HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-15-2018 Item 17 Public Hearing - Ordinance intro for Code Enforcement Priorities & Bldg Fine AmendmentMeeting Date: 5/15/2018
FROM: Michael Codron, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Martin Van Gundy, Interim Chief Building Official
SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1.24 (ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES) OF TITLE 1 TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO
MUNICIPAL CODE; AND A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
AMOUNT OF ADMINISTRATIVE FINES PAYABLE UNDER CERTAIN
CITATIONS.
RECOMMENDATION
1.Introduce an Ordinance entitled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California, amending Chapter 1.24 (Administrative Code Enforcement Procedures)
of Title 1 to the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code”; and
2.Adopt a Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California, amending the amount of administrative fines payable under certain
citations” to adopt and implement the recommended amended administrative fine schedule
for violations of Titles 8, 15, and 17 (except Chapter 17.17).
DISCUSSION
On November 21, 2017, the City Council established code enforcement priorities and provided
staff with additional direction regarding implement ation of the priorit ies. The direction received
included the development of additional enforcement tools, such as recording notices of
violations, and increased fines to help deter illegal construction.
Fine Increase for Building Code Violations
As discussed, an effective tool for deterring violations and facilitating compliance is increased
fines.
The recommended fine increase for building code violations include:
Current Administrative Fine New Administrative Fine
1st Citation $100 $100
2nd Citation $200 $500
3rd Citation, each thereafter $500 $1000
Packet Page 409
Item 17
1. The proposed resolution will increase the administrative fine for second and third
citations issued for a given code violation, the fine amount for the first citation will
remain. The base fine amounts for the second and third citation increases from two
hundred dollars to five hundred dollars and five hundred dollars to one thousa nd dollars
respectively. The increased fine amounts are limited to administrative citations issued
under Municipal Code Title 8 Health and Safety, Title 15 Buildings and Construction,
and Title 17 Zoning with the exception of Chapter 17.17 which contains t he Property
Maintenance Standards used for the Neighborhood Services Enforcement such as visible
storage, front yard parking, and other neighborhood preservation regulations.
2. Late Payment Charge. Staff is recommending a revised late payment fee structure which
is consistent with industry standards. Municipal Code section 1.24.070(B)(1) has been
added to include a late payment fee to recover costs associate with collection and help
encourage timely payments. The revised ordinance proposes establishing a late payment
fee through assessing interest accrued at a rate of 8% per month until paid.
3. Repeat Violation by Same Owner. Staff is recommending add ing Municipal Code
section 1.24.070(A)(1) to discourage the same violation occurring on multiple properties
by the same violator. The proposed ordinance allows staff to initiate the higher fines for
repeat violations by the same person. For example, if an individual continues to work
without the required permits multiple times over a 12 -month period and on separate
properties each time, they would be subject to increased penalties. With this example, the
recommended actions would allow staff to issue a citation for the second violation
occurring on a separate property at the increased fine amount allowed for the s econd
citation.
As recommended at the November 21, 2017 City Council meeting, Neighborhood Services
violations will not be increased as compliance is normally attained through current fine amounts,
proactive patrol, and outreach and educational efforts.
Recording the Notice of Violation
The City currently has a notice of violation process, however , this process does not include
recording the notice on the property’s title. This enforcement mechanism will be used for
continued property related violations such as building code violations. This process is not
applicable to “one time” or other transitory type of violations such as those contained in Title 8
of the City’s Municipal Code. The proposed changes will not affect the current notice of
violation - a violation will continue to receive a notice of correction (courtesy notice) before
receiving any notices of violation or citations.
Packet Page 410
Item 17
The notice of violation will be recorded with the County Recorder’s Office which serves as
notice to any person performing due diligence prior to purchasing a property. During the
purchase of a property, most financing agencies (banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc.)
require that these types of notices be removed from title before proceeding with the financing.
This has the added benefit of compelling compliance at a time when the property owner is
motivated and can provide sufficient resources to correct any outstanding violations. It also
removes the argument that the property owner did not know about a code violation if they went
forward with a property purchase despite the notice.
With the notice recorded and appropriate due diligence performed, a new owner has knowledge
of existing code violations and is free to assume that obligation if they choose, or to require the
violation to be resolved prior to purchase of the property. There may be circumstances where the
seller will not resolve the violations, but the buyer is willing to assume the liability voluntarily.
In these cases, the City will work with the new property owner to accomplish compliance
through an abatement agreement. This can be helpful in a case where the violations are
significant and require a large investment in construction costs to resolve. The new owner
purchases the property knowing the scope of violations to be resolved and is typically better able
to reach resolution in a timely fashion. Further, the new owner may be in a better position to
finance the improvements with the purchase of the property. This process has been used by the
County for many years.
Once the violations on the notice of violation have been corrected, the property owner requests a
reinspection of the property to determine compliance. Once each violation has been remedied
and all the fees/fines are paid, a notice of complia nce will be subsequently recorded on the
property. It is the notice of compliance which will cancel the recorded notice of violation.
CONCURRENCES
Community Development Department continues to coordinate the daily code enforcement
activities with severa l City Departments to accomplish its work program. Fire, Police, Public
Works, Utilities, Administration concur with the information included in this report. Staff
worked closely with the City Attorney’s Office to develop the previously approved code
enforcement priorities and the recommendations presented in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed action is a policy decision regarding implementation of existing regulations. This
action does not change existing regulations, nor does it introduce the potential for any new
environmental impacts. Additionally, the enforcement of regulations is categorically exempt
from environmental review pursuant to Section 15321(a)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines,
enforcement action by regulatory agencies.
Packet Page 411
Item 17
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed revisions will have a positive fiscal impact because they will provide increased
revenue to help offset costs associated with code enforcement. Ideally, each of the complaints
received by the City would result in voluntary compliance, there fore not initiating any of the
proposed fees and/or fines. However, in practice fees and fines are necessary to motivate
compliance. In the event a violation persists and the proposed fee is applied to a violation, the
amount of revenue collected will greatly depend on the scope and severity of violations, and
these will vary from month to month and year to year . The procedural impacts for staff will be
minimal.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Adopt the Resolution to implement the recommended fine amounts and the Ordinance
amendments establishing additional code enforcement tools. This is in accordance with
the November 21, 2017 City Council direction. This provides a more effective utilization
of the revised code enforcement priorities established at the November 21, 2017 City
Council Meeting.
2. Do not adopt and implement the recommended fine schedule and Ordinance
amendments. This is not recommended as it is not consistent with previous City Council
direction and limits code enforcement effectiveness.
Attachments:
a - Code Enforcement Ordinance
b - Draft Resolution Increasing Administrative fines (Chapters 8, 15, & 17 except Chapter
17.17)
c - Draft Resolution Exhibit A, Administrative Guidelines for Chapter 1.24
Packet Page 412
Item 17
O ______
ORDINANCE NO. _____ (2018 SERIES)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 1.24
(ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES) OF TITLE
1 TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 1.24.050, subsection E of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is
hereby amended as follows:
E. Prior and Repeat Violations. The city may take into consideration the fact that a
person has been previously issued an uncorrected notice of violation and/or a
sustained administrative citation when the city is determining whether to accept an
application or to grant any permit, license or any similar type of land use approval
for that person and such notice of violation and/or administrative citation may be
used as evidence that the person has committed acts that are not compatible with
the health, safety, and general welfare of other persons and businesse s within the
city. Repeated violations by the same person or the same property of the same code
provision within any twelve-month period may result in the issuance of an
administrative citation(s) imposing additional or escalated administrative fines
without a notice of violation and/or notice to correct preceding the citation.
SECTION 2. Section 1.24.070, subsection C is hereby added to the San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code as follows:
C. Late Payment Charges. Any person who fails to pay to the City any fine imposed
pursuant to this chapter on or before the date that fine is due also shall be liable for
interest accrued at a rate of 8% per month until paid.
SECTION 3. Sections 1.24.160 through 1.24.190 are hereby added to the San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code as follows:
1.24.160 Issuance and recordation of notices of violation. This chapter shall govern
the procedures relating to the recordation of administrative notices of violation.
1.24.170 Procedures for recordation.
A. Once the director has issued a notice of violation to a responsible person and
the property remains in violation after the deadline established in the notice of
violation, the director may record a notice of violation with the Reco rder’s Office
of San Luis Obispo County.
Packet Page 413
Item 17
Ordinance No. _____ (2018 Series) Page 2
O ______
B. Before recordation, the director shall provide to the responsible person a letter
of intent to record a notice of violation unless a written appeal is filed pursuant to
the procedures outlined in this chapter. The letter shall be served pursuant to any of
the methods of service set forth in Chapter 1.24 of this code. The director may also
send a courtesy copy of the letter to any financial institution with a legal interest in
the real property.
C. If a written appeal is not filed pursuant to the procedures set forth in this
chapter, the director may record the notice of violation if the violation has not been
corrected.
D. The recorded notice of violation shall include the name of the property owner,
the property’s assessor’s parcel number, the parcel’s legal description, and a copy
of the notice of violation.
1.24.200 Service of recorded notice of violation. A copy of the recorded notice of
violation shall be served on the responsible person and property owner pursuant to
any of the methods of service set forth in Chapter 1.24 of this code.
1.24.180 Notice of compliance – Procedures.
A. After a notice of violation has been recorded, and after the violations listed on
the notice of violation have been corrected, the responsible person or prop erty
owner may file with the director a written request for a reinspection of the property
to determine compliance with the municipal code and applicable state codes listed
in the recorded notice of violation, and for the issuance of a notice of compliance
on a form provided by the city.
B. Once the director receives this request, the director shall reinspect the property
to determine whether the violations listed in the notice of violation have been
corrected and whether all necessary permits have been issued and final inspections
have been performed.
C. The director shall serve a notice of compliance to the responsible person or
property owner in the manner provided in Chapter 1.24 of this code if the director
determines that:
1. All violations listed in the recorded notice of violation have been
corrected; and
2. All necessary permits have been issued and finalized; and
3. All civil penalties assessed against the property have been paid; and
Packet Page 414
Item 17
Ordinance No. _____ (2018 Series) Page 3
O ______
4. The party requesting the notice of compliance has paid an
administrative fee in an amount set by resolution of the City Council to
reimburse the city for all administrative costs related to the request for a
notice of compliance.
Upon finding that the conditions above have been satisfied, the director shall record
the notice of compliance with the County Recorder’s Office. The recordation of the
notice of compliance shall have the effect of canceling the recorded notice of
violation.
D. If the director denies a request to issue a notice of compliance, the director
shall serve the responsible person or property owner with a written explanation
setting forth the reasons for the denial. The written explanation shall be served by
any of the methods of service listed in Chapter 1.24 of this code.
E. The director’s decision denying a request to issue a notice of compliance shall
be final and non-appealable.
1.24.190 Prohibition against issuance of permits. Subject to the exception set forth
herein, the city may withhold any permit for any alteration, repair or construction
pertaining to any existing or new structures or signs on a property where a notice
of violation is recorded, or any permits pertaining to the use and development of
the real property or the structure. The city may thereafter withhold permits until a
notice of compliance has been issued by the director. The city may not withhold
permits which are necessary to obtain a notice of compliance or which are necessary
to correct serious health and safety violations.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of
this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforcement of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance, or any other provisions of the city’s rules and regulations. It
is the city’s express intent that each remaining portion would have been adopted irrespective of
the fact that any one or more subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared
invalid or unenforceable.
Packet Page 415
Item 17
Ordinance No. _____ (2018 Series) Page 4
O ______
SECTION 5. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council members
voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in The
Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect at
the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage.
INTRODUCED on the 15th day of May 2018, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the
Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the ____ day of ____, 2018, on the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
____________________________________
Mayor Heidi Harmon
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City
of San Luis Obispo, California, this ______ day of ______________, _________.
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
Packet Page 416
Item 17
R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2018 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE AMOUNT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE FINES PAYABLE UNDER CERTAIN CITATIONS.
WHEREAS, on October 1, 2002, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopted
Ordinance No. 1426, which added new Chapter 1.24 to Title One of the San Luis Obispo Municipal
Code, entitled “Administrative Code Enforcement Procedures”, pertaining to the issuance of
administrative citations for San Luis Obispo Municipal Code violations; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 53069.4 and San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code Chapter 1.24 enables the City, acting as a charter city pursuant to Article XI,
Sections 5 and 7 of the State Constitution, to impose and collect civil administrative fines in
conjunction with the abatement of Municipal Code violations; and
WHEREAS, September 17, 2002, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopted
Resolution No. 9366, effective October 1, 2002, establishing a Fine Schedule setting forth amounts
of administrative fines to be imposed pursuant to chapter 1.24 of the San Luis O bispo Municipal
Code, and adopting Administrative Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase the fine schedule for certain violations
that pertain to building, health and safety and specific zoning code violations
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Administrative Guidelines for Chapter 1.24 of the city of San Luis Obispo
Municipal code dated updated April 2012, for reference attached hereto as Exhibit A
SECTION 2. The Fine Schedule established by the City Council on September 17, 2002,
by Resolution No. 9366, for administrative citations issued pursuant to Chapter 1.24 of the San
Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
A. For the first violation of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, Chapter 8, Chapter 15,
Chapter 17, excepting section 17.17, the administrative citation fine shall remain the
same at the current sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100) for each such violation.
B. For the second violat ion of the same Code sections occurring within twelve (12) months
of the prior violations, the administrative fine shall be the sum of Five Hundred Dollars
($500).
C. For the third violation, or additional violations thereafter, of the same Code sections
occurring within twelve (12) months of the first violation, the administrative fine shall
be the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1000).
Packet Page 417
Item 17
Resolution No. _____ (2018 Series) Page 2
R ______
Upon motion of _______________________, seconded by _______________________,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _____________________ 2018.
____________________________________
Mayor Heidi Harmon
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City
of San Luis Obispo , California, this ______ day of ______________, _________.
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
Packet Page 418
Item 17
Packet Page 419
Item 17
Packet Page 420
Item 17
Packet Page 421
Item 17
Packet Page 422
Item 17
FNewspaper of the Central Coast
flab
�
RECEIVED
SLO CITY CLERK
3825 South Higuera • Post Office Box 112 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406-0112 • (805) 781-7800
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
AD #3645437
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ss.
County of San Luis Obispo
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not
interested in the above entitled matter; I am now, and at
all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned
was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of
THE TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general Circulation,
printed and published daily at the City of San Luis
Obispo in the above named county and state; that notice
at which the annexed clippings is a true copy, was
published in the above-named newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof — on the following dates to wit;;
MAY 53 2018 that said newspaper was duly and
regularly ascertained and established a newspaper of
general circulation by Decree entered in the Superior
Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, on
3une 9, 1952, Case # 19139 under the Government Code
of the State of California.
I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing its true and correct..
(SigkAure of Principal Clerk)
DATE: MAY 5, 2018
AD COST: $236.64
aCMOF
S€ LI M OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The San Luis Obispo City Council invites all interested persons to
attend a public hearing on Tuesday, May -15, 2018, at 6:00 p.m.
in the City Hall Council Chamber, 990 Palm Street, San Luis
Obispo, California, relative to the following:
1) Review of amendments to the Water and Wastewater Man-
agement Element of the General Plan with a Negative Declara-
tion of Environmental Impact. The an
incorporates wa-
ter supply information from the 2018 update Oto the City's safe
annual yield model and other background information. Project
Address: Citywide; Case #: GPA-1454-2018/EID-1455-2018;
City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department, applicant
For more information, you are invited to contact Jennifer Metz
of the City's Utility Department at (805) 781-7239 or by email at
jm�fz�siac€ +.org,
2) Introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 1.24 (administra-
tive code enforcement procedures) of Title 1 to the San Luis
Obispo Municipal Code; and adopt a Resolution of the City
Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, Callfornia, amending
the amount of administrative fines payable under certain cita-
tions and implement the recommended amended administra-
tive fine schedule for violations of Titles 8, 15, and 17 (except
Chapter 17.17).
For more information, you are invited to contact Martin Van
Gundy of the City's Community Development Department.at
(805) 781-7572 or by email at mvangundy,@slocity,org,
The City Councll may also discuss other hearings or business
items before or after the items listed above. If you challenge the
proposed project in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing descri-
bed in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Reports for this meeting will be available for review in the City
Clerk's Office and online at www.slocity.org on Wednesday, May
9, 2018. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (805) 781-7100 for
more information. The City Council meeting will be televised live
on Charter Cable Channel 20 and live streaming on www.slocity.
o(g,
Teresa. Purrington,
City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
,May 5. 2018 3645437
5/15/2018
1
Code Enforcement Priorities
Community Development Department
Overview
Amend Title 1, San Luis Obispo Municipal Code
• Clarify repeat violations
• Add late payment fee
• Record Notice of Violation on property
Adopt Resolution to increase Administrative Citation Fines
Prior and Repeat Violations
Section 1.24.050(E)
Clarified to include violations of the same code
section across multiple properties by the same person
within a 12 month period
Additional noticing is not required for the subsequent
violations of the same code section
5/15/2018
2
Late Payment Fee
Section 1.24.070(C)
New section added to include late payment fee
Any person who fails to pay to the City any fine
imposed pursuant to this chapter on or before the
date that fine is due also shall be liable for interest
accrued at a rate of 8% per month until paid
Recording Notice of Violation
Sections 1.24.160 through 1.24.190
Notification to prospective owners of outstanding code
violations on the property
Procedures identified
Records a notice of violation with the County
Recorder’s Office
Notice of compliance procedures identified
5/15/2018
3
Resolution Updating Administrative
Fine Amounts
Title 8, 15, and 17 violations (except 17.17)
Current fine amounts: $100, $200, $500
Proposed amounts: $100, $500, $1000
Questions?
Thank you!
Newspaper of the Central Coast
THEAY
MBUNE_7_�3825
FRECEIVE_b
2 9 CITY CLERK
South Higuera • Post Office Box 112 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406-0112 • (805) 781-7800
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
CMOF
OsHnLafflowpo
AD #3673974
ORDINANCE NO. 1648 (2018 SERIES)
CITY OF SANVT LUIS OBISPO
AN OROF THE TY
CIL OFDTHE NCITY OF SANILUISOOBI-
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
SPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAP-
TER 1.24 (ADMINISTRATIVE CODE EN-
FORCEMENT PROCEDURES) OF TITLE
1 TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO MUNICI-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PAL CODE
ss.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City
Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, Cal-
County of San Luis Obispo
Ifornfa, at its Regular Meeting of May15,
2018, introduced the above titled ordi-
nance upon a motion by Council Member
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
Rivoire, second by Council Member Vice
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not
Mayor Christianson, and on the following
roll call vote:
interested in the above entitled matter; I am now, and at
AYES: CounCtl Members Gomez, Pease,
all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned
and Sivolre, Vice Mayor Christianson, end
was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of
Mayor Harmon.
THE TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general Circulation,
NOES: None
printed and published daily at the City of San Luis
Ordinance Nj..11148 (2km Sorlj — This
Obispo in the above named county and state; that notice
�
1. a City Ordinance amending Chapter
1.24 (Administrative Code Enforcement Pro
at which the annexed clippings is a true copy, was
cedures) of Title 1 to the San Luis Obispo
published in the above-named newspaper and not in any
Municipal Code.
supplement thereof — on the following dates to wit;;
Section 1.24.050 subsection E is amended
MAY 23, 2018 that said newspaper was duly and
to provide the ability to impose escalated
or additional fines for repeat violations by
regularly ascertained and established a newspaper of
S ywitflln
the same person or the same property
a twelve-month period.
general circulation by Decree entered in the Superior
Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, on
Subsection C is added to Section 1.24.070
detailing late payment charges for unpaid
June 9, 1952, Case #19139 under the Government Code
fines.
of the State of California.
Added Section 1.24.160 through 1.24.200
outlines the procedures for recording and
removing a Notice of Violation on a proper-
I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
ty,
foregoing is true and correct.
The ordinance t$ now ready for final adop-
lion and WM become ®ffedvo on July 5,
full and copy of
menti n Ordinance is
Ordinance is available for in-
e r in-
spection
spection and copy in the City Clerk's Of-
(Skhature of Principal Clerk)
rice, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis
DATE: MAY 23, 2018
Obispo, California, or you may call (805)
AD COST: $199.52
781-7100 for more information.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN
That the City Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo will consider adopting the
aforementioned Ordinance at its Regular
Meeting of June 5, 2018 at 6:00 p.m.,
which wil be held in the Council Chamber,
tocated at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obi-
spo, California.
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
mliy 23, 2018 3673974