Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAC 12-06-2017 Cooper - Item 3 (3) Purrington, Teresa From:Allan Cooper <allancoope@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, To:Stanwyck, Shelly Cc:Advisory Bodies; Mudgett, Melissa; Hyfield, Devin; racouillat@charter.net; cc mc lean; Kit Gould-Himelblau Subject:Re: Public Hearing Item #3 - 2017 Annual Report: 2020 Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan Dear Shelly - Thank you for your reply. It is helpful to those of us who are interested in a seeing a park site procured in the North Broad Street Neighborhood that we could read the October 18, 2017 email you sent to both the Council and to “neighborhood leadership”. This is because it appears that neither Kit Gould-Himelblau nor Greg Robinson (the individuals representing “neighborhood leadership”) shared this correspondence with the rest of us. You mention that park site procurement activities were omitted from the Annual Progress Report under Goal #4 “Expand Parks and Facilities” because it was neither a completed project and there were no tangible results. However your meeting with “neighborhood leadership” could have been mentioned under the category “group and community activities”. This would be akin to your mention of the Dog Park survey results. Also, please amend the "Summary of Goals and Objectives" Goal #4 "Expand Parks and Facilities" on page 3-17 of the draft "2020 Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan" to include Objective 4.3.2. On another note, I, at this point, would like to know how much money remains to fund the procurement of a park site. I see the minutes of the City Council meeting of June 1, 2017 stating that Council consensus was “to take the Park and Recreation Element funds ($160,000) from the $900,000 and leave the remaining money for the park…” The minutes went on to assure the continued funding of the Safe Routes to School and the Broad Street Bike Boulevard. The implication here - though it was not stated explicitly - is that these expenses would come out of the General Fund. However the July 1, 2017 Adopted Budget states on page A1-24 under Budget Highlights (see below) that only $260,000 would remain in the Parkland Development Fund to pay for the procurement of a site for the North Broad Street Neighborhood Park. What happened between June 1, 2017 and July 1, 2017 that would result in this $380,000 discrepancy? Thank you! ______________ 2017-18 Adopted Budget July 1, 2017 Page A1-24 PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT FUND The proposed Financial Plan proposes to transfer $640,000 from the Parkland Development Fund set aside as part of the 2016-17 Supplemental Budget for potential use toward funding of a park north of Broad Street (original set aside amount was $900,000). This allocation will fund an update to the Parks and Recreation Element in the amount of $160,000 and two Capital Improvement Projects (Bishop Peak/Pacheco Safe Route to School and the Broad Street Bike Boulevard) in the same geographic area for a total of $480,000. The remainder amount of $260,000 is proposed to remain in the Parkland Development Fund. 1 On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org> wrote: Thanks Mr. Cooper – Here is a link to the correspondence to the PRC on this topic. From: Purrington, Teresa Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 1:55 PM Subject: Agenda Correspondence for 12-06-2017 PRC Meeting Hello all, Linked below is correspondence received for the 12-06-2017 Meeting. Item #3: Stanwick - http://opengov.slocity.org/weblink/1,1,1/doc/69405/Page1.aspx Bcc: PRC and staff Teresa Purrington Process Improvement Analyst City Administration City Clerk's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tpurrington@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org 2 From: Allan Cooper \[mailto:allancoope@gmail.com\] Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 11:42 AM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org>; Stanwyck, Shelly <sstanwyck@slocity.org>; Mudgett, Melissa <mmudgett@slocity.org>; Hyfield, Devin <DHyfield@slocity.org> Cc: racouillat@charter.net; cc mc lean <ccmslo@att.net>; Kit Gould-Himelblau <kit.gould1@gmail.com> Subject: Public Hearing Item #3 - 2017 Annual Report: 2020 Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan Dear Shelly, Melissa and Devin - I am attaching below a revised letter regarding Public Hearing Item #3 and I hope you will kindly replace the previous letter with this one. In this letter I am again stating that there is no mention in the 2017 Annual Progress Report of your, Kit Gould-Himelblau's or Rick Racouillat's hard work searching over the past year for a suitable park site. In fact there is no mention of the proposed North Broad Street Neighborhood park anywhere in this report (i.e., the 2017 Annual Progress Report) far less a description detailing the progress being made. Moving on to the Draft 2020 Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan, there is no mention of Objective 4.3.2 on page 3-17 where the Goals and Objectives first appear. I belatedly discovered that Objective 4.3.2 does indeed show up 14 pages further on - on page 3-31 - seemingly as an afterthought (and I apologize for being remiss in catching this). Nevertheless, I believe my point is still very valid in that there is no exposition whatsoever about how the $740,000 appropriation is being handled nor is there any 3 clarity coming from the P & R Commission regarding the following: "...greater clarity in pursuing a particular site in collaboration with the Safe Routes to School, and...there be some type of articulation to pursue a time frame for a park in the North Broad Street area." Shelly Stanwyck informed New Times back in June 15, 2017: "We'll be looking and talking to any large-property owners to see if they have an interest in either a sale or lease," Note my emphasis on the word "We'll" meaning that it is not solely up to the neighborhood to do the heavy lifting...it is also up to the P & R Commission to do much of the heavy lifting, per direction from the City Council. And I believe the public has a right to know what has transpired up to this point. I hope this might help clarify my position. Thank you! - Allan 4