Jim Miller. Moonstonewest@yahoo.com 5/4/2017 6:54 AM
37 I do not support a fenced option from question 9 and am forced to answer as if I do for question
10? Is the fix in?
5/4/2017 12:10 AM
38 Susan Olson smomk@yahoo.com 5/3/2017 10:52 PM
39 Greg gjmeade@sbcglobal.net 5/3/2017 9:54 PM
40 Amy Nemcik amynemcik@gmail.com 5/3/2017 9:17 PM
41 Judy haggard materofsix@gmail.com 5/3/2017 9:17 PM
42 Terre Dunivant 704-5433 5/3/2017 8:24 PM
43 Liz Roberts Liz.beeman@gmail.com 5/3/2017 7:41 PM
44 Mary Wood slomwood@yahoo.com 5/3/2017 4:52 PM
45 Stephanie Smith, stephsmith10@gmail.com 5/3/2017 7:52 AM
46 Keegan Draper, kdraper@sloymca.org, 9196339501 5/3/2017 7:46 AM
47 Cheyenne 5/2/2017 11:35 PM
48 billhallum@charter.net 5/2/2017 5:08 PM
49 John Brower 5/2/2017 2:25 PM
50 John McKenzie - johnnimac@earthlink.net 5/2/2017 1:30 PM
13 / 13
City of SLO Dog Off-Leash Area Community Survey 2017 SurveyMonkey
ATTACHMENT 3
Meeting Date: Sept. 6, 2017
Item Number:__4_____
WES CONNER AWARDEE IDEAS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
FOR THE 2017 ANNUAL VOLUNTEER DINNER
Background
The late Wes Conner was a devoted, civic-minded volunteer for the City of San Luis Obispo and an
avid supporter of all things parks and recreation. Throughout his lifetime, Wes served on a number of
City commissions, including the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Joint Use Committee, the
Bicycle Committee, and the Jack House Committee. Wes had a particular love for the Jack House
and, as a founding father of the Jack House Committee, served as a member for over thirty years.
Wes, who was employed most of his life as a professor at Cal Poly, continually shared his knowledge
of landscape architecture with the Jack House Committee. His influence is evident in the award
winning Jack House gardens. In 2004, Wes was honored by the Olympic Torch Run committee to
carry the torch the last leg of the run into San Luis Obispo. He was respected and loved by all those
who knew him. Wes passed away in January of 2007 at the age of 82.
The Wes Conner Award Criteria
In February 2007, the Parks and Recreation Commission approved the creation of the Wes Conner
Award to honor individuals who, like Wes, have provided sustained valuable service that resulted in
improved access to high quality parks and recreation services in the City of San Luis Obispo. The
criteria established for the award includes:
1. Honoree must have volunteered to advance the Parks and Recreation opportunities in
the Community of San Luis Obispo for at least 10 years.
2. The honoree’s efforts must have been directed toward the benefit of multiple
recreational interests within the City.
3. The honoree may not be an employee of the City or a member of the Parks and
Recreation Commission at the time of selection.
4. Nominations can come from any source (staff, commissioners, and others). Staff will
forward to Commissioners all qualified nominations at its July meeting.
Prior Recipients include:
2007 – Jim Neville
2008 – John Rosetti
2009 – Richard Kriet
2010 – Lee Hollister
2011 – Agatha Reardon
2012 – Bill Thoma
2013 – Greg Bettencourt
2014 – Rick May
2015 – Barry Karleskint and Nancy Roberts (In Memorium)
2016 – Herb Fillaponi
Below is a list of people that staff has provided. We have provided shorter summaries and more
names. This is intended to provide Commissioners with some ideas for the Wes Conner awardee for
2017. Commissioners do not have to go off this list.
Debbie Black
Local landscape architect and involved in Volleyball activities. Ms. Black supported the development
and expansion of boys and girls volleyball.
Todd Cooper
Youth Sports Association Board Chair and Soccer advocate, Todd is a hands on and involved
supporter of soccer for youth and adults.
Spencer Crotty
San Luis Obispo skateboarder. Spencer from start to finish symbolized the youth in our community
dedicated to the establishment of a permanent skate park. Spencer attended meetings, spok e to the
Council and grew into adulthood during this process.
Steve Davis
Former Parks and Recreation Commissioner and Chair. Advocate for turf fields for all. Dedicated to
public participation and input. Champion of increased use of Damon Garcia Sports Fields
Gary Havas
A dedicated volunteer, building miles of trails and bridges, advocate and educator for cyclists, and all
around Parks and Recreation enthusiast, Gary Havas is dedicated to improving parks and recreation
facilities, bike lanes, and open space.
Craig Kincaid
Former Parks and Recreation Commissioner and Chair. Advocate for open space, trails, and Laguna
Lake. Dedicated to the Jack House and preservation of natural resources. Champion for all Parks
and Recreation causes.
John Spatafore
John began his service to the community as a coach for the American Youth Soccer Organization
(AYSO) when his daughters were young. His experience with the poor field conditions that existed
in the City and School District prompted him to become a founding member of the Youth Sports
Association (YSA) and serve as its first president. As president of the YSA, John led the charge for
the development of the Damon-Garcia Sports Fields and spent countless hours at City Council
meetings speaking of the turf field needs of the community.
Staci Truelson
Stacy has been actively involved with AYSO for many years. She was the AYSO president elect,
president and past president. Stacy has also been a YSA board member and held different positions
on the board. She has been a referee and tireless supporter of soccer in the community.
Presentation of Award
The Wes Conner Award will be presented by the Parks and Recreation Commission Chair, or his/her
designee, at the 2017 Volunteer Appreciation Dinner on September 20, 2017 at 5:30pm at the Jack
House.
2017 PARK TOUR
Proposed Dates. Please check your calendars and be ready to pick a date.
✓ Friday October 13th or
✓ Friday October 27th
Proposed Agenda
Pick a Date
Step
1 Discuss and
Approve
Agenda
Step
2
•8:30 a.m. -Breakfast is Served!
•Board Trolley at 9:00 a.m. -Depart from LCC
Breakfast at the LCC
(Ludwick Community
Center)
•9:15 a.m.
•View New Community Garden ConstructionLaguna Lake Golf Course
•9:45 a.m.
•View Improvements to Dog Off-Leash Area
•View work on ADA Trail
Laguna Lake Park Dog Off-
Leash Area
•10:30 a.m.
•View Kikuyu Grass Field RenovationDamon-Garcia Sports Field
•11:15 a.m.
•Look at Pickleball Courts -completed painted
lines and future CIP
French Park
•11:45 a.m.
•Look at Tennis Courts -future lighting CIP
•Experience New Playround -Play!
Sinsheimer Park
•12:30 p.m.
•Return to LCC and Depature Return to LCC