HomeMy WebLinkAboutBox 1_015_Box-242 - LOT PETITION_PROGRAM MATERIAL ' /
MURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY �
�� ���o� C�
9
c O
I `' � 3rd Q�G� �����. ��
0
3 � p Q�' ���
I �o $ ? 2nd D O ,��i.
: � o�o�
�Sr �
_ _..� > .` � . -. ..�
r � s e� �\�� � �, , :
- • � 9 I
' � � �
.. • �l�' � 9 S'9 � O �
' � ��� F •
' O o�� F-I- ..�_•
� �
� �
. O ��'J -
O � �
� ��� �5
� O
: O �'
1��7 $ Q�
I ���'
<<n E 2�� : ,�� '�,� Q�� r��
0
S'JQv�Y � � ,yo �.. ��,
�
�° O � o �.. '�q, �y�
I p� �� Q� Po QZ,P�`' 9�.G
� J�� � �a y
. ��G ��� Q��� V
I � \ O o
� Q O ti
O O '� s
I e� '� �� � °�
� Q �, �
I � �� ,� � �,V O
. y � �
4P�, c��' G O •
y. . O a �
� � W
• �
. � o �¢ ¢
� � �
m
HIG ' '
. ¢
z HFSKIN �
. � w . . � - N .�
� w
� w
� m
SOUTH = SOUTH S U
G�
��
��
, ,.� ,
STREETS 18 ���
94 a
o - Soo �000
�" � ���-o ���� � SCALE IN METER
�U� � .20D9 p 1000 2000 3000 4000
SCALE IN FEET '
• ./ .
IdURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY �
�� ����� C�9
S� 3rd c� O�O
' �pat o V Q�,+� �,�,\
I o z � �� O �
� W 2nd D �, Q ���
_ . - a��2
1st �
-- -�-J > � -� � � . ..�
r � � e� =
;r ��J' `G �
� � 9 y � .
_ ' ��* s9 e� O I
I � ��� F :
: O oa� F�.. �_ .
I �
O �
O �GJ �
. O � ,�,
' ���' P�5
O
' O �2'
/P�7 ' � Q� /
I O
���E 2�L : ,� ' O . ,r Q�' °�o \��'
� o
S'vRvEy,� .. � � � ,yo ,.. �
�'° � o � ' '�,� c'�
I p�'P O OP Q� . � �� �' 9
. � -�-
� �Gy
I ��-� ��
• �.�G ��
� P�y� e� v
`a Q� O O . oti
� O O s
� O ��`' � �D(� y�- 02
a 9 � �
( � �,, �, l/ �,`�' O
- y �SO
�P�, c��A G O •
S-. � O a �
I � w
� �
. �i o m Q ¢
� N �
Q
HIG m • '
. F
Z HASKIN
� W �
w '�'
� W
C� m
SOUTH = SOUTFi S
�'� ��,a
F�
. �
STREETS 1894 ��°-
a
� 500 1000
�' � �fl�� ��1� � SCALE IN METER
Jv, y '2��9 p 1000 2000 3000 4000
SCALE IN FEET� j
/
MURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY �
o`� c —
���� �\� �9ti
`'� 3rd G� c�G . \� Op .
I ����a" � U QE$' i^�' `a O��
� = O P��
I = � 2nd D 9 Q ���
: - a��
,St o .
_..� > .` � .- _. .--,
r�� - � � � � =
.�
s,� �„��' �so � ,
, o � ,� Q� y D : .
^ I �+ °�� s9 ��� �
: O �� F+ "�_..
O .�°.
I � ��,,
. O a
O �
I ��" P��
O �
. m O
�P�� ' � Q�
O
i °� ���'
C�n�Qa.� : o -� O soe �
,� � ,
��av�Y� m � O �� �.. ,� ��'
�,° 0 9 �, ����
I o�'" °�, Q� �� e,�' �.G
: � � ��
�
, � ��GJ �� �
� Ci� QP'C' V
• �� Q\ O � oy
' O y O
� �Fy� � �D � 2
• O �
� `. � a ,r a� �,� .O
; � �A � O s
n �S O a W
I, � ti.. �� o Q �
. .yi m �
�� Q N
HIG m . �
. �
Z WtSKIN
a
¢ �
w
W m
� w
C� ap
SOUT}{ = SOUTH S
G�
��
��
, �
�
STRE�T� 1894 �a
0 500 1�00
.I. n �f120 �i..l� � SCALE IN METER
J�1 % �oa9 o i000 z000 a000 a000
SCALE IN FEET �
' / .
MURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY �
� �\�o� C�9
��
� O2
''� 3rd G�, 5'P \� �
� �o�� � � QEA °h��
I � � z"° D �' Q� ����
: � = W a��
,Sr o .
_..� > .� � �- -� --,
� . /\ �G e� . �
. \V Sy �\�� v y� \ I
� � 9 QW' y
: ��p�' o S 0 �
^ I S' � y ���
• O �� �+ . ••�
� �,O
� �J O
� .
. O �
O �
� ��" P��
a O �
. O
���� ' � Q�
O
� �9 C\�
�rD'cQ�L : � '� O �,oQ o
S'JQ v�Y� - 4 � � � ',r�.. ti��.
m � 0 9 ,�,� ��G.�
I o� O 0� Q\ �O Q� �G
. � y
� J�� �a
• � �,\G � ��E\G
I ��5 Q Q\ O O' � v�'S'
. � y s�
� B yF �
: � � D � �
� 4� � 0
� � �� � �
; ,�. y L,j, O J
C �� O a w
(. ti .. � _
' �� � m
z �
a
HIG m . '
, �
Z HASKIN
¢ N
� W
� W
C� m
SOUTH = SOUTH
G�
��
��
. �
� � ���
STR E S 1 �94 a
o Soo �000
J. n �A2.0 �A,l 19 � SCALE IN METER
Jv� y �on9 o i000 z000 300o a000
SCALE IN FEET �
' /
bIURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY �
����� C�
���� 9
`' 3rd �'P OZ�
1 �p�` o x Q`�$G�` �,�,�
i .U�- p p�.a
� �,'`
; = W 2�a . D 9 e ����
: - a��
,�� o .
_..� > .` � � -� �-,
r — ��' e``� :
: �� ,r `*\�,`' � �� �
9
I � � 9 Q� O
� I �y� '�`O\�� , s9 � !
• Ow/ R� ..�—•
O ���� F+
I GJ O
� , .
. O �
O �
� ��� ��
O �
• O
rp�� ' � Q�
O f
I � ���'
C�aEQ�� : ,� '2,� O soQ� o
S'cfQv�Y� m � � � ',�.. .�.
�� O � O q 'n'f� G�
( o�`Q' �o�, Q. . �,� �. �G
\� y
��e' e�
� �\GJ �`
`j` PG�
� �P�y � Q\ O• v�y
. O S
I �� �� yF °2
. �+, � �9 Q �
( \ 7P,� � E.� .�
; ��Q i. �
q� G O �
-T �" O a „��
� y.. � _
' ��%f- � m �
au'
� m . '
, �
Z HPSKIN
¢
� W N
� W
c� m
SOUfH = SOUTH
G�
��
FQ-
, �a
. �
STREETS 1894 °a
0 500 1000
J• � CAi�O 'i�]1, � SCALE IN METER
J�� y �OD9 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
• /
MURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY _�
�� �•�°� c�-�
. S,�,a� � 2�
�
I �p�� o� �c Q�G ��a\4
�
' o z 2nd D �q Q�� O��
: - a��
�St o .
_..� > � -- � �-,
�� - �G �� �
: \� s �'�� ` �\ �
9 `j'Oy .
I ° � -� Q�' O �
- � � °� s9 ��� F -
: O �� F�' ..�—•
O ��
I � ��,,
. O �
O �
I �`J" ��
� O �
. O
1 P�� ' � Q�`'
I fo ���'
���c 2+4 t : o `�� O . soe�' �O
S'�f Q v E Y� , � a.� � �� ,'�.. � .pF.
�� O � O q 4; �,G�
� o�'" �°�, Q� � �� e'� ��Gy
� e�\� �
. � �\G`�F• �`
`j` PG
5 Q v�
I �.� Q� O y
� �� y so
� e� yF• � 2
B �
I \ �p� a 9 � a� E.�
: y �S
� 3 �� O
n �S O a w
I y_ �
• '�.y� o m .c
�� ¢
H� . m ,
. �
Z HASKIN
¢
Q �
� W
� W
c� m
SOIJfH = SOUTH S
G�
�.[�
�Q-
, ,�"
STREETS 1894 � �°a
0 500 1�00
J• !-1 �A2.0 .'�,l 19 � SCALE IN METER
✓U� y �d a9 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
, �
SCALE IN F`EET
1
- /
MURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY �
�� �\�Q� C�9 -
• S�c,� �, O'LQ
� 3rd �G�, �'����.
' �p� � � ❑ Q
� � � �
3 � �
I = W 2nd D q Q a���
. . - -- a��
1 st O .
_ � > � � �_ . .-,
1 �G �� :
. �� S� �,��' v ��V I
v 9 soy .
I ° .� Q�" O I
_ � �+� °� s-� �� F :
: O �� F+ ..�_.
O �°.
I � ��� .
. O �r
O �
I ���' P��
m O �
- O
�P�� � � Q�' , -
O
I °,� ���'
C�n E 2+�� : o '� O soe�`�
S'JQ v E'Y� � `�� � �.. �,
0 �1,p� O p y '",�i �C,'�
I o�' o�, Q. . � e,�`. ,��G
• �p ti
� J�� Q��
�r`� �
I �� eP� �
.�'� Q� O O• °y
O y so2
� e� � �� �
� � 9 a �
� � �� � � �� �
: �'�` �
'�P c,,�` O
�' " O a w
� y. �
: ��- � m �
� �
Q
HIG °� ' �
• Fa--
Z H0.SKIN �
N
� W
� m
w
C� m
SOUTH = SOUTH
G�
��
F(-
�1'F
�TRE�TS 1 �94 � �°o
0 500 1000
J. !^1 CAtzO �i�,l L7 � SCALE IN METER
J�1 y �oa9 o i000 z000 s000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
• �
MURRAY MURRAY �
MURRAY _,
� ����� C�9
• �c,�� 'G
I `' � 3rd �`�, �'���\� O
� � Y e OO �`
i � s z 2nd D �9 Q�� ���
. , a���
1 st O ,
_..J > .` � �— _. .�
, � � � � � \ �
. Sy �C'\��' yJ,p I
( � 9 QW' y .
: Syc�' o� s O I
^ I � 9 ��� F •
: O �� F-f ..�—•
O ��
I � \GJ
. O �r
O �
� �,.� �5
O �
• O
lP�� ' � Q�
O
I � � ���'
<<nE QA� : ,� '�� O soQ� o
S'vR v EY� . .. m �o�`�� � �o� o ,�.•• � � .��.
c
� p� �'P Q� 9 � �� Q`� �4G
: � � � �� y
I J� �
�G L
� � P�Z� e�� O V�
. � Q� O y
O y o .
� �� � ao � ti :
� a �
, , �� � o �� o
. ,� �
' "gP , G O
�' �� O a w
� y " � x
- �� � � °' �
QN �
H� m • ' .
. �
Z HPSICIN
N
a' LJ
W W
� w
C� m
sourH = sourH
G�
��
F�
F+
STREET� 1894 � ��°
a
0 500 1000
J. n �A20 �i�� � , SCALE IN METER
��t y �d�9 0 �000 z000 3000 4000
SCALE IN F'EET �
4/10/2010
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Description Fee Map Certificate Deed Notes
� 1859 �
5/24/59 Thomas Graves Monterey/Court $15 $8.00
5/24/59 William J. Graves Block 17 $5 La Casa Grande; $8,000
5/24/59 Peter A. Forrester Monterey/Court $25 empty
6/3/59 John Wilson Block 9 tots 4, 9, 3 ,8 $10 signed C H Johnson
6/3/59 Fr. Juan Comopla cemetery road $25 use of Catholic Church
7/12/59 Benigna de Solis Block 24., lots 1,4 $20 Hutton Map/1850 '
7/21/59 J. Limass?. Block 14, lot 6 (part) $25 $5-6,000 improvements
7/21/59 Jose Carlon Block 15, lot 4 $10 empty �
7/21/59 Walter Murray Block 10J8, lots 1&4 $10
7/21/59 H. M. Osgood Block 15, lots 1,2 $20 empty •
. 7/21�/59 � Thomas (Tomas) Higuera Nipomo/cemetery $10 , improved. :
8/16/59 Peter A. Forrester � , , amend 5/24 petition
8/16/59 Roberto Villa Block 9, lots 5, 6 $15 . $1,500
8/16/59 T. M. Dillon Monterey Street unoccupied land
8/16/59 Gomez/Johnson Block 1�0, lot 6 $1 spousal transfer
10/12/59 Ramona Ortega $10 see Forrester �
10/29/59 Peter A. Forrester Block 15, lots 3, 6 "laid on table"
11�/2/59 Dolores Feliz Block 15, lot 5 $5 . "Improved" $300 , '
12/2/59 Board/Supervisors Block 31 $1 withdraw petition for BI 19
12/2/59 T M Dillon Bls 6,7;B1 5 lots 6-8,etc $1 alcalde grants
12/3/59 Peter A. Forrester replace 10%29 "laid on table'
12/3/59 J P Lewelling Chorro/Palm "laid on table" _.
12/12/59 T M Dillon near. cemetery unoccupied land
. , .:. .
1/4/60 Augustina Olivera Block 10, lot 4 $5 $500
� 5/15/1860 Julian Estrada Block 14, lots 4 & 8 � Hutton Map; $1000; blacksmith shop �
5/23/60 5/23/60 Julian Estrada Block 14, lots 4 & 8 $10 Hutton Map
5/28/60 5/29/60 Bernardo Lazcano Monterey/Creek
. 5/30/60 5/30/60 Blas Castro Monterey/Creek vacant
6/9/60 Antonio Limass Block 15, lot 6 $20 yes $300
1/4/60 6/11/60 Antonio Paredes � Block 14, lot 3 $2.50 1847 grant
6/6/60 6/11/60� Jose M Munoz Block 12, lot 6
6/11/60 Melchor Selm laid over to next meeting
12-Dec Augustine Garcia Block 11, lot 1 $5 improved
1/15/61 Rita Garcia Chorro Street $300
9/14/61 9/14/61 Louis Lami Block 24, lot 5 $300
10/21/61 10/21/61 Fernando Martinez Block 15, lot 1 $400-$500
7/8/63 7/8/63 Patrick Dunn Block 17, lots 2 & 4 unimproved
'�870
2/1/70 2/7/70 St. Stephen's Block 5, lot 2 $5 yes (29) 5/18/70 . Ward description: 1/29/70; "erect a church"
2/7/70 Lazare Landeker Block 5, lot 1 $5 yes (34) 5/18/70 2/3/1872 Ward description: 1/29/70; unimproved
1/31/70 2/7/70 Michael Henderson Block 3, lot 4 $10 yes (37) 5/19/70 2/13/1872 Ward description: 1/29/70; unimproved
2/7/70 2/7/70 M. Pepperman Block 32, lot 1 $10 (55) 6/14/70 11/30/1�872 Ward description; $50
George Sauer lot in Block 14 yes Ward description; 2/8/70; house
2/15/70 .2/15/70 J Lindenmeyer/G. Leffner Block 61 � $10 yes 2/5/1.872 Ward description: 2/14/70; $2500; court case
C. Wills Block 61 lot yes Ward description: 2/15/70 -
Henry Francis Morro/Monterey Ward description: 2/15/70
2/11/70 2/21/70 Leonardo Lopez Block 32, lot 4 $10 yes (4) 5/6/70 2/2/1872 Ward description: 2/2/70; $250
2/11/70 2/21/70 Leonardo Lopez Block 14 lot $5 yes (5) 5/6/70 2/2(3)/1872 Ward description: 2/5/70;$700
2/21/70 Asher Greenberg Block 1, lot 4 $10 (10) 5/6/70 11/2/1874 $300
2/18/70 2/21/70 H. Loobliner/L: Schwartz Block 58, lot 3 $10 yes (12) 5/9/70 1/30/1972 Ward description: 2/18/70; $550
2/21/70 2/21/70 W. W. Hays Block 9, lot 4 $10 yes (30) 5/18/70 1/15/1872 Harris description: 2/10/70; "valuable improvm'ts"
2/21/70 2/21/70 Isaac Goldtree Morro/Monterey $125 yes (32) 5/18/70 Ward description: 2/19/70; $500
�.
`;�;'r:`
2/29/70 Casper Shu(e)bek Block 59, lot 4 $10 yes (20) 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Ward description; see signature
Andrew/George Sauer Block 13 yes Ward certifies: 1/26/70
Andrew Sauer Block 14 lot yes Ward certifies: 1/2/70
Felipe Moraga Block 20, lot 1 � yes Ward certifies: 1/31/70
Manuel Rodriguez Block 20, lot 2 yes Ward certifies: 1/31/70
Antonio Garcia de la Rosa Block 82 $20 yes (2) 3/6/70 _ Ward description: 4/4/70
3/9/70 A. Blockman & A. Sauer part of Block 13 $5 yes (6) 5/6/70 1/30/1872 Ward description: 1/24/70; part of previous grant
3/9/70 3/9/70 Juan Cappe Block 14 $5 . yes (11) 5!6/70 4/12/1873 Ward description: 1/24/70; part of previous grant
2/20/69 3/9/70 Calvin H. Mills Block 61: irregular lot $15 (17) 5/11/70 1/29/1872 $135; fence around property
2/21/70 3/9/70 Isaac Goldtree Block 15: irregular lot $5 (31) 5/18/70 12/7/1871 Ward description: 2/2/70; dwelling house/barn
3/9/70 Isaac Goldtree Toro/Monterey $125 (32) 5/18/70 12/7/1871 certificate only
3/9/70 A. Blockman & Co. Block 13 (part) $5 (33) 5/18/70 1/31/1872 certificate only; stamped by Blockman: 5/19/70
3/9/70 Gordon Hendrickson Block 37, lots 1,2,4, 5 $15 . yes (52) 6/14/70 11/12/1872 Harris description; $300; blacksmith shop
2/70 3/9/70 L. Lawsen Block 1, lot 3 $10 yes (56) 6/14/70 2/3/1872 Harris description; $50; fence around property
3/27/70 3/21/70 Ramon Ybarra Blocks 19 & 20, 4 lots $15 yes � � 8/18/1871 2/3/1872 Harris description; $100; settled in 1865
3/21/70 Antonio Fopiano Block 16, lot 4 $5 yes (14) 5/11'/70 11/27/1871 Ward description: 2/1/70; $100; settled in 1869
3/21/70 A. S. Whitsel Block 1, lot 6 $10 yes (35) 5/19/70 2/3/1870 Harris description
3/21/70 Mariano Lazcano Block 15, lot 4 (part) $5 yes (36) 5/19/70 2/5/1872 Harris description; $100: fence
3/21/70 Henry Francis Toro/Monterey $15 (38) 5/19/70 11/4/1871 certificate only
3/21/70 Fred Kohn 14+/- acres $70 yes (70) 7/2/70 2/14/1872 Harris description; dwelling house & stables
3/21/70 Almira Young Blocks 25&26, various $15 yes (89)10/8/70 1/29/1872 Harris description; $7-800; dwelling & stable
3/21/70 Charles Collins Block 24, lots 2, 3, & 5 $10 yes (109)11/16/70 2/13/1872 $5-600: house & fence
3/21/70 3/21/70 Francisco Villa 44+ acres $225 , yes (111) 1/20/71 1/29/1872 Harris description; $2000: houses, fences °
3/25/1870 Levi Rackliffe Block 3, lot 3 yes Harris description; rejected: no improvements
3/26/70 3/28/70 E Lasar Block 38, lot 4 $10 yes (15) 5/11/70 1/30/1872 Harris description; fenced
3/26/70 3/28/70 Louis Lapiere � Block 26, lot 5 yes (41) 6/7/70 Harris description; unimproved
3/28/70 3/28/70 William B. Haley Block 3, lot 3 $10 yes (42) 6/7/70 1/26/1872 Ward description: 3/28/70
3/28/70 3/28/70 Charles E. Grable Block 59, lot 6 yes $50; rejected: "adverse claimant"
3/27/70 3/28/70 Pauline Louvel Block 41, lots 2 & 5 $10 yes 1/21/71 2/5/1872 Harris certifies description; fenced
3/27/70 3/28/70 Marie Louvel Block 41, lots 3 & 6 $10 yes (120) 1/21/71 "substantial wood fence"
4/1/70 Esteban Hasan Block 66, lot 1 yes rejected; Harris description
4/3/70 4/25/70 (fVlrs) P. P. Louvel Block 32, lot6 $10 yes (40) 6/7/70 4/17/1972 Harris description; $5-600; house & fense
4/4/70 Juan Viera Block 15, lots 2,3,5, 6 $10 (3) 5/6/70 7/19/1872 certificate only
3/4/70 4/6/70 Andrew Sauer Block 14 lot $5 (7) 5/6/70 1/30/1872 $500; "buildings"
3/7/70 4/6/70 George F. Sauer Block 14 lot $5 (8) 5/6/70 1/30/1872 $2500; residence
3/7/70 4/6/70 George F. Sauer Block 13 lot $5 (9) 5/6/70 1/30/1872 $3000; "hotel"
3/31/70 4/6/70 Calvin H. Mills Block 59, lot 1 $10 yes (16) 5/11/70 1/29/1872 Harris description; "board fence"
4/1/70 4/6/70 John Stannseich Block 64-67 (various) $15 yes (22) 5/18/70 1/27/1872 Harris description; $2000: residence, etc.
4/6/70 4/6/70 J. J. Staiger Block 77, lots 3 & 4 $10 yes (24) 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Ward description: 4/2/1870
4/6/70 Frederick Herting Block 77, lots 1 & 2 $10 yes (25) 5/8/70 2/9/1872 Ward description: 3/30/1870
2/3/70 4/6/70 Frank Rodriguez Block 20, lot 3 $10 yes (28) 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Harris description; $200; house & fence
3/28/70 4/6/70 Benjamin Grable Block 59, lot 2 (part), 3 $10 yes (53) 6/14/70 1/26/1872 Harris description; $300; residence
4/3/70 4/6/70 James Clausen Block 59, lot 6 $5 yes (115) 1/20/71 Harris description; $30; fence; left country
4/18/70 Charles H. Johnson Block 10 (lot) $10 5/4/1871 8/27/1872 recorded 12/24/72
4/25/70 4/18/70 John Stannseich Block 9, lot 5 $10 yes (21) 5/18/70 1/27/1872 Harris description: 2%10/70;$1000
4/18/70 Henry Loobliner Block 57, lot 1 $5 yes (23) 5/18/70 2/2/1872 Ward description:4/17/70; deed; rec. 3/15/72
4/18/70 Louis Fraga BI 19, lot 3; BI 15, lot 6 $10 yes (26) 5/18/70 2/9/1971 Harris description; $1000; residence in street
4/18/70 John J. Simmler Dana Street $30 (95) 10/1.0/70 2!2/1872 certificate only
4/18/70 4/25/70 Manuel Victorine block 79, lots 2,3, & 5 $30 yes (18) 5/11/70 Harris certifies; $300
4/25/70 George Tyng Block 7, lots 14,15,16 $10 yes (27) 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Ward description: 4/22/70
4/25/70 4/25/70 H. B. Palmer Higuera/Nipoma:1+ ac $15 yes (39) 5/19/70 1/30/1872 Ward description:4/22/70; $1500 settled in 1868
Harcington & McDougall Higuera $15 yes (54) 6/14/70 2/15/1872 Ward description: 4/9/70; sold to McDougal?
4/25/70 Jose Simon de Roco Block 54, lots 5 & 6 $20 yes (57) 6/14/70 Ward description: 4/20/70
. 3/26/70 4/25/70 Louis Chapeau Block 32, lot 6 yes Harris description; dwelling/fence; rejected:
4/29/70 Ventura Fernandez $55 (90) 10/8/70 1/26/1872 certificate only
5/4/70 5/4/70 Juan Castro Block 72; lot 1 (part) $5 yes (69) 6/23/70 2/14/1872 Harris description; $100; improvem'ts on Morro
5/4/70 5/4/70 Rafael Valencia Higuera/Pismo (15 ac) $75 yes (78) 8/25/70 1/29/1872 Harris description; $600; settled in 1867
Jose de Jesus Pico Monterey/Morro yes Ward description: 5/14/70
5/16/70 5/16/70 Loreta Garcia Broad/Palm $5 yes (58) 6/14/70 2/9/1872 Ward description: 5/16/70; $300; settled 1869
5/11/70 5/16/70 Adolph Sauer Block 24, lots 3&6 part $5 yes (59) 6/14/70 Harris description; $500; settled 1868
5/12/70 5/16/70 Henry Abel Block 8 (part) $5 yes (61) 6/15/70 2/13/1872 Harris description; $50; purchased from Wilson
5/11/70 5/16/70 D. P. Mallagh Block 10 (part) $5 yes (62) 6/15/70 2/3/1872 Harris description; $500; settled 1868
5/11/70 . 5/16/70 Blas Guerrero Block 16, lot 3 $10 yes (63) 6/15/70 3/10/1974 Ward description: 4/18/70; $50
5/12/70 5/16/70 George Deffner Chorro/Monterey $5 yes (65) 6/15/70 2/14/1872 Ward description: 4/21/70; $500; settled 1864
5/16/70 Manuel Rodriguez Block 20, lot 2 $10 (66) 6/15/70 7/30/1873 certificate only
5/16/70 Felipe Moraga Block 20, lot 1 $10 (67) 6/15/70 7/30/1873 certificate only
5/6/70 5/16/70 Ernst Krebs Block 32, lots 2 & 3 $15 yes (68) 6/15/70 2/5/1872 Harris description; $250
5/11/70 5/16/70 Samuel A. Pollard Block 9, lot 3 $10 yes (64) 6/15/70 1/30/1872 Harris description: 2/10/70; $2000;settled 1868
5/11/70 5/16/70 Adelaida Limass Block 60 $15 (79) 8/25/70 2/2/1872 Ward description: 5/10/70; $300; settled 1863
5/16/70 Mary Dillon Block 48 (all) $15 (99) 10/12/70 1/25/1872 certificate only
3/31/70 5/16/70 Henrique Vega Block 21, lot 3 $10 yes (116) 1/20/71 2/3/1872 Harris description
5/11/70 5/16/70 Francisco Ruiz Block 21, lot 1 $10 yes (117) 1/20/71 1/30/1872 Ward description: 4/20/1870; $100
5/10/70 5/19/70 Luiford Maxwell Block 7, lots 4-10 $15 yes (103)10/12/70 2/3/1872 Ward description: 5/11/70; $600
5/23/70 William B. Haley Block 61 lot $10 yes (83) 10/8/70 1/26/1872 Ward description: 4/15/70; $100
6/2/70 5/30/70 County of SLO Monterey/Court $15 yes 1/26/1872 Harris description; $3000; Casa Grande
5/20/70 6/3/70 Charles W. Dana Block 60: Dana street $10 yes 2/5/1872 Ward description: 2/15/70; $1500: house
5/26/70 6/6/70 Eugene Gauthier Block 55, lots 1 & 4 $10 (73) 7/24/70 Harris description; $50
6/2/70 6/3/70 County of SLO Block 31 . $20 yes (82) 10/8/70 Harris description; $5000: jail
. 6/6/70 6/6/70 Charles B. Pellerier Block 10 $5 yes (84) 10/8/70 1/30/1872 Harris description; $1500; settled in 1857
6/6/70 � 6/6/70 E. A. Smith . Block 38, lot 2 . $10 yes (87).10/8/70 1/30/1872 Harris description; $150
6/6/70 6/6/70 Henry Francis Block 38, lot 5 $10 yes (94)10/10/70 2/13/1872 Harris descciption; $100
6/6/70 6/6/70 Witliam J. Marcus Block 8 (part) $5 yes (98) 10/12/70 2/3/1872 Harris description; $1500
6/6/70 6/6/70 Modesta Castro Block 56 $5 yes (102)10/12/70 Harris description; $50
5/20/70 6/6/70 Ramona Garcia Block 4, lot 2 $5 yes (134) 2/2/71 4/7/1873 Harris description; $100; see note on certificate
6/6/70 Pedro Martinez $15 8/17/1�871 certificate only
6/20/70 6/20/70 Frank Guillemin Block 53, lot 5 $15 yes (72) 7/24/70 Harris description; $200
6/18/70 6/20/70 Claude Guillemin. Block 53, lot 6 $10 yes (74) 7/24/70 1/26/1872 Harris description: 6/18/1870
6/20/70 Ramona Wilson Block 9, lot 6 $10 yes 8/1�8/1871 12/6/1871 Harris description: 2/10/70; $2000; settled 1849
6/15/70 6/20/70 Ramona Wilson Block 61 (irregular lot) $10 yes 8/18/1871 Harris description :6/15/70; brewery
6/20/70 Ramona Wilson BI 3, lot 1; 61 1, lot 1 $15 yes 8/22/1871 12/6/1871 Harris description; court case
6/6/70 7/6/70 E. M. Lincoln Block 59, lot 5 $10 yes (71) 7/20/70 7/24/1876 Harris description: 5/23/70 $100; deed:lots 5 & 6
'7/6/70 7/6/70 Lazare Landeker BI 7:lot 1; BI 8:lots 1&2 $5 yes (81) 10/8/70 2/3/1872 Larkin description: 7/2/70; $100
6/20/70 7/6/70 W. S. Harriman Block 1, lots 2 & 5 $15 yes (100)10/12/70 2/13/1872 Harris description; $1000
6/27/70 7/6/70 J. P. Andrews 10+ acres $55 yes (101)10/12/70 2/13/1872 Harris description; $300
7/6/70 J. B: Fitch Block 58, lots 1 & 2 yes Larkin description: 7L6/70; rejected
7/18/70 7/19/70 Thomas Higuera Higuera/Nipomo 6 ac. $35 yes (76) 8/3/70 11/4/1871 Larkin description: 7/12/1870; $1000
J. Kreutzberger Block 24 (part) yes Harris description: 7/18/70
7/19/70 7/19/70 William Haley Higuera (irregular lot) $5 yes (92) 10/10/70 1/26/1872 Harris description: 6/11/70; $25
7/18/70 7/19/70 H. W. Little irregular tract $10 yes (96) 10/10/70 2/3/1872 Harris description: 6/12/70; deed from Higuera
� 7/19/70 Roberto Villa � Block 9, lot 2 $10 yes (129) 1/21/71 11/2/1871 Harris description: 5/25/70; $200; settled in 1855
7/18/70 7/19/70 Ramona Romero BI 41, lots 1,4; BI 37 3,6 $15 yes (130) 1/18/71 2 dates Harris description: 7/5/70; $500; settled in 1866
7/18/70 7/19/70 H. W. Little Block 33, lot 1 yes Larkin description: 7/14/70; rejected: "no impr'ts"
7/18/70 7/19/70 George F. Sauer Block 33, lot 2 yes Larkin description: 7/14/70; rejected: "no impr'ts"
8/1/70 In(n)ocente Garcia 10+ acres . $55 yes (88) 10/8/70 11/9/1871 Harris description: 5/11/70; $800; settled in 1853
7/19/70 8/1/70 H. M. Warden Higuera/Nipomo (1+ac) $15 yes (93) 10/10/70 2/2/1872 Harris description: 6/11/70; $1000
8/1/70 8/1/70 L. C. Holloway Block 38, lot 1 $10 (106) 10/12/70 Harris description; $75; 3/1/71:sale to H. Francis
7/14/70 8/1/70 J C Austin Block 8 (part) $5 yes (140) 3/11/71 Harris description; $50; settled in 1869
4/13/70 8/1/70 Jose Pablo Ortega Block 52, lot 5 $10 yes (141) 4/11/71 2/2/1872 Harris certifies; rejected; reconsidered 7/19
4/13/70 8/1/70 Juan Dias Ortega Block 52, lot 2 $10 yes (142) 4/11/71 2/2/1872 Harris certifies; rejected; reconsidered 7/19
4/13/70 8/1/70 Pedro Antonio Ortega Block 52, lot 1 $10 yes (143) 4/11/71 2/2/1872 Harris description; rejected; reconsidered 7/19
4/12/70 8/1/70 Angel Chaves Block 52, lot 3 $10 yes 2/5/1872 Harris description; rejected; reconsidered 7/19
4/12/70 8/1/70 Antonio J. Valdez Block 52, lot 6 $10 yes_ 5/9/1872 Harris description; rejercted, reconsidered7/19
8/12/70 A. P. Hendon $15 (144) 5/2/71 1/26/1872 certificate only
8/24/70 9/5/70 Francisco Sanabr.ia Block 24, lots 3 & 6 $10 yes (110)11/25/70 1/30/1872 Harris description; $400; settled in 1862
9/5/70 9/5/70 Hipolito Dallidet Block 12 (pact) $5 ($10) (104)10/12/70 1/29/1872 Harris description: 9/5/70; $200
George Matos Block 15 (part) yes Harris descrioption: 9l10/70
George Matos Block 14 (part) Larkin description: 9/23/70
10/1/70 Thomas Whiteley Block 59, lot 2 $5 yes 2/2/1872 Larkin description: 9/9/70; $500; fragment
9/2870 10/1/70 Antonio Paredes Block 12 $5 yes (80) 10/7/70 Larkin description: 9/24; $100
9/29/70 1�0/1/70 William Stanner $240 (97) 10/12/70 1/30/1872 Harris description; $1500; settled in 1858
7/18/70 10/1/70 Bishop Tadeo Amat Blocks 36 & 63 $40 yes 2/8/1872 Harris description; 6/27/70; $100
7/18/70 10/1/70 Bishop Tadeo Amat Block 11 $5 yes (108)10/18/70 2/8/1872 Harris description: 6/28/1870; $100
10/1/70 Refugio Burazo Dana/Nipomo Streets $15 (114) 1/20/71 11/21/1871 certificate only
9/28/70 10/1/70 Felipe Gajiola (Gariola?) Block 8 (lot) $5 yes (118) 1/20/71 2/10/1872 Harris description; $500
7/28/70 10/1/70 Silas B Call Blocks 14 & 18 $15 yes (119) 1/20/71 2/14/1872 Ward description: 5/11/1870; $5000
10/1/70 Hipolito Dallidet 9.9 acres $50 yes (122) 1/20/72 1/2�9/18.72 Harris description
10/1/70 10/1/70 Walter Murray Blocks 12 & 15: part $5 yes (123) 1/21/71 Ward description: 2/2/70; $1�000
7/18/70 10/1/70 Bishop Tadeo Amat Block 10 (lot) $5 yes (132) 1/27/71 2/8/1872 Harris description; $500
10/1/70 S Roco Block 10 $5 yes 8/22/1871 Harris description: 9/9/70
10/3/70 10/3/70 Simon Krolik Block 58, lots 1 & 2 yes description: 9/70; rejected
10/23/70 11/8/70 Thomas Whiteley Block 58, lots 1 & 2 $10 yes (112) 1/20/71 2/2/1872 Larkin description: 10/20/70; $75
11/8/70 Alexander Murray (heirs) Blocks 4,5,6,7, 8: part $160 yes (118) 1/20/71 2/5/1872 Larkin description: 10/3/70; Murray: died 6/16/70
11/9/70 11/8/70 Walter Murray Block 10 $15 yes (120) 1/20/71 1/1872 Larkin description: 10/3/70; $2000
11/9/70 11/8/70 Juan Cappe Monterey/Morro $5 yes (121) 1/20/71 Larkin description: 11/9/70; $8000-
11/14/70 11/15/70 D. W. James Blocks 17 & 23 $15 yes 8/8/1871 8/17/1871 Harris description: 11/14/70; $4000; fragment
11/15/70 11/15/70 James Summers Block 49, lots 3,4, & 5 $15 yes (126) 1/21/71 1/27/1872 Harris description; $250
11/15/70 11/15/70 Mary Summers Lot 49 lots 1 & 2 $15 yes (127) 1/21/71 1/27/1872 Harris description; $75
'9 871
1/1871 1/17/71 Jose Cantua Monterey/Toro Streets $15 yes 8/18/1871 2/14/1872 Harris description; $400; settled in 1862
1/17/71 1/17/71 J. F. Fisher Block 38 $10 (136) 2/22/71 2/9/1872 certificate on�y; $100
1/30/71 1/30/71 Lorenzo Madrid Block 72, lot 3 $10 yes (137) 2/22/71 8/21/1874 Harris description: 4/15/70;$150 .
1/24/71 Concepcion Molina Block 16 & 69 (parts) $15 yes (138) 2/22/71 9/28/1872 Harris description: 6/16/70; $250
2/7/71 2/8/71 Raymunda Villa Block 55, lot 6 $10 yes 8/18/1871 1/23/1877 Harris description: 1/28/71; $500
1/7/71 2/8/71 Goldtree Brothers Block 14 (part) $5 (135) 2/22/71 12/7/1871 Ward description: 5/12/70; $400
2/7/71 2/8/71 Charles Grable Block 59, lot 3 $5 yes (139) 2/22/71 2/13/1872 � Larkin description: 1/26/71; $25 �
2/7/71 2/8/71 Procopio Servin Block 55, lots 2 & 3 $15 yes 8/18/1871 3/16/1874 Harris description: 1/27/71; $500
2/21/71 2/21/71 Robert H. Choate Block 72, lots 2 & 3 $5 yes (146) 7/13/71 2/13/1872 Larkin description: 2/15%71; $700
2/22/71 2/22/71 Refugio Arballo Block 81, lot 4 $10 yes 8/18/1871 2/19/1872 Harris description: 6/10/70; $150
2/22/71 2/22/71 Jose de la Cruz Arballo Block 81, lot 1 $10 yes 8/18/1871 2/19/1872 Harris description: 2/10/70; $150
2/22/71 2/22/71 Andrea Murray Monterey/Moro Streets $5 yes 8/22/1871 2/3/1872 Ward description: 5/14/70; $5000
Asher Greenberg Block 1, lot 4 Harris & Ward certify description
2/22/71 Asher Greenberg Block 53, lot 2 $10 8/18/1971 certificate only
2/22/71 2/22/71 Maria A. Ortega (Lami) Block 32, lot 5 $10 yes 8/18/1871 2/5/1872 Harris description: 5/25/70; $400
3/7/71 3/7/71 Ramona Wilson Block 36 yes Harris description: 1/26/71: uses Hutton map
4/4/71 Charles Fink Block 33, lot 6 $10 yes 8/18/1871 2/9/1872 Larkin.description: 3/6/71; $60
4/3/71 4/4/71 George Mattos Block 15 $10 8/22/1871 1/29/1872 $500; settled in 1867
4/19/.71 Elizabeth J. Wilks Block 53, lot 3 $10 yes Larkin description: 4/18/71; $200
3/1/71 4/20/71 Bartholo Brizzolara Block 14 $5 8/18/1871 Ward description: 5/11/70; $200; Sheriff sale
5/3/71 5/4/71 Valentine Gagiola Block 26, lot 3 $10 yes 8/18/1871 9/18/1874 Harris description: 6/10//70: $300
6/6/71 Manuel Valdez Block 33, lot 4 $10 8/18/1871 certificate only
- 5/12/71 6/6/71 Alejo Acebes (Asabes?) Block 12 (part) $5 yes 12/2/1871 2/13/1871 Harris description:5/12/71; $150
6/3/71 6/6/71 Ciriaco Chaves Block 15, lot 4 $5 yes 8/18/1871 2/15/1872 Harris description: 6/2/71; $100
6/3/71 6/6/71 Ciriaco Chaves Block 12 (part) $5 yes 8/18/1871 2/15/1872 Harris description: 5/17/71; $80
5/20/70 6/6/71 Ramona O. Garcia $10 yes 4/7/1873 Ward description: 5/14/70; $600; settled in 1863 .
6/6/71 Pedro Martin 2 parcels $15 yes 8/18/1871 2/3/1872 Harris description: 5/26/71
6/6/71 6/6/71 Isabel & Virginia Pico Block 17 (part) $5 yes 8/8/1871 Harris description: 6/6/71; $2500
6/6/71 6/6/71 Isabel & Virginia Pico Block 14 (part) $15 yes 8/8/1871 Harris description: 6/6/71; $2500
6/4/71 6/6/71 Ramona Wilson Block 11 (part) $5 yes 8/18/1871 12/6/1871 Harris description: 6/5/71; adobe with tenants
6/19/71 Barbara Ruger Block 11 (part) $5 yes 8/18/1871 5/11/1872 Harris description: 6/5/71; $200; uncle P.�Garcia
6/19/71 6/19/71 H. M. Warden Block 6, lots 11,12, 13 $10 yes 8/18/1871 �:2/2/1871 Harris description:3/14/71; $80
7/10/71 7/10/71 Madalena Rodriguez Block 80, lots 1 & 2 $15 yes 8/22/1871 2/2/1872 Harris description: 7/10/71; $500; settled in 1867
7/10/71 7/17/71 William W. Hays Block 39, lots 1-6 $20 yes 12/2/1871 . Harris description: 7/7/71; $125; well for town/self
7/17/71 Petronilo Lopez (s) Block 42, lots 1 & 4 $15 yes 10/30/1871 6/28/1875 Larkin description: 3/17/71; $100
8/7/71 Methodist Church Higuera Street $15 yes 8/22/1871 7/20/1872 Harris description; 8/8/71; $1000; trustees sign
8/14/71 8/14/71 Sarah Edwards Block 80, lot 3 $10 yes 12/2/1871 2/14/1872 Harris description: 6/19/71,; $10
8/14/71 8/14/71 Frank Rodrigues Block 20, lot 4 (part) $5 yes 12/2/1871 1/20/1872 Harris description: 8/10/71; $25
8/29/71 8L21/71 Agustina Olivera Block 28, lots 3 & 6 $15 yes 5/22/1875 Harris description: 8/28%71$150
8/21/71 8/21/71 Tomas de Herrera Monterey Street $90 yes 11�/3/1871 2/13/1872 Harris description; $2000; settled on in 1861
5/3/71 8/21/71 Foribio Hernandez Block 80, lot 4 $10 yes 12/2/1871 Larkin ? Description: 5/3/71; $80
6/26/71 8/22/71 Rufus Demming Block 81, lot 5; part:2, 6 $15 yes 8/22/1871 2/13/1872 Harris description: 6/19/71; $300
10/1/71 S. Roco $5 8/22/1871 12/7/1871 certificate only
10/1/71 Felipe Gasiola (?) Block 8 (part) $5 (113)1/20/71 certificate only
10/23/71 Guadalupe Aguayo Block 38, lot 3 $10 yes 10/30/1871 10/2/1875 Larkin description: 4/3/71; $50
8/28/71 10/23/71 Jane Deming Block 83 (part) $10 yes 12/2/1871 2/14/1872 Harris description: 8/28/71; "board fence"
8/22/71 10/23/71 Bishop Tadeo Amat Cemetery lot (4.74 ac.) $25 yes 2/8/1872 Harris description: 8/14/71; fencing: $500
10/19/71 10/23/71 Guadalupe Garcia Block 42, lot 5 � $10 yes 12/25/1871 10/8/1873 Harris description: 10/19/71; $75
8/28/71 10/23/71 Daniel Edwards Block 80, lots 5 & 6 $15 yes 12/2/1871 2/13/1872 Harris description: 8/28/71;."substantial fence"
9/13/71 10/23/71 Honofrio Medina Block 42, lots 3 & 6 $15 yes 10/29/1871 6/2/1873 Harris description: 8/24/71; $100
9/18/71 10/23/71 Henry Schlichtman Block 59, lot 2 $10 yes 12/2/1871 Harris description: 9/18/71; see n/d Amos Wells
Knight Block 37, lots 1&4 part yes Harris description: 10/26/71
11/20/71 Salome Fuentez Block 12 (part) $10 5/3/1872 certificate only
10/28/71 11/20/71 Pulgeria Arroyo Block 45, lot 2 $10 yes 4/25/1872 Harris description: 8/22/71; $150
10/28/71 11/20/71 Juan Cordova Block 27, lots 4 & 5 $15 yes 5/3/1872 Harris description: 10/27/71
11/20/71 James Kelly Block 50 (part) $5 yes 9/21/1872 Larkin description: 3/16/71; $25
12/4/71 Josefa Fonseja Block 52, lot 3 $10 yes 5/3/1872 Harris description: 11/21/71
11/30/71 12/4/71 Antonio Herrera Monterey: 14+ acres $75 yes 4/17/1872 Harris description: 7/7/71; $500; settled in 1858
1872
2/5/72 Antonio Herrera Block 46, lots 1, 2 $15 yes 4/17/1872 Harris description: 1/24/72
" 2/5/72 Torribio Gorduno Block 14 (portion) yes 12/27/1873 Ward description: 5/11/70
2/5/72 C Calletano Cordova Block 28, lot 4 $10 yes 4/17/1872 Harris description: 1/24/72; new petition: 5L24/73
1/3/72 2/5/72 F. F. Fine Block 27, lots 1,2,3,6 $15 yes 4/17/1872 Harris description: 12/28/71; $50
1/24/72 2/5/72 Manuel Pader:as Block 43, lot 3 $10 yes 5/3/1872 4/17/1872 Harris description: 1/25/72; $75
1/6/72 , 2/5/72 Francisco Madril Block 43, lots 1, 2 $10 yes 5/3/1872 4/17/1872 Harris description: 1/25/72: $80
3/24/72 W. J. Lynch Block 33, lots 1,2,3 � $15 4/17/1872 Har.ris description: 2/5/72
2/5/72 3/29/72 Stephen Richards Block 66, lot 1 $5 yes 4/17/1872 Harris description: 2/5/72
4/1/72 4/1/72 Juan Castro Block 72, lot 4 $10 yes 5/3/1872 Harris description: 2/28/72
4/1/72 Mrs. Munos $10 5/3/1872 Harris description: 11/29/1871
. Guadulape Garcia Block 42, lot 2 yes Larkin: description: 4/17/72
4/29/72 4/29/72 J. Kruelzberger 5/4/1872. petition only; $300
5/10/1872 Felipe Puente Block 34, lots 1,2,3,5,6 $20 yes 4/2/1873 1/9/1874 Harris description: 5/8/72
5/13/72 7/1/72 Jose Ramon Ortega Block 33, lot 5 $5 yes 12/26/1872 1/14/1874 Harr:is description: 5/13/72
� 6/1/72 7/1/72 Nabor Tapia Block b5, lot 5 $5 yes 3/22/1873 3/8/1875 Harris description: 5/27/72; 3/8/75: to F. Tapia
6/1/1872 E. T. Hare Block 26, lots 2 & 5 yes Harris description: 5/27/72;12/2/72: rejected
5/30/72 6/6/72 Manuel Valdes Block 34, lot 4 $10 yes 8/18/1871 3/1/1872 Harris description: 6/4/70; $300
9/23/72 9/23/72 Fred H. Kimball Block 44, lots 3 & 5 $10 yes 12/4/1872 Larkin description: $100
10/5/72 10/7/72 Manuel Victorino Block 73, lots 1 & 4 $10 yes 12/18/1872 1/4/1874 Harris description: 10/1/72; $150
10/19/72 10/19/72 J. M. Danglada Block 40, lots 1,2, 3 $15 yes 12/4/1872 Larkin description; $60
10/28/72 11/4/72 Orofila Linares BI 69 & 70, lots 1,2;4,5 $15 yes 4/2/1873 10/7/1873 Harris description: 10/25/72; $150; settled 1858)
11/4/1872 J. M. Danglada Block 78, lots 1, 2, 3 yes Harris description: 11/4/72;12/2/72: rejected
1873
1/6//73 1/6//73 Valentin Mancilla Block 15 & 16, lots 5,6 yes 6/12/1873 Harris description: 5/8/72; $3000; Ward: 2/5/70
5/26/73 Florentino Ontiveros Block 35 lots 1,2,3,4 $20 yes 6/12/1873 10/22/1873 Larkin description; 10/9/72 petition
6/9/73 6/9/73 Blas Antonio Castro Block 26, lot 6 $5 6/12/1�873 2/28/1874 Walter Murray, attny; $200; settled in 1867
6/9/73 6/9/73 Jesus Gonzales yes 3.15 acres; $50; settled in 1852
6/9/73 6/11/73 Jesus Gonzales 3+ acres $20 yes 6/11/1873 11/22/1875 Harris description; settled in 1852
8/7/73 8/11/73 J. J. Simmler Block 52, lots 4, 1 yes .
10/13/73 10/13/73 Henry M Osgood Block 21, lots 2 & 4 $1 o yes 11/5/1873 8/21/1874 Harris description: 4/19/72; $50
1874/75
2/8/74 3/9/74 Maria A Ortega Block 24 lots 1-5 part yes 5/24/1875 3/9/18.74 Harris description; $400; settled in 1861
2/28/74 3/9/74 Ramon Ybarra Block 43,.lots 1,2,3 3/24/1874 previously granted and purchased
5/14/74 5/25/74 Joaquin Soto Block 47 lot 1 $5 yes 10/1.2/1874 12/1:2/1876 Larkin description; $50
4/30/75 5/10/75 S P McDougall Block 24, lots 5 & 6 $10 yes 5/24/1875 4/24/1876 Ward description: 4/30/75; $500
12/9//75 Pulqueria Arroyo Block 45, lot 1 $5 yes 12/27/1875 7/24/1876 sold 2/15/76: $50
1876-1889
1/22/76 1/22/76 Crisanto/Jose Villa Block 55, lot 6 $10 heirs of Raymunda Villa
7/11/76 7/11/76 Ernest Cerf Block 80, lot 4 12/12/1876 duplicate request .
8/3/76 8/14/76 Lucy Albert Block 33, lot 4 yes amateur made map
1�0/10/7611/13/76 William Sandercock Block 51 $5 yes 12/4/1876 6/8/1877 Ward description; $300
9/2/76 11/13/76 Rockwell A. Loomis Block 13 $5 yes 11/13/1876 9/20/1877 Ward description; $1000; plus comm. report
12/4/77 5/20/77 Lazare Landeker Block 8, lof 3 $100; settled in 1870
8/8/78 8/9/78 John Jacob Simmler Block 26, lots 2 & 5 yes delinquent tax purchase: 1874
1/2/80 1/5/80 G. W. Walker Nipomo/Dana yes improvements; rejected
1/21/1884 Bishop Francis Mora Block 10 petition to correct error of 2/8/72 grant
6/15/1885 Daniel Edwards Block 79 (lot) yes 6/22/85: rejected
5/6/1889 J. H. Orcutt error in description to Garcia: 6/6/71
1890-93
� 4/7/1890 Juliette Matthews Block 92, lot 1 replace lost deed to Grable 2/13/72 .
12/8/1890 C A Younglove Block 53, lot 2 no deed from City recorded; chain of title given
1/31/1891 William Sandercock Block 52, lot 5 �3/10/1891 previous deed never recorded
3/9/93 4/1%93 Jose C Castro Block 73, lot 4 clarify 1�875 grant: Block 73, lot 4
5/29/93 � 5/30/93 Alice Landeker Higuera/Nipomo lot of deceased husband
6/5/93 6/5/93 August Vollmer Block 61 20 years in possession
6/19/93 6/19/93 H. Mehlmam Chorro/Monterey
1894-'G 900
6/22/94 6/25/94 Ellen Morriss Rogers Block 32, lot 4 quitclaim to clear title
6/26/94 6/27/94 David Lopez Block 32, lot 4 quitclaim to clear title
6/26/94 6/27/94 Luis Zolezzi? Block 32, lot 4 quitclaim to clear title
1/7/95 1/7/95 Manuel Navarro Block 12, lot 1 . 8/1�8/1871 certificate destroyed by fire
5/6/95 5/6/95 J P Lynch - Block 26, lot 1, 4 quitclaim as uncertain conveyance
4/25/98 4/25/98 J G Sandercock Block 59, lot 4 in possession since1883
5/3/98 5/3/98 William Sandercock Block 59, lot 4, 5 in possession since1883
1900+
10/6/02 10/6/02 Milan C. Durkee Block 40, lot 2 (part) in possession since 1885
10%25%02 11/3/02 Marie Louvel . Block 41, lots 3 & 6 $10 (128) 1/21/71 sale on 11/3/1902
1/5/02 1/5/03 County Bank of SLO Block 54, lot 2 (part) chain of title; in possession 30 years
1/5102 1/5/03 M. F. Rittinghouse Block 54, lot 2 (part) chain of title; in possession 30 years
8/10/03 8/17/03 H. M: Warden Block 13 $5000; in possession since 1860
8/7/05 8/7/05 County Bank of SLO Block 54, lots 1 & 2 chain of title from 1873
11/8/09 11/13/09 City of San Luis Obispo Block 40, lot 1 (part) yes Ash estate
� NO DATES
Miguel Avila near Priest's Garden
Honora M. Moran Block 54, lot4 yes description: rejected: no improvements
Adolph Raur Block 24, lots 3,5,6 yes Hacris description
G. Rector Block 38, lot 6 . yes Harris description
Jesus Villa Block 25 & 26, 4 lots yes Harris description; includes tomb �
Amos Wells Block 59, lot 2 Harris description
Jennie Robasciotti Toro Street � description; used by City
MISCELLANEOUS
October 3, 1876 William Sandercock Blocks 58 & 95 yes recorded (10/3/76)transfer from G B Staniford.
06/04/10
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Description Fee Map Certificafe Deed Notes
Fiarris; $50; purchased from
� 5/12/70 5/16/70 Abel Henr Block 8 art $5 es 61 6/15/70 2/13/1872 Wilson
5/12/71 6/6/71 Acebes Ale'o Block 12 art $5 es 12/2/1871 2/13/1871 Harris:5/12/71; $150: Asabes?
10/23/71 A ua o Guadalu e Block 38, lot 3 $10 es 10/30/1871 10/2/1875 Larkin: 4/3/71; $50
8/3/76 8/14R6 Albert Luc Block 33, lot 4 es amateur made ma
7/18/70 10/1/70 Amat Bisho Tadeo Blocks 36 & 63 $40 es � 2/8/1872 Harris: 6/27/70; $100
7/18/70 10/1/70 Amat Bisho Tadeo Block 11 $5 es 108 10/18/70 2/8/1872 Harris: 6/28R0; $100
7/18/70 10/1/70 Amat Bisho Tadeo Block 10 lot $5 es 132 1/27R1 2/8/1872 Harris; $500
8/22/71 10/23/71 Amat Bisho Tadeo Cemete lot 4.74 ac. $25 es 2/8/1872 Harris: 8/14/71; fencin : $500
6/27/70 7/6/70 Andrews John P. 10+ acres $55 es 101 10/12/70 2/13/1872 Harris; $300
2/22/71 2/22/71 Arballo Refu io Block 81, lot 4 $10 es 8/18/1871 2/19/1872 Harris: 6/10R0; $150
10/28/71 11/20/71 Arro o Pul eria Block 45, lot 2 $10 es 4/25/1872 Harris: 8/22/71; $150
12/9//75 Arro o Pul ueria Block 45, lot 1 $5 es 12/27/1875 7/24/1876 sold 2/15/76: $50
7/14/70 8/1/70 Austin Jose h C. Block 8 art $5 es 140 3/11/71 Harris; $50; settled in 1869
Avila Mi uel near Priest's Garden
Ward: 1/24/70; part of previous
3/9/70 Blockman Abraham art of Block 13 $5 es 6 5/6/70 1/30/1872 rant
certificate only; stamped by
3/9/70 Blockman Abraham Block 13 art $5 33 5/18/70 1/31/1872 Blockman: 5/19/70
12/2/59 Board of Su ervisors Block 31 $1 withdrew etition for Block 19
3/1/71 4/20/71 Brizzolara Bartholo Block 14 $5 8/18/1871 Ward: 5/11/70; $200; Sheriff sale
1/7/71 2/8/71 Brothers Goldtree Block 14 art $5 135 2/22/71 12/7/1871 Ward: 5/12R0; $400
10/1/70 Burazo Refu io Dana/Ni omo Streets $15 114 1/20/71 11/21/1871 certificate onl
7/28/70 10/1/70 Call Silas B. Blocks 14 & 18 $15 es 119 1/20/71 2/14/1872 Ward: 5/11/1870; $5000
1/1871 1/17/71 Cantua Jose Montere /Toro Streets $15 es S/18/1871 2/14/1872 Harris; $400; settled in 1862
Ward: 1/24/70; part of previous
3/9/70 3/9/70 Ca e Juan Block 14 $5 es 11 5/6/70 4/12/1873 rant
11/9/70 11/8/70 Ca e Juan Montere /Morro $5 es 121 1/20R1 Larkin: 11/9/70; $8000
7/21/59 Carlon Jose Block 15, lot 4 $10 unim roved
1
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Description Fee Ma Certificate Deed Notes
5/30/60 5/30/60 Castro Blas Montere /Creek unim roved
Walter Murray, attny; $200;
6/9/73 6/9/73 Castro Blas Antonio Block 26, lot 6 $5 6/12/1873 2/28/1874 settled in 1867
3/9/93 4/1/93 Castro Jose C. Block 73, lot 4 clari 1875 rant: Block 73, lot 4
Harris; $100; improvements on
5/4/70 5/4/70 Castro Juan Block 72, lot 1 art $5 es 69 6/23/70 2/14/1872 Morro
4/1/72 4/1/72 Castro Juan Block 72, lot 4' $10 es 5/3/1872 Harcis: 2/28R2
6/6/70 6/6/70 Castro Modesta Block 56 $5 es 102 10/12/70 Harris; $50
7/11R6 7/11R6 CerF Ernest Block 80, lot 4 12/12/1876 du licate re uest
3/26/70 4/25/70 Cha eau Louis Block 32, lot 6 es Harris; dwellin /fence; re�ected
Harris; rejected; reconsidered
4/12/70 8/1/70 Chaves An el Block 52, lot 3 $10 es 2/5/1872 7/19
6/3/71 6/6/71 Chaves Ciriaco Block 15, lot 4 $5 es 8/18/1871 2/1'S/1872 Harris: 6/2/71; $100
6/3/71 6/6/71 Chaves Ciriaco Block 12 art $5 es 8/18/1871 2/15/1872 Harris: 5/17/71; $80
2/21/71 2/21/71 Choate Robert H. Block 72, lots 2 & 3 $5 es 146 7/13/71 2/13/1872 Larkin: 2/15/71; $700
Harris: 8!8/71; $1000; trustees
8/7/71 Methodist Church Hi uera Str.eet $15 es 8/22/1871 7/20/1872 si n
11/8/09 11/13/09 Cit of San Luis Obis o Block 40, lot 1 art es Ash estate
4/3/70 4/6/70 Clausen James Block 59, lot 6 $5 es 115 1/20/71 Harris; $30; fence; left count
. 3/21R0 Collins Charles Block 24, lots 2, 3, & 5 $10 es 109 11/16/70 2/13l1872 $5-600: house & fence
6/3/59 Como la Fr. Juan cemete road $25 use of Catholic Church
Harris: 1/24/72; new petition:
2/5/72 Cordova Calletano Block 28, lot 4 $10 es 4/17/1872 5/24/73
10/28/71 11/20/71 Cordova Juan Block 27, lots 4 & 5 $15 es 5/3/1872 Harris: 10/27/71
chain of title; in possession 30
1/5/02 1/5/03 Count Bank of SLO Block 54, lot 2 art ears
8R/05 8/7/05 Count Bank of SLO - Block 54, lots 1 & 2 chain of title from 1873
6/2/70 5/30R0 Count of San Luis Obis o - Montere /Court $15 es 1/26/1872 Harris; $3000; Casa Grande
6/2/70 6/3/70 Count of San Luis Obis o Block 31 $20 es. 82 10/8/70 Harris; $5000: 'ail
2
Date 1 / Date 2 . Petitioner Petitioner Description Fee Map Certificate Deed Notes
9/5/70 9/5/70 Dallidet Hi olito Block 12 art $5 $10 104 10/12/70 1/29/1872 Harris: 9/5/70; $200
10/1/70 Dallidet Hi olito 9.9 acres $50 es 122 1/20/72 1/29/1872 Harris
5/20R0 6/3/70 Dana Charles W. Block 60: Dana street $10 es 2/5/1872 Ward: 2/15R0; $1500: house �
10/19/72 10/19/72 Dan lada Jose M. Block 40, lots 1,2, 3 $15 es 12/4/1872 Larkin; $60
11/4/72 Dan lada Jose M. Block 78, lots 1, 2, 3 es � Harris: 11/4/72;12/2/72: re�ected
8/21/71 8/21/71 de Herrera Tomas Montere Street $90 es 11/3/1871 2/13/1872 Harris; $2U00; settled on in 1861
de Jesus Pico Jose Montere /Morro es Ward: 5/14/70
2/22/71 2/22/71 de la Cruz Arb Jose Block 81, lot 1 $10 es 8/18/1871 2/19/1872 Harris: 2/10f70; $150
de la Rosa Antonio Garcia Block 82 $20 es 2 3/6/70 Ward: 4/4/70
7/12/59 de Solis Beni na Block 24, lots 1,4 $20 Hutton Ma /1850
Ward: 4/21R0; $500; settled
5/12/70 5/16/70 Deffner Geor e Chorro/Montere $5 es 65 6/15/70 2/14/1872 1864
8/28R1 10/23/71 Demin Jane Block 83 art $10 es 12/2/1871 2/14/1872 Harris: 8/28/71; "board fence"
6/26/71 8/22R1 Demmin Rufus Block 81, lot 5; art:2, 6 $15 es 8/22/1871 2/13/1872 Harris: 6/19/71; $300
Harris certifies; rejected;
4/13/70 8/1/70 Dias Juan Dias Block 52, lot 2 $10 es 142 4/11/71 2/2/1872 reconsidered 7/19
5/16R0 Dillon Ma Block 48 all $15 99 10/12/70 1/25/1872 certificate onl
8/16/59 Dillon Timoth M. Montere Street unim roved
12/2/59 Dillon Timoth M. Bls 6,7;BI 5 lots 6-8,etc $1 alcalde rants
12/12/59 Dillon Timoth M. near cemete unim roved
7/8/63 7/8/63 Dunn Patrick Block 17, lots 2 & 4 unim roved
10/6/02 10/6/02 Durkee Milan C. Block 40, lot 2 art in ossession since 1885
Harris: 8/28771; "substantial
8/28R1 10/23/71 Edwards Daniel Block 80, lots 5 & 6 $15 es 12/2/1871 2/13/1872 fence"
06/15/85 Edwards Daniel Block 79 lot es 6/22/85: re'ected
8/14/71 8/14/71 Edwards Sarah Block 80, lot 3 $10 es 12/2/1871 2/14/1872 Harris: 6/19R1; $10
Hutton Map; $1000; blacksmith
05/15/60 Estrada Julian Block 14, lots 4 & 8 sho
5/23/60 5/23/60 Estrada Julian Block 14, lots 4 & 8 $10 Hutton Ma
11/2/59 Feliz Dolores Block 15, lot 5 $5 "Im roved" $300
3
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Description Fee �Vla Certificate Deed Notes
4/29/70 Fernandez Ventura $55 90 10/8/70 1/26/1872 certificate onl
1/3/72 2/5/72 Fine Fred F. Block 27, lots 1,2,3,6 $15 es 4/17/1872 Harris: 12/28/71; $50
4/4/71 Fink Charles Block 33, lot 6 $10 es 8/18/1871 2/9/1872 Larkin: 3/6/71; $60
1/17/71 1/17/71 Fisher John F. Block 38 $10 136 2/22R1 2/9/1872 certificate onl ; $100
7/6/70 Fitch John B. Block 58, lots 1 & 2 es Larkin: 7/6/70; re'ected
12/4/71 Fonse'a Josefa Block 52, lot 3 $10 es 5/3/1872 Harris: 11/21/71
Ward: 2/1/70; $100; settled in
3/21/70 Fo iano Antonio Block 16, lot 4 $5 es 14 5/11/70 11l27/1871 1869
5/24/59 Forrester Peter A. Montere /Court $25 unim roved
8/16/59 Forrester Peter A. amend 5/24 etition
10/29/59 Forrester Peter A. Block 15, lots 3, 6 "laid o.n table"
12/3/59 Forrester Peter A. re laces 10/29 "laid on table'
4/18/70 Fra a Louis BI 19, lot 3; BI 15, lot 6 $10 es 26 5/18/70 2/9/1971 Harris; $1000; residence in street
Francis Hen Morro/Montere Ward: 2/15R0
3/21l70 Francis Henr Toro/Montere $15 38 5/19/70 11/4/1871 certificate onl
6/6/70 6/6/70 Francis Henr Block 38, lot 5 $10 es 94 10/10/70 2/13/1872 Harris; $100
11/20/71 Fuentez Salome Block 12 art $10 5/3/1872 certificate onl
5/3/71 5/4/71 Ga iola Valentine Block 26, lot 3 $10 es 8/18/1871 9/18/1874 Harris: 6/10//70: $300
9/28/70 10/1/70 Ga'iola Gariol Feli e Block 8 lot $5 es 118 1/20/71 2/10/1872 Harris; $500
12/12/6U Garcia Au ustine Block 11, lot 1 $5 im roved
10/19/7110/23R1 Garcia Guadalu e Block 42, lot 5 $10 es 12/25/1871 10/8/1873 Harris: 10/19/71; $75
Garcia Guadula e Block 42, lot 2 es Larkin: 4/17/72
Harris: 5/11/70; $800; settled in
8/1/70 Garcia ln n ocente 10+ acres $55 es 88 10/8R0 11/9/1871 1853
Ward: 5/16R0; $300; settled
5/16/70 5/16/70 Garcia Loreta Broad/Palm $5 es 58 6/14R0 2/9/1872 1869
5/20R0 6/6/70 Garcia Ramona Block 4, lot 2 $5 es 134 2/2/71 4/7/1873 Harris; $100; note on certificate
Ward: 5/14/70; $600; settled in
5/20/70 6/6/71 Garcia Ramona O. $10 es 4/7/1873 1863
1/15/61 Garcia Rita Chorro Street $300
4
Date 1 / Date 2 PetitAoner Petitioner Description Fee Map Certificate Deed Notes
10/1/71 Gasiola Feli e Block 8 art $5 113 1/20/71 certificate onl
5/26R0 6/6/70 Gauthier Eu ene Block 55, lots 1 & 4 $10 73 7/24/70 Harris; $50
2/21/70 2/21/70 Goldtree Isaac Morro/Montere $125 es 32 5/18/70 Ward: 2/19/70; $500
Ward: 2/2/70; dwelling �
2/21/70 3/9/70 Goldtree Isaac Block 15: irre ular lot $5 31 5/18R0 12/7/1871 house/barn
3/9/70 Goldtree Isaac Toro/Montere _ $125 32 5/18/70 12/7/1871 certificate onl
6/9/73 6/9/73 Gonzales Jesus es 3.15 acres; $50; settled in 1852
6/9/73 6/11/73 Gonzales Jesus 3+ acres $20 es 6/11/1873 11/22/1875 Harris; settled in 1852
2/5/72 Gorduno Torribio Block 14 ortion es 12/27/1873 Ward: 5/11/70
3/28/70 4/6/70 Grable Ben'amin Block 59, lot 2 art , 3 $10 es 53 6/14/70 1/26/1872 Harris; $300; residence
2/7/71 2/8/71 Grable Charles Block 59, lot 3 $5 es 139 2/22/71 2/13/1872 Larkin: 1/26/71; $25
3/28/70 3l28/70 Grable Charles E. Block 59, lot 6 es $50; re'ected: "adverse claimant"
5/24/59 Graves Thomas Montere /Court $15 $8.00
5/24/59 Graves William J. Block 17 $5 La Casa Grande; $8,OU0
2/21 RO Greenber Asher Block 1, lot 4 $10 10 5/6/70 11/2/1874 $300
Greenber Asher Block 1, lot 4 Harris & Ward certi
2/22/71 Greenber Asher Block 53, lot 2 $10 8/18/1971 certificate onl
5/11/70 5/16/70 Guerrero Blas Block 16, lot 3 $10 es 63 6/15R0 3/10/1974 Ward: 4/18R0; $50
6/18/70 6/20/70 Guillemin Claude Block 53, lot 6 $10 es 74 7/24/70 1/26/1872 Harris: 6/18/1870
6/20/70 6/20R0 Guillemin Frank Block 53, lot 5 $15 es 72 7/24R0 Harris; $200
7/19/70 7/19/70 Hale William Hi uera irre ular lot $5 es 92 10/10/70 1/26/1872 Harris: 6/11/70; $25
3/28/70 3/28/70 Hale William B. Block 3, lot 3 $10 es 42 6/7/70 1/26/1872 Ward: 3/28R0
5/23R0 Hale William B. Block 61 lot $10 es 83 10/8/70 1/26/1872 Ward: 4/15R0; $100
06/01R2 Hare Edward T. Block 26, lots 2 & 5 es Harris: 5/27/72;12/2/72: re�ected
6/20R0 7/6/70 Harriman Witliam S. Block 1, lots 2 & 5 $15 es 100 10/12/70 2/13/1872 Harris; $1000
Harrin ton Dennis Hi uera $15 es 54 6/14/70 2/15/1872 Ward: 4/9/70; sold to McDou al?
4/1/70 Hasan Esteban Block 66, lot 1 es Harris; re'ected
2/1/70 2/7/70 Ha s William W. Block 5, lot 2 $5 es 29 5/18/70 Ward: 1/29/70; St. Ste hen's
Harris: 2/10/70; "valuable
2/21R0 2/21/70 Ha s William W. Block 9, lot 4 $10 es 30 5/18R0 1/15/1872 im rovments"
5
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Descri tion Fee Ma Certificate Deed Notes
Harris: 7/7/71; $1.25; well for
7/10/71 7/17/71 Ha s William W. Block 39, lots 1-6 $20 es 12/2/1871 town/self
1/31/70 2/7/70 Henderson Michae) Block 3, lot 4 $10 es 37 5/19/70 2/13/1872 Ward: 1/29/70; unim roved
8/12R0 Hendon A. Pascal $15 144 5/2/71 1/26/1872 certificate onl
3/9/70 Hendrickson Gordon Block 37, lots 1,2,4, 5 $15 es 52 6/14/70 11/12/1872 Harris; $300; blacksmith sho
5/3/71 8/21/71 Hernandez Foribio Block 80, lot 4 $10 es 12/2/1871 Larkin?: 5/3/71; $80
Harris: 7l7/71; $500; settled in
11/30/71 12/4R1 Herrera Antonio Montere : 14+ acres $75 es 4/17/1872 1858
2/5/72 Herrera Antonio Block 46, lots 1, 2 $15 es 4/17/1872 Harris: 1/24/72
4/6/70 Hertin Frederick Block 77, lots 1 & 2 $10 es 25 5/8/70 2/9/1872 Ward: 3/30/1870
7/18/70 7/19/70 Hi uera Thomas Hi uera/Ni omo 6 ac. $35 es 76 8/3/70 11/4/1871 Larkin: 7/12/70; $1000: Tomas
7/21/59 Hi uera Thomas Ni omo/cemeter $10 im roved Tomas
Harris; $75; 3/1/71:sale to H.
8/1/70 8/1/70 Hollowa Li scomb C. Block 38, lot 1 $10 106 10/12/70 Francis
Harris: 11/14R0; $4000;
11/14/70 11/15R0 James Drewr W. Blocks 17 & 23 $15 es 8/8/1871 8/17/1871 fra ment
8/16/59 Johnson Charles H. Block 10, lot 6 $1 s ousal transfer
4/18/70 Johnson Charles H. Block 10 lot $10 5/4/1871 8/27/1872 recorded 12/24/72
11/20/71 Kell James Block 50 art $5 es 9/21/1872 Larkin: 3/16/71; $25
9/23R2 9/23/72 Kimball Fred H. Block 44, lots 3 & 5 $10 es 12/4/1872 � Larkin: $100
Kni ht Block 37, lots 1&4 art es Harris: 10/26/71
3/21l70 Kohn Fred 14+/- acres $70 es 70 7/2/70 2/14/1872 Harris; dwellin house & stables
5/6/70 5/16R0 Krebs Ernst Block 32, lots 2 & 3 $15 es 68 6/15/70 2/5/1'872 Harris; $250
Kreutzber er ohn. Block 24 art - es Harris: 7/18/70
10/3J70 10/3/70 Krolik Simon Block 58, lots 1 & 2 es 9/70; re'ected
4/29/72 4/29/72 Kreutzber er John 5/4/1872 etition onl ; $300
9/14/61 9/14/61 Lami Louis Block 24, lot 5 $300
5/29/93 5/30/93 Landeker Alice Hi uera/Ni omo lot of deceased husband
2R/70 Landeker Lazare Block 5, lot 1 $5 es 34 5/18/70 2/3l1872 Ward: 1/29/70; unim roved
7/6/70 7/6R0 Landeker Lazare BI 7:lot 1; BI 8:lots 1&2 $5 es 81 10/8/70 2/3/1872 Larkin: 7/2/70; $100
6
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Descri tion Fee Ma Certificate . Deed Notes
12/4/77 5/20/77 Landeker Lazare Block 8, lot 3 $100; settled in 1870
3/26/70 3/28/70 La iere Louis Block 26, lot 5 es 41 6/7/70 Harris; unim roved
3/26/70 3/28/70 Lasar Emmanuel Block 38, lot 4 $10 es 15 5/11/70 1/30/1872 Harris; fenced
2/70 3/9/70 Lawsen L. Block 1, lot 3 $10 es 56 6/14/70 2/3/1872 Harris; $50; fenced
5/28/60 5/29/60 Lazcano Bernardo Montere /Creek
3/21/70 Lazcano Mariano Block 15, lot 4 art $5 es 36 5/19/70 2/5/1872 Harris; $100: fence
Leffner G.
12/3/59 Lewellin John P. Chorro/Palm "laid on table"
Ward: 5/10/70; $300; settled
5/11/70 5/16/70 Limass Adelaida Block 60 $15 79 8/25/70 2/2/1872 1863
6/9/60 Limass Antonio Block 15, lot 6 $20 es $300
7/21/59 Limass? J. Block 14, lot 6 art $25 $5-6,000 im rovements
Harris: 10/25R2; $150; settled in
10/28/72 11/4/72 Linares Orofila BI 69 & 70, lots 1,2,4,5 $15 es 4/2/1873 10/7/1873 1858
Harris: 5/23/70 $100; deed:lots 5
6/6/70 7/6/70 Lincoln Edward M. Block 59, lot 5 $10 es 71 7/20/70 7/24/1876 & 6
2/15R0 2/15/70 Lindenme er Julius Block 61 $10 es 2/5/1872 Ward: 2/14/70; $2500; couct case
Harris: 6/12R0; deed from
7/18/70 7/19/70 Little Hen W. irre ular tract $10 es 96 10/10/7U 2/3/1872 Hi uera
'Larkin: 7/14R0; rejected: "no
7/18/70 7/19/70 Little Henr W. Block 33, lot 1 es im rovements"
2/18/70 2/21/70 Loobliner Henr Block 58, lot 3 $10 es 12 5/9R0 1/30/1972 Ward: 2/18/70; $550
4/18R0 Loobliner Hen Block 57, lot 1 $5 es 23 5/18/70 2/2/1872 Ward:4/17R0; deed; rec. 3/15/72
9/2/76 11/13/76 Loomis Rockwell A. Block 13 $5 es 11/13/1876 9/20/1877 Ward; $1000; lus comm. re ort
6/26/94 6/27/94 Lo ez David Block 32, lot 4 uitclaim to clear title
2/11/70 2/21/70 Lo ez Leonardo Block 32, lot 4 $10 es 4 5/6/70 2/2/1872 Ward: 2/2/70; $250
2/11/70 2/21/70 Lo ez � Leonardo Block 14 lot $5 es 5 5/6/70 2/2 3 /1872 Ward: 2/5/70; $700
7/17/71 Lo ez Petronilo Block 42, lots 1 & 4 $15 es 10/30/1871 6/28/1875 Larkin: 3/17/71; $100
4/3/70 4/25/70 Louvel Mrs Paul P. Block 32, lot6 $10 es 40 6/7/70 4/17/1972 Harris; $5-600; house & fense
3/27/70 3/28R0 Louvel Marie Block 41, lots 3 & 6 $10 es 120 1/21 R 1 "substantial wood fence"
7
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Description Fee IIAap Certificate Deed � Notes
10/25/02 11/3/02 Louvel Marie Block 41, lots 3 & 6 $10 128 1/21/71 sale on 11/3/1902
3/27R0 3/28/70 Louvel Pauline Block 41, lots 2 & 5 $10 es 1/21/71 2/5/1872 Harris certifies; fenced
quitclaim as uncertain
5/6/95 5/6/95 L nch James John P Block 26, lot 1, 4 conve ance
3/24/72 L nch W. Jose h Block 33, lots 1,2,3 $15 4/17/1872 Harris: 2/5/72
1/30/71 1/30/71 Madrid Lorenzo Block 72, lot 3 $10 es 137 2/22/71 8/21/1874 Harris: 4/15/70;$150
1/6/72 2/5l72 Madril Francisco Block 43, lots 1, 2 $10 es 5/3/1872 4/17/1872 Harris: 1/25R2: $80
5/11/70 5/16/70 Malla h David P. Block 10 art $5 es 62 6/15/70 2/3/1872 Harris; $500; settled 1868
Harris: 5/8/72; $3000; Ward:
� 1/6//73 1/6//73 Mancilla Valentin Block 15 & 16, lots 5,6 es 6/12/1873 2/5/70
6/6/70 6/6/70 Marcus William J. Block 8 art $5 es 98 10/12/70 2/3/1872 Harris; $1500
6/6/71 Martin Pedro 2 arcels $15 es 8/18/1871 2/3/1872 Harris: 5/26/71
10/21/61 10/21/61 Martinez Fernando Block 15, lot 1 $400-$500
6/6/70 Mactinez Pedro $15 8/17/1871 certificate onl -
Matos Geor e Block 15 art es Harris: 9/10/70
Matos Geor e Block 14 art Larkin: 9/23/70
replace lost deed to Grable
4/7/1890 Matthews Juliette Block 92, lot 1 2/13/72
4/3/71 4/4/71 Mattos Geor e Block 15 $10 8/22/1871 1/29/1872 $500; settled in 1867
5/10R0 5/19R0 Maxwell Luiford Block 7, lots 4-10 $15 es 103 10/12/70 2/3/1872 Ward: 5l11/70; $600
4/30/75 5/10/75 McDou all Samuel P. Block 24, lots 5 & 6 $10 es 5/24/1875 4/24/1876 Ward: 4/30/75; $500
McDou all Samuel P.
9/13/71 10/23/71 Medina Honofrio Block 42, lots 3 & 6 $15 es 10/29/1871 6/2/1873 Harris: 8/24/71; $100
6/19/93 6/19/93 Mehlmam Herman Chorro/Montere
2/20/69 3/9/70 Mills Calvin H. Block 61: irre ular lot $15 17 5/11/70 1/29/1872 $135; fence around ro ert
3/31/70 4/6/70 Mills Calvin H. Block 59, lot 1 $10 es 16 5/11/70 1/29/1872 Harris; "board fence"
1/24/71 Molina Conce cion Block 16 & 69 arts $15 es 138 2/22/71 9/28/1872 Harris: 6/16/70; $250
petition to correct error of 2/8/72
1/21/1884 Mora Bisho Francis Block 10 rant
Mora a Feli e Block 20, lot 1 es Ward certifies: 1/31/70
8
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Description Fee Ma Certificate Deed IVotes
5/16/70 Mora a Feli e Block 20, lot 1 $10 67 6/15/70 7/30/1873 certificate onl
Moran Honora M. Block 54, lot4 es re'ected: no im rovements
4/1/72 Munos Mrs. $10 5/3/1872 Harris: 11/29/1871
6/6/60 6/11/60 Munoz Jose M. Block 12, lot 6
2/22/71 2/22/71 Murra Andrea Montere /Moro Streets $5 es 8/22/1871 2/3/1872 Ward: 5/14/70; $5000
7/21/59 Murra Walter Block 10/8, lots 1&4 $10
10/1/70 10/1/70 Murra Walter Blocks 12 & 15: art $5 es 123 1/21R1 Ward: 2/2/70; $1000
11/9/70 11/8/70 Murra Walter Block 10 $15 es 120 1/20R1 1/1872 Larkin: 10/3/70; $2000
Larkin: 10/3/70; Murray: died
11/8/70 Murra heirs Alexander Blocks 4,5,6,7, 8: art $160 es 118 1/20R1 2/5/1872 6/16/70
1R/95 1/7/95 Navarro Manuel Block 12, lot 1 8/18/1871 certificate destro ed b fire
8/29/71 8/21/71 Olivera A ustina Block 28, lots 3 & 6 $15 es 5/22/1875 Harris: 8/28/71$150
1/4/60 Olivera Au ustina Block 10, lot 4 � $5 $50U
5/26/73 Ontiveros Florentino Block 35 lots 1,2,3,4 $20 es 6/12/1873 1�0/22/1873 Larkin; 10/9/72 etition
5/6/1889 Orcutt Jacob H. error to Garcia: 6/6/71
Harris certifies; rejected;
4/13R0 8/1/70 Orte a Jose Pablo Block 52, lot 5 $10 es 141 4/11R1 2/2/1872 . reconsidered 7/19
5/13R2 7/1/72 Orte a Jose Ramon Block 33, lot 5 $5 es 12/26/1872 1/14/1874 Harris: 5/13/72
2/8/74 3/9/74 Orte a Maria A. Block 24 lots 1-5 art es 5/24/1875 3/9l1874 Harris; $400; settled in 1861
� Harris; rejected; reconsidered
4/13R0 8/1/70 Orte a Pedro Antonio Block 52, lot 1 $10 es 143 4/11/71 2/2/1872 7719
10/12/59 Orte a Ramona $10 see Forrester
2/22171 2/22/71 Orte a Lami Maria A. Block 32, lot 5 $10 es 8/18/1871 2/5/1872 Harris: 5/25/70; $400
7/21/59 Os ood Henr M. Block 15, lots 1,2 $20 unim roved
10/13/73 10/13/73 Os ood Henr M. Block 21, lots 2 & 4 ��o es 11/5/1873 8/21/1874 Harris: 4/19R2; $50
1/24/72 2/5/72 Paderas Manuel Block 43, lot 3 $10 es 5/3/1872 4/17/1872 Harris: 1/25R2; $75
Ward:4/22/70; $1500 settled in
4/25/70 4/25R0 Palmer Horatio 6. Hi uera/Ni oma:1+ ac $15 es 39 5/19R0 1/30/1872 1868
1/4/60 6/11/60 Paredes Antonio • Block 14, lot 3 $2.50 1847 rant
9/2870 10/1/70 Paredes Antonio Block 12 $5 es 80 10RR0 Larkin: 9/24; $100
9
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Descri tson Fee NBa Certificate Deed Notes
6/6/70 6/6/70 Pellerier Charles B. Block 10 $5 es 84 10/8/70 1/30/1872 Harris; $1500; settled in 1857
2/7/70 2/7/70 Pe erman Max Block 32, lot 1 $10 55 6/14R0 11/30/1872 Ward; $50
6/6/71 6/6/71 Pico IsabelNir inia Block 17 art $5 es 8/8/1871 Harris: 6/6/71; $2500
6/6/71 6/6/71 Pico IsabelNir inia Block 14 art $15 es 8/8/1871 Harris: 6/6/71; $2500
Harris: 2/10R0; $2000; settled in
5/11/70 5/16170 Pollard Samuel A. Block 9, lot 3 $10 es 64 6/15/70 1/30/1872 1868
5/10/1872 Puente Feli e Block 34, lots 1,2,3,5,6 $20 es 4/2/1873 1/9/1874 Harris: 5/8/72
Harris; rejected: no
3/25/1870 Rackliffe Levi Block 3, lot 3 es im rovements
Raur Adol h Block 24, lots 3,5,6 es Harris
Rector Geor e. Block 38, lot 6 es Harris
2/5/72 3/29/72 Richards Ste hen Block 66, lot 1 . $5 es 4/17/1872 Harris: 2/5/72
chain of title; in possession 30
1/5/02 1/5/03 Rittin house M. F. Block 54, lot 2 art ears
Robasciotti Jennie Toro Street used b Cit
10/1 RO Roco Jose Simon Block 10 $5 es 8/22/1871 � Harris: 9/9770
10/1/71 Roco Jose Simon $5 8/22/1871 12/7/1871 certificate onl
8/14/71 8/14/71 Rodri ues Frank Block 20, lot 4 art $5 es 12/2/1871 1/20/1872 Harris: 8/10/71; $25
2/3/70 4/6/70 Rodri uez Frank Block 20, lot 3 $10 es 28 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Harris; $200; house & fence
- Harris: 7/10/71; $500; settled in
7/10/71 7/10/71 Rodri uez Madalena Block 80, lots 1 & 2 $15 es 8/22/1871 2/2/1872 1867
Rodri uez Manuel Block 20, lot 2 es Ward certifies: 1/31/70
5/16/70 Rodri uez Manuel Block 20, lot 2 $10 66 6/15/70 7/30/1873 certificate onl
6/22/94 6/25/94 Ro ers Ellen Morriss Block 32, lot 4 uitctaim to clear title
Harris: 7/5/70; $500; settled in
7/18/70 7/19/70 Romero Ramona BI 41, lots 1,4; BI 37 3,6 $15 es 130 1/18/71 2 dates 1866
Harris: 6/5/71; $200; uncle P.
6/19/71 Ru er Bacbara Block 11 art $5 es 8/18/1871 5/11/1872 Garcia
5/11/70 5/16/70 Ruiz Francisco Block 21, lot 1 $10 es 117 1/20/71 1/30/1872 Ward: 4/20/1870; $100
8/24/70 9/5/70 Sanabria Francisco Block 24, lots 3 & 6 $10 es 110 11/25/70 . 1/30/1872 Harris; $400; settled in 1862
10
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Description Fee Ma Certificate Deed Notes
4/25/98 4/25/98 Sandercock John G. Block 59, lot 4 in ossession since1883
10/10/7611/13R6 Sandercock William Block 51 $5 es 12/4/1876 6/8/1877 Ward; $300
1/31/1891 Sandercock Wlliam Block 52, lot 5 3/10/1891 revious deed never recorded
5/3/98 5/3/98 Sandercock William Block 59, lot 4, 5 � in ossession since1883
recorded (10/3/76): transfer from
10/03/76 Sandercock William Blocks 58 & 95 es G B Staniford
Sauer Andrew
5/11/70 5/16/70 Sauer Adol h Block 24, lots 3&6 art $5 es 59 6/14/70 Harris; $500; settled 1868
Sauer Andrew Block 14 lot es Ward certifies: 1/2/70
3/4/70 4/6/70 Sauer Andrew Block 14 lot $5 7 5/6/70 1/30/1872 $500; "buildin s"
Sauer Andrew/Geor e Block 13 es Ward certifies: 1/26R0
Sauer Geor e lot in Block 14 es Ward: 2/8/70; house
3/7/70 4/6/70 Sauer Geor e F. Block 14 lot $5 8 5/6/70 1/30/1872 $2500; residence
3/7/70 4/6/70 Sauer Geor e F. Block 13 lot $5 9 5/6/70 1/30/1872 $3000; "hotel"
_ Larkin: 7/14/70; rejected: "no
7/18/70 7/19/70 Sauer Geor e F. Block 33, lot 2 es im rovements"
Harris: 9/18/71; see n/d Amos
9/18/71 10/23/71 Schlichtman Hen Block 59, lot 2 $10 es 12/2/1871 Wells
Schwartz L.
6/11/60 Selm Melchor laid over to next meetin
2/7[71 2/8/71 Servin Proco io Block 55, lots 2 & 3 $15 es 8/18/1871 3/16/1874 Harris: 1/27/71; $500
2/29/70 Shu e bek Cas er Block 59, lot 4 $10 es 20 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Ward; see si nature
8/7/73 8/11/73 Simmler John J. Block 52, lots 4, 1 es
4/18/70 Simmler John J. Dana Street $30 95 10/10/70 2/2/1872 certificate onl
8/8/78 8/9/78 Simmler John Jacob Block 26, lots 2 & 5 es delin uent tax urchase: 1874
4/25/70 Simon de Roc Jose Block 54, lots 5 & 6 $20 es 57 6/14R0 Ward: 4/20/70
6/6/70 6/6/70 Smith Edwin A. Block 38, lot 2 $10 es 87 10/8R0 1/30/1872 Harris; $150
5/14/74 5/25/74 Soto Joa uin Block 47 lot 1 $5 es 10/12/1874 12/12/1876 Larkin; $50
4/6/70 4/6/70 Stai er John J. Block 77, lots 3 & 4 $10 es 24 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Ward: 4/2/1870
9/29/70 10/1/70 Stanner William $240 97 10/12/70 1/30/1872 Harris; $1500; settled in 1858
� 11
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Descri tion Fee Ma Certificate Deed Notes
4/1/70 4/6/70 Stannseich John Block 64-67 various $15 es 22 5/18/70 1/27/1872 Harris; $2000: residence, etc.
4/25/70 4/18/70 Stannseich John Block 9, lot 5 $10 es 21 5/18/70 1/27/1872 Harris: 2/10R0;$1000
11/15/70 11/15/70 Summers James Block 49, lots 3,4, & 5 $15 es 126 1/21R1 1/27/1872 Harris; $250
11/15/70 11/15R0 Summers Ma Lot 49 lots 1 & 2 $15 es 127 1/21/71 1/27/1872 Harris; $75
Harris: 5/27R2; 3/8/75: to F.
6/1/72 7/1/72 Ta ia Nabor Block 55, lot 5 $5 es 3/22/1873 3/8/1875 Ta ia
4/25R0 T n Geor e Block 7, lots 14,15,16 $10 es 27 5/18/70 1/30/1872 Ward: 4/22/70
5/30/72 6/6/72 Valdes Manuel Block 34, lot 4 $10 es 8/18/1871 3/1/1872 Harris: 6/4/70; $300
Harris; rejected, reconsidered:
4/12/70 8/1/70 Valdez Antonio J. Block 52, lot 6 $10 es 5/9/1872 7/19
6/6/71 Valdez Manuel Block 33, lot 4 $10 8/18/1871 certificate onl
5/4/70 5/4/70 Valencia Rafael Hi uera/Pismo 15 ac $75 es 78 8/25/70 1/29/1872 Harris; $600; settled in 1867
3/31R0 5/16/70 Ve a Henri ue Block 21, lot 3 $10 es 116 1/20/71 2/3/1872 Harris
4/18/70 4/25/70 Victorine Manuel Block 79, lots 2,3, & 5 $30 es 18 5/11R0 Harris certifies; $300
10/5/72 10/7/72 Victorino Manuel Block 73, lots 1 & 4 $10 es 12/18/1872 1/4/1874 Harris: 10/1/72; $150 �
4/4/70 Viera Juan Block 15, lots 2,3,5, 6 $10 3 5/6/70 7/19/1872 certificate onl
1/22/76 1/22/76 Villa Crisanto/Jose Block 55, lot 6 $10 heirs of Ra munda Villa
3/21/70 3/21/70 Villa Francisco 44+ acres $225 es 111 1/20R1 1/29/1872 Harris; $2000: houses, fences
Villa Jesus Block 25 & 26, 4 lots es Harris; includes tomb �
2/7/71 2/8/71 Villa Ra munda Block 55, lot 6 $10 es 8/18/1871 1/23/1877 Harris: 1/28/71; $500.
8/1.6/59 Villa Roberto Block 9, lots 5, 6 $15 $1,500
Harris: 5/25/70; $200; settled in
7/19/70 Villa Roberto Block 9, lot 2 $10 es 129 1/21/71 11/2/1871 1855
6/5/93 6/5/93 Vollmer Au ust Block 61 20 ears in ossession
1/2/80 1/5/80 Walker Geor e W. Ni omo/Dana es im rovements; re�ected
8/10/03 8/17/03 Warden Horatio M. Block 13 $5000; in ossession since 1860
7/19/70 8/1/70 Warden Horatio M. Hi uera/Ni omo 1+ac $15 es 93 10/10/70 2/2/1872 Harris: 6/11R0; $1000
6/19/71 6/19/71 Warden Horatio M. Block 6, lots 11,12, 13 $10 es 8/18/1871 2/2/1871 Harris: 3/14/71; $80
Wells Amos Block 59, lot 2 Harris
10/1/70 Whitele Thomas Block 59, lot 2 $5 es 2/2/1872 Larkin: 9/9/70; $500; fra ment
12
Date 1 / Date 2 Petitioner Petitioner Descr.i tion Fee Ma Certificate Deed Notes
10/23/70 11/8/70 Whitele Thomas Block 58, lots 1 & 2 $10 es 112 1/20/71 2/2/1872 Larkin: 10/20/70; $75
3/21/70 Whitsel Alfred S. Block 1, lot 6 $10 , es 35 5/19/70 2/3/1870 Harris
4/19/71 Wilks Elizabeth J. Block 53, lot 3 $10 es Larkin: 4/18/71; $200
Wills C. Block 61 lot es Ward: 2/15/70
6/3/59 Wilson John Block 9 lots 4, 9, 3 ,8 $10 si ned C H Johnson
6/20/70 Wilson Ramona Block 9, lot 6 $10 es 8/18/1871 12/6/1871 Harris: 2/10/70; $2000; settled
6/15/70 6/20/70 Wilson Ramona Block 61 irre ular lot $10 es 8/18/1871 Harris:6/15/70; brewer
6/20/70 Wilson Ramona BI 3, lot 1; BI 1, lot 1 $15 es 8/22/1871 12/6/1871 Harris; court case
3/7/71 3/7/71 Wilson Ramona Block 36 es Harris: 1/26/71: uses Hutton ma
Harris: 6/5/71; adobe with
6/4/71 6/6/71 Wilson Ramona Block 11 art $5 es 8/18/1871 12/6/1871 tenants
3/27/70 3/21/70 Ybarra Ramon Blocks 19 & 20, 4 lots $15 - es 8/18/1871 2/3/1872 Harris; $100; settled in 1865
previously granted and
2/28/74 3/9/74 Ybarra Ramon Block 43, lots 1,2,3 3/24/1874 urchased
3/21/70 Youn Almira Blocks 25&26, various $15 es 89 1�0/8/70 1/29/1872 Harris; $7-800; dwellin & stable
no deed from City recorded;
12/8/1890 Youn love C'as A. Block 53, lot 2 chain of title iven �
6/26/94 6/27/94 Zolezzi? Luis Block 32, lot 4 uitclaim to clear title
324 entries
Compiled by:
Joseph A. Carotenuti
13
City of San Luis Obispo
Petitions for Land
Essential to the well-being and a well-ordered society is the ownership of land. Land is
one of the most precious of manki.nd's worldly possessions and, too often, history is
replete with individuals and nations wairing over the control of each other's properiy.
Those who shvggle don't survive; laad does.
Less global — but still pertinent — is the owaership of individual lots and acreage. In
California and locally, the path to "clear tide" to property was and is an evolutionary
process. Without regulations, "ownership rights" become a nightmaze of gigantic
proportions. Today, extensive bureaucratic organizations exist to insure such rights do
aot become ensnared in a quagmire of legal challenges. .
Tracing its origins to September 1, 1772, San Luis Obispo is one of the oldest settlements
in the State of California, The establishment of the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa
by the legendary Padre Junipero Serra was strictly a religious exercise; not an effort to
found a political unit. However, even then the plans of the Spanish crown were to
eventually turn any missionaty outpost into a pueblo...a secular governed community
with the church and plaza as ths center of town with individuals owning homesteads.
UIItil such time as designation as a pueblo,the padres were trustees—not vwners—of the
mission lands for the natives. Any governance was by the frisrs(rarely more than two per
mission)and the military leader...usually a sergeant...to address the most serious issues.
Beginning with the separation of Mexico from Spain in 1820, the mission lands were
divided into large ranchos. As a distant Depa.rtment, there was often only vague
governance by the Mexican government of the Califomios. The core community around
the Mission had few amenities. In 1834, Govemor Alvarado declared the settlement as
now a pueblo under the authority of an Qlcalde. The cential authorities in Mexico City,
however, never approved the declaration. Some 20 yeus later, ttris lack of oi�icial
recognition proved a tuming point in the poGtical organization of San Luis Obispo.
With the advent of American rule and that of Statehood, the small settlemen�t lrecame the
county seat but still had no official recognition as to its municipal form.At the instigation
of Charles H.Johnson,an application was made to the Federal Land Commission to ha.ve
the former mission establishment recognized as a pueblo. If it were so designated, the
community would then be determined to cover four square leagues. Such
acknowledgment was denied and in 1856, the settlement was legislatively decla,red a
town based upon its(the Town's)own local siuvey and map by William Rich Hutton.
It maintained the appellation until 187b when it was desiguated as a city. This followed
the federal survey of 186? and the purchase of the municipal site (about 600 acres) for
$690.82 ($1.25 per acre) five years later. Approximately 50 acres already had been
designated as belonging to the Mi.ssion. Over mauy years previous, various smaller tracts
of land around the mission were divided,baught and sold,homes and businesses built but
— unless deemed a fedeial grant (patent) - land underlying any claim of ownership
belonged to the federal government and not to the State, the town or city and, most
importantly, to any individual. Vast amounts of federal lanci are still included within the
State's borders. An act "to settle the tifle to lands" in the Town was pas.sed by the Sta.te
legislators on March 23, 1868 and provided for municipal procedures to obtain title to
local pmperty and confirm ownership to land if possession preceded the act.
To remedy the legal issues of ownership, individuals were required to petition the local
authorities and pay a fee in order to be granted a Certificate of Purchase—not a deed—to
the property. If there was no challenge to the Certificate holder within six moirths, a deed
could be granted (upon payment of$2.50). Recording any ownerslrip interest (if done at
a11) was through the County Recorder. �e attached represents the surviving petitions
made to the town officials(a Common Council)and then in 1876,the City Council.
Hutton provided the earliest survey of the community. He received a substantial fee of
$627. There has been some suggestion that no map was drawn. However, in numerous
petitions,reference is made to the Hutton Map(see May 24, 1859)and some(see July 21,
1859) place the document with the Clerk of the County. To date, this map has not been
found. Nonetheless, by using the descriptions found in the earliest petitions, a fair
representation of the boundaries of the map may be assumed as statements are made as to
the request being within the "corporate Iimits" of the town. With the town's purchase, a
map by Robert R. Harris and Hubert C. Ward became the official standard.
Various bits of information have �en included in the attached inventory. A desirable
next step would be to transfer petition lot locations/owners to a city map thus creating a
new image of the municipality's boundaries and some residents at a particular historical
moment.
As with all history,appreciation is extended for con�ections and/or clazifications.
Joseph A. Carotenuti
May S,2012
LEGEND
The following is intended to assist in reading the attached inventory. While da.tes are
sometimes conflicting (or non-existent) within a document, the attached are categorized
by the date of"presentation"to the municipal body.
DATE: #1: This is the date the petitioner prepared a request for the property often
repeating an attached surveyor's description.
DATE #2: This clate is when the petition was "presented" to the local government for
approval. If there is neither petitioner nor presentation date,the document is included at a
certair► point as being originally found with the companion petitions. Documents are
filed in order of this date.
A secondary inventocy of lot petitions is by the petitiomer's last name.
An additional benefit from the petitions is a list of ineeting dates of the community's
leaders as no official Minutes have been found before May 4, 1870. Within the preserved
Minutes, hundreds of references are macie to petitions being received and the disposition
of requests...not a11 represented in the surviving documents.
PE1'ITION/PETITIONER: Penmanship occasionally obscures correct spelling of
surnames...let alone differing versions by the surveyor and clerk. Petitions note if a
person signed with a mark. A few have signatures of the person completing the request if
not completed by the petitioner(usually an attorney). There aze a few women petitioners.
Initially, petitions were handwritten but beginning in 1870, a preprinted form was
available. Some indicate when the petitioner (or ancestors) first "settled upon" the
requested property.
DESCRIPTION: Many of the descriptions are rudimentary metes and bounds narratives �
with some referencing a neighbor's property line, a tree, fence, the Arroyo (San Luis
Creek) and such. Blocks (about 3 acres) and lot numbers are provided in the listing as a
reference help and are not meant to be the sum total of a petition's property request.
Many requests have no block and/or lot designations. Another avenue needing
exploration is the relationship of such designations to any used in the federal survey.
They may have differed from those used in the Hutton map.
FEE: The fee depended upon the size of the request with $5 for properties under '/Z acre;
$10 if more and up to two acres; from 2 to 5 acres were assessed $15. Any pazcel beyond
five acres was in the $20+ category. Special assessments below $5 are self-explana.tory
within the petition.
MAP: In addition to descriptions,many petitions contain small maps—generally of the
block—drawn on fragile vellum or trace paper. Often,names of the owners of adjoining
pmperty or lots are included in these maps. Some will indicate where a dwelling or
structure of some sort exists, fence line, and one a"sepulcher."A noticeable feature is the
rectangulaz alignment of streets while parts of petitions were included the same azea.
Note with petitions for lazger acreage, lot boundazies are often designated as"town
limits.,,
CERTIFICATE: If approved by the governing board, proof of ownership was a
Certificate of Purchase. The clerk made a note on the petition and/or issued a sepazate
document with the town/city seal. This proof of ownership included a caveat of a deed
costing an additional $2.50. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the Clerk's record of the
certificate number. Not all certificates noted have been preserved but their numbers aze
found on a separate document.
DEED: If a deed was issued, notice of such usually was written on the certificate and/or
original petition. A deed was available after a six-month wait for any adverse claim.
Thus, property searches relying solely on the recordation date (an optional practice) do
not necessarily pmvide proof as to the date of acquisition. . No deeds (except one:
DATE) have been preserved but their dates of issuance have been found on a separate
document.
NOZ'ES: A recurring statement in petitions was note of improvements or promise of
improvements on vacant land and occupancy/farming by the petitioner. Clearly, property
was intended for residents. If improvements were made (usually a dwelling andJor "a
substantial board fence"), an estimate of cost is included in this section. A few were
initially rejected as there were no improvements on the requested land or another ha.d
already received a Certificate of Purchase. Accuracy of such improvement costs may
have been modest so as to maintain a low tax assessment. Robert R. Harris, Hubert C.
Ward, and George Larkin were local surveyors. Their names in the Notes indicate their
descriptions for the peritions.
Joseph A. Cazotenuti
June 4,2010
LEGEND
The following is intended to assist in reading the attached inventory. While dates are
sometimes conflicting (or non-existent) within a documen�, the atta.ched are categorized
by the date of"presentation"to the municipal body.
DAZ'E: #1: This is the date the petitioner prepared a request for the property often
repeating an attached surveyor's descriptian.
DA'TE #2: This date is when the petition was "presented" to the local government for
approval. If there is neither petitioner nor presenta.tion da.te,the document is included at a
certain point as being originally found with the companion petitions. Doc�xments are
filed in order of tbis date.
A seco�dary iave�tory of Iot petitions is by tbe petitioner's Iast name.
An additional benefit from the petitions is a list of ineeting dates of the community's
leaders as no of�icial Minutes have been found before May 4, I870. Within the preserved
Minutes, hundreds of references are made to petitions being received and the disposition
of requests...not all represented in the suraiving documents.
PETITION/PETITIONER: Penmanship occasionally obsciues correCt spelling of
surnames...let alone differing versions by the surveyor and clerk. Petitions note if a
person signed with a mark. A few have signature.s of the person completing the request if
not completed by the petitioner(usually an attorney). There are a few women petitioners.
Initially, petitions were handwritten but beginning in 1870, a preprinted form was
available. Some indicate when the petitioner (or ancestors) first "settled upon" the
requested property.
DESCRIPTION: Many of the descriptions are rudimentary metes and bounds narratives
with some referencing a neig�bor's property line, a tree, fence, the Arroyo (San Luis
Creek) and such. Blocks (about 3 acres) and lot numbers ar� provided in the Iisting as a
reference help and are not meant to be the sum total of a pebtaon's pmperty request.
Many requests have no block and/or lot designations. Another avenue nceding
exploration is the relationship of such designations to any used in the federal survey.
They may have differed&om those used ia the Hutton map.
FEE: The fee depended upon the size of the request with$5 for properties under t/Z acre;
$10 if more and up to two acres; from 2 to 5 acres were assessed$]5.Any pazcel beyond
five acres was in the $20+ category. Special assessments below $5 are self-exp�ana.tory
withi.n the petition.
MAP: In addition to desc�riptions,many petitions contain small maps—generally of the
block—drawn on fragile vellum or trace paper. Often,names of the owners of adjoining
property or lots are included in these maps. Some will indicate where a dwelling or
structure of some sort exists,fence line,and one a"sepulcher."A noticeable feature is the
rectangulaz alignment of streets while parts of petitions were included the same area.
Note with petitions for larger acreage, lot boundazies are often designated as"town
limits."
CERTI�'ICATE: If approved by the governing board, proof of ownership was a
Certificate of Purchase. The clerk made a note on the petitaon and/or issued a separate
document with the town/city seal. This proof of ownership included a caveat of a deed
costing an additional $2.50. Numbers in pazenthesis indicate the Clerk's record of the
certifica.te number. Not all certifica.tes noted have been preserved but their numbers are
found on a separate documen�
DEED: If a deed was issued, notice of such usually was written on the certificate and/or
originai petition. A deed was available af�er a six month wait for any adverse claim.
Thus, pmperty searches relying solely on the recordation d�te (an optional practice) do
not necessarily provide proof as to the date of acyuisition. . No deeds (except one:
DATE) have been preserved but their dates of issuanoe have been fouad on a separate
document.
NOTES: A recurring statement in petitions was note of improvements or promise of
improvements on vacant land and occupancy/farming by the petitioner. Clearly,properiy
was intended for residents. If improvements were made (usually a dwelling and/or "a
substantial board fence'�, an estimate of cost is included in this section. A few were
initially rejected as there were no improvements on the requested land or another had
already received a Certificate of Piu+chase. Accuracy of such improvemeat costs may
have been modest so as to maintain a low tax assessmen� �.obert R. Hazris, Hubert C.
Wazd, and George Larkin were Iocal surveyors. Their names in the Notes indicate their
descriptions for the petitions.
Joseph A Carotenuti
June 4,2010
City of San Luis Obispo
Petitions for Land
Essential to the well-being and a well-ordered society is the ownership of land. Land is
one of the most precious of mankind's worldly possessions and, too often, history is
replete with individuals and narions wa.rring over the control of each other's properiy.
Those who struggle don't survive; land does.
Less global — but still pertinent — is the ownership of individual lots and acreage. In
California and locally, the pa.th to "clear title" to properiy was and is an evolutionary
process. Without regulations, "ownership rights" become a nightrnaze of gigantic
proportions. Today, extensive bureaucratic organizations exist to insure such rights do
not become ensnared in a quagmire of legal challenges. .
Tracing its origins to September 1, 1772, San Luis Obispo is one of the oldest settlements
in the State of California. The establishment of the Mission San Lwis Obispo de Tolosa
by the legendary Padre Junipero Serra was strictly a religious exercise; not an effort to
found a political unit. However, even then the plans of the Spanish crown were to
eventually turn any missionary outpost into a pueblo...a secular governed community
with the church and plaza as the center of town with individuals owning homestead.s.
Until such time as designation as a pueblo,the padres were tcustees—not owners—of the
nussion lands for the natives.Any governance was by the friars (rarely more than two per
mission)and the military leader...usuaily a sergeant...to address the most serious issues.
Beginxving with the sepaararion of Mexico from Sp�in in 1$20, the mission lands were
divided into Iarge ranchos. As a distant Deparlment, there was often only vague
governance by the Mexican govemment of the Califomios. The core community a.round
the Mission had few amenities. In 1834, Governor Alvaxado declared the settlement as
now a pueblo under the authority of an alcalde. The central authorities in Mexico City,
however, never approved the declaratian. Same 20 yeazs later, thts tack of offcial
recognition pmved a turning point in the political organi7�ation of San Luis Obispo.
With the advent of American rule and that of Statehoud, the small settlement became the
county seat but still had no official recognition as to its municipal form.At the instigation
of Charles H. Johnson,an application was made to the Federal Land Commission to have
the former mission establishment recognized as a pueblo. If it were so designated, the
commwnity would then be determined to cflver four square leagues. Such
acknowledgment was denied and in I856, the settlement was legislatively declared a
town based upon its(the Town's)own local survey and map by William Rich Hutton.
It maintained the appellation until 1876 when it was designated as a city. This followed
the federal survey of 1867 and the purchase of the municipal site (about 6Q0 acres) for
$690.82 ($1.25 per acre) five years Iater. Approximately 50 acres already had been
designated as belonging to the Mission. Over many years previous, vazious smaller tsacts
of land azound the mission were divided,bought and sold,homes and businesses built but
— unless deemed a federal grant (patent) - land underlying any claim of ownership
belonged to the federal government and not to the Sta.te, the town or city and, most
importantly, to any individual. Vast amounts of federal land are still included within the
State's borders. An act "to settle the title to lands" in the Town was passed by the State
legislators on March 23, 1868 and provided for municipal procedures to obtain title to
local property and confirm ownership to land if possession preceded the act.
To remedy the legal issues of ownership, in.dividuals were required to petition the local
authorities and pay a fee in order to be granted a Certificate of Purchase—not a deed—to
the property. If there was no challenge to the Certificate holder within six months, a dced
could be granted (upon payment of$2.50). Recording any ownership interest (if done at
all) was through the County Recorder. The attached represents the surviving petitions
made to the town oi�'icials(a Common Council)and then in 1876,the City Council.
Hutton provided the eazliest survey of th� community. He received a substantial fee of
$627. There has been some suggestion that no map was drawn. However, in numerous
petitions,reference is made to the Hutton Map(see May 24, 1859)and some(see Juty 21,
1859) place the docwnent with the Clerk of the County. To date, this map has not been
found. Nonetheless, by using the descriptions found in the earliest petitions, a fair
representation of the boundaries of the map may be assumed as statements are made as to
the request being within the "corporate limits" of th,e town. With the town's purchase, a
, map by Robert R Hazris and Hubert C.Ward became the official standard.
Various bits of information have been included in the attached inventory. A desirable
next step would be to transfer petition lot locations/owners to a city map thus creating a
new image of the municipalify's baundazies and same residents at a particular historical
moment.
As with all history,appreciation is extended for corrections and/or clarifications.
Joseph A. Carotenuti
May 8,2012
City of 5an Luis Obispo
Petitions for Land
Essential to the well-being and a well-ordered society is the ownership of land. Land is
one of the most precious of mankind's worldly possessions and, too often, history is
replete with individuals and nations wazring over the control of each other's properly.
Those who struggle don't survive; land does.
� Less global — but still pertinent — is the ownership of individual lots and acreage. In
California and locally, the pa.th to "clear title" to property was and is an evolutionary
process. Without regulations, "ownerslup rights" become a nightmare of gigantic
proportions. Today, extensive bureaucratic organizations exist to insure such rights do
not become ensnared in a quagmire of legal challenges. .
Tracing its origins to September l, 1772, San Luis Obispo is ane of the oldest settlements
in the State of California. The establishment of the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa
by the legendary Padre Junipero Serra was strictly a religious exercise; not an effort to
' found a political unit. However, even then the plans of the Spanish crown were to
eventually turn any missionary outpost into a pueblo...a secular governed community
with the church and plaza as the center of town with individuals owning homesteads.
Until such time as designation as a pueblo,the padres were tevstees—not owners—of the
mission�ands for the natives.Any govemance was by the friars(rarely more than two per
mission)and the military leader...usually a sergeant...to address the most se�ious issues.
Beginning with the separa.tion of Mexico from Spain in 1820, the mission lands were
divided into Iarge ranchos. As a distant Department, there was o$ea oniy vague
governance by the Mexican government of the Californios. The core community around
the Mission had few amenities. In 1834, Governor Alvarado declared the settlement as
now a pueblo under the authority of an alcalde. The cenhal auttiorities in Mexico City,
however, never approved the declaration. Same 20 yeazs tater, this �ack of official
recognition proved a turning point in the political organi�ation of San Luis Obispo.
With the advent of American rule and that of Statehood, the sma11 settleme�becatne the
county seat but still had no official recognition as to its municipal form.At the instigation
of Charles H. Johnson,an application was made to the Federal Land Commission to have
the former mission establishment recognized as a pueblo. If it were so designated, the
community would then be determined to cover four square leagues. Such
ac�owledgment was denied and in 1856, the settleme� was legislatively declared a
town based upon its(the Town's)own local survey and map by William Rich Hutton.
It maintained the appellation unfiil 1876 when it was desig�ated as a city. Tlus followed
the federal survey of 1867 and the purchase of the municipal site (about 600 acres) for
$690.82 ($1.25 per acre) five years later. Approximately 50 acres already had been
designated as belonging to the Mission. Over many years previous,various smaller tracts
of land around the mission were divided,bought and sold,homes and businesses built but
— unless deemed a federal grant (patent) - land underlying any claim of ownership
belonged to the federal govemment and not to the State, the town or city and, most
importandy, to any individual. Vast amo�m�ts of federal land are still included within the
Sta.te's borders. Aa act "to settle the title to lands" in the Town was passed by the State
legislators on March 23, 1868 and provided for municipal procedures to obtain tifle to
local property and confirm ownership to land if possession preceded the act.
To remedy the legal issues of ownership, individuals were required to petition the local
authorities and pay a fee in order to be granted a Certificate of Purchase—not a deed—to
the property. If there was no challenge to the Certificate holder within six months, a deed
could be granted (upon payment of$2.50). Recording any ownership interest (if done at
all) was through the County Recorder. The a.ttached represents the surviving petitions
made to the town officials(a Common Council)and then in 1876,the City Council.
Hutton provided the earliest survey of the commtinity. He received a substantial fee of
$627. There has been some suggestion that no map was drawn However, in numerous
petitions,reference is mad.e to the Hutton Map(s�May 24, 1859)and some(see July 21,
1859) place the document with the.Clerk of the County. To date, this map has not been
found. Nonetheless, by using the descriptions found in the earliest petitions, a fair
representation of the boundaries of the map may be assumed as stazements are made as to
the request being within the "corporate limits" of the town. With the town's purchase, a
map by Robert R.Harris and Hubert C. Ward became the official standard.
Various bits of information have been included in the attached inventory. A desirable
next step would be to transfer petition lot locations/owners to a city map thus cmaiing a
new image of the municipality's boundaries and same residents at a particular historical
moment.
As with all history,appreciation is extended for correctiions and/or clarifications.
Joseph A. Carotenuti
May S, 2412
City of San Luis Obispo
Petitions for Land
Essential to the well-being and a well-ordered society is the ownership of land. Land is �
one of the most precious of mankind's worldly possessions and, too often, history is
replete with individuals and nations wazring over the control of each other's property.
Those who struggle don't survive; land does.
Less global — but still pertinent — is the ownership of individual lots and acreage. In
California and locally, the paih to "clear title" to property was and is an evolutionary
process. Without regulations, "ownership rights" become a nightmare of gigantic
proportions. Today, extensive bureaucratic organizations exist to insiu�e such rights do
not become ensnazed in a quagmire of legal challenges. .
Tra.cing its origins to September 1, 1772, San Luis Obispo is one of the oldest settlements
in the State of California. The establishment of the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa
by the legendary Padre Junipero Sema was strictly a religious exercise; not an effort to
found a political unit. However, even then the plans of the Spanish crown were to
eventually turn any muissionary outpost into a pueblo...a secular governed community
with the church and plaza, as the center of town with individuaLs owning homesteads.
Until such time as designation as a pueblo,the padres were trustees—not owners—of the
mission lands for the natives. Any govemance was by the friars(rarely more than twv per
mission)and the military leader...usually a sergeant...to address the most serious issues.
Beginning with the separation of Mexico from Spain in 1820, the mission lands were
divided into Iarge ranchos. As a distant Department, there was often only vague
governance by the Mexican government of the Californios. The core community azound
the Mission had few amenities. In 1834, Governor Alvarado declared the settlement as
now a pueblo under the authority of an alcalde. The central authorities in Mexico City,
however, never approved the declaration. Some 20 years later, this lack of official
recognition pmved a huning point in the political organization of San Luis Obispo.
With the advent of American rule and that of Statehood,the small settlement became the
county seat but still had no official recagnition as to its municipal form.At the instigation
of Charles H. Johnson,an applicaiion was made to the Faderal Land Commission to have
the former mission establishment recognized as a pueblo. If it were so designated, the
community would then be determined to cover four square leagues. Such
acknowledgment was denied and in 185b, the settlement was legislatively declared a
town based upon its(the Town's)owa local survey and map by William Rich Hutton.
It maintained the appellation until 1876 when it was designated as a city. This followed
the federal survey of 1867 and the purchase of the municipal site (about 600 acres) for
$690.82 ($1.25 per acre) five years later. Approximately 50 acres already had been
designated as belonging to the Mission Over many years previous, vazious swaller tracts
of land around the mission were divided,bought and sold,homes and businesses built but
— unless dee�med a federal grant (patent) - laad underlying any claim of ownership
belonged to the federal govemment and not to the State, the town or city and, most
importaatly, to any individual. Vast amounts of federal land are still included within the
State's borders. An act "to settle the tifle to lands" ia the Town was passed by the State
legislators on March 23, 1868 and provided for municipal procedures to obtain tifle to
local property and confirm ownership to land if possession preceded the act.
To remedy tt�e legal issues of ownership, individuals were required to petition the local
authorities and pay a fee in order to be granted a Certificate of Purchase—not a deed—to
the property. If there was no challenge to the Certificate holder within six months, a deed
could be granted (upon payment of$2.50). Recording any ownership interest (if done at
all) was through the County Recorder. The attached represents the surviving petitions
made to the town officials(a Common Council)and then in 1876,the City Council.
Hutton provided the earliest survey of the comununity. He received a subs�tantial fee of
$627. There has been some suggestioa that no map was drawn. However, in numerous
petitions,reference is made to the Hutton Map(see May 24, 1859)and some(see Juty 21,
1859) place the document with the Clerk of the County. To date, thi.s map has not been
found. Nonetheless, by using the descriptions found in the eazliest petitions, a fair
representation of the boundaries of the map may be assumed as statements are made as to
the request being withi.n the "corporate limits" of the town. With the town's purchase, a
map by Robert R.Hazris and Hubert C. Ward bacame the official standazd.
Various bits of infornnation have been included in the attached inventory. A desirable
next step would be to transfer petition lot locations/owners to a city map thus cr�ating a
new image of the municipality's boundaries and some reside�s at a parbicular historical
moment.
As with all history,appreciation is extended for con�ections and/or clarifications.
Joseph A. Cazotenuti
May 8,2012
City of San Luis Obispo
Petitions for Land
Essential to the well-being and a well-ordered society is the ownership of land. Land is
one of the most precious of mankind's worldly possessions and, too often, history is
replete with individuals and nations wazring over the control of each other's property.
Those who struggle don't survive; land does.
Less global — but still pertinent — is the ownership of individual lots and acreage. In
California and locally, the path to "cleaz title" to property was and is an evolutionary
process. Without regulations, "ownership rights" become a nightmare of gigantic
proportions. Today, extensive bureaucratic organizations exist to insure such rights do
not become ensnared in a quagmire of legal challenges. .
Tracing its origins to September 1, 1772, San Luis Obispo is one of the oldest settlements
in the State of California. The establishment of the Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa
by the legendary Padre Junipero Sen�a was strictly a reli,gious exercise; not an effort to
found a political unit. However, even then the plans of the Spanish crown were to
eventua�ly turn any nussionary outpost into a pueblo...a secular governed community
with the church and plaza as the center of town with individuals owning homesteads.
Until such time as designation as a pueblo, the padres were trustees—not owners—of the
mission lands for the natives. Any governance was by the friars(rarely more tUan two per
mission)and the military leader...usually a sergeant...to address the most serious issues.
Begirming with tlie separation of Mexico from Spain in 1820, the mission lands were
divided into Iarge ranchos. As a distant Departmenf, thsre was often only vague
governaace by the Mexican government of the Catifomios. The core community azound
the Mission had few amenities. In 1834, Governor Alvarado declared the setklement as
now a pueblo under the authority of an alcalde. The central authorities in Mexico City,
however, never approved the decl�a.tion. Same 20 years later, this lack of official
recognition proved a turning point in the politioal organization of San Luis Obispo.
With the advent of American rule and that of Statehood, the sma11 settlement be�ame the
county seat but still had no official recognition as to its municipal form. At the instigation
of Charles H. Johnson,an application was made to the Federal Land Commission to have
the former mission establishment recognized as a pueblo. If it were so designated, the
community would tb.en be determined to cover four square leagues. Such
acknowledgment was denied and in 1856, the settlement was legislatively declared a
town based ugon its(the Town's)own local survey and map by William Rich Hutton.
It maintained the appellation until 1876 when it was designated as a city. This followed
the federal survey of 186? and the purchase of the municipal site (about 600 acres) for
$690.82 ($1.25 per acre) five years later. ApproximateIy 50 acres already had been
designated as belonging to the Mission. Over many years previous, various smaller tracts
of land around the mission were divided,bought and sold,h�mes and businesses built but
— unless deemed a federal grant (pataeent) - land underlying any claim of ownership
belonged to the federal govemment and not to the State, the town or city and, most
importantly, to any individual. Vast amounts of federal laad are still ineluded wiihin the
State's borders. An act "to settle the title to lands" in the Town was passed by the State
legislators on March 23, 1868 and provided for municipal procedme.s to obtain title to
local property and confirm ownerslup to land if possession preceded the act
To remedy the legal issues of ownership, individuals were required to petition the local
authorities and pay a fee in order to be granted a Certificate af Purchase—not a deed—to
the pmperty. If there was no challenge to the Certificate holder within six months, a deed
could be granted (upon payment of$2.50). Recording any owners}up interest (if done at
all) was through the County Recorder. The attached represents the surviving petitions
made to the town oi�cials(a Common Council)and then in 1876,the City Council.
Hutton provided the earliest.survey of the community. He received a substantial fee of
$627. There has been some suggestion that n� ma.p was drawn. However, in numerous
petitions,reference is made to the Hutton Map(see May 24, 1859)and some(see July 21,
1859) place the document with the Clerk of the Coanty. To date, this map has not been
found. Nonetheless, by using the descriptions found in the earliest petitions, a fair
representation of the boundaries of the map may be assumed as statemeats are made as to
the request being within the "corporate Iimits" of the town. With the town's purchase, a
map by Robert R.Hazris and Hubert C.Ward became the official standazd
Various bits of information have been included in the attached inventory. A desirable
next step would be to transfer petition lot IocationsJowners to a city map thus creating a
new image of the municipality's boundaries and some residents at a par�icular lustorical
moment. �
As with all history,appreciation is extended for comections and/or clarifications.
Joseph A. Carotenuti
May 8,2012 �
City of San Luis Obispo
Petitions for Land
Essential to the well-being and a well-ordered society is the ownership of land. Land is
one of the most precious of mankind's worldly possessions and, too often, history is
replete with individuals and nations warring over the control of each other's properiy.
Those who struggle don't survive; land does.
Less global — but still pertinent — is the ownership of individual lots and acreage. In
Califomia and locally, the path to "clear title" to property was and is an evolutionary
process. Without regulations, "ownership rights" become a nightmare of gigantic
proportions. Today, extensive bureaucratic organizations exist to insure such rights do
not become ensnazed in a quagmire of legal c1�a11enges. .
Tracing its origins to September 1, 1772, San Luis Obispo is one of the oldest settlements
in the State of California The establishment of the 1VTission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa
by the legendary Padre Junipero Serra was strictly a religious exercise; not an effort to
found a political unit. However, even then the plans of the Spanish crown were to
eventually turn any missionary outpost into a pueblo...a seculaz govemed community
with the church and plaza, as the center of town with individuals owning homesteads.
Until such time as designation as a pueblo,the padres were trustees—not owners—of the
mission lands for the natives.Any govemance was by the friars(rarely more than two per
mission)and the military leader...usually a sergeant...to address the most serious issues. _
Begi.nning with the separation of Mexico from Spain in 1820, the mission lands were
divided into Iarge ranchos. As a distant Department, there was often only vague
governance by the Mexican government of the Califomios. The core community around
the Mission had few amenities. In 1834, Governor Alvaiado declared the settlement as
now a pueblo under the authority of an alcalde. The central authorities in Mexico City,
however, never approved the declazation. Same 20 yeazs later, this tack of official
recognition proved a tuming point in the political organization of San Luis Obispo.
With the advent of American rule and that of Statehood,the small settlement becazne the
county seat but still had no official recognition as to its municipal form.At the instigation
of Charles H. Johnson,an application was made te the Federal Land Commission to have
the former mission establishment recognized as a pueblo. If it were so designated, the
community would then be determined to cover four squaze leagues. Such
aclrnowledgment was denied and in 1856, the settlement was legisiatively declared a
town based upon its(the Town's)own local survey and map by William Rich Hutton.
It maintained the appellation until 1876 when it was designated as a city. This followed
the federal survey of �867 and the purchase of tlie municipal site (about 6Q0 acres) for
$690.82 ($1.25 per acre) five years later. Approximately SO acres already had been
designated as belonging to the Mission. 4ver many years previous, various smaller tracts
of land around the mission were divided,bought and so1d,homes and businesses built but
— unless deemed a federal grant (patent) - land underlying any claim of ownership
belonged to the federal government and not to the State, the town or city and, most
importantly, to any individual. Vast amounts of federal land are still included within the
State's bordezs. An act "to settle the title to lands" ia the Town was passed by the Staxe
�
,`
`r
� /
� legislators on March 23, 1868 and provided for municipal procedures to obtain title to
local property and confirm ownership to land if possession preceded the act.
To remedy the legal issues of ownership, individuals were required to petition the local
authorities and pay a fee in order to be granted a Certificate of Purchase—not a deed—to
� the property. If there was no challenge to the Certificate holder within six morrths, a deed
could be granted (upon payment of$2.50). Recording any ownership interest (if done at
a11) was through the County Recorder. The attached represents the surviving petitions
made to the town officials(a Common Council)and then in 1876,the City Council.
Hutton provided the earliest survey of the community. He received a substantial fee of
$627. There has been some suggestion that no map was drawn. However, in numerous
petitions,reference is made to the Hutton Map(see May 24, 1859)and some(see Ju1y 21,
1859) place the document with the Clerk of the County. To date, this map has not been
found. Nonetheless, by using the descriptions found in the eazliest petitions, a fair
representation of the boundaries of the map may be assumed as statements are made as to
the request being within the "corporate limits" of the town. With the town's purchase, a
map by Robert R.Harris and Hubert C. Ward became the official standard.
Various bits of information have been included in the attached inventory. A desirable
next step would be to transfer petition lot locations/owners to a city map thus creating a
new image of the municipality's boundaries and some resideuts at a particular historical
moment.
As with a1i history,appreciation is extended for corr�ctions and/or clarifications.
Joseph A. Carotenuti
May 8, 2012
LEGEND
The following is intended to assist in reading the atta.ched inventory. While dates are
sometimes conflicting (or non-existent) within a document, the atta.ched aze categorized
by the date of"presentation"to the municipal body.
DATE: #1: This is the date the petitioner prepazed a request for the property often
repeating an attached surveyor's description.
DATE #2: This date is when the petition was "presented" to the local government for
approval. If there is neither petitioner nor presentation da.te,the document is included at a
certain point as being originally found with the companion petitions. Documents are
filed in order of this date.
A secondary inventory of Iot petitions is by the petitianer's last name.
An additional benefit from.the petitions is a list of ineeting dates of the community's
leaders as no oi�ciat Minutes have been found before May 4, 1870. Within the preserved
Minutes, hundreds of references are made to petitions being received and the dispositivn
of requests...not a11 represented in the surviving documents.
PETITION/PETITIONER: Penmanslup occasionally obscures cornect spelling of
surnames...let alone differing versions by the surveyor and clerk, Petitions note if a
person signed with a mark. A few have signatures of the person completing the request if
not completed by the petitioner(usually an attorney). There are a few women petitioners.
Initially, petitions were handwritten but beginning in 1870, a preprinted form was
available. Some indicate when t6e petitioner (or ancestors) first "settled upon" the
requested property.
DESGRIPTION: Many of the descriptions aze rudimentary metes and bounds namatives
with some referencing a neighbar's property line, a tree, fence, the Arroyo (San Luis
Creek) aad such. Blocks (about 3 acres) and lot numbers are provided in the listing as a
reference help and are not meant to be the sum total of a petition's property request.
Many requests have no block and/or lot designations. Another avenue needing
exploration is the relationship of such designations to any used in the federal survey.
They ma.y have differed from those used in the Hutton ma.p.
FEE: The fee depended upon the size of the request with $5 for properties under %2 acre;
$10 if more and up to two acres; from 2 to 5 acres were assessed $l 5.,qny pazcel beyand
five acres was in the $2U+ category. Special assessments below $S are self-explanatory
within the pe�ition.
MAP: In addition to descriptions,many petitions contain snnall maps—generaily of the
block—dra,wn on fiagile vellum or trace p�aper.Often,names of the owners of adjoining
property or lots aze includ�d in these maps. Some will indicate where a dwelling or
�� .
� structure of some sort exists,fence line,and one a"sepulcher."A noticeable feature is the
rectangular alignment of streets while parts of petitions were included the same at�ea.
Note with peti.tions for larger acreage,lot boundazies are often designated as"town
limits."
CERTII�'ICATE: If approved by the goveming board, praof of ownership was a
Certificate of Purchase. The clerk made a note on the pe�tition and/or issued a separate
document with the town/city sea1. This proof of ownership included a caveat of a deed
costi.ng an additional $2.50. Numbers in parenthesis ind.icaze the Clerk's record of the
certifica.te number. Not all certificates noted have been preserved but their numbers are
found on a separa.te document.
DEED: If a deed was issued, notice of such usually was written on the certificate and/or
original petition A dced was available after a six-month wait for any adverse claim.
Thus, properiy searches relyin.g solely an the recordation date (an optional practice) do
not necessarily provide proof as to the date of acquisition. . No deeds (except one:
DATE) have been preserv� but their dates of issuance have been found on a separate
document.
NOTES: A recurring statement in petitions was note of impmvements or promise of
improvements on vacant land and occupancy/farming by the petitianer. Clearly,pmperty
was intended for residents. If improvements were made (usually a dwelling and/or "a
substantial board fence'�, an estimate of cost is included in this section A few were
initially rejected as there were no improvements on the requested land or another ha.d
already received a Certificate of Purchase. Accuracy of such improvement costs may
have been modest so as to maintain a low tax assessment. Robert R Hazris, Hubert C.
Ward, and George Larkin were local surveyors. Their names in the Notes indicate their
descriptions for the petitions. _
Joseph A Carotenuti
June 4,2010
� . ' _
� _ , . _ , � .
• � ,. .�iir � ,'Ctk°'f r
. � � — ' , .• �
O . _ .
• � SI7Tl�L
. � � a
. z� •
, �► f�o�loior,y . r , � �11��d E la ; 1�70
i4 I�uc c�l. -
. ;�;. :y
- O ,�;: s= 6 � .
; _
:, � . __ .
. . � ���r,,����
.
- �� ., F.. :: �� -. _._ ,
.;,.,;.. .�P<�GY• .:. .� ._ ..-..,.
. . . . :, '.:.. ':::.'..t.� ' ' � .
. .P A L /y. . .
- ,
, �-�
=��:.��:,.
.' 't[,�Sf�r`� �j�2' y { - ' � •
. . i .F '��'��+L��'� i; . . A�� �.
`}' d�.-*1ea. . ' n�•,etf�ti{ '�' !S
.���-��A� '�.,?ri.'<.:.,=. N � _y -
, • eY�c.,4c +G .;i';:;"i;G'.. �• .� �.
I �• ���- �45��� ,'�_�x� ,• F~ �� � 'Y
�'"5.:.:* �,5. :,�; a::,;;.�c' ,� :�. -��" ..
' _... .. ... ��v J`t''i�"•�s�.'.�,'�-"'�.'�'.-�,��4. _`i:. ' A"K� ^i/..• ~M�• ��
.... ,,..., a•.
.. � ..�:... . . .
:
.. r:. •
� ':✓L..
. R;�.n.�;�' �� '
� .. �. . ::,,.. m,,.... ._ :ti.,'.�ax.�$+.; ."�.M'...; yx`•'.rJS. ��..�r
,...,, -u;..,
- -..... ..4...:.:.. ...-:.:,.......:
� � i ' �+�'" �'~ ' V''w''..'.
' ..... .y :1.. . E, . ,,�''�i�''V�'�. '�" . , ,p . •
.,.��, `�,�� v�`•
' '�'k�..'1��.`�k.F_:_. i.^r.r-. _ r.,#... _"?%.�•'�.a,.�x. ;`"'�n",�„?i; �.. �. .�:'.1`.. ...
'� ��:_:-' _. .. �, .
O � , � .. .. .... , <' ... . �,.;, �"`�:�•,;�:..�. . ':
1j'!q � [ -'%'��.�°�`.�,t�. �
. .. ... ,,. .
� �. f Q � � � � Q a���4�
� •
� ' ' � � ' .
; -' ._ i
� �' � /1/ T E R E y "� . .�
�rog�a� y�: /g7o :4.� ; , .
�,
, .. . , , .
/6s� `�- �� ` �
�. - -
. \��'
-. - - . . _
8.:p ' z: -.3..:�...
. �..
� �'. •: /� � . ; '�`� +
. - . ::,.: �� r��. 3 }�
.
.. ,..
, �1► Z ; �`' '�� ; �
: v v: �
�W /19U/� PAy �= _ P� , . ; �, .: �
s � � - �
. ti _ . . ... . �
. . �� � .
P � .
. . �r� . ;y�;:�. � ' :
� ..�.. ..��..,
_ � : -
.:�
_ - - ... . . - , : _
,_.,. . __ -- . . - -
; :. :.:�:,,.,,;._�.-,,.._ _..
. �
_..
_..:_
.
.. ...... '.ii..�.4�y�•• � ' .; ,�,^ �
�,,-;w,,;'t
.�•;...:-
.. ., . . .. ... . ,. . .
.. . ... . ''+
... .. . . 5 .. .. .-..._.,�
:.:e
.H_
_ �
' ..
:
.: �. ...... ...... :u,. . . .
�y.c
;.....
. .. .. . . . . . 'e:
�-
...�
� . ...,�. . ,.� ,: . . --�....._ _ '"_' . '
�--: �.,�.,
.. .... . -i .., . . ..:,.��.:•�.•.�.�.ti_i:.t`.x. _., r..:,. .
_ `-
,::�,.
'
. , ... y... 1:. �.,..::�..
. P
.. n.: .. . .'�,�$., . . ., "" . ' .
. . .� .:;� ...� �-.... ... :. ...�:;.+,1._...
....
` /
. . v. . �. :..,.: ... - . .
. . ...:....,'�. .�.,�. ...._�� . �
, � -�.;.....�_;.,.
_
. . ........-.� ,:�I.:• _
r:'•e'
.. ..::...:..' .. .... .. - .� . ' ,
. ...r..'!�+?�h.� ..�� �...,...r... . .. - '
. �::::.
_ .:��. i; . .�.... .. .i. . .
..,....:^:..n•..
. - . . �.;::' � '
r
....�.:.',�
; �
...�.e.....rva.._:.•.: . . . .. u":.:..:`'.:n.�'_ � �
. ....... . :`::: �� ..�y�.. .�` _ �
�.:.�..
.. . .. ....: ...`r..:::'
,��.�'.
. ._ .. . ..:_. ,. ...�.i... .. .�....:._'.:'� -
......�Z:::
�''.'''. ' �
Y
....... . ..:....... . .,�. . ... .. ...;� _
...,�..
..... '
r'.`.Y��r':
.. .. ..t�::......,. ':.... r�..,.'�� "
w.
:.
.�.'.�.'_�
�r.
�
t:'.
..... _:�e.�: ..
....�.. ,; .�. :.� .
` ..�,�.•:'T`.�. '
�Z.� .��� ,
...._. . .. . ... � _ .._ .. .�.= 'Y^..--.L:�..^� _�
. ...._ . ..��:. ...-.... ""
' ..�,..:....:.':.:...�..�•..
� .. . .., • . ..� . . .. ..: . . , .:.,�......:v4r.{`;'��...._..
. . �
' . � . _ . . '� .
- . � � r :l t � � 4
.��� �
• � ... . • ti
, ,,
,
. o �' Srr�<t�i '
, . � �,, a . �
- � �,, �;rlp�,y y �urd E � ; �g7o
. A 1�v�1a l.' -
, 3.`.>
� 4 :f y� ;�:. 6 � y� �
- � s_
.� . , � T``Y�l.•lT;ft 'G r9PC`t�f/i'. .� --- ----
•-." , . „ :;�� .
, ,P A L M � . �
, , �f ,
_ .•':,.�• �,:� ""�se��
, : .,;�c�,.a"-� ,
,. .�ps: � . . •: �. :. .i .. t. _ � {4s���� �i:; .
�5..: ` �S N�S�..� r,''„ , ��; ; t' Y,.-. ' .r��:;
:r �.;v� .... a '� • ..�:: �� � �! � .:�w
.�, �,�„,.�5��� �,. � ''i• & .• '<•' ;v:'�'` u y.. ' .•'
`;+''•,b:� '-i:��� :�':; ;y$.�„'�,�.,,( � ,; ..::�.�x��..• ' r':k=� y '+' _'-�
�� � �''--.'�jI' .~ -���, 4..
.F:,�^i Yr--'�-'T 1, `4' < ��':r., v
���s«�^;: �;'�x.: ' ..�� 'a' '.h;`':i':.'��29�.!��,:�;,� ` .':� `'�f.:�`4��F �-+t�i,,t�,�r�,.:, ,-�,
' ' _ :.�'. :7:�..5� 1,:GF'�:T:�._r.«� ��.'�+� "�,;" ���5,,, r�c,;��'. 34�:�fr.. .l� �V•4:'.
. . •�' �` a`,.:'r=' :>,.`�,�:..-�',�. „�, ...;�j;�',e, i�v;;�'= sw' �'f.,� :..a ,R.r� a�.�^'}�"'#-c' ff'�4r"�:�,' ,}e1: ':.�:s'-
. _ _1_'^'`i' _..... .'F:�4'.":,r_' ..., r.. d� `t,, �' •�A: ��..-:i:r,.. 74t:+t 3% ,
.Y ,^�. :%�. 7��...-." �^`�r:.. �,+..:`'
:� ,:�.sT;' �x; �?*'.y ;�'c: -.s.>�.�"a`;"•`. '3Y:�.
O - ':'t:.r.1�.`�.:"$^ _,�v+�+c='." ; . ' ., ' �.��'�,..; .-��,.;.,,,.�,k.:,•;.: -t�a;�, :. ° l
� . 4 n �. . , + � t` j "e�7�'`.�,_ . . . ,�
(1 �p ��.j..'•`'rs•:'.;.
V� � � � � ,.•� O � � V � O � - ,
� . . . .
� � . . . . . * • ' , . ,. ' .
, " - � r • . . . . � ' . �
. ' I
- � M O /1% T� E- �R E y � � � .�
�r;�-o��� � ig7Q :�- . + �:�
, . . . .
;r : . . , .
�6S-. � .. ���d , � -3 _ � - �� �
_ � �. , ��� c� � - .
. . „. � � .y� , '
. � ��� � � ,,
�W /YIUPRAY � P � � •v � v. .
�s o �
� - P¢� �
�� � � .
: .h . -- ,;.- ..; . � .�_ v,�.
. . ' . - j : . � . . !
' • . ' _ "_ _
. . . - '_
� . . .,,.�. � _ - .
� �; ' . -.�::' . -.._ . .. . . .. _ .
. . � ...A:.�'`.:.r'•' - . = " . . ' '.!�-
.
..�
.' . . . ... . :. •- . , . _ � .
� -...... . . . " . . • '_ � . � � . . . . . . .. . . . . � .�'' . . `� : . .. " .'_._,:_. ,
. ' . . �
� .�. � � � � ' ..
. . . . ' �.�� / ,,� L . :;�.� . �
. � W . . . .� �
� . � � �' sr:f�t�i " '
. , � �'� c�� ' `
, � � � �ror�e�y � � �u� E � . �g7 0
� , A l�l/c1a l.' ,
3;..
. , . 4 ti�� - .�';�� � y .
�� s 6 .
.� . � �f.�`rrr.�r,ci �qa��(ir _�y. . . .._..�
, • „ �. , . - , .
� � �P �A �� M. � . '
� , �; �
_ .ti.:.,.��.,,��a -r:-• .. • - _ ,��,
," � .. ..;.., ;: � y�.,� .. _ ���?s�';-t , ..
' ' '`r�l` ��G._`.3� �X'� 'Y�.� r�'+ii����,�. :,y'
�';':, ,G:.. M t' I� f1
�i:';a^4..y::�?: ,�' 'JY-�.: t.., �j�""y� Y. .tY�. �,• :;�`f�#-".�';,,s�,.
,i�'` •'i'- :`���`""'` ':�'��':�+� ��'�`°Y:;� _ '.�.:.�:�i ��5;''�''.'a..�"'. :x.*,i�'g`�i
•c:: C� ,�._�
_.�i �'.1::;.:^I'�F`.1T.�.:'fy f.
.�rd" a 7��.'d..•. - .
�+ t r•
., ��' ,��� `'
^Y - •� .d�:N•: 'l{�.. � �RY �t,. 3 �"f: ���: . f.���r .. - •' ,�
�,,?:s' ' ' "�.,'� '�?: 4����..s.a,,, .i�'fi ... ':f(.)�^�,'M"o`�y.k:J:y..:'•i �'M 7�.�fE '.i+ -* <': �r V�';' s.
. " a._=- .�.:�.^""• 'J��,...�'��..»,�',�<, �ii• ,�.P"�L Kr�-.S;g.:�5.i".r�`a�`:"+Cde.�S ��� 'r ' + � -:..a •
_.,. . .n'*_t;._ -.....�;�•',.:ri::v._ L "��?!n�� r S e!�`�;.�'.,'�-e�i�r��i.n� .� ��4.��'r:.' ;��, �
� . ' . . .a . . . ^Y`��'. "K 'p
� s A A/ - � -. .�s �,...,��,�,:K�,:. : '..�
. , � v i.�,r o � r, ,� � v �`�Ayy•
� . � :
. 4� � - . . � , � � . - , . .
. . ;
�-r . � M O /1/ T E �R E y .. , .. ,
og�� 1 �g�o :Y. , _ _ �:t
, _ - - � .
rf. . : ,
�6� , , . � -�,:� ;t _ V =3 _ � �` �
. . f � �MT� • ��,,,, "
� .• 1_•� � I "� . . �J
�y" � � , ,
VY /1�U P RA Y �� S P . ' .; � ��: , .
. . Rr� Z � �
�P -- e - .
� � . ..�� _ . �� � .
- ,,, . . . . .
, . _��:_ . . . �- -_ , x�, : ` � �^ :
:. ,..
� ." :_ ::���;� . -- -_ _____��� - ._ ;- ::- - _ � _ ���
.._ . . . - • ._ � . .. . - �-. - .�� ". '" . � .. _- ------
� ; , � . � , . � - .
- . � ' � �',. /. .l 1 � .�� : }
. � . � .. . .�
. ,;
� : 0 �� �- s�tr��t � �
, - � �., a . .
� � �. �� �arldi�y � � �urdE � �g7o
. ,� 1�vc1u 1,' ;
. 3.
: � . O �� _ .��, y .
. �t s 6
•� . � ,F`3'tF,�t��fr ;�yPfe�fi�Y u
. '� .�-. .—- ——
.� �. i � ,. .. F . . .
� � �P A �L /t�l . '
. - , . �; ,
ti `=M;:.�;r:,'�, y�: ., .. : ;�';� ��''�'"�' �R?: . ,
-*� �t
'� ... .� • >- ' ,'��'. i
-j : - ��-','` ��5 .� Y��' �._ `•r
;,M�w,:.,3,9;'� '�'_. ..�.•c:.w ,� J°re -''�'{. .�- '�s��.}�� :.�1'`•
�' , __., :s . .
. ��'c�t'�; :'y;,w�;��J.,-�,..�..��� •�J��^ ' � �;us:s g� � � �1� ��,/J� ;� .X���';,�"�*R i.!:.�',y:, '[i7 {. . �'� -
7�.4^�:',p,�.a1a� ;p . �i �. .
„a�y+� . �"Y,�'��'•'-�''� T�'�.a': ..sy�,�'y*iX�:.'*+.\.i "'�' ��N,. �v^'N�� �`L� -.•J;•�'j^���.��jF��i���,. y" ��{;� 'Y�:.��. ��Y:.
_. _� :4.'�'3.�. ; ��an. . � ` , �42�FR�,� ,,i .+ .
.a41':� .F � i.:. •-..7_..G: '+sr.:-�� �C . � �...1•
+: �':k��sn-.:.t.,:.i . �„n�.. ��; � `�
- ._..,. ... y 1.r:'.a. ��J'�[�`.. 7.,,n,.�. 7�.: 'Y6i ..n.+'..��i' � . •:i,
� ' . `7�:R'�Li� �S'�. . ... ,,. , �'"d . 7 � ' . .. ��..�,."�^C:�`�,,9a,�� ,J.a'. V...� j
� `�.' ' Vi �j�._ t�a°«!i,�:... :,�'
� � � L � �..f � � � � P � ,'��:��� � • ,
� • .. .. _ :
• � ' . . . � • � _ ,.
, f
_
� Nr o� �v r �-���R E y . .
�,-�e�� ,, ,g�a :w. . :?
_ ��
.:�� � . ' . . , .
�6S , ' .. � `�`d � :.�� �
. . ,► �. � - h . . � •
�� F "� �1� � � ��L �= : �;
y � v , ,
I�U /Yl UP fi'i9 Y : , P� :. .` v: ; _ ,
. f�s . � �
, Pp��' � � .
`�. - ,�� � . .
:�.: •. . . _
- ;�=.�� �� .. � -- . . - � . :-�:�
. - - � � - - - -_ -_=� _' ---- _ � . '��
. , f. - -
_.
. . -- - -
.:.:� . . : _ . .
.
. . �,� . . ._ ._ , . . _ - - -
. ,._ ,
-..
.
.
._ . .: ..r. :� . _ _._
�__�
... ...:
,
-� . . , .. . ° _ . _
_.. ... _ , ,. :;: � _
_,.
.; ..
,;:.
..
. .�
. . . _. . . ...-: . - � .� �� . . - . --- --. ._
: . .
. � .; :-
_
. _ -. . . - ��: .� �' .. .;_.._v_. �. :.
, . . , ' �
. . . � , _ � - .
� / .L, 1 . � f
i2,. ,
� .�. . . � O � �} � ��. ,- • '
. L� S�TTL('(l
, , /' �•. �j � +
� � frollaiaay . � �111� E !� � tS7 0
.4 t�ucla l.' . .
. . ��.�' �. . .
. o � �F y ,
: . .
�:��: '" s- � � 6 .
. . ., .. _
., _ .
�
. .� - .. ....
�`3'rl.�l.t.f���9PC`�OY
�. . . ,�� ��
,�° A :L /�I. . ,
. �
. �.
,
I i.%�.����� � '' - i ' '�4 � . ,,.Y.. '�� � .. �°'�� .��" -
.. �. y .. `�.r'. �+ti,�' I� .
.,Y . . ,:.-:, �,�, i� �.
. .�����y� �� • i'��;... •'� ..tr '�' �,A.. z., -
,
� .. .,r,... .-. ��; � � � - �'�y���.. .�
I �'�:a, 7� u: ti;:�`:�ic�..`7:..� r .y=�" �d.-'X.�.k+ .:�.
k �i .
�..x�"s :t;:`. shi±.iz `. :d%y;1�` ..� ;;l,,tir - � _ �;�
7`.��,'"�
. ... `�?`u�i�',?�. +:; ';,�Sr p " .,
. . `'e•.a f.;f.t`•.; ;� 1.+,� '.�:�n. .:; ''i�,'�•T'�;'� 7;. ;. :�+: ;{.e::..'
-1...,e-,... ' F'.��„ _ n,:.!.ia'✓'Sx:�., i� v�. _ic;[. _ �'.r�.
- ,Y, r'I.�,. ec..}." . �y,6�_tn.�S:Y .�a:i:•VIYY� �mw .{".^��).�., a'Rj,�a' ��C.a,y,. .�5. .�. :�.,'i..�.:
.�.:r..:. ' ,:. _
. .., ,..
.�. .:�... . .
:s, .,. . � ..: .A" _
' . �.�":� ...., �.`�
. . . --... .... �:,�:^,
.- . .. : ....... _ ,.
O � �.�'1°l�"�.�*°.,,*' _ ' . . � ..s. ��'..... �, Y�� ' - .i,
. :_...` ..3e„-..,� . _ � s.'}. --' +F:;���.;."`-� �.5.
. � . .'�!' .. . ':.-2. •.�,;:r �� :..::�' � .. �a
�' A /�V [ ..�'.''-"�,�:�
p� U /.s O � / �' P0 ��::
`` : . _ . :
; � - � - . _�. .
,
. . M O /V T E �/!� ,E y �� . ��
,:
('��^.;og�� j�� ./g7C . ._ ;,
/6,s- -. ,, . .. ,
;: ;;�. -:.
, $,p. °' ;�� �. _ � ,. . �' �
. -
... _ ,: :
,;:
: .. -. . . � , .. ..: ". w1� . I..
;., V
. , � �,
. .. f �` \ ...�� �� ,e
. � . � � ' � ��. a � �� v: � � . ,
. .. :: . . , ::�:'�� . .� . .
� /�l/� P/q y �. _ Q� . ` . .` ` ,v:., ... � , .
� . a��s. Z � �� ..
- (.�N. ' Q "
:V. �
�- - ���: -�_: , _
.3:�
.--.,,:.-. - ,
.��:,,,�.. -
�.....a:
,
,. .
.. ,
-,:�-,.�...... .. . .
.,a�`,.':';;' .F. . • . , � . ` .. _
_.: '. -
,.,. .. . -- -
....:;.,•:'.:. -- -
,. ., .., ,:.. - _ .
-::,
...: .. .. . .....'s - - - — - -
`'�. `...�.`
,.. ..�� � - --
:;�.
:
i
:� :.., .',. .:r:.•,,�,;�'•., ".:;.r.�.,c�',�*� _ . .
,.
, .�....,, .. �.�•��•��.'r. . .:...::�� - - - - � .
...
:.�::'..�.
. ..�
..�:;:�;�'���
.. ..., y. ... . ..
,c�.-,.
,. . .. . . ._�. - — . .
. ...:..�..:..�.tw"..4Tftr... .�.. ��'�... .....�.::�: ::�......�1....>>�__.'
:;�n'
:
`i..
.. .. ..--. .' .�.: � .. .....,. . __ - _ —
. .�
:':..::
�:..
....i.._..::.n . . .. ...:. ...'iCv';.•.•�:'� _ _ - �
��. .�.�::_.:i.:..
.:.n...�
.....
��n�.,.� !��_�
. ..�.......��. ,..•.. � ,.`,. .::. .._; �y�,
. .. .,��... . ....,..• ..�,..-..;�;.
. .. .... - - _ ^�w ;'•Ai:"':"." _
,
... . , ,:.�..-.�:_.•_ -+ -
.�%".
:'.+' ;:
� ....._:�......:..�... � . .':� _ _ - __
..:.::
.......... . .....:":"' �.•"���'`� ' -�." ' ' _
... . ... � _ ..- .. ' . '. " "�'�'..',;::.::���,..�:= _
, . � ' _
, _ , . � - . .
; '.�� �. ,t+ � '�k='4 �
. O • �I -..i . .• �
. � s�zr��tt � �
, � �,, a.
�. �• Hollo� h ,�V'f� E �G ; tg7 0
y ,� �u��u 1.� .
3�� a:�
' d '�� � � .
�.'' s ,6.
: : , ; . _ . -- - -. - - .. _ _:
�f
�.�`yrr.•i,,cr
. :.
:,... , .• ;;,'. .
'.,G.�Prl�'r..
� _ '�
�P A L M. '
, � �
'�` ,
.� ._:�.... :..
.�,.:..;..ryF- : . � .
..
, ,�-�i.. ._;z,. �- ��
. ;.�,-: .
�.4,E.. ..,;�,� ��:-.��.:.� -� � � ., �
, i� -x..;,�. , p-.�,��t�,,..�:••
F�:�%� 1ry��'"h. �'.7:,.a.�l,.'.i. .� �m� �.fi > .Eti•. .�.�
. . ..�•�'��: . •, . . �'. .
='�r7�`�,.�`.:' �a "?'.:'? ;'a�:..�• .�r° .�. 7� -+.�
: . •�. � � .u' � . .
�:�'u s,p.- ;;�:K�.;fi4'�rt;�,,..s ,v`.'�'�aiS'x'a.� �.. '�^ ._;+,.. -�`�:.�'� '�� w�N'` ;,�..
�:.y ,a` ;�;y� .1.. ,r4`::..a;..�t. `�, ' }: ,r. �``'�` - .. .=;�r:
.4�� � :� ��'. � I ,i���� -,� � eJ.3.' .i�,.
� ti� $s. ';•. .,�� :�•�• 'i�'c:'. �?:: �� -?:i�,�� 'J .€' :i:i�:
..,. ... ... .y:eC✓-w��.'a. _ .� ti,.IL"f:t "+i': �: �3u.f'�.r,-•...4�� �., _ . � ..
. ' ' . ...... .�..;J'' e.{•=i'•%'.R!Y !:��`S'i'. �".'x�„�ah, .q,:' ' ';�'°i'�-�5•.,y �r� 1 .:�,,�.
,�_ .
�
....,,.;.. ..
.. �. ..
. � ,.
,, ... �•
.- ._, .,,r;s-�. � ... �;,;: ��s"'" p
. : � �A:i�"�.1YY,'�i .... . ._. rim?;. - � .r.. �� ' ' "�r,�R".l� �• "� �:x' :;d
� � �i' A l�/ L '� -:.; ". � ,. .,'._ •.'" _�: '.;��!''�:>,��-:�:::: . ,
U /.s -�x:��, :
08 / s P � - . .
� � .
� - . - . � � � -
� � � ONTE �R £ y ..
�re�g�� .�� �5�� .. .� _ ,
/6s . . .. . . •$.:a t /� ��1 :3� _ � . �' - s
" . Y .LL. .�i . ' ,
� . , . . .. . ' F�: ' . . ��� � I , �� . ,2=� � .. ':r
. ' . �V`' V V . � ,
W /19�/f� RA Y �- P ' .v �°: : �
5 v �. "
. ¢�E .; . � . - �. .:
�
�P . -.,y " � • . ,
� � . : _.,.;
.
_ _ _ . .
, >.::, _. .
.:;.
. _..:,. ._ . . -
:-1_.-�: ,.s;
.
.,
. - -
,.;��' y . - � + -�
: _:__.. _
==:�:� =:��°=�'-{..,..=; .,' . - � M1�
- ....
,._ �-�:==�T-;--�-=._—� �:t;-...
. . . �
... ........:::
. . -�:. _
.�,
,.
. - . ..
.:... : ......:,� _
... �...�,�.�� - - _ _ - - - - -- — --.�..
� •-
.. . ..
_...... . :
.,r. ........:.;; _
.....
,.:.:
.....;.
...:_. ,.. y- . ...... . _ _
�`.�,� `....�': ••,1.
�
.. . ....:.�.�... . ... ... �. ..y._ :F', _ _
.7_.
-.:
_...:.'�.�..
.�:
. _.....�e%_. ';.._.•. ... ..4 .�F-. �'=.:^,'.:.. .��`� _
,.. .;-
.....L:, .�.r
�:
�:
. . .a..._ •..._..� :::iC:. ' - — �
.
,
. ...�-'...... . . �.:� _ _
•�
....:�. .;..:..�. . ..: �..:.�. _ _
�
......
.'...'.:_.:•
: :.."... ..
:,`.
.
.... .... ... ..�.•� . .:.. .:...� ' - '
...:.�:.�:
:...'.
,-..
:•.:
. .� ... . . '.. . �
- ' !�''�
. . . .. . � . : � . . ' '.'�:..':':�.�.'` . ^ �,��•t��l.
.. . ... ... . , �.
. . ... �., .... .� ._ �. .. .,
.. . . .. ., v... . ..:..','..�_
..... . .
.....�� ... ..
" e
. .
:: .. . ._.: . • �
., �'. �
. . . ..- . . ..�.. . ..�. .�i
�.. .. .
......�. . . . .. . '. . .`.c._.:�v.C.r.+ac.i.'-....._..
� � � , - _
.���..�____ , '� -
. � � � - / :1, L . � _
' � $�`-. . .• '
,
, . � � �' S�rf<�i � " '
2 � `
- Kprlaio�y . h ` � °+�u�►J E f� ; ►g�7 0
coa
� .4 l�ucla l,' _ -
, .. 3,: : y.
0 � � ,.:� ,
�. S' ��' 6
' ; _, . � - . _ _ .. : _
... �f'F`f cr,�t,:cr
_. .
: .....
. ..:
��. ....., .;�'
�ya��'v"r F"41:
_ .,,.
P A L,. J61. . ,
� ; � �
. , �.
., �4::�.h:F'iM " .. M1 . .
',�..��kl..� �i� .r .�+' �.. ' �. .
.�;e.,n^ ..�3t�. *��� �A y - 's f'�.,� ��.- .�..Y.
�'Yy�i���¢� ; . „'+!:•::;'�.,.'` �� ` ,%t'���.�f��-� Z..:::.� ':
^��-y�'r-"�-q-,�'.b-�.�j% �� +,G. �.'.=^ .:�:�%•�^,:.�r_ v: i` ,T JF.•i.:t;[.� � .Y� •-�
,d� ::ay�r°���.� 'a��.:�'.:�ii:y^z•��`�.,'::' .r, oy�.� -j` ��;
. . _ ... .. . '��.:��V:- _.•i'.�iy�_,,�,ss a� R.�b.w -..�., '��y - v.+; �'
.. ;wo- ':'a':; ,5,�;,��x.: '�:.'.�a,� ro�� �;1�� �1w.' ..:� ; - _ .�.:
--=- ,. :�. _ _ ..t-:�..y,:". � ;�s:r-.�r' .�?�;b.' ..
. •..... ..
. , . .
�y_.:..,..-
,
. .. .:.,`.:. . ::
.:,...
. . . ,.. . ..
.�;�
...,� . �_.. ..:: ..:_:. :'.,e.`:
M�.�
.. . -,,, _. • . -:-ar.,.4..�sa?'' 'L �t'-�--� ;�r _ ;�':a�..�„ � '-� 4 - �ti .��
0 ��:' . ._. �= � ...s . • ,: ... Y; °::;'��'�. '��
� �.
__....., ,;.
� ��-�-} F.
. . :.. , � �� Y4.
J' /P �/ L (� �..tr o 6� � `�'`. �� .•`-.,:;���R'':4'�'�:",.:
t p � -
� . . . - .
� M' ONTE" �RE y � � .
C�7'�g�� �` /g'�G . . , . T .
�6S . g:p j " �z z;3• � � �,, t
- f. � �.�. � .I . - .-
�9 . �. � ,�'� �;-°
� .
, . . . � v �
. .::
� ��
W /19 U P f?A y : Q � ` . ,; � �:: .
��5. �
, �, Z � .�,
P � �. �
: _ `,� � � ;� �
._._.
_ . r..:�. ._..._:-
..,,.,..
.. _. _
_ - -
. .. .;.:..,;- . , .
�:�:._,-� , � ,
..: .;.
.. .. . .. =��� . .
... _...
...:.:
...... ..�::�...: �'�
-- , ' �
._.: � -
:::-::..�- --- - - . _
. .. _ .t,� �.:::.. : �
_ �;�{���w .__ .
�':f"� �s — `-ii.'�'.f.'..�`� �'_ '_ - �'�.
. .
. :..�......:::.'. _ _
". -....
-� _ __
. , ..
'. ' ..� • '
�.�
. .'
Y . . ...
, . .. ... ..^.{�.,.�'M�ii%��t"+" _
^ .�
. . ..... .... . . .
. . . ..�..., .�.. ..�.r' _ ' " _ . .
i. . _ _
� ,'='�
� " ""_' :..,:.'...�.v :. " '�� � - _ � ,,.[� '
.. ...:. ._ .. . - � �<..�
' .. .. . . . . - .. _ � _ .�:.ti.:..
....... ..... ... .. - _ _ _ ' ?�'.1,:: ' '
� . .. . . . . . . . . ' :.�-...:��:.�,�;..'�.:_�,:�•—...,`�`.,,��:•:.''y';" _�._ _—_
_ . �
. , , d�: / .l L � .�;��¢ �
� �-. . � �
: 0 �- s�:t<�tt _ .
- � � 2�� a� `
- ' �. f�ollai�y Ic . � �11�1 E (� �g70
3:. y
Al�vc �.l ' . . �
. 0 � "' � ,
�: � s 6
`. � � �--
Y�'1,�1f;Ci PC`.GY _� . .. ... -- -- -
, , f�. . _ � ,k�"�_
P A �L M. � . ,
. ;.
, :�
- :b;:;::�;�: - :-.. ��� -�- . .
:s��::;� �:�,�v.:�: �,� . . : � ����� .�� y
�• .(�.��. , :,,*�,S'�., � .i.'�y t� '�..
. .•�, . f:4�'•�i� i� } :�}��'i..M�•�. ' '• a.Y . t� � '=1���.�.�. ".'r
. ��r� ,;. ,,,,�;.Y ..� s� '� ,. �`rx
... �
� �.: „ - :�:. - _ • �_.,.:a
,. -
��. �.- q
� F.K�iYt.IF{�� '�y' �. •.... � �( '4.' � :' ::i:� .�'' .•P '� �+'�
}' �t �r �''�.;IY"
y�i�_ «.�S,l.�i$%V!;ie� .�y.�'�^�.l'C��.+.�V�.'.l,.' T�iM� _ w: Y �.r• �_.F��. .b7'{� ' ,�
' " ::3�;jlJ .N,. � .'+l+' '19 t:,�i,:: '' .*��"".^,+-�d' �.�? 4,�'' �j�- ' _
, . t. ,
: o.:.:. _
:
.. �.
' :�"'-.:��.. b
. . .. ,_,y
`�iR
� ..i ty.� . �... _..ia.t�i.... .}.�r,�:;:.7p�S4!$t :n L `'7 ,..f��,�;y� '`t� 'Tf.."�?#�o�•�
-� .
...._ . .... .. .. .
... .. . ,r:,_.. .. ,. .'.`u. , _ ��s ,
, .
-� ..:._ �...;J.:.�:.:.:.R.{�a.;.'�^,R,7• �k%'.� �a'�Y�
,..�
� a�1;G"'+�.
�� ..�, ...� , .. :`..s:
--- --. ..., . _ �.1.. _ - _ �tijpr� . F',-�,,,:,.�„ �� c-:, 'v< .��'••
O „ . :�:R�� -a�. _ ��, _ . .� ."� �.��`��r:�:x.. , :;
� ' , �/ ,'' L�=i • ��ti.�' :':K�.,����'`q'.::::Y,.
� 1:.'-�/�.�, �•,:��.�
� � � � Y '.•Y O � , V � Q .,:r :...C+I�a�..,..�•./ ;�
. � . ' . . ' -. . . . . ' . .
� ' , ' ' .. . . . " • . . . ..
. . � . ' �F . � . ., � ' . '
M O iti T E'�`�R E y � " .
C�;og�� � �S�Q � . ,: _,
� _ -
,,; . . ; .
/6s- : �,,.:� � ���tl �3 .,, �{' �
. � . . .. . � . ;y � . ...� �v _ �./� . � � .
, �. � "� ,.r'��� ..' .'.
. : . � .: •,f'. �� ';,
.°'� .
�
.
.. . p� . ' I' '
1►� . Z ' ,��u � .. z ?.+
. . ; �� v v , .
.__ ;� - . .
W /�9U1�' Ri9' Y� ' P � . .v � v�; .,
_ , ��5 0 . -. �.
. Pµ � � ..
� �� �_ �, - e � �
, ;c.� I� .
.... . .. ..:_,. , -
:: �.- .
_ .:�,: �:: .. , �:•
. '..J.. - :.3_'� ' ' ,. - �
_ �y..:."•: . '�` . . . - 3 . \ . . . . . ' �
' _" _'="_... P _ _ i�...,:.=; "' . ^ 'j�
� V~
'...',.�:�_. . _
��.
.. _
_r:.__._ . .
. �. ...:;:... ._ _ _
.;��
. .. . .. .. ;�� .�1=1—"Y _ _ -
.
.. ..;: �. � - . '
. . -.'. _ ... .
. . ... ... .: — .
, . . , 967�� -.• ._ .•.;.. - _ '; "x.':.�::^',_ _ __ _ '
.r
�
:,
�;:..
. _ . : . .;.. . _ _-:.-> - - -- - - - - `"�•-�!
.
...
;�,�• ,�*,-:..
..:... , . .. .. ....,. .. ,�,,.:.'e - - .
� ..,:
_..,.. .,
•':'
.. .._ . ..... .. : •� �:; ' - -
..:
.�_,',.,...(�.
. �� �••���-
_,..........: .. . �' c.i�r.';:,...��.i _ - ------
,,, .
..� . ..
...., .. `.
,.;•.
. .. ��. .. ....:,; -
..._..• . .. .:�.�,.... ...... .:.�;:�.: _ ' ---
. ..
.•.....:.:..
, .. ...:.:;
,.: ,:..
, ..
. ... -..... . .� , --... :: ::.., - -
- _���;�;,_; -
. .. . _ . : . . � . . .:";�..�.,..� . •� .. _. .. . __ ._....... ..� ._....._.
,.
I . _. i--
� � � `� 3 � \� _ �
_ � � �
. � � \ . �
� � � � � . ,
� � � . � �
� � , s .
� .� . � �
� , �
� � I , �
� � � � � �� � �
- � � � � - . � � , �
� �
, � � � .
� - �� � �d � � �
� � . � ,
� � �. � . � I -
i � � �� � �
� � � � S � _
� , i � � � � �` �� � � . � .
� � � � � � � � � .
. � � � .
� �� � s � � , � �
. � � � � � . � � I � �
� . �
�
� � � � ,
� , .
, � � � � � � �
� � � � ; , � �
� � � b �
�
� . � ,� . .
� � , � �
� � � �
� . , ,
� . . � .
� `� . ► � .. �a
�a
4 � .� v .
r� . O
� � � � � � � � �
�
�.
i
` � � � � ,
. \ � �
� � � � � �
� � � �" � � . ,
c � . . � �
� � - - � �
� .�e . � � .
� � I . �
� � l �
� � � - ,� :� . . ;
- � � , � - . � � ; �
�
, � �
. , �
� -� �� . � �d �
� �
� � �. � - � �� I -
I � � �� � � �
� � � � S � -
� , � � � � � �.� � � �
� � � � �. �
. � � � � � � .
� ,� � s � � , � �
�
. � � � ' . � � I � �
� �
`� � � . � �
. � � �
� � � � � � �
� � . � ; � � �
� � b �.
� � �
� . ,� . �
� _,
� � , � � �
� � �
\� � . � • 4
`� . , � ,� .
� `� . I � . �
o �
� � �� °� �
� �� � � � � � � � �
�
.;: .
.. . . . . .. 1 .._ .
� � 3 �� _ �
, � � �
. � � � .
� � � ,�� � ,
c � � � � �
`� � , 5 .
� �� - � � .
� � �
� � I �
� � . � � � . �� . .
- � � � - . � � ; �
�
. � �
� -� ,� � �d
. , �
� . � _ ,
� � � � � � �
� � I
� � � � �
� � � � S � �
� � I � � � �.� � . �
� � � � �
. � � � � � � .
� �� � s � � , �
i . � � .� .
� � � . � I
� �
. � . �
`� � :
, I , .
� � , � � � � � �
� . � , , � �
� � � �
� � �.
� . ,� . -
� �
� � .. � �
� � �
� . � , �
� . . � � .
� `� . � � �
� � �� � � .
� �
� �`3 � � �p \� � � ''� ���
�
�..
� � 3 � �� �
. � � � � - :
� �
� � � �" � �
� � � � � � �
� � � , � .
� �� � - � .
� , �
� � � � �
�
� . � � � �� �
- � � � - � � �
� �
, � �
� -� �� � �d
. . , �
� �
� � -. � - . �� .
. � I
I � � � �
� � � � S � ,
� � � � � � � �� � � .
� � � � � � �
� � � � . � .
� � � �
� s � , � � � �
_ � . ,� � . � � � � �
� � �
`� � °� . � �
I
� � � � . � �
� , � � � �
� . � , , �
� � � ..
� � � � �
�
� , ,� . .
� � � ��
� � �. � �
� . � . ,
� . . � .
� `� . � � . �
� � -� � .
4 � . b �
� � � � � � � '
� �
�
� �
. , i--
� , � � � � �� . �
� , �
� � � � .
� a� � �" � � ,
� � � . � �
� � , � .
� .� . � � .
� � �
� � I �
� � , � = .
� . � � �
- � � � - . � � , �
� �
. � � �
. , �
� -� �� . � �a �
� � .
� � � � - . � -
, � I
I � � � �
z � � � S � - _
� � � � � � � �� � � � �
� � � � � � � �
� � a� � -
� ,� s � � , � �
� - � � � � ' . � � I �`� �
� �
`� � � , � \ �
, � , .
� � , � � � � � �
� � , � � �
� � �
� � �
� . . ,� . _
� — _,
� � . � � �
� � , �
� . � . ,
� . . � .
� `� � � � . �
o �
� � �� � �
� �� � � � � � � � �
�
. i --
�` � 3 �� _ �
, � � �
. � � � .
� � � � � � ,
� � � - � �
� � , � .
� .� . � � .
� � � �
� � � �
� � � ' + �
� - � �a
. ' � � , . . � � , � �
�
. � �
� -� �� . � �d
. . , �
� � ,
� � -. � - . � -
. � I
I � � � �
� � � � S � � _
� � � � � � � �� � . � �
� � � � � � �
. � � � � .
� � S � � , �
� . � � .� .
� �� � . � I
� �
`� � � . � �
. � � �
� � � � � � �
� � . � ; � � �
� � � .
� � �
� . ,� . -
� �
� � .. � �
� � � �
� . . �
� . . � .
� `� � i � . �
o �
� � .� � �
� �� � � � � � � � �
�
�� .
______..___.--...._.._ ...- - ---._.. ... ....._.._......
. � --
� � 3 �� . �
� � �
. . � � \ .
� � � � � �
� � � � � � �
� � - �
� .`� - � �' .
� � I �
� � � � -
� . , � =
� . �' �
- ' � � °� . . - � . �
�
, � � � �
� - �� � �a . . ,
� � � .
� � -. � - . � � �
I � � �� � �
� � � � S � - �
� � � � �� � � �� � � . � .
� � � � � � �
. � .
� � . � .
� � s � � � . � �
- � . � � � . � � i . .
� � . �
�
`�� � � , I .
� � � � . � � �
� � �
� � . � , , � .�
� � � b � ti
�
� , ,� .
� � ., � � �
� � � ►
� . . .
� . . �
� `� � ► � . �
4 e� �
� �� � �
'� b � � � � � � � �
� �
�