HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-07-13 Minutes
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ELECTION CAMPAIGN REGULATIONS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Finance and IT Conference Room, 990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, California
CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the Election Campaign Regulation Committee was called to order on
Thursday, November 7, 2013, at 4:30 p.m. in the Finance and IT Conference Room,
located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, by Chair Griffin.
ROLL CALL
Committee Members
Present: Jeri Carrol, Andrea Devitt, Wilda Rosene, Bob Shanbrom*, Vice Chair
Allen Settle, Chair Ty Griffin
* Committee Member Bob Shanbrom arrived at 5:12 p.m.
Committee Member
Absent: None
Staff Present: Christine Dietrick, City Attorney, Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk, and
Heather Goodwin, Deputy City Clerk
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
By unanimous consensus, the Committee approved of the minutes of the
Election Campaign Regulation Committee Meeting of October 24, 2013.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no members of the public desiring to speak.
Minutes - Election Campaign Regulation Committee Page 2
3. ACTION PLAN FOR DISCUSSION
Correspondence from Stew Jenkins concerning Election Campaign Regulations
dated November 5, 2013
In response to Committee inquiry, City Attorney Dietrick summarized the
allegations and potential implications raised in the correspondence received from
Mr. Jenkins; noted that Mr. Jenkins letter indicates that individual contribution
limits are effectively not going to withstand constitutional scrutiny over time and
recommends that the regulations be allowed to expire to avoid a legal challenge
in the future.
By unanimous consensus (with Committee Member Shanbrom absent), it was
recommended that the Election Campaign Regulations be extended for an
additional four year period.
Following discussion, it was agreed that the committee will reconsider Mr.
Jenkins letter after considering other agenda items.
Review the Role of the City Attorney in the Enforcement of the Existing
Ordinance
City Attorney Dietrick advised that there is potential that the public may perceive
a conflict of interest when she is required to enforce Election Campaign
Regulations against incumbent Council Members. In response to Committee
inquiry, Ms. Dietrick explained that her state bar ethical obligations require that if
she was unable to independently pursue her role that she would seek an
independent outside prosecutor.
Following discussion and by unanimous consensus (with Committee Member
Shanbrom absent), it was recommended that Code Section 2.40.100 Civil
Actions remain unchanged and the City Attorney retain her role as prosecutor in
relation to Election Campaign Regulations.
Correspondence from Bob Shanbrom concerning Election Campaign
Regulations dated November 6, 2013
Chair Griffin pointed out that Committee Member Shanbrom has recommend ed
the inclusion of the term “transparency” to Code Section 2.40.020(A)(1). The
Committee agreed that the purpose and intent statement already embodies the
sentiment of transparency and it is not necessary to revise the code.
Minutes - Election Campaign Regulation Committee Page 3
Supplemental City Statement
Committee discussion ensued relative to the impacts of requiring disclosure of
contributions greater than $50, but less than $100, on the supplemental city
campaign statement. By unanimous consensus (with Committee Member
Shanbrom absent), it is recommended that the supplemental city campaign
statement be eliminated.
Contribution Limits
During the course of deliberations, individual Committee Member(s) offered
commentary as follows. The below points do not necessarily reflect Committee
consensus:
People do not get power and influence from making campaign
contributions.
Other local races such as County Supervisor and School Board Members
do not have contribution limits.
It is not appropriate to retain contribution limits just because it’s the way
things have been done.
There is a perception that money buys access and drives public policy.
If large sums of money are contributed, how does an elected portray
themself as impartial representative of the community?
When money gets out of control, you don’t have a representative
government or democracy.
If Political Action Committees injected large contributions into a local
election it would be headline news.
It is a political issue to remove contribution limits and that should be a
decision of the Council.
It is highly unlikely that a developer’s contributions to a Council Member
would impact the outcome of a project before Council.
Contribution limits should be raised to $400 because it is difficult to keep
books with odd numbers.
If the Committee desires to raise the contribution limits, there would be a
higher rate of success if $300 is recommended.
The Committee should make policy recommendations based on our
opinions and not on what Council will approve.
By consensus (with Committee Member Devitt opposed and Committee Member
Shanbrom absent), it is recommended that contribution limits be raised to $300.
City Attorney Dietrick advised that the Council Agenda Report will include an
evaluation of the legal factors addressed in the correspondence by Stew Jenkins;
noted that if litigation is filled by Mr. Jenkins the Council will decide if defending
the principles of contribution limits is in the best interest of the City.
Minutes - Election Campaign Regulation Committee Page 4
Committee Member Shanbrom arrived at 5:12 p.m.
Committee Member Devitt expressed grave concern that the committee is
moving forward with retaining contribution limits despite the risk of litigation by
Stew Jenkins.
Chair Griffin noted for the record that the Committee read and discussed the
correspondence from Mr. Jenkins and it is recommending that contribution limits
be retained
Representative to Present Recommendations to Council
By straw poll vote, the committee selected Ty Griffin to present its
recommendations to Council.
4. ADJOURNMENT
The Committee agreed that it has concluded its business and no further
meetings are necessary. The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
Anthony J. Mejia
City Clerk