HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-27-2018 ATC Agenda Packet1
MISSION: The purpose of the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) is to provide
oversight and policy direction on matters related to bicycle and pedestrian
transportation in San Luis Obispo and its relationship to bicycling and walking outside
the City.
ROLL CALL: Lea Brooks (Chair), Ken Kienow (Vice Chair), Jenna Espinosa, Timothy Jouet, Layla Lopez,
Jonathan Roberts, and Howard Weisenthal
PUBLIC COMMENT:
At this time, the public is invited to address the Committee concerning items not on the agenda but are
of interest to the public and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Active Transportation
Committee. The Committee may not discuss or take action on issues that are not on the agenda other
than to briefly respond to statements made or questions raised, or to ask staff to follow up on such
issues.
1. DISCUSSION ITEM: Active Transportation Plan Kickoff (60 min) -- Fukushima
2. DISCUSSION ITEM: Minor Bikeway Improvement Projects (30 min) – Fukushima
3. DISCUSSION ITEM: Unleashed Dogs on Trails (15 min) -- Fukushima
ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting will be held March 15, 2018
Agenda
Active Transportation Committee
(formerly the Bicycle Advisory Committee)
Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Tuesday, February 27, 2018 – 6:00 pm
Thursday, November 16, 2017 – 6:00 pm (Note earlier time)
The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and
activities. Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance.
2
ITEMS:
1. DISCUSSION ITEM: Active Transportation Plan Kickoff (60 min) – Fukushima
This meeting will kickoff the Active Transportation Plan (ATP). This will include a presentation
on the State’s requirements for an ATP followed by a discussion of th e Conceptual Work Plan
(Attachment 1). Committee members should consider the overall project objectives of the Plan
as well as schedule, methodology, and processes for reviewing the bike & pedestrian network
and associated policies & programs. As detailed in the Conceptual Work Plan, staff has provided
a series of open ended questions to help guide committee input. They include:
I. Methodology Considerations
• What level of involvement would the ATC like to have? This includes
considerations for time (including time outside of meetings) and number of
meetings ATC members are willing to devote time to. Would it be helpful to
have a subcommittee for the Plan or other kind of group involvement?
• What kind of community outreach should there be for the Plan? Consider
past Bike Plan outreach efforts but also new ideas.
II. Review / Update the Bicycle and Pedestrian Network
• How would the ATC like to undertake reviewing the bike / ped network?
Would the ATC like to go over each project one by one? Or think of different
strategies that might be more efficient.
III. Review / Update Policies and Programs
• How would the ATC like to approach updating the policies and programs?
IV. Priority and Implementation
• Would the ATC like to reconsider the bikeway priority system from the last
plan?
Attachment 1: ATP Conceptual Work Plan
Attachment 2: 2019 ATP Guidelines – Final Draft
Link to the 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan:
http://www.slocity.org/home/showdocument?id=3785
2. DISCUSSION ITEM: Minor Bikeway Improvement Projects (30 min) –
Fukushima
3
The 2017/19 FY Budget includes $100,000 for Minor Bikeway Improvement Projects. This item
will review the Projects List. Committee members should consider the prioritization of the
projects to maximize the best use of the funds. Staff will discuss which projects are already in
progress and gather input on which projects from the list to complete this year. New projects
can also be considered.
Attachment 3: Minor Bikeway Improvements List
3. DISCUSSION ITEM: Unleashed Dogs on Trails (15 min) – Fukushima
If time allows, this item will present information about dogs on trails including the law on
required leashes. This item was postponed at the September 2017 meeting.
Attachment 4: A Guide for Dog Walkers
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held: March 15, 2018
ATTACHMENTS:
1. ATP Conceptual Work Plan
2. 2019 ATP Guidelines – Final Draft
3. Minor Bike Project Wish List
4. A Guide for Dog Walkers
Active Transportation Plan: Conceptual Work Plan
INTRODUCTION: The City of San Luis Obispo is developing an Active
Transportation Plan (ATP) to include both bicycle and pedestrian
transportation. The Plan will replace the existing Bicycle Transportation Plan
and will include a new pedestrian component. While the City does have
various pedestrian planning policies and goals, this will be the first formal plan
for walking. The ATP will be drafted in accordance with Active Transportation
Plan requirements as set forth in the California Active Transportation Program
Guidelines. The Active Transportation Plan update will place emphasis on planning for all bicycle
ability and age levels. It will also serve as an update to include new design elements including
Class IV bikeways (cycle tracks) as well as other design elements for both bicycle and pedestrian
transportation improvements.
The City last updated the Bike Plan in 2013 and has not had a formal Pedestrian Transportation
Plan until this planning effort. An Active Transportation Plan will define a cohesive framework for
the nonmotorized transportation network in San Luis Obispo, better integrate bicycle and
pedestrian project needs, support the General Plan including the Land Use and Circulation
Elements and the Climate Action Plan. It will also assist the City in making informed investments,
and better position the City for grant funding.
OVERALL PROJECT OBJECTIVES:
• Update to reflect the new City Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) policies as well
as other policies and goals relative to bike and pedestrian transportation
• Meet the standards set forth in the Active Transportation Plan requirements per the
California Active Transportation Program Guidelines
• Endeavor to increase bicycling and walking for all ages and ability levels
• Update design standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities including Caltrans Class IV
(cycle track) bikeways
• Update the bicycle and pedestrian network including updating proposed routes with new
design recommendations including cycle tracks
• Develop policies and programs for pedestrians (including parklets)
Schedule
It is estimated that the plan will take 12-15 months to complete and adopt depending on level of
project objectives and community outreach.
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 2
I. Methodology Considerations
• What level of involvement would the ATC like to have? This includes
considerations for time (including time outside of meetings) and number of
meetings ATC members are willing to devote time to. Would it be helpful to
have a subcommittee for the Plan or other kind of group involvement?
• What kind of community outreach should there be for the Plan? Consider past
Bike Plan outreach efforts but also new ideas.
II. Review / Update the Bicycle and Pedestrian Network
• How would the ATC like to undertake reviewing the bike / ped network?
Would the ATC like to go over each project one by one? Or think of different
strategies that might be more efficient.
III. Review / Update Policies and Programs
• How would the ATC like to approach updating the policies and programs?
IV. Priority and Implementation
• Would the ATC like to reconsider the bikeway priority system from the last
plan?
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 2
California Transportation Commission
2019 ATP Guidelines – Final Draft January 2018
26
APPENDIX
Active Transportation Plan for Disadvantaged Communities
Guidance for Plans
A city, county, county transportation commission, regional transportation planning agency,
MPO, school district, or transit district may prepare an active transportation plan (bicycle,
pedestrian, safe-routes-to-school, or comprehensive). An active transportation plan prepared by
a city or county may be integrated into the circulation element of its general plan or a separate
plan which is compliant or will be brought into compliance with the Complete Streets Act,
Assembly Bill 1358 (Chapter 657, Statutes of 2008). An active transportation plan must include,
but not be limited to, the following components or explain why the component is not applicable:
A. Mode Share: The estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the
plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips, and the estimated
increase in the number of bicycle trips and pedestrian trips resulting from implementation
of the plan.
B. Description of Land Use/Destinations: A map and description of existing and proposed
land use and settlement patterns which must include, but not be limited to, locations of
residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, public buildings, major
employment centers, major transit hubs, and other destinations. Major transit hubs must
include, but are not limited to, rail and transit terminals, and ferry docks and landings.
C. Pedestrian Facilities: A map and description of existing and proposed pedestrian
facilities, including those at major transit hubs and those that serve public and private
schools.
D. Bicycle Facilities: A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transportation
facilities, including those at major transit hubs and those a description of bicycle facilities
that serve public and private schools and, if appropriate, a description of how the five Es
(Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, Engineering, and Evaluation) will be used to
increase rates of bicycling to school.
E. Bicycle Parking: A map and description of existing and proposed end-of-trip bicycle
parking facilities. Include a description of existing and proposed policies related to
bicycle parking in public locations, private parking garages and parking lots and in new
commercial and residential developments. Also include a map and description of existing
and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for connections with and use of
other transportation modes. These must include, but not be limited to, bicycle parking
facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and
ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles
or ferry vessels.
F. Wayfinding: A description of existing and proposed signage providing wayfinding along
bicycle and pedestrian networks to designated destinations.
G. Non-Infrastructure: A description of existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian safety,
education, and encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation programs conducted in the
area included within the plan. Include efforts by the law enforcement agency having
primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the law
impacting bicycle and pedestrian safety, and the resulting effect on collisions involving
bicyclists and pedestrians.
Attachment 2, Page 1 of 2
California Transportation Commission
2019 ATP Guidelines – Final Draft January 2018
27
H. Collision Analysis: The number and location of collisions, serious injuries, and fatalities
suffered by bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as
a percentage of all collisions and injuries, and a goal for collision, serious injury, and
fatality reduction after implementation of the plan.
I. Equity Analysis: Identify census tracts that are considered to be disadvantaged or low-
income and identify bicycle and pedestrian needs.
J. Community Engagement: A description of the extent of community involvement in
development of the plan, including disadvantaged and underserved communities.
K. Coordination: A description of how the active transportation plan has been coordinated
with neighboring jurisdictions, including school districts within the plan area, and is
consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or energy conservation
plans, including, but not limited to, general plans and a Sustainable Community Strategy
in a Regional Transportation Plan.
L. Prioritization: A description of the projects and programs proposed in the plan and a
listing of their priorities for implementation, including the methodology for project
prioritization and a proposed timeline for implementation.
M. Funding: A description of future financial needs for projects and programs that improve
safety and convenience for bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area. Include
anticipated cost, revenue sources and potential grant funding for bicycle and pedestrian
uses.
N. Implementation: A description of steps necessary to implement the plan and the
reporting process that will be used to keep the adopting agency and community informed
of the progress being made in implementing the plan.
O. Maintenance: A description of the policies and procedures for maintaining existing and
proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including, but not limited to, the maintenance
of smooth pavement, ADA level surfaces, freedom from encroaching vegetation,
maintenance of traffic control devices including striping and other pavement markings,
and lighting.
P. Resolution: A resolution showing adoption of the plan by the city, county or district. If the
active transportation plan was prepared by a county transportation commission, regional
transportation planning agency, MPO, school district or transit district, the plan should
indicate the support via resolution of the city(s) or county(s) in which the proposed
facilities would be located.
A city, county, school district, or transit district that has prepared an active transportation plan
may submit the plan to the county transportation commission or transportation planning agency
for approval. The city, county, school district, or transit district may submit an approved plan to
Caltrans in connection with an application for funds for active transportation facilities which will
implement the plan.
Attachment 2, Page 2 of 2
Project Status Notes Cost Priority
drainage grate upgrades at San Luis Drive (north of
Johnson), California at CHP office, 2 at Santa Barbara at
Broad, Broad SB near South Street, Madonna near S.
Higuera high
2018 summer paving plan improvements $60k high
replace concrete landing on Jennifer Street Bridge $20k high
Improvements to path between Sinsheimer Park and RRST
request forwarded to
School District
School Dist not able to bring
improvements at this time medium
sharrow on Monterey st by the Fremont theatre medium
Actuation for Bikes on Broad and Upham crossing medium
Ped and bike crossing improvements on South St at King medium
flip stop signs on Morro and Pismo to favor bike blvd medium
Ped improvements on South St at King medium
bike box at Chorro / Foothill in engineering phase medium
Address car parking in bike lane on EB South St medium
pavement maintenance at Monday Club bridge over creek low
correct light angled on Jennifer St bridge
need clarification of
light location low
install sharrows and signage on Chorro between Palm and
Monterey
anticipated as part of
Broad Street Bike
Blvd construction low
King Street to Meadow Park ramp low
drainage issues in bike lane on Orcutt near Tank Farm low
flip yield sign on Jennifer Street bridge low
removal of bollards on pathway at Exposition and Bridge
streets low
Remove/move side railing on Jennifer Street Bridge low
bike lane improvements on LOVR bridge Completed!high
Remove parking on California Street at Higuera to improve
sight distance Completed!low
green bike lanes in front of Marigold Plaza on Los Osos
Valley Road Completed!high
Parking removed on California Street at Higuera to improve
sight distance for bike lane Completed!medium
improve delination between bike lane and travel lane on Completed!medium
green bike lanes on Santa Rosa at Olive completed!high
Improve delineation between bike lane and travel lane on
southbound S. Higuera to Madonna Rd completed!high
Remove bollards on the path behind Monday Club Completed! high
removal of three parking spaces on NB California Blvd at
Marsh Completed!high
Remove single bollard on Railroad Safety Trail at
George/Jennifer Street trailhead Completed!
The three bollards on the curb
ramp make this single bollard
on the trailhead redundant high
Yield markings and a push button beacon at the Broad
Street at Upham ped crossing Completed!high
Last Updated: 02/22/2018
Minor Bike Project Wish List: Annual Allocation $100k
Attachment 3, Page 1 of 1
Who We Are
1341 Nipomo Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
The City of San Luis Obispo manages
7,000+ acres of Open Space
Ranger Service (805) 781-7302
The City of San Luis ObispoOpen Space Guide
A GUIDE FOR
DOG
WALKERS
How to make the most of your park
or open space visit.
Provided to you by:
Trapper and his owner at Laguna Lake Dog Park
Bring a leash and spare pet waste disposal
bags.
Head out early on days that are forecast to
be hot. Your furry friend is a lot closer to the
ground than you are, and it’s much warmer
there.
Bring plenty of water for your pooch and
yourself, especially on warm days.
Be aware of your dog’s ability and general
fitness level.
Be prepared to carry out and properly dispose
of your dog’s waste.
Off-leash dogs are allowed at this
location:
How to have an enjoyable outing with your dog
Laguna Lake Dog Off Leash Park
504 Madonna Road, San Luis Obispo, CAAttachment 4, Page 1 of 2
inside left
Some people are uncomfortable around dogs.
Be mindful of your dog so that other park
visitors are not anxious about their safety.
Be cautious around cattle. Some are startled
by sudden movement or noise.
Pet waste on the trail can ruin an otherwise
pleasant visit to the parks. Always clean up
after your dog.
Leashed and controlled pets are less likely to
get into altercations with other animals.
Keep your dog licensed. That could help you
find your pet if it’s ever lost.
Make sure that your dog gets the mandatory
vaccinations and check for other health
problems regularly.
An unleashed dog could encounter poison
oak, cactus, ticks, coyotes, rattlesnakes, or
other natural hazards. For example, poison
oak can transfer from your dog to you or
another hiker.
Please be a responsible pet
owner by leashing and
cleaning up after your dog.
It will make your outing more
enjoyable for you and
everyone else.
It starts with respect…
Respect Parks and Open Space
Clean up after your dog. Pet waste can
include bacteria and parasites that
can threaten the health of our open space
and the wildlife that lives in it.
Leash your dog. When dogs are allowed to
run loose, they often flush birds and animals
out of their habitats. The fleeing animals use
valuable energy trying to escape, and those
lost calories could be needed to survive or
raise young. Dogs sometimes also dig after
burrowing animals, destroying their homes.
Keep an eye on your dog at all times. You are
responsible for your dog’s behavior.
Bailey and his owner at Emerson Park on leash.
Obey the law
The Leash Law
The City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
Open Space 12.22.050 B
City Parks 12.20.04C3
The Feces Law
The City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
12.08.130C
Respect Others
Respect Your Pet
Licensing
Licenses are required for all dogs four months
of age and older (Section 9.08.160).Attachment 4, Page 2 of 2