HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-19-2018 Agenda Item 10 - Roadway Sealing and Laurel Ln Complete Streets Spec no 91630Meeting Date: 6/19/2018
FROM : Daryl R. Grigsby, Director of Public Works
Prepared By:Timothy Scott Bochum, Deputy Director
Hai Nguyen, Engineer II
SUBJECT:ROADWAY SEALING AND LAUREL LANE COMPLETE STREETS 2018
PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 91630
RECOMMENDATION
Active Transportation Committee Recommendation
1. Direct staff to move forward with a contract change order to construct parking protected Class
IV bike lanes on Laurel Lane in lieu of buffered Class II bike lanes (vote: 3-2).
Staff Recommendations
1. Award a contract to VSS International, Inc. in the amount of $2,493,000 for the Roadway
Sealing, and bulb-outs at the intersection of Laurel & Southwood and Laurel & August, and
buffered Class II bike lanes, and
2. Approve the following budget transfers:
a) $1,800,783.63 from the Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing (Street R&R) master account
to the project account; and
b) $12,600 from the Raise Valve Covers account to the project account for adjustment of
water facilities included in this project; and
c) $11,550 from the Wastewater Collection System Improvements master account to the
project account for upgrading and adjusting sewer facilities included in this project; and
d) $90,000 from the Bicycle Facility Improvements account to the project account for this
project; and
e) $81,556 from the Bicycle Transportation Implementation account to the project account
for this project; and
f) $307,130.52 from the Storm Drain System Replacement account to the project account
for this project; and
3. Appropriate $793,100 of funding for the project subject to the approval of the 2018-19 Financial
Plan Supplement.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF
On May 1st, the City Council heard a proposal regarding the 2018-19 Road Sealing program in
Pavement Areas 2 and 3 wherein the Laurel Lane Complete Streets project would be included in
that project. Council directed staff to identify funding for the entire project, and, to consider a
Packet Pg. 105
Item 10
parking protected (Class IV) bike lane design for Laurel Lane. Staff reviewed the Capital
Projects scheduled for 2018-19 and identified projects which, due to unforeseen circumstances,
will cause delays. Those funds are recommended to be reallocated to the Sealing/Complete
Streets portion of the project.
Regarding the Separated Bike Facility, staff considered that option and is recommending –due
to inconsistent adopted design guidance, and other design and funding challenges - that council
approve the original bike path design of buffered Class II bike lanes. Bids were received for
Sealing Areas 2 and 3, and the additive alternates for the Laurel Lane Complete Streets Project.
In addition to the funding reallocations Council reviewed at the June 5 Supplemental Budget,
staff is recommending an additional reallocation of $307,131 from storm drains in order to
complete all three components (re-striping and bike lanes and both bulb-outs) on Laurel Lane.
The rationale for the reallocation is that a) due to changes in project scopes, lower bids on past
projects and other reasons, the storm drain account includes adequate funding to continue pipe
replacement this year, and b) this project presents a rare opportunity to complete safety
improvements in conjunction with a roadway maintenance project and enhance safe access for
schools, pedestrians, cyclists, transit and motorists.
DISCUSSION
On May 1st, the City Council authorized inviting bids for the Roadway Sealing and Laurel Lane
Complete Streets 2018 Project, Specification Number 91630. Bids were opened on May 24, 2018
and VSS International was the lowest responsible bidder with a proposal of $2,493,000 for the total
project. This bid was higher than the Engineer’s Estimate of $2,226,000 by $267,000. The
Contractor’s references, license and registration with the Department of Industrial Relations have
been verified (See attached Bid Summary, Attachment 1). It is recommended that the project be
awarded to VSS International and various budget amendments and transfers be completed to fund
the project.
Complete Streets Issues –Final Recommendation on Parking Protected Class IV Bike Lanes for
the Laurel Street Project
Also, on May 1
st, the City Council approved buffered Class II bike lanes for Laurel Lane from
Johnson to Orcutt but directed staff to evaluate converting the project to include a parking protected
Class IV bike lane design (as opposed to the proposed buffered bike lanes) and return to Council
with a finalrecommendation.
At this time staff is recommending against Class IV bike lane design at this location. The primary
reasons for this decision are:
1) Staff does not believe there is enough time to explore and resolve any and all issues relative
to maintaining consistency with NACTO, FHWA and ADA standards, and, maintain the
schedule necessary to take advantage including Laurel Lane Complete Streets with Sealing
Areas 2 and 3;
2) It is possible there could be additional costs related to Class IV. As noted during Budget
Supplement, staff has redirected dollars to include Laurel Lane into the Sealing Project. Bids
Packet Pg. 106
Item 10
received for the project were higher than estimated, and the budget to complete the project
has a narrow window for variance and contingency.
3) If Class IV was considered at the beginning of the project, staff believes many of the issues
noted below could be resolved satisfactorily. It should be noted that Class IV lanes on
Laurel are not part of the approved Bicycle Transportation Plan.
4) Staff recommends the revision of the Active Transportation Plan (ATP); the replacement for
the Bicycle Transportation Plan, include full analysis and consideration of future locations
of protected Class IV bike facilities.
5) Staff believes that the time constraints relative to full resolution of the Class IV issues would
require the Laurel Lane project to be removed from the Area Sea ling and rescheduled for a
future time. This is not recommended because costs could increase, and we would lose the
cost savings of combining Laurel Lane Complete Streets with Area Sealing 2 & 3.
At the meeting staff assumed that the conversion would be achievable if it met National Association
of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), Caltrans, Federal Highways Administration (FHWA),
and City standard minimums. Staff has conducted additional review of these issues and based on
design guidance provided by NACTO, FHWA, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Public
Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG). Staff does not recommend installing parking
protected Class IV bike lanes on Laurel Lane as the following issues have not been fully resolved.
1. Inadequate Street Width
An important consideration for parking protected Class IV bike lanes is providing adequate
clearance width between parked cars and the curb face for cyclists as well as between
parked cars and adjacent travel vehicles. The width from vehicle to curb face must be wide
enough so that cyclists have space to maneuver and avoid a collision with car doors,
pedestrians, and other objects. Minimum design guidance calls for 8’ of clearance under
ideal conditions and 10 ’ of clearance under less than ideal conditions such as hills and
adjacent to transit stops - which is the case for Laurel Lane. Ultimately, Laurel Lane is 2’ -
3’ feet too narrow to accommodate 10’clearance for parking protected Class IV bike lanes.
The effective width of the bike lane is further compromised by a concrete gutter and seam
reducing the effective riding width to approximately 3.5’ to 4’.
Similarly, the width between parked cars and adjacent travel lanes should be adequate to
accommodate pedestrians exiting parked cars from the driver side. Minimum travel and
parking lanes may lead to pedestrian conflicts in the vehicle t hru lane. The parking lane is
also too narrow to accommodate buses without protruding into the vehicle lane or further
reducing the bike lane clearance width.
2. ADA Path of Travel Requirements & Accessible Platforms
ADA path of travel for on-street parking is typically provided by virtue of vehicles parking
adjacent to the sidewalk and pedestrian accessible ramps at the ends of street blocks. When
marked parking is provided on the outside of a Class IV bike lane, special consideration
must be made to identify accessible paths of travel from parking spaces as well as at transit
stops. For example, the FHWA design guidance recommends accessible island platforms at
transit stops and accessible spaces such as the one depicted in the figures 1 and 2 below.
Packet Pg. 107
Item 10
Providing these types of facilities are not included in the current projects scope, schedule or
budget. The current project includes the installation of bulb-outs at Augusta and Southwood.
The bulb outs would require significant redesign in order to provide additional accessibility
due to the need to provide marked ADA parking and path of travel from the parking area to
the sidewalk.
Figure 1: FHWA Protected Bike Lane at Bus Stop Planning and Design Guide
Any ADA parking provided at mid-block locations would meet minimum FHWA
requirements but would require the bike lane to be reduced to a minimum of 4’ in width,
including the 1.5 to 2’ gutter, creating a minimal effective riding width of 1.5 feet.
Figure 2: City of Seattle ADA Parking Space Treatment & Accessible Path of Travel
3. Restricted Sight Distance & Parking Removal
A critical consideration of parking protected Class IV bike lanes is maintaining adequate
visibility of oncoming vehicles from driveways and intersections.In order to maintain
adequate sight distance parking must be restricted in certain areas resulting in a net loss of a
minimum of 30 spaces on Laurel, 26 less spaces on the east side and 4 less spaces on the
Packet Pg. 108
Item 10
west side.
Figure 3: Examples of Unsafe Parking Violations at visibility triangles –Telegraph Ave.
Oakland, CA
Additionally, poorly constructed and marked parking protected facilities have resulted in
unsafe parking activities that require significant enforcement and operational maintenance
needs not necessary in curbside parking. Figures 3 and 4 depict examples of parking
violations occurring in a parking protected facility where adequate raised curbing has not
been provided. Figure 3 shows how a vehicle approaching from the side street or driveway
must encroach into the bicycle lanes to see around the visibilit y restriction created by the
violation.
Figure 4: Examples of Unsafe Parking Violations at visibility triangles –Telegraph Ave.
Oakland, CA
Packet Pg. 109
Item 10
6/19/2018
1
Roadway Sealing & Laurel Lane
Complete Streets 2018
Resealing Project 2018
City Council, June 19, 2018
Presenter:
Jake Hudson, Transportation Manager
Tim Bochum, PW Deputy Director
May 1St - CC Approved Plans & Specs, Authorized Staff to Advertise:
Laurel Lane - Buffered Bike Lanes
Staff Presentation - Item 10
6/19/2018
2
May 1St - Consider Parking Protected Class IV Bike Lanes on
Laurel Lane as Potential Project Change Order:
Parking Protected Bike Lanes
Active
Transportation
Committee
(3-2 In Favor)
Inadequate Street Width
5’ minimum bike lane for cycle track – Ideal Conditions
7’ minimum bike lane for cycle track – Less than Ideal
Conditions (ie, Hills, Bus Stops, Large Gutter, Loading
Zone)
MINIMUM WIDTHS
GutterGutter
ATC discussed concerns about not meeting design guidance, however ATC felt that
protected lanes provide best opportunity to attract new riders.
Staff Presentation - Item 10
6/19/2018
3
ADA Path of Travel Requirements &
Accessible Platforms
ATC did not receive staff’s ADA assessment as it had
not yet been conducted.
-Total loss of 30 Parking Spaces (35 New Spaces on W/Side)
-35% of Laurel Bike Lanes inside parking Lane & 65% inside extra wide buffer.
Sight Distance & Parking Removal
ATC Presentation included preliminary assessment of sight distance issues, however
ATC felt that the protected lane option still provided the best opportunity to attract
new riders.
Staff Presentation - Item 10
6/19/2018
4
Staff Recommendation
1.Award a contract to VSS International, Inc. in the amount of $2,493,000 for the Roadway
Sealing, and Bulb-outs at the intersection of Laurel & Southwood and Laurel & Augusta,
and buffered Class II bike lanes, and
2.Approve the following budget transfers:
a)$1,800,783.63 from the Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing (Street R&R) master account to the project account; and
b)$12,600 from the Raise Valve Covers account to the project account for adjustment of water facilities included in this project; and
c)$11,500 from the Wastewater Collection system improvements master account to the project account for upgrading and adjusting sewer facilities included in this project; and
d)$90,000 from the Bicycle Facility Improvements account to the project account for this project; and
e)$81,556 from the Bicycle Transportation Implementation account to the project account for this project; and
f)$307,130.52 from the Storm Drain System Replacement account to the project account for
this project; and
3.Appropriate $793,100 of funding for the project subject to the approval of the 2018-19
Financial Plan Supplement
ATC Recommendation
1. Direct Staff to move forward with a contract change order to construct parking
protected Class IC bike lanes on Laurel Lane in lieu of buffered Class II bike lanes.
Active Transportation Committee Recommendation
Staff Recommendation
* Would require deferral of project to a later time to give staff adequate time to address
ADA design requirements and associated budget shortfall.
* Staff recommendation includes that updated Active Transportation Plan include full
analysis and consideration of future locations of protected Class IV bike facilities.
Staff Presentation - Item 10
6/19/2018
5
Oakland: Telegraph Avenue
8’4’
San Luis Obispo: Osos & Pacific
Staff Presentation - Item 10
6/19/2018
6
Staff Presentation - Item 10
Based upon the primary issues noted above, staff recommends moving forward with the initial
recommendation of the buffered bike lanes as presented to Counc il on May 1 st.
Concurrences - Active Transportation Committee Review
As discussed at the Council meeting, obtaining public input on the potential change to the bike lanes
was a challenge –particularly since the concept had received no community input or feedback as to
impacts or concerns. Staff determined there was not adequate time for a separate noticed public
forum between the May 1 st Council direction and the May 17th ATC meeting as the driver for
resolution of the design was needed in order to put Laurel Lane into the Sumer 2018 paving project
queue. Therefore, the ATC meeting was noticed to the public as their opportunity to comment on
the May 1st Council direction. In addition, a full analysis of all design issues was not possible prior
to the meeting date. The ADA access implications, additional hardscape and ramp work that may be
necessary and safety trade off issues were not fully presented as of that meeting. Staff, however,
informed the Committee that additional work was in progress that may affect the final staff
recommendation for Council consideration.
The ATC reviewed general design concepts and had difficulty arriving at a consensus on an
alternative. Ultimately the ATC voted 3-2 to recommend the parking protected Class IV bike lanes
for Council approval.
Figure 5 –Proposed Buffered Bike Lanes, Two Way Left Turn and Bulb-Outs and enhanced crosswalks
proposed on Laurel Lane
Packet Pg. 110
Item 10
FISCAL IMPACT
The total project cost for the Base Bid and Additive Alternative A, B, and C is $2,996,720. The
Council Agenda Report authorizing the advertisement of this project identifies Street R&R funds
will be available on July 1, 2018 to support this project. Additional funding to help complete this
work is planned to be obtained from the Water Distribution System Improvements Master
Account and the Collections System Improvement Master Account to fund all necessary sewer
and water infrastructure adjustment to the new pavement. The Bicycle Facility Improvement
Account and the Bicycle Transportation Implementation Account will also contribute funding to
this work to support striping improvements for bicycle safety a nd sidewalk bulb-out
modifications to the sidewalk at Laurel/Southwood and Laurel/Augusta intersections.
As noted earlier, on June 5th, the City Council reviewed funding recommendations to be
reallocated to the Roadway Sealing and Laurel Lane Complete Streets project shown below in
Table 1:
Table 1: Additional Funding for Laurel Lane Complete Streets Project reviewed by Council on
June 5, 2018
Project LRM Budget
Change
Non-LRM
Funds Added
1. Mission Plaza Railing Upgrade $30,000 $0
2. Storm Drain System Replacements $317,100 $0
3. Parks and Recreation Interior Office Rehabilitation $0 $61,000
4. Laguna Lake Dredging $100,000 $100,000
5. Bike Facilities Improvement $25,000 $0
6. Downtown Renewal $160,000 $0
Sub Total $632,100 $161,000
Total $793,100
In addition to the amounts shown above, staff is recommending an additional reallocation of
$307,131 from the General Capital Outlay’s Storm Drain System Replacements existing account
balance to fully fund all the components of the Laurel Lane Complete Streets Project including
any unforeseen issue during construction. A revised funding reallocation is shown below in
Table 2:
Table 2: Revised Funding Reallocation for Laurel Lane Complete Streets Project
Project LRM Budget
Change
Non-LRM
Funds Added
1. Mission Plaza Railing Upgrade $30,000 $0
2. Storm Drain System Replacements $317,100 $307,131
3. Parks and Recreation Interior Office Rehabilitation $0 $61,000
4. Laguna Lake Dredging $100,000 $100,000
5. Bike Facilities Improvement $25,000 $0
6. Downtown Renewal $160,000 $0
Sub Total $632,100 $468,131
Total $1,100,231
The Laurel Lane project represents a rare opportunity to accomplish a long-desired traffic safety
Packet Pg. 111
Item 10
project consistent with the City’s Traffic Safety Program. That opportunity leads to staff
recommendation to reallocate storm drain funding to this project. This recommendation is based
on Staff’s assessment that reallocating funds will not impede the City’s continued effort to
incrementally improve the overall drainage system. Given the sig nificant reallocations from the
Storm Drain program, the following is a status report on the program. The annual storm drain
CIP is to replace the approximately 22% of the pipe inventory composed of aging Corrugated
Metal Pipe (CMP) as well as other priority flood protection maint enance and replacements.
Approximately 5,290 feet of CMP pipe have been replaced to date since funding became
available. The rationale for the Storm Drain reallocation is as follows:
1) Due to changes in project scope on prior projects, delays in some projects to better
coordinate with other construction projects, and lower bids on past projects, there is
enough funding left in the Storm Drain System Replacement Account to complete
projects shown in the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Project Plan on Table 3 below:
Table 3: Fiscal Year 2018-19 Project Plan
Funding Amount
Storm Drain System Replacement Account Existing Balance $934,898
2018-19 Storm Drain Account Funding $317,100
Reallocation to Laurel Lane Complete Streets Project ($624,231)
Total Funding Available to Support 2018-19 Project Plan $627,858
Projects Estimated Cost
Southwood and Ellen Way Drainage $240,000
Bullock Storm Drain Repair $180,000
Broad Street $45,000
CMP Replacement at Sierra Way $150,000
Storm Drain Culvert Repair –Broad and Leff (Design Funds)$10,000
Total Estimate Project Cost $625,000
2) Storm Drain replacement is a City priority and thus receives an annual allocation such
that the 5-year forecast indicates future funding. That future funding, along with the
existing fund balance, will enable the city to continue with ongoing storm drain
replacement.
Concurrences –Revenue Enhancement Oversight Committee
Of the $1,100,231 reallocation noted in Table 2, $632,100 is Local Revenue Measure (LRM)
funding. Since portions of this funding is LRM, on May 22 the Revenue Enhancement Oversight
Committee (REOC) held a special meeting to review the LRM related reallocations. The REOC
approved the reallocations as consistent with the intended use of LRM. They did note that the
City should be clear in communicating that the reallocations are consistent with essential
services described in the LRM ballot language. They also noted the city should communicate its
continued commitment to storm drain replacement.
The project’s proposed construction budget, as well as funding source allocat ion, is shown in
Table 4.
Packet Pg. 112
Item 10
ALTERNATIVE
As recommended by the ATC, the Council could direct that a parking protected Class IV bike lane
design be used for Laurel Lane. This direction would require deferral of construction on Laurel
Lane until Summer of 2019 to allow time for redesign of ADA facilities and to address the
associated budget shortfall. If Council chooses to adopt this alternative it would not be in violation
of mandatory design standards but could have risks associated with the issues identified in the
discussions above. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it is inconsistent with adopted
design guidance which could increase liability exposure. Staff also does not recommend this
alternative because it would delay the project by approximately one year and would need additional
funding to address ADA requirements.
Attachments:
a - 91630 Bid Summary
b - 91630 Copy of original report authorizing advertising
c - 91630 Contract
Street R& R
Master
Account
Distribution
System Imp.
Wastewater
Collection
System Imp.
Bicycle
Facility Impr.
Bicycle
Trans.
Implement.
Other
Funding
Sources from
18/19 Projects
(91630) (90346) (90227) (90239) (90572) (91373) Table 2
Total Project Bid $2,493,000 $1,800,783 $10,500 $9,240 $90,000 $81,556 $500,921
Contingencies: 12%$305,220 $2,100 $2,310 $300,810
Total for Construction:$2,798,220 $1,800,783 $12,600 $11,550 $90,000 $81,556 $801,731
Construction Management $180,000 $180,000
Material Testing:$6,000 $6,000
Printing:$500 $500
Public Relations:$12,000 $12,000
Total Cost of Project $2,996,720 $1,800,783 $12,600 $11,550 $90,000 $81,556 $1,000,231
Street Lights on Laurel Lane:$100,000 $100,000
Total funding available after July
1, 2018 $3,096,720 $1,800,783 $12,600 $11,550 $90,000 $81,556 $1,100,231
Funding Sources
TABLE 4: ROADWAY SEALING AND LAUREL LANE COMPLETE STREETS 2018
Project Total
Costs
Packet Pg. 113
Item 10
ZŽĂĚǁĂLJ^ĞĂůŝŶŐϮϬϭϴĂŶĚ>ĂƵƌĞů>ĂŶĞŽŵƉůĞƚĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐϮϬϭϴ͕^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶEŽ͘ϵϭϲϯϬΎŵĂƌŬƐĂŶĂůůŽǁĂŶĐĞ/ƚĞŵη ^^ /ƚĞŵĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ hŶŝƚŽĨDĞĂƐƵƌĞ YƵĂŶƚŝƚLJ hŶŝƚWƌŝĐĞ /ƚĞŵdŽƚĂů hŶŝƚWƌŝĐĞ /ƚĞŵdŽƚĂů hŶŝƚWƌŝĐĞ /ƚĞŵdŽƚĂů hŶŝƚWƌŝĐĞ /ƚĞŵdŽƚĂů hŶŝƚWƌŝĐĞ /ƚĞŵdŽƚĂůϭ ϯϳ ^>hZZz^ >dzW //^z ϲϬϬϬϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϭϰ Ψϭ͕Ϯϴϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϴϵ Ψϭ͕ϭϯϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϴϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϴϱ Ψϭ͕ϭϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϲϬ ΨϵϲϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϮ ϴϱ >h ,zZEdZ &> dKZ^W Z E'͘^dϳϵϮϬ ϱϬϬ ΨϭϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϳϱ Ψϳ͕ϴϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϳϱ Ψϳ͕ϴϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϳ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϯ ϴϰ ϰ͟t,/d >& ϰϳϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϳϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϭϰ͕ϴϬϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϭϰ͕ϴϬϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϯϰϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϱϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϳϱϬ͘ϬϬϰ ϴϰ ϰ͟z >>Kt>& ϭϮϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϯ͕ϳϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϯ͕ϳϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ ΨϮ͕ϲϰϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϱϬ Ψϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϱ ϴϰ ϴ͟z >>Kt>& ϮϮ ΨϮ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘Ϯϱ Ψϭϭϱ͘ϱϬ Ψϱ͘ϯϬ Ψϭϭϲ͘ϲϬ Ψϯ͘ϯϬ ΨϳϮ͘ϲϬ Ψϯ͘ϱϬ Ψϳϳ͘ϬϬϲ ϴϰ ϭϮ͟t,/d >& ϰϲϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϵϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϵϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϲϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϯϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϳ ϴϰ ϭϮ͟z >>Kt>& ϮϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ ΨϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϲϬ Ψϭ͕ϯϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϴ ϴϰ Ϯϰ͟t,/d >& ϭϮ Ψϲ͘ϬϬ ΨϳϮ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͘ϲϬ Ψϭϱϭ͘ϮϬ ΨϭϮ͘ϳϱ Ψϭϱϯ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϮ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϲϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϳ͘ϬϬ Ψϴϰ͘ϬϬϵ ϴϰ /< >E h&& Z>& ϭϳϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϱ͕ϯϱϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϱ͕ϯϱϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϴϬ Ψϭϰ͕ϵϲϬ͘ϬϬΨϯ͘Ϯϱ Ψϱ͕ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬϭϬ ϴϰ 'Z EW/Ed/< >E Kd/E'^& ϴϱϬ Ψϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϲ͕ϯϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϳϱ Ψϭϯ͕ϯϴϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϳϱ Ψϭϯ͕ϯϴϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϭϯ͘ϮϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϮϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϴϰ ͞,/Ͳs/^͟ZK^^t>< ϴ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϵ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϵ͕ϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϳϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϵ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϵ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϮ ϴϰ ^W d> W Z E'^dϳϯϮϱ ϲ Ψϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϰϳϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϬ͕ϴϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϳϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϳϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϮ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϳϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϯ ϴϰ ZKhDWW Z E'^dϳϯϮϭ ϰ Ψϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϴϲϮ͘ϱϬ Ψϱϭ͕ϰϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϲϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϬ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϰ ϴϰ z/ >>/E ϰ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱϳ͘ϱϬ ΨϲϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϲϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϲϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϳϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϴϬ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϱϲ ZϭͲϱ^/'E ϭ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϱϲ ZϭͲϲtͬ^ϰͲϯW^/'E ϭ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϲϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϯϲϳ͘ϱϬ ΨϯϳϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϳϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱϬ͘ϬϬϭϳ ϱϲ ZϭϬͲϲ^/'EtͬWK^d ϭ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϴ ϱϲ ZϭϬͲϭϭ^/'EtͬWK^d ϭ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϵ ϱϲ ZϭϬͲϭϱ^/'E͕DK/&/ tͬWK^d ϭ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϬ ϱϲ ^tϮϰͲϮ;Ϳ^/'E Ϯ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϲϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϮϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϰϬ͘ϬϬΨϮϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϭ ϱϲ ZϰͲϭϭtͬWK^d ϴ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϮϰϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϳ͕ϬϰϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϰϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϮ ϴϰ d/>ϭ>& ϭϱϬϬ ΨϬ͘ϱϬ ΨϳϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϱϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϱϳϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ Ψϯ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϬ͘ϲϬ ΨϵϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϯ ϴϰ d/>ϭϲ>& ϮϬϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϭϬ Ψϰ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϭϬ Ψϰ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϯϬ Ψϲ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϭϱ ΨϮ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϰ ϴϰ d/>Ϯϭ>& ϮϲϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϲϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϲϯ Ψϲϴϯ͘ϴϬ ΨϮ͘ϲϬ Ψϲϳϲ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ ΨϱϳϮ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϭϱ ΨϮϵϵ͘ϬϬϮϱ ϴϰ d/>ϮϮ>& ϭϲϱϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϲ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϱϭ͕ϵϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϱϭ͕ϵϳϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ Ψϯϲ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϰϱ ΨϮϯ͕ϵϮϱ͘ϬϬϮϲ ϴϰ d/>Ϯϯ>& ϮϲϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ Ψϭ͕ϲϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ Ψϭ͕ϲϯϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϱϬ Ψϭ͕ϰϯϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϯϬ Ψϱϵϴ͘ϬϬϮϳ ϴϰ d/>Ϯϱ>& ϯϱϬ Ψϭ͘Ϯϱ Ψϰϯϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϭ͘ϴϰ Ψϲϰϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϴϬ ΨϲϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϯϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϱϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϬ͘ϴϱ ΨϮϵϳ͘ϱϬϮϴ ϴϰ d/>Ϯϴ>& ϯϬ Ψϭ͘Ϯϱ Ψϯϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϱ͘Ϯϱ Ψϭϱϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϱ͘ϯϬ Ψϭϱϵ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϯϬ Ψϵϵ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϯϬ Ψϲϵ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϴϰ d/>Ϯϵ>& ϭϱϬ Ψϭ͘ϱϬ ΨϮϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϳϴ Ψϴϲϳ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϴϬ ΨϴϳϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ ΨϲϲϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϴϱ ΨϰϮϳ͘ϱϬϯϬ ϴϰ d/>ϯϭ>& ϱϱϬ Ψϭ͘Ϯϱ Ψϲϴϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϱ͘Ϯϱ ΨϮ͕ϴϴϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϱ͘ϯϬ ΨϮ͕ϵϭϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ ΨϮ͕ϰϮϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϯϬ Ψϭ͕Ϯϲϱ͘ϬϬϯϭ ϴϰ d/>ϯϴ>& ϭϯϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϲϴ Ψϰ͕ϳϴϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϳϬ Ψϰ͕ϴϭϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ Ψϱ͕ϳϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϰϵϱ͘ϬϬϯϮ ϴϰ d/>ϯϴ>& ϵϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϮϬ Ψϯϳϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘Ϯϱ ΨϯϴϮ͘ϱϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ Ψϯϵϲ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϰϱ ΨϭϯϬ͘ϱϬϯϯ ϴϰ d/>ϯϵ>& ϭϳϰϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭϴ͕ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭϴ͕ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ Ψϯϴ͕ϮϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭϴ͕ϮϳϬ͘ϬϬϯϰ ϴϰ d/>ϯϵ>& ϭϲϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϲϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϲϴϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ Ψϯ͕ϱϮϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϬ͘ϳϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϮϬ͘ϬϬϯϱ ϴϰ Ws D EdDZ</E'^;ZZKt^͕/< >E ^zDK>͕ d͘Ϳ ^& ϲϴϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϭϱ ΨϮϴ͕ϮϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϰϬ Ψϱϳ͕ϭϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϱϬ Ψϱϳ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϲϬ Ψϰϰ͕ϴϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϱϰ͕ϰϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϲ ϭϱ 'Z/EͬZ DKs ; Ϳ^dZ/W/E'͕Ws D EdDZ</E'^ΘDZ< Z^ >^ ϭ ΨϮϬϬ͘ϬϬΨϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬΨϭϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϵϲ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϵϲ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϰϮ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϰϮ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϳ ϭϱ /< >E ' 'Z/E>& ϳϲϬϬ Ψϳ͘ϬϬ Ψϱϯ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭϱ͕ϱϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϴϱ Ψϯϲ͕ϴϲϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϱϬ Ψϭϵ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϴϱ ΨϮϵ͕ϮϲϬ͘ϬϬϯϴ ϭϮ dZ&&/KEdZK>W>EE/DW> D Edd/KE >^ ϭ ΨϰϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲϲ͕ϭϭϴ͘ϱϬ Ψϲϲ͕ϭϭϴ͘ϱϬ ΨϯϰϮ͕ϱϱϴ͘ϰϬ ΨϯϰϮ͕ϱϱϴ͘ϰϬ ΨϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϳϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϳϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϵ ϱ KDW>zt/d,>dZE^ EZK,D EdW ZD/d >^ ϭ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬĂƐĞŝĚdŽƚĂů Ψϭ͕ϱϴϯ͕ϲϱϴ͘ϱϬ Ψϭ͕ϳϮϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϵϲϯ͕ϰϮϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϳϭϴ͕ϳϳϴ͘ϲϬ ΨϮ͕ϬϬϵ͕ϮϮϮ͘ϱϬϭ ϯϳ ^>hZZz^ >dzW //^z ϭϵϱϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϭϰ Ψϰϭ͕ϳϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϴϵ Ψϯϲ͕ϴϱϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϰϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϴϱ Ψϯϲ͕Ϭϳϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϱϱ Ψϰϵ͕ϳϮϱ͘ϬϬϮ ϯϵ ϲ͟Wd,Z W/Z^& ϮϴϱϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϮϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ Ψϭϳϵ͕ϱϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϳϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϲϬ Ψϭϴϴ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϱϬ Ψϭϴϱ͕ϮϱϬ͘ϬϬϯ ϴϱ >h ,zZEdZ &> dKZ^W Z E'^dϳϵϮϬ ϭϯ ΨϭϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϳϱ ΨϮϬϰ͘ϳϱ Ψϭϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϵϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϰϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϵϱ͘ϬϬϰ ϴϰ ϰ͟t,/d >& ϰϲϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϭϰ͕ϰϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϭϮϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϱϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϱ ϴϰ ϴ͟t,/d >& ϭϲϬ ΨϮ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘Ϯϱ ΨϴϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ ΨϳϬϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϱϬ ΨϱϲϬ͘ϬϬϲ ϴϰ ϭϮ͟t,/d >& ϱϱϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϲϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ Ψϯ͕ϰϲϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϲϬ Ψϯ͕ϲϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϳϱϬ͘ϬϬϳ ϴϰ ϭϮ͟z >>Kt>& ϴϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϯϬ ΨϱϬϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͘ϲϬ ΨϱϮϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬϴ ϴϰ h&& Z /< >E >& ϰϱϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϭϰ͕ϭϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϴϬ Ψϯϵ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘Ϯϱ Ψϭϰ͕ϲϮϱ͘ϬϬϵ ϴϰ 'Z EW/Ed;/< >E Ϳ^& ϮϳϬϬ Ψϳ͘ϱϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϮϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϳϱ ΨϰϮ͕ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͘ϮϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϲϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϭ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϬ ϴϰ ͞,/Ͳs/^͟ZK^^t>< ϱ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϲϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϴ͕ϯϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϴϰ z/ >>/E ϭ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱϳ͘ϱϬ Ψϭϱϳ͘ϱϬ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϳϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϳϬ͘ϬϬϭϮ ϴϰ d/>ϮϮ>& ϰϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϮϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ Ψϭ͕ϳϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϰϱ ΨϱϴϬ͘ϬϬϭϯ ϴϰ d/>Ϯϵ>& ϮϮϬ Ψϭ͘ϱϬ ΨϯϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϳϴ Ψϭ͕Ϯϳϭ͘ϲϬ Ψϱ͘ϱϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϱϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϴϱ ΨϲϮϳ͘ϬϬϭϰ ϴϰ d/>ϯϮ>& ϮϭϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϯϱ ΨϮ͕ϴϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘Ϯϱ Ψϭϭ͕ϬϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ Ψϵ͕ϮϰϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϯϬ Ψϰ͕ϴϯϬ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϴϰ d/>ϯϳ>& ϭϮϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘Ϯϱ ΨϲϯϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ ΨϱϮϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϭϱ Ψϭϯϴ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϴϰ d/>ϯϴ>& ϰϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϲϴ Ψϭ͕ϰϳϮ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϱϬ Ψϭ͕ϰϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϰϬ Ψϭ͕ϳϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϭϱ ΨϰϲϬ͘ϬϬϭϳ ϴϰ d/>ϯϵ>& ϮϰϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ ΨϮϱϮ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϯϬ ΨϳϵϮ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ ΨϮϱϮ͘ϬϬϭϴ ϴϰ d/>ϯϵ>& ϭϬϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘Ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϬϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϮϬ ΨϮ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϬ͘ϳϬ ΨϳϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϵ ϴϰ Ws D EdDZ</E'^;ZZKt^͕/< >E ^zDK>^͕ d͘Ϳ ^& ϭϰϬϬ Ψϰ͘ϭϱ Ψϱ͕ϴϭϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϰϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϳϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϯ͘ϮϬ Ψϭϴ͕ϰϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͘ϬϬΨϭϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϬ ϭϱ 'Z/EͬZ DKs ; Ϳ^dZ/W/E'>^ ϭ ΨϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϭ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϭ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϳϬϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϳ͕ϳϬϱ͘ϬϬϮϭ ϭϱ :h^dtd Zs>s ^ ϭϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϮ ϭϱ :h^d^ t ZDE,K> ^ ϴ Ψϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϱϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϵ͕ϮϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϮϭϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϵ͕ϲϴϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϴ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϯ ϱ /< >E ' 'Z/E>& ϭϳϬ Ψϳ͘Ϭϲ Ψϭ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϱ͕ϵϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯ͘ϳϬ ΨϲϮϵ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͘ϱϬ ΨϰϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϴ͘ϬϬ Ψϰ͕ϳϲϬ͘ϬϬϮϰ ϭϮ dZ&&/KEdZK>W>EE/DW> D Edd/KE >^ ϭ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϰϰϴ͘ϭϱ ΨϮϲ͕ϰϰϴ͘ϭϱ Ψϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϱϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬĚĚŝƚŝǀĞůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞ͟͞ŝĚdŽƚĂů Ψϯϲϳ͕ϰϱϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϭϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰϲ͕ϬϬϰ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϴϯ͕ϱϭϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϴϮ͕ϳϮϳ͘ϬϬϭ ϳϯ >hZ >>E ͬ^Khd,tKKZ/s ʹEt/DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ Ψϯϯ͕ϳϴϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϯ͕ϳϴϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬ͕ϴϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϰϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϮ ϳϯ >hZ >>E ͬ^Khd,tKKZ/s ʹ^t/DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ Ψϯϰ͕ϱϳϬ͘ϬϬΨϯϰ͕ϱϳϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϳ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϳ͕ϭϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϲ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϰϲ͕ϮϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϯ ϳϯ >hZ >>E ͬ^Khd,tKKZ/s ʹE /DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ ΨϯϮ͕ϱϲϬ͘ϬϬΨϯϮ͕ϱϲϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϴ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϰ ϳϯ >hZ >>E ͬ^Khd,tKKZ/s ʹ^ /DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ ΨϮϳ͕Ϯϯϴ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕Ϯϯϴ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϳϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϳϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϱ ϭϮ dZ&&/KEdZK>W>EE/DW> D Edd/KE >^ ϭ ΨϮϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϴϳϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϴϳϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬĚĚŝƚŝǀĞůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞ͟͞ŝĚdŽƚĂůΨϭϱϬ͕ϭϱϯ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϴϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϴϬ͕ϳϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϵϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϳϯ>hZ >>E ͬh'h^d^dZ dʹEt/DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ ΨϮϲ͕ϳϵϳ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϳϵϳ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϬ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕ϲϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϮ ϳϯ >hZ >>E ͬh'h^d^dZ dʹ^t/DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ ΨϮϴ͕Ϭϭϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϴ͕Ϭϭϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϵϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϵϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϭ͕ϯϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϭ͕ϯϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϯ ϳϯ >hZ >>E ͬh'h^d^dZ dʹE /DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ ΨϮϳ͕ϯϱϳ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϳ͕ϯϱϳ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϳ͕ϲϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϳ͕ϲϱϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϲ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϲ͕ϯϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϵ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϵ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϰ ϳϯ >hZ >>E ͬh'h^d^dZ dʹ^ /DWZKs D Ed^ >^ ϭ ΨϮϲ͕ϱϯϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϲ͕ϱϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϱ ϭϮ dZ&&/KEdZK>W>EE/DW> D Edd/KE >^ ϭ Ψϭϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϲϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϲϮϱ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϯϰ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϯϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬĚĚŝƚŝǀĞůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞ͟͞ŝĚdŽƚĂů ΨϭϮϰ͕ϳϬϰ͘ϬϬ ΨϭϳϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϵϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϲϯ͕ϮϱϬ͘ϬϬ Ψϭϳϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬdŽƚĂůŝĚΨϮ͕ϮϮϱ͕ϵϳϬ͘ϱϬ ΨϮ͕ϰϵϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϱϮϰ͕ϰϮϱ͘ϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϱϰϲ͕Ϯϰϯ͘ϲϬ ΨϮ͕ϴϲϯ͕ϵϰϵ͘ϱϬd >& Zd ,EK>K'/ ^D Z/E^W,>d^Khd, ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌΖƐ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞs^^/Ed ZEd/KE> /Ed ZDKhEd/E^>hZZz^ >Packet Pg. 114Item 10
Packet Pg. 115
Item 10
Packet Pg. 116
Item 10
Packet Pg. 117
Item 10
Packet Pg. 118
Item 10
Packet Pg. 119
Item 10
Packet Pg. 120
Item 10
RI
AGREEMENT
7+,6$*5((0(17PDGHRQWKLVBBBBBBGD\RIBBBBBBBBBBBBBE\DQGEHWZHHQWKH&LW\RI6DQ/XLV
2ELVSRDPXQLFLSDOFRUSRUDWLRQDQGFKDUWHUFLW\6DQ/XLV2ELVSR&RXQW\&DOLIRUQLD KHUHLQDIWHUFDOOHGWKH
2ZQHU DQG%$6,& 5(6285&(6 ,1& '%$966 ,17(51$7,21$/ ,1& KHUHLQDIWHU FDOOHG WKH
&RQWUDFWRU
:,71(66(7+
7KDWWKH2ZQHUDQGWKH&RQWUDFWRUIRUWKHFRQVLGHUDWLRQVWDWHGKHUHLQDJUHHDVIROORZV
$57,&/(6&23(2):25. 7KH&RQWUDFWRUVKDOOSHUIRUPHYHU\WKLQJUHTXLUHGWREHSHUIRUPHGVKDOO
SURYLGHDQGIXUQLVKDOORIWKHODERUPDWHULDOVQHFHVVDU\WRROVH[SHQGDEOHHTXLSPHQWDQGDOOXWLOLW\DQG
WUDQVSRUWDWLRQVHUYLFHVUHTXLUHGWRFRPSOHWHDOOWKHZRUNRIFRQVWUXFWLRQRI
52$':$<6($/,1*$1'/$85(//$1(&203/(7(675((76
63(&,),&$7,2112
LQVWULFWFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHSODQVDQGVSHFLILFDWLRQVWKHUHIRULQFOXGLQJDQ\DQGDOO$GGHQGDDGRSWHGE\WKH
2ZQHULQVWULFWFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKH&RQWUDFW'RFXPHQWVKHUHLQDIWHUHQXPHUDWHG
,WLVDJUHHGWKDWVDLGODERUPDWHULDOVWRROVHTXLSPHQWDQGVHUYLFHVVKDOOEHIXUQLVKHGDQGVDLGZRUNSHUIRUPHG
DQGFRPSOHWHGXQGHUWKHGLUHFWLRQDQGVXSHUYLVLRQDQGVXEMHFWWRWKHDSSURYDORIWKH2ZQHURULWVDXWKRUL]HG
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV
$57,&/(,,&2175$&735,&( 7KH2ZQHUVKDOOSD\WKH&RQWUDFWRUDVIXOOFRQVLGHUDWLRQIRUWKHIDLWKIXO
SHUIRUPDQFHRIWKLV&RQWUDFWVXEMHFWWRDQ\DGGLWLRQVRUGHGXFWLRQVDVSURYLGHGLQWKH&RQWUDFW'RFXPHQWV
WKHFRQWUDFWSULFHVDVIROORZV
%DVH%LG
,WHP,WHP8QLWRI (VWLPDWHG ,WHP3ULFH7RWDO
1R66 'HVFULSWLRQ0HDVXUH 4XDQWLW\ LQILJXUHV LQILJXUHV
6/855<6($/7<3(,, 6<
%/8(+<'5$17
5()/(&72563(5(1*67'
($
´:+,7( /)
´<(//2: /)
´<(//2: /)
´:+,7( /)
´<(//2: /)
´:+,7( /)
%,.(/$1(%8))(5 /)
*5((13$,17%,.(/$1(
&2$7,1* 6)
³+,9,6´&5266:$/. ($
63(('7$%/(3(5(1*67'
($
52$'%8033(5(1*67'
($
<,(/'/,1( ($
Packet Pg. 121
Item 10
RI
%DVH%LG
,WHP,WHP8QLWRI (VWLPDWHG ,WHP3ULFH7RWDO
1R66 'HVFULSWLRQ0HDVXUH 4XDQWLW\ LQILJXUHV LQILJXUHV
56,*1 ($
5:636,*1 ($
56,*1:3267 ($
56,*1:3267 ($
56,*102',),('
:3267 ($
6: &$ 6,*1 ($
5:3267 ($
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/% /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ $ /)
3$9(0(170$5.,1*6
$552:6%,.(/$1(
6<0%2/(7&
6)
*5,1'5(029( (
675,3,1*3$9(0(17
0$5.,1*6 0$5.(56
/6
%,.(/$1(('*(*5,1' /)
75$)),&&21752/3/$1$1'
,03/(0(17$7,21 /6
&203/<:,7+&$/75$16
(1&52$&+0(173(50,7 /6
%DVH%LG7RWDO
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWLYH³$´
,WHP
1R66 ,WHP'HVFULSWLRQ 4XDQWLW\
8QLWRI
0HDVXUH 8QLW3ULFH,WHP7RWDO
6/855<6($/7<3(,, 6<
´$&3$7&+5(3$,5 6)
Packet Pg. 122
Item 10
RI
%/8(+<'5$17
5()/(&72563(5(1*67'
($
´:+,7( /)
´:+,7( /)
´:+,7( /)
´<(//2: /)
%8))(5('%,.(/$1( /)
*5((13$,17 %,.(/$1( 6)
³+,9,6´&5266:$/. ($
<,(/'/,1( ($
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/% /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ /)
'(7$,/ $ /)
3$9(0(170$5.,1*6
$552:6%,.(/$1(
6<0%2/6(7&
6)
*5,1'5(029( ( 675,3,1* /6
$'-867:$7(59$/9(6 ($
$-8676(:(50$1+2/(6 ($
%,.(/$1(('*(*5,1' /)
75$)),&&21752/3/$1$1'
,03/(0(17$7,21 /6
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWH³$´%LG7RWDO
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWLYH³%´
,WHP
1R66 ,WHP'HVFULSWLRQ 4XDQWLW\
8QLWRI
0HDVXUH 8QLW3ULFH,WHP7RWDO
/$85(//$1(6287+:22'
'5,9(±1:,03529(0(176 /6
/$85(//$1(6287+:22'
'5,9(±6:,03529(0(176 /6
/$85(//$1(6287+:22'
'5,9(±1(,03529(0(176 /6
/$85(//$1(6287+:22'
'5,9(±6(,03529(0(176 /6
75$)),&&21752/3/$1$1'
,03/(0(17$7,21 /6
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWH³%´%LG7RWDO
Packet Pg. 123
Item 10
RI
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWLYH³&´
,WHP
1R66 ,WHP'HVFULSWLRQ 4XDQWLW\
8QLWRI
0HDVXUH 8QLW3ULFH,WHP7RWDO
/$85(//$1($8*867$
675((7±1:
,03529(0(176
/6
/$85(//$1($8*867$
675((7±6:
,03529(0(176
/6
/$85(//$1($8*867$
675((7±1(
,03529(0(176
/6
/$85(//$1($8*867$
675((7±6(
,03529(0(176
/6
75$)),&&21752/3/$1$1'
,03/(0(17$7,21 /6
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWH³&´%LG7RWDO
%DVH%LG7RWDO Ψϭ͕ϳϮϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWLYH³$´7RWDO Ψϰϭϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWLYH³%´7RWDO Ψϭϴϳ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
$GGLWLYH$OWHUQDWLYH³&´7RWDO ΨϭϳϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
7RWDO3URMHFW%LG
%DVH%LG$GG$OW³$´$GG$OW³%´$GG$OW³&´ ΨϮ͕ϰϵϯ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
%,'727$/
3D\PHQWVDUHWREHPDGHWRWKH&RQWUDFWRULQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKDQGVXEMHFWWRWKHSURYLVLRQVHPERGLHGLQWKH
GRFXPHQWVPDGHDSDUWRIWKLV&RQWUDFW
6KRXOGDQ\GLVSXWHDULVHUHVSHFWLQJWKHWUXHYDOXHRIDQ\ZRUNRPLWWHGRURIDQ\H[WUDZRUNZKLFKWKH
&RQWUDFWRUPD\EHUHTXLUHGWRGRRUUHVSHFWLQJWKHVL]HRIDQ\SD\PHQWWRWKH&RQWUDFWRUGXULQJWKH
SHUIRUPDQFHRIWKLV&RQWUDFWVDLGGLVSXWHVKDOOEHGHFLGHGE\WKH2ZQHUDQGLWVGHFLVLRQVKDOOEHILQDODQG
FRQFOXVLYH
$57,&/( ,,, &20321(17 3$576 2) 7+,6 &2175$&7 7KH &RQWUDFW FRQVLVWV RI WKH IROORZLQJ
GRFXPHQWVDOORIZKLFKDUHDVIXOO\DSDUWWKHUHRIDVLIKHUHLQVHWRXWLQIXOODQGLIQRWDWWDFKHGDVLIKHUHWR
DWWDFKHG
1RWLFHWR%LGGHUVDQGLQIRUPDWLRQIRUELGGHUV
6WDQGDUG6SHFLILFDWLRQV(QJLQHHULQJ6WDQGDUGV6SHFLDO3URYLVLRQVDQGDQ\$GGHQGD
3ODQV
&DOWUDQV6WDQGDUG6SHFLILFDWLRQVDQG6WDQGDUG3ODQV
$FFHSWHG%LG
/LVWRI6XEFRQWUDFWRUV
3XEOLF&RQWUDFW&RGH6HFWLRQV6WDWHPHQW
3XEOLF&RQWUDFW&RGH6HFWLRQ4XHVWLRQQDLUH
3XEOLF&RQWUDFW&RGH6HFWLRQ6WDWHPHQW
/DERU&RGH6HFWLRQ6WDWHPHQWV
%LGGHU$FNQRZOHGJHPHQWV
4XDOLILFDWLRQV
$WWDFK%LGGHUV%RQGWR$FFRPSDQ\%LG
1RQFROOXVLRQ'HFODUDWLRQ
Packet Pg. 124
Item 10
RI
$JUHHPHQWDQG%RQGV
,QVXUDQFH5HTXLUHPHQWVDQG)RUPV
$57,&/(,9,1'(01,),&$7,21 +ROG+DUPOHVVDQG,QGHPQLILFDWLRQ7KH&RQWUDFWRUDJUHHVWRGHIHQG
LQGHPQLI\SURWHFWDQGKROGWKH&LW\DQGLWVDJHQWVRIILFHUVDQGHPSOR\HHVKDUPOHVVIURPDQGDJDLQVWDQ\
DQGDOOFODLPVDVVHUWHGRUOLDELOLW\HVWDEOLVKHGIRUGDPDJHVRULQMXULHVWRDQ\SHUVRQRUSURSHUW\LQFOXGLQJ
LQMXU\WRWKH&RQWUDFWRU
VHPSOR\HHVDJHQWVRURIILFHUVWKDWDULVHIURPRUDUHFRQQHFWHGZLWKRUDUHFDXVHGRU
FODLPHGWREHFDXVHGE\WKHDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRIWKH&RQWUDFWRUDQGLWVDJHQWVRIILFHUVRUHPSOR\HHVLQ
SHUIRUPLQJWKHZRUNRUVHUYLFHVKHUHLQDQGDOOH[SHQVHVRILQYHVWLJDWLQJDQGGHIHQGLQJDJDLQVWVDPH
SURYLGHGKRZHYHUWKDWWKH&RQWUDFWRU
VGXW\WRLQGHPQLI\DQGKROGKDUPOHVVVKDOOQRWLQFOXGHDQ\FODLPVRU
OLDELOLW\DULVLQJIURPWKHHVWDEOLVKHGVROHQHJOLJHQFHRUZLOOIXOPLVFRQGXFWRIWKH&LW\LWVDJHQWVRIILFHUVRU
HPSOR\HHV ,Q WKH HYHQW RI FRQIOLFW ZLWK DQ\ RWKHU LQGHPQLILFDWLRQ RU KROG KDUPOHVV SURYLVLRQV RI WKLV
$JUHHPHQWWKHSURYLVLRQWKDWSURYLGHVWKHPRVWSURWHFWLRQWRWKH&LW\VKDOODSSO\
$57,&/(9,WLVIXUWKHUH[SUHVVO\DJUHHGE\DQGEHWZHHQWKHSDUWLHVKHUHWRWKDWVKRXOGWKHUHEHDQ\FRQIOLFW
EHWZHHQWKHWHUPVRIWKLVLQVWUXPHQWDQGWKHELGRIVDLG&RQWUDFWRUWKHQWKLVLQVWUXPHQWVKDOOFRQWURODQG
QRWKLQJKHUHLQVKDOOEHFRQVLGHUHGDVDQDFFHSWDQFHRIWKHVDLGWHUPVRIVDLGELGFRQIOLFWLQJKHUHZLWK
,1:,71(66:+(5(2)WKHSDUWLHVWRWKHVHSUHVHQWVKDYHKHUHXQWRVHWWKHLUKDQGVWKLV\HDUDQGGDWHILUVW
DERYHZULWWHQ
$77(67
&,7<2)6$1/8,62%,632
$0XQLFLSDO&RUSRUDWLRQ
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
7HUHVD3XUULQJWRQ
&LW\&OHUN
+HLGL+DUPRQ
0D\RU
$33529('$672)250&2175$&725
Basic Resources, Inc. DBA VSS International, Inc.
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
%\ BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
-&KULVWLQH'LHWULFN
&LW\$WWRUQH\
-HIIUH\55HHG
,WV 3UHVLGHQW
Rev. 12-28-09
Rev. 2 5/12/16 DMA
Packet Pg. 125
Item 10
Page intentionally left
blank.
Packet Pg. 126
Item 10