Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 1 - ARCH-0469-2017 (273 Madonna) Sears RedevelopmentMeeting Date: October 16, 2017 Item Number: #1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: Continued review of the redevelopment of a portion of the Madonna Plaza Shopping Center to construct a new commercial building to provide for three new tenant spaces consisting of 56,257 square-feet. The project is categorical exemption from environmental review. PROJECT ADDRESS: 273 Madonna Road BY: Kyle Bell, Associate Planner Phone Number: 781-7524 e-mail: kbell@slocity.org FILE NUMBER: ARCH-0469-2017 FROM: Doug Davidson, Deputy Director RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Draft Resolution (Attachment 1) which approves the project, based on findings, and subject to conditions. SITE DATA Applicant Schottenstein Property Group Representative Oasis Associates, Inc. Complete Date October 3, 2017 Zoning C-R General Plan General Retail Site Area ~5.4 acres Environmental Status Categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) SUMMARY The project applicant, Schottenstein Property Group, has applied for architectural review of the redevelopment of an existing commercial building located at 273 Madonna Road. The proposed redevelopment includes demolition of the existing Sears building (75,400 square-foot) and construction of a 56,257 square-foot building that provides for three new tenants. The project was reviewed by the ARC on August 21, 2017, and was continued to a date uncertain. The ARC provided direction to the applicant to work with staff to redesign the project to conform with the Community Design Guidelines and address concerns (Attachment 4, Draft Meeting Minutes). ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 2 1.0 COMMISSION’S PURVIEW The ARC’s role is to review the project in terms of its consistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, Community Design Guidelines, and other applicable policy documents. 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION Site Information/Setting Site Size ~27.8 acres Present Use & Development Retail Commercial, formally occupied by Sears Topography Relatively Flat Access El Mercado & Madonna Road Surrounding Use/Zoning North: C-R (Commercial Uses: retail & personal services) South: C-R-PD (Commercial Uses: SLO Promenade Shopping Center) East: Highway 101 West: C-R (Commercial Uses: retail) Project Description A summary of significant project features includes the following (Attachment 6, Revised Project Plans): 1. Redevelopment: Construct a new commercial building for general retail uses (Ross – 22,020, Michael’s – 21,729, and Tenant C – 12,508 square feet). • Demolition and replacement of the existing Sears building • Parking lot reconfiguration and new landscaping • New commercial loading docks 2. Design: Contemporary architectural design that includes the following details and materials; • Three new commercial entrances oriented toward the commercial center • New design features included; detailed cornices, clay tile roofing, wood trellises, detailed columns and glass storefronts • Materials include; Stucco, Coronado Stone, Coronado Smooth Limestone, and CMU (rear elevation) Project Statistics Item Proposed 1 Ordinance Standard 2 Street Yard setback 30 feet 0 feet Side Yard Setbacks 0 feet 0 feet Max. Height of Structure(s) 42 feet 45 feet Coverage (buildings & paving) 24% (overall development) 100% Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.24 (overall development) 3.0 Parking Spaces 1,442 (overall development) 1,182 Notes: 1. Applicant’s project plans 2. City Zoning Regulations ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 3 3.0 DIRECTIONAL ITEM EVALUATION After the ARC review on August 21, 2017 the applicant worked with staff to revise the project to addressed concerns identified by the ARC (Attachment 4, Revised Project Narrative). A summary of the applicant’s responses and staff analysis of the changes to the project are provided for each directional item as follows: Directional Item #1: Consider providing pedestrian connectivity to adjacent shopping center (SLO Promenade) through modifications to parking lot along storefront entries, where appropriate. The applicant has responded that in order to achieve ARC direction the project would need to replace the existing driveway approach along El Mercado to align the building entrances with the existing paseo to the SLO Promenade Shopping Center, which would require a significant reconfiguration of the circulation and parking layout of the shopping center, this was not included in the project scope for the replacement of an existing structure (Attachment 2, Revised Project Narrative). The CDG state that parking areas on adjoining parcels should be connected to allow continuous vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access. Pedestrian linkages between parcels should be located separately from vehicle connections where possible (CDG 6.3A.1). The design of pedestrian access should consider pedestrian access to adjacent sites and uses (CDG 6.3D.3). However, the CDG also state that safe accommodation for pedestrians is essential and must be integral part of site design (CDG 3.2C). The project includes a pedestrian connection to the adjacent SLO Promenade Shopping Center with an accessible crosswalk across El Mercado Road, this connection is provided along the desired path for pedestrian connectivity and safety. The connection at the existing crosswalk is adequate for safe pedestrian circulation. Pedestrian circulation in parking areas should be parallel to traffic flow toward building entrances (CDG 3.2C.4), a connection parallel to the customer entrances through the parking lot would increase safety concerns and conflict with the intent of the CDG. Directional Item #2: Redesign the proposed arcade to allow sidewalk access in front of pillars rather than placing the pillars at the back of curb. The applicant has revised the project to include additional landscaping and delineated pedestrian connections in front of the arcade by reducing the width of the driveway. The arcade columns are set back from the edge of curb by eight feet, the applicant was unable to accommodate a sidewalk in front of the columns due to cross slope limitations, drainage requirements, and existing grades, however, the landscaping, broad sidewalk, and amenities that have been provided are intended to provide a pleasant, safe, and accessible pedestrian experience, see figure 1. ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 4 Figure 1: Revised pedestrian connections and arcade features. Directional Item #3: Remove “uplighting” features. The applicant has removed the “uplighting” fixtures from the building elevations. The CDG state that outdoor lighting fixtures shall be cutoff fixtures designed and installed so that no emitted light will break a horizontal plane passing through the lowest point of the fixture (CDG 6.1C.1). The Condition No. 5 had been provided to ensure light fixtures will comply with the City’s Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Chapter 17.23 of the Zoning Regulations. This condition will remain with the resolution for verification through the building permit review process. Directional Item #4: Remove stand-alone pilaster features at the back of the building. The applicant has removed one of the stand-alone pilaster from the rear elevation, the remaining pilaster has been provided to encase roof drain downspouts and has been modified to extend to match the roof line (Attachment 6). Directional Item #5: Remove trellis features with no practical application on building. The CDG state that building details and materials should be authentic, and integrated into building design, and should not be or appear as artificial “glued/tacked -on” features such as trellises that do not support plant materials, encouraging the perception of low quality (CDG 3.2D.2b). The applicant has modified the trellis elements to extend from the building that include support posts which will provide for climbing plants and shading the sidewalk and bench areas. The modifications to the trellises are appropriate with the building architectural style and provide a functional application integrated into the building design. Directional Item #6: Remove cultured stone along base of structure, use authentic materials reflective of San Luis Obispo. The CDG state that exterior treatment should be restrained, not harsh or garish, and should be selected for durability, weathering characteristics, and authenticity, as well as for beauty (CDG 2.2D). The applicant has replaced the previous wainscot material to include Air Vol Block Split- face CMU, which is locally made in San Luis Obispo, see figure 2. ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 5 Directional Item #7: Modify the building architectural style to be less corporate driven (blue banding on Ross building) or “anywhere USA”. Remove billboard-style architecture to include more human-scale architectural elements and focus on a more pedestrian local connection. The CDG state that colors or logos identified with an individual company should be employed as building accents (CDG 3.2D.3d), nevertheless, the applicant has removed the color banding from the building façade to comply with ARC direction, see figure 2. The CDG identify general objectives to assist applicants in understanding the City’s expectations for design quality, one of which is to keep San Luis Obispo architecturally distinctive to avoid an “anywhere USA” character. The intent of this objective is described by minimizing the use of “stock” plans and designs in corporate and franchise architecture, designs should take into consideration of the site context in terms of the best nearby examples of massing, scale, and land uses (CDG 1.4A). The CDG also acknowledges that large-scale retail projects should relate to the scale of pedestrians as well as passing motorists. The project design does not utilize any corporate or franchise architecture and has been designed to be consistent and compatible with the mass and scale of the neighboring storefronts for all major tenants within Madonna Plaza and SLO Promenade Shopping Centers. The proposed building is setback over 1,000 feet from the primary entry along Madonna Road, the upper facades are intended to relate to the broad scale. The project design incorporates human-scale architectural elements by enhancing the existing pedestrian connection along the building façade by including a pedestrian arcade with defined customer entrances, trellises, benches, landscaping, and clearly demarcated and direct pedestrian routes with colored and textured concrete materials. As a large-scale regional shopping center, the project incorporates design elements to balance the interaction between the building, pedestrians, and motorists within the existing shopping center. Directional Item #8: The proposed storefront window system along El Mercado elevation, shall provide clear window glazing to provide for a visible display area. Figure 2: Front elevation. Previous front elevation (top). Revised front elevation (bottom) ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 6 The applicant has agreed to design the storefront window system with clear window glazing and allow the future tenant to determine if the storefront will be used for viewing into the interior or as a display area. Staff recommends maintaining Condition No. 2 which states: Plans submitted for tenant improvements for Tenant C, shall ensure the window storefront along El Mercado is maintained to provide pedestrians with views into the building and not “walled-in” or darkened to provide more interior wall or storage space within the tenant space. Directional Item #9: Reduce the overall height of parapets, demonstrate how parapet features are integrated into the building design, provide for compatibility and scalability with adjacent tenants. Building sections have been provided in the project plans to demonstrate how the parapet features are integrated into the building design, see Attachment 6. The applicant did not reduce the heights of the parapets; however, a building height analysis has been provided to demonstrate compatibility and scalability with adjacent tenants, see table below; Building Height Inventory Building/Tenant Height (feet) Ralphs 34 Kohl’s 34 DSW 36 Best Buy 40 European Wax Center/ Message Envy 35 PETCO 32 Embassy Suites (SLO Promenade) 48 World Market (SLO Promenade) 39 Former Staples (SLO Promenade) 42 Bed, Bath, and Beyond (SLO Promenade) 43 Proposed Building A (Ross) 42 Proposed Building B (Michaels) 42 Proposed Building C 40 Average Building Height: 39 The applicant has expressed that the proposed building provides anchor stores that are consistent with the expected shopping center vernacular design for providing appropriate visibility and design hierarchy of major versus minor storefronts. The CDG state that building facades that are tall for no functional reason, have little surface articulation or relief, and are simply intended to provide high, visible surfaces for tenant signage are not appropriate (CDG 3.2D.4c). However, the CDG also state that customer entrances must be clearly defined and highly visible (CDG 3.2D.1). The project has been designed to provide emphasis to the customer entrances as the project is located toward the rear of the property with limited visibility from Madonna Road, as represented in project renderings (Attachment 3). The Zoning Regulations establish the max height in the C-R zone as 45 feet. The height of the building is distributed throughout the building façade, the tallest point of the project is 42 feet and is limited to the area around the customer entrances (approximately 35% of the front ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 7 building elevation); the heights step down from the entrances down to 28 feet. The CDG encourage consideration of how the project can be designed to fit in with the existing development in the vicinity of the site (CDG 2.1B). The designs of the customer entrances are consistent and compatible with the existing storefronts within Madonna Plaza and SLO Promenade Shopping Centers. Directional Item #10: Provide section cuts and perspective drawings. Response: Building sections and perspective renderings are provided to assist ARC to visualize the proposed redevelopment in the context of the Plaza, see Attachment 3 and Attachment 6. 4.0 CONCLUSION In summary, the revised project design complies with property development standards of the Zoning Regulations relative to height, setbacks, parking, coverage and floor area ratio for the Commercial Retail (C-R) zone. The project does not include any exceptions or parking reductions as part of this application and the applicant proposes to maintain a similar site plan to the existing layout including the parking lot and lighting configuration. The applicant has responded to the ARC directional items and the project is consistent with Community Design Guidelines for Large-Scale Retail infill development. The building design incorporates articulation that includes changes in wall planes and roof height to relieve the form and mass of the building from each elevation. All elevations are visually interesting and receive interesting architectural treatments that enhance views of the structures from all views on and off site. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt under Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction; Section 15302 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project consists of replacement of an existing structure where the new structure will be located on the same site as the previous structure, and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. The p roject is consistent with General Plan policies for the land use designation and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, that will have no significant impact on the environment. 6.0 OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Comments from the other City departments have been incorporated into the Draft Resolution as conditions of approval and/or code requirements, as appropriate. 7.0 ALTERNATIVES 7.1. Deny the project based on findings of inconsistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, Community Design Guidelines, or other policy document. ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 8 8.0 ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Project Revisions Narrative 3. Project Renderings 4. ARC August 21, 2017 Draft Meeting Minutes 5. ARC August 21, 2017 Staff Report 6. Revised Project Plans Available at the Community Development Department: Project Plans Available at ARC Hearing: Colors and Materials Board RESOLUTION NO. ARC-XXXX-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION APPROVING THE REDEVELOPMENT OF A PORTION OF THE MADONNA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO PROVIDE FOR THREE NEW TENANT SPACES CONSISTING OF 56,257 SQUARE-FEET, WITH A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, AS REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED OCTOBER 16, 2017 (273 MADONNA ROAD ARCH-0469-2017) WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on August 21, 2017, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARCH-0469- 2017, where the project was continued with direction to a date uncertain; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on October 16, 2017, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under ARCH-0469- 2017, Schottenstein Property Group, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Architectural Review Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Architectural Review Commission hereby grants final approval to the project (ARCH-0469-2017), based on the following findings: 1. As conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because the project will be compatible with site constraints and the scale and character of the neighborhood. 2. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal #15, which establishes Community Goals for Society and Economy in order to emphasize more productive use of existing commercial buildings and land areas already committed to urban development. The project proposes to construct a new commercial building that can be utilized by multiple retail establishments. 3. The project is consistent with the Zoning Regulations since the proposed building design Attachment 1 Resolution No. ARC-XXXX-17 273 Madonna Road, ARCH-0469-2017 Page 2 complies with height, coverage, parking and setbacks for the Retail Commercial (C-R) zone. 4. As conditioned, the project is consistent with the Community Design Guidelines for commercial project design because the design follow the same general scale, proportion, massing, and detailing of the original structure consistent and compatible with existing structures within the vicinity. 5. As conditioned, the project design is consistent with the Community Design Guidelines by providing a variety of architectural treatments that add visual interest and articulation to the building design that complements the design and scale of the existing structures on-site, and by providing clearly defined customer entrances. SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is categorically exempt under Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction; Section 15302 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project consists of replacement of an existing structure where the new structure will be located on the same site as the previous structure, and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. The project is consistent with General Plan policies for the land use designation and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, that will have no significant impact on the environment. SECTION 3. Action. The project conditions of approval do not include mandatory code requirements. Code compliance will be verified during the plan check process, which may include additional requirements applicable to the project. The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) hereby grants final approval to the project with incorporation of the following conditions: Planning Division 1. Final project design and construction drawings submitted for a building permit shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans approved by the ARC (ARCH-0469-2017). A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that lists all conditions and code requirements of project approvals listed as sheet number 2. Reference shall be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Plans submitted for tenant improvements for Tenant C, shall ensure the window storefront along El Mercado is maintained to provide pedestrians with views into the building and not “walled-in” or darkened to provide more interior wall or storage space within the tenant space, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 3. Plans submitted for a building permit application shall identify precise locations of pedestrian amenities (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) to demonstrate compliance with Communit y Design Guidelines Chapter 3.1C.3b, to the approval of the Community Development Director. Attachment 1 Resolution No. ARC-XXXX-17 273 Madonna Road, ARCH-0469-2017 Page 3 4. The storage area for trash and recycling cans shall be screened from the public right-of-way. The subject property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner at all times; free of excessive leaves, branches, and other landscape material. The applicant shall be responsible for the clean-up of any landscape material in the public right-of-way. 5. The locations of all lighting, including bollard style landscaping or path/parking lighting, shall be included in plans submitted for a building permit. All wall-mounted lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. All wall-mounted lighting shall complement building architecture, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. The lighting schedule for the building shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut-sheets on the submitted building plans. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to ensure that light is directed downward consistent with the requirements of the City’s Night Sky Preservation standards contained in Chapter 17.23 of the Zoning Regulations. 6. Final plans shall clearly depict the location of all required short and long-term bicycle parking. Sufficient detail shall be provided about the placement and design of bike racks and lockers to demonstrate compliance with relevant Engineering Standards and Community Design Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Public Works and Community Development Directors. 7. Plans submitted for a building permit shall include window details indicating the type of materials for the window frames and mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds recesses and other related window features. Plans shall demonstrate the use of high quality materials for the windows that reflect the architectural style of the project and are compatible with the neighborhood character, to the approval of the Community Development Director. 8. Mechanical and electrical equipment shall be located internally to the building. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of the building, which clearly show the sizes of any proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment. If any condensers or other mechanical equipment is to be placed on the roof, plans submitted for a building permit shall confirm that parapets and other roof features will adequately screen them. A line-of-sight diagram may be required to confirm that proposed screening will be adequate. This condition applies to initial construction and later improvements. 9. The location of any required backflow preventer and double-check assembly shall be shown on all site plans submitted for a building permit, including the landscaping plan. Construction plans shall also include a scaled diagram of the equipment proposed. Where possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, equipment shall be located inside the building within 20 feet of the front property line. Where this is not possible, as determined by the Utilities Director, the back flow preventer and double-check assembly shall be located in the street yard and screened using a combination of paint color, landscaping and, if deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, a low wall. The size and configuration of such Attachment 1 Resolution No. ARC-XXXX-17 273 Madonna Road, ARCH-0469-2017 Page 4 equipment shall be subject to review and approval by the Utilities and Community Development Directors. 10. The project proposes to split a single tenant space into three new tenant spaces, which will require an amendment to the Master Sign Program to include signage for additional tenant spaces. Prior to any sign permit issuance, the applicant shall submit a revision to the Madonna Plaza Sign Program for architectural review. The revised sign program shall, at a minimum, include the following: a. All proposed sign styles and methods of illumination b. Proposed finish materials for all sign types c. All proposed letter heights and approximate sign location areas for all tenants 11. The Architectural Review Commission’s approval of this project shall expire after one year if construction plans have not been submitted for a building permit . On request, the Community Development Director may grant a single, one-year extension. Engineering Division – Community Development Department 12. The building plan submittal shall show the limits of the damaged or displaced sidewalk, curb, gutter, driveway approaches, sidewalk underdrains, and catch basins along the entire El Mercado frontage to be repaired or replaced per City Engineering Standards. The applicant shall call Engineering Development Review to schedule a site inspection to walk the property frontage prior to building permit submittal to verify the extent of repairs required. 13. The building plan submittal shall show ADA upgrades/barrier removals to the site to the satisfaction of the City. The upgrades along El Mercado shall extend from the terminus at Highway 101 to west of the main access driveway, approximately 660’. 14. The building plan submittal shall show all existing driveway approaches/parking lot entrances adjacent to the building parking lot to be upgraded to comply with current standards. The current city and ADA standard requires a 4’ accessible sidewalk extension behind the ramp. 15. The building plan submittal shall show any existing driveway approach not proposed to be used to be abandoned per City Engineering Standards. 16. The building plan submittal shall show all existing curb ramps to be upgraded per current standards. The current city and ADA standard requires a 4’ accessible sidewalk extension behind the ramp. 17. The building plan submittal shall include a complete parking lot signage and striping plan per City Engineering Standards. 18. Development of the driveway and parking areas shall comply with the Parking and Driveway Standards for dimension, maneuverability, slopes, drainage, and materials. Attachment 1 Resolution No. ARC-XXXX-17 273 Madonna Road, ARCH-0469-2017 Page 5 19. The building plan submittal shall include a complete site utility plan. All existing and proposed utilities along with utility company meters shall be shown. Existing underground services shall be shown along with any proposed alterations or upgrades. All work in the public right-of-way shall be shown or noted. 20. The building plan submittal shall show the loading dock drainage to be in accordance with City codes and standards. Pre-treatment, filter inserts, or other water quality Best Management Practices(BMP’s) shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City. Trash enclosure drainage shall be considered in the final design in accordance with City Engineering Standard 1010.B. 21. The building plan submittal shall include water quality upgrades to the parking lot drainage from DMA 1 prior to discharge to the storm drain system and adjoining Cerro San Luis Channel. Upgrades may include a treatment train such as permeable pavers with a perforated drain pipe, sumped catch basins, filter inserts, or other acceptable BMP’s to the satisfaction of the City. 22. The building plan submittal shall show compliance with the Post Construction Stormwater Requirements as promulgated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for redeveloped sites. Include a complete Post Construction Stormwater Control Plan Template as available on the City’s Website. 23. An operations and maintenance manual will be required for the post construction stormwater improvements. The manual shall be provided at the time of building permit application and shall be accepted by the City prior to building permit issuance. A private stormwater conveyance agreement will be required and shall be recorded prior to final inspection approvals. 24. This property is located within a designated flood zone as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of San Luis Obispo. As such, any new or substantially remodeled structures shall comply with all Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements and the city’s Floodplain Management Regulations per Municipal Code Chapter 17.84. 25. A portion of this property is located in an AO (1’ depth) Flood Zone; the water surface or base flood elevation (BFE) of a 100-yr storm is 1' above adjacent grade. Normally, in the absence of a LOMR, the structure would be floodproofed to an elevation that is at least one foot above the BFE or 2’ above the highest adjacent grade. A compliance strategy shall be resolved prior to building permit issuance. 26. The building plan submittal shall include a complete drainage report in accordance with the Waterway Management Plan Drainage Design Manual. The drainage report shall consider historic offsite drainage that may need to be conveyed on th e property. 27. The building plan submittal shall show all existing trees on the property with a trunk diameter Attachment 1 Resolution No. ARC-XXXX-17 273 Madonna Road, ARCH-0469-2017 Page 6 of 3" or greater. Offsite trees along the adjoining property lines with canopies and/or root systems that extend onto the property shall be shown for reference. The plan shall note which trees are to remain and which trees are proposed for removal. Include the diameter and species of all trees. Tree canopies should generally be shown to scale for reference. The plan shall show all existing and proposed street trees. 28. The City Arborist supports the proposed tree removals with the compensatory tree plantings as shown on the landscape plan. The building plan submittal shall show replacement tree plantings in all empty planters within the existing parking lot per the original landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and City Arborist. 29. Additional tree removals along El Mercado may be required in conjunction with the replacement of sidewalk in areas of significant d amage from tree roots. The replacement sidewalk plans shall incorporate any feasible tree preservation efforts. A certified arborist report may be required to substantiate tree preservation strategies or to substantiate the need for tree removals. These additional tree removals, if required, shall be approved to the satisfaction of the City Arborist, Public Works Director, and Community Development Director. 30. The building plan submittal shall show one 15-gallon street tree for each 35 linear feet of frontage. Infill street trees along El Mercado will be required. Tree species and planting requirements shall be per City Engineering Standards. Utilities Department 31. A new sewer lateral shall be installed along the north road adjacent to the proposed buildings, and shall connect into the sewer within El Mercado Way. 32. A separate irrigation meter and backflow preventer shall be installed, and irrigation piping shall be designed with the capability of using recycled water in the future. 33. The water main south of the proposed building shall be equipped with double check valve backflow preventer, and relocations of the mains shall made to avoid the proposed loading dock ramps. Indemnification 34. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim. Attachment 1 Resolution No. ARC-XXXX-17 273 Madonna Road, ARCH-0469-2017 Page 7 On motion by Commissioner ___________, seconded by Commissioner _____________, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: REFRAIN: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of October, 2017. _____________________________ Doug Davidson, Secretary Architectural Review Commission Attachment 1 Madonna Plaza Redevelopment – ARCH-0469-2017 Madonna Plaza SRT LP Oasis Associates, Inc. 15 September 2017 Design Considerations for the proposed Madonna Plaza Redevelopment ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 APN 053-011-025 15 September 2017 I. INTRODUCTION The Madonna Plaza Shopping Center (Plaza) has been a hub for local and regional retail for half a century. As is the nature of any successful long-standing retail center, periodic renovation and rejuvenation is necessary. Redevelopment of the building, currently tenanted by Sears, is the focus of this rejuvenation process. The proposed project includes demolition of the existing building and replaces it with three (3) new commercial buildings. The proposed development is designed to reflect the urban character and quality design that is characteristic of contemporary development at the Plaza and in the City. A. Architectural Review Commission (ARC) Design Comments The following items have been provided by City Planning staff as a transcription of the ARC’s comments, direction, and points of consideration for the proposed redesign of Madonna Plaza. Each comment is noted with a subsequent response provided. 1. Consider providing pedestrian connectivity to adjacent shopping center (SLO Promenade) through modifications to parking lot along storefront entries, where appropriate. RESPONSE: As a remodel project, the location of existing infrastructure, surface grades, and parking lot do not provide an opportunity to relocate the existing driveway entry point for a wholesale reconfiguration of the circulation layout. The width of the sidewalk in front of the proposed buildings has been extended to provide an enhanced pedestrian experience. The subject property is connected to the SLO Promenade via an existing enhanced pedestrian crossing with inlayed pavers. The public sidewalk and crosswalk along El Mercado is an appropriate and expected connection point between the two shopping centers. The connection between the two centers is clearly visible when traveling in either direction. . 2. Redesign the proposed arcade to allow sidewalk access in front of pillars rather than placing the pillars at the back of curb. RESPONSE: The sidewalk in front of the buildings has been extended, such that the width of the sidewalk from building face to curb is now twenty-four (24) feet. This provides a minimum of eight (8) feet clear of sidewalk throughout, including ample planters, benches, and flush curb storefront entry points. The building columns are set back from the edge of curb by eight (8) feet and are softened by landscaping and trees. The design team made every effort to accommodate a sidewalk in front of the columns however, cross slope limitations to comply with ADA requirements, drainage requirements, and existing grades made the request infeasible. The landscaping, broad sidewalk and amenities will provide a pleasant, safe, and accessible pedestrian experience . See Floor Plans sheets A2 to A4 and Conceptual Landscape Plan sheet L-1. Attachment 2 Madonna Plaza Redevelopment – ARCH-0469-2017 Madonna Plaza SRT LP Oasis Associates, Inc. 15 September 2017 2 of 5 3. Remove “uplighting” features along building entries. RESPONSE: “Uplighting” fixtures have been removed from the buildings. See Front Elevation sheet A6. 4. Remove stand-alone pilaster features at the back of the building. RESPONSE: The central stand-alone pilasters has been removed. The northly pilaster is retained as it encases a roof drain downspout has been extended to the match the roof line. The pilaster provides integration of the elements with the building façade consistent with CDG §3.1.B.10) See Rear Elevation sheet A6. 5. Remove trellis features with no practical application on building. RESPONSE: Trellis elements have been retained with additional landscaping and plantings provided at the base. The trellis elements now have support posts, which will support climbing plants. The vegetated trellises provide shade to sidewalk and benches. The trellis will read as a landscape feature and provide a soft-scape in front of the building façade. See Front and Side Elevations sheet A6 and Conceptual Landscape Plan sheet L-1. 6. Remove cultured stone along base of structure, use authentic materials reflective of San Luis Obispo. RESPONSE: Base and wainscoting material have been updated to include Air Vol Block Split-face CMU; a locally made and authentic material. 7. Modify the building architectural style to be less corporate driven or “anywhere USA”. Remove billboard-style architecture to include more human -scale architectural elements and focus on a more pedestrian local connection. RESPONSE: Corporate color banding (blue) has been removed from the building façade. The building designs are consistent with the large-scale regional shopping center vernacular typical of San Luis Obispo. The sidewalks, landscaping, trellises, building arcades, and storefronts are indicative and consistent with human-scale design, however the Community Design Guideline 3.2.D also acknowledges that “building details should relate to the scale of pedestrians, as well as passing motorists” The buildings are consistent with the height and scale of the surrounding large-scale retail building located both within the Plaza and the adjacent promenade. The façade architecture provides a motorist-scale design (the life blood of any regional shopping center), while clearly defining the entry points and wayfinding for motorists entering the plaza from Madonna Road. Note that from previous conversations that mature trees, while helping to provide shade and cooling, tend to obscure the building facades. The proposed buildings are setback over 1,000 feet from the primary entries on Madonna Road. The upper facades are designed to relate to the broad-scale, while the closer detailing is designed with the pedestrian in mind. The development, as a large scale regional shopping center meets the Community Design Guidelines direction to balance the design elements for both pedestrian and motorist. Attachment 2 Madonna Plaza Redevelopment – ARCH-0469-2017 Madonna Plaza SRT LP Oasis Associates, Inc. 15 September 2017 3 of 5 8. The proposed storefront window system along El Mercado elevation shall include clear window glazing to provide for a visible display area. RESPONSE: Comment noted. The storefront remains as-is, per the condition of approval #2, the future tenant can determine if the storefront will be used for viewing of the interior space or as an display area with an open sided back drop. 9. Reduce the overall height of parapets, demonstrate how parapet features are integrated into the building design, provide for compatibility and scalability with adjacent tenants. RESPONSE: Building sections and roof plans are provided to detail the integration and return of the parapets. Please see response to item #8 above regarding compatibility of the buildings’ scale. The proposed building are anchor stores and are consistent with the expected shopping center vernacular of providing appropriate visibility and deigns hierarchy of major versus minor tenant storefronts and facades. The proposed parapet heights are consistent with the vertical articulation of the surrounding buildings, as noted in the table below. Building/ Tenant Height (feet) Ralphs 34 Kohl’s 34 DSW 36 Best Buy 40 European Wax Center/ Message Envy 35 PETCO 32 Embassy Suites (SLO Promenade) 48 World Market (SLO Promenade) 39 Former Staples (SLO Promenade) 42 Bed, Bath, and Beyond (SLO Promenade) 43 Proposed Building A (Ross) 42 Proposed Building B (Michaels) 42 Proposed Building C 40 10. Provide section cuts and perspective drawings. RESPONSE: Building sections and perspective renderings are provided to assist ARC to visualize the proposed redevelopment in the context of the Plaza. Attachment 2 Madonna Plaza Redevelopment – ARCH-0469-2017 Madonna Plaza SRT LP Oasis Associates, Inc. 15 September 2017 4 of 5 Previous Application Supplement – for reference II. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES The Community Design Guidelines were carefully considered during the design process. The Large- Scale Retail Project Design Guidelines (Chapter 3.2) have been integrated into the Madonna Plaza redevelopment, as applicable. Beyond the Community Design Guidelines, the project has incorporated appropriate measures to comply with post construction stormwater requirements, as outlined in the Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan and Basin Analysis Report (Wallace Group, 24 April 2017). New bioswales and vegetative planting areas are incorporated in the site design. A detention basin is proposed for the southerly corner of the property for infiltration of the existing and proposed runoff. A. Site Planning, Parking, Circulation (§3.2.A-C) The proposed buildings are integrated into the existing site configuration. Consideration has been given to highlight the entries and provide a continuous pedestrian experience throughout the interior sidewalk and related connections to the larger existing focal point in front of PetSmart. The existing planting will remain along the Highway 101 frontage to provide screening. The building walls facing Highway 101 are articulated and stepped to avoid a single monolithic plane. The main customer parking area is to remain as-is. The parking area includes mature trees, shopping cart corrals, and accessible parking, which will connect to the new building entries. Pedestrian routes are well defined and link to the existing sidewalks. The parking area between the new buildings and Highway 101 is not a primary parking area and appropriately utilized as employee parking, therefore internal planting is not proposed beyond the areas needed for post-construction stormwater requirements. The existing sidewalks along El Mercado Street are proposed to remain as-is. The replaced interior sidewalk in front of the buildings is clearly defined and demarcated with truncated domes and enhanced paving. A new pedestrian sidewalk parallel to El Mercado is proposed to the connect the primary entry area to the rear parking lot. This also provides an expanded bicycle parking area. B. Building Design (§3.2.D) The proposed building design is a contemporary distillation of the familiar local retail center vernacular. The proposed buildings provide a unified frontage with character distinctions for each building expressed in the design elements, material, and color. The customer entries are well defined with protected arcades. The entrances are consistent with the existing orientation of the shopping center. Building materials were selected for their quality, durability, and harmony with the materials of the existing shopping center. The articulated façades include a subdued, but varied. color palette of stucco with stone veneer wainscoting. Corporate colors are kept at a minimum and reserved for banded tiles accenting the wainscoting. Loading and utilitarian areas (back of house) are designed to be unobtrusive to the primary entry and provide buffering from any noise or visual disturbance. Building lighting will provide adequate pedestrian safety lighting, with the existing parking lot lighting to remain as-is. Attachment 2 Madonna Plaza Redevelopment – ARCH-0469-2017 Madonna Plaza SRT LP Oasis Associates, Inc. 15 September 2017 5 of 5 Stepped parapets with cornicing and pitched roofs tower elements with clay tiling provide vertical highlights that anchor the buildings to the entries and street. Parapet walls provide appropriate screening for roof mounted mechanical equipment. III. PROJECT TEAM A. Applicant/Property Owner SCHOTTENSTEIN PROPERTY GROUP c/o MADDONA PLAZA SRT, LP Mr. Paul W. Gugino 4300 E. 5th Avenue Columbus, OH 43219 561.471.8077 paul@paragonconsultantsllc.com B. Applicant’s Agent OASIS ASSOCIATES, INC. C.M. Florence, AICP & Emily Ewer, AICP 3427 Miguelito Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805.541.4509 cmf@oasisassoc.com emily@oasisasso.com C. Architect HERSCHMAN ARCHITECTS Mr. Mark Pike 25001 Emery Road, Suite 400 Cleveland, OH 44128 216.223.3240 mpike@herschmanarchitects.com D. Project Civil Engineer WALLACE GROUP Ms. Debra Tumler P.E. 612 Clarion Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805.544.4011 DebraT@wallacegroup.us E. Landscape Architect OASIS ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Scott Wright 3427 Miguelito Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805.541.4509 scott@oasisassoc.com ARC Response Attachments Previously Provided Attachments DESIGN SCHEMATIC Gerald J. Herschman Architect, et al, 25 April 2017 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN AND BASIN ANALYSIS REPORT Wallace Group, 24 April 2017 MATERIAL PALETTE Gerald J. Herschman Architect PARKING MASTER TABLE Oasis Associates, Inc., 26 April 2017 Attachment 2 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 4412813$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡MADONNA PLAZA KEY MAP(O0HUFDGR(O0HUFDGR&DEULOOR+Z\&DEULOO R + Z\0DGRQQD5G0DGRQQD5G'DOLGLR'U(PEDVV\6XLWHVE\+LOLOWRQ%HVW%X\.RKO·V5DOSKV8OWD%HDXW\%HG%DWK %H\RQG:RUOG0DUNHW'6:V 01V 02V 03V 04V 05V 06V 07V 083HWFR$QLPDO6XSSOLHVAttachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 4412823$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡VIEW 01 ‡9,(:1('2:10$,1'5,9($,6/(Attachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 4412833$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡9,(:‡9,(:72:$5'60,''/(7(1$17Attachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 4412843$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡9,(:‡9,(:6('2:1(/0$5&$'2Attachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 4412853$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡9,(:‡9,(:,1726,7()520(/0(5&$'2Attachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 441283$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡9,(:‡9,(:1:'2:1(/0(5&$'2Attachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 441283$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡9,(:‡9,(:72:5$5'6%$&.2)7(1$176Attachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 4412883$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡9,(:‡9,(:2)%$&.2)&(17(51($5+,*+:$<Attachment 3 25001 EMERY RD, SUITE 400, CLEVELAND OH 441283$5$*21‡0$'211$3/$=$5(129$7,21‡6$1/8,62%,632&$‡9,(:‡9,(:72:$5'61(:'(9(/230(17)520,16,'(&(17(5Attachment 3 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION Minutes Monday, August 21, 2017 Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order on Monday, August 21, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Wynn. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Richard Beller, Amy Nemcik, Brian Rolph, Allen Root, Vice-Chair Angela Soll, and Chair Greg Wynn Absent: None Staff: Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Associate Planner Shawna Scott, and Associate Planner Kyle Bell. PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. --End of Public Comment-- APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 15, 2017, AND SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 22, 2017. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WYNN, CARRIED BY A 6-0 CONSENSUS, to approve the minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of May 15, 2017, as amended: Page 2: strike from Condition #4 “space” and replace with “clearance to overhead screening.” ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ROOT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NEMCIK, CARRIED BY A 6-0 CONSENSUS, to approve the minutes of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of May 22, 2017. Attachment 4 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission Meeting of August 21, 2017 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 3249 Broad Street. ARCH-3530-2016: Design review of a new three-story mixed-use project consisting of an approximately 12,457 square-foot boutique hotel (including six suites, one caretaker’s unit, and roof decks), ten live/work units totaling approximately 21,430 square feet, including roof decks, onsite parking, associated tree removals, and roof-top solar panels, with a Categorical Exemption from environmental review (Class 32, in-fill development projects). The project includes demolition of the existing non-historic building; C-R-SF zone; Levi Seligman applicant. Associate Planner Shawna Scott presented a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Applicant Representative, Corey Goodwin, discussed the project and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Applicants Levi Seligman and Melissa Bailey added brief commentary and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Public Comments: None. --End of Public Comment-- Commission discussion followed. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SOLL, CARRIED 5-0-0-1 (COMMISSIONER NEMCIK RECUSED) to continue project to a date uncertain with direction to the applicant to: 1. Provide floor plans for each building (show the overall plan for each level). 2. Clarify building materials and architectural details, including color palette. Clearly call out material type for all elements, including but not limited to the base pedestal, bulkhead, stem wall, and bands/cornice. Provide complete colors and materials board. Demonstrate use of highly durable and high quality materials. 3. Provide exhibits showing wall thickness. 4. Show how transitions would occur and how the materials would wrap around corners and insets. Provide details on cornice and caps where buildings meet. 5. Provide more physical articulation, variety, interest, consistency, identity, and sense of place. Revise north and south-facing elevations. a. Provide variety on building façade, to include building heights and window alignment. Provide more physical and textural variety. b. Provide different window types and window pattern arrays to reduce monotony. c. Provide more shadow-play on the south-east external elevation d. Consider provision of additional decks for visual interest. Attachment 4 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission Meeting of August 21, 2017 Page 3 e. Consider making some units larger and some roof decks smaller. f. Consider dropping down Lots 1 and 7. g. Consider a uniform color for the awnings. Additional awnings or weather shield encouraged at live/work entrances. 6. Integrate the site design with the natural environment (creek). Create a transitional product. 7. Provide alternative pavers. 8. Add trellis to trash and recycling area/enclosure for additional screening. 9. Consider providing electric car charger(s). COMMISSIONER NEMCIK RETURNED AT 6:05 p.m. 2. 243 Madonna Road. ARCH-0824-2017: Review of proposed signage for a new tenant, Designer Shoe Warehouse, which exceeds the allowable number of signs and dimensions established in the Madonna Plaza Sign program. This project is categorically exempt from environmental review; C-R zone; Coast Monument Signs, applicant. (Kyle Bell) Associate Planner Kyle Bell presented a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Applicant Representative, Steve Fear, provided handouts, discussed the project, and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Public Comments: None. --End of Public Comment-- Commission discussion followed. ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WYNN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ROLPH, CARRIED BY A 6-0 CONSENSUS, to adopt a Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the San Luis Obispo Architectural Review Commission approving exceptions to the signage for a new tenant, designer shoe warehouse, which exceeds the allowable number of signs and dimensions established in the Madonna Plaza sign program, with a Categorical Exemption from environmental review, as represented in the staff report and attachments dated August 21, 2017 (243 Madonna Road, ARCH-0824-2017) with the following amendments and additions: a. Eliminate SECTION 1. Finding #2. b. Condition #3: Remove “…shall eliminate one of the tower signs over the entrance of the business…” c. Condition #3: “… for the two signs along the entry tower element shall not exceed a combined total of 151 square-feet.” d. Condition #3: “…and may include a maximum letter height of sixty-six forty-eight inches…” Attachment 4 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission Meeting of August 21, 2017 Page 4 e. Add Condition: “The use of the “Sports Authority red” color shall not be allowed or included as the background of any proposed wall signage.” 3. 273 Madonna Road. ARCH-0469-2017: Review of the redevelopment of a portion of the Madonna Plaza Shopping Center to construct a new commercial building to provide for three new tenant spaces, consisting of 56,257 square-feet. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review; C-R zone; Schottenstein Property Group, applicant. (Kyle Bell) Associate Planner Kyle Bell presented a PowerPoint presentation and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Applicant Representatives, Carol Florence and Emily Ewer of Oasis Associates, provided handouts, discussed the project, and responded to Commissioner inquiries. Public Comments: None. --End of Public Comment-- ACTION: MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NEMCIK, CARRIED BY A 6-0 CONSENSUS, to continue to continue project to a date uncertain with direction to the applicant and staff to: 1. Consider providing pedestrian connectivity to adjacent shopping center (SLO Promenade) through modifications to parking lot along storefront entries, where appropriate. 2. Redesign the proposed arcade to allow sidewalk access in front of pillars rather than placing the pillars at the back of curb. 3. Remove “uplighting” features. 4. Remove stand-alone pilaster features at the back of the building. 5. Remove trellis features with no practical application on building. 6. Remove cultured stone along base of structure, use authentic materials reflective of San Luis Obispo. 7. Modify the building architectural style to be less corporate driven (blue banding on Ross building) or “anywhere USA”. Remove billboard-style architecture to include more human-scale architectural elements and focus on a more pedestrian local connection. 8. The proposed storefront window system along El Mercado elevation, shall provide clear window glazing to provide for a visible display area. 9. Reduce the overall height of parapets, demonstrate how parapet features are integrated into the building design, provide for compatibility and scalability with adjacent tenants. 10. Provide section cuts and perspective drawings. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION Deputy Director Davidson provided a brief agenda forecast. Attachment 4 Minutes – Architectural Review Commission Meeting of August 21, 2017 Page 5 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m. The next Regular meeting of the Architectural Review Commission is scheduled for Monday, September 11, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION: XX/XX/2017 Attachment 4 Meeting Date: August 21, 2017 Item Number: #3 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: Review of the redevelopment of a portion of the Madonna Plaza Shopping Center to construct a new commercial building to provide for three new tenant spaces consisting of 56,257 square-feet. The project is categorical exemption from environmental review. PROJECT ADDRESS: 273 Madonna Road BY: Kyle Bell, Associate Planner Phone Number: 781-7524 e-mail: kbell@slocity.org FILE NUMBER: ARCH-0469-2017 FROM: Doug Davidson, Deputy Director RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Draft Resolution (Attachment 1) which approves the project, based on findings, and subject to conditions. SITE DATA Applicant Schottenstein Property Group Representative Oasis Associates, Inc. Complete Date July 3, 2017 Zoning C-R General Plan General Retail Site Area ~5.4 acres Environmental Status Categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) SUMMARY The project applicant, Schottenstein Property Group, has applied for architectural review of the redevelopment of an existing commercial building located at 273 Madonna Road. The proposed redevelopment includes demolition of the existing Sears building (75,400 square-foot) and construction of a 56,257 square-foot building that provides for three new tenants. The project site is located along El Mercado in the Retail Commercial (C-R) zone within the Madonna Plaza Shopping Center. The property is bounded by Retail Commercial zoning on all sides, and adjacent to Highway 101. Attachment 5 ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 2 1.0 COMMISSION’S PURVIEW The ARC’s role is to review the project in terms of its consistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, Community Design Guidelines, and other applicable policy documents. 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION Site Information/Setting Site Size ~27.8 acres Present Use & Development Retail Commercial, formally occupied by Sears Topography Relatively Flat Access El Mercado & Madonna Road Surrounding Use/Zoning North: C-R (Commercial Uses: retail & personal services) South: C-R-PD (Commercial Uses: SLO Promenade Shopping Center) East: Highway 101 West: C-R (Commercial Uses: retail) Project Description A summary of significant project features includes the following (Attachment 4, Reduced Project Plans): 1. Redevelopment: Construct a new commercial building for general retail uses (Ross – 22,020, Michael’s – 21,729, and Tenant C – 12,508 square feet). • Demolition and replacement of the existing Sears building • Parking lot reconfiguration and new landscaping • New commercial loading docks 2. Design: Contemporary architectural design that includes the following details and materials; • Three new commercial entrances oriented toward the commercial center • New design features included; detailed cornices, clay tile roofing, wood trellises, detailed columns and glass storefronts • Materials include; Stucco, Coronado Stone, Coronado Smooth Limestone, and CMU (rear elevation) Project Statistics Item Proposed 1 Ordinance Standard 2 Street Yard setback 30 feet 0 feet Side Yard Setbacks 0 feet 0 feet Max. Height of Structure(s) 42 feet 45 feet Coverage (buildings & paving) 24% 100% Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0.24 3.0 Parking Spaces 1,442 1,182 Notes: 1. Applicant’s project plans 2. City Zoning Regulations Attachment 5 ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 3 3.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS The proposed improvements must conform to the standards and limitations of the Zoning Regulations and Engineering Standards, and be consistent with applicable Community Design Guidelines (CDG). Staff has evaluated the project against relevant standards and guidelines and found it to be in substantial compliance, as discussed in this analysis. Consistency with the Community Design Guidelines The CDG establish the intent of the development standards for large-scale retail projects that are pedestrian-oriented and reflect architectural styles and features common in the city’s most attractive commercial areas. The CDG state that the tendency of many “big-box” retail chains is to replicate a corporate or generic aesthetic that may be absent of architectural character or local connection and serve to emphasize a disconnection between chain stores and the community (CDG 3.2). Designs should demonstrate a consistent use of colors, materials, and detailing throughout all elevations of the building. Elevations which do not directly face a street should not be ignored or receive only minimal architectural treatment (CDG 3.1.B.3). Site Plan: The project complies with the property development standards of the Zoning Regulations relative to height, setbacks, parking, coverage and floor area ratio. No exceptions to the Zoning Regulations are requested, and the applicant proposes to maintain a similar site plan to the existing layout including the parking lot and lighting configuration. The CDG state that loading facilities should not be located at the front of buildings where they will interfere with customer and employee traffic and be difficult to adequately screen. The proposed location of the loading docks along the rear elevation are appropriate because this elevation serves as the rear of the building, where two loading docks are currently located to serve the existing Sears building. The location of the loading dock will allow for a continuous storefront and pedestrian walkway along the main frontages of the building. Building Design: The CDG state that each side of a principal building facing a public street should feature at least one customer entrance. The project site is unique in that it was designed with its back towards Highway 101, and includes a service area and an employee parking lot with access from El Mercado. Consistent with the design of the center, customer entrances have been placed along the pedestrian walkway along the northeastern elevation of the project site, facing Madonna Plaza (Figure 1). These entrances are clearly defined with porticos, planters, and large storefront windows. The project is consistent with the CDG which state that predominant exterior building materials must be of high quality1. 1 Community Design Guidelines Chapter 3.2.D2: Predominant exterior building materials must be of high quality. Examples of these materials include brick, wood, stone, tinted/textured stucco, and tile accents. Figure 1: Front elevation. Attachment 5 ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 4 In order to address concerns identified by staff regarding the CDG to provide public entrance along El Mercado the applicant team has responded by stating that the slope and grade of the building and the street reduces the practical interface of the building and the street. Regardless, the applicant team has revised the project to include a window storefront to provide visual interest along El Mercado (Figure 2). Staff recommends Condition No. 2 which states: Plans submitted for tenant improvements for Tenant C, shall ensure the window storefront along El Mercado is maintained to provide pedestrians with views into the building and not “walled-in” or darkened to provide more interior wall or storage space within the tenant space. The CDG state that large scale retail projects should provide extensive façade articulation to provide variations in wall plane and surface relief. In order to address concerns identified by staff regarding articulation the applicant revised the rear elevation to provide additional articulation and visual interest to the façade as seen from Highway 101 (Figure 3). The proposed façade is broken up by wall offsets with variation in materials and patterns, consistent with CDG. Landscaping: The CDG state that parking areas should include extensive landscaping throughout parking areas to soften the appearance of large structures and make walking around the site a more pleasant experience for pedestrians. However, where appropriate parking areas intended for employees may be allowed to have screening perimeter landscaping only, with no internal plantings2. The CDG also require safe accommodations for pedestrians to be an integral part of the site design. The proposed pedestrian walkway along the northeastern elevation is appropriately integrated into the site plan providing on-site open space for pedestrians with 2 Community Design Guidelines Chapter 3.2.B4: Overflow and Employee Parking. Where appropriate because of site characteristics, surrounding land uses, and project site planning, parking areas intended for employees and peak-season overflow may be allowed to have screening perimeter landscaping on ly, with no internal plantings, provided that these parking areas are located behind the main structures and not readily visible from streets or residential areas. Figure 2: Previous side elevation (top). Revised side elevation (bottom) Figure 3: Previous rear elevation (top). Revised rear elevation (bottom) Attachment 5 ARCH-0469-2017 273 Madonna Road Page 5 amenities including benches, bike racks, and landscaping. In order to ensure compliance with the CDG, staff recommends Condition No. 3 which states: Plans submitted for a building permit application shall identify precise locations of pedestrian amenities (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) to demonstrate compliance with Community Design Guidelines Chapter 3.1.C.3b. Parking: The Madonna Plaza Shopping Center provides 1,462 parking spaces, and was approved for a 10% shared parking reduction (USE-0974-2015). The proposed retail space requires 188 parking spaces, this is 151 spaces less than the 339 required for previous structure (Attachment 3, Madonna Plaza Parking Table). No additional vehicle parking is required as part of this project. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt under Class 2, Replacement or Reconstruction; Section 15302 of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project consists of replacement of an existing structure where the new structure will be located on the same site as the previous structure, and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. The pr oject is consistent with General Plan policies for the land use designation and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, that will have no significant impact on the environment. 5.0 OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Comments from the other City departments have been incorporated into the Draft Resolution as conditions of approval and/or code requirements, as appropriate. 6.0 ALTERNATIVES 6.1. Continue the project with direction to the applicant and staff on pertinent issues. 6.2. Deny the project based on findings of inconsistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, Community Design Guidelines, or other policy document. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Project Narrative 3. Madonna Plaza Parking Table 4. Reduced Project Plans Available at the Community Development Department: Project Plans Available at ARC Hearing: Colors and Materials Board Attachment 5 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6 Attachment 6