HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-02-2018 Item 4 - Cooper1
Tonikian, Victoria
From:Allan Cooper <
Sent:Saturday, March 31, 2018 1:40 PM
To:Davidson, Doug; Leveille, Brian; Advisory Bodies; CityClerk
Subject:667 Monterey Street
Attachments:103_31_18...lettertoarc.pdf
Dear Doug and Brian -
Would you kindly forward the letter attached below to the
Architectural Review Commission so that the
Commissioners will have time to read it before their
Monday, April 2, 2018 meeting? Happy Easter and thanks!
- Allan
To: Architectural Review Commission and Brian LeVeille, Senior Planner
Re 667 Monterey Street - Review of revisions to a previously approved mixed-use
project in the Downtown Historic District
From: Allan Cooper, Secretary Save Our Downtown
Date: March 31, 2018
Honorable Chair Wynn and Commissioners -
Staff states the following: “The proposed revised project has a modern style more reflective of
contemporary design intent…” and “The project site is in a transition zone of the Downtown
where development includes buildings with varying heights and architectural styles…” and
“The modern elements of the revised design also appear compatible with the contemporary
design of the neighboring Children’s Museum”. With the exception of the Children’s Museum,
there is no other indication presently that this could be described as a “transition zone”.
And staff has misidentified the Children’s Museum as a “contemporary design” structure. The
Children’s Museum was an attempt, albeit crude, to reflect the warehouse aesthetic that once
prevailed at this end of town, i.e., the reconstructed Soda Water Works, the Bambu Batu, Old
World Rugs and Antique Boutique building with its characteristic stamped metal and
corrugated metal siding and the concrete block and corrugated metal aesthetic of The
Creamery which will be further accentuated with The Creamery Marketplace (more corrugated
siding) and 560 Higuera Street (more concrete block).
1023 Broad Street
Creamery Marketplace
560 Higuera
It should further be emphasized here that 1010 Nipomo Street (the Children’s Museum) has
been singled out on page 40 in SLO’s “Historic Preservation Program Guidelines” as a “non-
contributing architectural style” and therefore does not qualify as a standard for “compatibility”
in this otherwise historic neighborhood. On page 15 of SLO’s Community Design Guidelines
you will find under the heading “general architectural design guidelines”: “Design factors that
contribute to neighborhood compatibility include: a. Appropriate design theme;…d.
Appropriate colors, textures, and building materials.” In order to scale down an already over
tall structure please ask the architect to reconsider, as was recommended by the CHC, using
the color white throughout.
The design theme for this building calls to mind two other buildings (see below) designed by
the same architectural firm. The first was proposed to be located on Olive Street (which is
clearly not located within an historic district) and the second was proposed to be located at
1321/1327 Osos Street. The latter project was located within the Downtown Historic District
and was denied by the CHC at their June 23, 2014 meeting.
The project encompasses 38,420 square feet, including an adjacent site for additionalparking. The property is now home to four buildings and a 15-space parking lot. It isaccessed by pedestrian and vehicle traffic on Higuera Street as well as a parking lot offNipomo Street. It sits along San Luis Creek and lies next to a medium-high densityneighborhood.
A rendering shows how the Creamery would look after a proposed remodel and expansion.
The largest component of the project is the construction of a new, 2,880-square-foot
commercial building along the western property line called the Farmer’s Building, which
will house up to four retail units done in an agrarian-industrial design, according to a staff
report. A structure on the east side of the property used for years as a storage facility
behind Ciopinot on Nipomo Street will be converted into a taqueria.
The existing parking lot will make way for a 400- square-foot pedestrian courtyard, and
the remodel of an improved trash enclosure will be built next to Spike’s Pub.
Spike’s will demolish its back room, which was built in the 1980s and is considered a
nonhistoric addition, and construct a new back room as a secondary dining area. That
back room will include a rollup door opening to a patio as part of the plaza.
The project also entails extensive repair and repainting to the existing structures,
installation of metal awnings, and a complete landscape remodel. Parking will be moved
off-site to an adjacent parcel at 560 Higuera St.
p a g e 6 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n
g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n
1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1
p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m
Site & Landscape Design
In conjunction with the revised building architecture, site and landscaping improvements for this
infill redevelopment project will continue to include hard and soft-scape public areas, including
drought-tolerant, climate appropriate plantings and materials. The existing vehicular driveways
off of Monterey Street will be consolidated into a single private vehicular access point for the
project, in order to reduce traffic conflicts and provide more street exposure for pedestrian-
oriented commercial uses. Where possible, additional on-site landscape areas will be provided
to complement and enhance the aesthetics and sustainable architecture of the proposed
project. The strategically located upper level common walkways not only provide an
architectural break on each level, but will be treated as an inviting communal area to encourage
interaction between the residential users. The exterior ground-floor commercial pedestrian
paseo areas will be finished in colored and textured concrete or paver materials, intended to
enhance the pedestrian experience and provide human scale.. All new on and off-site plant
material will be drought tolerant and irrigated with typical water-conserving systems. In
addition, all required residential parking for the proposed project will be provided on-site via
private basement-level parking garage. The basement level will also provide required short and
long-term bicycle parking, designed to encourage alternate modes of transportation.
Proposed commercial signage will consist of building or canopy-mounted identification signage
to denote the various commercial retail businesses on the ground floor, along with wall-
mounted icon or individual logo signs to denote individual business within the development. All
business and directional signage will be integrated into the architecture of the project, including
building and address numbers located along the public way. All proposed signage will comply
with the city’s adopted sign regulations.
Attachment 4
CHC 3 - 31
Pacific Courtyards Project (ARC 96-13; 1321 & 1327 Osos Street) Cultural Heritage Committee - June 23, 2014 Page 8 Osos Street
The Osos Street building elevation has a flat roof and substantial amounts of glazing. It is lower
in height than the adjacent historic church to the west and somewhat taller than the rectilinear
and flat roof Rio Bravo apartments built in 1918 to the east. Figure 5 includes a comparison
between the plans reviewed last November and the current proposal (Sheet 2 of the comparison
plans).
Staff’s Analysis: Looking at the two elevations side by side, a case could be made that the
original version with its darker base and neutral palette appears more recessive and is as
compatible as, or more compatible than, the revised version. The advantage of the revised
elevation is that it has more modulation in wall planes afforded by the second and third level
decks and the void created by the central courtyard above the podium. In addition, the elevation
includes ground floor fenestration provided by having some office space at the street level.
However, neither elevation complements the streetscape and both look overly severe and boxy.
Figure 5. Osos Street elevation
CHC1 - 8
As you can see from the above four illustrations, a reoccurring signature architectural element
is the use of large, heavy grid-like elements which frame deeply recessed large plate glass
windows and cantilevered balconies. Per SLO’s HPP Guideline 3.2.1 “New structures in
historic districts shall be designed tone architecturally compatible with the district’s prevailing
historic character as measured by their consistency with scale, massing, rhythm, signature
architectural elements, exterior materials, siting and street yard setbacks…” As you would
readily concede, the three “contemporary” buildings below, which clearly reiterate these
signature architectural elements, would never be allowed in our Downtown Historic District.
Thank you!
p a g e 8 g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n
g a r c i a a r c h i t e c t u r e + d e s i g n
1 3 0 8 m o n t e r e y s t r e e t , s u I t e 2 3 0 , s a n l u i s o b i s p o , c a l i f o r n i a 9 3 4 0 1
p h o n e 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 0 f a x 8 0 5 . 7 8 3 . 1 8 8 1 w w w . g a r c i a a r c h d e s i g n . c o m
3. The project complies with all applicable City Design Guidelines; 4. There currently exists adequate public facilities, services and utilities to serve the proposed project; 5. The size, scale, and building design features are highly suited to the site and surrounding neighborhood, and will be compatible with the character of the current and future land uses and development intended for the surrounding neighborhood by the General Plan and Zoning Code; 6. The site is adequate for the proposed project, has access to existing public streets; and 7. The establishment and operation of the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity of the proposed project, nor will the project be detrimental or injurious to neighboring property or improvements, nor the general welfare of the City. Given the city’s goals and objectives to seek and provide more infill residential housing units, especially in the downtown core, this revised project will meet the city’s current desire and vision to encourage more in-fill redevelopment, as well as support the city’s short and long-term policy objectives for inclusionary housing components within mixed use redevelopment projects. Summary Monterey Place will bring long anticipated redevelopment to neglected, in-fill parcels of land along the historic Monterey Street downtown district. This environmentally responsible Smart
Growth in-fill project will also help fulfil the city’s mandated goals of providing additional market-
rate and affordable housing units to the greater San Luis Obispo region.
Attachment 4
CHC 3 - 33