Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-15-2018 ATC Agenda Packet1 MISSION: The purpose of the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) is to provide oversight and policy direction on matters related to bicycle and pedestrian transportation in San Luis Obispo and its relationship to bicycling and walking outside the City. ROLL CALL: Lea Brooks (Chair), Ken Kienow (Vice Chair), Jenna Espinosa, Timothy Jouet, Layla Lopez, Jonathan Roberts, and Howard Weisenthal PUBLIC COMMENT: At this time, the public is invited to address the Committee concerning items not on the agenda but are of interest to the public and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Active Transportation Committee. The Committee may not discuss or take action on issues that are not on the agenda other than to briefly respond to statements made or questions raised, or to ask staff to follow up on such issues. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 18, 2018 (Attachment 1), February 27, 2018 (Attachment 2) 1. DISCUSSION ITEM: Funding the Future of SLO (15 min) – Grigsby (or designee) 2. DISCUSSION ITEM: Annual Traffic Safety Report (30 min) – Crisp 3. Committee Items o Adopt-a-Trails Subcommittee (5 min) – Brooks 4. Project Updates (25 min) – Fukushima COMMITTEE AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS (5 min) ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting will be held May 17, 2018 Agenda – Regular Meeting Active Transportation Committee (formerly the Bicycle Advisory Committee) Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo Thursday, March 15, 2018 – 6:00 pm The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and activities. Please contact the Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance. 2 ITEMS: 1. DISCUSSION ITEM: Funding the Future of SLO (15 min) – Grigsby (or designee) The City is making progress on meeting the 2017-2019 Major City Goal of Fiscal Sustainability and Responsibility, which includes addressing capital improvement project goals with available funding. Staff will share the status of achieving this goal including key projects and possible funding mechanisms. Presentation by Public Works Director, Daryl Grigsby or designee. 2. DISCUSSION ITEM: Annual Traffic Safety Report (30 min) – Crisp City staff will present a summary of the bicycle and pedestrian activity in the latest Annual Traffic Safety Report (2016). Attachment 3 is an excerpt from the draft report summarizing collision data including details on the top bicycle and pedestrian collision locations and recommendations for improvements. The entire report can be found at: http://www.slocity.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=18904 Note: This agenda item supports the 2013 Bicycle Transportation Plan Implementation Action 4.13.3, “Present bicycling related statistics from the City’s Annual Traffic Safety Report to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for their consideration and input.” ATTACHMENT 3: Excerpt from the 2016 Annual Traffic Safety Report 3. Committee Items (5 min) • Adopt-a-Trails Subcommittee – Brooks 4. Project and Committee Updates (15 min) • Paving Plan Update • Anholm Bikeway Plan “Middle Section” Update • Active Transportation Plan Update • Bike Rodeo: May 19, 2018 at Hawthorne Elementary • Items for next meeting ✓ _Officer Elections______________________________________ ✓ _____________________________________________________ ✓ _____________________________________________________ 3 The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held: May 17, 2018 ATTACHMENTS: 1. DRAFT January 18, 2018 BAC Minutes 2. DRAFT February 27, 2018 ATC Minutes 3. Excerpt from the 2016 Annual Traffic Safety Report 4. Minor Bike Project Wish List 1 2 3 DRAFT Minutes 4 Bicycle Advisory Committee 5 Council Chamber Room, City Hall, 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo 6 Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. 7 8 MISSION: 9 The purpose of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) is to provide oversight and policy 10 direction on matters related to bicycle transportation in San Luis Obispo and its relationship to 11 bicycling outside the City. 12 13 Lea Brooks (Chair) called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 14 15 ROLL CALL: 16 Present: Lea Brooks (Chair), Ken Kienow (Vice Chair), Jenna Espinosa, Timothy Jouet, 17 Jonathan Roberts, Howard Weisenthal 18 Absent: Layla Lopez 19 Staff: Transportation Planner / Engineer Jennifer Rice, Active Transportation Manager Adam 20 Fukushima, Transportation Manager Jake Hudson, Recording Secretary Lareina Gamboa 21 22 Public Comment on Items Not on the Agenda 23 Lydia Mourenza, resident, reminded the committee and staff that the City would no longer 24 receive funding from the closure of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant and that the Safe Routes to 25 School Plan should be revisited before the City moves forward with it. She has seen a decrease 26 in students heading to Pacheco Elementary School and does not want the city to waste money 27 on a new route that may not get use. 28 29 MINUTES: 30 November 16, 2017 31 CM Howard motioned to approve the Minutes with no amendments. CM Jouet seconded the 32 motion. The motion passed unanimously. 33 December 14, 2017 34 A correction was made about the Adopt-a-Trails subcommittee item to add CM Jouet on the 35 subcommittee, not CM Roberts. 36 37 CM Kienow motioned to approve the Minutes with amendments. CM Weisenthal seconded the 38 motion. The motion passed unanimously. 39 40 ACTION ITEM: 41 42 Agenda Item #1: Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard 43 Attachment 1, Page 1 of 3 44 Transportation staff gave an update on the planning effort for the Broad Street Bicycle 45 Boulevard including a summary of the community outreach conducted over the course of the 46 last year and technical analysis on the two alternatives as determined by the City Council study 47 session on August 15, 2017. Analysis included the benefits and tradeoffs of each alternative. 48 Staff also provided information on the proposed phasing of the project and the performance 49 monitoring proposed throughout the project implementation. 50 51 Public Comment: 52 Lydia Mourenza, resident, informed the committee that most homes were built in the 1920s and 53 30s and were not built with wide parking spaces, or even garages, therefore leaving residents to 54 rely on on-street parking. She also had concerns about the project’s compatibility with garbage 55 and recycling collection. She mentioned challenges with living in a parking district especially on 56 the elderly. 57 58 Garrett Otto, resident, is in favor of the project and believes many in the community want the 59 protected path as well. He is concerned with safety first and encouraging more people to bike. 60 He does not believe that trash collection or driveway access are significant issues. In addition to 61 the Preferred Alternative, he suggested speed humps on Lincoln Street since it is already 62 seeing overflow from those who try to bypass Chorro Street. With the extra traffic calming 63 measures, he encouraged staff to pick a couple of elements from Phase II to push forward a 64 project that some have been waiting a long time for. He understands the Ferrini crossing is very 65 important and should be a high priority but hopes that striping on Chorro and Broad streets 66 would occur during the temporary implementation. 67 68 T. Keith Gurnee, resident, mentioned the lack of garages and driveways for some residents and 69 gave an overview of when his home was built in the 1980s. When he obtained his permit to 70 build, he had to decide on a three-story residence, the garage being the first story, or to park on-71 street. At the time, the City decided there was ample space for on-street parking, so he 72 proceeded with a two-story home. He favors improvements to the underpass but is hoping for 73 the Lincoln Street option. He has made many trips by bicycle and does not see a need for the 74 project. He also has never seen a report on bike vs. car accidents in the area and questions the 75 safety need. 76 77 John Valpa, resident, says his neighborhood is impacted by parking and removing parking 78 would be detrimental to the community. He stated that Chorro Street traffic is too fast and 79 congested. He prefers the Lincoln Street alternative as a place to bike with his grandson and 80 hopes the City will choose that alternative. 81 82 Myron Amerine, resident, thanked staff for all the work they have done in designing and 83 implementing this plan. He supports the full application of the Preferred Alternative and when he 84 bikes and walks he does not, and will not, go out of his way to take the Lincoln route. He asked 85 the Committee to consider City policy, the LUCE 20% mode share goal, and presented 86 percentages from other cities who have succeeded and surpassed this mode share goal. He 87 Attachment 1, Page 2 of 3 also encourages two-way cycle tracks for being more appealing to a wide range of cyclists and 88 hopes they will be pursued more often. 89 90 Liz Silveira, resident, likes Lincoln Street and uses it herself. She thinks more signage could 91 make it better. She worries that the Preferred Alternative will put more vehicular traffic on 92 Lincoln Street, creating a busy side street. She hopes that planters will not be considered on 93 Chorro since there is a question of who will maintain them. She appreciates that the City is 94 encouraging bicycling but wonders where they will park once they reach downtown. 95 96 Questions and Discussion: 97 Staff answered committee questions including those regarding parking demand, trash collection, 98 and the design of the protected bikeway. 99 100 CM Kienow motioned to recommend to the City Council the adoption of the Preferred 101 Alternative. CM Roberts seconded the motion. The motion passed with a majority 5 to 1 vote, 102 with CM Weisenthal voting “no”. 103 104 CM Weisenthal then motioned for a reexamination of the Broad Street Bike Boulevard using 105 minimal diverters, traffic calming devices along Chorro Street with shared lane marking, and that 106 staff investigate the possibility of closing the entrance of US 101 off Broad Street as an 107 alternative to the Preferred Alternative. The motion died for lack of a second. 108 109 COMMITTEE AND STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS 110 ● Applications for BAC members are due on January 19th, and new officer elections will 111 take place at the March meeting. 112 ● There will be a City Council meeting on February 6th. On the agenda is the BAC’s 113 transition to an Active Transportation Committee (ATC). 114 ● As discussed at the December meeting, there will be a special BAC meeting in 115 February. Staff will send a doodle poll to the BAC members to help decide on a few 116 potential dates. 117 118 ADJOURN 119 CM Weisenthal motioned to adjourn the meeting at 8:16 p.m. CM Jouet seconded the motion. 120 The motion passed unanimously. 121 122 Respectfully submitted, 123 124 Lareina Gamboa 125 Recording Secretary 126 127 DRAFT MINUTES TO BE CONSIDERED FOR APPROVAL AT THE MARCH 15, 2018 BAC 128 MEETING 129 Attachment 1, Page 3 of 3 1 2 DRAFT Minutes - Special Meeting 3 Active Transportation Committee 4 (Formerly the Bicycle Advisory Committee) 5 Council Chamber Room, City Hall, 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo 6 Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. 7 8 9 MISSION: 10 The purpose of the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) is to provide oversight and policy 11 direction on matters related to bicycle and pedestrian transportation in San Luis Obispo and its 12 relationship to bicycling and walking outside the City. 13 14 Lea Brooks (Chair) called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 15 16 ROLL CALL: 17 Present: Lea Brooks (Chair), Ken Kienow (Vice Chair), Jenna Espinosa, Timothy Jouet, Layla 18 Lopez (departed at 7:07 p.m.), Jonathan Roberts, Howard Weisenthal 19 Absent: None 20 Staff: Active Transportation Manager Adam Fukushima, Recording Secretary Lareina Gamboa 21 22 Public Comment on Items Not on the Agenda 23 No comments were made. 24 25 MINUTES: 26 No Minutes to approve at this time. 27 28 DISCUSSION ITEMS 29 30 Agenda Item #1: Active Transportation Plan Kickoff 31 Staff presented kicked off the new Active Transportation Plan effort. The Committee gave input 32 on the overall project objectives that will guide the Plan effort and discussed how it would like to 33 be involved in developing the Plan. 34 35 Public Comment 36 Myron Amerine, resident, distributed the City of Sacramento’s pedestrian master plan, and 37 urged the committee and staff to look it over. Amerine also encouraged the list of prioritizing and 38 ranking projects, and suggested any new projects be approached from many angles. He also 39 asked the committee to find a way to incorporate bike and ped elements into new developments 40 the way fire and safety are required. And, reminded the committee that new projects are a great 41 opportunity to include ADA specific improvements. 42 43 Attachment 2, Page 1 of 3 Garrett Otto, resident, hopes the subcommittee will be willing to meet with staff to bike and/or 44 walk corridors that need improvement so as not to have the same prolonged issues that the 45 Anholm bike way had. He also suggested to keep the committee small so broad improvements 46 will continue to take place, and to create objectives, like considering transit users to improve 47 connectivity. Otto also recommended driver education to be addressed in the plan, and perhaps 48 increased fees around schools to discourage the ongoing issue of distracted drivers. 49 50 Committee Discussion 51 Committee discussion centered around developing a subcommittee that would allow a focused 52 effort on the AT Plan development and not use all of the ATC time. They discussed 53 incorporating new developments into the Plan so as not to spend excess money attempting to 54 catch up while connecting gaps. 55 The committee also suggested prioritization of a few key projects that would yield a higher bike 56 mode share. The committee also suggested having a less time consuming process of selecting 57 and prioritizing projects than in the last Bicycle Transportation Plan. 58 59 Agenda Item #2: Minor Bikeway Improvement Projects 60 Staff presented the Paving Plan for summer 2018 including staff suggestions for using minor 61 bikeway improvement funds to augment the new street striping. This included widened bike 62 lanes on Orcutt Road, a widened bike lane on N. Sacramento and a Complete Streets project 63 on Laurel Lane that will add buffered bike lanes, as well as shared lane markings in certain 64 neighborhoods. 65 66 Public Comment 67 Myron Amerine, mentioned that with all of the new homes developing, that there is an important 68 corridor that will need lane widening and feels that the developer should be paying for this. He 69 also asked for green striping to continue southbound on LOVR in front of the main entrance of 70 Irish Hills shopping plaza, as well as just past Whole Foods, where the bike lane pulls out 20%. 71 72 Garrett Otto, encouraged offside improvements for increased safety on Orcutt Road as Righetti 73 Ranch continues to develop. In addition to street widening on Sacramento Street, Mr. Otto 74 requested signage with flashing lights, or a “Your Speed Is” monitor, where the street curves, to 75 slow down drivers. He also asked for the path in Meadow Park to be fixed and expressed desire 76 for a HAWK crossing on Broad Street, and a buffered bike lane on South Higuera where the 77 new Central Coast Brewery is opening. 78 79 Committee Discussion 80 Committee discussion focused on limiting the number of sharrows, investigate the possibility of 81 buffered bike lanes on Orcutt Road and investigate installing green pavement in conflict zones 82 on Los Osos Valley Road that were left over desires from last year’s pavement update. 83 84 Agenda Item #3: Unleashed Dogs on Trails 85 Attachment 2, Page 2 of 3 At the committee’s request, Staff presented information on unleashed dogs including in areas 86 where there are bike paths and open space. Staff gave info on the municipal code section, the 87 associated fines and efforts to encourage more leash use. 88 89 Public Comment 90 Myron Amerine, suggested the committee make a motion to require that Class I facilities 91 enforce the Municipal Code of dogs on leashes. 92 93 Garrett Otto, echoed Mr. Amerine’s comment, but expressed hope for some leeway for obedient 94 dogs on trails, and even mentioned other countries that issue certificates for those obedient 95 dogs and dog owners. 96 97 Committee Discussion 98 Discussion included the possibility of installing a kiosk on the Railroad Safety Trail where free 99 leashes could be provided. Other suggestions included more enforcement efforts, however 100 there was not a consensus among the committee members. Staff was asked for more 101 information for a later time including the number of unleashed dog violations and what the 102 municipal code was for unleashed dogs on regular city streets (not parks or open space). 103 104 ADJOURN 105 106 CM Weisenthal motioned to adjourn the meeting at 8:23 p.m. to a regular scheduled meeting of 107 March 15, 2018. CM Jouet seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 108 109 Respectfully submitted, 110 111 Lareina Gamboa 112 Recording Secretary 113 Attachment 2, Page 3 of 3 12016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Executive Summary  The Public Works & Police Departments are pleased to present the 16th cycle of the City’s annual traffic safety program. The Annual Traffic Safety Program began in 2002 in an attempt to identify high collision locations within the City. In addition, the program actively pursues corrective measures that may reduce collision rates and improve safety within the City. This program has had continued success with a 62% reduction in citywide collisions since the program began, despite increasing traffic volumes. This safety program has demonstrated continued success and again in 2016, total collisions are again the lowest on record, down by 9% from 2015. While reducing the overall collision rate continues to be a priority, over time the safety program has continued to increase focus on the most serious collisions—those that result in severe injuries or death. Because injury collisions require a police report and an investigation by a peace officer, these reports provide a clearer picture of the collision circumstances, and can establish a more reliable year-to-year trend as policies change with regard to collision response. There was one fatality on City Right of Way in 2016, however, not on a City Street. A pedestrian was struck in the sidewalk crossing the railroad tracks on Foothill Boulevard near California. Injury collisions decreased by 10% from the previous year and by 36% from 2002 when the safety program began. Severe injury collisions increased by 186% from 2015, with a 54% increase since 2002. There were more severe collisions this year than any other year since the program began. It is unclear why there was a spike in 2016 but Staff will continue to monitor and determine if 2016 was an anomaly in the next Safety Report. The program also includes thorough evaluations of bicycle and pedestrian safety, as these road users are more vulnerable to serious injury or death from collisions with motor vehicles. Bicycle collision trends have shown an 11% decline from the previous year and a 32% decline from peak levels in 2009. Except for a significant peak in 2013, annual pedestrian collisions have been relatively static since 2008. Although 2016 saw a 17% increase that number only represented 4 additional pedestrian collisions. The following report displays trends in collision history, traffic citations, and traffic safety measures and identifies high-collision rate locations in 2016. As in previous Traffic Safety Reports, staff reviewed all high-collision rate intersections and street segments and has recommended mitigation measures to increase safety at the top five locations in each category. In 2009, the City of San Luis Obispo received the International Public Agency Achievement award from the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) for this program. This award is one of the highest recognitions a public agency can receive for its traffic engineering practices. Attachment 3, Page 1 of 18 22016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Our goal is that the combination of data-driven analysis, appropriate mitigation, and consistent and focused education and enforcement will continue to reduce traffic collisions and improve the safety of our streets for all users. Attachment 3, Page 2 of 18 32016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Introduction  Background  Since its inception in 2002, the annual Traffic Safety Report (TSR) provides an overview of the City of San Luis Obispo’s efforts to monitor and improve safety for all road users. Every year, the City prepares a TSR for the previous twelve- month period with the following specific objectives:  Identify the intersections and street segments within the City associated with the highest collision rates, and thoroughly analyze collision patterns in order to develop potential mitigation measures for the five highest locations that will reduce the potential for collisions—particularly those involving severe injuries and/or fatalities, and;  Identify the predominant pedestrian and bicycle collision types and high- collision locations, and thoroughly analyze collision data and police reports so as to determine potential mitigation measures for the five highest-rate collision locations that may reduce the potential for collisions, and;  Report on traffic enforcement efforts, traffic safety education activities, and evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation measures implemented in the previous twelve month period. The locations mentioned in this report should not be interpreted as a list of dangerous or “least safe” intersections or streets within the City. The specific total of collisions for any location for any year is a function of various factors such as weather patterns, construction, traffic volumes, roadway conditions and driver habits. Many of these factors are often difficult to identify and are most often beyond the ability of the engineer to change or control. However, the City's mitigation program attempts to identify roadway elements that can be modified so as to make the transportation infrastructure more driver friendly, reduce driver confusion, promote bicycle and pedestrian safety and comfort, and limit impact severity. Moving Towards Vision Zero  Vision Zero is a multi-national traffic safety initiative, first initiated in Sweden, with a straightforward message: No loss of life is acceptable. At its core, Vision Zero seeks the elimination of deaths and serious injuries from our roadways. Since 1997, Sweden and other European countries practicing Vision Zero Attachment 3, Page 3 of 18 42016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  have been able to reduce their traffic fatalities by almost 50%. In recent years, Vision Zero has gained steam throughout the United States, with cities such as San Francisco, New York, Portland and Los Angeles adopting Vision Zero Policies and action plans. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), motor vehicle traffic crashes are the number one leading cause of death for people ages 13 through 25 and result in over 30,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. By focusing on not only reducing overall traffic collisions, but preventing severe collisions, particularly to vulnerable users such as pedestrians, bicyclists and people with disabilities, communities can achieve real live benefits and save lives. While the City of San Luis Obispo has not adopted a formal Vision Zero policy, the City has demonstrated a long-standing commitment towards eliminating traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries. Through (a) the data-driven analysis performed in the annual TSR, (b) regular collaboration between City Public Works and Police Departments to identify priorities for focused traffic safety enforcement, and (c) ongoing community education and outreach campaigns, the City is continually striving to improve the safety and efficiency of transportation facilities for all modes and users. Measuring Progress  Progress towards improving traffic safety for all road users is measured in the TSR using the following metrics:  Total collisions, fatalities and serious injuries  Total pedestrian collisions, fatalities and serious injuries  Total bicycle collisions, fatalities and serious injuries The traffic safety data for these metrics is obtained from traffic collision reports provided by the San Luis Obispo Police Department. The TSR for a given year will normally be prepared after City collision statistics become available in April or May of the following year; thus, the data analyzed in this TSR is for the 2016 calendar year. Collision data is reviewed for each intersection and roadway segment within the City and entered into the City Public Works Department’s traffic collision database. Auto, pedestrian and bicycle volumes are then utilized in conjunction with collision totals to calculate collision rates for all locations in the City. Considering the calculated collision rates, as well as collision severity, locations are ranked for each type of intersection and roadway segment within the City. The five highest-ranked collision locations for each category are analyzed in further detail and mitigation measures are presented, where feasible. Attachment 3, Page 4 of 18 52016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Additional discussion regarding the technical analysis methodology applied in this TSR is provided in the Appendix. How to Navigate this Report  The remainder of the 2016 TSR is organized into the following sections:  Citywide Collision Trends – Page 6 How safe are San Luis Obispo’s streets? This section describes the state of traffic safety in the City, discussing trends in traffic collisions from 1999 to 2016.  Traffic Enforcement Measures – Page 11 This section describes traffic enforcement efforts of the City Police Department, discussing traffic citations, DUI arrests and hazardous driving trends.  Ongoing Activities to Make our Streets Safer – Page 14 How are we making San Luis Obispo’s streets safer? This section describes the ongoing efforts to improve the safety of transportation facilities for all modes of travel within the City.  2016 High Collision Rate Locations & Recommendations – Page 18 What have we learned about traffic safety in 2016? This section describes the high collision rate intersections and roadway segments for 2016, and presents potential mitigation recommendations for high-priority locations. Attachment 3, Page 5 of 18 62016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Citywide Collision Trends  Injury collisions are the most accurate representation of City collision trends because these types of collision are most consistently reported and investigated. In 2015, injury collisions decreased by 10% from 2015. Injury collisions are also 36% lower than 2002 when the safety program began. Injury Collision Trend  Fatal Collision Trend  It’s difficult to identify a trend in fatal collisions because these types of collisions are typically sporadic, uncommon, and occur under unusual circumstances. There was one fatal collision within the City in 2016. A pedestrian was struck in the sidewalk while crossing the railroad tracks on Foothill Boulevard near California. Further, fatal and severe injury collisions decreased by 12% from 2014, with a 43% reduction since 2002. 240 267 268 309 308 315 285 250 257 240 236 233 220 191 207 201 220 197 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 290 310 330 Injury CollisionsYear Injury Collisions 22 110 4 3 2 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 111 0 1 2 3 4 5 Fatal CollisionsYear Fatal Collisions Attachment 3, Page 6 of 18 72016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016   Overall Collision Trend  In 2016 there were 482 total reported collisions in the City—the lowest total on record, down 9% from 2015 and down 62% from the introduction of the safety program. It should be noted that the Overall Collision chart above does not represent all collisions that occur in the City—merely all reported collisions occurring on public streets for which a report is generated. Many collisions are either unreported by the involved parties, reported by the parties without an officer investigation, or there is no response to the collision by emergency services. Therefore, the actual total collisions may vary between years. A more accurate measure are the injury and fatal collision trends, as police always respond to collisions where the reporting party indicates there is an injury. 910 1023 1140 1256 1097 1207 1089 873 866 793 683 598 619 594 570 548 531 482 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Total CollisionsYear Attachment 3, Page 7 of 18 82016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Pedestrian Collision Trend  Despite rising pedestrian volumes, pedestrian collisions have remained relatively static since 2008, with the exception of an unexplained spike in 2013. In 2016, the number of pedestrian collisions rose slightly but have returned to that of the recent trend. Bicycle Collision Trend  Despite rising bicycle volumes, bicycle collisions have generally been on the decline in recent years. Bicycle collision trends have shown a 32% decline from peak levels in 2009. In 2016, bicycle collision totals returned to the 2014 total which represented an 11% decrease from 2015. 24 37 19 41 24 41 26 27 18 25 24 22 24 26 39 24 23 27 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Pedestrian CollisionsYear 52 46 45 53 55 50 55 61 59 59 73 69 67 69 63 50 56 50 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Bicycle CollisionsYear Attachment 3, Page 8 of 18 92016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Pedestrian and Bicycle Serious Injuries and Fatalities  Over the past five years (2012-2016), 2,725 traffic collisions have been reported in the City—about 545 per year. Roughly 16% of these collisions involved a bicyclist or pedestrian. However, as illustrated in the graphic below, 46% of the collisions resulting in severe injury or death involved a bicyclist or pedestrian. These trends indicate that bicyclists and pedestrians are overrepresented in collisions that resulted in severe and life-threatening injuries and there is continued need for mitigation strategies that target bicycle and pedestrian collisions. Human and Economic Impact  Traffic collisions result in direct economic costs to those involved—wages and productivity losses, medical expenses and legal costs, and motor vehicle damages—but, this represents only a portion of total costs associated with collisions. Traffic collisions also have indirect impacts to the families of those involved, employers and society as a whole. A study by the NHTSA found that more than 75 percent of collision costs are born by society in the form of insurance premiums, taxes and congestion-related costs such as travel delay, excess fuel consumption and lost quality of life associated with deaths and injuries. Comprehensive costs include the economic cost components associated with traffic collisions, but also the indirect societal costs. Using cost estimates by crash severity published in the American Association of State Highway transportation Officials’ (AASHTO) Highway Safety Manual, adjusted to reflect 2016 dollars, the comprehensive costs associated with the 531 citywide traffic collisions occurring in 2016 were calculated to be more than $25 million. Comprehensive collision costs for 2016 by collision type are summarized in Table 1 below. Attachment 3, Page 9 of 18 152016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Location Project Description Highland Drive Centerline striping added as part of 2016 roadway resurfacing project. Sight Distance Improvements Cerro Romauldo & Ferrini Installed parking restriction. Cerro Romauldo & La Canada Installed parking restriction. Cerro Romauldo & Santa Lucia Installed parking restriction. Other Projects/Programs Fixilini NTM Construction Construct permanent traffic diverter at Fixilini Street & Iris Street intersection. Completed in spring 2016. South Chorro NTM Test Project Install temporary neighborhood traffic circles at Chorro & Islay, Chorro & Church and Chorro & High. Completed in winter of 2016. *Project recommended in previous Traffic Safety Report Traffic Safety Education Campaigns  Between City-led efforts and activities led by local partners, such as Bike SLO County and SLOCOG/Rideshare, there are a multitude of ongoing traffic safety education and outreach campaigns provided to the community of San Luis Obispo each year. Key education and outreach activities are summarized below:  Partnership with the California Office of Traffic Safety A Selective Enforcement Grant funds a full-time DUI officer position. This officer is utilized specifically for DUI enforcement in an effort to further reduce the number of alcohol and drug related driving incidents.  Bicycle Rodeo The City hosts a hands-on bicycle training class targeting youth teaching bicycle skills & operations.  Pedestrian Halloween Safety Campaign The City provides reflective Halloween bags with safety tips to local schools free of cost.  Impaired Driver Offender Classes City officers attend and supplement DUI offender courses to provide a unique positive opportunity to discuss, face to face, the impacts of driving under the influence.  Every Fifteen Minutes Program The City participates in a multi department and agency event simulating the psychological effects of student fatalities as a result of traffic collisions. Attachment 3, Page 10 of 18 162016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016   Child Car Seat Instruction & Assistance The City provides child safety seat installation and inspection free of cost.  Channel 20 Public Safety Announcements  Bicycle Safety Posters  City of SLO Partnerships: Bike SLO County  Safety Education Courses  Elementary School Safety Assemblies  Safety Brown Bag Lunch at Participating Businesses SLOCOG/SLO Rideshare  Safe Routes to School Program Perception of Transportation Safety – Utilizing Public Input  While the Traffic Safety Program has proven to be a useful tool for identifying citywide collision trends and prioritizing locations for safety improvement projects, the process relies on collisions to occur and be recorded by the City Police Department. An inherent limitation with this process is that locations that may have perceived safety or comfort issues for road users are not identified by City staff unless actual incidents are shown in the collision data. For locations such as a crossing where drivers fail to yield to pedestrians, or a traffic signal where bicyclists are not given sufficient green time to comfortably pass through the intersection, these issues may not be highlighted unless residents submit a specific complaint or an actual collision occurs. To improve the ability of City staff to appropriately consider locations where the transportation safety or comfort concerns are perceived by the public, the City Public Works Department is in the process of developing an interactive public input map where users can pinpoint locations and provide comments describing safety concerns that they have observed. The New York City Department of As part of their Vision Zero program, the NYCDOT uses an online transportation safety public input map to allow citizens to identify problem locations in the city. Attachment 3, Page 11 of 18 172016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Transportation developed a similar tool as part of their Vision Zero program to solicit public input on various safety concerns throughout the city. Ultimately, this perception map would be utilized by the City of San Luis Obispo to complement the existing Traffic Safety Program to develop a more holistic understanding of the transportation safety and mobility needs off all our road users. Attachment 3, Page 12 of 18 232016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  The most common factors attributed to recorded collisions in 2016 are summarized in Table 3 below. Improper turning movements and speeding represent the most prevalent factors in overall collisions and injury collisions. Pedestrian Right of Way is not ranked in the top 5 of All Collisions (7th at 4%), but represented 15% of the Severe Injury and Fatal Collisions. DUI along with Unsafe Speed ranks as the other most prevalent factor attributed to severe injury and fatal collisions. Table 3: Primary Collision Factors Factor Rank % All Collisions Unsafe Speed 1 26% Improper Turning 2 20% Unsafe Starting or Backing 3 11% DUI 4 10% Traffic Signal/Sign Violation 5 9% Injury Collisions Unsafe Speed 1 32% Traffic Signal/Sign Violation 2 12% Improper Turning 3 11% Pedestrian Right of Way 4 9% Unsafe Starting or Backing 58% Severe Injury & Fatal Collisions Unsafe Speed 1 25% DUI 2 15% Pedestrian Right of Way 3 15% Automobile Right of Way 4 10% Improper Turning 5 10% The table below lists the pedestrian collisions by type recorded in 2016, as well as the party at fault. As shown in the table, motorist failure to yield during various movements were the most frequent types of reported pedestrian collisions. The large majority (90%) of pedestrian collisions were the result of motorist fault. Table 4: Pedestrian Collisions by Type Pedestrian Collision Type No.%Party at Fault % Cyclist on Sidewalk 1 5% Driver 95% Motorist Failed to yield 16 80% Cyclist 5% Motorist Failed to Stop 1 5% Motorist Backing 1 5% Motorist Improper Turn 1 5% Total 20 100% Attachment 3, Page 13 of 18 242016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  The table below lists the bicycle collisions by type recorded in 2016, as well as the party at fault. Cyclists losing control/hitting fixed objects and failing to yield the right of way to the motorists, and motorist right-turn movements were the most common types of bicycle collisions reported. About 60% of reported bicycle collisions were the fault of the bicyclist. Table 5: Bicycle Collisions by Type Bicycle Collision Type No. % Party at Fault % Cyclist Lost Control 11 22% Driver 40% Cyclist Failed to Yield 8 16% Bicyclist 60% Motorist Right-Turn 6 12% Motorist Failed to Yield 6 12% Motorist Left-Turn 5 10% Cyclist Lane Change 4 6% Cyclist Under the Influence 3 6% Wrong-Way Cyclist 2 4% Motorist Overtaking or Sideswipe 2 4% Cyclist on Sidewalk 1 2% Motorist Starting or Backing 1 2% Cyclist no Light 1 2% Total 50 100% Attachment 3, Page 14 of 18 252016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  High Collision Rate Locations – Pedestrians  Rank Prev. Year Rank Intersection Control 5 Yr. Collisions PH Veh. Vol PH Ped. Vol REV 1 NR Santa Rosa & Montalban SSSC 3 3,347 25 2,008 2 1 Santa Rosa & Walnut Signal 4 2,741 29 1,890 3 2 Santa Rosa & Olive Signal 4 3,436 39 1,762 4 3 Foothill & Santa Rosa Signal 4 4,126 106 778 5 5 Santa Rosa & Monterey Signal 5 2,166 227 239 6 NR Foothill & Carpenter SSSC 3 905 100 136 7 NR Broad & Higuera Signal 6 1,158 242 40 8 8 Marsh & Chorro Signal 3 1,507 988 26 9 NR Higuera & Chorro Signal 3 1,315 1,680 12 NR = Not Ranked SSSC = Side Street Stop-Control PH = Peak Hour REV = Relative Exposure Value Attachment 3, Page 15 of 18 262016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Pedestrian Location Recommendations  Rank Intersection Control 5 Yr. Collisions PH Veh. Vol PH Ped. Vol REV 1 Santa Rosa & Montalban SSSC 3 3,347 25 2,008 Pattern: Turning traffic failing to yield to pedestrians. Recommendation: Paint crosswalks across Montalban on both sides of Santa Rosa to more clearly define the crosswalk and where vehicles should stop and wait. 2 Santa Rosa & Walnut Signal 4 2,741 29 1,890 Pattern: Turning traffic not yielding to pedestrians and unsafe pedestrian crossings. Recommendation: Intersection under State jurisdiction. Forward to Caltrans for study and continue to monitor in 2017. 3 Santa Rosa & Olive Signal 4 3,436 39 1,762 Pattern: Turning traffic failing to yield to pedestrians. Recommendation: Intersection under State jurisdiction. Forward to Caltrans for study and continue to monitor in 2017. 4 Foothill & Santa Rosa Signal 4 4,126 106 778 Pattern: Turning traffic failing to yield to pedestrians. Recommendation: Intersection under State jurisdiction. Forward to Caltrans for study and continue to monitor in 2017. 5 Santa Rosa & Monterey Signal 5 2,166 227 239 Pattern: Turning traffic failing to yield to pedestrians. Recommendation: Yield to Pedestrian signs installed in April of 2011. Advanced Pedestrian Phasing implemented in spring of 2016. Flashing Yellow Arrows were installed in late 2016. No pedestrian collisions occurred after the installation of the Flashing Yellow Arrows. Continue to monitor and report it 2017 Traffic Safety Report. Attachment 3, Page 16 of 18 272016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  High Collision Rate Locations – Bicycles  Rank Prev. Year Rank Intersection Control 5 Yr. Collisions PH Veh. Vol PH Bike. Vol REV 1 2 Santa Rosa & Olive Signal 4 3,436 19 3,617 2 8 California & Monterey Signal 7 1,902 38 1,752 3 7 Foothill & Santa Rosa Signal 5 4,126 70 1,474 4 NR Broad & South Signal 3 3,350 41 1,226 5 4 California & 101 N/B Ramps SSSC 4 1,528 27 1,132 6 3 California & Taft SSSC 4 1,680 35 960 7 NR Grand & Mill SSSC 3 576 9 960 8 NR Madonna & Oceanaire Signal 3 2,292 36 955 9 11 Broad & Leff SSSC 3 1,017 16 953 10 9 California & Palm SSSC 4 957 30 638 11 10 California & Foothill Signal 3 2,041 145 211 NR = Not Ranked AWSC = All-way Stop-Control SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Control PH = Peak Hour REV = Relative Exposure Value Attachment 3, Page 17 of 18 282016 Traffic Safety Report September 2016  Bicycle Location Recommendations  Rank Intersection Control 5 Yr. Collisions PH Veh. Vol PH Bike. Vol REV 1 Santa Rosa & Olive Signal 4 3,436 19 3,617 Pattern: Vehicles travelling NB on Santa Rosa turning right are causing "right hook" collisions. Recommendation: Green bike lane extensions through intersections installed along Santa Rosa from Walnut to Montalban in August of 2015 and reinstalled in July 2016. Only collisions in 2016 were due to red light violations. Continue to monitor in 2017. 2 California & Monterey Signal 7 1,902 38 1,752 Pattern: NB vehicle vs. NB bicyclist right-hook collisions. Recommendation: Green bike lanes were reinstalled and only collisions in 2016 were red light violations. 3 Foothill & Santa Rosa Signal 5 4,126 70 1,474 Pattern: No discernible pattern. Recommendation: Intersection under State jurisdiction. Forward to Caltrans for study and continue to monitor in 2017. 4 Broad & South Signal 3 3,350 41 1,226 Pattern: No discernible pattern Recommendation: Continue to monitor in 2017. 5 California & 101 N/B Ramps SSSC 4 1,528 27 1,132 Pattern: Cyclists vs. NB motorists turning left onto HWY 101 ramp and/or coming from HWY 101 ramps. Recommendation: Green bike lanes were installed and there were no collisions in 2016. Continue to monitor. Attachment 3, Page 18 of 18 Project Status Notes Cost Priority drainage grate upgrades at San Luis Drive (north of Johnson), California at CHP office, 2 at Santa Barbara at Broad, Broad SB near South Street, Madonna near S. Higuera high green bike lanes on LOVR on areas left over from the 2017 paving high 2018 summer paving plan improvements $60k high replace concrete landing on Jennifer Street Bridge $20k high Improvements to path between Sinsheimer Park and RRST request forwarded to School District School Dist not able to bring improvements at this time medium sharrow on Monterey st by the Fremont theatre medium Actuation for Bikes on Broad and Upham crossing medium Ped and bike crossing improvements on South St at King medium flip stop signs on Morro and Pismo to favor bike blvd medium Ped improvements on South St at King medium bike box at Chorro / Foothill in engineering phase medium Address car parking in bike lane on EB South St medium pavement maintenance at Monday Club bridge over creek low correct light angled on Jennifer St bridge need clarification of light location low install sharrows and signage on Chorro between Palm and Monterey anticipated as part of Broad Street Bike Blvd construction low King Street to Meadow Park ramp low drainage issues in bike lane on Orcutt near Tank Farm low flip yield sign on Jennifer Street bridge low removal of bollards on pathway at Exposition and Bridge streets low Remove/move side railing on Jennifer Street Bridge low bike lane improvements on LOVR bridge Completed!high Remove parking on California Street at Higuera to improve sight distance Completed!low green bike lanes in front of Marigold Plaza on Los Osos Valley Road Completed!high Parking removed on California Street at Higuera to improve sight distance for bike lane Completed!medium improve delination between bike lane and travel lane on Completed!medium green bike lanes on Santa Rosa at Olive completed!high Improve delineation between bike lane and travel lane on southbound S. Higuera to Madonna Rd completed!high Remove bollards on the path behind Monday Club Completed! high removal of three parking spaces on NB California Blvd at Marsh Completed!high Remove single bollard on Railroad Safety Trail at George/Jennifer Street trailhead Completed! The three bollards on the curb ramp make this single bollard on the trailhead redundant high Yield markings and a push button beacon at the Broad Street at Upham ped crossing Completed!high Last Updated: 03/09/2018 Minor Bike Project Wish List: Annual Allocation $100k Attachment 4, Page 1 of 1